UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
_____________________________________
Form 10-Q
_____________________________________
|
| |
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2017
or |
| |
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 001-35468
_____________________________________
CafePress Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
_____________________________________
|
| | |
Delaware | | 94-3342816 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | | (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
11909 Shelbyville Road, Louisville, KY 40243
(502) 995-2229
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of registrant’s principal executive offices)
_____________________________________
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or the Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
| | | | | |
Large accelerated filer | | ¨ | Accelerated filer | | ¨ |
| | | | | |
Non-accelerated filer | | ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company | | x¨
|
| | | Emerging growth company | | x¨
|
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock as of October 26, 2017 was 16,862,430 shares.
CAFEPRESS INC.
TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| | |
| | Page No. |
| | |
PART I. | | |
| | |
Item 1. | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
Item 2. | | |
| | |
Item 3. | | |
| | |
Item 4. | | |
| | |
PART II. | | |
| | |
Item 1. | | |
| | |
Item 1A. | | |
| | |
Item 6. | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
| |
Item 1. | Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements |
CAFEPRESS INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except par value amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
| | | | | | | |
| September 30, 2017 | | December 31, 2016 |
ASSETS | | | |
CURRENT ASSETS: | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 13,548 |
| | $ | 19,980 |
|
Short-term investments | 11,408 |
| | 23,808 |
|
Accounts receivable | 713 |
| | 1,288 |
|
Inventory, net | 2,352 |
| | 3,119 |
|
Deferred costs | 522 |
| | 798 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 2,126 |
| | 2,310 |
|
Total current assets | 30,669 |
| | 51,303 |
|
Property and equipment, net | 11,074 |
| | 10,936 |
|
Restricted cash | 1,513 |
| | — |
|
Other assets | 703 |
| | 681 |
|
TOTAL ASSETS | $ | 43,959 |
| | $ | 62,920 |
|
| | | |
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | | |
CURRENT LIABILITIES: | | | |
Accounts payable | $ | 1,092 |
| | $ | 1,803 |
|
Accrued royalties payable | 1,660 |
| | 3,623 |
|
Accrued liabilities | 4,717 |
| | 11,765 |
|
Deferred revenue | 749 |
| | 748 |
|
Capital lease obligation, current | — |
| | 347 |
|
Total current liabilities | 8,218 |
| | 18,286 |
|
Other long-term liabilities | 161 |
| | 166 |
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES | 8,379 |
| | 18,452 |
|
Commitments and contingencies |
| |
|
Stockholders’ Equity: | | | |
Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value: 10,000 shares authorized as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016; none issued and outstanding | — |
| | — |
|
Common stock, $0.0001 par value — 500,000 shares authorized and 16,861 and 16,643 shares issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively | 2 |
| | 2 |
|
Additional paid-in capital | 101,252 |
| | 99,756 |
|
Accumulated deficit | (65,674 | ) | | (55,290 | ) |
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | 35,580 |
| | 44,468 |
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | $ | 43,959 |
| | $ | 62,920 |
|
See the accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
CAFEPRESS INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended September 30, | | Nine Months Ended September 30, |
| 2017 | | 2016 (As Revised) | | 2017 | | 2016 (As Revised) |
Net revenue | $ | 15,349 |
| | $ | 19,658 |
| | $ | 51,491 |
| | $ | 58,481 |
|
Cost of net revenue | 9,278 |
| | 11,221 |
| | 31,470 |
| | 33,486 |
|
Gross profit | 6,071 |
| | 8,437 |
| | 20,021 |
| | 24,995 |
|
Operating expense: | | | | | | | |
Sales and marketing | 4,301 |
| | 4,607 |
| | 13,496 |
| | 14,443 |
|
Technology and development | 3,007 |
| | 3,395 |
| | 9,067 |
| | 9,895 |
|
General and administrative | 2,477 |
| | 2,775 |
| | 7,770 |
| | 8,447 |
|
Impairment charges | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 20,899 |
|
Restructuring costs | — |
| | 1,015 |
| | — |
| | 1,015 |
|
Total operating expense | 9,785 |
| | 11,792 |
| | 30,333 |
| | 54,699 |
|
Loss from operations | (3,714 | ) | | (3,355 | ) | | (10,312 | ) | | (29,704 | ) |
Interest income | 58 |
| | 76 |
| | 137 |
| | 150 |
|
Interest expense | (1 | ) | | (10 | ) | | (11 | ) | | (36 | ) |
Other income (expense), net | 17 |
| | (114 | ) | | 20 |
| | (177 | ) |
Loss before income taxes | (3,640 | ) | | (3,403 | ) | | (10,166 | ) | | (29,767 | ) |
Provision (benefit) for income taxes | — |
| | 10 |
| | 1 |
| | (394 | ) |
Net loss | $ | (3,640 | ) | | $ | (3,413 | ) | | $ | (10,167 | ) | | $ | (29,373 | ) |
| | | | | | | |
Net loss per share of common stock: | | | | | | | |
Basic | $ | (0.22 | ) | | $ | (0.20 | ) | | $ | (0.61 | ) | | $ | (1.76 | ) |
Diluted | $ | (0.22 | ) | | $ | (0.20 | ) | | $ | (0.61 | ) | | $ | (1.76 | ) |
Shares used in computing net loss per share of common stock: | | | | | | | |
Basic | 16,828 |
| | 16,683 |
| | 16,736 |
| | 16,728 |
|
Diluted | 16,828 |
| | 16,683 |
| | 16,736 |
| | 16,728 |
|
See the accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
CAFEPRESS INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
| | | | | | | |
| Nine Months Ended September 30, |
| 2017 | | 2016 |
Cash Flows from Operating Activities: | | | |
Net loss | $ | (10,167 | ) | | $ | (29,373 | ) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: | | | |
Depreciation and amortization | 3,498 |
| | 3,179 |
|
Loss on disposal of fixed assets | 11 |
| | 2 |
|
Stock-based compensation | 1,324 |
| | 1,190 |
|
Goodwill impairment | — |
| | 20,899 |
|
Deferred income taxes | — |
| | (350 | ) |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | | | |
Accounts receivable | 645 |
| | 143 |
|
Inventory | 767 |
| | 1,129 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 336 |
| | (498 | ) |
Other assets | 32 |
| | (26 | ) |
Accounts payable | (711 | ) | | (2,790 | ) |
Accrued royalties payables | (1,963 | ) | | (2,021 | ) |
Accrued and other liabilities | (6,995 | ) | | (3,300 | ) |
Deferred revenue | 1 |
| | (59 | ) |
Net cash used in operating activities | (13,222 | ) | | (11,875 | ) |
Cash Flows from Investing Activities: | | | |
Purchase of short-term investments | (1,984 | ) | | (11,904 | ) |
Proceeds from maturities of short-term investments | 14,384 |
| | 9,920 |
|
Purchase of property and equipment | (1,858 | ) | | (2,939 | ) |
Capitalization of software and website development costs | (1,850 | ) | | (1,800 | ) |
Proceeds from disposal of fixed assets | 3 |
| | 29 |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities | 8,695 |
| | (6,694 | ) |
Cash Flows from Financing Activities: | | | |
Principal payments on capital lease obligations | (347 | ) | | (421 | ) |
Proceeds from exercise of common stock options | 13 |
| | 5 |
|
Repurchases of common stock | (58 | ) | | (739 | ) |
Net cash used in financing activities | (392 | ) | | (1,155 | ) |
Net decrease in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash | (4,919 | ) | | (19,724 | ) |
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash — beginning of period | 19,980 |
| | 36,080 |
|
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash— end of period | $ | 15,061 |
| | $ | 16,356 |
|
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information: | | | |
Cash paid for interest | $ | 32 |
| | $ | 35 |
|
Income taxes paid during the period | 1 |
| | 44 |
|
Non-cash Investing and Financing Activities: | | | |
Accrued purchases of property and equipment | $ | 43 |
| | $ | 274 |
|
See the accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
CAFEPRESS INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
1. Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Business
CafePress Inc. (the "Company," "we," "us," "our") is a retailer of gifts and expressories. We take pride in helping to facilitate human connections by inspiring people to express themselves with the best assortment of engaging merchandise. We were founded in 1999 as a California corporation, we reincorporated in Delaware in 2005 and we completed our initial public offering in April 2012.
We are a leading retailer of personalized products offering a wide variety of expressive gifts and accessories, including t-shirts and apparel, mugs and drinkware and home goods such as custom shower curtains and bed coverings. We conduct most of our business on our primary United States-based domain, CafePress.com and operate CafePress branded websites for the markets in the United Kingdom, Canada and Australia. We also sell CafePress branded products through other online retail partners such as Amazon and Walmart. Our products are customized with expressive designs contributed through a variety of means, including crowd-sourced user generated content, stock art licenses and licensed content relationships with large entertainment companies and brands. Our distinctive items bring our customers' passions to life and connect people to each other.
Our production facility and fulfillment center in Louisville, Kentucky has innovative technology and manufacturing processes that enable us to provide high-quality customized products that are individually built to order. Our proprietary processes enable us to produce a broad range of merchandise efficiently and profitably. We also maintain a diverse network of contract manufacturers that give us the ability to broaden our manufacturing capabilities and produce in certain international locales.
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("U.S. GAAP") and follow the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") for interim reporting. As permitted under those rules, certain footnotes or other financial information that are normally required by U.S. GAAP can be condensed or omitted. These financial statements have been prepared on the same basis as our annual financial statements and, in the opinion of management, reflect all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments that are necessary for a fair statement of our financial information. The results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the year ending December 31, 2017 or for any other interim period or for any other future year. The balance sheet as of December 31, 2016 has been derived from audited financial statements at that date but does not include all of the information required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements.
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements and related financial information should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and the related notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2016 included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed on March 10, 2017 with the SEC. Our critical accounting policies are revenue recognition, property and equipment, inventory and income taxes. Our significant accounting policies are more fully described in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of our Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Segments
Our Chief Executive Officer manages our operations on a consolidated basis for purposes of allocating resources. Thus, we have a single operating segment which is our single reportable segment. Our principal operations and decision-making functions are in the United States.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates, including but not limited to those related to revenue recognition, provisions for doubtful accounts, credit card chargebacks, sales returns, inventory write-downs, stock-based compensation, legal contingencies, depreciable lives and income taxes, including required valuation allowances. We base our estimates on historical experience, projections for future performance and other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates.
Income taxes
There was no unrecognized tax benefit for any period presented.
We recognize interest and/or penalties related to all tax positions in income tax expense. To the extent that accrued interest and penalties do not ultimately become payable, amounts accrued will be reduced and reflected as a reduction of the overall income tax provision in the period that such determination is made. No interest or penalties have been accrued for any period presented.
We have weighed both positive and negative evidence and have determined that there is a need for a valuation allowance due to the existence of three years of historical cumulative losses, which we considered significant verifiable negative evidence. As of September 30, 2017, we maintain a valuation allowance on substantially all of our deferred tax assets.
Seasonality
Seasonal and cyclical influences impact our business volume. A significant portion of our sales are realized in conjunction with traditional retail holidays with the largest sales volume in the fourth quarter of each calendar year. Our offering of custom gifts for the holidays combined with consumers’ continued shift to online purchasing drive this trend. As a result of this seasonality, our revenue in each of the first three quarters of the year is generally substantially lower than our revenue in the fourth quarter of each year, and we expect this trend to continue in the foreseeable future.
Recent accounting pronouncements
In May 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2017-09, Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718) Scope of Modification Accounting. ASU 2017-09 will clarify and reduce both (i) diversity in practice and (ii) cost and complexity when applying the guidance in Topic 718, to a change to the terms and conditions of a share-based payment award. This guidance will become effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The amendments in this ASU should be applied prospectively to an award modified on or after the adoption date. We are currently evaluating the impact of this updated standard, but we do not believe this update will have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows - Restricted Cash (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force). ASU 2016-18 requires restricted cash and cash equivalents to be included with cash and cash equivalents on the statement of cash flows under a retrospective transition approach. We early adopted this guidance as of September 30, 2017, and the adoption of this accounting standard resulted in a $3.4 million impact to investing cash flows as of September 30, 2016.
The following table provides a reconciliation of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash reported within the statement of financial position that sum to the total of the same such amounts shown in the statement of cash flows.
|
| | | | | | | |
| September 30, 2017 | | December 31, 2016 |
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 13,548 |
| | $ | 19,980 |
|
Restricted cash | 1,513 |
| | — |
|
Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash shown in the statement of cash flows | $ | 15,061 |
| | $ | 19,980 |
|
Previously, we had an outstanding letter of credit of $1.5 million ("Letter of Credit"), secured by our existing operating cash, as required under the terms of our production facility and fulfillment center lease. As of September 30, 2017, as further disclosed in Note 5, amounts included in restricted cash represents funds set aside and required by the production facility and fulfillment center lease and corresponding escrow agreement negotiated with our landlord to replace the Letter of Credit.
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230) Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments. ASU 2016-15 eliminates the diversity in practice related to the classification of certain cash receipts and payments for debt prepayment or extinguishment costs, the maturing of a zero-coupon bond, the settlement of contingent liabilities arising from a business combination, proceeds from insurance settlements, distributions from certain equity method investees and beneficial interests obtained in a financial asset securitization. ASU 2016-15 designates the appropriate cash flow classification, including requirements to allocate certain components of these cash receipts and payments among operating, investing and financing activities. The retrospective transition method, requiring adjustment to all comparative periods presented, is required unless it is impracticable for some of the amendments, in which case those amendments would be treated prospectively as of the earliest date practicable. The guidance will become effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017. We do not expect the adoption of this standard to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-04, Recognition of Breakage for Certain Prepaid Stored-Value Products. The ASU exempts prepaid gift certificates from the guidance on extinguishing financial liabilities. The gift certificates will be subject to breakage accounting consistent with ASU 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). Breakage should only be recognized to the extent that it is probable that a significant reversal of the recognized breakage amount will not subsequently occur. The ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017 and is applied either using a modified retrospective transition method or retrospectively. Early adoption is permitted. Adoption of the standard is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In March 2016, the FASB issued 2016-09, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718) Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting, which simplifies several aspects of accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, an option to make an accounting policy election to either estimate forfeitures on stock-based payment awards as previously required, or to recognize forfeitures as they occur, as well as certain classifications on the statement of cash flows. We adopted this ASU on January 1, 2017 and elected to recognize forfeitures as they occur, and the impact of that change in accounting was recorded as a $0.2 million cumulative effect adjustment to increase additional paid-in-capital and accumulated deficit. The other provisions of this accounting standard did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements and footnote disclosures.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). ASU 2016-02 requires lessees to recognize the following for all leases (with the exception of short-term leases) at the commencement date: a lease liability, which is a lessee's obligation to make lease payments arising from a lease, measured on a discounted basis; and a right-of-use asset, which is an asset that represents the lessee’s right to use, or control the use of, a specified asset for the lease term. Under the new guidance, lessor accounting is largely unchanged. Certain targeted improvements were made to align, where necessary, lessor accounting with the lessee accounting model and ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). The new lease guidance also simplified the accounting for sale and leaseback transactions primarily because lessees must recognize lease assets and lease liabilities. Lessees will no longer be provided with a source of off-balance sheet financing. Lessees (for capital and operating leases) and lessors (for sales-type, direct financing, and operating leases) must apply a modified retrospective transition approach for leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements. The modified retrospective approach would not require any transition accounting for leases that expired before the earliest comparative period presented. Lessees and lessors may not apply a full retrospective transition approach. ASU 2016-02 is effective for financial statements issued for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018. Our preliminary analysis indicates that, for our one remaining operating lease that will be in effect, upon adoption of Topic 842, we will record an estimated lease right-of-use asset of $1.9 million and a corresponding lease liability of $1.9 million. We are still evaluating the qualitative and quantitative disclosures that will be required when we adopt the standard.
In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-11, Inventory - Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory (Topic 330). ASU 2015-11 requires inventory to be subsequently measured using the lower of cost and net realizable value, thereby eliminating the market value approach. Net realizable value is defined as the “estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal and transportation.” ASU 2015-11 is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016 and is applied prospectively. We adopted ASU 2015-11 on January 1, 2017, and the standard did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements and footnote disclosures.
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 605, Revenue Recognition. This ASU is based on the principle that revenue is recognized when a customer obtains control of promised goods or services in an amount that reflects the consideration the entity expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services. In addition, the standard requires disclosure of the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. We will adopt the requirements of the new standard on January 1, 2018 and anticipate using the full retrospective transition approach. Based on the results of our preliminary analysis, we do not expect the adoption to significantly impact the timing and measurement of revenue recognized. Revenue related to our Retail Partner Channel will continue to be recognized on a gross basis as we control the goods before the goods are transferred to the customer. We are in the process of finalizing the quantitative and qualitative disclosures required by the new standard and expect to complete this process during the fourth quarter of 2017.
2. Prior Year Revision
During 2016, we revised our Consolidated Statement of Operations to reflect the accounting for platform fees paid to third-party websites selling our products. Previously, these fees were presented as a reduction to net revenue when the fees should have been presented as sales and marketing expense. The revision, which we determined is not a material error, had no impact on loss from operations, results of operations, stockholders' equity or cash flows.
The impact on the individual line items of our consolidated financial statements for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 from the adjustment was as follows (in thousands):
Statement of Operations for the three months ended September 30, 2016:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Previously Reported | | Adjustments | | Revised |
Net revenue | $ | 19,165 |
| | $ | 493 |
| | $ | 19,658 |
|
Gross profit | $ | 7,944 |
| | $ | 493 |
| | $ | 8,437 |
|
Sales and marketing | $ | 4,114 |
| | $ | 493 |
| | $ | 4,607 |
|
Total operating expense | $ | 11,299 |
| | $ | 493 |
| | $ | 11,792 |
|
Loss from operations | $ | (3,355 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | (3,355 | ) |
Net loss | $ | (3,413 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | (3,413 | ) |
Statement of Operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2016:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Previously Reported | | Adjustments | | Revised |
Net revenue | $ | 57,084 |
| | $ | 1,397 |
| | $ | 58,481 |
|
Gross profit | $ | 23,598 |
| | $ | 1,397 |
| | $ | 24,995 |
|
Sales and marketing | $ | 13,046 |
| | $ | 1,397 |
| | $ | 14,443 |
|
Total operating expense | $ | 53,302 |
| | $ | 1,397 |
| | $ | 54,699 |
|
Loss from operations | $ | (29,704 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | (29,704 | ) |
Net loss | $ | (29,373 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | (29,373 | ) |
3. Investments and Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The components of our cash equivalents and short-term investments, including unrealized gains and losses associated with each are as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| September 30, 2017 |
| Amortized cost | | Gross unrealized gains | | Gross unrealized losses | | Fair Value |
Cash equivalents: | | | | | | | |
Money market funds | $ | 600 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 600 |
|
Short-term investments: | | | | | | | |
Certificates of deposit, 90 days or greater | 11,408 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 11,408 |
|
Total cash equivalents and short-term investments | $ | 12,008 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 12,008 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2016 |
| Amortized cost | | Gross unrealized gains | | Gross unrealized losses | | Fair Value |
Cash equivalents: | | | | | | | |
Money market funds | $ | 11,126 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 11,126 |
|
Short-term investments: | | | | | | | |
Certificates of deposit, 90 days or greater | 23,808 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 23,808 |
|
Total cash equivalents and short-term investments | $ | 34,934 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 34,934 |
|
The following table represents our fair value hierarchy for our financial assets and liabilities (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | |
| September 30, 2017 |
| Fair Value | | Level I |
Cash equivalents: | | | |
Money market funds | $ | 600 |
| | $ | 600 |
|
Total financial assets | $ | 600 |
| | $ | 600 |
|
|
| | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2016 |
| Fair Value | | Level I |
Cash equivalents: | | | |
Money market funds | $ | 11,126 |
| | $ | 11,126 |
|
Total financial assets | $ | 11,126 |
|
| $ | 11,126 |
|
We hold money market funds that invest primarily in high-quality, short-term money market instruments, including certificates of deposit, banker’s acceptances, commercial paper and other money market securities. Investments in these funds are not insured or guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) or any other government agency.
As of September 30, 2017, we held certificates of deposits, classified as cash equivalents or short-term investments, based on the original term. A certificate of deposit is a time deposit with a fixed term that is commonly offered by banks, thrifts and credit unions. As of September 30, 2017, the certificates of deposit held by us had a term of 365 days or less. All certificates of deposit held by the Company were within the insured limits of the FDIC.
4. Balance Sheet Items
Inventory, net, is comprised of the following (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | |
| September 30, 2017 | | December 31, 2016 |
Raw materials | $ | 2,676 |
| | $ | 3,422 |
|
Finished goods | — |
| | — |
|
Less: reserve for obsolescence | (324 | ) | | (303 | ) |
Inventory, net | $ | 2,352 |
| | $ | 3,119 |
|
Property and equipment, net, is comprised of the following (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | |
| September 30, 2017 | | December 31, 2016 |
Land and building | $ | 3,675 |
| | $ | 3,675 |
|
Computer equipment and office furniture | 7,888 |
| | 7,678 |
|
Computer software | 1,890 |
| | 1,795 |
|
Internal use software and website development | 13,661 |
| | 11,207 |
|
Internal use software and website development in progress | 233 |
| | 849 |
|
Production equipment | 14,574 |
| | 13,685 |
|
Leasehold improvements | 3,056 |
| | 3,003 |
|
Total property and equipment | 44,977 |
| | 41,892 |
|
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization | (33,903 | ) | | (30,956 | ) |
Property and equipment, net | $ | 11,074 |
| | $ | 10,936 |
|
Depreciation and amortization expense was $1.2 million and $1.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and $3.5 million and $3.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
Accrued liabilities consist of the following (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | |
| September 30, 2017 | | December 31, 2016 |
Payroll and employee related accruals | $ | 1,443 |
| | $ | 1,337 |
|
Production costs | 1,297 |
| | 5,323 |
|
Accrued sales and business taxes | 603 |
| | 1,072 |
|
Accrued advertising | 400 |
| | 1,616 |
|
Other accrued liabilities | 294 |
| | 332 |
|
Professional services | 268 |
| | 564 |
|
Unclaimed royalty payments | 195 |
| | 433 |
|
Royalties-minimum guarantee | 155 |
| | 299 |
|
Allowance for sales returns and chargebacks | 42 |
| | 219 |
|
Restructuring | 20 |
| | 570 |
|
Accrued liabilities | $ | 4,717 |
| | $ | 11,765 |
|
The change in the restructuring liability is summarized as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | |
| Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 |
Accrued restructuring balance, beginning of period | $ | 570 |
|
Lease related | (53 | ) |
Cash payments | (497 | ) |
Accrued restructuring balance, end of period | $ | 20 |
|
The following table presents the changes in the allowance for sales returns and chargebacks (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended September 30, | | Nine Months Ended September 30, |
| 2017 | | 2016 | | 2017 | | 2016 |
Balance, beginning of period | $ | 65 |
| | $ | 50 |
| | $ | 219 |
| | $ | 232 |
|
Add: provision | 464 |
| | 564 |
| | 1,468 |
| | 1,556 |
|
Less: deductions and other adjustments | (487 | ) | | (546 | ) | | (1,645 | ) | | (1,720 | ) |
Balance, end of period | $ | 42 |
| | $ | 68 |
| | $ | 42 |
| | $ | 68 |
|
5. Escrow Agreement
On September 15, 2017, the Letter of Credit provided to the landlord under our production facility and fulfillment center lease was replaced by a fully-negotiated escrow agreement. Pursuant to the terms of the escrow agreement, we deposited $1.5 million in a non-interest bearing account, representing the maximum amount owed to the landlord, only to be drawn on by the landlord should we exercise our right to terminate the production facility and fulfillment center lease prior to the expiration of the term.
6. Stock-Based Compensation
Stock option activity
The following table summarizes stock option activity related to shares of common stock (in thousands, except the weighted average exercise price):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Number of Stock Options Outstanding | | Weighted- Average Exercise Price | | Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years) | | Aggregate Intrinsic Value |
Outstanding — December 31, 2016 | 2,147 |
| | $ | 4.79 |
| | 6.35 | | $ | 8 |
|
Granted | 604 |
| | 2.90 |
| | | | |
Exercised | (6 | ) | | 2.12 |
| | | | |
Forfeited | (399 | ) | | 6.71 |
| | | | |
Outstanding — September 30, 2017 | 2,346 |
| | $ | 3.98 |
| | 7.08 | | $ | — |
|
Vested and expected to vest — September 30, 2017 | 2,346 |
| | $ | 3.98 |
| | 7.08 | | $ | — |
|
Options exercisable — September 30, 2017 | 789 |
| | $ | 4.99 |
| | 4.97 | | $ | — |
|
Included in the stock options outstanding as of September 30, 2017 are 449,816 non-statutory stock options that have both three-year service criteria and vesting contingent on financial performance measures at the end of a three-year performance period ended December 31, 2018. The performance criteria for these awards consist of the following financial measures during the performance period: (i) revenue during each period, (ii) cumulative Adjusted EBITDA and (iii) cumulative free cash flow, which we define as cash flows from operations minus capital expenditures. Compensation cost associated with these performance-based stock options is recognized using an attribution model and ultimately based on whether satisfaction of the performance criteria is probable. The total compensation cost we recognize under these option awards will be based upon the
results of the financial measures. As of September 30, 2017, we have estimated that it is not probable that the performance criteria will be met, and, accordingly, no stock compensation expense for the performance shares has been recorded. At September 30, 2017, we had $0.9 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to the performance awards.
Restricted stock unit activity
We may grant restricted stock units, ("RSUs") to our employees, consultants or outside directors under the provisions of our Amended and Restated 2012 Stock Incentive Plan. The cost of RSUs is determined using the fair value of our common stock on the date of grant. Compensation cost is amortized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period.
Restricted stock unit activity is summarized as follows (unit numbers in thousands):
|
| | | | | | |
| Number of Units Outstanding | | Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value Per Unit |
Awarded and unvested at December 31, 2016 | 440 |
| | $ | 3.69 |
|
Granted | 693 |
| | 3.00 |
|
Vested | (231 | ) | | 3.38 |
|
Forfeited and canceled | (89 | ) | | 3.18 |
|
Awarded and unvested at September 30, 2017 | 813 |
| | $ | 3.25 |
|
Included in the restricted stock units granted as of September 30, 2017 are 184,026 performance-based restricted stock units ("PSUs") that have both three-year service criteria and vesting contingent on financial performance measures at the end of a three-year performance period ended December 31, 2019. The performance criteria for these awards consist of the following financial measures during the performance period: (i) cumulative Adjusted EBITDA and (ii) cumulative free cash flow, which we define as cash flows from operations minus capital expenditures. Compensation cost associated with these PSUs will be recognized based on whether satisfaction of the performance criteria is probable. The total compensation cost we recognize under these awards will be based upon the results of the financial measures. As of September 30, 2017, we have estimated that it is not probable that the performance criteria will be met, and, accordingly, no stock compensation expense for the PSUs has been recorded. At September 30, 2017, we had $0.6 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to the PSUs.
Stock-based compensation expense
We estimated the fair value of each option award on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and the assumptions noted in the following table. In the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, we calculated volatility using our historical volatility as we had sufficient public trading history. The expected term of options granted gave consideration to historical exercises, assumed forfeitures when they occur and the options’ contractual term. For all periods presented, the risk-free rate is based on the rates in effect at the time of grant for zero coupon U.S. Treasury notes with maturities approximately equal to each grant’s expected life, and a dividend yield of zero is applied since we have not historically paid dividends and have no intention to pay dividends in the near future.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended September 30, | | Nine Months Ended September 30, |
| 2017 | | 2016 | | 2017 | | 2016 |
Expected term (in years) | 5.5 |
| | 5.6 |
| | 4.4 |
| | 6.0 |
|
Risk-free interest rate | 2.0 | % | | 1.2 | % | | 1.9 | % | | 1.5 | % |
Expected volatility | 54 | % | | 57 | % | | 54 | % | | 57 | % |
Expected dividend rate | 0.0 | % | | 0.0 | % | | 0.0 | % | | 0.0 | % |
The weighted average fair value of options granted was $1.05 and $1.30 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 respectively and $1.61 and $1.90 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 respectively.
Cost of net revenue and operating expense include stock-based compensation as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended September 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, |
| 2017 | | 2016 | 2017 | | 2016 |
Cost of net revenue | $ | 4 |
| | $ | 9 |
| $ | 12 |
| | $ | 45 |
|
Sales and marketing | 18 |
| | 72 |
| 66 |
| | 209 |
|
Technology and development | 7 |
| | 23 |
| 26 |
| | 81 |
|
General and administrative | 416 |
| | 340 |
| 1,220 |
| | 855 |
|
Total stock-based compensation expense | $ | 445 |
| | $ | 444 |
| $ | 1,324 |
| | $ | 1,190 |
|
7. Stock Repurchase Program
In April 2016, our Board of Directors approved the extension of our existing stock repurchase program that authorized the purchase of up to 20% of the outstanding shares of its common stock or an aggregate of 3.5 million shares of our common stock. Under the stock repurchase program, any stock repurchase could be made through open market and privately negotiated transactions, or as otherwise determined by management, at times and in such amounts as management deemed appropriate and could be made pursuant to one or more Rule 10b5-1 trading plans adopted in accordance with Rule 10b5-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). The timing and amount of stock repurchased under the program depended on a variety of factors including stock price, market conditions, corporate and regulatory requirements (including applicable securities laws and regulations and the rules of the NASDAQ Stock Market), any additional constraints related to material inside information we may have possessed and capital availability. In February 2017, our Board of Directors terminated the stock repurchase program.
Share repurchase activity based on settlement date was as follows (in thousands, except per share data):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended September 30, | | Nine Months Ended September 30, |
| 2017 | | 2016 | | 2017 | | 2016 |
Total number of shares repurchased | — |
| | 77 |
| | 19 |
| | 223 |
|
Aggregate cost of shares repurchased | $ | — |
| | $ | 241 |
| | $ | 58 |
| | $ | 739 |
|
Average cost per share | $ | — |
| | $ | 3.12 |
| | $ | 3.10 |
| | $ | 3.31 |
|
8. Net Loss per Share of Common Stock
Basic net loss per share is computed by dividing the net loss attributable to common shares for the period by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period.
Diluted net loss per share attributed to common shares is computed by dividing the net loss attributable to common shares for the period by the weighted average number of common and potential common shares outstanding during the period, if the effect of each class of potential common shares is dilutive. Potential common shares include restricted stock units and incremental shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options.
The following table sets forth the computation of our basic and diluted net loss per share of common stock (in thousands, except for per share amounts).
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended September 30, | | Nine Months Ended September 30, |
| 2017 | | 2016 | | 2017 | | 2016 |
Numerator: | | | | | | | |
Net loss | $ | (3,640 | ) | | $ | (3,413 | ) | | $ | (10,167 | ) | | $ | (29,373 | ) |
Denominator used in computing net loss per share of common stock: | | | | | | | |
Basic | 16,828 |
| | 16,683 |
| | 16,736 |
| | 16,728 |
|
Diluted | 16,828 |
| | 16,683 |
| | 16,736 |
| | 16,728 |
|
Net loss per share of common stock: | | | | | | | |
Basic | $ | (0.22 | ) | | $ | (0.20 | ) | | $ | (0.61 | ) | | $ | (1.76 | ) |
Diluted | $ | (0.22 | ) | | $ | (0.20 | ) | | $ | (0.61 | ) | | $ | (1.76 | ) |
The following outstanding shares of potentially dilutive securities were excluded from the computation of diluted net loss per share of common stock for the periods in which we incurred a net loss because including them would have been antidilutive (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended September 30, | | Nine Months Ended September 30, |
| 2017 | | 2016 | | 2017 | | 2016 |
Stock options to purchase common stock and restricted stock units | 28 |
| | 30 |
| | 61 |
| | 40 |
|
9. Geographic Information
During 2016, we revised our Consolidated Statement of Operations to reflect the accounting for platform fees paid to third-party websites selling our products. Previously, these fees were presented as a reduction to net revenue when the fees should have been presented as sales and marketing expense. The net impact of the revision on our net revenue is presented below.
Our revenue by geographic region, based on the location to where the product was shipped, is summarized as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended September 30, | | Nine Months Ended September 30, |
| 2017 | | 2016 | | 2017 | | 2016 |
United States as previously reported | $ | 13,803 |
| | $ | 16,943 |
| | $ | 46,790 |
| | $ | 50,861 |
|
Revision | — |
| | 436 |
| | — |
| | 1,244 |
|
United States as revised | 13,803 |
| | 17,379 |
| | 46,790 |
| | 52,105 |
|
International as previously reported | 1,546 |
| | 2,222 |
| | 4,701 |
| | 6,223 |
|
Revision | — |
| | 57 |
| | — |
| | 153 |
|
International as revised | 1,546 |
| | 2,279 |
| | 4,701 |
| | 6,376 |
|
Total | $ | 15,349 |
| | $ | 19,658 |
| | $ | 51,491 |
| | $ | 58,481 |
|
All of the Company’s long-lived assets are located in the United States.
10. Related Party Transaction
On September 1, 2015, we sold our EZ Prints business, which provided a suite of enterprise class deployable software products and services focused on private label e-commerce customization services, pursuant to an asset purchase agreement with EZP Holdings. Vincent Sarrecchia, the chief executive officer of EZP Holdings, was previously serving as the interim chief executive officer of the EZ Prints business pursuant to a consulting agreement with the Company. Total consideration for the sale was $0.6 million, of which $0.1 million has been received by the Company, and $0.5 million is in the form of a non-interest bearing note receivable which is outstanding at September 30, 2017, and it is due on or before December 31, 2018.
| |
Item 2. | MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS. |
You should read the following discussion in conjunction with our condensed consolidated financial statements (unaudited) and related notes included elsewhere in this report. Except for the historical financial information contained herein, this quarterly report on Form 10-Q contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, as amended and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended and are subject to the safe harbor created by the Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terms such as “may,” “might,” “will,” “objective,” “intend,” “should,” “could,” “can,” “would,” “expect,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “potential,” “plan,” or the negative of these terms, and similar expressions intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements reflect our current views with respect to future events and are based on assumptions and subject to risks and uncertainties. Given these uncertainties, you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements, include, but are not limited to, statements about: our technology and manufacturing process, and the benefits thereof, the impact of our diverse network of contract manufacturers, our ongoing evaluation of our estimates, seasonal fluctuations in our business and the impact thereof on our revenue, the impact of our adoption of new accounting standards, statements about our expectations achieving the performance criteria of our performance equity awards, anticipated trends and challenges in our business and the markets in which we operate, customer acquisition costs as a predictor of future growth and a key investment lever and our plans to invest in sales and marketing expense, the continued expansion of our catalogs, expectations with respect to the fluctuation of cash provided by operating activities, our anticipated cash needs and our estimates regarding capital requirements, our needs for additional financing and the potential dilutive effect thereof, benefit of non-GAAP financial measures, the impact of a change in market interest rates, our exposure to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations, the impact of inflation and changes thereto, the impact of any legal proceedings to which we are or may become a party and the impact and timing of costs related thereto.
These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performances or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, seasonality of our revenue, macroeconomic cycles and consumer discretionary spending, demand for our products and services,
fluctuations in costs, particularly customer acquisition costs, changes in technology and other risk factors described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.
These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date hereof. We expressly disclaim any obligation or undertaking to release publicly any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statements contained herein to reflect any change in our expectations with regard thereto or any change in events, conditions or circumstances on which any such statement is based. You are advised, however, to consult any further disclosures we make on related subjects in our 10-Q and 8-K reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Our Business
We are a leading retailer of personalized products offering a wide variety of expressive gifts and accessories, including t-shirts and apparel, mugs and drinkware and home goods such as custom shower curtains and bed coverings. We conduct most of our business on our primary United States-based domain, CafePress.com and operate CafePress branded websites for the markets in the United Kingdom, Canada and Australia. We also sell CafePress branded products through other online retail partners such as Amazon and Walmart. Our products are customized with expressive designs contributed through a variety of means, including crowd-sourced user generated content, stock art licenses and licensed content relationships with large entertainment companies and brands. Our distinctive items bring our customers' passions to life and connect people to each other.
Our production facility and fulfillment center in Louisville, Kentucky has innovative technology and manufacturing processes that enable us to provide high-quality customized products that are individually built to order. Our proprietary processes enable us to produce a broad range of merchandise efficiently and profitably. We also maintain a diverse network of contract manufacturers that give us the ability to broaden our manufacturing capabilities and produce in certain international locales.
Most of our net revenue is generated from sales of customized products through our e-commerce websites (collectively referred to as "CafePress.com"), associated Retail Partner Channel or Feeds (collectively referred to as "Retail Partner Channel") or through storefronts hosted by CafePress. In addition, we generate revenue from fulfillment services, including print and production services provided to third parties. Customized products include user-designed products as well as products designed by our content owners.
An important revenue driver is customer acquisition, primarily through online marketing efforts, including paid and organic search, email, social, affiliate and an array of other channels, as well as the acquisition efforts of our content owners. As a result, our sales and marketing expense is our largest operating expense.
Our consumers and content owner customers are increasingly accessing e-commerce sites from their mobile devices. This shift to mobile site access presents challenges for us as we cope with shifting traffic patterns, and we have experienced lower conversion rates on traffic from mobile devices. We expect that this shift to mobile site access will continue for the foreseeable future.
Seasonal and cyclical influences impact our business volume. A significant portion of our sales are realized in conjunction with traditional retail holidays with the largest sales volume in the fourth quarter of each calendar year. Our offering of custom gifts for the holidays combined with consumers’ continued shift to online purchasing drive this trend. As a result of seasonality, our revenue in each of the first three quarters of the year are generally substantially lower than our revenue in the fourth quarter of each year, and we expect this to continue for the foreseeable future.
Basis of presentation
Net Revenue
We generate revenue from online transactions through our e-commerce websites and through our partners' websites.
We recognize revenue associated with an order when all revenue recognition criteria have been met. Revenue is recorded at the gross amount when we are the primary obligor in a transaction, are subject to inventory and credit risk, have latitude in establishing prices and selecting suppliers or have most of these indicators. For transactions where we act as principal and record revenue on a gross basis, applicable royalty payments to our content owners are recorded in cost of net revenue.
Cost of Net Revenue
Cost of net revenue includes materials, labor, royalties and fixed overhead costs related to our manufacturing facilities, as well as outbound shipping and handling costs. The cost of materials may vary based on revenue as well as the price we are able to negotiate. Shipping fluctuates with volume as well as the method of shipping and fuel surcharges. Labor varies primarily by volume and product mix, and to a lesser extent, based on whether the employee is an hourly or a salary employee. We rely on temporary employees to augment our permanent staff particularly during periods of peak demand. Our royalty expense is comprised of fees we pay to our content owners for the use of their content on our products. Additionally, we pay commissions to shopkeepers for the use of their content on our products. Such fees vary based primarily on sales channel and volume. Royalty-based obligations and commissions are expensed to cost of net revenue at the contractual rate for the relevant product sales.
Operating Expense
Operating expense consist of sales and marketing, technology and development and general and administrative expense.
Sales and Marketing
Sales and marketing expense consists primarily of customer acquisition costs, personnel costs and costs related to customer support, order processing, third-party platform fees and other marketing activities. Customer acquisition, customer support, third-party platform fees and third-party payment processor and credit card fees are variable and historically have represented the majority of our overall sales and marketing expense.
Our customer acquisition costs consist of various online media programs, such as paid search engine marketing, email, display advertising and affiliate channels. We believe this expense is a key lever that we can use within our business as we adjust volumes to our target return on investment. We expect to continue to invest in sales and marketing expense in the foreseeable future to fund new customer acquisition, increase focus on driving repeat customer purchases and build our brand.
Technology and Development
Technology and development expense consists of costs incurred for engineering, network operations and information technology, including personnel expense, as well as the costs incurred to operate our websites. Technology and development costs are expensed as incurred, except for certain costs related to the development of internal use software and website development, which are capitalized and amortized over their estimated useful lives of two years.
General and Administrative
General and administrative expense consists of personnel, professional services and facilities costs related to our executive, finance, human resources and legal functions. Professional services consist primarily of outside legal and accounting services. General and administrative expense also include headcount and related costs for operations related to our content usage and fraudulent review personnel.
Results of Operations
During 2016, we revised our Consolidated Statement of Operations to reflect the accounting for platform fees paid to third-party websites selling our products. Previously, these fees were presented as a reduction to net revenue when the fees should have been presented as sales and marketing expense. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, the net impact of the revision was an increase in net revenue and a corresponding increase to sales and marketing expense of $0.5 million and $1.4 million, respectively. The revision, which we determined is not a material error, had no impact on loss from operations, results of operations, stockholders' equity or cash flows.
The following table presents the components of our statement of operations as a percentage of net revenue:
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended September 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, |
| 2017 | | 2016 (As Revised) | 2017 | | 2016 (As Revised) |
Net revenue | 100.0 | % | | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | | 100.0 | % |
Cost of net revenue | 60.4 |
| | 57.1 |
| 61.1 |
| | 57.3 |
|
Gross profit | 39.6 |
| | 42.9 |
| 38.9 |
| | 42.7 |
|
Operating expense: | | | | | | |
Sales and marketing | 28.1 |
| | 23.4 |
| 26.2 |
| | 24.8 |
|
Technology and development | 19.6 |
| | 17.3 |
| 17.6 |
| | 16.9 |
|
General and administrative | 16.1 |
| | 14.1 |
| 15.1 |
| | 14.4 |
|
Impairment charges | — |
| | — |
| — |
| | 35.7 |
|
Restructuring costs | — |
| | 5.2 |
| — |
| | 1.7 |
|
Total operating expense | 63.8 |
|
| 60.0 |
| 58.9 |
|
| 93.5 |
|
Loss from operations | (24.2 | ) | | (17.1 | ) | (20.0 | ) | | (50.8 | ) |
Interest income | 0.4 |
| | 0.4 |
| 0.3 |
| | 0.3 |
|
Interest expense | — |
| | — |
| — |
| | (0.1 | ) |
Other income (expense), net | 0.1 |
| | (0.6 | ) | — |
| | (0.3 | ) |
Loss before income taxes | (23.7 | ) | | (17.3 | ) | (19.7 | ) | | (50.9 | ) |
Provision (benefit) for income taxes | — |
| | 0.1 |
| — |
| | (0.7 | ) |
Net loss | (23.7 | )% | | (17.4 | )% | (19.7 | )% | | (50.2 | )% |
Effective tax rate | — | % | | (0.3 | )% | — | % | | 1.3 | % |
Comparison of the Three Months Ended September 30, 2017 and 2016
We monitor several key operating metrics including (in thousands, except for percentages and average order size data):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended September 30,
| | | | |
| 2017 | | 2016 (As Revised) | | Variance | | % Variance |
CafePress.com orders | 295 |
| | 425 |
| | (130 | ) | | (31)% |
Retail Partner Channel orders | 217 |
| | 197 |
| | 20 |
| | 10% |
Total orders | 512 |
| | 622 |
| | $ | (110 | ) | | (18)% |
| | | | | | | |
CafePress.com average order size | $ | 37.13 |
| | $ | 38.06 |
| | $ | (0.93 | ) | | (2)% |
Retail Partner Channel average order size | $ | 20.29 |
| | $ | 17.72 |
| | $ | 2.57 |
| | 15% |
Total average order size | $ | 29.99 |
| | $ | 31.61 |
| | $ | (1.62 | ) | | (5)% |
| | | | | | | |
CafePress.com revenue | $ | 10,944 |
| | $ | 16,162 |
| | $ | (5,218 | ) | | (32)% |
Retail Partner Channel revenue | 4,405 |
| | 3,496 |
| | 909 |
| | 26% |
Total revenue | $ | 15,349 |
| | $ | 19,658 |
| | $ | (4,309 | ) | | (22)% |
The following table presents our statements of operations for the periods indicated (in thousands, except for percentages):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended September 30,
| | | | |
| 2017 | | 2016 (As Revised) | | $ Change | | % Change |
Net revenue | $ | 15,349 |
| | $ | 19,658 |
| | $ | (4,309 | ) | | (22)% |
Cost of net revenue | 9,278 |
| | 11,221 |
| | (1,943 | ) | | (17) |
Gross profit | 6,071 |
| | 8,437 |
| | (2,366 | ) | | (28) |
Operating expense: | | | | | | | |
Sales and marketing | 4,301 |
| | 4,607 |
| | (306 | ) | | (7) |
Technology and development | 3,007 |
| | 3,395 |
| | (388 | ) | | (11) |
General and administrative | 2,477 |
| | 2,775 |
| | (298 | ) | | (11) |
Restructuring costs | — |
| | 1,015 |
| | (1,015 | ) | | (100) |
Total operating expense | 9,785 |
| | 11,792 |
| | (2,007 | ) | | (17) |
Loss from operations | (3,714 | ) | | (3,355 | ) | | (359 | ) | | (11) |
Interest income | 58 |
| | 76 |
| | (18 | ) | | (24) |
Interest expense | (1 | ) | | (10 | ) | | 9 |
| | 90 |
Other income (expense), net | 17 |
| | (114 | ) | | 131 |
| | F |
Loss before income taxes | (3,640 | ) | | (3,403 | ) | | (237 | ) | | (7) |
Provision (benefit) for income taxes | — |
| | 10 |
| | (10 | ) | | U |
Net loss | $ | (3,640 | ) | | $ | (3,413 | ) | | $ | (227 | ) | | (7)% |
U:> 100% unfavorable F:> 100% favorable
Total Number of Orders
Total number of orders represents the number of individual transactions that are shipped during the period. We monitor the total number of orders as a leading indicator of revenue trends. During the three months ended September 30, 2017, the decrease in orders of 18% as compared to the prior year period was primarily the result of lower visitation to CafePress.com across all traffic sources that we believe is related to changes in search engine algorithms that occurred earlier in the year as well as a continued competitive online retail environment. The decrease in our CafePress.com orders was partially offset by a 10% increase in Retail Partner Channel orders.
Average Order Size
Average order size is calculated as billings for a given period based on shipment date divided by the total number of associated orders in the same period. Due to timing of meeting revenue recognition criteria, billings may not be recognized as revenue until the following period. We closely monitor the average order size as it relates to changes in order volume, product pricing and product mix. For the three months ended September 30, 2017, the decrease in CafePress.com average order size of 2% as compared to the prior year period was primarily due to changes in our product mix. The 15% increase in Retail Partner Channel average order size was primarily due to a free shipping promotion that occurred during the three months ended September 30, 2016.
Net Revenue
Net revenue decreased $4.3 million, or 22%, for the three months ended September 30, 2017 compared to the same period in 2016. The change in revenue was driven by lower revenue from our CafePress.com domains, which more than offset growth from our Retail Partner Channel. The decline in revenue from CafePress.com of $5.2 million, or 32%, was primarily driven by declines in visits from all traffic sources, lower conversion rates and lower sales of political merchandise. We believe the reduction in traffic was driven by changes in search engine algorithms. Within our Retail Partner Channel, revenue increased $0.9 million, or 26%, primarily as a result of higher order volumes from our feed partnerships driven by the continued merchandising expansion of our catalogs.
Cost of Net Revenue
Cost of net revenue decreased $1.9 million, or 17%, for the three months ended September 30, 2017 compared to the same period in 2016. Cost of net revenue was 60.4%, as a percentage of net revenue, for the three months ended September 30, 2017, compared to 57.1% in the same period in 2016. The cost of materials increased as a percentage of net revenue by approximately 1.2 percentage points primarily as a result of changes in our product mix away from lower cost categories. In addition, the cost of order shipping increased as a percentage of net revenue by approximately 1.1 percentage points, which was primarily attributed to an increase in the number of shipments through our Retail Partner Channel where the average number of units per order is much lower than that experienced on CafePress.com. Finally, labor costs as a percentage of net revenue also increased by 1.1 percentage points as the decline in volume resulted in lower labor efficiency in our plant operations. On a per unit basis, total cost of net revenue was $10.38, which is approximately 9% higher than the prior year. The 5% decline in average order size also negatively impacted our cost of net revenue as a percentage of net revenue.
Sales and Marketing
Sales and marketing expense decreased $0.3 million or 7% for the three months ended September 30, 2017 compared to the same period in 2016. Sales and marketing expense was 28.1% of net revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2017 compared to 23.4% for the same period in 2016. Sales and marketing expense consisted of $0.5 million of lower fixed costs and $0.2 million of higher variable costs. Lower fixed costs were primarily driven by reductions in personnel-related costs associated with the closure of our California office. CafePress.com variable costs remained unchanged as higher paid search advertising costs were offset by a decrease in credit card fees and customer service expenses from a decline in revenue. Retail Partner Channel variable platform fees increased $0.2 million related to an increase in revenue.
Technology and Development
Technology and development expense decreased $0.4 million or 11% for the three months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016. Technology and development expense was 19.6% of net revenue in the three months ended September 30, 2017 compared to 17.3% in the same period in 2016. Personnel-related, consulting, recruiting and other technology infrastructure costs declined by $0.6 million primarily from the closure of our California office. Partially offsetting this decline was an increase of $0.2 million in depreciation expense.
General and Administrative
General and administrative expense decreased $0.3 million, or 11%, for the three months ended September 30, 2017 compared to the same period in 2016. General and administrative expense was 16.1% of net revenue in the three months ended September 30, 2017 compared to 14.1% for the same period of 2016. Personnel-related costs decreased $0.2 million, partially driven by the closure of our California office as well as a reduction in bonus expense related to our financial performance. In
addition, professional service expense decreased $0.2 million primarily due to a reduction in legal fees. These decreases were partially offset by a $0.1 million increase in stock-based compensation expense.
Restructuring Costs
Restructuring costs decreased $1.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 as the prior year expense consisted of severance charges of $0.8 million and a charge of $0.2 million for the abandonment of our office space in Hayward, California, which represented the net present value of the remaining minimum lease payments less expected sub-lease proceeds.
Comparison of the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 and 2016
We monitor several key operating metrics including (in thousands, except for percentages and average order size data):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Nine Months Ended September 30,
| | | | |
| 2017 | | 2016 (As Revised) | | Variance | | % Variance |
CafePress.com orders | 1,018 |
| | 1,234 |
| | $ | (216 | ) | | (18)% |
Retail Partner Channel orders | 640 |
| | 511 |
| | 129 |
| | 25% |
Total orders | 1,658 |
| | 1,745 |
| | $ | (87 | ) | | (5)% |
| | | | | | | |
CafePress.com average order size | $ | 37.66 |
| | $ | 39.25 |
| | $ | (1.59 | ) | | (4)% |
Retail Partner Channel average order size | $ | 20.55 |
| | $ | 19.65 |
| | $ | 0.90 |
| | 5% |
Total average order size | $ | 31.06 |
| | $ | 33.53 |
| | $ | (2.47 | ) | | (7)% |
| | | | | | | |
CafePress.com revenue | $ | 38,342 |
| | $ | 48,439 |
| | $ | (10,097 | ) | | (21)% |
Retail Partner Channel revenue | 13,149 |
| | 10,042 |
| | $ | 3,107 |
| | 31% |
Total revenue | $ | 51,491 |
| | $ | 58,481 |
| | $ | (6,990 | ) | | (12)% |
The following table presents our statements of operations for the periods indicated (in thousands, except for percentages):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Nine Months Ended September 30, | | | | |
| 2017 | | 2016 (As Revised) | | $ Change | | % Change |
Net revenue | $ | 51,491 |
| | $ | 58,481 |
| | $ | (6,990 | ) | | (12)% |
Cost of net revenue | 31,470 |
| | 33,486 |
| | (2,016 | ) | | (6) |
Gross profit | 20,021 |
| | 24,995 |
| | (4,974 | ) | | (20) |
Operating expense: | | | | | | | |
Sales and marketing | 13,496 |
| | 14,443 |
| | (947 | ) | | (7) |
Technology and development | 9,067 |
| | 9,895 |
| | (828 | ) | | (8) |
General and administrative | 7,770 |
| | 8,447 |
| | (677 | ) | | (8) |
Impairment charges | — |
| | 20,899 |
| | (20,899 | ) | | (100) |
Restructuring costs | — |
| | 1,015 |
| | (1,015 | ) | | (100) |
Total operating expense | 30,333 |
| | 54,699 |
| | (24,366 | ) | | (45) |
Loss from operations | (10,312 | ) | | (29,704 | ) | | 19,392 |
| | 65 |
Interest income | 137 |
| | 150 |
| | (13 | ) | | (9) |
Interest expense | (11 | ) | | (36 | ) | | 25 |
| | 69 |
Other income (expense), net | 20 |
| | (177 | ) | | 197 |
| | F |
Loss before income taxes | (10,166 | ) | | (29,767 | ) | | 19,601 |
| | 66 |
Provision (benefit) for income taxes | 1 |
| | (394 | ) | | 395 |
| | U |
Net loss | $ | (10,167 | ) | | $ | (29,373 | ) | | $ | 19,206 |
| | 65% |
U:> 100% unfavorable F:> 100% favorable
Total Number of Orders
Total number of orders represents the number of individual transactions that are shipped during the period. We monitor the total number of orders as a leading indicator of revenue trends. During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, the decrease in orders of 5% as compared to the prior year period was primarily the result of lower visitations to CafePress.com across all traffic sources that we believe is related to changes in search engine algorithms that occurred earlier in the year as well as a continued competitive online retail environment. Declines in orders at CafePress.com were partially offset by the growth in business volumes within our Retail Partner Channel related to the continued expansion of our catalogs.
Average Order Size
Average order size is calculated as billings for a given period based on shipment date divided by the total number of associated orders in the same period. Due to timing of meeting revenue recognition criteria, billings may not be recognized as revenue until the following period. We closely monitor the average order size as it relates to changes in order volume, product pricing and product mix. For the nine months ended September 30, 2017, the decrease in CafePress.com average order size of 4% as compared to the prior year period was primarily related to a change in our product mix. The increase in Retail Partner Channel average order size is due to a focus on pricing that maintains a desired margin level as well as the fact that a free shipping promotion was conducted during the third quarter of 2016 that resulted in lower prices.
Net Revenue
Net revenue decreased $7.0 million, or 12% in the nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to the same period in 2016. The change in revenue was driven by lower revenue from our CafePress.com domains, which more than offset growth from our Retail Partner Channel. The decline in revenue from CafePress.com of $10.1 million, or 21%, was primarily driven by declines in visits and conversion from most traffic sources. We believe the reduction in traffic was driven by changes in search engine algorithms. Furthermore, there was one less sale day during the nine months ended September 30, 2017, and we experienced declines in sales of political merchandise as 2016 benefited from the Presidential election cycle. Within our Retail Partner Channel, revenue increased $3.1 million, or 31%, primarily as a result of higher order volumes from our feeds partnership driven by the continued merchandising expansion of our catalogs.
Cost of Net Revenue
Cost of net revenue decreased $2.0 million, or 6%, in the nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to the same period in 2016. As a percentage of net revenue, cost of net revenue was 61.1% in the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 57.3% in the same period in 2016. The cost of order shipping increased as a percentage of net revenue by approximately 2.0 percentage points, which was primarily attributed to an increase in the number of shipments through our Retail Partner Channel where the average number of units per order is much lower than that experienced on CafePress.com. In addition, the cost of materials increased as a percentage of net revenue by approximately 1.6 percentage points primarily as a result of changes in our product mix away from lower cost categories. Labor costs as a percentage of net revenue also increased by 0.5 percentage points as the decline in volume resulted in lower labor efficiency in our plant operations. Finally, content commission costs also increased as a percentage of net revenue by approximately 0.3 percentage points. During the prior year, we established a commission forfeiture policy for inactive shopkeepers that resulted in a one-time reduction in commission expense of $0.4 million. Plant overhead costs, including depreciation and amortization, declined as a percentage of net revenue by approximately 0.6 percentage points primarily driven by a reduction in our plant footprint. On a per unit basis, excluding the impact of the one-time reduction in commission expense in 2016, total cost of net revenue was $10.61, which is approximately 4% higher than the prior year. The 5% decline in average order size also negatively impacted our cost of net revenue as a percentage of net revenue.
Sales and Marketing
Sales and marketing expense decreased $0.9 million, or 7%, in the nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to the same period in 2016. Sales and marketing expense was 26.2% of net revenue in the nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to 24.8% in the same period in 2016. The decrease in absolute dollars in sales and marketing expense consisted of a $1.3 million decline in fixed expenses, partially offset by a $0.4 million increase in variable expenses. Lower fixed costs were primarily driven by reductions in personnel-related costs associated with the closure of our California office as well as expense reductions from outside agencies. CafePress.com variable costs decreased $0.2 million as a decrease in credit card fees and customer service expenses from a decline in revenue were partially offset by higher paid search advertising costs. Retail Partner Channel variable platform fees increased $0.6 million related to an increase in revenue.
Technology and Development
Technology and development expense decreased $0.8 million, or 8%, in the nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to the same period in 2016. Technology and development expense was 17.6% of net revenue in the nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to 16.9% in the same period in 2016. Personnel-related, consulting, recruiting and other technology infrastructure costs declined by $1.3 million primarily from the closure of our California office. Partially offsetting this decline was an increase of $0.5 million in depreciation expense.
General and Administrative
General and administrative expense decreased $0.7 million, or 8%, in the nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to the same period in 2016. General and administrative expense was 15.1% of net revenue in the nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to 14.4% in the same period of 2016. Personnel-related costs decreased $0.4 million, partially driven by the closure of our California office. In addition, professional service expense decreased $0.5 million primarily due to a reduction in legal fees. Finally, rent expense decreased by $0.2 million from the closure of our California office. These decreases were partially offset by a $0.4 million increase in stock-based compensation expense.
Impairment Charges
Impairment charges decreased $20.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 as the prior year expense consisted of a non-cash charge related to the impairment of goodwill.
Restructuring Costs
Restructuring costs decreased $1.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 as the prior year expense consisted of severance charges of $0.8 million and a charge of $0.2 million for the abandonment of our office space in Hayward, California, which represented the net present value of the remaining minimum lease payments less expected sub-lease proceeds.
Provision (Benefit) for Income Taxes
We recorded a $0.4 million benefit for income taxes for the nine months ended September 30, 2016. Our effective tax rate was a 1.3% benefit for the nine months ended September 30, 2016. For the nine months ended September 30, 2016, the effective tax rate was different than our statutory rate primarily due to the net loss from continuing operations while maintaining a valuation allowance against substantially all of our deferred tax assets and the tax impact of the goodwill impairment.
Consolidated Balance Sheet
The following table is a summary of our overall financial position (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| September 30, 2017 | | December 31, 2016 | | $ Change |
Total assets | $ | 43,959 |
| | $ | 62,920 |
| | $ | (18,961 | ) |
Total liabilities | 8,379 |
| | 18,452 |
| | (10,073 | ) |
Total stockholders' equity | 35,580 |
| | 44,468 |
| | (8,888 | ) |
| |
• | Total assets decreased $19.0 million driven primarily by a reduction in current assets due to the utilization of cash and short-term investments for the payment of production, advertising, royalty and commission liabilities related to retail holiday activity during the fourth quarter of 2016 and reductions in accounts receivable and inventory related to the seasonality of our business. In addition, cash balances have been adversely affected by declines in our business levels. |
| |
• | Total liabilities decreased $10.1 million driven by the payment of the liabilities as discussed above related to retail holiday activity during the fourth quarter of 2016. |
| |
• | Total stockholders' equity decreased by $8.9 million primarily driven by $10.2 million of net loss and $0.1 million from the repurchases of our common stock partially offset by $1.3 million in stock-based compensation expense. |
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of September 30, 2017, we had cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments totaling $26.5 million.
The following table summarizes our cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Nine Months Ended September 30, | | Change |
| 2017 | | 2016 | | $ |
Cash flows from: | | | | | |
Operating activities | $ | (13,222 | ) | | $ | (11,875 | ) | | $ | (1,347 | ) |
Investing activities | $ | 8,695 |
| | $ | (6,694 | ) | | $ | 15,389 |
|
Financing activities | $ | (392 | ) | | $ | (1,155 | ) | | $ | 763 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities
Our primary source of cash from operating activities is cash collections from our customers and partners. The substantial majority of our net revenue is generated from credit card transactions and credit card accounts receivable and are typically settled within one to five business days. Our primary uses of cash for operating activities are for settlement of accounts payable to vendors and personnel-related expenditures. Our quarterly cash flows from operations are impacted by the seasonality of our business. We generate a significant portion of our cash flow from operations in the fourth quarter, and cash flows in the first three to nine months have generally been negative due to the timing of settlements of accounts payable and accrued liabilities related to our fourth quarter holiday business, and to a lesser extent, operating losses. We expect that cash provided by operating activities may fluctuate in future periods due to several factors, including volatility in our operating results, seasonality, accounts receivable collections performance, inventory and supply chain management, and the timing and amount of personnel-related payments.
Cash used in operating activities increased $1.3 million primarily due to an increase in payments related to the satisfaction of accounts payable and accrued liabilities related to retail holiday activity during the fourth quarter of 2016 as compared to the prior year partially offset by a decrease in our business insurance renewal payments that occurred in June and an increase in collections of cash related to credit card settlements during 2017 as compared to the prior year.
Cash flows from investing activities
Cash provided by investing activities increased $15.4 million driven by an increase in the net sale of short-term investments. During 2017, as certificates of deposits matured, we did not reinvest the proceeds as we are in the process of updating our investment policy.
Cash flows from financing activities
Cash used in financing activities decreased $0.8 million as we repurchased less stock under our stock repurchase program compared to the prior year. During the first quarter of 2017, we terminated the stock repurchase program.
Credit Facility and Indebtedness
On September 15, 2017, the Letter of Credit provided to the landlord under our production facility and fulfillment center lease was replaced by a fully-negotiated escrow agreement. Pursuant to the terms of the escrow agreement, we deposited $1.5 million in a non-interest bearing account, representing the maximum amount owed to the landlord, only to be drawn on by the landlord should we exercise our right to terminate the production facility and fulfillment center lease prior to the expiration of the term.
If we require additional capital resources to grow our business or to acquire complementary technologies and businesses at any time in the future, we may seek to sell additional equity or raise funds through debt financing or other sources. The sale of additional equity could result in additional dilution to our stockholders. If we raise additional funds by obtaining loans from third parties, the terms of those financing arrangements may include negative covenants or other restrictions on our business that could impair our operating flexibility, and would also require us to incur interest expense. We can provide no assurance that additional financing will be available at all or, if available, that we would be able to obtain financing on terms favorable to us.
In April 2016, our Board of Directors approved the extension of our existing stock repurchase program that authorized the purchase of up to 20% of the outstanding shares of our common stock or an aggregate of 3.5 million shares of our common
stock. As of September 30, 2017, we had used $5.3 million of excess cash to repurchase 1,266,028 shares of our common stock. In February 2017, our Board of Directors terminated the repurchase program.
We anticipate that our current cash and cash equivalent balances and cash generated from operations will be sufficient to meet our strategic and working capital requirements for at least the next twelve months.
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
Regulation G, conditions for use of non-generally accepted accounting principles, or Non-GAAP, financial measures and other SEC regulations define and prescribe the conditions for use of certain Non-GAAP financial information. In addition, to disclosing financial results that are determined in accordance with GAAP, we also disclose certain non-GAAP financial information, including Adjusted EBITDA and Cash Contribution Margin, as further explained below. Analysis of results on a non-GAAP basis should be used as a compliment to, and in conjunction with, data presented in accordance with GAAP. Additionally, because our non-GAAP measures are not calculated in accordance with GAAP, the measures may not necessarily be comparable to similarly titled measures employed by other companies.
Adjusted EBITDA
We closely monitor Adjusted EBITDA which meets the definition of a Non-GAAP financial measure. We define Adjusted EBITDA as net income (loss) from continuing operations less interest and other (income) expense, provision for (benefit from) income taxes, depreciation and amortization, stock-based compensation, acquisition-related costs, restructuring costs and impairment charges.
We use Adjusted EBITDA as a key performance measure because we believe it facilitates operating performance comparisons from period to period by excluding potential differences caused by variations in capital structures (affecting net interest expense), tax positions (such as the impact on periods of changes in effective tax rates or fluctuations in permanent differences or discrete quarterly items), the impact of depreciation and amortization, stock-based compensation, acquisition-related costs, restructuring costs and impairment charges. Because Adjusted EBITDA facilitates internal comparisons of our historical operating performance on a more consistent basis, we also use Adjusted EBITDA for business planning purposes and to incentivize and compensate our management personnel.
Our use of Adjusted EBITDA has limitations as an analytical tool, and you should not consider this measure in isolation or as a substitute for analysis of our results as reported under GAAP as the excluded items may have significant effects on our operating results and financial condition. When evaluating our performance, you should consider Adjusted EBITDA alongside other financial performance measures, including various cash flow metrics, net income (loss) and our other GAAP results. The following shows the trend of Adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of net revenue, for each of the periods indicated:
The following shows Adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of net revenue, for each of the periods indicated (in thousands, except for percentages):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended September 30, | | Nine Months Ended September 30, |
| 2017 | | 2016 (As Revised) | | 2017 | | 2016 (As Revised) |
Net Revenue | $ | 15,349 |
| | $ | 19,658 |
| | $ | 51,491 |
| | $ | 58,481 |
|
Non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA | $ | (2,040 | ) | | $ | (857 | ) | | $ | (5,490 | ) | | $ | (3,421 | ) |
% of net revenue | (13.3 | )% | | (4.4 | )% | | (10.7 | )% | | (5.8 | )% |
The following table presents a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to net loss, the most comparable GAAP measure, for each of the periods indicated (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended September 30, | | Nine Months Ended September 30, |
| 2017 | | 2016 | | 2017 | | 2016 |
Net loss | $ | (3,640 | ) | | $ | (3,413 | ) | | $ | (10,167 | ) | | $ | (29,373 | ) |
Non-GAAP adjustments: | | | | | | | |
Interest and other (income) expense | (74 | ) | | 48 |
| | (146 | ) | | 63 |
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes | — |
| | 10 |
| | 1 |
| | (394 | ) |
Depreciation and amortization | 1,229 |
| | 1,039 |
| | 3,498 |
| | 3,179 |
|
Stock-based compensation | 445 |
| | 444 |
| | 1,324 |
| | 1,190 |
|
Impairment charges | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 20,899 |
|
Restructuring costs | — |
| | 1,015 |
| | — |
| | 1,015 |
|
Adjusted EBITDA | $ | (2,040 | ) | | $ | (857 | ) | | $ | (5,490 | ) | | $ | (3,421 | ) |
Cash Contribution Margin
Cash contribution margin (a non-GAAP financial measure that we reconcile to “Gross profit” in our consolidated statements of operations) consists of gross profit plus stock-based compensation and depreciation and amortization included in cost of net revenue less variable sales and marketing expense. In addition, variable sales and marketing expense includes platform fees paid to third-party websites selling our products. Previously, these fees were presented as a reduction to net revenue when the fees should have been presented as sales and marketing expense. Finally, our definition of variable sales and marketing expense was updated to include fees we pay third parties to manage our keyword advertising spend. The prior year amounts were reclassified to conform to this presentation.
When viewed together with our GAAP results, we believe cash contribution margin provides management and users of the financial statements information about our ability to cover our operating costs, such as Technology and Development and General and Administrative expense. Cash contribution margin is used in addition to and in conjunction with results presented in accordance with GAAP and should not be relied upon to the exclusion of GAAP financial measures. You should review our financial statements and publicly-filed reports in their entirety and not rely on any single financial measure. One material limitation associated with the use of cash contribution margin is that it is an incomplete measure of profitability as it does not include all operating expense or non-operating income and expense. Management compensates for these limitations when using this measure by looking at other GAAP measures such as operating income (loss) and net income (loss).
The following table presents the calculation of cash contribution margin from continuing operations for the periods indicated (in thousands, except for percentages):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended September 30, | | Nine Months Ended September 30, |
| 2017 | | 2016 | | 2017 | | 2016 |
Net revenue as previously reported | $ | 15,349 |
| | 100.0 | % | | $ | 19,165 |
| | 100.0 | % | | $ | 51,491 |
| | 100.0 | % | | $ | 57,084 |
| | 100.0 | % |
Revision | — |
| | — |
| | 493 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,397 |
| | — |
|
Net revenue as revised | 15,349 |
| | 100.0 |
| | 19,658 |
| | 100.0 |
| | 51,491 |
| | 100.0 |
| | 58,481 |
| | 100.0 |
|
Cost of net revenue | 9,278 |
| | 60.4 |
| | 11,221 |
| | 57.1 |
| | 31,470 |
| | 61.1 |
| | 33,486 |
| | 57.3 |
|
Gross profit as previously reported | 6,071 |
| | 39.6 |
| | 7,944 |
| | 41.5 |
| | 20,021 |
| | 38.9 |
| | 23,598 |
| | 41.3 |
|
Revision | — |
| | — |
| | 493 |
| | 1.4 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,397 |
| | 1.4 |
|
Gross profit as revised | 6,071 |
| | 39.6 |
| | 8,437 |
| | 42.9 |
| | 20,021 |
| | 38.9 |
| | 24,995 |
| | 42.7 |
|
Non-GAAP adjustments: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Add: Stock-based compensation | 4 |
| | — |
| | 9 |
| | — |
| | 12 |
| | — |
| | 45 |
| | 0.1 |
|
Add: Depreciation and amortization | 395 |
| | 2.6 |
| | 459 |
| | 2.4 |
| | 1,251 |
| | 2.5 |
| | 1,520 |
| | 2.6 |
|
Less: Variable sales and marketing costs as previously reported | (3,179 | ) | | (20.7 | ) | | (2,612 | ) | | (13.6 | ) | | (9,763 | ) | | (19.0 | ) | | (7,698 | ) | | (13.5 | ) |
Revision | — |
| | — |
| | (412 | ) | | (1.8 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (1,664 | ) | | (2.5 | ) |
Less: Variable sales and marketing costs as revised | (3,179 | ) | | (20.7 | ) | | (3,024 | ) | | (15.4 | ) | | (9,763 | ) | | (19.0 | ) | | (9,362 | ) | | (16.0 | ) |
Contribution margin as previously reported | 3,291 |
| | 21.4 |
| | 5,341 |
| | 27.9 |
| | 11,521 |
| | 22.4 |
| | 15,945 |
| | 27.9 |
|
Revision | — |
| | — |
| | 540 |
| | 2.1 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,253 |
| | 1.5 |
|
Cash contribution margin as revised | $ | 3,291 |
| | 21.4 | % | | $ | 5,881 |
| | 29.9 | % | | $ | 11,521 |
| | 22.4 | % | | $ | 17,198 |
| | 29.4 | % |
Off-balance sheet arrangements
We do not have any relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities, which would have been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes. In addition, we do not have any undisclosed borrowings or debt and we have not entered into any synthetic leases. Therefore, we are not currently exposed to any financing, liquidity, market or credit risk that could arise if we had engaged in such relationships.
| |
ITEM 3. | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK |
We are exposed to market risks in the ordinary course of our business. These risks primarily include risk related to interest rate, foreign currency exchange rate sensitivities and inflation.
Interest rate sensitivity
We had cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments of $26.5 million and $43.8 million as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. These amounts were held primarily in cash deposits, money market funds and certificates of deposit. Our primary exposure to market risk is interest income sensitivity, which is affected by changes in the general level of the interest rates in the United States. Due to the short-term nature of these instruments, a change in market interest rates would not be expected to have a material impact on our financial condition or our results of operations.
Foreign currency exchange rate sensitivity
Our sales to international customers are denominated in multiple currencies, including the United States dollar, the British Pound, the Euro, the Canadian dollar and the Australian dollar. As the substantial majority of our sales are charged to credit cards, accounts receivables are generally settled in short time duration and accordingly, we have limited exposure to foreign currency exchange rates on our accounts receivable. To date, our operating costs have been denominated primarily in United States dollars. As a result of our limited exposure to foreign currency exchange rates, we do not currently enter into foreign currency hedging transactions. If our international operations increase, our exposure to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations may increase.
Inflation Risk
We do not believe that inflation has had a material effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. If our costs were to become subject to significant inflationary pressures, we may not be able to fully offset such higher costs through price increases. Our inability or failure to do so could harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
We maintain “disclosure controls and procedures” as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms, and is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance of achieving their objectives. Our disclosure controls and procedures have been designed to meet reasonable assurance standards. Additionally, our management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. The design of any disclosure controls and procedures is also based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of September 30, 2017, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act). Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer (our principal executive officer) and Chief Financial Officer (our principal financial officer) have concluded that, as of September 30, 2017, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fiscal period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
We may be subject to lawsuits, claims and proceedings incident to the ordinary course of business, particularly with respect to content that appears on our website. Any claims against us, whether material, meritorious or not, could be time consuming, result in costly litigation, require significant amounts of legal resources, management time and result in the diversion of significant operational resources. The results of these lawsuits, claims and proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty. In addition to the matters described below, we are also involved in the ordinary routine litigation matters which are incidental to our business.
On November 3, 2016, The Ohio State University ("Ohio State") filed a Complaint against the Company for Trademark Infringement, Unfair Competition, Passing Off, Counterfeiting and Violation of Right of Publicity styled The Ohio State University versus CafePress, Inc. (Civil Action No. 2:16-cv-1052) (the "Complaint") in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio. The Complaint alleged that the Company participated in trademark infringement, unfair competition, passing off and counterfeiting under the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1114 and § 1125(a), by unlawfully appropriating Ohio State's registered and common law trademarks, and violated the rights of publicity assigned to Ohio State by head football coach Urban F. Meyer ("Meyer") under O.R.C. § 2741, et. seq., in the Company's design, manufacture, promotion, advertising, sale and shipping of allegedly counterfeit and infringing t-shirts and other merchandise online. Ohio State seeked damages of $1,000,000 per counterfeit mark per type of product sold, offered for sale, or distributed, in accordance with 15 U.S.C. § 1117. The Company filed its Answer to the Complaint on April 10, 2017, and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(a)(5) and (c)(2), Ohio State and the Company appeared for a settlement conference on May 2, 2017. On May 4, 2017, the parties filed a Joint Motion to Stay Proceeding through August 30, 2017 (the "Joint Motion to Stay"). while the parties continued settlement negotiations. On May 5, 2017, the Joint Motion to Stay was granted. On September 28, 2017, we reached a formal settlement with Ohio State on the above-captioned Complaint. No further activity is expected on the complaint.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
There have been no material changes from the risk factors disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.
(A) Exhibits:
|
| | |
Exhibit number | | Description |
| | |
3(i)(1) | | |
| | |
3(ii)(2) | | |
| | |
10.1(3)+ | | |
| | |
| | |
31.1 | | |
| | |
31.2 | | |
| | |
32.1(4) | | |
| | |
32.2(4) | | |
| | |
101.INS | | XBRL Instance Document. |
| | |
101.SCH | | XBRL Schema Document. |
| | |
101.CAL | | XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document. |
| | |
101.DEF | | XBRL Taxonomy Definition Linkbase Document. |
| | |
101.LAB | | XBRL Label Linkbase Document. |
| | |
101.PRE | | XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document. |
+ Management contract, compensatory plan or arrangement
| |
(1) | Previously filed as Exhibit 3(i) to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-35468), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 15, 2012, and incorporated by reference herein. |
| |
(2) | Previously filed as Exhibit 3(ii) to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-35468), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 15, 2012, and incorporated by reference herein. |
| |
(3) | Previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-35468), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 16, 2017, and incorporated by reference herein. |
| |
(4) | The material contained in Exhibit 32.1 and Exhibit 32.2 is not deemed “filed” with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference. |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirement of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
| | | |
Date: November 2, 2017 | CAFEPRESS INC. |
| | | |
| By: | | /s/ Fred E. Durham III |
| | | Fred E. Durham III |
| | | |
| | | Chief Executive Officer |
| | | (Duly Authorized Officer, Principal Executive Officer) and Director |
| | | |
| By: | | /s/ Phillip L. Milliner, Jr. |
| | | Phillip L. Milliner, Jr. |
| | | |
| | | Chief Financial Officer |
| | | (Duly Authorized Officer, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
| | |
Exhibit number | | Description |
| | |
3(i)(1) | | Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company. |
| | |
3(ii)(2) | | Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company. |
| | |
10.1(3)+ | | Form of Retention Award Agreement |
| | |
| | |
31.1 | | Certificate of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350). |
| | |
31.2 | | Certificate of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350). |
| | |
32.1(4) | | Certificate of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350). |
| | |
32.2(4) | | Certificate of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350). |
| | |
101.INS | | XBRL Instance Document. |
| | |
101.SCH | | XBRL Taxonomy Schema Linkbase Document. |
| | |
101.CAL | | XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document. |
| | |
101.DEF | | XBRL Taxonomy Definition Linkbase Document. |
| | |
101.LAB | | XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase Document. |
| | |
101.PRE | | XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Document. |
+ Management contract, compensatory plan or arrangement
| |
(1) | Previously filed as Exhibit 3(i) to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-35468), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 15, 2012, and incorporated by reference herein. |
| |
(2) | Previously filed as Exhibit 3(ii) to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-35468), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 15, 2012, and incorporated by reference herein. |
| |
(3) | Previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-35468), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 16, 2017, and incorporated by reference herein. |
| |
(4) | The material contained in Exhibit 32.1 and Exhibit 32.2 is not deemed “filed” with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference. |