EnSync (ESNC) 10-Q 14 Nov 14 2015 Q1 Quarterly report Financial data

Document_and_Entity_Informatio

Document and Entity Information	3 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2014	Nov. 14, 2014
Document And Entity Information	'	'
Entity Registrant Name	'ZBB ENERGY CORP	'
Entity Central Index Key	'0001140310	'
Document Type	'10-Q	'
Document Period End Date	30-Sep-14	'
Amendment Flag	'false	'
Current Fiscal Year End Date	'--06-30	'
Is Entity a Well-known Seasoned Issuer	'No	'
Is Entity a Voluntary Filer	'No	'
Is Entity's Reporting Status Current	'Yes	'
Entity Filer Category	'Smaller Reporting Company	'
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding	'	39,044,959
Document Fiscal Period Focus	'Q1	'
Document Fiscal Year Focus	'2015	'

Condensed_Consolidated_Balance

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (USD $)	Sep. 30, 2014	Jun. 30, 2014
Current assets:	'	'
Cash and cash equivalents	$21,078,241	$10,360,721
Restricted cash on deposit	69,201	69,901
Accounts receivable, net	311,059	1,051,024
Inventories, net	1,400,337	1,352,970
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	226,218	295,814
Refundable income tax credit	84,620	91,191
Total current assets	23,169,676	13,221,621
Long-term assets:	'	'
Property, plant and equipment, net	4,246,000	4,382,203
Investment in investee company	2,821,145	1,646,240
Note receivable	150,132	0
Goodwill	803,079	803,079
Total assets	31,190,032	20,053,143
Current liabilities:	'	'
Current maturities of bank loans and notes payable	353,600	351,142
Accounts payable	540,923	589,642
Accrued expenses	2,382,463	2,621,479
Customer deposits	266,573	741,145
Accrued compensation and benefits	344,590	195,181
Total current liabilities	3,888,149	4,498,589
Long-term liabilities:	'	'
Bank loans and notes payable, net of current maturities	1,956,011	2,045,127
Total liabilities	5,844,160	6,543,716
Equity	'	'
Series B redeemable convertible preferred stock ($0.01 par value, $1,000 face value) 10,000,000 authorized, 3,000 shares issued, 2,575 shares outstanding, preference in liquidation of $5,417,319 and $5,347,994 as of September 30, 2014 and June 30, 2014, respectively	26	26
Common stock ($0.01 par value); 150,000,000 authorized, 39,044,959 and 25,651,389 shares issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2014 and June 30, 2014, respectively	1,098,764	964,828
Additional paid-in capital	116,218,643	102,286,450
Accumulated deficit	-92,428,591	-89,788,242
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	-1,595,705	-1,599,875
Total ZBB Energy Corporation Equity	23,293,137	11,863,187
Noncontrolling interest	2,052,735	1,646,240
Total equity	25,345,872	13,509,427
Total liabilities and equity	$31,190,032	$20,053,143

Condensed_Consolidated_Balance1

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Parenthetical) (USD $)	Sep. 30, 2014	Jun. 30, 2014
Statement of Financial Position [Abstract]	'	'
Preferred stock Series B, par value	$0.01	$0.01
Preferred stock Series B, authorized shares	10,000,000	10,000,000
Preferred stock Series B, issued shares	3,000	3,000
Preferred stock Series B, outstanding shares	2,575	2,575
Liquidation	$5,417,319	$5,347,994
Common stock, par value	$0.01	$0.01
Common stock, Authorized	15,000,000	15,000,000
Common stock, Issued	39,044,959	25,651,389
Common stock, outstanding	39,044,959	25,651,389

Condensed_Consolidated_Stateme

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited) (USD $)	3 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2013
Revenues	'	'
Product sales	$549,341	$1,069,122
Engineering and development	15,520	0
Total Revenues	564,861	1,069,122
Costs and Expenses	'	'
Cost of product sales	226,800	597,401
Cost of engineering and development	109,163	0
Advanced engineering and development	1,406,746	1,209,837
Selling, general, and administrative	2,059,553	1,485,490
Depreciation and amortization	154,516	342,580
Total Costs and Expenses	3,956,778	3,635,308
Income (Loss) from Operations	-3,391,917	-2,566,186
Other Income (Expense)	'	'
Equity in loss of investee company	-82,502	-117,892
Gain on investment in investee company	1,257,407	0
Interest income	3,611	509
Interest expense	-27,580	-51,738
Other income (expense)	0	896
Total Other Income (Expense)	1,150,936	-168,225
Loss before benefit for Income Taxes	-2,240,981	-2,734,411
Benefit for Income Taxes	0	-19,729
Net Loss	-2,240,981	-2,714,683
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest	82,502	117,892
Gain attributable to noncontrolling interest	-481,870	0
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to ZBB Energy Corporation	-2,640,349	-2,596,791
Preferred Stock Dividend	-47,809	-2,499
Net Loss Attributable to Common Shareholders	($2,688,158)	($2,599,290)
Net Loss per share - Basic and diluted	($0.09)	($0.15)
Weighted average shares-basic and diluted:	30,620,518	17,707,760

Condensed_Consolidated_Stateme1

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss (Unaudited) (USD $)	3 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2013
Condensed Consolidated Statements Of Comprehensive Loss	'	'
Net loss	($2,240,981)	($2,714,683)
Foreign exchange translation adjustments	4,170	-955
Comprehensive loss	-2,236,811	-2,715,638
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest	-399,368	117,892
Comprehensive Loss Attributable to ZBB Energy Corporation	($2,636,179)	($2,597,746)

Condensed_Consolidated_Stateme2

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity (Unaudited) (USD $)	Series B Preferred Stock	Common Stock	Additional Paid-In Capital	Accumulated Deficit	Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)	Noncontrolling Interest
Beginning Balance Amount at Jun. 30, 2013	'	$885,389	$85,464,055	($80,932,824)	($1,594,418)	$2,304,121
Beginning Balance Shares at Jun. 30, 2013	'	17,707,431	'	'	'	'
Net income (loss)	'	'	'	-8,855,418	'	-657,881
Net currency translation adjustment	'	'	'	'	-5,457	'
Issuance of warrants	'	'	498,793	'	'	'
Issuance of common stock, net of costs and underwriting fees, Shares	'	6,325,000	'	'	'	'
Issuance of common stock, net of costs and underwriting fees, Amount	'	63,250	12,973,214	'	'	'
Issuance of preferred stock, net of costs and underwriting fees, Shares	3,000	'	'	'	'	'
Issuance of preferred stock, net of costs and underwriting fees, Amount	30	'	2,388,756	'	'	'
Issuance of warrants to underwriter	'	'	15,455	'	'	'
Stock-based compensation, Shares	'	245,570	'	'	'	'
Stock-based compensation, Amount	'	2,456	959,905	'	'	'
Conversion of preferred stock, Shares	-425	470,171	'	'	'	'
Conversion of preferred stock, Amount	-4	4,701	-4,696	'	'	'
Exercise of warrants, Shares	'	903,217	'	'	'	'
Exercise of warrants, Amount	'	9,032	-9,032	'	'	'
Ending Balance Amount at Jun. 30, 2014	26	964,828	102,286,450	-89,788,242	-1,599,875	1,646,240
Ending Balance Shares at Jun. 30, 2014	2,575	25,651,389	'	'	'	'
Net income (loss)	'	'	'	-2,640,349	'	399,368
Net currency translation adjustment	'	'	'	'	4,170	'
Issuance of common stock, net of costs and underwriting fees, Shares	'	13,248,000	'	'	'	'
Issuance of common stock, net of costs and underwriting fees, Amount	'	132,480	13,557,257	'	'	'
Stock-based compensation, Shares	'	145,570	'	'	'	'
Stock-based compensation, Amount	'	1,456	374,936	'	'	'
Contribution of capital from noncontrolling interest	'	'	'	'	'	7,127
Ending Balance Amount at Sep. 30, 2014	$26	$1,098,764	$116,218,643	($92,428,591)	($1,595,705)	$2,052,735
Ending Balance Shares at Sep. 30, 2014	2,575	39,044,959	'	'	'	'

Condensed_Consolidated_Stateme3

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (USD $)	3 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2013
Cash flows from operating activities	'	'
Net loss	($2,240,981)	($2,714,683)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:	'	'
Depreciation of property, plant and equipment	154,516	158,057
Amortization of intangible assets	0	184,523
Amortization of discounts and debt issuance costs on notes payable	0	14,566
Stock-based compensation, net	376,392	284,080
Equity in loss of investee company	82,502	117,892
Gain on investment in investee company	-1,257,407	0
Changes in assets and liabilities	'	'
Accounts receivable, net	739,965	-51,000
Inventories, net	-47,367	290,030
Prepaids and other current assets	69,596	113,589
Refundable income taxes	6,571	-20,553
Accounts payable	-48,719	488,930
Accrued expenses	-238,062	92,642
Customer deposits	-474,572	154,156
Accrued compensation and benefits	149,409	77,249
Net cash used in operating activities	-2,728,157	-810,522
Cash flows from investing activities	'	'
Release of restricted cash	700	0
Expenditures for property and equipment	-18,313	-24,117
Investment in note receivable	-150,132	0
Net cash used in investing activities	-167,745	-24,117
Cash flows from financing activities	'	'
Repayments of bank loans and notes payable	-86,658	-92,967
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock and warrants	0	3,000,000
Preferred stock issuance costs	0	-90,127
Proceeds from issuance of Common Stock	14,837,760	0
Common stock issuance costs	-1,148,023	0
Proceeds from noncontrolling interest	7,127	0
Net cash provided by financing activities	13,610,206	2,816,906
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents	3,216	402
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents	10,717,520	1,982,669
Cash and cash equivalents - beginning of period	10,360,721	1,096,621
Cash and cash equivalents - end of period	21,078,241	3,079,290
Cash paid for interest	$24,912	$56,202

1_SUMMARY_OF_SIGNIFICANT_ACCOU

1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES	3 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2014
Notes to Financial Statements	'
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES	'
	Description of Business
	ZBB Energy Corporation (“ZBB,” “we,” “us,” “our” or the “Company”) develops, licenses, and manufactures innovative energy management systems solutions serving the utility, commercial, and industrial building markets.  ZBB was incorporated in Wisconsin in 1998 and is headquartered in Menomonee Falls, Wisconsin, USA with offices also located in Perth, Western Australia.
	ZBB Energy develops and commercializes application solutions for advanced energy management systems critical to the transition from a “coal-centric economy” to one reliant on renewable energy sources.  These advanced systems directly connect wind and solar equipment to the grid and other systems that can form various levels of micro-grids as well as power quality regulation solutions.  ZBB Energy brings vital power control and energy storage solutions to problems caused by the incorporation of increasingly pervasive renewable energy generating assets that are part of the grid power transmission and distribution network used in commercial, industrial, and multi-tenant buildings. The Company also develops and commercializes energy management systems for off-grid applications such as island or remote power.
	The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and those of its wholly-owned subsidiary ZBB Energy Pty Ltd. (formerly known as ZBB Technologies, Ltd.) which has an advanced engineering and development facility in Perth, Australia, and its sixty percent owned subsidiary ZBB PowerSav Holdings Limited located in Hong Kong which was formed in connection with the Company’s investment in a China joint venture.
	Interim Financial Data
	The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“US GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X.  Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and notes required by US GAAP for complete financial statements.  In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting only of adjustments of a normal and recurring nature) considered necessary for fair presentation of the results of operations have been included.  Operating results for the three month period ended September 30, 2014 are not necessarily indicative of the results that might be expected for the year ending June 30, 2015.
	The condensed consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2014 has been derived from audited financial statements at that date, but does not include all of the information and disclosures required by US GAAP.  For a more complete discussion of accounting policies and certain other information, refer to the Company’s annual report filed on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 29, 2014.
	Basis of Presentation
	The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly and majority-owned subsidiaries and have been prepared in accordance with US GAAP.  All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
	Fair Value of Financial Instruments
	The Company’s financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash on deposit, accounts receivable, a note receivable, accounts payable, and bank loans and notes payable.  The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial instruments approximate their respective fair values due to the relatively short-term nature of these instruments, except for the note receivable and bank loans and notes payable.  The carrying amount of the note receivable and the bank loans and notes payable approximate fair value due to the interest rate and terms approximating those available to us for similar obligations.
	The Company accounts for the fair value of financial instruments in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 820.  Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.  The degree of judgment utilized in measuring the fair value of assets and liabilities generally correlates to the level or pricing observability.  FASB ASC 820 describes a fair value hierarchy based on the following three levels of inputs, of which the first two are considered observable and the last unobservable, that may be used to measure fair value:
	Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity can access at the measurement date.
	Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for similar assets or liabilities in active markets.
	Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability.  As such, the prices or valuation techniques require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and are unobservable.
	Cash and Cash Equivalents
	The Company considers all highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents.  The Company maintains its cash deposits in fully insured accounts at financial institutions predominately in the United States, Australia, and Hong Kong.  The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts.
	Restricted Cash on Deposit
	The Company had $69,201 and $69,901 in restricted cash on deposit as of September 30, 2014 and June 30, 2014, respectively, as collateral for certain credit arrangements.
	Accounts Receivable
	Credit is extended based on an evaluation of a customer’s financial condition.  Accounts receivable are stated at the amount the Company expects to collect from outstanding balances.  The Company records allowances for doubtful accounts based on customer-specific analysis and general matters such as current assessments of past due balances and economic conditions.  The Company writes off accounts receivable against the allowance when they become uncollectible.  Accounts receivable are stated net of an allowance for doubtful accounts of $10,878 as of September 30, 2014 and June 30, 2014.  The composition of accounts receivable by aging category is as follows as of:
			30-Sep-14			30-Jun-14
	Current		$	77,329		$	902,545
	30-60 days			14,031			-
	60-90 days			69,040			-
	Over 90 days			150,659			148,479
	Total		$	311,059		$	1,051,024
	Inventories
	Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market.  Cost is computed using standard cost, which approximates actual cost, on a first-in, first-out basis.  The Company provides inventory write-downs based on excess and obsolete inventories determined primarily by future demand forecasts.  The write-down is measured as the difference between the cost of the inventory and market based upon assumptions about future demand and charged to the provision for inventory, which is a component of cost of sales.  At the point of the loss recognition, a new, lower cost basis for that inventory is established, and subsequent changes in facts and circumstances do not result in the restoration or increase in that newly established cost basis.
	Property, Plant and Equipment
	Land, building, equipment, computers, furniture and fixtures are recorded at cost.  Maintenance, repairs and betterments are charged to expense as incurred.  Depreciation is provided for all plant and equipment on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets.  The estimated useful lives used for each class of depreciable asset are:
		Estimated Useful Lives
	Manufacturing equipment	3 - 7 years
	Office equipment	3 - 7 years
	Assets held for lease	18 months
	Building and improvements	7 - 40 years
	The Company completed a review of the estimated useful lives of specific assets for the quarter ended September 30, 2014 and determined that there were no changes in the estimated useful lives of assets.
	Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
	In accordance with FASB ASC Topic 360, "Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets," the Company assesses potential impairments to its long-lived assets including property, plant, equipment and intangible assets when there is evidence that events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable.
	If such an indication exists, the recoverable amount of the asset is compared to the asset’s carrying value.  Any excess of the asset’s carrying value over its recoverable amount is expensed in the statement of operations.  In assessing value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate.  Management has determined that there were no long-lived assets impaired as of September 30, 2014 and June 30, 2014 (see Note 5).
	Investment in Investee Company
	Investee companies that are not consolidated, but over which the Company exercises significant influence, are accounted for under the equity method of accounting.  Whether or not the Company exercises significant influence with respect to an investee depends on an evaluation of several factors including, among others, representation on the investee company’s board of directors and ownership level, which is generally a 20% to 50% interest in the voting securities of the investee company.  Under the equity method of accounting, an investee company’s accounts are not reported in the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheets and statements of operations; however, the Company’s share of the earnings or losses of the investee company is reflected in the caption ‘‘Equity in loss of investee company” in the condensed consolidated statements of operations.  The Company’s carrying value in an equity method investee company is reported in the caption ‘‘Investment in investee company’’ in the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheets.
	When the Company’s carrying value in an equity method investee company is reduced to zero, no further losses are recorded in the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements unless the Company guaranteed obligations of the investee company or has committed additional funding.  When the investee company subsequently reports income, the Company will not record its share of such income until it equals the amount of its share of losses not previously recognized.
	Note Receivable
	The Company has one note receivable from an unrelated party.  The note matures on December 15, 2015 and is classified as “Note receivable” in the financial statements.  See further discussion of the note receivable in Note 6.
	Goodwill
	Goodwill is recognized as the excess cost of an acquired entity over the net amount assigned to assets acquired and liabilities assumed.  Goodwill is not amortized but reviewed for impairment annually as of June 30 or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that its carrying value may be impaired.  These conditions could include a significant change in the business climate, legal factors, operating performance indicators, competition, or sale or disposition of a significant portion of a reporting unit.
	The first step of the impairment test requires the comparing of a reporting unit’s fair value to its carrying value.  If the carrying value is less than the fair value, no impairment exists and the second step is not performed.  If the carrying value is higher than the fair value, there is an indication that impairment may exist and the second step must be performed to compute the amount of the impairment.  In the second step, the impairment is computed by estimating the fair values of all recognized and unrecognized assets and liabilities of the reporting unit and comparing the implied fair value of reporting unit goodwill with the carrying amount of that unit’s goodwill.  The Company determined fair value as evidenced by market capitalization, and concluded that there was no need for an impairment charge as of September 30, 2014 and June 30, 2014.
	Accrued Expenses
	Accrued expenses consist of the Company’s present obligations related to various expenses incurred during the period and includes a reserve for estimated contract losses, other accrued expenses, and warranty obligations.  Included in accrued expenses as of September 30, 2014 is a reserve of approximately $1.6 million for a product upgrade initiative established in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014.
	Subsequent to commercialization, installation and commissioning of units in the field, the Company garnered meaningful insights that have resulted in system design modifications and other general upgrades that have improved the performance, efficiency, and reliability of its systems.  In the interest of enhancing customer satisfaction, the Company launched the product upgrade initiative to implement these improvements at certain locations of its installed base over fiscal 2015.
	Warranty Obligations
	The Company typically warrants its products for twelve months after installation or eighteen months after date of shipment, whichever first occurs.  Warranty costs are provided for estimated claims and charged to cost of product sales as revenue is recognized.  Warranty obligations are also evaluated quarterly to determine a reasonable estimate for the replacement of potentially defective materials of all energy storage systems that have been shipped to customers.
	While the Company actively engages in monitoring and improving its evolving battery and production technologies, there is only a limited product history and relatively short time frame available to test and evaluate the rate of product failure.  Should actual product failure rates differ from the Company’s estimates, revisions are made to the estimated rate of product failures and resulting changes to the liability for warranty obligations.  In addition, from time to time, specific warranty accruals may be made if unforeseen technical problems arise.
	As of September 30, 2014 and June 30, 2014, included in the Company’s accrued expenses were $674,304 and $731,910, respectively, related to warranty obligations.  The following is a summary of accrued warranty activity:
			Three Months and Year Ended
			30-Sep-14			30-Jun-14
	Beginning balance		$	731,910		$	479,873
	Accruals for warranties during the period			146,345			741,412
	Settlements during the period			(214,962	)		(673,588	)
	Adjustments relating to preexisting warranties			11,011			184,213
	Ending balance		$	674,304		$	731,910
	Revenue Recognition
Revenues are recognized when persuasive evidence of a contractual arrangement exits, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, the seller’s price to buyer is fixed and determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured.  The portion of revenue related to installation and final acceptance, is deferred until such installation and final customer acceptance are completed.
From time to time, the Company may enter into separate agreements at or near the same time with the same customer.  The Company evaluates such agreements to determine whether they should be accounted for individually as distinct arrangements or whether the separate agreements are, in substance, a single multiple element arrangement.  The Company evaluates whether the negotiations are conducted jointly as part of a single negotiation, whether the deliverables are interrelated or interdependent, whether the fees in one arrangement are tied to performance in another arrangement, and whether elements in one arrangement are essential to another arrangement.  The Company’s evaluation involves significant judgment to determine whether a group of agreements might be so closely related that they are, in effect, part of a single arrangement.
Our collaboration agreements typically involve multiple elements or deliverables, including upfront fees, contract research and development, milestone payments, technology licenses or options to obtain technology licenses, and royalties.  For these arrangements, revenues are recognized in accordance with FASB ASC 605-25, “Revenue Recognition – Multiple Element Arrangements.” The Company’s revenues associated with multiple element contracts is based on the selling price hierarchy, which utilizes vendor-specific objective evidence (“VSOE”) when available, third-party evidence (“TPE”) if VSOE is not available, and if neither is available then the best estimate of the selling price is used.  The Company utilizes best estimate for its multiple deliverable transactions as VSOE and TPE do not exist.  To be considered a separate element, the product or service in question must represent a separate unit under SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin 104, and fulfill the following criteria: the delivered item(s) has value to the customer on a standalone basis; there is objective and reliable evidence of the fair value of the undelivered item(s); and if the arrangement includes a general right of return relative to the delivered item(s), delivery or performance of the undelivered item(s) is considered probable and substantially in our control. For arrangements containing multiple elements, revenue from time and materials based service arrangements is recognized as the service is performed.  Revenue relating to undelivered elements is deferred at the estimated fair value until delivery of the deferred elements.  If the arrangement does not meet all criteria above, the entire amount of the transaction is deferred until all elements are delivered.
The portion of revenue related to engineering and development is recognized ratably upon delivery of the goods or services pertaining to the underlying contractual arrangement or revenue is recognized as certain activities are performed by the Company over the estimated performance period.
The Company charges shipping and handling fees when products are shipped or delivered to a customer, and includes such amounts in net revenues.  The Company reports its revenues net of estimated returns and allowances.
Revenues from government funded research and development contracts are recognized proportionally as costs are incurred and compared to the estimated total research and development costs for each contract.  In many cases, the Company is reimbursed only a portion of the costs incurred or to be incurred on the contract.  Government funded research and development contracts are generally multi-year, cost-reimbursement and/or cost-share type contracts.  The Company is generally reimbursed for reasonable and allocable costs up to the reimbursement limits set by the contract.
Total revenues of $564,861 and $1,069,122 were recognized for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and September 30, 2013, respectively.  For the three months ended September 30, 2014 two significant customers comprised 62% and 30% of total revenues.  For the three months ended September 30, 2013 one significant customer comprised 82% of total revenues.
Engineering, Development, and License Revenues
We assess whether a substantive milestone exists at the inception of our agreements.  In evaluating if a milestone is substantive we consider whether:
·	Substantive uncertainty exists as to the achievement of the milestone event at the inception of the arrangement;
·	The achievement of the milestone involves substantive effort and can only be achieved based in whole or in part on our performance or the occurrence of a specific outcome resulting from our performance;
·	The amount of the milestone payment appears reasonable either in relation to the effort expended or the enhancement of the value of the delivered item(s);
·	There is no future performance required to earn the milestone; and
·	The consideration is reasonable relative to all deliverables and payment terms in the arrangement.
If any of these conditions are not met, we do not consider the milestone to be substantive and we defer recognition of the milestone payment and recognize it as revenue over the estimated period of performance, if any.
On December 13, 2011, the Company entered into a joint development and license agreement with a global technology company to jointly develop flow batteries.  The objective of the joint development agreement is to develop low cost, high energy density grid scale flow battery stacks and systems that could lead to a significant cost reduction for grid level storage.  The Company recognizes revenue under this agreement upon achievement of certain performance milestones.  The Company recognized $0 of revenue under this agreement for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and September 30, 2013.
On April 8, 2011, the Company entered into a Collaboration Agreement (the “Collaboration Agreement”) with Honam Petrochemical Corporation, now known as Lotte Chemical Corporation (“Lotte”), pursuant to which the Company and Lotte collaborated on the technical development of the Company’s third generation Zinc Bromide flow battery module (the “Version 3 Battery Module”) and Lotte received a fully paid-up, exclusive and royalty-free license to sell and manufacture the Version 3 Battery Module in Korea and a non-exclusive royalty-bearing license to sell the Version 3 Battery Module in Japan, Thailand, Taiwan, Malaysia, Vietnam and Singapore.
On December 16, 2013, the Company and Lotte entered into a Research and Development Agreement (the “R&D Agreement”) pursuant to which the Company has agreed to develop and provide to Lotte a Zinc Bromide chemical flow battery system, including a Zinc Bromide chemical flow battery module and related software (the “Product”), on the terms and conditions set forth in the R&D Agreement (the “Project”).  The Project is scheduled to continue until December 16, 2015, unless extended by the mutual agreement of the Company and Lotte.  Subject to the satisfaction of certain specified milestones, Lotte is required to make payments to the Company under the R&D Agreement totaling $3,000,000 over the term of the Project.  ZBB will recognize revenue based upon a Performance Based Method pursuant to the model described in FASB ASC 980-605-25, where revenue is recognized based on the lesser of the amount of nonrefundable cash received or the amounts due based on the proportional amount of the total effort expected to be expended on the contract that has been provided to date as there does not exist substantial doubt that the milestones will be achieved.  The Company recognized $0 of revenue under this agreement for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and September 30, 2013.
Additionally, on December 16, 2013, the Company and Lotte entered into an Amended License Agreement (the “Amended License”).  Pursuant to the Amended License Agreement, the Company granted to Lotte, (1) an exclusive and royalty-free limited license in Korea to use the Company’s Zinc Bromide flow battery module, Zinc Bromide flow battery stack and the technical information and know how related to the intellectual property arising from the Project (collectively, the “Technology”) to manufacture or sell a Zinc Bromide flow battery (the “Lotte Product”) in Korea and (2) a non-exclusive (a) royalty-free limited license for Lotte and its affiliates to use the Technology internally in all locations other than China and Korea to manufacture the Lotte Product and (b) royalty-bearing limited license to sell the Lotte Product in all locations other than China, the United States and Korea. Lotte is required to pay the Company a total license fee of $3,000,000 under the Amended License Agreement plus up to an additional $1,000,000 if certain specific milestones are successfully achieved.  In addition, Lotte is required to make ongoing royalty payments to the Company equal to a single digit percentage of Lotte’s sales of the Lotte Product outside of Korea until December 31, 2019.  The license fees are subject to a 16.5% non-refundable Korea withholding tax.
Overall, there were $3,750,000 of payments received and $4,125,000 of revenue recognized under the Lotte agreements in the year ended June 30, 2014.  During the three months ended September 30, 2014, the Company received the residual $375,000 payment under these agreements.
The Company recognized $15,520 in engineering and development revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and $0 for the three months ended September 30, 2013, respectively, related to collaborative agreements.  Engineering and development costs related to the collaboration agreements totaled $109,163 and $0 for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and September 30, 2013, respectively.
As of September 30, 2014 and September 30, 2013, the Company had no unbilled amounts from engineering and development contracts in process.  The Company had received $31,680 and $125,663 in customer payments for engineering and development contracts, representing deposits in advance of performance of the contracted work, as of September 30, 2014 and September 30, 2013, respectively.
Advanced Engineering and Development Expenses
In accordance with FASB ASC Topic 730, “Research and Development,” the Company expenses advanced engineering and development costs as incurred.  These costs consist primarily of materials, labor, and allocable indirect costs incurred to design, build, and test prototype units, as well as the development of manufacturing processes for these units.  Advanced engineering and development costs also include consulting fees and other costs.
To the extent these costs are separately identifiable, incurred and funded by advanced engineering and development type agreements with outside parties, they are shown separately on the condensed consolidated statements of operations as a “Cost of engineering and development.”
Stock-Based Compensation
The Company measures all “Share-Based Payments," including grants of stock options, restricted shares and restricted stock units to be recognized in its condensed consolidated statement of operations based on their fair values on the grant date, which is consistent with FASB ASC Topic 718, “Stock Compensation,” guidelines.
Accordingly, the Company measures share-based compensation cost for all share-based awards at the fair value on the grant date and recognition of share-based compensation over the service period for awards that are expected to vest.  The fair value of stock options is determined based on the number of shares granted and the price of the shares at grant, and calculated based on the Black-Scholes valuation model.
The Company compensates its outside directors primarily with restricted stock units (“RSUs”) rather than cash.  The grant date fair value of the restricted stock unit awards is determined using the closing stock price of the Company’s common stock on the day prior to the date of the grant, with the compensation expense amortized over the vesting period of restricted stock unit awards, net of estimated forfeitures.
The Company only recognizes expense to its statements of operations for those options or shares that are expected ultimately to vest, using two attribution methods to record expense, the straight-line method for grants with only service-based vesting or the graded-vesting method, which considers each performance period, for all other awards.  See Note 9.
Advertising Expense
Advertising costs of $7,563 and $23,151 for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and September 30, 2013, respectively, were charged to selling, general, and administrative expenses as incurred.
Income Taxes
The Company records deferred income taxes in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 740, “Accounting for Income Taxes.”  FASB ASC Topic 740 requires recognition of deferred income tax assets and liabilities for temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and the amounts at which they are carried in the financial statements, based upon the enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse.  The Company establishes a valuation allowance when necessary to reduce deferred income tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.  There were no net deferred income tax assets recorded as of September 30, 2014 and June 30, 2014.
The Company applies a more-likely-than-not recognition threshold for all tax uncertainties as required under FASB ASC Topic 740, which only allows the recognition of those tax benefits that have a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being sustained upon examination by the taxing authorities.
The Company’s U.S. Federal income tax returns for the years ended June 30, 2011 through June 30, 2014 and the Company’s Wisconsin and Australian income tax returns for the years ended June 30, 2010 through June 30, 2014 are subject to examination by taxing authorities.  As of September 30, 2014, there were no examinations in progress.
Foreign Currency
The Company uses the United States dollar as its functional and reporting currency, while the Australian dollar and Hong Kong dollar are the functional currencies of its foreign subsidiaries.  Assets and liabilities of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries are translated into United States dollars at exchange rates that are in effect at the balance sheet date while equity accounts are translated at historical exchange rates.  Income and expense items are translated at average exchange rates which were applicable during the reporting period.  Translation adjustments are accumulated in accumulated other comprehensive loss as a separate component of equity in the condensed consolidated balance sheets.
Loss per Share
The Company follows the FASB ASC Topic 260, “Earnings per Share,” provisions which require the reporting of both basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share.  Basic earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period.  Diluted earnings (net loss) per share reflect the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock.  In accordance with the FASB ASC Topic 260, any anti-dilutive effects on net income (loss) per share are excluded.  For the three months ended September 30, 2014 and September 30, 2013 there were 9,106,790 and 9,738,542 shares of common stock underlying convertible preferred stock, options, restricted stock units and warrants that are excluded, respectively.
Concentrations of Credit Risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash and accounts receivable.
The Company maintains significant cash deposits primarily with three financial institutions.  All deposits are fully insured as of September 30, 2014.  The Company has not previously experienced any losses on such deposits.  Additionally, the Company performs periodic evaluations of the relative credit ratings of these institutions as part of its banking strategy.
Concentrations of credit risk with respect to accounts receivable are limited due to accelerated payment terms in current customer contracts and creditworthiness of the current customer base.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions.  These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amount of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.  It is reasonably possible that the estimates we have made may change in the near future.  Significant estimates underlying the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include those related to:
·	the timing of revenue recognition;
·	the allowance for doubtful accounts;
·	provisions for excess and obsolete inventory;
·	the lives and recoverability of property, plant and equipment and other long-lived assets, including goodwill;
·	contract costs, losses, and reserves;
·	warranty obligations;
·	income tax valuation allowances;
·	stock-based compensation; and
·	valuation of warrants.
Reclassifications
Certain amounts previously reported have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation.
Segment Information
The Company has determined that it operates as one reportable segment.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
From time to time, new accounting pronouncements are issued by the FASB or other standard setting bodies that are adopted by the Company as of the specified effective date.  Unless otherwise discussed, the Company believes that the impact of recently issued standards that are not yet effective will not have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations upon adoption.
In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-15 – Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40).  The update requires management to perform a going concern assessment if there is substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year of the financial statement issuance date.  Under the new standard, the definition of substantial doubt incorporates a likeliness threshold of “probable” that is consistent with the current use of the term defined in US GAAP for loss contingencies (Topic 450 – Contingencies).  Management will need to consider conditions that are known and reasonably knowable at the financial statement issuance date and determine whether the entity will be able to meet its obligations within the one-year period.  Additional disclosures are required if it is probable that the entity will be unable to meet its current obligations.  The amendments in this ASU will be effective for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016.  Early adoption is permitted.  The Company does not expect adoption of this guidance to have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-12 - Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718).  The amendments require that entities should treat performance targets that can be met after the requisite service period of a share-based payment award as performance conditions that affect vesting and, accordingly, the performance target should not be reflected in estimating the grant-date fair value of the award.  Compensation expense should be recognized in the period in which it becomes probable that the performance target will be achieved.  ASU 2014-12 is effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015.  The Company is required to adopt this standard beginning July 1, 2016.  ASU 2014-12 does not contain any new disclosure requirements.  The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2014-12 to have a material effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09 – Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606).  The amendments outline a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersede most current revenue recognition guidance, including industry-specific guidance.  The core principle of the revenue model is that an entity recognizes revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.  In applying the revenue model to contracts within its scope, an entity identifies the contract(s) with a customer, identifies the performance obligations in the contract, determines the transaction price, allocates the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract and recognizes revenue when the entity satisfies a performance obligation.  ASU 2014-09, which includes additional disclosure requirements regarding revenue, cash flows and obligations related to contracts with customers, will be effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016.  Early adoption is not permitted.  The guidance permits companies to either apply the requirements retrospectively to all prior periods presented, or apply the requirements in the year of adoption, through a cumulative adjustment.  The Company is currently evaluating the effect that implementation of this update will have on its consolidated financial position and results of operations upon adoption.
In April 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-08 - Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant, and Equipment (Topic 360): Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity.  The update changes the requirements for reporting discontinued operations in Subtopic 205-20.  To be classified as a discontinued operation, the disposal of a component or group of components must represent a strategic shift that has, or will have, a major effect on an entity’s operations and financial results.  Examples include a disposal of a major geographic area, a major line of business or a major equity method investment.  The amendments in this ASU are effective prospectively for reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2014, with early adoption permitted.  The adoption of this standard update affects presentation only and, as such, is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
In July 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-11 – Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists, which requires an unrecognized tax benefit to be presented in the financial statements as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward, similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward.  To the extent the tax benefit is not available at the reporting date under the governing tax law or if the entity does not intend to use the deferred tax asset for such purpose, the unrecognized tax benefit should be presented as a liability and not combined with deferred tax assets.  ASU 2013-11 is effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013.  The amendments are to be applied to all unrecognized tax benefits that exist as of the effective date and may be applied retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented.  The adoption of this pronouncement did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In April 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-07 – Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) – Liquidation Basis of Accounting.  The amendments require an entity to prepare its financial statements using the liquidation basis of accounting when liquidation is imminent.  Liquidation is imminent when the likelihood is remote that the entity will return from liquidation and either (a) a plan for liquidation is approved by the person or persons with the authority to make such a plan effective and the likelihood is remote that the execution of the plan will be blocked by other parties or (b) a plan for liquidation is being imposed by other forces (for example, involuntary bankruptcy).  If a plan for liquidation was specified in the entity’s governing documents from the entity’s inception (for example, limited-life entities), the entity should apply the liquidation basis of accounting only if the approved plan for liquidation differs from the plan for liquidation that was specified at the entity’s inception.  The amendments require financial statements prepared using the liquidation basis of accounting to present relevant information about an entity’s expected resources in liquidation by measuring and presenting assets at the amount of the expected cash proceeds from liquidation.  The entity should include in its presentation of assets any items it had not previously recognized under US GAAP but that it expects to either sell in liquidation or use in settling liabilities (for example, trademarks).  The amendments are effective for entities that determine liquidation is imminent during annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2013, and interim reporting periods therein.  Entities should apply the requirements prospectively from the day that liquidation becomes imminent.  Early adoption is permitted.  The adoption did not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements in its present condition.
In March 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-05 – Foreign Currency Matters (Topic 830) – Parent’s Accounting for the Cumulative Translation Adjustment upon derecognition of Certain Subsidiaries or Group of Assets within a Foreign Entity or of an Investment in a Foreign Entity.  These amendments provide guidance on releasing cumulative translation adjustments when a reporting entity (parent) ceases to have a controlling financial interest in a subsidiary or a group of assets that is a non-profit activity or a business within a foreign entity.  In addition, these amendments provide guidance on the release of cumulative translation adjustments in partial sales of equity method investments and in step acquisitions.  The amendments are effective for fiscal years and interim reporting periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013.  The amendments should be applied prospectively to derecognition events occurring after the effective date.  Prior periods should not be adjusted.  Early adoption is permitted.  If an entity elects to early adopt the amendments, it should apply them as of the beginning of the entity’s fiscal year of adoption.  The Company was required to adopt this standard beginning July 1, 2014.  The adoption of this pronouncement did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-04 – Liabilities (Topic 405) – Obligations Resulting from Joint and Several Liability Arrangements for Which the Total Amount of the Obligation is Fixed at the Reporting Date.  These amendments provide guidance for the recognition, measurement, and disclosure of obligations resulting from joint and several liability arrangements for which the total amount of the obligation within the scope of this guidance is fixed at the reporting date, except for obligations addressed within existing guidance in US GAAP.  Examples of obligations within this guidance are debt arrangements, other contractual obligations, and settled litigation and judicial rulings.  The amendments are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013.  These amendments shall be applied retrospectively to all prior periods presented for those obligations within the scope of this Subtopic that exist at the beginning of an entity’s fiscal year of adoption.  Early adoption is permitted.  The adoption of this pronouncement did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

2_CHINA_JOINT_VENTURE

2. CHINA JOINT VENTURE	3 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2014
Notes to Financial Statements	'
CHINA JOINT VENTURE	'
	On August 30, 2011, the Company entered into agreements providing for establishment of a joint venture to develop, produce, sell, distribute and service advanced storage batteries and power electronics in China (the “Joint Venture”).  Joint Venture partners include ZBB PowerSav Holdings Limited (“Holdco”), AnHui Xinlong Electrical Co. and Wuhu Huarui Power Transmission and Transformation Engineering Co.  The Joint Venture was established upon receipt of certain governmental approvals from China which were received in November 2011.
	The Joint Venture operates through a jointly-owned Chinese company located in Wuhu City, Anhui Province named Anhui Meineng Store Energy Co., Ltd. (“Meineng Energy”).  Meineng Energy intends to initially assemble and ultimately manufacture the Company’s products for sale in the power management industry on an exclusive basis in mainland China and on a non-exclusive basis in Hong Kong and Taiwan.
	The Company’s President and Chief Operating Officer (“President and COO”) has served as the Chief Executive Officer of Meineng Energy since December 2011.  The President and COO owns an indirect 6% equity interest in Meineng Energy.
	In connection with the Joint Venture, on August 30, 2011 the Company and certain of its subsidiaries entered into the following agreements:
	·	Joint Venture Agreement of Anhui Meineng Store Energy Co., Ltd. (the “China JV Agreement”) by and between ZBB PowerSav Holdings Limited, a Hong Kong limited liability company (“Holdco”), and Anhui Xinrui Investment Co., Ltd, a Chinese limited liability company; and
	·	Limited Liability Company Agreement of ZBB PowerSav Holdings Limited by and between ZBB Cayman Corporation and PowerSav New Energy Holdings Limited (the “Holdco Agreement”).
	In connection with the Joint Venture, upon establishment of Meineng Energy, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries entered into the following agreements:
	·	Management Services Agreement by and between Meineng Energy and Holdco (the “Management Services Agreement”);
	·	License Agreement by and between Holdco and Meineng Energy (the “License Agreement”); and
	·	Research and Development Agreement by and between the Company and Meineng Energy (the “Research and Development Agreement”).
	Pursuant to the China JV Agreement, Meineng Energy was capitalized with approximately $13.6 million of equity capital.  The Company’s only capital contributions to the Joint Venture were the contribution of technology to Meineng Energy via the License Agreement and $200,000 in cash.  The Company’s indirect interest in Meineng Energy equaled approximately 33%.  On August 12, 2014, Meineng Energy received a cash investment of 20,000,000 RMB (approximately $3.2 million) from Wuhu Fuhai-Haoyan Venture Investment, L.P., a branch of Shenzhen Oriental Fortune Capital Co., Ltd., for a post-closing equity position of 8%.  Required governmental approval was obtained in October 2014.  This investment capital will be used to fund ongoing operations and development of the China market, and provides Meineng Energy a 250,000,000 RMB (approximately $42 million) post-closing valuation.  Following this investment, the Company’s indirect investment in Meineng Energy equals approximately 30%.  The Company’s indirect gain as a result of the investment is $775,537.
	The Company’s investment in Meineng Energy was made through Holdco.  Pursuant to the Holdco Agreement, the Company contributed to Holdco technology via a license agreement with an agreed upon value of approximately $4.1 million and $200,000 in cash in exchange for a 60% equity interest and PowerSav agreed to contribute to Holdco $3.3 million in cash in exchange for a 40% equity interest.  The initial capital contributions (consisting of the Company’s technology contribution and one half of required cash contributions) were made in December 2011.  The subsequent capital contributions (consisting of one half of the required cash contribution) were made on May 16, 2012.  For financial reporting purposes, Holdco’s assets and liabilities are consolidated with those of the Company and PowerSav’s 40% interest in Holdco is included in the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements as a noncontrolling interest.  For the three months ended September 30, 2014 and September 30, 2013, Meineng Energy had a net loss of $414,169 and $544,487, respectively.
	The Company’s basis in the technology contributed to Holdco is $0 due to US GAAP requirements related to research and development expenditures.  The difference of approximately $4.1 million in the Company’s basis in this technology and the valuation of the technology by Meineng Energy is accounted for by the Company through the elimination of the amortization expense recognized by Meineng Energy related to the technology.
	The Company has the right to appoint a majority of the members of the Board of Directors of Hong Kong Holdco and Hong Kong Holdco has the right to appoint a majority of the members of the Board of Directors of Meineng Energy.
	Pursuant to the Management Services Agreement, Holdco will provide certain management services to Meineng Energy in exchange for a management services fee equal to five percent of Meineng Energy’s net sales for the five year period beginning on the first day of the first quarter in which the JV Company achieves operational breakeven results and three percent of Meineng Energy’s net sales for the subsequent three years, provided the payment of such fees will terminate upon Meineng Energy completing an initial public offering on a nationally recognized securities exchange.  To date, no management service fee revenues have been recognized by Holdco.
	Pursuant to the Amended License Agreement dated July 1, 2014, Holdco granted to Meineng Energy (1) an exclusive royalty-free license to manufacture and distribute the Company’s ZBB EnerStore, zinc bromide flow battery, version three (V3) (50KW) and ZBB EnerSection, power and energy control center (up to 250KW) (the “Products”) in mainland China in the power supply management industry and (2) a non-exclusive royalty-free license to manufacture and distribute the Products in Hong Kong and Taiwan in the power supply management industry.
	Pursuant to the Research and Development Agreement, Meineng Energy may request the Company to provide research and development services upon commercially reasonable terms and conditions.  Meineng Energy would pay the Company’s fully-loaded costs and expenses incurred in providing such services.
	The Company had product sales of $0 and $44,478 to Meineng Energy during the three months ended September 30, 2014 and September 30, 2013, respectively.
	The operating results for Meineng Energy for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and September 30, 2013 are summarized as follows:
			Three Months Ended September 30,
			2014			2013
	Revenues		$	299,041		$	41,845
	Gross Profit (loss)			(33,493	)		(28,987	)
	Income (loss) from operations			(407,784	)		(583,595	)
	Net Income (loss)			(414,169	)		(544,487	)

3_GOING_CONCERN

3. GOING CONCERN	3 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2014
Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements [Abstract]	'
GOING CONCERN	'
	The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the basis of a going concern which contemplates that the Company will be able to realize assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of business.  Accordingly, they do not give effect to any adjustments that would be necessary should the Company be required to liquidate its assets.  The Company incurred a net loss of $2,640,349 attributable to ZBB Energy Corporation for three months ended September 30, 2014, and as of September 30, 2014 has an accumulated deficit of $92,428,591 and total ZBB Energy Corporation equity of $23,293,137.  The ability of the Company to settle its total liabilities of $5,844,160 and to continue as a going concern is dependent upon increasing revenues and achieving profitability.  The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of these uncertainties.
	We believe that cash and cash equivalents on hand at September 30, 2014, expected collections on the Lotte R&D Agreement and other potential sources of cash, will be sufficient to fund our current operations through the second quarter of fiscal year 2016.  However, there can be no assurances that unforeseen circumstances will not require the Company to raise additional investment capital to fund its operations.  If the Company is unable to obtain additional required funding, the Company’s financial condition and results of operations may be materially adversely affected and the Company may not be able to continue operations.

4_INVENTORIES

4. INVENTORIES	3 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2014
Inventory Disclosure [Abstract]	'
INVENTORIES	'
	Inventories are comprised of the following as of:
		30-Sep-14		30-Jun-14
	Raw materials	$	1,179,377	$	1,054,197
	Work in progress		220,960		298,773
	Total	$	1,400,337	$	1,352,970

5_PROPERTY_PLANT_EQUIPMENT

5. PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIPMENT	3 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2014
Property, Plant and Equipment [Abstract]	'
PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIPMENT	'
	Property, plant, and equipment are comprised of the following as of:
		30-Sep-14			30-Jun-14
	Land	$	217,000		$	217,000
	Building and improvements		3,532,375			3,520,872
	Manufacturing equipment		3,695,781			3,710,127
	Office equipment		417,073			399,583
	Total, at cost		7,862,229			7,847,582
	Less: accumulated depreciation		(3,616,229	)		(3,465,379	)
	Property, plant and equipment, net	$	4,246,000		$	4,382,203
	The Company recorded depreciation expense of $154,516 and $158,057 for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and September 30, 2013, respectively.

6_NOTE_RECEIVABLE

6. NOTE RECEIVABLE	3 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2014
Receivables [Abstract]	'
NOTE RECEIVABLE	'
	On September 23, 2014, the Company was issued a $150,000 convertible promissory note from an unrelated party.  The note accrues interest at 8% per annum on the outstanding principal amount.  The entire outstanding principal balance and accrued interest is due and payable on December 15, 2015, the maturity date of the note.  If at the maturity date the note and accrued interest has not been paid in full, the Company may convert the principal and interest outstanding into shares of its convertible preferred stock at the then-current valuation.

7_GOODWILL

7. GOODWILL	3 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2014
Goodwill and Intangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract]	'
GOODWILL	'
	The Company acquired ZBB Technologies, Inc., a former wholly-owned subsidiary, through a series of transactions in March 1996.  ZBB Technologies Inc. was subsequently merged with and into ZBB Energy Corporation on January 1, 2012.  The goodwill amount of $1.134 million, the difference between the price paid for ZBB Technologies, Inc. and the net assets of the acquisition, amortized through fiscal 2002, resulted in the net goodwill amount of $803,079 as of September 30, 2014 and June 30, 2014.

8_BANK_LOANS_AND_NOTES_PAYABLE

8. BANK LOANS AND NOTES PAYABLE	3 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2014
Debt Disclosure [Abstract]	'
BANK LOANS AND NOTES PAYABLE	'
	The Company’s debt consisted of the following as of September 30, 2014 and June 30, 2014:
			30-Sep-14		30-Jun-14
	Bank loans and notes payable-current		$	353,600	$	351,142
	Bank loans and notes payable-long term			1,956,011		2,045,127
	Total		$	2,309,611	$	2,396,269
	Bank loans and notes payable consisted of the following as of:
			30-Sep-14		30-Jun-14
	Note payable to Wisconsin Econcomic Development Corporation payable in monthly installments of $23,685, including interest at 2%, with the final payment due May 1, 2018; collateralized by equipment purchased with the loan proceeds and substantially all assets of the Company not otherwise collateralized.  The Company is required to maintain and increase a specified number of employees, and the  interest rate is increased in certain cases for failure to meet this requirement. See  note (a) below.		$	1,004,019	$	1,069,793
	Bank loan payable in fixed monthly payments of $6,800 of principal and interest at a rate of 0.25% below prime, as defined, subject to a floor of 5% with any principal due at maturity on June 1, 2018; collateralized by the building and land.			612,289		624,760
	Note payable in fixed monthly installments of $6,610 of principal and interest at a rate of 5.5% with any principal due at maturity on May 1, 2028; collateralized by the building and land.			693,303		701,716
			$	2,309,611	$	2,396,269
	(a)	As of April 2013, the Wisconsin Economic Development Corporation granted the Company a 12 month deferral of the required installment payments of $22,800.  On March 1, 2014, fifty equal monthly installments of $23,685 commenced through April 1, 2018 with the final installment due on May 1, 2018.
	Maximum aggregate annual principal payments for fiscal periods subsequent to September 30, 2014 are as follows:
	2015		$	264,305
	2016			361,051
	2017			371,392
	2018			358,373
	2019			105,823
	2020 and thereafter			848,667
			$	2,309,611

9_EMPLOYEEDIRECTOR_EQUITY_INCE

9. EMPLOYEE/DIRECTOR EQUITY INCENTIVE PLANS	3 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2014
Disclosure of Compensation Related Costs, Share-based Payments [Abstract]	'
EMPLOYEE/DIRECTOR EQUITY INCENTIVE PLANS	'
	The Company previously adopted the 2002 Stock Option Plan (“2002 Plan”) in which a stock option committee could grant up to 1,000,000 shares to key employees or non-employee members of the board of directors.  The options vest in accordance with specific terms and conditions contained in an employment agreement.  If vesting terms and conditions are not defined in an employment agreement, then the options vest as determined by the stock option committee.  If the vesting period is not defined in an employment agreement or by the stock option committee, then the options immediately vest in full upon death, disability, or termination of employment.  Vested options expire upon the earlier of either the five year anniversary of the vesting date or termination of employment.  No shares are available to be issued under the 2002 Plan.
	The Company also previously adopted the 2007 Equity Incentive Plan (“2007 Plan”) that authorized the board of directors or a committee to grant up to 300,000 shares to employees and directors of the Company.  Unless defined in an employment agreement or otherwise determined, the options vest ratably over a three-year period.  Options expire 10 years after the date of grant.  No shares are available to be issued under the 2007 Plan.
	In November 2010, the Company adopted the 2010 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan (“Omnibus Plan”) which authorizes a committee of the board of directors to grant stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, unrestricted stock, other stock-based awards and cash awards.  The Omnibus Plan authorized up to 800,000 shares plus shares of Common Stock underlying any outstanding stock option of other award granted by any predecessor employee stock plan of the Company that is forfeited, terminated, or cancelled without issuance of shares, to employees, officers, non-employee members of the board of directors, consultants, and advisors.  Unless otherwise determined, options vest ratably over a three-year period and expire 8 years after the date of grant.
	At the annual meeting of shareholders held on November 7, 2012 the Company’s shareholders approved an amendment of the Omnibus Plan which increased the number of shares of the Company’s common stock available for issuance pursuant to awards under the Omnibus Plan by 900,000 shares and the creation of the 2012 Non-Employee Director Equity Compensation Plan (“2012 Director Equity Plan”), under which the Company may issue up to 700,000 RSU awards and other equity awards to our non-employee directors pursuant to the Company’s director compensation policy. As of September 30, 2014, there are a total of 414,496 shares available to be issued under the Omnibus Plan and 19,304 shares available to be issued under the 2012 Director Equity Plan.
	In aggregate for all plans, at September 30, 2014 there were outstanding a total of 1,619,881 options and 1,561,242 restricted stock units (“RSUs”).
	The fair value of each option granted is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing method.  The Company uses historical data to estimate the expected price volatility, the expected option life and the expected forfeiture rate.  The Company has not made any dividend payments nor does it have plans to pay dividends in the foreseeable future.  The following assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of options granted during the three months ended September 30, 2014 and September 30, 2013 using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model:
			Three Months Ended
			September 30,
			2014		2013
	Expected life of option (years)		4		4
	Risk-free interest rate		1.23 - 1.41%		0.95 - 1.20%
	Assumed volatility		100.97 - 103.91%		94.35-94.83%
	Expected dividend rate		0%		0%
	Expected forfeiture rate		5.00 - 6.32%		5.55 - 5.62%
	Time-vested and performance-based stock awards, including stock options and RSUs are accounted for at fair value at date of grant.  Compensation expense is recognized over the requisite service and performance periods.
	During the three months ended September 30, 2014 and September 30, 2013, the Company’s results of operations include compensation expense for stock options and RSUs granted under its various equity incentive plans.  The amount recognized in the financial statements related to stock-based compensation was $376,392 and $284,080, based on the amortized grant date fair value of options and RSUs during the three months ended September 30, 2014 and September 30, 2013, respectively.
	Information with respect to stock option activity is as follows:
			Number				Weighted				Average
			of				Average				Remaining
			Options				Exercise Price				Contractual Life
											(in years)
	Balance at June 30, 2013			785,284			$	5.78
	Options granted			699,850				1.33
	Options forfeited			(66,066	)			13.23
	Balance at June 30, 2014			1,419,068				3.23				3.09
	Options granted			265,000				1.05
	Options forfeited			(64,187	)			3.66
	Balance at September 30, 2014			1,619,881			$	2.86				6.21
	The following table summarizes information relating to the stock options outstanding at September 30, 2014:
					Outstanding										Exercisable
	Range of Exercise Prices				Number				Average				Weighted		Number		Average		Weighted
					of				Remaining				Average		of		Remaining		Average
					Options				Contractual Life				Exercise		Options		Contractual Life		Exercise
									(in years)				Price				(in years)		Price
	$	0.50 to $1.00				293,000				7.16			$	1.32		-
	$	1.01 to $2.50				772,295				7.46				1.52		79,758		5.57	$	1.98
	$	2.51 to $5.00				179,813				4.91				3.95		163,389		4.88		3.96
	$	5.01 to $7.50				359,773				3.62				6.23		331,773		3.56		6.28
	$	7.51 to $17.95				15,000				1.33				17.95		15,000		1.33		17.95
	Balance at June 30, 2014					1,619,881				6.21			$	2.86		589,920		4.14	$	5.35
	During the three months ended September 30, 2014, options to purchase 265,000 shares were granted to employees exercisable at $1.02 to $1.67 per share based on various service-based and performance-based vesting terms from July 2014 through September 2017 and exercisable at various dates through September 2022.  During the three months ended September 30, 2013 options to purchase 200 shares were granted to employees exercisable at $1.90 per share based on various service-based vesting terms from July 2013 through September 2016 and exercisable at various dates through September 2021.
	The aggregate intrinsic value of outstanding options totaled $0 and was based on the Company’s adjusted closing stock price of $0.56 as of September 30, 2014.
	A summary of the status of unvested employee stock options as of September 30, 2014 and June 30, 2014 and changes during the three months and year then ended is presented below:
			Number				Weighted			Average
			of				Average			Remaining
			Options				Grant Date			Contractual Life
							Fair Value			(in years)
							Per Share
	Balance at June 30, 2013			262,668			$	3.44
	Options granted			699,850				1.33
	Options vested			(127,586	)			3.55
	Options forfeited			(12,463	)			3.38
	Balance at June 30, 2014			822,469				1.63
	Options granted			265,000				1.05
	Options vested			(30,656	)			2.52
	Options forfeited			(26,852	)			2.31
	Balance at September 30, 2014			1,029,961			$	1.43		7.4
	Total fair value of options granted for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and September 30, 2013 was $193,749 and $124, respectively.  At September 30, 2014, there was $608,808 in unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock options, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.6 years.
	The Company compensates its directors with RSUs and cash.  On December 20, 2013, 455,696 RSUs were granted to the Company’s directors in partial payment of directors fees through November 2014 under the 2012 Director Equity Plan.  As of September 30, 2014, 445,696 of the RSUs had vested and there were $90,000 in directors’ fees expense settled with RSUs for the three months ended September 30, 2014.
	On May 1, 2013, the Company’s CEO and Chief Operating Officer were awarded 200,000 RSUs each which would have vested on the satisfaction of certain performance targets.  The RSUs were forfeited on December 31, 2013 resulting in a credit to selling, general, and administrative expense of $406,000 during the year ended June 30, 2014.
	On January 14, 2014, the Company’s CEO and Chief Operating Officer were awarded 500,000 RSUs, of which 100,000 vested immediately upon grant, and the remaining 400,000 were cancelled prior to June 30, 2014.  On April 9, 2014, the Company’s CEO was awarded 200,000 RSUs which vested immediately upon grant under the Omnibus Plan.
	As of September 30, 2014 there were 386,667 unvested RSUs outstanding which will vest through January 15, 2016 and $435,788 in unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested RSUs which are expected to be recognized through January 15, 2016.  Generally, shares of common stock related to vested RSUs are to be issued six months after the holder’s separation from service with the Company.
	The table below summarizes the status of restricted stock unit balances:
		Number of				Weighted
		Restricted				Average
		Stock Units				Valuation
						Price Per Unit
Balance at June 30, 2013			1,131,687			$	2.3
RSUs granted			1,660,695				0.99
RSUs forfeited			(1,200,000	)			1.1
Shares issued			(245,570	)			1.61
Balance at June 30, 2014			1,346,812				1.87
RSUs granted			360,000				1.69
RSUs forfeited			-				-
Shares issued			(145,570	)			0.79
Balance at September 30, 2014			1,561,242			$	1.82

10_WARRANTS

10. WARRANTS	3 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2014
Notes to Financial Statements	'
WARRANTS	'
	At September 30, 2014, the following warrants to purchase the Company’s common stock were outstanding and exercisable:
		·	81,579 warrants exercisable at $0.95 per share and which expire in September 2016 issued as placement agent’s compensation in connection with the sale of $3 million of preferred stock on September 27, 2013 as described in Note 11.
		·	1,710,525 warrants exercisable at $0.95 per share and which expire in September 2016 issued in connection with Securities Purchase Agreements entered into with certain investors providing for the sale of a total of $3.0 million of preferred stock on September 27, 2013 described in Note 11.  In March 2014, 1,447,369 warrants were exercised via a cashless exercise resulting in the issuance of 850,169 shares of common stock of the Company.
		·	15,000 warrants exercisable at $2.10 per share which expire in July 2015 issued as partial payment for services.
		·	306,902 warrants exercisable at $2.375 per share and which expire in June 2017 issued in connection with the Underwriting Agreement entered into with MDB Capital Group, LLC as part of underwriting compensation which provided for the sale of $12 million of common stock on June 19, 2012. On March 19, 2014, 272,159 warrants were exercised via a cashless exercise resulting in the issuance of 53,048 shares of common stock of the Company.
		·	511,604 warrants exercisable at $2.65 per share and which expire in May 2017 issued in connection with Securities Purchase Agreements entered into with certain investors providing for the sale of a total of $2,465,000 of Zero Coupon Convertible Subordinated Notes on May 1, 2012.
		·	12,100 warrants exercisable at $5.00 per share which expire March 2015 through July 2015 issued as partial payment for services.
		·	224,375 warrants exercisable at $5.20 per share and which expire in September 2015 issued to certain purchasers of Company shares in March 2010.
		·	71,667 warrants exercisable at $6.65 per share and which expire in August 2015 issued to certain purchasers of Company shares in August 2009.
	The table below summarizes warrant balances:
			Number of			Weighted
			Warrants			Average
						Exercise Price
						Per Share
	Balance at June 30, 2013			1,421,806		$	3.15
	Warrants granted			3,239,474			0.95
	Warrants expired			(8,000	)		2.8
	Warrants exercised			(1,719,528	)		1.18
	Balance at June 30, 2014			2,933,752			1.88
	Warrants granted			-			-
	Warrants expired			-			-
	Warrants exercised			-			-
	Balance at September 30, 2014			2,933,752		$	1.88

11_EQUITY

11. EQUITY	3 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2014
Equity [Abstract]	'
EQUITY	'
	On August 27, 2014, the Company completed an underwritten public offering of its common stock at a price to the public of $1.12 per share.  The Company sold a total of 13,248,000 shares of its common stock in the offering for aggregate proceeds of approximately $14.8 million.  The Company received approximately $13.7 million of net proceeds from the offering, after deducting the underwriting discount and expenses.
	On March 13, 2013, the Company entered into a Common Stock Purchase Agreement (“Purchase Agreement”) with Aspire Capital Fund, LLC, an Illinois limited liability company (“Aspire Capital”), which provided that, upon the terms and subject to the conditions and limitations set forth therein, Aspire Capital was committed to purchase up to an aggregate of $10 million of shares of the Company’s common stock over the two-year term of the Purchase Agreement.  On August 18, 2014, the Company provided notice to Aspire Capital electing to terminate the Purchase Agreement.
	On March 19, 2014, the Company completed an underwritten public offering of its common stock at a price to the public of $2.25 per share.  The Company sold a total of 6,325,000 shares of its common stock in the offering for aggregate proceeds of approximately $14.2 million.  The Company received approximately $13.0 million of net proceeds from the offering, after deducting the underwriting discount and expenses.
	On October 31, 2013, the Company effected a reverse stock split of its common stock by a ratio of 1-for-5 (the “Reverse Split”).  As a result of the Reverse Split every five outstanding shares of Common Stock became one share of common stock.  No fractional shares were issued in connection with the Reverse Split.  A shareholder who would otherwise have been entitled to receive a fractional share of common stock received a cash payment equal to the closing sales price of the Company’s Common Stock on October 31, 2013 as reported on the NYSE MKT times the amount of the fractional share.  The Reverse Split did not change the number of shares of common or preferred stock that the Company is authorized to issue, or the par value of the Company’s common or preferred stock.  The Reverse Split resulted in a proportionate adjustment to the per share exercise price and the number of shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of outstanding warrants and stock options, as well as the number of shares of common stock eligible for issuance under the Omnibus Plan and the 2012 Director Equity Plan.  All of the information in these financial statements has been presented to reflect the impact of the 1-for-5 Reverse Split on a retroactive basis.
	On September 26, 2013 the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with certain investors providing for the sale of 3,000 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Preferred Stock”).  Certain Directors of the Company purchased 500 shares.
	Shares of Preferred Stock were sold for $1,000 per share (the “Stated Value”) and accrue dividends on the Stated Value at an annual rate of 10%.  The net proceeds to the Company, after deducting $90,127 of offering costs, were $2,903,034.  During the year ended June 30, 2014, 425 shares of Preferred Stock were converted into 470,171 shares of common stock of the Company.  At September 30, 2014, 2,575 shares of Preferred Stock were convertible into 2,991,915 shares of common stock of the Company (“Common Stock”) at a conversion price equal to $0.95.  Upon any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Corporation, holders of Preferred Stock are entitled to receive out of the assets of the Company an amount equal to two times the Stated Value, plus any accrued and unpaid dividends thereon.  At September 30, 2014 the liquidation preference of the Preferred Stock was $5,417,319.
	In connection with the purchase of the Preferred Stock, investors received warrants to purchase a total of 3,157,897 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $0.95.  The warrants are exercisable at any time prior to September 27, 2016.  During the year ended June 30, 2014, 1,447,368 warrants were exercised via a cashless exercise resulting in the issuance of 850,169 shares of common stock of the Company.  In addition, the Company issued a total of 81,579 warrants to a placement agent in connection with the transaction.  These warrants expire on September 27, 2016.

12_COMMITMENTS

12. COMMITMENTS	3 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2014
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]	'
COMMITMENTS	'
	Leasing Activities
	The Company leases its Australian research and development facility from a non-related Australian company under the terms of a lease that expires October 31, 2016.  The rental rate was $75,596 per year (A$72,431) and was subject to an annual CPI adjustment.  Rent expense was $23,734 and $22,945 for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and September 30, 2013, respectively.  In July of 2011, the Company renewed the lease on its Australian research and development facility through October 2016 at a rental rate of $95,855 per year (A$95,000) subject to an annual CPI adjustment.  The Company also leased a building from an officer of its subsidiary, Tier Electronics LLC, who is also a shareholder and was a director, under a lease agreement that was due to expire on December 31, 2014.  Subsequently a lease termination agreement was entered into on October 20, 2013, which terminated the lease effective December 31, 2013 for a fee of $21,000.  The rent expense for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and September 30, 2013 was $0 and $21,000, respectively.  The Company was required to pay real estate taxes and other occupancy costs related to the facility.
	The future payments required under the terms of the leases for fiscal periods subsequent to September 30, 2014 are as follows:
	2015	$	65,798
	2016		29,243
		$	95,041
	Employment Contracts
	The Company has entered into employment contracts with executives and management personnel.  The contracts provide for salaries, bonuses and stock option grants, along with other employee benefits.  The employment contracts generally have no set term and can be terminated by either party.  There is a provision for payments of up to six months of annual salary as severance if the Company terminates a contract without cause, along with the acceleration of certain unvested stock option grants.

13_RETIREMENT_PLANS

13. RETIREMENT PLANS	3 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2014
Compensation and Retirement Disclosure [Abstract]	'
RETIREMENT PLANS	'
	All Australian based employees are entitled to varying degrees of benefits on retirement, disability, or death.  The Company contributes to an accumulation fund on behalf of the employees under an award which is legally enforceable.  For U.S. employees, the Company has a 401(k) plan.  All active participants are 100% vested immediately.  Expenses under these plans were $23,663 and $32,326 for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and September 30, 2013, respectively.

14_INCOME_TAXES

14. INCOME TAXES	3 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2014
Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]	'
INCOME TAXES	'
	The provision (benefit) for income taxes consists of the following:
		Three Months Ended September 30,
		2014			2013
	Current	$	-		$	(19,729	)
	Deferred		-			-
	Provision (benefit) for income taxes	$	-		$	(19,729	)
	The Company accounts for income taxes using an asset and liability approach which generally requires the recognition of deferred income tax assets and liabilities based on the expected future income tax consequences of events that have previously been recognized in the Company’s financial statements or tax returns.  In addition, a valuation allowance is recognized if it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred income tax assets will not be realized in the foreseeable future.  Deferred income tax assets are reviewed for recoverability based on historical taxable income, the expected reversals of existing temporary differences, tax planning strategies and projections of future taxable income.  As a result of this analysis, the Company has provided for a valuation allowance against its net deferred income tax assets as of September 30, 2014 and June 30, 2014.
	The Company’s combined effective income tax rate differed from the U.S. federal statutory income rate as follows:
		As of September 30,
		2014		2013
	Income tax expense/(benefit) computed at the U.S. federal statutory rate	-34%		-34%
	Foreign tax expense/(benefit)	0%		-1%
	Change in valuation allowance	34%		34%
	Total	0%		-1%
	Significant components of the Company’s net deferred income tax assets as of September 30, 2014 and June 30, 2014 were as follows:
		30-Sep-14			30-Jun-14
	Federal net operating loss carryforwards	$	23,296,521		$	22,238,624
	Federal - other		2,813,229			2,737,404
	Wisconsin net operating loss carryforwards		2,863,493			2,747,275
	Australia net operating loss carryforwards		1,497,779			1,497,779
	Deferred income tax asset valuation allowance		(30,471,022	)		(29,221,082	)
	Total deferred income tax assets	$	-		$	-
	The Company has U.S. federal net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $68.5 million as of September 30, 2014, that expire at various dates between June 30, 2017 and 2034.  The Company also has $8.3 million in other federal deferred tax assets comprised of charitable contributions carryforwards and intangible amortization.  The Company has U.S. federal research and development tax credit carryforwards of approximately $223,000 as of September 30, 2014 that expire at various dates through June 30, 2033.  As of September 30, 2014, the Company has approximately $55.0 million of Wisconsin net operating loss carryforwards that expire at various dates between September 30, 2014 and 2028.  As of September 30, 2014, the Company also has approximately $5.0 million of Australian net operating loss carryforwards available to reduce future taxable income of its Australian subsidiaries with an indefinite carryforward period.
	A reconciliation of the beginning and ending balance of unrecognized income tax benefits is as follows:
		30-Sep-14			30-Jun-14
	Beginning balance	$	196,583		$	193,097
	Effect of foreign currency translation		(14,165	)		3,486
	Ending balance	$	182,418		$	196,583
	The Company’s issuance of additional shares of common stock has constituted an ownership change under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code which places an annual dollar limit on the use of net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards and other tax attributes that may be utilized in the future.  The calculation of the annual limitation of usage is based on a percentage of the equity value immediately after any ownership change.  The annual amount of tax attributes that may be utilized after the change in ownership is limited.  Previous issuances of additional shares of common stock also resulted in ownership changes and the annual amount of tax attributes from previous years is limited as well.  The extent of any limitations on the usage of net operating losses has not been determined.

1_SUMMARY_OF_SIGNIFICANT_ACCOU1

1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Policies)	3 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2014
Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies Policies	'
Description of Business	'
	ZBB Energy Corporation (“ZBB,” “we,” “us,” “our” or the “Company”) develops, licenses, and manufactures innovative energy management systems solutions serving the utility, commercial, and industrial building markets.  ZBB was incorporated in Wisconsin in 1998 and is headquartered in Menomonee Falls, Wisconsin, USA with offices also located in Perth, Western Australia.
	ZBB Energy develops and commercializes application solutions for advanced energy management systems critical to the transition from a “coal-centric economy” to one reliant on renewable energy sources.  These advanced systems directly connect wind and solar equipment to the grid and other systems that can form various levels of micro-grids as well as power quality regulation solutions.  ZBB Energy brings vital power control and energy storage solutions to problems caused by the incorporation of increasingly pervasive renewable energy generating assets that are part of the grid power transmission and distribution network used in commercial, industrial, and multi-tenant buildings. The Company also develops and commercializes energy management systems for off-grid applications such as island or remote power.
	The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and those of its wholly-owned subsidiary ZBB Energy Pty Ltd. (formerly known as ZBB Technologies, Ltd.) which has an advanced engineering and development facility in Perth, Australia, and its sixty percent owned subsidiary ZBB PowerSav Holdings Limited located in Hong Kong which was formed in connection with the Company’s investment in a China joint venture.
Interim Financial Data	'
	The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“US GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X.  Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and notes required by US GAAP for complete financial statements.  In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting only of adjustments of a normal and recurring nature) considered necessary for fair presentation of the results of operations have been included.  Operating results for the three month period ended September 30, 2014 are not necessarily indicative of the results that might be expected for the year ending June 30, 2015.
	The condensed consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2014 has been derived from audited financial statements at that date, but does not include all of the information and disclosures required by US GAAP.  For a more complete discussion of accounting policies and certain other information, refer to the Company’s annual report filed on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 29, 2014.
Basis of Presentation	'
	The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly and majority-owned subsidiaries and have been prepared in accordance with US GAAP.  All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments	'
	The Company’s financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash on deposit, accounts receivable, a note receivable, accounts payable, and bank loans and notes payable.  The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial instruments approximate their respective fair values due to the relatively short-term nature of these instruments, except for the note receivable and bank loans and notes payable.  The carrying amount of the note receivable and the bank loans and notes payable approximate fair value due to the interest rate and terms approximating those available to us for similar obligations.
	The Company accounts for the fair value of financial instruments in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 820.  Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.  The degree of judgment utilized in measuring the fair value of assets and liabilities generally correlates to the level or pricing observability.  FASB ASC 820 describes a fair value hierarchy based on the following three levels of inputs, of which the first two are considered observable and the last unobservable, that may be used to measure fair value:
	Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity can access at the measurement date.
	Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for similar assets or liabilities in active markets.
	Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability.  As such, the prices or valuation techniques require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and are unobservable.
Cash and Cash Equivalents	'
	The Company considers all highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents.  The Company maintains its cash deposits in fully insured accounts at financial institutions predominately in the United States, Australia, and Hong Kong.  The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts.
Restricted Cash on Deposit	'
	The Company had $69,201 and $69,901 in restricted cash on deposit as of September 30, 2014 and June 30, 2014, respectively, as collateral for certain credit arrangements.
Accounts Receivable	'
	Credit is extended based on an evaluation of a customer’s financial condition.  Accounts receivable are stated at the amount the Company expects to collect from outstanding balances.  The Company records allowances for doubtful accounts based on customer-specific analysis and general matters such as current assessments of past due balances and economic conditions.  The Company writes off accounts receivable against the allowance when they become uncollectible.  Accounts receivable are stated net of an allowance for doubtful accounts of $10,878 as of September 30, 2014 and June 30, 2014.  The composition of accounts receivable by aging category is as follows as of:
			30-Sep-14			30-Jun-14
	Current		$	77,329		$	902,545
	30-60 days			14,031			-
	60-90 days			69,040			-
	Over 90 days			150,659			148,479
	Total		$	311,059		$	1,051,024
Inventories	'
	Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market.  Cost is computed using standard cost, which approximates actual cost, on a first-in, first-out basis.  The Company provides inventory write-downs based on excess and obsolete inventories determined primarily by future demand forecasts.  The write-down is measured as the difference between the cost of the inventory and market based upon assumptions about future demand and charged to the provision for inventory, which is a component of cost of sales.  At the point of the loss recognition, a new, lower cost basis for that inventory is established, and subsequent changes in facts and circumstances do not result in the restoration or increase in that newly established cost basis.
Property, Plant and Equipment	'
	Land, building, equipment, computers, furniture and fixtures are recorded at cost.  Maintenance, repairs and betterments are charged to expense as incurred.  Depreciation is provided for all plant and equipment on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets.  The estimated useful lives used for each class of depreciable asset are:
		Estimated Useful Lives
	Manufacturing equipment	3 - 7 years
	Office equipment	3 - 7 years
	Assets held for lease	18 months
	Building and improvements	7 - 40 years
	The Company completed a review of the estimated useful lives of specific assets for the quarter ended September 30, 2014 and determined that there were no changes in the estimated useful lives of assets.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets	'
	In accordance with FASB ASC Topic 360, "Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets," the Company assesses potential impairments to its long-lived assets including property, plant, equipment and intangible assets when there is evidence that events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable.
	If such an indication exists, the recoverable amount of the asset is compared to the asset’s carrying value.  Any excess of the asset’s carrying value over its recoverable amount is expensed in the statement of operations.  In assessing value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate.  Management has determined that there were no long-lived assets impaired as of September 30, 2014 and June 30, 2014 (see Note 5).
Investment in Investee Company	'
	Investee companies that are not consolidated, but over which the Company exercises significant influence, are accounted for under the equity method of accounting.  Whether or not the Company exercises significant influence with respect to an investee depends on an evaluation of several factors including, among others, representation on the investee company’s board of directors and ownership level, which is generally a 20% to 50% interest in the voting securities of the investee company.  Under the equity method of accounting, an investee company’s accounts are not reported in the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheets and statements of operations; however, the Company’s share of the earnings or losses of the investee company is reflected in the caption ‘‘Equity in loss of investee company” in the condensed consolidated statements of operations.  The Company’s carrying value in an equity method investee company is reported in the caption ‘‘Investment in investee company’’ in the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheets.
	When the Company’s carrying value in an equity method investee company is reduced to zero, no further losses are recorded in the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements unless the Company guaranteed obligations of the investee company or has committed additional funding.  When the investee company subsequently reports income, the Company will not record its share of such income until it equals the amount of its share of losses not previously recognized.
Note Receivable	'
	The Company has one note receivable from an unrelated party.  The note matures on December 15, 2015 and is classified as “Note receivable” in the financial statements.  See further discussion of the note receivable in Note 6.
Goodwill	'
	Goodwill is recognized as the excess cost of an acquired entity over the net amount assigned to assets acquired and liabilities assumed.  Goodwill is not amortized but reviewed for impairment annually as of June 30 or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that its carrying value may be impaired.  These conditions could include a significant change in the business climate, legal factors, operating performance indicators, competition, or sale or disposition of a significant portion of a reporting unit.
	The first step of the impairment test requires the comparing of a reporting unit’s fair value to its carrying value.  If the carrying value is less than the fair value, no impairment exists and the second step is not performed.  If the carrying value is higher than the fair value, there is an indication that impairment may exist and the second step must be performed to compute the amount of the impairment.  In the second step, the impairment is computed by estimating the fair values of all recognized and unrecognized assets and liabilities of the reporting unit and comparing the implied fair value of reporting unit goodwill with the carrying amount of that unit’s goodwill.  The Company determined fair value as evidenced by market capitalization, and concluded that there was no need for an impairment charge as of September 30, 2014 and June 30, 2014.
Accrued Expenses	'
	Accrued expenses consist of the Company’s present obligations related to various expenses incurred during the period and includes a reserve for estimated contract losses, other accrued expenses, and warranty obligations.  Included in accrued expenses as of September 30, 2014 is a reserve of approximately $1.6 million for a product upgrade initiative established in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014.
	Subsequent to commercialization, installation and commissioning of units in the field, the Company garnered meaningful insights that have resulted in system design modifications and other general upgrades that have improved the performance, efficiency, and reliability of its systems.  In the interest of enhancing customer satisfaction, the Company launched the product upgrade initiative to implement these improvements at certain locations of its installed base over fiscal 2015.
Warranty Obligations	'
	The Company typically warrants its products for twelve months after installation or eighteen months after date of shipment, whichever first occurs.  Warranty costs are provided for estimated claims and charged to cost of product sales as revenue is recognized.  Warranty obligations are also evaluated quarterly to determine a reasonable estimate for the replacement of potentially defective materials of all energy storage systems that have been shipped to customers.
	While the Company actively engages in monitoring and improving its evolving battery and production technologies, there is only a limited product history and relatively short time frame available to test and evaluate the rate of product failure.  Should actual product failure rates differ from the Company’s estimates, revisions are made to the estimated rate of product failures and resulting changes to the liability for warranty obligations.  In addition, from time to time, specific warranty accruals may be made if unforeseen technical problems arise.
	As of September 30, 2014 and June 30, 2014, included in the Company’s accrued expenses were $674,304 and $731,910, respectively, related to warranty obligations.  The following is a summary of accrued warranty activity:
			Three Months and Year Ended
			30-Sep-14			30-Jun-14
	Beginning balance		$	731,910		$	479,873
	Accruals for warranties during the period			146,345			741,412
	Settlements during the period			(214,962	)		(673,588	)
	Adjustments relating to preexisting warranties			11,011			184,213
	Ending balance		$	674,304		$	731,910
Revenue Recognition	'
	Revenues are recognized when persuasive evidence of a contractual arrangement exits, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, the seller’s price to buyer is fixed and determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured.  The portion of revenue related to installation and final acceptance, is deferred until such installation and final customer acceptance are completed.
	From time to time, the Company may enter into separate agreements at or near the same time with the same customer.  The Company evaluates such agreements to determine whether they should be accounted for individually as distinct arrangements or whether the separate agreements are, in substance, a single multiple element arrangement.  The Company evaluates whether the negotiations are conducted jointly as part of a single negotiation, whether the deliverables are interrelated or interdependent, whether the fees in one arrangement are tied to performance in another arrangement, and whether elements in one arrangement are essential to another arrangement.  The Company’s evaluation involves significant judgment to determine whether a group of agreements might be so closely related that they are, in effect, part of a single arrangement.
	Our collaboration agreements typically involve multiple elements or deliverables, including upfront fees, contract research and development, milestone payments, technology licenses or options to obtain technology licenses, and royalties.  For these arrangements, revenues are recognized in accordance with FASB ASC 605-25, “Revenue Recognition – Multiple Element Arrangements.” The Company’s revenues associated with multiple element contracts is based on the selling price hierarchy, which utilizes vendor-specific objective evidence (“VSOE”) when available, third-party evidence (“TPE”) if VSOE is not available, and if neither is available then the best estimate of the selling price is used.  The Company utilizes best estimate for its multiple deliverable transactions as VSOE and TPE do not exist.  To be considered a separate element, the product or service in question must represent a separate unit under SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin 104, and fulfill the following criteria: the delivered item(s) has value to the customer on a standalone basis; there is objective and reliable evidence of the fair value of the undelivered item(s); and if the arrangement includes a general right of return relative to the delivered item(s), delivery or performance of the undelivered item(s) is considered probable and substantially in our control. For arrangements containing multiple elements, revenue from time and materials based service arrangements is recognized as the service is performed.  Revenue relating to undelivered elements is deferred at the estimated fair value until delivery of the deferred elements.  If the arrangement does not meet all criteria above, the entire amount of the transaction is deferred until all elements are delivered.
	The portion of revenue related to engineering and development is recognized ratably upon delivery of the goods or services pertaining to the underlying contractual arrangement or revenue is recognized as certain activities are performed by the Company over the estimated performance period.
	The Company charges shipping and handling fees when products are shipped or delivered to a customer, and includes such amounts in net revenues.  The Company reports its revenues net of estimated returns and allowances.
	Revenues from government funded research and development contracts are recognized proportionally as costs are incurred and compared to the estimated total research and development costs for each contract.  In many cases, the Company is reimbursed only a portion of the costs incurred or to be incurred on the contract.  Government funded research and development contracts are generally multi-year, cost-reimbursement and/or cost-share type contracts.  The Company is generally reimbursed for reasonable and allocable costs up to the reimbursement limits set by the contract.
	Total revenues of $564,861 and $1,069,122 were recognized for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and September 30, 2013, respectively.  For the three months ended September 30, 2014 two significant customers comprised 62% and 30% of total revenues.  For the three months ended September 30, 2013 one significant customer comprised 82% of total revenues.
Engineering, Development, and License Revenues	'
	We assess whether a substantive milestone exists at the inception of our agreements.  In evaluating if a milestone is substantive we consider whether:
	·	Substantive uncertainty exists as to the achievement of the milestone event at the inception of the arrangement;
	·	The achievement of the milestone involves substantive effort and can only be achieved based in whole or in part on our performance or the occurrence of a specific outcome resulting from our performance;
	·	The amount of the milestone payment appears reasonable either in relation to the effort expended or the enhancement of the value of the delivered item(s);
	·	There is no future performance required to earn the milestone; and
	·	The consideration is reasonable relative to all deliverables and payment terms in the arrangement.
	If any of these conditions are not met, we do not consider the milestone to be substantive and we defer recognition of the milestone payment and recognize it as revenue over the estimated period of performance, if any.
	On December 13, 2011, the Company entered into a joint development and license agreement with a global technology company to jointly develop flow batteries.  The objective of the joint development agreement is to develop low cost, high energy density grid scale flow battery stacks and systems that could lead to a significant cost reduction for grid level storage.  The Company recognizes revenue under this agreement upon achievement of certain performance milestones.  The Company recognized $0 of revenue under this agreement for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and September 30, 2013.
	On April 8, 2011, the Company entered into a Collaboration Agreement (the “Collaboration Agreement”) with Honam Petrochemical Corporation, now known as Lotte Chemical Corporation (“Lotte”), pursuant to which the Company and Lotte collaborated on the technical development of the Company’s third generation Zinc Bromide flow battery module (the “Version 3 Battery Module”) and Lotte received a fully paid-up, exclusive and royalty-free license to sell and manufacture the Version 3 Battery Module in Korea and a non-exclusive royalty-bearing license to sell the Version 3 Battery Module in Japan, Thailand, Taiwan, Malaysia, Vietnam and Singapore.
	On December 16, 2013, the Company and Lotte entered into a Research and Development Agreement (the “R&D Agreement”) pursuant to which the Company has agreed to develop and provide to Lotte a Zinc Bromide chemical flow battery system, including a Zinc Bromide chemical flow battery module and related software (the “Product”), on the terms and conditions set forth in the R&D Agreement (the “Project”).  The Project is scheduled to continue until December 16, 2015, unless extended by the mutual agreement of the Company and Lotte.  Subject to the satisfaction of certain specified milestones, Lotte is required to make payments to the Company under the R&D Agreement totaling $3,000,000 over the term of the Project.  ZBB will recognize revenue based upon a Performance Based Method pursuant to the model described in FASB ASC 980-605-25, where revenue is recognized based on the lesser of the amount of nonrefundable cash received or the amounts due based on the proportional amount of the total effort expected to be expended on the contract that has been provided to date as there does not exist substantial doubt that the milestones will be achieved.  The Company recognized $0 of revenue under this agreement for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and September 30, 2013.
	Additionally, on December 16, 2013, the Company and Lotte entered into an Amended License Agreement (the “Amended License”).  Pursuant to the Amended License Agreement, the Company granted to Lotte, (1) an exclusive and royalty-free limited license in Korea to use the Company’s Zinc Bromide flow battery module, Zinc Bromide flow battery stack and the technical information and know how related to the intellectual property arising from the Project (collectively, the “Technology”) to manufacture or sell a Zinc Bromide flow battery (the “Lotte Product”) in Korea and (2) a non-exclusive (a) royalty-free limited license for Lotte and its affiliates to use the Technology internally in all locations other than China and Korea to manufacture the Lotte Product and (b) royalty-bearing limited license to sell the Lotte Product in all locations other than China, the United States and Korea. Lotte is required to pay the Company a total license fee of $3,000,000 under the Amended License Agreement plus up to an additional $1,000,000 if certain specific milestones are successfully achieved.  In addition, Lotte is required to make ongoing royalty payments to the Company equal to a single digit percentage of Lotte’s sales of the Lotte Product outside of Korea until December 31, 2019.  The license fees are subject to a 16.5% non-refundable Korea withholding tax.
	Overall, there were $3,750,000 of payments received and $4,125,000 of revenue recognized under the Lotte agreements in the year ended June 30, 2014.  During the three months ended September 30, 2014, the Company received the residual $375,000 payment under these agreements.
	The Company recognized $15,520 in engineering and development revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and $0 for the three months ended September 30, 2013, respectively, related to collaborative agreements.  Engineering and development costs related to the collaboration agreements totaled $109,163 and $0 for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and September 30, 2013, respectively.
	As of September 30, 2014 and September 30, 2013, the Company had no unbilled amounts from engineering and development contracts in process.  The Company had received $31,680 and $125,663 in customer payments for engineering and development contracts, representing deposits in advance of performance of the contracted work, as of September 30, 2014 and September 30, 2013, respectively.
Advanced Engineering and Development Expenses	'
	In accordance with FASB ASC Topic 730, “Research and Development,” the Company expenses advanced engineering and development costs as incurred.  These costs consist primarily of materials, labor, and allocable indirect costs incurred to design, build, and test prototype units, as well as the development of manufacturing processes for these units.  Advanced engineering and development costs also include consulting fees and other costs.
	To the extent these costs are separately identifiable, incurred and funded by advanced engineering and development type agreements with outside parties, they are shown separately on the condensed consolidated statements of operations as a “Cost of engineering and development.”
Stock-Based Compensation	'
	The Company measures all “Share-Based Payments," including grants of stock options, restricted shares and restricted stock units to be recognized in its condensed consolidated statement of operations based on their fair values on the grant date, which is consistent with FASB ASC Topic 718, “Stock Compensation,” guidelines.
	Accordingly, the Company measures share-based compensation cost for all share-based awards at the fair value on the grant date and recognition of share-based compensation over the service period for awards that are expected to vest.  The fair value of stock options is determined based on the number of shares granted and the price of the shares at grant, and calculated based on the Black-Scholes valuation model.
	The Company compensates its outside directors primarily with restricted stock units (“RSUs”) rather than cash.  The grant date fair value of the restricted stock unit awards is determined using the closing stock price of the Company’s common stock on the day prior to the date of the grant, with the compensation expense amortized over the vesting period of restricted stock unit awards, net of estimated forfeitures.
	The Company only recognizes expense to its statements of operations for those options or shares that are expected ultimately to vest, using two attribution methods to record expense, the straight-line method for grants with only service-based vesting or the graded-vesting method, which considers each performance period, for all other awards.  See Note 9.
Advertising Expense	'
	Advertising costs of $7,563 and $23,151 for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and September 30, 2013, respectively, were charged to selling, general, and administrative expenses as incurred.
Income Taxes	'
	The Company records deferred income taxes in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 740, “Accounting for Income Taxes.”  FASB ASC Topic 740 requires recognition of deferred income tax assets and liabilities for temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and the amounts at which they are carried in the financial statements, based upon the enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse.  The Company establishes a valuation allowance when necessary to reduce deferred income tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.  There were no net deferred income tax assets recorded as of September 30, 2014 and June 30, 2014.
	The Company applies a more-likely-than-not recognition threshold for all tax uncertainties as required under FASB ASC Topic 740, which only allows the recognition of those tax benefits that have a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being sustained upon examination by the taxing authorities.
	The Company’s U.S. Federal income tax returns for the years ended June 30, 2011 through June 30, 2014 and the Company’s Wisconsin and Australian income tax returns for the years ended June 30, 2010 through June 30, 2014 are subject to examination by taxing authorities.  As of September 30, 2014, there were no examinations in progress.
Foreign Currency	'
	The Company uses the United States dollar as its functional and reporting currency, while the Australian dollar and Hong Kong dollar are the functional currencies of its foreign subsidiaries.  Assets and liabilities of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries are translated into United States dollars at exchange rates that are in effect at the balance sheet date while equity accounts are translated at historical exchange rates.  Income and expense items are translated at average exchange rates which were applicable during the reporting period.  Translation adjustments are accumulated in accumulated other comprehensive loss as a separate component of equity in the condensed consolidated balance sheets.
Loss per Share	'
	The Company follows the FASB ASC Topic 260, “Earnings per Share,” provisions which require the reporting of both basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share.  Basic earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period.  Diluted earnings (net loss) per share reflect the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock.  In accordance with the FASB ASC Topic 260, any anti-dilutive effects on net income (loss) per share are excluded.  For the three months ended September 30, 2014 and September 30, 2013 there were 9,106,790 and 9,738,542 shares of common stock underlying convertible preferred stock, options, restricted stock units and warrants that are excluded, respectively.
Concentrations of Credit Risk and Fair Value	'
	Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash and accounts receivable.
	The Company maintains significant cash deposits primarily with three financial institutions.  All deposits are fully insured as of September 30, 2014.  The Company has not previously experienced any losses on such deposits.  Additionally, the Company performs periodic evaluations of the relative credit ratings of these institutions as part of its banking strategy.
	Concentrations of credit risk with respect to accounts receivable are limited due to accelerated payment terms in current customer contracts and creditworthiness of the current customer base.
Use of Estimates	'
	The preparation of financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions.  These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amount of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.  It is reasonably possible that the estimates we have made may change in the near future.  Significant estimates underlying the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include those related to:
	·	the timing of revenue recognition;
	·	the allowance for doubtful accounts;
	·	provisions for excess and obsolete inventory;
	·	the lives and recoverability of property, plant and equipment and other long-lived assets, including goodwill;
	·	contract costs, losses, and reserves;
	·	warranty obligations;
	·	income tax valuation allowances;
	·	stock-based compensation; and
	·	valuation of warrants.
Reclassifications	'
	Certain amounts previously reported have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation.
Segment Information	'
	The Company has determined that it operates as one reportable segment.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements	'
	From time to time, new accounting pronouncements are issued by the FASB or other standard setting bodies that are adopted by the Company as of the specified effective date.  Unless otherwise discussed, the Company believes that the impact of recently issued standards that are not yet effective will not have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations upon adoption.
	In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-15 – Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40).  The update requires management to perform a going concern assessment if there is substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year of the financial statement issuance date.  Under the new standard, the definition of substantial doubt incorporates a likeliness threshold of “probable” that is consistent with the current use of the term defined in US GAAP for loss contingencies (Topic 450 – Contingencies).  Management will need to consider conditions that are known and reasonably knowable at the financial statement issuance date and determine whether the entity will be able to meet its obligations within the one-year period.  Additional disclosures are required if it is probable that the entity will be unable to meet its current obligations.  The amendments in this ASU will be effective for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016.  Early adoption is permitted.  The Company does not expect adoption of this guidance to have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements.
	In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-12 - Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718).  The amendments require that entities should treat performance targets that can be met after the requisite service period of a share-based payment award as performance conditions that affect vesting and, accordingly, the performance target should not be reflected in estimating the grant-date fair value of the award.  Compensation expense should be recognized in the period in which it becomes probable that the performance target will be achieved.  ASU 2014-12 is effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015.  The Company is required to adopt this standard beginning July 1, 2016.  ASU 2014-12 does not contain any new disclosure requirements.  The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2014-12 to have a material effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
	In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09 – Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606).  The amendments outline a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersede most current revenue recognition guidance, including industry-specific guidance.  The core principle of the revenue model is that an entity recognizes revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.  In applying the revenue model to contracts within its scope, an entity identifies the contract(s) with a customer, identifies the performance obligations in the contract, determines the transaction price, allocates the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract and recognizes revenue when the entity satisfies a performance obligation.  ASU 2014-09, which includes additional disclosure requirements regarding revenue, cash flows and obligations related to contracts with customers, will be effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016.  Early adoption is not permitted.  The guidance permits companies to either apply the requirements retrospectively to all prior periods presented, or apply the requirements in the year of adoption, through a cumulative adjustment.  The Company is currently evaluating the effect that implementation of this update will have on its consolidated financial position and results of operations upon adoption.
	In April 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-08 - Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant, and Equipment (Topic 360): Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity.  The update changes the requirements for reporting discontinued operations in Subtopic 205-20.  To be classified as a discontinued operation, the disposal of a component or group of components must represent a strategic shift that has, or will have, a major effect on an entity’s operations and financial results.  Examples include a disposal of a major geographic area, a major line of business or a major equity method investment.  The amendments in this ASU are effective prospectively for reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2014, with early adoption permitted.  The adoption of this standard update affects presentation only and, as such, is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
	In July 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-11 – Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists, which requires an unrecognized tax benefit to be presented in the financial statements as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward, similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward.  To the extent the tax benefit is not available at the reporting date under the governing tax law or if the entity does not intend to use the deferred tax asset for such purpose, the unrecognized tax benefit should be presented as a liability and not combined with deferred tax assets.  ASU 2013-11 is effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013.  The amendments are to be applied to all unrecognized tax benefits that exist as of the effective date and may be applied retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented.  The adoption of this pronouncement did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
	In April 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-07 – Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) – Liquidation Basis of Accounting.  The amendments require an entity to prepare its financial statements using the liquidation basis of accounting when liquidation is imminent.  Liquidation is imminent when the likelihood is remote that the entity will return from liquidation and either (a) a plan for liquidation is approved by the person or persons with the authority to make such a plan effective and the likelihood is remote that the execution of the plan will be blocked by other parties or (b) a plan for liquidation is being imposed by other forces (for example, involuntary bankruptcy).  If a plan for liquidation was specified in the entity’s governing documents from the entity’s inception (for example, limited-life entities), the entity should apply the liquidation basis of accounting only if the approved plan for liquidation differs from the plan for liquidation that was specified at the entity’s inception.  The amendments require financial statements prepared using the liquidation basis of accounting to present relevant information about an entity’s expected resources in liquidation by measuring and presenting assets at the amount of the expected cash proceeds from liquidation.  The entity should include in its presentation of assets any items it had not previously recognized under US GAAP but that it expects to either sell in liquidation or use in settling liabilities (for example, trademarks).  The amendments are effective for entities that determine liquidation is imminent during annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2013, and interim reporting periods therein.  Entities should apply the requirements prospectively from the day that liquidation becomes imminent.  Early adoption is permitted.  The adoption did not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements in its present condition.
	In March 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-05 – Foreign Currency Matters (Topic 830) – Parent’s Accounting for the Cumulative Translation Adjustment upon derecognition of Certain Subsidiaries or Group of Assets within a Foreign Entity or of an Investment in a Foreign Entity.  These amendments provide guidance on releasing cumulative translation adjustments when a reporting entity (parent) ceases to have a controlling financial interest in a subsidiary or a group of assets that is a non-profit activity or a business within a foreign entity.  In addition, these amendments provide guidance on the release of cumulative translation adjustments in partial sales of equity method investments and in step acquisitions.  The amendments are effective for fiscal years and interim reporting periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013.  The amendments should be applied prospectively to derecognition events occurring after the effective date.  Prior periods should not be adjusted.  Early adoption is permitted.  If an entity elects to early adopt the amendments, it should apply them as of the beginning of the entity’s fiscal year of adoption.  The Company was required to adopt this standard beginning July 1, 2014.  The adoption of this pronouncement did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
	In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-04 – Liabilities (Topic 405) – Obligations Resulting from Joint and Several Liability Arrangements for Which the Total Amount of the Obligation is Fixed at the Reporting Date.  These amendments provide guidance for the recognition, measurement, and disclosure of obligations resulting from joint and several liability arrangements for which the total amount of the obligation within the scope of this guidance is fixed at the reporting date, except for obligations addressed within existing guidance in US GAAP.  Examples of obligations within this guidance are debt arrangements, other contractual obligations, and settled litigation and judicial rulings.  The amendments are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013.  These amendments shall be applied retrospectively to all prior periods presented for those obligations within the scope of this Subtopic that exist at the beginning of an entity’s fiscal year of adoption.  Early adoption is permitted.  The adoption of this pronouncement did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

1_SUMMARY_OF_SIGNIFICANT_ACCOU2

1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Tables)	3 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2014
Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies Tables	'
Schedule of Accounts Receivable	'
			30-Sep-14			30-Jun-14
	Current		$	77,329		$	902,545
	30-60 days			14,031			-
	60-90 days			69,040			-
	Over 90 days			150,659			148,479
	Total		$	311,059		$	1,051,024
Estimated Useful Lives Used For Each Class of Depreciable Assets	'
		Estimated Useful Lives
	Manufacturing equipment	3 - 7 years
	Office equipment	3 - 7 years
	Assets held for lease	18 months
	Building and improvements	7 - 40 years
Schedule Of Accrued Warranty Liability	'
			Three Months and Year Ended
			30-Sep-14			30-Jun-14
	Beginning balance		$	731,910		$	479,873
	Accruals for warranties during the period			146,345			741,412
	Settlements during the period			(214,962	)		(673,588	)
	Adjustments relating to preexisting warranties			11,011			184,213
	Ending balance		$	674,304		$	731,910

2_CHINA_JOINT_VENTURE_Tables

2. CHINA JOINT VENTURE (Tables)	3 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2014
China Joint Venture Tables	'
Operating results for AHMN	'
		Three Months Ended September 30,
		2014			2013
	Revenues	$	299,041		$	41,845
	Gross Profit (loss)		(33,493	)		(28,987	)
	Income (loss) from operations		(407,784	)		(583,595	)
	Net Income (loss)		(414,169	)		(544,487	)

4_INVENTORIES_Tables

4. INVENTORIES (Tables)	3 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2014
Inventory Disclosure [Abstract]	'
Inventories	'
		30-Sep-14		30-Jun-14
	Raw materials	$	1,179,377	$	1,054,197
	Work in progress		220,960		298,773
	Total	$	1,400,337	$	1,352,970

5_PROPERTY_PLANT_EQUIPMENT_Tab

5. PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIPMENT (Tables)	3 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2014
Property, Plant and Equipment [Abstract]	'
Property, plant, and equipment	'
		30-Sep-14			30-Jun-14
	Land	$	217,000		$	217,000
	Building and improvements		3,532,375			3,520,872
	Manufacturing equipment		3,695,781			3,710,127
	Office equipment		417,073			399,583
	Total, at cost		7,862,229			7,847,582
	Less: accumulated depreciation		(3,616,229	)		(3,465,379	)
	Property, plant and equipment, net	$	4,246,000		$	4,382,203

8_BANK_LOANS_AND_NOTES_PAYABLE1

8. BANK LOANS AND NOTES PAYABLE (Tables)	3 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2014
Debt Disclosure [Abstract]	'
Bank loans and notes payable	'
		30-Sep-14		30-Jun-14
	Bank loans and notes payable-current	$	353,600	$	351,142
	Bank loans and notes payable-long term		1,956,011		2,045,127
	Total	$	2,309,611	$	2,396,269
		30-Sep-14		30-Jun-14
	Note payable to Wisconsin Econcomic Development Corporation payable in monthly installments of $23,685, including interest at 2%, with the final payment due  May 1, 2018; collateralized by equipment purchased with the loan proceeds and substantially all assets of the Company not otherwise collateralized.  The Company is required to maintain and increase a specified number of employees, and the interest rate is increased in certain cases for failure to meet this requirement. See  note (a) below.	$	1,004,019	$	1,069,793
	Bank loan payable in fixed monthly payments of $6,800 of principal and interest at a rate of 0.25% below prime, as defined, subject to a floor of 5% with any principal due at maturity on June 1, 2018; collateralized by the building and land.		612,289		624,760
	Note payable in fixed monthly installments of $6,610 of principal and interest at a rate of 5.5% with any principal due at maturity on May 1, 2028; collateralized by the building and land.		693,303		701,716
		$	2,309,611	$	2,396,269
Maximum aggregate annual principal payments for fiscal periods	'
	2015	$	264,305
	2016		361,051
	2017		371,392
	2018		358,373
	2019		105,823
	2020 and thereafter		848,667
		$	2,309,611

9_EMPLOYEEDIRECTOR_EQUITY_INCE1

9. EMPLOYEE/DIRECTOR EQUITY INCENTIVE PLANS (Tables)	3 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2014
Disclosure of Compensation Related Costs, Share-based Payments [Abstract]	'
Assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of options	'
			Three Months Ended
			September 30,
			2014		2013
	Expected life of option (years)		4		4
	Risk-free interest rate		1.23 - 1.41%		0.95 - 1.20%
	Assumed volatility		100.97 - 103.91%		94.35-94.83%
	Expected dividend rate		0%		0%
	Expected forfeiture rate		5.00 - 6.32%		5.55 - 5.62%
Stock option activity under the employee and director plans	'
			Number				Weighted				Average
			of				Average				Remaining
			Options				Exercise Price				Contractual Life
											(in years)
	Balance at June 30, 2013			785,284			$	5.78
	Options granted			699,850				1.33
	Options forfeited			(66,066	)			13.23
	Balance at June 30, 2014			1,419,068				3.23				3.09
	Options granted			265,000				1.05
	Options forfeited			(64,187	)			3.66
	Balance at September 30, 2014			1,619,881			$	2.86				6.21
Stock options outstanding	'
		Outstanding												Exercisable
	Range of Exercise Prices				Number				Average				Weighted		Number		Average		Weighted
					of				Remaining				Average		of		Remaining		Average
					Options				Contractual Life				Exercise		Options		Contractual Life		Exercise
									(in years)				Price				(in years)		Price
	$	0.50 to $1.00				293,000				7.16			$	1.32		-
	$	1.01 to $2.50				772,295				7.46				1.52		79,758		5.57	$	1.98
	$	2.51 to $5.00				179,813				4.91				3.95		163,389		4.88		3.96
	$	5.01 to $7.50				359,773				3.62				6.23		331,773		3.56		6.28
	$	7.51 to $17.95				15,000				1.33				17.95		15,000		1.33		17.95
	Balance at June 30, 2014					1,619,881				6.21			$	2.86		589,920		4.14	$	5.35
Summary of the status of unvested employee stock options	'
			Number				Weighted			Average
			of				Average			Remaining
			Options				Grant Date			Contractual Life
							Fair Value			(in years)
							Per Share
	Balance at June 30, 2013			262,668			$	3.44
	Options granted			699,850				1.33
	Options vested			(127,586	)			3.55
	Options forfeited			(12,463	)			3.38
	Balance at June 30, 2014			822,469				1.63
	Options granted			265,000				1.05
	Options vested			(30,656	)			2.52
	Options forfeited			(26,852	)			2.31
	Balance at September 30, 2014			1,029,961			$	1.43		7.4
Status of restricted stock unit balances	'
			Number of				Weighted
			Restricted				Average
			Stock Units				Valuation
							Price Per Unit
	Balance at June 30, 2013			1,131,687			$	2.3
	RSUs granted			1,660,695				0.99
	RSUs forfeited			(1,200,000	)			1.1
	Shares issued			(245,570	)			1.61
	Balance at June 30, 2014			1,346,812				1.87
	RSUs granted			360,000				1.69
	RSUs forfeited			-				-
	Shares issued			(145,570	)			0.79
	Balance at September 30, 2014			1,561,242			$	1.82

10_WARRANTS_Tables

10. WARRANTS (Tables)	3 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2014
Warrants Tables	'
Warrant balances	'
		Number of			Weighted
		Warrants			Average
					Exercise Price
					Per Share
	Balance at June 30, 2013		1,421,806		$	3.15
	Warrants granted		3,239,474			0.95
	Warrants expired		(8,000	)		2.8
	Warrants exercised		(1,719,528	)		1.18
	Balance at June 30, 2014		2,933,752			1.88
	Warrants granted		-			-
	Warrants expired		-			-
	Warrants exercised		-			-
	Balance at September 30, 2014		2,933,752		$	1.88

12_COMMITMENTS_Tables

12. COMMITMENTS (Tables)	3 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2014
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]	'
Future payments required under the terms of the leases for fiscal periods	'
	2015	$	65,798
	2016		29,243
		$	95,041

14_INCOME_TAXES_Tables

14. INCOME TAXES (Tables)	3 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2014
Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]	'
Provision (benefit) for income taxes	'
		Three Months Ended September 30,
		2014			2013
	Current	$	-		$	(19,729	)
	Deferred		-			-
	Provision (benefit) for income taxes	$	-		$	(19,729	)
Effective income tax rate reconciliation	'
		As of September 30,
		2014		2013
	Income tax expense/(benefit) computed at the U.S. federal statutory rate	-34%		-34%
	Foreign tax expense/(benefit)	0%		-1%
	Change in valuation allowance	34%		34%
	Total	0%		-1%
Significant components of the Company's net deferred income tax assets	'
		30-Sep-14			30-Jun-14
	Federal net operating loss carryforwards	$	23,296,521		$	22,238,624
	Federal - other		2,813,229			2,737,404
	Wisconsin net operating loss carryforwards		2,863,493			2,747,275
	Australia net operating loss carryforwards		1,497,779			1,497,779
	Deferred income tax asset valuation allowance		(30,471,022	)		(29,221,082	)
	Total deferred income tax assets	$	-		$	-
Reconciliation of the beginning and ending balance of unrecognized income tax benefits	'
		30-Sep-14			30-Jun-14
	Beginning balance	$	196,583		$	193,097
	Effect of foreign currency translation		(14,165	)		3,486
	Ending balance	$	182,418		$	196,583

1_SUMMARY_OF_SIGNIFICANT_ACCOU3

1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Details) (USD $)	Sep. 30, 2014	Jun. 30, 2014
Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies Details	'	'
Current	$77,329	$902,545
30-60 days	14,031	0
60-90 days	69,040	0
Over 90 days	150,659	148,479
Total	$311,059	$1,051,024

1_SUMMARY_OF_SIGNIFICANT_ACCOU4

1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Details 1)	3 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2014
Assets held for lease	'
Estimated Useful Lives of Property, Plant and Equipment	'18 months
Minimum [Member] | ManufacturingEquipment [Member]	'
Estimated Useful Lives of Property, Plant and Equipment	'3 years
Minimum [Member] | OfficeEquipment [Member]	'
Estimated Useful Lives of Property, Plant and Equipment	'3 years
Minimum [Member] | BuildingAndImprovementsMember	'
Estimated Useful Lives of Property, Plant and Equipment	'7 years
Maximum [Member] | ManufacturingEquipment [Member]	'
Estimated Useful Lives of Property, Plant and Equipment	'7 years
Maximum [Member] | OfficeEquipment [Member]	'
Estimated Useful Lives of Property, Plant and Equipment	'7 years
Maximum [Member] | BuildingAndImprovementsMember	'
Estimated Useful Lives of Property, Plant and Equipment	'40 years

1_SUMMARY_OF_SIGNIFICANT_ACCOU5

1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Details 2) (USD $)	3 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2014	Jun. 30, 2014
Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies Details 2	'	'
Beginning balance	$731,910	$479,873
Accruals for warranties during the period	146,345	741,412
Settlements during the perioid	-214,962	-673,588
Adjustments relating to preexisting warranties	11,011	184,213
Ending balance	$674,304	$731,910

2_CHINA_JOINT_VENTURE_Details

2. CHINA JOINT VENTURE (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2013
China Joint Venture Details	'	'
Revenues	$299,041	$41,845
Gross Profit (loss)	-33,493	-28,987
Income (loss) from operations	-407,784	-583,595
Net Income (loss)	($414,169)	($544,487)

2_CHINA_JOINT_VENTURE_Details_

2. CHINA JOINT VENTURE (Details Narrative) (USD $)	3 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2013
China Joint Venture Details Narrative	'	'
Net loss	$414,169	$544,487

4_INVENTORIES_Details

4. INVENTORIES (Details) (USD $)	Sep. 30, 2014	Jun. 30, 2014
Inventories Details	'	'
Raw materials	$1,179,377	$1,054,197
Work in progress	220,960	298,773
Total	$1,400,337	$1,352,970

5_PROPERTY_PLANT_EQUIPMENT_Det

5. PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIPMENT (Details) (USD $)	Sep. 30, 2014	Jun. 30, 2014
Property Plant Equipment Details	'	'
Land	$217,000	$217,000
Building and improvements	3,532,375	3,520,872
Manufacturing equipment	3,695,781	3,710,127
Office equipment	417,073	399,583
Total, at cost	7,862,229	7,847,582
Less: accumulated depreciation	-3,616,229	-3,465,379
Property, plant and equipment, net	$4,246,000	$4,382,203

7_GOODWILL_Details_Narrative

7. GOODWILL (Details Narrative) (USD $)	Sep. 30, 2014	Jun. 30, 2014
Goodwill Details Narrative	'	'
Net goodwill amount	$803,079	$803,079

8_BANK_LOANS_AND_NOTES_PAYABLE2

8. BANK LOANS AND NOTES PAYABLE (Details) (USD $)	Sep. 30, 2014	Jun. 30, 2014
Bank Loans And Notes Payable Details	'	'
Bank loans and notes payable-current	$353,600	$351,142
Bank loans and notes payable-long term	1,956,011	2,045,127
Total	$2,309,611	$2,396,269

8_BANK_LOANS_AND_NOTES_PAYABLE3

8. BANK LOANS AND NOTES PAYABLE (Details 1) (USD $)	Sep. 30, 2014	Jun. 30, 2014
Bank Loans And Notes Payable Details	'	'
Note payable to Wisconsin Department of Commerce payable in monthly installments of $23,685, including interest at 2%, with the final payment due May 1, 2018; collateralized by equipment purchased with the loan proceeds and substantially all assets of the Company not otherwise collateralized. The Company is required to maintain and increase a specified number of employees, and the interest rate is increased in certain cases for failure to meet this requirement. See note (b) below.	$1,004,019	$1,069,793
Bank loan payable in fixed monthly payments of $6,800 of principal and interest at a rate of .25% below prime, as defined, subject to a floor of 5% with any principal due at maturity on June 1, 2018; collateralized by the building and land	612,289	624,760
Note payable in fixed monthly installments of $6,716 of principal and interest at a rate of 5.5% with any principal due at maturity on May 1, 2028; collateralized by the building and land	693,303	701,716
Total	$2,309,611	$2,396,269

8_BANK_LOANS_AND_NOTES_PAYABLE4

8. BANK LOANS AND NOTES PAYABLE (Details 2) (USD $)	Sep. 30, 2014	Jun. 30, 2014
Bank Loans And Notes Payable Details 2	'	'
2015	$264,305	'
2016	361,051	'
2017	371,392	'
2018	358,373	'
2019	105,823	'
2020 and thereafter	848,667	'
Total	$2,309,611	$2,396,269

9_EMPLOYEEDIRECTOR_EQUITY_INCE2

9. EMPLOYEE/DIRECTOR EQUITY INCENTIVE PLANS (Details)	3 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2013
Employeedirector Equity Incentive Plans Details	'	'
Expected life of option (years)	'4 years	'4 years
Risk-free interest rate, minimum	0.95%	0.46%
Risk-free interest rate, maximum	1.27%	0.61%
Assumed volatility, minimum	94.35%	96.28%
Assumed volatility, maximum	111.20%	104.13%
Expected dividend rate	0.00%	0.00%
Expected forfeiture rate, minimum	4.91%	4.19%
Expected forfeiture rate, maximum	5.62%	6.66%

9_EMPLOYEEDIRECTOR_EQUITY_INCE3

9. EMPLOYEE/DIRECTOR EQUITY INCENTIVE PLANS (Details 1) (USD $)	3 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2013
Outstanding Number of Options, Ending balance	1,619,881	'
Outstanding, ending, Weighted-Average Exercise Price	$2.86	'
Average Remaining Contractual Life of Outstanding Options	'6 years 2 months 15 days	'
Employee and Director Plans	'	'
Outstanding Number of Options, Beginning balance	1,419,068	785,284
Options granted	265,000	699,850
Options forfeited	-64,187	-66,066
Outstanding Number of Options, Ending balance	1,619,881	1,419,068
Outstanding, ending, Weighted-Average Exercise Price	$3.23	$5.78
Options granted	$1.05	$1.33
Options forfeited	$3.66	$13.23
Outstanding, ending, Weighted-Average Exercise Price	$2.86	$3.23
Average Remaining Contractual Life of Outstanding Options	'6 years 2 months 16 days	'3 years 1 month 2 days

9_EMPLOYEEDIRECTOR_EQUITY_INCE4

9. EMPLOYEE/DIRECTOR EQUITY INCENTIVE PLANS (Details 2) (USD $)	3 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2013
Number of Options	'	'
Beginning Balance, Number of Options	822,469	262,668
Granted	265,000	699,850
Vested	-30,656	-127,586
Forfeited	-26,852	-12,463
Ending Balance, number of options	1,029,961	822,469
Weighted - Average Grant Date Fair Value Per Share	'	'
Beginning Balance, grant date fair value	$1.63	$3.44
Granted	$1.05	$1.33
Vested	$2.52	$3.55
Forfeited	$2.31	$3.38
Ending Balance, grant date fair value	$1.43	$1.63
Average Remaining Contractual Life	'7 years 4 months 24 days	'

9_EMPLOYEEDIRECTOR_EQUITY_INCE5

9. EMPLOYEE/DIRECTOR EQUITY INCENTIVE PLANS (Details 3) (USD $)	3 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2013
Outstanding Number of Options, Ending balance	1,619,881	'
Outstanding, ending, Weighted-Average Exercise Price	$2.86	'
Number of Restricted Stock Units	'	'
Outstanding Number of Options, Beginning balance	1,346,812	1,131,687
Granted	360,000	1,660,695
Forfeited	0	-1,200,000
Shares issued	-145,570	-245,570
Outstanding Number of Options, Ending balance	1,561,242	1,346,812
Outstanding, ending, Weighted-Average Exercise Price	$1.87	$2.30
Granted	$1.69	$0.99
Forfeited	$0	$1.10
Shares issued	$0.79	$1.61
Outstanding, ending, Weighted-Average Exercise Price	$1.82	$1.87

9_EMPLOYEEDIRECTOR_EQUITY_INCE6

9. EMPLOYEE/DIRECTOR EQUITY INCENTIVE PLANS (Details 4) (USD $)	3 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2014
Outstanding Number of Options	1,619,881
Outstanding Number of Options Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years)	'6 years 2 months 15 days
Outstanding, ending, Weighted-Average Exercise Price	$2.86
Exercisable Number of Options	589,920
Exercisable Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years)	'4 years 1 month 20 days
Exercisable Weighted Average Exercise Price	$5.35
$1.01 to $2.50	'
Outstanding Number of Options Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years)	'7 years 5 months 16 days
Exercisable Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years)	'5 years 6 months 25 days
Range 0.50 to 1.00	'
Outstanding Number of Options	293,000
Outstanding, ending, Weighted-Average Exercise Price	$1.32
$1.01 to $2.50	'
Outstanding Number of Options	772,295
Outstanding, ending, Weighted-Average Exercise Price	$1.52
Exercisable Number of Options	79,758
Exercisable Weighted Average Exercise Price	$1.98
Range 2.51 to 5.00	'
Outstanding Number of Options	179,813
Outstanding Number of Options Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years)	'4 years 10 months 28 days
Outstanding, ending, Weighted-Average Exercise Price	$3.95
Exercisable Number of Options	163,389
Exercisable Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years)	'4 years 10 months 20 days
Exercisable Weighted Average Exercise Price	$3.96
Range 5.01 to 7.50	'
Outstanding Number of Options	359,773
Outstanding Number of Options Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years)	'3 years 7 months 13 days
Outstanding, ending, Weighted-Average Exercise Price	$6.23
Exercisable Number of Options	331,773
Exercisable Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years)	'3 years 11 months 12 days
Exercisable Weighted Average Exercise Price	$6.28
Range 7.51 to 17.95	'
Outstanding Number of Options	15,000
Outstanding Number of Options Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years)	'1 year 3 months 29 days
Outstanding, ending, Weighted-Average Exercise Price	$17.95
Exercisable Number of Options	15,000
Exercisable Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years)	'1 year 3 months 29 days
Exercisable Weighted Average Exercise Price	$17.95
Range 0.76 to 2.50	'
Outstanding Number of Options Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years)	'7 years 1 month 28 days

10_WARRANTS_Details

10. WARRANTS (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2014	Jun. 30, 2013
Warrants Details	'	'
Beginning Balance	2,933,752	1,421,806
Warrants granted	0	3,239,474
Warrants expired	0	-8,000
Warrants exercised	0	-1,719,528
Ending balance	2,933,752	2,933,752
Warrants outstanding beginning weighted average exercise price	$1.88	$3.15
Warrants granted weighted average exercise price	$0	$0.95
Warrants expired weighted average exercise price	$0	$2.80
Warrants exercised weighted average exercise price	$0	$1.18
Warrants outstanding ending weighted average exercise price	$1.88	$1.88

12_COMMITMENTS_Details

12. COMMITMENTS (Details) (USD $)	Sep. 30, 2014
Commitments Details	'
2015	$65,798
2016	29,243
Operating lease commitment	$95,041

13_RETIREMENT_PLANS_Details_Na

13. RETIREMENT PLANS (Details Narrative) (USD $)	3 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2013
Retirement Plans Details Narrative	'	'
Retirement plan expense	$23,663	$32,326

14_INCOME_TAXES_Details

14. INCOME TAXES (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2013
Income Taxes Details	'	'
Current	$0	($19,729)
Deferred	0	0
Provision (benefit) for income taxes	$0	($19,729)

14_INCOME_TAXES_Details_1

14. INCOME TAXES (Details 1)	3 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2013
Income Taxes Details 1	'	'
Income tax benefit computed at the U.S. federal statutory rate	-34.00%	-34.00%
Foreign tax expense/(benefit)	0.00%	-1.00%
Change in valuation allowance	34.00%	34.00%
Total	0.00%	-1.00%

14_INCOME_TAXES_Details_2

14. INCOME TAXES (Details 2) (USD $)	Sep. 30, 2014	Jun. 30, 2014
Income Taxes Details 2	'	'
Federal net operating loss carryforwards	$23,296,521	$22,238,624
Federal - other	2,813,229	2,737,404
Wisconsin net operating loss carryforwards	2,863,493	2,747,275
Australia net operating loss carryforwards	1,497,779	1,497,779
Deferred income tax asset valuation allowance	-30,471,022	-29,221,082
Total deferred income tax assets	$0	$0

14_INCOME_TAXES_Details_3

14. INCOME TAXES (Details 3) (USD $)	3 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2013
Income Taxes Details 3	'	'
Beginning balance	$196,583	$193,097
Effect of foreign currency translation	-14,165	3,486
Ending balance	$182,418	$196,583