Exhibit 99.1
The following information regarding the trust portfolio is as of August 31, 2019.
For purposes of the tables below, “Number of Accounts” refers to all accounts in the trust portfolio, including any accounts that are inactive accounts and zero-balance accounts, which in some cases may be closed accounts that have not yet been removed from the originator’s computer system and from the trust portfolio. Because the future composition of the trust portfolio will change over time, these tables are not indicative of the composition of the trust portfolio at any subsequent time.
Composition by Retailer Type
Trust Portfolio
Retailer Type | | Percentage of Total Principal Receivables |
Soft goods | | 56.15% |
Furniture | | 21.52% |
Jewelry | | 14.02% |
Department Store | | 7.68% |
Other | | |
Total(1) | | |
________________________________
(1) Percentages may not add up to the total due to rounding.
The table immediately below sets forth the companies, including each of their respective affiliates, that have credit card programs, or groups of credit card programs, that account for more than 7.5% of principal receivables balances in the trust portfolio as of August 31, 2019. Except for the three companies listed below, no other company’s credit card program, or group of credit card programs, accounts for more than 7.5% of the principal receivables in the trust portfolio as of August 31, 2019.
Composition by Retailer Group of
Trust Portfolio
(Dollars in Thousands; Accounts in Thousands)
Retailer Group(1) | | Number of Accounts | | | Percentage
of Total Number of Accounts | | | Principal Receivables | | | Percentage of Total Principal Receivables | |
L Brands, Inc. Retail Group | | | 13,763 | | | | 22.26 | % | | $ | 1,589,242 | | | | 21.74 | % |
Signet Retail Group | | | 2,740 | | | | 4.43 | % | | $ | 924,466 | | | | 12.65 | % |
Ascena Retail Group Inc. | | | 7,261 | | | | 11.74 | % | | $ | 697,437 | | | | 9.54 | % |
Retailer Groups less than 7.5% | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total(2)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
________________________________
(1) Includes each individual retailer in the trust commonly owned by the retailer group.
(2) Amounts and percentages may not add up to the total due to rounding.
Composition by Individual Retailer of
Trust Portfolio
(Dollars in Thousands; Accounts in Thousands)
Retailer | | Number of Accounts | | | Percentage of Total Number of Accounts | | | Principal Receivables | | | Percentage of Total Principal Receivables | |
Victoria's Secret PL | | | 13,730 | | | | 22.21 | % | | $ | 1,587,134 | | | | 21.71 | % |
Wayfair PL | | | 1,777 | | | | 2.87 | % | | $ | 631,112 | | | | 8.63 | % |
Kay Jewelers PL | | | 1,996 | | | | 3.23 | % | | $ | 625,724 | | | | 8.56 | % |
Lane Bryant PL | | | 2,713 | | | | 4.39 | % | | $ | 372,164 | | | | 5.09 | % |
Express PL | | | 2,768 | | | | 4.48 | % | | $ | 309,963 | | | | 4.24 | % |
Pottery Barn PL | | | 1,145 | | | | 1.85 | % | | $ | 288,923 | | | | 3.95 | % |
Jared PL | | | 637 | | | | 1.03 | % | | $ | 279,955 | | | | 3.83 | % |
New York & Company PL | | | 2,789 | | | | 4.51 | % | | $ | 273,620 | | | | 3.74 | % |
Ann Taylor PL | | | 3,717 | | | | 6.01 | % | | $ | 228,477 | | | | 3.13 | % |
Torrid | | | 1,119 | | | | 1.81 | % | | $ | 227,977 | | | | 3.12 | % |
Other Retailers(1) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total(2)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
________________________________
(1) Retailers individually representing a lesser percentage of principal receivables balances in the trust portfolio as of August 31, 2019.
(2) Amounts and percentages may not add up to the total due to rounding.
Composition by Account Balance
Trust Portfolio
(Dollars in Thousands; Accounts in Thousands)
Account Balance Range | | | Number of Accounts | | | Percentage
of Total Number of Accounts | | | Principal Receivables | | | Percentage of Total Principal Receivables | |
Credit Balance | | | | 306 | | | | 0.49 | % | | $ | (13,468 | ) | | | (0.18 | %) |
No Balance | | | | 48,422 | | | | 78.32 | % | | $ | - | | | | - | |
$0.01 - $50.00 | | | | 1,665 | | | | 2.69 | % | | $ | 47,189 | | | | 0.65 | % |
$50.01 - $100.00 | | | | 1,712 | | | | 2.77 | % | | $ | 127,609 | | | | 1.75 | % |
$100.01 - $150.00 | | | | 1,252 | | | | 2.03 | % | | $ | 155,337 | | | | 2.13 | % |
$150.01 - $250.00 | | | | 1,824 | | | | 2.95 | % | | $ | 359,876 | | | | 4.92 | % |
$250.01 - $350.00 | | | | 1,103 | | | | 1.78 | % | | $ | 327,328 | | | | 4.48 | % |
$350.01 - $500.00 | | | | 1,168 | | | | 1.89 | % | | $ | 493,356 | | | | 6.75 | % |
$500.01 - $1,000.00 | | | | 2,276 | | | | 3.68 | % | | $ | 1,642,788 | | | | 22.48 | % |
$1,000.01 - $1,500.00
|
| | | | 1,004 | | | | 1.62 | % | | $ | 1,222,124 | | | | 16.72 | % |
$1,500.01 or more | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total(1) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
________________________________
(1) Amounts and percentages may not add up to the total due to rounding.
Composition by Credit Limit
Trust Portfolio
(Dollars in Thousands; Accounts in Thousands)
Credit Limit Range | | | Number of Accounts | | | Percentage of Total Number of Accounts | | | Principal Receivables | | | Percentage of Total Principal Receivables | |
No Credit Limit | | | | 1,855 | | | | 3.00 | % | | $ | 15,617 | | | | 0.21 | % |
$0.01 - $100.00 | | | | 778 | | | | 1.26 | % | | $ | 12,221 | | | | 0.17 | % |
$100.01 - $250.00 | | | | 4,738 | | | | 7.66 | % | | $ | 159,214 | | | | 2.18 | % |
$250.01 - $350.00 | | | | 1,929 | | | | 3.12 | % | | $ | 98,162 | | | | 1.34 | % |
$350.01 - $500.00 | | | | 3,852 | | | | 6.23 | % | | $ | 218,506 | | | | 2.99 | % |
$500.01 - $750.00 | | | | 8,537 | | | | 13.81 | % | | $ | 399,227 | | | | 5.46 | % |
$750.01 - $1,000.00 | | | | 13,467 | | | | 21.78 | % | | $ | 547,227 | | | | 7.49 | % |
$1,000.01 - $1,250.00 | | | | 3,473 | | | | 5.62 | % | | $ | 484,177 | | | | 6.62 | % |
$1,250.01 - $1,500.00 | | | | 4,795 | | | | 7.76 | % | | $ | 546,072 | | | | 7.47 | % |
$1,500.01 - $2,000.00 | | | | 5,153 | | | | 8.33 | % | | $ | 980,701 | | | | 13.42 | % |
$2,000.01 - $2,500.00 | | | | 1,895 | | | | 3.06 | % | | $ | 674,265 | | | | 9.23 | % |
$2,500.01 or more | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total(1) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
________________________________
(1) | Amounts and percentages may not add up to the total due to rounding. |
Composition by Account Age
Trust Portfolio
(Dollars in Thousands; Accounts in Thousands)
Account Age Range | | Number of Accounts | | | Percentage of Total Number of Accounts | | | Principal Receivables | | | Percentage of Total Principal Receivables | |
Not More than 12 Months | | | 6,941 | | | | 11.23 | % | | $ | 1,440,667 | | | | 19.71 | % |
Over 12 Months to 24 Months | | | 6,541 | | | | 10.58 | % | | $ | 940,312 | | | | 12.87 | % |
Over 24 Months to 36 Months | | | 6,515 | | | | 10.54 | % | | $ | 852,280 | | | | 11.66 | % |
Over 36 Months to 48 Months | | | 7,096 | | | | 11.48 | % | | $ | 783,684 | | | | 10.72 | % |
Over 48 Months to 60 Months | | | 6,412 | | | | 10.37 | % | | $ | 654,839 | | | | 8.96 | % |
Over 60 Months | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total(1) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
________________________________
(1) | Amounts and percentages may not add up to the total due to rounding. |
Cardholders whose accounts are designated for the trust portfolio had billing addresses in all 50 states, the District of Columbia and other U.S. territories, except for approximately 0.25% of the principal receivables balance for the trust for which cardholders had billing addresses located outside of the United States, the District of Columbia or other U.S. territories. Except for the five states listed below, no state accounted for more than 5% of the number of accounts or 5% of the total principal receivables balances as of August 31, 2019.
Composition by Billing Address
Trust Portfolio
State | | Percentage of Total Number of Accounts | | Percentage of Total Principal Receivables |
Texas | | 8.46% | | 11.24% |
California | | 9.09% | | 10.41% |
Florida | | 7.50% | | 7.57% |
New York | | 7.53% | | 7.01% |
Illinois | | 4.61% | | 5.27% |
The bank uses credit bureau scoring and a proprietary scoring model developed for the bank as tools in the underwriting process and for making credit decisions. The bank uses credit bureau scoring and a proprietary scoring model also for purposes of monitoring obligor credit quality. The bank’s proprietary scoring model is based on historical data and requires the bank to make various assumptions about future performance. As a result, the bank’s proprietary model is not intended, and should not be relied upon, to forecast actual future performance.
Information regarding customer performance is factored into these proprietary scoring models to determine the probability of an account becoming 91 or more days past due or becoming charged off at any time within the next 12 months. Obligor credit quality is monitored at least monthly during the life of an account. The information in the table below is based on the most recent information available for each account in the trust portfolio. Because the future composition of the trust portfolio will change over time, obligor credit quality as shown in the table below is not indicative of obligor credit quality for the trust portfolio at any subsequent time. In addition, the bank’s assessment of obligor credit quality may change over time depending on the conduct of the cardholder and changes in the proprietary scoring models used by the bank.
Composition by Obligor Credit Quality
Trust Portfolio
(Dollars in Thousands)
Probability of an Account Becoming 91 or More Days Past Due or Becoming Charged-off (within the next 12 months) | | | Principal Receivables | | | Percentage of Total Principal Receivables | |
No Score | | | $ | 61,606 | | | | 0.84 | % |
27.1% and higher | | | $ | 741,381 | | | | 10.14 | % |
17.1% – 27.0% |
|
| $ | 492,798 |
|
|
| 6.74 | % |
12.6% – 17.0% | | | $ | 488,961 | | | | 6.69 | % |
3.7% – 12.5% | | | $ | 3,140,596 | | | | 42.97 | % |
1.9% – 3.6% | | | $ | 1,234,815 | | | | 16.89 | % |
Lower than 1.9%% | | | | | | | | | |
Total(1) | | | | | | | | | |
________________________________
(1) Amounts and percentages may not add up to the total due to rounding.