Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements Disclosure and Significant Accounting Policies [Text Block] | 1. Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Organization and Business Senomyx, Inc. (“we”, “us” or “our”) was incorporated on September 16, 1998 in Delaware and commenced operations in January 1999. We use proprietary taste receptor technologies to discover, develop and commercialize innovative flavor ingredients for the packaged food, beverage and ingredient supply industries to improve the nutritional profile of their products and generate cost of goods savings while maintaining or improving taste. Our current programs focus on the development and commercialization of sweet, savory and salt flavor ingredients, bitter blockers and cooling agents. We currently have product discovery, development and commercialization collaborations with four of the world’s leading packaged food, beverage and ingredient companies: Ajinomoto Co., Inc. (“Ajinomoto”), Firmenich SA (“Firmenich”), Nestlé SA (“Nestlé”) and PepsiCo, Inc. (“PepsiCo”). Our collaboration agreements generally provide for license fees, research and development funding, reimbursement of certain costs, development milestone payments based upon our achievement of research or development goals and, in the event of commercialization, commercial milestone payments, minimum periodic royalties and royalties on sales of products incorporating our flavor ingredients. We also sell certain flavor ingredients directly to flavor companies for inclusion in a flavor system for re-sale to food and beverage companies. Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with United States generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Cash and Cash Equivalents We consider all highly liquid investments with a remaining maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents are recorded at cost, which approximates market value. Investments Available-for-Sale Our surplus cash is invested in United States Treasuries, United States government agency bonds and corporate bonds with maturity dates of two years or less from the settlement date. The amortized cost of debt securities is adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts to maturity with all amortization and accretion included in interest income. Our investments are classified as available-for-sale and carried at estimated fair value, with unrealized gains and losses reported in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as a separate component of stockholders’ equity. Realized gains and losses and declines in value judged to be other-than-temporary, if any, on available-for-sale securities are included in interest income. The cost of securities sold is based on the specific identification method. Interest on securities classified as available-for-sale is included in interest income. Fair Value of Financial Instruments other than Investments Available-for-Sale The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivables, accounts payable and accrued expenses are considered to be representative of their respective fair value because of the short-term nature of those items. Concentration of Credit Risk and Major Collaborations Financial instruments, which potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk, consist of cash, cash equivalents and investments available-for-sale. We limit our exposure to credit loss by placing our cash, cash equivalents, and investments with high credit quality financial institutions in instruments with short maturities. We derive significant portions of our revenues from a relatively small number of collaborators. For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, revenues from any single collaborator that contributed 10% or more of revenues for the period were as follows: Years Ended December 31, 201 5 201 4 201 3 PepsiCo $14.9 million (60%) $14.5 million (53%) $16.2 million (55%) Firmenich $8.8 million (35%) $9.4 million (34%) $9.4 million (32%) Accounts Receivable We extend credit to our customers in the normal course of business based upon an evaluation of the customer’s credit history, financial condition and other factors. Estimates of allowances for uncollectible receivables are determined by evaluating individual customer circumstances, historical payment patterns, length of time past due and other factors. At December 31, 2015 and 2014, we did not have any allowances for uncollectible receivables. Accounts receivable from customers which contributed 10% or more of accounts receivable at December 31, 2015 and 2014 were as follows: December 31, 201 5 201 4 PepsiCo $2.0 million (61%) — Firmenich $1.2 million (37%) $1.2 million (55%) Nestlé — $0.6 million (26%) Inventories Inventories consist entirely of purchased finished goods. Inventories are valued at lower of cost (on a moving average basis) or market value. We are required to make assumptions regarding the level of reserves required to value items at the lower of cost or market. These assumptions require us to analyze forecasted demand, pricing trends, margins, product life cycles and qualitative factors given the limited sales history of our products, and to make judgments and estimates regarding excess or obsolete inventory. At December 31, 2015 and 2014, we did not have any reserves for lower of cost or market, excess or obsolete inventory. In July 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2015-11, “Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory” which requires an entity to measure inventory within the scope of this ASU at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation. The amendments in this guidance more closely align the measurement of inventory in GAAP with the measurement of inventory in International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”). This accounting guidance is effective for us beginning in the first quarter of 2018. We do not expect this updated standard to have a material impact on our financial statements and related disclosures. Property and Equipment Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and are depreciated over the estimated useful lives of the assets (ranging from three to five years) using the straight-line method. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the estimated useful life of the asset or the lease term, whichever is shorter. Impairment of Long-Lived Assets In accordance with the Property, Plant and Equipment Topic of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) , if indicators of impairment exist, we assess the recoverability of the affected long-lived assets by determining whether the carrying value of such assets can be recovered through undiscounted future operating cash flows. If impairment is indicated, we measure the amount of such impairment by comparing the fair value to the carrying value. There have been no indicators of impairment through December 31, 2015. Deferred Rent Rent expense is recorded on a straight-line basis over the term of any lease. The difference between rent expense accrued and amounts paid under any lease agreement is recorded as deferred rent in the accompanying balance sheets. Leasehold Incentive Obligation In conjunction with the lease agreement covering the facility occupied by us, we received a tenant improvement allowance of $155 per square foot leased, or $10.1 million. As the tenant improvements were constructed, we recorded both the covered tenant improvements (as property and equipment) and an offsetting leasehold incentive obligation on our balance sheet. Through the term of the lease, we record depreciation expense to depreciate the tenant improvements and record an offsetting reduction to rent expense to amortize the leasehold incentive obligation. Revenue Recognition Development Revenues Development revenues are based on our product discovery, development and commercialization collaboration agreements. Some of our collaboration agreements contain multiple elements, including technological and territorial licenses and research and development services. In accordance with these agreements, we may be eligible for license fees, research and development funding, development milestone payments, cost reimbursements, royalty payments, minimum periodic royalty payments and commercial milestone payments. Development revenues include revenues from license fees, research and development funding, the achievement of development milestones and cost reimbursements. Pursuant to the Revenue Recognition – Multiple-Element Arrangements Topic of the FASB ASC, each required deliverable is evaluated to determine if it qualifies as a separate unit of accounting. For us, this determination is generally based on whether the deliverable has “stand-alone value” to the customer. The arrangement’s consideration is then allocated to each separate unit of accounting based on the relative selling price of each deliverable. The estimated selling price of each deliverable is determined using the following hierarchy of values: (i) vendor-specific objective evidence of fair value; (ii) third-party evidence of selling price; and (iii) best estimate of selling price, or BESP. The BESP reflects our best estimate of what the selling price would be if the deliverable was regularly sold by us on a stand-alone basis. We expect, in general, to use the BESP for allocating consideration to each deliverable. In general, the consideration allocated to each unit of accounting is then recognized as the related goods or services are delivered, limited to the consideration that is not contingent upon future deliverables. For multiple-element arrangements entered into prior to January 1, 2011 and not materially modified thereafter, we continue to apply our prior accounting policy with respect to such arrangements. Non-refundable license fees, if not associated with our future performance, are recognized when received. Non-refundable license fees, if associated with our future performance obligations, are attributed to a specific program or collaboration and recognized over the period of service for that specific program or collaboration. Amounts received for research funding are recognized as revenues as the services are performed. Revenue is deferred for fees received before earned. Revenues from development milestones are accounted for in accordance with the Revenue Recognition – Milestone Method Topic of the FASB ASC. Milestones are recognized when earned, as evidenced by written acknowledgment from the collaborator or other persuasive evidence that the milestone has been achieved, provided that the milestone event is substantive. A milestone event is considered to be substantive if its achievability was not reasonably assured at the inception of the agreement and our efforts led to the achievement of the milestone or the milestone was due upon the occurrence of a specific outcome resulting from our performance. If both of these criteria are not met, the milestone payment is recognized over the remaining minimum period of our performance obligations under the agreement. We assess whether a milestone is substantive at the inception of each agreement. Revenues from cost reimbursement are recognized when earned, as evidenced by written acknowledgment from the collaborator or other persuasive evidence. Commercial Revenues Commercial revenues from collaboration agreements include royalties on sales made by our collaborators of products incorporating our flavor ingredients, minimum periodic royalty payments and revenues from the achievement of commercial milestones. Commercial revenues also include direct sales of our flavor ingredients to flavor companies. Royalties on sales made by our collaborators of products incorporating our flavor ingredients are recognized when a royalty report or other persuasive evidence is received, which is generally one quarter in arrears. Non-refundable minimum periodic royalty payments are recognized as revenues over the related royalty periods. Royalty terms are specific to each collaboration and collaborator and can vary from year to year. These terms vary based on factors such as the characteristics of the flavor ingredient and the product categories and geographies licensed by the collaborator. Periodically, as contractually specified, our collaborators are required to provide a report detailing all sales of products containing our flavor ingredients. To the extent that calculated royalties on sales of such products exceed the minimum periodic royalty payments made to date, the collaborators are required to remit to us the difference between royalties calculated and minimum periodic royalty payments made to date. We recognize this difference as royalties on product sales at the time the report is received. To the extent that minimum periodic royalty payments through the end of any applicable period exceed calculated royalties, we are not required to refund the difference. Revenues from commercial milestones are recognized when earned, as evidenced by written acknowledgment from the collaborator or other persuasive evidence that the milestone has been achieved, because we have no further performance obligations related to the commercial milestones. Revenues from direct sales of our flavor ingredients are recorded when there is persuasive evidence that an arrangement exists, title has passed, collection is reasonably assured and the price is fixed or determinable. We generally do not offer discounts, rebates or a general right of return on sales of flavor ingredients. New Accounting Guidance In May 2014, the FASB issued accounting guidance on the recognition of revenue from customers which will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in U.S. GAAP when it becomes effective. Under this guidance, an entity will recognize revenue when it transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects that the entity expects in exchange for the goods or services. This guidance also requires more detailed disclosures to enable users of the financial statements to understand the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. The guidance is currently effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those years. The guidance allows entities to select one of two methods of adoption, either the full retrospective approach, meaning the guidance would be applied to all periods presented, or modified retrospective, meaning the cumulative effect of applying the guidance would be recognized as an adjustment to our opening retained earnings new balance at January 1, 2018, along with providing certain additional disclosures. We have not yet selected a transition method nor have we determined the effect of the standard on our ongoing financial reporting. Cost of Commercial Revenues Cost of commercial revenues represents royalties payable under our third-party licensing agreements and the cost of goods sold related to direct sales, including related shipping and handling costs. Research, Development and Patents Research and development costs, including those incurred in relation to our collaborative agreements, are expensed in the period incurred. Research and development costs primarily consist of salaries and related expenses for personnel, facilities and depreciation, research and development supplies, licenses and outside services. Such research and development costs totaled $22.4 million, $24.9 million and $27.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Costs related to filing and pursuing patent applications are expensed as incurred, as recoverability of such expenditures is uncertain. We include all external costs related to the filing of patents related to development in Research, Development and Patents expenses. Such patent-related expenses totaled $1.7 million, $1.7 million and $1.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Employee Benefit Plans We have a defined contribution plan under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code covering employees who meet certain eligibility requirements. Eligible employees may defer their pre-tax compensation up to the maximum allowed by the Internal Revenue Service, or IRS. Under the plan, we may match a portion of employee contributions up to a defined maximum. Such matching contributions become vested and non-forfeitable according to a defined vesting schedule. We made matching contributions of $183,000, $199,000 and $187,000 for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Stock-Based Compensation Compensation cost for stock-based awards is based on the estimated grant-date fair value. We use the Black-Scholes option-pricing model for determining the estimated fair value for stock-based awards with the following weighted average assumptions (annualized percentages): Years Ended December 31, 201 5 201 4 201 3 Stock Options Expected volatility 65.6 % 71.8 % 70.2 % Risk-free interest rate 1.73 % 1.82 % 1.54 % Dividend yield 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % Expected term (in years) 6.1 6.2 6.1 Employee Stock Purchase Plan Expected volatility 68.4 % 68.9 % 62.8 % Risk-free interest rate 0.47 % 0.23 % 0.10 % Dividend yield 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % Expected term 1.2 1.3 1.2 Expected volatility is based on our historical volatility. The risk-free interest rate for the expected term of the option is based on the average United States Treasury yield curve at the balance sheet date. The assumed dividend yield is based on our expectation of not paying dividends in the foreseeable future. The expected term of options granted is based on historical exercise data . The assumptions related to expected volatility and risk-free interest rate used for the valuation of stock options differ from those used for the valuation of employee stock purchase plan rights primarily due to the difference in their respective expected terms. The weighted-average estimated fair value of stock options granted during the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 were $2.79, $5.53 and $1.36 per share, respectively. The weighted-average estimated fair value of employee stock purchase plan rights granted during the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 were $2.88, $4.21 and $1.32 per share, respectively. Stock-based compensation expenses recognized in the Statements of Operations are based on awards ultimately expected to vest; accordingly, these expenses are reduced for estimated forfeitures. The Compensation-Stock Compensation Topic of the FASB ASC requires forfeitures to be estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. Pre-vesting forfeitures were estimated to be approximately 3.8%, 4.0% and 6.1% for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively, based on historical experience. Stock-based compensation expenses for options and awards are recognized on a straight-line basis. S tock-based compensation expenses are allocated to research, development and patents or selling, general and administrative based upon the department to which the associated employee or non-employee reports. Total stock-based compensation expenses recognized for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 was comprised as follows (in thousands): Years Ended December 31, 201 5 201 4 201 3 Research, development and patents $ 2,233 $ 2,575 $ 1,688 Selling, general and administrative 3,037 3,606 2,341 Total stock-based compensation expenses $ 5,270 $ 6,181 $ 4,029 The total fair value of options that vested during the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 was $5.8 million, $3.7 million and $3.9 million, respectively. At December 31, 2015, total unrecognized estimated compensation expenses related to non-vested stock options granted prior to that date were $7.1 million, expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.6 years. Income Taxes We account for income taxes in accordance with provisions which set forth an asset and liability approach that requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the carrying amounts and the tax bases of assets and liabilities. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not expected to be realized. In making such a determination, a review of all available positive and negative evidence is considered, including scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, tax planning strategies and recent financial performance. The provisions of the Income Taxes Topic of the FASB ASC defines a recognition threshold and measurement attributes for financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax provision taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The Topic also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. Under the Topic, the impact of an uncertain income tax position on the income tax return must be recognized at the largest amount that is more-likely-than-not to be sustained upon audit by the relevant taxing authority. An uncertain income tax position will not be recognized if it has less than a 50% likelihood of being sustained. We recognize interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions as a component of the income tax provision. Net Loss Per Share Basic earnings per share (“EPS”) is calculated by dividing the net loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period, without consideration for common stock equivalents. Diluted EPS is computed by dividing the net income or loss by the weighted average number of common share equivalents outstanding for the period determined using the treasury-stock method. Dilutive common share equivalents include the dilutive effect of in-the-money shares, which is calculated based on the average share price for each period using the treasury stock method. Under the treasury stock method, the exercise price of a share, the amount of compensation cost, if any, for future service that we have not yet recognized, and the amount of estimated tax benefits that would be recorded in paid-in capital, if any, when the share is exercised are assumed to be used to repurchase shares in the current period. For purposes of this calculation, options to purchase common stock are considered to be common stock equivalents and are only included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share when their effect is dilutive. The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net loss per share for the respective periods. Years Ended December 31, 201 5 201 4 201 3 Numerator: Net loss (in thousands) $ (12,648 ) $ (12,150 ) $ (11,898 ) Denominator: Weighted average common shares 43,968,167 42,611,904 40,662,640 Basic and diluted net loss per share $ (0.29 ) $ (0.29 ) $ (0.29 ) Years Ended December 31, 201 5 201 4 201 3 O utstanding antidilutive securities not included in diluted net loss per share calculation: Options to purchase common stock 10,942,398 11,256,053 11,578,438 Comprehensive Income (Loss) The Comprehensive Income Topic of the FASB ASC requires that all components of comprehensive income (loss), including net income (loss), be reported in the financial statements in the period in which they are recognized. Comprehensive income (loss) is defined as the change in equity during a period from transactions and other events and circumstances from non-owner sources. Our accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as of December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 consisted of unrealized gains or losses on investments available-for-sale and is reported in stockholders’ equity. Segment Reporting We operate in one business segment, which is the development and commercialization of flavor ingredients. All of our operations are located in the United States. Due to the confidential nature of our collaborations, it is impracticable to report geographic information related to revenues. Recent Accounting Pronouncements In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements-Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern. Under the new guidance, management will be required to assess an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, and to provide related footnote disclosures in certain circumstances. The provisions of this ASU are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and for annual and interim periods thereafter; early adoption is permitted. We have not elected to early adopt and are currently evaluating the potential changes from this ASU to our future financial reporting and disclosures. |