Issuer and/or the servicer and their respective businesses and operations. This may adversely affect our ability to make payments in full on the Issuer Notes when due.
In September 2002, the European Commission published a proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the harmonisation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the member states concerning credit for consumers and surety agreements entered into by consumers. Under the original proposed draft, the directive required specific requirements to be met in respect of certain mortgage loan products (including new credit agreements for further drawings under certain flexible mortgages and for further advances and amortisation tables for repayment mortgages). Mortgage loans not complying with these requirements were potentially unenforceable. Significantly, in its original form, the proposal provided that it does not apply retrospectively (subject to certain exceptions including in respect of new drawings made in respect of existing agreements) and does not apply to residential mortgage loans except those which include an equity release component.
There has been significant opposition from the European Parliament to the original form of the proposed directive. On 13 February 2004, the Committee of Legal Affairs and the Internal Market published the European Parliament's amendments to the proposed draft. These amendments included excluding any credit agreement secured by a mortgage on land. On 20 April 2004 the European parliament voted on its first reading on the proposed directive. The European Commission published on 28 October 2004 a revised proposal, which comprised a list of intended revisions to the draft directive based on the amendments that the European Commission felt either able or unable to accept rather than a full redraft. In this amended form die proposed directive will apply to any loan secured by a mortgage over land if the loan includes an equity release element and is not over €100,000, but it is unclear whether it will apply to further drawings and further advances made in relation to agreements existing before national implementing legislation conies into effect.
It is currently unclear to what extent mortgage loans will be included in the scope of the proposed directive, which may be substantially amended before it is brought into effect. The proposal is unlikely to come into force before 2006 as the co-decision procedure of the European Parliament and of the Council, from the publication of the proposal to the coming into force of the new consumer credit directive, is likely to take at least two years, and member states will then have a further two years in which to bring implementing legislation into force. Until the final text of the directive is decided and the details of the United Kingdom implementing legislation are published, the form and the effect of any ultimately implemented directive on our ability to make payments when due on the Issuer Notes, cannot be determined.
In the United Kingdom, the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999, and (in so far as applicable) the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1994 (together, the “regulations”) apply to agreements entered into on or after July 1, 1995 and affect all of the loans. The regulations provide that:
Back to Contents
The regulations will not generally affect individually negotiated or “core terms” which set out the main subject- matter of the contract, such as the borrower's obligation to repay the principal. However, they may affect terms that are not considered to be core terms, such as the right of the lender to vary the interest rate.
For example, if a term permitting a lender to vary the interest rate (as the servicer is permitted to do) is found to be unfair, the borrower will not be liable to pay the increased rate or, to the extent that she or he has paid it, will be able, as against the lender, or any assignee such as Trustees, to claim repayment of the extra interest amounts paid or to set-off the amount of the claim against the amount owing by the borrower under the loan. Any such non-recovery, claim or set-off ultimately may adversely affect our ability to make payments on the Issuer Notes.
In August 2002, the Law Commission and the Scottish Law Commission issued a joint consultation LCCP No. 166/SLCDP 119 on proposals to rationalise the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 and the regulations into a single piece of legislation and a final report (incorporating a proposed Bill on unfair terms), which was expected early in 2004 but at the date of this annual report, has not yet been published. The Law Commissions have a duty under section 3 of the Law Commissions Act 1965 to keep the law under review for a number of purposes, including its simplification. The proposals are primarily to simplify the legislation on unfair terms. It is not proposed that there should be any significant increase in the extent of controls over terms in consumer contracts. Some changes are proposed, however, such as that the legislation should not affect core terms in so far as they are not substantially different from what the borrower should reasonably expect and are tran sparent. However, it is not obligatory for any of the Law Commission's reports to be considered for enactment as legislation by the UK government. It is therefore too early to tell how the proposals, if enacted, would affect the loans.
Decisions of the Ombudsman could lead to terms of the loans being considered unfair and such terms being varied, which may adversely affect payments on the Issuer Notes
Under the UK Financial Services and Markets Act 2000, the Financial Ombudsman Service is empowered to make decisions on, among other things, complaints relating to the terms in agreements for the provision of financial services, including loans, on the basis of what, in the Ombudsman's opinion, would be fair and reasonable in all circumstances of the case, taking into account, among other things, law and guidance. Such complaints are generally decided on a case by case basis by the Financial Ombudsman Service, with reference to the particular facts of any individual case. Each case is first adjudicated by an adjudicator. Either party to the case may appeal against the adjudication. In the event of an appeal, the case proceeds to a final decision by the Ombudsman.
No Financial Ombudsman Service decision against the seller has had a material adverse effect on the Issuer's ability to make payments on the Issuer Notes. However, given the Financial Ombudsman Service's wide jurisdiction in respect of fairness in the provision of financial services, it cannot be said with certainty what effect, if any, any future decision of the Financial Ombudsman Service may have on the Issuer's ability to make payments on the Issuer Notes.
Tax payable by Funding or the Issuer may adversely affect the Issuer’s ability to make payments on the Issuer Notes
Funding and the Issuer will generally be subject to UK corporation tax, currently at a rate of 30 per cent., on the profit reflected in their respective profit and loss accounts as increased by the amount of any non-deductible expenses or losses. If the tax payable by Funding or the Issuer is greater than expected because, for example, non-deductible expenses or losses are greater than expected, the funds available to make payments on the Issuer Notes will be reduced and this may adversely affect the Issuer’s ability to make payments on the Issuer Notes.
25
Back to Contents
European Directive 2003/48/EC on the Taxation of Savings Income may adversely affect noteholders’ interests
On June 3, 2003 the Council of the European Union adopted a Directive (2003/48/EC) regarding the taxation of savings income. Subject to a number of important conditions being met, it is proposed that member states will be required from no earlier than 1 July 2005 to provide to the tax authorities of other member states details of payments of interest and other similar income paid by a person within a member state's jurisdiction to an individual in another member state, except that Austria, Belgium and Luxembourg will instead impose a withholding system for a transitional period, unless during such period they elect otherwise (the ending of such transitional period being dependent upon the conclusion of certain other agreements relating to information exchange with certain other countries).
Payments of interest on the Issuer Notes which are made or collected through a member state or any other relevant country may be subject to withholding tax which would prevent holders of the Issuer Notes from receiving interest on their Issuer Notes in full.
Noteholders’ interests may be adversely affected if the United Kingdom joins the European Monetary Union
It is possible that prior to the maturity of the Notes, the United Kingdom may become a participating member state in the European economic and monetary union and the euro may become the lawful currency of the United Kingdom. In that event (a) all amounts payable in respect of the Issuer Notes denominated in pounds sterling may become payable in euro, (b) applicable provisions of law may require or allow us to redenominate such Issuer Notes into euro and take additional measures in respect of such Issuer Notes and (c) the introduction of the euro as the lawful currency of the United Kingdom may result in the disappearance of published or displayed rates for deposits in sterling used to determine the rates of interest on such Issuer Notes or changes in the way those rates are calculated, quoted and published or displayed. The introduction of the euro could also be accompanied by a volatile interest rate environment which could adversely affect investors. It cannot be said with certainty what effect, if any, adoption of the euro by the United Kingdom will have on investors on the Issuer Notes.
Changes of law may adversely affect noteholders’ interests
The structure of the issue of the Issuer Notes and the ratings which are to be assigned to them are based on English law in effect as at the date of this annual report. No assurance can be given as to the impact of any possible change to English or Scottish law or administrative practice in the United Kingdom after the date of this annual report.
Insolvency Act 2000
Significant changes to the insolvency regime in England and Wales and Scotland have recently been enacted, including the Insolvency Act 2000. The Insolvency Act 2000 allows certain “small” companies to seek protection from their creditors for a period of 28 days, for the purposes of putting together a company voluntary arrangement, with the option for creditors to extend the moratorium for a further two months. A “small” company is defined as one which satisfies, in any financial year, two or more of the following criteria: (i) its turnover is not more than £5.6 million, (ii) its balance sheet total is not more than £2.8 million and (iii) the number of employees is not more than 50. Whether or not a company is a “small” company may change from period to period and consequently no assurance can be given that the Issuer, Trustees or Funding will not, at any given time, be determined to be a “small” company. The Secretary of State for Trade and Industry may by regulation modify the eligibility requirements for “small” companies and has the power to make different provisions for different cases. No assurance can be given that any such modification or different provisions will not be detrimental to the interests of noteholders.
26
Back to Contents
Secondary legislation has now been enacted which excludes certain special purpose companies in relation to capital markets transactions from the optional moratorium provisions. Such exceptions include (amongst other matters): (i) a company which is a party to an agreement which is or forms part of a capital market arrangement (as defined in the secondary legislation) under which (a) a party has incurred or when the agreement was entered into was expected to incur a debt of at least £10 million under the arrangement and (b) the arrangement involves the issue of a capital market investment (also defined, but generally, a rated, listed or traded bond) and (ii) a company which has incurred a liability (including a present, future or contingent liability) of at least £10 million. While the Issuer, Trustees and Funding should fall within the exceptions, there is no guidance as to how the legislation will be interpreted by a court and the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry may by regulation modify the exception. No assurance may be given that any modification of the eligibility requirements for “small” companies and/or the exceptions will not be detrimental to the interests of noteholders.
If the Issuer and/or Trustees and/or Funding is determined to be a “small” company and determined not to fall within one of the exceptions (by reason of modification of the exceptions or otherwise), then the enforcement of the Issuer security by the security trustee may, for a period, be prohibited by the imposition of a moratorium.
Enterprise Act 2002
On September 15, 2003, the corporate insolvency provisions of the Enterprise Act 2002 (the “Enterprise Act”) came into force, amending certain provisions of the Insolvency Act 1986 as amended (the “Insolvency Act”). These provisions introduced significant reforms to corporate insolvency law. In particular the reforms restrict the right of the holder of a floating charge created after 15th September, 2003 to appoint an administrative receiver (unless an exception applies) and instead gives primacy to collective insolvency procedures (in particular, administration).
The holder of a floating charge created before September 15, 2003 over the whole or substantially the whole of the assets of a company (such as the security trustee under the Funding deed of charge) retains the ability to block the appointment of an administrator by appointing an administrative receiver, who has a duty to primarily act in the interests of the floating charge holder.
The Insolvency Act contains provisions which continue to allow for the appointment of an administrative receiver in relation to certain transactions in the capital markets. The right to appoint an administrative receiver is retained for certain types of security (such as the Issuer security) that form part of a capital markets arrangement (as defined in the Insolvency Act) that involves (i) indebtedness of at least £50,000,000 (or, when the relevant security document was entered into (being in respect of the transactions described in this annual report, the Issuer deed of charge), a party to the relevant transaction (such as the Issuer) was expected to incur a debt of at least £50,000,000) and (ii) the issue of a capital markets investment (also defined but generally a rated, listed or traded bond). The Secretary of State for Trade and Industry may, by secondary legislation, modify this exception and/or provide that the exception shall cease to have effect. No assurance can be given that any such modification or provision in respect of the capital market exception, or its ceasing to be applicable to the transactions described in this document will not adversely affect payments on the Issuer Notes. While the Issuer security should fall within the relevant exception, as the provisions of the Enterprise Act have never been considered judicially, no assurance can be given as to whether the Enterprise Act could have a detrimental effect on the transaction described in this annual report or on the interests of noteholders.
The Insolvency Act also contains a new out-of-court route into administration for a qualifying floating charge holder, the directors or the company itself. The relevant provisions provide for a notice period during which the holder of the floating charge can either agree to the administrator proposed by the directors of the company or appoint an alternative administrator, although the moratorium will take effect immediately after notice is given. If the qualifying floating charge holder does not respond to the directors' notice of intention to appoint, the directors', or as the case may be, the company's appointee will
27
Back to Contents
automatically take office after the notice period has elapsed. Where the holder of a qualifying floating charge within the context of a capital market transaction retains the power to appoint an administrative receiver, such holder may prevent the appointment of an administrator (either by the new out-of-court route or by the court based procedure), by appointing an administrative receiver prior to the appointment of the administrator being completed.
The new provisions of the Insolvency Act give primary emphasis to the rescue of the company as a going concern. The purpose of realising property to make a distribution to one or more secured creditors is subordinated to the primary purposes of rescuing the company as a going concern or achieving a better result for the creditors as a whole than would be likely if the company were wound up. No assurance can be given that the primary purposes of the new provisions will not conflict with the interests of noteholders were the Issuer ever subject to administration.
In addition to the introduction of a prohibition on the appointment of an administrative receiver as set out above, section 176A of the Insolvency Act provides that in relation to floating charges created after September 15, 2003 any receiver (including an administrative receiver), liquidator or administrator of a company is required to make a “prescribed part” of the company's “net property” available for the satisfaction of unsecured debts in priority to the claims of the floating charge holder. The company's “net property” is defined as the amount of the chargor's property which would be available for satisfaction of debts due to the holder(s) of any debentures secured by a floating charge and so refers to any floating charge realisations less any amounts payable to the preferential creditors or in respect of the fees or expenses of administration. The “prescribed part” is defined in The Insolvency Act 1986 (Prescribed Part) Order 2003 (SI 2003/2097) to be an amount equal to 50 per cent. of the first £10,000 of floating charge realisations plus 20 per cent. of the floating charge realisations thereafter, provided that such amount may not exceed £600,000.
This obligation does not apply if the net property is less than a prescribed minimum and the relevant officeholder is of the view that the cost of making a distribution to unsecured creditors would be disproportionate to the benefits. The relevant officeholder may also apply to court for an order that the provisions of section 176A of the Insolvency Act should not apply on the basis that the cost of making a distribution would be disproportionate to the benefits.
Floating charge realisations upon the enforcement of the Issuer security may be reduced by the operation of the “ring fencing” provisions described above.
Capital Adequacy
An authorised person with permission from the FSA to accept deposits by way of business (in other words, a bank) is subject tointer aliathe part of the Handbook known as the “Interim Prudential Sourcebook for Banks”. The Interim Prudential Sourcebook for Banks will be replaced in stages between 2004 and (probably) 2007 as parts of the Integrated Prudential Sourcebook come into force; the Integrated Prudential Sourcebook in relation to mortgage firms (other than banks and building societies) is already in force.
The development of the Integrated Prudential Sourcebook is to take into account the implementation of a range of European directives and international agreements, in particular the New Basel Capital Accord (Basel II) and the related European Capital Requirements Directive (which implements, and indeed goes further than, the New Basel Capital Accord).
Implementation of the New Basel Capital Accord and the risk-weighted asset framework may result in changes to the risk-weighting of the Issuer Notes
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision announced on 11 May 2004 that it had achieved consensus on the remaining issues concerning the framework of the New Basel Capital Accord and
28
Back to Contents
published the text of the new framework on 26 June 2004. The framework is designed to place enhanced emphasis on markets discipline and sensitivity to risk. The text of the framework will serve as the basis for national rule-making and approval processes to continue and for banking organisations to complete their preparations for implementation of the New Basel Accord. The Committee confirmed that it is currently intended that the various approaches under the New Basel Accord will be implemented in stages, some from year-end 2006, the most advanced at year-end 2007.
The new capital framework proposed consists of three '“pillars”: (i) minimum regulatory capital requirements, (ii) supervisory review of an institution's internal assessment process and capital adequacy and (iii) effective use of disclosure to strengthen market discipline.
Consequently, noteholders should consult their own advisers as to the consequences to, and effect on, any noteholder of the proposed implementation of the New Basel Capital Accord.
Item 4. INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY |
|
A. HISTORY AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE COMPANY |
|
Not applicable. |
|
B. BUSINESS OVERVIEW |
|
Not applicable. |
|
C. ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE |
|
Not applicable. |
|
D. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT |
The property of the Issuer consists solely of its right to receive payments of interest and principal from Funding on the various Term Advances made under the First Intercompany Loan Agreement. The property of Funding consists of its interest in the trust property held by Trustees together with amounts available under two reserve funds and its right to receive certain payments of principal and interest from the trust property controlled by Trustees. The trust property includes the loans in the portfolio at the closing date or which have subsequently been assigned to Trustees thereafter (including any new drawings under flexible loans) and their related security and any income generated by the loans or their related security. The composition of the trust property will fluctuate as drawings under flexible loans and new loans are added and as the loans that were previously part of the trust property are repaid, mature, default or are repurchased by the seller. The trust property also includes any money in the mortgages trustee guaranteed investment contract (or GIC) account and in any other bank account or bank accounts held by Trustees (as agreed by Trustees, Funding, the seller and the security trustee) from time to time, called the alternative accounts. The mortgages trustee GIC account is the bank account in which Trustees holds any cash that is part of the trust property until it is distributed to the beneficiaries. The alternative accounts are accounts into which payments by some mortgage borrowers are paid initially.
The officers’ certificate of compliance of the Issuer, executed by two directors of the Issuer is filed as Exhibit 10.18 to this Annual Report on Form 20-F. The certificate of compliance contains a statement that during the period from July 26, 2000 to April 30, 2005, to the best of the knowledge and belief of the signatories, the Issuer has complied with all its obligations contained in the First Issuer Trust Deed and each of the Transaction Documents (as defined in the First Issuer Trust Deed) to which it is a
29
Back to Contents
party. It also contains a statement that as at April 30, 2005, there did not exist and had not existed since July 26, 2000, any Note Event of Default (as defined in the First Issuer Trust Deed).
Item 5. OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS |
|
A. OPERATING RESULTS |
|
Not applicable. |
|
B. LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES |
|
Not applicable. |
|
C. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, PATENTS AND LICENSES, ETC. |
|
Not applicable. |
|
D. TREND INFORMATION |
|
Not applicable. |
|
E. Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements |
|
Not applicable. |
|
F. TABULAR DISCLOSURE OF CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS |
|
Not applicable. |
|
Item 6. DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES |
|
A. DIRECTORS AND SENIOR MANAGEMENT |
|
The following sets out the names, business addresses and business occupations of the directors of the Issuer, Funding and Trustees. Because each of the Issuer, Funding and Trustees is organized as a special purpose company and will be largely passive, it is expected that the directors of each entity in that capacity will manage its operations to the extent necessary. |
|
Issuer
| | |
Name | Business Address | Business Occupation |
| | |
Martin McDermott | SPV Management Limited Tower 42 25 Old Broad Street London EC2N 1HQ | Executive Director of SPV Management Limited |
| | |
SPV Management Limited | SPV Management Limited Tower 42 25 Old Broad Street London EC2N 1HQ | Management of special purpose companies |
| | |
30
Back to Contents
David Green | Abbey National House 2 Triton Square Regent’s Place London NW1 3AN | Finance Director, Banking, Abbey National plc |
| | |
Funding | | |
| | |
Name | Business Address | Business Occupation |
| | |
Martin McDermott | SPV Management Limited Tower 42 25 Old Broad Street London EC2N 1HQ | Executive Director of SPV Management Limited |
| | |
SPV Management Limited | SPV Management Limited Tower 42 25 Old Broad Street London EC2N 1HQ | Management of special purpose companies |
| | |
David Green | Abbey National House 2 Triton Square Regent’s Place London NW1 3AN | Finance Director, Banking, Abbey National plc |
| | |
Trustees | | |
| | |
Name | Business Address | Business Occupation |
| | |
Martin McDermott | SPV Management Limited Tower 42 25 Old Broad Street London EC2N 1HQ | Executive Director of SPV Management Limited |
| | |
SPV Management Limited | SPV Management Limited Tower 42 25 Old Broad Street London EC2N 1HQ | Management of special purpose companies |
| | |
David Green | Abbey National House 2 Triton Square Regent’s Place London NW1 3AN | Finance Director, Banking, Abbey National plc |
| | |
David Green is an employee of Abbey National plc, the seller. |
|
B. COMPENSATION |
|
None of the Issuer, Funding or Trustees pays remuneration directly to any director. |
|
C. BOARD PRACTICES |
31
Back to Contents
Not applicable. |
|
D. EMPLOYEES |
|
Not applicable. |
|
E. SHARE OWNERSHIP |
|
Not applicable. |
|
Item 7. MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS |
|
A. MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS |
|
Each of the Issuer, Funding and Trustees is wholly owned by Holmes Holdings Limited, a private limited company incorporated under the laws of England and Wales. SPV Management Limited holds all of the beneficial interest in the issued shares of Holmes Holdings Limited on a discretionary trust for persons employed as nurses in the United Kingdom and for charitable purposes. SPV Management Limited is not affiliated with Abbey National plc. |
|
B. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS |
|
None, other than with respect to the making of payments in respect to the securities as described in the Registration Statement and “Item 3.D. – Risk Factors.” |
|
C. INTERESTS OF EXPERTS AND COUNSEL |
|
Not applicable to annual reports on Form 20-F. |
|
Item 8. FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
|
For a discussion of the available financial information, see “Item 3.A. – Selected Financial Information.” |
|
Litigation. The Issuer knows of no material legal proceedings involving the Issuer. Funding knows of no material legal proceedings involving Funding. Trustees knows of no material legal proceedings involving Trustees or the trust. |
|
Item 9. THE LISTING |
|
A. LISTING DETAILS |
|
Not applicable. |
|
B. PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION |
|
Not applicable to annual reports on Form 20-F. |
|
C. MARKETS |
|
The principal trading market for each class of Issuer Notes is the London Stock Exchange. The Issuer Notes have been listed on the London Stock Exchange since July 26, 2000. |
32
Back to Contents
D. SELLING SHAREHOLDERS |
|
Not applicable to annual reports on Form 20-F. |
|
E. DILUTION |
|
Not applicable to annual reports on Form 20-F. |
|
F. EXPENSES OF THE ISSUE |
|
Not applicable to annual reports on Form 20-F. |
|
Item 10. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION |
|
A. SHARE CAPITAL |
|
Not applicable to annual reports on Form 20-F. |
|
B. MEMORANDUM AND ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION |
|
Not applicable. |
|
C. MATERIAL CONTRACTS |
|
Not applicable other than with respect to contracts relating to the securities, which were described in the Registration Statement on Form S-11 relating to the securities (file number 333-12250). |
|
D. EXCHANGE CONTROLS |
|
None. |
|
E. TAXATION |
|
United Kingdom Taxation |
|
The following section summarizes the material UK tax consequences of the purchase, ownership and disposition of the Issuer Notes based on current law and practice in the UK. The summary assumes that all payments made pursuant to the final documentation are calculated on arm’s length terms. The summary does not purport to be a complete analysis of all tax considerations of the purchase, ownership and disposition of the Issuer Notes. It relates to the position of persons who are the absolute beneficial owners of Issuer Notes and may not apply to certain classes of persons such as dealers or persons connected with the Issuer. Holders of Issuer Notes who are unsure as to their tax position should seek their own professional advice. |
|
Taxation of US residents |
|
As discussed in more detail under “Withholding tax” below, no UK withholding tax will be required in relation to interest payments on the Issuer Notes provided that the Issuer Notes are and remain at all times listed on a recognised stock exchange. On the basis of the United Kingdom Inland Revenue’s published interpretation of the relevant legislation, this requirement is satisfied providing the Issuer Notes are listed by the Financial Services Authority and admitted to trading on the London Stock Exchange. |
|
33
Back to Contents
As discussed in more detail under “Direct Assessment of non-UK holders of Issuer Notes to UK tax on interest” below, a noteholder who is resident in the US for US tax purposes and not resident in the UK for UK tax purposes will not be subject to UK tax by direct assessment in respect of any payments on the Issuer Notes unless such noteholder carries on a trade, profession or vocation through a branch or agency in the UK in connection with which payments on the Issuer Notes are received or to which the Issuer Notes are attributable and where that noteholder is a company, unless that noteholder carries on a trade in the UK through a permanent establishment in connection with which the payments on the Issuer Notes are received or to which the Issuer Notes are attributable.
Subject as set out in the rest of this paragraph, residents of the US who are not subject to UK tax by direct assessment are generally not subject to tax in the UK on payments on the Issuer Notes under the terms of the double taxation treaty dated July 24, 2001 between the US and the UK (the “Treaty”) provided that the amounts paid on the Issuer Notes do not exceed the return on comparable debt instruments. To the extent that the amounts paid do exceed such a return, the UK may tax the excess in accordance with UK domestic law. In order for such US residents to avoid being subject to tax in the UK on such payments, they must satisfy the requirements of the Limitation on Benefits article of the Treaty and the necessary administrative formalities must be completed. Treaty relief will not be available where a payment on the Issuer Notes is attributable to a permanent establishment of the noteholder situated in the UK or if certain other exceptions apply. Noteholders who are entitled to greater benefits under the double taxation treaty dated December 31, 1975 between the US and the UK (the “Old Treaty”) are able to elect for the provisions of the Old Treaty to continue to apply to them for a period of 12 months from the date on which the provisions of the Treaty otherwise would have effect under paragraph (2) of Article 29 of the Treaty (in respect of UK taxes withheld at source: 12 months from May 1, 2003; in respect of UK corporation tax: 12 months from April 1, 2003; in respect of UK income tax not withheld at source and UK capital gains tax: 12 months from April 6, 2003).
Withholding tax
There will be no UK withholding tax in relation to interest payments on the Issuer Notes provided that, so far as concerns deduction by the Issuer or its paying agents, the Issuer Notes are and remain at all times listed on a “recognised stock exchange”, as defined in Section 841 of the UK Income and Corporation Taxes Act 1988. On the basis of the United Kingdom Inland Revenue’s published interpretation of this legislation, securities which are to be listed on a stock exchange in the UK will satisfy this requirement if they are listed by a competent authority in that country and are admitted to trading on a recognised stock exchange in that country. The London Stock Exchange is a recognised stock exchange for this purpose. The Inland Revenue is able to obtain information about individual holders of the Issuer Notes to whom or, in certain circumstances, for whose benefit interest is paid. Information so obtained may, in certain circumstances, be exchanged by the Inland Revenue with the tax authorities of other jurisdictions.
On June 3, 2003 the Council of the European Union adopted a Directive (2003/48/EC) regarding the taxation of savings income. Subject to a number of important conditions being met, it is proposed that member states will be required, from a date not earlier than July 1, 2005, to provide to the tax authorities of other member states details of payments of interest and other similar income paid by a person within a member state's jurisdiction to an individual in another member state, except that Austria, Belgium and Luxembourg will instead impose a withholding system for a transitional period, unless during such period they elect otherwise (the ending of such transitional period being dependent upon the conclusion of certain other agreements relating to information exchange with certain other countries).
34
Back to Contents
Direct assessment of non-UK resident holders of Issuer Notes to UK tax on interest
The interest on the Issuer Notes has a UK source. Accordingly, payments on the Issuer Notes will in principle be within the charge to UK tax even if paid without withholding or deduction. However, such payments will not be chargeable to UK tax in the hands of a noteholder who is not resident for UK tax purposes in the UK unless (i) such holder carries on a trade, profession or vocation in the UK through a UK branch or agency in connection with which the payments are received or to which the Issuer Notes are attributable (subject to exemptions for interest received by certain categories of agent such as some brokers and investment managers) or (ii) such noteholder is a company and carries on a trade in the UK through a permanent establishment in connection with which the payments are received or to which the Issuer Notes are attributable, in which case tax may be levied on the UK branch or agency or the UK permanent establishment, as applicable.
Taxation of returns: companies within the charge to UK corporation tax
Noteholders who are within the charge to UK corporation tax (other than authorised unit trusts) will normally be subject to tax on all profits and gains, including interest, and (in respect of all accounting periods commencing on or after October 1, 2002) all foreign exchange gains and losses arising on or in connection with the Issuer Notes under the loan relationship rules contained in the Finance Act 1996. Any such profits and gains will generally fall to be calculated in accordance with the statutory accounting treatment of the Issuer Notes in the hands of the relevant noteholder, and will generally be charged to tax as income in respect of each accounting period to which they are allocated, in accordance with that accounting treatment. Relief may be available in respect of losses or for related expenses on a similar basis.
For holders within the charge to UK corporation tax (other than authorised unit trusts and investment trusts), the series 2 Issuer Notes will (in respect of all accounting periods commenced prior to October 1, 2002) be qualifying assets for the purposes of the taxation of foreign exchange gains and losses. Any changes in the sterling value of such Issuer Notes as a result of changes in the sterling/US dollar exchange rate or the sterling/euro exchange rate, as appropriate, during each such accounting period in which such a holder holds such Issuer Notes will generally be taxed or relieved by reference to the holder’s accounting treatment of such Issuer Notes.
Taxation of returns: other noteholders
Noteholders who are not within the charge to UK corporation tax and who are resident or ordinarily resident in the UK for UK tax purposes or who carry on a trade, profession or vocation in the UK through a branch or agency in connection with which interest on the Issuer Notes is received or to which the Issuer Notes are attributable will generally be liable to UK tax on the amount of any interest received in respect of the Issuer Notes. The series 2 Issuer Notes will not be qualifying corporate bonds within the meaning of Section 117 of the United Kingdom Taxation of Chargeable Gains Act 1992 and therefore a disposal of such an Issuer Note by such a noteholder may give rise to a chargeable gain or an allowable loss for the purpose of UK capital gains tax.
A disposal of Issuer Notes by a noteholder who is resident or ordinarily resident in the UK for UK tax purposes or who carries on a trade in the UK through a branch or agency to which the Issuer Notes are attributable may also give rise to a charge to tax on income in respect of an amount representing interest accrued on the Issuer Notes since the preceding payment date. For Issuer Notes which constitute variable rate securities, taxation in respect of such a disposal will be computed on the basis that such amount as the Inland Revenue considers to be just and reasonable will be treated as accrued income. However, the transferee of a variable rate security will not be entitled to any relief on such amount. All of the series 2 Issuer Notes will constitute variable rate Issuer Notes for this purpose.
35
Back to Contents
Stamp duty and stamp duty reserve tax
No UK stamp duty or stamp duty reserve tax is payable on the issue or transfer of the offered global Issuer Notes or on the issue or transfer of an Issuer Note in definitive form.
UK taxation of Funding and the Issuer
Funding and the Issuer will generally be subject to UK corporation tax, currently at a rate of 30 per cent., on the profit reflected in their respective profit and loss accounts as increased by the amounts of any non-deductible expenses or losses. Examples of non-deductible expenses and losses include general provisions for bad debts. In respect of Funding, the profit in the profit and loss account will not exceed 0.01 per cent., of the Funding available revenue receipts. In respect of the Issuer, the profit in the profit and loss account will not exceed 0.02 per cent., of the interest on the issuer term advances under the issuer intercompany loan. See the risk factor “Tax payable by Funding or the Issuer may adversely affect the Issuer’s ability to make payments on the Issuer Notes”.
UK taxation of Trustees
Trustees will have no liability to UK tax in respect of any income, profit or gain arising under these arrangements, apart from a liability to UK corporation tax on amounts, such as trustee fees and expenses, which are paid to Trustees for its own benefit. Accordingly, Trustees will have no liability to UK tax in relation to amounts which it receives on behalf of Funding or the seller under the mortgages trust. For the avoidance of doubt, references to “Trustees” in this paragraph are to Holmes Trustees Limited only.
United States Taxation
General
The following section summarizes the material federal income tax consequences of the purchase, ownership and disposition of the series 2 class A Issuer Notes, series 2 class B Issuer Notes and series 2 class C Issuer Notes (the “US Issuer Notes”) that may be relevant to a noteholder that is a “US holder” (as defined later in this section). In general, the summary assumes that a holder acquires a US Issuer Note at original issuance and holds such Note as a capital asset. It does not purport to be a comprehensive description of all the tax considerations that may be relevant to a decision to purchase the US Issuer Notes. In particular, it does not discuss special tax considerations that may apply to certain types of taxpayers, including dealers in stocks, securities or notional principal contracts; traders in securities electing to mark to market; banks, savings and loan associations and similar financial institutions; taxpayers whose functional currency is other than the US dollar; and taxpayers that hold a US Issuer Note as part of a hedge or straddle or a conversion transaction, within the meaning of section 1258 of the US Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). In addition, this summary does not describe any tax consequences arising under the laws of any taxing jurisdiction other than the US federal government.
This summary is based on the US tax laws, regulations, rulings and decisions in effect or available on the effective date of the registration statement. All of the foregoing are subject to change, and any change may apply retroactively and could affect the continued validity of this summary.
The Issuer suggests that US holders consult their own tax advisors as to the US federal income tax consequences of the purchase, ownership and disposition of the US Issuer Notes, including the possible application of state, local, non-US or other tax laws, and other US tax issues affecting the transaction.
As used in this section, the term “US holder” means a person who is a citizen or resident of the United States, a US domestic corporation or partnership, or any other person subject to US federal income tax on a net income basis in respect of a US Issuer Note.
36
Back to Contents
Characterization of the US Issuer Notes
Although there is no authority regarding the treatment of instruments that are substantially similar to the US Issuer Notes, the Issuer believes that the US Issuer Notes will be treated as debt for US federal income tax purposes (either of the Issuer or of Funding). The Issuer intends to treat the US Issuer Notes as indebtedness of the Issuer for all purposes, including US tax purposes. The discussion in the next section assumes this result.
The US Issuer Notes will not be qualifying real property loans in the hands of domestic savings and loan associations, real estate investment trusts, or REMICs under sections 7701(a)(19)(C), 856(c)(5)(A) or 860G(a)(3) of the Code, respectively.
Taxation of US holders of the US Issuer Notes
Qualified Stated Interest.A US holder of a US Issuer Note will treat stated interest on such US Note as ordinary interest income when paid or accrued, in accordance with its tax method of accounting.
Sales and Retirement. In general, a US holder of a US Issuer Note will have a basis in such Note equal to the cost of the US Issuer Note to such holder, and reduced by any payments thereon other than payments of stated interest. Upon a sale or exchange of the US Issuer Note, a US holder will generally recognize gain or loss equal to the difference between the amount realized (less any accrued interest, which would be taxable as such) and the holder’s tax basis in the US Issuer Note. Such gain or loss will be long-term capital gain or loss if the US holder has held the US Issuer Note for more than one year at the time of disposition. In certain circumstances, US holders that are individuals may be entitled to preferential treatment for net long-term capital gains. The ability of US holders to offset capital losses against ordinary income is limited.
Market Discout and Bond Premium.If a US holder purchased US Issuer Notes for a price greater or less than their stated principal amount, such notes may be subject to special US tax rules relating to market discount or bond premium. US holders should consult their own advisors regarding the tax consequences of these rules.
US Issuer Notes as debt of Funding
The U.S. Internal Revenue Service could possibly seek to characterize the series 2 class A Issuer Notes, the series 2 class B Issuer Notes and the series 2 class C Issuer Notes as ownership interests in the issuer series 2 term AAA advance, the issuer series 2 term AA advance and the issuer series 2 term BBB advance, respectively, rather than as debt of the Issuer. If the U.S. Internal Revenue Service were successful in such a characterization, a US holder of a US Issuer Note would be treated as owning (i) a pro rata share of the related issuer term advance between Funding and the Issuer (“related advance”), which will be treated as debt for US federal income tax purposes and (ii) an interest in the related issuer currency swap. Treasury regulations permit taxpayers meeting certain requirements to integrate a debt instrument and a related currency hedge and to treat them for most tax purposes as if they were a synthetic debt instrument having the terms of the debt instrument and hedge combined. Integrating the related advance and issuer currency swap would create a synthetic debt instrument having the characteristics of the US Issuer Notes and hence would produce largely the same result as if the US Issuer Notes were not recharacterized as debt of Funding.
The integration regulations apply only if a taxpayer creates a record identifying the debt instrument and hedge on or before the close of the date the hedge is entered into. The Issuer will create a record that is intended to provide such identification effective for each US holder as of the date of acquisition of a US Issuer Note. By its acquisition of a US Issuer Note, each US holder will be treated as having appointed the Issuer as its agent for this purpose. The U.S. Internal Revenue Service could challenge the effectiveness of such an identification made on behalf of a group of taxpayers. The
37
Back to Contents
integration rules would not apply to a US holder that is related to the Issuer swap provider to the issuer currency swap.
If the issuer currency swap terminated before the US Issuer Notes were retired, and the integration regulations applied, then a US holder may be considered to recognize gain or loss as if the holder had sold for fair market value his interest in the related advance. Moreover, for periods following such termination, the integration rules would no longer apply to the related advance except in the discretion of the U.S. Internal Revenue Service.
If the issuer currency swap were not integrated with the related advance, then a US holder would calculate separately income and deductions from the issuer currency swap and income from the related advance. For most holders, the tax consequences of treating the issuer currency swap and related advances separately would be similar to the treatment if they were combined, but there could be differences. For example, income from the issuer currency swap may be sourced differently from income from the related advance. Individual taxpayers may be allowed deductions for payments made under the issuer currency swap only as a miscellaneous itemized deduction (which is allowed for regular tax purposes only subject to limitations and is not allowed for alternative minimum tax purposes). US holders may wish to consult their own tax advisors regarding the possible treatment of US Issuer Notes as debt of Funding, application of the integration rules, and the consequences of an inability to integrate the issuer currency swap and the related advance.
F. DIVIDENDS AND PAYING AGENTS
Not applicable to annual reports on Form 20-F.
G. STATEMENT BY EXPERTS
Not applicable to annual reports on Form 20-F.
H. DOCUMENTS ON DISPLAY
The Issuer, Funding and Trustees are subject to the information requirements of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and are therefore required to file reports, including annual reports on Form 20-F, and other information with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. These materials, including this annual report and the exhibits thereto, may be inspected and copied at the Commission’s public reference rooms in Washington, DC, New York, NY and Chicago, IL. Please call the Commission at +1-800-732-0330 for further information on the public reference rooms. As foreign private issuers, the Issuer, Funding and Trustees are not required to make filings with the Commission by electronic means, although we are entitled to do so. Any filings we make electronically will be made available to the public over the internet at the Commission’s web site at http://www.sec.gov.
I. SUBSIDIARY INFORMATION
Not applicable to annual reports on Form 20-F.
Item 11. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
See the Periodic Reports referred to in “Item 3.A. – Selected Financial Information.”
Item 12. DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES
Not applicable to annual reports on Form 20-F.
38
Back to Contents
PART II
Item 13. Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies
None.
Item 14. Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders
None.
Item 15. Controls and Procedures
Not applicable.
Item 16A. Audit Committee Financial Expert
Not applicable.
Item 16B. Code of Ethics
Not applicable.
Item 16C. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
Not applicable.
Item 16D. Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees
Not applicable.
Item 16E. Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
Not applicable.
PART III
Item 17. Financial Statements
Not applicable.
Item 18. Financial Statements
Not applicable.
Item 19. Exhibits
The following documents are filed as part of the Annual Report on Form 20-F:
39
Back to Contents
1. | Exhibit 1: a copy of the Memorandum and Articles of Association of each of the Issuer, Funding and Trustees is incorporated by reference from the previously filed Registration Statement on Form S-11 relating to the securities (file number 333-12250). |
| |
2. | Exhibit 2: instruments defining the rights of the security holders are incorporated by reference from the previously filed Registration Statement on Form S-11 relating to the securities (file number 333-12250). |
| |
3. | Exhibit 10.1: Periodic Report for the period from December 9, 2003 to January 8, 2004 (incorporated by reference from the Form 6-K previously filed on January 20, 2004). |
| |
4. | Exhibit 10.2: Periodic Report for the period from January 9, 2004 to February 9, 2004 (incorporated by reference from the Form 6-K previously filed on March 1, 2004). |
| |
5. | Exhibit 10.3: Periodic Report for the period from February 10, 2004 to March 8, 2004 (incorporated by reference from the Form 6-K previously filed on March 22, 2004). |
| |
6. | Exhibit 10.4: Periodic Report for the period from March 9, 2004 to April 8, 2004 (incorporated by reference from the Form 6-K previously filed on April 30, 2004). |
| |
7. | Exhibit 10.5: Periodic Report for the period from April 9, 2004 to May 10, 2004 (incorporated by reference from the Form 6-K previously filed on May 26, 2004). |
| |
8. | Exhibit 10.6: Periodic Report for the period from May 11, 2004 to June 8, 2004 (incorporated by reference from the Form 6-K previously filed on June 16, 2004). |
| |
9. | Exhibit 10.7: Periodic Report for the period from June 9, 2004 to July 8, 2004 (incorporated by reference from the Form 6-K previously filed on July 28, 2004). |
| |
10. | Exhibit 10.8: Periodic Report for the period from July 9, 2004 to August 9, 2004 (incorporated by reference from the Form 6-K previously filed on September 1, 2004). |
| |
11. | Exhibit 10.9: Periodic Report for the period from August 10, 2004 to September 8, 2004 (incorporated by reference from the Form 6-K previously filed on September 29, 2004). |
| |
12. | Exhibit 10.10: Periodic Report for the period from September 9, 2004 to October 8, 2004 (incorporated by reference from the Form 6-K previously filed on October 29, 2004). |
| |
13. | Exhibit 10.11: Periodic Report for the period from October 9, 2004 to November 8, 2004 (incorporated by reference from the Form 6-K previously filed on December 1, 2004). |
| |
14. | Exhibit 10.12: Periodic Report for the period from November 9, 2004 to December 8, 2004 (incorporated by reference from the Form 6-K previously filed on December 29, 2004). |
| |
15. | Exhibit 10.13: Periodic Report for the period from December 9, 2004 to January 10, 2005 (incorporated by reference from the Form 6-K previously filed on January 31, 2005). |
| |
16. | Exhibit 10.14: Profit and Loss Accounts and Balance Sheets for the period ended January 15, 2004 (incorporated by reference from the Form 6-K previously filed on March 1, 2004). |
| |
17. | Exhibit 10.15: Profit and Loss Accounts and Balance Sheets for the period ended April 15, 2004 (incorporated by reference from the Form 6-K previously filed on May 20, 2004). |
40
Back to Contents
18. | Exhibit 10.16: Profit and Loss Accounts and Balance Sheets for the period ended July 15, 2004 (incorporated by reference from the Form 6-K previously filed on August 17, 2004). |
| |
19. | Exhibit 10.17: Profit and Loss Accounts and Balance Sheets for the period ended October 15, 2004 (incorporated by reference from the Form 6-K previously filed on June 10, 2005). |
| |
20. | Exhibit 10.18: Certificate Relating to Financial Information pursuant to the First Issuer Trust Deed dated April 30, 2005 (incorporated by reference from the Form 6-K previously filed on June 13, 2005). |
| |
21. | Exhibit 10.19: Report and Accounts for Holmes Financing (No. 1) PLC for the year ended December 31, 2004. |
| |
22. | Exhibit 10.20: Report and Accounts for Holmes Funding Limited for the year ended December 31, 2004. |
| |
23. | Exhibit 10.21: Report and Accounts for Holmes Trustees Limited for the year ended December 31, 2004. |
| |
24. | Exhibit 12.1: Certificate pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002. |
| |
25. | Exhibit 13.1: Certificate pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002. |
41
Back to Contents
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, each of the registrant certifies that it meets all the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and has duly caused this Annual Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
HOLMES TRUSTEES LIMITED |
| |
| |
By: | /s/ Martin McDermott |
Name: | Martin McDermott |
Title: | Director |
| |
HOLMES FUNDING LIMITED |
| |
| |
By: | /s/ Martin McDermott |
Name: | Martin McDermott |
Title: | Director |
| |
HOLMES FINANCING (NO. 1) PLC |
| |
| |
By: | /s/ Martin McDermott |
Name: | Martin McDermott |
Title: | Director |
| |
| |
Dated: | June 30, 2005 |
42
Back to Contents
EXHIBIT INDEX
• | Exhibit 1: A copy of the Memorandum and Articles of Association of each of the Issuer, Funding and Trustees is incorporated by reference from the previously filed Registration Statement on Form S-11 relating to the securities (file number 333-12250). |
| |
• | Exhibit 2: Instruments defining the rights of the security holders are incorporated by reference from the previously filed Registration Statement on Form S-11 relating to the securities (file number 333-12250). |
| |
• | Exhibit 10.1: Periodic Report for the period from December 9, 2003 to January 8, 2004 (incorporated by reference from the Form 6-K previously filed on January 20, 2004). |
| |
• | Exhibit 10.2: Periodic Report for the period from January 9, 2004 to February 9, 2004 (incorporated by reference from the Form 6-K previously filed on March 1, 2004). |
| |
• | Exhibit 10.3: Periodic Report for the period from February 10, 2004 to March 8, 2004 (incorporated by reference from the Form 6-K previously filed on March 22, 2004). |
| |
• | Exhibit 10.4: Periodic Report for the period from March 9, 2004 to April 8, 2004 (incorporated by reference from the Form 6-K previously filed on April 30, 2004). |
| |
• | Exhibit 10.5: Periodic Report for the period from April 9, 2004 to May 10, 2004 (incorporated by reference from the Form 6-K previously filed on May 26, 2004). |
| |
• | Exhibit 10.6: Periodic Report for the period from May 11, 2004 to June 8, 2004 (incorporated by reference from the Form 6-K previously filed on June 16, 2004). |
| |
• | Exhibit 10.7: Periodic Report for the period from June 9, 2004 to July 8, 2004 (incorporated by reference from the Form 6-K previously filed on July 28, 2004). |
| |
• | Exhibit 10.8: Periodic Report for the period from July 9, 2004 to August 9, 2004 (incorporated by reference from the Form 6-K previously filed on September 1, 2004). |
| |
• | Exhibit 10.9: Periodic Report for the period from August 10, 2004 to September 8, 2004 (incorporated by reference from the Form 6-K previously filed on September 29, 2004). |
| |
• | Exhibit 10.10: Periodic Report for the period from September 9, 2004 to October 8, 2004 (incorporated by reference from the Form 6-K previously filed on October 29, 2004). |
| |
• | Exhibit 10.11: Periodic Report for the period from October 9, 2004 to November 8, 2004 (incorporated by reference from the Form 6-K previously filed on December 1, 2004). |
| |
• | Exhibit 10.12: Periodic Report for the period from November 9, 2004 to December 8, 2004 (incorporated by reference from the Form 6-K previously filed on December 29, 2004). |
| |
• | Exhibit 10.13: Periodic Report for the period from December 9, 2004 to January 10, 2005 (incorporated by reference from the Form 6-K previously filed on January 31, 2005). |
| |
• | Exhibit 10.14: Profit and Loss Accounts and Balance Sheets for the period ended January 15, 2004 (incorporated by reference from the Form 6-K previously filed on March 1, 2004). |
43
Back to Contents
• | Exhibit 10.15: Profit and Loss Accounts and Balance Sheets for the period ended April 15, 2004 (incorporated by reference from the Form 6-K previously filed on May 20, 2004). |
| |
• | Exhibit 10.16: Profit and Loss Accounts and Balance Sheets for the period ended July 15, 2004 (incorporated by reference from the Form 6-K previously filed on August 17, 2004). |
| |
• | Exhibit 10.17: Profit and Loss Accounts and Balance Sheets for the period ended October 15, 2004 (incorporated by reference from the Form 6-K previously filed on June 10, 2005). |
| |
• | Exhibit 10.18: Certificate Relating to Financial Information pursuant to the First Issuer Trust Deed dated April 30, 2005 (incorporated by reference from the Form 6-K previously filed on June 13, 2005) |
| |
• | Exhibit 10.19: Report and Accounts for Holmes Financing (No. 1) PLC for the year ended December 31, 2004. |
| |
• | Exhibit 10.20: Report and Accounts for Holmes Funding Limited for the year ended December 31, 2004. |
| |
• | Exhibit 10.21: Report and Accounts for Holmes Trustees Limited for the year ended December 31, 2004. |
| |
• | Exhibit 12.1: Certificate pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002. |
| |
• | Exhibit 13.1: Certificate pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002. |
| |