Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | 6 Months Ended |
Jun. 30, 2014 |
Accounting Policies [Abstract] | ' |
Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | ' |
1. Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
|
The accompanying interim condensed financial statements are unaudited, but in the opinion of management of Reed’s, Inc. (the “Company”), contain all adjustments, which include normal recurring adjustments necessary to present fairly the financial position at June 30, 2014 and the results of operations and cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013. The balance sheet as of December 31, 2013 is derived from the Company’s audited financial statements. |
|
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements that have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, although management of the Company believes that the disclosures contained in these condensed financial statements are adequate to make the information presented herein not misleading. For further information, refer to the financial statements and the notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 25, 2014. |
|
The results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2014 are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations to be expected for the full fiscal year ending December 31, 2014. |
|
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expense during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Those estimates and assumptions include estimates for reserves of uncollectible accounts, inventory obsolescence, analysis of impairments of recorded intangibles, accruals for potential liabilities and assumptions made in valuing stock instruments issued for services. |
|
Income (Loss) per Common Share |
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing the net income (loss) applicable to common stock holders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the year. Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing the net income applicable to common stock holders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding plus the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if all dilutive potential common shares had been issued, using the treasury stock method. Potential common shares are excluded from the computation when their effect is antidilutive. |
|
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 the calculations of diluted earnings per share included stock options and warrants, calculated under the treasury stock method, and excluded preferred stock since the effect was antidilutive. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 the calculations of basic and diluted loss per share are the same. The calculation of weighted average shares outstanding – diluted is as follows: |
|
| | Three months ended | | | Six months ended | |
| | June 30, | | | June 30, | |
| | | 2014 | | | | 2013 | | | | 2014 | | | | 2013 | |
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders | | $ | 633,000 | | | $ | (499,000 | ) | | $ | 413,000 | | | $ | (902,000 | ) |
Denominator: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Weighted average shares outstanding - basic | | | 13,046,631 | | | | 12,543,983 | | | | 13,025,195 | | | | 12,413,958 | |
Effect of dilutive instruments: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Warrants and options | | | 209,993 | | | | – | | | | 272,919 | | | | – | |
Weighted average shares outstanding-diluted | | | 13,256,624 | | | | 12,543,983 | | | | 13,298,114 | | | | 12,413,958 | |
|
The Company had potentially dilutive securities that consisted of: |
|
| | 30-Jun-14 | | | 30-Jun-13 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Warrants | | | 101,963 | | | | 317,253 | | | | | | | | | |
Series A Preferred Stock | | | 37,644 | | | | 41,644 | | | | | | | | | |
Options | | | 648,967 | | | | 839,669 | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | | 788,574 | | | | 1,198,566 | | | | | | | | | |
|
Recent Accounting Pronouncements |
|
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09 (ASU 2014-09), Revenue from Contracts with Customers. ASU 2014-09 will eliminate transaction- and industry-specific revenue recognition guidance under current U.S. GAAP and replace it with a principle based approach for determining revenue recognition. ASU 2014-09 will require that companies recognize revenue based on the value of transferred goods or services as they occur in the contract. The ASU also will require additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments and assets recognized from costs incurred to obtain or fulfill a contract. ASU 2014-09 is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and early adoption is not permitted. Entities can transition to the standard either retrospectively or as a cumulative-effect adjustment as of the date of adoption. Management is currently assessing the impact the adoption of ASU 2014-09 and has not determined the effect of the standard on our ongoing financial reporting. |
|
In April 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-08 (ASU 2014-08), Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant and Equipment (Topic 360). ASU 2014-08 amends the requirements for reporting discontinued operations and requires additional disclosures about discontinued operations. Under the new guidance, only disposals representing a strategic shift in operations or that have a major effect on the Company’s operations and financial results should be presented as discontinued operations. This new accounting guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2014. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting ASU 2014-08 on the Company’s results of operations or financial condition. |
|
Other recent accounting pronouncements issued by the FASB, including its Emerging Issues Task Force, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, and the Securities and Exchange Commission did not or are not believed by management to have a material impact on the Company’s present or future consolidated financial statements. |
|
Concentrations |
|
The Company’s cash balances on deposit with banks are guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation up to $250,000. The Company may be exposed to risk for the amounts of funds held in one bank in excess of the insurance limit. In assessing the risk, the Company’s policy is to maintain cash balances with high quality financial institutions. The Company had cash balances in excess of the guarantee during the six months ended June 30, 2014. |
|
During the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, the Company had two customers which accounted for approximately 39.4% and 10% of sales in 2014, and 34% and 9% of sales in 2013, respectively. During the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, the Company had two customers which accounted for approximately 37% and 11% of sales in 2014, and 34% and 10% of sales in 2013, respectively. No other customers accounted for more than 10% of sales in either year. As of June 30, 2014, the Company had accounts receivable due from a customer who comprised $1,182,000 (37%) of its total accounts receivable and as of December 31, 2013 the Company had accounts receivable due from two customers who comprised $571,000 (23%), and $424,000 (17%), respectively, of its total accounts receivable. |
|
During the six months ended June 30, 2014, the Company had one vendor which accounted for approximately 26% of purchases, and in the six months ended June 30, 2013 one vendor who accounted for approximately 28% of purchases. No other vendor accounted for more than 10% of purchases in either period. As of June 30, 2014, the Company had two vendors which accounted for approximately 29% and 11% of total accounts payable and as of December 31, 2013 the Company had accounts payable due to one vendor who comprised 23% of its total. No other account was in excess of 10% of the balance of accounts payable as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013. |
|
Advertising |
|
Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. For the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, advertising costs were $41,000 and $19,000, respectively and for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, advertising costs were $111,000 and $40,000 respectively. |
|
Comprehensive Income |
|
For the three months and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, the Company had no items of comprehensive income. |
|
Fair Value of Financial Instruments |
|
The Company uses various inputs in determining the fair value of its investments and measures these assets on a recurring basis. Financial assets recorded at fair value in the balance sheets are categorized by the level of objectivity associated with the inputs used to measure their fair value. Authoritative guidance provided by the FASB defines the following levels directly related to the amount of subjectivity associated with the inputs to fair valuation of these financial assets: |
|
Level 1—Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. |
Level 2—Inputs, other than the quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either directly or indirectly. |
Level 3—Unobservable inputs based on the Company’s assumptions. |
|
The Company had no such assets or liabilities recorded to be valued on the basis above at June 30, 2014 or December 31, 2013. |