UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
| | | |
| (Mark One) |
| þ | | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
| For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 |
| OR |
| o | | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
| For the transition period from ............ to ............ |
Commission file number 001-31305
FOSTER WHEELER AG
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
| | | |
Switzerland
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | | 98-0607469
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No). |
| | | |
80 Rue de Lausanne
CH 1202 Geneva, Switzerland
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) | | 6340
(Zip Code) |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:
41 22 741 80 00
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
| | | |
| (Title of Each Class) | | (Name of each exchange on which registered) |
| | | |
Foster Wheeler AG,
Registered Shares, CHF 3.00 par value | | The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
| | | |
| (Title of Each Class) | | (Name of each exchange on which registered) |
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. þ Yes o No
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. o Yes þ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. þ Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 ofRegulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 ofRegulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of thisForm 10-K or any amendment to thisForm 10-K. þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” inRule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
| | | | | | | |
Large accelerated filer þ | | Accelerated filer o | | Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | | Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined inRule 12b-2 of the Act). o Yes þ No
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $2,513,000,000 as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, based upon the closing sale price on the NASDAQ Global Select Market reported for such date. Registered shares held as of such date by each officer and director and by each person who owns 5% or more of the outstanding common shares have been excluded in that such persons may be deemed to be affiliates. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes.
There were 124,880,649 of the registrant’s registered shares outstanding as of February 11, 2011.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:
Part III incorporates information by reference from the definitive proxy statement for the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders, which is expected to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days of the close of the registrant’s fiscal year ended December 31, 2010.
FOSTER WHEELER AG
INDEX
This annual report onForm 10-K contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements as a result of the risk factors set forth in this annual report onForm 10-K. See Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Safe Harbor Statement” for further information.
1
PART I
General
Foster Wheeler AG was incorporated under the laws of Switzerland on November 18, 2008 and registered in the commercial register of the Canton of Zug, Switzerland on November 25, 2008 as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Foster Wheeler Ltd. Pursuant to a scheme of arrangement under Bermuda law, on February 9, 2009 all previously outstanding whole common shares of Foster Wheeler Ltd. were cancelled and Foster Wheeler AG issued registered shares to the holders of whole Foster Wheeler Ltd. common shares that were cancelled. As a result of the scheme of arrangement, the common shareholders of Foster Wheeler Ltd. became common shareholders of Foster Wheeler AG, and Foster Wheeler Ltd. became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Foster Wheeler AG, a holding company that owns the stock of its various subsidiary companies. See “— The Redomestication” for more information regarding the scheme of arrangement and certain related transactions. Except as the context otherwise requires, the terms “Foster Wheeler,” “us” and “we,” as used herein, refer to Foster Wheeler AG and its direct and indirect subsidiaries for the period after the consummation of the scheme of arrangement and Foster Wheeler Ltd. and its direct and indirect subsidiaries for the period before the consummation of the scheme of arrangement.
The redomestication was undertaken in order to establish a corporation more centrally located within Foster Wheeler’s major markets, in a country with a stable and well-developed tax regime as well as a sophisticated financial and commercial infrastructure, and to improve our ability to maintain a competitive worldwide effective corporate tax rate. In January 2010, we relocated our principal executive offices to Geneva, Switzerland.
Amounts in Part I, Item 1 are presented in thousands, except for the number of employees.
Business
We operate through two business groups: ourGlobal Engineering and Construction Group, which we refer to as our Global E&C Group, and ourGlobal Power Group.
Our Global E&C Group, which operates worldwide, designs, engineers and constructs onshore and offshore upstream oil and gas processing facilities, natural gas liquefaction facilities and receiving terminals,gas-to-liquids facilities, oil refining, chemical and petrochemical, pharmaceutical and biotechnology facilities and related infrastructure, including power generation facilities, distribution facilities, and gasification facilities and processing facilities associated with the metals and mining sector. Our Global E&C Group is also involved in the design of facilities in new or developing market sectors, including carbon capture and storage, solid fuel-fired integrated gasification combined-cycle power plants,coal-to-liquids,coal-to-chemicals and biofuels. Additionally, our Global E&C Group is also involved in the development, engineering, construction, ownership and operation of power generation facilities, from conventional and renewable sources, and ofwaste-to-energy facilities primarily in Europe.
Our Global E&C Group owns one of the leading technologies (SYDECsm delayed coking) used in refinery residue upgrading, in addition to other refinery residue upgrading technologies (solvent deasphalting and visbreaking), and a hydrogen production process used in oil refineries and petrochemical plants. During fiscal year 2010, our Global E&C Group acquired a proprietary sulfur recovery technology through a business acquisition. The sulfur recovery technology is used to treat gas streams containing hydrogen sulfide for the purpose of reducing the sulfur content of fuel products and to recover a saleable sulfur by-product.
Our Global E&C Group also designs and supplies direct-fired furnaces, including fired heaters and waste heat recovery generators, used in a range of refinery, chemical, petrochemical, oil and gas processes, including furnaces used in its proprietary delayed coking and hydrogen production technologies. Additionally, our Global E&C Group has experience with, and is able to work with, a wide range of processes owned by others.
2
Our Global E&C Group generates revenues from design, engineering, procurement, construction and project management activities pursuant to contracts spanning up to approximately four years in duration. Additionally, our Global E&C Group generates equity earnings from returns on its noncontrolling interest investments in various power production facilities.
Our Global Power Group designs, manufactures and erects steam generators and auxiliary equipment for electric power generating stations, district heating and power plants and industrial facilities worldwide. Our steam generating equipment includes a full range of technologies, offering independent power producers, utility and industrial clients high-value technology solutions for economically converting a wide range of fuels, including coal, lignite, petroleum coke, oil, gas, biomass and municipal solid waste, into high quality steam and power.
Our circulating fluidized-bed steam generator technology, which we refer to as CFB, is ideally suited to burning a very wide range of fuels, including low-quality and “waste-type” fuels, and we believe is generally recognized as one of the cleanest burning solid-fuel technologies available on a commercial basis in the world today.
For both our CFB and pulverized coal, which we refer to as PC, steam generators, we offer supercritical once-through-unit designs to further improve the energy efficiency and, therefore, the environmental performance of these units. Once-through supercritical steam generators operate at higher steam temperatures than traditional plants, which results in higher efficiencies and lower emissions, including emissions of carbon dioxide, or CO2, which is considered a greenhouse gas.
Further, for the longer term, we are actively developing Flexi-Burntm technology for our CFB steam generators. We believe Flexi-Burntm technology will be an important part of an overall strategy for capturing and storing CO2 from coal power plants. This technology will enable our CFB steam generators to operate in “oxygen-firing CO2capture” mode, commonly referred to as oxy-fuel combustion. In this mode, the CFB combustion process will produce a CO2-rich flue gas which can then be delivered to a storage location while avoiding the need for large, expensive and energy intensive post-combustion CO2separation equipment.
We also design, manufacture and install auxiliary equipment, which includes steam generators for solar thermal power plants, feedwater heaters, steam condensers and heat-recovery equipment. Our Global Power Group also offers a full line of new and retrofit nitrogen-oxide, which we refer to as NOx reduction systems such as selective non-catalytic and catalytic NOx reduction systems as well as complete low-NOxcombustion systems. We provide a broad range of site services relating to these products, including construction and erection services, maintenance engineering, plant upgrading and life extensions.
Our Global Power Group also conducts research and development in the areas of combustion, solid, fluid and gas dynamics, heat transfer, materials and solid mechanics. In addition, our Global Power Group owns and operates cogeneration, independent power production andwaste-to-energy facilities, as well as power generation facilities for the process and petrochemical industries. Our Global Power Group generates revenues from engineering activities, equipment supply and construction contracts, operating activities pursuant to the long-term sale of project outputs, such as electricity and steam, operating and maintenance agreements, royalties from licensing our technology, and generates equity earnings from returns on its noncontrolling interest investments in power production facilities.
In addition to these two business groups, which also represent two of our operating segments for financial reporting purposes, we report corporate center expenses, our captive insurance operation and expenses related to certain legacy liabilities, such as asbestos and other expenses, in the Corporate and Finance Group, which is our other operating segment for financial reporting purposes and which we refer to as the C&F Group.
Please refer to Note 14 to the consolidated financial statements in this annual report onForm 10-K for a discussion of our operating segments and geographic financial information relating to our operations.
3
Products and Services
Our Global E&C Group’s services include:
| | |
| | • | Consulting —Our Global E&C Group provides technical and economic analyses and study reports to owners, investors, developers, operators and governments. These services include concept and feasibility studies, market studies, asset assessments, environmental assessment, energy and emissions management, product demand and supply modeling, and technology evaluations. |
| |
| | • | Design and Engineering —Our Global E&C Group provides a broad range of engineering and design-related services. Our design and engineering capabilities include process, civil, structural, architectural, mechanical, instrumentation, electrical, and health, safety and environmental management. For each project, we identify the project requirements and then integrate and coordinate the various design elements. Other critical tasks in the design process may include value engineering to optimize costs, risk and hazard reviews, and the assessment of construction, maintenance and operational requirements. |
| |
| | • | Project Management and Project Control —Our Global E&C Group offers a wide range of project management and project control services for overseeing engineering, procurement and construction activities. These services include estimating costs, project planning and project cost control. The provision of these services is an integral part of the planning, design and construction phases of projects that we execute directly for clients. We also provide these services to our clients in the role of project management or program management consultant, where we oversee, on our client’s behalf, the execution by other contractors of all or some of the planning, design and construction phases of a project. |
| |
| | • | Procurement —Our procurement activities focus on those projects where we also execute the design and engineering work. We manage the procurement of materials, subcontractors and craft labor. Often, we purchase materials, equipment and third-party services on behalf of our client, where the client will pay for the purchased items or services at cost and reimburse us the cost of our associated services plus a margin or fee. |
| |
| | • | Construction/Commissioning andStart-up —Our Global E&C Group provides construction and construction management services on a worldwide basis. Our construction, commissioning andstart-up activities focus on those projects where we have performed most of the associated design and engineering work. Depending on the project, we may function as the primary contractor or as a subcontractor to another firm. On some projects, we function as the construction manager, engaged by the customer to oversee another contractor’s compliance with design specifications and contracting terms. In some instances, we have responsibility for commissioning and plantstart-up, or, where the client has responsibility for these activities, we provide experts to work as part of our client’s team. |
| |
| | • | Operations and Maintenance —Our Global E&C Group provides project management, plant operations and maintenance services, such as repair, renovation, predictive and preventative services and other aftermarket services. In some instances, our contracts may require us to operate a plant, which we have designed and built, for an initial period that may vary from a very short period to up to approximately two years. |
| |
| | • | Fired Heaters —Our Global E&C Group designs and supplies direct-fired furnaces used in a wide range of refining, petrochemical, chemical, oil and gas processes, including fired heaters and waste heat recovery units. In addition, our Global E&C Group also designs and supplies fired heaters which form an integral part of its proprietary delayed coking and hydrogen production technologies. |
The principal products of our Global Power Group are steam generators, which are commonly referred to as boilers. Our steam generators produce steam in a range of conditions and qualities, from low-pressure saturated steam to high quality superheated steam at eithersub-critical or supercritical conditions (steam pressures above approximately 3,200 pounds-force per square inch absolute). The steam produced by steam generators can be used to produce electricity in power plants, to heat buildings and in the production of many manufactured goods and products, such as paper, chemicals and food products. Our steam generators convert
4
the energy of a wide range of solid and liquid fuels, as well as hot process gases, into steam and can be classified into several types: circulating fluidized-bed, pulverized coal, oil and natural gas, grate, heat recovery steam generators and fully assembled package boilers. The two most significant elements of our product portfolio are our CFB and PC steam generators.
Our Global Power Group’s products and services include:
| | |
| | • | Circulating Fluidized-Bed Steam Generators— Our Global Power Group designs, manufactures and supplies steam generators that utilize our proprietary CFB technology to clients worldwide. We believe that CFB combustion is generally recognized as one of the most commercially viable, fuel-flexible and clean burning ways to generate steam on a commercial basis from coal and many other solid fuels and waste products. A CFB steam generator utilizes air nozzles on the floor and lower side walls of its furnace to mix and fluidize the fuel particles as they burn, resulting in a very efficient combustion and heat transfer process. The fuel and other added solid materials, such as limestone, are continuously recycled through the furnace to maximize combustion efficiency and the capture of pollutants, such as the oxides of sulfur, which we refer to as SOx. Due to the efficient mixing of the fuel with the air and other solid materials and the long period of time the fuel remains in the combustion process, the temperature of the process can be greatly reduced below that of a conventional burning process. This has the added benefit of reducing the formation of NOx, which is another pollutant formed during the combustion process. Due to these benefits, additional SOx and NOx control systems are frequently not needed. The application of supercritical steam technology to CFB technology is the latest commercially proven technology development. By dramatically raising the pressure of the water as it is converted to steam, supercritical steam technology allows the steam to absorb more heat from the combustion process, resulting in a substantial improvement of approximately 5-15% in the efficiency of an electric power plant. To meet the requirements of the utility power sector, our Global Power Group is now offering supercritical CFB steam generators that range from 400 megawatt electrical, or MWe, up to 800 MWe in single unit sizes, in addition to subcritical CFB steam generators which typically range between30-400 MWe. As discussed above, we are actively developing Flexi-Burntm technology for our CFB steam generators. We believe Flexi-Burntm technology will be an important part of an overall strategy for capturing and storing CO2 from coal power plants. We have recently received two new projects which incorporate our carbon-capturing Flexi-Burntm technology. These two projects include a new contract award to carry out the detailed engineering and supply of a pilot-scale CFB steam generator and we have recently signed, together with other parties, a grant agreement with the European Commission to support the technology development of a commercial scale Carbon Capture and Storage demonstration plant. Please refer to Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Business Segments,” for further discussion of these projects. |
| |
| | • | Pulverized Coal Steam Generators —Our Global Power Group designs, manufactures and supplies PC steam generators to clients worldwide. PC steam generators are commonly used in large coal-fired power plant applications. The coal is pulverized into fine particles and injected through specially designed low NOx burners. Our PC steam generators control NOx by utilizing advanced low-NOx combustion technology and selective catalytic reduction technology, which we refer to as SCR. PC technology requires flue gas desulfurization equipment, which we refer to as FGD, to be installed after the steam generator to capture SOx. We offer our PC steam generators with either conventionalsub-critical steam technology or more efficient supercritical steam technology for electric power plant applications. PC steam generators typically range from200-800 MWe. |
| |
| | • | Industrial Steam Generators —Our Global Power Group designs, manufactures and supplies industrial steam generators of various types including: CFB, as described above, grate, fully assembled package, field erected oil and gas, waste heat, and heat recovery steam generators. Depending on the steam generator type and application, our industrial boilers are designed to burn a wide spectrum of industrial fuels from high quality oil and natural gas to biomass and “waste type” fuels such as tires, municipal solid waste, waste wood and paper. Our industrial steam generators are designed for ruggedness and reliability. |
5
| | |
| | • | Auxiliary Equipment and Aftermarket Services— Our Global Power Group also manufactures and installs auxiliary and replacement equipment for utility power and industrial facilities, including steam generators for solar thermal power plants, surface condensers, feed water heaters, coal pulverizers, steam generator coils and panels, biomass gasifiers, and replacement parts. Additionally, we install NOx reduction systems manufactured by third-parties. The NOx reduction systems include SCR equipment and low-NOx combustion systems for PC steam generators, which significantly reduce NOx emissions from PC steam generators. Our Global Power Group also performs steam generator modifications and provides engineered solutions for steam generators worldwide. |
We provide a broad range of site services relating to these products, including construction and erection services, maintenance engineering, plant upgrading and life extension, and plant repowering. Our Global Power Group also conducts research and development in the areas of combustion, fluid and gas dynamics, heat transfer, materials and solid mechanics. In addition, our Global Power Group licenses technology to a limited number of third-parties in select countries or markets.
Industries We Serve
We serve the following industries:
| | |
| | • | Oil and gas; |
| |
| | • | Oil refining; |
| |
| | • | Chemical/petrochemical; |
| |
| | • | Pharmaceutical; |
| |
| | • | Environmental; |
| |
| | • | Metals and mining |
| |
| | • | Power generation; and |
| |
| | • | Power plant operation and maintenance. |
Customers and Marketing
We market our services and products through a worldwide staff of sales and marketing professionals, through a network of sales representatives and through partnership or joint venture arrangements with unrelated third-parties. Our businesses are not seasonal and are not dependent on a limited group of clients. One client accounted for approximately 25%, 24% and 24% of our consolidated operating revenues (inclusive of flow-through revenues) in fiscal years 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively; however, the associated flow-through revenues included in these percentages accounted for approximately 23%, 22% and 20% of our consolidated operating revenues in fiscal years 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. No other single client accounted for ten percent or more of our consolidated revenues in fiscal years 2010, 2009 and 2008. Representative clients include state-owned and multinational oil and gas companies; major petrochemical, chemical, and pharmaceutical companies; national, municipal and independent electric power generation companies; utilities; and government agencies throughout the world. The majority of our revenues and new business originates outside of the United States.
Licenses, Patents and Trademarks
We own and license patents, trademarks and know-how, which are used in each of our business groups. The life cycles of the patents and trademarks are of varying durations. We are not materially dependent on any particular patent or trademark, although we depend on our ability to protect our intellectual property rights to the technologies and know-how used in our proprietary products. As noted above, our Global Power Group has granted licenses to a limited number of companies in select countries to manufacture steam generators and related equipment and certain of our other products. Our principal licensees are located in China, India, Japan and South Korea. Recurring royalty revenues have historically ranged from approximately $5,000 to $10,000 per year.
6
Unfilled Orders
We execute our contracts on lump-sum turnkey, fixed-price, target-price with incentives and cost-reimbursable bases. Generally, contracts are awarded on the basis of price, acceptance of certain project-related risks, technical capabilities and availability of qualified personnel, reputation for quality and ability to perform in a timely manner, and safety record. On certain contracts our clients may make a down payment at the time a contract is executed and continue to make progress payments until the contract is completed and the work has been accepted as meeting contract guarantees. Our products are custom designed and manufactured, and are not produced for inventory. Our Global E&C Group frequently purchases materials, equipment, and third-party services at cost for clients on a cash neutral/reimbursable basis when providing engineering specification or procurement services, referred to as “flow-through” amounts. “Flow-through” amounts are recorded both as revenues, which we refer to as flow-through revenues, and cost of operating revenues with no profit recognized.
We measure our unfilled orders in terms of expected future revenues. Included in future revenues are flow-through revenues, as defined above. We also measure our unfilled orders in terms of Foster Wheeler scope, which excludes flow-through revenues. As such, Foster Wheeler scope measures the component of backlog of unfilled orders with profit potential and represents our services plus fees for reimbursable contracts and total selling price for lump-sum or fixed-price contracts.
Please refer to Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” for a discussion of the changes in unfilled orders, both in terms of expected future revenues and Foster Wheeler scope. See also Item 1A, “Risk Factors — Risks Related to Our Operations — Projects included in our backlog may be delayed or cancelled, which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.”
Use of Raw Materials
We source the materials used in our manufacturing and construction operations from several countries. The procurement of materials, consisting mainly of steel products and manufactured items, is heavily dependent on unrelated third-party sources. These materials are subject to timing of availability and price fluctuations, which we monitor on a regular basis. We have access to numerous global sources and are not dependent on any single source of supply.
Compliance with Government Regulations
We are subject to certain federal, state and local environmental, occupational health and product safety laws arising from the countries where we operate. We also purchase materials and equipment from third-parties, and engage subcontractors, who are also subject to these laws and regulations. We believe that all our operations are in material compliance with those laws and we do not anticipate any material capital expenditures or material adverse effect on earnings or cash flows as a result of complying with those laws. Additionally, please refer to Note 16 to the consolidated financial statements in this annual report onForm 10-K for a discussion of our environmental matters.
Employees
The following table indicates the number of full-time, temporary and agency personnel in each of our business groups. We believe that our relationship with our employees is satisfactory.
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | As of December 31, | |
| | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
| |
| Global E&C Group | | | 9,037 | | | | 10,400 | |
| Global Power Group | | | 2,987 | | | | 2,968 | |
| C&F Group | | | 81 | | | | 78 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Total | | | 12,105 | | | | 13,446 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
7
Competition
Many companies compete with us in the engineering and construction business. Neither we nor any other single company has a dominant market share of the total design, engineering and construction business servicing the global businesses previously described. Many companies also compete in the global power generating equipment business and neither we nor any other single competitor has an overall dominant market share over the entire steam generator product portfolio.
The vast majority of the market opportunities that we pursue are subject to a competitive tendering process, and we believe that our target customers consider the price, acceptance of certain project-related risks, technical capabilities and availability of qualified personnel, reputation for quality and ability to perform in a timely manner, and safety record as the primary factors in determining which qualified contractor is awarded a contract. We derive our competitive strength from our reputation for quality of our services and products, technology, worldwide procurement capability, project management expertise, ability to execute complex projects, professionalism, strong safety record and lengthy experience with a wide range of services and technologies.
Companies that compete with our Global E&C Group include but are not limited to the following: Bechtel Corporation; Chicago Bridge & Iron Company N.V.; Chiyoda Corporation; Fluor Corporation; Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.; JGC Corporation; KBR, Inc.; Saipem S.p.A.; Shaw Group, Inc.; Technip; Técnicas Reunidas, SA; and Worley Parsons Ltd.
Companies that compete with our Global Power Group include but are not limited to the following: Alstom Power S.A.; Austrian Energy & Environment AG.; The Babcock & Wilcox Company; Babcock Power Inc.; Dongfang Boiler Works (a subsidiary of Dong Fang Electric Corporation); Doosan-Babcock; Harbin Boiler Co., Ltd.; Hitachi, Ltd.; Metso Corporation; Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Ltd.; and Shanghai Boiler Works Ltd.
Available Information
You may obtain free electronic copies of our annual reports onForm 10-K, quarterly reports onForm 10-Q, current reports onForm 8-K, proxy statements and all amendments to these documents at our website,www.fwc.com, under the heading “Investor Relations” by selecting the heading “SEC Filings.” We make these documents available on our website as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file them with or furnish them to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, which we refer to as SEC. The information disclosed on our website is not incorporated herein and does not form a part of this annual report onForm 10-K.
You may also read and copy any materials that we file with or furnish to the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room located at 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549. You may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC also maintains electronic versions of our filings on its website atwww.sec.gov.
The Redomestication
In 2009, we redomesticated our ultimate parent company from Bermuda to Switzerland. Through a scheme of arrangement, we effectively changed our place of incorporation from Bermuda to the Canton of Zug, Switzerland. The scheme of arrangement was approved by the common shareholders of Foster Wheeler Ltd. on January 27, 2009 and was sanctioned by the Supreme Court of Bermuda on January 30, 2009. On February 9, 2009, the following steps occurred pursuant to the scheme of arrangement:
(1) all fractional common shares of Foster Wheeler Ltd. were cancelled and Foster Wheeler Ltd. paid to each holder of fractional shares that were cancelled an amount based on the average of the high and low trading prices of Foster Wheeler Ltd. common shares on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on February 5, 2009, the business day immediately preceding the effectiveness of the scheme of arrangement;
8
(2) all previously outstanding whole common shares of Foster Wheeler Ltd. were cancelled;
(3) Foster Wheeler Ltd., acting on behalf of its shareholders, issued 1,000 common shares (which constituted all of Foster Wheeler Ltd.’s common shares at such time) to Foster Wheeler AG;
(4) Foster Wheeler AG increased its share capital and filed amended articles of association reflecting the share capital increase with the Swiss Commercial Register; and
(5) Foster Wheeler AG issued registered shares to the holders of whole Foster Wheeler Ltd. common shares that were cancelled.
As a result of the scheme of arrangement, the common shareholders of Foster Wheeler Ltd. became common shareholders of Foster Wheeler AG and Foster Wheeler Ltd. became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Foster Wheeler AG. In connection with consummation of the scheme of arrangement:
| | |
| | • | pursuant to the terms of the Certificate of Designation governing Foster Wheeler Ltd.’s Series B Convertible Preferred Shares, concurrently with the issuance of registered shares to the holders of whole Foster Wheeler Ltd. common shares, Foster Wheeler AG issued to the holders of the preferred shares the number of registered shares of Foster Wheeler AG that such holders would have been entitled to receive had they converted their preferred shares into common shares of Foster Wheeler Ltd. immediately prior to the effectiveness of the scheme of arrangement (with Foster Wheeler Ltd. paying cash in lieu of any fractional common shares otherwise issuable); |
| |
| | • | pursuant to the terms of the Warrant Agreement governing Foster Wheeler Ltd.’s Class A Warrants outstanding on the date of the consummation of the scheme of arrangement, Foster Wheeler AG executed a supplemental warrant agreement pursuant to which it assumed Foster Wheeler Ltd.’s obligations under the Warrant Agreement and agreed to issue registered shares of Foster Wheeler AG upon exercise of such warrants in accordance with their terms; and |
| |
| | • | Foster Wheeler AG assumed Foster Wheeler Ltd.’s existing obligations in connection with awards granted under Foster Wheeler Ltd.’s incentive plans and other similar employee awards. |
We refer to the foregoing transactions together with the steps of the scheme of arrangement as the “Redomestication.”
In January 2010, we relocated our principal executive offices to Geneva, Switzerland.
9
| |
| ITEM 1A. | RISK FACTORS (amounts in thousands of dollars) |
Our business is subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, including those described below. If any of these events occur, our business could be harmed and the trading price of our securities could decline. The following discussion of risks relating to our business should be read carefully in connection with evaluating our business and the forward-looking statements contained in this annual report onForm 10-K. For additional information regarding forward-looking statements, see Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Safe Harbor Statement.”
The categorization of risks set forth below is meant to help you better understand the risks facing our business and is not intended to limit consideration of the possible effects of these risks to the listed categories. Any adverse effects related to the risks discussed below may, and likely will, adversely affect many aspects of our business.
Risks Related to Our Operations
The nature of our contracts subject us to risks related to the project’s technical design and associated warranty obligations, changes from original projections for costs and schedules which, particularly with our current and future lump-sum or fixed-price contracts and other shared risk contracts, may result in significant losses if costs are greater than anticipated and/or contractual schedules are not met.
We assume the project’s technical risk and associated warranty obligations on all of our contracts and projects, meaning that we must tailor products and systems to satisfy the technical requirements of a project even though, at the time the project is awarded, we may not have previously produced such a product or system. Warranty obligations can range from re-performance of engineering services to modification or replacement of equipment. We also assume the risks related to revenue, cost and gross profit realized on such contracts that can vary, sometimes substantially, from the original projections due to changes in a variety of other factors, including but not limited to:
| | |
| | • | engineering design changes; |
| |
| | • | unanticipated technical problems with the equipment being supplied or developed by us, which may require that we spend our own money to remedy the problem; |
| |
| | • | changes in the costs of components, materials or labor; |
| |
| | • | difficulties in obtaining required governmental permits or approvals; |
| |
| | • | changes in local laws and regulations; |
| |
| | • | changes in local labor conditions; |
| |
| | • | project modifications creating unanticipated costsand/or delays related to contractual schedules; |
| |
| | • | delays caused by local weather conditions; and |
| |
| | • | our project owners’, suppliers’ or subcontractors’ failure to perform. |
These risks may be exacerbated by the length of time between signing a contract and completing the project because most of the projects that we execute are long-term. The term of our contracts can be as long as approximately four years. In addition, we sometimes bear the risk of delays caused by unexpected conditions or events.
Some of our contracts are fixed-price contracts and other shared-risk contracts that are inherently risky because we agree to the selling price of the project at the time we enter into the contract. The selling price is based on estimates of the ultimate cost of the contract and we assume substantially all of the risks associated with completing the project, as well as the post-completion warranty obligations. Certain of these contracts are lump-sum turnkey projects where we are responsible for all aspects of the work from engineering through construction, as well as commissioning, all for a fixed selling price. We may be subject to penalties if portions of the long-term fixed priced projects are not completed in accordance withagreed-upon time limits.
10
Therefore, significant losses can result from performing large, long-term projects on a fixed-price or lump-sum basis. These losses may be material, including in some cases up to or exceeding the full contract value in certain events of non-performance, and could negatively impact our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. As of December 31, 2010, our backlog included $1,760,000 attributable to lump-sum turnkey and other fixed-price contracts, which represented 44% of our total backlog. We may increase the size and number of fixed-price or lump-sum turnkey contracts, sometimes in countries where or with clients with whom we have limited previous experience.
We may bid for and enter into such contracts through partnerships or joint ventures with third-parties. This may increase our ability and willingness to bid for increased numbers of contractsand/or increased size of contracts. In addition, in some cases, applicable law and joint venture or other agreements may provide that each joint venture partner is jointly and severally liable for all liabilities of the venture. Entering into these partnerships or joint ventures will expose us to credit and performance risks of those third-party partners, which could have a negative impact on our business and our results of operations if these parties fail to perform under the arrangements.
Failure by us to successfully defend against claims made against us by project owners, suppliers or project subcontractors, or failure by us to recover adequately on claims made against project owners, suppliers or subcontractors, could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Our projects generally involve complex design and engineering, significant procurement of equipment and supplies and construction management. We may encounter difficulties in the design or engineering, equipment and supply delivery, schedule changes and other factors, some of which are beyond our control, that affect our ability to complete the project in accordance with the original delivery schedule or to meet the contractual performance obligations. In addition, we generally rely on third-party partners, equipment manufacturers and subcontractors to assist us with the completion of our contracts. As such, claims involving project owners, suppliers and subcontractors may be brought against us and by us in connection with our project contracts. Claims brought against us include back charges for alleged defective or incomplete work, breaches of warrantyand/or late completion of the project work and claims for cancelled projects. The claims and back charges can involve actual damages, as well as contractually agreed upon liquidated sums. Claims brought by us against project owners include claims for additional costs incurred in excess of current contract provisions arising out of project delays and changes in the previously agreed scope of work. Claims between us and our suppliers, subcontractors and vendors include claims like any of those described above. These project claims, if not resolved through negotiation, are often subject to lengthy and expensive litigation or arbitration proceedings. Charges associated with claims could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. For further information on project claims, please refer to Note 16, “Litigation and Uncertainties,” to the consolidated financial statements in this annual report onForm 10-K.
Projects included in our backlog may be delayed or cancelled, which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
The dollar amount of backlog does not necessarily indicate future earnings related to the performance of that work. Backlog refers to expected future revenues under signed contracts and legally binding letters of intent that we have determined are likely to be performed. Backlog represents only business that is considered firm, although cancellations or scope adjustments may and do occur. Because of changes in project scope and schedule, we cannot predict with certainty when or if backlog will be performed or the associated revenue will be recognized. In addition, even where a project proceeds as scheduled, it is possible that contracted parties may default and fail to pay amounts owed to us. Material delays, cancellations or payment defaults could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
11
Because our operations are concentrated in four particular industries, we may be adversely impacted by economic or other developments in these industries.
We derive a significant amount of revenues from services provided to clients that are concentrated in four industries: oil and gas, oil refining, chemical/petrochemical and power generation. These industries historically have been, and will likely continue to be, cyclical in nature. Consequently, our results of operations have fluctuated, and may continue to fluctuate, depending on the demand for our products and services from clients in these industries.
Unfavorable developments in global or regional economic growth rates or other unfavorable developments in one or more of these industries could adversely affect our clients’ investment plans and could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
The weakness in the global economy has impacted the demand for the products that our Global E&C Group’s clients produce. We have seen instances of postponement or cancellation of prospects; clients electing to proceed with their investments in phases; clients releasing us to proceed on projects in phases; clients conducting further analysis before deciding to proceed with their investments; clients resizing, reconfiguring or relocating prospective projects to make them more economically viable; and intensified competition among engineering and construction contractors which has resulted in pricing pressure. These factors may continue in the future, but to a lesser extent as the global economy improves.
In our Global Power Group business, new order activity has been unfavorably affected by the weakness in the global economy and its impact on the near-term growth in demand for electricity and steam for industrial production and processes, political and environmental sensitivity regarding coal-fired steam generators and the depressed level of natural gas pricing since fiscal year 2008, which increased the attractiveness of that fuel, in relation to coal, for the generation of electricity. These factors may continue in the future, but to a lesser extent as the global economy improves.
In addition, the constraints on the global credit market have impacted, and may continue to impact, some of our Global E&C Group’s and Global Power Group’s clients’ investment plans as these clients are affected by the availability and cost of financing, as well as their own financial strategies, which could include cash conservation.
Our results of operations and cash flows depend on new contract awards, and the selection process and timing for performing these contracts are not entirely within our control.
A substantial portion of our revenues is derived from new contract awards of projects. It is difficult to predict whether and when we will receive such awards due to the lengthy and complex bidding and selection process, which is affected by a number of factors, such as market conditions, financing arrangements, governmental approvals and environmental matters. We often compete with other general and specialty contractors, including large multinational contractors and small local contractors in the global markets in which we operate. The strong competition in our markets requires us to maintain skilled personnel and invest in technology, and also puts pressure on our profit margins. Because of this, we could be prevented from obtaining contracts for which we have bid due to price, greater perceived financial strength and resources of our competitorsand/or perceived technology advantages. Alternatively, we may have to agree to lower prices and margins for contracts that we win or we may lose a bid or decide not to pursue a contract if the profit margins are below our minimum acceptable margins based on our risk assessment of the project conditions.
Our results of operations and cash flows can fluctuate from quarter to quarter depending on the timing of our contract awards. In addition, certain of these contracts are subject to client financing contingencies and environmental permits, and, as a result, we are subject to the risk that the customer will not be able to secure the necessary financing and approvals for the project, which could result in a delay or cancellation of the proposed project and thereby reduce our revenues and profits.
12
A failure by us to attract and retain key officers, qualified personnel, joint venture partners, advisors and subcontractors could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Our ability to attract and retain key officers, including our search for a permanent Chief Executive Officer, qualified engineers and other professional personnel, as well as joint venture partners, advisors and subcontractors, will be an important factor in determining our future success. The market for these professionals is competitive and we may not be successful in efforts to attract and retain these individuals. Failure to attract or retain these key officers, professionals, joint venture partners, advisors and subcontractors could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Our worldwide operations involve risks that may limit or disrupt operations, limit repatriation of cash, increase taxation or otherwise materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
We have worldwide operations that are conducted through our subsidiaries, as well as through agreements with joint venture partners. Our subsidiaries have operations located in Asia, Australia, Europe, the Middle East, North America, South Africa and South America. Additionally, we purchase materials and equipment on a worldwide basis and are heavily dependent on unrelated third-party sources for these materials and equipment. Our worldwide operations are subject to risks that could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows, including:
| | |
| | • | uncertain political, legal and economic environments; |
| |
| | • | potential incompatibility with joint venture partners; |
| |
| | • | foreign currency controls and fluctuations; |
| |
| | • | energy prices and availability; |
| |
| | • | war and civil disturbances; |
| |
| | • | terrorist attacks; |
| |
| | • | the imposition of additional governmental controls and regulations; |
| |
| | • | labor problems and safety practices; and |
| |
| | • | interruptions to shipping lanes or other methods of transit. |
Because of these risks, our worldwide operations and our execution of projects may be limited, or disrupted; our contractual rights may not be enforced fully or at all; our taxation may be increased; or we may be limited in repatriating earnings. These potential events and liabilities could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
It can be very difficult or expensive to obtain insurance coverage for our business operations, and we may not be able to secure or maintain sufficient coverage to satisfy our needs.
As part of our business operations, we maintain insurance coverage both as a corporate risk management strategy and in order to satisfy the requirements of many of our contracts. Although we have in the past been able to satisfy our insurance needs, there can be no assurance that we can secure all necessary or appropriate insurance coverage in the future. Our insurance is purchased from a number of the world’s leading providers, often in layered insurance arrangements. We monitor the financial health of the insurance companies from which we hold policies, and review the financial health of an insurer prior to purchasing a policy. If any of our third party insurers fail, refuse to renew or revoke coverage or otherwise cannot satisfy their insurance requirements to us, then our overall risk exposure and operational expenses could be increased and our business operations could be interrupted.
13
We are subject to anti-bribery laws in the countries in which we operate. Failure to comply with these laws could result in our becoming subject to penalties and the disruption of our business activities.
Many of the countries in which we transact business have laws that restrict the offer or payment of anything of value to government officials or other persons with the intent of gaining business or favorable government action. We are subject to these laws in addition to being governed by the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act restricting these types of activities. In addition to prohibiting certain bribery-related activity with foreign officials and other persons, these laws provide for recordkeeping and reporting obligations. Our policies mandate compliance with these anti-bribery laws and we have procedures and controls in place to monitor internal and external compliance. However, any failure by us, our subcontractors, agents or others who work for us on our behalf to comply with these legal and regulatory obligations could impact us in a variety of ways that include, but are not limited to, significant criminal, civil and administrative penalties. The failure to comply with these legal and regulatory obligations could also result in the disruption of our business activities.
A change in tax laws, treaties or regulations, or their interpretation, of any country in which we operate could increase our tax burden and otherwise adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
A change in tax laws, treaties or regulations, or their interpretation, of any country in which we operate could result in a higher tax rate on our earnings, which could result in a significant negative impact on our earnings and cash flows from operations. We continue to assess the impact of various legislative proposals, including U.S. federal and state proposals, and modifications to existing tax treaties, that could result in a material increase in our taxes. We cannot predict whether any specific legislation will be enacted or the terms of any such legislation. However, if such proposals were to be enacted, or if modifications were to be made to certain existing treaties, the consequences could have a materially adverse impact on us, including increasing our tax burden, increasing costs of our tax compliance or otherwise adversely affecting our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Our business may be materially adversely impacted by regional, national and/or global requirements to significantly limit or reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the future.
Greenhouse gases that result from human activities, including burning of fossil fuels, have been the focus of increased scientific and political scrutiny and are being subjected to various legal requirements. International agreements, national laws, state laws and various regulatory schemes that limit or otherwise regulate emissions measuring and control of greenhouse gases are under consideration by different governmental entities. We derive a significant amount of revenues and contract profits from engineering and construction services provided to clients that ownand/or operate a wide range of process plants and from the supply of our manufactured equipment to clients that ownand/or operate electric power generating plants. Additionally, we own or partially own plants that generate electricity from burning natural gas or various types of solid fuels. These plants emit greenhouse gases as part of the process to generate electricity or other products. Compliance with the future greenhouse gas regulations may prove costly or difficult. It is possible that owners and operators of existing or future process plants and electric generating plants could be subject to new or changed environmental regulations that result in increasing the cost of emitting such gases or requiring emissions allowances. The costs of controlling such emissions or obtaining required emissions allowances could be significant. It also is possible that necessary controls or allowances may not be available. Such regulations could negatively impact client investments in capital projects in our markets, which could negatively impact the market for our manufactured products and certain of our services, and also could negatively affect the operations and profitability of our own electric power plants. This could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
14
We are subject to various environmental laws and regulations in the countries in which we operate. If we fail to comply with these laws and regulations, we may incur significant costs and penalties that could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Our operations are subject to laws and regulations governing the generation, management and use of regulated materials, the discharge of materials into the environment, the remediation of environmental contamination, or otherwise relating to environmental protection. Both our Global E&C Group and our Global Power Group make use of and produce as wastes or by-products substances that are considered to be hazardous under these environmental laws and regulations. We may be subject to liabilities for environmental contamination as an owner or operator (or former owner or operator) of a facility or as a generator of hazardous substances without regard to negligence or fault, and we are subject to additional liabilities if we do not comply with applicable laws regulating such hazardous substances, and, in either case, such liabilities can be substantial. These laws and regulations could expose us to liability arising out of the conduct of current and past operations or conditions, including those associated with formerly owned or operated properties caused by us or others, or for acts by us or others which were in compliance with all applicable laws at the time the acts were performed. In some cases, we have assumed contractual indemnification obligations for environmental liabilities associated with some formerly owned properties. The ongoing costs of complying with existing environmental laws and regulations could be substantial. Additionally, we may be subject to claims alleging personal injury, property damage or natural resource damages as a result of alleged exposure to or contamination by hazardous substances. Changes in the environmental laws and regulations, remediation obligations, enforcement actions, stricter interpretations of existing requirements, future discovery of contamination or claims for damages to persons, property, natural resources or the environment could result in material costs and liabilities that we currently do not anticipate.
We may lose future business to our competitors and be unable to operate our business profitably if our patents and other intellectual property rights do not adequately protect our proprietary products.
Our success depends significantly on our ability to protect our intellectual property rights to the technologies and know-how used in our proprietary products. We rely on patent protection, as well as a combination of trade secret, unfair competition and similar laws and nondisclosure, confidentiality and other contractual restrictions to protect our proprietary technology. However, these legal means afford only limited protection and may not adequately protect our rights or permit us to gain or keep any competitive advantage. We also rely on unpatented proprietary technology. We cannot provide assurance that we can meaningfully protect all of our rights in our unpatented proprietary technology, or that others will not independently develop substantially equivalent proprietary products or processes or otherwise gain access to our unpatented proprietary technology. We also hold licenses from third parties that are necessary to utilize certain technologies used in the design and manufacturing of some of our products. The loss of such licenses would prevent us from manufacturing and selling these products, which could harm our business.
We rely on our information systems in our operations. Failure to protect these systems against security breaches could adversely affect our business and results of operations. Additionally, if these systems fail or become unavailable for any significant period of time, our business could be harmed.
The efficient operation of our business is dependent on computer hardware and software systems. Information systems are vulnerable to internal and external security breaches including by computer hackers and cyber terrorists. The unavailability of the information systems, the failure of these systems to perform as anticipated for any reason or any significant breach of security could disrupt our business and could result in decreased performance and increased overhead costs, causing our business and results of operations to suffer.
15
Risks Related to Asbestos Claims
The number and cost of our current and future asbestos claims in the United States could be substantially higher than we have estimated and the timing of payment of claims could be sooner than we have estimated, which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Some of our subsidiaries are named as defendants in numerous lawsuits andout-of-court administrative claims pending in the United States in which the plaintiffs claim damages for alleged bodily injury or death arising from exposure to asbestos in connection with work performed, or heat exchange devices assembled, installedand/or sold, by our subsidiaries. We expect these subsidiaries to be named as defendants in similar suits and that claims will be brought in the future. For purposes of our financial statements, we have estimated the indemnity and defense costs to be incurred in resolving pending and forecasted U.S. claims through fiscal year 2025. Although we believe our estimates are reasonable, the actual number of future claims brought against us and the cost of resolving these claims could be substantially higher than our estimates. Some of the factors that may result in the costs of asbestos claims being higher than our current estimates include:
| | |
| | • | the rate at which new claims are filed; |
| |
| | • | the number of new claimants; |
| |
| | • | changes in the mix of diseases alleged to be suffered by the claimants, such as type of cancer, asbestosis or other illness; |
| |
| | • | increases in legal fees or other defense costs associated with asbestos claims; |
| |
| | • | increases in indemnity payments; |
| |
| | • | decreases in the proportion of claims dismissed with zero indemnity payments; |
| |
| | • | indemnity payments being required to be made sooner than expected; |
| |
| | • | bankruptcies of other asbestos defendants, causing a reduction in the number of available solvent defendants and thereby increasing the number of claims and the size of demands against our subsidiaries; |
| |
| | • | adverse jury verdicts requiring us to pay damages in amounts greater than we expect to pay in settlements; |
| |
| | • | changes in legislative or judicial standards that make successful defense of claims against our subsidiaries more difficult; or |
| |
| | • | enactment of federal legislation requiring us to contribute amounts to a national settlement trust in excess of our expected net liability, after insurance, in the tort system. |
The total liability recorded on our consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2010 is based on estimated indemnity and defense costs expected to be incurred through fiscal year 2025. We believe that it is likely that there will be new claims filed after fiscal year 2025, but in light of uncertainties inherent in long-term forecasts, we do not believe that we can reasonably estimate the indemnity and defense costs that might be incurred after fiscal year 2025. Our forecast contemplates that the number of new claims requiring indemnity will decline from year to year. If future claims fail to decline as we expect, our aggregate liability for asbestos claims will be higher than estimated.
Since fiscal year-end 2004, we have worked with Analysis Research Planning Corporation, or ARPC, nationally recognized consultants in the United States with respect to projecting asbestos liabilities, to estimate the amount of asbestos-related indemnity and defense costs. Since that time, we have recorded our estimated asbestos liability at a level consistent with ARPC’s reasonable best estimate. ARPC reviews our asbestos indemnity payments, defense costs and claims activity and compares them to our 15 year forecast prepared at the previous year-end. Based on its review, ARPC may recommend that the assumptions used to estimate our future asbestos liability be updated, as appropriate.
16
Our forecast of the number of future claims is based, in part, on an analysis of future disease incidence and, in part, on a regression model, which employs the statistical analysis of our historical claims data to generate a trend line for future claims. Although we believe this forecast method is reasonable, other forecast methods that attempt to estimate the population of living persons who could claim they were exposed to asbestos at worksites where our subsidiaries performed work or sold equipment could also be used and might project higher numbers of future claims than our forecast.
The actual number of future claims, the mix of disease types and the amounts of indemnity and defense costs may exceed our current estimates. We update our forecasts at least annually to take into consideration recent claims experience and other developments, such as legislation and litigation outcomes, that may affect our estimates of future asbestos-related costs. The announcement of increases to asbestos liabilities as a result of revised forecasts, adverse jury verdicts or other negative developments involving asbestos litigation or insurance recoveries may cause the value or trading prices of our securities to decrease significantly. These negative developments could also negatively impact our liquidity, cause us to default under covenants in our indebtedness, cause our credit ratings to be downgraded, restrict our access to capital markets or otherwise materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
The adequacy and timing of insurance recoveries of our asbestos-related costs in the United States is uncertain. The failure to obtain insurance recoveries could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Although we believe that a significant portion of our subsidiaries’ liability and defense costs for asbestos claims will be covered by insurance, the adequacy and timing of insurance recoveries is uncertain. The asset recorded on our consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2010 represents our best estimate of settled and probable future insurance receivables relating to our U.S. liability for pending and estimated future asbestos claims through fiscal year 2025. The insurance asset includes an estimate of the amount of recoveries under existing settlements with other insurers.
Over the last several years, certain of our subsidiaries have entered into settlement agreements calling for insurers to make lump-sum payments, as well as payments over time, for use by our subsidiaries to fund asbestos-related indemnity and defense costs and, in certain cases, for reimbursement for portions ofout-of-pocket costs previously incurred. During fiscal year 2010, our subsidiaries reached agreements to settle their disputed asbestos-related insurance coverage with four insurers. As a result of these settlements, there were no unsettled asbestos insurance-related assets recorded as of December 31, 2010. Additionally, certain of the settlements with insurance companies during the past several years were for fixed dollar amounts that do not change as the liability changes. Accordingly, increases in the asbestos liability would not result in an equal increase in the insurance asset and we would have to fund the difference, which would reduce our cash flows and working capital.
Our insurance recoveries may be limited by future insolvencies among our insurers. We have not assumed recovery in the estimate of our asbestos-related insurance asset from any of our currently insolvent insurers. Other insurers may become insolvent in the future and our insurers may fail to reimburse amounts owed to us on a timely basis. If we fail to realize expected insurance recoveries, or experience delays in receiving material amounts from our insurers, our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could be materially adversely affected.
A number of asbestos-related claims have been received by our subsidiaries in the United Kingdom. To date, these claims have been substantially covered by insurance policies and proceeds from the policies have been paid directly to the plaintiffs. The timing and amount of asbestos claims that may be made in the future, the financial solvency of the insurers and the amount that may be paid to resolve the claims are uncertain. The insurance carriers’ failure to make payments due under the policies could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Some of our subsidiaries in the United Kingdom have received claims alleging personal injury arising from exposure to asbestos in connection with work performed, or heat exchange devices assembled, installed
17
and/or sold, by our subsidiaries. We expect these subsidiaries to be named as defendants in additional suits and claims brought in the future. To date, insurance policies have provided coverage for substantially all of the costs incurred in connection with resolving asbestos claims in the United Kingdom. In our consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2010, we have recorded U.K. asbestos-related insurance recoveries equal to the U.K. asbestos-related liabilities, which are comprised of an estimated liability relating to open (outstanding) claims and an estimated liability relating to future unasserted claims through fiscal year 2025. Our ability to continue to recover under these insurance policies is dependent upon, among other things, the timing and amount of asbestos claims that may be made in the future, the financial solvency of our insurers and the amount that may be paid to resolve the claims. These factors could significantly limit our insurance recoveries, which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Risks Related to Our Liquidity and Capital Resources
We require cash repatriations from our subsidiaries to meet our cash needs related to ourasbestos-related and other liabilities, corporate overhead expenses and share repurchases. Our ability to repatriate funds from our subsidiaries is limited by a number of factors.
As a holding company, we are dependent on cash inflows from our subsidiaries in order to fund our asbestos-related and other liabilities and overhead expenses. We are dependent on cash repatriations to cover essentially all payments and expenses of our holding company and principal executive offices in Switzerland, to cover cash needs related to our asbestos related liability and other overhead expenses in the U.S. and at our discretion, the acquisition of our shares under our share repurchase program. There can be no assurance that the forecasted cash repatriations will occur as our subsidiaries need to keep certain amounts available for working capital purposes, to pay known liabilities, to comply with covenants and for other general corporate purposes. The repatriation of funds may also subject those funds to taxation in some jurisdictions. The inability to repatriate cash could negatively impact our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Certain of our various debt agreements impose financial covenants, which may prevent us from capitalizing on business opportunities, which could negatively impact our business.
Certain of our debt agreements, including our U.S. senior secured credit agreement, impose financial covenants on us. These covenants limit our ability to incur indebtedness, pay dividends or make other distributions, make investments and sell assets. These limitations may restrict our ability to pursue business opportunities, which could negatively impact our business.
We may have significant working capital requirements, which could negatively impact our business, financial condition and cash flows.
In some cases, we may require significant amounts of working capital to finance the purchase of materials and in the performance of engineering, construction and other work on certain of our projects before we receive payment from our customers. In some cases, we are contractually obligated to our customers to fund working capital on our projects. Increases in working capital requirements could negatively impact our business, financial condition and cash flows. In addition, we may invest some of our cash in longer-term investment opportunities, including, as described below, the acquisition of other entities or operations, the reduction of certain liabilities such as unfunded pension liabilitiesand/or repurchases of our outstanding registered shares. To the extent we use cash for such other purposes, the amount of cash available for the working capital needs described above would be reduced.
Our new contract awards, current projects and liquidity may be adversely affected by the availability and/or cost of our performance-related standby letters of credit, bank guarantees, surety bonds and other guarantee facilities.
Consistent with industry practice, we are often required to provide performance-related standby letters of credit, bank guarantees, surety bonds or other forms of performance-related guarantees to clients, which we
18
refer to as bonds or bonding. These bonds provide credit support for the client if we fail to perform our obligations under our contract. A restriction, reduction, terminationand/or increase in the cost of our bonding facilities may limit our ability to bid on new project awards, delay work on current projects or significantly change the timing of cash flows for current projects, adversely affecting our liquidity.
Additionally, in the event our credit ratings are lowered by independent rating agencies, such as Standard & Poor’s or Moody’s Investors Service, it may be more difficult or costly for us to obtain bonding for new awards or maintain such bonding on current projects. We may also be required to provide or increase cash collateral to obtain these bonds, which would reduce our available cash and could impact our ability to increase availability under our U.S. senior secured credit agreement or other bonding facilities. We are also subject to the risk that any new or amended bonding facilities might not be on terms as favorable as those we have currently, which could adversely affect our liquidity.
We may invest in longer-term investment opportunities, such as the acquisition of other entities or operations in the engineering and construction industry or power industry. Acquisitions of other entities or operations have risks that could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
We are exploring possible acquisitions within the engineering and construction industry to strategically complement or expand on our technical capabilities or access to new market segments. We are also exploring possible acquisitions within the power industry to complement our product offering. The acquisition of companies and assets in the engineering and construction and power industries is subject to substantial risks, including the failure to identify material problems during due diligence, the risk of over-paying for assets and the inability to arrange financing for an acquisition as may be required or desired. Further, the integration and consolidation of acquisitions require substantial human, financial and other resources including management time and attention, and ultimately, our acquisitions may not be successfully integratedand/or our resources may be diverted. There can be no assurances that we will consummate any such future acquisitions, that any acquisitions we make will perform as expected or that the returns from such acquisitions will support the investment required to acquire them or the capital expenditures needed to develop them.
Risk Factors Related to Our Financial Reporting and Corporate Governance
If we have a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting, our ability to report our financial results on a timely and accurate basis may be adversely affected.
Although we had no material weaknesses as of December 31, 2010, we have reported material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting in the past. There can be no assurance that we will avoid a material weakness in the future. If we have another material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting in the future, it could adversely impact our ability to report our financial results in a timely and accurate manner.
Our use of thepercentage-of-completion accounting method could result in a reduction or elimination of previously reported profits.
A substantial portion of our revenues is recognized using thepercentage-of-completion method of accounting. Under this method of accounting, the earnings or losses recognized on individual contracts are based on estimates of contract revenues, costs and profitability. Revisions to estimated revenues and estimated costs can and do result in changes to revenues, costs and profits. For further information on our revenue recognition methodology, please refer to Note 1, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies — Revenue Recognition on Long-Term Contracts,” to the consolidated financial statements in this annual report onForm 10-K.
19
Registered holders who acquired our shares after the Redomestication must apply for enrollment in our share register as shareholders with voting rights in order to have voting rights; we may deny such registration under certain circumstances.
To be able to exercise voting rights, registered holders of our shares who acquired our shares after the Redomestication must apply to us for enrollment in our share register as shareholders with voting rights. Our board of directors may refuse to register holders of shares as shareholders with voting rights based on certain grounds. In particular, under our articles of association, no shareholder will be registered with voting rights for 10% or more of our share capital as recorded in the commercial register. Only shareholders that are registered as shareholders with voting rights on the relevant record date are permitted to participate in and vote at a general shareholders’ meeting. Registered holders who received our shares as a result of the Redomestication are registered as shareholders with voting rights and shareholders who hold in “street name” will be entitled to participate in and vote at a general shareholders’ meeting through Cede & Co.
There are provisions in our articles of association that may reduce the voting rights of our registered shares.
Our articles of association provide that shareholders have one vote for each registered share held by them and are entitled to vote at all meetings of shareholders. However, our articles of association provide that shareholders whose “controlled shares” (as defined in the articles of association) represent 10% or more of our total voting shares are limited to voting one vote less than 10% of the total voting rights of our share capital as registered with the commercial register. This provision is intended to prevent the possibility of our company becoming a controlled foreign corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes, which could have certain adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences to U.S. persons who own (directly, indirectly or under applicable constructive ownership rules) 10% or more of our voting shares. It may also have an anti-takeover effect by making it more difficult for a third party to acquire us without the consent of our board of directors. Under our articles of association, our board of directors has the authority to interpret and grant exceptions to this provision.
Our status as a Swiss corporation may limit our flexibility with respect to certain aspects of capital management.
Swiss law allows our shareholders to authorize share capital that can be issued by the board of directors without further shareholder approval. Such authorization is limited to 50 percent of the issued share capital and expires after two years at the latest and must therefore be renewed by the shareholders every two years. Additionally, subject to specified exceptions, including exceptions explicitly described in our articles of association, Swiss law grants preemptive rights to existing shareholders to subscribe for new issuances of shares. Swiss law also does not provide as much flexibility in the various terms that can attach to different classes of shares as the laws of some other jurisdictions. In the event we need to raise share capital at a time when the trading price of our shares is below the CHF 3.00 (equivalent to U.S. $3.22, based on a foreign exchange rate of CHF 0.9319 to U.S. $1.00 on December 31, 2010) par value of the shares, we will need to obtain the approval of our shareholders to decrease the par value of our issued shares or issue another class of shares with a lower par value. Any reduction in par value would decrease our par value available for future repayment of share capital not subject to Swiss withholding tax. In addition, we will not be able to issue options under our various compensation and benefit plans with an exercise price below the par value, which could limit the flexibility of our compensation arrangements. Swiss law also reserves for approval by shareholders many corporate actions over which a board of directors would have authority in some other jurisdictions. For example, dividends must be approved by shareholders. These Swiss law requirements relating to our capital management may limit our flexibility, and situations may arise where greater flexibility would have provided substantial benefits to our shareholders.
20
If we elect to declare dividends, we would be required to declare such dividends in Swiss francs and any currency fluctuations between the U.S. dollar and the Swiss franc will affect the dollar value of the dividends we pay.
Under Swiss corporate law, if we elect to declare dividends, including distributions through a reduction in par value, we would be required to declare such dividends in Swiss francs. Dividend payments will be made by our transfer agent in U.S. dollars converted at the applicable exchange rate shortly before the payment date. As a result, shareholders will be exposed to fluctuations in the exchange rate between the date used for purposes of calculating the CHF amount of any proposed dividend or par value reduction and the relevant payment date, which will not be shorter than two months and could be as long as a year.
We may not be able to make distributions without subjecting our shareholders to Swiss withholding tax.
If we are not successful in our efforts to make distributions, if any, through a reduction of par value or pay dividends, if any, out of qualifying additional paid-in capital, then any dividends paid by us will generally be subject to a Swiss federal withholding tax at a rate of 35%. The withholding tax must be withheld from the gross distribution and paid to the Swiss Federal Tax Administration. A U.S. holder that qualifies for benefits under the Convention between the United States of America and the Swiss Confederation for the Avoidance of Double Taxation with Respect to Taxes on Income, which we refer to as the“U.S.-Swiss Treaty,” may apply for a refund of the tax withheld in excess of the 15% treaty rate (or in excess of the 5% reduced treaty rate for qualifying corporate shareholders with at least 10% participation in our voting stock, or for a full refund in the case of qualified pension funds). Payment of a capital distribution in the form of a par value reduction is not subject to Swiss withholding tax. However, there can be no assurance that our shareholders will approve a reduction in par value; that we will be able to meet the other legal requirements for a reduction in par value; or that Swiss withholding rules will not be changed in the future. In addition, over the long term, the amount of par value available for us to use for par value reductions will be limited. If we are unable to make a distribution through a reduction in par value or pay a dividend out of qualifying additional paid-in capital, we may not be able to make distributions without subjecting our shareholders to Swiss withholding taxes.
We have anti-takeover provisions in our articles of association that may discourage a change of control.
Our articles of association and Swiss law contain provisions that could make it more difficult for a third-party to acquire us without the consent of our board of directors. These provisions provide for:
| | |
| | • | Our board of directors to be divided into three classes serving staggered three-year terms. In addition, directors may be removed from office, by the affirmative vote of the holders of two-thirds of the issued shares generally entitled to vote. These provisions of our articles of association may delay or limit the ability of a shareholder to obtain majority representation on the board of directors. |
| |
| | • | Limiting the voting rights of shareholders whose “controlled shares” (as defined in the articles of association) represent 10% or more of our total voting shares to one vote less than 10% of the total voting rights of our share capital as registered with the Swiss commercial register. |
| |
| | • | Under Swiss corporate law, merger and demerger transactions require the affirmative vote of holders of at least 662/3% of the shares represented at the applicable shareholders meeting. In addition, under certain circumstances (for example, in the case of so-called “cashout” or “squeezeout” mergers) a merger requires the affirmative vote of the holders of at least 90% of shares. |
| |
| | • | Any shareholder who wishes to propose any business or to nominate a person or persons for election as a director at any annual meeting may only do so if advance notice is given to our Corporate Secretary. |
These provisions could make it more difficult for a third-party to acquire us, even if the third-party’s offer may be considered beneficial by many shareholders. As a result, shareholders may be limited in their ability to obtain a premium for their shares.
21
We are a Swiss company and it may be difficult for you to enforce judgments against us or our directors and executive officers.
Foster Wheeler AG is a Swiss corporation. As a result, the rights of our shareholders are governed by Swiss law and by our articles of association and organizational regulations. The rights of shareholders under Swiss law may differ from the rights of shareholders of companies of other jurisdictions. A substantial portion of our assets are located outside the United States. It may be difficult for investors to enforce in the United States judgments obtained in U.S. courts against us or our directors based on the civil liability provisions of the U.S. securities laws. Uncertainty exists as to whether courts in Switzerland will enforce judgments obtained in other jurisdictions, including in the United States, under the securities laws of those jurisdictions or entertain actions in Switzerland under the securities laws of other jurisdictions.
| |
| ITEM 1B. | UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS |
None.
22
The following table provides location and general use of our materially important owned or leased physical properties by business segment as of December 31, 2010. All or part of the listed properties may be leased or subleased to other affiliates. All properties are in good condition and adequate for their intended use.
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | Owned/Leased
| |
Business Segment and Location | | Principal Use | | (Lease Expiration)(1) | |
| |
| |
Corporate and Finance Group |
| Zug, Switzerland | | Registered Office | | | Leased (2014 | ) |
| Geneva, Switzerland | | Principal executive offices | | | Leased (2020 | ) |
Union Township, New Jersey(2) | | Office & engineering | | | Leased (2022 | ) |
| Union Township, New Jersey | | Investment in undeveloped land | | | Owned | |
| Union Township, New Jersey | | Storage and reproduction facilities | | | Owned | |
| | | | | | | |
Global Engineering & Construction Group | | | | | | |
| Avellino, Italy | | Wind farm towers | | | Owned(3 | ) |
| Chennai, India | | Office & engineering | | | Leased (2011-2017 | ) |
| Glasgow, Scotland | | Office & engineering | | | Owned(4 | ) |
| Gurgaon, India | | Office & engineering | | | Leased (2018 | ) |
| Houston, Texas | | Office & engineering | | | Leased (2018 | ) |
| Istanbul, Turkey | | Office & engineering | | | Leased (2015 | ) |
| Kolkata, India | | Office & engineering | | | Leased (2015-2016 | ) |
| Kolkata, India | | Office & engineering | | | Leased (2017 | ) |
| Madrid, Spain | | Office & engineering | | | Leased (2015 | ) |
| McGregor, Texas | | Storage facilities | | | Owned | |
| Midrand, South Africa | | Office & engineering | | | Owned | |
| Milan, Italy | | Office & engineering | | | Leased (2011-2014 | ) |
| Paris, France | | Office & engineering | | | Leased (2011-2013 | ) |
| Paris, France | | Warehouse | | | Leased (2013 | ) |
| Philadelphia, Pennsylvania | | Office | | | Leased (2012 | ) |
| Provence, France | | Office & engineering | | | Leased (2011 | ) |
| Reading, England | | Office & engineering | | | Leased (2011-2024 | ) |
| Reading, England | | Investment in undeveloped land | | | Owned | |
| Santiago, Chile | | Office & engineering | | | Leased (2011 | ) |
| Shanghai, China | | Office & engineering | | | Leased (2012-2013 | ) |
| Singapore | | Office & engineering | | | Leased (2013 | ) |
| Sriracha, Thailand | | Office & engineering | | | Leased (2012 | ) |
| | | | | | | |
Global Power Group | | | | | | |
| Camden, New Jersey | | Waste-to-energy plant | | | Owned(5 | ) |
| Madrid, Spain | | Office & engineering | | | Leased (2015 | ) |
| Martinez, California | | Cogeneration plant | | | Owned | |
| Melbourne, Florida | | Office & warehouse | | | Leased (2013 | ) |
| Norrkoping, Sweden | | Manufacturing & office | | | Leased (2014 | ) |
| Oberhausen Germany | | Service workshop & storage | | | Leased (2016 | ) |
| Rayong, Thailand | | Manufacturing & office | | | Leased (2017 | ) |
| Shanghai, China | | Office | | | Leased (2012 | ) |
| Sosnowiec, Poland | | Manufacturing & office | | | Leased (2089 | ) |
| Sosnowiec, Poland | | Office & engineering | | | Leased(6 | ) |
| Talcahuano, Chile | | Cogeneration plant-facility site | | | Leased (2035 | ) |
| Tarragona, Spain | | Manufacturing | | | Owned | |
| Varkaus, Finland | | Manufacturing & office | | | Owned | |
| Varkaus, Finland | | Office | | | Leased (2031 | ) |
| Xinhui, Guangdong, China | | Manufacturing | | | Leased(6 | ) |
| Xinhui, Guangdong, China | | Manufacturing | | | Leased (2012 | ) |
| Xinhui, Guangdong, China | | Manufacturing & office | | | Leased (2045 | ) |
| Xinhui, Guangdong, China | | Storage | | | Leased (2011-2013 | ) |
23
| | |
| (1) | | Properties with date ranges represent multiple leases at the same location with lease expiration dates within the range listed. |
| |
| (2) | | The facility is also utilized by the Global Engineering & Construction Group and the Global Power Group. |
| |
| (3) | | The facility is owned and the land for the two towers is leased (2031 and 2033). |
| |
| (4) | | Portion or entire facility leased or subleased to third parties. |
| |
| (5) | | The facility is owned and the land is leased (2015). |
| |
| (6) | | Lease facilities on amonth-to-month basis with no contractual termination date. |
| |
| ITEM 3. | LEGAL PROCEEDINGS |
For information on asbestos claims and other material litigation affecting us, see Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Application of Critical Accounting Estimates” and Note 16, “Litigation and Uncertainties,” to our consolidated financial statements in this annual report onForm 10-K.
24
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
As a result of the Redomestication described in Item 1, “Business — The Redomestication,” on February 9, 2009 Foster Wheeler AG became the parent company of our group of companies and its registered shares were listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “FWLT,” the same symbol under which Foster Wheeler Ltd. common shares were previously listed. The share information below relates to sales prices of Foster Wheeler Ltd. common shares for periods prior to the Redomestication.
On January 8, 2008, the shareholders of Foster Wheeler Ltd. approved an increase in its authorized share capital at a shareholders meeting which was necessary in order to effect atwo-for-one stock split of Foster Wheeler Ltd.’s common shares in the form of a stock dividend to Foster Wheeler Ltd.’s common shareholders in the ratio of one additional Foster Wheeler Ltd. common share in respect of each common share outstanding. As a result of these capital alterations, all references to common share prices, share capital, the number of shares, stock options, restricted awards, per share amounts, cash dividends, and any other reference to shares in this annual report onForm 10-K, unless otherwise noted, have been adjusted to reflect the stock split on a retroactive basis.
The following chart lists the quarterly high and low sales prices of our shares on the NASDAQ Global Select Market during our fiscal years 2010 and 2009.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Fiscal Quarters Ended |
| | | March 31,
| | June 30,
| | September 30,
| | December 31,
|
| | | 2010 | | 2010 | | 2010 | | 2010 |
| |
| Common share prices: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| High | | $ | 35.01 | | | $ | 32.38 | | | $ | 25.89 | | | $ | 35.39 | |
| Low | | $ | 23.98 | | | $ | 20.54 | | | $ | 20.33 | | | $ | 22.53 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Fiscal Quarters Ended |
| | | March 31,
| | June 30,
| | September 30,
| | December 31,
|
| | | 2009 | | 2009 | | 2009 | | 2009 |
| |
| Common share prices: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| High | | $ | 28.18 | | | $ | 28.74 | | | $ | 35.82 | | | $ | 33.95 | |
| Low | | $ | 12.73 | | | $ | 17.00 | | | $ | 18.33 | | | $ | 27.47 | |
We had 2,624 shareholders of record, as defined underRegulation S-K Item 201, and 124,880,649 registered shares outstanding as of February 11, 2011.
We have not declared or paid a cash dividend since July 2001 and we do not have any plans to declare or pay any cash dividends. Our current U.S. senior secured credit agreement contains limitations on our ability to pay cash dividends.
25
Performance Graph
The stock performance graph below shows how an initial investment of $100 in our shares would have compared over a five-year period with an equal investment in (1) the S&P 500 Index and (2) an industry peer group index that consists of several peer companies (referred to as the “Peer Group”) as defined below.
Comparison of Cumulative Total Return
In the preparation of the line graph, we used the following assumptions: (i) $100 was invested in each of our shares, the S&P 500 Index and the Peer Group on December 30, 2005, (ii) dividends, if any, were reinvested, and (iii) the investments were weighted on the basis of market capitalization.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Fiscal Years Ended |
| | | December 30,
| | December 29,
| | December 28,
| | December 26,
| | December 31,
| | December 31,
|
| | | 2005 | | 2006 | | 2007 | | 2008 | | 2009 | | 2010 |
| |
| Foster Wheeler AG | | $ | 100.00 | | | $ | 149.92 | | | $ | 424.88 | | | $ | 127.46 | | | $ | 160.09 | | | $ | 187.71 | |
| S&P 500 Index | | | 100.00 | | | | 115.79 | | | | 123.00 | | | | 74.37 | | | | 97.33 | | | | 111.99 | |
Peer Group* | | | 100.00 | | | | 121.94 | | | | 246.08 | | | | 89.74 | | | | 114.06 | | | | 167.72 | |
| | |
| * | | The following companies comprise the Peer Group: Chicago Bridge & Iron Company N.V., Fluor Corporation, Jacobs Engineering Group Inc., KBR, Inc., McDermott International, Inc. and Shaw Group, Inc. The Peer Group consists of companies that were compiled by us for benchmarking the performance of our registered shares. |
26
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities (amounts in thousands of dollars, except share data and per share amounts)
On September 12, 2008, we announced a share repurchase program pursuant to which our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $750,000 of our outstanding shares and the designation of the repurchased shares for cancellation. On November 4, 2010, our Board of Directors proposed an increase to our share repurchase program of $335,000 and the designation of the repurchased shares for cancellation, which was approved by our shareholders at an Extraordinary General Meeting on February 24, 2011.
Under Swiss law, the cancellation of shares previously repurchased under our share repurchase program must be approved by our shareholders. Repurchased shares remain as treasury shares on our balance sheet until cancellation. We expect to seek specific shareholder approval for the cancellation of all treasury shares as of December 31, 2010 and amend our Articles of Association to reduce our share capital accordingly at our 2011 annual general meeting of shareholders. Based on the aggregate share repurchases under our program through December 31, 2010, we are authorized to repurchase up to an additional $500,591 of our outstanding shares. As noted in the table below, there were no purchases under our share repurchase program during the fiscal fourth quarter of 2010.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | Approximate Dollar
| |
| | | | | | | | | Total Number of
| | | Value of Shares
| |
| | | | | | | | | Shares Purchased as
| | | that May Yet Be
| |
| | | | | | | | | Part of Publicly
| | | Purchased Under
| |
| | | Total Number of
| | | Average Price Paid
| | | Announced Plans or
| | | the Plans or
| |
Fiscal Month | | Shares Purchased(1) | | | per Share | | | Programs | | | Programs | |
| |
| October 1, 2010 through October 31, 2010 | | | — | | | $ | — | | | | — | | | | | |
| November 1, 2010 through November 30, 2010 | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | | |
| December 1, 2010 through December 31, 2010 | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total | | | — | | | $ | — | | | | — | (2) | | $ | 500,591 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
| (1) | | During the fiscal fourth quarter of 2010, we did not repurchase any shares in open market transactions or privately negotiated transactions pursuant to our share repurchase program. We are authorized to repurchase up to an additional $500,591 of our outstanding shares based on the aggregate share repurchases as of December 31, 2010. The repurchase program has no expiration date and may be suspended for periods or discontinued at any time. We did not repurchase any shares other than through our publicly announced repurchase program. |
| |
| (2) | | As of December 31, 2010, an aggregate of 22,411,229 shares were purchased for a total of $584,409 since the inception of the repurchase program announced on September 12, 2008. |
27
| |
| ITEM 6. | SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA |
FOSTER WHEELER AG
COMPARATIVE FINANCIAL STATISTICS
(amounts in thousands of dollars, except share data and per share amounts)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Fiscal Years | |
| | | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
| |
Statement of Operations Data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Operating revenues | | $ | 4,067,719 | | | $ | 5,056,334 | | | $ | 6,854,290 | | | $ | 5,107,243 | | | $ | 3,495,048 | |
| Income before income taxes | | | 305,240 | (1) | | | 455,120 | (1) | | | 630,897 | (1) | | | 535,871 | (1) | | | 348,482 | (1) |
| Provision for income taxes | | | 74,531 | | | | 93,762 | | | | 97,028 | (2) | | | 136,420 | | | | 81,709 | |
| Net income | | | 230,709 | | | | 361,358 | | | | 533,869 | | | | 399,451 | | | | 266,773 | |
| Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | | | 15,302 | | | | 11,202 | | | | 7,249 | | | | 5,577 | | | | 4,789 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net income attributable to Foster Wheeler AG | | $ | 215,407 | | | $ | 350,156 | | | $ | 526,620 | | | $ | 393,874 | | | $ | 261,984 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Earnings per share: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Basic | | $ | 1.71 | | | $ | 2.77 | | | $ | 3.73 | | | $ | 2.78 | | | $ | 1.82 | (3) |
| Diluted | | $ | 1.70 | | | $ | 2.75 | | | $ | 3.68 | | | $ | 2.72 | | | $ | 1.72 | (3) |
Shares outstanding: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Weighted-average number of shares outstanding for basic earnings per share | | | 126,032,130 | | | | 126,541,962 | | | | 141,149,590 | | | | 141,661,046 | | | | 132,996,384 | |
| Effect of dilutive securities | | | 544,725 | | | | 632,649 | | | | 1,954,440 | | | | 3,087,176 | | | | 8,221,592 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Weighted-average number of shares outstanding for diluted earnings per share | | | 126,576,855 | | | | 127,174,611 | | | | 143,104,030 | | | | 144,748,222 | | | | 141,217,976 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | As of | |
| | | December 31,
| | | December 31,
| | | December 26,
| | | December 28,
| | | December 29,
| |
| | | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
| |
Balance Sheet Data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Current assets | | $ | 1,986,183 | | | $ | 1,941,555 | | | $ | 1,790,186 | | | $ | 2,044,383 | | | $ | 1,389,628 | |
| Current liabilities | | | 1,210,674 | | | | 1,282,004 | | | | 1,488,614 | | | | 1,523,773 | | | | 1,247,603 | |
| Working capital | | | 775,509 | | | | 659,551 | | | | 301,572 | | | | 520,610 | | | | 142,025 | |
| Land, buildings and equipment, net | | | 362,087 | | | | 398,132 | | | | 383,209 | | | | 337,485 | | | | 302,488 | |
| Total assets | | | 3,083,539 | | | | 3,187,738 | | | | 3,011,254 | | | | 3,248,988 | | | | 2,565,549 | |
| Long-term debt (including current installments) | | | 164,570 | | | | 212,440 | | | | 217,364 | | | | 205,346 | | | | 202,969 | |
| Total temporary equity | | | 4,935 | | | | 2,570 | | | | 7,586 | | | | 2,728 | | | | 983 | |
| Total Foster Wheeler AG shareholders’ equity | | | 967,693 | | | | 831,517 | | | | 392,562 | | | | 571,041 | | | | 62,727 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other Data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Unfilled orders (in terms of future revenues), end of year | | $ | 3,979,500 | | | $ | 4,112,800 | | | $ | 5,504,400 | | | $ | 9,420,400 | | | $ | 5,431,400 | |
| New orders booked (in terms of future revenues) | | | 4,105,800 | | | | 3,481,700 | | | | 4,056,000 | | | | 8,882,800 | | | | 4,892,200 | |
28
| | |
| (1) | | Income before income taxes includes the following: |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Fiscal Years | |
| | | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
| |
| Net asbestos-related provision/(gain) | | $ | 5,400 | | | $ | 26,400 | | | $ | 6,600 | | | $ | (6,100 | ) | | $ | (100,100 | ) |
| Curtailment gain on closure of the U.K. pension plan | | | 20,100 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
| Charges for severance-related postemployment benefits | | | 10,800 | | | | 12,400 | | | | 9,000 | | | | — | | | | — | |
| Aggregate charge related to the voluntary termination of our prior U.S. senior credit agreement | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 15,000 | |
| Net charge related to certain debt reduction initiatives completed in April and May 2006 | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 12,500 | |
| | |
| (2) | | Includes in fiscal year 2008: a benefit of $24,100 related to the net impact of deferred tax valuation allowance adjustments at two of ournon-U.S. subsidiaries. |
| |
| (3) | | We completed two common share purchase warrant offer transactions in January 2006. The fair value of the additional shares issued as part of the warrant offer transactions reduced net income attributable to our shareholders when calculating earnings per share. The fair value of the additional shares issued was $19,445. |
29
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (amounts in thousands of dollars, except share data and per share amounts)
The following is management’s discussion and analysis of certain significant factors that have affected our financial condition and results of operations for the periods indicated below. This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in this annual report onForm 10-K.
Safe Harbor Statement
This management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations, other sections of this annual report onForm 10-K and other reports and oral statements made by our representatives from time to time may contain forward-looking statements that are based on our assumptions, expectations and projections about Foster Wheeler AG and the various industries within which we operate. These include statements regarding our expectations about revenues (including as expressed by our backlog), our liquidity, the outcome of litigation and legal proceedings and recoveries from customers for claims, and the costs of current and future asbestos claims and the amount and timing of related insurance recoveries. Such forward-looking statements by their nature involve a degree of risk and uncertainty. We caution that a variety of factors, including but not limited to the factors described in Item 1A, “Risk Factors” and the following, could cause business conditions and our results to differ materially from what is contained in forward-looking statements:
| | |
| | • | benefits, effects or results of our redomestication or the relocation of our principal executive offices to Geneva, Switzerland; |
| |
| | • | the search for a permanent Chief Executive Officer; |
| |
| | • | benefits, effects or results of our strategic renewal initiative; |
| |
| | • | further deterioration in global economic conditions; |
| |
| | • | changes in investment by the oil and gas, oil refining, chemical/petrochemical and power generation industries; |
| |
| | • | changes in the financial condition of our customers; |
| |
| | • | changes in regulatory environments; |
| |
| | • | changes in project design or schedules; |
| |
| | • | contract cancellations; |
| |
| | • | changes in our estimates of costs to complete projects; |
| |
| | • | changes in trade, monetary and fiscal policies worldwide; |
| |
| | • | compliance with laws and regulations relating to our global operations; |
| |
| | • | currency fluctuations; |
| |
| | • | warand/or terrorist attacks on facilities either owned by us or where equipment or services are or may be provided by us; |
| |
| | • | interruptions to shipping lanes or other methods of transit; |
| |
| | • | outcomes of pending and future litigation, including litigation regarding our liability for damages and insurance coverage for asbestos exposure; |
| |
| | • | protection and validity of our patents and other intellectual property rights; |
| |
| | • | increasing global competition; |
| |
| | • | compliance with our debt covenants; |
30
| | |
| | • | recoverability of claims against our customers and others by us and claims by third-parties against us; and |
| |
| | • | changes in estimates used in our critical accounting policies. |
Other factors and assumptions not identified above were also involved in the formation of these forward-looking statements and the failure of such other assumptions to be realized, as well as other factors, may also cause actual results to differ materially from those projected. Most of these factors are difficult to predict accurately and are generally beyond our control. You should consider the areas of risk described above in connection with any forward-looking statements that may be made by us.
In addition, this management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations contains several statements regarding current and future general global economic conditions. These statements are based on our compilation of economic data and analyses from a variety of external sources. While we believe these statements to be reasonably accurate, global economic conditions are difficult to analyze and predict and are subject to significant uncertainty and as a result, these statements may prove to be wrong. The challenges and drivers for each of our business segments are discussed in more detail in the section entitled “— Results of Operations-Business Segments,” within this Item 7.
We undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. You are advised, however, to consult any additional disclosures we make in proxy statements, quarterly reports onForm 10-Q, annual reports onForm 10-K and current reports onForm 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC.
Overview
We operate through two business groups — the Global Engineering & Construction Group, which we refer to as our Global E&C Group, and our Global Power Group. In addition to these two business groups, we also report corporate center expenses, our captive insurance operation and expenses related to certain legacy liabilities, such as asbestos and other expenses, in the Corporate and Finance Group, which we refer to as the C&F Group.
We have been exploring, and intend to continue to explore, acquisitions within the engineering and construction industry to strategically complement or expand on our technical capabilities or access to new market segments. We are also exploring acquisitions within the power generation industry to complement our Global Power Group product offering. However, there is no assurance that we will consummate any acquisitions in the future.
Summary Financial Results
Our summary financial results for fiscal years 2010, 2009 and 2008 are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Fiscal Years Ended | |
| | | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
| |
Operating revenues(1) | | $ | 4,067,719 | | | $ | 5,056,334 | | | $ | 6,854,290 | |
Contract profit(1) | | | 598,786 | | | | 758,647 | | | | 895,646 | |
Selling, general and administrative expenses(1) | | | 303,330 | | | | 294,907 | | | | 283,883 | |
| Net income attributable to Foster Wheeler AG | | $ | 215,407 | | | $ | 350,156 | | | $ | 526,620 | |
| Earnings per share : | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Basic | | $ | 1.71 | | | $ | 2.77 | | | $ | 3.73 | |
| Diluted | | $ | 1.70 | | | $ | 2.75 | | | $ | 3.68 | |
Cash and cash equivalents (at period end)(2) | | $ | 1,057,163 | | | $ | 997,158 | | | $ | 773,163 | |
Net cash provided by operating activities(2) | | $ | 178,668 | | | $ | 290,615 | | | $ | 428,926 | |
| | |
| (1) | | Please refer to the section entitled “— Results of Operations” within this Item 7 for further discussion. |
31
| | |
| (2) | | Please refer to the section entitled “— Liquidity and Capital Resources” within this Item 7 for further discussion. |
Net income attributable to Foster Wheeler AG decreased in fiscal year 2010, as compared to fiscal year 2009, primarily driven by the pretax decrease in contract profit of $159,900. Decreased equity earnings in our Global E&C Group in fiscal year 2010, compared to fiscal year 2009, for two projects in Italy that recorded impairment charges, and an increase in our effective tax rate also contributed to the decline.
Net income attributable to Foster Wheeler AG decreased in fiscal year 2009, as compared to fiscal year 2008, primarily driven by the pre-tax decrease in contract profit of $137,000 and an increase in our effective tax rate.
Please refer to the discussion within the section entitled “— Results of Operations” within this Item 7.
Challenges and Drivers
Our primary operating focus continues to be booking quality new business and executing our contracts well. The global markets in which we operate are largely dependent on overall economic growth and the resultant demand for oil and gas, electric power, petrochemicals and refined products.
In the engineering and construction industry, we expect long-term demand to be strong for the end products produced by our clients, and we believe that this long-term demand will continue to stimulate investment by our clients in new, expanded and upgraded facilities. The global economic downturn experienced in 2008 and 2009 caused many of our engineering and construction clients to reevaluate the size, timing and scope of their capital spending plans in relation to the kinds of energy, petrochemical and pharmaceutical projects that we execute, but as the global economic outlook continues to improve, we have noted signs of market improvement. During fiscal year 2010, we saw an increased number of our clients implementing their capital spending plans. A number of these clients are, however, releasing tranches of work on a piecemeal basis, conducting further analysis before deciding to proceed with their investments or re-evaluating the size, timing or configuration of specific planned projects. We are also seeing clients re-activating planned projects that had previously been placed on hold and developing new projects. The challenges and drivers for our Global E&C Group are discussed in more detail in the section entitled “— Results of Operations-Business Segments-Global E&C Group-Overview of Segment,” within this Item 7.
New order activity in our Global Power Group business had been unfavorably affected by several trends which began in fiscal year 2008. However, demand for new solid-fuel steam generators improved in fiscal year 2010 in some markets, as evidenced by our significantly increased new orders, driven primarily by growing electricity demand and industrial production as economies around the world recover from the recent global economic downturn. The challenges and drivers for our Global Power Group are discussed in more detail in the section entitled “— Results of Operations-Business Segments-Global Power Group-Overview of Segment,” within this Item 7.
New Orders and Backlog of Unfilled Orders
The tables below summarize our new orders and backlog of unfilled orders by period:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Fiscal Years |
| | | 2010 | | 2009 | | 2008 |
| |
| New orders, measured in future revenues | | $ | 4,105,800 | | | $ | 3,481,700 | | | $ | 4,056,000 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | As of December 31, |
| | | 2010 | | 2009 |
| |
| Backlog of unfilled orders, measured in future revenues | | $ | 3,979,500 | | | $ | 4,112,800 | |
| Backlog, measured in Foster Wheeler scope* | | $ | 2,643,200 | | | $ | 2,068,600 | |
E&Cman-hours in backlog (in thousands) | | | 12,700 | | | | 12,700 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | |
| * | | As defined in the section entitled “— Backlog and New Orders” within this Item 7. |
32
Please refer to the section entitled “— Backlog and New Orders” within this Item 7 for further detail.
Results of Operations
Operating Revenues
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Fiscal Years | | | 2010 vs 2009 | | | Fiscal Year | | | 2009 vs 2008 | |
| | | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | $ Change | | | % Change | | | 2008 | | | $ Change | | | % Change | |
| |
| Global E&C Group | | $ | 3,346,050 | | | $ | 4,040,082 | | | $ | (694,032 | ) | | | (17 | )% | | $ | 5,147,227 | | | $ | (1,107,145 | ) | | | (22 | )% |
| Global Power Group | | | 721,669 | | | | 1,016,252 | | | | (294,583 | ) | | | (29 | )% | | | 1,707,063 | | | | (690,811 | ) | | | (40 | )% |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total | | $ | 4,067,719 | | | $ | 5,056,334 | | | $ | (988,615 | ) | | | (20 | )% | | $ | 6,854,290 | | | $ | (1,797,956 | ) | | | (26 | )% |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
We operate through two business groups: our Global E&C Group and our Global Power Group. Please refer to the section entitled “— Business Segments,” within this Item 7, for a discussion of the products and services of our business segments.
The composition of our operating revenues varies from period to period based on the portfolio of contracts in execution during any given period. Our operating revenues are further dependent upon the strength of the various geographic markets and industries we serve and our ability to address those markets and industries.
Our operating revenues by geographic region, based upon where our projects are being executed, for fiscal years 2010, 2009 and 2008, were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Fiscal Years | | | 2010 vs 2009 | | | Fiscal Year | | | 2009 vs 2008 | |
| | | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | $ Change | | | % Change | | | 2008 | | | $ Change | | | % Change | |
| |
| Asia | | $ | 964,526 | | | $ | 1,407,313 | | | $ | (442,787 | ) | | | (31 | )% | | $ | 1,575,383 | | | $ | (168,070 | ) | | | (11 | )% |
| Australasia and other* | | | 1,176,246 | | | | 1,336,509 | | | | (160,263 | ) | | | (12 | )% | | | 1,745,039 | | | | (408,530 | ) | | | (23 | )% |
| Europe | | | 879,503 | | | | 1,040,179 | | | | (160,676 | ) | | | (15 | )% | | | 1,451,670 | | | | (411,491 | ) | | | (28 | )% |
| Middle East | | | 212,627 | | | | 395,225 | | | | (182,598 | ) | | | (46 | )% | | | 858,592 | | | | (463,367 | ) | | | (54 | )% |
| North America | | | 595,963 | | | | 654,728 | | | | (58,765 | ) | | | (9 | )% | | | 1,056,209 | | | | (401,481 | ) | | | (38 | )% |
| South America | | | 238,854 | | | | 222,380 | | | | 16,474 | | | | 7 | % | | | 167,397 | | | | 54,983 | | | | 33 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total | | $ | 4,067,719 | | | $ | 5,056,334 | | | $ | (988,615 | ) | | | (20 | )% | | $ | 6,854,290 | | | $ | (1,797,956 | ) | | | (26 | )% |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
| * | | Australasia and other primarily represents Australia, South Africa, New Zealand and the Pacific Islands. |
Fiscal Year 2010 vs. Fiscal Year 2009
Our operating revenues declined in fiscal year 2010, compared to fiscal year 2009. The decline was primarily the result of decreased flow-through revenues of $470,100, as described below, and decreased operating revenues in both of our operating groups. Foreign currency fluctuations had a minimal impact on the decline in operating revenues. Our operating revenues decreased approximately 16% excluding the impact of the change in flow-through revenues in fiscal year 2010, compared to fiscal year 2009.
Flow-through revenues and costs result when we purchase materials, equipment or third-party services on behalf of our customer on a reimbursable basis with no profit on the materials, equipment or third-party services and where we have the overall responsibility as the contractor for the engineering specifications and procurement or procurement services for the materials, equipment or third-party services included in flow-through costs. Flow-through revenues and costs do not impact contract profit or net earnings.
33
Please refer to the section entitled “— Business Segments,” within this Item 7, for further discussion related to operating revenues and our view of the market outlook for both of our operating groups.
Fiscal Year 2009 vs. Fiscal Year 2008
Our operating revenues declined in fiscal year 2009, compared to fiscal year 2008. The decline was primarily the result of decreased flow-through revenues of $785,000, decreased operating revenues in both of our operating groups and a net decrease due to foreign currency fluctuations relative to the U.S. dollar. Our operating revenues decreased approximately 20% excluding the impact of the change in flow-through revenues and foreign currency fluctuations, compared to fiscal year 2008.
Contract Profit
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Fiscal Years |
| | | 2010 | | 2009 | | 2008 |
| |
| Amount | | $ | 598,786 | | | $ | 758,647 | | | $ | 895,646 | |
| $ Change | | | (159,861 | ) | | | (136,999 | ) | | | | |
| % Change | | | (21.1 | )% | | | (15.3 | )% | | | | |
Contract profit is computed as operating revenues less cost of operating revenues. “Flow-through” amounts are recorded both as operating revenues and cost of operating revenues with no contract profit. Contract profit margins are computed as contract profit divided by operating revenues. Flow-through revenues reduce the contract profit margin as they are included in operating revenues without any corresponding impact on contract profit. As a result, we analyze our contract profit margins excluding the impact of flow-through revenues as we believe that this is a more accurate measure of our operating performance.
Fiscal Year 2010 vs. Fiscal Year 2009
Both of our operating groups experienced decreased contract profit in fiscal year 2010, compared to fiscal year 2009, which was partially offset by the favorable impact of a curtailment gain of approximately $20,100 in fiscal year 2010 related to our U.K. pension plan that has been closed for future defined benefit accrual and a settlement fee of $11,800 that our Global E&C Group received in fiscal year 2010. Please refer to the section entitled “— Business Segments,” within this Item 7, for further information related to contract profit for both of our operating groups.
Fiscal Year 2009 vs. Fiscal Year 2008
The decrease in our contract profit in fiscal year 2009, compared to fiscal year 2008, resulted from contract profit decreases in both our operating groups and a severance-related postemployment benefits charge of $7,800 that our Global E&C Group incurred in fiscal year 2009, partially offset by the favorable impact of a commitment fee of $7,500 that our Global Power Group received in fiscal year 2009, a charge of $6,700 that our Global Power Group incurred in fiscal year 2008 for a legacy project in Ireland and a severance-related postemployment benefits charge of $6,600 that our Global Power Group incurred in fiscal year 2008. Please refer to the section entitled “— Business Segments,” within this Item 7, for further information related to contract profit for both of our operating groups.
Selling, General and Administrative (SG&A) Expenses
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Fiscal Years |
| | | 2010 | | 2009 | | 2008 |
| |
| Amount | | $ | 303,330 | | | $ | 294,907 | | | $ | 283,883 | |
| $ Change | | | 8,423 | | | | 11,024 | | | | | |
| % Change | | | 2.9 | % | | | 3.9 | % | | | | |
SG&A expenses include the costs associated with general management, sales pursuit, including proposal expenses, and research and development costs.
34
Fiscal Year 2010 vs. Fiscal Year 2009
The increase in SG&A expenses in fiscal year 2010, compared to fiscal year 2009, resulted primarily from increased costs related to our redomestication to Switzerland of $10,300, an increased charge for severance-related postemployment benefits of $2,500, partially offset by decreased general overhead costs of $3,300, while sales pursuit and research and development costs were relatively flat. Fiscal year 2010 included a severance-related postemployment benefits charge of $7,100 in our C&F Group. Fiscal year 2009 included a severance-related postemployment benefits charge of $4,600, which included charges in our C&F Group and our Global E&C Group of $3,700 and $900, respectively.
Fiscal Year 2009 vs. Fiscal Year 2008
The increase in SG&A expenses in fiscal year 2009, compared to fiscal year 2008, resulted from increased pension costs of $11,900 related to our U.S. pension plans, which are frozen to new entrants and additional benefit accruals, increased sales pursuit costs of $3,300 and an increased charge for severance-related postemployment benefits of $2,500, while research and development costs were relatively unchanged and general overhead costs decreased by $6,200.
Other Income, net
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Fiscal Years |
| | | 2010 | | 2009 | | 2008 |
| |
| Amount | | $ | 60,444 | | | $ | 52,263 | | | $ | 53,001 | |
| $ Change | | | 8,181 | | | | (738 | ) | | | | |
| % Change | | | 15.7 | % | | | (1.4 | )% | | | | |
Fiscal Year 2010
Other income, net in fiscal year 2010 consisted primarily of equity earnings of $24,000 generated from our investments, primarily from our ownership interests in build, own and operate projects in Italy and Chile and a $21,900 gain recognized at our Camden, New Jerseywaste-to-energy facility from the payment of the remaining balance of the project’s debt by the Pollution Control Finance Authority of Camden County, or PCFA, and State of New Jersey. For further information please refer to Note 16 to the consolidated financial statements in this annual report onForm 10-K.
Other income, net increased in fiscal year 2010, compared to fiscal year 2009. This was the net result of a $12,000 increase in the gain recognized at our Camden, New Jerseywaste-to-energy facility from the payment of the remaining balance of the project’s debt by the PCFA and State of New Jersey, an increase in equity earnings in our Global Power Group’s project in Chile of $4,600 and other activities, including $2,600 of value-added tax refunds and other non-income tax credits, partially offset by a decrease in equity earnings in our Global E&C Group’s projects in Italy. During fiscal year 2010, our Global E&C Group’s equity earnings decreased $16,100, compared to fiscal year 2009, for two projects in Italy that recorded impairment charges.
For further information related to our equity earnings, please refer to the sections within this Item 7 entitled “— Business Segments-Global Power Group” for our Global Power Group’s project in Chile and “— Business Segments-Global E&C Group” for our Global E&C Group’s projects in Italy, as well as Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements in this annual report onForm 10-K.
Fiscal Year 2009
Other income, net in fiscal year 2009 consisted primarily of $34,500 in equity earnings generated from our investments, as described above, and a $9,900 gain recognized from the payment of the 2009 debt service obligation on the Camden project’s debt by the PCFA and State of New Jersey, as described above.
The slight decrease in other income, net in fiscal year 2009, compared to fiscal year 2008, resulted primarily from a decrease in equity earnings in our Global Power Group’s project in Chile of $5,300 and a
35
$1,700 gain from an insurance settlement in fiscal year 2008, partially offset by an increase in equity earnings of $6,300 in our Global E&C Group’s projects in Italy.
Fiscal Year 2008
Other income, net in fiscal year 2008 consisted primarily of $33,400 in equity earnings generated from our investments, as described above, a $9,600 gain recognized from the payment of the 2008 debt service obligation on the Camden project’s debt by the PCFA and State of New Jersey, as described above, and a $1,700 gain from an insurance settlement.
Other Deductions, net
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Fiscal Years |
| | | 2010 | | 2009 | | 2008 |
| |
| Amount | | $ | 41,221 | | | $ | 30,931 | | | $ | 54,382 | |
| $ Change | | | 10,290 | | | | (23,451 | ) | | | | |
| % Change | | | 33.3 | % | | | (43.1 | )% | | | | |
Other deductions, net includes various items, such as legal fees, consulting fees, bank fees, net penalties on unrecognized tax benefits and the impact of net foreign exchange transactions within the period. Net foreign exchange transactions include the net amount of transaction losses and gains that arise from exchange rate fluctuations on transactions denominated in a currency other than the functional currency of our subsidiaries.
Fiscal Year 2010
Other deductions, net in fiscal year 2010 consisted primarily of $17,800 of legal fees, $5,800 of net foreign exchange transaction losses, $4,700 of consulting fees, $4,300 of bank fees, $1,700 of net penalties on unrecognized tax benefits, which were net of previously accrued tax penalties that were ultimately not assessed, a charge of $1,600 for unamortized fees and expenses related to the amendment and restatement of our October 2006 U.S. senior secured credit agreement in July 2010 and a charge of $900 for the write-off of capitalized costs due to a decision not to proceed with a power plant development project. During fiscal year 2010, net foreign exchange transaction losses were primarily driven by exchange rate fluctuations on cash balances held by certain of our subsidiaries that were denominated in a currency other than the functional currency of those subsidiaries.
Fiscal Year 2009
Other deductions, net in fiscal year 2009 consisted primarily of $16,400 of legal fees, $4,000 of consulting fees, $3,900 of bank fees, $2,500 in net penalties on unrecognized tax benefits, which were net of previously accrued tax penalties that were ultimately not assessed, a $800 provision for dispute resolution and environmental remediation cost and a $800 loss on sale of fixed assets, partially offset by $1,000 of net foreign exchange gains.
Fiscal Year 2008
Other deductions, net in fiscal year 2008 consisted primarily of $23,100 of legal fees, $16,500 of net foreign exchange losses, $4,300 of bank fees, a $4,200 provision for dispute resolution and environmental remediation costs, $1,500 of consulting fees and $1,400 of fees related to our redomestication to Switzerland, partially offset by a net $2,400 decrease in penalties on unrecognized tax benefits, which included $5,000 of previously accrued tax penalties that were ultimately not assessed.
36
Interest Income
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Fiscal Years |
| | | 2010 | | 2009 | | 2008 |
| |
| Amount | | $ | 11,581 | | | $ | 10,535 | | | $ | 44,743 | |
| $ Change | | | 1,046 | | | | (34,208 | ) | | | | |
| % Change | | | 9.9 | % | | | (76.5 | )% | | | | |
Fiscal Year 2010 vs. Fiscal Year 2009
The increase in interest income in fiscal year 2010, compared to fiscal year 2009, was driven primarily by higher average cash and cash equivalents balances and, to a lesser extent, the favorable impact from higher interest rates and investment yields.
Fiscal Year 2009 vs. Fiscal Year 2008
The decrease in interest income in fiscal year 2009, compared to fiscal year 2008, was driven primarily by lower interest rates and investment yields and, to a lesser extent, the unfavorable impact of lower average cash and cash equivalents balances.
Interest Expense
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Fiscal Years |
| | | 2010 | | 2009 | | 2008 |
| |
| Amount | | $ | 15,610 | | | $ | 14,122 | | | $ | 17,621 | |
| $ Change | | | 1,488 | | | | (3,499 | ) | | | | |
| % Change | | | 10.5 | % | | | (19.9 | )% | | | | |
Fiscal Year 2010 vs. Fiscal Year 2009
Interest expense in fiscal year 2010 increased, compared to fiscal year 2009, which primarily resulted from an increase in net interest expense on unrecognized tax benefits of $3,800, partially offset by decreased average borrowings. Accrued interest expense on unrecognized tax benefits in fiscal years 2010 and 2009 are net of the reversal of previously accrued interest expense on unrecognized tax benefits that was ultimately not assessed of $1,900 and $5,100, respectively.
Fiscal Year 2009 vs. Fiscal Year 2008
The decrease in interest expense in fiscal year 2009, compared to fiscal year 2008, primarily resulted from $5,100 of previously accrued interest expense on unrecognized tax benefits that were ultimately not assessed during fiscal year 2009 and decreased average borrowings, which was net of increased FW Power S.r.l. project debt for the construction of electric power generating wind farm projects in Italy.
Net Asbestos-Related Provision
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Fiscal Years |
| | | 2010 | | 2009 | | 2008 |
| |
| Amount | | $ | 5,410 | | | $ | 26,365 | | | $ | 6,607 | |
| $ Change | | | (20,955 | ) | | | 19,758 | | | | | |
| % Change | | | (79.5 | )% | | | 299.0 | % | | | | |
Fiscal Year 2010 vs. Fiscal Year 2009
The decrease in the net asbestos-related provision in fiscal year 2010, compared to fiscal year 2009, primarily resulted from an increased gain of $12,800 in fiscal year 2010, compared to fiscal year 2009, on the settlement of coverage litigation with asbestos insurance carriers and a decrease of $8,200 to our provision in
37
fiscal year 2010, compared to fiscal year 2009. Our fiscal year 2010 and 2009 provisions included charges to increase our asbestos liability for increased asbestos defense costs projected over our 15 year estimate.
Fiscal Year 2009 vs. Fiscal Year 2008
The increase in the net asbestos-related provision in fiscal year 2009, compared to fiscal year 2008, primarily resulted from a decreased gain of $34,900 in fiscal year 2009, compared to fiscal year 2008, on the settlement of coverage litigation with certain asbestos insurance carriers, partially offset by a decrease of $15,100 to our provision in fiscal year 2009, compared to fiscal year 2008. Our fiscal year 2009 and 2008 provisions included charges to increase our asbestos liability for increased asbestos defense costs projected over our respective 15 year estimates.
Please refer to Note 16 to the consolidated financial statements in this annual report onForm 10-K for more information.
Provision for Income Taxes
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Fiscal Years |
| | | 2010 | | 2009 | | 2008 |
| |
| Amount | | $ | 74,531 | | | $ | 93,762 | | | $ | 97,028 | |
| $ Change | | | (19,231 | ) | | | (3,266 | ) | | | | |
| % Change | | | (20.5 | )% | | | (3.4 | )% | | | | |
| Effective Tax Rate | | | 24.4 | % | | | 20.6 | % | | | 15.4 | % |
Our effective tax rate can fluctuate significantly from period to period and may differ significantly from the U.S. federal statutory rate as a result of income taxed in variousnon-U.S. jurisdictions with rates different from the U.S. statutory rate, as a result of our inability to recognize a tax benefit for losses generated by certain unprofitable operations and as a result of the varying mix of income earned in the jurisdictions in which we operate. In addition, our deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, based upon available evidence, it is more likely than not that the tax benefit of loss carryforwards (or other deferred tax assets) will not be realized in the future. In periods when operating units subject to a valuation allowance generate pretax earnings, the corresponding reduction in the valuation allowance favorably impacts our effective tax rate. Conversely, in periods when operating units subject to a valuation allowance generate pretax losses, the corresponding increase in the valuation allowance has an unfavorable impact on our effective tax rate.
Fiscal Year 2010
Our effective tax rate for fiscal year 2010 was lower than the U.S. statutory rate of 35% due principally to the impact of the following:
| | |
| | • | Income earned in tax jurisdictions with tax rates lower than the U.S. statutory rate, which contributed to an approximate 17 percentage point reduction in the effective tax rate; and |
| |
| | • | Total changes in our valuation allowance contributed to an approximate five percentage point increase in the effective tax rate as a result of the net impact of a valuation allowance increase because we are unable to recognize a tax benefit for losses subject to valuation allowance in certain jurisdictions (primarily the United States), and a reversal of valuation allowance on deferred tax assets in a non-us jurisdiction. |
Fiscal Year 2009
Our effective tax rate for fiscal year 2009 was lower than the U.S. statutory rate of 35% due principally to the net impact of income earned in tax jurisdictions with tax rates lower than the U.S. statutory rate, which contributed to an approximate 15-percentage point reduction in the effective tax rate for fiscal year 2009.
38
Fiscal Year 2008
Our effective tax rate for fiscal year 2008 was lower than the U.S. statutory rate of 35% due principally to the impact of the following:
| | |
| | • | Income earned in tax jurisdictions with tax rates lower than the U.S. statutory rate, which contributed to an approximate 14-percentage point reduction in the effective tax rate for fiscal year 2008; and |
| |
| | • | Total changes in our valuation allowance contributed to an approximate six-percentage point reduction in the effective tax rate for fiscal year 2008 and included the net impact of the following: |
| | |
| | • | A valuation allowance decrease which consisted of a reversal of our valuation allowance on deferred tax assets in one of ournon-U.S. subsidiaries; |
| |
| | • | A decrease in our valuation allowance because we recognized earnings in jurisdictions where we had a full valuation allowance; |
| |
| | • | The establishment of a valuation allowance on deferred tax assets in another of ournon-U.S. subsidiaries; and |
| |
| | • | Our inability to recognize a tax benefit for losses subject to valuation allowance in certain other jurisdictions and other permanent differences. |
We monitor the jurisdictions for which valuation allowances against deferred tax assets were established in previous years, and we evaluate, on a quarterly basis, the need for the valuation allowances against deferred tax assets in those jurisdictions. Such evaluation includes a review of all available evidence, both positive and negative, in determining whether a valuation allowance is necessary.
For statutory purposes, the majority of the U.S. federal tax benefits, against which valuation allowances have been established, do not expire until fiscal year 2025 and beyond, based on current tax laws.
Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Fiscal Years |
| | | 2010 | | 2009 | | 2008 |
| |
| Amount | | $ | 15,302 | | | $ | 11,202 | | | $ | 7,249 | |
| $ Change | | | 4,100 | | | | 3,953 | | | | | |
| % Change | | | 36.6 | % | | | 54.5 | % | | | | |
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests represents third-party ownership interests in the net income of our Global Power Group’s Martinez, California gas-fired cogeneration subsidiary and our manufacturing subsidiaries in Poland and the People’s Republic of China as well as our Global E&C Group’s subsidiaries in Malaysia and South Africa. The change in net income attributable to noncontrolling interests is based upon changes in the net income of these subsidiariesand/or changes in the noncontrolling interests’ ownership interest in the subsidiaries.
Fiscal Year 2010 vs. Fiscal Year 2009
The increase in net income attributable to noncontrolling interests in fiscal year 2010, compared to fiscal year 2009, primarily resulted from an increase of $3,900 from our subsidiary in Martinez, California. Other changes included an increase in our subsidiary in South Africa, substantially offset by decreases in our subsidiaries in the People’s Republic of China and Malaysia.
Fiscal Year 2009 vs. Fiscal Year 2008
The increase in net income attributable to noncontrolling interests in fiscal year 2009, compared to fiscal year 2008, primarily resulted from a $2,300 increase from our subsidiary in South Africa and, to a lesser extent, our subsidiary in Martinez, California.
39
EBITDA
EBITDA, as discussed and defined below, is the primary measure of operating performance used by our chief operating decision maker.
In addition to our two business groups, which also represent operating segments for financial reporting purposes, we report corporate center expenses, our captive insurance operation and expenses related to certain legacy liabilities, such as asbestos, in the Corporate and Finance Group, or C&F Group, which we also treat as an operating segment for financial reporting purposes.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Fiscal Years |
| | | 2010 | | 2009 | | 2008 |
| |
| Amount | | $ | 359,703 | | | $ | 503,799 | | | $ | 686,067 | |
| $ Change | | | (144,096 | ) | | | (182,268 | ) | | | | |
| % Change | | | (28.6 | )% | | | (26.6 | )% | | | | |
Fiscal Year 2010 vs. Fiscal Year 2009
EBITDA decreased in fiscal year 2010, compared to fiscal year 2009, primarily driven by decreased contract profit of $159,900 We also experienced decreased equity earnings in our Global E&C Group in fiscal year 2010, compared to fiscal year 2009, for two projects in Italy that recorded impairment charges. The above-noted decreases in EBITDA in fiscal year 2010, compared to fiscal year 2009, were partially offset by a decrease in our net asbestos-related provision, which includes the benefit of a gain on the settlement of coverage litigation with our insurance carriers in fiscal year 2010, and an increased gain recognized in other income, net related to our Camden, New Jersey project from the payment of the remaining balance of the project’s debt by the PCFA and State of New Jersey. Please refer to the preceding discussion of each of these items within this “— Results of Operations” section.
Fiscal Year 2009 vs. Fiscal Year 2008
EBITDA decreased in fiscal year 2009, compared to fiscal year 2008, primarily driven by decreased contract profit of $137,000 and, to a lesser extent, decreased interest income and an increased net asbestos-related provision. Please refer to the preceding discussion of each of these items within this “— Results of Operations” section.
See the individual segment explanations below for additional details.
EBITDA is a supplemental financial measure not defined in generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP. We define EBITDA as income attributable to Foster Wheeler AG before interest expense, income taxes, depreciation and amortization. We have presented EBITDA because we believe it is an important supplemental measure of operating performance. Certain covenants under our U.S. senior secured credit agreement use an adjusted form of EBITDA such that in the covenant calculations the EBITDA as presented herein is adjusted for certain unusual and infrequent items specifically excluded in the terms of our U.S. senior secured credit agreement. We believe that the line item on the consolidated statement of operations entitled “net income attributable to Foster Wheeler AG” is the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure to EBITDA. Since EBITDA is not a measure of performance calculated in accordance with GAAP, it should not be considered in isolation of, or as a substitute for, net income attributable to Foster Wheeler AG as an indicator of operating performance or any other GAAP financial measure. EBITDA, as calculated by us, may not be comparable to similarly titled measures employed by other companies. In addition, this measure does not necessarily represent funds available for discretionary use and is not necessarily a measure of our ability to fund our cash needs. As EBITDA excludes certain financial information that is included in net income attributable to Foster Wheeler AG, users of this financial information should consider the type of events and
40
transactions that are excluded. Our non-GAAP performance measure, EBITDA, has certain material limitations as follows:
| | |
| | • | It does not include interest expense. Because we have borrowed money to finance some of our operations, interest is a necessary and ongoing part of our costs and has assisted us in generating revenue. Therefore, any measure that excludes interest expense has material limitations; |
| |
| | • | It does not include taxes. Because the payment of taxes is a necessary and ongoing part of our operations, any measure that excludes taxes has material limitations; and |
| |
| | • | It does not include depreciation and amortization. Because we must utilize property, plant and equipment and intangible assets in order to generate revenues in our operations, depreciation and amortization are necessary and ongoing costs of our operations. Therefore, any measure that excludes depreciation and amortization has material limitations. |
A reconciliation of EBITDA to net income attributable to Foster Wheeler AG is shown below:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Global
| | | Global
| | | C&F
| |
| | | Total | | | E&C Group | | | Power Group | | | Group(1) | |
| |
Fiscal Year 2010 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
EBITDA(2) | | $ | 359,703 | | | $ | 296,240 | | | $ | 163,825 | | | $ | (100,362 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Less: Interest expense | | | 15,610 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Less: Depreciation and amortization | | | 54,155 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Less: Provision for income taxes | | | 74,531 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net income attributable to Foster Wheeler AG | | $ | 215,407 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fiscal Year 2009 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
EBITDA(2) | | $ | 503,799 | | | $ | 421,186 | | | $ | 194,027 | | | $ | (111,414 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Less: Interest expense | | | 14,122 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Less: Depreciation and amortization | | | 45,759 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Less: Provision for income taxes | | | 93,762 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net income attributable to Foster Wheeler AG | | $ | 350,156 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fiscal Year 2008 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
EBITDA(2) | | $ | 686,067 | | | $ | 535,602 | | | $ | 239,508 | | | $ | (89,043 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Less: Interest expense | | | 17,621 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Less: Depreciation and amortization | | | 44,798 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Less: Provision for income taxes | | | 97,028 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net income attributable to Foster Wheeler AG | | $ | 526,620 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
| (1) | | Includes general corporate income and expense, our captive insurance operation and the elimination of transactions and balances related to intercompany interest. |
41
| | |
| (2) | | EBITDA includes the following: |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Fiscal Years | |
| | | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
| |
Net increase in contract profit from the regular revaluation of final estimated contract profit revisions*: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Global E&C | | $ | 32,700 | | | $ | 66,700 | | | $ | 46,300 | |
| Global Power Group | | | 24,100 | | | | 2,300 | | | | (19,600 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total | | | 56,800 | | | | 69,000 | | | | 26,700 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net asbestos-related provision in C&F Group** | | | 5,410 | | | | 26,365 | | | | 6,607 | |
| Curtailment gain on closure of the U.K. pension plan in Global E&C | | | 20,100 | | | | — | | | | — | |
| Charges for severance-related postemployment benefits: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Global E&C | | | 3,700 | | | | 8,700 | | | | — | |
| Global Power Group | | | — | | | | — | | | | 9,000 | |
| C&F Group | | | 7,100 | | | | 3,700 | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total | | | 10,800 | | | | 12,400 | | | | 9,000 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
| * | | Please refer to “Revenue Recognition on Long-Term Contracts” in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements in this annual report onForm 10-K for further information regarding changes in our final estimated contract profit. |
| |
| ** | | Please refer to Note 16 to the consolidated financial statements in this annual report onForm 10-K for further information regarding the revaluation of our asbestos liability and related asset. |
The accounting policies of our business segments are the same as those described in our summary of significant accounting policies. The only significant intersegment transactions relate to interest on intercompany balances. We account for interest on those arrangements as if they were third-party transactions — i.e. at current market rates, and we include the elimination of that activity in the results of the C&F Group.
Business Segments
Global E&C Group
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Fiscal Years |
| | | 2010 | | 2009 | | 2008 |
| |
| Operating revenues | | $ | 3,346,050 | | | $ | 4,040,082 | | | $ | 5,147,227 | |
| $ Change | | | (694,032 | ) | | | (1,107,145 | ) | | | | |
| % Change | | | (17.2 | )% | | | (21.5 | )% | | | | |
| EBITDA | | $ | 296,240 | | | $ | 421,186 | | | $ | 535,602 | |
| $ Change | | | (124,946 | ) | | | (114,416 | ) | | | | |
| % Change | | | (29.7 | )% | | | (21.4 | )% | | | | |
42
Results
Our Global E&C Group’s operating revenues by geographic region, based upon where our projects are being executed, for fiscal years 2010, 2009, and 2008, were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Fiscal Years | | | 2010 vs 2009 | | | Fiscal Year | | | 2009 vs 2008 | |
| | | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | $ Change | | | % Change | | | 2008 | | | $ Change | | | % Change | |
| |
| Asia | | $ | 813,212 | | | $ | 1,301,173 | | | $ | (487,961 | ) | | | (38 | )% | | $ | 1,398,295 | | | $ | (97,122 | ) | | | (7 | )% |
| Australasia and other* | | | 1,176,211 | | | | 1,332,184 | | | | (155,973 | ) | | | (12 | )% | | | 1,731,781 | | | | (399,597 | ) | | | (23 | )% |
| Europe | | | 603,862 | | | | 601,553 | | | | 2,309 | | | | 0 | % | | | 847,788 | | | | (246,235 | ) | | | (29 | )% |
| Middle East | | | 194,906 | | | | 393,052 | | | | (198,146 | ) | | | (50 | )% | | | 857,944 | | | | (464,892 | ) | | | (54 | )% |
| North America | | | 372,223 | | | | 283,622 | | | | 88,601 | | | | 31 | % | | | 276,796 | | | | 6,826 | | | | 2 | % |
| South America | | | 185,636 | | | | 128,498 | | | | 57,138 | | | | 44 | % | | | 34,623 | | | | 93,875 | | | | 271 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total | | $ | 3,346,050 | | | $ | 4,040,082 | | | $ | (694,032 | ) | | | (17 | )% | | $ | 5,147,227 | | | $ | (1,107,145 | ) | | | (22 | )% |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
| * | | Australasia and other primarily represents Australia, South Africa, New Zealand and the Pacific Islands. |
Please refer to the section entitled, “— Overview of Segment” below for our view of the market outlook for our Global E&C Group.
Fiscal Year 2010 vs. Fiscal Year 2009
Our Global E&C Group experienced a decrease in operating revenues of 17% in fiscal year 2010, compared to fiscal year 2009. The decline included the net impact of decreased flow-through revenues of $468,800, partially offset by the favorable impact of a settlement fee of $11,800 that our Global E&C Group received in fiscal year 2010, as noted below. Foreign currency fluctuations had a minimal impact on the decline in operating revenues. Excluding flow-through revenues and the settlement fee noted above, our Global E&C Group’s operating revenues decreased 10% in fiscal year 2010, compared to fiscal year 2009. Please refer to the “— Overview of Segment” section below for a discussion of our Global E&C Group’s market outlook.
The decrease in our Global E&C Group’s EBITDA in fiscal year 2010, compared to fiscal year 2009, resulted primarily from the net impact of the following:
| | |
| | • | Decreased contract profit of $149,000, excluding the favorable contract profit impacts of the fiscal year 2010 curtailment gain and settlement fee and fiscal years 2010 and 2009 severance-related postemployment benefits charges noted below. The contract profit decrease was primarily as a result of decreased contract profit margins and, to a lesser extent, the volume decrease in operating revenues. |
| |
| | • | The favorable impact of a curtailment gain of $20,100 in fiscal year 2010 related to our U.K. pension plan that has been closed for future defined benefit accrual, which was included in contract profit. |
| |
| | • | A net favorable impact of approximately $9,800 for a settlement fee we received in fiscal year 2010, net of charges incurred, due to a decision not to proceed with a power plant development project and the related prospective engineering, procurement and construction contract, as described below. |
| |
| | • | A net favorable impact of $5,000 for decreased severance-related postemployment benefits charges in fiscal year 2010, compared to fiscal year 2009. Fiscal years 2010 and 2009 included severance-related postemployment benefits charges of $3,700 and $8,700, respectively, which predominantly impacted contract profit in both fiscal years. |
| |
| | • | During fiscal year 2010, our Global E&C Group’s equity earnings decreased $16,100, compared to fiscal year 2009, for two projects in Italy that recorded impairment charges as a result of the termination of their power off-take agreements with a local energy authority, which are described below. |
43
As noted above, during fiscal year 2010, we received a settlement fee of $11,800, which was included in operating revenues, due to a decision not to proceed with a power plant development project and the related prospective engineering, procurement and construction contract. As a result of the decision to not proceed with the project, we incurred a charge of approximately $900 for the write-off of capitalized costs in our project company. Additionally, we incurred approximately $1,100 of development costs associated with this project during fiscal year 2010. The development costs are included in SG&A. These items contributed to a net favorable impact to EBITDA of approximately $9,800 in fiscal year 2010.
Two of our equity interest investments in electric power generation projects in Italy, Centro Energia Teverola S.p.A., or CET, and Centro Energia Ferrara S.p.A., or CEF, recognized revenue in their 2010 financial statements related to termination fees from the Italian Economic Development Ministry for the termination of its long-term incentivized power off-take agreements in place with the Authority for Energy.
In light of the termination of the power off-take agreement at CET, we and our partner in CET decided to shut down the plant effective January 1, 2011. CET recorded an impairment charge to write down their assets, primarily fixed assets, to fair value in their financial statements as a result of the decision to shut down the plant. Our CET investment was reduced by an equity loss of $5,300, inclusive of an $8,000 impairment charge, in fiscal year 2010 based on CET’s 2010 financial results. As a result of the foregoing, the carrying value of our CET investment approximated fair value at December 31, 2010.
We and our partner in CEF decided to continue to operate the plant following the termination of its power off-take agreement. We and our partner continue to review the economic viability of the project and we may consider a potential sale of the plant in 2011. In light of the termination of the power off-take agreement, CEF recorded an impairment charge, which considered estimates related to the continued operation of the plant and potential sale of the plant, to write down their assets, primarily fixed assets, to fair value in their financial statements. Our CEF investment was reduced by an equity loss of $2,900, inclusive of a $5,200 impairment charge in fiscal year 2010 based on CEF’s 2010 financial results. As a result of the foregoing, the carrying value of our CEF investment approximated fair value at December 31, 2010. Please refer to Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements in this annual report onForm 10-K for more information.
Fiscal Year 2009 vs. Fiscal Year 2008
Our Global E&C Group experienced a decrease in operating revenues of 22% in fiscal year 2009, compared to fiscal year 2008. The decline included the net impact of decreased flow-through revenues. Excluding flow-through revenues and foreign currency fluctuations, our Global E&C Group’s operating revenues decreased 6% in fiscal year 2009, compared to fiscal year 2008.
The decrease in our Global E&C Group’s EBITDA in fiscal year 2009, compared to fiscal year 2008, resulted primarily from the net impact of the following:
| | |
| | • | Decreased contract profit of $91,300 in fiscal year 2009, excluding the unfavorable contract profit impact of the fiscal year 2009 severance-related postemployment benefits charge, noted below. The contract profit decrease was primarily as a result of decreased volume of operating revenues as described above, while contract profit margins remained unchanged. |
| |
| | • | The unfavorable impact of an $8,700 severance-related postemployment benefits charge in fiscal year 2009, which predominantly impacted contract profit, as described above. |
| |
| | • | The net unfavorable impact of $29,700 related to foreign currency fluctuations relative to the U.S. dollar and the settlement of transactions denominated in foreign currencies in fiscal year 2009. |
| |
| | • | A $6,300 equity earnings increase in fiscal year 2009 in our Global E&C Group’s projects in Italy compared to fiscal year 2008. |
Overview of Segment
Our Global E&C Group, which operates worldwide, designs, engineers and constructs onshore and offshore upstream oil and gas processing facilities, natural gas liquefaction facilities and receiving terminals,
44
gas-to-liquids facilities, oil refining, chemical and petrochemical, pharmaceutical and biotechnology facilities and related infrastructure, including power generation facilities, distribution facilities, gasification facilities and processing facilities associated with the metals and mining sector. Our Global E&C Group is also involved in the design of facilities in new or developing market sectors, including carbon capture and storage, solid fuel-fired integrated gasification combined-cycle power plants,coal-to-liquids,coal-to-chemicals and biofuels. Additionally, our Global E&C Group is also involved in the development, engineering, construction, ownership and operation of power generation facilities, from conventional and renewable sources, and ofwaste-to-energy facilities in Europe.
Our Global E&C Group provides the following services:
| | |
| | • | Design, engineering, project management, construction and construction management services, including the procurement of equipment, materials and services from third-party suppliers and contractors. |
| |
| | • | Environmental remediation services, together with related technical, engineering, design and regulatory services. |
| |
| | • | Design and supply of direct-fired furnaces, including fired heaters and waste heat recovery generators, used in a range of refinery, chemical, petrochemical, oil and gas processes, including furnaces used in its proprietary delayed coking and hydrogen production technologies. |
Our Global E&C Group owns one of the leading technologies (SYDECsm delayed coking) used in refinery residue upgrading, in addition to other refinery residue upgrading technologies (solvent deasphalting and visbreaking), and a hydrogen production process used in oil refineries and petrochemical plants. During the fiscal fourth quarter of 2010, our Global E&C Group acquired a proprietary sulfur recovery technology through a business acquisition. The sulfur recovery technology is used to treat gas streams containing hydrogen sulfide for the purpose of reducing the sulfur content of fuel products and to recover a saleable sulfur by-product. Additionally, our Global E&C Group has experience with, and is able to work with, a wide range of processes owned by others.
Our Global E&C Group generates revenues from design, engineering, procurement, construction and project management activities pursuant to contracts spanning up to approximately four years in duration and generates equity earnings from returns on its noncontrolling interest investments in various power production facilities.
In the engineering and construction industry, we expect long-term demand to be strong for the end products produced by our clients, and we believe that this long-term demand will continue to stimulate investment by our clients in new, expanded and upgraded facilities. The global economic downturn experienced in 2008 and 2009 caused many of our engineering and construction clients to reevaluate the size, timing and scope of their capital spending plans in relation to the kinds of energy, petrochemical and pharmaceutical projects that we execute.
We have seen instances of postponement or cancellation of prospects; clients electing to proceed with their investments in phases; clients releasing us to proceed on projects in phases; clients conducting further analysis before deciding to proceed with their investments; clients resizing, reconfiguring or relocating of prospective projects to make them more economically viable; and intensified competition among engineering and construction contractors which has resulted in pricing pressure. These factors may continue in 2011, but to a lesser extent as global economic conditions improve.
The global economic recovery is continuing at varying rates by region. We are seeing new projects developing, projects moving forward and clients re-examining previously postponed projects to review the business cases for proceeding with such projects. In addition, we believe world demand for energy and chemicals will continue to grow over the long term and that clients will continue to invest in new and upgraded capacity to meet that demand. Moreover, we have continued to be successful in booking contracts of varying types and sizes in our key end markets, including a new contract award for the basic engineering design and front-end engineering design for two new refineries in Brazil, a project management consultancy contract for the expansion of an oil export terminal in Iraq, an engineering, procurement and construction
45
management contract in Germany for a cogeneration plant, engineering, procurement and construction management contracts for gas compression facilities in Western Europe, and services for a potential refinery re-start project in the U.S. Our success in this regard is a reflection of our technical expertise, our long-term relationships with clients, and our selective approach in pursuit of new prospects where we believe we have significant differentiators.
Global Power Group
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Fiscal Years |
| | | 2010 | | 2009 | | 2008 |
| |
| Operating revenues | | $ | 721,669 | | | $ | 1,016,252 | | | $ | 1,707,063 | |
| $ Change | | | (294,583 | ) | | | (690,811 | ) | | | | |
| % Change | | | (29.0 | )% | | | (40.5 | )% | | | | |
| EBITDA | | $ | 163,825 | | | $ | 194,027 | | | $ | 239,508 | |
| $ Change | | | (30,202 | ) | | | (45,481 | ) | | | | |
| % Change | | | (15.6 | )% | | | (19.0 | )% | | | | |
Results
Our Global Power Group’s operating revenues by geographic region, based upon where our projects are being executed, for fiscal years 2010, 2009, and 2008, were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Fiscal Years | | | 2010 vs 2009 | | | Fiscal Year | | | 2009 vs 2008 | |
| | | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | $ Change | | | % Change | | | 2008 | | | $ Change | | | % Change | |
| |
| Asia | | $ | 151,314 | | | $ | 106,140 | | | $ | 45,174 | | | | 43 | % | | $ | 177,088 | | | $ | (70,948 | ) | | | (40 | )% |
| Australasia and other* | | | 35 | | | | 4,325 | | | | (4,290 | ) | | | (99 | )% | | | 13,258 | | | | (8,933 | ) | | | (67 | )% |
| Europe | | | 275,641 | | | | 438,626 | | | | (162,985 | ) | | | (37 | )% | | | 603,882 | | | | (165,256 | ) | | | (27 | )% |
| Middle East | | | 17,721 | | | | 2,173 | | | | 15,548 | | | | 716 | % | | | 648 | | | | 1,525 | | | | 235 | % |
| North America | | | 223,740 | | | | 371,106 | | | | (147,366 | ) | | | (40 | )% | | | 779,413 | | | | (408,307 | ) | | | (52 | )% |
| South America | | | 53,218 | | | | 93,882 | | | | (40,664 | ) | | | (43 | )% | | | 132,774 | | | | (38,892 | ) | | | (29 | )% |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total | | $ | 721,669 | | | $ | 1,016,252 | | | $ | (294,583 | ) | | | (29 | )% | | $ | 1,707,063 | | | $ | (690,811 | ) | | | (40 | )% |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
| * | | Australasia and other primarily represents Australia, South Africa, New Zealand and the Pacific Islands. |
Please refer to the section entitled, “— Overview of Segment” below for our view of the market outlook for our Global Power Group.
Fiscal Year 2010 vs. Fiscal Year 2009
Our Global Power Group experienced a decrease in operating revenues in fiscal year 2010, compared to fiscal year 2009, of 29%, while foreign currency fluctuations had minimal impact on the decline. The decrease was the result of a decreased volume of business. Please refer to the “— Overview of Segment” section below for a discussion of our Global Power Group’s market outlook.
The decrease in our Global Power Group’s EBITDA in fiscal year 2010, compared to fiscal year 2009, resulted primarily from the net impact of the following:
| | |
| | • | Decreased contract profit of $49,800 in fiscal year 2010, primarily as a result of the volume decrease in operating revenues, partially offset by increased contract profit margins. |
| |
| | • | Decreased SG&A expenses of $9,900 in fiscal year 2010, primarily as a result of decreased sales pursuit costs of $5,100 and general overhead costs of $4,100. |
46
| | |
| | • | A $12,000 increase in the gain recognized at our Camden, New Jerseywaste-to-energy facility from the payment of the remaining balance of the project’s debt by the PCFA and State of New Jersey in fiscal year 2010. |
| |
| | • | An increase in equity earnings in our Global Power Group’s project in Chile of $4,600, which includes the recognition of insurance recoveries in fiscal year 2010 as described below. |
On February 27, 2010, an earthquake occurred off the coast of Chile that caused significant damage to our Global Power Group’s project in Chile. The project’s facility suspended normal operating activities on that date. Normal operating activities are anticipated to resume in late first quarter 2011. The project included an estimated recovery under its business interruption insurance policy in its financial statements as of December 31, 2010. Our Global Power Group’s equity earnings from the project in Chile were $20,700 in fiscal year 2010, which included our Global Power Group’s equity interest in the after-tax estimated recovery under the project’s business interruption insurance policy.
Fiscal Year 2009 vs. Fiscal Year 2008
Our Global Power Group experienced a decrease in operating revenues in fiscal year 2009, compared to fiscal year 2008, of 37%, excluding foreign currency fluctuations. The decrease was the result of a decreased volume of business.
The decrease in our Global Power Group’s EBITDA in fiscal year 2009, compared to fiscal year 2008, resulted primarily from the net impact of the following:
| | |
| | • | Decreased contract profit of $41,200 in fiscal year 2009, primarily as a result of the volume decrease in operating revenues, significantly offset by increased contract profit margins. |
| |
| | • | Decreased equity earnings in our Global Power Group’s project in Chile of $5,300 in fiscal year 2009. |
| |
| | • | The net unfavorable impact of $5,100 related to foreign currency fluctuations relative to the U.S. dollar and the settlement of transactions denominated in foreign currencies in fiscal year 2009. |
| |
| | • | The favorable impact, when comparing to fiscal year 2008, of a $9,000 severance-related postemployment benefits charge in fiscal year 2008, which decreased contract profit by $6,600 and increased SG&A by $2,100, with the remainder being included in other deductions, net. The severance charge resulted from our efforts to right-size our power generation business to match market conditions. |
| |
| | • | The unfavorable impact, when comparing to fiscal year 2008, for a $7,500 commitment fee received in fiscal year 2008 for a contract that our Global Power Group was not awarded, which was included in contract profit. |
| |
| | • | The favorable impact, when comparing to fiscal year 2008, of a $6,700 charge for a legacy project in Ireland in fiscal year 2008, which was included in contract profit. Please refer to Note 16 to the consolidated financial statements in this annual report onForm 10-K for further information. |
Overview of Segment
Our Global Power Group designs, manufactures and erects steam generators and auxiliary equipment for electric power generating stations, district heating and power plants and industrial facilities worldwide. Our competitive differentiation in serving these markets is the ability of our products to cleanly and efficiently burn a wide range of fuels, singularly or in combination. In particular, our CFB steam generators are able to burn coals of varying quality, as well as petroleum coke, lignite, municipal waste, waste wood, biomass, and numerous other materials. Among these fuel sources, coal is the most widely used, and thus the market drivers and constraints associated with coal strongly affect the steam generator market and our Global Power Group’s business. Additionally, our Global Power Group ownsand/or operates several cogeneration, independent power production andwaste-to-energy facilities, as well as power generation facilities for the process and petrochemical industries.
47
Our Global Power Group offers a number of other products and services related to steam generators, including:
| | |
| | • | Designing, manufacturing and installing auxiliary and replacement equipment for utility power and industrial facilities, including surface condensers, steam generators for solar thermal power plants, feedwater heaters, coal pulverizers, steam generator coils and panels, biomass gasifiers, and replacement parts for steam generators. |
| |
| | • | Installation of nitrogen-oxide, or NOx, reduction systems and components for pulverized coal steam generators such as selective catalytic reduction systems, low NOx combustion systems, low NOx burners, primary combustion and overfire air systems and components, fuel and combustion air measuring and control systems and components. |
| |
| | • | A broad range of site services including construction and erection services, maintenance engineering, steam generator upgrading and life extension, and plant repowering. |
| |
| | • | Research and development in the areas of combustion, fluid and gas dynamics, heat transfer, materials and solid mechanics. |
| |
| | • | Technology licenses to other steam generator suppliers in select countries. |
In our Global Power Group business, new order activity has been unfavorably affected since fiscal year 2008 by the weakness in the global economy and its impact on the near-term growth in demand for electricity and steam for industrial production processes. In addition, political and environmental sensitivity regarding coal-fired steam generators caused a number of our Global Power Group’s prospective projects to be postponed or cancelled as clients experienced difficulty in obtaining the required environmental permits or decided to wait for additional clarity regarding governmental regulations. This environmental concern has been especially pronounced in the U.S. and Western Europe, and is linked to the view that solid-fuel-fired steam generators contribute to global warming through the discharge of greenhouse gas emissions into the atmosphere. In addition, the depressed level of natural gas pricing since 2008 increased the attractiveness of that fuel, in relation to coal, for the generation of electricity. Finally, the constraints on the global credit market are impacting and may continue to impact some of our clients’ investment plans as these clients are affected by the availability and cost of financing, as well as their own financial strategies, which could include cash conservation. Demand for new solid-fuel steam generators improved in some markets in fiscal year 2010, as evidenced by our significantly increased new orders, and we believe will continue to improve in fiscal year 2011, driven primarily by growing electricity demand and industrial production as economies around the world recover from the recent global economic downturn. We are now seeing increased demand for our products in Asia and Eastern Europe as evidenced by increased proposal activity.
Longer-term, we believe that world demand for electrical energy will continue to grow and that solid-fuel-fired steam generators will continue to fill a significant portion of the incremental growth in new generating capacity. In addition, we are seeing a growing need to repower older coal plants with new clean coal plants in order to drive environmental, financial and reliability benefits in relation to the performance of mature coal plant fleets in the U.S., Europe and Russia. The fuel flexibility of our CFB steam generators enables them to burn a wide variety of fuels other than coal and to produce carbon-neutral electricity when fired by biomass. In addition, our utility steam generators can be designed to incorporate supercritical steam technology, which significantly improves power plant efficiency and reduces power plant emissions.
We have recently received an award to carry out the detailed engineering and supply of a pilot-scale (approximately 30 megawatt thermal, equivalent to approximately 10 megawatt electrical, or MWe) CFB steam generator, which incorporates our carbon-capturing Flexi-Burntm technology. Once operational, this pilot facility will be utilized to validate the design of a full-scale carbon-capturing CFB power plant. Further, we have recently signed, together with other parties, a grant agreement with the European Commission, or EC, to support the technology development of a commercial scale (approximately 300 MWe) Carbon Capture and Storage, or CCS, demonstration plant featuring our Flexi-Burntm CFB technology. If the technology development work demonstrates that the project meets its specified technology and investment goals, construction of the commercial scale demonstration plant could begin in 2012 and the plant could be operational by 2015.
48
This project is one of the six European based CCS projects selected for funding by the EC under the European Energy Program for Recovery and it is the only selected project utilizing CFB technology for CCS application.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Fiscal Year 2010 Activities
Our cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash balances were:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | As of December 31, | | | | | | | |
| | | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | $ Change | | | % Change | |
| |
| Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 1,057,163 | | | $ | 997,158 | | | $ | 60,005 | | | | 6.0 | % |
| Restricted cash | | | 27,502 | | | | 34,905 | | | | (7,403 | ) | | | (21.2 | )% |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total | | $ | 1,084,665 | | | $ | 1,032,063 | | | $ | 52,602 | | | | 5.1 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
N/M — not meaningful
Total cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash held by ournon-U.S. entities as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 were $849,500 and $806,800, respectively. Please refer to Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements in this annual report onForm 10-K for additional details on cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash balances.
During fiscal year 2010, our cash and cash equivalents increased by $60,000. The increase was primarily as a result of $178,700 of cash provided by operating activities and $25,700 of proceeds from stock option exercises, partially offset by $99,200 of cash used to repurchase our shares under our share repurchase program, $23,300 of capital expenditures, $16,700 related to the repayment of debt and capital lease obligations and a $5,100 decrease in cash and cash equivalents due to the effect of exchange rate changes.
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Fiscal Years |
| | | 2010 | | 2009 | | 2008 |
| |
| Amount | | $ | 178,668 | | | $ | 290,615 | | | $ | 428,926 | |
| $ Change | | $ | (111,947 | ) | | $ | (138,311 | ) | | | | |
| % Change | | | (38.5 | )% | | | (32.2 | )% | | | | |
Net cash provided by operating activities in fiscal year 2010 primarily resulted from cash provided by net income of $309,400, which includes a gain and the related cash receipts of $10,400 on the settlement of coverage litigation with certain asbestos insurance carriers and excludes non-cash charges of $78,700, partially offset by mandatory and discretionary contributions to our pension plans of $98,600, which included discretionary contributions of $76,600, and cash used to fund working capital of $36,500.
The decrease in net cash provided by operating activities of $111,900 in fiscal year 2010, compared to fiscal year 2009, resulted primarily from decreased cash provided by net income of $150,300, increased pension plan contributions of $27,200, which was driven by higher discretionary contributions of $28,300, partially offset by decreased cash used to fund working capital of $91,600 and decreased cash used for asbestos-related activities of $24,900.
The decrease in net cash provided by operating activities of $138,300 in fiscal year 2009, compared to fiscal year 2008, resulted primarily from decreased cash provided by net income of $142,900, which includes a gain and the related cash receipts of $36,100 on the settlement of coverage litigation with certain asbestos insurance carriers in fiscal year 2008, and an increase in cash used for working capital of $73,000, partially offset by decreased pension plan contributions of $34,200, which included lower discretionary contributions of $14,200.
49
Working capital varies from period to period depending on the mix, stage of completion and commercial terms and conditions of our contracts and the timing of the related cash receipts. We experienced a decrease in cash used for working capital during fiscal year 2010, compared to fiscal year 2009, as cash receipts from client billings increased relative to cash used for services rendered and purchases of materials and equipment. The decrease in cash used for working capital during fiscal year 2010 was driven by our Global Power Group, partially offset by a use of cash to fund working capital by our Global E&C Group.
As more fully described below in “— Outlook,” we believe our existing cash balances and forecasted net cash provided from operating activities will be sufficient to fund our operations throughout the next 12 months. Our ability to increase or maintain our cash flows from operating activities in future periods will depend in large part on the demand for our products and services and our operating performance in the future. Please refer to the sections entitled “— Global E&C Group-Overview of Segment” and “— Global Power Group-Overview of Segment” above for our view of the outlook for each of our business segments.
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Fiscal Years |
| | | 2010 | | 2009 | | 2008 |
| |
| Amount | | $ | (13,114 | ) | | $ | (87,265 | ) | | $ | (128,584 | ) |
| $ Change | | $ | 74,151 | | | $ | 41,319 | | | | | |
| % Change | | | (85.0 | )% | | | (32.1 | )% | | | | |
The net cash used in investing activities in fiscal year 2010 was attributable primarily to capital expenditures of $23,300 and payments related to business acquisitions of $4,200, partially offset by a decrease in restricted cash of $6,000, proceeds from the sale of investments and other assets of $5,100 and a return of investment from unconsolidated affiliates of $3,200.
The net cash used in investing activities in fiscal year 2009 was attributable primarily to capital expenditures of $45,600, which included $18,100 of expenditures in FW Power S.r.l. for the construction of the electric power generating wind farm projects in Italy and payments totaling approximately $32,600 primarily for two business acquisitions specializing in upstream oil and gas engineering services.
The net cash used in investing activities in fiscal year 2008 was attributable primarily to capital expenditures of $103,900 (which included $54,300 of expenditures related to the FW Power S.r.l. projects, noted above). Other investing activities included payments related to business acquisitions of $14,900 and an increase in investments in and advances to unconsolidated affiliates of $7,600.
The capital expenditures in each of the fiscal years related primarily to project construction (including the expenditures related to the FW Power S.r.l. wind farm projects in fiscal years 2009 and 2008 noted above), leasehold improvements, information technology equipment and office equipment. Our capital expenditures decreased $22,300 in fiscal year 2010, compared to fiscal year 2009, as a result of decreased expenditures in our Global E&C Group, while expenditures in our Global Power Group were relatively flat. For further information on capital expenditures by segment, please see Note 14 to the consolidated financial statements in this annual report onForm 10-K.
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Fiscal Years |
| | | 2010 | | 2009 | | 2008 |
| |
| Amount | | $ | (100,494 | ) | | $ | 1,456 | | | $ | (466,104 | ) |
| $ Change | | $ | (101,950 | ) | | $ | 467,560 | | | | | |
| % Change | | | N/M | | | | N/M | | | | | |
N/M — not meaningful
50
The net cash used in financing activities in fiscal year 2010 was attributable primarily to cash used to repurchase shares under our share repurchase program of $99,200 (please see below ‘‘— Outlook” section for further details regarding our share repurchase program). Other financing activities included the repayment of debt and capital lease obligations of $16,700 and distributions to noncontrolling interests of $8,000, partially offset by cash provided from exercises of stock options of $25,700.
The net cash provided by financing activities in fiscal year 2009 was attributable primarily to proceeds from issuance of debt of $13,100 and proceeds from the exercise of share purchase warrants of $2,800, partially offset by the repayment of debt and capital lease obligations of $12,700 and distributions to noncontrolling interests of $2,200.
The net cash used in financing activities in fiscal year 2008 was attributable primarily to cash used to repurchase shares under our share repurchase program of $485,600. Other financing activities included the repayment of debt and capital lease obligations of $28,700, which includes $19,000 of cash to acquire our 1999C Robbins Bonds (as defined in Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements in this annual report onForm 10-K), and distributions by us to noncontrolling interests of $9,600, partially offset by proceeds from the issuance of debt of $54,600 and cash provided from exercises of stock options of $2,800.
Outlook
Our liquidity forecasts cover, among other analyses, existing cash balances, cash flows from operations, cash repatriations, changes in working capital activities, unused credit line availability and claim recoveries and proceeds from asset sales, if any. These forecasts extend over a rolling12-month period. Based on these forecasts, we believe our existing cash balances and forecasted net cash provided by operating activities will be sufficient to fund our operations throughout the next 12 months. Based on these forecasts, our primary cash needs will be working capital, capital expenditures, pension contributions and asbestos liability indemnity and defense costs. We may also use cash for acquisitions, discretionary pension plan contributions or to repurchase our shares under the share repurchase program, as described further below. The majority of our cash balances are invested in short-term interest bearing accounts with maturities of less than three months. We continue to consider investing some of our cash in longer-term investment opportunities, including the acquisition of other entities or operations in the engineering and construction industry or power industryand/or the reduction of certain liabilities such as unfunded pension liabilities.
It is customary in the industries in which we operate to provide standby letters of credit, bank guarantees or performance bonds in favor of clients to secure obligations under contracts. We believe that we will have sufficient letter of credit capacity from existing facilities throughout the next 12 months.
We are dependent on cash repatriations from our subsidiaries to cover essentially all payments and expenses of our holding company and principal executive offices in Switzerland, to cover cash needs related to our asbestos related liability and other overhead expenses in the U.S. and, at our discretion, the acquisition of our shares under our share repurchase program, as described further below. Consequently, we require cash repatriations to Switzerland and the U.S. from our entities located in other countries in the normal course of our operations to meet our Swiss and U.S. cash needs and have successfully repatriated cash for many years. We believe that we can repatriate the required amount of cash to Switzerland and the U.S. Additionally, we continue to have access to the revolving credit portion of our U.S. senior secured credit facility, if needed.
During fiscal year 2010, we had net cash inflows of approximately $9,700, resulting from insurance settlement proceeds in excess of asbestos liability indemnity and defense costs payments. In fiscal year 2011, we expect net cash outflows to be approximately $5,700. This estimate assumes no additional settlements with insurance companies or elections by us to fund additional payments. As we continue to collect cash from insurance settlements and assuming no increase in our asbestos-related insurance liability or any future insurance settlements, the asbestos-related insurance receivable recorded on our balance sheet will continue to decrease.
On July 30, 2010, Foster Wheeler AG, Foster Wheeler Ltd., certain of Foster Wheeler Ltd.’s subsidiaries and BNP Paribas, as Administrative Agent, entered into a four-year amendment and restatement of our
51
U.S. senior secured credit agreement, which we entered into in October 2006. The amended and restated U.S. senior secured credit agreement provides for a facility of $450,000, and includes a provision which permits future incremental increases of up to an aggregate of $225,000 in total additional availability under the facility. The amended and restated U.S. senior secured credit agreement permits us to issue up to $450,000 in letters of credit under the facility. Letters of credit issued under the amended and restated U.S. senior secured credit agreement have performance pricing that is decreased (or increased) as a result of improvements (or reductions) in our corporate credit rating as reported by Moody’s Investors Service, which we refer to as Moody’s,and/or Standard & Poor’s, or S&P. We received a corporate credit rating of BBB- as issued by S&P during fiscal year 2010, which, under the amended and restated U.S. senior secured credit agreement, reduces our pricing for letters of credit issued under the agreement. Based on the current ratings, the letter of credit fees for performance and financial letters of credit issued under the amended and restated U.S. senior secured credit agreement are 1.000% and 2.000% per annum of the outstanding amount, respectively, excluding fronting fees. This performance pricing is not expected to materially impact our liquidity or capital resources in fiscal year 2011. We also have the option to use up to $100,000 of the $450,000 for revolving borrowings at a rate equal to adjusted LIBOR, as defined in the agreement, plus 2.000%, subject also to the performance pricing noted above. No borrowings were outstanding at December 31, 2010.
The assetsand/or stock of certain of our U.S. andnon-U.S. subsidiaries collateralize our obligations under our amended and restated U.S. senior secured credit agreement. In the event that our corporate credit rating as issued by Moody’s is at least Baa3 and as issued by S&P is at least BBB-, all liens securing our obligations under the amended and restated U.S. senior secured credit agreement will be automatically released and terminated.
We had approximately $310,100 and $308,000 of letters of credit outstanding under our U.S. senior secured credit agreement in effect as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. There were no funded borrowings under our U.S. senior secured credit agreement outstanding as of December 31, 2010 or 2009. We do not intend to borrow under our U.S. senior secured credit facility during fiscal year 2011. Please refer to Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements in this annual report onForm 10-K for further information regarding our debt obligations.
On February 27, 2010, an earthquake occurred off the coast of Chile that caused significant damage to our unconsolidated affiliate’s project in Chile. The project’s facility suspended normal operating activities on that date. Subsequent to that date, our unconsolidated affiliate filed a claim with their insurance carrier. A preliminary assessment of the extent of the damage was completed and an estimate of the required cost of repairs was developed. Based on the assessment and cost estimate, as well as correspondence received from its insurance carrier, we expect the property damage insurance recovery to be sufficient to cover the estimated costs of repairing the facility. The insurance carrier also provided a preliminary assessment of the business interruption insurance recovery due to the project, and an advance of insurance proceeds against this assessment. Based on this assessment, we expect the business interruption insurance recovery to substantially compensate the project for the loss of profits while the facility had suspended operations, which resumed in February 2011. Please refer to Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements in this annual report onForm 10-K for further information on our equity interest in this project.
We are not required to make any mandatory contributions to our U.S. pension plans in fiscal year 2011 based on the minimum statutory funding requirements. Based on the minimum statutory funding requirements for fiscal year 2011, we expect to make mandatory contributions totaling approximately $24,000 to ournon-U.S. pension plans in fiscal year 2011. Additionally, we may elect to make additional discretionary contributions to ourU.S. and/ornon-U.S. pension plans during fiscal year 2011.
On September 12, 2008, we announced a share repurchase program pursuant to which our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $750,000 of our outstanding shares and the designation of the repurchased shares for cancellation. On November 4, 2010, our Board of Directors proposed an increase to our share repurchase program of $335,000 and the designation of the repurchased shares for cancellation, which was approved by our shareholders at an Extraordinary General Meeting on February 24, 2011.
52
Based on the aggregate share repurchases under our program through December 31, 2010, we are authorized to repurchase up to an additional $500,600 of our outstanding shares. Any repurchases will be made at our discretion in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions in compliance with applicable securities laws and other legal requirements and will depend on a variety of factors, including market conditions, share price and other factors. The program does not obligate us to acquire any particular number of shares. The program has no expiration date and may be suspended or discontinued at any time. Any repurchases made pursuant to the share repurchase program will be funded using our cash on hand. Through December 31, 2010, we have repurchased 22,411,229 shares for an aggregate cost of approximately $584,400. We have executed the repurchases in accordance with 10b5-1 repurchase plans as well as other privately negotiated transactions pursuant to our share repurchase program. The 10b5-1 repurchase plans allow us to purchase shares at times when we may not otherwise do so due to regulatory or internal restrictions. Purchases under the 10b5-1 repurchase plans are based on parameters set forth in the plans. For further information, please refer to Part II, Item 5 of this annual report onForm 10-K.
We have not declared or paid a cash dividend since July 2001 and we do not have any plans to declare or pay any cash dividends. Our current U.S. senior secured credit agreement contains limitations on cash dividend payments as well as other restricted payments.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We own several noncontrolling equity interests in power projects in Chile and Italy. Certain of the projects have third-party debt that is not consolidated in our balance sheet. We have also issued certain guarantees for the Chile-based project. Please refer to Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements in this annual report onForm 10-K for further information related to these projects.
Contractual Obligations
We have contractual obligations comprised of long-term debt, non-cancelable operating lease commitments, purchase commitments, capital lease obligations and pension funding requirements. Our expected cash flows related to contractual obligations outstanding as of December 31, 2010 are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Less than
| | | | | | | | | More than
| |
| | | Total | | | 1 Year | | | 1-3 Years | | | 3-5 Years | | | 5 Years | |
| |
| Long-term debt: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Principal | | $ | 103,000 | | | $ | 9,400 | | | $ | 20,700 | | | $ | 25,100 | | | $ | 47,800 | |
| Interest | | | 22,800 | | | | 3,500 | | | | 6,600 | | | | 5,500 | | | | 7,200 | |
| Non-cancelable operating lease commitments | | | 329,200 | | | | 51,500 | | | | 80,600 | | | | 57,400 | | | | 139,700 | |
| Purchase commitments | | | 1,066,200 | | | | 992,500 | | | | 67,800 | | | | 5,800 | | | | 100 | |
| Capital lease obligations: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Principal | | | 61,600 | | | | 2,600 | | | | 4,700 | | | | 6,100 | | | | 48,200 | |
| Interest | | | 53,300 | | | | 6,500 | | | | 12,200 | | | | 11,100 | | | | 23,500 | |
| Pension funding requirements — U.S.* | | | 21,000 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 21,000 | | | | — | |
Pension funding requirements —non-U.S.* | | | 116,900 | | | | 24,000 | | | | 45,900 | | | | 47,000 | | | | — | |
| Other postretirement benefit plan payments* | | | 55,500 | | | | 6,200 | | | | 11,900 | | | | 11,500 | | | | 25,900 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total contractual cash obligations | | $ | 1,829,500 | | | $ | 1,096,200 | | | $ | 250,400 | | | $ | 190,500 | | | $ | 292,400 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
| * | | Funding requirements are expected to extend beyond five years; however, data for contribution requirements beyond five years are not yet available and depend on the performance of our investment portfolio and actuarial experience. These projections assume no discretionary contributions. |
53
The table above does not include payments of our asbestos-related liabilities as we cannot reasonably predict the timing of the net cash outflows associated with this liability beyond 2011. We expect to fund $5,700 of our asbestos liability indemnity and defense costs from our cash flows in fiscal year 2011 net of the cash expected to be received from existing insurance settlements. Please refer to Note 16 to the consolidated financial statements in this annual report onForm 10-K for more information.
The table above does not include payments relating to our uncertain tax positions as we cannot reasonably predict the timing of the net cash outflows associated with the settlement of these obligations. Our total liability (including accrued interest and penalties) is $77,100 as of December 31, 2010. Please refer to Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements in this annual report onForm 10-K for more information.
We are contingently liable under standby letters of credit, bank guarantees and surety bonds, primarily for guarantees of our performance on projects currently in execution or under warranty. These balances include the standby letters of credit issued under the U.S. senior secured credit agreement, for further discussion please refer to the section entitled “— Liquidity and Capital Resources-Outlook” within this Item 7, and from other facilities worldwide. As of December 31, 2010, such commitments and their period of expiration are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Less than
| | | | | | | | | More than
| |
| | | Total | | | 1 Year | | | 1-3 Years | | | 3-5 Years | | | 5 Years | |
| |
| Bank issued letters of credit and guarantees | | $ | 869,800 | | | $ | 421,900 | | | $ | 315,900 | | | $ | 75,200 | | | $ | 56,800 | |
| Surety bonds | | | 140,800 | | | | 23,000 | | | | 77,500 | | | | — | | | | 40,300 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total commitments | | $ | 1,010,600 | | | $ | 444,900 | | | $ | 393,400 | | | $ | 75,200 | | | $ | 97,100 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Please refer to Note 9 to the consolidated financial statements in this annual report onForm 10-K for a discussion of guarantees.
Backlog and New Orders
New orders are recorded and added to the backlog of unfilled orders based on signed contracts as well as agreed letters of intent, which we have determined are legally binding and likely to proceed. Although backlog represents only business that is considered likely to be performed, cancellations or scope adjustments may and do occur. The elapsed time from the award of a contract to completion of performance may be up to approximately four years. The dollar amount of backlog is not necessarily indicative of our future earnings related to the performance of such work due to factors outside our control, such as changes in project schedules, scope adjustments or project cancellations. We cannot predict with certainty the portion of backlog to be performed in a given year. Backlog is adjusted quarterly to reflect project cancellations, deferrals, revised project scope and cost and sales of subsidiaries, if any.
Backlog measured in Foster Wheeler scope reflects the dollar value of backlog excluding third-party costs incurred by us on a reimbursable basis as agent or principal, which we refer to as flow-through costs. Foster Wheeler scope measures the component of backlog with profit potential and corresponds to our services plus fees for reimbursable contracts and total selling price for fixed-price or lump-sum contracts.
54
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
NEW ORDERS (MEASURED IN TERMS OF FUTURE REVENUES) BY PROJECT LOCATION | |
| | |
Global
| | | Global
| | | | |
| | | E&C Group | | | Power Group | | | Total | |
| |
Fiscal Year 2010 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| North America | | $ | 525,100 | | | $ | 223,500 | | | $ | 748,600 | |
| South America | | | 390,600 | | | | 20,200 | | | | 410,800 | |
| Europe | | | 569,400 | | | | 600,800 | | | | 1,170,200 | |
| Asia | | | 712,300 | | | | 333,300 | | | | 1,045,600 | |
| Middle East | | | 304,200 | | | | 25,800 | | | | 330,000 | |
| Australasia and other* | | | 400,500 | | | | 100 | | | | 400,600 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total | | $ | 2,902,100 | | | $ | 1,203,700 | | | $ | 4,105,800 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fiscal Year 2009 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| North America | | $ | 544,000 | | | $ | 217,800 | | | $ | 761,800 | |
| South America | | | 180,400 | | | | 15,700 | | | | 196,100 | |
| Europe | | | 388,000 | | | | 237,900 | | | | 625,900 | |
| Asia | | | 900,500 | | | | 109,600 | | | | 1,010,100 | |
| Middle East | | | 262,900 | | | | 29,400 | | | | 292,300 | |
| Australasia and other* | | | 594,900 | | | | 600 | | | | 595,500 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total | | $ | 2,870,700 | | | $ | 611,000 | | | $ | 3,481,700 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fiscal Year 2008 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| North America | | $ | 352,500 | | | $ | 571,000 | | | $ | 923,500 | |
| South America | | | 153,200 | | | | 134,300 | | | | 287,500 | |
| Europe | | | 981,000 | | | | 512,800 | | | | 1,493,800 | |
| Asia | | | 665,100 | | | | 117,500 | | | | 782,600 | |
| Middle East | | | 216,400 | | | | 100 | | | | 216,500 | |
| Australasia and other* | | | 339,300 | | | | 12,800 | | | | 352,100 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total | | $ | 2,707,500 | | | $ | 1,348,500 | | | $ | 4,056,000 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
| * | | Australasia and other primarily represents Australia, South Africa, New Zealand and the Pacific Islands. |
55
NEW ORDERS (MEASURED IN TERMS OF FUTURE REVENUES) BY INDUSTRY
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Global
| | | Global
| | | | |
| | | E&C Group | | | Power Group | | | Total | |
| |
Fiscal Year 2010 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Power generation | | $ | 22,900 | | | $ | 1,096,200 | | | $ | 1,119,100 | |
| Oil refining | | | 1,691,100 | | | | — | | | | 1,691,100 | |
| Pharmaceutical | | | 70,300 | | | | — | | | | 70,300 | |
| Oil and gas | | | 375,000 | | | | — | | | | 375,000 | |
| Chemical/petrochemical | | | 669,000 | | | | 100 | | | | 669,100 | |
| Power plant operation and maintenance | | | 16,900 | | | | 107,400 | | | | 124,300 | |
| Environmental | | | 14,700 | | | | — | | | | 14,700 | |
| Other, net of eliminations | | | 42,200 | | | | — | | | | 42,200 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total | | $ | 2,902,100 | | | $ | 1,203,700 | | | $ | 4,105,800 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fiscal Year 2009 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Power generation | | $ | 33,600 | | | $ | 512,200 | | | $ | 545,800 | |
| Oil refining | | | 1,533,300 | | | | — | | | | 1,533,300 | |
| Pharmaceutical | | | 55,100 | | | | — | | | | 55,100 | |
| Oil and gas | | | 786,500 | | | | — | | | | 786,500 | |
| Chemical/petrochemical | | | 439,300 | | | | — | | | | 439,300 | |
| Power plant operation and maintenance | | | — | | | | 98,800 | | | | 98,800 | |
| Environmental | | | 17,300 | | | | — | | | | 17,300 | |
| Other, net of eliminations | | | 5,600 | | | | — | | | | 5,600 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total | | $ | 2,870,700 | | | $ | 611,000 | | | $ | 3,481,700 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fiscal Year 2008 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Power generation | | $ | 43,500 | | | $ | 1,212,100 | | | $ | 1,255,600 | |
| Oil refining | | | 1,523,300 | | | | — | | | | 1,523,300 | |
| Pharmaceutical | | | 110,400 | | | | — | | | | 110,400 | |
| Oil and gas | | | 457,200 | | | | — | | | | 457,200 | |
| Chemical/petrochemical | | | 516,100 | | | | — | | | | 516,100 | |
| Power plant operation and maintenance | | | — | | | | 136,400 | | | | 136,400 | |
| Environmental | | | 24,000 | | | | — | | | | 24,000 | |
| Other, net of eliminations | | | 33,000 | | | | — | | | | 33,000 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total | | $ | 2,707,500 | | | $ | 1,348,500 | | | $ | 4,056,000 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
56
BACKLOG (MEASURED IN TERMS OF FUTURE REVENUES) BY CONTRACT TYPE
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Global
| | | Global
| | | | |
| | | E&C Group | | | Power Group | | | Total | |
| |
As of December 31, 2010 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Lump-sum turnkey | | $ | — | | | $ | 424,400 | | | $ | 424,400 | |
| Other fixed-price | | | 779,800 | | | | 555,800 | | | | 1,335,600 | |
| Reimbursable | | | 2,157,900 | | | | 61,600 | | | | 2,219,500 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total | | $ | 2,937,700 | | | $ | 1,041,800 | | | $ | 3,979,500 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
As of December 31, 2009 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Lump-sum turnkey | | $ | 100 | | | $ | 169,300 | | | $ | 169,400 | |
| Other fixed-price | | | 215,800 | | | | 306,300 | | | | 522,100 | |
| Reimbursable | | | 3,297,700 | | | | 128,700 | | | | 3,426,400 | |
| Eliminations | | | (900 | ) | | | (4,200 | ) | | | (5,100 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total | | $ | 3,512,700 | | | $ | 600,100 | | | $ | 4,112,800 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
As of December 26, 2008 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Lump-sum turnkey | | $ | 10,100 | | | $ | 260,900 | | | $ | 271,000 | |
| Other fixed-price | | | 338,400 | | | | 772,000 | | | | 1,110,400 | |
| Reimbursable | | | 3,981,200 | | | | 153,600 | | | | 4,134,800 | |
| Eliminations | | | (2,900 | ) | | | (8,900 | ) | | | (11,800 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total | | $ | 4,326,800 | | | $ | 1,177,600 | | | $ | 5,504,400 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
57
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
BACKLOG (MEASURED IN TERMS OF FUTURE REVENUES) BY PROJECT LOCATION | |
| | |
Global
| | | Global
| | | | |
| | | E&C Group | | | Power Group | | | Total | |
| |
As of December 31, 2010 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| North America | | $ | 620,900 | | | $ | 189,500 | | | $ | 810,400 | |
| South America | | | 389,200 | | | | 30,400 | | | | 419,600 | |
| Europe | | | 382,500 | | | | 517,800 | | | | 900,300 | |
| Asia | | | 481,200 | | | | 269,300 | | | | 750,500 | |
| Middle East | | | 266,900 | | | | 34,800 | | | | 301,700 | |
| Australasia and other* | | | 797,000 | | | | — | | | | 797,000 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total | | $ | 2,937,700 | | | $ | 1,041,800 | | | $ | 3,979,500 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
As of December 31, 2009 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| North America | | $ | 472,700 | | | $ | 198,900 | | | $ | 671,600 | |
| South America | | | 185,300 | | | | 52,700 | | | | 238,000 | |
| Europe | | | 432,800 | | | | 228,500 | | | | 661,300 | |
| Asia | | | 728,400 | | | | 93,200 | | | | 821,600 | |
| Middle East | | | 226,000 | | | | 27,800 | | | | 253,800 | |
| Australasia and other* | | | 1,467,500 | | | | (1,000 | ) | | | 1,466,500 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total | | $ | 3,512,700 | | | $ | 600,100 | | | $ | 4,112,800 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
As of December 26, 2008 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| North America | | $ | 212,600 | | | $ | 518,800 | | | $ | 731,400 | |
| South America | | | 139,900 | | | | 130,500 | | | | 270,400 | |
| Europe | | | 672,100 | | | | 436,900 | | | | 1,109,000 | |
| Asia | | | 1,140,000 | | | | 87,400 | | | | 1,227,400 | |
| Middle East | | | 341,900 | | | | 100 | | | | 342,000 | |
| Australasia and other* | | | 1,820,300 | | | | 3,900 | | | | 1,824,200 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total | | $ | 4,326,800 | | | $ | 1,177,600 | | | $ | 5,504,400 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
| * | | Australasia and other primarily represents Australia, South Africa, New Zealand and the Pacific Islands. |
58
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
BACKLOG (MEASURED IN TERMS OF FUTURE REVENUES) BY INDUSTRY | |
| | |
Global
| | | Global
| | | | |
| | | E&C Group | | | Power Group | | | Total | |
| |
As of December 31, 2010 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Power generation | | $ | 15,100 | | | $ | 929,300 | | | $ | 944,400 | |
| Oil refining | | | 1,726,200 | | | | — | | | | 1,726,200 | |
| Pharmaceutical | | | 39,800 | | | | — | | | | 39,800 | |
| Oil and gas | | | 793,800 | | | | — | | | | 793,800 | |
| Chemical/petrochemical | | | 331,800 | | | | 200 | | | | 332,000 | |
| Power plant operation and maintenance | | | — | | | | 112,300 | | | | 112,300 | |
| Environmental | | | 8,500 | | | | — | | | | 8,500 | |
| Other, net of eliminations | | | 22,500 | | | | — | | | | 22,500 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total | | $ | 2,937,700 | | | $ | 1,041,800 | | | $ | 3,979,500 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Backlog, measured in terms of Foster Wheeler Scope | | $ | 1,611,300 | | | $ | 1,031,900 | | | $ | 2,643,200 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
E & CMan-hours in Backlog (in thousands) | | | 12,700 | | | | | | | | 12,700 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
As of December 31, 2009 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Power generation | | $ | 18,900 | | | $ | 482,100 | | | $ | 501,000 | |
| Oil refining | | | 1,597,900 | | | | — | | | | 1,597,900 | |
| Pharmaceutical | | | 21,300 | | | | — | | | | 21,300 | |
| Oil and gas | | | 1,559,400 | | | | — | | | | 1,559,400 | |
| Chemical/petrochemical | | | 299,800 | | | | — | | | | 299,800 | |
| Power plant operation and maintenance | | | — | | | | 118,000 | | | | 118,000 | |
| Environmental | | | 8,200 | | | | — | | | | 8,200 | |
| Other, net of eliminations | | | 7,200 | | | | — | | | | 7,200 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total | | $ | 3,512,700 | | | $ | 600,100 | | | $ | 4,112,800 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Backlog, measured in terms of Foster Wheeler Scope | | $ | 1,480,100 | | | $ | 588,500 | | | $ | 2,068,600 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
E & CMan-hours in Backlog (in thousands) | | | 12,700 | | | | | | | | 12,700 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
As of December 26, 2008 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Power generation | | $ | 30,500 | | | $ | 1,049,500 | | | $ | 1,080,000 | |
| Oil refining | | | 1,497,100 | | | | — | | | | 1,497,100 | |
| Pharmaceutical | | | 50,400 | | | | — | | | | 50,400 | |
| Oil and gas | | | 1,872,700 | | | | — | | | | 1,872,700 | |
| Chemical/petrochemical | | | 856,400 | | | | — | | | | 856,400 | |
| Power plant operation and maintenance | | | — | | | | 128,100 | | | | 128,100 | |
| Environmental | | | 7,200 | | | | — | | | | 7,200 | |
| Other, net of eliminations | | | 12,500 | | | | — | | | | 12,500 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total | | $ | 4,326,800 | | | $ | 1,177,600 | | | $ | 5,504,400 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Backlog, measured in terms of Foster Wheeler Scope | | $ | 1,374,500 | | | $ | 1,164,800 | | | $ | 2,539,300 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
E & CMan-hours in Backlog (in thousands) | | | 12,600 | | | | | | | | 12,600 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The foreign currency translation impact on backlog and Foster Wheeler scope backlog resulted in decreases of $102,700 and $86,200, respectively, as of December 31, 2010 as compared to December 31, 2009.
59
The foreign currency translation impact on backlog and Foster Wheeler scope backlog resulted in increases of $262,700 and $85,600, respectively, as of December 31, 2009 as compared to December 26, 2008.
Inflation
The effect of inflation on our financial results is minimal. Although a majority of our revenues are realized under long-term contracts, the selling prices of such contracts, established for deliveries in the future, generally reflect estimated costs to complete the projects in these future periods. In addition, many of our projects are reimbursable at actual cost plus a fee, while some of the fixed-price contracts provide for price adjustments through escalation clauses.
Application of Critical Accounting Estimates
Our consolidated financial statements are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Management and the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors approve the critical accounting policies.
Highlighted below are the accounting policies that we consider significant to the understanding and operations of our business as well as key estimates that are used in implementing the policies.
Revenue Recognition
Revenues and profits on long-term contracts are recorded under thepercentage-of-completion method.
Progress towards completion on fixed price contracts is measured based on physical completion of individual tasks for all contracts with a value of $5,000 or greater. For contracts with a value less than $5,000, progress toward completion is measured based on the ratio of costs incurred to total estimated contract costs (thecost-to-cost method).
Progress towards completion on cost-reimbursable contracts is measured based on the ratio of quantities expended to total forecasted quantities, typicallyman-hours. Incentives are also recognized on apercentage-of-completion basis when the realization of an incentive is assessed as probable. We include flow-through costs consisting of materials, equipment or subcontractor services as both operating revenues and cost of operating revenues on cost-reimbursable contracts when we have overall responsibility as the contractor for the engineering specifications and procurement or procurement services for such costs. There is no contract profit impact of flow-through costs as they are included in both operating revenues and cost of operating revenues.
Contracts in process are stated at cost, increased for profits recorded on the completed effort or decreased for estimated losses, less billings to the customer and progress payments on uncompleted contracts.
At any point, we have numerous contracts in progress, all of which are at various stages of completion. Accounting for revenues and profits on long-term contracts requires estimates of total estimated contract costs and estimates of progress toward completion to determine the extent of revenue and profit recognition. We rely extensively on estimates to forecast quantities of labor(man-hours), materials and equipment, the costs for those quantities (including exchange rates), and the schedule to execute the scope of work including allowances for weather, labor and civil unrest. Many of these estimates cannot be based on historical data, as most contracts are unique, specifically designed facilities. In determining the revenues, we must estimate thepercentage-of-completion, the likelihood that the client will pay for the work performed, and the cash to be received net of any taxes ultimately due or withheld in the country where the work is performed. Projects are reviewed on an individual basis and the estimates used are tailored to the specific circumstances. In establishing these estimates, we exercise significant judgment, and all possible risks cannot be specifically quantified.
Thepercentage-of-completion method requires that adjustments or re-evaluations to estimated project revenues and costs, including estimated claim recoveries, be recognized on aproject-to-date cumulative basis, as changes to the estimates are identified. Revisions to project estimates are made as additional information
60
becomes known, including information that becomes available subsequent to the date of the consolidated financial statements up through the date such consolidated financial statements are filed with the SEC. If the final estimated profit to complete a long-term contract indicates a loss, provision is made immediately for the total loss anticipated. Profits are accrued throughout the life of the project based on thepercentage-of-completion. The project life cycle, including project-specific warranty commitments, can be up to approximately six years in duration.
The actual project results can be significantly different from the estimated results. When adjustments are identified near or at the end of a project, the full impact of the change in estimate is recognized as a change in the profit on the contract in that period. This can result in a material impact on our results for a single reporting period. We review all of our material contracts on a monthly basis and revise our estimates as appropriate for developments such as earning project incentive bonuses, incurring or expecting to incur contractual liquidated damages for performance or schedule issues, providing services and purchasing third-party materials and equipment at costs differing from those previously estimated and testing completed facilities, which, in turn, eliminates or confirms completion and warranty-related costs. Project incentives are recognized when it is probable they will be earned. Project incentives are frequently tied to cost, scheduleand/or safety targets and, therefore, tend to be earned late in a project’s life cycle.
Changes in estimated final contract revenues and costs can either increase or decrease the final estimated contract profit. In the period in which a change in estimate is recognized, the cumulative impact of that change is recorded based on progress achieved through the period of change. There were 46, 43 and 33 separate projects that had final estimated contract profit revisions whose impact on contract profit exceeded $1,000 in fiscal years 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The changes in final estimated contract profit resulted in a net increase of $56,800, $69,000 and $26,700 to reported contract profit for fiscal years 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively, relating to the revaluation of work performed on contracts in prior periods. The changes in fiscal year 2009 included $24,300 for positive settlements on two projects in our Global E&C Group, of which $14,800 was associated with the receipt of a payment on a long outstanding arbitration award. The impact on contract profit is measured as of the beginning of each fiscal year and represents the incremental contract profit or loss that would have been recorded in prior periods had we been able to recognize in those periods the impact of the current period changes in final estimated profits.
Asbestos
Some of our U.S. and U.K. subsidiaries are defendants in numerous asbestos-related lawsuits andout-of-court informal claims pending in the United States and the United Kingdom. Plaintiffs claim damages for personal injury alleged to have arisen from exposure to or use of asbestos in connection with work allegedly performed by our subsidiaries during the 1970s and earlier. The calculation of asbestos-related liabilities and assets involves the use of estimates as discussed below.
We believe the most critical assumptions within our asbestos liability estimate are the number of future mesothelioma claims to be filed against us, the number of mesothelioma claims that ultimately will require payment from us or our insurers, and the indemnity payments required to resolve those mesothelioma claims.
United States
As of December 31, 2010, we had recorded total liabilities of $337,500 comprised of an estimated liability of $78,500 relating to open (outstanding) claims being valued and an estimated liability of $259,000 relating to future unasserted claims through fiscal year 2025. Of the total, $59,000 is recorded in accrued expenses and $278,500 is recorded in asbestos-related liability on the consolidated balance sheet.
Since year-end 2004, we have worked with Analysis Research Planning Corporation, or ARPC, nationally recognized consultants in the United States with respect to projecting asbestos liabilities, to estimate the amount of asbestos-related indemnity and defense costs at year-end for the next 15 years. Since that time, we have recorded our estimated asbestos liability at a level consistent with ARPC’s reasonable best estimate.
61
Based on its review of fiscal year 2010 activity, ARPC recommended that the assumptions used to estimate our future asbestos liability be updated as of fiscal year-end 2010. Accordingly, we developed a revised estimate of our aggregate indemnity and defense costs through fiscal year 2025 considering the advice of ARPC. In fiscal year 2010, we revalued our liability for asbestos indemnity and defense costs through fiscal year 2025 to $337,500. In connection with updating our estimated asbestos liability and related asset, we recorded a charge of $19,400 in fiscal year 2010 resulting primarily from our 15 year liability estimate projected through fiscal year 2025.
Our liability estimate is based upon the following informationand/or assumptions: number of open claims, forecasted number of future claims, estimated average cost per claim by disease type - mesothelioma, lung cancer, and non-malignancies — and the breakdown of known and future claims into disease type — mesothelioma, lung cancer or non-malignancies and as well as other factors. The total estimated liability, which has not been discounted for the time value of money, includes both the estimate of forecasted indemnity amounts and forecasted defense costs. Total defense costs and indemnity liability payments are estimated to be incurred through fiscal year 2025, during which period the incidence of new claims is forecasted to decrease each year. We believe that it is likely that there will be new claims filed after fiscal year 2025, but in light of uncertainties inherent in long-term forecasts, we do not believe that we can reasonably estimate the indemnity and defense costs that might be incurred after fiscal year 2025. Historically, defense costs have represented approximately 31.8% of total defense and indemnity costs. Through December 31, 2010, cumulative indemnity costs paid, prior to insurance recoveries, were approximately $729,300 and total defense costs paid were approximately $340,700.
As of December 31, 2010, we had recorded assets of $219,900, which represents our best estimate of actual and probable insurance recoveries relating to our liability for pending and estimated future asbestos claims through fiscal year 2025; $54,400 of this asset is recorded within accounts and notes receivable-other, and $165,500 is recorded as asbestos-related insurance recovery receivable on the consolidated balance sheet. Asbestos-related assets under executed settlement agreements with insurers due in the next 12 months are recorded within accounts and notes receivable-other and amounts due beyond 12 months are recorded within asbestos-related insurance recovery receivable. Asbestos-related insurance recovery receivable also includes our best estimate of actual and probable insurance recoveries relating to our liability for pending and estimated future asbestos claims through fiscal year 2025. Our asbestos-related assets have not been discounted for the time value of money.
We have considered the financial viability and legal obligations of our subsidiaries’ insurance carriers and believe that the insurers or their guarantors will continue to reimburse a significant portion of claims and defense costs relating to asbestos litigation. As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, we have not recorded an allowance for uncollectible balances against our outstanding asbestos insurance-related assets. We write off receivables from insurers that have become insolvent; there have been no such write-offs during fiscal years 2010, 2009 and 2008. We have not assumed recovery in the estimate of our asbestos insurance asset from any of our currently insolvent insurers. The overall historic average combined indemnity and defense cost per resolved claim through December 31, 2010 has been approximately $2.9. The average cost per resolved claim is increasing and we believe it will continue to increase in the future.
We plan to update our forecasts periodically to take into consideration our experience and other considerations to update our estimate of future costs and expected insurance recoveries. The estimate of the liabilities and assets related to asbestos claims and recoveries is subject to a number of uncertainties that may result in significant changes in the current estimates. Among these are uncertainties as to the ultimate number and type of claims filed, the amounts of claim costs, the impact of bankruptcies of other companies with asbestos claims, uncertainties surrounding the litigation process from jurisdiction to jurisdiction and from case to case, as well as potential legislative changes. Increases in the number of claims filed or costs to resolve those claims could cause us to increase further the estimates of the costs associated with asbestos claims and could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
62
The following chart reflects the sensitivities in the fiscal year 2010 consolidated financial statements associated with a change in certain estimates used in relation to the U.S. asbestos-related liabilities.
| | | | | |
| | | Approximate Change
|
Changes (Increase or Decrease) in Assumption: | | in Liability |
| |
| One-percentage point change in the inflation rate related to the indemnity and defense costs | | $ | 24,600 | |
| Twenty-five percent change in average indemnity settlement amount | | | 52,300 | |
| Twenty-five percent change in forecasted number of new claims | | | 64,900 | |
Based on the fiscal year-end 2010 liability estimate, an increase of 25% in the average per claim indemnity settlement amount would increase the liability by $52,300 as described above and the impact on expense would be dependent upon available additional insurance recoveries. Assuming no change to the assumptions currently used to estimate our insurance asset, this increase would result in a charge in the statement of operations of approximately 80% of the increase in the liability. Long-term cash flows would ultimately change by the same amount. Should there be an increase in the estimated liability in excess of this 25%, the percentage of that increase that would be expected to be funded by additional insurance recoveries would decline.
Our subsidiaries have been effective in managing the asbestos litigation, in part, because our subsidiaries: (1) have access to historical project documents and other business records going back more than 50 years, allowing them to defend themselves by determining if the claimants were present at the location of the alleged asbestos exposure and, if so, the timing and extent of their presence; (2) maintain good records on insurance policies and have identified and validated policies issued since 1952; and (3) have consistently and vigorously defended these claims which has resulted in dismissal of claims that are without merit or settlement of meritorious claims at amounts that are considered reasonable.
United Kingdom
As of December 31, 2010, we had recorded total liabilities of $31,000 comprised of an estimated liability relating to open (outstanding) claims of $5,800 and an estimated liability relating to future unasserted claims through fiscal year 2025 of $25,200. Of the total, $1,900 was recorded in accrued expenses and $29,100 was recorded in asbestos-related liability on the consolidated balance sheet. An asset in an equal amount was recorded for the expected U.K. asbestos-related insurance recoveries, of which $1,900 was recorded in accounts and notes receivable-other and $29,100 was recorded as asbestos-related insurance recovery receivable on the consolidated balance sheet. The liability estimates are based on a U.K. House of Lords judgment that pleural plaque claims do not amount to a compensable injury and accordingly, we have reduced our liability assessment. If this ruling was reversed by legislation, the asbestos liability and related asset recorded in the U.K. would be approximately $53,100.
Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans
We have defined benefit pension plans in the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, Finland, France, India and South Africa and we have other postretirement benefit plans, or OPEB plans, for health care and life insurance benefits in the United States and Canada. The U.S. plans, which are closed to new entrants and additional benefit accruals, and the Canadian, Finnish and French plans are non-contributory. The U.K. pension plan, which is closed to new entrants and additional benefit accruals, is contributory. Additionally, one of our subsidiaries in the United States also has a benefit plan which provides coverage for an employee’s beneficiary upon the death of the employee. This plan has been closed to new entrants since 1988.
Our defined benefit pension and OPEB plans are accounted for in accordance with current accounting guidance, which requires us to recognize the funded status of each of our defined benefit pension and OPEB plans on the consolidated balance sheet. The guidance also requires us to recognize any gains or losses, which are not recognized as a component of annual service cost, as a component of comprehensive income, net of tax. Please refer to Note 8 of the consolidated financial statements in this annual report onForm 10-K for more information.
63
The calculations of defined benefit pension and OPEB plan liabilities, annual service cost and cash contributions required rely heavily on estimates about future events often extending decades into the future. We are responsible for establishing the assumptions used for the estimates, which include:
| | |
| | • | The discount rate used to calculate the present value of future obligations; |
| |
| | • | The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets; |
| |
| | • | The expected rate of annual salary increases; |
| |
| | • | The selection of the actuarial mortality tables; |
| |
| | • | The annual healthcare cost trend rate (only for the OPEB plans); and |
| |
| | • | The annual inflation rate. |
We utilize our business judgment in establishing the estimates used in the calculations of our defined benefit pension and OPEB plan liabilities, annual service cost and cash contributions. These estimates are updated on an annual basis or more frequently upon the occurrence of significant events. The estimates can vary significantly from the actual results and we cannot provide any assurance that the estimates used to calculate the defined benefit pension and postretirement benefit liabilities included herein will approximate actual results. The volatility between the assumptions and actual results can be significant.
The following table summarizes the estimates used for our defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans for fiscal years 2010, 2009, and 2008:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Defined Benefit Pension Plans | | | Other Postretirement
| |
| | | United States | | | United Kingdom | | | Other | | | Benefit Plans | |
| | | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
| |
Net periodic benefit cost: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Discount rate | | | 5.67 | % | | | 6.23 | % | | | 6.31 | % | | | 5.70 | % | | | 6.20 | % | | | 5.70 | % | | | 5.37 | % | | | 6.18 | % | | | 5.85 | % | | | 4.53 | % | | | 6.26 | % | | | 6.23 | % |
| Long-term rate of return | | | 7.75 | % | | | 8.25 | % | | | 7.90 | % | | | 6.70 | % | | | 6.30 | % | | | 6.80 | % | | | 7.37 | % | | | 7.14 | % | | | 8.01 | % | | | N/A | | | | N/A | | | | N/A | |
| Salary growth* | | | N/A | | | | N/A | | | | N/A | | | | N/A | | | | 3.50 | % | | | 4.10 | % | | | 3.67 | % | | | 3.07 | % | | | 5.43 | % | | | N/A | | | | N/A | | | | N/A | |
Projected benefit obligations: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Discount rate | | | 5.11 | % | | | 5.67 | % | | | 6.23 | % | | | 5.50 | % | | | 5.70 | % | | | 6.20 | % | | | 5.68 | % | | | 6.22 | % | | | 6.59 | % | | | 4.88 | % | | | 5.45 | % | | | 6.28 | % |
| Salary growth* | | | N/A | | | | N/A | | | | N/A | | | | N/A | | | | 4.05 | % | | | 3.50 | % | | | 4.22 | % | | | 4.20 | % | | | 3.79 | % | | | N/A | | | | N/A | | | | N/A | |
| | |
| * | | Salary growth is not applicable for closed plans as future salary levels do not affect benefits payable. |
N/A — Not applicable
The discount rate is developed using a market-based approach that matches our projected benefit payments to a spot yield curve of high-quality corporate bonds. Changes in the discount rate fromperiod-to-period were generally due to changes in long-term interest rates.
The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets is developed using a weighted-average methodology, blending the expected returns on each class of investment in the plans’ portfolio. The expected returns by asset class are developed considering both past performance and future considerations. We annually review and adjust, as required, the long-term rate of return for our pension plans. The weighted-average expected long-term rate of return on plan assets has ranged from 6.9% to 7.2% over the past three years.
The following tables reflect the sensitivities in the consolidated financial statements associated with a change in certain estimates used in relation to the United States and the United Kingdom defined benefit
64
pension plans. Each of the sensitivities below reflects an evaluation of the change based solely on a change in that particular estimate.
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | Approximate Increase
|
| | | (Decrease) |
| | | Impact on
| | Impact on 2011
|
| | | Liabilities | | Benefit Cost |
| |
U.S. Pension Plans: | | | | | | | | |
| One-tenth of a percentage point increase in the discount rate | | $ | (3,734 | ) | | $ | 18 | |
| One-tenth of a percentage point decrease in the discount rate | | | 3,800 | | | | (20 | ) |
| One-tenth of a percentage point increase in the expected return on plan assets | | | — | | | | (311 | ) |
| One-tenth of a percentage point decrease in the expected return on plan assets | | | — | | | | 311 | |
U.K. Pension Plans: | | | | | | | | |
| One-tenth of a percentage point increase in the discount rate | | $ | (11,625 | ) | | $ | (291 | ) |
| One-tenth of a percentage point decrease in the discount rate | | | 11,855 | | | | 287 | |
| One-tenth of a percentage point increase in the expected return on plan assets | | | — | | | | (704 | ) |
| One-tenth of a percentage point decrease in the expected return on plan assets | | | — | | | | 702 | |
Accumulated net actuarial losses from our pension plans that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive loss into net periodic benefit cost over the next fiscal year is $13,300. Estimated amortization of prior service costs and net transition obligation are immaterial. Net actuarial losses reflect differences between expected and actual plan experience, including returns on plan assets, and changes in actuarial assumptions, all of which occurred over time. These net actuarial losses, to the extent not offset by future actuarial gains, will result in increases in our future pension costs depending on several factors, including whether such losses exceed the corridor in which losses are not amortized. The net actuarial losses outside the corridor are amortized over the expected remaining service periods of active participants (approximately 11, 15 and 18 years for the Canadian, South African and Finnish plans, respectively) and average remaining life expectancy of participants for our closed plans (approximately 25 and 29 years for the U.S. and U.K. plans, respectively) since benefits are closed.
A one-tenth of a percentage point decrease in the funding rates, used for calculating future funding requirements to the U.S. plans through 2015, would increase aggregate contributions over the next five years by approximately $3,400, while an increase by one-tenth of a percentage point would decrease aggregate contributions by approximately $3,500.
A one-tenth of a percentage point decrease in the funding rates, used for calculating future funding requirements to the U.K. plans through 2015, would increase aggregate contributions over the next five years by approximately $5,000, while an increase by one-tenth of a percentage point would decrease aggregate contributions by approximately $4,000.
Accumulated net actuarial losses and prior service credit that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive loss into net periodic postretirement benefit cost in connection with our OPEB plans over the next fiscal year are $300 and $3,600, respectively. The net actuarial losses outside the corridor are amortized over the average life expectancy of inactive participants (approximately 20 years) because benefits are closed. The prior service credits are amortized over schedules established at the date of each plan change (approximately 8 years).
Please refer to Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements in this annual report onForm 10-K for further discussion of our defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans.
Share-Based Compensation Plans
Our share-based compensation plans include both restricted awards and stock option awards. We measure these awards at fair value on their grant date and recognize compensation cost in the consolidated statements of operations over their vesting period.
65
The following table summarizes our share-based compensation expense and related income tax benefit:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Fiscal Years |
| | | 2010 | | 2009 | | 2008 |
| |
| Share-based compensation | | $ | 22,996 | | | $ | 22,781 | | | $ | 15,766 | |
| Related income tax benefit | | | 353 | | | | 448 | | | | 332 | |
As of December 31, 2010, the breakdown of our unrecognized compensation cost and related weighted-average period for the cost to be recognized were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Weighted-
| |
| | | | | | Average Period
| |
| | | | | | for Cost to be
| |
| | | December 31, 2010 | | | Recognized | |
| |
Unrecognized compensation cost: | | | | | | | | |
| Stock options | | $ | 12,233 | | | | 23 months | |
| Restricted awards | | $ | 14,070 | | | | 23 months | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total unrecognized compensation cost | | $ | 26,303 | | | | 23 months | |
| | | | | | | | | |
We estimate the fair value of each option award on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option valuation model, which incorporates assumptions regarding a number of complex and subjective variables. We then recognize the fair value of each option as compensation cost ratably using the straight-line attribution method over the service period (generally the vesting period). The Black-Scholes model incorporates the following assumptions:
| | |
| | • | Expected volatility — we estimate the volatility of our share price at the date of grant using a “look-back” period which coincides with the expected term, as defined below. We believe using a “look-back” period which coincides with the expected term is the most appropriate measure for determining expected volatility. |
| |
| | • | Expected term — we estimate the expected term using the “simplified” method, as outlined in Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107, “Share-Based Payment.” |
| |
| | • | Risk-free interest rate — we estimate the risk-free interest rate using the U.S. Treasury yield curve for periods equal to the expected term of the options in effect at the time of grant. |
| |
| | • | Dividends — we use an expected dividend yield of zero because we have not declared or paid a cash dividend since July 2001 and we do not have any plans to declare or pay any cash dividends. |
We estimate pre-vesting forfeitures at the time of grant using a combination of historical data and demographic characteristics, and we revise those estimates in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. We record share-based compensation expense only for those awards that are expected to vest.
If factors change and we employ different assumptions in the application of current accounting guidance, in future periods, the compensation expense that we record for future awards may differ significantly from what we have recorded in the current period. There is a high degree of subjectivity involved in selecting the option pricing model assumptions used to estimate share-based compensation expense. Option pricing models were developed for use in estimating the value of traded options that have no vesting or hedging restrictions, are fully transferable and do not cause dilution. Because our share-based payments have characteristics significantly different from those of freely traded options, and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect our estimates of fair value, existing valuation models may not provide reliable measures of the fair value of our share-based compensation. Consequently, there is a risk that our estimates of the fair value of our share-based compensation awards on the grant dates may bear little resemblance to the actual value realized upon the exercise, expiration or forfeiture of those share-based payments in the future. Stock options may expire worthless or otherwise result in zero intrinsic value compared to the fair value originally estimated on the grant date and reported in the consolidated financial
66
statements. Alternatively, value may be realized from these instruments that are significantly in excess of the fair value originally estimated on the grant date and reported in the consolidated financial statements.
There are significant differences among valuation models. This may result in a lack of comparability with other companies that use different models, methods and assumptions. There is also a possibility that we will adopt different valuation models in the future. This may result in a lack of consistency in future periods and may materially affect the fair value estimate of share-based payments.
Please refer to Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements in this annual report onForm 10-K for further discussion of our share-based compensation plans.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
At least annually, we evaluate goodwill for potential impairment. We test goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level, which is defined as the components one level below our operating segments, as these components constitute businesses for which discrete financial information is available and segment management regularly reviews the operating results of those components. Presently, goodwill exists in two of our reporting units — one within our Global Power Group business segment and one within our Global E&C Group business segment.
The goodwill impairment test is a two-step process. The first step of the goodwill impairment test, used to identify potential impairment, compares the fair value of the reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the fair value exceeds the carrying amount, goodwill is not considered impaired. If the carrying amount exceeds the fair value, the second step must be performed to measure the amount of the impairment loss, if any. The second step compares the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. In the fourth quarter of each fiscal year, we evaluate goodwill at each reporting unit to assess recoverability, and impairments, if any, are recognized in earnings. An impairment loss would be recognized in an amount equal to the excess of the carrying amount of the goodwill over the implied fair value of the goodwill. Intangible assets with determinable useful lives are amortized over their respective estimated useful lives and reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that its carrying amount may not be recoverable.
We determined that both the income and market valuation approaches provide inputs into the estimate of the fair value of our reporting units, which would be considered by market participants. Under the income valuation approach, we employed a discounted cash flow model to estimate the fair value of each reporting unit. This model requires the use of significant estimates and assumptions regarding future revenues, costs, margins, capital expenditures, changes in working capital, terminal year growth rate and cost of capital. Our cash flow models are based on our forecasted results for the applicable reporting units. The models also assume a 3% growth rate in the terminal year. Actual results could differ from our projections.
Under the market valuation approach, we employed the guideline publicly traded company method, which indicates the fair value of the equity of each reporting unit by comparing it to publicly traded companies in similar lines of business. After identifying and selecting guideline companies, we analyzed their business and financial profiles for relative similarity. Factors such as size, growth, risk and profitability were analyzed and compared to each of our reporting units.
We noted that the indicated fair value of each of the income approach and the market approach was above the carrying value of each reporting unit.
Goodwill of $48,500 and other intangible assets of $9,800 relate to our Global Power Group’s European reporting unit which has experienced a number of performance related issues in prior years; however, the performance of this reporting unit has improved in recent years. Our calculation of the estimated fair value of the reporting unit was sufficiently in excess of its carrying value even after conducting various sensitivity analyses on key assumptions, such that no adjustment to the carrying value of goodwill was required. However, should the performance of this unit deteriorate in the future, its carrying value could exceed its fair value in future periods, which could lead to an impairment of goodwill.
67
Our calculation of the estimated fair value of each of our Global E&C Group’s reporting units was significantly in excess of their respective carrying value even after conducting various sensitivity analyses on key assumptions.
Income Taxes
Deferred tax assets/liabilities are established for the difference between the financial reporting and income tax basis of assets and liabilities, as well as for operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws and rates on the date of enactment.
Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. In evaluating our ability to realize our deferred tax assets within the various tax jurisdictions in which they arise, we consider all available positive and negative evidence, including scheduled reversals of taxable temporary differences, projected future taxable income, tax planning strategies and recent financial performance. Projecting future taxable income requires significant assumptions about future operating results, as well as the timing and character of taxable income in numerous jurisdictions. For statutory purposes, the majority of the deferred tax assets for which a valuation allowance is provided as of December 31, 2010 do not begin to expire until 2025 or later, based on the current tax laws. We have a valuation allowance of $373,900 recorded as of December 31, 2010.
We recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position are based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement.
Our subsidiaries file income tax returns in numerous tax jurisdictions, including the United States, several U.S. states and numerousnon-U.S. jurisdictions around the world. Tax returns are also filed in jurisdictions where our subsidiaries execute project-related work. The statute of limitations varies by jurisdiction. Because of the number of jurisdictions in which we file tax returns, in any given year the statute of limitations in a number of jurisdictions may expire within 12 months from the balance sheet date. As a result, we expect recurring changes in unrecognized tax benefits due to the expiration of the statute of limitations, none of which are expected to be individually significant. With few exceptions, we are no longer subject to U.S. (including federal, state and local) ornon-U.S. income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before fiscal year 2006.
A number of tax years are under audit by the relevant state andnon-U.S. tax authorities. We anticipate that several of these audits may be concluded in the foreseeable future, including in fiscal year 2011. Based on the status of these audits, it is reasonably possible that the conclusion of the audits may result in a reduction of unrecognized tax benefits. However, it is not possible to estimate the magnitude of any such reduction at this time.
As of December 31, 2010, we had $54,900 of unrecognized tax benefits, all of which would, if recognized, affect our effective tax rate before existing valuation allowance considerations.
We recognize interest accrued on the unrecognized tax benefits in interest expense and penalties on the unrecognized tax benefits in other deductions, net on our consolidated statement of operations. During fiscal year 2010, we recorded net interest expense and net penalties on unrecognized tax benefits of $800 and $1,700, respectively, which included previously accrued interest expense and tax penalties that were ultimately not assessed of $1,900 and $2,000, respectively.
Please refer to Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements in this annual report onForm 10-K for further discussion of our income taxes.
68
| |
| ITEM 7A. | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK |
(amounts in thousands of dollars)
Interest Rate Risk — We are exposed to changes in interest rates should we need to borrow under our U.S. senior secured credit agreement (there were no such borrowings as of December 31, 2010 and, based on current operating plans and cash flow forecasts, none are expected in fiscal year 2011) and, to a limited extent, under our variable rate special-purpose limited recourse project debt for any portion of the debt for which we have not entered into a fixed rate swap agreement. If average market rates are 100-basis points higher in the next twelve months, our interest expense for such period of time would increase, and our income before income taxes would decrease, by approximately $200. This amount has been determined by considering the impact of the hypothetical interest rates on our variable rate borrowings as of December 31, 2010 and does not reflect the impact of interest rate changes on outstanding debt held by certain of our equity interests since such debt is not consolidated on our balance sheet.
Foreign Currency Risk — We operate on a worldwide basis with substantial operations in Europe that subject us to U.S. dollar translation risk on the British pound, Euro and Polish Zloty. In accordance with our company policy, we do not hedge translation risk exposure.
All activities of ournon-U.S. affiliates are recorded in their functional currency, which is typically the local currency in the country of domicile of the affiliate. In the ordinary course of business, our affiliates enter into transactions in currencies other than their respective functional currencies. We seek to minimize the resulting foreign currency transaction risk by contracting for the procurement of goods and services in the same currency as the sales value of the related long-term contract.
We further mitigate the risk through the use of foreign currency forward contracts to hedge the exposed item, such as anticipated purchases or revenues, back to their functional currency. We utilize all such financial instruments solely for hedging, and our company policy prohibits the speculative use of such instruments. However, for financial reporting purposes, these contracts are generally not accounted for as hedges.
The notional amount of foreign currency forward contracts provides one measure of the transaction volume outstanding as of the balance sheet date. As of December 31, 2010, we had a total gross notional amount of approximately $215,700 related to foreign currency forward contracts and the primary currencies movements hedged were the British pound, Euro and U.S. dollar. Amounts ultimately realized upon final settlement of these financial instruments, along with the gains and losses on the underlying exposures within our long-term contracts, will depend on actual market exchange rates during the remaining life of the instruments. The contracts mature between fiscal years 2011 and 2013.
We are exposed to credit loss in the event of non-performance by the counterparties. These counterparties are commercial banks that are primarily rated “BBB+” or better by Standard & Poor’s (or the equivalent by other recognized credit rating agencies).
Please refer to Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements in this annual report onForm 10-K for further information on our primary foreign currency forward exchange contracts.
69
| |
| ITEM 8. | FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA |
Index to Financial Statements
| | | | | |
| | | Page |
| |
| | | 71 | |
| | | 72 | |
| | | 73 | |
| | | 74 | |
| | | 75 | |
| | | 76 | |
| | | 132 | |
70
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Foster Wheeler AG:
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements listed in the accompanying index present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Foster Wheeler AG and its subsidiaries (“the Company”) at December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three fiscal years in the period ended December 31, 2010 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition, in our opinion, the financial statement schedule listed in the accompanying index presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, based on criteria established inInternal Control — Integrated Frameworkissued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s management is responsible for these financial statements and the financial statement schedule, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A of the Company’sForm 10-K. Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements, on the financial statement schedule, and on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our integrated audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Florham Park, New Jersey
February 28, 2011
71
FOSTER WHEELER AG AND SUBSIDIARIES
(in thousands of dollars, except per share amounts)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Fiscal Years | |
| | | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
| |
| Operating revenues | | $ | 4,067,719 | | | $ | 5,056,334 | | | $ | 6,854,290 | |
| Cost of operating revenues | | | 3,468,933 | | | | 4,297,687 | | | | 5,958,644 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Contract profit | | | 598,786 | | | | 758,647 | | | | 895,646 | |
| Selling, general and administrative expenses | | | 303,330 | | | | 294,907 | | | | 283,883 | |
| Other income, net | | | (60,444 | ) | | | (52,263 | ) | | | (53,001 | ) |
| Other deductions, net | | | 41,221 | | | | 30,931 | | | | 54,382 | |
| Interest income | | | (11,581 | ) | | | (10,535 | ) | | | (44,743 | ) |
| Interest expense | | | 15,610 | | | | 14,122 | | | | 17,621 | |
| Net asbestos-related provision | | | 5,410 | | | | 26,365 | | | | 6,607 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Income before income taxes | | | 305,240 | | | | 455,120 | | | | 630,897 | |
| Provision for income taxes | | | 74,531 | | | | 93,762 | | | | 97,028 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net income | | | 230,709 | | | | 361,358 | | | | 533,869 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | | | 15,302 | | | | 11,202 | | | | 7,249 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net income attributable to Foster Wheeler AG | | $ | 215,407 | | | $ | 350,156 | | | $ | 526,620 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Earnings per share (see Note 1): | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Basic | | $ | 1.71 | | | $ | 2.77 | | | $ | 3.73 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Diluted | | $ | 1.70 | | | $ | 2.75 | | | $ | 3.68 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
72
FOSTER WHEELER AG AND SUBSIDIARIES
(in thousands of dollars, except share data and per share amounts)
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | December 31,
| | | December 31,
| |
| | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
| |
ASSETS | | | | | | | | |
Current Assets: | | | | | | | | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 1,057,163 | | | $ | 997,158 | |
| Accounts and notes receivable, net: | | | | | | | | |
| Trade | | | 577,400 | | | | 526,525 | |
| Other | | | 96,758 | | | | 117,718 | |
| Contracts in process | | | 165,389 | | | | 219,774 | |
| Prepaid, deferred and refundable income taxes | | | 51,660 | | | | 46,478 | |
| Other current assets | | | 37,813 | | | | 33,902 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Total current assets | | | 1,986,183 | | | | 1,941,555 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Land, buildings and equipment, net | | | 362,087 | | | | 398,132 | |
| Restricted cash | | | 27,502 | | | | 34,905 | |
| Notes and accounts receivable — long-term | | | 2,648 | | | | 1,571 | |
| Investments in and advances to unconsolidated affiliates | | | 217,071 | | | | 228,030 | |
| Goodwill | | | 88,917 | | | | 88,702 | |
| Other intangible assets, net | | | 66,070 | | | | 73,029 | |
| Asbestos-related insurance recovery receivable | | | 194,570 | | | | 244,265 | |
| Other assets | | | 84,078 | | | | 87,781 | |
| Deferred tax assets | | | 54,413 | | | | 89,768 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
TOTAL ASSETS | | $ | 3,083,539 | | | $ | 3,187,738 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| |
LIABILITIES, TEMPORARY EQUITY AND EQUITY |
Current Liabilities: | | | | | | | | |
| Current installments on long-term debt | | $ | 11,996 | | | $ | 36,930 | |
| Accounts payable | | | 239,071 | | | | 303,436 | |
| Accrued expenses | | | 240,894 | | | | 280,861 | |
| Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts | | | 684,090 | | | | 600,725 | |
| Income taxes payable | | | 34,623 | | | | 60,052 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Total current liabilities | | | 1,210,674 | | | | 1,282,004 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Long-term debt | | | 152,574 | | | | 175,510 | |
| Deferred tax liabilities | | | 65,241 | | | | 62,956 | |
| Pension, postretirement and other employee benefits | | | 166,362 | | | | 270,269 | |
| Asbestos-related liability | | | 307,619 | | | | 352,537 | |
| Other long-term liabilities | | | 160,785 | | | | 171,405 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Commitments and contingencies | | | | | | | | |
TOTAL LIABILITIES | | | 2,063,255 | | | | 2,314,681 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Temporary Equity: | | | | | | | | |
| Non-vested share-based compensation awards subject to redemption | | | 4,935 | | | | 2,570 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
TOTAL TEMPORARY EQUITY | | | 4,935 | | | | 2,570 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Equity: | | | | | | | | |
| Registered shares: | | | | | | | | |
| CHF 3.00 par value; authorized: 192,156,579 shares and 190,649,900 shares, respectively; conditionally authorized: 60,675,249 shares and 62,181,928 shares, respectively; issued: 128,948,622 shares and 127,441,943 shares, respectively; outstanding: 124,635,912 shares and 127,441,943 shares, respectively | | | 334,052 | | | | 329,402 | |
| Paid-in capital | | | 659,739 | | | | 617,938 | |
| Retained earnings | | | 537,588 | | | | 322,181 | |
| Accumulated other comprehensive loss | | | (464,504 | ) | | | (438,004 | ) |
| Treasury shares (outstanding 4,312,710 shares) | | | (99,182 | ) | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | |
TOTAL FOSTER WHEELER AG SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | | 967,693 | | | | 831,517 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Noncontrolling interests | | | 47,656 | | | | 38,970 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
TOTAL EQUITY | | | 1,015,349 | | | | 870,487 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
TOTAL LIABILITIES, TEMPORARY EQUITY AND EQUITY | | $ | 3,083,539 | | | $ | 3,187,738 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
73
FOSTER WHEELER AG AND SUBSIDIARIES
(in thousands of dollars, except share data)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Retained
| | | Accumulated
| | | | | | Total Foster
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Preferred
| | | Common
| | | Registered
| | | | | | Earnings/
| | | Other
| | | Treasury
| | | Wheeler AG
| | | | | | | |
| | | Preferred
| | | Common
| | | Registered
| | | Treasury
| | | Shares
| | | Shares
| | | Shares
| | | Paid-in
| | | (Accumulated
| | | Comprehensive
| | | Shares
| | | Shareholders’
| | | Noncontrolling
| | | Total
| |
| | | Shares | | | Shares | | | Shares | | | Shares | | | Value | | | Value | | | Value | | | Capital | | | Deficit) | | | Loss | | | Value | | | Equity | | | Interests | | | Equity | |
| |
Balance at December 28, 2007 | | | 1,887 | | | | 143,877,804 | | | | — | | | | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,439 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,385,311 | | | $ | (554,595 | ) | | $ | (261,114 | ) | | $ | — | | | $ | 571,041 | | | $ | 31,773 | | | $ | 602,814 | |
| Net income | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 526,620 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 526,620 | | | | 7,249 | | | | 533,869 | |
| Other comprehensive income, net of tax: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Foreign currency translation | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (68,747 | ) | | | — | | | | (68,747 | ) | | | (679 | ) | | | (69,426 | ) |
| Cash flow hedges | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (8,645 | ) | | | — | | | | (8,645 | ) | | | — | | | | (8,645 | ) |
| Pension and other postretirement benefits | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (156,282 | ) | | | — | | | | (156,282 | ) | | | — | | | | (156,282 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Comprehensive Income | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 292,946 | | | | 6,570 | | | | 299,516 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Repurchase and retirement of shares | | | — | | | | (18,098,519 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (181 | ) | | | — | | | | (485,408 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (485,589 | ) | | | — | | | | (485,589 | ) |
| Issuance of common shares upon conversion of preferred shares | | | (808 | ) | | | 105,040 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1 | | | | — | | | | (1 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
| Issuance of common shares upon exercise of share purchase warrants | | | — | | | | 88,762 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1 | | | | — | | | | 413 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 414 | | | | — | | | | 414 | |
| Issuance of common shares upon exercise of stock options | | | — | | | | 142,038 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1 | | | | — | | | | 2,790 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 2,791 | | | | — | | | | 2,791 | |
| Issuance of common shares upon vesting of restricted awards | | | — | | | | 62,486 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1 | | | | — | | | | (1 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
| Distributions to noncontrolling interests | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (9,625 | ) | | | (9,625 | ) |
| Share-based compensation expense -stock options and restricted awards | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 10,909 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 10,909 | | | | — | | | | 10,909 | |
| Excess tax benefit related to share-based compensation | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 50 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 50 | | | | — | | | | 50 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at December 26,2008 | | | 1,079 | | | | 126,177,611 | | | | — | | | | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,262 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 914,063 | | | $ | (27,975 | ) | | $ | (494,788 | ) | | $ | — | | | $ | 392,562 | | | $ | 28,718 | | | $ | 421,280 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net income | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 350,156 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 350,156 | | | | 11,202 | | | | 361,358 | |
| Other comprehensive income, net of tax: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Foreign currency translation | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 29,287 | | | | — | | | | 29,287 | | | | 1,181 | | | | 30,468 | |
| Cash flow hedges | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (1,524 | ) | | | — | | | | (1,524 | ) | | | — | | | | (1,524 | ) |
| Pension and other postretirement benefits | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 29,021 | | | | — | | | | 29,021 | | | | 40 | | | | 29,061 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Comprehensive Income | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 406,940 | | | | 12,423 | | | | 419,363 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Issuance of common shares upon conversion of preferred shares | | | (4 | ) | | | 520 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
| Issuance of common shares upon exercise of share purchase warrants | | | — | | | | 2,021 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 9 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 9 | | | | — | | | | 9 | |
| Issuance of common shares upon vesting of restricted awards | | | — | | | | 97,535 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1 | | | | — | | | | (1 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
| Repurchase and retirement of shares | | | — | | | | (1,575 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (28 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (28 | ) | | | — | | | | (28 | ) |
| Cancellation of common shares and issuance of registered shares | | | — | | | | (126,276,112 | ) | | | 126,276,112 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (1,263 | ) | | | 326,070 | | | | (324,807 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
| Issuance of registered shares upon conversion of preferred shares | | | (1,075 | ) | | | — | | | | 139,802 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 361 | | | | (361 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
| Issuance of registered shares upon exercise of share purchase warrants | | | — | | | | — | | | | 594,280 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1,711 | | | | 1,076 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 2,787 | | | | — | | | | 2,787 | |
| Issuance of registered shares upon exercise of stock options | | | — | | | | — | | | | 65,026 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 189 | | | | 1,322 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1,511 | | | | — | | | | 1,511 | |
| Issuance of registered shares upon vesting of restricted awards | | | — | | | | — | | | | 366,723 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1,071 | | | | (1,071 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
| Distributions to noncontrolling interests | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (2,171 | ) | | | (2,171 | ) |
| Share-based compensation expense -stock options and restricted awards | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 27,797 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 27,797 | | | | — | | | | 27,797 | |
| Excess tax shortfall related to share-based compensation | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (61 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (61 | ) | | | — | | | | (61 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at December 31, 2009 | | | — | | | | — | | | | 127,441,943 | | | | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 329,402 | | | $ | 617,938 | | | $ | 322,181 | | | $ | (438,004 | ) | | $ | — | | | $ | 831,517 | | | $ | 38,970 | | | $ | 870,487 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net income | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 215,407 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 215,407 | | | | 15,302 | | | | 230,709 | |
| Other comprehensive income, net of tax: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Foreign currency translation | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (22,537 | ) | | | — | | | | (22,537 | ) | | | 1,748 | | | | (20,789 | ) |
| Cash flow hedges | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (837 | ) | | | — | | | | (837 | ) | | | — | | | | (837 | ) |
| Pension and other postretirement benefits | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (3,126 | ) | | | — | | | | (3,126 | ) | | | (333 | ) | | | (3,459 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Comprehensive Income | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 188,907 | | | | 16,717 | | | | 205,624 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Issuance of registered shares upon exercise of stock options | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1,185,186 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 3,638 | | | | 22,164 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 25,802 | | | | — | | | | 25,802 | |
| Issuance of registered shares upon vesting of restricted awards | | | — | | | | — | | | | 321,493 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1,012 | | | | (1,012 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
| Distributions to noncontrolling interests | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (8,031 | ) | | | (8,031 | ) |
| Share-based compensation expense -stock options and restricted awards | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 20,631 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 20,631 | | | | — | | | | 20,631 | |
| Excess tax benefit related to share-based compensation | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 18 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 18 | | | | — | | | | 18 | |
| Repurchase of shares | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 4,312,710 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (99,182 | ) | | | (99,182 | ) | | | — | | | | (99,182 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at December 31, 2010 | | | — | | | | — | | | | 128,948,622 | | | | 4,312,710 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 334,052 | | | $ | 659,739 | | | $ | 537,588 | | | $ | (464,504 | ) | | $ | (99,182 | ) | | $ | 967,693 | | | $ | 47,656 | | | $ | 1,015,349 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
74
FOSTER WHEELER AG AND SUBSIDIARIES
(in thousands of dollars)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Fiscal Years | |
| | | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
| |
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net income | | $ | 230,709 | | | $ | 361,358 | | | $ | 533,869 | |
| Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash flows from operating activities: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Depreciation and amortization | | | 54,155 | | | | 45,759 | | | | 44,798 | |
| Gain on curtailment of defined benefit pension plans | | | (19,562 | ) | | | — | | | | — | |
| Gain on repayment of project debt | | | (21,865 | ) | | | (9,914 | ) | | | (9,648 | ) |
| Net asbestos-related provision | | | 15,823 | | | | 27,615 | | | | 42,727 | |
| Share-based compensation expense-stock options and restricted awards | | | 22,996 | | | | 22,781 | | | | 15,766 | |
| Excess tax (benefit)/shortfall related to share-based compensation | | | (18 | ) | | | 61 | | | | (50 | ) |
| Deferred income tax provision/(benefit) | | | 33,241 | | | | 19,681 | | | | (22,883 | ) |
| Loss on sale of assets | | | 316 | | | | 822 | | | | 1,107 | |
| Equity in the net earnings of partially-owned affiliates, net of dividends | | | (8,076 | ) | | | (8,429 | ) | | | (10,352 | ) |
| Other noncash items | | | 1,678 | | | | 5 | | | | 7,346 | |
| Changes in assets and liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (Increase)/decrease in receivables | | | (54,945 | ) | | | 111,558 | | | | (105,591 | ) |
| Net change in contracts in process and billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts | | | 140,756 | | | | (133,058 | ) | | | 15,817 | |
| (Decrease)/increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses | | | (91,111 | ) | | | (105,193 | ) | | | 35,509 | |
| Decrease in income taxes payable | | | (31,200 | ) | | | (1,389 | ) | | | (778 | ) |
| Decrease in pension, postretirement and other employee benefits | | | (89,498 | ) | | | (33,031 | ) | | | (89,364 | ) |
| Net change in asbestos-related assets and liabilities | | | (718 | ) | | | (25,639 | ) | | | (19,362 | ) |
| Net change in other assets and liabilities | | | (4,013 | ) | | | 17,628 | | | | (9,985 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net cash provided by operating activities | | | 178,668 | | | | 290,615 | | | | 428,926 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Payments related to acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired | | | (4,191 | ) | | | (32,619 | ) | | | (14,856 | ) |
| Change in restricted cash | | | 6,017 | | | | (11,892 | ) | | | (2,800 | ) |
| Capital expenditures | | | (23,278 | ) | | | (45,623 | ) | | | (103,965 | ) |
| Proceeds from sale of investments and other assets | | | 5,087 | | | | 1,117 | | | | 831 | |
| Investments in and advances to unconsolidated affiliates | | | — | | | | (911 | ) | | | (7,620 | ) |
| Return of investment from unconsolidated affiliates | | | 3,232 | | | | — | | | | 2,330 | |
| Decrease/(increase) in short-term investments | | | 19 | | | | 2,663 | | | | (2,504 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net cash used in investing activities | | | (13,114 | ) | | | (87,265 | ) | | | (128,584 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Repurchase of shares | | | (99,182 | ) | | | (28 | ) | | | (485,589 | ) |
| Distributions to noncontrolling interests | | | (8,031 | ) | | | (2,171 | ) | | | (9,625 | ) |
| Proceeds from share purchase warrants exercised | | | — | | | | 2,796 | | | | 414 | |
| Proceeds from stock options exercised | | | 25,748 | | | | 546 | | | | 2,791 | |
| Excess tax benefit/(shortfall) related to share-based compensation | | | 18 | | | | (61 | ) | | | 50 | |
| Payment of deferred financing costs | | | (4,504 | ) | | | — | | | | — | |
| Proceeds from issuance of short-term debt | | | 2,197 | | | | 5,852 | | | | 3,658 | |
| Repayment of short-term debt | | | (5,185 | ) | | | (6,583 | ) | | | — | |
| Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt | | | — | | | | 7,238 | | | | 50,939 | |
| Repayment of long-term debt and capital lease obligations | | | (11,555 | ) | | | (6,133 | ) | | | (28,742 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net cash(used in)/provided by financing activities | | | (100,494 | ) | | | 1,456 | | | | (466,104 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents | | | (5,055 | ) | | | 19,189 | | | | (109,619 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
INCREASE/(DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS | | | 60,005 | | | | 223,995 | | | | (275,381 | ) |
| Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year | | | 997,158 | | | | 773,163 | | | | 1,048,544 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF YEAR | | $ | 1,057,163 | | | $ | 997,158 | | | $ | 773,163 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Cash paid during the year for: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Interest (net of amount capitalized) | | $ | 13,861 | | | $ | 14,856 | | | $ | 13,436 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Income taxes | | $ | 76,635 | | | $ | 86,685 | | | $ | 130,147 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
75
FOSTER WHEELER AG AND SUBSIDIARIES
(amounts in thousands of dollars, except share data and per share amounts)
| |
| 1. | Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
Basis of Presentation —At a special court-ordered meeting of common shareholders held on January 27, 2009, the common shareholders of Foster Wheeler Ltd. approved a scheme of arrangement under Bermuda law. On February 9, 2009, after receipt of the approval of the scheme of arrangement by the Supreme Court of Bermuda and the satisfaction of certain other conditions, the transactions contemplated by the scheme of arrangement were effected. Pursuant to the scheme of arrangement, among other things, all previously outstanding whole common shares of Foster Wheeler Ltd. were cancelled and the common shareholders of Foster Wheeler Ltd. became common shareholders of Foster Wheeler AG, a Swiss corporation, and Foster Wheeler Ltd. became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Foster Wheeler AG, a holding company that owns the stock of its various subsidiary companies. The steps of the scheme of arrangement together with certain related transactions, which are collectively referred to throughout the Notes to the consolidated financial statements as the “Redomestication,” effectively changed our place of incorporation from Bermuda to the Canton of Zug, Switzerland. In January 2010, we relocated our principal executive offices to Geneva, Switzerland. Please see Note 18 for further information related to the Redomestication.
The fiscal year of Foster Wheeler AG ends on December 31 of each calendar year. Foster Wheeler AG’s fiscal quarters end on the last day of March, June and September. The fiscal years of ournon-U.S. operations are the same as the parent’s. The fiscal year of Foster Wheeler Ltd., the parent company prior to the Redomestication, was the 52- or 53-week annual accounting period ending the last Friday in December and ended on December 26, 2008 for fiscal year 2008. The fiscal year of our U.S. operations is the 52- or 53-week annual accounting period ending on the last Friday in December.
Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.
Principles of Consolidation — The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Foster Wheeler AG and all significant U.S. andnon-U.S. subsidiaries as well as certain entities in which we have a controlling interest. Intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued authoritative guidance to amend the manner in which entities evaluate whether consolidation is required for variable interest entities (“VIE”). The model for determining which enterprise has a controlling financial interest and is the primary beneficiary of a VIE has changed under the new guidance. Furthermore, the new guidance requires an ongoing reconsideration of the primary beneficiary and also amends the events that trigger a reassessment of whether an entity is a VIE. This revised guidance also requires enhanced disclosures about how a company’s involvement with a VIE affects its financial statements and exposure to risks. This guidance, which became effective for us on January 1, 2010, did not result in any change to the entities previously included in our consolidated financial statements.
Capital Alterations — See above“— Basis of Presentation”and Note 18 for further information related to the Redomestication.
Use of Estimates — The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and revenues and expenses during the periods reported. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Changes in estimates are reflected in the periods in which they become known. Significant estimates are used in accounting for long-term contracts including estimates of total costs, progress toward completion and customer and vendor claims, employee benefit plan obligations and share-based compensation plans. In addition, we also use estimates when accounting for uncertain tax positions and deferred taxes, asbestos liabilities and expected recoveries and when assessing goodwill for impairment, among others.
76
FOSTER WHEELER AG AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(amounts in thousands of dollars, except share data and per share amounts)
| |
| 1. | Summary of Significant Accounting Policies — (Continued) |
Revenue Recognition on Long-Term Contracts — Revenues and profits on long-term contracts are recorded under thepercentage-of-completion method.
Progress towards completion on fixed-price contracts is measured based on physical completion of individual tasks for all contracts with a value of $5,000 or greater. For contracts with a value less than $5,000, progress toward completion is measured based on the ratio of costs incurred to total estimated contract costs (thecost-to-cost method).
Progress towards completion on cost-reimbursable contracts is measured based on the ratio of quantities expended to total forecasted quantities, typicallyman-hours. Incentives are also recognized on apercentage-of-completion basis when the realization of an incentive is assessed as probable. We include flow-through costs consisting of materials, equipment or subcontractor services as both operating revenues and cost of operating revenues on cost-reimbursable contracts when we have overall responsibility as the contractor for the engineering specifications and procurement or procurement services for such costs. There is no contract profit impact of flow-through costs as they are included in both operating revenues and cost of operating revenues.
Contracts in process are stated at cost, increased for profits recorded on the completed effort, less billings to the customer and progress payments on uncompleted contracts. A full provision for loss contracts is made at the time the loss becomes probable regardless of the stage of completion.
At any point, we have numerous contracts in progress, all of which are at various stages of completion. Accounting for revenues and profits on long-term contracts requires estimates of total estimated contract costs and estimates of progress toward completion to determine the extent of revenue and profit recognition. These estimates may be revised as additional information becomes available or as specific project circumstances change. We review all of our material contracts on a monthly basis and revise our estimates as appropriate for developments such as earning project incentive bonuses, incurring or expecting to incur contractual liquidated damages for performance or schedule issues, providing services and purchasing third-party materials and equipment at costs differing from those previously estimated and testing completed facilities, which, in turn, eliminates or confirms completion and warranty-related costs. Project incentives are recognized when it is probable they will be earned. Project incentives are frequently tied to cost, scheduleand/or safety targets and, therefore, tend to be earned late in a project’s life cycle.
Changes in estimated final contract revenues and costs can either increase or decrease the final estimated contract profit. In the period in which a change in estimate is recognized, the cumulative impact of that change is recorded based on progress achieved through the period of change. The following table summarizes the number of separate projects that experienced final estimated contract profit revisions with an impact on contract profit in excess of $1,000 relating to the revaluation of work performed in prior periods:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Fiscal Years |
| | | 2010 | | 2009 | | 2008 |
| |
| Number of separate projects | | | 46 | | | | 43 | | | | 33 | |
| Net increase in contract profit from the regular revaluation of final estimated contract profit revisions | | $ | 56,800 | | | $ | 69,000 | | | $ | 26,700 | |
The changes in fiscal year 2009 included $24,300 for positive settlements on two projects in our Global Engineering and Construction Group (“Global E&C Group”) business segment, of which $14,800 was associated with the receipt of a payment on a long-outstanding arbitration award.
Please see Note 14 for further information related to changes in final estimated contract profit and the impact on business segment results.
77
FOSTER WHEELER AG AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(amounts in thousands of dollars, except share data and per share amounts)
| |
| 1. | Summary of Significant Accounting Policies — (Continued) |
Claims are amounts in excess of the agreed contract price (or amounts not included in the original contract price) that we seek to collect from customers or others for delays, errors in specifications and designs, contract terminations, disputed or unapproved change orders as to both scope and price or other causes of unanticipated additional costs. We record claims as additional contract revenue if it is probable that the claims will result in additional contract revenue and if the amount can be reliably estimated. These two requirements are satisfied by the existence of all of the following conditions: the contract or other evidence provides a legal basis for the claim; additional costs are caused by circumstances that were unforeseen at the contract date and are not the result of deficiencies in our performance; costs associated with the claim are identifiable or otherwise determinable and are reasonable in view of the work performed; and the evidence supporting the claim is objective and verifiable. If such requirements are met, revenue from a claim may be recorded only to the extent that contract costs relating to the claim have been incurred. Costs attributable to claims are treated as costs of contract performance as incurred and are recorded in contracts in process. Our consolidated financial statements included the following regarding commercial claims:
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | December 31, 2010 | | December 31, 2009 |
| |
| Assumed recovery of commercial claims | | $ | 7,300 | | | $ | 18,700 | |
| Claims yet to be expended | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,200 | |
In certain circumstances, we may defer pre-contract costs when it is probable that these costs will be recovered under a future contract. Such deferred costs would then be included in contract costs upon execution of the anticipated contract. Deferred pre-contract costs were immaterial as of December 31, 2010 and 2009.
Certain special-purpose subsidiaries in our Global Power Group business segment are reimbursed by customers for their costs of building and operating certain facilities over the lives of the corresponding service contracts. Depending on the specific legal rights and obligations under these arrangements, in some cases those reimbursements are treated as operating revenues at gross value and other cases as a reduction of cost.
Cash and Cash Equivalents — Cash and cash equivalents include highly liquid short-term investments with original maturities of three months or less at the date of acquisition. We are dependent on cash repatriations to cover essentially all payments and expenses of our holding company and principal executive offices in Switzerland, to cover cash needs related to our asbestos related liability and other overhead expenses in the U.S. and, at our discretion, the acquisition of our shares under our share repurchase program. Cash and cash equivalents of $824,938 and $772,565 were held by ournon-U.S. entities as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. These entities require a portion of these funds to support their liquidity and working capital needs, as well as to comply with required minimum capitalization requirements and, in some cases, contractual restrictions. Accordingly, a portion of these funds may not be readily available for repatriation to our entities in Switzerland or the U.S.
Trade Accounts Receivable — Trade accounts receivable represent amounts billed to customers. In accordance with terms under our long-term contracts, our customers may withhold certain percentages of such billings until completion and acceptance of the work performed, which we refer to as retention receivables. Final payment of retention receivables might not be received within a one-year period. In conformity with industry practice, however, the full amount of accounts receivable, including such amounts withheld, are included in current assets on the consolidated balance sheet. Please see Note 3 for more detailed information regarding our retention receivable balances.
Trade accounts receivable are continually evaluated for collectibility. Provisions are established on a project-specific basis when there is an issue associated with the client’s ability to make payments or there are circumstances where the client is not making payment due to contractual issues.
78
FOSTER WHEELER AG AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(amounts in thousands of dollars, except share data and per share amounts)
| |
| 1. | Summary of Significant Accounting Policies — (Continued) |
Contracts in Process and Billings in Excess of Costs and Estimated Earnings on Uncompleted Contracts — Under long-term contracts, amounts recorded in contracts in process and billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts may not be realized or paid, respectively, within a one-year period. In conformity with relevant industry accounting standards, however, the full amount of contracts in process and billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts is included in current assets and current liabilities, respectively on the consolidated balance sheet.
Inventories — Inventories, principally materials and supplies, are stated at the lower of cost or market, determined primarily on the average-cost method. We had inventories of $11,255 and $9,636 as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Such amounts are recorded within other current assets on the consolidated balance sheet.
Land, Buildings and Equipment — Depreciation is computed on a straight-line basis using estimated lives ranging from 10 to 50 years for buildings and from 3 to 35 years for equipment. Depreciation expense is allocated to cost of operating revenues or selling, general and administrative expenses based on the manner in which the underlying assets are deployed. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. Renewals and betterments are capitalized. Upon retirement or other disposition of fixed assets, the cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and the resulting gains or losses, if any, are reflected in earnings.
Restricted Cash — The following table details our restricted cash balances held by our entities:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | December 31, 2010 | | | December 31, 2009 | |
| | | Non-U.S. | | | U.S. | | | Total | | | Non-U.S. | | | U.S. | | | Total | |
| |
| Held by special-purpose entities and restricted for debt service payments | | $ | 6,685 | | | $ | 269 | | | $ | 6,954 | | | $ | 15,613 | | | $ | 267 | | | $ | 15,880 | |
| Held to collateralize letters of credit and bank guarantees | | | 9,720 | | | | — | | | | 9,720 | | | | 5,280 | | | | — | | | | 5,280 | |
| Client dedicated accounts | | | 8,140 | | | | 2,688 | | | | 10,828 | | | | 13,340 | | | | 405 | | | | 13,745 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total | | $ | 24,545 | | | $ | 2,957 | | | $ | 27,502 | | | $ | 34,233 | | | $ | 672 | | | $ | 34,905 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | �� | | |
Investments in and Advances to Unconsolidated Affiliates — We use the equity method of accounting for affiliates in which our investment ownership ranges from 20% to 50% unless significant economic or governance considerations indicate that we are unable to exert significant influence in which case the cost method is used. The equity method is also used for affiliates in which our investment ownership is greater than 50% but we do not have a controlling interest. Currently, all of our investments in affiliates in which our investment ownership is 20% or greater and that are not consolidated are recorded using the equity method. Affiliates in which our investment ownership is less than 20% are carried at cost.
Variable Interest Entities — We sometimes form separate legal entities such as corporations, partnerships and limited liability companies in connection with the execution of a single contract or project. Upon formation of each separate legal entity, we perform an evaluation to determine whether the new entity is a VIE, and whether we are the primary beneficiary of the new entity, which would require us to consolidate the new entity in our financial results. We reassess our initial determination on whether the entity is a VIE upon the occurrence of certain events and whether we are the primary beneficiary as outlined in current accounting guidelines. If the entity is not a VIE, we determine the accounting for the entity under the voting interest accounting guidelines.
79
FOSTER WHEELER AG AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(amounts in thousands of dollars, except share data and per share amounts)
| |
| 1. | Summary of Significant Accounting Policies — (Continued) |
An entity is determined to be a VIE if either (a) the total equity investment is not sufficient for the entity to finance its own activities without additional subordinated financial support, (b) characteristics of a controlling financial interest are missing (such as the ability to make decisions through voting or other rights or the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits), or (c) the voting rights of the equity holders are not proportional to their obligations to absorb losses of the entityand/or their rights to receive benefits of the entity, and substantially all of the entity’s activities either involve or are conducted on behalf of an investor that has disproportionately few voting rights.
As of December 31, 2010, we participated in certain entities determined to be VIEs, including a gas-fired cogeneration facility in Martinez, California, awaste-to-energy facility in Camden, New Jersey and a refinery/electric power generation project in Chile. We consolidate the operations of both the Martinez and Camden projects while we record our participation in the Chile based project on the equity method of accounting.
Please see Note 5 for further information regarding our participation in these projects.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets — Goodwill is allocated to our reporting units on a relative fair value basis at the time of the original purchase price allocation. Other intangible assets consist principally of patents, trademarks, customer relationships, pipeline, and backlog. Patents and trademarks are amortized on a straight-line basis over periods of 3 to 40 years. Customer relationships, pipeline and backlog are amortized on a straight-line basis over periods of 1 to 13 years.
We test goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level, which is defined as the components one level below our operating segments, as these components constitute businesses for which discrete financial information is available and segment management regularly reviews the operating results of those components. Presently, goodwill exists in two of our reporting units - one within our Global Power Group business segment and one within our Global E&C Group business segment.
The goodwill impairment test is a two-step process. The first step of the goodwill impairment test, used to identify potential impairment, compares the fair value of the reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the fair value exceeds the carrying amount, goodwill is not considered impaired. If the carrying amount exceeds the fair value, the second step must be performed to measure the amount of the impairment loss, if any. The second step compares the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. In the fourth quarter of each fiscal year, we evaluate goodwill at each reporting unit to assess recoverability, and impairments, if any, are recognized in earnings. An impairment loss would be recognized in an amount equal to the excess of the carrying amount of the goodwill over the implied fair value of the goodwill. As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, the estimated fair value of each of the reporting units was sufficiently in excess of its carrying values even after conducting various sensitivity analyses on key assumptions, such that no adjustment to the carrying values of goodwill was required.
Intangible assets with determinable useful lives are amortized over their respective estimated useful lives and reviewed for impairment together with other tangible long-lived assets whenever events or circumstances indicate that an impairment may exist.
Income Taxes — Deferred tax assets/liabilities are established for the difference between the financial reporting and income tax basis of assets and liabilities, as well as for operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws and rates on the date of enactment.
Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. In evaluating our ability to realize our deferred tax assets within the various tax jurisdictions in which they arise, we consider all
80
FOSTER WHEELER AG AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(amounts in thousands of dollars, except share data and per share amounts)
| |
| 1. | Summary of Significant Accounting Policies — (Continued) |
available positive and negative evidence, including scheduled reversals of taxable temporary differences, projected future taxable income, tax planning strategies and recent financial performance. Projecting future taxable income requires significant assumptions about future operating results, as well as the timing and character of taxable income in numerous jurisdictions.
We do not make a provision for incremental income taxes on subsidiary earnings, which have been retained in the subsidiary’s country of domicile, if we expect such earnings to be indefinitely reinvested in that jurisdiction. Unremitted earnings of our subsidiaries, that have been, or are intended to be, permanently reinvested (and for which no incremental income tax has been provided) aggregated $383,800 as of December 31, 2010. It is not practicable to estimate the additional tax that would be incurred, if any, if these amounts were repatriated.
We recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position are based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement.
We recognize interest accrued on the potential tax liability related to unrecognized tax benefits in interest expense, and we recognize any potential penalties in other deductions, net on our consolidated statement of operations.
Foreign Currency — The functional currency of Foster Wheeler AG is the U.S. dollar. The functional currency of ournon-U.S. operations is typically the local currency of their country of domicile. Assets and liabilities ofnon-U.S. entities are translated into U.S. dollars, our reporting currency, at period-end exchange rates with the resulting translation adjustment recorded as a separate component within accumulated other comprehensive loss. Income and expense accounts and cash flows are translated at weighted-average exchange rates for the period.
Transaction gains and losses that arise from exchange rate fluctuations on transactions denominated in a currency other than the functional currency are included in other deductions, net on our consolidated statement of operations. The net balance of our foreign currency transaction gains and losses for fiscal years 2010, 2009 and 2008 were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Fiscal Years | |
| | | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
| |
| Net foreign currency transaction gains/(losses) | | $ | (5,778 | ) | | $ | 979 | | | $ | (16,543 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net foreign currency transaction gains/(losses), net of tax | | $ | (4,367 | ) | | $ | 780 | | | $ | (10,753 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fair Value Measurements — Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification, or FASB ASC,820-10 defines fair value, establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value and provides guidance on required disclosures about fair value measurements. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs.
Our financial assets and liabilities that are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis consist primarily of the assets or liabilities arising from derivative financial instruments and defined benefit pension plan assets. See Note 10 for further information regarding our derivative financial instruments and Note 8 for further information regarding our defined benefit pension plan assets.
81
FOSTER WHEELER AG AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(amounts in thousands of dollars, except share data and per share amounts)
| |
| 1. | Summary of Significant Accounting Policies — (Continued) |
The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate fair value:
Financial instruments valued independent of the fair value hierarchy:
| | |
| | • | Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash — The carrying value of our cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash approximates fair value because of the demand nature of many of our deposits or short-term maturity of these instruments. |
Financial instruments valued within the fair value hierarchy:
| | |
| | • | Long-term Debt — We estimate the fair value of our long-term debt (including current installments) based on the quoted market prices for the same or similar issues or on the current rates offered for debt of the same remaining maturities using level 2 inputs. |
| |
| | • | Foreign Currency Forward Contracts — We estimate the fair value of foreign currency forward contracts by obtaining quotes from financial institutions or market transactions in either the listed orover-the-counter markets, which we further corroborate with observable market data using level 2 inputs. |
| |
| | • | Interest Rate Swaps — We estimate the fair value of our interest rate swaps based on quotes obtained from financial institutions, which we further corroborate with observable market data using level 2 inputs. |
| |
| | • | Defined Benefit Pension Plan Assets — In accordance with current accounting guidance, our valuations include the use of net asset values for commingled fund assets. For other defined benefit pension plan assets, we estimate the fair value at each fiscal year end based on quotes obtained from financial institutions. We further corroborate the above valuations with observable market data using level 1 and 2 inputs. |
External Legal Fees — External legal fees are expensed as incurred and recorded in other deductions, net on our consolidated statement of operations with the exception of external legal fees associated with asbestos defense costs (please refer to Note 16 for further information related to our accounting for asbestos defense costs). We incurred external legal fees, excluding asbestos defense costs, of $17,800, $16,400, and $23,100 for fiscal years 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively, which include external legal fees related to project claims.
Restrictions on Shareholders’ Dividends — We have not declared or paid a cash dividend since July 2001 and we do not have any plans to declare or pay any cash dividends. Our current U.S. senior secured credit agreement contains limitations on cash dividend payments.
Retirement of Shares under Share Repurchase Program — On September 12, 2008, we announced a share repurchase program pursuant to which our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $750,000 of our outstanding shares and the designation of the repurchased shares for cancellation. On November 4, 2010, our Board of Directors proposed an increase to our share repurchase program of $335,000 and the designation of the repurchased shares for cancellation, which was approved by our shareholders at an extraordinary general meeting on February 24, 2011.
Under Swiss law, the cancellation of shares previously repurchased under our share repurchase program must be approved by our shareholders. Repurchased shares remain as treasury shares on our balance sheet until cancellation. We expect to seek specific shareholder approval for the cancellation of all treasury shares as of December 31, 2010 and amend our Articles of Association to reduce our share capital accordingly at our 2011 annual general meeting of shareholders. Based on the aggregate share repurchases under our program
82
FOSTER WHEELER AG AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(amounts in thousands of dollars, except share data and per share amounts)
| |
| 1. | Summary of Significant Accounting Policies — (Continued) |
through December 31, 2010, we are authorized to repurchase up to an additional $500,591 of our outstanding shares.
Any repurchases will be made at our discretion in compliance with applicable securities laws and other legal requirements and will depend on a variety of factors, including market conditions, share price and other factors. The program does not obligate us to acquire any particular number of shares. The program has no expiration date and may be suspended or discontinued at any time.
All treasury shares are carried at cost on the consolidated balance sheet until the cancellation of the shares has been approved by our shareholders and the cancellation is registered with the commercial register of the Canton of Zug in Switzerland. Upon the effectiveness of the cancellation of the shares, the cost of the shares cancelled will be removed from treasury shares, on the consolidated balance sheet, the par value of the cancelled shares will be removed from registered shares, on the consolidated balance sheet, and the excess of the cost of the treasury shares above par value will be removed from paid-in capital, on the consolidated balance sheet.
Once repurchased, treasury shares are no longer considered outstanding, which results in a reduction to the weighted-average number of shares outstanding during the reporting period when calculating earnings per share, as described below.
Earnings per Share — Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income attributable to Foster Wheeler AG by the weighted-average number of shares outstanding during the reporting period, excluding non-vested restricted shares. There were no non-vested restricted shares as of December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, and 82,980 non-vested restricted shares as of December 26, 2008. Restricted shares and restricted share units (collectively, “restricted awards”) are included in the weighted-average number of shares outstanding when such restricted awards vest.
Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing net income attributable to Foster Wheeler AG by the combination of the weighted-average number of shares outstanding during the reporting period and the impact of dilutive securities, if any, such as outstanding stock options, warrants to purchase shares and the non-vested portion of restricted awards to the extent such securities are dilutive. Our previously outstanding warrants are included in the earnings per share calculation for fiscal years 2009 and 2008. The remaining warrants expired on October 2, 2009.
In profitable periods, outstanding stock options and warrants have a dilutive effect under the treasury stock method when the average share price for the period exceeds the assumed proceeds from the exercise of the option or warrant. The assumed proceeds include the exercise price, compensation cost, if any, for future service that has not yet been recognized in the consolidated statement of operations, and any tax benefits that would be recorded in paid-in capital when the option or warrant is exercised. Under the treasury stock method, the assumed proceeds are assumed to be used to repurchase shares in the current period. The dilutive impact of the non-vested portion of restricted awards is determined using the treasury stock method, but the proceeds include only the unrecognized compensation cost and tax benefits as assumed proceeds.
83
FOSTER WHEELER AG AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(amounts in thousands of dollars, except share data and per share amounts)
| |
| 1. | Summary of Significant Accounting Policies — (Continued) |
The computations of basic and diluted earnings per share were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Fiscal Years | |
| | | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
| |
Basic earnings per share: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net income attributable to Foster Wheeler AG | | $ | 215,407 | | | $ | 350,156 | | | $ | 526,620 | |
| Weighted-average number of shares outstanding for basic earnings per share | | | 126,032,130 | | | | 126,541,962 | | | | 141,149,590 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Basic earnings per share | | $ | 1.71 | | | $ | 2.77 | | | $ | 3.73 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Diluted earnings per share: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net income attributable to Foster Wheeler AG | | $ | 215,407 | | | $ | 350,156 | | | $ | 526,620 | |
| Weighted-average number of shares outstanding for basic earnings per share | | | 126,032,130 | | | | 126,541,962 | | | | 141,149,590 | |
| Effect of dilutive securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Options to purchase shares | | | 236,363 | | | | 124,602 | | | | 1,228,170 | |
| Warrants to purchase shares | | | — | | | | 355,472 | | | | 574,591 | |
| Non-vested portion of restricted awards | | | 308,362 | | | | 152,575 | | | | 151,679 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Weighted-average number of shares outstanding for diluted earnings per share | | | 126,576,855 | | | | 127,174,611 | | | | 143,104,030 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Diluted earnings per share | | $ | 1.70 | | | $ | 2.75 | | | $ | 3.68 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The following table summarizes options not included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share as the exercise price of those options was greater than the average share price for the period, which would result in an antidilutive effect on diluted earnings per share:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Fiscal Years | |
| | | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
| |
| Options not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share | | | 2,141,454 | | | | 2,802,193 | | | | 522,566 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
In December 2010, we acquired the assets of a proprietary sulfur recovery technology business for $1,000. The sulfur recovery technology is used to treat gas streams containing hydrogen sulfide for the purpose of reducing the sulfur content of fuel products and to recover a saleable sulfur by-product. The acquisition includes patents, know-how and skilled personnel. The purchase price allocation and pro forma information for this acquisition were not material to our consolidated financial statements. This company’s financial results are included within our Global E&C Group business segment.
In October 2009, we acquired substantially all of the assets of the Houston operations of Atlas Engineering, Inc., a privately held company, for a purchase price of approximately $21,000. The purchase price may be increased by an estimated $12,000 for contingent consideration depending on the acquired company’s EBITDA, as defined in the purchase agreement for this transaction, over the first three years after the closing date. The estimated fair value of the contingent consideration liability on our consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2010 was $6,625. The acquired company is active in upstream oil and gas engineering services. The purchase price allocation and pro forma information for this acquisition were not
84
FOSTER WHEELER AG AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(amounts in thousands of dollars, except share data and per share amounts)
| |
| 2. | Business Combinations — (Continued) |
material to our consolidated financial statements. This company’s financial results are included within our Global E&C Group business segment.
In April 2009, we acquired substantially all of the assets of the offshore engineering division of OPE Holdings Ltd., a Canadian company that is listed on the TSX Venture Exchange and which we refer to as OPE, for a purchase price of approximately $8,900. The acquired company is active in upstream oil and gas engineering services. The purchase price allocation and pro forma information for this acquisition were not material to our consolidated financial statements. This company’s financial results are included within our Global E&C Group business segment.
In July 2008, we acquired the majority of the assets and work force of an engineering design company. Purchase consideration payments since the acquisition totaled $8,000, which includes performance milestones that were achieved. This company, which has an engineering center in Kolkata, India, provides engineering services to the petrochemical, refining, upstream oil and gas and power industries. The purchase price allocation and pro forma information for this acquisition were not material to our consolidated financial statements. This company’s financial results are included within our Global E&C Group business segment.
In February 2008, we acquired all of the outstanding capital stock of a biopharmaceutical engineering company, based in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Purchase consideration payments since the acquisition totaled $12,207, plus up to an additional $8,700 to be paid if certain performance milestones are met over the following three years. This company provides design, engineering, manufacture, installation, validation and startup/commissioning services to the life sciences industry. The purchase price allocation and pro forma information for this acquisition were not material to our consolidated financial statements. This company’s financial results are included within our Global E&C Group business segment.
| |
| 3. | Accounts and Notes Receivable, net |
The following table shows the components of trade accounts and notes receivable:
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | December 31,
| | | December 31,
| |
| | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
| |
| From long-term contracts: | | | | | | | | |
| Amounts billed due within: | | | | | | | | |
| One year | | $ | 544,225 | | | $ | 492,391 | |
| Two years | | | 1,264 | | | | 169 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Total receivables from long-term contracts | | | 545,489 | | | | 492,560 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Retention receivables: | | | | | | | | |
| Estimated to be due in: | | | | | | | | |
| One year | | | 39,299 | | | | 33,857 | |
| Two years | | | 2,600 | | | | 10,957 | |
| Three years and thereafter | | | 5,731 | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Total retention receivables | | | 47,630 | | | | 44,814 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Trade accounts and notes receivable, gross | | | 593,119 | | | | 537,374 | |
| Less: Allowance for doubtful accounts | | | (15,719 | ) | | | (10,849 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Trade accounts and notes receivable, net | | $ | 577,400 | | | $ | 526,525 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
85
FOSTER WHEELER AG AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(amounts in thousands of dollars, except share data and per share amounts)
| |
| 3. | Accounts and Notes Receivable, net — (Continued) |
We have not recorded a provision for the outstanding retention receivable balances as of December 31, 2010 and 2009.
The following table shows the components of other accounts and notes receivable, net:
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | December 31,
| | | December 31,
| |
| | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
| |
| Asbestos insurance receivable | | $ | 56,377 | | | $ | 69,007 | |
| Foreign refundable value-added tax | | | 18,094 | | | | 23,397 | |
| Other | | | 22,287 | | | | 25,314 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Other accounts and notes receivable, net | | $ | 96,758 | | | $ | 117,718 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| |
| 4. | Land, Buildings and Equipment |
Land, buildings and equipment are stated at cost and are set forth below:
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | December 31,
| | | December 31,
| |
| | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
| |
| Land and land improvements | | $ | 18,183 | | | $ | 18,226 | |
| Buildings | | | 293,223 | | | | 300,345 | |
| Furniture, fixtures and equipment | | | 496,004 | | | | 507,280 | |
| Construction in progress | | | 3,168 | | | | 2,004 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Land, buildings and equipment, gross | | | 810,578 | | | | 827,855 | |
| Less: Accumulated depreciation | | | (448,491 | ) | | | (429,723 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Land, buildings and equipment, net | | $ | 362,087 | | | $ | 398,132 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation expense for fiscal years 2010, 2009 and 2008 was $46,833, $39,357 and $39,271, respectively.
We own certain office and manufacturing facilities in Finland that contain asbestos. We are required to remove the asbestos from such facilities if such facilities are significantly renovated or demolished. At present, there are no plans to undertake a major renovation that would require the removal of the asbestos or the demolition of the facilities. We do not have sufficient information to estimate the fair value of the asset retirement obligation because the settlement date or the range of potential settlement dates has not been specified and information is not currently available to apply an expected present value technique. We will recognize a liability in the period in which sufficient information is available to reasonably estimate the fair value of the asset retirement obligation.
Investment in Unconsolidated Affiliates
We own a noncontrolling interest in two electric power generation projects, onewaste-to-energy project and one wind farm project in Italy and in a refinery/electric power generation project in Chile. We also own a 50% noncontrolling interest in a project based in Italy which generates earnings from royalty payments linked to the price of natural gas. Based on the outstanding equity interests of these entities, we own 41.65% of each of the two electric power generation projects in Italy, 39% of thewaste-to-energy project and 50% of the wind farm project. We have a notional 85% equity interest in the project in Chile; however, we are not the primary
86
FOSTER WHEELER AG AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(amounts in thousands of dollars, except share data and per share amounts)
| |
| 5. | Investments — (Continued) |
beneficiary as a result of participating rights held by the minority shareholder. In determining that we are not the primary beneficiary, we considered the minority shareholder’s right to approve activities of the project that most significantly impact the project’s economic performance which include the right to approve or reject the annual financial (capital and operating) budget and the annual operating plan, the right to approve or reject the appointment of the general manager and senior management, and approval rights with respect to capital expenditures beyond those included in the annual budget.
On February 27, 2010, an earthquake occurred off the coast of Chile that caused significant damage to our unconsolidated affiliate’s plant in Chile. The project’s facility suspended normal operating activities on that date. Subsequent to that date, our unconsolidated affiliate filed a claim with their insurance carrier. A preliminary assessment of the extent of the damage was completed and an estimate of the required cost of repairs was developed. Based on the assessment and cost estimate, as well as correspondence received from the insurance carrier, we expect the property damage insurance recovery to be sufficient to cover the estimated costs of repairing the facility. The insurance carrier also provided a preliminary assessment of the business interruption insurance recovery due to the project, and continues to advance insurance proceeds against this assessment. Based on this assessment, we expect the business interruption insurance recovery to substantially compensate the project for the loss of profits while the facility has suspended normal operating activities. Normal operating activities are anticipated to resume in late first quarter 2011.
The summarized financial information presented below for the Chile based project includes an estimated recovery under a property damage insurance policy sufficient to cover the costs that have been incurred to date to repair the facility and an estimated recovery under a business interruption insurance policy for fixed costs along with an estimated recovery for lost profits for the period from the suspension of the facility’s operations on February 27, 2010 through December 31, 2010.
We account for these investments in Italy and Chile under the equity method. The following is summarized financial information for these entities (each as a whole) based on where the projects are located:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | December 31, 2010 | | December 31, 2009 |
| | | Italy | | Chile | | Italy | | Chile |
| |
Balance Sheet Data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Current assets | | $ | 396,512 | | | $ | 70,381 | | | $ | 325,688 | | | $ | 46,311 | |
| Other assets (primarily buildings and equipment) | | | 395,264 | | | | 117,779 | | | | 644,344 | | | | 127,393 | |
| Current liabilities | | | 202,658 | | | | 43,909 | | | | 173,593 | | | | 40,444 | |
| Other liabilities (primarily long-term debt) | | | 275,466 | | | | 50,132 | | | | 440,942 | | | | 63,109 | |
| Net assets | | | 313,652 | | | | 94,119 | | | | 355,497 | | | | 70,151 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Fiscal Years |
| | | 2010 | | 2009 | | 2008 |
| | | Italy | | Chile | | Italy | | Chile | | Italy | | Chile |
| |
Income Statement Data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total revenues | | $ | 520,907 | | | $ | 48,337 | | | $ | 361,797 | | | $ | 63,330 | | | $ | 439,455 | | | $ | 88,586 | |
| Gross profit/(loss) | | | 26,996 | | | | (1,639 | ) | | | 90,228 | | | | 37,412 | | | | 95,492 | | | | 53,161 | |
| Income before income taxes | | | 11,046 | | | | 34,244 | | | | 74,430 | | | | 32,129 | | | | 69,208 | | | | 47,445 | |
| Net (loss)/earnings | | | (17 | ) | | | 28,422 | | | | 44,234 | | | | 26,667 | | | | 29,028 | | | | 39,379 | |
Our investment in these unconsolidated affiliates is recorded within investments in and advances to unconsolidated affiliates on the consolidated balance sheet and our equity in the net earnings of these
87
FOSTER WHEELER AG AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(amounts in thousands of dollars, except share data and per share amounts)
| |
| 5. | Investments — (Continued) |
unconsolidated affiliates is recorded within other income, net on the consolidated statement of operations. The investments and equity earnings of the Italy based projects and Chile based project are included in our Global E&C Group and Global Power Group business segments, respectively. Our consolidated financial statements reflect the following amounts related to these unconsolidated affiliates:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Fiscal Years |
| | | 2010 | | 2009 | | 2008 |
| |
| Equity in the net earnings of partially owned affiliates | | $ | 23,009 | | | $ | 34,953 | | | $ | 33,905 | |
| Distributions from equity affiliates | | $ | 18,055 | | | $ | 25,486 | | | $ | 24,452 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | December 31,
| | December 31,
|
| | | 2010 | | 2009 |
| |
| Total investment in equity affiliates | | $ | 200,668 | | | $ | 215,280 | |
Our equity earnings for our Chile based project in fiscal year 2010 was $20,670, which primarily represents our equity interest in the after tax estimated recovery under our Chile based project’s business interruption insurance policy. In accordance with authoritative accounting guidance on business interruption insurance, we recorded an estimated recovery for lost profits as substantially all contingencies related to the insurance claim had been resolved. Our Chile based project’s estimated recovery for lost profits covered the period from February 27, 2010 through December 31, 2010.
The two electric power generation projects in Italy, owned by the companies Centro Energia Teverola S.p.A., (“CET”) and Centro Energia Ferrara S.p.A., (“CEF”), in which we hold 41.65% of the shares in each company, have long-term power off-take agreements in place with the Authority for Energy (the “Energy Authority”), which is part of the Italian Economic Development Ministry (the “Ministry”). The power off-take agreements with the Energy Authority included an incentivized tariff during the period of operation. In September 2010, the Ministry announced an option for certain projects, including those of CEF and CET, to terminate their long-term power off-take agreements with the Energy Authority in exchange for a lump-sum payment. The payment is determined by specific calculation under parameters established by the Ministry. In October 2010, CEF and CET submitted an application to terminate their power off-take agreements and, in December 2010, the Ministry approved the applications. CET and CEF recognized revenue for the full value of the termination payments in their 2010 financial statements.
In light of the termination of the power off-take agreement at CET, we and our partner in CET decided to shut down the plant effective January 1, 2011. CET recorded an impairment charge to write down their assets, primarily fixed assets, to fair value in their financial statements as a result of the decision to shut down the plant. Our investment in CET was reduced by an equity loss of $5,300, inclusive of an $8,000 impairment charge, in fiscal year 2010 based on CET’s 2010 financial results. As a result of the foregoing, the carrying value of our CET investment approximated fair value at December 31, 2010.
We and our partner in CEF decided to continue to operate the plant at least temporarily on a merchant basis following the termination of its power off-take agreement. We and our partner continue to review the economic viability of the project and we may consider a potential sale of the plant in 2011. In light of the termination of the power off-take agreement, CEF recorded an impairment charge, which considered estimates related to the continued operation of the plant and potential sale of the plant, to write down their assets, primarily fixed assets, to fair value in their financial statements. Our investment in CEF was reduced by an equity loss of $2,900, inclusive of a $5,200 impairment charge in fiscal year 2010 based on CEF’s 2010 financial results. As a result of the foregoing, the carrying value of our CEF investment approximated fair value at December 31, 2010.
88
FOSTER WHEELER AG AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(amounts in thousands of dollars, except share data and per share amounts)
| |
| 5. | Investments — (Continued) |
We have guaranteed certain performance obligations of the Chile based project. We do not expect that the earthquake will require us to contribute to this project under our guarantee of the project’s performance obligations.
We have a contingent obligation, which is measured annually based on the operating results of the Chile based project for the preceding year and is shared equally with our minority interest partner. We did not have a current payment obligation under this guarantee as of December 31, 2010.
In addition, we have provided a $10,000 debt service reserve letter of credit to cover debt service payments in the event that the Chile based project does not generate sufficient cash flows to make such payments. We are required to maintain the debt service reserve letter of credit during the term of the Chile based project’s debt, which matures in 2014. As of December 31, 2010, no amounts have been drawn under this letter of credit and, based on our current assessment following the earthquake in Chile as described above, we do not anticipate any amounts being drawn under this letter of credit.
We also have a wholly-owned subsidiary that provides operations and maintenance services to the Chile based project. We continue to provide our services to the project while the facility has suspended normal operating activities, as a result of the earthquake in Chile noted above, which have been focused on assessing the damage caused by the earthquake and the related repair for the facility to resume normal operating activities. We record the fees for operations and maintenance services in operating revenues on our consolidated statement of operations and the corresponding receivable in trade accounts and notes receivable on our consolidated balance sheet. Our consolidated financial statements include the following balances related to our Chile based project:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Fiscal Years |
| | | 2010 | | 2009 | | 2008 |
| |
| Fees for operations and maintenance services (included in operating revenues) | | $ | 9,841 | | | $ | 8,464 | | | $ | 9,312 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | December 31,
| | December 31,
|
| | | 2010 | | 2009 |
| |
| Receivable from our unconsolidated affiliate in Chile (included in trade receivables) | | $ | 632 | | | $ | 4,916 | |
We also have guaranteed the performance obligations of our wholly-owned subsidiary under the Chile based project’s operations and maintenance agreement. The guarantee is limited to $20,000 over the life of the operations and maintenance agreement, which extends through 2016. No amounts have ever been paid under the guarantee.
Our share of the undistributed retained earnings of our equity investees amounted to $112,742 and $122,337 as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Other Investments
We are the majority equity partner and general partner of a gas-fired cogeneration facility in Martinez, California, and we own 100% of the equity in awaste-to-energy facility in Camden, New Jersey (please see Note 16 for further information on thewaste-to-energy facility). We have determined that these entities are VIEs and that we are the primary beneficiary of these VIEs since we have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the VIE’s performance. These activities include the operations and maintenance of the facilities. Accordingly, we consolidate these entities. The aggregate net assets of these entities are presented below.
89
FOSTER WHEELER AG AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(amounts in thousands of dollars, except share data and per share amounts)
| |
| 5. | Investments — (Continued) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | December 31,
| | | December 31,
| |
Balance Sheet Data (excluding intercompany balances): | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
| |
| Current assets | | $ | 15,915 | | | $ | 14,722 | |
| Other assets (primarily buildings and equipment) | | | 102,457 | | | | 104,552 | |
| Current liabilities | | | 11,177 | | | | 31,014 | |
| Other liabilities | | | 1,791 | | | | 876 | |
| Net assets | | | 105,404 | | | | 87,384 | |
| |
| 6. | Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets |
We have tracked accumulated goodwill impairments since December 29, 2001, the first day of fiscal year 2002 and our date of adoption of the accounting guidelines related to the assessment of goodwill for impairment. There were no accumulated goodwill impairment losses as of that date.
The following table provides the rollforward of our goodwill balances:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | December 31, 2010 | | | December 31, 2009 | |
| | | Gross
| | | Accumulated
| | | Net
| | | Gross
| | | Accumulated
| | | Net
| |
| | | Carrying
| | | Impairment
| | | Carrying
| | | Carrying
| | | Impairment
| | | Carrying
| |
| | | Amount | | | Losses | | | Amount | | | Amount | | | Losses | | | Amount | |
| |
Global E&C Group: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Balance at beginning of year | | $ | 36,484 | | | $ | (36 | ) | | $ | 36,448 | | | $ | 11,325 | | | $ | (36 | ) | | $ | 11,289 | |
| Goodwill acquired during the year | | | 3,921 | | | | — | | | | 3,921 | | | | 24,400 | | | | — | | | | 24,400 | |
| Foreign currency translation adjustment | | | 41 | | | | — | | | | 41 | | | | 759 | | | | — | | | | 759 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Balance at end of year | | $ | 40,446 | | | $ | (36 | ) | | $ | 40,410 | | | $ | 36,484 | | | $ | (36 | ) | | $ | 36,448 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Global Power Group: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Balance at beginning of year | | $ | 156,404 | | | $ | (104,150 | ) | | $ | 52,254 | | | $ | 155,026 | | | $ | (104,150 | ) | | $ | 50,876 | |
| Goodwill acquired during the year | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
| Foreign currency translation adjustment | | | (3,747 | ) | | | — | | | | (3,747 | ) | | | 1,378 | | | | — | | | | 1,378 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Balance at end of year | | $ | 152,657 | | | $ | (104,150 | ) | | $ | 48,507 | | | $ | 156,404 | | | $ | (104,150 | ) | | $ | 52,254 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Balance at beginning of year | | $ | 192,888 | | | $ | (104,186 | ) | | $ | 88,702 | | | $ | 166,351 | | | $ | (104,186 | ) | | $ | 62,165 | |
| Goodwill acquired during the year | | | 3,921 | | | | — | | | | 3,921 | | | | 24,400 | | | | — | | | | 24,400 | |
| Foreign currency translation adjustment | | | (3,706 | ) | | | — | | | | (3,706 | ) | | | 2,137 | | | | — | | | | 2,137 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Balance at end of year | | $ | 193,103 | | | $ | (104,186 | ) | | $ | 88,917 | | | $ | 192,888 | | | $ | (104,186 | ) | | $ | 88,702 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
90
FOSTER WHEELER AG AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(amounts in thousands of dollars, except share data and per share amounts)
| |
| 6. | Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets — (Continued) |
The following table provides our net carrying amount of goodwill by geographic region in which our reporting units are located:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Global E&C Group | | | Global Power Group | |
| | | December 31,
| | | December 31,
| | | December 31,
| | | December 31,
| |
| | | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
| |
Goodwill Net Carrying Amount: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| U.S. | | $ | 39,357 | | | $ | 35,436 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
| Asia | | | 1,053 | | | | 1,012 | | | | — | | | | — | |
| Europe | | | — | | | | — | | | | 48,507 | | | | 52,254 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at end of year | | $ | 40,410 | | | $ | 36,448 | | | $ | 48,507 | | | $ | 52,254 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
During fiscal year 2010, goodwill increased related to contractual payments totaling approximately $3,200 related to prior acquisitions of businesses and $700 for the acquisition of assets of a proprietary sulfur recovery technology business. These increases were related to our Global E&C Group’s U.S. operations.
The following table sets forth amounts relating to our identifiable intangible assets:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | December 31, 2010 | | | December 31, 2009 | |
| | | Gross
| | | | | | Net
| | | Gross
| | | | | | Net
| |
| | | Carrying
| | | Accumulated
| | | Carrying
| | | Carrying
| | | Accumulated
| | | Carrying
| |
| | | Amount | | | Amortization | | | Amount | | | Amount | | | Amortization | | | Amount | |
| |
| Patents | | $ | 41,237 | | | $ | (28,476 | ) | | $ | 12,761 | | | $ | 39,304 | | | $ | (24,983 | ) | | $ | 14,321 | |
| Trademarks | | | 63,774 | | | | (27,764 | ) | | | 36,010 | | | | 63,676 | | | | (24,487 | ) | | | 39,189 | |
| Customer relationships, pipeline and backlog | | | 22,329 | | | | (5,030 | ) | | | 17,299 | | | | 21,934 | | | | (2,415 | ) | | | 19,519 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total | | $ | 127,340 | | | $ | (61,270 | ) | | $ | 66,070 | | | $ | 124,914 | | | $ | (51,885 | ) | | $ | 73,029 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
As of December 31, 2010, the net carrying amounts of our identifiable intangible assets were $48,673 for our Global Power Group and $17,397 for our Global E&C Group. Identifiable intangible asset amortization expense is recorded within cost of operating revenues on the consolidated statement of operations. The following table details amortization expense by period:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Fiscal Years |
| | | 2010 | | 2009 | | 2008 |
| |
| Amortization expense | | $ | 6,496 | | | $ | 5,640 | | | $ | 4,716 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Fiscal Years |
| | | 2011 | | 2012 | | 2013 | | 2014 | | 2015 |
| |
| Approximate full year amortization expense | | $ | 6,200 | | | $ | 5,900 | | | $ | 5,600 | | | $ | 5,300 | | | $ | 5,300 | |
91
FOSTER WHEELER AG AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(amounts in thousands of dollars, except share data and per share amounts)
The following table shows the components of our long-term debt:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | December 31, 2010 | | | December 31, 2009 | |
| | | Current | | | Long-term | | | Total | | | Current | | | Long-term | | | Total | |
| |
| Capital Lease Obligations | | $ | 2,574 | | | $ | 59,024 | | | $ | 61,598 | | | $ | 1,492 | | | $ | 65,327 | | | $ | 66,819 | |
| Special-Purpose Limited Recourse Project Debt: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Camden County Energy Recovery Associates | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 21,865 | | | | — | | | | 21,865 | |
| FW Power S.r.l. | | | 7,403 | | | | 81,047 | | | | 88,450 | | | | 7,428 | | | | 95,661 | | | | 103,089 | |
| Energia Holdings, LLC at 11.443% interest, due April 15, 2015 | | | 2,019 | | | | 11,220 | | | | 13,239 | | | | 3,187 | | | | 13,239 | | | | 16,426 | |
| Subordinated Robbins Facility Exit Funding Obligations: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 1999C Bonds at 7.25% interest, due October 15, 2024 | | | — | | | | 1,283 | | | | 1,283 | | | | — | | | | 1,283 | | | | 1,283 | |
| Term Loan in China at 4.374% interest, due January 8, 2010 | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 2,930 | | | | — | | | | 2,930 | |
| Other | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 28 | | | | — | | | | 28 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total | | $ | 11,996 | | | $ | 152,574 | | | $ | 164,570 | | | $ | 36,930 | | | $ | 175,510 | | | $ | 212,440 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Estimated fair value | | | | | | | | | | $ | 182,602 | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 222,165 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest Costs — Interest costs incurred in fiscal years 2010, 2009 and 2008 were $14,842, $17,166 and $16,463, respectively.
Capital Lease Obligations — We have entered into a series of capital lease obligations, primarily for office buildings. Assets under capital lease obligations are summarized as follows:
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | December 31,
| | | December 31,
| |
| | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
| |
| Buildings and improvements | | $ | 48,022 | | | $ | 48,299 | |
| Less: Accumulated depreciation | | | (16,916 | ) | | | (14,924 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Net assets under capital lease obligations | | $ | 31,106 | | | $ | 33,375 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
92
FOSTER WHEELER AG AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(amounts in thousands of dollars, except share data and per share amounts)
| |
| 7. | Borrowings — (Continued) |
The following are the minimum lease payments to be made in each of the years indicated for our capital lease obligations as of December 31, 2010:
| | | | | |
Fiscal years: | | | | |
| 2011 | | $ | 9,050 | |
| 2012 | | | 8,607 | |
| 2013 | | | 8,326 | |
| 2014 | | | 8,570 | |
| 2015 | | | 8,654 | |
| Thereafter | | | 71,683 | |
| Less: Interest | | | (53,292 | ) |
| | | | | |
| Net minimum lease payments under capital lease obligations | | | 61,598 | |
| Less: Current portion of net minimum lease payments | | | (2,574 | ) |
| | | | | |
| Long-term portion of net minimum lease payments | | $ | 59,024 | |
| | | | | |
Special-Purpose Limited Recourse Project Debt — Special-purpose limited recourse project debt represents debt incurred to finance the construction of cogeneration facilities,waste-to-energy or wind farm projects in which we are a majority-owner. Certain assets of each project collateralize the notesand/or bonds. Our obligations with respect to this debt are limited to contributing project equity during the construction phase of the projects and the guarantee of the operating performance of our Chile based project.
The Camden County Energy Recovery Associates debt represented Solid Waste Disposal and Resource Recovery System Revenue Bonds. These bonds were repaid by the Pollution Control Finance Authority of Camden County (“PCFA”) and the State of New Jersey at the scheduled maturity date in December 2010. The repayment of the bonds by the PCFA and the State of New Jersey in fiscal years 2010, 2009 and 2008 resulted in non-cash gains of $21,865, $9,914 and $9,648, respectively. The bonds were collateralized by a pledge of certain revenues and assets of the project, but not the plant. Thewaste-to-energy project is located in Camden, New Jersey in the United States. Please refer to Note 16 for further information.
FW Power S.r.l., which is the owner of certain electric power generating wind farms in Italy, has project financing for two wind farm projects under base facilities and value-added tax (“VAT”) facilities. The base facilities bear interest at variable rates based upon6-month Euribor plus a spread varying from 0.9% to 1.0% throughout the life of the debt and are repayable semi-annually based upon a pre-defined payment schedule through December 31, 2022. The VAT facilities bear interest based upon6-month Euribor plus a spread of 0.5% and are repayable semi-annually based upon actual VAT received during commercial operation through December 31, 2013.
The debt is collateralized by certain revenues and assets of FW Power S.r.l. Our total borrowing capacity under the FW Power S.r.l. credit facilities is €75,300 (approximately $100,700 at the exchange rate as of December 31, 2010).
We have executed interest rate swap contracts that effectively convert approximately 90% of the base facilities to a weighted-average fixed interest rate of 4.48%. The swap contracts are in place through the life of the facilities. See Note 10, “Derivative Financial Instruments — Interest Rate Risk,” for our accounting policy related to these interest rate swap contracts. The interest rates on the VAT facilities and the portion of the base facilities not subject to the interest rate swap contracts were 1.738% and 2.138%, respectively, as of December 31, 2010.
93
FOSTER WHEELER AG AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(amounts in thousands of dollars, except share data and per share amounts)
| |
| 7. | Borrowings — (Continued) |
The Energia Holdings, LLC notes are collateralized by certain revenues and assets of a special-purpose subsidiary, which has an indirect ownership interest in a refinery/electric power generation project in Chile.
Subordinated Robbins Facility Exit Funding Obligations (“Robbins bonds”) — In connection with the restructuring of debt incurred to finance construction of awaste-to-energy facility in the Village of Robbins, Illinois in the U.S., we assumed certain subordinated obligations. The 1999C Bonds due October 15, 2024 (the “1999C bonds”) are the only Robbins bonds outstanding as of December 31, 2010, as the remaining subordinated obligations were paid off in full at their scheduled maturity dates. The 1999C bonds are subject to mandatory sinking fund reduction prior to maturity at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued interest to the redemption date. On October 3, 2008, we acquired a portion of our 1999C bonds for $19,016 of cash, plus accrued and unpaid interest to date.
Term Loans in China — During fiscal year 2010, one of our subsidiaries based in China repaid its outstanding term loan at the scheduled maturity date. Also during fiscal year 2010, the same China based subsidiary entered into a new term loan for approximately $2,200 at an interest rate of 4.78%, which was also repaid in fiscal year 2010.
Aggregate Maturities — Aggregate principal repayments and sinking fund requirements of long-term debt, excluding payments on capital lease obligations, over the next five years are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Fiscal Years | | | | | | | |
| | | 2011 | | | 2012 | | | 2013 | | | 2014 | | | 2015 | | | Thereafter | | | Total | |
| |
| Aggregate maturities by year | | $ | 9,422 | | | $ | 10,162 | | | $ | 10,549 | | | $ | 10,595 | | | $ | 14,468 | | | $ | 47,776 | | | $ | 102,972 | |
U.S. Senior Secured Credit Agreement — On July 30, 2010, Foster Wheeler AG, Foster Wheeler Ltd., certain of Foster Wheeler Ltd.’s subsidiaries and BNP Paribas, as Administrative Agent, entered into a four-year amendment and restatement of our U.S. senior secured credit agreement, which we entered into in October 2006. The amended and restated U.S. senior secured credit agreement provides for a facility of $450,000, and includes a provision which permits future incremental increases of up to an aggregate of $225,000 in total additional availability under the facility. The amended and restated U.S. senior secured credit agreement permits us to issue up to $450,000 in letters of credit under the facility. Letters of credit issued under the amended and restated U.S. senior secured credit agreement have performance pricing that is decreased (or increased) as a result of improvements (or reductions) in our corporate credit rating as reported by Moody’s Investors Service, which we refer to as Moody’s,and/or Standard & Poor’s, or S&P. We received a corporate credit rating of BBB- as issued by S&P during the fiscal third quarter of 2010, which, under the amended and restated U.S. senior secured credit agreement, reduces our pricing for letters of credit issued under the agreement. Based on our current credit ratings, letter of credit fees for performance and financial letters of credit issued under the amended and restated U.S. senior secured credit agreement are 1.000% and 2.000% per annum of the outstanding amount, respectively, excluding fronting fees. We also have the option to use up to $100,000 of the $450,000 for revolving borrowings at a rate equal to adjusted LIBOR, as defined in the agreement, plus 2.000%, subject also to the performance pricing noted above.
Fees and expenses incurred in conjunction with the execution of our amended and restated U.S. senior credit agreement were approximately $4,300 and are being amortized to expense over the four-year term of the agreement, which commenced in the fiscal third quarter of 2010. As a result of amending and restating our October 2006 U.S. senior secured credit agreement in July 2010, we incurred a charge in fiscal year 2010 of $1,600 related to unamortized fees and expenses remaining from the October 2006 agreement, which was recorded in other deductions, net on the consolidated statement of operations.
94
FOSTER WHEELER AG AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(amounts in thousands of dollars, except share data and per share amounts)
| |
| 7. | Borrowings — (Continued) |
The assetsand/or stock of certain of our subsidiaries collateralize our obligations under our amended and restated U.S. senior secured credit agreement. Our amended and restated U.S. senior secured credit agreement contains various customary restrictive covenants that generally limit our ability to, among other things, incur additional indebtedness or guarantees, create liens or other encumbrances on property, sell or transfer certain property and thereafter rent or lease such property for substantially the same purposes as the property sold or transferred, enter into a merger or similar transaction, make investments, declare dividends or make other restricted payments, enter into agreements with affiliates that are not on an arms’ length basis, enter into any agreement that limits our ability to create liens or the ability of a subsidiary to pay dividends, engage in new lines of business, with respect to Foster Wheeler AG, change Foster Wheeler AG’s fiscal year or, with respect to Foster Wheeler AG, Foster Wheeler Ltd. and one of our holding company subsidiaries, directly acquire ownership of the operating assets used to conduct any business. In the event that our corporate credit rating as issued by Moody’s is at least Baa3 and as issued by S&P is at least BBB-, all liens securing our obligations under the amended and restated U.S. senior secured credit agreement will be automatically released and terminated.
In addition, our amended and restated U.S. senior secured credit agreement contains financial covenants requiring us not to exceed a total leverage ratio, which compares total indebtedness to EBITDA, and to maintain a minimum interest coverage ratio, which compares EBITDA to interest expense. All such terms are defined in our amended and restated U.S. senior secured credit agreement. We must be in compliance with the total leverage ratio at all times, while the interest coverage ratio is measured quarterly. We have been in compliance with all financial covenants and other provisions of our U.S. senior secured credit agreement prior and subsequent to our amendment and restatement of the agreement.
We had approximately $310,100 and $308,000 of letters of credit outstanding under our U.S. senior secured credit agreement in effect as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The letter of credit fees under the U.S. senior secured credit agreement outstanding as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 ranged from 1.00% to 2.00% and 1.50% to 1.60%, respectively, of the outstanding amount, excluding fronting fees. There were no funded borrowings outstanding under either of these two agreements as of December 31, 2010 or 2009.
| |
| 8. | Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits |
We have defined benefit pension plans in the United States or U.S., the United Kingdom, or U.K., Canada, Finland, France, India and South Africa, and we have other postretirement benefit plans for health care and life insurance benefits in the U.S. and Canada. We also have defined contribution retirement plans in the U.S. and the U.K. Finally, we have certain other benefit plans including government mandated postretirement programs.
We recognize the funded status of each of our defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans on our consolidated balance sheet. We recognize any gains or losses, which are not recognized as a component of annual service cost, as a component of other comprehensive income, net of tax. We record net actuarial losses, prior service cost/(credits) and net transition obligations/(assets) within accumulated other comprehensive loss on the consolidated balance sheet.
Defined Benefit Pension Plans — Our defined benefit pension plans, or pension plans, cover certain full-time employees. Under the pension plans, retirement benefits are primarily a function of both years of service and level of compensation. The U.S. pension plans, which are closed to new entrants and additional benefit accruals, and the Canada, Finland, France and India pension plans are non-contributory. The U.K. pension
95
FOSTER WHEELER AG AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(amounts in thousands of dollars, except share data and per share amounts)
| |
| 8. | Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits — (Continued) |
plan, which is closed to new entrants and additional benefit accruals, and the South Africa pension plan are both contributory plans.
Effective March 31, 2010, we closed the U.K. pension plan for future defined benefit accrual. As a result of the U.K. plan closure, we recognized a curtailment gain in our statement of operations for fiscal year 2010 of approximately £13,300 (approximately $20,086 at the exchange rate in effect at the time of the pension plan closure).
Other Postretirement Benefit Plans — Certain employees in the U.S. and Canada may become eligible for health care and life insurance benefits (“other postretirement benefits”) if they qualify for and commence normal or early retirement pension benefits as defined in the U.S. and Canada pension plans while working for us.
Additionally, one of our subsidiaries in the U.S. also has a benefit plan, referred to as the Survivor Income Plan (“SIP”), which provides coverage for an employee’s beneficiary upon the death of the employee. This plan has been closed to new entrants since 1988. Total liabilities under the SIP, which were $16,086 and $15,904 as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, are reflected in the other postretirement benefit obligation and funded status information below. The assets held to fund the benefits provided by the SIP, which reflect the cash surrender value of insurance polices purchased to cover obligations under the SIP, totaled $5,609 and $5,201 as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The assets are recorded in other assets on the consolidated balance sheet and are not reflected in the other postretirement benefit obligation and funded status information.
96
FOSTER WHEELER AG AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(amounts in thousands of dollars, except share data and per share amounts)
| |
| 8. | Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits — (Continued) |
Components of net periodic benefit cost and changes recognized in other comprehensive income include:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Defined Benefit Pension Plans | | | Other Postretirement Benefit Plans | |
| | | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
| |
Net periodic benefit (credit)/cost: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Service cost | | $ | 2,901 | | | $ | 6,310 | | | $ | 11,142 | | | $ | 109 | | | $ | 134 | | | $ | 142 | |
| Interest cost | | | 61,295 | | | | 63,076 | | | | 69,527 | | | | 3,655 | | | | 4,845 | | | | 4,623 | |
| Expected return on plan assets | | | (61,945 | ) | | | (52,106 | ) | | | (72,524 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
| Amortization of net actuarial loss | | | 16,179 | | | | 21,196 | | | | 19,476 | | | | 56 | | | | 845 | | | | 466 | |
| Amortization of prior service (credit)/cost | | | (395 | ) | | | 7,901 | | | | 4,826 | | | | (3,988 | ) | | | (4,629 | ) | | | (4,662 | ) |
| Amortization of transition obligation | | | 43 | | | | 36 | | | | 39 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
| (Curtailment gain)/settlement charges, net* | | | (19,562 | ) | | | 243 | | | | 886 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net periodic benefit (credit)/cost | | $ | (1,484 | ) | | $ | 46,656 | | | $ | 33,372 | | | $ | (168 | ) | | $ | 1,195 | | | $ | 569 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Changes recognized in other comprehensive income: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net actuarial loss/(gain) | | $ | 20,295 | | | $ | 55,144 | | | $ | 139,556 | | | $ | 1,093 | | | $ | (8,916 | ) | | $ | 3,679 | |
| Prior service (credit)/cost | | | (9,051 | ) | | | (51,579 | ) | | | 39,861 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1,609 | |
| Settlement charge recognized on the remeasurement of transitional asset | | | — | | | | 71 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
| Amortization of net actuarial loss | | | (16,179 | ) | | | (21,196 | ) | | | (19,476 | ) | | | (56 | ) | | | (845 | ) | | | (466 | ) |
| Amortization of prior service credit/(cost) | | | 395 | | | | (7,901 | ) | | | (4,826 | ) | | | 3,988 | | | | 4,629 | | | | 4,662 | |
| Amortization of transition obligation | | | (43 | ) | | | (36 | ) | | | (39 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total recognized in other comprehensive income — before tax | | $ | (4,583 | ) | | $ | (25,497 | ) | | $ | 155,076 | | | $ | 5,025 | | | $ | (5,132 | ) | | $ | 9,484 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
| * | | During fiscal year 2010, a curtailment gain resulted from the closure of the U.K. pension plan for future benefit accrual and charges were incurred related to the settlement of pension obligations with former employees of the Canada pension plan. During fiscal year 2009, net charges were incurred related to the settlement of pension obligations with former employees of the U.K., Canada and Finland pension plans. During fiscal year 2008, charges were incurred related to the settlement of pension obligations with former employees of the U.K. and Canada pension plans. |
97
FOSTER WHEELER AG AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(amounts in thousands of dollars, except share data and per share amounts)
| |
| 8. | Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits — (Continued) |
The following is a summary of our net periodic pension (credit)/cost by defined benefit pension plan:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
| |
Net periodic benefit (credit)/cost by defined benefit pension plan: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| United States | | $ | 5,501 | | | $ | 10,516 | | | $ | (1,393 | ) |
| United Kingdom* | | | (9,347 | ) | | | 33,706 | | | | 31,851 | |
| Other | | | 2,362 | | | | 2,434 | | | | 2,914 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net periodic benefit (credit)/cost | | $ | (1,484 | ) | | $ | 46,656 | | | $ | 33,372 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
| * | | The U.K. pension plan was closed for future benefit accrual effective March 31, 2010. |
Estimated amortization expense to be recognized in net periodic benefit cost over the next fiscal year includes:
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | Defined Benefit
| | Other Postretirement
|
| | | Pension Plans | | Benefit Plans |
| |
| Net actuarial loss | | $ | 13,300 | | | $ | 300 | |
| Prior service credit | | $ | 100 | | | $ | 3,600 | |
| Net transition obligation | | $ | 100 | | | $ | — | |
The following table summarizes the weighted-average assumptions used to estimate our net periodic benefit cost and projected benefit obligation by fiscal year:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Defined Benefit Pension Plans | | | Other Postretirement
| |
| | | United States | | | United Kingdom | | | Other | | | Benefit Plans | |
| | | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
| |
Net periodic benefit cost: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Discount rate | | | 5.67 | % | | | 6.23 | % | | | 6.31 | % | | | 5.70 | % | | | 6.20 | % | | | 5.70 | % | | | 5.37 | % | | | 6.18 | % | | | 5.85 | % | | | 4.53 | % | | | 6.26 | % | | | 6.23 | % |
| Long-term rate of return | | | 7.75 | % | | | 8.25 | % | | | 7.90 | % | | | 6.70 | % | | | 6.30 | % | | | 6.80 | % | | | 7.37 | % | | | 7.14 | % | | | 8.01 | % | | | N/A | | | | N/A | | | | N/A | |
| Salary growth* | | | N/A | | | | N/A | | | | N/A | | | | N/A | | | | 3.50 | % | | | 4.10 | % | | | 3.67 | % | | | 3.07 | % | | | 5.43 | % | | | N/A | | | | N/A | | | | N/A | |
Projected benefit obligations: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Discount rate | | | 5.11 | % | | | 5.67 | % | | | 6.23 | % | | | 5.50 | % | | | 5.70 | % | | | 6.20 | % | | | 5.68 | % | | | 6.22 | % | | | 6.59 | % | | | 4.88 | % | | | 5.45 | % | | | 6.28 | % |
| Salary growth* | | | N/A | | | | N/A | | | | N/A | | | | N/A | | | | 4.05 | % | | | 3.50 | % | | | 4.22 | % | | | 4.20 | % | | | 3.79 | % | | | N/A | | | | N/A | | | | N/A | |
| | |
| * | | Salary growth is not applicable for frozen pension plans as future salary levels do not affect benefits payable. |
N/A — Not applicable
The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets is developed using a weighted-average methodology, blending the expected returns on each class of investment in the pension plans’ portfolio. The expected returns by asset class are developed considering both past performance and future considerations. We annually review and adjust, as required, the long-term rate of return for our pension plans. The weighted-average expected long-term rate of return on plan assets has ranged from 6.9% to 7.2% over the past three years.
98
FOSTER WHEELER AG AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(amounts in thousands of dollars, except share data and per share amounts)
| |
| 8. | Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits — (Continued) |
Assumed healthcare cost trend rates for the other postretirement benefit plans were:
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | Pre-Medicare Eligible | | Medicare Eligible |
| |
| Healthcare cost trend rate used for next fiscal year: | | | | | | | | |
| 2009 | | | 8.30 | % | | | 20.47 | % |
| 2010 | | | 7.80 | % | | | 6.36 | % |
| Rate to which the healthcare cost trend rate will ultimately decline | | | 5.70 | % | | | 5.60 | % |
| Year that the cost trend rate will reach its ultimate rate | | | 2024 | | | | 2024 | |
Assumed healthcare cost trend rates have a significant effect on the costs and obligations reported for the other postretirement benefit plans. A one-percentage-point change in assumed healthcare cost trend rates would have the following effects:
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | One-Percentage Point |
| | | Increase | | Decrease |
| |
| Effect on total of service and interest cost components | | $ | 100 | | | $ | (100 | ) |
| Effect on accumulated postretirement benefit obligation | | $ | 2,300 | | | $ | (2,000 | ) |
99
FOSTER WHEELER AG AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(amounts in thousands of dollars, except share data and per share amounts)
| |
| 8. | Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits — (Continued) |
Projected benefit obligations and funded status for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Defined Benefit
| | | Other Postretirement
| |
| | | Pension Plans | | | Benefit Plans | |
| | | December 31,
| | | December 31,
| | | December 31,
| | | December 31,
| |
| | | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
| |
Change in projected benefit obligations: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Projected benefit obligations at beginning of year | | $ | 1,148,779 | | | $ | 987,414 | | | $ | 72,355 | | | $ | 82,464 | |
| Service cost | | | 2,901 | | | | 6,310 | | | | 109 | | | | 134 | |
| Interest cost | | | 61,295 | | | | 63,076 | | | | 3,655 | | | | 4,845 | |
| Plan participants’ contributions | | | 1,961 | | | | 5,427 | | | | 1,851 | | | | 1,869 | |
| Plan amendments | | | (23,209 | ) | | | (51,654 | ) | | | — | | | | — | |
| Actuarial loss/(gain) | | | 58,305 | | | | 121,378 | | | | 1,093 | | | | (8,916 | ) |
| Benefits paid | | | (71,216 | ) | | | (60,349 | ) | | | (7,933 | ) | | | (8,132 | ) |
| Special termination benefits/other | | | 5,616 | | | | (809 | ) | | | — | | | | — | |
| Foreign currency exchange rate changes | | | (30,566 | ) | | | 77,986 | | | | 35 | | | | 91 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Projected benefit obligations at end of year | | | 1,153,866 | | | | 1,148,779 | | | | 71,165 | | | | 72,355 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Change in plan assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year | | | 968,280 | | | | 768,418 | | | | — | | | | — | |
| Actual return on plan assets | | | 100,088 | | | | 118,086 | | | | — | | | | — | |
| Employer contributions | | | 98,585 | | | | 71,424 | | | | 6,082 | | | | 6,263 | |
| Plan participants’ contributions | | | 1,961 | | | | 5,427 | | | | 1,851 | | | | 1,869 | |
| Benefits paid | | | (71,216 | ) | | | (60,349 | ) | | | (7,933 | ) | | | (8,132 | ) |
| Other | | | 130 | | | | (774 | ) | | | — | | | | — | |
| Foreign currency exchange rate changes | | | (25,478 | ) | | | 66,048 | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Fair value of plan assets at end of year | | | 1,072,350 | | | | 968,280 | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Funded status at end of year | | $ | (81,516 | ) | | $ | (180,499 | ) | | $ | (71,165 | ) | | $ | (72,355 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Funded status by plan: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| United States | | $ | (41,166 | ) | | $ | (60,554 | ) | | $ | (70,514 | ) | | $ | (71,723 | ) |
| United Kingdom | | | (28,914 | ) | | | (108,870 | ) | | | — | | | | — | |
| Other | | | (11,436 | ) | | | (11,075 | ) | | | (651 | ) | | | (632 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Funded status at end of year | | $ | (81,516 | ) | | $ | (180,499 | ) | | $ | (71,165 | ) | | $ | (72,355 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Funded status recognized on the consolidated balance sheet: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Current liabilities | | $ | (1,185 | ) | | $ | (942 | ) | | $ | (6,011 | ) | | $ | (6,597 | ) |
| Non-current liabilities | | | (80,331 | ) | | | (179,557 | ) | | | (65,154 | ) | | | (65,758 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Funded status at end of year | | $ | (81,516 | ) | | $ | (180,499 | ) | | $ | (71,165 | ) | | $ | (72,355 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net actuarial loss | | $ | 505,723 | | | $ | 501,608 | | | $ | 5,439 | | | $ | 4,401 | |
| Prior service cost/(credit) | | | 316 | | | | 8,972 | | | | (28,659 | ) | | | (32,647 | ) |
| Net transition asset | | | (159 | ) | | | (116 | ) | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total before tax and allocation to noncontrolling interests | | $ | 505,880 | | | $ | 510,464 | | | $ | (23,220 | ) | | $ | (28,246 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Accumulated benefit obligation at end of year | | $ | 1,052,658 | | | $ | 1,016,944 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
100
FOSTER WHEELER AG AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(amounts in thousands of dollars, except share data and per share amounts)
| |
| 8. | Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits — (Continued) |
Defined benefit pension plans with an accumulated benefit obligation in excess of plan assets:
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | December 31,
| | December 31,
|
| | | 2010(1) | | 2009(2) |
| |
| Projected benefit obligation | | $ | 398,932 | | | $ | 380,183 | |
| Accumulated benefit obligation | | | 395,832 | | | | 377,284 | |
| Fair value of plan assets | | | 344,670 | | | | 306,119 | |
| | |
| (1) | | Balances for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 do not include information for plans in the United Kingdom and South Africa since the plan assets of those plans exceeded the accumulated benefit obligation. |
| |
| (2) | | Balances for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 do not include information for plans in the United Kingdom and South Africa since the plan assets of those plans exceeded the accumulated benefit obligation. |
Contributions:
Based on the minimum statutory funding requirements for fiscal year 2011, we are not required to make any mandatory contributions to our U.S. pension plans. Based on the minimum statutory funding requirements for fiscal year 2011, we expect to contribute total mandatory contributions of approximately $24,000 to ournon-U.S. pension plans and approximately $6,200 to our other postretirement benefit plans.
Estimated future benefit payments:
We expect to make the following benefit payments:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 2011 | | | 2012 | | | 2013 | | | 2014 | | | 2015 | | | 2016-2020 | |
| |
| Defined benefit pension plans | | | 72,000 | | | | 72,100 | | | | 72,300 | | | | 74,100 | | | | 75,000 | | | | 383,500 | |
| Other postretirement benefit plans | | | 6,200 | | | | 6,000 | | | | 5,900 | | | | 5,800 | | | | 5,700 | | | | 25,900 | |
Plan Assets:
Each of our defined benefit pension plans in the U.S., U.K., Canada, India and South Africa is governed by a written investment policy. The pension plans in Finland and France have no plan assets.
The investment policy of each of our pension plans allocates assets in accordance with policy guidelines. These guidelines identify targetand/or maximum and minimum allocations by asset class. Our guidelines vary by pension plan for each asset class, but generally range between 40% and 60% for equities, 40% and 50% for fixed income and 0% and 10% for cash, with the exception of plan contributions temporarily awaiting longer-term investment. Some of the guidelines expressly endorse +/- ranges, which ranges are generally 10% or less.
Investments are exposed to various risks, such as interest rate and market and credit risks. Due to the level of uncertainty related to certain investment securities, it is at least reasonably possible that changes in the values of investment securities will occur in the near term and, that such changes could materially affect the fair value of our defined benefit plan assets, which in turn, would result in a change to our net pension benefit liability on our consolidated balance sheet. Accordingly, the valuation of investments at each fiscal year end may not be indicative of future valuations or the amounts that could be realized upon future liquidation. We develop investment policies for each of our pension plans which take these risks into account and we continually review the investment policies to ensure that the investment strategy is aligned with pension plan
101
FOSTER WHEELER AG AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(amounts in thousands of dollars, except share data and per share amounts)
| |
| 8. | Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits — (Continued) |
liabilities and projected pension plan benefit payments. Based on our current holdings, we believe that our individual pension plans are not exposed to a significant concentration of risk in any particular sector or asset class.
Our pension plan assets are valued under the established framework for measuring fair value in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. See Note 1 for further information regarding the measurement of fair value under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and our accounting policy. Our pension plan assets measured within the fair value framework consist of commingled funds and equity securities. Quoted prices in active markets are used to value investments when available. Investments are valued at their closing price or, when not available, the last reported bid price. Commingled funds are valued at the net asset value for their underlying securities. In accordance with current accounting guidance, our valuations include the use of net asset values for commingled fund assets. We further corroborate the above valuations with observable market data using inputs within the fair value framework.
The fair values of our defined benefit pension plan assets as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 by asset category are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Fair Value Measurements as of | |
| | | December 31, 2010 | | | December 31, 2009 | |
| | | Level 1 | | | Level 2 | | | Level 3 | | | Total | | | Level 1 | | | Level 2 | | | Level 3 | | | Total | |
| |
Equity Securities(1) | | $ | 193,795 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 193,795 | | | $ | 171,528 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 171,528 | |
Commingled Funds: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Equity(2) | | | — | | | | 307,964 | | | | — | | | | 307,964 | | | | — | | | | 299,217 | | | | — | | | | 299,217 | |
Corporate Fixed Income(3) | | | — | | | | 217,734 | | | | — | | | | 217,734 | | | | — | | | | 194,520 | | | | — | | | | 194,520 | |
Government Fixed Income(4) | | | — | | | | 254,836 | | | | — | | | | 254,836 | | | | — | | | | 248,726 | | | | — | | | | 248,726 | |
Money Market(5) | | | — | | | | 1,106 | | | | — | | | | 1,106 | | | | — | | | | 11,153 | | | | — | | | | 11,153 | |
| Cash equivalents | | | — | | | | 88,813 | | | | — | | | | 88,813 | | | | — | | | | 32,470 | | | | — | | | | 32,470 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Subtotal | | $ | 193,795 | | | $ | 870,453 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,064,248 | | | $ | 171,528 | | | $ | 786,086 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 957,614 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6,374 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8,921 | |
| Plan receivables | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1,728 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1,745 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total plan assets | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 1,072,350 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 968,280 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
| (1) | | Publicly traded equity securities. |
| |
| (2) | | Primarily equity securities with a focus on long-term returns. |
| |
| (3) | | Primarily corporate fixed income securities with a focus on intermediate-term and long-term maturities. |
| |
| (4) | | Primarily government fixed-income securities with focus on current income and capital preservation with varying maturities. |
| |
| (5) | | Primarily short-term maturities of two years or less from various issuers with a focus on preservation of capital. |
Defined Contribution Plans — Our U.S. subsidiaries have a 401(k) plan for salaried employees. We match 100% of the employee contributions on the first 6% of eligible base pay, subject to the annual limit on eligible earnings under the Internal Revenue Code. In total, our U.S. subsidiaries contributed approximately $7,000, $7,800, and $9,000 to the 401(k) plan in fiscal years 2010, 2009, and 2008, respectively. Our U.S. subsidiaries also have a Roth 401(k) plan for salaried employees.
Our U.K. subsidiaries offer a defined contribution plan for salaried employees. Under the defined contribution plan, amounts are credited as a percentage of earnings which percentage can be increased within
102
FOSTER WHEELER AG AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(amounts in thousands of dollars, except share data and per share amounts)
| |
| 8. | Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits — (Continued) |
prescribed limits after five years of membership in the fund if matched by the employee. At termination (up to two years’ service only), an employee may receive the balance in the account. Otherwise, at termination or at retirement, an employee receives an annuity or a combination of lump-sum and annuity. Our U.K. subsidiaries contributed approximately $8,400, $3,800, and $3,400 in fiscal years 2010, 2009, and 2008, respectively, to the defined contribution plan.
Other Benefits — Certain of ournon-U.S. subsidiaries participate in government-mandated indemnity and postretirement programs for their employees. Liabilities of $20,877 and $24,954 were recorded within pension, postretirement and other employee benefits on the consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, related to such benefits.
| |
| 9. | Guarantees and Warranties |
We have agreed to indemnify certain third parties relating to businessesand/or assets that we previously owned and sold to such third parties. Such indemnifications relate primarily to potential environmental and tax exposures for activities conducted by us prior to the sale of such businessesand/or assets. It is not possible to predict the maximum potential amount of future payments under these or similar indemnifications due to the conditional nature of the obligations and the unique facts and circumstances involved in each particular indemnification.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Maximum
| | Carrying Amount of Liability |
| | | Potential
| | December 31,
| | December 31,
|
| | | Payment | | 2010 | | 2009 |
| |
| Environmental indemnifications | | No limit | | $ | 8,400 | | | $ | 8,800 | |
| Tax indemnifications | | No limit | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
We also maintain contingencies for warranty expenses on certain of our long-term contracts. Generally, warranty contingencies are accrued over the life of the contract so that a sufficient balance is maintained to cover our aggregate exposure at the conclusion of the project.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Fiscal Years | |
| | | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
| |
Warranty Liability: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Balance at beginning of year | | $ | 110,800 | | | $ | 99,400 | | | $ | 87,800 | |
| Accruals | | | 27,200 | | | | 32,600 | | | | 36,000 | |
| Settlements | | | (13,100 | ) | | | (6,600 | ) | | | (7,300 | ) |
| Adjustments to provisions, including foreign currency translation | | | (24,600 | ) | | | (14,600 | ) | | | (17,100 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Balance at end of year | | $ | 100,300 | | | $ | 110,800 | | | $ | 99,400 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
We are contingently liable under standby letters of credit, bank guarantees and surety bonds, totaling $1,010,600 and $943,100 as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, primarily for guarantees of our performance on projects currently in execution or under warranty. These amounts include the standby letters of credit issued under the U.S. senior secured credit agreement discussed in Note 7 and from other facilities worldwide. No material claims have been made against these guarantees, and based on our experience and current expectations, we do not anticipate any material claims.
We have also guaranteed certain performance obligations in a refinery/electric power generation project based in Chile in which we hold a noncontrolling interest. See Note 5 for further information.
103
FOSTER WHEELER AG AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(amounts in thousands of dollars, except share data and per share amounts)
| |
| 10. | Derivative Financial Instruments |
We are exposed to certain risks relating to our ongoing business operations. The risks managed by using derivative financial instruments relate primarily to foreign currency exchange rate risk and, to a significantly lesser extent, interest rate risk. Derivative financial instruments are recognized as assets or liabilities at fair value in our consolidated balance sheet.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Fair Values of Derivative Financial Instruments | |
| | | | | Asset Derivatives | | | | | | Liability Derivatives | |
| | | Balance Sheet
| | December 31,
| | | December 31,
| | | | Balance Sheet
| | December 31,
| | | December 31,
| |
| | | Location | | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | | Location | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Interest rate swap contracts | | Other assets | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | | Other long-term liabilities | | $ | 6,903 | | | $ | 6,554 | |
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Foreign currency forward contracts | | Contracts in process or billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts | | | 2,112 | | | | 1,174 | | | | Contracts in process or billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts | | | 2,978 | | | | 4,934 | |
| Foreign currency forward contracts | | Other accounts receivable | | | 367 | | | | 470 | | | | Accounts payable | | | 38 | | | | 246 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total derivatives | | | | $ | 2,479 | | | $ | 1,644 | | | | | | $ | 9,919 | | | $ | 11,734 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk
We operate on a worldwide basis with substantial operations in Europe that subject us to translation risk mainly relative to the Euro and British pound. Under our risk management policies, we do not hedge translation risk exposure. All activities of our affiliates are recorded in their functional currency, which is typically the local currency in the country of domicile of the affiliate. In the ordinary course of business, our affiliates enter into transactions in currencies other than their respective functional currencies. We seek to minimize the resulting foreign currency transaction risk by contracting for the procurement of goods and services in the same currency as the sales value of the related long-term contract. We further mitigate the risk through the use of foreign currency forward contracts.
The notional amount of foreign currency forward contracts provides one measure of the transaction volume outstanding as of the balance sheet date. As of December 31, 2010, we had a total gross notional amount of $215,652 related to foreign currency forward contracts. Amounts ultimately realized upon final settlement of these financial instruments, along with the gains and losses on the underlying exposures within our long-term contracts, will depend on actual market exchange rates during the remaining life of the instruments. The contracts mature between fiscal years 2011 and 2013.
We are exposed to credit loss in the event of non-performance by the counterparties. These counterparties are commercial banks that are primarily rated “BBB+” or better by S&P (or the equivalent by other recognized credit rating agencies).
Increases in the fair value of the currencies sold forward result in losses while increases in the fair value of the currencies bought forward result in gains. For foreign currency forward contracts used to mitigate currency risk on our projects, the gain or loss from the portion of themark-to-market adjustment related to the completed portion of the underlying project is included in cost of operating revenues at the same time as the underlying foreign currency exposure occurs. The gain or loss from the remaining portion of themark-to-market adjustment, specifically the portion relating to the uncompleted portion of the underlying project is reflected directly in cost of operating revenues in the period in which themark-to-market adjustment
104
FOSTER WHEELER AG AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(amounts in thousands of dollars, except share data and per share amounts)
| |
| 10. | Derivative Financial Instruments — (Continued) |
occurs. We also utilize foreign currency forward contracts to mitigate non-project related currency risks, which are recorded in other deductions, net. The gain or loss from the remaining uncompleted portion of our projects and other non-project related transactions were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Amount of Gain/(Loss) Recognized in
| |
Derivatives Not
| | Location of Gain/(Loss)
| | Income on Derivatives | |
Designated as
| | Recognized in Income on
| | Fiscal Years | |
Hedging Instruments | | Derivative | | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
| |
| Foreign currency forward contracts | | Cost of operating revenues | | $ | (73 | ) | | $ | 7,021 | | | $ | (11,473 | ) |
| Foreign currency forward contracts | | Other deductions, net | | | 98 | | | | 756 | | | | (390 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | | | $ | 25 | | | $ | 7,777 | | | $ | (11,863 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Themark-to-market adjustments on foreign currency forward exchange contracts for these unrealized gains or losses are primarily recorded in either contracts in process or billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts on the consolidated balance sheet.
In fiscal years 2010, 2009, and 2008, we included net cash outflows on the settlement of derivatives of $5,289, $10,600 and $8,410, respectively, within the “net change in contracts in process and billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts,” a component of cash flows from operating activities in the consolidated statement of cash flows.
Interest Rate Risk
We use interest rate swap contracts to manage interest rate risk associated with some of our variable rate special-purpose limited recourse project debt. The aggregate notional amount of the receive-variable/pay-fixed interest rate swaps was $73,400 as of December 31, 2010.
Upon entering into the swap contracts, we designate the interest rate swaps as cash flow hedges. We assess at inception, and on an ongoing basis, whether the interest rate swaps are highly effective in offsetting changes in the cash flows of the project debt. Consequently, we record the fair value of interest rate swap contracts in our consolidated balance sheet at each balance sheet date. Changes in the fair value of the interest rate swap contracts are recorded as a component of other comprehensive income.
The impact from interest rate swap contracts in cash flow hedging relationships was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Fiscal Years | |
| | | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
| |
| Gain/(loss) recognized in Other comprehensive income | | $ | (3,735 | ) | | $ | (3,213 | ) | | $ | (5,752 | ) |
| Gain/(loss) reclassified from Accumulated other comprehensive loss | | | 2,942 | | | | 2,317 | | | | (186 | ) |
See Note 12 for the related tax benefits on cash flow hedges that are recognized in other comprehensive income for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2010, December 31, 2009, and December 26, 2008.
105
FOSTER WHEELER AG AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(amounts in thousands of dollars, except share data and per share amounts)
| |
| 11. | Share-Based Compensation Plans |
Our share-based compensation plans include both restricted awards and stock option awards. The following table summarizes our share-based compensation expense and related income tax benefit:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Fiscal Years | |
| | | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
| |
| Share-based compensation | | $ | 22,996 | | | $ | 22,781 | | | $ | 15,766 | |
| Related income tax benefit | | | 353 | | | | 448 | | | | 332 | |
We estimate the fair value of each option award on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. We then recognize the grant date fair value of each option as compensation expense ratably using the straight-line attribution method over the service period (generally the vesting period). The Black-Scholes model incorporates the following assumptions:
| | |
| | • | Expected volatility — we estimate the volatility of our shares using a “look-back” period which coincides with the expected term, defined below. We believe using a “look-back” period which coincides with the expected term is the most appropriate measure for determining expected volatility. |
| |
| | • | Expected term — we estimate the expected term using the “simplified” method, as outlined in Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107, “Share-Based Payment.” |
| |
| | • | Risk-free interest rate — we estimate the risk-free interest rate using the U.S. Treasury yield curve for periods equal to the expected term of the options in effect at the time of grant. |
| |
| | • | Dividends — we use an expected dividend yield of zero because we have not declared or paid a cash dividend since July 2001 and we do not have any plans to declare or pay any cash dividends. |
We used the following weighted-average assumptions to estimate the fair value of the options granted for the periods indicated:
| | | | | | | |
| | | Fiscal Years |
| | | 2010 | | 2009 | | 2008 |
| |
| Expected volatility | | 69% | | 70% | | 57% |
| Expected term | | 3.9 years | | 3.6 years | | 3.6 years |
| Risk-free interest rate | | 1.60% | | 1.60% | | 1.88% |
| Expected dividend yield | | 0% | | 0% | | 0% |
We estimate the fair value of restricted awards using the market price of our shares on the date of grant. We then recognize the fair value of each restricted award as compensation cost ratably using the straight-line attribution method over the service period (generally the vesting period).
We estimate pre-vesting forfeitures at the time of grant using a combination of historical data and demographic characteristics, and we revise those estimates in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. We record share-based compensation expense only for those awards that are expected to vest.
106
FOSTER WHEELER AG AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(amounts in thousands of dollars, except share data and per share amounts)
| |
| 11. | Share-Based Compensation Plans — (Continued) |
As of December 31, 2010, the breakdown of our unrecognized compensation cost and related weighted-average period for the cost to be recognized were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Weighted-Average
| |
| | | December 31,
| | | Period for Cost to
| |
| | | 2010 | | | be Recognized | |
| |
Unrecognized compensation cost: | | | | | | | | |
| Stock options | | $ | 12,233 | | | | 23 months | |
| Restricted awards | | $ | 14,070 | | | | 23 months | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total unrecognized compensation cost | | $ | 26,303 | | | | 23 months | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Omnibus Incentive Plan:
On May 9, 2006, our shareholders approved the Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “Omnibus Plan”). The Omnibus Plan allows for the granting of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance-contingent shares, performance-contingent units, cash-based awards and other equity-based awards to our employees, non-employee directors and third-party service providers. The Omnibus Plan effectively replaces our prior share-based compensation plans, and no further options or equity-based awards will be granted under any of the prior share-based compensation plans. The maximum number of shares as to which stock options and restricted stock awards may be granted under the Omnibus Plan is 9,560,000 shares, plus shares that become available for issuance pursuant to the terms of the awards previously granted under the prior compensation plans and outstanding as of May 9, 2006 and only if those awards expire, terminate or are otherwise forfeited before being exercised or settled in full (but not to exceed 10,000,000 shares). Shares awarded pursuant to the Omnibus Plan are issued out of our conditionally authorized shares.
The Omnibus Plan includes a “change in control” provision, which provides for cash redemption of equity awards issued under the Omnibus Plan in certain limited circumstances. In accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission Accounting Series Release No. 268, “Presentation in Financial Statements of Redeemable Preferred Stocks,” we present the redemption amount of these equity awards as temporary equity on the consolidated balance sheet as the equity award is amortized during the vesting period. The redemption amount represents the intrinsic value of the equity award on the grant date. In accordance with current accounting guidance regarding the classification and measurement of redeemable securities, we do not adjust the redemption amount each reporting period unless and until it becomes probable that the equity awards will become redeemable (upon a change in control event). Upon vesting of the equity awards, we reclassify the intrinsic value of the equity awards, as determined on the grant date, to permanent equity. A reconciliation of temporary equity for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | December 31,
| | | December 31,
| | | December 26,
| |
| | | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
| |
| Balance at beginning of year | | $ | 2,570 | | | $ | 7,586 | | | $ | 2,728 | |
| Compensation cost during the period for those equity awards with intrinsic value on the grant date | | | 11,672 | | | | 11,615 | | | | 8,306 | |
| Intrinsic value of equity awards vested during the period for those equity awards with intrinsic value on the grant date | | | (9,307 | ) | | | (16,631 | ) | | | (3,448 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Balance at end of year | | $ | 4,935 | | | $ | 2,570 | | | $ | 7,586 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Our articles of association provide for conditional capital of 63,207,957 shares for the issuance of shares under our share-based compensation plans, outstanding share purchase warrants and other convertible securities
107
FOSTER WHEELER AG AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(amounts in thousands of dollars, except share data and per share amounts)
| |
| 11. | Share-Based Compensation Plans — (Continued) |
we may issue in the future. Conditional capital decreases upon issuance of shares in connection with the exercise of outstanding stock options or vesting of restricted stock units, with an offsetting increase to our issued and authorized share capital. As of December 31, 2010, our remaining available conditional capital was 60,675,249 shares.
Prior Share-Based Compensation Plans:
Our prior share-based compensation plans include the 1995 Stock Option Plan and the Stock Option Plan for Directors of Foster Wheeler, both of which were approved by our shareholders, and inducement options granted to our former chief executive officer in 2001 in connection with his employment agreement. No further awards will be granted under these plans. In connection with the Redomestication, Foster Wheeler AG assumed Foster Wheeler Ltd.’s obligations under Foster Wheeler Ltd.’s share-based incentive award programs and similar employee share-based awards. See Note 18 for further information related to the Redomestication.
Stock Option Awards:
A summary of employee stock option activity for fiscal years 2010, 2009, and 2008 is presented below:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
| | | | | | Weighted-
| | | | | | Weighted-
| | | | | | Weighted-
| |
| | | | | | Average
| | | | | | Average
| | | | | | Average
| |
| | | | | | Exercise
| | | | | | Exercise
| | | | | | Exercise
| |
| | | Shares | | | Price | | | Shares | | | Price | | | Shares | | | Price | |
| |
| Options outstanding at beginning of year | | | 3,517,022 | | | $ | 30.53 | | | | 3,077,046 | | | $ | 32.59 | | | | 1,502,476 | | | $ | 44.45 | |
| Options exercised | | | (1,185,186 | ) | | $ | 21.77 | | | | (65,026 | ) | | $ | 23.23 | | | | (142,038 | ) | | $ | 19.65 | |
| Options granted | | | 535,123 | | | $ | 25.61 | | | | 580,576 | | | $ | 30.15 | | | | 1,761,246 | | | $ | 26.99 | |
| Options cancelled or expired | | | (129,962 | ) | | $ | 55.22 | | | | (75,574 | ) | | $ | 117.58 | | | | (44,638 | ) | | $ | 251.94 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Options outstanding at end of year | | | 2,736,997 | | | $ | 32.19 | | | | 3,517,022 | | | $ | 30.53 | | | | 3,077,046 | | | $ | 32.59 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Options available for grant at end of year | | | 4,082,045 | | | | | | | | 4,836,596 | | | | | | | | 5,582,611 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Weighted-average fair value of options granted* | | $ | 13.23 | | | | | | | $ | 15.25 | | | | | | | $ | 11.21 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
| * | | Based on grant date fair value of options. |
108
FOSTER WHEELER AG AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(amounts in thousands of dollars, except share data and per share amounts)
| |
| 11. | Share-Based Compensation Plans — (Continued) |
The following tables summarize our stock options outstanding and exercisable as of December 31, 2010:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Stock Options Outstanding | | | Stock Options Exercisable | |
| | | | | | | Weighted-
| | | | | | | | | | | | Weighted-
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Average
| | | | | | | | | | | | Average
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Remaining
| | | Weighted-
| | | Aggregate
| | | | | | Remaining
| | | Weighted-
| | | Aggregate
| |
| | | | | | | | | Number
| | | Contractual
| | | Average
| | | Intrinsic
| | | Number
| | | Contractual
| | | Average
| | | Intrinsic
| |
| Range of Exercise Prices | | | Outstanding | | | Life | | | Exercise Price | | | Value | | | Exercisable | | | Life | | | Exercise Price | | | Value | |
| |
| $ | 14.52 | | | to | | $ | 16.50 | | | | 38,424 | | | | 2.52 years | | | $ | 15.22 | | | $ | 741,690 | | | | 19,125 | | | | 2.03 years | | | $ | 15.92 | | | $ | 355,710 | |
| | 21.43 | | | to | | | 21.70 | | | | 1,031,252 | | | | 2.91 years | | | | 21.43 | | | | 13,498,765 | | | | 566,855 | | | | 2.90 years | | | | 21.43 | | | | 7,419,808 | |
| | 22.86 | | | to | | | 26.07 | | | | 543,923 | | | | 2.87 years | | | | 24.88 | | | | 5,242,606 | | | | 101,868 | | | | 1.28 years | | | | 25.02 | | | | 967,845 | |
| | 28.11 | | | to | | | 33.73 | | | | 592,942 | | | | 3.61 years | | | | 31.66 | | | | 1,698,670 | | | | 213,530 | | | | 2.70 years | | | | 31.91 | | | | 558,240 | |
| | 46.90 | | | to | | | 56.88 | | | | 181,167 | | | | 0.70 years | | | | 51.18 | | | | — | | | | 181,167 | | | | 0.70 years | | | | 51.18 | | | | — | |
| | 65.62 | | | to | | | 116.00 | | | | 349,289 | | | | 2.02 years | | | | 68.29 | | | | — | | | | 300,682 | | | | 1.99 years | | | | 68.72 | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| $ | 14.52 | | | to | | $ | 116.00 | | | | 2,736,997 | | | | 2.79 years | | | $ | 32.19 | | | $ | 21,181,731 | | | | 1,383,227 | | | | 2.25 years | | | $ | 37.41 | | | $ | 9,301,603 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The aggregate intrinsic value of outstanding options and exercisable options as of December 31, 2010 was calculated as the difference between the market price of our shares and the exercise price of the underlying options for the options that had an exercise price lower than the market price of our shares at that date. The total intrinsic value of the options exercised during fiscal years 2010, 2009, and 2008 was $10,268, $483, and $7,320, respectively, determined as of the date of exercise.
Restricted Awards:
Restricted awards consist of restricted shares and restricted share units. A summary of restricted awards activity for fiscal years 2010, 2009, and 2008 is presented below:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
| | | | | | Weighted-
| | | | | | Weighted-
| | | | | | Weighted-
| |
| | | | | | Average
| | | | | | Average
| | | | | | Average
| |
| | | | | | Grant
| | | | | | Grant
| | | | | | Grant
| |
| | | Units | | | Price | | | Units | | | Price | | | Units | | | Price | |
| |
Restricted Share Units: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Non-vested at beginning of year | | | 707,923 | | | $ | 28.28 | | | | 931,915 | | | $ | 29.63 | | | | 227,430 | | | $ | 38.79 | |
| Granted | | | 374,204 | | | $ | 26.53 | | | | 245,949 | | | $ | 30.15 | | | | 768,255 | | | $ | 26.68 | |
| Vested | | | (321,493 | ) | | $ | 28.95 | | | | (464,258 | ) | | $ | 31.94 | | | | (62,486 | ) | | $ | 26.31 | |
| Cancelled or forfeited | | | (22,879 | ) | | $ | 29.15 | | | | (5,683 | ) | | $ | 32.14 | | | | (1,284 | ) | | $ | 44.10 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Non-vested at end of year | | | 737,755 | | | $ | 27.07 | | | | 707,923 | | | $ | 28.28 | | | | 931,915 | | | $ | 29.63 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Restricted Shares: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Non-vested at beginning of year | | | — | | | $ | — | | | | 82,980 | | | $ | 21.47 | | | | 165,960 | | | $ | 21.47 | |
| Granted | | | — | | | $ | — | | | | — | | | $ | — | | | | — | | | $ | — | |
| Vested | | | — | | | $ | — | | | | (82,980 | ) | | $ | 21.47 | | | | (82,980 | ) | | $ | 21.47 | |
| Cancelled or forfeited | | | — | | | $ | — | | | | — | | | $ | — | | | | — | | | $ | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Non-vested at end of year | | | — | | | $ | — | | | | — | | | $ | — | | | | 82,980 | | | $ | 21.47 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, there were no restricted shares outstanding and there was no restricted share activity during fiscal year 2010.
109
FOSTER WHEELER AG AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(amounts in thousands of dollars, except share data and per share amounts)
| |
| 11. | Share-Based Compensation Plans — (Continued) |
The total fair value of restricted awards vested during fiscal years 2010, 2009, and 2008 was $10,129, $16,043, and $8,946, respectively.
| |
| 12. | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss |
Below are the adjustments included in other comprehensive loss/(income) for foreign currency translation, net gain/(loss) on cash flow hedges and pension and other postretirement benefits and their related tax provision/(benefit) and balances attributable to noncontrolling interests and Foster Wheeler AG:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Fiscal Years | |
| | | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
| |
| Foreign currency translation | | $ | (20,789 | ) | | $ | 30,468 | | | $ | (69,426 | ) |
| Less: Attributable to noncontrolling interests | | | 1,748 | | | | 1,181 | | | | (679 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Attributable to Foster Wheeler AG | | $ | (22,537 | ) | | $ | 29,287 | | | $ | (68,747 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net loss on cash flow hedges | | $ | (1,154 | ) | | $ | (2,102 | ) | | $ | (11,925 | ) |
| Less: Tax benefit | | | (317 | ) | | | (578 | ) | | | (3,280 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Attributable to Foster Wheeler AG | | $ | (837 | ) | | $ | (1,524 | ) | | $ | (8,645 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Pension and other postretirement benefits | | $ | (442 | ) | | $ | 30,629 | | | $ | (164,560 | ) |
| Less: Tax provision/(benefit) | | | 3,017 | | | | 1,568 | | | | (8,278 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Pension and other postretirement benefits, net of tax | | | (3,459 | ) | | | 29,061 | | | | (156,282 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Less: Attributable to noncontrolling interests | | | (333 | ) | | | 40 | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Attributable to Foster Wheeler AG | | $ | (3,126 | ) | | $ | 29,021 | | | $ | (156,282 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
No tax is currently provided on foreign currency translation adjustments in comprehensive income as they relate to earnings that are indefinitely reinvested in each subsidiary’s country of domicile.
Below is a rollforward of accumulated other comprehensive loss adjusted for other comprehensive income/(loss) items attributable to Foster Wheeler AG (all amounts net of tax):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss | |
| | | Accumulated
| | | | | | Pension and
| | | Total Accumulated
| |
| | | Foreign
| | | Net Gains/(Losses)
| | | Other
| | | Other
| |
| | | Currency
| | | on Cash Flow
| | | Postretirement
| | | Comprehensive
| |
| | | Translation | | | Hedges | | | Benefits | | | Loss | |
| |
| Balance as of December 28, 2007 | | $ | (10,617 | ) | | $ | 1,673 | | | $ | (252,170 | ) | | $ | (261,114 | ) |
| Other comprehensive loss | | | (68,747 | ) | | | (8,645 | ) | | | (156,282 | ) | | | (233,674 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Balance as of December 26, 2008 | | | (79,364 | ) | | | (6,972 | ) | | | (408,452 | ) | | | (494,788 | ) |
| Other comprehensive income/(loss) | | | 29,287 | | | | (1,524 | ) | | | 29,021 | | | | 56,784 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Balance as of December 31, 2009 | | | (50,077 | ) | | | (8,496 | ) | | | (379,431 | ) | | | (438,004 | ) |
| Other comprehensive loss | | | (22,537 | ) | | | (837 | ) | | | (3,126 | ) | | | (26,500 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Balance as of December 31, 2010 | | $ | (72,614 | ) | | $ | (9,333 | ) | | $ | (382,557 | ) | | $ | (464,504 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
110
FOSTER WHEELER AG AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(amounts in thousands of dollars, except share data and per share amounts)
Below are the components of income/(loss) before income taxes for fiscal years 2010, 2009, and 2008 and under the following tax jurisdictions:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Fiscal Years | |
| | | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
| |
| U.S. | | $ | (57,982 | ) | | $ | (724 | ) | | $ | 28,290 | |
| Non-U.S. | | | 363,222 | | | | 455,844 | | | | 602,607 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total | | $ | 305,240 | | | $ | 455,120 | | | $ | 630,897 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The provision for income taxes was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Fiscal Years | |
| | | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
| |
Current tax expense: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| U.S. | | $ | 1,057 | | | $ | 387 | | | $ | 2,880 | |
| Non-U.S. | | | 40,233 | | | | 73,694 | | | | 117,031 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total current | | | 41,290 | | | | 74,081 | | | | 119,911 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Deferred tax expense/(benefit): | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| U.S. | | | — | | | | — | | | | (8,758 | ) |
| Non-U.S. | | | 33,241 | | | | 19,681 | | | | (14,125 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total deferred | | | 33,241 | | | | 19,681 | | | | (22,883 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total provision for income taxes | | $ | 74,531 | | | $ | 93,762 | | | $ | 97,028 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
111
FOSTER WHEELER AG AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(amounts in thousands of dollars, except share data and per share amounts)
| |
| 13. | Income Taxes — (Continued) |
Deferred tax assets/(liabilities) consist of the following:
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | December 31,
| | | December 31,
| |
| | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
| |
| Deferred tax assets: | | | | | | | | |
| Pensions | | $ | 29,499 | | | $ | 62,643 | |
| Accrued costs on long-term contracts | | | 24,858 | | | | 27,893 | |
| Deferred income | | | 5,786 | | | | 10,001 | |
| Accrued expenses | | | 50,668 | | | | 42,264 | |
| Postretirement benefits other than pensions | | | 23,948 | | | | 23,723 | |
| Asbestos claims | | | 49,952 | | | | 43,560 | |
| Net operating loss carryforwards and other tax attributes | | | 264,146 | | | | 259,717 | |
| Asset impairments and other reserves | | | 1,990 | | | | 779 | |
| Other | | | 7,700 | | | | 10,216 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Total gross deferred tax assets | | | 458,547 | | | | 480,796 | |
| Valuation allowance | | | (373,878 | ) | | | (362,022 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Total deferred tax assets | | | 84,669 | | | | 118,774 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Deferred tax liabilities: | | | | | | | | |
| Property, plant and equipment | | | (27,363 | ) | | | (30,145 | ) |
| Goodwill and other intangible assets | | | (16,230 | ) | | | (11,825 | ) |
| Investments | | | (21,648 | ) | | | (20,986 | ) |
| Unremitted earnings of foreign subsidiaries | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Total gross deferred tax liabilities | | | (65,241 | ) | | | (62,956 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Net deferred tax assets | | $ | 19,428 | | | $ | 55,818 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Realization of deferred tax assets is dependent on generating sufficient taxable income prior to the expiration of the various attributes. We believe that it is more likely than not that the remaining net deferred tax assets (after consideration of the valuation allowance) will be realized through future earningsand/or tax planning strategies. The amount of the deferred tax assets considered realizable, however, could change in the near future if estimates of future taxable income during the carryforward period are changed. We have reduced our U.S. and certainnon-U.S. tax benefits by a valuation allowance based on a consideration of all available evidence, which indicates that it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. During fiscal year 2010, the valuation allowance increased by $11,900, primarily as a result of losses in jurisdictions where a full valuation allowance was previously recorded (primarily U.S.). This increase was partially offset by a reversal of our valuation allowance on deferred tax assets in one of ournon-U.S. subsidiaries.
For statutory purposes, the majority of deferred tax assets for which a valuation allowance is provided do not begin expiring until fiscal year 2025 or later, based on the current tax laws.
Our subsidiaries file income tax returns in numerous tax jurisdictions, including the United States, several U.S. states and numerousnon-U.S. jurisdictions around the world. Tax returns are also filed in jurisdictions where our subsidiaries execute project-related work. The statute of limitations varies by jurisdiction. Because of the number of jurisdictions in which we file tax returns, in any given year the statute of limitations in a
112
FOSTER WHEELER AG AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(amounts in thousands of dollars, except share data and per share amounts)
| |
| 13. | Income Taxes — (Continued) |
number of jurisdictions may expire within 12 months from the balance sheet date. As a result, we expect recurring changes in unrecognized tax benefits due to the expiration of the statute of limitations, none of which are expected to be individually significant. With few exceptions, we are no longer subject to income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before fiscal year 2006.
During fiscal year 2010 and 2008, we settled tax audits in the Europe and Asia Pacific regions, respectively, which resulted in a reduction of unrecognized tax benefits and a corresponding reduction in the provision for income taxes of $1,700 and $3,200, respectively. A number of tax years are under audit by the tax authorities in various jurisdictions, including the U.S. and several states within the U.S. We anticipate that several of these audits may be concluded in the foreseeable future, including in fiscal year 2011. Based on the status of these audits, it is reasonably possible that the conclusion of the audits may result in a reduction of unrecognized tax benefits. However, it is not possible to estimate the magnitude of any such reduction at this time.
The following table summarizes the activity related to our unrecognized tax benefits which, if recognized, would affect our effective tax rate before existing valuation allowance considerations:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Fiscal Years | |
| | | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
| |
| Balance at beginning of year | | $ | 58,846 | | | $ | 48,742 | | | $ | 52,175 | |
| Additions for tax positions related to the current year | | | 9,131 | | | | 12,680 | | | | 7,859 | |
| Additions for tax positions related to prior years | | | — | | | | 10,644 | | | | — | |
| Reductions for tax positions related to prior years | | | (4,791 | ) | | | (3,336 | ) | | | (5,668 | ) |
| Settlements | | | (2,445 | ) | | | (507 | ) | | | — | |
| Reductions for lapse of statute of limitations | | | (5,871 | ) | | | (9,377 | ) | | | (5,624 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Balance at end of year | | $ | 54,870 | | | $ | 58,846 | | | $ | 48,742 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
We recognize interest accrued on the unrecognized tax benefits in interest expense and penalties on the unrecognized tax benefits in other deductions, net on our consolidated statement of operations. Previously accrued interestand/or penalties that are ultimately not assessed reduce current year expense. The table below summarizes our activity for interest and penalties on unrecognized tax benefits for fiscal years 2010, 2009 and 2008:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Fiscal Years | |
| | | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
| |
| Interest expense accrued on unrecognized tax benefits | | $ | 2,701 | | | $ | 2,014 | | | $ | 1,158 | |
| Previously accrued interest that was ultimately not assessed | | | (1,933 | ) | | | (5,060 | ) | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net interest expense/(net reduction of interest expense) on unrecognized tax benefits | | | 768 | | | | (3,046 | ) | | | 1,158 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Penalties on unrecognized tax benefits | | $ | 3,735 | | | $ | 5,187 | | | $ | 2,649 | |
| Previously accrued tax penalties that were ultimately not assessed | | | (2,012 | ) | | | (2,706 | ) | | | (5,000 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net penalties/(net reduction of penalties) on unrecognized tax benefits | | $ | 1,723 | | | $ | 2,481 | | | $ | (2,351 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
113
FOSTER WHEELER AG AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(amounts in thousands of dollars, except share data and per share amounts)
| |
| 13. | Income Taxes — (Continued) |
The provision for income taxes differs from the amount of income tax computed by applying the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35% to income before income taxes, as a result of the following:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Fiscal Years | |
| | | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
| |
| Tax provision at U.S. statutory rate | | | 35.0 | % | | | 35.0 | % | | | 35.0 | % |
| Valuation allowance | | | 5.3 | % | | | (0.8 | )% | | | (6.4 | )% |
Non-U.S. rates different than U.S. statutory rate | | | (16.8 | )% | | | (14.7 | )% | | | (13.8 | )% |
| Impact of changes in tax rate on deferred taxes | | | 0.3 | % | | | 0.2 | % | | | 0.3 | % |
Nondeductibleloss/nontaxable income | | | 0.6 | % | | | 1.9 | % | | | (0.2 | )% |
| Other | | | 0.0 | % | | | (1.0 | )% | | | 0.5 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total | | | 24.4 | % | | | 20.6 | % | | | 15.4 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
We operate through two business groups: ourGlobal E&C Groupand ourGlobal Power Group.
Global E&C Group
Our Global E&C Group, which operates worldwide, designs, engineers and constructs onshore and offshore upstream oil and gas processing facilities, natural gas liquefaction facilities and receiving terminals,gas-to-liquids facilities, oil refining, chemical and petrochemical, pharmaceutical and biotechnology facilities and related infrastructure, including power generation facilities, distribution facilities, gasification facilities and processing facilities associated with the metals and mining sector. Our Global E&C Group is also involved in the design of facilities in new or developing market sectors, including carbon capture and storage, solid fuel-fired integrated gasification combined-cycle power plants,coal-to-liquids,coal-to-chemicals and biofuels. Additionally, our Global E&C Group is also involved in the development, engineering, construction, ownership and operation of power generation facilities, from conventional and renewable sources, and ofwaste-to-energy facilities in Europe. Our Global E&C Group generates revenues from design, engineering, procurement, construction and project management activities pursuant to contracts spanning up to approximately four years in duration and from returns on its equity investments in various power production facilities.
Global Power Group
Our Global Power Group designs, manufactures and erects steam generating and auxiliary equipment for electric power generating stations, district heating and industrial facilities worldwide and ownsand/or operates several cogeneration, independent power production andwaste-to-energy facilities, as well as power generation facilities for the process and petrochemical industries. Our Global Power Group generates revenues from engineering activities, equipment supply, construction contracts, operating and maintenance agreements, royalties from licensing its technology, and from returns on its investments in power production facilities.
Our Global Power Group’s steam generating equipment includes a full range of technologies, offering independent power producers, utilities, municipalities and industrial clients high-value technology solutions for converting a wide range of fuels, such as coal, lignite, petroleum coke, oil, gas, solar, biomass and municipal solid waste, into steam, which can be used for power generation, district heating or for industrial processes.
114
FOSTER WHEELER AG AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(amounts in thousands of dollars, except share data and per share amounts)
| |
| 14. | Business Segments — (Continued) |
Corporate and Finance Group
In addition to these two business groups, which also represent operating segments for financial reporting purposes, we report corporate center expenses, our captive insurance operation and expenses related to certain legacy liabilities, such as asbestos, in the Corporate and Finance Group (“C&F Group”), which we also treat as an operating segment for financial reporting purposes.
Operating Revenues
We conduct our business on a global basis. Our Global E&C Group has accounted for the largest portion of our operating revenues over the last ten years. In fiscal year 2010, our Global E&C Group accounted for 82% of our total operating revenues, while our Global Power Group accounted for 18% of our total operating revenues.
Our operating revenues by geographic region, based upon where our projects are being executed, for fiscal year 2010 were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Global E&C Group | | | Global Power Group | | | Total | |
Geographic Region Concentration
| | | | | Percentage of
| | | | | | Percentage of
| | | | | | Percentage of
| |
of Operating Revenues (Third
| | Third-Party
| | | Third-Party
| | | Third-Party
| | | Third-Party
| | | Third-Party
| | | Third-Party
| |
| Party) by Project Location: | | Revenues | | | Revenues | | | Revenues | | | Revenues | | | Revenues | | | Revenues | |
| |
| Asia | | $ | 813,212 | | | | 24.3 | % | | $ | 151,314 | | | | 21.0 | % | | $ | 964,526 | | | | 23.7 | % |
| Australasia and other* | | | 1,176,211 | | | | 35.2 | % | | | 35 | | | | 0.0 | % | | | 1,176,246 | | | | 28.9 | % |
| Europe | | | 603,862 | | | | 18.1 | % | | | 275,641 | | | | 38.2 | % | | | 879,503 | | | | 21.6 | % |
| Middle East | | | 194,906 | | | | 5.8 | % | | | 17,721 | | | | 2.5 | % | | | 212,627 | | | | 5.2 | % |
| North America | | | 372,223 | | | | 11.1 | % | | | 223,740 | | | | 31.0 | % | | | 595,963 | | | | 14.7 | % |
| South America | | | 185,636 | | | | 5.5 | % | | | 53,218 | | | | 7.3 | % | | | 238,854 | | | | 5.9 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total | | $ | 3,346,050 | | | | 100.0 | % | | $ | 721,669 | | | | 100.0 | % | | $ | 4,067,719 | | | | 100.0 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
| * | | Australasia and other primarily represents Australia, South Africa, New Zealand and the Pacific Islands. |
One client accounted for approximately 25%, 24%, and 24% of our consolidated operating revenues (inclusive of flow-through revenues) in fiscal years 2010, 2009, and 2008, respectively; however, the associated flow-through revenues included in these percentages accounted for approximately 23%, 22%, and 20% of our consolidated operating revenues in fiscal years 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. No other single client accounted for ten percent or more of our consolidated revenues in fiscal years 2010, 2009 or 2008.
EBITDA
EBITDA is the primary measure of operating performance used by our chief operating decision maker. We define EBITDA as net income attributable to Foster Wheeler AG before interest expense, income taxes, depreciation and amortization.
115
FOSTER WHEELER AG AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(amounts in thousands of dollars, except share data and per share amounts)
| |
| 14. | Business Segments — (Continued) |
A reconciliation of EBITDA to net income attributable to Foster Wheeler AG is shown below:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Global
| | | Global
| | | C&F
| |
| | | Total | | | E&C Group | | | Power Group | | | Group(1) | |
| |
Fiscal Year 2010 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Operating revenues (third-party) | | $ | 4,067,719 | | | $ | 3,346,050 | | | $ | 721,669 | | | $ | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
EBITDA(2) | | $ | 359,703 | | | $ | 296,240 | | | $ | 163,825 | | | $ | (100,362 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Add: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | | $ | 15,302 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Less: Interest expense | | | 15,610 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Less: Depreciation and amortization | | | 54,155 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Income before income taxes | | | 305,240 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Less: Provision for income taxes | | | 74,531 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net income | | | 230,709 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | | | 15,302 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net income attributable to Foster Wheeler AG | | $ | 215,407 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total assets | | $ | 3,083,539 | | | $ | 1,530,575 | | | $ | 1,054,193 | | | $ | 498,771 | |
| Capital expenditures | | $ | 23,278 | | | $ | 9,036 | | | $ | 9,172 | | | $ | 5,070 | |
Fiscal Year 2009 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Operating revenues (third-party) | | $ | 5,056,334 | | | $ | 4,040,082 | | | $ | 1,016,252 | | | $ | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
EBITDA(2) | | $ | 503,799 | | | $ | 421,186 | | | $ | 194,027 | | | $ | (111,414 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Add: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | | $ | 11,202 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Less: Interest expense | | | 14,122 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Less: Depreciation and amortization | | | 45,759 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Income before income taxes | | | 455,120 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Less: Provision for income taxes | | | 93,762 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net income | | | 361,358 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | | | 11,202 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net income attributable to Foster Wheeler AG | | $ | 350,156 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total assets | | $ | 3,187,738 | | | $ | 1,626,027 | | | $ | 941,966 | | | $ | 619,745 | |
| Capital expenditures | | $ | 45,623 | | | $ | 34,711 | | | $ | 7,840 | | | $ | 3,072 | |
116
FOSTER WHEELER AG AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(amounts in thousands of dollars, except share data and per share amounts)
| |
| 14. | Business Segments — (Continued) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Global
| | | Global
| | | C&F
| |
| | | Total | | | E&C Group | | | Power Group | | | Group(1) | |
| |
Fiscal Year 2008 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Operating revenues (third-party) | | $ | 6,854,290 | | | $ | 5,147,227 | | | $ | 1,707,063 | | | $ | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
EBITDA(2) | | $ | 686,067 | | | $ | 535,602 | | | $ | 239,508 | | | $ | (89,043 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Add: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | | | 7,249 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Less: Interest expense | | | 17,621 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Less: Depreciation and amortization | | | 44,798 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Income before income taxes | | | 630,897 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Less: Provision for income taxes | | | 97,028 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net income | | | 533,869 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | | | 7,249 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net income attributable to Foster Wheeler AG | | $ | 526,620 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Capital expenditures | | $ | 103,965 | | | $ | 90,228 | | | $ | 11,625 | | | $ | 2,112 | |
| | |
| (1) | | Includes general corporate income and expense, our captive insurance operation and the elimination of transactions and balances related to intercompany interest. |
| |
| (2) | | EBITDA includes the following: |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Fiscal Years | |
| | | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
| |
| Net increase in contract profit from the regular revaluation of final estimated contract profit revisions*: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Global E&C | | $ | 32,700 | | | $ | 66,700 | | | $ | 46,300 | |
| Global Power Group | | | 24,100 | | | | 2,300 | | | | (19,600 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total | | | 56,800 | | | | 69,000 | | | | 26,700 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net asbestos-related provision in C&F Group** | | | 5,410 | | | | 26,365 | | | | 6,607 | |
| Curtailment gain on closure of the U.K. pension plan in Global E&C | | | 20,100 | | | | — | | | | — | |
| Charges for severance-related postemployment benefits: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Global E&C | | | 3,700 | | | | 8,700 | | | | — | |
| Global Power Group | | | — | | | | — | | | | 9,000 | |
| C&F Group | | | 7,100 | | | | 3,700 | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total | | | 10,800 | | | | 12,400 | | | | 9,000 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
| * | | Please refer to “Revenue Recognition on Long-Term Contracts” in Note 1 for further information regarding changes in our final estimated contract profit. |
| |
| ** | | Please refer to Note 16 for further information regarding the revaluation of our asbestos liability and related asset. |
117
FOSTER WHEELER AG AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(amounts in thousands of dollars, except share data and per share amounts)
| |
| 14. | Business Segments — (Continued) |
Identifiable Assets
Identifiable assets by group are those assets that are directly related to and support the operations of each group. Assets of our C&F Group are principally cash, investments, real estate and insurance receivables.
The accounting policies of our business segments are the same as those described in our summary of significant accounting policies. The only significant intersegment transactions relate to interest on intercompany balances. We account for interest on those arrangements as if they were third-party transactions — i.e. at current market rates, and we include the elimination of that activity in the results of the C&F Group.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Equity in Earnings of
| | Fiscal Years Ended | |
| Unconsolidated Subsidiaries: | | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
| |
| Global E&C Group | | $ | 3,107 | | | $ | 18,220 | | | $ | 11,649 | |
| Global Power Group | | | 20,916 | | | | 16,323 | | | | 21,729 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total | | $ | 24,023 | | | $ | 34,543 | | | $ | 33,378 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | December 31,
| | | December 31,
| |
| Investments In and Advances to Unconsolidated Subsidiaries: | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
| |
| Global E&C Group | | $ | 137,486 | | | $ | 157,970 | |
| Global Power Group | | | 79,580 | | | | 70,055 | |
| C&F Group | | | 5 | | | | 5 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Total | | $ | 217,071 | | | $ | 228,030 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Third-party operating revenues as presented below are based on the geographic region in which the contracting subsidiary is located and not the location of the client or job site.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Geographic Region Concentration of
| | Fiscal Years | |
| Operating Revenues (Third-Party) by Subsidiary Location: | | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
| |
| Asia | | $ | 669,321 | | | $ | 847,316 | | | $ | 1,010,232 | |
| Australasia and other* | | | 1,090,252 | | | | 1,126,905 | | | | 1,219,366 | |
| Europe | | | 1,404,526 | | | | 2,011,673 | | | | 2,898,987 | |
| Middle East | | | 54,015 | | | | 232,405 | | | | 557,437 | |
| United States | | | 791,603 | | | | 810,750 | | | | 1,127,212 | |
| Other locations in North America | | | 3,783 | | | | 8,575 | | | | 21,122 | |
| South America | | | 54,219 | | | | 18,710 | | | | 19,934 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total | | $ | 4,067,719 | | | $ | 5,056,334 | | | $ | 6,854,290 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
| * | | Australasia and other primarily represents Australia, South Africa, New Zealand and the Pacific Islands. |
118
FOSTER WHEELER AG AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(amounts in thousands of dollars, except share data and per share amounts)
| |
| 14. | Business Segments — (Continued) |
Additional country detail for third-party revenues, determined based upon the location of the contracting subsidiary, are presented below and these balances represent a portion of the total operating revenues presented in the table above:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Geographic Country Concentration of
| | Fiscal Years | |
| Operating Revenues (Third-Party) by Subsidiary Location: | | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
| |
| United Kingdom | | $ | 482,190 | | | $ | 881,553 | | | $ | 1,308,255 | |
| Australia | | | 975,112 | | | | 1,054,216 | | | | 1,170,601 | |
| Singapore | | | 357,235 | | | | 564,007 | | | | 694,847 | |
| Switzerland* | | | 2,784 | | | | 3,872 | | | | 2,716 | |
| | |
| * | | Switzerland is the country of domicile of Foster Wheeler AG. |
Long-lived assets as presented below are based on the geographic region in which the contracting subsidiary is located:
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | December 31,
| | | December 31,
| |
| Long-Lived Assets: | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
| |
| Asia | | $ | 33,664 | | | $ | 37,896 | |
| Australasia and other* | | | 4,502 | | | | 4,397 | |
| Europe | | | 330,564 | | | | 379,854 | |
| Middle East | | | 296 | | | | 52 | |
| United States | | | 284,771 | | | | 296,976 | |
| Other locations in North America | | | 8 | | | | 12 | |
| South America | | | 80,340 | | | | 68,706 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Total | | $ | 734,145 | | | $ | 787,893 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | |
| * | | Australasia and other primarily represents Australia, South Africa, New Zealand and the Pacific Islands. |
As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, our contracting subsidiaries in Switzerland, the Foster Wheeler AG country of domicile, had long-lived assets of $5,094 and $1,065, respectively.
Operating revenues by industry were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Fiscal Years | |
| Operating Revenues (Third-Party) by Industry: | | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
| |
| Power generation | | $ | 644,033 | | | $ | 954,852 | | | $ | 1,637,718 | |
| Oil refining | | | 1,401,994 | | | | 1,437,277 | | | | 1,574,426 | |
| Pharmaceutical | | | 48,207 | | | | 65,891 | | | | 81,438 | |
| Oil and gas | | | 1,149,053 | | | | 1,499,276 | | | | 1,891,490 | |
| Chemical/petrochemical | | | 653,748 | | | | 963,986 | | | | 1,490,168 | |
| Power plant operation and maintenance | | | 130,839 | | | | 108,875 | | | | 130,144 | |
| Environmental | | | 12,873 | | | | 16,586 | | | | 29,959 | |
| Other, net of eliminations | | | 26,972 | | | | 9,591 | | | | 18,947 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total | | $ | 4,067,719 | | | $ | 5,056,334 | | | $ | 6,854,290 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
119
FOSTER WHEELER AG AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(amounts in thousands of dollars, except share data and per share amounts)
Certain of our subsidiaries are obligated under operating lease agreements, primarily for office space. In many instances, our subsidiaries retain the right tosub-lease the office space. Rental expense for these leases was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Fiscal Years | |
| | | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
| |
| Rental expense for leases | | $ | 61,936 | | | $ | 65,570 | | | $ | 65,644 | |
Future minimum rental commitments on non-cancelable leases are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Fiscal Years | |
| | | 2011 | | | 2012 | | | 2013 | | | 2014 | | | 2015 | | | Thereafter | | | Total | |
| |
| Future minimum rental commitments on non-cancelable leases | | $ | 51,449 | | | $ | 43,172 | | | $ | 37,475 | | | $ | 31,151 | | | $ | 26,272 | | | $ | 139,661 | | | $ | 329,180 | |
We entered into sale/leaseback transactions for an office building in Spain in 2000 and an office building in the United Kingdom in 1999. In connection with these transactions, we recorded deferred gains, which are being recognized into income over the term of the respective leases. The gain recognized was $4,004, $4,036, and $4,575 for fiscal years 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, the balance of the deferred gains was $41,328 and $47,691, respectively, and is included in other long-term liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet. Theyear-over-year change in the deferred gain balance includes the impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates.
| |
| 16. | Litigation and Uncertainties |
Asbestos
Some of our U.S. and U.K. subsidiaries are defendants in numerous asbestos-related lawsuits andout-of-court informal claims pending in the United States and the United Kingdom. Plaintiffs claim damages for personal injury alleged to have arisen from exposure to or use of asbestos in connection with work allegedly performed by our subsidiaries during the 1970s and earlier.
United States
A summary of our U.S. claim activity is as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Number of Claims: | |
| | | Fiscal Years | |
| | | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
| |
| Open claims at beginning of year | | | 125,100 | | | | 130,760 | | | | 131,340 | |
| New claims | | | 6,080 | | | | 4,410 | | | | 4,950 | |
| Claims resolved | | | (6,760 | ) | | | (10,070 | ) | | | (5,530 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Open claims at end of year | | | 124,420 | | | | 125,100 | | | | 130,760 | |
Claims not valued in the liability(1) | | | (97,440 | ) | | | (94,740 | ) | | | (84,830 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Open claims valued in the liability at end of year | | | 26,980 | | | | 30,360 | | | | 45,930 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
| (1) | | Claims not valued in the liability include claims on certain inactive court dockets, claims over six years old that are considered abandoned and certain other items. |
120
FOSTER WHEELER AG AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(amounts in thousands of dollars, except share data and per share amounts)
| |
| 16. | Litigation and Uncertainties — (Continued) |
Of the approximately 124,420 open claims, our subsidiaries are respondents in approximately 30,300 open claims wherein we have administrative agreements and are named defendants in lawsuits involving approximately 94,120 plaintiffs.
All of the open administrative claims have been filed under blanket administrative agreements that we have with various law firms representing claimants and do not specify monetary damages sought. Based on our analysis of lawsuits, approximately 56% do not specify the monetary damages sought or merely recite that the amount of monetary damages sought meets or exceeds the required minimum in the jurisdiction in which suit is filed. The following table summarizes the range of requested monetary damages sought by asbestos lawsuits:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | No specified
| | | Range of Requested Monetary Damages | | | | |
| | | damages* | | | $1 to $50 | | | $51 to $1,000 | | | $1,001 to $10,000 | | | $10,001 +** | | | Total | |
| |
| Asbestos lawsuit monetary damages sought | | | 56 | % | | | 10 | % | | | 27 | % | | | 5 | % | | | 2 | % | | | 100 | % |
| | |
| * | | No specified monetary damages sought or recited amount of monetary damages sought meets or exceeds the required jurisdictional minimum in the jurisdiction in which suit is filed. |
| |
| ** | | Very small number of cases range to $50,000. |
The majority of requests for monetary damages are asserted against multiple named defendants in a single complaint.
We had the following U.S. asbestos-related assets and liabilities recorded on our consolidated balance sheet as of the dates set forth below. Total U.S. asbestos-related liabilities are estimated through fiscal year 2025. Although it is likely that claims will continue to be filed after that date, the uncertainties inherent in any long-term forecast prevent us from making reliable estimates of the indemnity and defense costs that might be incurred after that date.
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | December 31,
| | | December 31,
| |
| | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
| |
Asbestos-related assets: | | | | | | | | |
| Accounts and notes receivable-other | | $ | 54,449 | | | $ | 65,578 | |
| Asbestos-related insurance recovery receivable | | | 165,452 | | | | 208,428 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Total asbestos-related assets | | $ | 219,901 | | | $ | 274,006 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Asbestos-related liabilities: | | | | | | | | |
| Accrued expenses | | $ | 59,000 | | | $ | 59,800 | |
| Asbestos-related liability | | | 278,500 | | | | 316,700 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Total asbestos-related liabilities | | $ | 337,500 | | | $ | 376,500 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Liability balance by claim category: | | | | | | | | |
| Open claims | | $ | 78,460 | | | $ | 141,600 | |
| Future unasserted claims | | | 259,040 | | | | 234,900 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Total asbestos-related liabilities | | $ | 337,500 | | | $ | 376,500 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Since fiscal year-end 2004, we have worked with Analysis, Research & Planning Corporation, or ARPC, nationally recognized consultants in the United States with respect to projecting asbestos liabilities, to estimate
121
FOSTER WHEELER AG AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(amounts in thousands of dollars, except share data and per share amounts)
| |
| 16. | Litigation and Uncertainties — (Continued) |
the amount of asbestos-related indemnity and defense costs at each fiscal year-end for the next 15 years. Since that time, we have recorded our estimated asbestos liability at a level consistent with ARPC’s reasonable best estimate. Based on its review of fiscal year 2010 activity, ARPC recommended that the assumptions used to estimate our future asbestos liability be updated as of fiscal year 2010. Accordingly, we developed a revised estimate of our aggregate indemnity and defense costs through fiscal year 2025 considering the advice of ARPC. In fiscal year 2010, we revalued our liability for asbestos indemnity and defense costs through fiscal year 2025 to $337,500, which brought our liability to a level consistent with ARPC’s reasonable best estimate. In connection with updating our estimated asbestos liability and related asset, we recorded a charge of $19,451 in fiscal year 2010 primarily related to the revaluation of our asbestos liability, which includes adjustments for actual settlement experience different from our estimates and the accrual of our rolling15-year asbestos-related liability estimate. The total asbestos-related liabilities are comprised of our estimates for our liability relating to open (outstanding) claims being valued and our liability for future unasserted claims through fiscal year-end 2025.
Our liability estimate is based upon the following informationand/or assumptions: number of open claims, forecasted number of future claims, estimated average cost per claim by disease type — mesothelioma, lung cancer and non-malignancies — and the breakdown of known and future claims into disease type — mesothelioma, lung cancer or non-malignancies. The total estimated liability, which has not been discounted for the time value of money, includes both the estimate of forecasted indemnity amounts and forecasted defense costs. Total defense costs and indemnity liability payments are estimated to be incurred through fiscal year 2025, during which period the incidence of new claims is forecasted to decrease each year. We believe that it is likely that there will be new claims filed after fiscal year 2025, but in light of uncertainties inherent in long-term forecasts, we do not believe that we can reasonably estimate the indemnity and defense costs that might be incurred after fiscal year 2025.
Through December 31, 2010, total cumulative indemnity costs paid were approximately $729,300 and total cumulative defense costs paid were approximately $340,700. Historically, defense costs have represented approximately 31.8% of total defense and indemnity costs. The overall historic average combined indemnity and defense cost per resolved claim through December 31, 2010 has been approximately $2.9. The average cost per resolved claim is increasing and we believe it will continue to increase in the future.
Over the last several years, certain of our subsidiaries have entered into settlement agreements calling for insurers to make lump-sum payments, as well as payments over time, for use by our subsidiaries to fund asbestos-related indemnity and defense costs and, in certain cases, for reimbursement for portions ofout-of-pocket costs previously incurred. During fiscal year 2010, our subsidiaries reached agreements to settle their disputed asbestos-related insurance coverage with four additional insurers. As a result of these settlements, we increased our asbestos-related insurance asset and recorded a gain of $14,041 in fiscal year 2010.
Asbestos-related assets under executed settlement agreements with insurers due in the next 12 months are recorded within accounts and notes receivable-other and amounts due beyond 12 months are recorded within asbestos-related insurance recovery receivable. Asbestos-related insurance recovery receivable also includes our best estimate of actual and probable insurance recoveries relating to our liability for pending and estimated future asbestos claims through fiscal year 2025. Our asbestos-related assets have not been discounted for the time value of money.
As of December 31, 2010, there were no unsettled asbestos insurance-related assets recorded. Our insurance recoveries may be limited by insolvencies among our insurers. We have considered the financial viability and legal obligations of our subsidiaries’ insurance carriers and believe that the insurers or their
122
FOSTER WHEELER AG AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(amounts in thousands of dollars, except share data and per share amounts)
| |
| 16. | Litigation and Uncertainties — (Continued) |
guarantors will continue to reimburse a significant portion of claims and defense costs relating to asbestos litigation. As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, we have not recorded an allowance for uncollectible balances against our asbestos insurance-related assets. We write off receivables from insurers that have become insolvent; there have been no such write-offs during fiscal years 2010, 2009 and 2008. We have not assumed recovery in the estimate of our asbestos insurance asset from any of our currently insolvent insurers. Other insurers may become insolvent in the future and our insurers may fail to reimburse amounts owed to us on a timely basis. Failure to realize the expected insurance recoveries, or delays in receiving material amounts from our insurers, could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and our cash flows.
The following table summarizes our net asbestos-related provision:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Fiscal Years | |
| | | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
| |
| Provision for revaluation | | $ | 19,451 | | | $ | 27,615 | | | $ | 42,727 | |
| Gain on the settlement of coverage litigation | | | (14,041 | ) | | | (1,250 | ) | | | (36,120 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net asbestos-related provision | | $ | 5,410 | | | $ | 26,365 | | | $ | 6,607 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Our net asbestos-related provision is the result of our revaluation of our asbestos liability and related asset resulting from adjustments for actual settlement experience different from our estimates and the accrual of our rolling15-year asbestos liability estimate, partially offset by gains on the settlement of coverage litigation with asbestos insurance carriers.
The following table summarizes our approximate asbestos-related payments and insurance proceeds:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Fiscal Years | |
| | | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
| |
| Asbestos litigation, defense and case resolution payments | | $ | 62,200 | | | $ | 63,500 | | | $ | 70,600 | |
| Insurance proceeds | | | (71,900 | ) | | | (39,100 | ) | | | (87,400 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net asbestos-related payments/(receipts) | | $ | (9,700 | ) | | $ | 24,400 | | | $ | (16,800 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
We expect to have net cash outflows of $5,700 as a result of asbestos liability indemnity and defense payments in excess of insurance settlement proceeds for the full fiscal year 2011. This estimate assumes no additional settlements with insurance companies and no elections by us to fund additional payments. As we continue to collect cash from insurance settlements and assuming no increase in our asbestos-related insurance liability, the asbestos-related insurance receivable recorded on our consolidated balance sheet will continue to decrease.
The estimate of the liabilities and assets related to asbestos claims and recoveries is subject to a number of uncertainties that may result in significant changes in the current estimates. Among these are uncertainties as to the ultimate number and type of claims filed, the amounts of claim costs, the impact of bankruptcies of other companies with asbestos claims, uncertainties surrounding the litigation process from jurisdiction to jurisdiction and from case to case, as well as potential legislative changes. Increases in the number of claims filed or costs to resolve those claims could cause us to increase further the estimates of the costs associated with asbestos claims and could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Based on the fiscal year-end 2010 liability estimate, an increase of 25% in the average per claim indemnity settlement amount would increase the liability by $52,300 and the impact on expense would be dependent upon available additional insurance recoveries. Assuming no change to the assumptions currently
123
FOSTER WHEELER AG AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(amounts in thousands of dollars, except share data and per share amounts)
| |
| 16. | Litigation and Uncertainties — (Continued) |
used to estimate our insurance asset, this increase would result in a charge in the statement of operations of approximately 80% of the increase in the liability. Long-term cash flows would ultimately change by the same amount. Should there be an increase in the estimated liability in excess of this 25%, the percentage of that increase that would be expected to be funded by additional insurance recoveries will decline.
United Kingdom
Some of our subsidiaries in the United Kingdom have also received claims alleging personal injury arising from exposure to asbestos. To date, 959 claims have been brought against our U.K. subsidiaries of which 287 remained open as of December 31, 2010. None of the settled claims has resulted in material costs to us. The following table summarizes our asbestos-related liabilities and assets for our U.K. subsidiaries based on open (outstanding) claims and our estimate for future unasserted claims through fiscal year 2025:
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | December 31,
| | | December 31,
| |
| | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
| |
Asbestos-related assets: | | | | | | | | |
| Accounts and notes receivable-other | | $ | 1,927 | | | $ | 3,430 | |
| Asbestos-related insurance recovery receivable | | | 29,119 | | | | 35,837 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Total asbestos-related assets | | $ | 31,046 | | | $ | 39,267 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Asbestos-related liabilities: | | | | | | | | |
| Accrued expenses | | $ | 1,927 | | | $ | 3,430 | |
| Asbestos-related liability | | | 29,119 | | | | 35,837 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Total asbestos-related liabilities | | $ | 31,046 | | | $ | 39,267 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Liability balance by claim category: | | | | | | | | |
| Open claims | | $ | 5,782 | | | $ | 10,290 | |
| Future unasserted claims | | | 25,264 | | | | 28,977 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Total asbestos-related liabilities | | $ | 31,046 | | | $ | 39,267 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
The liability estimates are based on a U.K. House of Lords judgment that pleural plaque claims do not amount to a compensable injury and accordingly, we have reduced our liability assessment. If this ruling is reversed by legislation, the total asbestos liability and related asset recorded in the U.K. would be approximately $53,100.
Project Claims
In the ordinary course of business, we are parties to litigation involving clients and subcontractors arising out of project contracts. Such litigation includes claims and counterclaims by and against us for canceled contracts, for additional costs incurred in excess of current contract provisions, as well as for back charges for alleged breaches of warranty and other contract commitments. If we were found to be liable for any of the claims/counterclaims against us, we would incur a charge against earnings to the extent a reserve had not been established for the matter in our accounts or if the liability exceeds established reserves.
Due to the inherent commercial, legal and technical uncertainties underlying the estimation of all of the project claims described herein, the amounts ultimately realized or paid by us could differ materially from the balances, if any, included in our financial statements, which could result in additional material charges against earnings, and which could also materially adversely impact our financial condition and cash flows.
124
FOSTER WHEELER AG AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(amounts in thousands of dollars, except share data and per share amounts)
| |
| 16. | Litigation and Uncertainties — (Continued) |
Power Plant Dispute — Ireland
In 2006, a dispute arose with a client because of material corrosion that occurred at two power plants we designed and built in Ireland, which began operation in December 2005 and June 2006. There was also corrosion that occurred to subcontractor-provided emissions control equipment and induction fans at the back-end of the power plants which is due principally to the low set point temperature design of the emissions control equipment that was set by our subcontractor. We have identified technical solutions to resolve the boiler tube corrosion and emissions control equipment corrosion and during the fiscal fourth quarter of 2008 entered into a settlement with the client under which we are implementing the technical solutions in exchange for a full release of all claims related to the corrosion (including a release from the client’s right under the original contract to reject the plants under our availability guaranty) and the client’s agreement to share the cost of the ameliorative work related to the boiler tube corrosion. Accordingly, the client withdrew its notice of arbitration in January 2009, which was originally filed in May 2008.
Between fiscal year 2006 and the end of fiscal year 2008, we recorded charges totaling $61,700 in relation to this project. The implementation of the technical solutions is anticipated to be completed in 2011.
Power Plant Arbitration — North America
In January 2010, we commenced arbitration against our client in connection with a power plant project in Louisiana seeking, among other relief, a declaration as to our rights under our purchase order with respect to $17,800 in retention monies and an $82,000 letter of credit held by the client. The purchase order was for the supply of two boilers and ancillary equipment for the project. The project was substantially completed and released for commercial operation in February 2010. Our client is the project’s engineering, procurement and construction contractor. Under the terms of the purchase order, significant reductions to the retention and letter of credit monies are to occur upon the project’s achievement of substantial completion, which has been delayed due to failures on our client’s part to properly manage and execute the project. The client has taken the position that we are responsible for the project’s delays and, subsequent to service of our arbitration demand, has served its own arbitration demand, seeking to assess us with all associated late substantial completion liquidated damages under our purchase order, together with liquidated damages for alleged late material and equipment deliveries, and back charges for corrective work and other damages arising out of allegedly defective materials and equipment delivered by us. The client contends it is owed in excess of $69,000 under our purchase order as a result of our alleged failures. There is a risk that the client will attempt to call all or part of the letter of credit during the pendency of the proceeding. We are of the opinion that any such call would be wrongful and entitle us to seek return of the funds and any other damages arising out of the call. Our client has commenced a separate arbitration against the power plant owner, seeking monetary damages and delay liquidated damage assessment refunds for schedule and productivity impacts due to force majeure events and other power plant owner-caused delays. The power plant owner has counterclaimed seeking monetary damages for deficient plant performance including the alleged inability of the boilers to sustain reliable operation. Our client has asserted a claim against us in our arbitration with the client for damages in an unspecified amount due to boiler performance problems. It is our position that the existence of theowner-to-client claim does not affect our liability under our contract with the client. We cannot predict the ultimate outcome of this dispute at this time.
Camden CountyWaste-to-Energy Project
One of our project subsidiaries, Camden County Energy Recovery Associates, LP (“CCERA”) owns and operates awaste-to-energy facility in Camden County, New Jersey (the “Project”). The Pollution Control Finance Authority of Camden County (“PCFA”) issued bonds to finance the construction of the Project and to
125
FOSTER WHEELER AG AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(amounts in thousands of dollars, except share data and per share amounts)
| |
| 16. | Litigation and Uncertainties — (Continued) |
acquire a landfill for Camden County’s use. Pursuant to a loan agreement between the PCFA and CCERA, proceeds from the bonds were loaned by the PCFA to CCERA and used by CCERA to finance the construction of the Project. Accordingly, the proceeds of this loan were recorded as debt on CCERA’s balance sheet and, therefore, were included in our consolidated balance sheet. CCERA’s obligation to service the debt incurred pursuant to the loan agreement was limited to depositing all tipping fees and electric revenues received with the trustee of the PCFA bonds. The bond trustee was required to pay CCERA its service fees prior to servicing the PCFA bonds. CCERA had no other debt repayment obligations under the loan agreement with the PCFA and its debt to PCFA was limited to the amount of the outstanding bonds.
In 1997, the United States Supreme Court effectively invalidated New Jersey’s long-standing municipal solid waste flow rules and regulations, eliminating the guaranteed supply of municipal solid waste to the Project with its corresponding tipping fee revenue. As a result, tipping fees were reduced to market rate in order to provide a steady supply of fuel to the Project. Those market-rate revenues were not sufficient to service the debt on bonds issued by the PCFA to finance the construction of the Project.
In 1998, CCERA filed suit against the PCFA, the State of New Jersey (the “State”), and other parties seeking, among other things, to void the applicable contracts and agreements governing the Project and a judgment that one or more of the defendants were responsible to pay the bonds. (Camden County Energy Recovery Assoc. v. N.J. Department of Environmental Protection, et al., Superior Court of New Jersey, Mercer County, L-268-98). The bonds outstanding in connection with the Project were issued by the PCFA, not by us or CCERA, and the bonds were not guaranteed by either us or CCERA. In the litigation, the defendants asserted, among other things, that an equitable portion of the bond debt on the Project should be allocated to CCERA even though CCERA did not guarantee the bonds.
From 1999 through 2009, the State provided subsidies sufficient to ensure the payment of each of the PCFA’s bond debt service payments as they became due. In November 2010, the State entered into an agreement with PCFA whereby PCFA was permitted to utilize certain restricted funds towards making the final debt service payment due on the bonds in December 2010 and such final debt service payment on the bonds was made. As a result of the foregoing, we have removed the PCFA debt from our balance sheet, and we believe that the litigation over responsibility for the payment of the bonds has become moot.
Environmental Matters
CERCLA and Other Remedial Matters
Under U.S. federal statutes, such as the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (“CERCLA”), the Clean Water Act and the Clean Air Act, and similar state laws, the current owner or operator of real property and the past owners or operators of real property (if disposal of toxic or hazardous substances took place during such past ownership or operation) may be jointly and severally liable for the costs of removal or remediation of toxic or hazardous substances on or under their property, regardless of whether such materials were released in violation of law or whether the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of such substances. Moreover, under CERCLA and similar state laws, persons who arrange for the disposal or treatment of hazardous or toxic substances may also be jointly and severally liable for the costs of the removal or remediation of such substances at a disposal or treatment site, whether or not such site was owned or operated by such person, which we refer to as an off-site facility. Liability at such off-site facilities is typically allocated among all of the financially viable responsible parties based on such factors as the relative amount of waste contributed to a site, toxicity of such waste, relationship of the waste contributed by a party to the remedy chosen for the site and other factors.
126
FOSTER WHEELER AG AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(amounts in thousands of dollars, except share data and per share amounts)
| |
| 16. | Litigation and Uncertainties — (Continued) |
We currently own and operate industrial facilities and we have also transferred our interests in industrial facilities that we formerly owned or operated. It is likely that as a result of our current or former operations, hazardous substances have affected the facilities or the real property on which they are or were situated. We also have received and may continue to receive claims pursuant to indemnity obligations from the present owners of facilities we have transferred, which claims may require us to incur costs for investigationand/or remediation.
We are currently engaged in the investigationand/or remediation under the supervision of the applicable regulatory authorities at two of our or our subsidiaries’ former facilities (including Mountain Top, which is described below). In addition, we sometimes engage in investigationand/or remediation without the supervision of a regulatory authority. Although we do not expect the environmental conditions at our present or former facilities to cause us to incur material costs in excess of those for which reserves have been established, it is possible that various events could cause us to incur costs materially in excess of our present reserves in order to fully resolve any issues surrounding those conditions. Further, no assurance can be provided that we will not discover additional environmental conditions at our currently or formerly owned or operated properties, or that additional claims will not be made with respect to formerly owned properties, requiring us to incur material expenditures to investigateand/or remediate such conditions.
We have been notified that we are a potentially responsible party (“PRP”) under CERCLA or similar state laws at three off-site facilities. At each of these sites, our liability should be substantially less than the total site remediation costs because the percentage of waste attributable to us compared to that attributable to all other PRPs is low. We do not believe that our share of cleanup obligations at any of the off-site facilities as to which we have received a notice of potential liability will exceed $500 in the aggregate. We have also received and responded to a request for information from the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“USEPA”) regarding a fourth off-site facility. We do not know what, if any, further actions USEPA may take regarding this fourth off-site facility.
Mountain Top
In February 1988, one of our subsidiaries, Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation (“FWEC”), entered into a Consent Agreement and Order with the USEPA and the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (“PADEP”) regarding its former manufacturing facility in Mountain Top, Pennsylvania. The order essentially required FWEC to investigate and remediate as necessary contaminants, including trichloroethylene (“TCE”), in the soil and groundwater at the facility. Pursuant to the order, in 1993 FWEC installed a “pump and treat” system to remove TCE from the groundwater. It is not possible at the present time to predict how long FWEC will be required to operate and maintain this system.
In the fall of 2004, FWEC sampled the private domestic water supply wells of certain residences in Mountain Top and identified approximately 30 residences whose wells contained TCE at levels in excess of Safe Drinking Water Act standards. The subject residences are located approximately one mile to the southwest of where the TCE previously was discovered in the soils at the former FWEC facility. Since that time, FWEC, USEPA, and PADEP have cooperated in responding to the foregoing. Although FWEC believed the evidence available was not sufficient to support a determination that FWEC was responsible for the TCE in the residential wells, FWEC immediately provided the affected residences with bottled water, followed by water filters, and, pursuant to a settlement agreement with USEPA, it hooked them up to the public water system. Pursuant to an amendment of the settlement agreement, FWEC subsequently agreed with USEPA to arrange and pay for the hookup of approximately five additional residences, even though TCE has not been detected in the wells at those residences. FWEC is incurring costs related to public outreach and communications in the affected area, and it may be required to pay the agencies’ costs in overseeing and responding to
127
FOSTER WHEELER AG AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(amounts in thousands of dollars, except share data and per share amounts)
| |
| 16. | Litigation and Uncertainties — (Continued) |
the situation. FWEC is also incurring further costs in connection with a Remedial Investigation / Feasibility Study (“RI/FS”) that in March 2009 it agreed to conduct. In April 2009, USEPA proposed for listing on the National Priorities List (“NPL”) an area consisting of its former manufacturing facility and the affected residences, but it also stated that the proposed listing may not be finalized if FWEC complies with its agreement to conduct the RI/FS. FWEC submitted comments opposing the proposed listing. FWEC has accrued its best estimate of the cost of the foregoing and it reviews this estimate on a quarterly basis.
Other costs to which FWEC could be exposed could include, among other things, FWEC’s counsel and consulting fees, further agency oversightand/or response costs, costsand/or exposure related to potential litigation, and other costs related to possible further investigationand/or remediation. At present, it is not possible to determine whether FWEC will be determined to be liable for some or all of the items described in this paragraph or to reliably estimate the potential liability associated with the items. If one or more third-parties are determined to be a source of the TCE, FWEC will evaluate its options regarding the potential recovery of the costs FWEC has incurred, which options could include seeking to recover those costs from those determined to be a source.
Other Environmental Matters
Our operations, especially our manufacturing and power plants, are subject to comprehensive laws adopted for the protection of the environment and to regulate land use. The laws of primary relevance to our operations regulate the discharge of emissions into the water and air, but can also include hazardous materials handling and disposal, waste disposal and other types of environmental regulation. These laws and regulations in many cases require a lengthy and complex process of obtaining licenses, permits and approvals from the applicable regulatory agencies. Noncompliance with these laws can result in the imposition of material civil or criminal fines or penalties. We believe that we are in substantial compliance with existing environmental laws. However, no assurance can be provided that we will not become the subject of enforcement proceedings that could cause us to incur material expenditures. Further, no assurance can be provided that we will not need to incur material expenditures beyond our existing reserves to make capital improvements or operational changes necessary to allow us to comply with future environmental laws.
With regard to the foregoing, thewaste-to-energy facility operated by our CCERA project subsidiary is subject to certain revisions to New Jersey’s mercury air emission regulations. The revisions make CCERA’s mercury control requirements more stringent, especially when the last phase of the revisions becomes effective in 2012. CCERA’s management believes that the data generated during recent stack testing tends to indicate that the facility will be able to comply with even the most stringent of the regulatory revisions without installing additional control equipment. Even if the equipment had to be installed, CCERA could assert that the project’s sponsor would be responsible to pay for the equipment. However, the sponsor may not have sufficient funds to do so or may assert that it is not so responsible. Estimates of the cost of installing the additional control equipment are approximately $30,000 based on our last assessment.
128
FOSTER WHEELER AG AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(amounts in thousands of dollars, except share data and per share amounts)
| |
| 17. | Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Fiscal Quarters Ended | |
| | | December 31,
| | | September 30,
| | | June 30,
| | | March 31,
| |
| | | 2010 | | | 2010 | | | 2010 | | | 2010 | |
| |
| Operating revenues | | $ | 1,211,941 | | | $ | 904,709 | | | $ | 1,005,496 | | | $ | 945,573 | |
| Contract profit | | | 138,924 | | | | 139,920 | | | | 147,860 | | | | 172,082 | |
| Net income attributable to Foster Wheeler AG | | | 32,769 | (1) | | | 51,720 | | | | 58,858 | | | | 72,060 | |
| Earnings per share: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Basic | | $ | 0.26 | | | $ | 0.41 | | | $ | 0.46 | | | $ | 0.57 | |
| Diluted | | $ | 0.26 | | | $ | 0.41 | | | $ | 0.46 | | | $ | 0.56 | |
| Shares outstanding: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Weighted-average number of shares outstanding for basic earnings per share | | | 123,721,667 | | | | 125,459,735 | | | | 127,519,766 | | | | 127,474,887 | |
| Effect of dilutive securities | | | 677,608 | | | | 251,497 | | | | 359,510 | | | | 418,289 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Weighted-average number of shares outstanding for diluted earnings per share | | | 124,399,275 | | | | 125,711,232 | | | | 127,879,276 | | | | 127,893,176 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Fiscal Quarters Ended | |
| | | December 31,
| | | September 30,
| | | June 30,
| | | March 31,
| |
| | | 2009 | | | 2009 | | | 2009 | | | 2009 | |
| |
| Operating revenues | | $ | 1,266,631 | | | $ | 1,216,379 | | | $ | 1,308,801 | | | $ | 1,264,523 | |
| Contract profit | | | 182,099 | | | | 193,837 | | | | 219,959 | | | | 162,752 | |
| Net income attributable to Foster Wheeler AG | | | 65,091 | (1) | | | 89,998 | | | | 122,204 | | | | 72,863 | |
| Earnings per share: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Basic | | $ | 0.51 | | | $ | 0.71 | | | $ | 0.97 | | | $ | 0.58 | |
| Diluted | | $ | 0.51 | | | $ | 0.71 | | | $ | 0.96 | | | $ | 0.57 | |
| Shares outstanding: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Weighted-average number of shares outstanding for basic earnings per share | | | 127,104,838 | | | | 126,459,865 | | | | 126,344,093 | | | | 126,265,903 | |
| Effect of dilutive securities | | | 797,295 | | | | 939,989 | | | | 711,085 | | | | 481,492 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Weighted-average number of shares outstanding for diluted earnings per share | | | 127,902,133 | | | | 127,399,854 | | | | 127,055,178 | | | | 126,747,395 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
129
FOSTER WHEELER AG AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(amounts in thousands of dollars, except share data and per share amounts)
| |
| 17. | Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited) — (Continued) |
| | |
| (1) | | Net Income for the quarter includes the following: |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | Fiscal Quarters Ended | |
| | | December 31,
| | | December 31,
| |
| | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
| |
| Net increase/(decrease) in contract profit from the regular revaluation of final estimated contract profit revisions*: | | | | | | | | |
| Global E&C | | $ | (2,900 | ) | | $ | 13,990 | |
| Global Power Group | | | 3,200 | | | | (4,090 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Total | | | 300 | | | | 9,900 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Net asbestos-related provision in C&F Group** | | | 5,478 | | | | 21,114 | |
| Charges for severance-related postemployment benefits: | | | | | | | | |
| Global E&C | | | 2,000 | | | | 6,100 | |
| C&F Group | | | 7,100 | | | | 3,700 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Total | | | 9,100 | | | | 9,800 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | |
| * | | Please refer to “Revenue Recognition on Long-Term Contracts” in Note 1 for further information regarding changes in our final estimated contract profit. |
| |
| ** | | Please refer to Note 16 for further information regarding the revaluation of our asbestos liability and related asset. |
Foster Wheeler AG was incorporated under the laws of Switzerland on November 18, 2008 and registered in the commercial register of the Canton of Zug, Switzerland on November 25, 2008 as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Foster Wheeler Ltd. At a special court-ordered meeting of common shareholders held on January 27, 2009, the common shareholders of Foster Wheeler Ltd. approved a scheme of arrangement under Bermuda law. On February 9, 2009, after receipt of the approval of the scheme of arrangement by the Supreme Court of Bermuda and the satisfaction of certain other conditions, the transactions contemplated by the scheme of arrangement were effected. Pursuant to the scheme of arrangement, among other things, each holder of whole common shares of Foster Wheeler Ltd., par value $0.01 per share, outstanding immediately before the transaction was effected received registered shares of Foster Wheeler AG, par value CHF 3.00 per share (approximately $2.58 based on the exchange rate as of February 9, 2009, the date when the Redomestication had been completed), on aone-for-one basis in respect of such outstanding Foster Wheeler Ltd. common shares (or, in the case of fractional shares of Foster Wheeler Ltd., cash for such fractional shares in lieu of registered shares of Foster Wheeler AG) and additional paid-in capital decreased by the same amount.
The scheme of arrangement effectively changed our place of incorporation from Bermuda to the Canton of Zug, Switzerland. The scheme of arrangement was approved by the common shareholders of Foster Wheeler Ltd. on January 27, 2009 and was sanctioned by the Supreme Court of Bermuda on January 30, 2009. On February 9, 2009, the following steps occurred pursuant to the scheme of arrangement:
(1) all fractional common shares of Foster Wheeler Ltd., totaling approximately 1,336 shares, were cancelled and Foster Wheeler Ltd. paid to each holder of fractional shares that were cancelled an amount based on the average of the high and low trading prices of Foster Wheeler Ltd. common shares on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on February 5, 2009 ($20.63), the business day immediately preceding the effectiveness of the scheme of arrangement;
130
FOSTER WHEELER AG AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(amounts in thousands of dollars, except share data and per share amounts)
| |
| 18. | Redomestication — (Continued) |
(2) all previously outstanding whole common shares of Foster Wheeler Ltd., totaling 126,276,112 whole shares, were cancelled;
(3) Foster Wheeler Ltd., acting on behalf of its shareholders, issued 1,000 common shares (which constituted all of Foster Wheeler Ltd.’s common shares at such time) to Foster Wheeler AG;
(4) Foster Wheeler AG increased its share capital and filed amended articles of association reflecting the share capital increase with the Swiss Commercial Register; and
(5) Foster Wheeler AG issued an aggregate of 126,276,112 registered shares to the holders of whole Foster Wheeler Ltd. common shares that were cancelled.
As a result of the scheme of arrangement, the common shareholders of Foster Wheeler Ltd. became common shareholders of Foster Wheeler AG and Foster Wheeler Ltd. became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Foster Wheeler AG, a holding company that owns the stock of its various subsidiary companies.
In connection with consummation of the scheme of arrangement:
| | |
| | • | concurrently with the issuance of registered shares to the holders of whole Foster Wheeler Ltd. common shares, Foster Wheeler AG issued to the holders of the preferred shares an aggregate of 139,802 registered shares, which was the number of registered shares of Foster Wheeler AG that such holders would have been entitled to receive had they converted their preferred shares into common shares of Foster Wheeler Ltd. immediately prior to the effectiveness of the scheme of arrangement (with Foster Wheeler Ltd. paying cash in lieu of fractional common shares otherwise issuable totaling approximately one share); |
| |
| | • | Foster Wheeler AG executed a supplemental warrant agreement pursuant to which it assumed Foster Wheeler Ltd.’s obligations under the warrant agreement and agreed to issue registered shares of Foster Wheeler AG upon exercise of such warrants in accordance with their terms; and |
| |
| | • | Foster Wheeler AG assumed Foster Wheeler Ltd.’s existing obligations in connection with awards granted under Foster Wheeler Ltd.’s incentive plans and other similar employee awards. |
We refer to the foregoing transactions together with the steps of the scheme of arrangement as the “Redomestication.”
In January 2010, we relocated our principal executive offices to Geneva, Switzerland.
131
Foster Wheeler AG
(amounts in thousands)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Fiscal Year 2010 | |
| | | | | | Additions
| | | Additions
| | | | | | | |
| | | Balance at
| | | Charged to
| | | Charged to
| | | | | | Balance at the
| |
| | | Beginning of
| | | Costs and
| | | Other
| | | | | | End of the
| |
| | | Year | | | Expenses | | | Accounts | | | Deductions | | | Year | |
| |
Description | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Allowance for doubtful accounts | | $ | 10,849 | | | $ | 9,088 | | | $ | — | | | $ | (4,218 | ) | | $ | 15,719 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Deferred tax valuation allowance | | $ | 362,022 | | | $ | 14,025 | | | $ | 5,328 | | | $ | (7,497 | ) | | $ | 373,878 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Fiscal Year 2009 | |
| | | | | | Additions
| | | Additions
| | | | | | | |
| | | Balance at
| | | Charged to
| | | Charged to
| | | | | | Balance at the
| |
| | | Beginning of
| | | Costs and
| | | Other
| | | | | | End of the
| |
| | | Year | | | Expenses | | | Accounts | | | Deductions | | | Year | |
| |
Description | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | �� | | | | |
| Allowance for doubtful accounts | | $ | 13,844 | | | $ | 7,438 | | | $ | — | | | $ | (10,433 | ) | | $ | 10,849 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Deferred tax valuation allowance | | $ | 342,721 | | | $ | 34,275 | | | $ | 1,161 | | | $ | (16,135 | ) | | $ | 362,022 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Fiscal Year 2008 | |
| | | | | | Additions
| | | Additions
| | | | | | | |
| | | Balance at
| | | Charged to
| | | Charged to
| | | | | | Balance at the
| |
| | | Beginning of
| | | Costs and
| | | Other
| | | | | | End of the
| |
| | | Year | | | Expenses | | | Accounts | | | Deductions | | | Year | |
| |
Description | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Allowance for doubtful accounts | | $ | 12,398 | | | $ | 6,821 | | | $ | — | | | $ | (5,375 | ) | | $ | 13,844 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Deferred tax valuation allowance | | $ | 313,329 | | | $ | 6,577 | | | $ | 57,342 | | | $ | (34,527 | ) | | $ | 342,721 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The fiscal year 2009 and 2008 balances reflect adjustments from previously presented balances to properly reflect tax benefits associated with share-based compensation.
132
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
Not applicable.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, we recognize that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives and we necessarily are required to apply our judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.
As of the end of the period covered by this report, our interim chief executive officer and our chief financial officer carried out an evaluation, with the participation of our Disclosure Committee and management, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inRules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) pursuant to Exchange ActRule 13a-15. Based on this evaluation, our interim chief executive officer and our chief financial officer concluded, at the reasonable assurance level, that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange ActRule 13a-15(f). Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the interim chief executive officer and the chief financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework inInternal Control — Integrated Frameworkissued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on our evaluation under the framework inInternal Control — Integrated Framework, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2010.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues within a company are detected. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm that audited the consolidated financial statements included in this annual report onForm 10-K, has also audited the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, as stated in their report, which appears within Item 8.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting in the quarter ended December 31, 2010 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
133
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Item 10 incorporates information by reference to our definitive proxy statement for the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders, which is expected to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days of the close of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010.
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, which applies to all of our directors, officers and employees including the interim chief executive officer, chief financial officer, controller and all other senior finance organization employees. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is publicly available on our website atwww.fwc.com/corpgov. Any waiver of this Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for executive officers or directors may be made only by the Board of Directors or a committee of the Board of Directors and will be promptly disclosed to shareholders. If we make any substantive amendments to this Code of Business Conduct and Ethics or grant any waiver, including an implicit waiver, from a provision of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics to the interim chief executive officer, chief financial officer, controller or any person performing similar functions, we will disclose the nature of such amendment or waiver on our website atwww.fwc.com/corpgovand/or in a current report onForm 8-K, as required by law and the rules of any exchange on which our securities are publicly traded.
A copy of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics can be obtained upon request, without charge, by writing to the Office of the Corporate Secretary, Foster Wheeler AG, Perryville Corporate Park, Clinton, New Jersey08809-4000.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Item 11 incorporates information by reference to our definitive proxy statement for the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders, which is expected to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days of the close of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
Item 12 incorporates information by reference to our definitive proxy statement for the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders, which is expected to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days of the close of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010.
134
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table sets forth, as of December 31, 2010, the number of securities outstanding under each of our equity compensation plans, the weighted-average exercise price for our outstanding stock options and the number of options available for grant under such plans. Our equity compensation plans include stock options in all of the plans listed below and restricted share units granted pursuant to our Omnibus Incentive Plan.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Weighted-Average
| | | Remaining
| |
| | | Number of Securities to be
| | | Exercise Price of
| | | Available for Future Issuance
| |
| | | Issued Upon Exercise of
| | | Outstanding
| | | Under Equity Compensation Plans
| |
| | | Outstanding Options,
| | | Options, Warrants
| | | (excluding securities reflected
| |
| | | Warrants and Rights
| | | and Rights ($)
| | | in column (a))
| |
Plan Category | | (a) | | | (b) | | | (c) | |
| |
Equity Compensation Plans | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Approved by Security Holders: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Omnibus Incentive Plan | | | 3,289,922 | | | $ | 24.00 | | | | 4,082,045 | |
| 1995 Stock Option Plan | | | 49,430 | | | $ | 46.50 | | | | — | |
| Directors’ Stock Option Plan | | | 5,400 | | | $ | 67.41 | | | | — | |
| Directors’ Deferred Compensation Program | | | — | | | $ | — | | | | — | |
Equity Compensation Plans | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Not Approved by Security Holders: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Raymond J. Milchovich(1) | | | 130,000 | | | $ | 49.85 | | | | — | |
M.J. Rosenthal & Associates, Inc.(2) | | | 25,000 | | | $ | 18.80 | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | | 3,499,752 | | | $ | 25.31 | | | | 4,082,045 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
| (1) | | Under the terms of his employment agreement, dated October 22, 2001, Mr. Milchovich received an option to purchase 130,000 of our shares on October 22, 2001. This option was granted at an exercise price of $49.85 and vested 20% each year over the five-year term of the agreement. The option exercise price is equal to the median of the high and low price of our shares on the grant date. The option has a term of 10 years from the date of grant. |
| |
| (2) | | Under the terms of the consulting agreement with M.J. Rosenthal & Associates, Inc., on May 7, 2002 we granted a nonqualified stock option to purchase 25,000 of our shares at a price of $18.80 with a term of 10 years from the date of grant. The exercise price is equal to the mean of the high and low price of our shares on the date of grant. The option is exercisable on or after March 31, 2003. The option, to the extent not then exercised, shall terminate upon any breach of certain covenants contained in the consulting agreement. |
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
Item 13 incorporates information by reference to our definitive proxy statement for the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders, which is expected to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days of the close of our fiscal year ended December 31, 2010.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
Item 14 incorporates information by reference to our definitive proxy statement for the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders, which is expected to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days of the close of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010.
135
PART IV
| |
| ITEM 15. | EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES |
(a) Documents filed as part of this Report:
Financial Statements — See Item 8 of this Report.
| | |
| | (2) | Financial Statement Schedules |
Schedule II: Valuation and Qualifying Accounts — See Item 8 of this Report.
All schedules and financial statements other than those indicated above have been omitted because of the absence of conditions requiring them or because the required information is shown in the financial statements or the notes thereto.
| | | | | |
Exhibit
| | |
No. | | Exhibits |
| |
| | 3 | .1 | | Articles of Association of Foster Wheeler AG. (Filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Foster Wheeler AG’sForm 8-K, dated February 6, 2009 and filed on February 9, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 3 | .2 | | Organizational Regulations of Foster Wheeler AG. (Filed as Exhibit 3.2 to Foster Wheeler AG’sForm 8-K, dated February 6, 2009 and filed on February 9, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 4 | .0 | | Foster Wheeler AG hereby agrees to furnish copies of instruments defining the rights of holders oflong-term debt of Foster Wheeler AG and its consolidated subsidiaries to the Commission upon request. |
| | 10 | .1 | | Credit Agreement, dated September 13, 2006, among Foster Wheeler LLC, Foster Wheeler USA Corporation, Foster Wheeler North America Corp., Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation, Foster Wheeler International Corporation, and Foster Wheeler Inc., as Borrowers, the guarantors party thereto, the lenders party thereto, BNP Paribas as Administrative Agent, BNP Paribas Securities Corp. as Sole Bookrunner and Sole Lead Arranger, and Calyon New York Branch as Syndication Agent. (Filed as Exhibit 99.1 to Foster Wheeler Ltd.’sForm 8-K, dated September 13, 2006 and filed on September 14, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 10 | .2 | | Amendment No. 1, dated May 4, 2007, to the Credit Agreement, dated September 13, 2006, between Foster Wheeler LLC, Foster Wheeler USA Corporation, Foster Wheeler North America Corp., Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation, Foster Wheeler International Corporation, Foster Wheeler Inc., Foster Wheeler Ltd., Foster Wheeler Holdings Ltd., the subsidiary guarantors party thereto, the lenders party thereto, and BNP Paribas. (Filed as Exhibit 10.4 to Foster Wheeler Ltd.’sForm 10-Q for the quarter ended March 30, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 10 | .3 | | Amendment No. 2, dated September 29, 2008, to the Credit Agreement, dated September 13, 2006, between Foster Wheeler LLC, Foster Wheeler Inc., Foster Wheeler USA Corporation, Foster Wheeler North America Corp., Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation and Foster Wheeler International Corporation, as borrowers, Foster Wheeler Ltd., Foster Wheeler Holdings Ltd., the subsidiary guarantors party thereto, the lenders party thereto, and BNP Paribas. (Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Foster Wheeler Ltd.’sForm 8-K, dated September 29, 2008 and filed on October 14, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 10 | .4 | | Amendment No. 3, dated December 18, 2008, to the Credit Agreement, dated September 13, 2006, between Foster Wheeler LLC, Foster Wheeler Inc., Foster Wheeler USA Corporation, Foster Wheeler North America Corp., Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation and Foster Wheeler International Corporation, as borrowers, Foster Wheeler Ltd., Foster Wheeler AG, Foster Wheeler Holdings Ltd., the subsidiary guarantors party thereto, the lenders party thereto, and BNP Paribas. (Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Foster Wheeler Ltd.’sForm 8-K, dated December 18, 2008 and filed on December 22, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
136
| | | | | |
Exhibit
| | |
No. | | Exhibits |
| |
| | 10 | .5 | | Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated July 30, 2010, among Foster Wheeler AG, Foster Wheeler Ltd., Foster Wheeler LLC, Foster Wheeler USA Corporation, Foster Wheeler North America Corp., Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation, Foster Wheeler International Corporation, and Foster Wheeler Inc., as Borrowers, the guarantors party thereto, the lenders party thereto, BNP Paribas as Administrative Agent, BNP Paribas Securities Corp. as Sole Bookrunner and Sole Lead Arranger, and HSBC Bank USA, National Association, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Crédit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank, and Natixis as Syndication Agents. (Filed as Exhibit 10.9 to Foster Wheeler AG’sForm 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 10 | .6 | | Guarantee Facility, dated December 15, 2009, among Foster Wheeler Limited, Foster Wheeler Energy Limited, Foster Wheeler World Services Limited, Foster Wheeler (G.B.) Limited and The Bank of Scotland regarding, among other things, a £100,000,000 uncommitted guarantee facility and a £150,000,000 forward foreign exchange facility. (Filed as Exhibit 10.8 to Foster Wheeler AG’sForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 10 | .7 | | Guarantee Facility, dated November 21, 2008, among Foster Wheeler Limited, Foster Wheeler Energy Limited, Foster Wheeler World Services Limited, Foster Wheeler (G.B.) Limited and The Bank of Scotland regarding, among other things, a £90,000,000 guarantee facility and a £150,000,000 forward foreign exchange facility. (Filed as Exhibit 10.8 to Foster Wheeler AG’sForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 26, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 10 | .8 | | Corporate Guarantee, dated July 25, 2005, among Foster Wheeler Limited, Foster Wheeler Energy Limited, Foster Wheeler World Services Limited, Foster Wheeler (G.B.) Limited and The Bank of Scotland. (Filed as Exhibit 99.2 to Foster Wheeler Ltd.’sForm 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 10 | .9 | | Form of Debenture, dated July 25, 2005, issued in favor of The Bank of Scotland as Security Trustee. (Filed as Exhibit 99.3 to Foster Wheeler Ltd.’sForm 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 10 | .10 | | Lease Agreement, dated as of August 16, 2002, by and among Energy (NJ) QRS15-10, Inc. and Foster Wheeler Realty Services, Inc. (Filed as Exhibit 10.15 to Foster Wheeler Ltd.’sForm 10-Q for the quarter ended June 28, 2002, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 10 | .11 | | Amendment to the Lease Agreement, dated as of January 6, 2003, between Energy (NJ) QRS15-10, Inc. and Foster Wheeler Realty Services, Inc. (Filed as Exhibit 10.30 to Foster Wheeler Ltd.’sForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 27, 2002, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 10 | .12 | | Amendment No. 2, dated as of April 21, 2003, to the Lease Agreement between Energy (NJ)QRS 15-10, Inc. and Foster Wheeler Realty Services, Inc. (Filed as Exhibit 10.7 to Foster Wheeler Ltd.’sForm 10-Q for the quarter ended March 28, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 10 | .13 | | Amendment No. 3, dated as of July 14, 2003, to the Lease Agreement dated August 16, 2002, between Energy (NJ) QRS15-10, Inc. and Foster Wheeler Realty Services, Inc. (Filed as Exhibit 10.6 to Foster Wheeler Ltd.’sForm 10-Q for the quarter ended June 27, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 10 | .14 | | Guaranty and Suretyship Agreement, dated as of August 16, 2002, made by Foster Wheeler LLC, Foster Wheeler Ltd., Foster Wheeler Inc., Foster Wheeler International Holdings, Inc. and Energy (NJ) QRS15-10, Inc. (Filed as Exhibit 10.14 to Foster Wheeler Ltd.’sForm 10-Q for the quarter ended June 28, 2002 and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 10 | .15 | | Deed between Foster Wheeler LLC and Foster Wheeler Realty Services, Inc. and CIT Group Inc. (NJ), dated as of March 31, 2003. (Filed as Exhibit 10.3 to Foster Wheeler Ltd.’sForm 10-Q for the quarter ended March 28, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 10 | .16 | | Master Guarantee Agreement, dated as of May 25, 2001, by and among Foster Wheeler LLC, Foster Wheeler International Holdings, Inc. and Foster Wheeler Ltd. (Filed as Exhibit 10.9 to Foster Wheeler Ltd.’sForm 10-Q for the quarter ended June 29, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 10 | .17* | | Foster Wheeler Inc. Directors Deferred Compensation and Stock Award Plan, amended and restated effective as of May 25, 2001. (Filed as Exhibit 10.5 to Foster Wheeler AG’sForm 8-K, dated February 6, 2009 and filed on February 9, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
137
| | | | | |
Exhibit
| | |
No. | | Exhibits |
| |
| | 10 | .18* | | Amendment to the Foster Wheeler Inc. Directors Deferred Compensation and Stock Award Plan. (Filed as Exhibit 10.6 to Foster Wheeler AG’sForm 8-K, dated February 6, 2009 and filed on February 9, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 10 | .19* | | Foster Wheeler Inc. Directors’ Stock Option Plan. (Filed as Exhibit 99.1 to Foster Wheeler Ltd.’s post effective amendment toForm S-8 (RegistrationNo. 333-25945-99), filed on June 27, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 10 | .20* | | Amendment to Foster Wheeler Inc. Directors’ Stock Option Plan. (Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Foster Wheeler AG’sForm 8-K, dated February 6, 2009 and filed on February 9, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 10 | .21* | | 1995 Stock Option Plan of Foster Wheeler Inc., as amended and restated as of September 24, 2002. (Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Foster Wheeler Ltd.’sForm 10-Q for the quarter ended September 27, 2002, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 10 | .22* | | First Amendment to the 1995 Stock Option Plan of Foster Wheeler Inc., as amended and restated as of September 24, 2002. (Filed as Exhibit 10.26 to Foster Wheeler AG’sForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 26, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 10 | .23* | | Second Amendment to the 1995 Stock Option Plan of Foster Wheeler Inc., as amended and restated as of September 24, 2002. (Filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Foster Wheeler AG’sForm 8-K, dated February 6, 2009 and filed on February 9, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 10 | .24* | | Foster Wheeler Annual Executive Short-term Incentive Plan, as amended and restated effective January 1, 2006. (Filed as Exhibit 10.20 to Foster Wheeler Ltd.’sForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 10 | .25* | | First Amendment to the Foster Wheeler Annual Executive Short-term Incentive Plan. (Filed as Exhibit 10.29 to Foster Wheeler AG’sForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 26, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 10 | .26* | | Second Amendment to the Annual Executive Short-term Incentive Plan of Foster Wheeler AG. (Filed as Exhibit 10.7 to Foster Wheeler AG’sForm 8-K, dated February 6, 2009 and filed on February 9, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 10 | .27* | | Third Amendment to the Foster Wheeler AG Annual Executive Short-Term Incentive Plan (as restated effective January 1, 2006), adopted on November 4, 2010. |
| | 10 | .28* | | Foster Wheeler Ltd. 2004 Stock Option Plan. (Filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Foster Wheeler Ltd.’sForm 8-K, dated September 29, 2004 and filed on October 1, 2004, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 10 | .29* | | First Amendment to the Foster Wheeler Ltd. 2004 Stock Option Plan. (Filed as Exhibit 99.1 to Foster Wheeler Ltd.’sForm 8-K, dated May 13, 2005 and filed on May 16, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 10 | .30* | | Second Amendment to the Foster Wheeler Ltd. 2004 Stock Option Plan. (Filed as Exhibit 10.3 to Foster Wheeler AG’sForm 8-K, dated February 6, 2009 and filed on February 9, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 10 | .31* | | Form of First Amendment to the Foster Wheeler Ltd. 2004 Stock Option Plan with respect to non-employee directors. (Filed as Exhibit 99.2 to Foster Wheeler Ltd.’sForm 8-K, dated May 13, 2005 and filed on May 16, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 10 | .32* | | Form of Amended and Restated Notice of Stock Option Grant with respect to executive officers, officers and key employees. (Filed as Exhibit 99.3 to Foster Wheeler Ltd.’sForm 8-K, dated May 13, 2005 and filed on May 16, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 10 | .33* | | Foster Wheeler Ltd. Omnibus Incentive Plan. (Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Foster Wheeler Ltd.’sForm 8-K, dated May 9, 2006 and filed on May 12, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 10 | .34* | | First Amendment to the Foster Wheeler Ltd. Omnibus Incentive Plan. (Filed as Exhibit 10.37 to Foster Wheeler AG’sForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 26, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 10 | .35* | | Second Amendment to the Foster Wheeler Ltd. Omnibus Incentive Plan. (Filed as Exhibit 10.4 to Foster Wheeler AG’sForm 8-K, dated February 6, 2009 and filed on February 9, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
138
| | | | | |
Exhibit
| | |
No. | | Exhibits |
| |
| | 10 | .36* | | Third Amendment to Foster Wheeler AG Omnibus Incentive Plan. (Filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Foster Wheeler AG’sForm 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 10 | .37* | | Foster Wheeler AG Omnibus Incentive Plan, Restated Effective as of February 9, 2009 (incorporating the First, Second, and Third Amendments). (Filed as Exhibit 10.3 to Foster Wheeler AG’sForm 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 10 | .38* | | First Amendment to the Foster Wheeler AG Omnibus Incentive Plan (as restated effective February 9, 2009), adopted on November 3, 2010. |
| | 10 | .39* | | Form of Director’s Stock Option Agreement effective June 16, 2006 by and between Foster Wheeler Ltd. and each of Ralph Alexander, Eugene Atkinson, Diane C. Creel, Robert C. Flexon, Stephanie Hanbury-Brown, Joseph J. Melone and James D. Woods. (Filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Foster Wheeler Ltd.’sForm 8-K, dated June 14, 2006 and filed on June 16, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 10 | .40* | | Form of Employee Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement effective November 15, 2006 with respect to certain employees and executive officers. (Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Foster Wheeler Ltd.’sForm 8-K, dated November 15, 2006 and filed on November 17, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 10 | .41* | | Form of Employee Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement effective May 6, 2008 with respect to certain employees and executive officers. (Filed as Exhibit 10.41 to Foster Wheeler AG’sForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 26, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 10 | .42* | | Form of Employee Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement effective March 4, 2009 with respect to employees and executive officers. (Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Foster Wheeler AG’sForm 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 10 | .43* | | Form of Employee Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement effective November 15, 2006 with respect to certain employees and executive officers. (Filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Foster Wheeler Ltd.’sForm 8-K, dated November 15, 2006 and filed on November 17, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 10 | .44* | | Form of Employee Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement effective May 6, 2008 with respect to certain employees and executive officers. (Filed as Exhibit 10.43 to Foster Wheeler AG.’sForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 26, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 10 | .45* | | Form of Employee Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement effective May 2010 with respect to certain employees and executive officers. (Filed as Exhibit 10.16 to Foster Wheeler AG’sForm 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 10 | .46* | | Form of Employee Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement effective May 2010 with respect to certain employees and executive officers. (Filed as Exhibit 10.17 to Foster Wheeler AG’sForm 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 10 | .47* | | Form of Employee Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement effective March 4, 2009 with respect to employees and executive officers. (Filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Foster Wheeler AG’sForm 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 10 | .48* | | Form of Director Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement effective November 15, 2006 with respect to non-employee directors. (Filed as Exhibit 10.3 to Foster Wheeler Ltd.’sForm 8-K, dated November 15, 2006 and filed on November 17, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 10 | .49* | | Form of Director Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement effective May 6, 2008 with respect tonon-employee directors. (Filed as Exhibit 10.45 to Foster Wheeler AG’sForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 26, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 10 | .50* | | Form of Director Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement effective March 4, 2009 with respect to employees and executive officers. (Filed as Exhibit 10.3 to Foster Wheeler AG’sForm 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 10 | .51* | | Form of Director Restricted Stock Unit Agreement effective November 15, 2006 with respect to non-employee directors. (Filed as Exhibit 10.4 to Foster Wheeler Ltd.’sForm 8-K, dated November 15, 2006 and filed on November 17, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 10 | .52* | | Form of Director Restricted Stock Unit Agreement effective May 6, 2008 with respect to non-employee directors. (Filed as Exhibit 10.47 to Foster Wheeler AG’sForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 26, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
139
| | | | | |
Exhibit
| | |
No. | | Exhibits |
| |
| | 10 | .53* | | Form of Director Restricted Stock Unit Agreement effective March 4, 2009 with respect to employees and executive officers. (Filed as Exhibit 10.4 to Foster Wheeler AG’sForm 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 10 | .54* | | Form of Indemnification Agreement for directors and officers of Foster Wheeler Ltd. and Foster Wheeler Inc., dated as of November 3, 2004. (Filed as Exhibit 99.1 to Foster Wheeler Ltd.’sForm 8-K, dated November 3, 2004 and filed on November 8, 2004, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 10 | .55* | | Form of Indemnification Agreement for directors and officers of Foster Wheeler AG, dated as of February 9, 2009. (Filed as Exhibit 10.10 to Foster Wheeler AG’sForm 8-K, dated February 6, 2009 and filed on February 9, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 10 | .56* | | Form of Notice and Acknowledgement for executive officers of Foster Wheeler AG, dated as of February 9, 2009. (Filed as Exhibit 10.8 to Foster Wheeler AG’sForm 8-K, dated February 6, 2009 and filed on February 9, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 10 | .57* | | Form of Notice and Acknowledgement for David Wardlaw, dated as of February 9, 2009. (Filed as Exhibit 10.9 to Foster Wheeler AG’sForm 8-K, dated February 6, 2009 and filed on February 9, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 10 | .58* | | Employment Agreement between Foster Wheeler Ltd. and Raymond J. Milchovich, dated as of August 11, 2006. (Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Foster Wheeler Ltd.’sForm 8-K, dated August 7, 2006 and filed on August 11, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 10 | .59* | | First Amendment to the Employment Agreement, dated January 30, 2007, between Foster Wheeler Ltd. and Raymond J. Milchovich. (Filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Foster Wheeler Ltd.’sForm 8-K, dated January 30, 2007 and filed on February 2, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 10 | .60* | | Second Amendment to the Employment Agreement, dated February 27, 2007, between Foster Wheeler Ltd. and Raymond J. Milchovich. (Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Foster Wheeler Ltd.’sForm 8-K, dated February 27, 2007 and filed on March 2, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 10 | .61* | | Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of May 6, 2008, between Foster Wheeler Ltd. and Raymond J. Milchovich. (Filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Foster Wheeler Ltd.’sForm 8-K, dated May 6, 2008 and filed on May 12, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 10 | .62* | | Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of November 4, 2008, between Foster Wheeler Ltd. and Raymond J. Milchovich. (Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Foster Wheeler Ltd.’sForm 8-K, dated November 4, 2008 and filed on November 5, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 10 | .63* | | Stock Option Agreement of Raymond J. Milchovich, dated as of October 22, 2001. (Filed as Exhibit 10.13 to Foster Wheeler Ltd.’sForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 28, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 10 | .64* | | Employee’s Restricted Stock Award Agreement of Raymond J. Milchovich, dated as of August 11, 2006. (Filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Foster Wheeler Ltd.’sForm 8-K, dated August 7, 2006 and filed on August 11, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 10 | .65* | | Employee Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement of Raymond J. Milchovich, dated as of August 11, 2006. (Filed as Exhibit 10.3 to Foster Wheeler Ltd.’sForm 8-K, dated August 7, 2006 and filed on August 11, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 10 | .66* | | Consulting Agreement between Foster Wheeler Inc. and Raymond J. Milchovich, dated as of March 15, 2010. (Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Foster Wheeler AG’sForm 8-K, dated March 15, 2010 and filed on March 18, 2010, and incorporated herein by reference.). |
| | 10 | .67* | | Unofficial English Translation of Fixed Term Employment Agreement, effective as of April 1, 2008, between Foster Wheeler Continental Europe S.r.l. and Umberto della Sala. (Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Foster Wheeler Ltd.’sForm 8-K, dated February 22, 2008 and filed on February 28, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 10 | .68* | | Employment Agreement, dated as of March 1, 2008, between Foster Wheeler Ltd. and Umberto della Sala. (Filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Foster Wheeler Ltd.’sForm 8-K, dated February 22, 2008 and filed on February 28, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 10 | .69* | | Agreement for the Termination of Fixed Term Employment Contract, dated as of September 30, 2008, between Foster Wheeler Continental Europe S.r.l. and Umberto della Sala. (Filed as Exhibit 10.3 to Foster Wheeler Ltd.’sForm 10-Q for the quarter ended September 26, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
140
| | | | | |
Exhibit
| | |
No. | | Exhibits |
| |
| | 10 | .70* | | Unofficial English Translation of Fixed Term Employment Agreement, dated as of October 1, 2008, between Foster Wheeler Global E&C S.r.l. and Umberto della Sala. (Filed as Exhibit 10.4 to Foster Wheeler Ltd.’sForm 10-Q for the quarter ended September 26, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 10 | .71* | | First Amendment to the Employment Agreement, dated as of October 1, 2008, between Foster Wheeler Ltd. and Umberto della Sala. (Filed as Exhibit 10.5 to Foster Wheeler Ltd.’sForm 10-Q for the quarter ended September 26, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 10 | .72* | | Second Amendment to the Employment Agreement between Foster Wheeler Inc. and Umberto della Sala, effective as of February 18, 2010. (Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Foster Wheeler AG’sForm 8-K, dated February 18, 2010 and filed on February 22, 2010, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 10 | .73* | | Third Amendment to the Employment Agreement between Foster Wheeler Inc. and Umberto della Sala, dated as of November 29, 2010 (Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Foster Wheeler AG’sForm 8-K, dated November 29, 2010 and filed on December 1, 2010, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 10 | .74* | | Unofficial English Translation of Extension of Fixed Term Employment Agreement between Foster Wheeler Global E&C S.r.l. and Umberto della Sala, dated February 18, 2010. (Filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Foster Wheeler AG’sForm 8-K, dated February 18, 2010 and filed on February 22, 2010, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 10 | .75* | | Employment Agreement, dated as of November 3, 2009, between Foster Wheeler USA Corporation and Robert C. Flexon (Filed as Exhibit 10.96 to Foster Wheeler AG’sForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 10 | .76* | | Employment Agreement, dated as of May 10, 2010, among Foster Wheeler Inc., Foster Wheeler USA Corporation, Foster Wheeler International Corporation and Robert C. Flexon (Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Foster Wheeler AG’sForm 8-K dated May 10, 2010 and filed on May 12, 2010, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 10 | .77* | | Employment Agreement, dated as of May 6, 2008, between Foster Wheeler Ltd. and Franco Baseotto. (Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Foster Wheeler Ltd.’sForm 8-K, dated May 6, 2008 and filed on May 12, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 10 | .78* | | First Amendment to the Employment Agreement, effective as of January 18, 2010, between Foster Wheeler Inc. and Franco Baseotto. (Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Foster Wheeler AG’sForm 8-K, dated January 14, 2010 and filed on January 20, 2010, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 10 | .79* | | Second Amendment to the Employment Agreement, dated as of May 4, 2010, between Foster Wheeler Inc. and Franco Baseotto. (Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Foster Wheeler AG’sForm 8-K, dated May 4, 2010 and filed on May 10, 2010, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 10 | .80* | | Employment Agreement, dated as of August 20, 2008, between Foster Wheeler Ltd. and Peter D. Rose. (Filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Foster Wheeler Ltd.’sForm 10-Q for the quarter ended September 26, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 10 | .81* | | First Amendment to the Employment Agreement, effective as of January 18, 2010, between Foster Wheeler Inc. and Peter D. Rose. (Filed as Exhibit 10.84 to Foster Wheeler AG’sForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 10 | .82* | | Second Amendment to the Employment Agreement, effective as of November 16, 2010, between Foster Wheeler Inc. and Peter D. Rose. |
| | 10 | .83* | | Employment Agreement, dated as of April 7, 2008, between Foster Wheeler Ltd. and Beth Sexton. (Filed as Exhibit 10.3 to Foster Wheeler Ltd.’sForm 10-Q for the quarter ended March 28, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 10 | .84* | | First Amendment to the Employment Agreement, effective as of January 18, 2010, between Foster Wheeler Inc. and Beth Sexton. (Filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Foster Wheeler AG’sForm 8-K, dated January 14, 2010 and filed on January 20, 2010, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 10 | .85* | | Second Amendment to the Employment Agreement, dated as of May 4, 2010, between Foster Wheeler Inc. and Beth Sexton. (Filed as Exhibit 10.3 to Foster Wheeler AG’sForm 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 10 | .86* | | Deed of Variation, dated as of October 8, 2008, between Foster Wheeler Energy Limited and David Wardlaw. (Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Foster Wheeler Ltd.’sForm 8-K, dated October 8, 2008 and filed on October 14, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
141
| | | | | |
Exhibit
| | |
No. | | Exhibits |
| |
| | 10 | .87* | | Employment Agreement, dated as of January 6, 2009, between Foster Wheeler North America Corp. and Gary T. Nedelka. (Filed as Exhibit 10.76 to Foster Wheeler AG’sForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 26, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 10 | .88* | | First Amendment to the Employment Agreement, dated as of December 21, 2009, between Foster Wheeler North America Corp. and Gary T. Nedelka. (Filed as Exhibit 10.89 to Foster Wheeler AG’sForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 10 | .89* | | Second Amendment to the Employment Agreement, dated as of August 30, 2010, between Foster Wheeler North America Corp. and Gary T. Nedelka. (Filed as Exhibit 10.3 to Foster Wheeler AG’sForm 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 10 | .90* | | Employment Agreement, dated as of January 6, 2009, between Foster Wheeler Ltd. and Lisa Z. Wood. (Filed as Exhibit 10.77 to Foster Wheeler AG’sForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 26, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 10 | .91* | | First Amendment to the Employment Agreement, effective as of January 18, 2010, between Foster Wheeler Inc. and Lisa Z. Wood. (Filed as Exhibit 10.91 to Foster Wheeler AG’sForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 10 | .92* | | Second Amendment to the Employment Agreement, dated as of July 16, 2010, between Foster Wheeler Inc. and Lisa Z. Wood. (Filed as Exhibit 10.6 to Foster Wheeler AG’sForm 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 10 | .93* | | Employment Agreement, dated as of March 27, 2009, among Foster Wheeler Inc., Thierry Desmaris and Foster Wheeler International Corp. (Filed as Exhibit 10.19 to Foster Wheeler AG’sForm 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 10 | .94* | | First Amendment to the Employment Agreement, effective as of January 18, 2010, between Foster Wheeler Inc. and Thierry Desmaris. (Filed as Exhibit 10.93 to Foster Wheeler AG’sForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 10 | .95* | | Second Amendment to the Employment Agreement, dated as of July 29, 2010, between Foster Wheeler Inc. and Thierry Desmaris. (Filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Foster Wheeler AG’sForm 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 10 | .96* | | Employment Agreement, dated as of April 27, 2009, among Foster Wheeler Inc., Rakesh K. Jindal and Foster Wheeler International Corp. (Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Foster Wheeler AG’sForm 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 10 | .97* | | First Amendment to the Employment Agreement, effective as of January 18, 2010, between Foster Wheeler Inc. and Rakesh K. Jindal. (Filed as Exhibit 10.95 to Foster Wheeler AG’sForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 10 | .98* | | Second Amendment to the Employment Agreement, effective as of April 1, 2010, between Foster Wheeler Inc. and Rakesh K. Jindal. |
| | 10 | .99* | | Third Amendment to the Employment Agreement, dated as of May 25, 2010, between Foster Wheeler Inc. and Rakesh K. Jindal. (Filed as Exhibit 10.5 to Foster Wheeler AG’sForm 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 10 | .100* | | Employment Agreement, dated as of February 16, 2009, between Foster Wheeler USA Corporation and W. Troy Roder. (Filed as Exhibit 10.98 to Foster Wheeler AG’sForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 10 | .101* | | Employment Agreement, dated as of September 22, 2010, among Foster Wheeler Inc., W. Troy Roder, Foster Wheeler USA Corporation and Foster Wheeler International Corp. (Filed as Exhibit 10.4 to Foster Wheeler AG’sForm 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 10 | .102* | | Contract of Employment between Foster Wheeler Energy Limited and Michelle Davies, prepared on August 8, 2008. (Filed as Exhibit 10.99 to Foster Wheeler AG’sForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 10 | .103* | | First Amendment, dated as of January 1, 2010, to the Employment Agreement between Foster Wheeler Energy Limited and Michelle K. Davies. (Filed as Exhibit 10.14 to Foster Wheeler AG’sForm 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
142
| | | | | |
Exhibit
| | |
No. | | Exhibits |
| |
| | 10 | .104* | | Employment Agreement, dated as of May 28, 2010, between Foster Wheeler Inc., Michael Liebelson and Foster Wheeler International Corp. (Filed as Exhibit 10.4 to Foster Wheeler AG’sForm 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, and incorporated herein by reference.) |
| | 10 | .105* | | First Amendment to the Employment Agreement, dated as of December 1, 2010, between Foster Wheeler Inc. and Michael Liebelson. |
| | 21 | .0 | | Subsidiaries of the Registrant. |
| | 23 | .1 | | Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. |
| | 23 | .2 | | Consent of Analysis, Research & Planning Corporation. |
| | 31 | .1 | | Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of Umberto della Sala. |
| | 31 | .2 | | Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of Franco Baseotto. |
| | 32 | .1 | | Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of Umberto della Sala. |
| | 32 | .2 | | Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of Franco Baseotto. |
| | 101 | .INS | | XBRL Instance Document |
| | 101 | .SCH | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema |
| | 101 | .CAL | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase |
| | 101 | .DEF | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase |
| | 101 | .LAB | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase |
| | 101 | .PRE | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase |
| | |
| * | | Management contract or compensation plan or arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit to this form pursuant to Item 15(b) of this report. |
143
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
FOSTER WHEELER AG
(Registrant)
Franco Baseotto
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Date: February 28, 2011
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Report has been signed, as of February 28, 2011, by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant, in the capacities indicated.
| | | | | |
Signature | | Title |
| |
| | | |
/s/ Umberto della Sala
Umberto della Sala
(Principal Executive Officer) | | Director and Interim Chief Executive Officer |
| | | |
/s/ Franco Baseotto
Franco Baseotto
(Principal Financial Officer) | | Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer |
| | | |
/s/ Lisa Z. Wood
Lisa Z. Wood
(Principal Accounting Officer) | | Vice President and Controller |
| | | |
/s/ Eugene D. Atkinson
Eugene D. Atkinson | | Director |
| | | |
/s/ Clayton C. Daley, Jr.
Clayton C. Daley, Jr. | | Director |
| | | |
/s/ Steven J. Demetriou
Steven J. Demetriou | | Director |
| | | |
/s/ Edward G. Galante
Edward G. Galante | | Director |
| | | |
/s/ Stephanie Hanbury-Brown
Stephanie Hanbury-Brown | | Director |
| | | |
/s/ Raymond J. Milchovich
Raymond J. Milchovich | | Director, Chairman of the Board |
| | | |
/s/ Maureen B. Tart-Bezer
Maureen B. Tart-Bezer | | Director |
| | | |
/s/ James D. Woods
James D. Woods | | Director |
144
