Significant Accounting Policies [Text Block] | Note 2. Revenue Recognition Our Catasys contracts are generally designed to provide cash fees to us on a monthly basis or an upfront case rate based on enrolled members. To the extent our contracts may may twelve Cost of Services Cost of healthcare services consists primarily of salaries related to our care coaches, outreach specialists and other staff directly involved in member care, healthcare provider claims payments, and fees charged by our third third Trak TM Cash Equivalents and Concentration of Credit Risk We consider all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three may March 31, 2017, $115,038. For the three March 31, 2017, three 94% two 79% Basic and Diluted Income (Loss) per Share Basic income (loss) per share is computed by dividing the net income (loss) to common stockholders for the period by the weighted average number of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted income (loss) per share is computed by dividing the net income (loss) for the period by the weighted average number of common stock and dilutive common equivalent shares outstanding during the period. Common equivalent shares, consisting of 1,928,431 620,119 three March 31, 2017 2016, Share-Based Compensation Our 2017 “2017 2,333,334 422A ten three five March 31, 2017, 243,853 50,774 Total share-based compensation expense on a consolidated basis was $127,000 $174,000 three March 31, 2017 2016, Stock Options – Employees and Directors We measure and recognize compensation expense for all share-based payment awards made to employees and directors based on estimated fair values on the date of grant. We estimate the fair value of share-based payment awards using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The value of the portion of the award that is ultimately expected to vest is recognized as expense over the requisite service periods in the consolidated statements of operations. Share-based compensation expense recognized for employees and directors for the three March 31, 2017 2016 $127,000 $174,000, For share-based awards issued to employees and directors, share-based compensation is attributed to expense using the straight-line single option method. Share-based compensation expense recognized in our consolidated statements of operations for the three March 31, 2017 2016, There were no three March 31, 2017 2016, 2017 three March 31, 2017 Weighted Avg. Shares Exercise Price Balance December 31, 2016 244,000 $ 39.06 Granted - $ - Cancelled - $ - Balance March 31, 2017 244,000 $ 38.90 The expected volatility assumptions have been based on the historical and expected volatility of our stock, measured over a period generally commensurate with the expected term. The weighted average expected option term for the three March 31, 2017 2016, 107 110), As of March 31, 2017, $191,000 1.52 Stock Options and Warrants – Non-employees We account for the issuance of options and warrants for services from non-employees by estimating the fair value of warrants issued using the Black-Scholes pricing model. This model’s calculations include the option or warrant exercise price, the market price of shares on grant date, the weighted average risk-free interest rate, the expected life of the option or warrant, and the expected volatility of our stock and the expected dividends. For options and warrants issued as compensation to non-employees for services that are fully vested and non-forfeitable at the time of issuance, the estimated value is recorded in equity and expensed when the services are performed and benefit is received. For unvested shares, the change in fair value during the period is recognized in expense using the graded vesting method. There were no three March 31, 2017 2016, no three March 31, 2017 2016, Common Stock There were 14,492 0 three March 31, 2017 2016, There were 214,514 a Company owned by David E. Smith, a member of our board of directors for the conversion of their December 2016 Income Taxes We have recorded a full valuation allowance against our otherwise recognizable deferred tax assets as of March 31, 2017. not March 31, 2017. 740, We assess our income tax positions and record tax benefits for all years subject to examination based upon our evaluation of the facts, circumstances and information available at the reporting date. For those tax positions where there is greater than 50% may 50% March 31, 2017 Fair Value Measurements Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Assets and liabilities recorded at fair value in the condensed consolidated balance sheets are categorized based upon the level of judgment associated with the inputs used to measure fair value. The fair value hierarchy distinguishes between (1) (2) three three Level Input: Input Definition: Level I Inputs are unadjusted, quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets at the measurement date. Level II Inputs, other than quoted prices included in Level I, that are observable for the asset or liability through corroboration with market data at the measurement date. Level III Unobservable inputs that reflect management’s best estimate of what market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability at the measurement date. The following table summarizes fair value measurements by level at March 31, 2017 Balance at March 31, 2017 (Amounts in thousands) Level I Level II Level III Total Certificates of deposit 106 - - 106 Total assets 106 - - 106 Warrant liabilities - - 12,893 12,893 Derivative Liability 18,718 18,718 Total liabilities - - 31,611 31,611 Carrying amounts reported in the condensed consolidated balance sheets of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, and accrued expenses approximate fair value due to their relatively short maturity. The fair value of borrowings is not considered to be significantly different from its carrying amount because stated rates for such debt reflect current market rates and conditions. Financial instruments classified as Level III in the fair value hierarchy as of March 31, 2017, Warrant Liabilities The following table summarizes our fair value measurements using significant Level III inputs, and changes therein, for the three March 31, 2017: Level III Level III Warrant Derivative (Dollars in thousands) Liabilities (Dollars in thousands) Liabilities Balance as of December 31, 2016 $ 5,307 Balance as of December 31, 2016 $ 8,122 Issuance of warrants 2,405 Issuance of warrants - Change in fair value 5,181 Change in fair value 10,596 Balance as of March 31, 2017 $ 12,893 Balance as of March 31, 2017 $ 18,718 Issuance (exercise) of warrants, net - Issuance (exercise) of warrants, net - Change in fair value - Change in fair value - Balance as of June 30, 2016 $ 12,893 Balance as of June 30, 2016 $ 18,718 Issuance (exercise) of warrants, net - Issuance (exercise) of warrants, net - Expiration of warrants - Expiration of warrants - Change in fair value - Change in fair value - Balance as of September 30, 2016 $ 12,893 Balance as of September 30, 2016 $ 18,718 Property and Equipment Property and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation. Additions and improvements to property and equipment are capitalized at cost. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets, which range from two seven five seven Warrant Liabilities In January 2017, one (100%) $1,300,000 8% March 31, 2017 “January 2017 five one (100%) January 2017 $5.10 “January 2017 March 31, 2017, March 31, 2017 $1,115,000. December 2016 25% 137,883 January 2017 April 30, 2017 first. The January 2017 January 2017 January 2017 January 2017 January 2017 In connection with the Subscription Agreement described above, the number of Shamus warrants issued as part of the December 2016 75% 100% 58,824 The warrant liabilities were calculated using the Black-Scholes model based upon the following assumptions: March 31, 201 7 Expected volatility 93.56% Risk-free interest rate 1.27 - 1.93% Weighted average expected lives in years 2 - 5 Expected dividend 0% We have issued warrants to purchase common stock in February 2012, April 2015, July 2015, August 2016, December 2016, January 2017, February 2017 March 2017. For the three March 31, 2017 2016, $5.2 $228,000, Derivative Liability In July 2015, $3.55 12% January 18, 2016 “July 2015 July 2015 $11.40 may October 2015, July 2015 July 2015 January 18, 2016 January 18, 2017. July 2015 $1.80 July 2015 12% July 2015 April 30, 2017 first. July 2015 March 31, 201 7 Expected volatility 93.56 % Risk-free interest rate 0.74 % Weighted average expected lives in years 0.08 Expected dividend 0 % For the three March 31, 2017 2016, $10.6 $1.3 Recently Issued or Newly Adopted Accounting Standards In April 2016, 2016 10, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) 2014 09, 2014 09, December 15, 2017. In March 2016, 2016 09, Compensation — Stock Compensation (Topic 718): 2016 09”), December 15, 2016, 2016 09 In February 2015, Consolidation (Topic 810): 2015 02”). 2015 02 2015 02 December 15, 2015, 2015 02 In August 2014, 2014 15, Presentation of Financial Statements—Going Concern (Subtopic 205 40): 2014 15”) . 2014 15 may one one 2014 15 December 15, 2016. 2014 15 |