This Amendment No. 1 (this “Amendment”) amends and supplements the Tender Offer Statement on Schedule TO (together with any amendments or supplements thereto, the “Schedule TO”) filed by Snapfish Merger Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Purchaser”) and a wholly owned subsidiary of Snapfish, LLC, a California limited liability company (“Parent”), with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on October 12, 2018. The Schedule TO relates to the offer by Purchaser to purchase all outstanding shares of common stock, par value $0.0001 per share (the “Shares”), of CafePress Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), at a price per Share of $1.48 (such price as it may be amended from time to time in accordance with the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of September 28, 2018, among Parent, Purchaser and the Company, the “Offer Price”), net to the seller in cash, without any interest, but subject to and reduced by any required withholding of taxes upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Offer to Purchase dated October 12, 2018 (together with any amendments or supplements thereto, the “Offer to Purchase”) and in the related Letter of Transmittal (together with any amendments or supplements thereto, the “Letter of Transmittal” and, together with the Offer to Purchase, the “Offer”), which are annexed to and filed with the Schedule TO as Exhibits (a)(1)(A) and (a)(1)(B), respectively. This Amendment is being filed on behalf of Purchaser and Parent. Unless otherwise indicated, references to sections in this Amendment are references to sections of the Offer to Purchase. Except as otherwise indicated below, the information set forth in the prior Schedule TO remains unchanged and is incorporated herein by reference to the items in this Amendment.
ITEM 11. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.
The information set forth in the Offer to Purchase under “The Offer—Section 15—Certain Legal Matters” and Item 11 of the Schedule TO, to the extent such Item incorporates by reference the information contained in the Offer to Purchase, are hereby amended and supplemented by adding the following subsection at the end of Section 15:
“Legal Proceedings Related to the Merger. On October 17, 2018, Stephen Bushansky, a purported stockholder of the Company, filed a putative class action complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, captioned Stephen Bushansky v. CafePress Inc. et al., Civil Action No.1:18-cv-01607-UNA (the “Bushansky Complaint”) against the Company and all members of the Company Board. Among other things, the Bushansky Complaint alleges that the Company, and the members of the Company Board, omitted to state material information in the Schedule14D-9, rendering it false and misleading and in violation of Sections 14(d)(4), 14(e) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act and SEC Rule14d-9. The alleged omissions concern certain standstill agreements, alleged discussions and negotiations between Snapfish and CafePress executive officers concerning continued employment and inputs and assumptions underlying the fairness opinion given by Needham & Company. In addition, the Bushansky Complaint alleges that the members of the Company Board acted as controlling persons of the Company within the meaning and in violation of Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act to influence and control the dissemination of the allegedly defective Schedule14D-9. The Bushansky Complaint seeks, among other things, an order that the action may be maintained as a class action, an order preliminarily and permanently enjoining proceeding with, consummating or closing the Offer and the Merger, rescission of the Offer and the Merger if they have already been consummated or rescissory damages, and an award of costs, including attorneys’ fees and experts’ fees.
On October 18, 2018, Adam Franchi, a purported stockholder of the Company, filed a putative class action complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, captioned Adam Franchi v. CafePress Inc. et al., Civil Action No.1:18-cv-01620-UNA (the “Franchi Complaint”) against the Company, all members of the Company Board, Parent and Purchaser. Among other things, the Franchi Complaint alleges that the Company, the members of the Company Board, Parent and Purchaser omitted to state material information in the Schedule14D-9, rendering it false and misleading and in violation of Sections 14(d), 14(e), and 20(a) of the Exchange Act and SEC Rule14d-9. The alleged omissions concern certain standstill agreements, alleged discussions and negotiations between Snapfish and CafePress executive officers concerning continued employment and inputs and assumptions underlying the fairness opinion given by Needham & Company. In addition, the Franchi Complaint alleges that the members of the Company Board, Parent and Purchaser acted as controlling persons of the Company within the meaning and in violation of Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act to influence and control the dissemination of the allegedly defective Schedule14D-9. The Franchi Complaint seeks, among other things, an order preliminarily and permanently enjoining proceeding with, consummating or closing the Offer and the Merger, rescission of the Offer and the Merger if they have already been consummated or rescissory damages, an order directing the defendants to file a corrected Schedule14D-9 and an award of costs, including attorneys’ fees and experts’ fees.”