Friendly Energy Exploration 10K/A 2009 Annual report (amended)

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K/A

Amendment No. 1


x	ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

	For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2009

☐	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT

For the transition period from ________ to ______

FRIENDLY ENERGY EXPLORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



Nevada	000-31423	91-1832462
(State or other jurisdiction	(Commission File Number)	(IRS Employer
of Incorporation)		Identification Number)
	502 North Division Street Carson City, NV 89703
	(Address of principal executive offices)
	(702) 953-0411
	(Registrant’s Telephone Number)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yes ☐ No x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1 934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes ☐ No x

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o

The aggregate market value of common stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant on June 30, 2009, based on the closing price of $.006 on that date was $129,000. For purposes of calculating this amount only, all directors, executive officers and shareholders owning in excess of ten percent (10%) of the Registrant’s outstanding common stock have been treated as affiliates.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large Accelerated Filer

☐

Accelerated Filer

☐

Non-Accelerated Filer

☐

Smaller Reporting Company

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes o

No x

As of March 22, 2010, there were 52,568,790 shares of the registrant’s $.001 par value common stock issued and outstanding.

Documents incorporated by reference: None

FRIENDLY ENERGY EXPLORATION

Table of Contents


		Page
	PART I

Item 1	Business	5
Item 1A	Risk Factors	7
Item 1B	Unresolved Staff Comments	7
Item 2	Properties	7
Item 3	Legal Proceedings	8
Item 4	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	8

	PART II

It em 5	Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	9
Item 6	Selected Financial Data	10
Item 7	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	11
Item 7A	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	13
Item 8	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	14
Item 9	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	31
Item 9A(T)	Controls and Procedures	31
Item 9B	Other Information	32

	PART III

Item 10	Directors and Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	32
Item 11	Executive Compensation	34
Item 12	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	36
Item 13	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions	37
Item 14	Principal Accountant Fees and Services	37

	PART IV

Item 15	Exhibits	38

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). These forward-looking statements are not historical facts but rather are based on current expectations, estimates and projections. We may use words such as “anticipate,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “foresee,” “estimate” and variations of these words and similar expressions to identify forward-looking statements. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and other factors, some of which are beyond our control, are difficult to predict and could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or forecasted. These risks and uncertainties include the following:

The availability and adequacy of our cash flow to meet our requirements;

Economic, competitive, demographic, business and other conditions in our local and regional markets;

Changes or developments in laws, regulations or taxes in our industry;

Actions taken or omitted to be taken by third parties including our competitors, as well as legislative, regulatory, judicial and other governmental authorities;

Competition in our industry;

The loss of or failure to obtain any license o r permit necessary or desirable in the operation of our business;

Changes in our business strategy, capital improvements or development plans;

The availability of additional capital to support improvements and development; and

Other risks identified in this report and in our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission or the SEC.

You should read this report completely and with the understanding that actual future results may be materially different from what we expect. The forward looking statements included in this report are made as of the date of this report and should be evaluated with consideration of any changes occurring after the date of this Report. We will not update forward-looking statements even though our situation may change in the future and we assume no obligation to update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Use of Term

Except as otherwise indicated by the context, references in this report to “Company”, “FEGR”, “Friendly”, “we,&# 148; “us” and “our” are references to Friendly Energy Exploration. All references to “USD” or United States Dollars refer to the legal currency of the United States of America.

EXPLANATORY NOTE

Friendly Energy Exploration (the “Company”) is filing this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A to amend its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (S.E.C.) on March 31, 2010. The purpose of this Amendment No. 1 is to respond to S.E. C. comments made to the Company in a letter dated May 6, 2010. As a result of these comments, the financial statements have been restated as described in Note 11 to the financial statements. Also, several disclosures have been expanded. This Amendment No. 1 does not otherwise update information in the Original Filing to reflect facts or events occurring subsequent to the date of the Original Filing.

Currently-dated certifications from the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have been included as exhibits to this Amendment No. 1.

PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

History

Friendly Energy Exploration was formed under the laws of the State of Nevada on January 7, 1993, under the name Eco-Systems Marketing. Eco-Systems subsequently changed its name to Rama Financial Corporation. An amendment to the Articles of Incorporation was filed changing the corporate name to Friendly Energy Corporation and then to Friendly Energy Exploration in April 2008.

Friendly Energy Exploration was originally incorporated to engage in any lawful act or activity for which corporations may be organized under the General Corporation Law of Nevada. Friendly Energy Exploration, from its inception in 1993 to 2005, was engaged primarily in establishing itself as an electric service provider.

Overview

Our primary focus is on acquiring leases and wells in established oil fields to minimize risk. We expect to build share value through revenue from oil & gas wells.

We have reworked three existing oil wells on one of the leases and soon will be pumping into our refurbished tank farm.

During 2010, we plan to rework an additional fifteen wells, to reenter seven plugged wells and to drill at least two “in-fill” wells on the leases. The estimated cost is $400,000 to $500,000 for rework and reentry including additional infrastructure costs. Drilling and completing a Fry well will cost $150,000 to $180,000. Drilling and completing a Marble Falls well will cos t $250,000 to $300,000. It may be possible to fund a substantial part of this cost from oil & gas revenues.

Mission

Friendly Energy Exploration engages in the acquisition, exploration, development and operation of oil and gas properties in the United States. Our primary focus is on acquiring leases and wells in established oil fields to minimize risk. The Company expects to build share value through revenue from oil and gas wells.

The Company was founded in 1993. It was originally an Energy Service Provider (ESP) for electricity in California after the State deregulated power. A few years later the State reversed course and put ESPs out of business. It then began marketing cogeneration equipment to companies concerne d about high electricity prices and brownouts. For several years the Company was dormant and then in 2005 began investing in oil and gas joint ventures. The Company has recently found a niche market acquiring leases in established, low risk oil fields which have been poorly operated and shut-in. In the past six months the acquisition program has been very successful. Four leases have been acquired in Central Texas totaling 1,036 acres of which approximately 560 acres are in defined oil and gas fields. Another lease totaling approximately 1,000 acres is being negotiated. The Company is a registered, “bonded” operator in Texas (Operator No. 286572). Therefore, we are in full control of all operations.

The Company is a fully reporting public company. It is currently listed on Pink Sheets with symbol “FEGR”. It was listed on the Bulletin Board before it became dormant.

The following has been accomplished in 2009:

Acquired four oil & gas leases on 1,036 acres in Central Texas, including 25 producing and shut-in wells. There are also 13 plugged wells that are candidates for reentry. Approximately 560 acres are in defined oil & gas fields. These fields have several proven oil and gas zones, which enhances our potential production. There are many opportunities for in-fill drilling. &n bsp;Allowed well spacing is 5 acres for shallow wells (approximately 1,200 feet) and 10 acre spacing for deeper wells (approximately 2,600 feet).

Brought back into production 3 wells on one of its leases to date.

The Company plans the following activities over the next year:

Of the 25 producing and shut-in wells on two of the Central Texas leases, bring at least fifteen more wells back into production in addition to the three that have already b een reworked.

Of the 13 plugged wells on the other two leases, reenter and bring seven back into production. A geologist will evaluate each well before reentry is started.

Drill at least two in-fill wells on the Central Texas leases.

Acquire additional leases.

Our Oil and Gas Property

There are several oil & gas zones underlying the four leases. The wells are mostly completed as Fry or Gray Sands wells at a depth of approximately 1,200 feet. Four wells are completed in the Marble Falls sands at a depth of approximately 2,700 feet. None of the wells on the leases were completed in the Caddo gas zone, which is approximately 300 feet below the Fry Sands; we may want to recomplete some of the Fry wells as Caddo wells. About one-half mile from our Panther Creek lease, a Caddo well was completed recently with an initial potential of 14 BBL/day and 150 MCF/day. And, none of our wells have been completed in the Barnett Shale gas zone, which lies a little below the Marble Falls zone; this zone has not been explored much in Brown County.

Spacing for Fry and Gray wells has been reduced to 5 acres and spacing for Marble Falls and Chappel Reef wells has been reduced to 10 acres—half of the old spacing. Many in-fill wells could be drilled on the leases.

Panther Creek Lease: The Panther Creek lease totals 115 acres of which approximately 70% is in a defined Fry Sand oil field. Of the 13 wells, one is a water supply well, three are water injection wells and nine are Fry wells. The water supply well is 2,885 feet deep; we expect to recomplete as a Marble Falls well or possibly a Barnett Shale well. The original Fry well is 2, 860 feet deep; we expect to recomplete as a Marble Falls well or possibly a Barnett Shale well. It may be feasible to recomplete some of the other Fry wells in the Caddo or Marble Falls. Panther Creek has a 630 barrel tank farm and infrastructure work is completed.

Byler Lease: The Byler lease totals 372 acres of which approximately 57% is in a defined Fry Sand oil field. Of the 17 wells, two are water injection wells, 11 are Fry wells and four are Marble Falls wells. Of the Fry wells, we expect to rework only six, because the others will probably be uneconomic to rework. Of the Marble Falls wells, we expect to rework three, because one had a tool dropped down the hole and will probably be uneconomic to rework. It may be feasible to drill some of the Fry wells deeper and recomplete in the Caddo or Marble Falls. Two new tank farms and other infrastructure are needed on the Byler lease.

Mud Creek Lease: The Mud Creek lease totals 355 acres of which approximately 56% is in a defined Fry Sand oil field. Eight wells that had been producing were plugged several years ago at the mineral owners request to get rid of a fraudulent operator. We expect to reenter all eight wells, but for planning purposes we have assumed reentry of five wells. It may be feasible to recomplete some of these Fry wells in the Caddo or Marble Falls. A new tank farm and other infrastructure are needed on the Mud Creek lease.

Hutchins Lease: The Hutchins lease totals 194 acres of which approximately 30% is in defined oil fields. There are four Fry Sand wells and one Chappel Reef well. The latter well was the discovery well for the Chappel Reef and has 300 feet of sands. There were good oil shows, which were estimated could produce 35 to 40 BOPD, but the gas was even better—maximum open flow potential was 2,500 MCF per day. In production it did 500 MCF per day with gradual decline. These wells were plugged in 2001 when the operator had financial problems and oil and gas prices were very low. We expect to reenter the Chappel Reef well and one of the Fry Sand wells. There is still very good potential for oil and gas production from these wells. There is very good potential for in-field drilling. A new tank farm and other infrastructure are needed on the Hutchins lease.

Future Plans

During the remainder of 2010, we plan to rework an additional fifteen wells, reenter seven o f the plugged wells and to drill at least two “in-fill” wells on the leases, as mentioned above. The estimated cost is $400,000 to $500,000 for rework and reentry including additional infrastructure costs. Drilling and completing a Fry well will cost $150,000 to $180,000. Drilling and completing a Marble Falls well will cost $250,000 to $300,000.

WHERE YOU CAN GET ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

The public may read and copy any materials filed with the SEC at the SEC's Public Reference Room at 450 Fifth Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20549. The public may also obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 1-800-SEC-0330 . The SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file el ectronically with the SEC. The address of that site is http://www.sec.gov.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are not required to provide the information under this item.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

On May 6, 2010, the S.E.C. sent a letter to the Company with comments on our 2009 Form 10-K. This amended 2009 Form 10-K responds to these comments.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

Our principal executive office is located at 502 North Division Street, Carson City, NV 89703. Our telephone number is (702) 953-0411. Friendly Energy Exploration does not presently own any interests in real estate.

As of the dates specified in the following table, Friendly Energy Exploration held the following property in the following amounts:


			December 31, 2009 $	December 31, 2008 $
Oil & Gas Properties - Unproved
	Panther Lease		& nbsp; 15,000	-
	Byler Lease		& nbsp; 33,650	-
	Mud Creek Lease		10,000	-
	Hutchins Lease		2,400	-
	Red Oak Project		242,000	242,000
	Talpa Project		50,000	&nbs p; 50,000
	West Peach Project		36,970	36,970
			390,020	328,970
	Impairment		(328,970)	-
		Total oil & gas properties	&n bsp; 61,050	328,970

The Company defines cash equivalents as all highly liquid investments with a maturity of 3 months or less when purchased.

In 2009, the Red Oak, Talpa and West Peach projects were not generating income and are unlikely to generate future revenues. Management has impaired the value of these investments.

Proven Reserves: The oil & gas leases acquired in 2009 have a number of existing wells, many of which were shut-in. We are in the process of re-working these existing wells. All of these leases are in Texas. At this time, we do not have proven developed or undeveloped reserve estimates for t hese leases, but plan to have proven reserve estimates made in 2010.

Products Sold: No oil & gas products had been sold by the company during the last three fiscal years.

Drilling Activities: No exploratory or development wells have been drilled by the company during the last three fiscal years. The only exploratory and development activity during the last three fiscal years was the company’s participation in the drilling of the Red Oak well.

Present Activities: The Company has no wells in the process of being drilled.

Delivery Commitments: The company has no commitments to pro vide a fixed and determinable quantity of oil or gas in the near future under existing contracts or arrangements.

Oil & Gas Properties, Wells, Operations and Acreage: The following table shows the number of wells and acres as of December 31, 2009.

Net


	Gross
Productive Oil Wells	3	3
Developed Acreage	15	15
Undeveloped Acreage	545	545

“Gross” means the company owns an interest. “Net” is the fractional ownership bas ed on the percentage of the working interest owned by the company. In this case, the company owns 100% of the working interest so the “gross” and “net” are the same. “Productive” means a producing well or a well mechanically capable of production. “Developed Acreage” is based on the legal well spacing for productive wells. “Undeveloped Acreage” is based on leased acres on which wells have not been drilled or completed to a point that would permit the production of economic quantities of oil or gas. Because the company has a number of wells that are in the process of being reworked to make them productive again, we have included in the “Undeveloped Acreage” the well spacing for these wells that are being reworked. None of the wells have multiple completions.

Lease Terms: The Panther Creek lease is held by prod uction into the tank farm. The Byler Lease requires that production from an existing well bore commence by April 14, 2010 (production into the tank farm began in early April 2010 and the lease is now held by production). The Mud Creek lease requires that production from re-entering a plugged well or drilling a new well commence by July 24, 2010. The Hutchins lease requires that production from drilling a new well commence by December 31, 2010.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

None.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

During the fourth quarter of 2009, there were no matters submitted to a vote of the stockholders.

PART II

ITEM 5.

MARKET FOR THE COMPANY’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCK HOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Our common stock is currently quoted on Pink Sheets. Our common stock is quoted on Pink Sheets under the symbol “FEGR.PK” since 2008. Because we are quoted on Pink Sheets, our securities may be less liquid, receive less coverage by security analysts and news media, and generate lower prices than might otherwise be obtained if they were listed on a national securities exchange. The reported high and low bid and ask prices for the common stock are shown below for the period from January 1, 2008 through December 31, 2009.


	Bid
	High		Low
2008 Fiscal Year
First Quarter	$	0.75	$	0.02
Second Quarter	$	0.70	$	0.10
Third Quarter	$	0.10	$	0.012
Fourth Quarter	$	0.025	$	0.008
	Bid
	High		Low
2009 Fiscal Year
First Quarter	$	0.011	$	0.006
Second Quarter	$	0.012	$	0.002
Third Quarter	$	0.045	$	0.002
Fourth Quarter	$	0.05	$	0.018

Our common stock is subject to rules adopted by the Commission regula ting broker dealer practices in connection with transactions in “penny stocks.” Those disclosure rules applicable to “penny stocks” require a broker dealer, prior to a transaction in a “penny stock” not otherwise exempt from the rules, to deliver a standardized list disclosure document prepared by the Securities and Exchange Commission. That disclosure document advises an investor that investment in “penny stocks” can be very risky and that the investor’s salesperson or broker is not an impartial advisor but rather paid to sell the shares. The disclosure contains further warnings for the investor to exercise caution in connection with an investment in “penny stocks,” to independently investigate the security, as well as the salesperson with whom the investor is working and to understand the risky nature of an investment in this security. The broker dealer must also provide the customer with certain other information and must make a special written determ ination that the “penny stock” is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive the purchaser’s written agreement to the transaction. Further, the rules require that, following the proposed transaction, the broker provide the customer with monthly account statements containing market information about the prices of the securities.

These disclosure requirements may have the effect of reducing the level of trading activity in the secondary market for our common stock. Many brokers may be unwilling to engage in transactions in our common stock because of the added disclosure requirements, thereby making it more difficult for stockholders to dispose of their shares.

Common Stock

Friendly Energy Exploration is authorized to issue 100,000,000 shares of co mmon stock, $.001 par value, each share of common stock having equal rights and preferences, including voting privileges. The shares of $.001 par value common stock of Friendly Energy Exploration constitute equity interests in Friendly Energy Exploration entitling each shareholder to a pro rata share of cash distributions made to shareholders, including dividend payments. As of December 31, 2009, 52,568,790 shares of the Friendly Energy Exploration’s common stock were issued and outstanding.

The holders of Friendly Energy Exploration’s common stock are entitled to one vote for each share of record on all matters to be voted on by shareholders. Holders of preferred stock are entitled to twenty votes for each share of record on all matters to be voted on by shareholders. There is no cumulative voting with respect to the election of directors of Friendly Energy Exploration or any other matter, wi th the result that the holders of more than 50% of the shares voted for the election of those directors can elect all of the Directors.

The holders of Friendly Energy Exploration’s common stock have no conversion, preemptive or other subscription rights, and there are no redemption provisions applicable to Friendly Energy Exploration’s common stock. All of the outstanding shares of Friendly Energy Exploration’s common stock are duly authorized, validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable.

Record Holders

As of December 31, 2009, an aggregate of 52,568,790 shares of our common stock were issued and outstanding and were owned by approximately 584 holders of record, based on information provided by our transfer agent.

Dividends

The holders of the Friendly Energy Exploration’s common stock are entitled to receive dividends when, as and if declared by Friendly Energy Exploration’s Board of Directors from funds legally available therefore; provided, however, that cash dividends are at the sole discretion of Friendly Energy Exploration’s Board of Directors. In the event of liquidation, dissolution or winding up of Friendly Energy Exploration, the shareholders of common stock are entitled to share ratably in all assets remaining available for distribution to them after payment of liabilities of Friendly Energy Exploration and after provision has been made for each class of stock, if any, having preference in relation to Friendly Energy Exploration’s common stock.

Friendly Energy Exploration has never declared or paid any dividends on its common stock. Friendly Energy Exploration does not intend to declare or pay any dividends in the foreseeable future.

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

None.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

There were no stock repurchases during the fourth quarter of 2009.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

During the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company issued the following shares:


	a)	On January 26, 2009, 200,000 preferred shares were sold to an officer for $15,000.
	b)	On July 24, 2009, 2,500,000 preferred shares were issued to officers in satisfaction of debt for $140,000.
	c)	On September 25, 2009, 1,000,000 common shares were sold to a non-related party for $2,000.
	d)	On November 30, 2009, 275,000 preferred shares were sold to a non-related party for $50,000.
	e)	On December 30, 2007, 1,200,000 preferred shares were issued to officers in satisfaction of debt for $252,000.

On July 24, 2009, the Company issued the following Stock Options:


	a)	1,000,000 options on common shares were granted to Douglas Tallant.
	b)	500,000 options on common shares were granted to Donald Trapp.

The terms of these options were set as follows: Fair market value $0 .005 (recognizing any options exercised would result in restricted shares); 50% vests after 6 months after the date of grant and the remaining 50% vests after one year; all options expire after 10 years.

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are not required to provide the information under this item.

ITEM 7. MA NAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION.

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our audited financial statements and notes thereto included herein. In connection with, and because we desire to take advantage of, the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, we caution readers regarding certain forward looking statements in the following discussion and elsewhere in this report and in any other statement made by, or on our behalf, whether or not in future filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Forward-looking statements are statements not based on historical information and which relate to future operations, strategies, financial results or other developments. Forward looking statements are necessarily based upon estimates and assumptions that are inherently subject to significant business, economic and competit ive uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond our control and many of which, with respect to future business decisions, are subject to change. These uncertainties and contingencies can affect actual results and could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in any forward looking statements made by, or our behalf. We disclaim any obligation to update forward-looking statements.

Historical Background and Overview

Overview

For the year ended December 31, 2009, we had total assets of $86,005, compared to total assets in 2008 of $650,729. The decrease in assets was due to writing off uncollectable notes and impairment of the Red Oak, Talpa and West Peach investments. This decrease in assets was partially offset by the acquisitio n of four oil and gas leases in Central Texas for $61,050. We believe these assets, which include 25 producing or shut-in oil wells, are worth substantially more than we paid for them. We have brought three of the wells back into production by the end of 2009, and have started rework on the remaining wells. One of the leases has approximately 180 barrels of oil in its tank farm at the end of 2009. The value of this oil will not be included in the financial statements until it is sold. See Item 1: Business for additional information about the four oil and gas leases.

At December 31, 2009, we had current liabilities of $1,588,281, which was represented by accounts payable, payroll liabilities, judgment payable, deferred salaries, interest payable and loans payable. At December 31, 2008 we had current liabilities of $1,520,961. A conversion of some of the loans payable to officers to prefer red shares offset much of the increase in deferred salaries.

Results of Operations

We did not realize any revenue from operations in 2009. In 2008, we received $5,035 from the Asher #1 oil well. We will start receiving revenues from the oil and gas wells on our four Central Texas leases in early 2010. During the year ended December 31, 2009, the loss from operations is $783,179 (2008 - $315,540). This increase in loss was due primarily to the bad debt expense for the notes that were written off and to oil well operations costs for reworking oil wells of the Central Texas leases and for upgrading and repairing infrastructure on the leases. From February 11, 2005 (inception of oil and gas exploration operations) to December 31, 2009, Friendly Energy Exploration has incurred cumulative net operating losses of $2,782,139.

Cash Requirements

Our cash on hand as of December 31, 2009 is 15,038. We do not have sufficient cash on hand to pay the costs of our operations as projected to twelve (12) months or less or to fund our operations for that same period of time. We will require additional financing in order to proceed with some or all of our goals as projected over the next twelve (12) months. We presently do not have any arrangements for additional financing, and no potential lines of credit or sources of financing are currently available for the purpose of proceeding with any of our goals projected over the next twelve (12) months and beyond.

Any additional growth of the Company will require additional cash infusions. We may face expenses or other circumstances such that we will have additional fin ancing requirements. In such event, the amount of additional capital we may need to raise will depend on a number of factors. These factors primarily include the extent to which we can achieve revenue growth, the profitability of such revenues, operating expenses, research and development expenses, and capital expenditures. Given the number of programs that we have ongoing and not complete, it is not possible to predict the extent or cost of these additional financing requirements.

Notwithstanding the numerous factors that our cash requirements depend on, and the uncertainties associated with each of the major revenue opportunities that we have, we believe that our plan of operation can build long-term value if we are able to demonstrate clear progress toward our objectives.

Progress in the development of our business plan will likely lend credibility to our plan to achieve profitability.

The failure to secure any necessary outside funding could have an adverse affect on our development and results therefrom and a corresponding negative impact on shareholder liquidity.

Going Concern

We have not attained profitable operations and are dependent upon obtaining financing to pursue any extensive activities. For these reasons, our auditors stated in their report on our audited financial statements that they have substantial doubt that we will be able to continue as a going concern without further financing.

Future Financings

We will continue to rely on equity sales of our common shares in order to continue to fund our business operations. Issuances of additional shares will result in dilution to existing stockholders. There is no assurance that we will achieve any additional sales of the equity securities or arrange for debt or other financing to fund planned acquisitions and exploration activities.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no significant off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that are material to stockholders.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In January 2010, the FASB issued an amendment to ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosure, to require reporting entities to separately disclose the amounts and business rationale for significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and separately present information regarding purchase, sale, issuance, and settlement of Level 3 fair value measures on a gross basis. This standard, for which the Company is currently assessing the impact, is effec tive for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009 with the exception of disclosures regarding the purchase, sale, issuance, and settlement of Level 3 fair value measures which are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010.

In January 2010, the FASB issued an amendment to ASC 505, Equity, where entities that declare dividends to shareholders that may be paid in cash or shares at the election of the shareholders are considered to be a share issuance that is reflected prospectively in EPS, and is not accounted for as a stock dividend. This standard is effective for interim and annual periods ending on or after December 15, 2009 and is to be applied on a retrospective basis. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In October 2009, the FASB issued an amendment to the accounting standards related to certain revenue arrangements that include software elements. This standard clarifies the existing accounting guidance such that tangible products that contain both software and non-software components that function together to deliver the product’s essential functionality, shall be excluded from the scope of the software revenue recognition accounting standards. Accordingly, sales of these products may fall within the scope of other revenue recognition standards or may now be within the scope of this standard and may require an allocation of the arrangement consideration for each element of the arrangement. This standard, for which the Company is currently assessing the impact, will become effective on January 1, 2011.

In October 2009, FASB issued an amend ment to the accounting standards related to the accounting for revenue in arrangements with multiple deliverables including how the arrangement consideration is allocated among delivered and undelivered items of the arrangement. Among the amendments, this standard eliminated the use of the residual method for allocating arrangement considerations and requires an entity to allocate the overall consideration to each deliverable based on an estimated selling price of each individual deliverable in the arrangement in the absence of having vendor-specific objective evidence or other third party evidence of fair value of the undelivered items. This standard also provides further

guidance on how to determine a separate unit of ac counting in a multiple-deliverable revenue arrangement and expands the disclosure requirements about the judgments made in applying the estimated selling price method and how those judgments affect the timing or amount of revenue recognition. This standard, for which the Company is currently assessing the impact, will become effective on January 1, 2011.

In August 2009, FASB issued an amendment to the accounting standards related to the measurement of liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value on a recurring basis. This standard clarifies how a company should measure the fair value of liabilities and that restrictions preventing the transfer of a liability should not be considered as a factor in the measurement of liabilities within the scope of this standard. This standard is effective for the Company on October 1, 2009. The adoption of this amendment did not have a material effect on the Com pany’s consolidated financial statements.

In June 2009, the FASB issued guidance now codified as ASC 105, Generally Accepted Accounting Principles as the single source of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP, aside from those issued by the SEC. ASC 105 does not change current U.S. GAAP, but is intended to simplify user access to all authoritative U.S. GAAP by providing all authoritative literature related to a particular topic in one place. The adoption of ASC 105 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements, but did eliminate all references to pre-codification standards.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES A BOUT MARKET RISK

We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are not required to provide the information under this item.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To: the Board of Directors and Shareholders

Friendly Energy Exploration

502 North Division Street

Carson City, Nevada 89703

I have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Friendly Energy Exploration as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 and the related consolidated statements of operations and of cash flows for the years then ended, and I have audited the period from inception of the development stage (January 7, 1993) through February 10, 2005 and the period from inception of the exploration stage (February 11, 2005) through December 31, 2009. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. My responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on my audit.

I conducted my audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). &nb sp;Those standards require that I plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. I believe that my audit provides a reasonable basis for my opinion.

In my opinion, based on my audit, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Friendly Energy Exploration as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the period from inception of the development stage (January 7, 1993) through Februar y 10, 2005 and the period from inception of the exploration stage (February 11, 2005) through December 31, 2009, in conformity with United States generally accepted accounting principles.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements, the Company has suffered recurring losses. This raises substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 2. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

The Company has determined that it is not required to have, nor was I engaged to perform, an audit of the effectiveness of its documented internal controls over financial reporting.

/s/ John Kinross-Kennedy

John Kinross-Kennedy

Certified Public Accountant

Irvine, California

March 27, 2010

Revised June 14, 2010

FRIENDLY ENERGY EXPLORATION

(An Exploration Stage Company)

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET


			December 31, 2009 (Restated – Note 11)	December 31, 2008

ASSETS

Current assets
	Cash and cash equivalents		$ 15,038	$115
		Total current assets	15,038	&nb sp; 115

	Oil and Gas Properties – unproved		61,050	328,970
	Property and equipment		1,418	1,644
	Notes receivable		7,500	319,000
	Other assets		1,000	1,000

Total Assets			$ 86,005	$ 650,729

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT

LIABILITIES
Current liabilities
	Accounts Payable		$ 16,888	$ 87,990
	Payroll Tax Liabilities		110,431	96,609
	Judgment payable		239,286	216,605
	Deferred Salaries		828,000	588,000
	Interest Payable		189,366	144,697
	Loan Payable		180,433	358,779
	Loans Payable-Related Parties		23,877	28,281
		Total current liabilities	1,588,281	1,520,961

STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
	Common stock, $0.001 par value; 100,000,000 shares
		authorized, 52,568,790 and 21,568,790 shares,
		respectively, issued and outstanding	52,569	21,569
	Preferred Stock, $0.001 par value, 10,000,000 shares
		authorized, 8,842,302 and 7,667,302 shares,	8,842	7,667
		respectively, issued and outstanding
	Additional paid-in capital		4,097,805	3,667,693
	Accumulated deficit during the development stage		(2,201,561)	(2,201,561)
	Accumulated deficit during the exploration stage		(3,459,931)	(2,365,599)
		Total stockholders' deficit	(1,502,276)	(870,231)

		Total liabilities and stockholders' deficit	$ 86,005	$ 650,729

FRIENDLY ENERGY EXPLORATION

( An Exploration Stage Company)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS


					Development Stage	Exploration Stage
			For the year ended	For the year ended	(Jan. 7, 1993)	(Feb. 11, 2005)
			December 31,	December 31,	through	through
			2009 (Restated – Note 11)	2008	Feb. 10, 2005	Dec. 31, 2009 (Restated – Note 11)

Revenue			$ -	$5,035	$13,372	$16,053

Operating expenses
	Bad Debt Expense		319,000	-	-	319,000
	Depreciation		853	822	35,287	9,751
	Dry Hole Cost		-	-	-	88,157
	General and administrative		6,335	33,495	218,930	78,330
	Intangible Drilling Costs		-	-	-	333,206
	Officer Wages		240,000	240,000	-	1,227,000
	Oil Well Operations Cost		118,344	3,157	-	128,083
	Payroll Expenses		13,822	13,524	213,228	73,163
	Professional Fees		68,875	24,422	711,228	145,955
	Rent		-	-	282,410	-
	Stock Based Compensation		3,288	-	156,825	359,130
	Travel & Entertainment		12,662	5,154	128,687	36,418

		Total operating expenses	783,179	320,575	1,746,594	2,798,192

		Loss from operations	(783,179)	(315,540)	(1,733,223)	(2,782,139)

Other income (expenses):
	Other income		76,118	-	120,605	76,118
	Forgiveness of Debt		-	-	(122,765)	-
	Impairment Loss on Asset		(328,970)	-	(442,800)	(328,970)
	Interest Expense		(58,301)	(49,933)	(23,379)	(314,939)
	Lawsuit Judgment		-	-	-	(110,000)
		Total other income (expenses)	(311,153)	(49,933)	(468,339)	(677,791)
				&nbs p;
		Loss before provision for income taxes	(1,094,332)	(365,473)	(2,201,562)	(3,459,930)
Provision for income taxes			-	-	-	-

		Net loss	$(1,094,332)	$ (365,473)	$(2,201,562)	$ (3,459,930)

Basic and diluted loss per common share			$(0.03)	$ (0.03)	$(0.28)	$ (0.32)
				&nbs p;
Basic and diluted weighted avg.
&nbs p;	common shares outstanding		34,212,626	13,693,977	7,762,659	10,660,153

FRIENDLY ENERGY EXPLORATION

(An Exploration Stage Company)

STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS DEFICIT


						Accumulated	Accumulated
					Additional	Deficit Devel-	Deficit Explor-	Total
	Common Stock		Preferred Stock		Paid-in	opment Stage	ation Stage	Stockholders'
	Shares	Amount	Shares	Amount	Capital	Prior to 2-11-05	From 2-11-05	Deficit
Balance at January 7, 1993 (Date of inception)	-	$0	-	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0
Common shares issued to officers & directors for cash, $0.016 per share	2,550	3	-	-	997	-		1,000
Net loss	-	&nbs p;-	-	-	-	&nb sp; (1,000)		(1,000)
Balance at December 31, 1993, 1994, and 1995	2,550	; 3	-	-	997	(1,000)		-

Common shares cancelled	(2,550)	(3)	-	-	&nb sp; 3	-		-
Common shares issued for cash, $0.00 per share	100,000	100	-	-	(90)	-		10
Conversion to preferred stock	(20,000)	(20)	50,000	50	(30)	& nbsp; -		-
Net loss	-	-	-	-	&nbs p; -	(10)		(10)
Balance at December 31, 1996	&nb sp; 80,000	80	50,000	50	880	(1,010)		-

Common shares issued relating to spin-out	609	1	-	; -	(1)	-		; -
Common shares issued for cash, $0.80 per share	1,500	1	-	; -	29,999	-		�� 30,000
Common shares issued to officers and directors for cash, $0.685 per share	1,750	2	-	-	29,998	-		30,000
Preferred shares issued to officers and directors for services, $0.04 per share	-	-	750,000	750	29,250	-		30,000
Net loss	&nb sp; -	-	-	-	&n bsp; -	(63,266)		(63,266)
Balance at December 31, 1997	; 83,859	84	800,000	800	90,126	(64,276)		26,734

Common shares issued for cash, $1.74 per share	390	0	-	-	17,000	-		17,000
Common shares issued to officers and directors for services, $0.004	105,000	105	-	-	10,395			10,500
Conversion of preferred stock	320,000	320	(800,000)	(800)	480	-		-
Net loss	-	-	-	-	-	(33,234)		(33,234)
Balance at December 31, 1998	509,249	509	; -	-	118,001	(97,510)		&nbs p; 21,000

Cancellation of common stock	(1,850)	(2)	-	-	2	-		-
Preferred shares issued for debt settlement, $3.69 per share	-	-	146,883	147	541,853	& nbsp;-		542,000
Preferred shares issued for services, $3.69 per share	-	-	5,000	5	18,445	-		18,450
Net loss	-	-	-	-	-	(556,309)		(556,309)
Balance at December 31, 1999	507,399	507	151,883	152	678,301	(653,819)		25,141

Preferred shares issued for debt settlement, $3.69 per share	-	-	174,798	175	644,825	-		645,000
Issuance of stock related to merger with Friendly Energy Services, Inc., $3.69 per share	-	-	120,000	120	442,680	-		442,800
Preferred shares issued for services, $3.69 per share	-	-	37,500	&nbs p; 37	138,338	-		138,375
Net loss	-	-	-	-	-	(914,511)		&nb sp; (914,511)
Balance at December 31, 2000	507,399	507	484,181	484	1,904,144	(1,568,330)		336,805


Net loss	& nbsp; -	-	-	-	-	(584,851)		(584,851)
Balance at December 31, 2001	507,399	507	484,181	484	1,904,144	(2,153,181)		(248,046)

Preferred shares issued for debt settlement, $3.69 per share	0	0	2,973,080	2,973	145,681	0		148,654
Net loss	-	-	-	-	-	(12,371)		(12,371)
Balance at December 31, 2002	507,399	507	3,457,261	3,457	2,049,825	(2,165,552)		(111,763)

Net loss	-	-	-	-	-	(24,215)		(24,215)
Balance, December 31, 2003	507,399	507	3,457,261	3,457	2,049,825	(2,189,767)		(135,978)
Net loss	-	-	-	-	-	(11,794)		&n bsp; (11,794)
Balance, December 31, 2004	507,399	507	3,457,261	3,457	2,049,825	(2,201,561)		(147,772)

Common shares issued for cash, $0.025	&nb sp; 16,000	16	-	-	9,984	&nbs p; -	-	10,000
Common shares issued for servicees, $0.05 per share	10,000	10	-	-	12,490	-	-	12,500
Common shares issued to officers and directors for services, $0.04 per share	20,000	20	-	-	19,980	& nbsp; -	-	20,000
Preferred shares issued to officers and directors for services, $0.40 per share	; -	-	450,000	450	179,550	&n bsp; -	-	180,000
Conversion of preferred stock	789,680	790	(1,974,200)	(1,974)	1,185	-	&n bsp; -	-
Issuance of stock options to two officers	-	-	-	-	24,929	-	& nbsp; -	24,929
Net loss	-	& nbsp; -	-	-	-	-	(691,271)	(691,271)
Balance, December 31, 2005	1,343,079	1,343	1,933,061	1,933	2,297,942	(2,201,561)	(691,271)	(591,615)

Common shares issued for cash, $0.05	20,000	20	�� -	&n bsp; -	24,980			25,000
Conversion of preferred stock	380,677	381	(951,692)	(952)	571	-	-	-
Issuance of stock options to 2 officers (2nd half vested)	-	-	-	-	24,929	&nb sp; -	-	24,929
Preferred shares issued for debt settlement, $0.195 per share	-	-	278,554	279	54,039	; -	-	54,318
Net Loss	-	-	-	-	-	-	(824,586)	(824,586)
Balance, December 31, 2006	1,743,756	1,744	1,259,923	1,260	2,402,461	(2,201,561)	(1,515,857)	(1,311,954)

Preferred shares issued for debt settlement, $0.090 per share	-	-	5,222,222	5,222	464,778	-	-	470,000
Common shares issued for notes $0.020	732,000	732	-	; -	318,268			319,000
Issuance of stock options to 2 officers (vested)	-	-	-	-	93,484	-	-	93,484
Common shares issued for cash, $0.05	20,000	20	-	-	24,980			25,000
Common shares issued for cash, $0.025	16,000	16	-	-	9,964			; 9,980
Preferred shares issued to officers and directors for services, $0.10 per share	-	-	3,740,000	3,740	370,260	-	-	374,000
Conversion of preferred stock	270,516	271	(676,289)	(676)	406	-	-	-
Net Loss	-	-	-	-	-	-	(484,269)	(484,269)
Balance, December 31, 2007	2,782,271	2,782	9,545,856	9,546	3,684,601	(2,201,561)	(2,000,126)	(504,759)

Common shares issued relating to reverse stock split (shareholders with less than 25 old shares)	97 9	1	-	-	(1)	-		-
Conversion of preferred stock	18,785,540	&nbs p; 18,786	(1,878,554)	(1,879)	(16,907)	-		-
Net Loss	-	-	-	-	-	-	(365,473)	(365,472)
Balance, December 31, 2008 (Restated – Note 11)	21,568,790	21,569	7,667,302	7,667	3,667,693	(2,201,561)	(2,365,599)	(870,231)

Common shares issued for cash, $0.002	1,000,000	1,000	-	�� -	1,000			2,000


Preferred shares issued for cash, $0.075 per share	-	-	200,000	200	14,800	-	; -	15,000
Preferred shares issued for cash, $0.182 per share	-	-	275,000	275	49,725			50,000
Preferred shares issued for debt settlement, $0.056 per share	-	-	2,500,000	2,500	&nbs p; 137,500	-	-	140,000
Preferred shares issued for debt settlement, $0.21 per share	-	-	1,200,000	1,200	250,800			252,000
Conversion of preferred stock	30,000,000	30,000	(3,000,000)	(3,000)	(27,000)	-	-	& nbsp; -
Stock-based compensation expense on stock options	-	-	-	-	3,288	-	-	3,288
Net Loss	-	-	-	-	-	-	(1,094,332)	(1,094,332)
Balance, December 31, 2009 (Restated – Note 11)	52,568,790	$52,569	8,842,302	$8,842	$4,097,805	($2,201,561)	($3,459,931)	($1,502,276)

FRIENDLY ENERGY EXPLORATION

(An Exploration Stage Company)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS


							From Inception	From Inception
						&nbs p;	Development Stage	Exploration Stage
				For the year ended		For the year ended	(Jan. 7, 1993)	(Feb. 11, 2005)
				December 31,		December 31,	through	through
				2009 (Restated – Note 11)		2008 (Restated – Note 11)	Dec. 31, 2004	Dec. 31, 2009 (Restated – Note 11)
Cash flows from operating activities:
	Net loss			$ (1,094,332)		$ &nbs p; (365,473)	$ (2,202,562)	$ (3,459,931)
	Adjustments to reconcile net loss to
	net cash used by operating activities:
		Depreciation		853		82 2	35,287	9,750
		Stock Based Compensation		3,288		-	(61,635)	577,590
		Impairment Loss		328,970		123,120	442,800	452,090
		Bad debt		319,000		-	-	319,000
	Changes in operating assets and liabilities:			-			&n bsp; -	-
		Accounts Payable		(59,354)		(81,478)	&n bsp; 74,857	(57,270)
		Advances		-		360	-	-
		Judgement payable		22,681		20,531	-	239,286
		Interest Payable		33,620		12,036	23,079	166,287
		Payroll Liabilities		13,822		13,524	37,268	73,163
		Deferred Salaries		240,000		240,000	-	828,000
			Net cash used by operating activities	(191,452)		(36,558)	551,656	(852,035)

Cash flows from investing activities:
	Purchase of property and equipment			(627)		-	&n bsp; (41,718)	(4,737)
	Issunace of promissory notes			(7,500)		-	-	(326,500)
	Investment in oil and gas properties			(61,050)		(292,000)	-	(513,139)
			Net cash used by investing activities	(69,177)		(292,000)	(41,718)	(844,376)
					&nbs p;
Cash flows from financing activities:
	Proceeds from issuance of notes payable			121,956		307,210	-	480,735
	Proceeds from issuance of common stock			2,000		-	&n bsp; 112,970	366,520
	Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock			65,000		-	1,559,654	769,318
	Proceeds on borrowings from related parties			86,596		21,195	20,000	& nbsp;94,876
			Net cash provided by financing activities	275,552		328,405	1,692,624	1,711,449

Net increase in cash				14,923		(153)	-	15,038

Cash, beginning of period				&nbs p; 115		268	& nbsp; -	-

Cash, end of period				$ ; 15,038		$ 115	$ -	$ 15,038

Supplementary Disclosures
Interest paid				-		-	-	-
Income tax paid				-		-	-	-

FRIENDLY ENERGY EXPLORATION

(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - 2009

DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND HISTORY

Friendly Energy Corp., Nevada corporation, (hereinafter referred to as the “Company” or “Friendly Energy”) was incorporated in the State of Nevada on January 7, 1993 under the name Eco-Systems Marketing. The company was originally in the business of selling electric power and related services to small and medium sized businesses in a newly deregulated California market. The Company is now in the business of oil and gas exploration and operations. The Company has participated in the drilling of two oil wells in Oklahoma and a gas well in Iowa. In 2009, the Company acquired four oil and gas leases in central Texas totaling 1,036 acres with twenty-five wells.

The Company is considered an exploration stage company in accordance with by Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 915, Development Stage Entities. The Company entered the oil and gas exploration business in February 2005, so the cumulative columns in the financial statements include activities for the development stage prior to February 2005 and for the exploration stage beginning February 2005.

On March 9, 2000, the Company formed a wholly owned subsidiary named Friendly Energy Services, Inc.. All oil and gas activities are conducted through this subsidiary.

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Going concern – The Company incurred net losses of $3,459,930 from the period of February 1, 2005 (date of entering the oil and gas exploration business) through December 31, 2009 and has com menced its operations on a limited basis. The Company is still in the exploration stage, raising substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The Company may seek additional sources of capital through the issuance of debt or equity financing, but there can be no assurance the Company will be successful in accomplishing its objectives.

The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent on additional sources of capital and the success of the Company’s plan. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.

Year end – The Company’s yearend is December 31.

Principles of consolidation – The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.

Use of estimates – The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Oil and Gas Properties – The Company utilizes the full-cost method of accounting f or petroleum and natural gas properties. Under this method, the Company capitalizes all costs associated with acquisition, exploration and development of oil and natural gas reserves, including leasehold acquisition costs, geological and geophysical expenditures, lease rentals on undeveloped properties and costs of drilling of productive and non-productive wells into the full cost pool on a country by country basis. When the Company obtains proven oil and gas reserves, capitalized costs, including estimated future costs to develop the reserves proved and estimated abandonment costs, net of salvage, will be depleted on the units-of-production method using estimates of proved reserves. The costs of unproved properties are not amortized until it is determined whether or not proved reserves can be assigned to the properties. Until such determination is made the Company assesses annually whether impairment has occurred, and includes in the amortization base drilling exploratory dry holes associated with unproved properties.

The Company applies a ceiling test to the capitalized cost in the full cost pool. The ceiling test limits such cost to the estimated present value, using a ten percent discount rate, of the future net revenue from proved reserves, based on current economic and operating conditions. Specifically, the Company computes the ceiling test so that capitalized cost,

less accumulated depletion and related deferred income tax, do not exceed an amount (the ceiling) equal to the sum of: (A) The present value of estimated future net revenue computed by applying current prices of oil and gas reserves (with consideration of price changes only to the extent provided by contractual arrangements) to estimated future production of proved oil and gas reserves as of the date of the latest balance sheet presented, less estimated future expenditures (based on current cost) to be incurred in developing and producing the proved reserves computed using a discount factor of ten percent and assuming continuation of existing economic conditions; plus (B) the cost of property not being amortized; plus (C) the lower of cost or estimated fair value of unproven properties included in the costs being amortized; less (D) income tax effects related to differences between the book and tax basis of the property.

For unproven properties, the Company excludes from capitalized costs subject to depletion, all costs directly associated with the acquisition and evaluation of the unproved property until it is determined whether or not pro ved reserves can be assigned to the property. Until such a determination is made, the Company assesses the property at least annually to ascertain whether impairment has occurred. In assessing impairment the Company considers factors such as historical experience and other data such as primary lease terms of the property, average holding periods of unproved property, and geographic and geologic data. The Company adds the amount of impairment assessed to the cost to be amortized subject to the ceiling test.

Asset Retirement Obligations – The Company follows the provisions of ASC 410, Asset Retirement and Environmental Obligations, which establishes standards for the initial measurement and subsequent accounting for obligations associated with the sale, abandonment or other disposal of long-lived tangible assets arising from the acquisition, construction or development and for normal operations of such assets.

Property and equipment – Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is provided principally on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which are generally 3 to 27 years. The amounts of depreciation provided are sufficient to charge the cost of the related assets to operations over their estimated useful lives.

The Company periodically evaluates whether events and circumstances have occurred that may warrant revision of the estimated useful life of fixed assets or whether the remaining balance of fixed assets should be evaluated for possible impairment. The Company uses an estimate of the related undiscounted cash flows over the remaining life of the fixed assets in measuring their recoverabi lity.

Income taxes – Potential benefits of income tax losses are not recognized in the accounts until realization is more likely than not. The Company has adopted ASC 740, Accounting for Income Taxes, as of its inception. Pursuant to ASC 740, the Company is required to compute tax asset benefits for net operating losses carried forward. The potential benefits of net operating losses have not been recognized in these financial statements because the Company cannot be assured it is more likely than not it will utilize the net operating losses carried forward in future years.

Net loss per common share – The Company computes net income (loss) per share in accordance with ASC 260, Earning per Share. ASC 260 requires presentation of both basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS) on the face of the income sta tement. Basic EPS is computed by dividing net income (loss) available to common shareholders (numerator) by the weighted average number of shares outstanding (denominator) during the period. Diluted EPS gives effect to all dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period using the treasury stock method and convertible preferred stock using the if-converted method. In computing Diluted EPS, the average stock price for the period is used in determining the number of shares assumed to be purchased from the exercise of stock options or warrants. Diluted EPS excludes all dilutive potential shares if their effect is anti dilutive.

Stock-Based Compensation -- The Company records stock-based compensation in accordance with ASC 718, Share-Based Payments, using the fair value method. All transactions in which goods or services are the consideration received for the issuance of equity instruments are accounted for based on the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instrument issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. Equity instruments issued to employees and the cost of the services received as consideration are measured and recognized based on the fair value of the equity instruments issued.

Concentration of risk – A significant amount of the Company’s assets and resources are currently dependent on the financial support of Douglas Tallant and Donald Trapp. Should they determine to no longer finance the operations of the company before new capital is raised, it may be unlikely for the company to continue.

Revenue recognition – The Company has had revenues of $16,053 to date from its operations. Revenue is recognized as it is received.

Financial Instruments - Pursuant to ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures and ASC 825, Financial Instruments, an entity is required to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. ASC 820 and 825 establishes a fair value hierarchy based on the level of independent, objective evidence surrounding the inputs used to measure fair value. A financial instrument’s categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. ASC 820 and 825 prioritizes the inputs into three levels that may be used to measure fai r value:

Level 1

Level 1 applies to assets or liabilities for which there are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2

Level 2 applies to assets or liabilities for which there are inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in markets with insufficient volume or infrequent transactions (less active markets); or model-derived valuations in which significant inputs are observable or can be derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market data.

Level 3

Level 3 applies to assets or liabilities for which there are unobservable inputs to the valuation methodology that are significant to the measurement of the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

The Company’s financial instruments consist principally of cash, notes receivable, investment, accounts payable, payroll tax liabilities, judgement payable, deferred salaries, interest payable, loans payables, and amounts due to related parties. Pursuant to ASC 820 and 825, the fair value of cash is determined based on “Level 1” inputs, which consist of quoted prices in active markets for identical assets. The recorded values of all other financial instruments approximate their current fair values because of their nature and respective maturity dates or durations.

Recent accounting pronouncements – In January 2010, the FASB issued an amendment to ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosure, to require reporting entities to separately disclose the amounts and business rationale for significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and separately present information regarding purchase, sale, issuance, and settlement of Level 3 fair value measures on a gross basis. This standard, for which the Company is currently assessing the impact, is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009 with the exception of disclosures regarding the purchase, sale, issuance, and settlement of Level 3 fair value measures which are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010.

In January 2010, the FASB issued an amendment to ASC 5 05, Equity, where entities that declare dividends to shareholders that may be paid in cash or shares at the election of the shareholders are considered to be a share issuance that is reflected prospectively in EPS, and is not accounted for as a stock dividend. This standard is effective for interim and annual periods ending on or after December 15, 2009 and is to be applied on a retrospective basis. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In October 2009, FASB issued an amendment to the accounting standards related to the accounting for revenue in arrangements with multiple deliverables including how the arrangement consideration is allocated among delivered and undelivered items of the arrangement. Among the amendments, this standard eliminated the use of the residual method for allocating arrangement considerations and requires an entity to allocate the overall consideration to each deliverable based on an estimated selling price of each individual deliverable in the arrangement in the absence of having vendor-specific objective evidence or other third party evidence of fair value of the undelivered items. This standard also

provides further guidance on how to determine a separate unit of accounting in a multiple-deliverable revenue arrangement and expands the disclosure requirements about the judgments made in applying the estimated selling price method and how those judgments affect the timing or amount of revenue recognition. This standard, for which the Company is currently assessing the impact, will become effective on January 1, 2011.

In June 2009, the FASB issued guidance now codified as ASC 105, Generally Accepted Accounting Principles as the single source of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP, aside from those issued by the SEC. ASC 105 does not change current U.S. GAAP, but is intended to simplify user access to all authoritative U.S. GAAP by providing all authoritative literature related to a particular topic in one place. The adoption of ASC 105 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements, but did eliminate all references to pre-codification standards.

The Company has implemented all new accounting pronouncements that are in effect. These pronouncements did not have any material impact on the financial statements unless otherwise disclosed, and the Company does not believe that there are any other new accounting pronouncements.

OIL & GAS PROPERTIES

West Peach Project


				December 31, 2009 $		December 31, 2008 $
Oil & Gas Properties - Unproved
	Panther Lease		15,000		; -
	Byler Lease		33,650		; -
	Mud Creek Lease		10,000		& nbsp; -
	Hutchins Lease		2,400		; -
	Red Oak Project		242,000		242,000
	Talpa Project		50,000		50,000

36,970				36,970
	Asher #1		-		103,077
	Asher #2		-		5,008
	West Peach Project		-		15,035
			390,020		452,090
	Impairment		(328,970)		(123,120)
		Total oil & gas properties		61,050		328,970

Byler Lease – In 2009, the Company purchased, through its wholly-owned subsidiary, a 100% interest in oil and gas properties in central Texas for $33,650. The property totals 372 acres and consists of 17 wells. Upon production, the Company will remit a 22% royalty payment. As at December 31, 2009, there was no production on the property.

Hutchins Lease - In 2009, the Company purchased, through its wholly-owned subsidiary, a 100% interest in oil and gas properties in central Texas for $2,400. The property totals 194 acres. Upon production, the Company will remit a 15.125% royalty payment. As at December 31, 2009, there was no production on the property.

Mud Creek Lease - In 2009, the Company purchased, through its wholly-owned subsidiary, a 100% interest in oil and gas properties in central Texas for $10,000. The property totals 355 acres. Upon production, the Company will remit a 22% royalty payment with production expected to commence by July 2010. As at December 31, 2009, there was no production on the property.

OIL & GAS PROPERTIES (continued)

Panther Creek Lease - In 2009, the Company purchased, through its wholly-owned subsidiary, a 100% interest in oil and gas properties in central Texas for $15,000. The property totals 155 acres. Upon production, the Company will remit a 22% royalty payment. As at December 31, 2009, there was no production on the property.

Red Oak Project - Friendly Energy Exploration, through its wholly owned subsidiary, Friendly Energy Services, Inc. (FES), participated in the drilling of a 3,200 foot deep oil and gas well in southwest Iowa through its wholly owned subsidiary, Friendly Energy Services, Inc. (FES). FES owns a 42.5% working interest in the well. In 2009, management elected not to continue with further exploration of the property and impaired all capitalized costs.

Talpa Project - Friendly Energy Exploration purchased, through its wholly owned subsidiary, Friendly Energy Services, Inc. (FES), a 25% working interest in an 1,100 acre oil and gas lease in Texas. In 2009, management elected not to continue with further exploration of the property and impaired all capitalized costs.

West Peach Creek Project - Friendly Energy Exploration had planned to drill a 5,400 foot deep well in central Oklahoma through its wholly owned subsidiary, Friendly Energy Services, Inc. (FES). If the geophysicist and operator each purchase a 10% working interest, as expected, then FES will own an 80% working interest in the well. The location is on the West Peach Creek Prospect, a development/exploratory prospect, located on the western edge of the giant St. Louis Oil Field. In 2009, management elected not to continue with further exploration of the property and impaired all capitalized costs.

PROPERTY & EQUIPMENT

Property and equipment consist of the following as of December 31, 2009 a nd 2008:


	December 31, 2009 $	December 31, 2008 $
Furniture and fixtures	20,102	20,102
Computers and equipment	26,353	25, 726
	46,455	45,828
Less: accumulated depreciation	(45,037)	(44,184)
Net Furniture, fixtures, computers & equipment	1,418	1,644

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

In 2009, the officers agreed with the Company to defer their s alaries totaling $240,000, see note 7.

As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, loans payable from related parties consists of the following:


	December 31, 2009 $	December 31, 2008 $
Notes payable from officers of
the Company bearing interest at 8%
unsecured and due on demand	23,877	28,281

OTHER CURRENT LIABILITIES

The company has accrued for unpaid federal payroll taxes in the amounts of $110,431 and $96,609 for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. $37,268 is owed from 2000 and 2001 unpaid federal payroll taxes; the Company has filed the payroll taxes with the Internal Revenue Service. $73,163 is owed for accrued payroll taxes on deferred salaries; the Company has yet to file the payroll tax forms with the Internal Revenue Service or related state taxing authorities.

The company has accrued deferred salaries owed to three officers in the amount of $828,000 and 588,000 for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

The company has accrued interest in the amount of $189,366 and $155,746 for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The accrued interest includes interest on unpaid payroll taxes and related party loans.

The company reduced its borrowings from another company in 2009 through the sale of preferred shares. Also, the company borrowed $50,000 from an individual in 2009 for operational expenses.

COMMON SHARES

Common Shares

During the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company issued 30,000,000 common shares upon the conversion of 3,000,000 preferred shares of the Company.

On September 25, 2009, the Company issued 1,000,000 common shares at $0.002 per share for proceeds of $2,000.

Preferred Shares: Each share of preferred stock is convertible into ten shares of common stock and has voting rights equal to twenty shares of common stock. The board of directors has not specified any other rights or privileges with respect to the preferred stock.

During the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company issued 30,000,000 common shares upon the conversion of 3,000,000 preferred shares of the Company.

On December 30, 2009, the Company issued 3,000,000 preferred shares for settlement of debt with a fair value of $630,000.

On November 30, 2009, the Company issued 275,000 preferred shares for proceeds of $50,000.

On July 24, 2009, the Company issued 2,500,000 preferred shares for settlement of debt with a fair value of $140,000.

On January 26, 2009, the Company issued 200,000 preferred shares to a related party for proceeds of $15,000.

STOCK OPTIONS

On July 24, 2009, the Company granted 1,500,000 options under the Company’s Stock Option Plan to management and directors of the Company, with an exercise price of $0.005 per option. Under the terms of the issuance of the options, 750,000 options vest on January 24, 2010 (six months from the date of issuance) and 750,000 options vest on July 24, 2010 (one year from the date of issuance). The fair value of the options was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model using the following weighted average assumptions: risk-free interest rate of 3.50%, expected volatility of 353%, an expected option life of 10 years and no expected dividends. The weighted average fair value of options granted was $0.005 per option. During the year ended December 31, 2009, stock-based compensation expense of $3,288 was charged to operations.

The following table summarizes stock option plan activities:


	Number of Options	Weighted Average Exercise Price $	Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (years)	Aggregate Intrinsic Value $

Balance – December 31, 2007 and 2008	400,000	0.55

Granted	1,500,000	0.005

Balance – December 31, 2009	1,900,000	0.12	9.01	–

STOCK OPTIONS (continued)

Additional information regarding stock options as of October 31, 2009, is as follows:


Number of Options	Exercise Price $	Expiry Date

40,000	1.25	April 20, 2015
60,000	1.56	September 28, 2016
300,000	0.25	December 27, 2017
1,500,000	0.005	July 23, 2019

1,900,000

A summary of the status of the Company’s non-vested stock options as of December 31, 2009 are presented below:


	Stock Options #	Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value $

Non-vested, December 31, 2007 and 2008	–	–
Granted	1,500,000	0.005

Non-vested, December 31, 2009	1,500,000	0.005

As of December 31, 2009, the Company had $4,212 of unrecognized compensation expense relating to unvested options.

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Employment contracts –

Douglas Tallant - The Company entered into an employment agreement with Douglas Tallant effective January 1, 2007. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, Mr. Tallant is to be paid an annual salary of $180,000 in consideration of which Mr. Tallant agreed to act as the Company’s President. The term of the agreement is for an indefinite period, unless otherwise terminated pursuant to the terms of the agreement.

Donald Trapp - The Company entered into an employment agreement with Donald Trapp effective February 1, 2005. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, Mr. Trapp is to be paid an annual salary of $60,000 in consideration of which Mr. Trapp agreed to act as the Company’s Corporate Secretary and Treasurer. The term of the agreement is for an indefinite period, unless otherwise terminated pursuant to the terms of the agreement.

10.

LITIGATION

In 2005, an employee received a defaulted judgment against the Company concerning the case Bowers v. Friendly Energy Corporation, San Diego Superior Court Case No. 775084. The default judgment in the principle sum of $434,211.50 was reduced to a principal amount of $110,000, with interest from October 13, 2000.The transaction has been recorded on the financial statements along with accrued interest of $129,286. The total of $239,286 is reported in the liability section of the balance sheet.

11.

RESTATEMENT

The Company has restated its financial statements as at and for the year ended December 31, 2009. The consolidated financial statements have been restated to reflect the following transactions:

impairment of $328,970 of oil and gas properties for projects that the Company does not intend to continue; and

recording of $3,288 of stock-based compensation for valuation of stock options issued during the year.

The effect of the restatement increased net loss for the year ended December 31, 2009 by $332,258.

Balance Sheet


	As at December 31, 2009
	As Reported	Adjustme nt	Restated
	$	$	$
Assets
Other Assets – Red Oak Project	242,000	(242,000)	-
Other Assets – Talpa Project	50,000	(50,000)	-
Other Assets – West Peach Project	36,970	(36,970)	-
Total Assets	414,975	(328,970)	86,005
Stockholders’ Deficit
Additional paid-in capital	4,094,518	3,288	4,097,806
Accumulated deficit during the exploration stage	(3,127,673)	(332,258)	(3,459,931)
Total Stockholders’ Deficit	(1,173,305)	(328,970)	(1,502,275)
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Deficit	414,975	(328,970)	86,005

Statement of Operations


	For the Year Ended December 31, 2009
	As Reported	Adjustment	Res tated
	$	$	$
Stock-based compensation	-	3,288	3,288
Total Operating Expenses	779,891	3,288	783,179
Other income (expenses)
Impairment Loss on Asset	-	328,970	328,970
Net Loss	(762,074)	(332,258)	(1,094,332)


	Accumulated from February 11, 2005 to December 31, 2009
	As Reported	Adjustment	Restated
	$	$	$
Stock-based compensation	355,842	3,288	359,130
Total Operating Expenses	2,794,904	3,288	2,798,192
Other income (expenses)
Impairment Loss on Asset	-	328,970	328,970
Net Loss	(3,127,673)	(332,258)	(3,459,930)

Statement of Cashflows


	For the Year Ended December 31, 2009
	As Reported	Adjustment	Restated
	$	$	$
Operating Activities
Net Loss	(762,074)	(332,258)	(1,094,332)
Impairment of oil and gas properties	-	328,970	328,970
Bad debt expense	-	319,000	319,000
Stock-based compensation	-	3,288	3,288
Notes	311,500	(311,500)	-
Loans Payable	(179,045)	179,045	-
Loans Payable – Related Parties	(4,404)	4,404	-
Cashflows Used In Operating Activities	(382,401)	190,949	(191,452)

11.

RESTATEMENT (continued)

Statement of Cashflows


	For the Year Ended December 31, 2009
	As Reported	Adjustment	Restated
	$	$	$
Investing Activities
Issuance of promissory notes	-	(7,500)	(7,500)
Cashflows Used In Investing Activities	(61,677)	(7,500)	(69,177)

Financing Activities
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock	457,000	(392,000)	65,000
Proceeds from note payable	-	121,955	121,955
Proceeds from related parties	-	86,596	86,596
Cashflows Provided by Financing A ctivities	459,000	(183,449)	275,551


	For the Year Ended December 31, 2008
	As Reported	Adjustment	Restated
	$	$	$
Operating Activities
Impairment of oil and gas properties	-	123,120	123,120
Advances	-	360	360
Loan Payable	307,570	(307,570)	-
Loan Payable – Related Parties	21,195	(21,195)	-
Cashflows Used In Operating Activities	168,727	(205,285)	(36,558)

Investing Activities
Asher #1 Oil Well	103,077	(103,077)	-
Asher #2 Project	5,008	(5,008)	-
West Peach Project	15,035	(15,035)	-
Cashflows Used In Investing Activities	(168,880)	(123,120)	(292,000)

Financing Activities
Proceeds from note payable	-	307,210	307,210
Procee ds from related parties	-	21,195	21,195
Cashflows Provided by Financing Activities	-	328,405	328,405


	Accumulated from February 11, 2005 to December 31, 2009
	As Reported	Adjustment	Restated
	$	$	$
Operating Activities
Net Loss	(3,126,673)	(333,258)	(3,459,931)
Impairment of oil and gas properties	-	452,090	452,090
Bad debt expense	-	319,000	319,000
Stock-based compensation	574,302	3,288	577,590
Advances	(360)	360	-
Notes	(7,500)	7,500	-
Loans Payable	180,094	(180,094)	-
Loans Payable – Related Parties	16,791	(16,791)	-
Cashflows Used In Operating Activities	(1,104,130)	252,095	(852,035)

11.

RESTATEMENT (continued)

Statement of Cashflows


	Accumulated from February 11, 2005 to December 31, 2009
	As Reported	Adjustment	Restated
	$	$	$
Investing Activities
Asher #1 Oil Well	-	(103,077)	(103,077)
Asher #2 Project	-	(5,008)	(5,008)
Investment	(1,000)	1,000	-
West Peach Project	(36,970)	(15,035)	(52,005)
Issuance of promissory notes	-	(326,500)	(326,500)
Cashflows Used In Investing Activities	(395,757)	(448,620)	(844,377)

Financing Activities
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock	1,161,318	(392,000)	769,318
Proceeds from note payabl e	-	480,735	480,735
Proceeds from related parties	(12,914)	107,790	94,876
Cashflows Provided by Financing Activities	1,514,924	196,525	1,711,449

12.

SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

In accordance with ASC 855, we have evaluated subsequent events through our audit issuance date, and did not have any material recognizable subsequent events.

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING

AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.

None.


ITEM 9A.	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"), that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appro priate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2009. Based on the evaluation of these disclosure controls and procedures, and in light of the material weaknesses found in our internal controls over financial reporting, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009 using the criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial report ing, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the Company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. In its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, the Company determined that there were control deficiencies that constituted material weaknesses, as described below.


	1.	We do not have an Audit Committee – While not being legally obligat ed to have an audit committee, it is the management’s view that such a committee, including a financial expert member, is an utmost important entity level control over the Company’s financial statement. Currently the Board of Directors acts in the capacity of the Audit Committee, and does not include a member that is considered to be independent of management to provide the necessary oversight over management’s activities.

	2. ;	We did not maintain appropriate cash controls – As of December 31, 2009, the Company has not maintained sufficient internal controls over financial reporting for the cash process, including failure to segregate cash handling and accounting functions, and did not require dual signature on the Company’s bank accounts. Alternatively, the effects of poor cash controls were mitigated by the fact that the Company had limited transactions in their bank accounts.



	3.	We did not implement appropriate information technology controls – As at December 31, 2009, the Company retains copies of all financial data and material agreements; however there is no formal procedure or evidence of normal backup of the Company’s data or off-site storage of the data in the event of theft, misplacement, or loss due to unmitigated factors.

Accordingly, the Company concluded that these control deficiencies resulted in a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by the company’s internal controls.

As a result of the material weaknesses described above, management has concluded that the Company did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009 based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by COSO.

There has been no change in internal control over financial reporting identified, in connection with the evaluation we conducted of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, that occurred during our fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Managements report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the S.E.C. that permit the Company to provide only management’s report in this annual report.

Continuing Remediation Efforts to address deficiencies in Company’s Internal Control over Financial Reporting

In connection with the aforementioned deficiencies, we will establish the following remediation measures:


	1.	Our Board of Directors will nominate an audit committee and audit committee financial expert.

	2.	We will implement either a system of dual signatures of all checks, or implement alternative procedures that ensure that at least two members of management and/or the Board of Directors review and approve the transaction prior to issuance of payment.

	3.	The Company will implement formal procedures to ensure that appropriate back-up and off-site storage of Company data is being performed.

ITEM 9B.

OTHER INFORMATION.

None.

PART III

ITEM 10.

DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS.

Identification of Directors and Executive Officers

Our current directors and executive officers are as follows:


Name and Age	Position(s) Held	Tenure	Other Public Company Directorships
Douglas Tallant, 65	Director and President	Since February 2, 2002	None
Donald Trapp, 70	Director, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer	Since February 8, 2005	None

Term of Office

Each director serves until our next annual meeting of the stockholders or unless they resign earlier. The Board of Directors elects officers and their terms of office are at the discretion of the Board of Directors. Each of

our directors serves until his or her successor is elected and qualified. Each of our officers is elected by the board of directors to a term of one (1) year and serves until his or her successor is duly elected and qualified, or until he or she is removed from office. At the present time, members of the board of directors are not compensated for their services to the board.

Background and Business Experience

The business experience during the past five years of each of the persons presently listed a bove as an Officer or Director of the Company is as follows:

Mr. Douglas Tallant was born and raised in Oklahoma. He has owned several businesses including the largest automobile dealership in Denver and physical therapy clinics in Denver and Oklahoma City. He has formed and managed several public companies including Entec, the developer of the original breathalyzer. Mr. Tallant has a Bachelor of Science degree in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Oklahoma.

Mr. Donald Trapp was formerly the CFO of Infohighway International, Inc., an internet service provider. He has also bought and sold oil and gas leases, been the operator of two oil wells, and been the General Partner of four oil and gas partn erships in New Mexico. Mr. Trapp has a Bachelor of Science degree in Nuclear Engineering from M.I.T.

Identification of Significant Employees

We have no significant employees other than Douglas Tallant, our President and Director, and Donald Trapp, our Secretary, Treasurer and Director.

Family Relationships

We currently do not have any officers or directors of our company who are related to each other.

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

During the last five years no director, executive officer, promoter or control person of the Co mpany has had or has been subject to:

(1)

any bankruptcy petition filed by or against any business of which such person was a general partner or executive officer either at the time of the bankruptcy or within two years prior to that time;

(2)

any conviction in a criminal proceeding or being subject to a pending criminal proceeding;

(3)

any order, judgme nt, or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining, barring, suspending or otherwise limiting his involvement in any type of business, securities or banking activities; or

(4)

being found by a court of competent jurisdiction, the Commission or the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to have violated any federal or state securities or commodities law, and the judgment has not been reversed, suspended, or vacated.

Code of Ethics

Our board of directors has not adopted a code of ethics due to the fact that we presently only have two directors and we are in the development stage of our operations. We anticipate that we will adopt a code of ethics when we increase either the number of our directors and officers or the number of our employees.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance.

Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires the Company’s directors and certain executive officers and certain other beneficial owners of the Company’s common stock to periodically file notices of changes in beneficial ownership of common stock with the Securities and Exchange Commission. To the best of the Company’s knowledge, based solely on copies of such reports received by it, and the written representations of its officers and directors, the Company believes that for 2009 all required filings were timely filed by each of its directors and executive officers.

We believe that our officers, directors, and principal shareholders have, if required, filed all reports required to be filed on Form 3 (Initial Statement of Beneficial Ownership of Securities), Form 4 (Statement of Changes of Beneficial Ownership of Securities), or Form 5 (Annual Statement of Beneficial Ownership of Securities).

Audit Committee and Audit Committee Financial Expert

The Company intends to establish an audit committee of the board of dir ectors, which will consist of a soon-to-be-nominated independent director. The audit committee’s duties would be to recommend to the Company’s board of directors the engagement of an independent registered public accounting firm to audit the Company’s financial statements and to review the Company’s accounting and auditing principles. The audit committee would review the scope, timing and fees for the annual audit and the results of audit examinations performed by the internal auditors and independent registered public accounting firm, including their recommendations to improve the system of accounting and internal controls. The audit committee would at all times be composed exclusively of directors who are, in the opinion of the Company’s board of directors, free from any relationship which would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment as a committee member and who possess an understanding of financial statements and generally accepted accounting principles.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The following table sets forth the compensation paid to our executive officers during the twelve month periods ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 (collectively, the “Named Executive Officers”):


Summary Compensation Table
Name and principal position	Year	Salary ($)	Bonus ($)	Stock Awards ($)	Option Awards ($)	Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compen sation	Nonqualified Deferred Compensation	All Other Compensation	Total ($)

Douglas Tallant (2)	2009	$ 180,000	Nil	Nil	$ 0	Nil	Nil	$ nil	$ 180,000
President and Director	2008	$ 180,000	Nil	Nil	$ 0	Nil	Nil	$ nil	$ 180,000

Donald Trapp	2009	$ 60,000	Nil	Nil	$ 0	Nil	Nil	$ nil	$ 60,000
CFO, Secretary, Treasurer and Director	2009	$ 60,000	Nil	Nil	$ 0	Nil	Nil	$ nil	$ 60,000

(1)

The compensation was paid as deferred salaries.

Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table

Donald Trapp - The Company entered into an employment agreement with Donald Trapp effective February 1, 2005. Pursuant to the terms of th e agreement, Mr. Trapp is to be paid an annual salary of $60,000 in consideration of which Mr. Trapp agreed to act as the Company’s Corporate Secretary and Treasurer. The term of the agreement is for an indefinite period, unless otherwise terminated pursuant to the terms of the agreement.

Option Grants


Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End
OPTION AWARDS
Name	Number of Common Shares Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable	Number of Common Shares Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable	Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options (#)	Option Exercise Price ($)	Option Expiration Date
Douglas Tallant	20,000	0	nil	$ 1.2500	April 20, 2015
	40,000	0	nil	$ 1.5625	September 28, 2016
	200,000	0	nil	$ 0.2500	December 27, 2017
	0	1,000,000	nil	$ 0.0050	July 23, 2019
Total	260,000	1,000,000
Donald Trapp	20,000	0	nil	$ 1.2500	April 20, 2015

	20,000	0	nil	$ 1.5625	September 28, 2016

	100,000	0	nil	$ 0.2500	December 27, 2017

	0	500,000	nil	$ 0.0050	July 23, 2019
Total	140,000	500,000

Pension, Retirement or Similar Benefit Plans

As of December 31, 2009 we had no pension plans or compensatory plans or other arrangements which provide compensation on the event of termination of employment or change in control of us. There are no arrangements or plans in which we provide pension, retirement or similar benefits for directors or executive officers. We have no material bonus or profit sharing plans pursuant to which cash or non-cash compensation is or may be paid to our directors or executive officers, except that stock options may be granted at the discretion of the Board of Directors or a committee thereof.

Compensation Committee

We currently do not have a compensation committee of the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors as a whole determines executive compensation.

Compensation of Directors


DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
Name (a)	Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($) (b)	Stock Awards ($) (c)	Option Awards ($) (d)	Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($) (e)	Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($) (f)	All Other Compensation ($) (g)	Total ($)(h)
Douglas Tallant	nil	nil	nil	nil	nil	nil	nil
Donald Trapp	nil	nil	nil	nil	nil	nil	nil

We do not pay members of the Board of Directors any set fees for attendance at the Board meetings or similar remuneration or reimburse them for any out-of-pocket expenses incurred by them in connection with our business.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

We do not currently have a compensation committee of the Board of Directors or a committee performing similar functions. The Board of Directors as a whole participates in the consideration of executive officer and director compensation.

Compensation Committee Repo rt

Our Chief Financial Officer and Chief Executive Officer have reviewed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and the requirements pertaining to this item. They have determined that no disclosure is necessary as we have not adopted any compensation programs and we have approved that a statement to that effect be disclosed in this Form 10-K.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.

The following table sets forth certain information concerning the number of shares of our common stock owned beneficially as of March 26, 2010 by: (i) each of our directors; (ii) each of our named executive officers; and (iii) e ach person or group known by us to beneficially own more than 5% of our outstanding shares of common stock. Unless otherwise indicated, the shareholders listed below possess sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares they own.


Name and Address of Beneficial Owner	Title of Class	Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership (1) (#)	Percent of Class (2) (%)
Douglas Tallant(3) 502 North Division Street Carson City, NV 89703	Common	2,380,673	4.52%
Donald Trapp(4) 502 North Division Street Carson City, NV 89703	Common	1,572,002	2.99%
All Officers and Directors as a Group	Common	3,952,675	7.51%

(1)

The number and percentage of shares beneficially owned is determined under rules of the SEC and the information is not necessarily indicative of beneficial ownership for any other purpose. Under such rules, beneficial ownership includes any shares as to which the individual has sole or shared voting power or investment power and also any shares which the individual has the right to acquire within 60 days through the exercise of any stock option or other right. The persons named in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common stock shown as beneficially owned by them, subject to community property laws where applicable and the information contained in the footnotes to this table.

(2)

Based on 52,568,790 issued and outstanding shares of common stock as of March 26, 2010.

(3)

Douglas Tallant is a Director and the Company's President and CEO. His beneficial ownership includes 1,620,673 common shares, as well as options to purchase 760,000 common shares that will vest within the next 60 days.

(4)

Donald Trapp is a Director and the Company's CFO, Treasurer and Secretary. His beneficial ownership includes 1,182,002 common shares, as well as options to purchase 390,000 common shares that will vest within the next 60 days.

Changes in Control

There are no present arrangements or pledges of the Company’s securities which may result in a change in control of the Company.

ITEM 13.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

Related Party Transactions

None of the directors or executive officers of the Company, nor any person who owned of record or was known to own beneficially more than 5% of the Company’s outstanding shares of its Common Stock, nor any associate or affiliate of such persons or companies, has any material interest, direct or indirect, in any transaction that has occurred during the past fiscal year, or in any proposed transaction, which has materially affected or will affect the Company.

Director Independence

The Board applies the definition of independent director as set forth in NASDAQ Stock Market Rule 4200 (a)(15), as well as Rule 10A-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. In accordance with this guidance, the Board does not consider Mr. Tallant or Mr. Trapp to be independent.

ITEM 14.

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES.


	Year Ended December 31, 2009	Year Ended December 31, 2008
Audit fees	$4,000	$4,400
Audit-related fees	$ nil	$ nil
Tax fees	$ nil	$ nil
All other fees	$ nil	$ nil
Total	$4,000	$4,400

Audit Fees

During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2009, we incurred approximately $4,000 in fees to our principal independent accountants for professional services rendered in connection with the audit and reviews of our financial statements for fiscal years ended December 31, 2009.

During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, we incurred approximately $4,400 in fees to our principal independent accountants for professional services rendered in connection with the audit and reviews of our financial statements for fiscal year ended December 31, 2008.

Audit-Related Fees

The aggregate fees billed during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 for assurance and related services by our principal independent accountants that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements (and are not reported under Item 9(e)(1) of Schedule 14A was $0 and $0, respectively.

Tax Fees

The aggregate fees billed during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 for professional servic es rendered by our principal accountant tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning was $0 and $0, respectively.

All Other Fees

The aggregate fees billed during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 for products and services provided by our principal independent accountants (other than the services reported in Items 9(e)(1) through 9(e)(3) of Schedule 14A was $0 and $0, respectively.

ITEM 15.

EXHIBITS.

(a)

Documents filed as part of this Report.

Exhibits. The following exhibits are either filed as a part hereof or are incorporated by reference. Exhibit numbers correspond to the numbering system in Item 601 of Regulation S-K.


Exhibit	& nbsp;
Number	Description of Exhibit
3.01	Articles of Incorporation⁽¹⁾
3.02	Restated Articles of Incorporation⁽²⁾
3.03	Bylaws⁽¹⁾
31.01	Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14⁽³⁾
31.02	Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14⁽³⁾
32.01	CEO Certification Pursuant to Sec tion 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act⁽³⁾
32.02	CFO Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act⁽³⁾

(1)

Incorporated by reference to our Registration Statement on Form 10SB12G filed on August 31, 2000.

(2)

Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 14, 2008, and filed with the Nevada Secretary of State on March 3, 2008.

(3)

Filed herewith.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

FRIENDLY ENERGY EXPLORATION

Dated: June 14, 2010

/s/ Douglas Tallant

By: Douglas Tallant

Its: President and Principal Executive Officer

Dated: June 14, 2010

/s/ Donald Trapp

By: Donald Trapp

Its: Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer

Pursuant to the requirement of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:

Dated: June 14, 2010

/s/ Douglas Tallant

Douglas Tallant, Director

Dated: June 14, 2010

/s/ Donald Trapp

Donald Trapp, Director

Friendly Energy Exploration (FEGR) Inactive 10-K/A2009 FY Annual report (amended)