Fair Value Measurements | 9 Months Ended |
Sep. 30, 2014 |
Fair Value Measurements [Abstract] | ' |
Fair Value Measurements | ' |
11. Fair value measurements: |
|
Fair value measurements and disclosures are based on a fair value hierarchy as determined by significant inputs used to measure fair value. The three levels of inputs within the fair value hierarchy are defined as follows: |
|
Level 1 – Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. An active market for the asset or liability is a market in which transactions for the asset or liability occur with sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis, generally on a national exchange. |
|
Level 2 – Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-based valuations in which all significant inputs are observable in the market. |
|
Level 3 – Valuation is modeled using significant inputs that are unobservable in the market. These unobservable inputs reflect the Company's own estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. |
|
At September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, only the Company’s warrants were measured on a recurring basis. However, the Company recorded non-recurring adjustments to reflect the fair values of certain impaired off-lease assets during the first nine months of 2014, and those of impaired lease and off-lease assets during 2013. Amounts at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 reflect the fair value of the then existing impaired assets. |
|
The Company’s valuation policy is determined by members of the Asset Management, Credit and Accounting departments. Whenever possible, the policy is to obtain quoted market prices in active markets to estimate fair values for recognition and disclosure purposes. Where quoted market prices in active markets are not available, fair values are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, broker quotes, information from third party remarketing agents, third party appraisals of collateral and/or other valuation techniques. These techniques are significantly affected by certain of the Company’s assumptions, including discount rates and estimates of future cash flows. Potential taxes and other transaction costs are not considered in estimating fair values. As the Company is responsible for determining fair value, an analysis is performed on prices obtained from third parties. Such analysis is performed by asset management and credit department personnel who are familiar with the Company’s investments in equipment, notes receivable and equity securities of venture companies. The analysis may include a periodic review of price fluctuations and validation of numbers obtained from a specific third party by reference to multiple representative sources. |
|
The measurement methodologies are as follows: |
|
Warrants (recurring) |
|
Warrants owned by the Company are not registered for public sale, but are considered derivatives and are carried on the balance sheet at an estimated fair value at the end of the period. The valuation of the warrants was determined using a Black-Scholes formulation of value based upon the stock price(s), the exercise price(s), the volatility of comparable venture companies, and a risk free interest rate for the term(s) of the warrant exercise(s). As of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the calculated fair value of the Fund’s warrant portfolio approximated $81 thousand and $177 thousand, respectively. Such valuations are classified within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy. |
|
The following table reconciles the beginning and ending balances of the Company’s Level 3 recurring assets (in thousands): |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Level 3 Assets | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at December 31, 2013 | $ | 177 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Unrealized loss on warrants, net recorded during the period | | -96 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at September 30, 2014 | $ | 81 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Impaired off-lease equipment (non-recurring) |
|
During the third quarter of 2014, the Company deemed certain lease equipment (assets) to be impaired and recorded fair value adjustments of $37 thousand to reduce the cost basis of the equipment. Such amount also represents total fair value adjustments for the nine months ended September 30, 2014. By comparison, during the respective three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Company recorded $63 thousand and $219 thousand of fair value adjustments to reduce the cost basis of certain impaired lease and off-lease equipment. No additional adjustments were recorded during the fourth quarter of 2013. As of December 31, 2013, all impaired lease equipment was either disposed of or were re-categorized to off-lease equipment. |
|
The aforementioned adjustments were non-recurring. Under the Fair Value Measurements Topic of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, the fair values of such impaired equipment are classified within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy as the data sources utilized for the valuation of the assets reflect significant inputs that are unobservable in the market. Such valuation utilizes a market approach technique and uses inputs that reflect the sales price of similar assets sold by affiliates and/or information from third party remarketing agents not readily available in the market. |
|
As of September 30, 2014, the fair value measurement of assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis was nominal. The table below presents the December 31, 2013 fair value measurement of assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis and the level within the hierarchy in which the fair value measurements fall (in thousands): |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 31-Dec-13 | | Level 1 Estimated Fair Value | | Level 2 Estimated Fair Value | | Level 3 Estimated Fair Value | | | | | | |
Assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Impaired off-lease equipment | $ | 3 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 3 | | | | | | |
|
The following tables summarize the valuation techniques and significant unobservable inputs used for the Company’s recurring and non-recurring fair value adjustments categorized as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013: |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
30-Sep-14 | | | | | | |
Name | | Valuation Frequency | | Valuation Technique | | Unobservable Inputs | | Range of Input Values | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Warrants | | Recurring | | Black-Scholes formulation | | Stock price | | $1.12 - $50.94 | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Exercise price | | $0.16 - $50.94 | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Time to maturity (in years) | | 0.08 - 5.75 | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Risk-free interest rate | | 0.02% - 1.95% | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Annualized volatility | | 16.15% - 100.00% | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Off-lease Equipment | | Non-recurring | | Market Approach | | Third Party Agents' Pricing | | $100-$300 | | | | | | |
Quotes - per equipment | (total of $400) | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Equipment Condition | | Poor to Average | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
31-Dec-13 | | | | | | |
Name | | Valuation Frequency | | Valuation Technique | | Unobservable Inputs | | Range of Input Values | | | | | | |
Warrants | | Recurring | | Black-Scholes formulation | | Stock price | | $1.12 - $50.94 | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Exercise price | | $0.16 - $50.94 | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Time to maturity (in years) | | 0.62 - 7.00 | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Risk-free interest rate | | 0.11% - 2.28% | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Annualized volatility | | 17.80% - 100.00% | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Off-lease Equipment | | Non-recurring | | Market Approach | | Third Party Agents' Pricing | | $500 | | | | | | |
Quotes - per equipment | (total of $2,500) | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Equipment Condition | | Poor to Average | | | | | | |
|
The following disclosure of the estimated fair value of financial instruments is made in accordance with the guidance provided by the Financial Instruments Topic of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Fair value estimates, methods and assumptions, set forth below for the Company’s financial instruments, are made solely to comply with the requirements of the Financial Instruments Topic. |
|
The Company has determined the estimated fair value amounts by using market information and valuation methodologies that it considers appropriate and consistent with the fair value accounting guidance. Considerable judgment is required to interpret market data to develop the estimates of fair value. The use of different market assumptions and/or estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts. |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
The recorded amounts of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents approximate fair value because of the liquidity and short-term maturity of these instruments. |
|
Notes receivable |
|
The fair value of the Company’s notes receivable is generally estimated based upon various methodologies deployed by financial and credit management including, but not limited to, credit analysis, third party appraisal and/or discounted cash flow analysis based upon current market valuation techniques and market rates for similar types of lending arrangements, which may consider adjustments for impaired loans as deemed necessary. |
|
Investment in securities |
|
The Company’s investment securities are not registered for public sale and are carried at cost which management believes approximates fair value, as appropriately adjusted for impairment. |
|
Non-recourse debt |
|
The fair value of the Company’s non-recourse debt is estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, based upon current market borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements. |
|
Commitments and Contingencies |
|
Management has determined that the fair value of contingent liabilities (or guarantees) is not considered material because management believes there has been no event that has occurred wherein a guarantee liability has been incurred or will likely be incurred. |
|
The following tables present estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments in accordance with the guidance provided by the Financial Instruments Topic of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 (in thousands): |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fair Value Measurements at September 30, 2014 |
| | Carrying Amount | | | Level 1 | | | Level 2 | | | Level 3 | | | Total |
Financial assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 5,016 | | $ | 5,016 | | $ | - | | $ | - | | $ | 5,016 |
Notes receivable, net | | 380 | | | - | | | - | | | 380 | | | 380 |
Investment in securities | | 5 | | | - | | | - | | | 5 | | | 5 |
Warrants | | 81 | | | - | | | - | | | 81 | | | 81 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Financial liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Non-recourse debt | | 9,707 | | | - | | | - | | | 9,974 | | | 9,974 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2013 |
| | Carrying Amount | | | Level 1 | | | Level 2 | | | Level 3 | | | Total |
Financial assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 4,738 | | $ | 4,738 | | $ | - | | $ | - | | $ | 4,738 |
Notes receivable, net | | 526 | | | - | | | - | | | 526 | | | 526 |
Investment in securities | | 5 | | | - | | | - | | | 5 | | | 5 |
Warrants | | 177 | | | - | | | - | | | 177 | | | 177 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Financial liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Non-recourse debt | | 13,105 | | | - | | | - | | | 13,575 | | | 13,575 |
|
|