Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Basis of Presentation and Use of Estimates The preparation of the Company’s consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) requires it to make estimates and assumptions that impact the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities in the Company’s consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. The most significant estimates in the Company’s consolidated financial statements relate to the valuation of equity awards, purchase price allocations including fair value estimates of intangible assets, estimated useful lives of fixed assets and intangible assets and accruals relating to development contracts, clinical trials and settlement obligations. The Company bases its estimates and assumptions on historical experience when available and on various factors that it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. The Company evaluates its estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis. The Company’s actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. Certain prior year amounts have been conformed to the current year presentation. These reclassifications had no impact on net loss or total equity. Principles of Consolidation The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Epirus and its wholly owned subsidiaries: EB Sub, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Epirus Biopharmaceuticals Ltd., a United Kingdom corporation, Epirus Biopharmaceuticals (Switzerland) GmbH, a Swiss corporation, Epirus Brasil Tecnologia Ltda, a Brazilian corporation, Epirus Biopharmaceuticals (Netherlands) B.V., a Netherlands corporation, and Zalicus Pharmaceuticals Ltd., a Canadian corporation. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Merger and Exchange Ratio The Merger has been accounted for as a “reverse merger” under the acquisition method of accounting for business combinations with Private Epirus treated as the accounting acquirer of Zalicus. The historical financial statements of Private Epirus have become the historical financial statements of Public Epirus, or the combined company, and are included in this filing labeled Epirus Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. As a result of the Merger, historical common stock, stock options and additional paid-in capital, including share and per share amounts, have been retroactively adjusted to reflect the equity structure of Public Epirus, including the effect of the Merger exchange ratio and the Public Epirus common stock par value of $0.001 per share. See Note 4, “Merger,” for additional discussion of the Merger and the exchange ratio. Reverse Stock Split On July 16, 2014, Public Epirus effected a 1 -for-10 reverse stock split of its outstanding common stock, par value $0.001 per share (“Public Epirus Common Stock”) (the “Reverse Stock Split”). The accompanying consolidated financial statements and these notes to consolidated financial statements, including the Merger exchange ratio (Note 4) applied to historical Private Epirus common stock and stock options, give retroactive effect to the Reverse Stock Split for all periods presented. The shares of Public Epirus Common Stock retained a par value of $0.001 per share. Segment and Geographic Information Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate discrete financial information is available for evaluation by the chief operating decision-maker (“CODM”) or decision-making group in making decisions regarding resource allocation and assessing performance. The Company and the Company’s CODM view the Company’s operations and manage its business in one operating segment: the development and commercialization of biosimilar monoclonal antibodies for emerging markets . The Company's entire business is managed by a single management team, which reports to the Chief Executive Officer. As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, all of the Company's long-lived assets were held within the United States, Switzerland and The Netherlands. Cash and Cash Equivalents The Company considers all highly liquid investments with maturities of 90 days or less from the date of purchase to be cash equivalents. As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, all cash and cash equivalents are held in depository accounts at six commercial banks. Cash equivalents are reported at fair value. Concentrations of Credit Risk and Off-Balance Sheet Risk Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk are primarily cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash. The Company maintains its cash and cash equivalent balances in the form of checking and savings accounts with financial institutions that management believes are creditworthy. The Company’s investment policy includes guidelines on the quality of the institutions and financial instruments and defines allowable investments that the Company believes minimizes the exposure to concentration of credit risk. The Company has no financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk of loss. Fair Value of Financial Instruments The Company is required to disclose information on all assets and liabilities reported at fair value that enables an assessment of the inputs used in determining the reported fair values. The Company determines the fair market values of its financial instruments based on the fair value hierarchy, which is a hierarchy of inputs used in measuring fair value that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring that the observable inputs be used when available. Observable inputs are inputs that market participants would use in pricing the financial instrument based on market data obtained from sources independent of the Company. Unobservable inputs are inputs that reflect the Company’s assumptions about the inputs that market participants would use in pricing the financial instrument and are developed based on the information available in the circumstances. The fair value hierarchy applies only to the valuation inputs used in determining the reported or disclosed fair value of the financial instruments and is not a measure of the investment credit quality. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy, and its applicability to the Company’s financial assets and liabilities, are described below: Level 1 Inputs : Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date of identical, unrestricted assets and liabilities. Level 2 Inputs : Quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities, or inputs that are observable, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term through corroboration with observable market data. Level 2 includes investments valued at quoted prices adjusted for legal or contractual restrictions specific to the security. Level 3 Inputs : Pricing inputs are unobservable for the assets and liabilities, that is, inputs that reflect the reporting entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the assets. Level 3 includes private investments that are supported by little or no market activity. The fair value hierarchy level is determined by asset class based on the lowest level of significant input. In periods of market inactivity, the observability of prices and inputs may be reduced for certain instruments. This condition could cause an instrument to be reclassified between levels. During the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, there were no transfers between levels. The Company measures cash equivalents at fair value on a recurring basis. The fair value of cash equivalents is determined based on “Level 1” inputs, which consist of quoted prices in active markets for identical assets. The fair value of the Company's note is determined using current applicable rates for similar instruments with similar settlement features as of the balance sheet date. The carrying value of the Company's short term debt approximates its fair value as the Company's interest rate is near current market rates for instruments with similar settlement features. The fair value of the Company's note and contingent consideration was determined using Level 3 inputs. Property and Equipment Property and equipment consists of office furniture, office and computer equipment and leasehold improvements. Expenditures for repairs and maintenance are recorded to expense as incurred, whereas major betterments are capitalized as additions to property and equipment. Property and equipment are recorded at cost and are depreciated when placed into service using the straight-line method of depreciation, based on their estimated useful lives as follows: Asset Description Estimated Useful Lives Furniture and fixtures years Office and computer equipment 3 years Leasehold improvements Shorter of the useful life or remaining lease term Upon retirement or sale, the cost of assets disposed and the related accumulated depreciation is removed from the accounts and any resulting gain or loss is recorded in the consolidated statements of operations. The Company evaluates the potential of its long-lived assets for impairment if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be fully recoverable or that the useful life of the assets is no longer appropriate. The impairment test is based on a comparison of the undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated from the use of the asset group and its eventual disposition to the carrying value of the asset group. If impairment is indicated, the assets are written down by the amount by which the carrying value of the assets exceeds the related fair value of the assets. Any write-downs are treated as permanent reductions in the carrying value of the assets. No such impairment losses have been recorded through December 31, 2015. Restricted Cash Restricted cash represents cash held in depository accounts at financial institutions to collateralize conditional stand-by letter of credits related to the Company’s Boston, Massachusetts and Zug, Switzerland facility lease agreements and the Company’s subleased Cambridge, Massachusetts facility. Restricted cash is reported as non-current unless the restrictions are expected to be released in the next 12 months. Acquisitions Business combinations are accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting. Under the acquisition method of accounting, the tangible and intangible assets acquired and the liabilities assumed are recorded as of the acquisition date at their respective fair values. The Company evaluates a business as an integrated set of activities and assets that is capable of being managed for the purpose of providing a return in the form of dividends, lower costs or other economic benefits and consists of inputs and processes that provide or have the ability to provide outputs. In an acquisition of a business the excess of the fair value of the consideration transferred over the fair value of the net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill. In an acquisition of net assets that does not constitute a business, no goodwill is recognized. The Company’s consolidated financial statements include the results of operations of an acquired business after the completion of the acquisition. In-process Research & Development In-process research & development (“IPR&D”) represents the fair value assigned to research and development assets that were not fully developed at the date of acquisition. IPR&D acquired in a business combination or recognized from the application of push-down accounting is capitalized on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet at its acquisition-date fair value. Until the project is completed, the assets are accounted for as indefinite-lived intangible assets and subject to impairment testing. Upon completion of a project, the carrying value of the related IPR&D is reclassified to intangible assets and is amortized over the estimated useful life of the asset. When performing the impairment assessment, the Company first assesses qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to recalculate the fair value of its acquired IPR&D. If the Company determines, as a result of the qualitative assessment, that it is more likely than not that the fair value of acquired IPR&D is less than its carrying amount, it calculates the asset’s fair value. If the carrying value of the Company’s acquired IPR&D exceeds its fair value, then the intangible asset is written down to its fair value. For the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company determined that there was an impairment related to IPR&D acquired in the Merger. As a result, the Company recorded a loss on impairment of IPR&D in the amount of $1,671 for the year ended December 31, 2015. This impairment charge was recorded within research and development expense. For the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company determined that there was no impairment of IPR&D. Intangible Assets The Company amortizes its intangible assets using the straight-line method over its estimated economic life, which ranges from six to 16.5 years. The Company evaluates the potential impairment of its intangible assets if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be fully recoverable or that the useful life of the assets is no longer appropriate. The impairment test is first based on a comparison of the undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated from the use of the asset group and its eventual disposition to the carrying value of the asset group. If impairment is indicated, the assets are written down by the amount by which the carrying value of the assets exceeds the related fair value of the assets. Any write-downs are treated as permanent reductions in the carrying value of the assets. For the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, the Company determined that there was no impairment of its intangible assets. Goodwill Goodwill represents the difference between the consideration transferred and the fair value of the net assets acquired under the acquisition method of accounting for push-down accounting. Goodwill is not amortized but is evaluated for impairment within the Company’s single reporting unit on an annual basis, during the fourth quarter, or more frequently if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of the Company’s reporting unit below its carrying amount. When performing the impairment assessment, the accounting standard for testing goodwill for impairment permits a company to first assess the qualitative factors to determine whether the existence of events and circumstances indicates that it is more likely than not that the goodwill is impaired. If the Company believes, as a result of the qualitative assessment, that it is more likely than not that the fair value of goodwill is impaired, the Company must perform the first step of the goodwill impairment test. The Company has determined that goodwill was not impaired as of December 31, 2015 and 2014. To date, the Company has not recognized any impairment charges related to goodwill. Revenue Recognition Multiple-Element Arrangements Under the authoritative guidance for revenue recognition related to multiple-element revenue arrangements, each deliverable within a multiple-element revenue arrangement is accounted for as a separate unit of accounting if both of the following criteria are met: (1) the delivered item or items have value to the customer on a standalone basis and (2) for an arrangement that includes a general right of return relative to the delivered item(s), delivery or performance of the undelivered item(s) is considered probable and substantially in the Company’s control. The Company considers a deliverable to have standalone value if the Company sells this item separately or if the item is sold by another vendor or could be resold by the customer. Deliverables not meeting the criteria for being a separate unit of accounting are accounted for on a combined basis. In the event the Company enters into a contract in which the deliverables are required to be separated, the Company will allocate arrangement consideration to each deliverable in an arrangement based on its relative selling price. The Company determines selling price using vendor-specific objective evidence (“VSOE”), if it exists; otherwise, the Company uses third-party evidence (“TPE”). If neither VSOE nor TPE of selling price exists for a deliverable, the Company uses estimated selling price (“ESP”) to allocate the arrangement consideration. The Company applies appropriate revenue recognition guidance to each unit of accounting. Milestones Contingent consideration from research and development activities that is earned upon the achievement of a substantive milestone is recognized in its entirety in the period in which the milestone is achieved. At the inception of each arrangement that includes milestone payments, the Company evaluates whether each milestone is substantive. This evaluation includes an assessment of whether: (a) the consideration is commensurate with either (1) the entity’s performance to achieve the milestone, or (2) the enhancement of the value of the delivered item(s) as a result of a specific outcome resulting from the entity’s performance to achieve the milestone, (b) the consideration relates solely to past performance and (c) the consideration is reasonable relative to all of the deliverables and payment terms within the arrangement. The Company evaluates factors such as the scientific, clinical, regulatory, commercial and other risks that must be overcome to achieve the respective milestone, the level of effort and investment required and whether the milestone consideration is reasonable relative to all deliverables and payment terms in the arrangement in making this assessment. Royalty Revenue Under certain license agreements to which the Company is a party, the Company receives royalty payments based upon its licensees’ net sales of products. Generally, under these agreements, the Company receives royalty payments from licensees approximately one quarter in arrears after the licensee has sold the income generating product or products. The Company recognizes royalty revenues when it can reliably estimate such amounts and collectability is reasonably assured. As such, the Company generally recognizes royalty revenues in the quarter reported to it by its licensees. Therefore, royalty revenues are recognized one quarter in arrears from the quarter in which sales by its licensees occurred. Under this accounting policy, the royalty revenues the Company recognizes are not based upon estimates and are typically reported in the same period in which the Company receives payment from its licensees. Deferred Revenue Amounts received prior to satisfying the above revenue recognition criteria are recorded as deferred revenue in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Amounts not expected to be recognized within 12 months from the balance sheet date are classified as long-term deferred revenue. Deferred Rent Deferred rent, included within other non-current liabilities, net of the current portion recorded in accrued expenses in the consolidated balance sheet, consists of the difference between cash payments and the recognition of rent expense on a straight-line basis for the facilities the Company occupies. The Company’s lease for its Boston, Massachusetts, facility provides for a rent-free period as well as fixed increases in minimum annual rental payments. The total amount of rental payments due over the lease term is being charged to rent expense ratably over the life of the lease. Other Liabilities In conjunction with the Merger, as discussed in Note 4, the Company assumed a sublease liability for Zalicus’ Cambridge, Massachusetts facility, which is included within other non-current liabilities, net of the current portion recorded in other current liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet. The liability represents the fair value of the difference between the total sublease payments to be received by the Company and the total payment obligation for the Company per the lease agreement. The Company has an operating lease for office space in Boston, Massachusetts. In connection with this lease, the Company and its third party lessor agreed that the lessor would pay for certain leasehold improvements on behalf of the Company. These leasehold improvements are accounted for as a lease incentive obligation, which is recorded in other non-current liabilities, net of the current portion recorded in other current liabilities. This liability is being amortized over the life of the lease and as a reduction to rent expense. Organizational Costs All organizational costs are expensed as incurred. Research and Development Costs Research and development costs are charged to expense as incurred in performing research and development activities. The costs include employee compensation, facilities and overhead, clinical study and related clinical manufacturing costs, regulatory and other related costs. Nonrefundable advanced payments for goods or services to be received in the future for use in research and development activities are deferred and capitalized. The capitalized amounts are expensed as the related goods are delivered or the services are performed. Costs for certain development activities, such as clinical trials, are recognized based on an evaluation of the progress to completion of specific tasks using data such as patient enrollment, clinical site activations, or information provided to the Company by its vendors with respect to their actual costs incurred. Payments for these activities are based on the terms of the individual arrangements, which may differ from the pattern of costs incurred, and are reflected in the consolidated financial statements as prepaid or accrued research and development expense, as the case may be. Stock-Based Compensation The Company accounts for grants of stock options and restricted stock based on their grant date fair value and recognizes compensation expense over the award’s vesting period. The Company estimates the fair value of stock options as of the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and restricted stock based on the fair value of the underlying common stock, which is determined as the closing trading price of the Company’s common stock subsequent to the Merger, in which the Company’s common stock became publicly traded, and was determined by management prior to the Merger (Note 15). Stock-based compensation expense represents the cost of the grant date fair value of employee stock option grants recognized over the requisite service period of the awards (usually the vesting period) on a straight-line basis, net of estimated forfeitures. The expense is adjusted for actual forfeitures at the end of each reporting period. Stock-based compensation expense recognized in the consolidated financial statements is based on awards that are ultimately expected to vest. Stock-based awards issued to nonemployees are accounted for based on the fair value of such services received or of the equity instruments issued, whichever is more reliably measured. Awards are revalued at each reporting date and upon vesting and are expensed on a straight-line basis over the vesting period. Income Taxes The Company accounts for income taxes under the liability method, which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined on the basis of the differences between the financial statements and tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. The effect of a change in tax rates on deferred tax assets and liabilities is recognized in operations in the period that includes the enactment date. The Company recognizes net deferred tax assets through the recording of a valuation allowance to the extent that the Company believes these assets are more likely than not to be realized. In making such a determination, management considers all available positive and negative evidence, including future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, projected future taxable income, tax-planning strategies, and results of recent operations. If management determines that the Company would be able to realize its deferred tax assets in the future, in excess of its net recorded amount, management would make an adjustment to the deferred tax asset valuation allowance, which would reduce the provision for income taxes. The Company records uncertain tax positions on the basis of a two-step process whereby: (1) management determines whether it is more likely than not that the tax positions will be sustained on the basis of the technical merits of the position and (2) for those tax positions that meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold, management recognizes the largest amount of tax benefit that is more than 50% likely to be realized upon ultimate settlement with the related tax authority. The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits within income tax expense. Any accrued interest and penalties are included within the related tax liability. Net Loss Per Share Basic net loss per share is calculated by dividing net loss by the weighted average shares outstanding during the period, without consideration for common stock equivalents. During periods of income, the Company allocates participating securities a proportional share of income determined by dividing total weighted average participating securities by the sum of the total weighted average common shares and participating securities (the “two-class method”). The Company’s convertible preferred stock, which was exchanged for Public Epirus Common Stock in the Merger, participated in any dividends declared by the Company and were therefore considered to be participating securities. Participating securities have the effect of diluting both basic and diluted earnings per share during periods of income. During periods of loss, the Company allocates no loss to participating securities because they have no contractual obligation to share in the losses of the Company. Diluted net loss per share attributable to common stockholders is calculated by adjusting weighted average shares outstanding for the dilutive effect of common stock equivalents outstanding for the period, determined using the treasury-stock and if-converted methods. For purposes of the diluted net loss per share calculation, common stock equivalents have been excluded from the calculation of diluted net loss per share, as their effect would be anti-dilutive for all periods presented. Therefore, basic and diluted net loss per share were the same for all periods presented. Comprehensive Loss Comprehensive loss is the change in equity of a company during a period from transactions and other events and circumstances, excluding transactions resulting from investments by owners and distributions to owners. Recent Accounting Pronouncements Going Concern In August 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standard Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements—Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to continue as a Going Concern. This update is intended to define management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an organization’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year of the date of issuance of the entity’s financial statements and to provide related footnote disclosures. This guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, with early application permitted. The Company is currently evaluating what effect, if any, the adoption of this guidance will have on the disclosures included in its consolidated financial statements. Debt Issuance Costs In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-03 , Interest—Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs , which requires that debt issuance costs be presented in the balance sheet as a deduction from the carrying amount of the related liability, rather than as a deferred charge. The updated guidance is effective retroactively for financial statements covering fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company early adopted ASU No. 2015-03 effective December 31, 2015. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and footnote disclosures. Technical Corrections and Improvements In June 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-10, Technical Corrections and Improvements . This update covers a wide range of Topics in the ASC. The amendments in this update represent changes to clarify the ASC, correct unintended application of guidance, or make minor improvements to the ASC that are not expected to have a significant effect on current accounting practice or create a significant administrative cost to most entities. Additionally, some of the amendments will make the ASC easier to understand and easier to apply by eliminating inconsistencies, providing needed clarifications, and improving the presentation of guidance in the ASC. The amendments in this update that require transition guidance are effective for all entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. All other amendments will be effective upon the issuance of this update. The Company does not anticipate that the adoption of this standard will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements and footnote disclosures. Revenue Recognition In July 2015, the FASB deferred the effective date for ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, by one year. This update will supersede the revenue recognition requirements in Revenue Recognition (Topic 605) and requires entities to recognize revenue in a way that depicts the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled to in exchange for those goods or services. This update is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period, which for the Company is January 1, 2018. Early application is permitted for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within that reporting period. The update can be applied retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented or retrospectively with the cumulative effect of the change recognized at the date of the initial application in retained earnings. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact the adoption of this update will have on its consolidated financial statements and has not yet selected a transition method. Business Combinations In September 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-16, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement - Period Adjustments . This update eliminates the requirement to restate prior period financial statements for measurement period adjustments following a business combination. The update requires that the cumulative impact of a measurement period adjustment (including the impact on prior periods) be recognized in the reporting period in which the adjustment is identified. The prior period impact of the adjustment should be either presented separately on the face of the income statement or disclosed in the notes. The update is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015. The adoption of this update is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations. Income Taxes During November 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-17, “Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes”, which simplifies the presentation of deferred income taxes. This ASU requires that deferred tax assets and liabilities be classified as non-current in a statement of financial position. The standard is effective for public companies for fiscal years beginning after De |