Spire (SR) 10-Q 2011 Q1 Quarterly report

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D. C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

[ X ] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the Quarter Ended December 31, 2010

OR

[     ]	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
	For the Transition Period from ­__________ to __________

Commission File Number 1-16681

THE LACLEDE GROUP, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Missouri (State of Incorporation)	74-2976504 (I.R.S. Employer Identification number)
720 Olive Street St. Louis, MO  63101 (Address and zip code of principal executive offices) 314-342-0500 (Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant:

(1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such report) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [ X ] No [     ]

has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes [ X ] No [     ]

is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer	[ X ]	Accelerated filer	[     ]
Non-accelerated filer	[     ]	Smaller reporting company	[     ]

is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [     ] No [ X ]

As of January 27, 2011, there were 22,384,705 shares of the registrant’s Common Stock, par value $1.00 per share, outstanding.

TABLE OF CONTENTS			Page No.
PART I.  FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1	Financial Statements:
		Statements of Consolidated Income	4
		Statements of Consolidated Comprehensive Income	5
		Consolidated Balance Sheets	6-7
		Statements of Consolidated Cash Flows	8
		Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	9-24
Item 2	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
		Results of Operations	25-37
Item 3	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		38
Item 4	Controls and Procedures		38
PART II.  OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1	Legal Proceedings		39
Item 2	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		39
Item 6	Exhibits		39
SIGNATURE			40
INDEX TO EXHIBITS			41

FILING FORMAT

The Laclede Group, Inc. (Laclede Group or the Company) and Laclede Gas Company (Laclede Gas or the Utility) previously filed joint Forms 10-K and 10-Q, with the Utility’s Financial Statements, Notes to Financial Statements, and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included as Exhibit 99.1 in the combined reports. Beginning with the quarter ended December 31, 2010, the Company and the Utility are each filing separate periodic reports with the SEC.

2

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

The interim financial statements included herein have been prepared by the Company, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the notes thereto included in the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010.

3

Item 1. Financial Statements

THE LACLEDE GROUP, INC.

STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED INCOME

 (UNAUDITED)

	Three Months Ended
	December 31,
(Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)	2010		2009
Operating Revenues:
Regulated Gas Distribution	$	277,443	$	282,929
Non-Regulated Gas Marketing		166,408		197,525
Other		351		10,712
Total Operating Revenues		444,202		491,166
Operating Expenses:
Regulated Gas Distribution
Natural and propane gas		173,365		182,000
Other operation expenses		34,862		37,463
Maintenance		6,140		6,174
Depreciation and amortization		9,638		9,363
Taxes, other than income taxes		15,748		16,224
Total Regulated Gas Distribution Operating Expenses		239,753		251,224
Non-Regulated Gas Marketing		163,353		194,730
Other		345		4,548
Total Operating Expenses		403,451		450,502
Operating Income		40,751		40,664
Other Income and (Income Deductions) – Net		1,845		1,587
Interest Charges:
Interest on long-term debt		5,942		6,146
Other interest charges		744		563
Total Interest Charges		6,686		6,709
Income Before Income Taxes		35,910		35,542
Income Tax Expense		12,541		12,656
Net Income	$	23,369	$	22,886
Average Number of Common Shares Outstanding:
Basic		22,041		21,957
Diluted		22,120		22,001
Basic Earnings Per Share of Common Stock	$	1.05	$	1.03
Diluted Earnings Per Share of Common Stock	$	1.05	$	1.03
Dividends Declared Per Share of Common Stock	$	0.405	$	0.395
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

4

THE LACLEDE GROUP, INC.

STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(UNAUDITED)

	Three Months Ended
	December 31,
(Thousands)	2010			2009
Net Income	$	23,369		$	22,886
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Before Tax:
Net gains (losses) on cash flow hedging derivative instruments:
Net hedging gain arising during the period		214			3,743
Reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income		(3,090	)		(4,051	)
Net unrealized losses on cash flow hedging derivative instruments		(2,876	)		(308	)
Amortization of actuarial loss included in net periodic pension and
postretirement benefit cost		107			98
Other Comprehensive Loss, Before Tax		(2,769	)		(210	)
Income Tax Benefit Related to Items of Other Comprehensive Loss		(1,070	)		(81	)
Other Comprehensive Loss, Net of Tax		(1,699	)		(129	)
Comprehensive Income	$	21,670		$	22,757
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

5

THE LACLEDE GROUP, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(UNAUDITED)

	Dec. 31,			Sept. 30,			Dec. 31,
(Thousands)	2010			2010			2009
ASSETS
Utility Plant	$	1,338,568		$	1,326,284		$	1,288,862
Less:  Accumulated depreciation and amortization		447,582			442,200			429,892
Net Utility Plant		890,986			884,084			858,970
Non-utility property		4,538			4,551			4,123
Other investments		50,505			50,226			46,321
Other Property and Investments		55,043			54,777			50,444
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents		25,087			86,919			80,029
Accounts receivable:
Utility		165,171			70,053			159,423
Non-utility		61,951			56,160			75,317
Other		11,055			11,671			15,781
Allowance for doubtful accounts		(6,732	)		(10,295	)		(8,297	)
Inventories:
Natural gas stored underground at LIFO cost		109,171			113,576			88,204
Propane gas at FIFO cost		16,881			15,625			15,649
Materials, supplies, and merchandise at average cost		4,255			3,867			4,162
Natural gas receivable		12,320			22,963			25,026
Derivative instrument assets		13,150			10,285			11,234
Unamortized purchased gas adjustments		18,136			23,718			—
Deferred income taxes		1,162			—			—
Prepayments and other		6,080			9,653			10,171
Total Current Assets		437,687			414,195			476,699
Deferred Charges:
Regulatory assets		453,030			479,462			467,130
Other		7,481			7,678			6,785
Total Deferred Charges		460,511			487,140			473,915
Total Assets	$	1,844,227		$	1,840,196		$	1,860,028

6

THE LACLEDE GROUP, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

	Dec. 31,			Sept. 30,			Dec. 31,
(Thousands, except share amounts)	2010			2010			2009
CAPITALIZATION AND LIABILITIES
Capitalization:
Common stock (70,000,000 shares authorized, 22,376,183,     22,292,804, and 22,252,467 shares issued, respectively)	$	22,376		$	22,293		$	22,252
Paid-in capital		158,976			158,698			154,697
Retained earnings		376,055			361,723			356,910
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(8,836	)		(7,137	)		(2,295	)
Total Common Stock Equity		548,571			535,577			531,564
Long-term debt – Laclede Gas		364,313			364,298			364,254
Total Capitalization		912,884			899,875			895,818
Current Liabilities:
Notes payable		97,450			129,650			145,150
Accounts payable		125,315			95,595			135,108
Advance customer billings		9,639			16,809			10,421
Current portion of long-term debt		—			25,000			25,000
Wages and compensation accrued		12,406			13,410			11,715
Dividends payable		9,195			8,942			8,928
Customer deposits		11,315			11,244			12,163
Interest accrued		5,756			9,639			6,217
Taxes accrued		17,633			10,501			25,148
Unamortized purchased gas adjustments		—			—			4,741
Deferred income taxes		—			155			1,873
Other		26,623			12,979			21,297
Total Current Liabilities		315,332			333,924			407,761
Deferred Credits and Other Liabilities:
Deferred income taxes		297,792			292,391			256,051
Unamortized investment tax credits		3,485			3,538			3,700
Pension and postretirement benefit costs		210,642			207,607			201,659
Asset retirement obligations		26,224			25,837			25,885
Regulatory liabilities		47,898			47,365			44,681
Other		29,970			29,659			24,473
Total Deferred Credits and Other Liabilities		616,011			606,397			556,449
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 11)
Total Capitalization and Liabilities	$	1,844,227		$	1,840,196		$	1,860,028
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

7

THE LACLEDE GROUP, INC.

STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOWS

(UNAUDITED)

	Three Months Ended
	December 31,
(Thousands)	2010			2009
Operating Activities:
Net Income	$	23,369		$	22,886
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in)       operating activities:
Depreciation, amortization, and accretion		9,766			9,434
Deferred income taxes and investment tax credits		1,078			(4,184	)
Other – net		(387	)		615
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable – net		(103,856	)		(122,229	)
Unamortized purchased gas adjustments		5,582			1,611
Deferred purchased gas costs		30,860			23,609
Accounts payable		31,159			63,176
Advance customer billings - net		(7,170	)		(10,719	)
Taxes accrued		7,125			9,101
Natural gas stored underground		4,405			5,109
Other assets and liabilities		3,866			1,562
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		5,797			(29	)
Investing Activities:
Capital expenditures		(15,627	)		(11,198	)
Other investments		1,002			(972	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(14,625	)		(12,170	)
Financing Activities:
Maturity of first mortgage bonds		(25,000	)		—
(Repayment) issuance of short-term debt – net		(32,200	)		15,350
Changes in book overdrafts		13,310			11,028
Issuance of common stock		591			338
Dividends paid		(8,766	)		(8,535	)
Employees’ taxes paid associated with restricted shares withheld upon vesting		(1,166	)		(576	)
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation		227			32
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities		(53,004	)		17,637
Net (Decrease) Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents		(61,832	)		5,438
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period		86,919			74,591
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period	$	25,087		$	80,029
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Paid (Refunded) During the Period for:
Interest	$	10,288		$	10,294
Income taxes		(132	)		606
��
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

8

THE LACLEDE GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

These notes are an integral part of the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of The Laclede Group, Inc. (Laclede Group or the Company) and its subsidiaries. In the opinion of Laclede Group, this interim report includes all adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring accruals) necessary for the fair presentation of the results of operations for the periods presented. This Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in the Company’s Fiscal Year 2010 Form 10-K.

The consolidated financial position, results of operations, and cash flows of Laclede Group are comprised primarily from the financial position, results of operations, and cash flowsof Laclede Gas Company (Laclede Gas or the Utility). Laclede Gas is a regulated natural gas distribution utility having a material seasonal cycle. As a result, these interim statements of income for Laclede Group are not necessarily indicative of annual results or representative of succeeding quarters of the fiscal year. Due to the seasonal nature of the business of Laclede Gas, earnings are typically concentrated in the November through April period, which generally corresponds with the heating season.

REVENUE RECOGNITION - Laclede Gas reads meters and bills its customers on monthly cycles. The Utility records its regulated gas distribution revenues from gas sales and transportation services on an accrual basis that includes estimated amounts for gas delivered, but not yet billed. The accruals for unbilled revenues are reversed in the subsequent accounting period when meters are actually read and customers are billed. The amounts of accrued unbilled revenues at December 31, 2010 and 2009, for the Utility, were $54.6 million and $55.0 million, respectively. The amount of accrued unbilled revenue at September 30, 2010 was $11.3 million.

GROSS RECEIPTS TAXES - Gross receipts taxes associated with Laclede Gas’ natural gas utility service are imposed on the Utility and billed to its customers. These amounts are recorded gross in the Statements of Consolidated Income. Amounts recorded in Regulated Gas Distribution Operating Revenues for the quarters ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 were $11.3 million, and $12.0 million, respectively. Gross receipts taxes are expensed by the Utility and included in the Taxes, other than income taxes line.

2. PENSION PLANS AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS

Pension Plans

Laclede Gas has non-contributory, defined benefit, trusteed forms of pension plans covering substantially all employees. Effective January 1, 2010, the Company modified the calculation of future benefits under its Missouri Natural Gas division plan from a career average formula to a cash balance formula, which accrues benefits based on a percentage of compensation, provides interest credits on the balance, and provides certain transition credits. Benefits attributable to plan participation prior to January 1, 2010, will be based on career average compensation earned as a participant prior to January 1, 2010. Plan assets consist primarily of corporate and U.S. government obligations and equity market exposure achieved through derivative investments.

Pension costs for both the quarters ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 were $1.6 million, including amounts charged to construction.

The net periodic pension costs include the following components:

	Three Months Ended
	December 31,
(Thousands)	2010			2009
Service cost – benefits earned during the period	$	2,388		$	2,274
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation		4,705			4,957
Expected return on plan assets		(4,712	)		(5,032	)
Amortization of prior service cost		160			239
Amortization of actuarial loss		2,557			2,034
Sub-total		5,098			4,472
Regulatory adjustment		(3,533	)		(2,893	)
Net pension cost	$	1,565		$	1,579

9

Pursuant to the provisions of the Laclede Gas pension plans, pension obligations may be satisfied by lump-sum cash payments. Pursuant to a Missouri Public Service Commission (MoPSC or Commission) Order, lump-sum payments are recognized as settlements (which can result in gains or losses) only if the total of such payments exceeds 100% of the sum of service and interest costs. No lump-sum payments were recognized as settlements during the three months ended December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009.

Pursuant to a MoPSC Order, the return on plan assets is based on the market-related value of plan assets implemented prospectively over a four-year period. Gains or losses not yet includible in pension cost are amortized only to the extent that such gain or loss exceeds 10% of the greater of the projected benefit obligation or the market-related value of plan assets. Such excess is amortized over the average remaining service life of active participants. The recovery in rates for the Utility’s qualified pension plans is based on an allowance of $4.8 million annually. The difference between this amount and pension expense as calculated pursuant to the above and that otherwise would be included in the Statements of Consolidated Income and Statements of Consolidated Comprehensive Income is deferred as a regulatory asset or regu latory liability.

Postretirement Benefits

Laclede Gas provides certain life insurance benefits at retirement. Medical insurance is available after early retirement until age 65. The transition obligation not yet includible in postretirement benefit cost is being amortized over 20 years. Postretirement benefit costs for both the quarters ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 were $1.9 million, including amounts charged to construction.

Net periodic postretirement benefit costs consisted of the following components:

	Three Months Ended
	December 31,
(Thousands)	2010			2009
Service cost – benefits earned during the period	$	1,919		$	1,610
Interest cost on accumulated
postretirement benefit obligation		1,211			1,129
Expected return on plan assets		(911	)		(758	)
Amortization of transition obligation		34			34
Amortization of prior service credit		(582	)		(582	)
Amortization of actuarial loss		1,110			995
Sub-total		2,781			2,428
Regulatory adjustment		(871	)		(518	)
Net postretirement benefit cost	$	1,910		$	1,910

Missouri state law provides for the recovery in rates of costs accrued pursuant to generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) provided that such costs are funded through an independent, external funding mechanism. Laclede Gas established Voluntary Employees’ Beneficiary Association (VEBA) and Rabbi trusts as its external funding mechanisms. VEBA and Rabbi trusts’ assets consist primarily of money market securities and mutual funds invested in stocks and bonds.

Pursuant to a MoPSC Order, the return on plan assets is based on the market-related value of plan assets implemented prospectively over a four-year period. Gains and losses not yet includible in postretirement benefit cost are amortized only to the extent that such gain or loss exceeds 10% of the greater of the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation or the market-related value of plan assets. Such excess is amortized over the average remaining service life of active participants. The Commission ordered that the recovery in rates be based on an annual allowance of $7.6 million. The difference between this amount and postretirement benefit cost based on the above and that otherwise would be included in the Statements of Consolidated Income and Statements of Consolidated Comprehensive Income is deferred as a regulatory asset o r regulatory liability.

10

3. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

Awards of stock-based compensation are made pursuant to The Laclede Group 2006 Equity Incentive Plan and the Restricted Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors. Refer to Note 4 of the Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010 for descriptions of these plans.

Restricted Stock Awards

During the three months ended December 31, 2010, the Company granted 81,525 performance-contingent restricted shares and share units to executive officers and key employees at a weighted average grant date fair value of $30.78 per share. This number represents the maximum shares that can be earned pursuant to the terms of the awards. The shares and share units have a performance period ending September 30, 2013, during which participants are entitled to voting rights on the target level, or 54,350 shares. Dividends on these target level of shares accrue during the performance period and are paid to the participants up to the target level upon vesting, but are subject to forfeiture if the underlying shares do not vest. The number of shares and share units that will ultimately vest is dependent upon the attainmen t of certain levels of earnings growth and portfolio development performance goals; further, under the terms of the award, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors has the discretion to reduce by up to 25% the number that vest if the Company’s total shareholder return (TSR) during the performance period ranks below the median relative to a comparator group of companies. This TSR provision is considered a market condition under generally accepted accounting principles.

Performance-contingent restricted stock and performance-contingent restricted stock unit activity for the three months ended December 31, 2010 is presented below:

			Weighted
			Average
	Shares/		Grant Date
	Units		Fair Value
Nonvested at September 30, 2010	255,300			$	34.07
Granted (maximum shares that can be earned)	81,525			$	30.78
Vested	(72,750	)		$	29.32
Forfeited	(15,000	)		$	32.65
Nonvested at December 31, 2010	249,075			$	34.46

During the three months ended December 31, 2010, the Company granted 29,250 shares of time-vested restricted stock to executive officers and key employees at a weighted average grant date fair value of $35.93 per share. These shares were awarded on December 1, 2010 and vest December 1, 2013. In the interim, participants receive full voting rights and dividends, which are not subject to forfeiture.

Time-vested restricted stock and time-vested restricted stock unit activity for the three months ended December 31, 2010 is presented below:

			Weighted
			Average
	Shares/		Grant Date
	Units		Fair Value
Nonvested at September 30, 2010	121,850			$	36.62
Granted	29,250			$	35.93
Vested	(21,750	)		$	34.25
Forfeited	—			$	—
Nonvested at December 31, 2010	129,350			$	36.86

11

During the three months ended December 31, 2010, 94,500 shares of restricted stock (performance-contingent and time-vested), awarded on December 5, 2007, vested. The Company withheld 32,373 of the vested shares at a weighted average price of $35.90 per share pursuant to elections by employees to satisfy tax withholding obligations.

Stock Option Awards

Stock option activity for the three months ended December 31, 2010 is presented below:

					Weighted
					Average
			Weighted		Remaining	Aggregate
			Average		Contractual	Intrinsic
	Stock		Exercise		Term	Value
	Options		Price		(Years)	($000)
Outstanding at September 30, 2010	335,975		$	30.75
Granted	—		$	—
Exercised	(7,100	)	$	30.53
Forfeited	—		$	—
Expired	—		$	—
Outstanding at December 31, 2010	328,875		$	30.76	4.1	$	1,901
Fully Vested and Expected to Vest   at December 31, 2010	328,875		$	30.76	4.1	$	1,901
Exercisable at December 31, 2010	328,875		$	30.76	4.1	$	1,901

The closing price of the Company’s common stock was $36.54 at December 31, 2010.

Equity Compensation Costs

The amounts of compensation cost recognized for share-based compensation arrangements for the three months ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 are presented below:

	Three Months Ended
	December 31,
(Thousands)		2010			2009
Total equity compensation cost	$	718		$	868
Compensation cost capitalized		(154	)		(138	)
Compensation cost recognized in net income		564			730
Income tax benefit recognized in net income		(218	)		(282	)
Compensation cost recognized in net income, net of income tax	$	346		$	448

As of December 31, 2010, there was $5.5 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested share-based compensation arrangements. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.5 years.

12

4. EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

	Three Months Ended
	December 31,
(Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)		2010		2009
Basic EPS:
Net Income	$	23,369	$	22,886
Less: Income allocated to participating securities		201		228
Net Income Available to Common Shareholders	$	23,168	$	22,658
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding		22,041		21,957
Earnings Per Share of Common Stock	$	1.05	$	1.03
Diluted EPS:
Net Income	$	23,369	$	22,886
Less: Income allocated to participating securities		201		227
Net Income Available to Common Shareholders	$	23,168	$	22,659
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding		22,041		21,957
Dilutive Effect of Stock Options
and Restricted Stock		79		44
Weighted Average Diluted Shares		22,120		22,001
Earnings Per Share of Common Stock	$	1.05	$	1.03
Outstanding Shares Excluded from the
Calculation of Diluted EPS Attributable to:
Antidilutive stock options		—		82
Performance-contingent restricted stock		193		148
Total		193		230

13

5. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of financial instruments are as follows:

(Thousands)	Carrying Amount		Fair Value
As of December 31, 2010
Cash and cash equivalents	$	25,087	$	25,087
Marketable securities		13,652		13,652
Derivative instrument assets		15,415		15,415
Derivative instrument liabilities		35		35
Short-term debt		97,450		97,450
Long-term debt		364,313		393,705
As of September 30, 2010
Cash and cash equivalents	$	86,919	$	86,919
Marketable securities		12,856		12,856
Derivative instrument assets		12,761		12,761
Derivative instrument liabilities		14		14
Short-term debt		129,650		129,650
Long-term debt, including current portion		389,298		443,959
As of December 31, 2009
Cash and cash equivalents	$	80,029	$	80,029
Marketable securities		11,679		11,679
Derivative instrument assets		11,234		11,234
Derivative instrument liabilities		1,159		1,159
Short-term debt		145,150		145,150
Long-term debt, including current portion		389,254		409,216

The carrying amounts for cash and cash equivalents and short-term debt approximate fair value due to the short maturity of these instruments. The fair values of long-term debt are estimated based on market prices for similar issues. The fair values of marketable securities, derivative instrument assets, and derivative instrument liabilities are valued as described in Note 6, Fair Value Measurements.

14

6. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

The following table categorizes the assets and liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets that are accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis in periods subsequent to initial recognition.

(Thousands)		Quoted Prices in Active Markets (Level 1)		Significant Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Effects of Netting and Cash Margin Receivables /Payables			Total
As of December 31, 2010
Assets
U. S. Stock/Bond Mutual Funds	$	13,652	$	—	$	—	$	—		$	13,652
NYMEX natural gas contracts		3,506		—		—		11,201			14,707
NYMEX gasoline and heating
oil contracts		182		—		—		315			497
Natural gas commodity contracts		—		125		140		(54	)		211
Total	$	17,340	$	125	$	140	$	11,462		$	29,067
Liabilities
NYMEX natural gas contracts	$	35,753	$	—	$	—	$	(35,753	)	$	—
Natural gas commodity contracts		—		25		64		(54	)		35
Total	$	35,753	$	25	$	64	$	(35,807	)	$	35
As of September 30, 2010
Assets
U. S. Stock/Bond Mutual Funds	$	12,856	$	—	$	—	$	—		$	12,856
NYMEX natural gas contracts		5,087		—		—		7,214			12,301
NYMEX gasoline and heating
oil contracts		59		—		—		220			279
Natural gas commodity contracts		—		161		76		(56	)		181
Total	$	18,002	$	161	$	76	$	7,378		$	25,617
Liabilities
NYMEX natural gas contracts	$	53,677	$	—	$	—	$	(53,677	)	$	—
NYMEX gasoline & heating
oil contracts		37		—		—		(37	)		—
Natural gas commodity contracts		—		17		53		(56	)		14
Total	$	53,714	$	17	$	53	$	(53,770	)	$	14
As of December 31, 2009
Assets
U. S. Stock/Bond Mutual Funds	$	11,679	$	—	$	—	$	—		$	11,679
NYMEX natural gas contracts		3,550		—		—		7,082			10,632
NYMEX gasoline and heating
oil contracts		289		—		—		98			387
Natural gas commodity contracts		—		292		327		(404	)		215
Total	$	15,518	$	292	$	327	$	6,776		$	22,913
Liabilities
NYMEX natural gas contracts	$	51,563	$	—	$	—	$	(51,563	)	$	—
Natural gas commodity contracts		—		1,027		536		(404	)		1,159
Total	$	51,563	$	1,027	$	536	$	(51,967	)	$	1,159

15

The mutual funds included in Level 1 are valued based on quoted market prices of identical securities that are provided by the trustees of these securities. Derivative instruments included in Level 1 are valued using quoted market prices on the New York Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX). Derivative instruments included in Level 2 are valued using broker or dealer quotation services or by using observable market inputs. Derivative instruments included in Level 3 are valued using generally unobservable inputs that are based upon the best information available and reflect management’s assumptions about how market participants would price the asset or liability. During the three months ended December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, there were no transfers between the levels of the fair value hierarchy. The Company& #8217;s policy is to recognize such transfers, if any, as for the beginning of the interim reporting period in which circumstances change or events occur to cause the transfer. The following is a reconciliation of the Level 3 beginning and ending net derivative balances:

	Three Months Ended
	December 31,
(Thousands)	2010		2009
Beginning of period	$	23	$	(101	)
Issuances and settlements - net		29		(139	)
Net gains related to derivatives still held   at end of period		24		31
End of period	$	76	$	(209	)

The mutual funds are included in the Other investments line of the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Derivative assets and liabilities, including receivables and payables associated with cash margin requirements, are presented net in the Consolidated Balance Sheets when a legally enforceable netting agreement exists between the Company and the counterparty to a derivative contract. For additional information on derivative instruments, see Note 7, Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.

7. DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES

Laclede Gas has a risk management policy that allows for the purchase of natural gas derivative instruments with the goal of managing price risk associated with purchasing natural gas on behalf of its customers. This policy prohibits speculation and permits the Utility to hedge up to 70% of its normal volumes purchased for up to a 36-month period. Costs and cost reductions, including carrying costs, associated with the Utility’s use of natural gas derivative instruments are allowed to be passed on to the Utility’s customers through the operation of its Purchased Gas Adjustment (PGA) Clause, through which the MoPSC allows the Utility to recover gas supply costs, subject to prudence review. Accordingly, Laclede Gas does not expect any adverse earnings impact as a result of the use of these derivative instruments. The Uti lity does not designate these instruments as hedging instruments for financial reporting purposes because gains or losses associated with the use of these derivative instruments are deferred and recorded as regulatory assets or regulatory liabilities pursuant to ASC Topic 980, “Regulated Operations,” and, as a result, have no direct impact on the Statements of Consolidated Income. The timing of the operation of the PGA Clause may cause interim variations in short-term cash flows, because the Utility is subject to cash margin requirements associated with changes in the values of these instruments. Nevertheless, carrying costs associated with such requirements are recovered through the PGA Clause.

From time to time, Laclede Gas purchases NYMEX futures contracts to help stabilize operating costs associated with forecasted purchases of gasoline and diesel fuels used to power vehicles and equipment used in the course of its business. At December 31, 2010, Laclede Gas held 0.5 million gallons of gasoline futures contracts at an average price of $2.19 per gallon and 0.1 million gallons of heating oil futures contracts (to hedge diesel fuel purchases) at an average price of $2.33 per gallon. Most of these futures contracts, the longest of which extends to October 2011, are designated as cash flow hedges of forecasted transactions pursuant to ASC Topic 815, “Derivatives and Hedging.” The gains or losses on these derivative instruments are not subject to the Utility’s PGA Clause.

16

In the course of its business, Laclede Group’s non-regulated gas marketing subsidiary, Laclede Energy Resources, Inc. (LER), enters into commitments associated with the purchase or sale of natural gas. Many of LER’s derivative natural gas contracts are designated as normal purchases or normal sales and, as such, are excluded from the scope of ASC Topic 815 and are accounted for as executory contracts on an accrual basis. Any of LER’s derivative natural gas contracts that are not designated as normal purchases or normal sales are accounted for at fair value. At December 31, 2010, the fair values of 9.2 million MMBtu of non-exchange traded natural gas commodity contracts were reflected in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Of these contracts, 6.0 million MMBtu will settle during fiscal year 2011, while the r emaining 3.2 million MMBtu will settle during fiscal year 2012. These contracts have not been designated as hedges; therefore, changes in the fair value of these contracts are reported in earnings each period. Furthermore, LER manages the price risk associated with its fixed-priced commitments by either closely matching the offsetting physical purchase or sale of natural gas at fixed prices or through the use of NYMEX futures contracts to lock in margins. At December 31, 2010, LER’s unmatched fixed-price positions were not material to Laclede Group’s financial position or results of operations. LER’s NYMEX natural gas futures contracts used to lock in margins are generally designated as cash flow hedges of forecasted transactions for financial reporting purposes.

Derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges of forecasted transactions are recognized on the Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value and the change in the fair value of the effective portion of these hedge instruments is recorded, net of tax, in other comprehensive income (OCI). Accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI) is a component of Total Common Stock Equity. Amounts are reclassified from AOCI into earnings when the hedged items affect net income, using the same revenue or expense category that the hedged item impacts. Based on market prices at December 31, 2010, it is expected that approximately $8.7 million of pre-tax unrealized losses will be reclassified into the Statements of Consolidated Income during the next twelve months. The net amount of pre-tax losses recognized in earnings for the ineffe ctive portion of cash flow hedges was $0.1 million and $1.9 million for the quarters ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Cash flows from hedging transactions are classified in the same category as the cash flows from the items that are being hedged in the Statements of Consolidated Cash Flows.

The Company’s exchange-traded/cleared derivative instruments consist primarily of NYMEX positions. The NYMEX is the primary national commodities exchange on which natural gas derivatives are traded. NYMEX-traded contracts are supported by the financial and credit quality of the clearing members of the NYMEX and have nominal credit risk. Open NYMEX natural gas futures positions at December 31, 2010 were as follows:

	Laclede Gas Company			Laclede Energy Resources, Inc.
	MMBtu (millions)	Avg. Price Per MMBtu		MMBtu (millions)	Avg. Price Per MMBtu
Open short futures positions
Fiscal 2011	—	$	—	5.79	$	4.45
Fiscal 2012	—		—	0.71		4.54
Open long futures positions
Fiscal 2011	7.19	$	6.72	5.64	$	5.89
Fiscal 2012	10.94		5.26	2.35		6.31
Fiscal 2013	—		—	0.08		5.35

At December 31, 2010, Laclede Gas also had 13.77 million MMBtu of other price mitigation in place through the use of NYMEX natural gas option-based strategies.

17

The Effect of Derivative Instruments on the Statements of Consolidated Income and Statements of Consolidated Comprehensive Income
		Three Months Ended
	Location of Gain (Loss)	December 31,
(Thousands)	Recorded in Income		2010			2009
Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships
Effective portion of gain recognized in OCI
on derivatives:
NYMEX natural gas contracts		$	41		$	3,577
NYMEX gasoline and heating oil contracts			173			166
Total		$	214		$	3,743
Effective portion of gain (loss) reclassified from
AOCI to income:
NYMEX natural gas contracts	Non-Regulated Gas Marketing Operating Revenues	$	4,834		$	4,525
	Non-Regulated Gas Marketing Operating Expenses		(1,793	)		(536	)
Sub-total			3,041			3,989
NYMEX gasoline and heating oil contracts	Other Regulated Gas Distribution Operating Expenses		49			62
Total		$	3,090		$	4,051
Ineffective portion of gain (loss) on derivatives
recognized in income:
NYMEX natural gas contracts	Non-Regulated Gas Marketing Operating Revenues	$	9		$	525
	Non-Regulated Gas Marketing Operating Expenses		(125	)		(2,349	)
Sub-total			(116	)		(1,824	)
NYMEX gasoline and heating oil contracts	Other Regulated Gas Distribution Operating Expenses		29			(56	)
Total		$	(87	)	$	(1,880	)
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments *
Gain (loss) recognized in income on derivatives:
Natural gas commodity contracts	Non-Regulated Gas Marketing Operating Revenues	$	(442	)	$	3,994
	Non-Regulated Gas Marketing Operating Expenses		450			(3,514	)
NYMEX natural gas contracts	Non-Regulated Gas Marketing Operating Revenues		(36	)		(554	)
NYMEX gasoline and heating oil contracts	Other Income and (Income Deductions) - Net		16			—
Total		$	(12	)	$	(74	)

* Gains and losses on Laclede Gas’ NYMEX natural gas derivative instruments, which are not designated as hedging instruments for financial reporting purposes, are deferred pursuant to the Utility’s PGA Clause and recorded as regulatory assets or regulatory liabilities. These gains and losses are excluded from the table above because they have no direct impact on the Statements of Consolidated Income.

18

Fair Value of Derivative Instruments in the Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2010
	Asset Derivatives				Liability Derivatives
(Thousands)	Balance Sheet Location		Fair Value	*	Balance Sheet Location		Fair Value	*
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments
NYMEX natural gas contracts	Derivative Instrument Assets	$	1,102		Derivative Instrument Assets	$	11,088
	Other Deferred Charges		21		Other Deferred Charges		1,240
NYMEX gasoline and heating oil contracts	Derivative Instrument Assets		169		Derivative Instrument Assets		—
Sub-total			1,292				12,328
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
NYMEX natural gas contracts	Derivative Instrument Assets		2,289		Derivative Instrument Assets		23,180
	Other Deferred Charges		94		Other Deferred Charges		245
Natural gas commodity contracts	Derivative Instrument Assets		201		Derivative Instrument Assets		4
	Other Deferred Charges		14		Other Deferred Charges		—
	Other Current Liabilities		50		Other Current Liabilities		85
NYMEX gasoline and heating oil contracts	Derivative Instrument Assets		13		Derivative Instrument Assets		—
Sub-total			2,661				23,514
Total derivatives		$	3,953			$	35,842
Fair Value of Derivative Instruments in the Consolidated Balance Sheet at September 30, 2010
	Asset Derivatives				Liability Derivatives
(Thousands)	Balance Sheet Location		Fair Value	*	Balance Sheet Location		Fair Value	*
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments
NYMEX natural gas contracts	Derivative Instrument Assets	$	3,174		Derivative Instrument Assets	$	9,705
	Other Deferred Charges		4		Other Deferred Charges		3,435
NYMEX gasoline and heating oil contracts	Derivative Instrument Assets		56		Derivative Instrument Assets		34
Sub-total			3,234				13,174
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
NYMEX natural gas contracts	Derivative Instrument Assets		1,401		Derivative Instrument Assets		37,457
	Other Deferred Charges		508		Other Deferred Charges		3,080
Natural gas commodity contracts	Derivative Instrument Assets		237		Derivative Instrument Assets		56
	Other Current Liabilities		—		Other Current Liabilities		14
	Derivative Instrument Assets		3		Derivative Instrument Assets		3
Sub-total			2,149				40,610
Total derivatives		$	5,383			$	53,784
Fair Value of Derivative Instruments in the Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2009
	Asset Derivatives				Liability Derivatives
(Thousands)	Balance Sheet Location		Fair Value	*	Balance Sheet Location		Fair Value	*
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments
NYMEX natural gas contracts	Derivative Instrument Assets	$	2,351		Derivative Instrument Assets	$	3,355
NYMEX gasoline and heating oil contracts	Derivative Instrument Assets		289		Derivative Instrument Assets		—
Sub-total			2,640				3,355
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments		��
NYMEX natural gas contracts	Derivative Instrument Assets		1,199		Derivative Instrument Assets		48,208
Natural gas commodity contracts	Derivative Instrument Assets		246		Derivative Instrument Assets		31
	Other Current Liabilities		373		Other Current Liabilities		1,532
Sub-total			1,818				49,771
Total derivatives		$	4,458			$	53,126

* The fair values of Asset Derivatives and Liability Derivatives exclude the fair value of cash margin receivables or payables with counterparties subject to netting arrangements. Fair value amounts of derivative contracts (including the fair value amounts of cash margin receivables and payables) for which there is a legal right to set off are presented net on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. As such, the gross balances presented in the table above are not indicative of the Company’s net economic exposure. Refer to Note 6, Fair Value Measurements, for information on the valuation of derivative instruments.

19

Following is a reconciliation of the amounts in the tables above to the amounts presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheets:

		Dec. 31,			Sept. 30,			Dec. 31,
	(Thousands)	2010			2010			2009
	Fair value of asset derivatives presented above	$	3,953		$	5,383		$	4,458
	Fair value of cash margin receivables		47,269			61,148			58,743
	Netting of assets and liabilities with the same counterparty		(35,807	)		(53,770	)		(51,967	)
	Total	$	15,415		$	12,761		$	11,234
	Derivative Instrument Assets, per Consolidated Balance Sheets:
	Derivative instrument assets	$	13,150		$	10,285		$	11,234
	Other deferred charges		2,265			2,476			—
	Total		15,415			12,761			11,234
	Fair value of liability derivatives presented above	$	35,842		$	53,784		$	53,126
	Netting of assets and liabilities with the same counterparty		(35,807	)		(53,770	)		(51,967	)
	Derivative instrument liabilities, per Consolidated Balance Sheet*	$	35		$	14		$	1,159
*	Included in the Other line of the Current Liabilities section

8. CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT RISK

A significant portion of LER’s transactions are with (or are associated with) energy producers, utility companies, and pipelines. These concentrations of transactions with these counterparties have the potential to affect the Company’s overall exposure to credit risk, either positively or negatively, in that each of these three groups may be affected similarly by changes in economic, industry, or other conditions. To manage this risk, as well as credit risk from significant counterparties in these and other industries, LER has established procedures to determine the creditworthiness of its counterparties. These procedures include obtaining credit ratings and credit reports, analyzing counterparty financial statements to assess financial condition, and considering the industry environment in which the counterparty opera tes. This information is monitored on an ongoing basis. In some instances, LER may require credit assurances such as prepayments, letters of credit, or parental guarantees. In addition, LER may enter into netting arrangements to mitigate credit risk with counterparties in the energy industry from which LER both sells and purchases natural gas. Sales are typically made on an unsecured credit basis with payment due the month following delivery. Accounts receivable amounts are closely monitored and provisions for uncollectible amounts are accrued when losses are probable. To date, losses have not been significant. LER records accounts receivable, accounts payable, and prepayments for physical sales and purchases of natural gas on a gross basis. The amount included in accounts receivable attributable to energy producers and their marketing affiliates amounted to $22.4 million, or 36.7% of LER’s total accounts receivable at December 31, 2010. Net receivable amounts from these customers on the same date, reflecting netting arrangements, were $13.0 million. Accounts receivable attributable to utility companies and their marketing affiliates comprised $22.4 million of LER’s total accounts receivable, or 36.6% at December 31, 2010, while net receivable amounts from these customers, reflecting netting arrangements, were $18.9 million. LER also has concentrations of credit risk with certain individually significant counterparties. At December 31, 2010, the amounts included in accounts receivable from LER’s five largest counterparties (in terms of net accounts receivable exposure), all of which are investment-grade rated companies, were $25.3 million, or 41.5% of LER’s total accounts receivable. Net receivable amounts from these customers on the same date, reflecting netting arrangements, were $20.8 million. Additionally, LER has concentrations of credit risk with pipeline companies associated with its natural gas receivable amounts.

20

9. OTHER INCOME AND (INCOME DEDUCTIONS) – NET

	Three Months Ended
	December 31,
(Thousands)	2010		2009
Interest income	$	448	$	535
Net investment gain		737		474
Other income		13		—
Other income deductions		647		578
Other Income and (Income Deductions) – Net	$	1,845	$	1,587

The increase in Other Income and (Income Deductions) – Net for the quarter ended December 31, 2010, compared with the quarter ended December 31, 2009, was primarily due to higher net investment gains.

10. INFORMATION BY OPERATING SEGMENT

All of Laclede Group’s subsidiaries are wholly owned. The Regulated Gas Distribution segment consists of the regulated operations of Laclede Gas and is the core business segment of Laclede Group. Laclede Gas is a public utility engaged in the retail distribution and sale of natural gas serving an area in eastern Missouri, with a population of approximately 2.1 million, including the City of St. Louis and parts of ten counties in eastern Missouri. The Non-Regulated Gas Marketing segment includes the results of LER, a subsidiary engaged in the non-regulated marketing of natural gas and related activities. Other includes Laclede Pipeline Company’s transportation of liquid propane regulated by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) as well as non-regulated activities, including real estate development, the compres sion of natural gas, and financial investments in other enterprises. These operations are conducted through five subsidiaries. Other also includes Laclede Gas’ non-regulated propane transaction. Accounting policies are described in Note 1. Certain intersegment revenues with Laclede Gas are not eliminated in accordance with the provisions of ASC Topic 980. Those types of transactions include sales of natural gas from Laclede Gas to LER, sales of natural gas from LER to Laclede Gas, and transportation services provided by Laclede Pipeline Company to Laclede Gas. These revenues are shown on the Intersegment revenues lines in the table under Regulated Gas Distribution, Non-Regulated Gas Marketing, and Other columns, respectively.

Laclede Group’s non-regulated subsidiary, LER, and to a lesser extent, Laclede Gas account for certain transactions through fair value measurements. As a result, management evaluates the performance of the operating segments based on the computation of net economic earnings. Net economic earnings exclude from reported net income the after-tax impact of net unrealized gains and losses on energy-related derivative contracts.

21

			Non-
	Regulated		Regulated
	Gas		Gas
(Thousands)	Distribution		Marketing		Other		Eliminations			Consolidated
Three Months Ended
December 31, 2010
Revenues from external
customers	$	276,505	$	157,701	$	91	$	—		$	434,297
Intersegment revenues		938		8,707		260		—			9,905
Total Operating Revenues		277,443		166,408		351		—			444,202
Net Economic Earnings		21,434		1,946		8		—			23,388
Total assets		1,734,389		166,394		121,235		(177,791	)		1,844,227
Three Months Ended
December 31, 2009
Revenues from external
customers	$	281,111	$	189,887	$	10,452	$	—		$	481,450
Intersegment revenues		1,818		7,638		260		—			9,716
Total Operating Revenues		282,929		197,525		10,712		—			491,166
Net Economic Earnings		17,432		4,612		3,753		—			25,797
Total assets		1,662,121		174,852		113,172		(90,117	)		1,860,028

Reconciliation of Consolidated Net Economic Earnings to Consolidated Net Income
		Three Months Ended
		December 31,
	(Thousands)	2010			2009
	Total Net Economic Earnings above	$	23,388		$	25,797
	Add: Unrealized loss on energy-related
	derivative contracts, net of tax		(19	)		(2,911	)
	Net Income	$	23,369		$	22,886

22

11. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Commitments

Laclede Gas and LER have entered into various contracts, expiring on dates through 2017, for the storage, transportation, and supply of natural gas. Minimum payments required under the contracts in place at December 31, 2010 are estimated at approximately $842 million. Additional contracts are generally entered into prior to or during the heating season. Laclede Gas recovers its costs from customers in accordance with the PGA Clause.

Leases and Guarantees

Laclede Gas has several operating leases for the rental of vehicles that contain provisions requiring Laclede Gas to guarantee certain amounts related to the residual value of the leased property. These leases have various terms, the longest of which extends into 2015. At December 31, 2010, the maximum guarantees under these leases are $1.3 million. However, the Utility believes it is unlikely that it will be subject to the maximum payment amount because it estimates that the residual value of the leased vehicles will be adequate to satisfy most of the guaranteed amounts. At December 31, 2010, the carrying value of the liability recognized for these guarantees was $0.3 million.

Laclede Group had guarantees totaling $107.6 million for performance and payment of certain wholesale gas supply purchases by LER, as of December 31, 2010. Since that date, total guarantees issued by Laclede Group on behalf of LER increased by $3.0 million, bringing the total to $110.6 million in guarantees outstanding at January 28, 2011. No amounts have been recorded for these guarantees in the financial statements. As of December 31, 2010, management believes the probability is low that Laclede Group will be required to make payments under these guarantees.

Contingencies and Indemnifications

Laclede Gas owns and operates natural gas distribution, transmission, and storage facilities, the operations of which are subject to various environmental laws, regulations, and interpretations. While environmental issues resulting from such operations arise in the ordinary course of business, such issues have not materially affected the Company’s or Laclede Gas’ financial position and results of operations. As environmental laws, regulations, and their interpretations change, however, Laclede Gas may be required to incur additional costs.

As with other companies, Laclede Gas faces the risk of environmental liabilities. In the natural gas industry, these are typically associated with sites formerly owned or operated by gas distribution companies like Laclede Gas and/or its predecessor companies at which manufactured gas operations took place. At this time, Laclede Gas has identified three former manufactured gas plant (MGP) sites located in Missouri: one in Shrewsbury and two in the City of St. Louis.

One of the sites located in the City of St. Louis is currently owned by a development agency of the City, which, together with other City development agencies, has selected a developer to redevelop the site. In conjunction with this redevelopment effort, Laclede Gas and another former owner of the site entered into an agreement (Remediation Agreement) with the City development agencies, the developer, and an environmental consultant that obligates one of the City agencies and the environmental consultant to remediate the site and obtain a No Further Action letter from the Missouri Department of Natural Resources. The Remediation Agreement also provides for a release of Laclede Gas and the other former site owner from certain liabilities related to the past and current environmental condition of the site and requires the developer and the environmental consultant to maintain certain insurance coverages, including remediation cost containment, premises pollution liability, and professional liability. The operative provisions of the Remediation Agreement were triggered on December 20, 2010, on which date Laclede Gas and the other former site owner, as full consideration under the Remediation Agreement, funded an escrow account that will be used to pay a small percentage of the cost of remediation of the site. The amount deposited into escrow by Laclede Gas, which is its only monetary obligation under the Remediation Agreement, is not material and did not have a material impact on the financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows of the Company.

23

To date, amounts required for remediation at these sites have not been material. However, the amount of costs relative to future remedial actions at these and other sites is unknown and may be material. Laclede Gas has notified its insurers that it seeks reimbursement for costs incurred in the past and future potential liabilities associated with the MGP sites. While some of the insurers have denied coverage and reserved their rights, Laclede Gas continues to discuss potential reimbursements with them. In 2005, the Utility’s outside consultant completed an analysis of the MGP sites to determine cost estimates for a one-time contractual transfer of risk from each of the Utility’s insurers of environmental coverage for the MGP sites. That analysis demonstrated a range of possible future expenditures to investigate, monit or, and remediate these MGP sites from $5.8 million to $36.3 million based upon then currently available facts, technology, and laws and regulations. The actual costs that Laclede Gas may incur could be materially higher or lower depending upon several factors, including whether remedial actions will be required, final selection and regulatory approval of any remedial actions, changing technologies and governmental regulations, the ultimate ability of other potentially responsible parties to pay, the successful completion of remedation efforts required by the Remediation Agreement described above, and any insurance recoveries. Costs associated with environmental remediation activities are accrued when such costs are probable and reasonably estimable.

Laclede Gas anticipates that any costs it may incur in the future to remediate these sites, less any amounts received as insurance proceeds or as contributions from other potentially responsible parties, would be deferred and recovered in rates through periodic adjustments approved by the MoPSC. Accordingly, potential liabilities associated with remediating these sites are not expected to have a material impact on the future financial position and results of operations of Laclede Gas or the Company.

On December 28, 2006, the MoPSC Staff proposed a disallowance of $7.2 million related to Laclede Gas’ recovery of its purchased gas costs applicable to fiscal year 2005, which the Staff later reduced to a $1.7 million disallowance pertaining to Laclede Gas’ purchase of gas from a marketing affiliate, LER. The MoPSC Staff has also proposed disallowances of $2.8 million and $1.5 million of gas costs relating to Laclede Gas purchases of gas supply from LER for fiscal years 2006 and 2007, respectively. The MoPSC Staff proposed a number of non-monetary recommendations only, based on its review of gas costs for fiscal years 2008 and 2009. Laclede Gas believes that the proposed disallowances lack merit and is vigorously opposing these adjustments in proceedings before the MoPSC. As such, no amount has been recorded in the financial statements for these proposed disallowances.

In connection with the affiliate transactions mentioned above, on July 7, 2010, the MoPSC Staff filed a complaint against Laclede Gas alleging that, by stating that it was not in possession of proprietary LER documents, Laclede Gas violated the MoPSC Order approving a 2001 Stipulation and Agreement that permitted the Company’s corporate reorganization into a holding company structure. The Utility filed a counterclaim against the MoPSC Staff alleging that the Staff has failed to adhere to the pricing provisions of the MoPSC’s affiliate transaction rules and the provisions under which the Company allocates costs among affiliated companies. However, on November 3, 2010, the MoPSC issued an Order dismissing the Utility’s counterclaim for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. A lso, on October 6, 2010, the MoPSC Staff filed a related complaint against Laclede Gas, LER, and Laclede Group, alleging that the Utility has failed to comply with the MoPSC’s affiliate transaction rules. LER and Laclede Group both filed motions to dismiss, which were granted by the Commission on December 22, 2010. Laclede Gas also filed a motion to dismiss certain counts of the complaint, which is still pending before the Commission, as well as a counterclaim against the Staff. Laclede Gas believes that neither of the complaints has merit and intends to vigorously oppose both of them.

Laclede Group and its subsidiaries are involved in other litigation, claims, and investigations arising in the normal course of business. Management, after discussion with counsel, believes that the final outcome of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows of the Company.

24

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

This management’s discussion analyzes the financial condition and results of operations of The Laclede Group, Inc. (Laclede Group or the Company) and its subsidiaries. It includes management’s view of factors that affect its business, explanations of past financial results including changes in earnings and costs from the prior year periods, and their effects on overall financial condition and liquidity.

Certain matters discussed in this report, excluding historical information, include forward-looking statements. Certain words, such as “may,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “seek,” and similar words and expressions identify forward-looking statements that involve uncertainties and risks. Future developments may not be in accordance with our expectations or beliefs and the effect of future developments may not be those anticipated. Among the factors that may cause results to differ materially from those contemplated in any forward-looking statement are:

• weather conditions and catastrophic events, particularly severe weather in the natural gas producing areas of the country;

• volatility in gas prices, particularly sudden and sustained changes in natural gas prices, including the related impact on margin deposits associated with the use of natural gas derivative instruments;

• the impact of changes and volatility in natural gas prices on our competitive position in relation to suppliers of alternative heating sources, such as electricity;

• changes in gas supply and pipeline availability, particularly those changes that impact supply for and access to our markets in which our subsidiaries transact business;

• legislative, regulatory and judicial mandates and decisions, some of which may be retroactive, including those affecting

• allowed rates of return

• incentive regulation

• industry structure

• purchased gas adjustment provisions

• rate design structure and implementation

• regulatory assets

• franchise renewals

• environmental or safety matters, including the potential impact of legislative and regulatory actions related to climate change

• taxes

• pension and other postretirement benefit liabilities and funding obligations

• accounting standards, including the effect of potential changes relative to adoption of or convergence with international accounting standards;

• the results of litigation;

• retention of, ability to attract, ability to collect from, and conservation efforts of, customers;

• capital and energy commodity market conditions, including the ability to obtain funds with reasonable terms for necessary capital expenditures and general operations and the terms and conditions imposed for obtaining sufficient gas supply;

• discovery of material weakness in internal controls; and

• employee workforce issues.

Readers are urged to consider the risks, uncertainties, and other factors that could affect our business as described in this report. All forward-looking statements made in this report rely upon the safe harbor protections provided under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. We do not, by including this statement, assume any obligation to review or revise any particular forward-looking statement in light of future events.

The Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements and the Notes thereto.

25

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Overview

Laclede Group’s earnings are primarily derived from the regulated activities of its largest subsidiary, Laclede Gas Company (Laclede Gas or the Utility), Missouri’s largest natural gas distribution company. Laclede Gas is regulated by the Missouri Public Service Commission (MoPSC or Commission) and serves the City of St. Louis and parts of ten counties in eastern Missouri. Laclede Gas delivers natural gas to retail customers at rates and in accordance with tariffs authorized by the MoPSC. The Utility’s earnings are primarily generated by the sale of heating energy. The Utility’s weather mitigation rate design lessens the impact of weather volatility on Laclede Gas customers during cold winters and stabilizes the Utility’s earnings by recovering fixed costs more evenly during the heating season. Due to the seasonal nature of the business of Laclede Gas, Laclede Group’s earnings are seasonal in nature and are typically concentrated in the November through April period, which generally corresponds with the heating season.

Laclede Energy Resources, Inc. (LER) is engaged in the marketing of natural gas and related activities on a non-regulated basis. LER markets natural gas to both on-system Utility transportation customers and customers outside of Laclede Gas’ traditional service territory, including large retail and wholesale customers. LER’s operations and customer base are more subject to fluctuations in market conditions than the Utility.

Other subsidiaries provide less than 10% of consolidated revenues.

Based on the nature of the business of the Company and its subsidiaries, as well as current economic conditions, management focuses on the following key variables in evaluating the financial condition and results of operations and managing the business:

Regulated Gas Distribution Segment:

• the Utility’s ability to recover the costs of purchasing and distributing natural gas from its customers;

• the impact of weather and other factors, such as customer conservation, on revenues and expenses;

• changes in the regulatory environment at the federal, state, and local levels, as well as decisions by regulators, that impact the Utility’s ability to earn its authorized rate of return;

• the Utility’s ability to access credit markets and maintain working capital sufficient to meet operating requirements; and,

• the effect of natural gas price volatility on the business.

Non-Regulated Gas Marketing Segment:

• the risks of competition;

• regional fluctuations in natural gas prices;

• new national pipeline infrastructure projects;

• credit and/or capital market access;

• counterparty risks; and,

• the effect of natural gas price volatility on the business.

Further information regarding how management seeks to manage these key variables is discussed below.

Laclede Group’s strategy is to improve the performance of its core Utility, while developing non-regulated businesses and taking a measured approach in the pursuit of additional growth opportunities that complement the Utility business.

26

The Utility’s strategy focuses on improving performance and mitigating the impact of weather fluctuations on Laclede Gas’ customers while improving the ability to recover its authorized distribution costs and return. The Utility’s distribution costs are the essential, primarily fixed expenditures it must incur to operate and maintain more than 16,000 miles of mains and services comprising its natural gas distribution system and related storage facilities. The Utility’s distribution costs include wages and employee benefit costs, depreciation and maintenance expenses, and other regulated utility operating expenses, excluding natural and propane gas expense. Distribution costs are considered in the ratemaking process, and recovery of these types of costs is included in revenues generated through the Utility 217;s tariff rates, as approved by the MoPSC. In addition, Laclede Gas is working to improve its ability to provide reliable natural gas service at a reasonable cost, while maintaining and building a secure and dependable infrastructure. The settlement of the Utility’s rate case in 2010 retained the Utility’s weather mitigation rate design that better ensures the recovery of its fixed costs and margins despite variations in sales volumes due to the impacts of weather and other factors that affect customer usage.

The Utility’s income from off-system sales and capacity release remains subject to fluctuations in market conditions. The Utility is allowed to retain 15% to 25% of the first $6 million in annual income earned (depending on the level of income earned) and 30% of income exceeding $6 million annually. Some of the factors impacting the level of off-system sales include the availability and cost of the Utility’s natural gas supply, the weather in its service area, and the weather in other markets. When Laclede Gas’ service area experiences warmer-than-normal weather while other markets experience colder weather or supply constraints, some of the Utility’s natural gas supply is available for off-system sales and there may be a demand for such supply in other markets. See the Regulatory and O ther Matters section on page 31 of this report for additional information on regulatory issues relative to the Utility.

Laclede Gas works actively to reduce the impact of wholesale natural gas prices on its costs by strategically structuring its natural gas supply portfolio to increase its gas supply availability and pricing alternatives and through the use of derivative instruments to protect its customers from significant changes in the commodity price of natural gas. Nevertheless, the overall cost of purchased gas remains subject to fluctuations in market conditions. The Utility’s Purchased Gas Adjustment (PGA) Clause allows Laclede Gas to flow through to customers, subject to prudence review, the cost of purchased gas supplies, including costs, cost reductions, and related carrying costs associated with the use of derivative instruments to hedge the purchase price of natural gas, as well as gas inventory carrying costs. The Utility believe s it will continue to be able to obtain sufficient gas supply. The price of natural gas supplies and other economic conditions may affect sales volumes, due to the conservation efforts of customers, and cash flows associated with the timing of collection of gas costs and related accounts receivable from customers. Long-term increases in the wholesale cost of natural gas supplies may adversely impact the Utility’s competitive position compared with alternative energy sources.

The Utility relies on both short-term credit and long-term capital markets, as well as cash flows from operations, to satisfy its seasonal cash requirements and fund its cost of capital expenditures. Laclede Gas’ ability to issue commercial paper supported by lines of credit, to issue long-term bonds, or to obtain new lines of credit is dependent on current conditions in the credit and capital markets. Management focuses on maintaining a strong balance sheet and believes it currently has adequate access to credit and capital markets and will have sufficient capital resources to meet its foreseeable obligations. See the Liquidity and Capital Resources section on page 33 for additional information.

LER focuses on growing its markets on a long-term and sustainable basis by providing both on-system Utility transportation customers and customers outside of Laclede Gas’ traditional service area with another choice in non-regulated natural gas suppliers. LER utilizes its natural gas supply agreements, transportation agreements, and other executory contracts to provide a variety of services to its customers at competitive prices. It closely monitors and manages the natural gas commodity price risk associated with providing such services to its customers through the use of exchange-traded/cleared derivative instruments and other contractual arrangements. LER is committed to managing commodity price risk, while it continues to seek new growth opportunities and expand the services that it now provides. Nevertheless, income from LER’s operations is more subject to fluctuations in market conditions than the Utility’s operations. LER’s business is directly impacted by the effects of competition in the marketplace and the impact of new pipeline infrastructure and surplus natural gas supplies on regional natural gas commodity prices.

In the course of its business, LER enters into commitments associated with the purchase or sale of natural gas. Many of LER’s physical purchase and sale transactions are recognized in earnings when the natural gas is delivered. However, generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) require that some of LER’s energy-related transactions be accounted for as derivatives, with the changes in their fair value (representing unrealized gains or losses) recorded in earnings in periods prior to physical delivery. Because related transactions of a purchase and sale strategy may be accounted for differently, there may be timing differences in the recognition of earnings under GAAP and economic earnings realized upon settlement. The Company reports both GAAP and net economic earnings, as discussed below.

27

In addition to its operating cash flows, LER relies on parental guarantees to secure its purchase and sales obligations of natural gas. LER also has access to Laclede Group’s liquidity resources. A large portion of LER’s receivables are from customers in the energy industry. LER also enters into netting arrangements with many of its energy counterparties to reduce overall credit and collateral exposure. Although LER’s uncollectible amounts are closely monitored and have not been significant, increases in uncollectible amounts from customers are possible and could adversely affect LER’s liquidity and results.

LER carefully monitors the creditworthiness of counterparties to its transactions. LER performs in-house credit reviews of potential customers and may require credit assurances such as prepayments, letters of credit, or parental guarantees when appropriate. Credit limits for customers are established and monitored.

EARNINGS

The Laclede Group reports net income and earnings per share determined in accordance with GAAP. Laclede Group’s non-regulated subsidiary, LER, and to a lesser extent, Laclede Gas account for certain transactions through fair value measurements. As a result, management also uses the non-GAAP measures of net economic earnings and net economic earnings per share when internally evaluating results of operations. Net economic earnings exclude from net income the after-tax impacts of net unrealized gains and losses on energy-related derivatives that are required by GAAP fair value accounting. This adjustment eliminates the impact of timing differences related to current changes in the fair value of financial and physical transactions prior to their completion and settlement. Management believes that excluding the earnings volatilit y caused by recognizing changes in fair value prior to settlement provides a useful representation of the economic impact of only the actual settled transactions and their effects on results of operations. These internal non-GAAP operating metrics should not be considered as an alternative to, or more meaningful than, GAAP measures such as net income. While management uses these non-GAAP measures to evaluate both Laclede Gas and LER, the net effect of unrealized gains and losses on the Utility’s earnings is minimal because gains or losses on its natural gas derivative instruments are deferred pursuant to its PGA Clause, as authorized by the MoPSC. These unrealized gains and losses result primarily from two sources:

1)	changes in fair values of physical and/or financial derivatives prior to the period of settlement; and,
2)	ineffective portions of accounting hedges, required to be recorded in earnings prior to settlement, due to differences in commodity price changes between the locations of the forecasted physical purchase or sale transactions and the locations of the underlying hedge instruments.

Unrealized gains or losses are recorded in each period until being replaced with the actual gains or losses realized when the associated physical transaction(s) occur.

28

Reconciliations of net economic earnings and net economic earnings per share to the Company’s most directly comparable GAAP measures are provided below.

(Millions, except per share amounts)		Net Economic Earnings (Non-GAAP)			Add: Unrealized gain (loss) on energy-related derivative contracts*				Net Income (GAAP)
Quarter Ended December 31, 2010
	Regulated Gas Distribution		$	21.5		$	—			$	21.5
	Non-Regulated Gas Marketing			1.9			—				1.9
	Other			—			—				—
	Total		$	23.4		$	—			$	23.4
	Per Share Amounts **		$	1.05		$	—			$	1.05
Quarter Ended December 31, 2009
	Regulated Gas Distribution		$	17.4		$	—			$	17.4
	Non-Regulated Gas Marketing			4.7			(2.9	)			1.8
	Other			3.7			—				3.7
	Total		$	25.8		$	(2.9	)		$	22.9
	Per Share Amounts **		$	1.16		$	(0.13	)		$	1.03
*	Amounts presented net of income taxes. Income taxes are calculated by applying federal, state, and local income tax rates applicable to ordinary income to the amounts of unrealized gain (loss) on energy-related derivative contracts. For the quarter ended December 31, 2009, the amount of income tax benefit included in the reconciling item above is $1.8 million.
**	Net economic earnings per share is calculated by replacing consolidated net income with consolidated net economic earnings in the GAAP diluted earnings per share calculation.

Laclede Group’s net income was $23.4 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2010, compared with $22.9 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2009. Basic and diluted earnings per share for the quarter ended December 31, 2010 were $1.05 compared with basic and diluted earnings per share of $1.03 for the quarter ended December 31, 2009. Earnings increased compared to last year primarily due to improved results reported by Laclede Group’s Regulated Gas Distribution segment, partially offset by decreased Other income. Net economic earnings were $23.4 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2010 compared with $25.8 million for the same quarter last year. Net economic earnings per share were $1.05 for the quarter ended December 31, 2010 compared with $1.16 for the quarter ended December 31, 2009.

Both Regulated Gas Distribution net income and Regulated Gas Distribution net economic earnings increased by $4.1 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2010, compared with the quarter ended December 31, 2009. The increase was primarily due to the following factors, quantified on a pre-tax basis:

• the benefit of the general rate increase, effective September 1, 2010, totaling $7.6 million; and,

• decreases in operation and maintenance expense totaling $2.6 million.

These factors were partially offset by:

• lower Infrastructure System Replacement Surcharge (ISRS) revenues totaling $2.0 million; and,

• lower system gas sales volumes and other variations totaling $1.3 million.

The Non-Regulated Gas Marketing segment reported GAAP earnings totaling $1.9 million, an increase of $0.1 million compared with the same quarter last year. Net economic earnings for the three months ended December 31, 2010 decreased $2.8 million from the three months ended December 31, 2009. The decreased net economic earnings were primarily due to LER’s decreased margins on sales of natural gas, and to a lesser extent, the effect of 8% lower sales volumes. The reduced sales margins and volumes were driven primarily by narrower regional price differentials that continue to prevail in the marketplace.

29

Both Other net income and Other net economic earnings decreased $3.7 million compared with the same quarter last year primarily due to the effect of a propane transaction in the wholesale market by Laclede Gas during the quarter ended December 31, 2009. This non-regulated transaction resulted from an inventory exchange that the counterparty settled in cash instead of through a return of inventory, and resulted in income, net of income taxes, totaling $3.7 million, contributing $0.16 to diluted earnings per share.

Regulated Gas Distribution Operating Revenues

Laclede Gas passes on to Utility customers (subject to prudence review) increases and decreases in the wholesale cost of natural gas in accordance with its PGA Clause. The volatility of the wholesale natural gas market results in fluctuations from period to period in the recorded levels of, among other items, revenues and natural gas cost expense. Nevertheless, increases and decreases in the cost of gas associated with system gas sales volumes have no direct effect on net revenues and net income.

Regulated Gas Distribution Operating Revenues for the quarter ended December 31, 2010 were $277.4 million, or $5.5 million less than the same period last year. Temperatures experienced in the Utility’s service area during the quarter were 0.1% warmer than the same quarter last year and 1.8% warmer than normal. Total system therms sold and transported were 285.9 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2010 compared with 288.0 million for the same period last year. Total off-system therms sold and transported were 53.7 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2010 compared with 28.5 million for the same period last year. The decrease in Regulated Gas Distribution Operating Revenues was primarily attributable to the following factors:

(Millions)
Lower wholesale gas costs passed on to Utility customers (subject to prudence review by the MoPSC)	$	(13.7	)
Higher off-system sales volumes		11.8
General rate increase, effective September 1, 2010		7.6
Lower system sales volumes and other variations		(5.5	)
Lower prices charged for off-system sales		(3.7	)
Lower ISRS revenues		(2.0	)
Total Variation	$	(5.5	)

Regulated Gas Distribution Operating Expenses

Regulated Gas Distribution Operating Expenses for the quarter ended December 31, 2010 decreased $11.5 million from the same quarter last year. Natural and propane gas expense decreased $8.6 million, or 4.7%, from last year’s level, primarily attributable to lower rates charged by our suppliers and decreased system volumes purchased for sendout, partially offset by higher off-system gas expense. Other operation and maintenance expenses decreased $2.6 million, or 6.0%, primarily due to a higher rate of overheads capitalized, a lower provision for uncollectible accounts, a gain on the disposal of assets, and reduced distribution charges, partially offset by increased group insurance charges. Taxes, other than income taxes, decreased $0.5 million, or 2.9%, primarily due to decreased gross receipts taxes (attributab le to the decreased revenues).

Non-Regulated Gas Marketing Operating Revenues and Operating Expenses

Non-Regulated Gas Marketing Operating Revenues decreased $31.1 million primarily due to lower per unit gas prices charged by LER and the effect of 8% lower sales volumes. The decrease in Non-Regulated Gas Marketing Operating Expenses, totaling $31.4 million, was primarily associated with lower prices charged by suppliers and decreased volumes purchased.

Other Operating Revenues and Operating Expenses

Other Operating Revenues decreased $10.4 million primarily due to the effect of a propane transaction in the wholesale market by Laclede Gas during the quarter ended December 31, 2009. The decrease in Other Operating Expenses, totaling $4.2 million, was primarily due to expenses associated with this propane transaction.

30

Other Income and (Income Deductions) - Net

Other Income and (Income Deductions) – Net increased $0.3 million primarily due to higher net investment gains.

Interest Charges

The minor decrease in interest charges was primarily due to lower interest on long-term debt, primarily attributable to the November 2010 maturity of $25 million principal amount of 6 1/2 % first mortgage bonds. This decrease was largely offset by an increase in interest on short-term debt. Average short-term interest rates were 0.4% for the quarter ended December 31, 2010 compared with 0.2% for the quarter ended December 31, 2009. Average short-term borrowings were $127.9 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2010 compared with $146.1 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2009.

REGULATORY AND OTHER MATTERS

On December 28, 2006, the MoPSC Staff proposed a disallowance of $7.2 million related to Laclede Gas’ recovery of its purchased gas costs applicable to fiscal year 2005, which the Staff later reduced to a $1.7 million disallowance pertaining to Laclede Gas’ purchase of gas from a marketing affiliate, LER. The MoPSC Staff has also proposed disallowances of $2.8 million and $1.5 million of gas costs relating to Laclede Gas purchases of gas supply from LER for fiscal years 2006 and 2007, respectively. The MoPSC Staff proposed a number of non-monetary recommendations only, based on its review of gas costs for fiscal years 2008 and 2009. Laclede Gas believes that the proposed disallowances lack merit and is vigorously opposing these adjustments in proceedings before the MoPSC. As such, no amount has been recorded i n the financial statements for these proposed disallowances.

In connection with the affiliate transactions mentioned above, on July 7, 2010, the MoPSC Staff filed a complaint against Laclede Gas alleging that, by stating that it was not in possession of proprietary LER documents, Laclede Gas violated the MoPSC Order approving a 2001 Stipulation and Agreement that permitted the Company’s corporate reorganization into a holding company structure. The Utility filed a counterclaim against the MoPSC Staff alleging that the Staff has failed to adhere to the pricing provisions of the MoPSC’s affiliate transaction rules and the provisions under which the Company allocates costs among affiliated companies. However, on November 3, 2010, the MoPSC issued an Order dismissing the Utility’s counterclaim for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Al so, on October 6, 2010, the MoPSC Staff filed a related complaint against Laclede Gas, LER, and Laclede Group, alleging that the Utility has failed to comply with the MoPSC’s affiliate transaction rules. LER and Laclede Group both filed motions to dismiss, which were granted by the Commission on December 22, 2010. Laclede Gas also filed a motion to dismiss certain counts of the complaint, which is still pending before the Commission, as well as a counterclaim against the Staff. Laclede Gas believes that neither of the complaints has merit and intends to vigorously oppose both of them.

On July 9, 2008, Laclede Gas made a tariff filing with the MoPSC that would make the payment provisions for the restoration of gas service under the Utility’s Cold Weather Rule available to customers in the summer of 2008 and enable the Utility to increase or decrease its PGA rates to correct for any shortfall or surplus created by the difference between the gas cost portion of the Utility’s actual net bad debt write-offs and the amount of such cost that is embedded in its existing rates. As a result of the ensuing procedural schedule, the Cold Weather Rule portion of the filing became moot. On April 15, 2009, the Commission rejected the Utility’s tariffs on the grounds that it did not have the legal authority to approve them, of which Laclede Gas sought judicial review. On January 11, 0;2010, the Court found that the Commission did have the legal authority to approve such tariffs, which decision the Commission appealed to the Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. On October 19, 2010, the Western District overruled the Cole County Circuit Court’s decision and affirmed the Commission’s April 15, 2009 Order. Laclede Gas filed with the Western District a motion for rehearing and an application to transfer the case to the Missouri Supreme Court. On December 7, 2010, the Western District denied the Utility’s requests for rehearing and for transfer to the Missouri Supreme Court. On December 22, 2010, the Utility filed an application at the Missouri Supreme Court for transfer of the case to that Court.

On October 29, 2010, the Utility made an ISRS filing with the Commission designed to increase revenues by $2.6 million annually, $2.5 million of which the MoPSC approved effective January 7, 2011.

31

On June 29, 2010, the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs issued a Notice of Violations to Laclede Gas alleging lapses in certain employment selection procedures during a two-year period ending in February 2006. The Company believes that the allegations lack merit and is vigorously defending its position. Management, after discussion with counsel, believes that the final outcome of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position and results of operations of the Company.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition, results of operations, liquidity, and capital resources is based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. GAAP requires that we make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. We evaluate our estimates on an ongoing basis. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates. Our critical accounting policies used in the p reparation of our Consolidated Financial Statements are described in Item 7 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010 and include the following:

• Accounts receivable and allowance for doubtful accounts

• Employee benefits and postretirement obligations

• Regulated operations

• Non-regulated gas marketing energy contracts

There were no significant changes to these critical accounting policies during the three months ended December 31, 2010. For discussion of other significant accounting policies, see Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010.

ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

The Company continues to monitor the developments of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) relative to possible changes in accounting standards. Currently, the FASB is considering various changes to U. S. GAAP, some of which may be significant, as part of a joint effort with the International Accounting Standards Board to converge accounting standards. Future developments, depending on the outcome, have the potential to impact the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

FINANCIAL CONDITION

CASH FLOWS

The Company’s short-term borrowing requirements typically peak during colder months when Laclede Gas borrows money to cover the lag between when it purchases its natural gas and when its customers pay for that gas. Changes in the wholesale cost of natural gas (including cash payments for margin deposits associated with the Utility’s use of natural gas derivative instruments), variations in the timing of collections of gas cost under the Utility’s PGA Clause, and the utilization of storage gas inventories cause short-term cash requirements to vary during the year and from year to year, and can cause significant variations in the Utility’s cash provided by or used in operating activities.

Net cash provided by operating activities was $5.8 million for the three months ended December 31, 2010. There was essentially no net cash used in operating activities for the three months ended December 31, 2009. The variation is primarily attributable to reduced cash payments for margin deposits associated with the Utility’s use of natural gas derivative instruments and improved cash flows at LER, partially offset by variations associated with the timing of collections of gas cost under the Utility’s PGA Clause.

Net cash used in investing activities for the three months ended December 31, 2010 was $14.6 million compared with $12.2 million for the three months ended December 31, 2009. Cash used in investing activities primarily reflected capital expenditures in both periods.

32

Net cash used in financing activities was $53.0 million for the three months ended December 31, 2010 compared with net cash provided by financing activities of $17.6 million for the three months ended December 31, 2009. The variation primarily reflects increased repayments of short-term debt and the maturity of long-term debt this quarter.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Short-term Investments

Laclede Group had short-term investments totaling $15.5 million at December 31, 2010, earning an average interest rate of 0.2%. These investments, which are presented in the Cash and cash equivalents line of the Consolidated Balance Sheets, were diversified among several money market funds and interest-bearing deposits at highly-rated commercial banks. The money market funds are accessible by the Company on demand. The bank deposits are also generally available on demand, though the banks reserve the right to require seven days’ notice for a withdrawal. These funds are used to support the working capital needs of the Company’s subsidiaries. The balance of short-term investments ranged between $15.5 million and $85.8 million during the three months ended December 31, 2010. Due to lower yields availabl e to Laclede Group on its short-term investments, Laclede Group elected to provide a portion of Laclede Gas' short-term funding through intercompany lending during the three months ended December 31, 2010.

Short-term Debt

As indicated in the discussion of cash flows above, the Company’s short-term borrowing requirements typically peak during the colder months. These short-term cash requirements can be met through the sale of commercial paper supported by lines of credit with banks or through direct use of the lines of credit. Laclede Gas has a syndicated line of credit in place of $320 million from 10 banks, with the largest portion provided by a single bank being 17.5%. This line expires in December 2011. Laclede Gas’ lines of credit include covenants limiting total debt, including short-term debt, to no more than 70% of total capitalization and requiring earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) to be at least 2.25 times interest expense. On December 31, 2010, total debt was 56% of total cap italization. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2010, EBITDA was 4.57 times interest expense.

Short-term cash requirements outside of Laclede Gas have generally been met with internally-generated funds. However, Laclede Group has $50 million in working capital lines of credit which expire in September 2011, to meet short-term liquidity needs of its subsidiaries. These lines of credit have covenants limiting the total debt of the consolidated Laclede Group to no more than 70% of the Company’s total capitalization. This ratio stood at 46% on December 31, 2010. These lines have been used to provide for seasonal funding needs of various subsidiaries from time to time. There were no borrowings under Laclede Group’s lines during the three months ended December 31, 2010, other than minimal one-day draws under each line for administrative purposes.

Information about Laclede Group’s consolidated short-term borrowings (excluding intercompany borrowings) during the three months ended December 31, 2010 and as of December 31, 2010, is presented below:

	Laclede Gas Commercial Paper Borrowings
Three Months Ended December 31, 2010
Weighted average borrowings outstanding	$127.8 million
Weighted average interest rate	0.4%
Range of borrowings outstanding	$94.1 – $172.1 million
As of December 31, 2010
Borrowings outstanding at end of period	$97.5 million
Weighted average interest rate	0.4%

Based on average short-term borrowings for the three months ended December 31, 2010, an increase in the average interest rate of 100 basis points would decrease Laclede Group’s pre-tax earnings and cash flows by approximately $1.3 million on an annual basis, portions of which may be offset through the application of PGA carrying costs.

33

Long-term Debt, Equity, and Shelf Registrations

The Utility has MoPSC authority to issue debt securities and preferred stock, including on a private placement basis, as well as to issue common stock, receive paid-in capital, and enter into capital lease agreements, all for a total of up to $518 million, effective through June 30, 2013. During the three months ended December 31, 2010, pursuant to this authority, the Utility sold 10 shares of its common stock to Laclede Group for $0.4 million. For more information on these sales of stock, see Part II., Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds. As of January 28, 2011, $517.0 million remains available under this authorization. The amount, timing, and type of additional financing to be issued will depend on cash requirements and market conditio ns, as well as future MoPSC authorizations.

At December 31, 2010, Laclede Gas had fixed-rate long-term debt totaling $365 million. While these long-term debt issues are fixed-rate, they are subject to changes in their fair value as market interest rates change. However, increases or decreases in fair value would impact earnings and cash flows only if Laclede Gas were to reacquire any of these issues in the open market prior to maturity. Under GAAP applicable to Laclede Gas’ regulated operations, losses or gains on early redemptions of long-term debt would typically be deferred as regulatory assets or regulatory liabilities and amortized over a future period. Of the Utility’s $365 million in long-term debt, $50 million have no call option, $235 million have make-whole call options, and $80 million are callable at par in 2013. None of the debt has any put options.

Laclede Group has a registration statement on file on Form S-3 for the issuance and sale of up to 400,000 shares of its common stock under its Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Program. At December 31, 2010, there were 316,978 shares remaining available for issuance under this Form S-3. Also, Laclede Group previously filed an automatic shelf registration statement on Form S-3 for the issuance of equity and debt securities, as well as a post-effective amendment in February 2010. No securities have been issued under that S-3. To address a technical correction related to the latter filing, the Company anticipates filing a new S-3 immediately after the filing of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q.

Guarantees

Laclede Gas has several operating leases for the rental of vehicles that contain provisions requiring Laclede Gas to guarantee certain amounts related to the residual value of the leased property. These leases have various terms, the longest of which extends into 2015. At December 31, 2010, the maximum guarantees under these leases were $1.3 million. However, the Utility believes it is unlikely that it will be subject to the maximum payment amount because it estimates that the residual value of the leased vehicles will be adequate to satisfy most of the guaranteed amounts. At December 31, 2010, the carrying value of the liability recognized for these guarantees was $0.3 million.

Laclede Group had guarantees totaling $107.6 million for performance and payment of certain wholesale gas supply purchases by LER, as of December 31, 2010. Since that date, total guarantees issued by Laclede Group on behalf of LER increased by $3.0 million, bringing the total to $110.6 million in guarantees outstanding at January 28, 2011. No amounts have been recorded for these guarantees in the financial statements.

Other

The Company’s and the Utility’s access to capital markets, including the commercial paper market, and their respective financing costs, may depend on the credit rating of the entity that is accessing the capital markets. These ratings, which are indicated below, were unchanged over the past quarter, but remain subject to review and change by the rating agencies.

Type of Facility	S&P	Moody’s	Fitch
Laclede Group Issuer Rating	A		A-
Laclede Gas First Mortgage Bonds	A	A2	A+
Laclede Gas Commercial Paper	A-1	P-2	F1

Utility capital expenditures were $15.5 million for the three months ended December 31, 2010, compared with $11.1 million for the same period last year. Non-utility capital expenditures were $0.1 million for both the three months ended December 31, 2010 and 2009.

Consolidated capitalization at December 31, 2010 consisted of 60.0% Laclede Group common stock equity and 40.0% Laclede Gas long-term debt.

34

It is management’s view that the Company has adequate access to capital markets and will have sufficient capital resources, both internal and external, to meet anticipated capital requirements, which primarily include capital expenditures, scheduled maturities of long-term debt, short-term seasonal needs, and dividends.

The seasonal nature of Laclede Gas’ sales affects the comparison of certain balance sheet items at December 31, 2010 and at September 30, 2010, such as Accounts receivable - net, Gas stored underground, Notes payable, Accounts payable, Regulatory assets and Regulatory liabilities, and Advance customer billings. The Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2009 is presented to facilitate comparison of these items with the corresponding interim period of the preceding fiscal year.

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS

As of December 31, 2010, Laclede Group had contractual obligations with payments due as summarized below (in millions):

			Payments due by period
			Remaining						Fiscal Years
Contractual Obligations	Total		Fiscal Year 2011		Fiscal Years 2012-2013		Fiscal Years 2014-2015		2016 and thereafter
Principal Payments on Long-Term Debt	$	365.0	$	—	$	25.0	$	—	$	340.0
Interest Payments on Long-Term Debt		475.0		13.9		45.1		42.7		373.3
Capital Leases (a)		0.3		0.1		0.1		0.1		—
Operating Leases (a)		14.9		3.9		7.5		3.5		—
Purchase Obligations – Natural Gas (b)		841.7		397.8		402.7		26.8		14.4
Purchase Obligations – Other (c)		96.6		17.7		23.9		17.8		37.2
Total (d)	$	1,793.5	$	433.4	$	504.3	$	90.9	$	764.9

(a)	Lease obligations are primarily for office space, office equipment, vehicles, and power operated equipment in the Regulated Gas Distribution segment. Additional payments will be incurred if renewal options are exercised under the provisions of certain agreements.
(b)	These purchase obligations represent the minimum payments required under existing natural gas transportation and storage contracts and natural gas supply agreements in the Regulated Gas Distribution and Non-Regulated Gas Marketing segments. These amounts reflect fixed obligations as well as obligations to purchase natural gas at future market prices, calculated using December 31, 2010 forward market prices. Laclede Gas recovers the costs related to its purchases, transportation, and storage of natural gas through the operation of its PGA Clause, subject to prudence review; however, variations in the timing of collections of gas costs from customers affect short-term cash requirements. Additional contractual commitments are generally entered into prior to or during the heating season.
(c)	These purchase obligations primarily reflect miscellaneous agreements for the purchase of materials and the procurement of services necessary for normal operations.
(d)	The category of Other Long-Term Liabilities has been excluded from the table above because there are no material amounts of contractual obligations under this category. Long-term liabilities associated with unrecognized tax benefits, totaling $6.4 million, have been excluded from the table above because the timing of future cash outflows, if any, cannot be reasonably estimated. Also, commitments related to pension and postretirement benefit plans have been excluded from the table above. At this writing, the Company expects to make contributions to its qualified, trusteed pension plans of at least $10.3 million during the remainder of fiscal year 2011. Laclede Gas anticipates a $1.8 million contribution relative to its non-qualified pension plans during the remainder of fiscal year 2011. With regard to the postretirem ent benefits, the Company anticipates Laclede Gas will contribute $11.1 million to the qualified trusts and $0.3 million directly to participants from Laclede Gas’ funds during the remainder of fiscal year 2011. For further discussion of the Company’s pension and postretirement benefit plans, refer to Note 2, Pension Plans and Other Postretirement Benefits, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

35

MARKET RISK

Commodity Price Risk

Laclede Gas’ commodity price risk, which arises from market fluctuations in the price of natural gas, is primarily managed through the operation of its PGA Clause. The PGA Clause allows Laclede Gas to flow through to customers, subject to prudence review, the cost of purchased gas supplies. The Utility is allowed the flexibility to make up to three discretionary PGA changes during each year, in addition to its mandatory November PGA change, so long as such changes are separated by at least two months. The Utility is able to mitigate, to some extent, changes in commodity prices through the use of physical storage supplies and regional supply diversity. Laclede Gas also has a risk management policy that allows for the purchase of natural gas derivative instruments with the goal of managing its price risk associated with purchas ing natural gas on behalf of its customers. This policy prohibits speculation. Costs and cost reductions, including carrying costs, associated with the Utility’s use of natural gas derivative instruments are allowed to be passed on to the Utility’s customers through the operation of its PGA Clause. Accordingly, Laclede Gas does not expect any adverse earnings impact as a result of the use of these derivative instruments. However, the timing of recovery for cash payments related to margin requirements may cause short-term cash requirements to vary. Nevertheless, carrying costs associated with such requirements, as well as other variations in the timing of collections of gas costs, are recovered through the PGA Clause. For more information about the Utility’s natural gas derivative instruments, see Note 7, Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, of the Notes to Consolidated F inancial Statements.

In the course of its business, Laclede Group’s non-regulated gas marketing subsidiary, LER, enters into contracts to purchase and sell natural gas at fixed prices and natural gas index-based prices. Commodity price risk associated with these contracts has the potential to impact earnings and cash flows. To minimize this risk, LER has a risk management policy that provides for daily monitoring of a number of business measures, including fixed price commitments. Pursuant to this risk management policy, LER manages the price risk associated with its fixed-price commitments by either closely matching the offsetting physical purchase or sale of natural gas at fixed-prices or through the use of natural gas futures and swap contracts traded on or cleared through the NYMEX to lock in margins. At December 31, 2010 and 2009, LER’s unmatched fixed-price positions were not material to Laclede Group’s financial position or results of operations.

As mentioned above, LER uses natural gas futures and swap contracts traded on or cleared through the NYMEX to manage the commodity price risk associated with its fixed-price natural gas purchase and sale commitments. These derivative instruments are generally designated as cash flow hedges of forecasted purchases or sales. Such accounting treatment generally permits a substantial portion of the gain or loss to be deferred from recognition in earnings until the period that the associated forecasted purchase or sale is recognized in earnings. To the extent a hedge is effective, gains or losses on the derivatives will be offset by changes in the value of the hedged forecasted transactions. Accordingly, the Company does not expect any material adverse earnings impact associated with the use of these instruments. Information about the f air values of LER’s exchange-traded/cleared natural gas derivative instruments is presented below:

(Thousands)	Derivative Fair Values			Cash Margin		Derivatives and Cash Margin
Net balance of derivative (liabilities) assets at September 30, 2010	$	(9,962	)	$	11,568	$	1,606
Changes in fair value		(111	)		—		(111	)
Settlements		(1,132	)		—		(1,132	)
Changes in cash margin		—			2,325		2,325
Net balance of derivative (liabilities) assets at December 31, 2010	$	(11,205	)	$	13,893	$	2,688

	At December 31, 2010
	Maturity by Fiscal Year
(Thousands)		Total			2011			2012			2013
Fair values of exchange-traded/cleared natural gas derivatives - net	$	(11,205	)	$	(7,787	)	$	(3,406	)	$	(12	)
MMBtu – net long (short) futures/swap positions		1,560			(150	)		1,635			75

36

Many of LER’s physical natural gas derivative contracts are designated as normal purchases or normal sales, as permitted by GAAP. This election permits the Company to account for the contract in the period the natural gas is delivered. However, certain contracts do not qualify for this election under GAAP and are required to be accounted for as derivatives with changes in fair value recognized in earnings in the periods prior to physical delivery. Below is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances for physical natural gas contracts accounted for as derivatives, none of which will settle beyond fiscal year 2012:

(Thousands)
Net balance of derivative assets at September 30, 2010	$	168
Changes in fair value		7
Settlements		1
Net balance of derivative assets at December 31, 2010	$	176

For further details related to LER’s derivatives and hedging activities, see Note 7, Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Counterparty Credit Risk

LER has concentrations of counterparty credit risk in that a significant portion of its transactions are with (or are associated with) energy producers, utility companies, and pipelines. These concentrations of counterparties have the potential to affect the Company’s overall exposure to credit risk, either positively or negatively, in that each of these three groups may be affected similarly by changes in economic, industry, or other conditions. LER also has concentrations of credit risk with certain individually significant counterparties. To the extent possible, LER enters into netting arrangements with its counterparties to mitigate exposure to credit risk. Although not recorded on the consolidated balance sheets, LER is also exposed to credit risk associated with its derivative contracts designated as normal purchases an d normal sales. LER closely monitors its credit exposure and, although uncollectible amounts have not been significant, increased counterparty defaults are possible and may result in financial losses and/or capital limitations. For more information on these concentrations of credit risk, including how LER manages these risks, see Note 8, Concentrations of Credit Risk, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Interest Rate Risk

The Company is subject to interest rate risk associated with its long-term and short-term debt issuances. Based on average short-term borrowings during the three months ended December 31, 2010, an increase of 100 basis points in the underlying average interest rate for short-term debt would have caused an increase in interest expense of approximately $1.3 million on an annual basis. Portions of such increases may be offset through the application of PGA carrying costs. At December 31, 2010, Laclede Gas had fixed-rate long-term debt totaling $365 million. While these long-term debt issues are fixed-rate, they are subject to changes in fair value as market interest rates change. However, increases or decreases in fair value would impact earnings and cash flows only if Laclede Gas were to reacquire any of these iss ues in the open market prior to maturity. Under GAAP applicable to Laclede Gas’ regulated operations, losses or gains on early redemptions of long-term debt would typically be deferred as regulatory assets or regulatory liabilities and amortized over a future period.

ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS

Laclede Gas owns and operates natural gas distribution, transmission and storage facilities, the operations of which are subject to various environmental laws, regulations and interpretations. While environmental issues resulting from such operations arise in the ordinary course of business, such issues have not materially affected the Company’s or Laclede Gas’ financial position and results of operations. As environmental laws, regulations, and their interpretations change, however, Laclede Gas may be required to incur additional costs. For information relative to environmental matters, see Note 16, Commitments and Contingencies, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010. For changes during the three months ended December 31, 2010, see Note 11, Commitments and Contingencies, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

Laclede Group has no off-balance sheet arrangements.

37

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

For this discussion, see Part I., Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Market Risk, on page 36 of this report.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

As of the end of the period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-15e and Rule 15d-15e under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during our first fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

38

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

For a description of environmental matters and legal proceedings, see Note 16, Commitments and Contingencies, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010. For changes during the three months ended December 31, 2010, see Note 11, Commitments and Contingencies, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. For a description of pending regulatory matters of Laclede Gas, see Part I., Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Regulatory and Other Matters, on page 31 of this report.

Laclede Group and its subsidiaries are involved in litigation, claims and investigations arising in the normal course of business. Management, after discussion with counsel, believes that the final outcome of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position or results of operations of the Company.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

On December 13, 2010, the Board of Directors of Laclede Gas approved the sale of 10 shares of Laclede Gas common stock to Laclede Group. The proceeds from the sale, totaling $0.4 million, were used to reduce short-term borrowings. Exemption from registration was claimed under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

During the quarter ended December 31, 2010, the only repurchases of our common stock were pursuant to elections by employees to have shares of stock withheld to cover employee tax withholding obligations upon the vesting of performance-based restricted stock. The following table provides information on those repurchases.

Period	Total No. of Shares Purchased	Average Price Paid Per Share	Total No. of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans	Maximum No. of Shares that May Yet be Purchased Under the Plans
October 1, 2010 – October 31, 2010	—	—	—	—
November 1, 2010 – November 30, 2010	—	—	—	—
December 1, 2010 – December 31, 2010	32,373	$35.90	—	—
Total	32,373	—	—	—

Item 6. Exhibits

(a) See Exhibit Index

39

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

		The Laclede Group, Inc.
Dated:	January 28, 2011	By:	/s/ Mark D. Waltermire
			Mark D. Waltermire
			Chief Financial Officer
			(Authorized Signatory and Chief Financial Officer)

40

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

Exhibit No.
12	-	Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.
31	-	CEO and CFO Certifications under Exchange Act Rule 13a – 14(a).
32	-	CEO and CFO Section 1350 Certifications.

41