Hipcricket (HIPP) 10-K 14 May 14 2014 FY Annual report Financial data

Document_and_Entity_Informatio

Document and Entity Information (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Feb. 28, 2014	1-May-14
Document And Entity Information	'	'
Entity Registrant Name	'Hipcricket, Inc.	'
Entity Central Index Key	'0001137204	'
Document Type	'10-K	'
Document Period End Date	28-Feb-14	'
Amendment Flag	'false	'
Current Fiscal Year End Date	'--02-29	'
Entity Well-known Seasoned Issuer	'No	'
Entity Voluntary Filers	'No	'
Entity Current Reporting Status	'Yes	'
Entity Filer Category	'Smaller Reporting Company	'
Entity Public Float	'	$129,564
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding	'	154,786,916
Document Fiscal Year Focus	'2014	'
Document Fiscal Period Focus	'FY	'

BALANCE_SHEETS

BALANCE SHEETS (USD $)	Feb. 28, 2014	Feb. 28, 2013
ASSETS	'	'
Cash and cash equivalents	$3,002,442	$4,352,691
Restricted cash	214,751	214,455
Accounts receivable, net	6,808,401	5,707,019
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	415,507	772,029
Total current assets	10,441,101	11,046,194
Intangible assets held for sale	'	3,500,000
Property and equipment, net	322,628	82,737
Goodwill	35,060,183	35,060,183
Intangible assets, net	21,203,081	25,812,037
Deposits	162,555	238,011
TOTAL ASSETS	67,189,548	75,739,162
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY	'	'
Accounts payable	4,411,606	4,812,086
Accrued liabilities	2,628,635	2,614,365
Deferred revenue	807,598	851,847
Acquisition related contingent consideration	2,210,045	'
Total current liabilities	10,057,884	8,278,298
Deferred tax liability, net	3,376,383	3,517,652
Accrued liabilities	55,059	82,002
TOTAL LIABILITIES	13,489,326	11,877,952
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY:	'	'
Common stock, $.0001 par value; 250,000,000 shares authorized; 154,661,916 and 129,554,226 shares issued and outstanding, respectively.	15,466	12,955
Additional paid-in capital	187,333,089	175,241,799
Accumulated deficit	-133,648,333	-111,393,544
Total stockholders' equity	53,700,222	63,861,210
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY	$67,189,548	$75,739,162

BALANCE_SHEETS_Parenthetical

BALANCE SHEETS (Parenthetical) (USD $)	Feb. 28, 2014	Feb. 28, 2013
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY:	'	'
Common stock, par value (in dollars per share)	$0.00	$0.00
Common stock, shares authorized	250,000,000	250,000,000
Common stock, shares issued	154,661,916	154,661,916
Common stock, shares outstanding	129,554,226	129,554,226

STATEMENTS_OF_OPERATIONS

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Feb. 28, 2014	Feb. 28, 2013
Statements Of Operations	'	'
REVENUE	$26,690,718	$26,210,101
COST OF REVENUES	12,433,780	10,370,770
OPERATING EXPENSES:	'	'
Selling and marketing	11,880,904	15,123,547
Technology and development	6,781,916	7,474,928
General and administrative	9,211,028	12,682,015
Depreciation and amortization	5,206,900	6,036,740
Impairment of intangibles and investments	3,493,729	12,196,269
Goodwill impairment	'	25,919,000
Total operating expenses	36,574,477	79,432,499
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS	-22,317,539	-63,593,168
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):	'	'
Interest income (expense), net	-52,342	-62,580
Acquisition related contingent consideration	'	-12,199,730
NET LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAXES	-22,369,881	-51,456,018
Income tax benefit	115,092	2,618,723
NET LOSS	($22,254,789)	($48,837,295)
NET LOSS PER SHARE - basic and diluted	($0.16)	($0.47)
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING	'	'
Basic and diluted	139,913,502	104,185,651

STATEMENTS_OF_CASH_FLOWS

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Feb. 28, 2014	Feb. 28, 2013
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:	'	'
Net loss	($22,254,789)	($48,837,295)
Depreciation and amortization	5,206,900	6,036,740
Non-cash interest expense	'	50,596
Common stock issued for services	352,667	625,000
Bad debt expense and other	160,511	135,990
Share-based payments	2,764,669	5,100,883
Goodwill impairment	'	25,919,000
Deferred income tax benefits	-141,269	-2,618,723
Impairment of intangible assets investments	3,493,729	12,196,269
Fair value adjustment of acquisition related contingent consideration	'	-12,199,730
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:	'	'
Accounts receivable	1,260,998	2,107,664
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	-356,522	499,163
Deposits	-75,456	-127,689
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	-386,246	3,213,421
Deferred revenue	-44,249	-198,522
Long-term liabilities	-27,204	-31,276
NET CASH USED IN OPERATING ACTIVITIES	-11,704,301	-13,086,785
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:	'	'
Cash paid for purchase of patents	-43,542	-864,092
Cash paid for patent defense costs	-428,562	-3,040,838
Cash paid for acquisition related contingent consideration	'	-3,242,268
Cash paid for long-term investment	'	-200,000
Additions to property and equipment	-360,354	'
NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES	-832,458	-7,347,198
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:	'	'
Proceeds from sale of common stock, net	8,973,965	12,093,189
Proceeds received from line of credit	2,210,045	'
Proceeds received from issuance of short-term debt	'	450,000
Payments on short-term debt	'	-450,000
Proceeds received from the exercise of stock options and warrants, net	2,500	1,264,660
NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES	11,186,510	13,357,849
NET CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS	-1,350,249	-7,076,134
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF YEAR	4,352,691	11,428,825
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF YEAR	3,002,442	4,352,691
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION:	'	'
Interest paid	52,638	14,854
Income taxes paid	'	39,315
Non-cash activity	'	'
Stock issued for underwriting services	166,526	'
Stock issued for asset purchase	'	3,813,953
Acquisition related contingent consideration settled in stock	'	$10,558,502

STATEMENT_OF_CHANGES_IN_STOCKH

STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (USD $)	Common Stock	Additional Paid-In Capital	Accumulated Deficit	Total
Beginning balance, Amount at Feb. 29, 2012	$9,443	$141,738,528	($62,556,249)	$79,191,722
Beginning Balance, Shares at Feb. 29, 2012	94,434,817	'	'	'
Stock subscription, net, Shares	21,969,661	'	'	'
Stock subscription, net, Amount	2,197	12,090,992	'	12,093,189
Option/Warrant exercise, Shares	1,422,092	'	'	'
Option/Warrant exercise, Amount	143	1,264,517	'	1,264,660
Cashless option exercise, Shares	132,320	'	'	'
Cashless option exercise, Amount	13	-13	'	'
Employee share-based compensation	'	4,438,272	'	4,438,272
Warrants issued for services	'	662,611	'	662,611
Advisory services, Shares	500,000	'	'	'
Advisory services, Amount	50	624,950	'	625,000
Purchase of intangible assets, Shares	1,860,465	'	'	'
Purchase of intangible assets, Amount	186	3,813,767	'	3,813,953
Acquisition related contingent consideration, Shares	9,234,871	'	'	'
Acquisition related contingent consideration, Amount	923	10,557,579	'	10,558,502
Warrants issued with debt issuance	'	50,596	'	50,596
Net Loss	'	'	-48,837,295	-48,837,295
Ending Balance, Amount at Feb. 28, 2013	12,955	175,241,799	-111,393,544	63,861,210
Ending Balance, Shares at Feb. 28, 2013	129,554,226	'	'	'
Stock subscription, net, Shares	23,875,000	'	'	'
Stock subscription, net, Amount	2,388	8,971,577	'	8,973,965
Option/Warrant exercise, Shares	10,000	'	'	'
Option/Warrant exercise, Amount	1	2,499	'	2,500
Board of Director fees, Shares	268,380	'	'	'
Board of Director fees, Amount	27	103,640	'	103,640
Employee share-based compensation	'	2,454,151	'	2,454,151
Warrants issued for services	'	310,518	'	310,518
Underwriter services, Shares	354,310	'	'	'
Underwriter services Amount	35	-35	'	'
Advisory services, Shares	600,000	'	'	'
Advisory services, Amount	60	248,940	'	249,000
Net Loss	'	'	-22,254,789	-22,254,789
Ending Balance, Amount at Feb. 28, 2014	$15,466	$187,333,089	($133,648,333)	$53,700,222
Ending Balance, Shares at Feb. 28, 2014	154,661,916	'	'	'

DESCRIPTION_OF_BUSINESS

DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS	12 Months Ended
	Feb. 28, 2014
Notes to Financial Statements	'
NOTE 1 - DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS	'
	We provide an end-to-end, data driven mobile engagement and analytics solution that empowers brands, agencies and media companies to drive customer engagement, loyalty and sales.  Our proprietary, scalable and user friendly AD LIFE® software-as-a service platform (“AD LIFE Platform” or the “Platform”) creates measurable, real-time, one-to-one relationships between companies and their current or prospective customers, using text messages, multimedia messages (“MMS”), mobile web sites, mobile applications, mobile coupons, quick response (“QR”) codes and via mobile advertising from a single, scalable, self-service access point. The Platform enables customers to quickly plan, create, test, deploy, monitor, measure and optimize interactive mobile marketing and advertising programs throughout the campaign lifecycle across nearly every major mobile channel.  We also provide business-to-consumer utilities including national mobile couponing solutions, strategic mobile healthcare tools, custom mobile application development, and consumer data tracking and analytics.
	The AD LIFE Platform features a rich analytics engine that sources real-time campaign data, in addition to third party and client information, to personalize mobile advertising and marketing campaigns, thereby increasing the effectiveness of these messages and the likelihood of re-engagement. The Platform automatically tracks mobile phone numbers through interactions across nearly every major mobile channel, capturing and applying additional data to build a more complete consumer profile.  Hipcricket’s current database consists of detailed profiles on millions of mobile phone numbers, which, by employing third party data, can be turned into virtually unlimited segments. These data help advertisers understand the most effective use of advertising resources and help optimize their marketing spend.
	Our products service marketers, brands, and agencies in many vertical markets, including automotive, retail, consumer products, food and beverage, media and broadcast, pharmaceutical and restaurant brands. We have delivered over 400,000 campaigns since 2004, across hundreds of customers including Fortune 100 and other established brand clients. We generate revenue primarily through license fees, content development fees, messaging campaign fees, and fees associated with various add-on promotional applications in the Platform. Additional revenue is generated by platform administration and professional service fees related to the mobilization of client content and implementation of marketing campaigns through the Platform.
	Our portfolio of patents covers technical processes and methods related to behavioral targeting — the automatic provision of customized content to individuals based on information such as past web activity, personal preferences, geography, or demographic data.  As of February 28, 2014, we owned 21 U.S. patents.
	Liquidity, Business Risks and Uncertainties
	As of February 28, 2014 and 2013, we had accumulated deficits of $133.6 million and $111.4 million, respectively. We are subject to the risks and challenges associated with companies at a similar stage of development including dependence on key individuals, successful development and marketing of our products and services, integration of recent business combinations, competition from substitute products and services and larger companies with greater financial, technical management and marketing resources. Any of the following factors could have a significant negative effect on our future financial position, results of operations and cash flows: unanticipated fluctuations in quarterly operating results, adverse changes in our relationship with significant customers or failure to secure contracts with other customers, intense competition, failure to attract and retain key personnel, failure to protect  intellectual property, decrease in the migration trends from traditional advertising methods to digital and mobile media and the inability to manage growth.
	We will likely require additional financing to execute our key business strategies and fund operations, those funds may not be readily available or may not be on terms that are favorable to us. Certain financing terms could be dilutive to existing shareholders or could result in significant interest or other costs, or require us to license or relinquish certain intellectual property rights. If sources of capital are unavailable, or are available only on a limited basis or under unacceptable terms, then we could be required to substantially reduce or discontinue our investments in new customers and new products; reduce selling, marketing, general and administrative costs related to our continuing operations; or limit the scope of our continuing operations, which would raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Due to the nature of our operations and financial commitments we may not have the discretion to reduce operations in an orderly manner to a more sustainable level without impacting future operations. Our financial statements for the year ended February 28, 2014 contained in this report have been prepared assuming that we will continue as a going concern. Our financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
	In January 2014, we retained the corporate advisory services of Canaccord Genuity to explore and evaluate strategic alternatives with a view to enhancing shareholder value. We intend to consider a full range of strategic alternatives, including possible acquisitions or dispositions of assets, joint ventures, strategic investments, sale of the company or other potential transactions.  We have not set a timetable for completion of the strategic review, and there can be no assurance the process will result in a transaction or pursuit of any strategic alternative.
	On October 4, 2013, we closed a $9.6 million financing transaction with 13 investors, each of which is an “accredited investor” within the meaning of the Securities Act of 1933. The investors purchased units of our securities at $0.40 per unit.  We received net proceeds of $9.0 million, reflecting approximately $581,000 in fees and costs associated with the financing. Each unit consisted of one share of our common stock and a warrant to purchase 0.3 shares of our common stock. An aggregate of 23,875,000 shares of our common stock and warrants to purchase up to 7,162,500 shares of our common stock were purchased in the financing. The warrants have a five year term and an exercise price of $0.60 per share. In connection with the financing, we also entered into a registration rights agreement with each investor pursuant to which we have agreed to file and maintain effectiveness of a registration statement covering the resale of all of the shares of common stock and shares of common stock underlying the warrants sold in the financing. We filed a registration statement on Form S-1 with the SEC on November 4, 2013. The registration statement was declared effective on November 8, 2013.
	In May 2013, we secured an accounts receivable credit facility from Silicon Valley Bank (“SVB”) to help fund our working capital needs, which was amended and restated on November 25, 2013 (the “Amended Agreement”), and further amended on March 31, 2014 (See Note 12). The revolving loan facility has a two-year term and allows us to borrow up to $5.0 million based upon a formula equal to 90% of eligible accounts receivable, decreasing to 80% of eligible accounts receivable plus the least of (i) 80% of Eligible 120 Day Accounts as defined in the Amended Agreement, (ii) $1,000,000, and (iii) 30% of the sum of all eligible accounts plus Eligible 120 Day Accounts after December 31, 2013 and the satisfaction of conditions specified in the Amended Agreement. The facility is secured by substantially all of our assets. During fiscal year 2014, amounts drawn under the facility accrued annual interest at the prime rate plus 0.75% during a Streamline Period, as defined in the Amended Agreement, and at the prime rate plus 1.25% when a Streamline Period was not in effect. As of the February 28, 2014, we had drawn $2.2 million from this line of credit and had approximately $1.9 million available based on our outstanding accounts receivable as of that date.
	We are required to deliver periodic reports to SVB regarding our ability to meet certain financial and other covenants contained in the Amended Agreement. In late July 2013, we delivered a report to SVB indicating that as of June 30, 2013, we had breached the minimum tangible net worth covenant and began discussions of a forbearance or waiver agreement with SVB. On November 25, 2013, we entered into the Amended Agreement with SVB. The Amended Agreement retained substantially the same terms as the original loan and security agreement, except the borrowing base was amended as described above and the collateral securing the loan facility was expanded to include our intellectual property. In connection with the execution of the Amended Agreement, we obtained a waiver of the covenant default. Although we continue to be current with all principal and interest payments under the loan agreement, as of January 31, 2014, we again breached the minimum tangible net worth covenant.  On March 31, 2014 we entered into a forbearance and amendment to the Amended Agreement with SVB, pursuant to which SVB agreed to forbear from taking any action to enforce its rights or remedies under the Amended Agreement until April 15, 2014. The forbearance agreement also increased the interest rate of borrowing under the Amended Agreement to prime rate plus 3.75% during a Streamline Period and to prime rate plus 4.25% when a Streamline Period is not in effect.  As of May 1, 2014, we had not regained compliance with the minimum tangible net worth covenant and are in further forbearance discussions with SVB. SVB is currently continuing to allow us to draw on the line of credit during these discussions.
	In September 2012, we adopted a restructuring plan which included reducing the number of employees, slowing the pace of investments in our IP portfolio and minimizing variable expenses. We have restructured overall corporate overhead expenses in order to focus our business around our mobile marketing and advertising technology and services. Consistent with this plan, during fiscal year 2014 we settled a majority of our patent litigation cases, while taking actions designed to protect the value of our IP, streamlined personnel and variable costs, downsized our Tucson division which was primarily involved with development and monetization of our IP, and solidified the management team by appointing new personnel with extensive experience in the mobile marketing and advertising space to lead our sales and engineering teams.  We have made substantial improvements in lowering our operating expenses and lowering our cash paid for purchases of patents and patent defense costs, compared to the same period one year ago.  We intend to continue our efforts to minimize cash spend and identify additional costs savings opportunities while carefully investing our resources and protecting our strategic assets to strengthen our position in the mobile marketing and mobile advertising industry.
	We currently do not meet the minimum $75 million public float requirement for use of Form S-3 registration for primary sales of our common stock. Until such time as we satisfy the $75 million public float and other requirements for use of Form S-3 registration, we will be required to use a registration statement on Form S-1 to register any public offering of our securities with the SEC or must issue such securities in a private placement or other transaction exempt from registration under federal securities law, which could increase the cost of raising capital.

SUMMARY_OF_SIGNIFICANT_ACCOUNT

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES	12 Months Ended
	Feb. 28, 2014
Notes to Financial Statements	'
Note 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES	'
	Principles of Consolidation
	Prior to October 2013, our financial statements were consolidated and included the accounts of Hipcricket, Inc., formerly Augme Technologies, Inc., and our wholly owned subsidiaries. In October 2013, we merged Hipcricket, Inc. and our subsidiaries into a single entity and our financial statements have been prepared on an unconsolidated basis since that date.
	Use of Estimates
	The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements. We regularly evaluate estimates and judgments based on historical experience and other relevant facts and circumstances. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant estimates relate to allowances for tax assets, the use of the Black-Scholes-Merton pricing model for valuing stock option and common stock warrant issuances, estimates of future cash flows used to estimate the value of long-lived assets and implied fair value of goodwill, revenues earned from percentage of completion contracts and the period in which revenues should be recorded.
	Cash and Cash Equivalents
	We consider all highly liquid investments purchased with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents.
	Accounts Receivable
	Our accounts receivable balances are due from customers throughout the U.S. Credit is extended based on evaluation of a customer’s financial condition and, generally, collateral is not required. Based on the nature of the contract, our billing terms are such that a certain percentage is billed at the time of the contract and then at various time intervals or through the length of the agreement, which are generally up to 12 months.
	We determine our allowance for doubtful accounts by considering a number of factors, including the length of time trade accounts receivable are past due, previous loss history, the customer’s current ability to pay its obligation to us, and the condition of the general economy and the industry as a whole. Our allowance for doubtful accounts was $400,500 and $270,960 as of February 28, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
	Property and Equipment
	Property and equipment consists primarily of computer software and office equipment, furniture and fixtures and leasehold improvements and is stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is recorded on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets ranging from three to seven years. Leasehold improvements are amortized using the straight-line method over the shorter of the lease term or estimated useful lives.
	We capitalize the costs of developing software for internal use or to be sold, leased or otherwise marketed. These costs include both purchased software and internally developed software. Costs of developing software are expensed until technological feasibility has been established. Thereafter, all costs are capitalized and are carried at the lower of unamortized cost or net realizable value. Internally developed and purchased software costs are generally amortized over three years.
	Fair Value of Financial Instruments
	The fair value of some of our financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable, approximate their respective carrying value due to their short maturity. Financial instruments that potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk are cash-equivalents and trade receivables.
	Capitalized Legal Patent Costs
	We capitalize external legal costs incurred in the defense of our patents, including assertion of claims against others for patent infringement, where we believe that there is an evident increase in the value of the patent and that the successful outcome of the legal action is probable. During the course of any legal action, the court where the case is pending makes decisions and issues rulings of various kinds, which may be favorable or unfavorable. We monitor developments in the legal action, the legal costs incurred and the anticipated outcome of the legal action, and assess the likelihood of a successful outcome based on the entire action. If changes in the anticipated outcome occur that reduce the likelihood of a successful outcome of the entire action to less than probable, the capitalized costs would be charged to expense in the period in which the change is determined. The capitalized legal patent costs are recorded within intangible assets on our balance sheets and are amortized over the remaining useful life of the patent.
	Fair Value Measurements
	We measure certain assets, including our intangible assets and goodwill, at fair value on a nonrecurring basis.  Fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or a liability. A three-tier fair value hierarchy is established as a basis for considering such assumptions and for inputs used in the valuation methodologies in measuring fair value:
	Level 1:  Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
	Level 2:  Observable inputs such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not sufficiently active to qualify as Level 1 or, other inputs that are observable by market data.
	Level 3:  Unobservable inputs for which there is little or no market data, which requires us to develop our own assumptions.  The inputs require significant management judgment or estimation.
	The fair values of our intangible assets and the implied fair value of goodwill are determined based on valuation techniques using the best information available, and may include quoted market prices, market comparables, and discounted cash flow projections.
	For the years ended February 28, 2014 and 2013, the remeasurement of goodwill and identified intangibles, including patents, to their implied fair value is classified as a Level 3 fair value assessment due to the significance of unobservable inputs. The inputs used to measure the fair value of the identified intangible assets were largely unobservable, and, accordingly, these measurements were classified as Level 3. The fair value of the intangible assets were estimated using the income approach, which is based on management's cash flow projections of revenue growth rates and operating margins, taking into consideration industry and market conditions. The discount rates used in the fair value calculations for the intangible assets were based on a weighted average cost of capital adjusted for the relevant risk associated with those assets. The unobservable inputs used in these valuations include projected revenue growth rates, operating margins, royalty rates and the risk factor added to the discount rate.
	Indefinite-lived Intangible Assets
	We review indefinite-lived intangible assets, which include acquired trade names, for impairment annually and whenever events or changes in circumstances suggest that the fair value of the asset may be less than the carrying value. The fair value of indefinite-lived intangible assets is measured by comparing the carrying amount of the asset to the future discounted cash flows that the asset is expected to generate. If it is determined that an individual asset is impaired, the amount of any impairment is measured as the difference between the carrying value and the fair value of the impaired asset.
	Goodwill
	We have recorded goodwill as a result of business combinations. Goodwill is carried at cost and is not amortized.  We review goodwill for impairment annually as of the first day of our fourth fiscal quarter, generally December 1st, and whenever events or changes in circumstances suggest that the fair value of goodwill may be less than its carrying value.
	The goodwill impairment test is performed at the reporting unit level. A reporting unit is an operating segment or one level below an operating segment (referred to as a “component”). An operating segment is a component of an enterprise that earns revenues and incurs expenses, for which discrete financial information is available and management regularly reviews the operating results. We have a single operating segment, however there are two reporting units for purposes of our goodwill impairment assessment.  All of our recorded goodwill is attributed to the Mobile Marketing and Advertising reporting unit, which generated substantially all of our revenues and expenses.  The second reporting unit represents the Intellectual Property reporting unit, which does not have any attributed goodwill.
	We have an unconditional option to evaluate impairment of goodwill by performing a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit is less than the carrying amount. If the fair value of the reporting unit is determined to be more likely than not greater than the carrying amount, further testing of goodwill impairment is not performed. If the fair value of the reporting unit is less than the carrying amount, we perform a quantitative two-step impairment test.
	The quantitative goodwill impairment test involves a two-step process. In the first step, we compare the fair value of each reporting unit to its carrying value. If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds its carrying value, goodwill is not impaired and no further testing is required. If the fair value of the reporting unit is less than the carrying value, we must perform the second step of the impairment test to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any. If the implied fair value of the reporting unit's goodwill is less than the carrying value, the difference is recorded as an impairment loss. When performing a quantitative two-step impairment test, we depend upon our estimates of future cash flows and other factors to determine the fair value of our reporting unit. We rely on a number of factors including operating results, business plans, economic projections, anticipated future cash flows and marketplace data.
	We estimate the fair value of our reporting units using the income approach and the market approach. Using the income approach, we calculate the fair value of a reporting unit based on the present value of estimated future cash flows. Cash flow projections are based on management's estimates of revenue growth rates and operating margins, taking into consideration industry and market conditions. The discount rate used is based on the weighted-average cost of capital risk-adjusted for business-specific characteristics and the uncertainty related to the business's ability to execute on the projected cash flows. The market approach estimates fair value based on market multiples of revenue and earnings derived from comparable publicly-traded companies with similar operating and investment characteristics as the reporting unit. The weighting of the fair value derived from the market approach ranges from 0% to 50% depending on the level of comparability of these publicly-traded companies to the reporting unit. When market comparables are not meaningful or not available, we may estimate the fair value of a reporting unit using only the income approach.
	In order to assess the reasonableness of the calculated fair values of our reporting units, we also compare the sum of the reporting units' fair values to our market capitalization and calculate an implied control premium (the excess of the sum of the reporting units' fair values over the market capitalization). We compare our implied control premium to the control premiums of recent comparable market transactions for reasonableness and may adjust the fair value estimates of our reporting units by adjusting the discount rates and/or other assumptions if necessary. Financial and credit market volatility directly impacts our fair value measurement through our weighted average cost of capital, which we use to determine our discount rate, and our stock price, which we use to determine our market capitalization. Therefore, changes in the stock price may also affect the amount of impairment recorded. We believe that our market capitalization alone does not fully capture the fair value of our business as a whole, or the substantial value that an acquirer would obtain from its ability to obtain control of our business. As such, in determining fair value, we add a control premium to our market capitalization. To estimate the control premium, we consider our unique competitive advantages that would likely provide synergies to a market participant. In addition, we consider external market factors, which we believe, may contribute to changes in and volatility of our stock price that does not reflect our underlying fair value.
	Intangible Assets
	Intangible assets are stated at estimated fair value at the time of acquisition less accumulated amortization. We assess the recoverability of long-lived assets subject to amortization when events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be fully recoverable. If undiscounted expected cash flows to be generated by a long-lived asset or asset group are less than its carrying amount, we record an impairment to write down the long-lived asset or asset group to its estimated fair value. Fair value is estimated based on discounted expected future cash flows.
	Business Combinations
	We account for business combinations using the acquisition method of accounting. The consideration transferred or transferable to sellers and the assets acquired and liabilities assumed are recorded at their estimated fair values at the date of acquisition. When a business combination agreement provides for consideration to be paid in future periods, contingent on future events, we include an estimate of the acquisition-date fair value of the contingent consideration as part of the cost of the combination. Contingent consideration to be paid to officers, directors, stockholders and/or employees of the acquiree whom continue employment with the Company are evaluated as to whether the amounts represent purchase consideration or a separate transaction, such as post-transaction employee compensation.  Factors evaluated require significant judgment and include, among other factors; consideration of the terms of continuing employment, levels of post-transaction compensation, ownership interest of the selling stockholder/employees, linkage of the contingent consideration to the transaction date combination valuation and any other agreements or matters related to the transaction.  Acquisition transaction costs are expensed as incurred.   The results of operations of the acquired business are included in the financial statements from the respective date of acquisition.
	Share-Based Payments
	The fair value of our share-based payments for stock options and stock warrants is estimated at the grant date based on the stock award’s fair value as calculated by the Black-Scholes-Merton (“BSM”) option-pricing model and is recognized as expense over the requisite service period using a straight line method. The BSM model requires various highly judgmental assumptions including expected volatility and option life. We estimate the forfeiture rate based on historical experience. To the extent our actual forfeiture rate is different from our estimate, share-based payment expense is adjusted accordingly in that period.
	Revenue Recognition
	We provide access to our AD LIFE Platform and services through term license fees, support fees, and mobile marketing campaign fees.  The contracts generally include multiple elements as part of the overall service delivery and allocated revenues are generally recognized over the term of service period or as the related services are provided.  We also offer professional services related to the strategy and execution of mobile marketing campaigns.  Professional services revenue is recognized as the services are performed as these services have value on a standalone basis, do not involve unique acceptance criteria.
	Contracts may also include deliverables such as production and delivery of online media content, hosting, fees from content retention and delivery, custom solution creation, or placement of mobile or online advertising content.  Revenues from contracts with multiple deliverables for the production and delivery of online media content and hosting are recognized over the term of the media content production, delivery or hosting period. For deliverables that do not have stand alone value, that are delivered in conjunction with a term license, support or hosting arrangement, we recognize the related revenues over the related license term, support, or hosting service period.
	When contracts include multiple deliverables, revenue is allocated to each respective element that is determined to have stand alone value. When these multiple deliverables can be separated into different units of accounting, we allocate the arrangement consideration to the identified separate units of accounting based on their relative selling price. Accounting guidance for multiple-deliverable arrangements provides a hierarchy to use when determining the relative selling price for each unit of accounting. We use vendor-specific objective evidence ("VSOE") of selling price, based on the price at which we regularly sell the item on a standalone basis, if it exists. If VSOE of selling price is not available, third-party evidence ("TPE") of selling price is used to establish the selling price if it exists. If VSOE or TPE of selling price are not available, the best estimate of selling price ("BESP") is used. Allocation of revenue to deliverables of an arrangement is based on the VSOE for professional services revenues and on BESP for all other elements being sold on a stand-alone basis. We evaluate BESP by reviewing historical data related to sales of our deliverables.
	Fixed-price contracts for the creation of custom software are typically of a duration of less than one year and are accounted for using the percentage-of-completion method.  We use the percentage-of-completion method of accounting because we believe it is the most accurate method to recognize revenue based on the nature and scope of these service contracts; we believe it is a better measure of periodic income results than other methods and better matches revenue recognized with the costs incurred. Percentage of completion is measured based primarily on input measures such as hours incurred to date compared to total estimated hours to complete, with consideration given to output measures, such as contract milestones, when applicable. Significant judgment is required when estimating total hours and progress to completion on these arrangements which determines the amount of revenue we recognize as well as whether a loss is recognized if one is expected to be incurred for the remainder of the project. Revisions to hour and cost estimates are incorporated in the period in which the facts that give rise to the revision become known.
	Revenues from the creation of custom software are generally a component of contracts that include hosting and/or production and delivery services. We allocate revenues on multiple element arrangements between the software and non-software deliverables using VSOE or BESP, depending on the nature of the multiple deliverables. Software revenues are recorded when the software is completed and accepted by the client if the software has free standing functionality, the fee for the software is separately determinable and we have demonstrated our capability of completing any remaining terms under the contract. Otherwise all revenues under the multi-deliverable contracts are recognized over the term of the production and content delivery or hosting period.
	Revenues for producing interactive advertising content are based upon fees for the production and hosting of the advertising content and/or a percentage of the fees paid by third party advertisers. Revenues from third parties for the production and hosting of the advertising content are recorded pro rata over the related hosting period. Revenues representing a percentage of the fees paid by third party advertisers for advertising on third party or company websites are recorded when the contractual criteria has been met and amounts are due from third party advertisers.
	Deferred revenues primarily consist of billings or payments received in advance of revenue recognition from our subscription and professional services and support and maintenance revenues and are recognized as the revenue recognition criteria are met. We generally invoice our customers in monthly or quarterly installments for subscription revenue and as services are provided. Accordingly, the deferred revenues balance does not represent the total contract value of annual or multi-year non-cancelable subscription agreements.
	Income Taxes
	Income taxes are provided for tax effects of transactions reported in the financial statements and consist of income taxes currently due plus deferred income taxes related to timing differences between the basis of certain assets and liabilities for financial statement and income tax reporting. Deferred taxes are determined based on the difference between the financial statement and tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect in the years in which the differences are expected to reverse. A valuation allowance is provided if, based upon the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
	We recognize tax benefits from uncertain tax positions only if it is “more-likely-than-not” that the position is sustainable, based on its technical merits. The tax benefit of a qualifying position is the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement with a taxing authority having full knowledge of all relevant information. Interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions may be classified in the financial statements as either income taxes or interest and other expense classification. We classify interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions as income tax expense.
	Income or Loss Per Share
	Basic income or loss per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period, and excludes any dilutive effects of common stock equivalent shares, such as stock options and stock warrants. Diluted income or loss per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding and common stock equivalent shares outstanding during the period using the treasury stock method. Common stock equivalent shares are excluded from the computation if their effect is anti-dilutive, see Note 9.
	Recently Issued Accounting Standards
	In July 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2013-11, "Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists" to bring conformity in the presentation of unrecognized tax benefits when a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward exists. ASU 2013-11 becomes effective for us on March 1, 2014. We do not believe the adoption of this guidance will have a material impact on our financial statements or notes to the financial statements.
	We reviewed other recently issued accounting pronouncements and determined they are either not applicable to our business or that no material effect is expected on our financial position, results of operations or disclosures.

BUSINESS_COMBINATIONS

BUSINESS COMBINATIONS	12 Months Ended
	Feb. 28, 2014
Notes to Financial Statements	'
Note 3 - BUSINESS COMBINATIONS	'
	Acquisition of GEOS IP Assets: On May 24, 2012, we acquired all of the common stock and all of the preferred stock of GEOS Communications IP Holdings, Inc. (“GEOS”) pursuant to the Stock Purchase Agreement between Augme and GEOS and other parties.  By acquiring the GEOS stock, we acquired five U. S. patents covering Voice over Internet Protocol (“VoIP”) and other mobility inventions and seven U.S. patent applications and 18 pending international patent applications covering related invention families within the field of mobile VoIP.
	We determined that the GEOS assets acquired did not constitute a business as defined under ASC Topic 805 on the basis that the GEOS assets were not an integrated set of activities or assets that were capable of being conducted or managed in a manner that would provide economic benefits or return to us.  As a result, we accounted for this acquisition as an asset purchase.  The total consideration paid has been allocated to the intangible assets acquired based upon their relative fair values at the date of acquisition.
	The fair value of the consideration given for the acquisition of the GEOS stock was $4.2 million, which included $355,000 in cash and $3.8 million in our common stock (1,860,465 shares at a price of $2.05 per share). During the year ended February 28, 2013, we recorded an increase to the carrying value of the patents on our balance sheet of $2.6 million related to the income tax provision impacts of differences between the book and tax basis of the acquired assets, and a corresponding income tax benefit on our statement of operations, due to the reduction in the deferred income tax asset valuation allowance.
	Acquisition of Hipcricket, Inc. Assets:  On August 25, 2011, we completed our acquisition of the business and substantially all of the assets of Hipcricket, Inc. pursuant to the Amended and Restated Asset Purchase Agreement dated August 25, 2011 between Augme and Hipcricket. We accounted for the acquisition as a business combination.
	The estimated fair value of the acquisition consideration was $62.8 million that included a 12-month earn-out payment to Hipcricket stockholders and employees, which if achieved was estimated to be no less than $15.0 million and as high as $27.5 million. The amount of contingent consideration was based on the amount of revenue recognized in the earn-out period and could be paid in our common stock or a combination of common stock and cash at our discretion, provided that the transaction remained a tax-free reorganization. The contingent consideration recorded at the time of the acquisition was $23.3 million plus the seller tax liabilities of $2.0 million, resulting in an aggregate liability on the transaction date of $25.2 million. The $2.0 million was paid during the quarter ended May 31, 2012.
	The earn-out period ended on August 25, 2012, which was the measurement date of the contingent consideration obligation.  The earn-out payment was calculated to be $22.0 million, and we recognized a gain of $2.0 million resulting from the reduction of the actual consideration due, compared to management’s previous estimates.  The gain is included within other income on the 2013 statement of operations.
	As partial satisfaction of the contingent consideration payments, we paid approximately 50% of the outstanding obligation using shares of our common stock. We issued a total of 5.5 million shares of our common stock as payment of approximately $11.0 million in contingent consideration to the former Hipcricket stockholders. The number of common shares issued was calculated using a $2.00 per share “floor” price, as defined in the agreement. The market price of our common stock on August 25, 2012 was $1.48.  The difference between the floor price used to calculate the number of shares to be issued, and the actual price of $1.48 on the measurement date, resulted in a reduction of the estimated consideration payment of $2.9 million, which is included in other income on the 2013 statement of operations.
	On November 2, 2012, we issued 3.7 million shares of our common stock, net of tax withholding, for substantially all of the remaining contingent consideration obligation. The difference between the $2.00 per share price used to calculate the number of shares to be issued, and the actual price of the shares of $0.65 on the date we issued the shares, resulted in a reduction in the acquisition consideration payment of $7.3 million which amount is in other income on the 2013 statement of operations.

PROPERTY_AND_EQUIPMENT

PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT	12 Months Ended
	Feb. 28, 2014
Notes to Financial Statements	'
Note 4 - PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT	'
	Property and equipment consisted of the following at February 28, 2014 and 2013:
		2014			2013
	Office equipment and software	$	1,152,586		$	1,503,872
	Furniture and fixtures		219,936			86,789
	Leasehold improvements		94,433			-
	Property and equipment		1,466,955			1,590,661
	Less: Accumulated depreciation		(1,144,327	)		(1,507,924	)
	Property and equipment, net	$	322,628		$	82,737
	Depreciation expense was $119,568 and $209,355, for the years ended February 28, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

GOODWILL_AND_INTANGIBLE_ASSETS

GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS	12 Months Ended
	Feb. 28, 2014
Notes to Financial Statements	'
Note 5 - GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS	'
	Goodwill
	The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the years ended February 28, 2014 and February 28, 2013 are as follows:
	Balance as of February 29, 2012:	$	60,979,183
	Impairment		(25,919,000	)
	Balance as of February 28, 2013:		35,060,183
	Additions/Impairment		-
	Balance as of February 28, 2014:	$	35,060,183
	On December 1, 2013, we performed our qualitative annual review for impairment.  This review was based upon the valuation approach described in Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies-Goodwill.  We evaluated several factors including the underlying fundamentals of the business, industry trends, and the macroeconomic environment and concluded that it was more likely than not that the fair value of goodwill was greater than the carrying amount and there was no indication of impairment.  Subsequent to December 1, 2013, we determined that the then recent decline in the trading values of our common stock and revenue trends during the second half of fiscal 2014 were sufficient indicators of potential impairment to trigger an interim goodwill impairment analysis for the Mobile Marketing and Advertising (“MMA”) reporting unit, the only reporting unit which has allocated goodwill.  We performed the first step of the of the quantitative goodwill impairment assessment and concluded that there was no indication of impairment.  As such, step two was not performed and no impairment charge was recognized for the year ended February 28, 2014.
	In conducting the step one analysis, we estimated the fair value of goodwill using a blend of our implied fair value base in part on our market capitalization as derived by the trading value of our common stock as well as the income approach, to determine the present value of future cash flows.  We relied upon our estimates of revenue growth trends, future cash flows, operating results, business plans, industry growth estimates, and marketplace data to determine the estimated fair value of goodwill. Our estimates of future revenue growth and cash flows were derived from historical trends that we expect to continue in fiscal 2015 and beyond including high customer retention rate, high success rate selling multiple products to existing customers, successful expansion of our customer base, our historical compound annual growth rates of specific product lines which we plan to emphasize going forward, and our operating cost reduction accomplishments. Additionally, our estimates are supported by expected new product introductions or enhancements planned for fiscal 2015 which are expected to generate new revenue streams, strong forecasted industry growth, and our expected shift in future product mix to high growth, higher margin product lines.
	Prior to completing the goodwill impairment test, we tested the recoverability of the MMA reporting unit’s long-lived assets (other than goodwill) and concluded that the assets were not impaired.  In order to assess the reasonableness of the calculated fair values of our reporting units, we also compared the sum of the reporting units’ fair values to our market capitalization and concluded that the implied control premium (the excess of the reporting unit’s fair values over the market capitalization) was reasonable.
	During the fiscal quarter ended November 30 2012, we determined that sufficient indicators of potential impairment existed to require an interim goodwill impairment analysis for the Mobile Marketing and Advertising (“MMA”) reporting unit, the only reporting which has allocated goodwill. These indicators included the then recent trading values of our common stock, coupled with market conditions, recurring losses and the restructuring undertaken during the period. We assessed the impact of the errors relating to the Hipcricket and JAGTAG transactions on our interim goodwill impairment analysis that was performed as of November 30, 2012.  Due to the increased carrying value of the MMA reporting unit resulting from the adjustments described above, the first step failed and the second step of the impairment test was required to be performed as of November 30, 2012.  As a result of the second step, the implied fair value of goodwill was $35.1 million and we recognized an impairment loss of $25.9 million during the fiscal year 2013.
	Prior to completing the goodwill impairment test during fiscal year 2013, we tested the recoverability of the MMA reporting unit’s long-lived assets (other than goodwill) and concluded that such assets were not impaired.
	Intangible Assets
	Intangible assets relate to patent filing and patent protection litigation costs as well as customer relationships, trade names and technology obtained in past acquisitions. With the exception of the Hipcricket trade name carried at $8.7 million, the intangible assets have finite lives and, as such, are subject to amortization.  As of February 28, 2014, the weighted average remaining useful life of the finite-lived intangible assets was two years.
	Identified intangible assets subject to amortization are included in both reporting units of our single operating segment.
	In the third fiscal quarter of 2013, ended November 30, 2012, we entered into negotiations with a potential buyer for the sale of certain of our assets including certain GEOS and JAGTAG IP patents. We reached a conclusion that these patent assets met all of the criteria to be held for sale and had an estimated value of $3.5 million. We estimated the fair value of the patents by calculating the expected proceeds to be received through a sale, exclusive license agreement and royalties that would have been paid to a third party had we not owned the patents. We applied a discounted cash flow model based on certain scenarios, but significantly weighted towards outright sale given our intent to dispose or exclusively license the rights to these patents. In estimating the fair value of these patents, we used our own assumptions about the use of the patents by a market participant and considered all available evidence. We classified these intangible assets as held for sale as of November 30, 2012.  In March 2013, we closed a transaction with the buyer which did not include sale of the GEOS and JAGTAG IP patents. As part of our September 2012 restructuring plan, we planned to sell these patents while retaining the right to use them in our technology as a stated means of deriving value from the assets. At that time, we concluded that it was probable that we would continue to market the patents for sale and that it was likely such a sale would be completed within one year.
	In the third fiscal quarter of 2014, ended November 30, 2013, we discontinued efforts to actively market these patents for sale. Consequently, we have reclassified these intangible assets from “held for sale” to “held and used.” In estimating the fair value of the patents upon transfer to held and used, we evaluated current industry trends for the types of technology covered or enabled by these patents and used our own assumptions about the use of the patents by market participants. For the quarter ended November 30, 2013, we reclassified $3.1 million from Intangible Assets Held for Sale to held and used, and recognized a $376,984 charge upon reclassification equal to the estimated amortization expense that would have been attributed to the assets if they had been continuously held and used for the past year.
	During the fourth fiscal quarter of 2014, we tested the recoverability of the JAGTAG and GEOS patents. Estimates of future cash flows used to test these assets for recoverability included only the future cash flows that we believe would be directly associated with and that we expect would arise as a direct result of the use of this group of patents, based on our assumptions about how we expect to the to use these assets using all available evidence.  As a result of our strategy shift away from pursuing the monetization of patents through patent litigation activities and our focus on mobile advertising and mobile marketing revenue growth in the future using our AD LIFE Platform, which does not use the JAGTAG and GEOS patents in a material manner, we are unable to reasonably estimate positive future cash flows attributable to these assets.  We had ongoing efforts through much of fiscal 2014 to sell or license the patent portfolio but we were not able to complete a definitive transaction, which prompted our decision to reclassify the assets from held for sale to held and used in the third fiscal quarter of 2014.  Based on this re-assessment of the plan for use of these patents, we have estimated the present fair value of the JAGTAG and GEOS patents to be zero, which is intended to represent the exit price of the asset in the current market, not the potential value of the asset at some future date.  We do believe these patents have some value and that the capabilities that these patents cover could be incorporated into our AD LIFE Platform in the future.  However, based on our current operating plan using our most recent understanding of market demand for our product, we do not expect to add the capabilities covered by the JAGTAG and GEOS patents to our Platform development activities in the foreseeable future.  As a result, we recorded an impairment write down of $3.1 million, which was equal to the carrying value of the patents immediately prior to the adjustment.  The impairment charge is included in the Impairment of intangible assets and investments within the 2014 statement of operations.
	During fiscal year 2014, we settled our litigation case with Millennial Media, Inc. and wrote down capitalized costs related to this case, resulting in an impairment charge of $87,975. During fiscal year 2013 we settled, dismissed, or abandoned certain litigation efforts to reduce our ongoing legal costs and wrote down the capitalized cost of these cases, resulting in an impairment of these amounts during the fiscal year ended February 28, 2013.
	During fiscal year 2013, as a result of efforts undertaken in the third fiscal quarter of 2013 to market certain patents for sale, and as a result of the interim period goodwill impairment assessment, we concluded that a triggering event had occurred requiring us to assess whether the carrying amount of certain of our intellectual property assets was recoverable. Following the completion of the impairment analysis, we determined that the fair value of the JAGTAG and GEOS were less than the carrying value and we recorded an impairment charge of $8.4 million during fiscal year 2013, which was included in the Impairment of intangible assets and investments within  the 2013 statement of operations.
	The following table presents the gross carrying value of the components of intangible assets and accumulated amortization:
					As of February 28, 2014
		Weighted Average Amortization Period			Gross Carrying Amount, net of impairment writedowns		Accumulated Amortization		Transferred from Held for Sale		Impairment Loss		Net Carrying Value
		(In months)
	Indefinite Lived Intangible:
	Trade name	Indefinite			$	8,700,000	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	8,700,000
	Definite Lived Intangible:
	Patent litigation		84			4,451,946		1,971,568		-		87,975		2,392,403
	Patents		120			623,600		125,125		3,123,016		3,028,771		592,720
	Acquired technology		60			7,270,000		3,919,750		-		-		3,350,250
	Customer relationships		60-72			12,850,000		6,682,292		-		-		6,167,708
	Software		36			2,095,705		2,095,705		-		-		-
	Non-compete agreements		36			212,000		212,000		-		-		-
	Trade names		24			44,000		44,000		-		-		-
	Total intangibles				$	36,247,251	$	15,050,440	$	3,123,016	$	3,116,746	$	21,203,081
					As of February 28, 2013
		Weighted Average Amortization Period			Gross Carrying Amount, net of impairment write downs		Accumulated Amortization		Transfer to Held for Sale		Impairment Loss		Net Carrying Value
		(In months)
	Indefinite Lived Intangible:
	Trade name	Indefinite			$	8,700,000	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	8,700,000
	Definite Lived Intangible:
	Patent litigation		84			7,567,290		1,060,109		-		3,528,386		2,978,795
	Patents		120			12,642,189		51,356		3,500,000		8,467,883		622,950
	Acquired technology		60			7,270,000		2,465,750		-		-		4,804,250
	Customer relationships		60-72			12,850,000		4,143,958		-		-		8,706,042
	Software		36			2,095,705		2,095,705		-		-		-
	Non-compete agreements		36			212,000		212,000		-		-		-
	Trade names		24			44,000		44,000		-		-		-
	Total intangibles				$	51,381,184	$	10,072,878	$	3,500,000	$	11,996,269	$	25,812,037
	Amortization of intangible assets was $5.1 million and $5.8 million for the years ended February 28, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Amortization in future fiscal periods is expected to be as follows:
	2015	$	4,925,257
	2016		4,637,330
	2017		2,560,303
	2018		70,843
	2019		70,843
	Thereafter		238,505
	Total	$	12,503,081

INCOME_TAXES

INCOME TAXES	12 Months Ended
	Feb. 28, 2014
Notes to Financial Statements	'
Note 6 - INCOME TAXES	'
	All of our income is generated in the U.S. The components of income tax expense were as follows (in thousands):
		Years Ended February 28,
		2014			2013
	Current:
	Federal	$	-		$	-
	State		26			-
	Foreign		-			-
	Total Current		26			-
	Deferral:
	Federal		76			(2,245	)
	State		(217	)		(374	)
	Foreign		-			-
	Total Current		(141	)		(2,619	)
	Provision (Benefit) for income taxes	$	(115	)	$	(2,619	)
	The reconciliation between our effective tax rate on income from continuing operations and the federal statutory rate is as follows:
		Years Ended February 28,
		2014			2013
	Statutory rate		35	%		35	%
	State and local taxes, net of federal income tax benefit		4.3			2.8
	Change in valuation allowance		(35.2	)		(27.4	)
	Stock-based compensation		(3.2	)		(2.3	)
	Non-deductible expenses		(0.2	)		(0.1	)
	Goodwill impairment		-			(13.8	)
	Acquisition related contingent consideration		-			8.3
	Research tax credits		-			0.6
	Prior year adjustments - deferred true-ups		(0.1	)		0.8
	Change in state rate		(0.1	)		1
	Other		-			0.1
	Effective tax rate		0.5	%		5	%
	Deferred income tax assets and liabilities reflect the net effect of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes.  Deferred tax assets are recorded for the future tax benefit of net operating losses and tax credit carryforwards.  Significant components of our deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows:
		Years Ended February 28,
		2014			2013
	Deferred tax assets:
	Net operating loss carryforwards	$	26,473,022		$	21,529,307
	Tax credit carryforwards		307,657			307,657
	Stock-based compensation		2,428,865			2,028,017
	Property and equipment		302,854			279,953
	Trade accounts receivable		163,644			104,538
	Other		536,073			236,094
	Total deferred tax assets		30,212,115			24,485,566
	Less: valuation allowance		(29,690,511	)		(21,848,032	)
	Net deferred tax assets		521,604			2,637,534
	Deferred tax liabilities:
	Intangible assets		(3,881,586	)		(6,155,186	)
	Other		(16,401	)		-
	Net deferred tax assets/(liabilities)	$	(3,376,383	)	$	(3,517,652	)
	In accounting for income taxes, we recognize deferred tax assets if realization of such assets is more likely than not.  We believe, based on factors including but not limited to, our significant financial and tax loss history, forecasts of financial and tax income or loss, the estimated impact of future stock option deductions, possible tax planning strategies, and the expiration dates and amounts of net operating loss carryforwards, that it is more likely than not that the net deferred tax asset will not be realized in the future.
	The net change in the valuation allowance for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2014 was an increase of $7.8 million. The net increase was the result of: (1) a $2.3 million decrease in the deferred tax liabilities related to intangible assets and (2) a $4.9 million increase in the deferred tax assets related to federal and state net operating losses generated in fiscal year 2013, which we expect to expire unused.
	As of February 28, 2014, we had approximately $65.6 million in federal net operating loss carryforwards available to offset future federal taxable income.  Federal net operating losses will expire in tax years 2025 to 2033.  We also had approximately $45.5 million of state net operating loss carryfowards, which will expire in tax years 2014 to 2033.
	Utilization of net operating losses may be subject to limitation due to ownership changes and other limitations provided by the Internal Revenue Code and similar state provisions.  If such a limitation applies, the net operating loss may expire before full utilization.
	The table of deferred tax assets and liabilities shown above does not include certain deferred tax assets at February 28, 2014 and 2013 that arose directly from tax deductions related to equity compensation in excess of compensation recognized for financial reporting.  Equity will be increased if and when such deferred tax assets are ultimately realized.  We use ASC 740 ordering for purposes of determining when excess tax benefits have been realized.

STOCKHOLDERS_EQUITY

STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY	12 Months Ended
	Feb. 28, 2014
Notes to Financial Statements	'
Note 7 - STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY	'
	During the year ended February 28, 2014, the number of shares of our common stock outstanding increased by 25.1 million shares, primarily as a result of sales of our common stock.
	On October 4, 2013, we completed a $9.6 million financing transaction with 13 investors. The investors purchased units of our securities at $0.40 per unit. Each unit consisted of 1 share of our common stock and a warrant to purchase 0.3 shares of our common stock. An aggregate of approximately 23.9 million shares of our common stock and warrants to purchase up to 7.2 million shares of our common stock were purchased in the financing. The warrants have a five year term and an exercise price of $0.60 per share.
	We also issued to the placement agent, for services rendered in connection with the financing and for previously rendered services, 354,310 shares of common stock, a 10-year warrant to purchase up to 596,875 shares of common stock and a 5-year warrant to purchase up to 106,293 shares of common stock. Both warrants have an exercise price of $0.60 per share.
	During the year ended February 28, 2014, we issued 268,380 shares of common stock to our independent directors for payment of fees pursuant to the Board of Director’s compensation plan, 100,000 shares to a consultant for services, and 500,000 shares to legal counsel for services.
	During the year ended February 28, 2013, we issued 22.0 million shares of common stock in connection with two public offerings of shares registered on a Form S-3 shelf registration statement which became effective with the SEC in July 2011.
		·	On October 3, 2012, we sold 8.5 million shares of common stock at a price to the public of $0.80 per share. We also issued warrants to purchase an additional 2.125 million shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.96 per share. We raised $6.2 million in proceeds, net of $0.6 million in costs related to the offering.
		·	On February 4, 2013, we sold 13.5 million shares of common stock at a price to the public of $0.49 per share. We also issued warrants to purchase an additional 6.7 million shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.66 per share. We raised $5.9 million in proceeds, net of $0.7 million in costs related to the offering.
	During the year ended February 28, 2013, we issued approximately 9.2 million shares of common stock as acquisition related contingent consideration in accordance with the purchase of Hipcricket, Inc.  We also issued approximately 1.9 million shares of common stock in connection with the acquisition of all of the outstanding common stock and preferred stock of GEOS, the assets of which comprise patents and intellectual property.  See Note 3.
	During the year ended February 28, 2013, we issued approximately 1.6 million shares of common stock for option and warrant exercises and 500,000 shares of common stock to our legal counsel for services rendered to us related to corporate transactions and financial reporting.

SHAREBASED_PAYMENTS

SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS	12 Months Ended
	Feb. 28, 2014
Notes to Financial Statements	'
Note 8 - SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS	'
	Description of Incentive Plans
	2014 Equity Incentive Plan
	On April 1, 2014, our Board of Directors approved a newly established 2014 Equity Incentive Plan.  A total of 12,000,000 shares of our common stock are authorized for issuance under the plan.  The Board and/or the Compensation Committee is authorized to administer the plan.  Employees, officers, directors, consultants, advisors and independent contractors are eligible to receive awards under the plan.  Awards may consist of stock options, stock appreciation rights, stock grants, performance shares, performance units, dividend equivalents or other cash-based or equity awards.
	2010 Incentive Stock Option Plan
	In September 2010, our stockholders approved the 2010 Incentive Stock Option Plan (the “2010 Plan”), which our Board adopted on August 12, 2010. The purpose of the 2010 Plan is to advance our interests and those of our stockholders by enabling us to attract and retain persons of ability to perform services for us by providing an incentive to such individuals through equity participation in the Company and by rewarding such individuals who contribute to the achievement of our economic objectives.  The 2010 Plan permits us to grant, for a ten-year period, stock options, restricted stock awards and stock bonuses, collectively referred to in this discussion as “awards.”  We reserved 15,000,000 shares of our common stock for issuance to our directors, employees, independent contractors and consultants under the 2010 Plan. The Board of Directors or a committee of the Board administers the 2010 Plan and has the authority and discretion, subject to the provisions of the 2010 Plan, to select persons to whom awards will be granted, to designate the number of shares to be covered by each award, to specify the type of consideration to be paid, and to establish all other terms and conditions of each award. As of February 28, 2014, there were options outstanding of 10.1 million shares of common stock and 1.1 million shares of stock issued from the 2010 Plan, leaving a balance of approximately 3.6 million shares available for future awards.
	2004 Stock Plan
	In March 2004, our Board adopted our 2004 Stock Plan (the “2004 Plan”) pursuant to which key employees, including officers, directors and consultants of the Company are eligible to receive shares of common stock, stock options and stock appreciation rights (“SARs”). The 2004 Plan expired in March 2014. The 2004 Plan is administered by the Board of Directors.  Incentive stock options granted under the 2004 Plan are exercisable for a period of up to 10 years from the date of grant at an exercise price which is not less than the fair market value (“FMV”) of the common stock on the date of the grant, except that the term of an incentive stock option granted under the 2004 Plan to a stockholder owning more than 10% of the outstanding common stock may not exceed five years and the exercise price of an incentive stock option granted to such a stockholder may not be less than 110% of the FMV of the common stock on the date of the grant. Non-qualified stock options may be granted on terms determined by the Board of Directors. SARs, which give the holder the privilege of surrendering such rights for an amount of stock equal to the appreciation in the common stock between the time of grant and the surrender, may be granted on any terms determined by the Board of Directors. The 2004 Plan also permits the grant of new stock options to participants who tender shares of our common stock as payment of the exercise price of stock options or the payment of withholding tax (“Reload Options”). The Reload Options will be granted at the fair market value of a share of common stock on the date of the grant and will be exercisable six months following the date of the grant. The 2004 Plan also includes limited option valuation rights upon a change of control of the Company. We reserved 2,000,000 shares for issuance under the 2004 Plan, of which, to date, there are awards issued covering 1,800,000 shares of common stock.
	Stock-Based Compensation
	Stock-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award. We use the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model to estimate the fair value of stock options and warrants. The determination of the fair value of stock-based awards on the date of grant using an option pricing model is affected by our stock price as well as assumptions regarding a number of complex and subjective variables. These variables include our expected stock price volatility over the expected term of the awards, actual and projected employee stock option exercise behaviors, a risk-free interest rate and any expected dividends.
	The following table shows the amount of share-based compensation expense included in the statements of operations:
		Year Ended February 28,
		2014			2013
	Selling and marketing	$	1,047,103		$	1,594,565
	Technology and development		749,207			1,069,186
	General and administrative		968,359			2,437,132
	Total stock option and warrant expense	$	2,764,669		$	5,100,883
	Stock Option Exchange
	On August 29, 2013, we completed a stock option exchange program. Subject to the terms of our exchange offer filed on August 2, 2013, eligible participants tendered, and we exchanged, 5,460,424 options for 1,261,710 new options affecting 73 employees and 2 directors. The new options have an exercise price of $0.42, which was the closing price of our common stock on August 29, 2013. The new options were granted with the same vesting proportions as the tendered options. Of the 1,261,710 new options granted, 846,516, or 67%, were vested on the grant date and 415,194, or 33%, will vest over the remaining vesting periods of the original options. The tender offer did not result in the acceleration of vesting of any options. The new options have the same expiration dates as the options exchanged.
	We are required to compare the fair value of the options immediately before and after modification and recognize additional compensation expense to the extent the new options have greater value than the exchanged options they replaced. The fair value of the stock options tendered for exchange and the replacement stock options was estimated on August 29, 2013 using the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model with the following assumptions:
		Pre-modification			Post-modification
	Weighted-average exercise price	$	2.4		$	0.42
	Expected term (in years)		3			2
	Weighted-average volatility		70	%		70	%
	Risk-free rate		0.79	%		0.39	%
	Expected dividends		0	%		0	%
	The total fair value of the new options issued to each participant in the exchange did not exceed the fair value of the original options outstanding just prior to the exchange. As such, no compensation expense was recognized as a result of the stock option exchange offer.
	STOCK OPTIONS:
	We estimate the expected volatility of options granted using a combination of historical volatility and implied volatility. We use a simplified approach to estimate the expected term for options granted. We base the risk-free interest rate used in the option valuation model on zero-coupon yields implied by U.S. Treasury issues with remaining terms similar to the expected term on the options. We do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future and therefore use an expected dividend yield of zero in the option valuation model. We are required to estimate forfeitures at the time of grant and revise those estimates in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. We use historical data and future expectations to estimate option forfeitures and record stock-based compensation expense only for those awards that are expected to vest.
	The fair values of our stock option awards issued to employees were estimated with the following weighted average assumptions:
		Year Ended February 28,
		2014			2013
	Expected dividends		0	%		0	%
	Expected term (in years)		3.23			3.5
	Weighted-average volatility		70	%		63	%
	Risk-free rate		0.82	%		0.37 - 0.75	%
	The summary of activity for our stock options is presented below:
		Number of options			Weighted Average Exercise Price			Average Remaining Contractual Term (In Years)
	Options outstanding at February 28, 2012		20,153,219		$	2.09			4.07
	Granted		3,326,668			1.35
	Exercised		(602,092	)		0.51
	Cancelled		-			-
	Forfeited or expired		(5,503,863	)		2.31
	Options outstanding at February 28, 2013		17,373,932			2			2.99
	Granted		6,882,762			0.35
	Exercised		-			-
	Cancelled		(5,388,549	)		2.39
	Forfeited or expired		(4,815,167	)		2.09
	Options outstanding at February 28, 2014		14,052,978		$	1.02			2.9
	Options exercisable at February 28, 2014		8,589,996		$	1.44			1.74
	As of February 28, 2014, unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested options, net of estimated forfeitures, was $1.5 million.  The weighted average period over which share-based compensation expense related to these options will be recognized is 2.7 years.
	The aggregate intrinsic value of the exercisable options at February 28, 2014 was $22,390. The aggregate intrinsic value was calculated based on the positive differences between the market value of our common stock on February 28, 2014 of $0.35 per share and the exercise prices of the exercisable options.
	The exercise prices of options outstanding at February 28, 2014 ranged from $0.25 to $3.90.  The weighted average fair value of options granted was $0.16 and $0.56 per share for the fiscal years ended February 28, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
	There were no options exercised during fiscal 2014.  The total intrinsic value of options exercised during fiscal 2013 was $0.8 million. The intrinsic value is calculated as the difference between the market value on the date of exercise and the exercise price of the shares.
	WARRANTS:
	The estimated fair values of our stock warrant awards issued to service providers and employees were estimated with the following weighted average assumptions:
		Year Ended February 28,
		2014			2013
	Expected dividends		0	%		0	%
	Expected term (in years)		5			3.0 - 5.0
	Weighted-average volatility		70	%		63.4	%
	Risk-free rate		1.06	%		0.37 - .077	%
	The summary of activity for our warrants is presented below:
		Number of Warrants			Weighted Average Exercise Price			Average Remaining Contractual Term (In Years)
Warrants outstanding at February 28, 2012		10,787,641		$	1.86			2.8
Granted		10,222,330			0.82
Exercised		(1,000,000	)		1
Forfeited and expired		(838,867	)		2.48
Warrants outstanding at February 28, 2013		19,171,104			1.32			3.53
Granted		8,740,668			0.61
Exercised		-			-
Forfeited and expired		(725,616	)		1.83
Warrants outstanding at February 28, 2014		27,186,156		$	1.06			3.4
Warrants exercisable at February 28, 2014		26,477,822		$	1.07			3.4
The exercisable warrants as of February 28, 2014 had no aggregate intrinsic value because the market value of our common stock on February 28, 2014 of $0.35 per share was lower than the exercise prices of the exercisable warrants.
The exercise prices of warrants outstanding at February 28, 2014 ranged from $0.39 to $4.00.  The weighted average fair value of warrants granted was $0.23 and $0.49 per share for the fiscal years ended February 28, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
As of February 28, 2014, unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested warrants, net of estimated forfeitures, was $90,900.  The weighted average period over which share-based compensation expense related to these warrants will be recognized is 1.8 years.
There were no warrants exercised during fiscal 2014.  The total intrinsic value of warrants exercised during fiscal 2013 was $0.6 million. The intrinsic value is calculated as the difference between the market value on the date of exercise and the exercise price of the shares.
Common Stock Reserved for Future Issuance
The following table summarizes our shares of common stock reserved for future issuance at February 28, 2014:
	Number of Shares
Stock options outstanding		14,052,978
Warrants outstanding		27,186,156
Stock options available for future grant		3,632,602
Common stock reserved for future issuance		44,871,736

LOSS_PER_SHARE

LOSS PER SHARE	12 Months Ended
	Feb. 28, 2014
Notes to Financial Statements	'
Note 9 - LOSS PER SHARE	'
	Basic net income per share is based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted net income per share is based on the weighted average number of common shares and common share equivalents outstanding. Common share equivalents included in the computation represent shares issuable upon assumed exercise of outstanding stock options and warrants except when the effect of their inclusion would be anti-dilutive.  As of February 28, 2014, there were potentially dilutive securities of options exercisable to purchase 8.6 million shares of common stock, and warrants exercisable to purchase 26.5 million shares of common stock.  As the inclusion of these outstanding stock options and warrants would be anti-dilutive, they were excluded from the computation of loss per share. Accordingly, basic net loss per share and diluted net loss per share are identical for each of the periods presented in the accompanying statement of operations.

CONTINGENCIES

CONTINGENCIES	12 Months Ended
	Feb. 28, 2014
Notes to Financial Statements	'
Note 10 - CONTINGENCIES	'
	Litigation
	In the normal course of business, we may become involved in various legal proceedings.  Except as stated below, we know of no pending or threatened legal proceeding to which we are or will be a party that, if successful, might result in a material adverse change in our business, properties or financial condition.
	Litigation Update
	Augme Technologies, Inc. v. AOL, Inc. and Time Warner, Inc., Civil Action No. 1:12-cv-05439-CM (transferred from Civil Action No. 1:09-cv-04299-RWS (S.D.N.Y.)), a patent infringement and trademark infringement lawsuit pending in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (transferred from the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California) since September 10, 2008.
	The case is a patent infringement case originally filed by Augme against AOL, Inc. and Time Warner, Inc. in the Central District of California and subsequently transferred to the Southern District of New York.  It also originally included a trademark infringement action against AOL, Inc. for use of the BOOMBOX trademark which has subsequently been dismissed.  In its patent infringement claim, Augme sought both monetary relief for patent infringement damages and injunctive relief against further infringement by AOL and Time Warner.  The AOL defendants and Augme agreed to settle litigation between themselves and, on February 26, 2013, the case was dismissed between those parties. The stayed case remains pending against Time Warner, Inc.  Below is a summary of the current status of this case.
	On June 13, 2012, the patent infringement claims were transferred from Judge Robert Sweet to Judge Colleen McMahon.  The residual claims for trademark infringement, unfair competition and false designation of origin, which remained with Judge Sweet, were dismissed by agreement of the parties on November 19, 2012.
	With regard to the patent infringement claims, Time Warner filed a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings on September 27, 2012, and, shortly thereafter, a Motion for Rule 11 Sanctions on October 23, 2012.  On October 26, 2012, the Court suasponte stayed the case regarding any claims related to U.S. Patent No. 7,269,636 (“‘636 patent”), pending the outcome of the ongoing reexamination of that patent by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.  Because the remaining patent-in-suit, U.S. Patent Nos. 6,594,691 (“‘691 patent”), is closely related to the ‘636 patent, Augme moved to stay the case in its entirety on November 5, 2012.  On December 20, 2012, Judge McMahon denied Augme’s motion to stay as to the ‘691 patent and did not disturb the preexisting stay as to the ‘636 patent.
	Because of Judge McMahon’s requirement that all discovery in the case be completed by the end of February 2013 and given that discovery as to the ‘691 patent would be totally duplicative of discovery which would have to be conducted later as to the ‘636 patent, on January 7, 2013, Augme filed a covenant not to sue defendants on the ‘691 patent and a motion to dismiss the ‘691 patent from the case.  Based on the pendency of the motion to dismiss, on January 11, 2013, Magistrate Judge Gabriel Gorenstein adjourned all further discovery as to the ‘691 patent.
	On January 16, 2013, Judge McMahon entered an order dismissing the ‘691 patent from the case and maintaining the stay as to the ‘636 patent.  She placed the case on suspension and denied Time Warner’s pending motions without prejudice.
	The AOL defendants and Augme agreed to settle the litigation as between Augme, on the one hand, and AOL, Inc. and AOL Advertising, Inc., on the other.  Accordingly, on February 6, 2013, Augme and the AOL defendants filed a Joint Motion for Stipulated Dismissal of the case as between those parties.  On February 26, 2013, Judge McMahon entered an Order of Dismissal as to the parties, AOL, Inc. and AOL Advertising, Inc.  The stayed case remains pending against Time Warner, Inc.
	Augme Technologies, Inc. v. Yahoo! Inc., Civil Action No. 3:09-cv-05386-JCS, a patent infringement lawsuit pending in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California since November 16, 2009.  On December 21, 2010, Yahoo! filed a first amended answer to Augme’s complaint, in which Yahoo! asserted its own counterclaim against Augme alleging infringement of, inter alia, U.S. Patent Nos. 7,640,320 (“‘320 patent”) and 7,512,622 (“‘622 patent”).  On August 21, 2012, the parties stipulated to dismissal of Yahoo’s claim for infringement of the ‘622 patent with prejudice.
	This case is a patent infringement lawsuit brought by Augme against Yahoo, Inc.  Yahoo has also counterclaimed for patent infringement.  In this case, Augme is seeking monetary relief for patent infringement damage and injunctive relief against future infringement.  A summary of the case is set forth below.
	With respect to Augme’s claims of patent infringement, on June 11, 2012, Yahoo! renewed its Motion for Summary Judgment of non-infringement. The Court heard argument on the summary judgment issues on July 20, 2012.  On August 8, 2012, the Court granted Yahoo!’s Motion for Summary Judgment of non-infringement, dismissing Augme’s patent claims against Yahoo! and declining to address Augme’s previously filed Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of validity.  Based on the Court’s summary judgment order, Augme moved for Entry of Judgment under Rule 54(b).  Yahoo! opposed Augme’s motion in light of the pending counterclaim for infringement of the ‘320 patent.  Nonetheless, Augme’s motion was granted by the Court on October 29, 2012, and final judgment was entered shortly thereafter on November 15, 2012.  On December 12, 2012, Augme filed a Notice of Appeal as to the judgment as to the Augme patent. The appeal was docketed by the Federal Circuit on December 19, 2012.
	With respect to Yahoo!’s counterclaim regarding infringement of the ‘320 patent, the parties agreed to and filed a stipulation of non-infringement of this patent on December 13, 2012, under the Court’s claim construction ruling of January 3, 2012.  The parties also stipulated to entry of judgment under Rule 54(b) and 28 U.S.C. § 1292(c)(2), which permits the entry of judgment in patent cases “which … [are] final except for an accounting.”  The parties also requested that the Court stay the remainder of the case pending Augme’s appeal to the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals.  The Court signed such an order on December 13, 2012, and entered it the next day.  Augme filed with the district court a Notice of Appeal to the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals as to Yahoo!’s ‘320 patent judgment on January 11, 2013. The second appeal was docketed by the Federal Circuit on February 6, 2013 and consolidated with the prior appeal.  Briefing on the appeals was completed by September 6, 2013.  Oral argument before the Court of Appeals was held on December 5, 2013 and the parties are awaiting the Court’s decision.
	Brandofino Communications vs. Augme Technologies, Inc. Civil Action No. 652639/2011. On September 27, 2011, Brandofino Communications, Inc. (“Brandofino”) filed suit against Augme and New Aug LLC in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County.  The complaint alleges, inter alia, breach of contract and unjust enrichment claims arising from work Brandofino allegedly performed for Augme pursuant to a marketing agreement entered into by Brandofino and Augme. The complaint seeks damages in excess of $1.0 million.  Augme has served its Answer and set forth counterclaims for breach of contract, unfair competition, tortious interference with business relations, and violations of New York General Business Law Section 349 (relating to violations of Augme’s intellectual property rights).  The Company intends to vigorously defend against Brandofino’s claim and pursue its counterclaims.
	Shaub & Williams, L.L.P., vs. Augme Technologies, Inc. Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-01101-GBD. Augme's prior counsel, Shaub & Williams, LLP (“S&W”), filed a Complaint in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York seeking recovery on a quantum meruit (value of services) basis attorney's fees in the amount of $2,249,686.25 for its prior representation of Augme in litigation.  Augme has denied the allegations in the Complaint and have alleged that it has paid all fees due to S&W.  The Company also asserted a breach of contract counterclaim, alleging that S&W overbilled Augme and should be refunded some of the attorney’s fees already paid to S&W.  The parties are currently conducting discovery, and the court recently issued new discovery deadlines—fact discovery shall be completed by May 30, 2014, and expert discovery by July 15, 2014.  The court has declined to set a trial date at this time.
	Leibsohn, et al. v. Hipcricket, Inc. (FKA Augme Technologies), et al., No. 13-2-40007-3 (King Cty. Sup. Ct.):  On November 25, 2013, stockholders of the former Hipcricket, Inc. who were stockholders when Augme purchased the assets of Hipcricket, Inc. in August 2011 filed a lawsuit in King County Superior Court alleging that Augme and its board of directors at the time made false statements which induced the plaintiff stockholders to approve the asset purchase transaction.  The lawsuit asserts claims under the Washington State Securities Act as well as common-law claims for intentional misrepresentation and negligent misrepresentation.  Plaintiffs seek to rescind the asset purchase transaction or obtain a “rescissionary measure of damages,” as well as compensatory damages, interest and attorneys’ fees.  On March 3, 2014, defendants filed a motion to dismiss the action in its entirety, and that motion will be fully briefed by April 23, 2014.  An oral argument on the motion to dismiss took place on May 9, 2014. The Court took the matter under advisement and did not issue any order.  The parties await the Court's decision.  Defendants intend to continue to vigorously defend the action.  The Company cannot at this time estimate any potential loss that may result from this litigation.
	OPERATING LEASES
	As of February 28, 2014 we leased space in four locations under non-cancellable leases, with initial terms of one to five and one half years. Total rent expense under operating leases was $815,244, net of $204,750 of sublease income on the unused office space in our New York office, and $906,151 for the years ended February 28, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
	As of February 28, 2014, future minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating leases are as follows:
	Fiscal year 2015	$	790,307
	Fiscal year 2016		583,822
	Fiscal year 2017		436,322
	Fiscal year 2018		449,408
	Fiscal year 2019		462,958
	Thereafter		158,083
	Total	$	2,880,900

CONCENTRATION_OF_RISK

CONCENTRATION OF RISK	12 Months Ended
	Feb. 28, 2014
Notes to Financial Statements	'
Note 11 - CONCENTRATION OF RISK	'
	During the year ended February 28, 2014, three customers accounted for approximately 15% of our revenues and no other customer accounted for over 5% of revenues.  During the year ended February 28, 2013, two customers accounted for approximately 16% of our revenues and no other customer accounted for over 5% of revenues.
	At February 28, 2014, three customers accounted for 22% of accounts receivable, the largest of which accounted for 11%.  At February 28, 2013, three customers accounted for 23% of accounts receivable, the largest of which accounted for 9%.

LINE_OF_CREDIT

LINE OF CREDIT	12 Months Ended
	Feb. 28, 2014
Line Of Credit	'
Note 12 - LINE OF CREDIT	'
	On May 21, 2013, we entered into a loan and security agreement with Silicon Valley Bank (“SVB”), which was amended and restated on November 25, 2013.  The agreement, as amended and restated, provides for a $5.0 million asset based revolving loan facility, with availability subject to a borrowing base of 90% of our eligible accounts receivable, decreasing to 80% of eligible accounts receivable plus the least of (i) 80% of Eligible 120 Day Accounts as defined in the Agreement, (ii) $1,000,000 and (iii) 30% of the sum of all eligible accounts plus Eligible 120 Day Accounts after December 31, 2013, and the satisfaction of conditions specified in the agreement. The facility expires on May 3, 2015, at which time all outstanding amounts will become due and payable.
	During the fiscal year ended February 28, 2014, amounts drawn under the facility accrued interest at a floating per annum rate equal to 1.25% above the prime rate, or 0.75% above prime rate at all times when a Streamline Period (“Streamline Period”) is in effect. A Streamline Period commences on the first day of the month following the day that we provide SVB a written notice that, for each consecutive day in the immediately preceding fiscal quarter, we had unrestricted cash at Silicon Valley Bank plus the unused amount available under the facility in an amount above $4.0 million, subject to terms and conditions of the loan agreement. Interest is payable monthly. We also are required to pay SVB a quarterly fee equal to 0.25% per annum of the average unused portion of the facility. The facility is secured by substantially all of our assets. Borrowings under the facility may be used for general corporate purposes, including funding working capital. As of the February 28, 2014, we had drawn $2.2 million from the line of credit and had approximately $1.9 million available based on our outstanding accounts receivable as of that date.
	The loan agreement includes customary covenants, including covenants that limit or restrict our ability to, without the prior written consent of SVB, dispose of assets, change our business, have a change in control, make acquisitions, be acquired, incur indebtedness, grant liens, make investments, make distributions, repurchase stock, and enter into certain transactions with affiliates. The loan agreement also requires us to maintain a minimum tangible net worth of at least negative $1.25 million, increasing (i) at the end of each month by 50% of the proceeds of issuances of equity securities and the principal amount of any subordinated debt received during such month, (ii) at the end of each calendar quarter 50% of net income for such quarter and (iii) immediately by 1.5x the cash received by us from the sale of any intellectual property minus any realized gain or plus any realized loss associated with the sale of such intellectual property.
	The loan agreement contains customary events of default that include non-payment defaults, covenant defaults, material adverse change defaults, insolvency defaults, material judgment defaults and inaccuracy of representations and warranty defaults. The occurrence of an event of default could result in the acceleration of obligations under the loan agreement, in which case we must repay all loans and related charges, fees and amounts then due and payable. At the election of SVB, upon the occurrence and during the continuance of an event of default, the interest rate will increase an additional 5.0% per annum above the rate that is otherwise applicable.
	We are required to deliver periodic reports to SVB regarding our ability to meet certain financial and other covenants contained in the loan agreement. In late July we delivered the report to SVB indicating that as of June 30, 2013, we had breached the minimum tangible net worth covenant and began discussions of a forbearance agreement with SVB. On November 25, 2013, we entered into an amended and restated loan and security agreement with SVB. The amended and restated agreement retained substantially the same terms as the original loan and security agreement, except the borrowing base was amended as described above and the collateral securing the loan facility was expanded to include our intellectual property. In connection with the execution of the amended and restated agreement, we obtained a waiver of the covenant default.
	Although we continue to be current with all principal and interest payments under the loan agreement, as of January 31, 2014, we again breached the minimum tangible net worth covenant. On March 31, 2014 we entered into a forbearance and amendment to the loan agreement with SVB, pursuant to which SVB agreed to forbear from taking any action to enforce its rights or remedies under the loan agreement until April 15, 2014. The forbearance agreement also increased the interest rate under the loan agreement to prime rate plus 3.75% during a Streamline Period and to prime rate plus 4.25% when a Streamline Period is not in effect.  As of May 1, 2014, we had not regained compliance with the minimum tangible net worth covenant and are in further forbearance discussions with SVB. Currently, SVB is continuing to allow us to draw on the line of credit during these discussions.

QUARTERLY_FINANCIAL_INFORMATIO

QUARTERLY FINANCIAL INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)	12 Months Ended
	Feb. 28, 2014
Notes to Financial Statements	'
Note 13 - QUARTERLY FINANCIAL INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)	'
	Summarized quarterly financial information for the years ended February 28, 2014 and 2013 is as follows:
		First			Second			Third			Fourth			Fiscal Year
	Fiscal 2014 quarter:
	Total revenues		5,865,564			7,592,735			6,425,887			6,806,532			26,690,718
	Operating loss		(6,014,403	)		(3,360,367	)		(5,259,979	)		(7,682,790	)		(22,317,539	)
	Net loss		(6,015,204	)		(3,374,255	)		(5,278,975	)		(7,586,355	)		(22,254,789	)
	Basic and diluted		(0.05	)		(0.03	)		(0.04	)		(0.05	)		(0.16	)
	Fiscal 2013 quarter:
	Total revenues		5,078,351			6,189,220			7,433,051			7,509,480			26,210,101
	Operating loss		(4,944,918	)		(7,160,379	)		(41,005,388	)		(10,482,483	)		(63,593,168	)
	Net loss		(4,942,273	)		(2,299,598	)		(33,706,071	)		(7,889,353	)		(48,837,295	)
	Basic and diluted		(0.05	)		(0.02	)		(0.31	)		(0.07	)		(0.47	)

SUMMARY_OF_SIGNIFICANT_ACCOUNT1

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Policies)	12 Months Ended
	Feb. 28, 2014
Notes to Financial Statements	'
Principles of Consolidation	'
	Prior to October 2013, our financial statements were consolidated and included the accounts of Hipcricket, Inc., formerly Augme Technologies, Inc., and our wholly owned subsidiaries. In October 2013, we merged Hipcricket, Inc. and our subsidiaries into a single entity and our financial statements have been prepared on an unconsolidated basis since that date.
Use of Estimates	'
	The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements. We regularly evaluate estimates and judgments based on historical experience and other relevant facts and circumstances. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant estimates relate to allowances for tax assets, the use of the Black-Scholes-Merton pricing model for valuing stock option and common stock warrant issuances, estimates of future cash flows used to estimate the value of long-lived assets and implied fair value of goodwill, revenues earned from percentage of completion contracts and the period in which revenues should be recorded.
Cash and Cash Equivalents	'
	We consider all highly liquid investments purchased with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents.
Accounts Receivable	'
	Our accounts receivable balances are due from customers throughout the U.S. Credit is extended based on evaluation of a customer’s financial condition and, generally, collateral is not required. Based on the nature of the contract, our billing terms are such that a certain percentage is billed at the time of the contract and then at various time intervals or through the length of the agreement, which are generally up to 12 months.
	We determine our allowance for doubtful accounts by considering a number of factors, including the length of time trade accounts receivable are past due, previous loss history, the customer’s current ability to pay its obligation to us, and the condition of the general economy and the industry as a whole. Our allowance for doubtful accounts was $400,500 and $270,960 as of February 28, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
Property and Equipment	'
	Property and equipment consists primarily of computer software and office equipment, furniture and fixtures and leasehold improvements and is stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is recorded on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets ranging from three to seven years. Leasehold improvements are amortized using the straight-line method over the shorter of the lease term or estimated useful lives.
	We capitalize the costs of developing software for internal use or to be sold, leased or otherwise marketed. These costs include both purchased software and internally developed software. Costs of developing software are expensed until technological feasibility has been established. Thereafter, all costs are capitalized and are carried at the lower of unamortized cost or net realizable value. Internally developed and purchased software costs are generally amortized over three years.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments	'
	The fair value of some of our financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable, approximate their respective carrying value due to their short maturity. Financial instruments that potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk are cash-equivalents and trade receivables.
Capitalized Legal Patent Costs	'
	We capitalize external legal costs incurred in the defense of our patents, including assertion of claims against others for patent infringement, where we believe that there is an evident increase in the value of the patent and that the successful outcome of the legal action is probable. During the course of any legal action, the court where the case is pending makes decisions and issues rulings of various kinds, which may be favorable or unfavorable. We monitor developments in the legal action, the legal costs incurred and the anticipated outcome of the legal action, and assess the likelihood of a successful outcome based on the entire action. If changes in the anticipated outcome occur that reduce the likelihood of a successful outcome of the entire action to less than probable, the capitalized costs would be charged to expense in the period in which the change is determined. The capitalized legal patent costs are recorded within intangible assets on our balance sheets and are amortized over the remaining useful life of the patent.
Fair Value Measurements	'
	We measure certain assets, including our intangible assets and goodwill, at fair value on a nonrecurring basis.  Fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or a liability. A three-tier fair value hierarchy is established as a basis for considering such assumptions and for inputs used in the valuation methodologies in measuring fair value:
	Level 1:  Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
	Level 2:  Observable inputs such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not sufficiently active to qualify as Level 1 or, other inputs that are observable by market data.
	Level 3:  Unobservable inputs for which there is little or no market data, which requires us to develop our own assumptions.  The inputs require significant management judgment or estimation.
	The fair values of our intangible assets and the implied fair value of goodwill are determined based on valuation techniques using the best information available, and may include quoted market prices, market comparables, and discounted cash flow projections.
	For the years ended February 28, 2014 and 2013, the remeasurement of goodwill and identified intangibles, including patents, to their implied fair value is classified as a Level 3 fair value assessment due to the significance of unobservable inputs. The inputs used to measure the fair value of the identified intangible assets were largely unobservable, and, accordingly, these measurements were classified as Level 3. The fair value of the intangible assets were estimated using the income approach, which is based on management's cash flow projections of revenue growth rates and operating margins, taking into consideration industry and market conditions. The discount rates used in the fair value calculations for the intangible assets were based on a weighted average cost of capital adjusted for the relevant risk associated with those assets. The unobservable inputs used in these valuations include projected revenue growth rates, operating margins, royalty rates and the risk factor added to the discount rate.
Indefinite-lived Intangible Assets	'
	We review indefinite-lived intangible assets, which include acquired trade names, for impairment annually and whenever events or changes in circumstances suggest that the fair value of the asset may be less than the carrying value. The fair value of indefinite-lived intangible assets is measured by comparing the carrying amount of the asset to the future discounted cash flows that the asset is expected to generate. If it is determined that an individual asset is impaired, the amount of any impairment is measured as the difference between the carrying value and the fair value of the impaired asset.
Goodwill	'
	We have recorded goodwill as a result of business combinations. Goodwill is carried at cost and is not amortized.  We review goodwill for impairment annually as of the first day of our fourth fiscal quarter, generally December 1st, and whenever events or changes in circumstances suggest that the fair value of goodwill may be less than its carrying value.
	The goodwill impairment test is performed at the reporting unit level. A reporting unit is an operating segment or one level below an operating segment (referred to as a “component”). An operating segment is a component of an enterprise that earns revenues and incurs expenses, for which discrete financial information is available and management regularly reviews the operating results. We have a single operating segment, however there are two reporting units for purposes of our goodwill impairment assessment.  All of our recorded goodwill is attributed to the Mobile Marketing and Advertising reporting unit, which generated substantially all of our revenues and expenses.  The second reporting unit represents the Intellectual Property reporting unit, which does not have any attributed goodwill.
	We have an unconditional option to evaluate impairment of goodwill by performing a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit is less than the carrying amount. If the fair value of the reporting unit is determined to be more likely than not greater than the carrying amount, further testing of goodwill impairment is not performed. If the fair value of the reporting unit is less than the carrying amount, we perform a quantitative two-step impairment test.
	The quantitative goodwill impairment test involves a two-step process. In the first step, we compare the fair value of each reporting unit to its carrying value. If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds its carrying value, goodwill is not impaired and no further testing is required. If the fair value of the reporting unit is less than the carrying value, we must perform the second step of the impairment test to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any. If the implied fair value of the reporting unit's goodwill is less than the carrying value, the difference is recorded as an impairment loss. When performing a quantitative two-step impairment test, we depend upon our estimates of future cash flows and other factors to determine the fair value of our reporting unit. We rely on a number of factors including operating results, business plans, economic projections, anticipated future cash flows and marketplace data.
	We estimate the fair value of our reporting units using the income approach and the market approach. Using the income approach, we calculate the fair value of a reporting unit based on the present value of estimated future cash flows. Cash flow projections are based on management's estimates of revenue growth rates and operating margins, taking into consideration industry and market conditions. The discount rate used is based on the weighted-average cost of capital risk-adjusted for business-specific characteristics and the uncertainty related to the business's ability to execute on the projected cash flows. The market approach estimates fair value based on market multiples of revenue and earnings derived from comparable publicly-traded companies with similar operating and investment characteristics as the reporting unit. The weighting of the fair value derived from the market approach ranges from 0% to 50% depending on the level of comparability of these publicly-traded companies to the reporting unit. When market comparables are not meaningful or not available, we may estimate the fair value of a reporting unit using only the income approach.
	In order to assess the reasonableness of the calculated fair values of our reporting units, we also compare the sum of the reporting units' fair values to our market capitalization and calculate an implied control premium (the excess of the sum of the reporting units' fair values over the market capitalization). We compare our implied control premium to the control premiums of recent comparable market transactions for reasonableness and may adjust the fair value estimates of our reporting units by adjusting the discount rates and/or other assumptions if necessary. Financial and credit market volatility directly impacts our fair value measurement through our weighted average cost of capital, which we use to determine our discount rate, and our stock price, which we use to determine our market capitalization. Therefore, changes in the stock price may also affect the amount of impairment recorded. We believe that our market capitalization alone does not fully capture the fair value of our business as a whole, or the substantial value that an acquirer would obtain from its ability to obtain control of our business. As such, in determining fair value, we add a control premium to our market capitalization. To estimate the control premium, we consider our unique competitive advantages that would likely provide synergies to a market participant. In addition, we consider external market factors, which we believe, may contribute to changes in and volatility of our stock price that does not reflect our underlying fair value.
Intangible Assets	'
	Intangible assets are stated at estimated fair value at the time of acquisition less accumulated amortization. We assess the recoverability of long-lived assets subject to amortization when events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be fully recoverable. If undiscounted expected cash flows to be generated by a long-lived asset or asset group are less than its carrying amount, we record an impairment to write down the long-lived asset or asset group to its estimated fair value. Fair value is estimated based on discounted expected future cash flows.
Business Combinations	'
	We account for business combinations using the acquisition method of accounting. The consideration transferred or transferable to sellers and the assets acquired and liabilities assumed are recorded at their estimated fair values at the date of acquisition. When a business combination agreement provides for consideration to be paid in future periods, contingent on future events, we include an estimate of the acquisition-date fair value of the contingent consideration as part of the cost of the combination. Contingent consideration to be paid to officers, directors, stockholders and/or employees of the acquiree whom continue employment with the Company are evaluated as to whether the amounts represent purchase consideration or a separate transaction, such as post-transaction employee compensation.  Factors evaluated require significant judgment and include, among other factors; consideration of the terms of continuing employment, levels of post-transaction compensation, ownership interest of the selling stockholder/employees, linkage of the contingent consideration to the transaction date combination valuation and any other agreements or matters related to the transaction.  Acquisition transaction costs are expensed as incurred.   The results of operations of the acquired business are included in the financial statements from the respective date of acquisition.
Share-Based Payments	'
	The fair value of our share-based payments for stock options and stock warrants is estimated at the grant date based on the stock award’s fair value as calculated by the Black-Scholes-Merton (“BSM”) option-pricing model and is recognized as expense over the requisite service period using a straight line method. The BSM model requires various highly judgmental assumptions including expected volatility and option life. We estimate the forfeiture rate based on historical experience. To the extent our actual forfeiture rate is different from our estimate, share-based payment expense is adjusted accordingly in that period.
Revenue Recognition	'
	We provide access to our AD LIFE Platform and services through term license fees, support fees, and mobile marketing campaign fees.  The contracts generally include multiple elements as part of the overall service delivery and allocated revenues are generally recognized over the term of service period or as the related services are provided.  We also offer professional services related to the strategy and execution of mobile marketing campaigns.  Professional services revenue is recognized as the services are performed as these services have value on a standalone basis, do not involve unique acceptance criteria.
	Contracts may also include deliverables such as production and delivery of online media content, hosting, fees from content retention and delivery, custom solution creation, or placement of mobile or online advertising content.  Revenues from contracts with multiple deliverables for the production and delivery of online media content and hosting are recognized over the term of the media content production, delivery or hosting period. For deliverables that do not have stand alone value, that are delivered in conjunction with a term license, support or hosting arrangement, we recognize the related revenues over the related license term, support, or hosting service period.
	When contracts include multiple deliverables, revenue is allocated to each respective element that is determined to have stand alone value. When these multiple deliverables can be separated into different units of accounting, we allocate the arrangement consideration to the identified separate units of accounting based on their relative selling price. Accounting guidance for multiple-deliverable arrangements provides a hierarchy to use when determining the relative selling price for each unit of accounting. We use vendor-specific objective evidence ("VSOE") of selling price, based on the price at which we regularly sell the item on a standalone basis, if it exists. If VSOE of selling price is not available, third-party evidence ("TPE") of selling price is used to establish the selling price if it exists. If VSOE or TPE of selling price are not available, the best estimate of selling price ("BESP") is used. Allocation of revenue to deliverables of an arrangement is based on the VSOE for professional services revenues and on BESP for all other elements being sold on a stand-alone basis. We evaluate BESP by reviewing historical data related to sales of our deliverables.
	Fixed-price contracts for the creation of custom software are typically of a duration of less than one year and are accounted for using the percentage-of-completion method.  We use the percentage-of-completion method of accounting because we believe it is the most accurate method to recognize revenue based on the nature and scope of these service contracts; we believe it is a better measure of periodic income results than other methods and better matches revenue recognized with the costs incurred. Percentage of completion is measured based primarily on input measures such as hours incurred to date compared to total estimated hours to complete, with consideration given to output measures, such as contract milestones, when applicable. Significant judgment is required when estimating total hours and progress to completion on these arrangements which determines the amount of revenue we recognize as well as whether a loss is recognized if one is expected to be incurred for the remainder of the project. Revisions to hour and cost estimates are incorporated in the period in which the facts that give rise to the revision become known.
	Revenues from the creation of custom software are generally a component of contracts that include hosting and/or production and delivery services. We allocate revenues on multiple element arrangements between the software and non-software deliverables using VSOE or BESP, depending on the nature of the multiple deliverables. Software revenues are recorded when the software is completed and accepted by the client if the software has free standing functionality, the fee for the software is separately determinable and we have demonstrated our capability of completing any remaining terms under the contract. Otherwise all revenues under the multi-deliverable contracts are recognized over the term of the production and content delivery or hosting period.
	Revenues for producing interactive advertising content are based upon fees for the production and hosting of the advertising content and/or a percentage of the fees paid by third party advertisers. Revenues from third parties for the production and hosting of the advertising content are recorded pro rata over the related hosting period. Revenues representing a percentage of the fees paid by third party advertisers for advertising on third party or company websites are recorded when the contractual criteria has been met and amounts are due from third party advertisers.
	Deferred revenues primarily consist of billings or payments received in advance of revenue recognition from our subscription and professional services and support and maintenance revenues and are recognized as the revenue recognition criteria are met. We generally invoice our customers in monthly or quarterly installments for subscription revenue and as services are provided. Accordingly, the deferred revenues balance does not represent the total contract value of annual or multi-year non-cancelable subscription agreements.
Income Taxes	'
	Income taxes are provided for tax effects of transactions reported in the financial statements and consist of income taxes currently due plus deferred income taxes related to timing differences between the basis of certain assets and liabilities for financial statement and income tax reporting. Deferred taxes are determined based on the difference between the financial statement and tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect in the years in which the differences are expected to reverse. A valuation allowance is provided if, based upon the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
	We recognize tax benefits from uncertain tax positions only if it is “more-likely-than-not” that the position is sustainable, based on its technical merits. The tax benefit of a qualifying position is the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement with a taxing authority having full knowledge of all relevant information. Interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions may be classified in the financial statements as either income taxes or interest and other expense classification. We classify interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions as income tax expense.
Income or Loss Per Share	'
	Basic income or loss per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period, and excludes any dilutive effects of common stock equivalent shares, such as stock options and stock warrants. Diluted income or loss per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding and common stock equivalent shares outstanding during the period using the treasury stock method. Common stock equivalent shares are excluded from the computation if their effect is anti-dilutive, see Note 9.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards	'
	In July 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2013-11, "Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists" to bring conformity in the presentation of unrecognized tax benefits when a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward exists. ASU 2013-11 becomes effective for us on March 1, 2014. We do not believe the adoption of this guidance will have a material impact on our financial statements or notes to the financial statements.
	We reviewed other recently issued accounting pronouncements and determined they are either not applicable to our business or that no material effect is expected on our financial position, results of operations or disclosures.

PROPERTY_AND_EQUIPMENT_Tables

PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT (Tables)	12 Months Ended
	Feb. 28, 2014
Property And Equipment Tables	'
Property and equipment	'
	Property and equipment consisted of the following at February 28, 2014 and 2013:
		2014			2013
	Office equipment and software	$	1,152,586		$	1,503,872
	Furniture and fixtures		219,936			86,789
	Leasehold improvements		94,433			-
	Property and equipment		1,466,955			1,590,661
	Less: Accumulated depreciation		(1,144,327	)		(1,507,924	)
	Property and equipment, net	$	322,628		$	82,737

GOODWILL_AND_INTANGIBLE_ASSETS1

GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS (Tables)	12 Months Ended
	Feb. 28, 2014
Notes to Financial Statements	'
Changes in carrying amount of goodwill	'
	The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the years ended February 28, 2014 and February 28, 2013 are as follows:
	Balance as of February 29, 2012:	$	60,979,183
	Impairment		(25,919,000	)
	Balance as of February 28, 2013:		35,060,183
	Additions/Impairment		-
	Balance as of February 28, 2014:	$	35,060,183
Gross carrying value of components of intangible assets and accumulated amortization	'
	The following table presents the gross carrying value of the components of intangible assets and accumulated amortization:
					As of February 28, 2014
		Weighted Average Amortization Period			Gross Carrying Amount, net of impairment writedowns		Accumulated Amortization		Transferred from Held for Sale		Impairment Loss		Net Carrying Value
		(In months)
	Indefinite Lived Intangible:
	Trade name	Indefinite			$	8,700,000	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	8,700,000
	Definite Lived Intangible:
	Patent litigation		84			4,451,946		1,971,568		-		87,975		2,392,403
	Patents		120			623,600		125,125		3,123,016		3,028,771		592,720
	Acquired technology		60			7,270,000		3,919,750		-		-		3,350,250
	Customer relationships		60-72			12,850,000		6,682,292		-		-		6,167,708
	Software		36			2,095,705		2,095,705		-		-		-
	Non-compete agreements		36			212,000		212,000		-		-		-
	Trade names		24			44,000		44,000		-		-		-
	Total intangibles				$	36,247,251	$	15,050,440	$	3,123,016	$	3,116,746	$	21,203,081
					As of February 28, 2013
		Weighted Average Amortization Period			Gross Carrying Amount, net of impairment write downs		Accumulated Amortization		Transfer to Held for Sale		Impairment Loss		Net Carrying Value
		(In months)
	Indefinite Lived Intangible:
	Trade name	Indefinite			$	8,700,000	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	8,700,000
	Definite Lived Intangible:
	Patent litigation		84			7,567,290		1,060,109		-		3,528,386		2,978,795
	Patents		120			12,642,189		51,356		3,500,000		8,467,883		622,950
	Acquired technology		60			7,270,000		2,465,750		-		-		4,804,250
	Customer relationships		60-72			12,850,000		4,143,958		-		-		8,706,042
	Software		36			2,095,705		2,095,705		-		-		-
	Non-compete agreements		36			212,000		212,000		-		-		-
	Trade names		24			44,000		44,000		-		-		-
	Total intangibles				$	51,381,184	$	10,072,878	$	3,500,000	$	11,996,269	$	25,812,037
Schedule of the expected future amortization	'
	Amortization in future fiscal periods is expected to be as follows:
	2015	$	4,925,257
	2016		4,637,330
	2017		2,560,303
	2018		70,843
	2019		70,843
	Thereafter		238,505
	Total	$	12,503,081

INCOME_TAXES_Tables

INCOME TAXES (Tables)	12 Months Ended
	Feb. 28, 2014
Income Taxes Tables	'
Reconciliation between effective tax rate on income from continuing operations and federal statutory rate	'
		Years Ended February 28,
		2014			2013
	Current:
	Federal	$	-		$	-
	State		26			-
	Foreign		-			-
	Total Current		26			-
	Deferral:
	Federal		76			(2,245	)
	State		(217	)		(374	)
	Foreign		-			-
	Total Current		(141	)		(2,619	)
	Provision (Benefit) for income taxes	$	(115	)	$	(2,619	)
	The reconciliation between our effective tax rate on income from continuing operations and the federal statutory rate is as follows:
		Years Ended February 28,
		2014			2013
	Statutory rate		35	%		35	%
	State and local taxes, net of federal income tax benefit		4.3			2.8
	Change in valuation allowance		(35.2	)		(27.4	)
	Stock-based compensation		(3.2	)		(2.3	)
	Non-deductible expenses		(0.2	)		(0.1	)
	Goodwill impairment		-			(13.8	)
	Acquisition related contingent consideration		-			8.3
	Research tax credits		-			0.6
	Prior year adjustments - deferred true-ups		(0.1	)		0.8
	Change in state rate		(0.1	)		1
	Other		-			0.1
	Effective tax rate		0.5	%		5	%
Components of deferred tax assets and liabilities	'
		Years Ended February 28,
		2014			2013
	Deferred tax assets:
	Net operating loss carryforwards	$	26,473,022		$	21,529,307
	Tax credit carryforwards		307,657			307,657
	Stock-based compensation		2,428,865			2,028,017
	Property and equipment		302,854			279,953
	Trade accounts receivable		163,644			104,538
	Other		536,073			236,094
	Total deferred tax assets		30,212,115			24,485,566
	Less: valuation allowance		(29,690,511	)		(21,848,032	)
	Net deferred tax assets		521,604			2,637,534
	Deferred tax liabilities:
	Intangible assets		(3,881,586	)		(6,155,186	)
	Other		(16,401	)		-
	Net deferred tax assets/(liabilities)	$	(3,376,383	)	$	(3,517,652	)

SHAREBASED_PAYMENT_Tables

SHARE-BASED PAYMENT (Tables)	12 Months Ended
	Feb. 28, 2014
Disclosure of Compensation Related Costs, Share-based Payments [Abstract]	'
Assumptions used to value option grants	'
		Year Ended February 28,
		2014			2013
	Expected dividends		0	%		0	%
	Expected term (in years)		3.23			3.5
	Weighted-average volatility		70	%		63	%
	Risk-free rate		0.82	%		0.37 - 0.75	%
Assumptions used to value option exchange	'
		Pre-modification			Post-modification
	Weighted-average exercise price	$	2.4		$	0.42
	Expected term (in years)		3			2
	Weighted-average volatility		70	%		70	%
	Risk-free rate		0.79	%		0.39	%
	Expected dividends		0	%		0	%
Effect on results of operations of recording share-based compensation expense	'
		Year Ended February 28,
		2014			2013
	Selling and marketing	$	1,047,103		$	1,594,565
	Technology and development		749,207			1,069,186
	General and administrative		968,359			2,437,132
	Total stock option and warrant expense	$	2,764,669		$	5,100,883
Summary of activity for stock options	'
		Number of options			Weighted Average Exercise Price			Average Remaining Contractual Term (In Years)
	Options outstanding at February 28, 2012		20,153,219		$	2.09			4.07
	Granted		3,326,668			1.35
	Exercised		(602,092	)		0.51
	Cancelled		-			-
	Forfeited or expired		(5,503,863	)		2.31
	Options outstanding at February 28, 2013		17,373,932			2			2.99
	Granted		6,882,762			0.35
	Exercised		-			-
	Cancelled		(5,388,549	)		2.39
	Forfeited or expired		(4,815,167	)		2.09
	Options outstanding at February 28, 2014		14,052,978		$	1.02			2.9
	Options exercisable at February 28, 2014		8,589,996		$	1.44			1.74
Estimated fair values of stock warrant awards issued to service providers and employees	'
		Year Ended February 28,
		2014			2013
	Expected dividends		0	%		0	%
	Expected term (in years)		5			3.0 - 5.0
	Weighted-average volatility		70	%		63.4	%
	Risk-free rate		1.06	%		0.37 - .077	%
Summary of activity for warrants	'
		Number of Warrants			Weighted Average Exercise Price			Average Remaining Contractual Term (In Years)
	Warrants outstanding at February 28, 2012		10,787,641		$	1.86			2.8
	Granted		10,222,330			0.82
	Exercised		(1,000,000	)		1
	Forfeited and expired		(838,867	)		2.48
	Warrants outstanding at February 28, 2013		19,171,104			1.32			3.53
	Granted		8,740,668			0.61
	Exercised		-			-
	Forfeited and expired		(725,616	)		1.83
	Warrants outstanding at February 28, 2014		27,186,156		$	1.06			3.4
	Warrants exercisable at February 28, 2014		26,477,822		$	1.07			3.4
Summary shares of common stock reserved for future issuance	'
		Number of Shares
	Stock options outstanding		14,052,978
	Warrants outstanding		27,186,156
	Stock options available for future grant		3,632,602
	Common stock reserved for future issuance		44,871,736

CONTINGENCIES_Tables

CONTINGENCIES (Tables)	12 Months Ended
	Feb. 28, 2014
Contingencies Tables	'
Future minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating leases	'
	Fiscal year 2015	$	790,307
	Fiscal year 2016		583,822
	Fiscal year 2017		436,322
	Fiscal year 2018		449,408
	Fiscal year 2019		462,958
	Thereafter		158,083
	Total	$	2,880,900

QUARTERLY_FINANCIAL_INFORMATIO1

QUARTERLY FINANCIAL INFORMATION (UNAUDITED) (Tables)	12 Months Ended
	Feb. 28, 2014
Quarterly Financial Information Tables	'
Summary of quarterly financial information	'
	Summarized quarterly financial information for the years ended February 28, 2014 and 2013 is as follows:
		First			Second			Third			Fourth			Fiscal Year
	Fiscal 2014 quarter:
	Total revenues		5,865,564			7,592,735			6,425,887			6,806,532			26,690,718
	Operating loss		(6,014,403	)		(3,360,367	)		(5,259,979	)		(7,682,790	)		(22,317,539	)
	Net loss		(6,015,204	)		(3,374,255	)		(5,278,975	)		(7,586,355	)		(22,254,789	)
	Basic and diluted		(0.05	)		(0.03	)		(0.04	)		(0.05	)		(0.16	)
	Fiscal 2013 quarter:
	Total revenues		5,078,351			6,189,220			7,433,051			7,509,480			26,210,101
	Operating loss		(4,944,918	)		(7,160,379	)		(41,005,388	)		(10,482,483	)		(63,593,168	)
	Net loss		(4,942,273	)		(2,299,598	)		(33,706,071	)		(7,889,353	)		(48,837,295	)
	Basic and diluted		(0.05	)		(0.02	)		(0.31	)		(0.07	)		(0.47	)

DESCRIPTION_OF_BUSINESS_Detail

DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS (Details Narrative) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Feb. 28, 2014	Feb. 28, 2013
Notes to Financial Statements	'	'
Accumulated deficits	$133,648,333	$111,393,544
Proceeds from public offering	33,600,000	75,000,000
Financing transaction amount	9,600,000	22,000
Financing transaction investors	'13	'
Financing transaction price per share	$0.40	'
Common stock sold	23,900,000	'
Warrants issued	7,200,000	'
Warrant term	'5 years	'
Warrant exercise price	$0.60	'
Revolving loan facility line of credit	5,000,000	'
Borrowing base	90.00%	'
Line of credit borrowed	2,200,000	'
Line of credit available	$1,900,000	'
Line Of Credit Facility Borrowing Capacity Description	'Based upon a formula equal to 90% of eligible accounts receivable, decreasing to 80% of eligible accounts receivable plus the least of (i) 80% of Eligible 120 Day Accounts as defined in the Amended Agreement, (ii) $1,000,000, and (iii) 30% of the sum of all eligible accounts plus Eligible 120 Day Accounts after December 31, 2013 and the satisfaction of conditions specified in the Amended Agreement.	'

SUMMARY_OF_SIGNIFICANT_ACCOUNT2

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Details Narrative) (USD $)	Feb. 28, 2014	Feb. 28, 2013
Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies Details Narrative	'	'
Allowance for doubtful accounts	$400,500	$270,960

BUSINESS_COMBINATIONS_Details_

BUSINESS COMBINATIONS (Details Narative) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Feb. 28, 2014
GEOS [Member]	'
Fair value of the acquisition consideration	$4,200,000
Fair value contingent consideration, cash	355,000
Fair value contingent consideration, common stock, value	3,800,000
Fair value contingent consideration, common stock, shares	1,860,465
Fair value contingent consideration, common stock, share price	$2.05
Increase to carrying value of patents	2,600,000
Hipcricket Inc [Member]	'
Fair value of the acquisition consideration	62,800,000
Fair value contingent consideration, cash	23,300,000
Fair value contingent consideration, tax liabilities	200,000
Fair value contingent consideration, Net	25,200,000
Earn out payment	22,000,000
Gain from reduction of consideration due	$2,000,000

PROPERTY_AND_EQUIPMENT_Details

PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT (Details) (USD $)	Feb. 28, 2014	Feb. 28, 2013
Property and equipment	$1,466,955	$1,590,661
Less: Accumulated depreciation	-1,144,327	-1,507,924
Property and equipment, net	322,628	82,737
Office equipment and software	'	'
Property and equipment	1,152,586	1,503,872
Furniture and fixtures	'	'
Property and equipment	219,936	86,789
Leasehold improvements	'	'
Property and equipment	$94,433	'

PROPERTY_AND_EQUIPMENT_Details1

PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT (Details Narrative) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Feb. 28, 2014	Feb. 28, 2013
Property And Equipment Details Narrative	'	'
Depreciation expense	$119,568	$209,355

GOODWILL_AND_INTANGIBLE_ASSETS2

GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS (Details) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Feb. 28, 2014	Feb. 28, 2013
Goodwill And Intangible Assets Details	'	'
Balance at beginning of year:	$35,060,183	$60,979,183
Goodwill acquired	'	'
Impairment	'	-25,919,000
Balance at of end of year:	$35,060,183	$35,060,183

GOODWILL_AND_INTANGIBLE_ASSETS3

GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS (Details 1) (USD $)

Feb. 28, 2014

Feb. 28, 2013

Feb. 28, 2014

Feb. 28, 2013

Feb. 28, 2014

Feb. 28, 2013

Feb. 28, 2014

Feb. 28, 2013

Feb. 28, 2014

Feb. 28, 2013

Feb. 28, 2014

Feb. 28, 2013

Feb. 28, 2014

Feb. 28, 2012

Feb. 28, 2014

Feb. 28, 2013

Feb. 28, 2014

Feb. 28, 2013

Feb. 28, 2014

Feb. 28, 2013

Feb. 28, 2014

Feb. 28, 2013

Patent litigation

Patent litigation

Patents

Patents

Acquired technology

Acquired technology

Customer relationships

Customer relationships

Customer relationships

Customer relationships

Customer relationships

Customer relationships

Software

Software

Non-compete agreements

Non-compete agreements

Trade names

Trade names

Trade Names [Member]

Trade Names [Member]

Minimum [Member]

Minimum [Member]

Maximum [Member]

Maximum [Member]

Weighted Average Amortization Period (In months)

'

'

'84 months

'84 months

'120 months

'120 months

'60 months

'60 months

'

'

'60 months

'60 months

'72 months

'72 months

'36 months

'36 months

'36 months

'36 months

'24 months

'24 months

'

'

Gross Carrying Amount

$36,247,251

$51,381,184

$4,451,946

$7,567,290

$623,600

$12,642,189

$7,270,000

$7,270,000

$12,850,000

$12,850,000

'

'

'

'

$2,095,705

$2,095,705

$212,000

$212,000

$44,000

$44,000

$8,700,000

$8,700,000

Accumulated Amortization

15,050,440

10,072,878

1,971,568

1,060,109

125,125

51,356

3,919,750

2,465,750

6,682,292

4,143,958

'

'

'

'

2,095,705

2,095,705

212,000

212,000

44,000

44,000

'

'

Transfer to Held For Sale

3,123,016

3,500,000

'

'

3,123,016

3,500,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Impairment Loss

3,116,746

11,996,269

87,975

3,528,386

3,028,771

8,467,883

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Net Carrying Value

$21,203,081

$25,812,037

$2,392,403

$2,978,795

$592,720

$622,950

$3,350,250

$4,804,250

$6,167,708

$8,706,042

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

$8,700,000

$8,700,000

GOODWILL_AND_INTANGIBLE_ASSETS4

GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS (Details 2) (USD $)	Feb. 28, 2014
Goodwill And Intangible Assets Details 2	'
2015	$4,925,257
2016	4,637,330
2017	2,560,303
2018	70,843
2019	70,843
Thereafter	238,505
Total	$12,503,081

GOODWILL_AND_INTANGIBLE_ASSETS5

GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS (Details Narrative) (USD $)	3 Months Ended		12 Months Ended
	Feb. 28, 2014	Nov. 30, 2013	Feb. 28, 2014	Feb. 28, 2013
Impairment loss	'	'	'	($25,919,000)
Additional impairment expense	3,100,000	376,984	'	'
Amortization of intangible assets	'	'	5,100,000	5,800,000
Goodwill	35,060,183	'	35,060,183	35,060,183
Millennial Media Inc [Member]	'	'	'	'
Additional impairment expense	'	'	$87,975	'

INCOME_TAXES_Details

INCOME TAXES (Details)	12 Months Ended
	Feb. 28, 2014	Feb. 28, 2013
Income Taxes Details	'	'
Statutory rate	3500.00%	3500.00%
State and local taxes, net of federal income tax benefit	430.00%	280.00%
Change in valuation allowance	-3520.00%	-2740.00%
Stock-based compensation	-320.00%	-230.00%
Non-deductible expenses	-20.00%	-10.00%
Goodwill impairment	'	-1380.00%
Acquisition related contingent consideration	'	830.00%
Research tax credits	'	60.00%
Prior year adjustments - deferred true-ups	-10.00%	80.00%
Change in state rate	-10.00%	100.00%
Other	'	10.00%
Effective tax rate	50.00%	500.00%

INCOME_TAXES_Details_1

INCOME TAXES (Details 1) (USD $)	Feb. 28, 2014	Feb. 28, 2013
Deferred tax assets:	'	'
Net operating loss carryforwards	$26,473,022	$21,529,307
Tax credit carryforwards	307,657	307,657
Stock-based compensation	2,428,865	2,028,017
Property and equipment	302,854	279,953
Trade accounts receivable	163,644	104,538
Other	536,073	236,094
Total deferred tax assets	30,212,115	24,485,566
Less: valuation allowance	-29,690,511	-21,848,032
Net deferred tax assets	521,604	2,637,534
Deferred tax liabilities:	'	'
Intangible assets	-3,881,586	-6,155,186
Other	-16,401	'
Net deferred tax assets/(liabilities)	($3,376,383)	($3,517,652)

INCOME_TAXES_Details_2

INCOME TAXES (Details 2) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Feb. 28, 2014	Feb. 28, 2013
Current:	'	'
Federal	'	'
State	26,000	'
Foreign	'	'
Total Current	26,000	'
Deferred:	'	'
Federal	76,000	-2,245,000
State	-217,000	-374,000
Foreign	'	'
Total Deferred:	-141,269	-2,618,723
Provision (Benefit) for income taxes	($115,092)	($2,618,723)

INCOME_TAXES_Details_Narrative

INCOME TAXES (Details Narrative) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Feb. 28, 2014	Feb. 28, 2013
Income Taxes Details Narrative	'	'
Increase in valuation allowance	$7,800,000	'
Decrease in the deferred tax liabilities	2,300,000	'
Increase in deferred tax assets related to federal and state net operating losses	4,900,000	'
Federal net operating loss carryforwards	'	65,600,000
Federal net operating loss carryforwards Expiry	'	'2025 to 2033
State net operating loss carryfowards	'	$45,500,000
State net operating loss carryfowards Expiry	'	'2014 to 2033

STOCKHOLDERS_EQUITY_Details_Na

STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (Details Narrative) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Feb. 28, 2014	Feb. 28, 2013
Share increase	25,100,000	'
Financing transaction amount	$9,600,000	$22,000
Financing transaction investors	'13	'
Financing transaction price per share	$0.40	'
Common stock sold	23,900,000	'
Warrants issued	7,200,000	'
Warrant term	'5 years	'
Warrant exercise price	$0.60	'
Common stock issued pursuant to compensation plan	2,454,151	4,438,272
Shares issued for services	310,518	662,611
Shares issued for option and warrant exercises	'	1,600,000
Shares of common stock, shares	'	1,900,000
Director [Member]	'	'
Shares issued for services	268,380	'
Consultant [Member]	'	'
Shares issued for services	100,000	'
Counsel [Member]	'	'
Shares issued for services	500,000	500,000
Placement Agent [Member]	'	'
Warrants issued	596,875	'
Warrant term	'10 years	'
Warrant exercise price	$0.60	'
Shares issued for services	354,310	'
Placement Agent Issuance 2 [Member]	'	'
Warrants issued	106,293	'
Warrant term	'5 years	'
Warrant exercise price	$0.60	'
Sale of Stock 1 [Member]	'	'
Financing transaction amount	'	6,200,000
Offering costs	'	600,000
Common stock sold	'	8,500,000
Sale of stock price per share	'	$0.80
Warrants issued	'	2,125,000
Warrant exercise price	'	$0.96
Sale of Stock 2 [Member]	'	'
Financing transaction amount	'	5,900,000
Offering costs	'	$700,000
Common stock sold	'	13,500,000
Sale of stock price per share	'	$0.49
Warrants issued	'	6,700,000
Warrant exercise price	'	$0.66
Hipcricket	'	'
Shares of common stock, shares	9,200,000	'

SHAREBASED_PAYMENTS_Details

SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS (Details) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Feb. 28, 2014	Feb. 28, 2013
Total stock option and warrant expense	$2,764,669	$5,100,883
Selling and Marketing Expense [Member]	'	'
Total stock option and warrant expense	1,047,103	1,594,565
Technology and development	'	'
Total stock option and warrant expense	749,207	1,069,186
General and Administrative Expense [Member]	'	'
Total stock option and warrant expense	$968,359	$2,437,132

SHAREBASED_PAYMENTS_Details_1

SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS (Details 1)	12 Months Ended
	Feb. 28, 2014	Feb. 28, 2013	Feb. 28, 2012
Expected term (in years)	'2 years 10 months 24 days	'2 years 11 months 27 days	'4 years 0 months 26 days
Stock Options [Member]	'	'	'
Expected dividends	0.00%	0.00%	'
Expected term (in years)	'3 years 2 months 23 days	'3 years 6 months	'
Weighted-average volatility	70.00%	63.00%	'
Risk-free rate minimum	82.00%	37.00%	'
Risk-free rate maximum	'	75.00%	'

SHAREBASED_PAYMENTS_Details_2

SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS (Details 2) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Feb. 28, 2014	Feb. 28, 2013	Feb. 28, 2012
Weighted-average exercise price	$0.35	$1.35	'
Expected term (in years)	'2 years 10 months 24 days	'2 years 11 months 27 days	'4 years 0 months 26 days
Exchange Traded Options [Member]	'	'	'
Weighted-average exercise price	$2.40	'	'
Expected dividends	0.00%	'	'
Expected term (in years)	'3 years	'	'
Weighted-average volatility	70.00%	'	'
Risk-free rate minimum	79.00%	'	'
PostModification [Member]	'	'	'
Weighted-average exercise price	$0.42	'	'
Expected dividends	0.00%	'	'
Expected term (in years)	'2 years	'	'
Weighted-average volatility	70.00%	'	'
Risk-free rate minimum	39.00%	'	'

SHAREBASED_PAYMENTS_Details_3

SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS (Details 3) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Feb. 28, 2014	Feb. 28, 2013	Feb. 28, 2012
Notes to Financial Statements	'	'	'
Options outstanding beginning	17,373,932	20,153,219	'
Granted	6,882,762	3,326,668	'
Cancelled	-5,388,549	'	'
Forfeited or expired	-4,815,167	-5,503,863	'
Options outstanding ending	14,052,978	17,373,932	'
Weighted Average Exercise Price Beginning	$2	$2.09	'
Granted	$0.35	$1.35	'
Exercised	'	$0.51	'
Cancelled	$2.39	'	'
Forfeited or expired	$2.09	$2.31	'
Weighted Average Exercise Price Ending	$1.02	$2	'
Weighted Average Exercise Price Exercisable	$1.44	'	'
Average remaining contractual term	'2 years 10 months 24 days	'2 years 11 months 27 days	'4 years 0 months 26 days
Average remaining contractual term exercisable	'1 year 8 months 27 days	'	'

SHAREBASED_PAYMENTS_Details_4

SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS (Details 4)	12 Months Ended
	Feb. 28, 2014	Feb. 28, 2013	Feb. 28, 2012
Expected term (in years)	'2 years 10 months 24 days	'2 years 11 months 27 days	'4 years 0 months 26 days
Warrant [Member]	'	'	'
Expected dividends	0.00%	0.00%	'
Expected term (in years)	'5 years	'	'
Weighted-average volatility	70.00%	63.40%	'
Risk-free rate	106.00%	0.37%	'
Risk-free rate maximum	'	0.77%	'
Warrant [Member] | Minimum [Member]	'	'	'
Expected term (in years)	'	'3 years	'
Warrant [Member] | Maximum [Member]	'	'	'
Expected term (in years)	'	'5 years	'

SHAREBASED_PAYMENTS_Details_5

SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS (Details 5) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Feb. 28, 2014	Feb. 28, 2013	Feb. 28, 2012
Options outstanding beginning	17,373,932	20,153,219	'
Granted	6,882,762	3,326,668	'
Forfeited	-4,815,167	-5,503,863	'
Options outstanding ending	14,052,978	17,373,932	'
Weighted Average Exercise Price Beginning	$2	$2.09	'
Granted	$0.35	$1.35	'
Exercised	'	$0.51	'
Forfeited	$2.09	$2.31	'
Weighted Average Exercise Price Ending	$1.02	$2	'
Weighted Average Exercise Price Exercisable	$1.44	'	'
Average remaining contractual term, end of period	'2 years 10 months 24 days	'2 years 11 months 27 days	'4 years 0 months 26 days
Average remaining contractual term exercisable	'1 year 8 months 27 days	'	'
Warrant [Member]	'	'	'
Options outstanding beginning	19,171,104	10,787,641	'
Granted	8,740,668	10,222,330	'
Exercised	'	-1,000,000	'
Forfeited	-725,616	-838,867	'
Options outstanding ending	27,186,156	19,171,104	'
Options exercisable	26,477,822	'	'
Weighted Average Exercise Price Beginning	$1.32	$1.86	'
Granted	$0.61	$0.82	'
Exercised	'	$1	'
Forfeited	$1.83	$2.48	'
Weighted Average Exercise Price Ending	$1.06	$1.32	'
Weighted Average Exercise Price Exercisable	$1.07	'	'
Average remaining contractual term, end of period	'5 years	'	'
Average remaining contractual term exercisable	'3 years 4 months 24 days	'	'

SHAREBASED_PAYMENTS_Details_6

SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS (Details 6)	Feb. 28, 2014
Share-Based Payments Details 6	'
Stock options outstanding	14,052,978
Warrants outstanding	27,186,156
Stock options available for future grant	3,632,602
Common stock reserved for future issuance	44,871,736

SHAREBASED_PAYMENTS_Details_Na

SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS (Details Narrative) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Feb. 28, 2014	Feb. 28, 2013	Feb. 29, 2012
Shares outstanding	14,052,978	17,373,932	20,153,219
Shares available for future grant	3,632,602	'	'
Intrinsic value of options exercised	'	'	'
Stock Options [Member]	'	'	'
Options exchanged	5,460,424	'	'
Replacement options issued	1,261,710	'	'
Option exercise price	$0.42	'	'
Options vested	846,516	'	'
Options non yet vested	415,194	'	'
Options issued covering shares of common stock	1,500,000	'	'
Aggregate intrinsic value of the exercisable options	22,390	'	'
Aggregate intrinsic value of the exercisable options, Per share	$0.35	'	'
Exercise prices of options outstanding, Lower limit	$0.25	'	'
Exercise prices of options outstanding, upper limit	$3.90	'	'
Weighted average expected life	'2 years 8 months 20 days	'	'
Weighted average fair value of options granted	$0.16	$0.56	'
Intrinsic value of options exercised	0	800,000	'
Warrant [Member]	'	'	'
Shares outstanding	27,186,156	19,171,104	10,787,641
Unrecognized share-based payment expense	90,900	'	'
Exercise prices of options outstanding, Lower limit	$0.39	'	'
Exercise prices of options outstanding, upper limit	$4	'	'
Weighted average expected life	'1 year 9 months 18 days	'	'
Weighted average fair value of options granted	$0.23	$0.49	'
Intrinsic value of options exercised	$0	$600,000	'
2014 Equity Plan [Member]	'	'	'
Authorized for issuance	12,000,000	'	'
2010 Incentive Plan [Member]	'	'	'
Reserved for issuance	15,000,000	'	'
Shares outstanding	10,100,000	'	'
Shares issued	1,100,000	'	'
Shares available for future grant	3,600,000	'	'
2004 Stock Plan [Member]	'	'	'
Reserved for issuance	2,000,000	'	'
Shares issued	1,800,000	'	'

LOSS_PER_SHARE_Details_Narrati

LOSS PER SHARE (Details Narrative)	12 Months Ended
	Feb. 28, 2014
Options [Member]	'
Anti-dilutive securities excluded from computation of loss per share	8,600,000
Warrant [Member]	'
Anti-dilutive securities excluded from computation of loss per share	26,500,000

CONTINGENCIES_Details

CONTINGENCIES (Details) (USD $)	Feb. 28, 2014
Contingencies Details	'
Fiscal year 2015	$790,307
Fiscal year 2016	583,822
Fiscal year 2017	436,322
Fiscal year 2018	449,408
Fiscal year 2019	462,958
Thereafter	158,083
Total	$2,880,900

CONTINGENCIES_Details_Narrativ

CONTINGENCIES (Details Narrative) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Feb. 28, 2014	Feb. 28, 2013
Rent expense operating leases	$814,244	$906,151
Sublease income	$204,750	'
Minimum [Member]	'	'
Rental term	'1 year	'
Maximum [Member]	'	'
Rental term	'5 years 6 months	'

CONCENTRATION_OF_RISK_Details_

CONCENTRATION OF RISK (Details Narrative)	12 Months Ended		12 Months Ended
	Feb. 28, 2014	Feb. 28, 2013	Feb. 28, 2013	Feb. 28, 2014	Feb. 28, 2013
	Three Customers [Member]	Three Customers [Member]	Two Customers [Member]	Largest Customer [Member]	Largest Customers [Member]
Revenue major customer percentage	15.00%	'	16.00%	'	'
Customers accounted accounts receivables	22.00%	23.00%	'	11.00%	9.00%

LINE_OF_CREDIT_Details_Narrati

LINE OF CREDIT (Details Narrative) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Feb. 28, 2014
Line Of Credit Details Narrative	'
Revolving loan facility line of credit	$5,000,000
Borrowing base	90.00%
Line of credit borrowed	2,200,000
Line of credit available	1,900,000
Line Of Credit Facility Borrowing Capacity Description	'Based upon a formula equal to 90% of eligible accounts receivable, decreasing to 80% of eligible accounts receivable plus the least of (i) 80% of Eligible 120 Day Accounts as defined in the Amended Agreement, (ii) $1,000,000, and (iii) 30% of the sum of all eligible accounts plus Eligible 120 Day Accounts after December 31, 2013 and the satisfaction of conditions specified in the Amended Agreement.
LOC Interest rate above prime	1.25%
LOC Interest rate above prime, streamline period	0.75%
Streamline rate, Unrestricted cash value trigger	$4,000,000
LOC Quarterly fee	0.25%
LOC Minimum tangible net worth and other terms	'The loan agreement also requires us to maintain a minimum tangible net worth of at least negative $1.25 million, increasing (i) at the end of each month by 50% of the proceeds of issuances of equity securities and the principal amount of any subordinated debt received during such month, (ii) at the end of each calendar quarter 50% of net income for such quarter and (iii) immediately by 1.5x the cash received by us from the sale of any intellectual property minus any realized gain or plus any realized loss associated with the sale of such intellectual property.

QUARTERLY_FINANCIAL_INFORMATIO2

QUARTERLY FINANCIAL INFORMATION (UNAUDITED) (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended								12 Months Ended
	Feb. 28, 2014	Nov. 30, 2013	Aug. 31, 2013	31-May-13	Feb. 28, 2013	Nov. 30, 2012	Aug. 31, 2012	31-May-12	Feb. 28, 2014	Feb. 28, 2013
Quarterly Financial Information Details	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'	'
Total revenues	$6,806,532	$6,425,887	$7,592,735	$5,865,564	$7,509,480	$7,433,051	$6,189,220	$5,078,351	$26,690,718	$26,210,101
Operating loss	-7,682,790	-5,259,979	-3,360,367	-6,014,403	-10,482,483	-41,005,388	-7,160,379	-4,944,918	-22,317,539	-63,593,168
NET LOSS	($7,586,355)	($5,278,975)	($3,374,255)	($6,015,204)	($7,889,353)	($33,706,071)	($2,299,598)	($4,942,273)	($22,254,789)	($48,837,295)
NET LOSS PER SHARE - basic and diluted	($0.05)	($0.04)	($0.03)	($0.05)	($0.07)	($0.31)	($0.02)	($0.05)	($0.16)	($0.47)