Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | (2) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Revision to Consolidated Statements of Operations The Company has historically presented its sales and costs of state fish and game licenses, duck stamps, and state government-mandated firearm background checks in net sales and cost of goods sold under the gross method. Subsequent to filing its Fiscal Year 2015 Form 10-K, the Company’s management determined that the revenue from these transactions should have been presented under the net method, thereby recognizing only the commission received in net sales for acting as the agent under the principal versus agent model. This revision does not have any impact upon gross profit, net income or earnings per share. The following table provides a reconciliation of the revision for the 13 weeks ended May 2, 2015 as reported in the condensed consolidated statement of operations included in the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the first quarter of fiscal year 2015, which was filed with the SEC on May 29, 2015: For the thirteen weeks ended May 2, 2015 As Previously Reported Revision As Revised Net sales $ 144,493 $ (5,335 ) $ 139,158 Cost of goods sold 101,342 (5,335 ) 96,007 Gross profit 43,151 — 43,151 The Company assessed the materiality of these changes both on a quantitative and qualitative basis and determined that its current and previously reported consolidated statements of operations are not materially misstated. This revision had no impact upon gross profit, net income, or earnings per share in any of the fiscal periods. Principles of Consolidation The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Holdings and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Reporting Periods The Company operates on a fiscal calendar that, in a given fiscal year, consists of the 52- or 53-week period ending on the Saturday closest to January 31st. The fiscal first quarters ended April 30, 2016 and May 2, 2015 both consisted of 13 weeks and are referred to herein as the first quarter of fiscal year 2016 and first quarter of fiscal year 2015, respectively. Fiscal year 2015 contained 52 weeks of operations ended January 30, 2016. Fiscal year 2016 will contain 52 weeks of operations and will end on January 28, 2017. Seasonality The Company’s business is generally seasonal, with a significant portion of total sales occurring during the third and fourth quarters of the fiscal year. Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Certain costs are estimated for the full year and allocated to interim periods based on estimates of time expired, benefit received, or activity associated with the interim period. Segment Reporting The Company operates solely as a sporting goods retailer whose Chief Operating Decision Maker (“CODM”) is the Chief Executive Officer. The CODM reviews financial information presented on a consolidated and individual store and cost center basis, for purposes of allocating resources and evaluating financial performance. The Company’s stores offer essentially the same general product mix, and the core customer demographic remains similar chain-wide, as does the Company’s process for the procurement and marketing of its product mix. Furthermore, the Company distributes its product mix chain-wide from a single distribution center. Given that the stores have the same economic characteristics, the individual stores are aggregated into one single operating and reportable segment. Significant Accounting Policies The Company has adopted the following accounting standards during the fiscal quarter ended April 30, 2016: Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs In April 2015, the “Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2015-03, “Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs” (“ASU 2015-03”). ASU 2015-03 requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. The Company adopted the provisions of ASU 2015-03 retrospectively in the fiscal quarter ended April 30, 2016. The adoption of ASU 2015-03 had an effect on the presentation of the Company’s financial position but no effect on the Company’s results from operations. In accordance with the standard, for the fiscal quarter ended April 30, 2016, the Company reclassified deferred financing fees of $350 from prepaid expenses to the current portion of long-term debt, net of discount and debt issuance costs. The Company also reclassified $1,259 of deferred financing fees from other long-term assets, net to long-term debt, net of discount, debt issuance costs, and current portion. For the fiscal year ended January 30, 2016, the Company reclassified deferred financing fees of $350 from prepaid expenses to the current portion of long-term debt, net of discount and debt issuance costs. The Company also reclassified $1,347 of deferred financing fees from other long-term assets, net to long-term debt, net of discount, debt issuance costs, and current portion. Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Association with Line of Credit Arrangements In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-15, “Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Association with Line of Credit Arrangements” (“ASU 2015-15”). ASU 2015-15 indicates that the guidance in ASU 2015-03 did not address presentation or subsequent measurement of debt issuance costs related to line of credit arrangements. Given the absence of authoritative guidance within ASU 2015-03, the SEC staff has indicated that they would not object to an entity deferring and presenting debt issuance costs ratably over the term of the line of credit arrangement, regardless of whether there are any outstanding borrowings on the line of credit arrangement. The Company adopted the provisions of ASU 2015-03 prospectively in the fiscal quarter ended April 30, 2016. The adoption of ASU 2015-03 had no effect on the presentation of the Company’s financial position and no effect on the Company’s results from operations. Simplifying the Presentation of Deferred Taxes In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-17 “Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes” (“ASU 2015-17”). ASU 2015-17 is intended to simplify the presentation of deferred income taxes and requires that all deferred tax liabilities and assets be classified as noncurrent in the company’s consolidated balance sheets. ASU 2015-17 is required to be adopted for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, with early adoption permitted. The Company early adopted the provisions of ASU 2015-17 prospectively in the fiscal quarter ended April 30, 2016. The adoption of ASU 2015-17 had an effect on the presentation of the Company’s financial position but no effect on the Company’s results of operations. Specifically, for the fiscal quarter ended April 30, 2016, the Company reclassified $2,368 in current deferred tax assets as noncurrent deferred tax assets. See Note 8, Income Taxes, for additional information. Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, “Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting” (“ASU 2016-09”). This standard is intended to simplify several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment award transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as equity or liabilities, an option to recognize gross stock compensation expense with actual forfeitures recognized as they occur, and classifications in the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-09 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted. Management has evaluated this statement and early adopted the provision in the fiscal quarter ended April 30, 2016. The adoption of ASU 2016-09 had an effect on the presentation of the Company’s results of operations. In connection with the vesting of restricted stock units in the 13 weeks ended April 30, 2016, under the transition guidance the Company has prospectively recorded $470 in income tax benefits as a reduction of income taxes payable and as an income tax benefit with no significant impact on earnings (loss) per share. In prior periods presented, the income tax benefits were recorded to additional paid-in-capital instead of income tax benefit as specified in the new standard. The Company is no longer required to disclose excess tax benefits as a financing activity in the statement of cash flows and has elected to adopt this change on a prospective basis. ASU 2016-09 allows for the election to either record forfeitures as they occur or to continue estimating the level of forfeitures consistent with current accounting standards. The Company has elected to record forfeitures as they occur which change did not have a significant impact on the condensed consolidated financial statements. There have been no other significant changes to the Company’s significant accounting policies as described in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 30, 2016. Comprehensive Income The Company has no components of net income (loss) that would require classification as other comprehensive income for the 13 week periods ended April 30, 2016 and May 2, 2015. Recent Accounting Pronouncements Revenue from Contracts with Customers In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09 “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” (Topic 606) (“ASU 2014-09”). ASU 2014-09 is a comprehensive new revenue recognition model requiring a company to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to a customer at an amount reflecting the consideration it expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-14, “Deferral of the Effective Date” (“ASU 2015-14”). ASU 2015-14 simply formalized a one year deferral of the effective date of ASU 2014-09. In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-08 “Principal versus Agent Considerations – Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net” (“ASU 2016-08”), amending the principal-versus-agent implementation guidance set forth in ASU 2014-09. In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-10 “Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing” (“ASU 2016-10”), which amends certain aspects of the guidance set forth in the FASB’s new revenue standard related to identifying performance obligations and licensing implementation. As a result of these four standards updates, the Company expects that it will apply the new revenue standard to annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. In adopting ASU 2014-09, ASU 2015-14, ASU 2016-08, and ASU 2016-10, companies may use either a full retrospective or a modified retrospective approach. Management is evaluating the provisions of ASU 2014-09, ASU 2015-14, ASU 2016-08, and ASU 2016-10 and has not yet selected a transition method nor have they determined what impact the adoption of ASU 2014-09, ASU 2015-14, ASU 2016-08, and ASU 2016-10 will have on the Company's financial position or results of operations. Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-11, “Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory” (“ASU 2015-11”). Under ASU 2015-11, inventory will be measured at the “lower of cost and net realizable value” and options that currently exist for “market value” will be eliminated. ASU 2015-11 defines net realizable value as the “estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation.” No other changes were made to the current guidance on inventory measurement. ASU 2015-11 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Early application is permitted and should be applied prospectively. Management is evaluating the provisions of this statement and has not determined what impact the adoption of ASU 2015-11 will have on the Company's financial position or results of operations. Management has determined that the Company will adopt the provision in first quarter in fiscal year 2017. Lease Accounting In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases” (“ASU 2016-02”). The standard amends the existing accounting standards for lease accounting, including requiring lessees to recognize most leases on their balance sheets and making targeted changes to lessor accounting. ASU 2016-02 will be effective beginning in the first quarter of 2019. Early adoption of ASU 2016-02 is permitted. The new leases standard requires a modified retrospective transition approach for all leases existing at, or entered into after, the date of initial application, with an option to use certain transition relief. Management is currently evaluating the impact of adopting ASU 2016-02 on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Recognition of Breakage for Certain Prepaid Stored-Value Products In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-04, “Recognition of Breakage for Certain Prepaid Stored-Value Products” (“ASU 2016-04”). ASU 2016-04 entitles a company to derecognize amounts related to expected breakage in proportion to the pattern of rights expected to be exercised by the product holder to the extent that it is probable a significant reversal of the recognized breakage amount will not subsequently occur. ASU 2016-04 is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and is to be applied retrospectively. Early adoption is permitted. Management is currently evaluating the impact of adopting ASU 2016-02 on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. |