Commitments and Contingencies | Note 12 — COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES Environmental — We have been notified by federal and state environmental agencies and by private parties that we may be a potentially responsible party (PRP) in connection with the environmental investigation and remediation of certain sites. While government agencies frequently assert that PRPs are jointly and severally liable at these sites, in our experience, the interim and final allocations of liability costs are generally made based on the relative contribution of waste. We may also initiate corrective and preventive environmental projects of our own to ensure safe and lawful activities at our operations. We believe that compliance with current governmental regulations at all levels will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. In September 2007, we were informed of rulings by the United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky on several pending motions in the case of Westlake Vinyls, Inc. v. Goodrich Corporation, et al., which had been pending since 2003. The Court held that PolyOne must pay the remediation costs at the former Goodrich Corporation Calvert City facility (now largely owned and operated by Westlake Vinyls), together with certain defense costs of Goodrich Corporation. The rulings also provided that PolyOne can seek indemnification for contamination attributable to Westlake Vinyls. The environmental obligation at the site arose as a result of an agreement between The B.F.Goodrich Company (n/k/a Goodrich Corporation) and our predecessor, The Geon Company, at the time of the initial public offering in 1993, by which The Geon Company became a public company, to indemnify Goodrich Corporation for environmental costs at the site. At the time, neither PolyOne nor The Geon Company ever owned or operated the facility. Following the Court rulings, the parties to the litigation entered into settlement negotiations and agreed to settle all claims regarding past environmental costs incurred at the site. The settlement agreement provides a mechanism to pursue allocation of future remediation costs at the Calvert City site to Westlake Vinyls. While we do not currently assume any allocation of costs in our current accrual, we will adjust our accrual, in the future, consistent with any such future allocation of costs. A remedial investigation and feasibility study (RIFS) is underway at Calvert City. During the third quarter of 2013, we submitted a remedial investigation report to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). The USEPA required certain changes to the remedial investigation report and provided a final report in the third quarter of 2015. Additionally, in the third quarter of 2015, the USEPA assumed responsibility for the completion of the feasibility study. We continue to pursue available insurance coverage related to this matter and recognize gains as we receive reimbursement. No receivable has been recognized for future recoveries. On March 13, 2013, PolyOne acquired Spartech. One of Spartech's subsidiaries, Franklin-Burlington Plastics, Inc. (Franklin-Burlington), operated a plastic resin compounding facility in Kearny, New Jersey, located adjacent to the Passaic River. The USEPA has requested that companies located in the area of the lower Passaic River, including Franklin-Burlington, cooperate in an investigation of contamination of approximately 17 miles of the lower Passaic River (the lower Passaic River Study Area). In response, Franklin-Burlington and approximately 70 other companies (collectively, the Cooperating Parties) agreed, pursuant to an Administrative Order on Consent (AOC) with the USEPA, to assume responsibility for development of a RIFS of the lower Passaic River Study Area. The RIFS costs are exclusive of any costs that may ultimately be required to remediate the lower Passaic River Study Area or costs associated with natural resource damages that may be assessed. By agreeing to bear a portion of the cost of the RIFS, Franklin-Burlington did not admit to any liability or agree to bear any such remediation or natural resource damage costs. In February 2015, the Cooperating Parties submitted to the USEPA a remedial investigation report for the lower Passaic River Study Area. In March 2015, Franklin-Burlington, along with nine other PRPs, submitted a de minimis settlement petition to the USEPA, asserting the ten entities contributed little or no impact to the lower Passaic River and seeking a meeting to commence settlement discussions. In April 2015, the Cooperating Parties submitted a feasibility study to the USEPA. The feasibility study does not contemplate who is responsible for remediation nor does it determine how such costs will be allocated to PRPs. The Cooperating Parties are currently revising their RIFS, which has not yet been approved by the USEPA, as part of continuing technical discussions with the USEPA. On March 4, 2016, the USEPA issued a Record of Decision selecting a remedy for an eight -mile portion of the lower Passaic River Study Area at an estimated and discounted cost of $1.4 billion . On March 31, 2016, the USEPA sent a Notice of Potential Liability (the Notice) to over 100 companies, including Franklin-Burlington, and several municipalities for this eight -mile portion, in which the USEPA stated it intended to negotiate an AOC for Remedial Design with Occidental Chemical Corporation (OCC) and, upon signature, planned to negotiate a consent decree with other major PRPs to perform remedial actions. The Notice did not identify the “other major PRPs.” Further, the Notice communicated that the USEPA will provide to certain parties separate notice of the opportunity to discuss a cash-out settlement at a later date. On September 30, 2016, the USEPA reached an agreement with OCC, which orders OCC to perform the remedial design for the lower eight mile portion of the Passaic River. Based on the currently available information, we have found no evidence that Franklin-Burlington contributed any of the primary contaminants of concern to the lower Passaic River. Any allocation to Franklin-Burlington, including a final resolution of our de minimis petition or other opportunity for cash-out settlement, or further appropriate legal actions has not been determined. As a result of these uncertainties, we are unable to estimate a liability, if any, related to this matter. As of September 30, 2016 , we have not accrued for costs of remediation related to the lower Passaic River. During the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 , PolyOne recognized $6.1 million and $7.8 million , respectively, of expense related to environmental remediation activities. During the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 , we received $5.3 million and $2.6 million , respectively, of insurance recoveries related to previously incurred environmental costs. These expenses and gains associated with these reimbursements are included within Cost of sales within our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income . Our Consolidated Balance Sheet includes accruals totaling $118.2 million and $119.9 million as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 , respectively, based on our estimates of probable future environmental expenditures relating to previously contaminated sites. These undiscounted amounts are included in Accrued expenses and other liabilities and Other non-current liabilities on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. The accruals represent our best estimate of probable future costs that we can reasonably estimate, based upon currently available information and technology and our view of the most likely remedy. Depending upon the results of future testing, completion and results of remedial investigation and feasibility studies, the ultimate remediation alternatives undertaken, changes in regulations, technology development, new information, newly discovered conditions and other factors, it is reasonably possible that we could incur additional costs in excess of the amount accrued at September 30, 2016 . However, such additional costs, if any, cannot be currently estimated. Further, we have not recorded receivables for future available insurance recoveries associated with these costs. Guarantee — On February 28, 2011, we sold our 50% equity interest in SunBelt Chlor Alkali Partnership (SunBelt) to Olin Corporation (Olin). As a result of the sale, Olin assumed our obligations under our guarantee of senior secured notes issued by SunBelt, which are $12.2 million as of September 30, 2016 . Unless the guarantee is formally assigned to Olin, we remain obligated under the guarantee, although Olin has agreed to indemnify us for amounts that we may be obligated to pay under the guarantee. The senior secured notes mature in December 2017. |