During the three months ended March 31, 2009, we had cash outflows from investing activities of
During the three months ended March 31, 2009, we had net cash outflows from financing activities of $235.9 million primarily due to:
Dividends paid on our common stock totaled $13.8 million during the three months ended March 31, 2009, or $0.355 per share. On April 28, 2009, our Board of Directors declared a quarterly dividend of $0.355 per share payable June 1, 2009, which is equivalent to an annual dividend rate of $1.42 per share. The determination of the amount of future cash dividends, if any, to be declared and paid will depend upon, among other things, our financial condition, funds from operations, the level of our capital expenditures, restrictions under our credit facilities and our future business prospects.
Financing Transactions and Short-Term Liquidity
Our principal sources of short-term liquidity are our revolving credit facility and cash provided by operations. As of March 31, 2009, we had approximately $121.6 million of cash unrestricted for operations.
Corporate Credit Facility
Our $525.0 million revolving credit facility expires on May 4, 2010. The cost of borrowings or letters of credit issued under the facility is determined based on our credit ratings. At our current ratings levels, the facility has an annual facility fee of 17.5 basis points, and has a borrowing spread of 70 basis points over LIBOR (which equates to a 1.2% one-month borrowing rate as of March 31, 2009).
Our revolving credit facility can be used to fund our working capital needs and for general corporate purposes. At March 31, 2009, we had borrowings of $97.0 million and $56.7 million of letters of credit issued on our revolving credit facility. Available capacity remaining on our revolving credit facility was approximately $371.3 million at March 31, 2009.
The credit facility includes customary affirmative and negative covenants, such as limitations on the creation of new indebtedness and on certain liens, restrictions on certain transactions and maintenance of the following financial covenants:
• A consolidated net worth in an amount of not less than the sum of $625 million and 50% of our aggregate consolidated net income beginning January 1, 2005; |
|
• A recourse leverage ratio not to exceed 0.70 to 1.00 for the first year after the Aquila acquisition and thereafter, a ratio not to exceed 0.65 to 1.00; and |
|
• An interest expense coverage ratio of not less than 2.5 to 1.0. |
If these covenants are violated, it would be considered an event of default entitling the lenders to terminate the remaining commitment and accelerate all principal and interest outstanding.
In addition to covenant violations, an event of default under the credit facility may be triggered by other events, such as a failure to make payments when due or a failure to make payments when due in respect of, or a failure to perform obligations relating to, other debt obligations of $20 million or more. Subject to applicable cure periods (non of which apply to a failure to timely pay indebtedness), an event of default would permit the lenders to restrict our ability to further access the credit facility for loans or new letters of credit, and could require both the immediate repayment of any principal and interest outstanding and the cash collateralization of outstanding letter of credit obligations.
The credit facility prohibits us from paying cash dividends if a default or an event of default exists prior to, or would result, after giving effect to such action.
Our consolidated net worth was $1.1 billion at March 31, 2009, which was approximately $274.3 million in excess of the net worth we were required to maintain under the credit facility. At March 31, 2009, our long-term debt ratio was 30.5%, our total debt leverage ratio (long-term debt and short-term debt) was 47.8%, and our recourse leverage ratio was approximately 52.2%. Our interest expense coverage ratio for the twelve month period ended March 31, 2009 was 4.3 to 1.0.
61
Enserco Credit Facility
Our Energy Marketing segment, Enserco, had a $300 million uncommitted, discretionary line of credit to provide support for the purchase, sale, transportation and storage of natural gas and crude oil. The line of credit, which was secured by this segment’s assets, expired on May 8, 2009. The Enserco Credit Facility allowed for the issuance of letters of credit and loans for our marketing operations. At March 31, 2009, there were outstanding letters of credit issued under the facility of $95.1 million, with no borrowing balances outstanding on the facility.
On May 8, 2009, Enserco entered into an agreement for a $240 million committed credit facility. Societe Generale, Fortis Capital Corp., and BNP Paribas are co-lead arranger banks. This facility replaces its previously uncommitted $300 million credit facility which expires on May 8, 2009. Enserco expects to close an additional $60 million of funding in May 2009 with new facility lenders, raising the total committed facility to $300 million.
Acquisition Facility
In July 2008, in conjunction with the closing of the Aquila Transaction, we borrowed $382.8 million under our $1 billion bridge acquisition credit facility dated May 7, 2007. The Acquisition Facility was structured as a single-draw term loan facility for the sole purpose of financing the Aquila Transaction and following our July 2008 borrowing we have no additional borrowing capacity available under the facility.
Borrowings under the term loan are available under a base rate option, which is based on the then-current prime rate, or under a LIBOR option, which is based on the then-current LIBOR plus an applicable margin. The loan matures on December 29, 2009 and has the following interest rate:
• The applicable margin for base-rate borrowings is (i) 200 basis points for the period commencing December 18, 2008 through March 31, 2009, (ii) 250 basis points for the period commencing April 1, 2009 through June 30, 2009, (iii) 300 basis points for the period commencing July 1, 2009 through September 30, 2009, and (iv) 350 basis points thereafter. If our credit ratings, as assigned by S&P and Moody’s, fall below investment grade, the applicable margin will increase by an additional 25 basis points; and |
|
• The applicable margin for LIBOR borrowings is (i) 300 basis points for the period commencing December 18, 2008 through March 31, 2009, (ii) 350 basis points for the period commencing April 1, 2009 through June 30, 2009, (iii) 400 basis points for the period commencing July 1, 2009 through September 30, 2009, and (iv) 450 basis points thereafter. If our credit ratings, as assigned by S&P and Moody’s, fall below investment grade, the applicable margin will increase by 25 basis points. |
As of March 31, 2009, the facility has a borrowing spread of 300 basis points over LIBOR (which equates to a 3.5% one-month borrowing rate as of March 31, 2009).
The Acquisition Facility also includes certain affirmative and negative covenants and events of default that largely replicate the covenants in our corporate revolving credit facility. We were in compliance with all such covenants as of March 31, 2009.
On April 9, 2009, we received proceeds of $30.2 million for the sale of 23.5% of the Wygen III plant to MDU. These proceeds were used to pay down a portion of the Acquisition Facility.
62
Future Financing Plans
We have an effective shelf registration statement on file with the SEC under which we may issue, from time to time, senior debt securities, subordinated debt securities, common stock, preferred stock, warrants and other securities. Although the shelf registration statement does not limit our issuance capacity, our ability to issue securities is limited to the authority granted by our Board of Directors, certain covenants in our finance arrangements and restrictions imposed by federal and state regulatory authorities.
We continue to evaluate the debt capital markets and prepare for long-term debt issuances, some of which may be completed in the second quarter of 2009, to replace the Acquisition Credit Facility, refinance other short-term debt, and fund our power generation construction projects.
In the unexpected event we are unable to complete debt financing on acceptable terms, we will consider implementing alternative measures to conserve or raise capital. These alternatives could include deferring our planned capital expenditure program, implementing asset sales, issuing equity, reducing or eliminating our dividend payments, or curtailing certain business activities, including our marketing operations.
Interest Rate Swaps
We have entered into floating-to-fixed interest rate swap agreements to reduce our exposure to interest rate fluctuations.
We have interest rate swaps with a notional amount of $250.0 million that are not designated as hedge instruments in accordance with SFAS 133. Accordingly, mark-to-market changes in value on the swaps are recorded within the income statement. During the first quarter of 2009, we recorded a $14.8 million pre-tax unrealized mark-to-market non-cash gain on the swaps. The mark-to-market value on these swaps was a liability of $79.7 million at March 31, 2009. Subsequent mark-to-market adjustments could have a significant impact on our results of operations. A one basis point move in the interest rate curves over the term of the swaps would have a pre-tax impact of approximately $0.4 million. These swaps are for terms of ten and twenty years and have amended mandatory early termination dates ranging from September 30, 2009 to December 29, 2009. We may choose to cash settle these swaps at their fair value prior to their mandatory early termination dates, or unless these dates are extended, we will cash settle these swaps for an amount equal to their fair value on the termination dates.
In addition, we have $150.0 million notional amount floating-to-fixed interest rate swaps, having a maximum term of 8 years. These swaps have been designated as cash flow hedges in accordance with SFAS 133 and accordingly, their mark-to-market adjustments are recorded in Accumulated other comprehensive loss on the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
There have been no other material changes in our financing transactions and short-term liquidity from those reported in Item 7 of our 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC.
63
Capital Requirements
During the three months ended March 31, 2009, capital expenditures were approximately $100.2 million for property, plant and equipment additions, which were partially financed through approximately $28.9 million of accrued liabilities. We currently expect total capital expenditures in 2009 to approximate $313.5 million. This sum includes, but is not limited to: $62.1 million for our share of the 110 MW Wygen III power plant located near Gillette, Wyoming in which we retain 75% ownership interest in the plant; $73.8 million related to maintenance capital for our new utility properties, and $38.6 million within our Oil and Gas segment primarily for maintenance capital and development drilling.
Forecasted capital requirements for maintenance capital and development capital are as follows:
| Three Months Ended | Total |
| March 31, 2009 | 2009 Planned |
| Expenditures | Expenditures |
| (in thousands) |
Utilities: | | |
Electric Utilities – Wygen III(1) | $ | 25,539 | $ | 62,100 |
Electric Utilities (2) (3) | | 20,041 | | 135,268 |
Gas Utilities | | 10,501 | | 42,508 |
Non-regulated Energy: | | | | |
Oil and Gas(4) | | 9,501 | | 38,621 |
Power Generation | | 1,396 | | 4,925 |
Coal Mining | | 4,294 | | 12,592 |
Energy Marketing | | — | | 4,135 |
Corporate | | — | | 13,342 |
| $ | 71,272 | $ | 313,491 |
__________________________
(1) | Forecasted expenditures of the Wygen III coal-fired plant reflect our 75% ownership interest in the plant. |
(2) | Electric Utilities capital requirements include approximately $17.6 million for transmission projects in 2009. |
(3) | The 2009 total planned expenditures do not include capital requirements associated with our plans to build gas-fired power generation facilities to serve our Colorado Electric customers. In February 2009, the CPUC authorized Colorado Electric to build two natural gas-fired combustion turbine facilities. We are currently evaluating the total costs of building these new facilities and expect to spend capital in 2009 particularly related to the commitment to purchase the turbine generators from GE. The total construction cost is expected to be approximately $225 million to $275 million to be completed by the end of 2011 |
(4) | Development capital for our oil and gas properties is expected to be limited to no more than the cash flows produced by those properties. Continued low commodity prices make many of our development drilling sites uneconomical, which could further reduce our planned development capital expenditures. |
As a result of the current global credit crisis we are re-evaluating all of our forecasted capital expenditures, and if determined prudent, may defer some of these expenditures for a period of time. Future projects are dependent upon the availability of attractive economic opportunities, and as a result, actual expenditures may vary significantly from forecasted estimates.
64
Contractual Obligations
Unconditional purchase obligations for firm transportation and storage fees for our Energy Marketing segment increased $8.6 million from $93.5 million at December 31, 2008 to $102.1 million at March 31, 2009. Approximately $67.0 million of the firm transportation and storage fee obligations relate to the 2009-2011 period with the remaining occurring thereafter.
Guarantees
See Note 6 to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
New Accounting Pronouncements
Other than the new pronouncements reported in our 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC and those discussed in Notes 2 and 3 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, there have been no new accounting pronouncements that affect us.
FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION
This report contains forward-looking information. Forward-looking information involves risks and uncertainties, and certain important factors can cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated. The forward-looking statements contained in this report include:
• We expect to refinance in the bank loan markets or the debt capital markets the acquisition debt we incurred in the Aquila Transaction before the acquisition loan matures in the fourth quarter of 2009. Some important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated include: |
|
§ Our ability to access the bank loan and debt capital markets depends on market conditions beyond our control. If the credit markets remain tight and do not improve, we may not be able to permanently finance our acquisition debt on reasonable terms, if at all. |
|
§ Our ability to raise capital in the debt capital markets depends upon our financial condition and credit ratings, among other things. If our financial condition deteriorates unexpectedly, or our credit ratings are lowered, we may not be able to permanently finance the acquisition debt on reasonable terms, if at all. |
|
• We anticipate that our existing credit capacity and available cash will be sufficient to fund our working capital needs and capital requirements. Some important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated include: |
|
§ Our access to revolving credit capacity depends on maintaining compliance with loan covenants. If we violate these covenants, we may lose revolving credit capacity and not have sufficient cash available for our peak winter needs and other working capital requirements, and our forecasted capital expenditure requirements. |
|
§ Counterparties may default on their obligations to supply commodities, return collateral to us, or otherwise meet their obligations under commercial contracts, including those designed to hedge against movements in commodity prices. |
|
65
• In connection with the IPP Transaction, we deferred tax payments of $185 million. Some important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated include: |
|
§ The Internal Revenue Service could successfully challenge our deferred tax planning strategies, which could impair our ability to defer all or part of these tax payments. |
|
• We expect to make contributions to our defined benefit pension plans of approximately $14.4 million and $16.7 million in 2009 and 2010, respectively. Some important factors that could cause actual contributions to differ materially from anticipated amounts include: |
|
§ The actual value of the plans’ invested assets. |
|
§ The discount rate used in determining the funding requirement. |
|
• We expect the goodwill related to our utility assets to fairly reflect the long-term value of stable, long-lived utility assets. Some important factors that could cause us to revisit the fair value of this goodwill include: |
|
§ A significant, sustainable deterioration of the market value of our common stock. |
|
§ Negative regulatory orders or other events that materially impact our Utilities’ ability to generate stable cash flow over an extended period of time. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
• We expect to make approximately $313.5 million of capital expenditures in 2009. Some important factors that could cause actual costs to differ materially from those anticipated include: |
|
§ The timing of planned generation, transmission or distribution projects for our Utilities is influenced by state and federal regulatory authorities and third parties. The occurrence of events that impact (favorably or unfavorably) our ability to make planned or unplanned capital expenditures could cause our 2009 forecasted capital expenditures to change. |
|
§ Forecasted capital expenditures associated with our Oil and Gas segment are driven, in part, by current market prices. A continued decline in crude oil and natural gas prices may cause us to change our planned 2009 capital expenditures related to our oil and gas operations. |
ITEM 3. | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK |
Utilities
We produce, purchase and distribute power in four states and purchase and distribute natural gas in five states. All of our gas distribution utilities have PGA provisions that allow them to pass the prudently-incurred cost of gas through to the customer. To the extent that gas prices are higher or lower than amounts in our current billing rates, adjustments are made on a periodic basis to “true-up” billed amounts to match the actual natural gas cost we incurred. These adjustments are subject to periodic prudence reviews by the state utility commissions. In South Dakota, Colorado, Wyoming and Montana, we have a mechanism for our electric utilities that serves a purpose similar to the PGAs for our gas utilities. To the extent that our fuel and purchased power energy costs are higher or lower than the energy cost built into our tariffs, the difference (or a portion thereof) is passed through to the customer.
The fair value of our Utilities derivative contracts are summarized below (in thousands):
| March 31, | December 31, |
| 2009 | 2008 |
| | | | |
Net derivative liabilities | $ | (543) | $ | (7,444) |
Cash collateral | | 2,044 | | 8,744 |
| | | | |
| $ | 1,501 | $ | 1,300 |
67
Non Regulated Trading Activities
The following table provides a reconciliation of activity in our natural gas and crude oil marketing portfolio that has been recorded at fair value including market value adjustments on inventory positions that have been designated as part of a fair value hedge during the three months ended March 31, 2009 (in thousands):
Total fair value of energy marketing positions marked-to-market at December 31, 2008 | $ | 28,447 (a) |
Net cash settled during the period on positions that existed at December 31, 2008 | | (11,531) |
Unrealized loss on new positions entered during the period and still existing at | | |
March 31, 2009 | | (4,680) |
Realized loss on positions that existed at December 31, 2008 and were settled during | | |
the period | | (1,944) |
Change in cash collateral | | 12,642 |
Unrealized gain on positions that existed at December 31, 2008 and still exist at | | |
March 31, 2009 | | 10,837 |
| | |
Total fair value of energy marketing positions at March 31, 2009 | $ | 33,771 (a) |
_____________________________
(a) | The fair value of energy marketing positions consists of derivative assets/liabilities held at fair value in accordance with SFAS 157 and market value adjustments to natural gas inventory that has been designated as a hedged item as part of a fair value hedge in accordance with SFAS 133, as follows (in thousands): |
| March 31, | December 31, |
| 2009 | 2008 |
| | | | |
Net derivative assets (liabilities) | $ | 39,843 | $ | 54,117 |
Cash collateral | | (3,673) | | (16,315) |
Market adjustment recorded | | | | |
in material, supplies and fuel | | (2,399) | | (9,355) |
| | | | |
| $ | 33,771 | $ | 28,447 |
GAAP restricts mark-to-market accounting treatment primarily to only those contracts that meet the definition of a derivative under SFAS 133. Therefore, the above reconciliation does not present a complete picture of our overall portfolio of trading activities or our expected cash flows from energy trading activities. In our natural gas and crude oil marketing operations, we often employ strategies that include utilizing derivative contracts along with inventory, storage and transportation positions to accomplish the objectives of our producer services, end-use origination and wholesale marketing groups. Except in circumstances when we are able to designate transportation, storage or inventory positions as part of a fair value hedge, SFAS 133 generally does not allow us to mark our inventory, transportation or storage positions to market. The result is that while a significant majority of our energy marketing positions are fully economically hedged, we are required to mark some parts of our overall strategies (the derivatives) to market value, but are generally precluded from marking the rest of our economic hedges (transportation, inventory or storage) to market. Volatility in reported earnings and derivative positions should be expected given these accounting requirements.
68
To value the assets and liabilities for our outstanding derivative contracts, we use the fair value methodology outlined in SFAS 157. See Note 3 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in our 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K and Note 12 of the accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
The sources of fair value measurements were as follows (in thousands):
Source of Fair Value | Maturities |
of Energy Marketing Positions | Less than 1 year | 1 – 2 years | Total Fair Value |
| | | | | | |
Cash collateral | $ | (3,673) | $ | — | $ | (3,673) |
Level 2 | | 28,525 | | 2,369 | | 30,894 |
Level 3 | | 8,749 | | 200 | | 8,949 |
Market value adjustment for inventory | | | | | | |
(see footnote (a) above) | | (2,399) | | — | | (2,399) |
| | | | | | |
Total fair value of our energy | | | | | | |
marketing positions | $ | 31,202 | $ | 2,569 | $ | 33,771 |
The following table presents a reconciliation of our March 31, 2009 energy marketing positions recorded at fair value under GAAP to a non-GAAP measure of the fair value of our energy marketing forward book wherein all forward trading positions are marked-to-market (in thousands):
Fair value of our energy marketing positions marked-to-market in accordance with GAAP | | |
(see footnote (a) above) | $ | 33,771 |
Market value adjustments for inventory, storage and transportation positions that are | | |
part of our forward trading book, but that are not marked-to-market under GAAP | | 5,026 |
Fair value of all forward positions (non-GAAP) | | 38,797 |
Cash collateral included in GAAP marked-to-market fair value | | 3,673 |
Fair value of all forward positions excluding cash collateral (non-GAAP) | $ | 42,470 |
There have been no material changes in market risk faced by us from those reported in our 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC. For more information on market risk, see Part II, Items 7 and 7A. in our 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K, and Note 12 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
69
Activities Other Than Trading
We have entered into agreements to hedge a portion of our estimated 2009, 2010 and 2011 natural gas and crude oil production from the Oil and Gas segment. The hedge agreements in place are as follows:
Natural Gas
Location | Transaction Date | Hedge Type | Term | Volume | Price |
| | | | (MMBtu/day) | |
San Juan El Paso | 04/25/2007 | Swap | 04/09 – 06/09 | 2,500 | $ | 7.21 |
San Juan El Paso | 04/26/2007 | Swap | 04/09 – 06/09 | 2,500 | $ | 7.15 |
San Juan El Paso | 05/09/2007 | Swap | 04/09 – 06/09 | 5,000 | $ | 7.24 |
CIG | 05/09/2007 | Swap | 04/09 – 06/09 | 2,000 | $ | 6.87 |
San Juan El Paso | 07/27/2007 | Swap | 07/09 – 09/09 | 5,000 | $ | 7.63 |
CIG | 09/07/2007 | Swap | 07/09 – 09/09 | 1,500 | $ | 6.48 |
AECO | 09/07/2007 | Swap | 04/08 – 10/09 | 1,000 | $ | 6.89 |
San Juan El Paso | 10/29/2007 | Swap | 07/09 – 09/09 | 5,000 | $ | 7.38 |
San Juan El Paso | 10/29/2007 | Swap | 10/09 – 12/09 | 5,000 | $ | 7.53 |
CIG | 10/29/2007 | Swap | 10/09 – 12/09 | 1,500 | $ | 7.07 |
NWR | 11/16/2007 | Swap | 01/09 – 12/09 | 1,500 | $ | 6.87 |
San Juan El Paso | 12/13/2007 | Swap | 10/09 – 12/09 | 1,500 | $ | 7.39 |
San Juan El Paso | 12/13/2007 | Swap | 10/09 – 12/09 | 1,500 | $ | 7.41 |
CIG | 01/03/2008 | Swap | 01/10 – 03/10 | 2,000 | $ | 7.49 |
NWR | 01/03/2008 | Swap | 01/10 – 03/10 | 1,500 | $ | 7.50 |
AECO | 01/03/2008 | Swap | 11/09 – 03/10 | 1,000 | $ | 8.07 |
San Juan El Paso | 01/23/2008 | Swap | 01/10 – 03/10 | 5,000 | $ | 7.50 |
San Juan El Paso | 02/28/2008 | Swap | 01/10 – 03/10 | 3,000 | $ | 8.55 |
San Juan El Paso | 04/09/2008 | Swap | 04/10 – 06/10 | 5,000 | $ | 7.26 |
San Juan El Paso | 04/30/2008 | Swap | 04/10 – 06/10 | 2,500 | $ | 7.65 |
AECO | 08/20/2008 | Swap | 04/10 – 06/10 | 1,000 | $ | 7.73 |
San Juan El Paso | 08/20/2008 | Swap | 07/10 – 09/10 | 5,000 | $ | 7.74 |
AECO | 08/20/2008 | Swap | 07/10 – 09/10 | 1,000 | $ | 7.88 |
AECO | 10/24/2008 | Swap | 10/10 – 12/10 | 1,000 | $ | 7.05 |
San Juan El Paso | 12/19/2008 | Swap | 10/09 – 12/09 | 1,000 | $ | 5.12 |
San Juan El Paso | 12/19/2008 | Swap | 04/10 – 06/10 | 1,500 | $ | 5.39 |
San Juan El Paso | 12/19/2008 | Swap | 07/10 – 09/10 | 3,000 | $ | 5.95 |
San Juan El Paso | 12/19/2008 | Swap | 10/10 – 12/10 | 5,000 | $ | 5.89 |
CIG | 01/26/2009 | Swap | 04/10 – 06/10 | 2,000 | $ | 4.45 |
CIG | 01/26/2009 | Swap | 07/10 – 09/10 | 2,000 | $ | 4.47 |
CIG | 01/26/2009 | Swap | 10/10 – 12/10 | 2,000 | $ | 4.68 |
CIG | 01/26/2009 | Swap | 01/11 – 03/11 | 2,000 | $ | 6.00 |
NWR | 01/26/2009 | Swap | 01/11 – 03/11 | 2,000 | $ | 6.05 |
San Juan El Paso | 01/26/2009 | Swap | 01/11 – 03/11 | 5,000 | $ | 6.38 |
San Juan El Paso | 02/13/2009 | Swap | 01/11 – 03/11 | 2,500 | $ | 6.16 |
San Juan El Paso | 02/13/2009 | Swap | 10/10 – 12/10 | 3,000 | $ | 5.35 |
NWR | 02/13/2009 | Swap | 04/10 – 12/10 | 1,000 | $ | 4.20 |
AECO | 03/04/2009 | Swap | 01/11 – 03/11 | 1,000 | $ | 5.95 |
NWR | 03/04/2009 | Swap | 07/09 – 09/09 | 1,000 | $ | 3.07 |
NWR | 03/04/2009 | Swap | 04/10 – 06/10 | 1,000 | $ | 4.06 |
NWR | 03/04/2009 | Swap | 07/10 – 09/10 | 1,000 | $ | 4.12 |
NWR | 03/04/2009 | Swap | 10/10 – 12/10 | 1,000 | $ | 4.55 |
NWR | 03/20/2009 | Swap | 01/10 – 03/10 | 500 | $ | 4.58 |
San Juan El Paso | 03/20/2009 | Swap | 01/10 – 03/10 | 1,000 | $ | 4.87 |
70
Crude Oil
Location | Transaction Date | Hedge Type | Term | Volume | Price |
| | | | (Bbls/month) | |
| | | | | | |
NYMEX | 04/26/2007 | Swap | 04/09 – 06/09 | 5,000 | $ | 70.25 |
NYMEX | 05/10/2007 | Swap | 04/09 – 06/09 | 5,000 | $ | 69.10 |
NYMEX | 05/29/2007 | Put | 04/09 – 06/09 | 5,000 | $ | 65.00 |
NYMEX | 06/22/2007 | Swap | 07/09 – 09/09 | 5,000 | $ | 72.10 |
NYMEX | 07/27/2007 | Put | 07/09 – 09/09 | 5,000 | $ | 65.00 |
NYMEX | 09/12/2007 | Swap | 07/09 – 09/09 | 5,000 | $ | 71.20 |
NYMEX | 09/12/2007 | Put | 04/09 – 06/09 | 5,000 | $ | 70.00 |
NYMEX | 10/29/2007 | Put | 10/09 – 12/09 | 5,000 | $ | 75.00 |
NYMEX | 10/29/2007 | Swap | 10/09 – 12/09 | 5,000 | $ | 80.75 |
NYMEX | 11/16/2007 | Put | 07/09 – 09/09 | 5,000 | $ | 75.00 |
NYMEX | 11/16/2007 | Put | 10/09 – 12/09 | 5,000 | $ | 75.00 |
NYMEX | 01/03/2008 | Put | 01/10 – 03/10 | 5,000 | $ | 80.00 |
NYMEX | 01/03/2008 | Swap | 01/10 – 03/10 | 5,000 | $ | 88.70 |
NYMEX | 01/23/2008 | Swap | 10/09 – 12/09 | 5,000 | $ | 83.10 |
NYMEX | 01/23/2008 | Swap | 01/10 – 03/10 | 5,000 | $ | 82.90 |
NYMEX | 02/28/2008 | Put | 01/10 – 03/10 | 5,000 | $ | 85.00 |
NYMEX | 04/09/2008 | Swap | 04/10 – 06/10 | 5,000 | $ | 99.60 |
NYMEX | 04/30/2008 | Put | 04/10 – 06/10 | 5,000 | $ | 85.00 |
NYMEX | 05/29/2008 | Put | 04/10 – 06/10 | 5,000 | $ | 105.00 |
NYMEX | 07/16/2008 | Swap | 04/10 – 06/10 | 5,000 | $ | 135.10 |
NYMEX | 07/16/2008 | Swap | 07/10 – 09/10 | 5,000 | $ | 134.90 |
NYMEX | 08/20/2008 | Put | 07/10 – 09/10 | 5,000 | $ | 90.00 |
NYMEX | 09/03/2008 | Put | 07/10 – 09/10 | 5,000 | $ | 90.00 |
NYMEX | 10/24/2008 | Put | 07/10 – 09/10 | 5,000 | $ | 60.00 |
NYMEX | 12/05/2008 | Swap | 10/10 – 12/10 | 5,000 | $ | 65.20 |
NYMEX | 01/26/2009 | Swap | 10/10 – 12/10 | 5,000 | $ | 60.15 |
NYMEX | 01/26/2009 | Swap | 01/11 – 03/11 | 5,000 | $ | 60.90 |
NYMEX | 02/13/2009 | Swap | 01/11 – 03/11 | 5,000 | $ | 60.05 |
NYMEX | 03/04/2009 | Swap | 10/10 – 12/10 | 5,000 | $ | 55.80 |
NYMEX | 03/04/2009 | Swap | 01/11 – 03/11 | 5,000 | $ | 57.00 |
NYMEX | 04/08/2009 | Swap | 04/11 – 06/11 | 5,000 | $ | 68.80 |
NYMEX | 04/23/2009 | Swap | 04/11 – 06/11 | 5,000 | $ | 65.10 |
71
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of March 31, 2009. Based on their evaluation, they have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective.
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended March 31, 2009 that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting. On July 14, 2008, we acquired the assets of Aquila’s regulated electric utility in Colorado and its regulated gas utilities in Colorado, Kansas, Nebraska and Iowa (the “Acquired Businesses”). The internal controls of the Acquired Businesses are an area of focus for us. We are in the process of reviewing the internal controls of the Acquired Businesses and making any necessary changes. As permitted by the guidance set forth by the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Acquired Businesses were not included in management’s assessment of internal control over financial reporting for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Our assessment of the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting as of March 31, 2009 excluded the assets and operations acquired on July 14, 2008 in the Aquila Transaction, which are doing business as Black Hills Energy. Such exclusion was in accordance with SEC guidance that an assessment of a recently acquired business may be omitted in management’s report on internal control over financial reporting, provided the acquisition took place within twelve months of management’s evaluation. Collectively, Black Hills Energy comprised 40% of our consolidated assets at March 31, 2009, 68% of our consolidated revenues and 56% of our net income for the quarter ended March 31, 2009. Our disclosure controls and procedures were not materially impacted by the acquisition.
72
BLACK HILLS CORPORATION
Part II – Other Information
For information regarding legal proceedings, see Note 18 in Item 8 of our 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K and Note 16 in Item 1 of Part I of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, which information from Note 16 is incorporated by reference into this item.
There have been no material changes in risk factors involving us from those previously disclosed in Item 1A. of Part I in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Item 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
| | | | Maximum |
| | | Total | Number (or |
| | | Number | Approximate |
| | | of Shares | Dollar |
| Total | | Purchased as | Value) of Shares |
| Number | | Part of Publicly | That May Yet Be |
| of | Average | Announced | Purchased Under |
| Shares | Price Paid | Plans | the Plans |
Period | Purchased | per Share | or Programs | or Programs |
| | | | | | |
January 1, 2009 – | | | | | | |
January 31, 2009 | 9,388 (1) | $ | 27.29 | — | | — |
| | | | | | |
February 1, 2009 – | | | | | | |
February 28, 2009 | 1,063 | $ | 26.61 | — | | — |
| | | | | | |
March 1, 2009 – | | | | | | |
March 31, 2009 | 2,293 | $ | 16.55 | — | | — |
| | | | | | |
Total | 12,744 | $ | 25.30 | — | | — |
__________________________
| (1) | Shares were acquired from certain officers and key employees under the share withholding provisions of the Omnibus Incentive Plan for the payment of taxes associated with the vesting of shares of Restricted Stock and the distribution of vested restricted stock units. |
73
Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement
On May 8, 2009, the Registrant’s subsidiary, Enserco Energy Inc. (“Enserco”), entered into a Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement effective as of May 8, 2009, by and among Enserco Energy Inc., as borrower, Fortis Capital Corp., as administrative agent and collateral agent; Societe Generale as Syndication Agent, BNP Paribas as Documentation Agent, U.S. Bank National Association, The Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd., New York Branch and the other financial institutions which may become parties hereto.
The Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement provides for a $300 million committed stand-alone credit facility to replace Enserco’s previously uncommitted $300 million credit facility, which was due to expire May 9, 2009. Enserco has received commitments on $240 million under the facility and has the right to receive commitments up to the $300 million maximum line. The facility is secured by all of Enserco’s assets and provides support for the purchase and sale of natural gas and crude oil.
Item 6. | Exhibits | |
| | |
| Exhibit 3 | Amended and Restated Bylaws of Black Hills Corporation dated January 30, 2009 (filed as Exhibit 3 to the Company’s 8-K filed on February 3, 2009 and incorporated by reference herein). |
| | |
| Exhibit 10 | Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement effective May 8, 2009 among Enserco Energy Inc., as borrower, Fortis Capital Corp., as administrative agent and collateral agent; Societe Generale as Syndication Agent, BNP Paribas as Documentation Agent, U.S. Bank National Association, The Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd., New York Branch and the other financial institutions which may become parties hereto. |
| | |
| Exhibit 12 | Statements Regarding Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges. |
| | |
| Exhibit 31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a – 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002. |
| | |
| Exhibit 31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a – 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002. |
| | |
| Exhibit 32.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002. |
| | |
| Exhibit 32.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002. |
74
BLACK HILLS CORPORATION
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
| BLACK HILLS CORPORATION |
| |
| |
| /s/ David R. Emery |
| David R. Emery, Chairman, President and |
| Chief Executive Officer |
| |
| |
| /s/ Anthony S. Cleberg |
| Anthony S. Cleberg, Executive Vice President |
| and Chief Financial Officer |
| |
| |
Dated: May 8, 2009 | |
75
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit Number | Description |
| |
Exhibit 3 | Amended and Restated Bylaws of Black Hills Corporation dated January 30, 2009 (filed as Exhibit 3 to the Company’s 8-K filed on February 3, 2009 and incorporated by reference herein). |
| |
Exhibit 10 | Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement effective May 8, 2009 among Enserco Energy Inc., as borrower, Fortis Capital Corp., as administrative agent and collateral agent; Societe Generale as Syndication Agent, BNP Paribas as Documentation Agent, U.S. Bank National Association, The Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd., New York Branch and the other financial institutions which may become parties hereto. |
| |
Exhibit 12 | Statements Regarding Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges. |
| |
Exhibit 31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a – 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002. |
| |
Exhibit 31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a – 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002. |
| |
Exhibit 32.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002. |
| |
Exhibit 32.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002. |
76