Exhibit 99.01
414 Nicollet Mall
Minneapolis, MN 55401
Oct. 29, 2009
XCEL ENERGY THIRD QUARTER 2009 EARNINGS
MINNEAPOLIS — Xcel Energy Inc. (NYSE: XEL) today reported third quarter 2009 earnings of $221 million, or $0.48 per diluted share, compared with $223 million, or $0.51 per diluted share, in 2008.
The decrease in third quarter 2009 earnings was primarily due to lower sales resulting from cooler temperatures in the third quarter of 2009, higher operating and maintenance expense and an increase in the effective tax rate. Partially offsetting these factors was an increase in electric margins as a result of several constructive rate case outcomes including those in Minnesota, Colorado, Texas, New Mexico and Wisconsin.
“Lower sales resulting from unseasonably cool temperatures, as well as an increase in our overall effective tax rate reduced our earnings this quarter compared to last year,” said Richard C. Kelly, chairman and chief executive officer. “Throughout the year, we have acted to offset the impact of lower sales, due to both unfavorable temperatures and economic conditions, through various cost management initiatives. Based on current projections, we expect 2009 earnings to be near the mid-point of our guidance range of $1.45 to $1.55 per share.”
At 10 a.m. CDT today, Xcel Energy will host a conference call to review financial results. To participate in the call, please dial in 5 to 10 minutes prior to the start and follow the operator’s instructions.
US Dial-In: | (877) 941-8610 |
International Dial-In: | (480) 629-9819 |
Conference ID: | 4166774 |
The conference call also will be simultaneously broadcast and archived on Xcel Energy’s website at www.xcelenergy.com. To access the presentation, click on Investor Information. If you are unable to participate in the live event, the call will be available for replay from 12:00 p.m. CDT on Oct. 29 through 11:59 p.m. CDT on Oct. 30.
Replay Numbers |
|
US Dial-In: | (800) 406-7325 |
International Dial-In: | (303) 590-3030 |
Access Code: | 4166774# |
1
Except for the historical statements contained in this release, the matters discussed herein, including our 2009 full year EPS guidance and assumptions, are forward-looking statements that are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Such forward-looking statements are intended to be identified in this document by the words “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “objective,” “outlook,” “plan,” “project,” “possible,” “potential,” “should” and similar expressions. Actual results may vary materially. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and we do not undertake any obligation to update them to reflect changes that occur after that date. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially include, but are not limited to: general economic conditions, including the availability of credit and its impact on capital expenditures and the ability of Xcel Energy and its subsidiaries to obtain financing on favorable terms; business conditions in the energy industry; actions of credit rating agencies; competitive factors, including the extent and timing of the entry of additional competition in the markets served by Xcel Energy and its subsidiaries; unusual weather; effects of geopolitical events, including war and acts of terrorism; state, federal and foreign legislative and regulatory initiatives that affect cost and investment recovery, have an impact on rates or have an impact on asset operation or ownership; structures that affect the speed and degree to which competition enters the electric and natural gas markets; costs and other effects of legal and administrative proceedings, settlements, investigations and claims; actions of accounting regulatory bodies; and the other risk factors listed from time to time by Xcel Energy in reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), including Risk Factors in Item 1A and Exhibit 99.01 of Xcel Energy’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended Dec. 31, 2008 and of Xcel Energy’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009.
For more information, contact: |
|
Paul Johnson, Managing Director, Investor Relations and Assistant Treasurer | (612) 215-4535 |
Jack Nielsen, Director, Investor Relations | (612) 215-4559 |
Cindy Hoffman, Senior Investor Relations Analyst | (612) 215-4536 |
|
|
For news media inquiries only, please call Xcel Energy media relations | (612) 215-5300 |
Xcel Energy Internet address: www.xcelenergy.com |
|
This information is not given in connection with any sale, offer for sale or offer to buy any security.
2
XCEL ENERGY INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (Unaudited)
(amounts in thousands, except per share data)
|
| Three Months Ended Sept. 30, |
| Nine Months Ended Sept. 30, |
| ||||||||
|
| 2009 |
| 2008 |
| 2009 |
| 2008 |
| ||||
Operating revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Electric |
| $ | 2,128,955 |
| $ | 2,576,467 |
| $ | 5,749,207 |
| $ | 6,704,164 |
|
Natural gas |
| 169,601 |
| 258,961 |
| 1,224,161 |
| 1,736,701 |
| ||||
Other |
| 16,006 |
| 16,252 |
| 52,819 |
| 54,718 |
| ||||
Total operating revenues |
| 2,314,562 |
| 2,851,680 |
| 7,026,187 |
| 8,495,583 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Electric fuel and purchased power |
| 982,103 |
| 1,513,935 |
| 2,703,952 |
| 3,871,437 |
| ||||
Cost of natural gas sold and transported |
| 71,638 |
| 155,804 |
| 809,791 |
| 1,298,731 |
| ||||
Cost of sales — other |
| 4,915 |
| 4,528 |
| 14,268 |
| 14,095 |
| ||||
Other operating and maintenance expenses |
| 466,465 |
| 422,560 |
| 1,410,760 |
| 1,340,362 |
| ||||
Conservation and demand side management program expenses |
| 47,157 |
| 27,483 |
| 133,793 |
| 92,278 |
| ||||
Depreciation and amortization |
| 198,222 |
| 209,131 |
| 609,285 |
| 622,512 |
| ||||
Taxes (other than income taxes) |
| 78,914 |
| 70,245 |
| 229,025 |
| 218,220 |
| ||||
Total operating expenses |
| 1,849,414 |
| 2,403,686 |
| 5,910,874 |
| 7,457,635 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Operating income |
| 465,148 |
| 447,994 |
| 1,115,313 |
| 1,037,948 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Other income (expense), net |
| (977 | ) | 9,736 |
| 4,394 |
| 27,270 |
| ||||
Allowance for funds used during construction — equity |
| 18,618 |
| 16,319 |
| 55,565 |
| 45,478 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Interest charges and financing costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Interest charges — includes other financing costs of $5,103, $5,162, $15,255 and $15,294, respectively |
| 139,347 |
| 139,777 |
| 420,447 |
| 405,671 |
| ||||
Allowance for funds used during construction — debt |
| (9,598 | ) | (9,625 | ) | (29,671 | ) | (28,748 | ) | ||||
Total interest charges and financing costs |
| 129,749 |
| 130,152 |
| 390,776 |
| 376,923 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Income from continuing operations before income taxes and equity earnings |
| 353,040 |
| 343,897 |
| 784,496 |
| 733,773 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Income taxes |
| 135,610 |
| 121,551 |
| 280,581 |
| 252,765 |
| ||||
Equity earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries |
| 4,363 |
| 349 |
| 10,760 |
| 1,154 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Income from continuing operations |
| 221,793 |
| 222,695 |
| 514,675 |
| 482,162 |
| ||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax |
| (965 | ) | 94 |
| (2,673 | ) | (684 | ) | ||||
Net income |
| 220,828 |
| 222,789 |
| 512,002 |
| 481,478 |
| ||||
Dividend requirements on preferred stock |
| 1,060 |
| 1,060 |
| 3,180 |
| 3,180 |
| ||||
Earnings available to common shareholders |
| $ | 219,768 |
| $ | 221,729 |
| $ | 508,822 |
| $ | 478,298 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Basic |
| 456,769 |
| 434,131 |
| 456,095 |
| 431,511 |
| ||||
Diluted |
| 457,453 |
| 439,397 |
| 456,729 |
| 436,716 |
| ||||
Earnings per average common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Basic |
| $ | 0.48 |
| $ | 0.51 |
| $ | 1.12 |
| $ | 1.11 |
|
Diluted |
| 0.48 |
| 0.51 |
| 1.11 |
| 1.10 |
| ||||
Cash dividends declared per common share |
| 0.25 |
| 0.24 |
| 0.73 |
| 0.71 |
| ||||
3
XCEL ENERGY INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Investor Relations Earnings Release (Unaudited)
Due to the seasonality of Xcel Energy’s operating results, quarterly financial results are not an appropriate base from which to project annual results.
Note 1. Earnings per Share Summary
The following table summarizes the diluted earnings per share for Xcel Energy:
|
| Three Months Ended Sept. 30, |
| Nine Months Ended Sept. 30, |
| ||||||||
Diluted earnings (loss) per share |
| 2009 |
| 2008 |
| 2009 |
| 2008 |
| ||||
Public Service Company of Colorado (PSCo) |
| $ | 0.20 |
| $ | 0.20 |
| $ | 0.51 |
| $ | 0.56 |
|
NSP-Minnesota |
| 0.20 |
| 0.25 |
| 0.48 |
| 0.51 |
| ||||
NSP-Wisconsin |
| 0.03 |
| 0.03 |
| 0.08 |
| 0.07 |
| ||||
Southwestern Public Service Company (SPS) |
| 0.08 |
| 0.05 |
| 0.14 |
| 0.06 |
| ||||
Equity earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries (WYCO) |
| 0.01 |
| 0.01 |
| 0.02 |
| 0.01 |
| ||||
Regulated utility — continuing operations (Note 2) |
| 0.52 |
| 0.54 |
| 1.23 |
| 1.21 |
| ||||
Holding company and other costs |
| (0.04 | ) | (0.03 | ) | (0.11 | ) | (0.11 | ) | ||||
Ongoing(a) diluted earnings per share |
| 0.48 |
| 0.51 |
| 1.12 |
| 1.10 |
| ||||
PSR Investments Inc. (PSRI) |
| — |
| — |
| (0.01 | ) | — |
| ||||
GAAP diluted earnings per share |
| $ | 0.48 |
| $ | 0.51 |
| $ | 1.11 |
| $ | 1.10 |
|
(a) Ongoing earnings exclude the impact related to the Corporate Owned Life Insurance (COLI) program. During 2007, Xcel Energy resolved a dispute with the IRS regarding its COLI program. The 2009 and 2008 earnings were not materially affected by the termination of the COLI program and the 2009 impact is primarily related to legal costs associated with company claims against the insurance provider and broker of the COLI policies.
PSCo — Earnings at PSCo were flat for the third quarter and decreased by five cents per share for the nine months ending Sept. 30, 2009, largely due to the negative impact of weather and rising costs. The decrease was partially offset by new electric rates that went into effect in July 2009. In May 2009, the Colorado Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) approved an annual electric rate increase of $112 million.
NSP-Minnesota — Earnings at NSP-Minnesota decreased by five cents per share for the third quarter and by three cents per share for the nine months ending Sept. 30, 2009. The decrease is mainly due to the negative impact of weather, an increase in the effective tax rate and timing of nuclear outage expenses. The decrease was partially offset by an electric rate increase that went into effect in January 2009.
NSP-Wisconsin — Earnings at NSP-Wisconsin were flat for the third quarter and increased by one cent per share for the nine months ending Sept. 30, 2009, largely due to improved fuel recovery and new rates which were effective in January 2009.
SPS — Earnings at SPS increased by three cents per share for the third quarter and by eight cents per share for the nine months ending Sept. 30, 2009. The increase was primarily due to electric rate increases in Texas (effective in February 2009) and New Mexico (effective in July 2009) and the 2008 resolution of certain fuel cost allocation issues, which were partially offset by higher purchased capacity costs.
WYCO — Equity earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries were flat for the third quarter and increased by one cent per share for the nine months ending Sept. 30, 2009, due to our investment in WYCO, which owns a natural gas pipeline in Colorado that began operations in late 2008 as well as a storage facility that commenced operations in July 2009.
4
The following table summarizes significant components contributing to the changes in the 2009 diluted earnings per share compared with the same periods in 2008, which are discussed in more detail later in the release.
|
| Three Months |
| Nine Months |
| ||
|
| Ended Sept. 30, |
| Ended Sept. 30, |
| ||
2008 GAAP and ongoing(a) diluted earnings per share |
| $ | 0.51 |
| $ | 1.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Components of change — 2009 vs. 2008 |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Higher electric margins |
| 0.12 |
| 0.30 |
| ||
Lower depreciation and amortization expenses |
| 0.02 |
| 0.02 |
| ||
Higher allowance for funds used during construction — equity |
| 0.01 |
| 0.02 |
| ||
Higher operating and maintenance expenses |
| (0.06 | ) | (0.10 | ) | ||
Higher conservation and DSM expenses (generally offset in revenues) |
| (0.03 | ) | (0.06 | ) | ||
Lower other income (expense), net |
| (0.02 | ) | (0.03 | ) | ||
Dilution from DRIP, benefit plan and the 2008 common equity issuance |
| (0.02 | ) | (0.05 | ) | ||
Higher taxes, other than income taxes |
| (0.01 | ) | (0.02 | ) | ||
Lower natural gas margins |
| (0.01 | ) | (0.03 | ) | ||
Higher interest expenses |
| — |
| (0.02 | ) | ||
Other, including higher effective tax rate |
| (0.03 | ) | (0.01 | ) | ||
2009 GAAP diluted earnings per share |
| 0.48 |
| 1.12 |
| ||
PSR Investments Inc. (PSRI) |
| — |
| (0.01 | ) | ||
2009 ongoing(a) diluted earnings per share |
| $ | 0.48 |
| $ | 1.11 |
|
(a) Ongoing earnings exclude the impact related to the COLI program. During 2007, Xcel Energy resolved a dispute with the IRS regarding its COLI program.The 2009 and 2008 earnings were not materially affected by the termination of the COLI program and the 2009 impact is primarily related to legal costs associated with company claims against the insurance provider and broker of the COLI policies.
Note 2. Regulated Utility Results — Continuing Operations
Estimated Impact of Temperature Changes on Regulated Earnings — The following table summarizes the estimated impact on earnings per share of temperature variations compared with sales under normal weather conditions.
|
| Three Months Ended Sept. 30, |
| Nine Months Ended Sept. 30, |
| ||||||||||||||
|
| 2009 vs. |
| 2008 vs. |
| 2009 vs. |
| 2009 vs. |
| 2008 vs. |
| 2009 vs. |
| ||||||
|
| Normal |
| Normal |
| 2008 |
| Normal |
| Normal |
| 2008 |
| ||||||
Retail electric |
| $ | (0.05 | ) | $ | (0.01 | ) | $ | (0.04 | ) | $ | (0.05 | ) | $ | (0.01 | ) | $ | (0.04 | ) |
Firm natural gas |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| (0.01 | ) | 0.01 |
| (0.02 | ) | ||||||
Total |
| $ | (0.05 | ) | $ | (0.01 | ) | $ | (0.04 | ) | $ | (0.06 | ) | $ | — |
| $ | (0.06 | ) |
Sales — The following table summarizes Xcel Energy’s sales increases and decreases for actual and weather-normalized sales for 2009 compared with the same periods in 2008, excluding the impact of the 2008 leap year.
|
| Three Months Ended Sept. 30, |
| Nine Months Ended Sept. 30, |
| ||||
|
| Actual |
| Normalized |
| Actual |
| Normalized |
|
Electric residential |
| (3.6 | )% | 2.8 | % | (2.3 | )% | 0.5 | % |
Electric commercial and industrial |
| (3.9 | ) | (2.2 | ) | (3.3 | ) | (2.6 | ) |
Total retail electric sales |
| (3.8 | ) | (0.8 | ) | (3.0 | ) | (1.7 | ) |
Firm natural gas sales |
| (3.4 | ) | (2.0 | ) | (7.0 | ) | 0.7 |
|
5
Electric — Electric revenues and fuel and purchased power expenses are largely impacted by the fluctuation of natural gas prices used in the generation of electricity, but has little impact on electric margin. The following tables detail the electric revenues and margin:
|
| Three Months Ended Sept. 30, |
| Nine Months Ended Sept. 30, |
| ||||||||
(Millions of Dollars) |
| 2009 |
| 2008 |
| 2009 |
| 2008 |
| ||||
Electric revenues |
| $ | 2,129 |
| $ | 2,576 |
| $ | 5,749 |
| $ | 6,704 |
|
Electric fuel and purchased power |
| (982 | ) | (1,514 | ) | (2,704 | ) | (3,871 | ) | ||||
Electric margin |
| $ | 1,147 |
| $ | 1,062 |
| $ | 3,045 |
| $ | 2,833 |
|
The following table summarizes the components of the changes in electric margin:
|
| Three Months |
| Nine Months |
| ||
|
| Ended Sept. 30, |
| Ended Sept. 30, |
| ||
(Millions of Dollars) |
| 2009 vs. 2008 |
| 2009 vs. 2008 |
| ||
Retail rate increases (Colorado, Minnesota, Texas, New Mexico and Wisconsin) |
| $ | 98 |
| $ | 190 |
|
Conservation and DSM revenues (generally offset by expenses) |
| 20 |
| 53 |
| ||
2008 refund of nuclear refueling outage revenues due to change in recovery method |
| 14 |
| 15 |
| ||
Non-fuel riders |
| 4 |
| 18 |
| ||
Metropolitan Emissions Reduction Project (MERP) rider |
| 3 |
| 13 |
| ||
NSP-Wisconsin fuel recovery |
| 3 |
| 10 |
| ||
Firm wholesale |
| 2 |
| 10 |
| ||
Estimated impact of weather |
| (26 | ) | (24 | ) | ||
NSP-Minnesota rate case provision for refund (largely offset in depreciation expense) |
| (25 | ) | (30 | ) | ||
Purchased capacity costs |
| (11 | ) | (44 | ) | ||
Sales mix and demand revenues |
| (5 | ) | 10 |
| ||
Retail sales decline (excluding weather impact) |
| — |
| (17 | ) | ||
SPS 2008 fuel cost allocation regulatory accruals |
| — |
| 12 |
| ||
Other, net |
| 8 |
| (4 | ) | ||
Total increase in electric margin |
| $ | 85 |
| $ | 212 |
|
Xcel Energy has experienced a decline in megawatt hours (MwH) sales, which we believe is driven by overall economic conditions and to a lesser degree, increased conservation efforts. Our most significant declines have occurred in commercial and industrial sales, which are directly related to the economic downturn. The declines in MwH sales to the commercial and industrial customer class are partially offset by demand fees, which mitigate to a certain degree the impact of the lower MwH sales.
Natural Gas — The cost of natural gas tends to vary with changing sales requirements and the cost of natural gas purchases. However, due to purchased natural gas cost recovery mechanisms for sales to retail customers, fluctuations in the cost of natural gas have little effect on natural gas margin. The following tables detail natural gas revenues and margin:
|
| Three Months Ended Sept. 30, |
| Nine Months Ended Sept. 30, |
| ||||||||
(Millions of Dollars) |
| 2009 |
| 2008 |
| 2009 |
| 2008 |
| ||||
Natural gas revenues |
| $ | 170 |
| $ | 259 |
| $ | 1,224 |
| $ | 1,737 |
|
Cost of natural gas sold and transported |
| (72 | ) | (156 | ) | (810 | ) | (1,299 | ) | ||||
Natural gas margin |
| $ | 98 |
| $ | 103 |
| $ | 414 |
| $ | 438 |
|
6
The following table summarizes the components of the changes in natural gas margin:
|
| Three Months |
| Nine Months |
| ||
|
| Ended Sept. 30, |
| Ended Sept. 30, |
| ||
(Millions of Dollars) |
| 2009 vs. 2008 |
| 2009 vs. 2008 |
| ||
Sales mix |
| $ | (2 | ) | $ | (4 | ) |
Transportation margin |
| (2 | ) | (2 | ) | ||
Estimated impact of weather |
| (1 | ) | (13 | ) | ||
Conservation and DSM revenues (generally offset by expenses) |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| ||
Other, net |
| (1 | ) | (7 | ) | ||
Total decrease in natural gas margin |
| $ | (5 | ) | $ | (24 | ) |
Other Operating and Maintenance (O&M) Expenses — O&M expenses increased by approximately $43.9 million, or 10.4 percent, for the third quarter and approximately $70.4 million, or 5.3 percent for the first nine months of 2009, compared with 2008. The following table summarizes the changes in other O&M expenses:
|
| Three Months |
| Nine Months |
| ||
|
| Ended Sept. 30, |
| Ended Sept. 30, |
| ||
(Millions of Dollars) |
| 2009 vs. 2008 |
| 2009 vs. 2008 |
| ||
Nuclear outage costs, net of deferral |
| $ | 27 |
| $ | 26 |
|
Higher employee benefit costs |
| 15 |
| 40 |
| ||
Higher nuclear plant operation costs |
| 4 |
| 20 |
| ||
Higher plant generation costs |
| 3 |
| 5 |
| ||
Lower consulting costs |
| (7 | ) | (19 | ) | ||
Other, net |
| 2 |
| (2 | ) | ||
Total increase in other operating and maintenance expenses |
| $ | 44 |
| $ | 70 |
|
· The increase in nuclear outage costs is due to the timing of outages in conjunction with the commissions’ approval of the change in the nuclear refueling outage recovery method from the direct expense method to the deferral and amortization method in the third quarter of 2008.
· Higher employee benefits costs are primarily attributable to increased pension costs, in part, related to market losses on retirement benefit plan assets as well as higher employee medical plan costs.
· The increase in nuclear plant operation costs is driven primarily by an increase in security costs and regulatory fees, resulting from new Nuclear Regulatory Commission requirements.
· Lower consulting costs are primarily the result of cost management initiatives implemented in early 2009.
Conservation and Demand Side Management (DSM) Program Expenses — Conservation and DSM program expenses increased approximately $19.7 million for the third quarter of 2009, and by $41.5 million for the first nine months of 2009, compared with the same periods in 2008. The higher expense is attributable to the expansion of programs and regulatory commitments. Conservation and DSM program expenses are generally recovered through riders in our major jurisdictions or through base rates with tracker mechanisms.
Depreciation and Amortization — Depreciation and amortization expenses decreased by approximately $10.9 million, or 5.2 percent, for the third quarter of 2009, and by $13.2 million, or 2.1 percent, for the first nine months of 2009, compared with the same periods in 2008. In September 2009, as a result of the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission (MPUC) decision in the Minnesota electric rate case, NSP-Minnesota began recognizing a 10-year life extension of the Prairie Island nuclear plant for purposes of determining depreciation, effective Jan. 1, 2009. In addition, in June 2009, the MPUC extended the recovery period of decommissioning expense by 10 years for the Prairie Island and the Monticello nuclear plants. These decreases were partially offset by normal system expansion.
Taxes (Other Than Income Taxes) — Taxes (other than income taxes) increased by approximately $8.7 million, or 12.3 percent, for the third quarter of 2009, and by $10.8 million, or 5.0 percent, for the first nine months of 2009, compared with the same periods in 2008. The increase is primarily due to increased property taxes.
7
Other Income (Expense), Net — Other income (expense), net, decreased $10.7 million during the third quarter of 2009 and $22.9 million for the first nine months of 2009, compared with the same periods in 2008. The net decline is mainly due to changes in our non-qualified benefit plan liabilities related to market activity, lower interest on under recovered deferred fuel balances and a decrease in interest received from WYCO for construction deposits.
Allowance for Funds Used During Construction, Equity and Debt (AFDC) — AFDC increased by approximately $2.3 million, or 8.8 percent, for the third quarter of 2009, and by $11.0 million, or 14.8 percent, for the first nine months of 2009, compared with the same periods in 2008. The increase was due primarily to the construction of Comanche Unit 3, a power facility located in Colorado which is expected to be completed in the fourth quarter of 2009, as well as other construction projects.
Interest Charges — Interest charges decreased by approximately $0.4 million, or 0.3 percent, for the third quarter of 2009 and increased by $14.8 million, or 3.6 percent, for the first nine months of 2009, compared with the same periods in 2008. The lower interest expense in the third quarter was largely due to a maturing bond at NSP-Minnesota that was repaid by issuing lower-cost short-term debt. This short-term debt is expected to be refinanced with long-term debt later in the year. The year-to-date increase was primarily the result of increased debt levels to fund new capital investments.
Income Taxes — Income tax expense for continuing operations increased by $14.1 million for the third quarter of 2009, compared with 2008. The effective tax rate for continuing operations was 38.4 percent for the third quarter of 2009, compared with 35.3 percent for the same period in 2008. Income tax expense for continuing operations increased by $27.8 million for the first nine months of 2009, compared with the first nine months of 2008. The effective tax rate for continuing operations was 35.8 percent for the first nine months of 2009, compared with 34.4 percent for the same period in 2008.
The higher effective tax rates were primarily due to the recognition of additional state unitary tax expense and the establishment of a valuation allowance against certain state tax credit carryovers that are now expected to expire, which was partially offset by wind energy production tax credits. Excluding these expense items, the effective tax rate for the third quarter and first nine months of 2009 would have been 36.4 percent and 34.8 percent, respectively. We expect the effective tax rate for 2009 continuing operations to be approximately 34 percent to 36 percent.
Equity Earnings of Unconsolidated Subsidiaries — Equity earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries increased by $4.0 million for the third quarter of 2009, and by $9.6 million for the first nine months of 2009, compared with the same periods in 2008. The increase is primarily due to higher earnings from the equity investment in WYCO as a result of the High Plains natural gas pipeline, located in Colorado, commencing operations in late 2008 as well as a storage facility that commenced operations in July 2009.
Note 3. Xcel Energy Capital Structure and Financing
Following is the capital structure of Xcel Energy at Sept. 30, 2009:
|
|
|
| Percentage |
| |
|
| Balance at |
| of Total |
| |
(Billions of Dollars) |
| Sept. 30, 2009 |
| Capitalization |
| |
Current portion of long-term debt |
| $ | 0.2 |
| 1 | % |
Short-term debt |
| 0.5 |
| 3 |
| |
Long-term debt |
| 7.9 |
| 50 |
| |
Total debt |
| 8.6 |
| 54 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Preferred equity |
| 0.1 |
| 1 |
| |
Common equity |
| 7.2 |
| 45 |
| |
Total equity |
| 7.3 |
| 46 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Total capitalization |
| $ | 15.9 |
| 100 | % |
8
Financing Plans — Xcel Energy issues debt securities to refinance retiring maturities, reduce short-term debt, fund construction programs and for other general corporate purposes.
NSP-Minnesota plans to issue $300 million of first mortgage bonds in November. The proceeds will be used to repay short-term debt, which was used to fund the payment of a $250 million unsecured note that matured on Aug. 1, 2009, and for general corporate purposes.
Financing plans are subject to change, depending on capital expenditures, internal cash generation, market conditions and other factors.
Xcel Energy and Utility Subsidiary Credit Facilities — As of Oct. 21, 2009, Xcel Energy had the following credit facilities available to meet its liquidity needs:
(Millions of Dollars) |
| Facility |
| Drawn(a) |
| Available |
| Cash |
| Liquidity |
| Maturity |
| |||||
NSP-Minnesota |
| $ | 482.2 |
| $ | 170.8 |
| $ | 311.4 |
| $ | 0.2 |
| $ | 311.6 |
| December 2011 |
|
PSCo |
| 675.1 |
| 4.6 |
| 670.5 |
| 13.1 |
| 683.6 |
| December 2011 |
| |||||
SPS |
| 247.9 |
| 10.0 |
| 237.9 |
| 3.6 |
| 241.5 |
| December 2011 |
| |||||
Xcel Energy – Holding Company |
| 771.6 |
| 371.1 |
| 400.5 |
| 1.7 |
| 402.2 |
| December 2011 |
| |||||
NSP-Wisconsin(b) |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 21.8 |
| 21.8 |
|
|
| |||||
Total |
| $ | 2,176.8 |
| $ | 556.5 |
| $ | 1,620.3 |
| $ | 40.4 |
| $ | 1,660.7 |
|
|
|
(a) Includes direct borrowings, outstanding commercial paper and letters of credit.
(b) NSP-Wisconsin does not have a separate credit facility; however, it has a short-term borrowing agreement with NSP-Minnesota.
Note 5. Rates and Regulation
NSP-Minnesota Electric Rate Case — In November 2008, NSP-Minnesota filed a request with the MPUC to increase Minnesota electric rates by $156 million annually. This request was later modified to $136 million.
In September 2009, the MPUC voted to approve a rate increase of approximately $91.4 million. As part of its decision, the MPUC approved a 10-year life extension of the Prairie Island nuclear plant for purposes of determining depreciation and decommissioning expenses, effective Jan. 1, 2009. This decision reduced NSP-Minnesota’s overall revenue deficiency by approximately $40 million, while at the same time reducing expense accruals by a corresponding amount. A summary of the key terms is listed below:
|
| Revised Request |
| Approved |
|
Rate increase |
| $136 million |
| $91 million |
|
Return on equity (ROE) |
| 11.0% |
| 10.88% |
|
Equity ratio |
| 52.5% |
| 52.5% |
|
Electric rate base |
| $4.1 billion |
| $4.1 billion |
|
Depreciation life extension for Prairie Island nuclear plant |
| 0 years |
| 10 years |
|
As of Sept. 30, 2009, NSP-Minnesota accrued a customer refund of approximately $30.2 million to reflect the difference between interim rates that were implemented Jan. 2, 2009 and the amount approved by the MPUC. The written order was issued Oct. 23, 2009.
NSP-Minnesota - South Dakota Electric Rate Case — In June 2009, NSP-Minnesota filed to increase South Dakota electric rates by $18.6 million, or 12.7 percent. The request is based on a requested ROE of 11.25 percent, an electric rate base of $282 million, an equity ratio of 51.63 percent and a 2008 historic test year, adjusted for known and measurable changes in rate base and O&M expense. The proposed increase includes approximately $2.9 million in rider revenues; therefore, the requested increase, net of current riders, is approximately $15.7 million or 10.7 percent. Rates are expected to be effective in January 2010, based on statutory requirements in South Dakota. The procedural schedule is as follows:
· Staff and Intervenor Testimony – Nov. 20, 2009;
· Testimony – Dec. 4. 2009;
· Hearings – Dec. 9 – 11, 2009.
9
NSP-Wisconsin - Electric and Gas Rate Case — In June 2009, NSP-Wisconsin filed an electric and gas rate case in Wisconsin seeking an increase in retail electric rates of $30.4 million, or 5.7 percent, and proposed no change in natural gas rates. The request is based on an ROE of 10.75 percent, an equity ratio of 53.12 percent, an electric rate base of $644 million, a gas rate base of $81 million and a 2010 forecasted test year. The request is comprised of a traditional base rate increase of $45.1 million offset by projected fuel decreases of $14.7 million.
On Oct. 21, 2009, Public Service Commission of Wisconsin (PSCW) staff and intervenors filed testimony. The PSCW staff recommended an increase of $14.5 million for 2010 based on a 10.75 percent ROE and a 51.63 percent equity ratio. The staff has proposed to apply the 2009 fuel over recovery against the increase such that there would be no change in rates for 2010. A summary of the adjusted request is listed below:
Millions of dollars |
| Request |
| PSCW |
| ||
Base non-fuel |
| $ | 45.1 |
| $ | 36.8 |
|
Fuel |
| (14.7 | ) | (15.8 | ) | ||
Prairie Island decommissioning |
| — |
| (6.5 | ) | ||
Rate increase |
| $ | 30.4 |
| $ | 14.5 |
|
The base non-fuel adjustments include: (1) an adjustment to the equity ratio from 53.12 percent to 51.63 percent on a regulatory basis; (2) a reduction to rate base to account for appropriated retained earnings associated with certain hydro licenses; (3) reduced interchange agreement fixed charge billings and (4) a disallowance of certain employee compensation expenses. In addition, the PSCW staff adjustments to the proposed increase include a $6.5 million reduction for Prairie Island nuclear plant decommissioning expense as a result of the 10-year life extension approved by the MPUC.
The Wisconsin Industrial Energy Group (WIEG) was the only intervenor to file direct testimony. WIEG objects to NSP-Wisconsin’s class cost of service study and proposed rate design, and recommends changes that would benefit its members.
A decision is expected by the end of 2009 with new rates in effect in January 2010. The procedural schedule is as follows:
· Rebuttal Testimony — Nov. 6, 2009;
· Surrebuttal Testimony — Nov. 10, 2009;
· Technical & Public Hearing — Nov. 11, 2009.
PSCo - 2010 Electric Rate Case — In May 2009, PSCo filed a request to increase electric rates in Colorado by $180.2 million, or 6.8 percent. The rate filing is based on a 2010 forecast test year, 11.25 percent ROE, rate base of $4.4 billion, and an equity ratio of 58.05 percent. Intervenors have filed testimony with the following current recommendations:
· The CPUC staff has recommended an increase of $70.5 million, based on an adjusted 2008 historic test year (adjusted for Comanche Unit 3 and Fort St. Vrain) and a 9.84 percent ROE. The main adjustments are related to ROE, elimination of incentive pay, and deferral of recovery of dismantling costs.
· The Colorado Office of Consumer Counsel (OCC) has recommended an increase of $33.2 million, based on an adjusted 2008 historic test year (adjusted for Comanche Unit 3 and Fort St. Vrain) and a 9.75 percent ROE. The main adjustments are related to ROE, a lower equity ratio of 53 percent, a cash working capital cost reduction, unbilled revenue, elimination of incentive pay, lower pension and benefit costs, and no recovery of future Innovative Clean Technology expense. The OCC recommended an increase of $87.8 million if a forward test year is accepted.
· Colorado Energy Consumers recommended an increase of up to $95.4 million, an adjusted 2008 historic test year and an ROE of 10.0 percent. The recommendation should be reduced to reflect adjustments by other intervenors.
· CF&I Steel, LP and Climax Molybdenum Co. recommended an increase of up to $98.4 million and an adjusted 2008 historic test year. The recommendation should be reduced to reflect adjustments by other intervenors.
In October 2009, PSCo filed rebuttal testimony and revised their request rate increase to $177.4 million and affirmed its requested ROE of 11.25 percent. The procedural schedule is as follows.
· Hearings | Oct. 26 — Nov. 6, 2009; |
· Statements of Position | Nov. 16, 2009. |
PSCo expects a decision before year end with new rates effective in January 2010.
10
Note 6. Xcel Energy Earnings Guidance
Based on current projections, we expect 2009 earnings to be near the mid-point of our guidance range of $1.45 to $1.55 per share. Key assumptions are detailed below:
· | Normal weather patterns are experienced for the remainder of the year. | |
· | Reasonable regulatory outcomes are achieved in various rate cases and other regulatory decisions which may occur during the year. | |
· | Various riders, associated with MERP, Minnesota and Colorado transmission and Minnesota renewable energy, are expected to increase revenue by approximately $50 million to $60 million over 2008 levels. | |
· | Weather adjusted electric retail sales decline by approximately 2 percent. | |
· | Weather adjusted retail firm natural gas sales decline by approximately 1 percent. | |
· | Capacity costs are projected to increase approximately $45 million over 2008 levels. Capacity costs at PSCo are recovered under the purchased capacity cost adjustment. | |
· | Operating and maintenance expenses are projected to increase $140 million over 2008 levels. In 2008, nuclear outage expense decreased due to a change in recovery method related to costs associated with refueling outages and there was no accrual in 2008 for the annual performance based incentive plan. The increase reflects the following: | |
| · | Nuclear (including outage amortization) — $55 million |
| · | Pension and medical — $35 million |
| · | Other —$50 million (including $35 million of incentive compensation) |
· | Depreciation and amortization expense is projected to decline by approximately $10 million compared with 2008 levels. This reflects the recent MPUC decision to extend the depreciation life of the Prairie Island nuclear plant by 10 years. | |
· | Interest expense increases approximately $15 million to $20 million over 2008 levels. | |
· | Allowance for funds used during construction — equity is projected to increase by $10 million to $15 million over 2008 levels. | |
· | An effective tax rate for continuing operations of approximately 34 percent to 36 percent. | |
· | Average common stock and equivalents of approximately 457 million shares. | |
Note 7. Non-GAAP Reconciliation
The following table provides a reconciliation of ongoing earnings to GAAP earnings:
|
| Three Months Ended Sept. 30, |
| Nine Months Ended Sept. 30, |
| ||||||||
(Thousands of Dollars) |
| 2009 |
| 2008 |
| 2009 |
| 2008 |
| ||||
Ongoing(a) earnings |
| $ | 222,131 |
| $ | 223,275 |
| $ | 516,970 |
| $ | 482,535 |
|
PSRI |
| (338 | ) | (580 | ) | (2,295 | ) | (373 | ) | ||||
Total continuing operations |
| 221,793 |
| 222,695 |
| 514,675 |
| 482,162 |
| ||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations |
| (965 | ) | 94 |
| (2,673 | ) | (684 | ) | ||||
GAAP earnings |
| $ | 220,828 |
| $ | 222,789 |
| $ | 512,002 |
| $ | 481,478 |
|
(a) Ongoing earnings exclude the impact related to the COLI program. During 2007, Xcel Energy resolved a dispute with the IRS regarding its COLI program. The 2009 and 2008 earnings were not materially affected by the termination of the COLI program and the 2009 impact is primarily related to legal costs associated with company claims against the insurance provider and broker of the COLI policies.
11
XCEL ENERGY INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED EARNINGS RELEASE SUMMARY
All amounts in thousands, except earnings per share
Three Months Ended Sept. 30, |
| 2009 |
| 2008 |
| ||
Operating revenues: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Electric and natural gas revenues |
| $ | 2,298,556 |
| $ | 2,835,428 |
|
Other |
| 16,006 |
| 16,252 |
| ||
Total operating revenues |
| 2,314,562 |
| 2,851,680 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Income from continuing operations |
| 221,793 |
| 222,695 |
| ||
Income from discontinued operations |
| (965 | ) | 94 |
| ||
Net income |
| 220,828 |
| 222,789 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Earnings available to common shareholders |
| 219,768 |
| 221,729 |
| ||
Weighted average diluted common shares outstanding |
| 457,453 |
| 439,397 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Components of Earnings per Share — Diluted |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Regulated utility — continuing operations |
| 0.52 |
| 0.54 |
| ||
Holding company and other costs |
| (0.04 | ) | (0.03 | ) | ||
Ongoing(a) diluted earnings per share |
| 0.48 |
| 0.51 |
| ||
PSRI |
| — |
| — |
| ||
GAAP diluted earnings per share |
| $ | 0.48 |
| $ | 0.51 |
|
Nine Months Ended Sept. 30, |
| 2009 |
| 2008 |
| ||
Operating revenues: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Electric and natural gas revenues |
| $ | 6,973,368 |
| $ | 8,440,865 |
|
Other |
| 52,819 |
| 54,718 |
| ||
Total operating revenues |
| 7,026,187 |
| 8,495,583 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Income from continuing operations |
| 514,675 |
| 482,162 |
| ||
Income from discontinued operations |
| (2,673 | ) | (684 | ) | ||
Net income |
| 512,002 |
| 481,478 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Earnings available to common shareholders |
| 508,822 |
| 478,298 |
| ||
Weighted average diluted common shares outstanding |
| 456,729 |
| 436,716 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Components of Earnings per Share — Diluted |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Regulated utility — continuing operations |
| 1.23 |
| 1.21 |
| ||
Holding company and other costs |
| (0.11 | ) | (0.11 | ) | ||
Ongoing(a) diluted earnings per share |
| 1.12 |
| 1.10 |
| ||
PSRI |
| (0.01 | ) | — |
| ||
GAAP diluted earnings per share |
| $ | 1.11 |
| $ | 1.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Book value per share |
| $ | 15.76 |
| $ | 15.27 |
|
(a) Ongoing earnings exclude the impact related to the COLI program. During 2007, Xcel Energy resolved a dispute with the IRS regarding its COLI program. The 2009 and 2008 earnings were not materially affected by the termination of the COLI program and the 2009 impact is primarily related to legal costs associated with company claims against the insurance provider and broker of the COLI policies.
12