Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies) | 12 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2013 |
Accounting Policies [Abstract] | ' |
Basis of Consolidation | ' |
Basis of Consolidation |
|
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiary, Response Genetics, Ltd., a Scottish corporation (the “Subsidiary”), which was incorporated in November 2006. The Subsidiary had no employees or active operations during 2012 and 2013. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and Cash Equivalents | ' |
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity at date of purchase of three months or less to be cash equivalents. The carrying value of cash equivalents approximates fair value due to the short-term nature and liquidity of these instruments. The Company’s cash equivalents are comprised of cash on hand, deposits in banks and money market investments. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Accounts Receivable | ' |
Accounts Receivable |
|
Pharmaceutical Accounts Receivable |
|
The Company invoices its clients as specimens are processed and any other contractual obligations are met. The Company’s contracts with clients typically require payment within 45 days of the date of invoice. The Company maintains allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of its clients to make required payments. The Company specifically analyzes accounts receivable and historical bad debts, client credit, current economic trends and changes in client payment trends when evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts. Account balances are charged-off against the allowance when it is probable the receivable will not be recovered. To date, the Company’s clients have primarily been large pharmaceutical companies. As a result, bad debts from clinical accounts receivable to date have been minimal. Pharmaceutical company accounts receivable as of December 31, 2012 and 2013 were $2,549,665 and $1,892,384 respectively. There were no allowances for doubtful accounts recorded against these pharmaceutical accounts receivable at December 31, 2012 and 2013. |
|
ResponseDX® Accounts Receivable |
|
ResponseDX® accounts receivable are recorded from two primary payors: Medicare and third party and private payors (“Private Payors”). ResponseDX® accounts receivable are recorded at established billing rates less an estimated billing adjustment, based on reporting models utilizing historical cash collection percentages and updated for current effective reimbursement factors. Management performs ongoing valuations of accounts receivable balances based on management’s evaluation of historical collection experience and industry trends. Based on the historical experience for our Medicare and Private Payor accounts, management has determined, based on a detailed analysis, that accounts receivable associated with certain billings are unlikely to be collected. Therefore, the Company has recorded an allowance for doubtful accounts of $991,990 and $2,404,659 as of December 31, 2012 and 2013. The Company’s bad debt expense for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2013 was $1,351,592 and $3,165,918, respectively. |
|
ResponseDX ® accounts receivable consisted of the following: |
|
| | December 31, | | December 31, | | | | | | | |
| | 2012 | | 2013 | | | | | | | |
Net Medicare receivable | | $ | 890,936 | | $ | 2,422,611 | | | | | | | |
Net Private Payor receivable | | | 2,924,412 | | | 4,315,587 | | | | | | | |
| | | 3,815,348 | | | 6,738,198 | | | | | | | |
Allowance for doubtful accounts | | | -991,990 | | | -2,404,659 | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 2,823,358 | | $ | 4,333,539 | | | | | | | |
|
As more fully discussed in Note 3 Property and Equipment and Intangible Assets, the Company acquired accounts receivable in August 2013 that had a valuation of $257,000. All of these receivables were collected by December 31, 2013. |
|
As part of its process for evaluating the collectability of aged accounts receivable management identified delays in the Medicare administrative law appeal process for aged accounts receivable that would extend the process significantly (up to two years). Accordingly, management considered this factor in estimating the allowance for doubtful accounts and concluded that an additional allowance of approximately $690,000 was necessary as of December 31, 2013 to reserve for the balance of Medicare accounts receivable as of December 31, 2013 that were going to age greater than one year shortly after December 31, 2013. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Property and Equipment and Intangible Assets | ' |
Property and Equipment and Intangible Assets |
|
Property and equipment are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization are calculated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. The Company has determined the estimated useful lives of its property and equipment, as follows: |
|
Laboratory equipment | | 5 to 7 years | | | | | | | | | | | |
Furniture and equipment | | 5 to 7 years | | | | | | | | | | | |
Purchased and internally-developed software | | 3 to 5 years | | | | | | | | | | | |
Leasehold improvements | | Shorter of the useful life (5 to 7 years) or the lease term | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. The cost and accumulated depreciation of assets sold or otherwise disposed of are removed from the related accounts and the resulting gain or loss is reflected in the statements of operations. The Company has capitalized costs related to the development of database software (see Note 3). The portion of this database placed into service is amortized in accordance with ASC 350-40, Internal-Use Software. The amortization period is five years using the straight-line method. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Revenue Recognition | ' |
Revenue Recognition |
|
Pharmaceutical Revenue |
|
Revenues that are derived from testing services provided to pharmaceutical companies are recognized on a contract specific basis pursuant to the terms of the related agreements. Revenue is recognized in accordance with ASC 605, Revenue Recognition, which requires that four basic criteria must be met before revenue can be recognized: (1) persuasive evidence that an arrangement exists; (2) delivery has occurred and title and the risks and rewards of ownership have been transferred to the client or services have been rendered; (3) the price is fixed or determinable; and (4) collectability is reasonably assured. |
|
Revenues are recorded on an accrual basis as the contractual obligations are completed and as a set of assays is processed through the Company’s laboratory under a specified contractual protocol and are recorded on the date the tests are resulted. Certain contracts have minimum assay requirements that, if not met, result in payments that are due upon the completion of the designated period. In these cases, revenues are recognized when the end of the specified contract period is reached. |
|
On occasion, the Company may enter into a contract that requires the client to provide an advance payment for specimens that will be processed at a later date. In these cases, the Company records this advance as deferred revenue and recognizes the revenue as the specimens are processed or at the end of the contract period, as appropriate. |
|
In March 2010, the Company entered into a non-exclusive license agreement with GlaxoSmithKline, LLC, which called for certain milestone payments to be made to the Company when certain events specified in the agreement occur, specifically GlaxoSmithKline, LLC submitting an application to use the license to the FDA, the FDA approving the application, and issuance of certain patent applications to the Company. The Company has no further obligations related to these events and therefore has recorded the milestone payments that were due under the agreement into revenue at the time the event occurred. |
|
The Company recorded revenue from pharmaceutical clients of $6,852,536 and $7,789,985 for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2013, respectively. |
|
ResponseDX® Revenue |
|
Revenues that are derived from ResponseDX® testing services are recognized in accordance with ASC 605, Revenue Recognition, which requires that four basic criteria be met before revenue can be recognized: (1) persuasive evidence that an arrangement exists; (2) delivery has occurred and title and the risks and rewards of ownership have been transferred to the client or services have been rendered; (3) the price is fixed or determinable; and (4) collectability is reasonably assured. We record revenues when our tests have confirmed results which are evidence that the services have been performed. |
|
Revenues are recorded on an accrual basis as the contractual obligations are completed and as a set of assays is processed through our laboratory under a specified contractual protocol. |
|
ResponseDX® private payor and Medicare revenues are recorded at established billing rates less an estimated billing adjustment, based on reporting models utilizing historical cash collection percentages and updated for current effective reimbursement factors. The Company’s Medicare provider number allows it to invoice and collect from Medicare. The Company’s invoicing to Medicare is primarily based on amounts allowed by Medicare for the service provided as defined by Common Procedural Terminology (“CPT”). |
|
Medicare reimbursement rates are subject to regulatory changes and government funding restrictions. In January 2013, the annual Medicare fee schedules update was announced which included proposed changes to Medicare reimbursement rates that significantly reduced the reimbursement rates for certain of the testing services the Company provides. The Company participated with other impacted organizations to provide guidance to the local Medicare Administrative Contractor (“MAC”) that resulted in the local MAC updating certain pricing through September 2013 which reflected an increase in many of the tests originally priced in January 2013. In addition, on October 1, 2013, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (“CMS”) issued fees for some, but not all, of the CPT codes used by the Company. As a result of these CPT code changes and Medicare price changes, the Company has experienced a departure from its normal reimbursement patterns with Medicare and other payors. Specifically, the Company has experienced delays in certain reimbursements for services and an increase in initial denials of claims for certain services provided. Accordingly, the Company re-evaluated the assumptions employed in its model for estimating revenue to be recognized for ResponseDX® testing. The Company views the code and price changes described above as affecting only the assumptions the Company used in pricing its services. The nature of the testing the Company provides, the evidence it gathers to establish the creditworthiness of its payors and the delivery method of its services have not changed from prior periods, and there are no indicators that these assumptions require change. |
|
The Company performed an analysis that considered its historical patterns of revenue by payor in conjunction with the fluctuations it experienced in the twelve months ended December 31, 2013 to arrive at the revenue recorded during 2013. The Company believes that the changes in CPT codes and pricing that are causing confusion and erratic payment experience in the payor community will take some time to resolve. The time needed for resolution will depend upon Medicare and the local MAC releasing additional pricing changes and potentially, revisions to previously revised prices, and upon the private payor community adopting the new CPT codes and some level of revised pricing. Accordingly, the Company’s revenue recognition estimates could be materially affected in future periods as pricing and payment patterns change and develop, and the Company may be materially affected by future or retroactive price changes. |
|
The following details ResponseDX® revenue for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2013: |
|
| | Year Ended December 31, | | | | | | | |
| | 2012 | | 2013 | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Medicare revenue | | $ | 5,405,393 | | $ | 4,521,732 | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Private Payor revenue | | | 6,472,386 | | | 7,489,642 | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other | | | 6,354 | | | — | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net ResponseDX® revenue | | $ | 11,884,133 | | $ | 12,011,374 | | | | | | | |
|
Cost-Containment Measures |
|
Both government and private pay sources have instituted cost-containment measures designed to limit payments made to providers of health care services, which include diagnostic test providers such as the Company, and there can be no assurance that future measures designed to limit payments made to providers will not adversely affect the Company. |
|
Regulatory Matters |
|
A portion of the Company’s revenues are derived from Medicare reimbursement. Laws and regulations governing Medicare programs are complex and subject to interpretation, and the Company may be adversely affected by future governmental investigations, lawsuits or private actions which include mandatory damages, fines, penalties, criminal charges, loss or suspension of licenses and/or suspension or exclusion from Medicare and certain other governmental programs. The Company believes that it is in compliance with all applicable laws and regulations and is not aware of any pending or threatened investigations involving allegations of potential wrongdoing. |
|
Medicare reimbursement rates are subject to regulatory changes and government funding restrictions. In January 2013, the annual Medicare fee schedules update was announced which included proposed changes to Medicare reimbursement rates that significantly reduced the reimbursement rates for certain of the testing services we provide. The Company participated with other impacted organizations to provide guidance to the local MAC that resulted in the local MAC updating certain pricing through September 2013 which reflected an increase in many of the tests originally priced in January 2013. In addition, on October 1, 2013, CMS issued fees for some, but not all, of the CPT codes used by the Company. It is uncertain if continued guidance provided to Medicare and the local MAC by impacted organizations will result in additional fee increases or additional positive coverage determinations in 2014. If however, the current reduction in reimbursement rates is adopted as is, it may have a material adverse effect on the Company's operations. |
|
On July 8, 2013, CMS released a new proposed rulemaking entitled “Medicare Program; Revisions to Payment Policies under the Physician Fee Schedule, Clinical Laboratory Fee Schedule & Other Revisions to Part B for CY 2014”. This proposed rule contains a number of provisions that may adversely impact the level of reimbursement for a variety of tests for which the Company receives reimbursement from the Medicare program beginning in 2014. Among other things, CMS has proposed examining approximately 1,200 laboratory tests that appear on the Clinical Lab Fee Schedule (“CLFS”) over a period of five years to determine whether advances in technology may have reduced the cost of providing such tests and whether or not the level of reimbursement should be revised. The Company is currently performing molecular testing which is reimbursed using CPT codes that fall on the CLFS. CMS has also proposed changing the methodology used to determine reimbursement rates for the technical component of certain tests reimbursed off of the Physician Fee Schedule (“PFS”). Among other provisions, CMS has proposed limiting the Relative Value Units (“RVUs”) ascribed to the Practice Expense component of their reimbursement formula for tests performed in “Non-Facilities” (which would include most clinical laboratories like the Company) to the RVUs that have been ascribed for the same procedures under the Hospital Outpatient Prospective Payment System, or the Ambulatory Payment Classification (“APC”) system which are used to reimburse “Facilities” (such as hospitals and ambulatory surgery centers). The Company currently performs FISH testing, which may be impacted by this PFS rule change if it is enacted. CMS has not yet proposed any specific rates for 2014 and the Company is examining the potential impact that a reduction in the level of reimbursement for the tests the Company offers may have on its operations. |
|
A number of proposals for legislation or regulation continue to be under discussion which could have the effect of substantially reducing Medicare reimbursements for clinical laboratories or introducing cost sharing to beneficiaries. Depending upon the nature of regulatory action, if any, which is taken and the content of legislation, if any, which is adopted, the Company could experience a significant decrease in revenues from Medicare and Medicaid, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company. The Company is unable to predict, however, the extent to which such actions will be taken. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cost of Revenue | ' |
Cost of Revenue |
|
Cost of revenue represents the cost of materials, direct labor, royalties, costs associated with processing tissue specimens including pathological review, staining, microdissection, paraffin extraction, reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, fluorescence in situ hybridization (“FISH”), quality control analyses, license fees and delivery charges necessary to render an individualized test result. Costs associated with performing tests are recorded as the tests are processed. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
License Fees | ' |
License Fees |
|
The Company has licensed technology for the extraction of ribonucleic acid (“RNA”) from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor specimens from the University of Southern California (“USC”). Under the terms of the license agreement, the Company is required to pay royalties to USC calculated as a fixed percentage of the revenue the Company generates by using this technology. The Company also maintains a non-exclusive license to use certain patents related to the polymerase chain reaction (“PCR”) of Roche Molecular Systems, Inc. (“Roche”). The Company pays Roche a royalty fee based on revenue that the Company generates through use of this technology. The Company accrues for such royalties at the time revenue is recognized. Such royalties are included in cost of revenues in the accompanying statements of operations. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Research and Development | ' |
Research and Development |
|
The Company expenses costs associated with research and development activities as incurred. Research and development costs are expensed as incurred and classified as research and development costs. Research and development costs include employee costs (salaries, payroll taxes, benefits, and travel), equipment depreciation and warranties and maintenance, laboratory supplies, primers and probes, reagents, patent costs and occupancy costs. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Line of Credit | ' |
Line of Credit |
|
On July 14, 2011, the Company entered into a line of credit agreement with Silicon Valley Bank (the “Bank”). The agreement has been amended most recently on March 7, 2013. The line of credit is collateralized by the Company’s pharmaceutical , Private Payor and Medicare receivables. The amended maximum amount that can be borrowed from the credit line is $2,000,000. As of December 31, 2013, the amount the Company can draw from the loan was $1,000,000 calculated as the lesser of (i) the Company’s calculated borrowing base, which was 80% of certain of the Company’s accounts receivable, or (ii) the amount available under the credit line. As of December 31, 2013, the interest fees associated with this line of credit were set at the prime rate plus 1%. During 2012 and 2013, the rate charged to the Company was 5%. As needed from time to time, the Company may draw on this line for use for general corporate purposes. As of December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2013, the Company has drawn $1,000,000 against the line of credit. The line of credit is subject to various financial covenants. As of December 31, 2013, the Company was not in compliance with one of these covenants, and the Bank waived the covenant violation. Prior to the most recent amendment on March 7, 2013, the Company was also not in compliance with certain other covenants. The September 28, 2012 amendment provided forbearance for the failure to comply with these certain covenants through November 30, 2012, and modified the covenants to include a requirement that the Company maintain account balances at the Bank totaling a minimum of $4,000,000 during the covered forbearance period. The December 6, 2012 amendment to the agreement extended the forbearance for the failure to comply with these certain covenants and the requirement for the Company to maintain account balances at the Bank totaling a minimum of $4,000,000 through December 31, 2012. In addition, pursuant to the March 7, 2013 amendment, the Bank waived the Company's existing breach of financial covenants under the credit agreement and the parties restructured the line of credit to provide that, among other things: (i) the revolving line of credit's maturity date was extended to March 7, 2015, (ii) the fee for the unused portion of the revolving line of credit was reduced from 0.375% to 0.250% per annum of the average unused portion of the revolving line of credit, (iii) the Company must continue to meet certain reporting requirements including providing financial statements and a certificate of compliance with the terms and conditions of the credit agreement by an authorized officer to the Bank within 45 days of the last day of each calendar quarter, provided that if the Company has less than $4,000,000 in its account at the Bank at any time during such calendar quarter, the Company must provide the financial statements and the certificate of compliance within 30 days of the end of such calendar quarter and provide a monthly report on revenues realized from private payors, (iv) the financial covenants were amended and restated to require the Company to maintain a ratio of quick assets to current liabilities of 1:50 to 1:00 and meet certain specified minimum adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) requirements as defined in the amendment and measured on a monthly basis and (v) the Bank is granted certain additional inspection of books, records and collateral rights. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
As of December 31, 2012, the line of credit under the credit agreement was classified as a current liability of the Company on the accompanying balance sheet as the line of credit had a maturity date less than one year from December 31, 2012. As of December 31, 2013, the line of credit under the credit agreement was classified as a non-current liability of the Company on the accompanying balance sheet as the line of credit had a maturity date of greater than one year from December 31, 2013. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
From time to time, the Company’s calculated borrowing base under its Bank line of credit may decrease to a level where the Company is in an over-advance position in which case the Company will be required to repay any outstanding amounts greater than the calculated borrowing base for such covered period back to the Bank immediately. The Company will be able to draw down on the credit line again with respect to such paid back amount once the Company is in compliance with the borrowing base requirement. This occurred on one occasion during the second quarter of 2012 based on the May 2012 borrowing base, as a result of which the Company was required to repay $298,000 to the Bank. The Company drew down the same amount one week later once the June 2012 borrowing base was determined to be sufficiently higher than the May 2012 borrowing base, thereby giving the Company the capacity to borrow such additional amount. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income Taxes | ' |
Income Taxes |
|
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between the financial reporting and tax basis of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized. |
|
ASC 740, Income Taxes, clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in financial statements and requires the impact of a tax position to be recognized in the financial statements if that position is more likely than not of being sustained by the taxing authority. As of December 31, 2012 and 2013, the Company does not have a liability for unrecognized tax benefits. The Company recognizes interest and penalties associated with tax matters as part of the income tax provision, and the Company includes accrued interest and penalties with the related tax liability in the balance sheet. For the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2013, there were no interest or penalties recorded on the consolidated statement of operations. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Stock-Based Compensation | ' |
Stock-Based Compensation |
|
The Company accounts for stock-based compensation in accordance with ASC 718, Stock Compensation, Share-Based Payment. Stock-based compensation expense for all stock-based compensation awards granted is based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of ASC 718. The Company recognizes these compensation costs on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the award, which is generally the option vesting period. As further described in Note 7, certain awards granted to Thomas A. Bologna, the Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, were recognized based on an accelerated vesting basis triggered by market conditions rather than a straight-line basis. |
|
The Company accounts for equity instruments issued to non-employees in accordance with ASC 505, Equity. Under ASC 505, stock option awards issued to non-employees are measured at fair value using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and recognized pursuant to a performance model. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Management Estimates | ' |
Management Estimates |
|
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates in these consolidated financial statements have been made for revenue, allowances for doubtful accounts, impairment of long-lived assets, depreciation of property and equipment and stock-based compensation. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Long-lived Assets | ' |
Long-lived Assets |
|
Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. The Company evaluates potential impairment by comparing the carrying amount of the asset with the estimated undiscounted future cash flows associated with the use of the asset and its eventual disposition. Should the review indicate that the assets cost is not recoverable, the carrying value of the asset would be reduced to its fair value, which is measured by future discounted cash flows. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Foreign Currency Translation | ' |
Foreign Currency Translation |
|
The financial position and results of operations of the Company’s foreign subsidiary are determined using local currency as the functional currency. Assets and liabilities of these operations are translated at the exchange rate in effect at each period-end. Statement of Operations amounts are translated at the average rate of exchange prevailing during the period. Translation adjustments arising from the use of differing exchange rates from period to period are included in accumulated other comprehensive loss in stockholders’ equity (deficit). |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Comprehensive Loss | ' |
Comprehensive Loss |
|
The components of comprehensive loss are net loss and foreign currency translation adjustments for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2013. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fair Value of Financial Instruments | ' |
Fair Value of Financial Instruments |
|
Cash and cash equivalents are stated at cost, which approximates fair market value. Cash equivalents consist of money market accounts, with fair values estimated based on quoted market prices. Debt balances are stated at historical amounts less principal payments, which approximate fair market value. The Company believes interest rates in its debt agreements are commensurate with lender risk profiles for similar companies. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Advertising Costs | ' |
Advertising costs |
|
The Company markets its services through its advertising activities in trade publications and on the internet. Advertising costs are included in selling and marketing expenses on the statements of operations and are expensed as incurred. Advertising costs for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2013 were $13,788 and $16,677, respectively. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Reclassification | ' |
Reclassifications |
|
Prior year amounts in the consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform with the current year presentation. Reclassified amounts had no impact on the Company’s net losses for the year ended December 31, 2012 or 2013. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Concentration of Credit Risk and Clients and Limited Suppliers | ' |
Concentration of Credit Risk Clients and Limited Suppliers |
|
Cash and cash equivalents are maintained at financial institutions and, at times, balances may exceed federally insured limits. The Company has never experienced any losses related to these balances. At December 31, 2013, the Company had $7,867,276 in cash and cash equivalents that exceeded federally insured limits. At December 31, 2013, $6,969 of cash was held outside of the United States. |
|
Revenue sources that accounted for greater than 10 percent of revenue are provided below. |
|
| | Year Ended December 31, | |
| | 2012 | | 2013 | |
| | Revenue | | Percent of Total Revenue | | Revenue | | Percent of Total Revenue | |
GlaxoSmithKline entities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
GlaxoSmithKline LLC | | $ | 1,280,704 | | | 6.8 | % | $ | 1,134,366 | | | 5.8 | % |
GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals S.A. | | $ | 3,241,211 | | | 17.3 | % | $ | 3,534,619 | | | 17.9 | % |
Total GlaxoSmithKline entities | | $ | 4,521,915 | | | 24.1 | % | $ | 4,668,985 | | | 23.7 | % |
Medicare, net of contractual allowances | | $ | 5,405,393 | | | 28.8 | % | $ | 4,521,732 | | | 22.8 | % |
|
Clients that accounted for greater than 10 percent of accounts receivable are provided below. |
|
| | As of December 31, | |
| | 2012 | | 2013 | |
| | Receivable | | Percent of Total Receivables | | Receivable | | Percent of Total Receivables | |
Balance | Balance |
GlaxoSmithKline entities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
GlaxoSmithKline LLC | | $ | 200,169 | | | 3.1 | % | $ | 597,937 | | | 6.9 | % |
GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals S.A. | | $ | 1,490,975 | | | 23.4 | % | $ | 544,298 | | | 6.3 | % |
Total GlaxoSmithKline entities | | $ | 1,691,144 | | | 26.5 | % | $ | 1,142,235 | | | 13.2 | % |
Medicare, net of contractual allowances | | $ | 890,936 | | | 14 | % | $ | 2,422,611 | | | 28.1 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Many of the supplies and reagents used in the Company’s testing process are procured from a limited number of suppliers. Any supply interruption or an increase in demand beyond the suppliers’ capabilities could have an adverse impact on the Company’s business. Management believes it can identify alternative sources, if necessary, but it is possible such sources may not be identified in sufficient time to avoid an adverse impact on its business. Refer also to Note 6 for further discussion regarding these supply agreements. The Company purchases certain laboratory supplies and reagents primarily from a limited number of suppliers. The Company made approximately 71% of its reagent purchases from two suppliers during the year ended December 31, 2012 and made approximately 87% of its reagent purchases from four suppliers during the year ended December 31, 2013. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Recent Accounting Pronouncements | ' |
Recent Accounting Pronouncements |
|
We have reviewed all recently issued standards and have determined they will not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements or do not apply to our operations. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |