UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
| | |
(Mark One) | | |
þ | | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011 |
or |
| | |
o | | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission file number:001-16503
WILLIS GROUP HOLDINGS PUBLIC
LIMITED COMPANY
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
| | |
Ireland | | 98-0352587 |
(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
c/o Willis Group Limited
51 Lime Street, London, EC3M 7DQ, England
(Address of principal executive offices)
(011) 44-20-3124-6000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 ofRegulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” inRule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
| | | |
Large accelerated filer þ | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting companyo |
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined inRule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
As of July 29, 2011, there were outstanding 173,040,762 ordinary shares, nominal value $0.000115 per share, of the Registrant.
Certain Definitions
The following definitions apply throughout this quarterly report unless the context requires otherwise:
| | |
| | |
‘We’, ‘Us’, ‘Company’, ‘Group’, ‘Willis’, or ‘Our’ | | Willis Group Holdings and its subsidiaries. |
| | |
‘Willis Group Holdings’ or ‘Willis Group Holdings plc’ | | Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company, a company organized under the laws of Ireland. |
| | |
‘shares’ | | The ordinary shares of Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company, nominal value $0.000115 per share. |
| | |
‘HRH’ | | Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company. |
3
Willis Group Holdings plc
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
We have included in this document ‘forward-looking statements’ within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which are intended to be covered by the safe harbors created by those laws. These forward-looking statements include information about possible or assumed future results of our operations. All statements, other than statements of historical facts that address activities, events or developments that we expect or anticipate may occur in the future, including such things as our outlook, potential cost savings and acceleration of adjusted operating margin and adjusted earnings growth, future capital expenditures, growth in commissions and fees, business strategies, competitive strengths, goals, the benefits of new initiatives, growth of our business and operations, plans and references to future successes, are forward-looking statements. Also, when we use the words such as ‘anticipate’, ‘believe’, ‘estimate’, ‘expect’, ‘intend’, ‘plan’, ‘probably’, or similar expressions, we are making forward-looking statements.
There are important uncertainties, events and factors that could cause our actual results or performance to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements contained in this document, including the following:
| |
• | the impact of any regional, national or global political, economic, business, competitive, market, environmental and regulatory conditions on our global business operations; |
|
• | the impact of current financial market conditions on our results of operations and financial condition, including as a result of any insolvencies of or other difficulties experienced by our clients, insurance companies or financial institutions; |
|
• | our ability to continue to manage our significant indebtedness; |
|
• | our ability to compete effectively in our industry; |
|
• | our ability to implement and realize anticipated benefits of the 2011 Operational Review, the Willis Cause, or any other initiative we pursue; |
|
• | material changes in commercial property and casualty markets generally or the availability of insurance products or changes in premiums resulting from a catastrophic event, such as a hurricane, or otherwise; |
|
• | the volatility or declines in other insurance markets and premiums on which our commissions are based, but which we do not control; |
|
• | our ability to retain key employees and clients and attract new business; |
| |
• | the timing or ability to carry out share repurchases, refinancings or take other steps to manage our capital and the limitations in our long-term debt agreements that may restrict our ability to take these actions; |
|
• | any fluctuations in exchange and interest rates that could affect expenses and revenue; |
|
• | rating agency actions that could inhibit our ability to borrow funds or the pricing thereof; |
|
• | a significant decline in the value of investments that fund our pension plans or changes in our pension plan funding obligations; |
|
• | our ability to achieve the expected strategic benefits of transactions; |
|
• | our ability to receive dividends or other distributions in needed amounts from our subsidiaries; |
|
• | changes in the tax or accounting treatment of our operations; |
|
• | any potential impact from the US healthcare reform legislation; |
|
• | the potential costs and difficulties in complying with a wide variety of foreign laws and regulations and any related changes, given the global scope of our operations; |
|
• | our involvements in and the results of any regulatory investigations, legal proceedings and other contingencies; |
|
• | risks associated with non-core operations including underwriting, advisory or reputational; |
|
• | our exposure to potential liabilities arising from errors and omissions and other potential claims against us; and |
|
• | the interruption or loss of our information processing systems or failure to maintain secure information systems. |
The foregoing list of factors is not exhaustive and new factors may emerge from time to time that could also affect actual performance and results.
For more information see the section entitled ‘Risk Factors’ included in Willis’Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 and this Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011. Copies of the10-K are available online athttp://www.sec.govorwww.willis.com or on request from the Company as set forth in Part I, Item 1 ‘Business-Available Information’ in Willis’ Form 10-K.
4
About Willis
Although we believe that the assumptions underlying our forward-looking statements are reasonable, any of these assumptions, and therefore also the forward-looking statements based on these assumptions, could themselves prove to be inaccurate. In light of the significant uncertainties inherent in the forward-looking statements included in this document, our inclusion of this information is not a representation or guarantee by us that our objectives and plans will be achieved.
Our forward-looking statements speak only as of the date made and we will not update these forward-looking statements unless the securities laws require us to do so. In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the forward-looking events discussed in this document may not occur, and we caution you against unduly relying on these forward-looking statements.
5
Willis Group Holdings plc
PART I —FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1—Financial Statements
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Three months ended
| | | Six months ended
| |
| | | | | June 30, | | | June 30, | |
| | Note | | | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
| | | | | (millions, except per share data) | |
|
REVENUES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Commissions and fees | | | | | | $ | 854 | | | $ | 789 | | | $ | 1,854 | | | $ | 1,752 | |
Investment income | | | | | | | 8 | | | | 10 | | | | 16 | | | | 19 | |
Other income | | | | | | | 1 | | | | — | | | | 1 | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total revenues | | | | | | | 863 | | | | 799 | | | | 1,871 | | | | 1,771 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
EXPENSES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Salaries and benefits | | | 3 | | | | (506 | ) | | | (456 | ) | | | (1,090 | ) | | | (942 | ) |
Other operating expenses | | | | | | | (164 | ) | | | (135 | ) | | | (317 | ) | | | (284 | ) |
Depreciation expense | | | | | | | (19 | ) | | | (16 | ) | | | (39 | ) | | | (31 | ) |
Amortization of intangible assets | | | | | | | (17 | ) | | | (21 | ) | | | (34 | ) | | | (42 | ) |
Net (loss) gain on disposal of operations | | | | | | | — | | | | (2 | ) | | | 4 | | | | (2 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total expenses | | | | | | | (706 | ) | | | (630 | ) | | | (1,476 | ) | | | (1,301 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
OPERATING INCOME | | | | | | | 157 | | | | 169 | | | | 395 | | | | 470 | |
Make-whole on repurchase and redemption of senior notes and write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs | | | 14 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (171 | ) | | | — | |
Interest expense | | | | | | | (34 | ) | | | (41 | ) | | | (74 | ) | | | (84 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES AND INTEREST IN EARNINGS OF ASSOCIATES | | | | | | | 123 | | | | 128 | | | | 150 | | | | 386 | |
Income taxes | | | 4 | | | | (31 | ) | | | (35 | ) | | | (32 | ) | | | (102 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
INCOME BEFORE INTEREST IN EARNINGS OF ASSOCIATES | | | | | | | 92 | | | | 93 | | | | 118 | | | | 284 | |
Interest in earnings of associates, net of tax | | | | | | | (3 | ) | | | (2 | ) | | | 13 | | | | 18 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
NET INCOME | | | | | | | 89 | | | | 91 | | | | 131 | | | | 302 | |
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | | | | | | | (4 | ) | | | (2 | ) | | | (12 | ) | | | (9 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO WILLIS GROUP HOLDINGS | | | | | | $ | 85 | | | $ | 89 | | | $ | 119 | | | $ | 293 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
EARNINGS PER SHARE — BASIC AND DILUTED | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
—Basic earnings per share | | | 5 | | | $ | 0.49 | | | $ | 0.52 | | | $ | 0.69 | | | $ | 1.73 | |
—Diluted earnings per share | | | 5 | | | $ | 0.48 | | | $ | 0.52 | | | $ | 0.68 | | | $ | 1.71 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
CASH DIVIDENDS DECLARED PER SHARE | | | | | | $ | 0.26 | | | $ | 0.26 | | | $ | 0.52 | | | $ | 0.52 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
6
Financial statements
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | June 30,
| | | December 31,
| |
| | Note | | | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
| | | | | (millions, except share data) | |
|
ASSETS | | | | | | | | | | | | |
CURRENT ASSETS | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | | | | | $ | 317 | | | $ | 316 | |
Accounts receivable, net | | | | | | | 1,049 | | | | 839 | |
Fiduciary assets | | | | | | | 11,256 | | | | 9,569 | |
Deferred tax assets | | | | | | | 32 | | | | 36 | |
Other current assets | | | 12 | | | | 327 | | | | 340 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total current assets | | | | | | | 12,981 | | | | 11,100 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
NON-CURRENT ASSETS | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fixed assets, net | | | | | | | 391 | | | | 381 | |
Goodwill | | | 10 | | | | 3,317 | | | | 3,294 | |
Other intangible assets, net | | | 11 | | | | 461 | | | | 492 | |
Investments in associates | | | | | | | 186 | | | | 161 | |
Deferred tax assets | | | | | | | 9 | | | | 7 | |
Pension benefits asset | | | | | | | 231 | | | | 179 | |
Other non-current assets | | | 12 | | | | 365 | | | | 233 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total non-current assets | | | | | | | 4,960 | | | | 4,747 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
TOTAL ASSETS | | | | | | $ | 17,941 | | | $ | 15,847 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY |
CURRENT LIABILITIES | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fiduciary liabilities | | | | | | $ | 11,256 | | | $ | 9,569 | |
Deferred revenue and accrued expenses | | | | | | | 323 | | | | 298 | |
Income taxes payable | | | | | | | 50 | | | | 57 | |
Short-term debt and current portion of long-term debt | | | 14 | | | | 114 | | | | 110 | |
Deferred tax liabilities | | | | | | | 22 | | | | 9 | |
Other current liabilities | | | 13 | | | | 318 | | | | 266 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total current liabilities | | | | | | | 12,083 | | | | 10,309 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Long-term debt | | | 14 | | | | 2,307 | | | | 2,157 | |
Liability for pension benefits | | | | | | | 150 | | | | 164 | |
Deferred tax liabilities | | | | | | | 111 | | | | 83 | |
Provisions for liabilities | | | | | | | 184 | | | | 179 | |
Other non-current liabilities | | | 13 | | | | 367 | | | | 347 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total non-current liabilities | | | | | | | 3,119 | | | | 2,930 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities | | | | | | | 15,202 | | | | 13,239 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Continued on next page)
7
Willis Group Holdings plc
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Continued)
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | June 30,
| | | December 31,
| |
| | Note | | | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
| | | | | (millions, except share data) | |
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES | | | 7 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
EQUITY | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ordinary shares, $0.000115 nominal value; Authorized: 4,000,000,000; Issued 172,949,656 shares in 2011 and 170,883,865 shares in 2010 | | | | | | | — | | | | — | |
Ordinary shares, €1 nominal value; Authorized: 40,000; Issued 40,000 shares in 2011 and 2010 | | | | | | | — | | | | — | |
Preference shares, $0.000115 nominal value; Authorized: 1,000,000,000; Issued nil shares in 2011 and 2010 | | | | | | | — | | | | — | |
Additional paid-in capital | | | | | | | 1,033 | | | | 985 | |
Retained earnings | | | | | | | 2,165 | | | | 2,136 | |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax | | | 16 | | | | (488 | ) | | | (541 | ) |
Treasury shares, at cost, 46,408 shares, $0.000115 nominal value, in 2011 and 2010 and 40,000 shares, €1 nominal value, in 2011 and 2010 | | | | | | | (3 | ) | | | (3 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Willis Group Holdings stockholders’ equity | | | 17 | | | | 2,707 | | | | 2,577 | |
Noncontrolling interests | | | 17 | | | | 32 | | | | 31 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total equity | | | | | | | 2,739 | | | | 2,608 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY | | | | | | $ | 17,941 | | | $ | 15,847 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
8
Financial statements
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Six months ended
| |
| | | | | June 30, | |
| | Note | | | 2011 | | | 2010(i) | |
| | | | | (millions) | |
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income | | | | | | $ | 131 | | | $ | 302 | |
Adjustments to reconcile net income to total net cash provided by operating activities: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net (gain) loss on disposal of operations and fixed and intangible assets | | | | | | | (5 | ) | | | 3 | |
Depreciation expense | | | | | | | 39 | | | | 31 | |
Amortization of intangible assets | | | | | | | 34 | | | | 42 | |
Provision for doubtful debts | | | | | | | 1 | | | | — | |
Provision (benefit) for deferred income taxes | | | | | | | 49 | | | | (17 | ) |
Excess tax benefits from share-based payment arrangements | | | | | | | (4 | ) | | | (1 | ) |
Share-based compensation | | | | | | | 24 | | | | 25 | |
Make-whole on repurchase and redemption of senior notes and write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs | | | | | | | 171 | | | | — | |
Undistributed earnings of associates | | | | | | | (6 | ) | | | (14 | ) |
Non-cash Venezuela currency devaluation | | | 2 | | | | — | | | | 12 | |
Effect of exchange rate changes on net income | | | | | | | 3 | | | | (2 | ) |
Change in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects from purchase of subsidiaries: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Accounts receivable, net | | | | | | | (188 | ) | | | (119 | ) |
Fiduciary funds | | | | | | | (1,510 | ) | | | (1,525 | ) |
Fiduciary liabilities | | | | | | | 1,510 | | | | 1,525 | |
Other assets | | | | | | | (145 | ) | | | (110 | ) |
Other liabilities | | | | | | | 21 | | | | 22 | |
Movement on provisions | | | | | | | 1 | | | | (20 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net cash provided by operating activities | | | | | | | 126 | | | | 154 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds on disposal of fixed and intangible assets | | | | | | | 5 | | | | 4 | |
Additions to fixed assets | | | | | | | (47 | ) | | | (45 | ) |
Acquisitions of subsidiaries, net of cash acquired | | | | | | | (4 | ) | | | (15 | ) |
Acquisition of investments in associates | | | | | | | (2 | ) | | | (1 | ) |
Investment in Trident V Parallel Fund, LP | | | | | | | (4 | ) | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net cash used in investing activities | | | | | | | (52 | ) | | | (57 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
(i) | | The 2010 Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows has been recast to conform to the new balance sheet presentation. See Note 2 — Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies for details. |
(Continued on next page)
9
Willis Group Holdings plc
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Six months ended
| |
| | | | | June 30, | |
| | Note | | | 2011 | | | 2010(i) | |
| | | | | (millions) | |
|
INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS FROM OPERATING AND INVESTING ACTIVITIES | | | | | | $ | 74 | | | $ | 97 | |
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Repayment of) proceeds from draw down of revolving credit facility | | | 14 | | | | (90 | ) | | | 30 | |
Senior notes issued | | | 14 | | | | 794 | | | | — | |
Debt issuance costs | | | | | | | (7 | ) | | | — | |
Repayments of debt | | | 14 | | | | (555 | ) | | | (70 | ) |
Make-whole on repurchase and redemption of senior notes | | | 14 | | | | (158 | ) | | | — | |
Proceeds from issue of shares | | | | | | | 42 | | | | 17 | |
Excess tax benefits from share-based payment arrangements | | | | | | | 4 | | | | 1 | |
Dividends paid | | | | | | | (90 | ) | | | (89 | ) |
Acquisition of noncontrolling interests | | | | | | | (9 | ) | | | (4 | ) |
Dividends paid to noncontrolling interests | | | | | | | (12 | ) | | | (22 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net cash used in financing activities | | | | | | | (81 | ) | | | (137 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS | | | | | | | (7 | ) | | | (40 | ) |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents | | | | | | | 8 | | | | (14 | ) |
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD | | | | | | | 316 | | | | 221 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD | | | | | | $ | 317 | | | $ | 167 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
(i) | | The 2010 Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows has been recast to conform to the new balance sheet presentation. See Note 2 — Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies for details. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
10
Notes to the financial statements
(Unaudited)
Willis Group Holdings and its subsidiaries provide a broad range of insurance and reinsurance broking and risk management consulting services to its clients worldwide, both directly and indirectly through its associates. The Company provides both specialized risk management advisory and consulting services on a global basis to clients engaged in specific industrial and commercial activities, and services to small, medium and major corporates through its retail operations.
In its capacity as an advisor and insurance broker, the Company acts as an intermediary between clients and insurance carriers by advising clients on risk management requirements, helping clients determine the best means of managing risk, and negotiating and placing insurance risk with insurance carriers through the Company’s global distribution network.
2. BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements (‘Interim Financial Statements’) have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (‘US GAAP’).
The Interim Financial Statements are unaudited but include all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) which the Company’s management considers necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position as of such dates and the operating results and cash flows for those periods. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with US GAAP have been condensed or omitted. However, the Company believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. The results of operations for the six month period ended June 30, 2011 may not necessarily be indicative of the operating results for the entire fiscal year.
These Interim Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations, cash flows and changes in equity for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2010 included in the Annual Report onForm 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 25, 2011 (‘201010-K’) and Current Report onForm 8-K subsequently filed on March 14, 2011.
Balance Sheet Presentation
As disclosed in the Company’s 201010-K, the Company now provides additional disclosure within the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet of:
| |
• | the Group’s non-fiduciary balances; and |
|
• | the further distinction between those assets and liabilities that are expected to be realized within or later than twelve months of the balance sheet date. |
The Company believes this amended presentation better reflects the Company’s liquidity position and exposures to credit risk. Accordingly, the unaudited condensed consolidated statement of cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2010 has been recast to conform with the new balance sheet presentation.
Devaluation of Venezuelan Currency
With effect from January 1, 2010, the Venezuelan economy was designated as hyper-inflationary. The Venezuelan government also devalued the Bolivar Fuerte in January 2010. As a result of these actions, the Company recorded a $12 million charge in other operating expenses in the three month period ended March 31, 2010 to reflect the re-measurement of its net monetary assets denominated in Venezuelan Bolivar Fuerte at January 1, 2010.
11
Willis Group Holdings plc
| |
2. | BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued) |
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure
In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (‘FASB’) issued Accounting Standards Update (‘ASU’)No. 2011-04,Fair Value Measurement: Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs.The new guidance was issued to provide a consistent definition of fair value and ensure that fair value measurements and disclosure requirements are similar between US GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (‘IFRS’). The guidance changes certain fair value measurement principles and enhances the disclosure requirements for fair value measurements.
This guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011 and is applied prospectively.
The Company is currently evaluating the impact that adoption of this guidance will have on the consolidated financial statements.
Other Comprehensive Income
In June 2011, the FASB issued ASUNo. 2011-05,Presentation of Comprehensive Incometo revise the manner in which entities present comprehensive income in their financial statements. These changes require that components of comprehensive income be presented in either a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. The amendments do not change the items that must be reported in other comprehensive income or when an item of other comprehensive income must be reclassified to net income.
This guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011 and is applied retrospectively, although early adoption is permitted.
The Company is currently evaluating the impact that adoption of this guidance will have on the consolidated financial statements.
| |
3. | SALARIES AND BENEFITS EXPENSE |
Severance Costs
As part of the Company’s 2011 Operational Review, the Company incurred severance costs of $55 million in the six months ended June 30, 2011 (three months ended June 30, 2011: $9 million). These costs relate to approximately 600 positions that have been eliminated (three months ended June 30, 2011: approximately 150 positions).
$49 million of these severance costs for these employees were recognized pursuant to a one-time benefit arrangement, with the remaining $6 million recognized pursuant to the terms of employees’ existing benefit arrangements or employee arrangements. All of these costs have been recognized within salaries and benefits.
In addition to the severance incurred as part of the 2011 Operational Review, an additional charge of $2 million in the six months ended June 30, 2011 (three months ended June 30, 2011: $nil) was recognised within salaries and benefits relating to the waiver of retention awards held on the balance sheet for the approximately 600 positions that have been eliminated.
12
Notes to the financial statements
(Unaudited)
| |
3. | SALARIES AND BENEFITS EXPENSE (Continued) |
The Company’s severance liability under the 2011 Operational Review was:
| | | | |
| | June 30,
| |
| | 2011 | |
| | (millions) | |
|
Balance at January 1, 2011 | | $ | — | |
Severance costs accrued | | | 55 | |
Cash payments | | | (29 | ) |
Foreign exchange | | | — | |
| | | | |
Balance at end of period | | $ | 26 | |
| | | | |
It is estimated that a total of $70 million will be incurred under the 2011 Operational Review for severance throughout 2011 across the Group.
The Company evaluates the performance of its operating segments based on organic revenue growth and operating income. For internal reporting and segmental reporting, segmental management are not held accountable for certain items deemed to be centrally-controlled costs and initiatives, which includes the 2011 Operational Review. See Note 18 — Segment Information for an analysis of centrally-controlled costs and initiatives, including the 2011 Operational Review costs, disclosed within ‘Corporate and Other’.
Severance costs also arise in the normal course of business and these charges amounted to $nil in the six months ended June 30, 2011 (2010: $11 million). Of these costs, $nil was incurred in the three months ended June 30, 2011 (2010: $3 million).
Other Salaries and Benefits Expense
The Company also incurred other salaries and benefits costs as part of the 2011 Operational Review of $35 million in the six months ended June 30, 2011 (three months ended June 30, 2011: $1 million) relating primarily to the buy out of previously existing incentive schemes and other contractual arrangements.
Cash Retention Awards
As part of the Company’s incentive compensation, the Company makes annual cash retention awards to its employees. Employees must repay a proportionate amount of these awards if they voluntarily leave the Company’s employ (other than in the event of retirement or permanent disability) before a certain time period, currently up to three years. The Company makes cash payments to its employees in the year it grants these retention awards and recognizes these payments ratably over the period they are subject to repayment, beginning in the quarter in which the award is made. The unamortized portion of cash retention awards is recorded within Other Assets.
The following table sets out the amount of cash retention awards made and the related amortization of those awards for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three months ended
| | Six months ended
|
| | June 30, | | June 30, |
| | 2011 | | 2010 | | 2011 | | 2010 |
| | (millions) |
|
Cash retention awards made | | $ | 11 | | | $ | 16 | | | $ | 206 | | | $ | 185 | |
Amortization of cash retention awards included in salaries and benefits | | | 44 | | | | 32 | | | | 88 | | | | 60 | |
13
Willis Group Holdings plc
| |
3. | SALARIES AND BENEFITS EXPENSE (Continued) |
Unamortized cash retention awards totaled $293 million as of June 30, 2011 (December 31, 2010: $173 million; June 30, 2010: $217 million).
The tables below reflect the components of the tax charge for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three months ended June 30, 2011 | |
| | Income
| | | | | | Effective
| |
| | before tax | | | Tax | | | tax rate | |
| | (millions, except percentages) | |
|
Ordinary income taxed at estimated annual effective tax rate | | $ | 123 | | | $ | (31 | ) | | | 25 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
As reported | | $ | 123 | | | $ | (31 | ) | | | 25 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six months ended June 30, 2011 | |
| | Income
| | | | | | Effective
| |
| | before tax | | | Tax | | | tax rate | |
| | (millions, except percentages) | |
|
Ordinary income taxed at estimated annual effective tax rate | | $ | 317 | | | $ | (79 | ) | | | 25 | % |
Items where tax effect is treated discretely: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Make-whole on repurchase and redemption of senior notes and write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs | | | (171 | ) | | | 47 | | | | 27 | % |
Non-taxable gain on disposal of operations | | | 4 | | | | — | | | | — | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
As reported | | $ | 150 | | | $ | (32 | ) | | | 21 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
For interim income tax reporting purposes, the Company generally determines its best estimate of an annual effective tax rate and applies that rate on ayear-to-date basis applicable to its ordinary income. The Company’s estimated annual effective tax rate excludes significant, unusual or infrequently occurring items and certain other items excluded pursuant to the US GAAP authoritative guidance where applicable. The income tax expense (or benefit) related to all other items is individually computed and recognized when the items occur.
The estimated annual effective tax rate applicable to ordinary income of 25 percent includes the tax benefit of expenses relating to the 2011 Operational Review, which are generally relieved at a higher rate than the Company’s annual effective tax rate calculated excluding these expenses, and the impact of the UK Financial Services Authority (‘FSA’) regulatory fine for which no tax relief is available. The tax rate effect of these items broadly nets out such that, after adjusting for their impact, the effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2011 would also have been approximately 25 percent.
Basic and diluted earnings per share are calculated by dividing net income attributable to Willis Group Holdings by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during each period. The computation of diluted earnings per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if dilutive securities and other contracts to issue shares were exercised or converted into shares or resulted in the issuance of shares that then shared in the net income of the Company.
At June 30, 2011, time-based and performance-based options to purchase 9.9 million and 7.5 million (2010: 12.3 million and 8.6 million) shares, respectively, and 1.4 million restricted stock units (2010: 1.7 million), respectively, were outstanding.
14
Notes to the financial statements
(Unaudited)
| |
5. | EARNINGS PER SHARE (Continued) |
Basic and diluted earnings per share are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three months ended
| | | Six months ended
| |
| | June 30, | | | June 30, | |
| | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
| | (millions, except per share data) | |
|
Net income attributable to Willis Group Holdings | | $ | 85 | | | $ | 89 | | | $ | 119 | | | $ | 293 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic weighted average number of shares outstanding | | | 172 | | | | 170 | | | | 172 | | | | 169 | |
Dilutive effect of potentially issuable shares | | | 4 | | | | 1 | | | | 3 | | | | 2 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding | | | 176 | | | | 171 | | | | 175 | | | | 171 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic earnings per share: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income attributable to Willis Group Holdings shareholders | | $ | 0.49 | | | $ | 0.52 | | | $ | 0.69 | | | $ | 1.73 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dilutive effect of potentially issuable shares | | | (0.01 | ) | | | — | | | | (0.01 | ) | | | (0.02 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Diluted earnings per share: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income attributable to Willis Group Holdings shareholders | | $ | 0.48 | | | $ | 0.52 | | | $ | 0.68 | | | $ | 1.71 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Options to purchase 2 million shares were not included in the computation of the dilutive effect of stock options for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 because the effect was antidilutive (three and six months ended June 30, 2010: 13 million).
The components of the net periodic benefit cost of the UK, US and international defined benefit plans are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three months ended June 30, | |
| | UK Pension
| | | US Pension
| | | Intl Pension
| |
| | Benefits | | | Benefits | | | Benefits | |
| | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
| | (millions) | |
|
Components of net periodic benefit cost: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Service cost | | $ | 10 | | | $ | 9 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1 | | | $ | 2 | |
Interest cost | | | 27 | | | | 24 | | | | 11 | | | | 10 | | | | 2 | | | | 2 | |
Expected return on plan assets | | | (41 | ) | | | (33 | ) | | | (12 | ) | | | (10 | ) | | | (2 | ) | | | (2 | ) |
Amortization of unrecognized prior service gain | | | (1 | ) | | | (1 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Amortization of unrecognized actuarial loss | | | 7 | | | | 9 | | | | 1 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net periodic benefit cost | | $ | 2 | | | $ | 8 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1 | | | $ | 3 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
15
Willis Group Holdings plc
| |
6. | PENSION PLANS (Continued) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six months ended June 30, | |
| | UK Pension
| | | US Pension
| | | Intl Pension
| |
| | Benefits | | | Benefits | | | Benefits | |
| | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
| | (millions) | |
|
Components of net periodic benefit cost: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Service cost | | $ | 19 | | | $ | 18 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 2 | | | $ | 3 | |
Interest cost | | | 53 | | | | 49 | | | | 21 | | | | 20 | | | | 4 | | | | 4 | |
Expected return on plan assets | | | (81 | ) | | | (69 | ) | | | (23 | ) | | | (21 | ) | | | (4 | ) | | | (4 | ) |
Amortization of unrecognized prior service gain | | | (2 | ) | | | (2 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Amortization of unrecognized actuarial loss | | | 15 | | | | 18 | | | | 2 | | | | 1 | | | | — | | | | 1 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net periodic benefit cost | | $ | 4 | | | $ | 14 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 2 | | | $ | 4 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
As of June 30, 2011, the Company had made contributions of $46 million, $13 million and $4 million to the UK, US and international defined benefit pension plans (2010: $43 million, $13 million and $4 million), respectively. The Company expects to contribute a total of approximately $92 million to the UK defined benefit pension plan, $30 million to the US plan and $7 million to the international plans for the full year 2011 (inclusive of amounts contributed in the first six months).
| |
7. | COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES |
Debt Obligations and Facilities
Changes in the Company’s debt obligations are set out in Note 14 — ‘Debt’ to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Guarantees
Guarantees issued by Willis Group Holdings and certain of its subsidiaries with respect to the senior notes are discussed in Note 19—‘Financial information for parent guarantor, other guarantor subsidiaries and non-guarantor subsidiaries’ and Note 20—‘Financial information for parent issuer, guarantor subsidiaries and non-guarantor subsidiaries’.
The revolving credit facilities are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a joint and several basis by Willis Netherlands Holdings B.V., Willis Investment UK Holdings Limited, TA1 Limited, Trinity Acquisition plc, Willis Group Limited and Willis Group Holdings plc.
Other Contractual Obligations
In July 2010, the Company made a capital commitment of $25 million to Trident V Parallel Fund, LP. As at June 30, 2011 there had been approximately $5 million of capital contributions.
In May 2011, the Company made a capital commitment of $10 million to Dowling Capital Partners I, LP. As at June 30, 2011 there had been no capital contributions.
16
Notes to the financial statements
(Unaudited)
| |
7. | COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Continued) |
Claims, Lawsuits, and Other Proceedings
In the ordinary course of business, the Company is subject to various actual and potential claims, lawsuits, and other proceedings relating principally to alleged errors and omissions in connection with the placement of insurance and reinsurance. Similar to other corporations, the Company is also subject to a variety of other claims, including those relating to the Company’s employment practices. Some of the claims, lawsuits and other proceedings seek damages in amounts which could, if assessed, be significant.
Errors and omissions claims, lawsuits, and other proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business are covered in part by professional indemnity or other appropriate insurance. The terms of this insurance vary by policy year and self-insured risks have increased significantly in recent years. Regarding self-insured risks, the Company has established provisions which are believed to be adequate in the light of current information and legal advice, and the Company adjusts such provisions from time to time according to developments.
On the basis of current information, the Company does not expect that the actual claims, lawsuits and other proceedings, to which the Company is subject, or potential claims, lawsuits, and other proceedings relating to matters of which it is aware, will ultimately have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or liquidity. Nonetheless, given the large or indeterminate amounts sought in certain of these actions, and the inherent unpredictability of litigation and disputes with insurance companies, it is possible that an adverse outcome in certain matters could, from time to time, have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations or cash flows in particular quarterly or annual periods.
The material actual or potential claims, lawsuits and other proceedings, of which the Company is currently aware, are:
Assurance of Discontinuance
In connection with the investigation launched by the New York State Attorney General in April 2004 concerning, among other things, contingent commissions paid by insurers to insurance brokers, in April 2005, the Company entered into an Assurance of Discontinuance (‘Original AOD’) with the New York State Attorney General and the Superintendent of the New York Insurance Department and paid $50 million to eligible clients. As part of the Original AOD, the Company also agreed not to accept contingent compensation and to disclose to customers any compensation the Company will receive in connection with providing policy placement services to the customer. The Company also resolved similar investigations launched by the Minnesota Attorney General, the Florida Attorney General, the Florida Department of Financial Services, and the Florida Office of Insurance Regulation for amounts that were not material to the Company.
Similarly, in August 2005, HRH entered into an agreement with the Attorney General of the State of Connecticut and the Insurance Commissioner of the State of Connecticut to resolve all issues related to their investigations into certain insurance brokerage and insurance agency practices and to settle a lawsuit brought in August 2005 by the Connecticut Attorney General alleging violations of the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act and the Connecticut Unfair Insurance Practices Act. As part of this settlement, HRH agreed to take certain actions including establishing a $30 million national fund for distribution to certain clients; enhancing disclosure practices for agency and broker clients; and declining to accept contingent compensation on brokerage business.
On February 16, 2010, the Company entered into the Amended and Restated Assurance of Discontinuance with the Attorney General of the State of New York and the Amended and Restated Stipulation with the Superintendent of Insurance of the State of New York (the ‘Amended and Restated AOD’) on behalf of itself and its named subsidiaries. The Amended and Restated AOD was effective February 11, 2010 and supersedes and replaces the Original AOD.
The Amended and Restated AOD specifically recognizes that the Company has substantially met its obligations under the Original AOD and ends many of the requirements previously imposed. It relieves the Company of a number of technical compliance obligations that have imposed significant administrative and financial burdens on its operations. The Amended and Restated AOD no longer limits the types of compensation the Company can receive and has lowered the
17
Willis Group Holdings plc
| |
7. | COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Continued) |
compensation disclosure requirements. The Amended and Restated AOD requires the Company among, other things to: (i) in New York, and each of the other 49 states of the United States, the District of Columbia and U.S. territories, provide compensation disclosure that will, at a minimum, comply with the terms of the applicable regulations, as may be amended from time to time, or the provisions of the AOD that existed prior to the adoption of the Amended and Restated AOD; and (ii) maintain its compliance programs and continue to provide appropriate training to relevant employees in business ethics, professional obligations, conflicts of interest, and antitrust and trade practices compliance.
European Commission Sector Inquiry
In 2006, the European Commission issued questionnaires pursuant to its Sector Inquiry or, in respect of Norway, the European Free Trade Association Surveillance Authority, related to insurance business practices, including compensation arrangements for brokers, to at least 150 European brokers including our operations in nine European countries. The Company filed responses to the European Commission and the European Free Trade Association Surveillance Authority questionnaires. The European Commission reported on September 25, 2007, expressing concerns over potential conflicts of interest in the industry relating to remuneration and binding authorities and also over the nature of the coinsurance market. The Company cooperated with both the European Free Trade Association Surveillance Authority and the European Commission to resolve issues raised in its final report regarding coinsurance as required of the industry by the European Commission. The Company has recently learned that the European Commission has renewed its interest in the coinsurance market and we anticipate that, like our competitors and insurers, our European subsidiaries will receive further questionnaires on this matter later this year or early 2012.
Contingent Compensation Class Action
Since August 2004, the Company and HRH (along with various other brokers and insurers) have been named as defendants in purported class actions in various courts across the United States. All of these actions have been consolidated into a single action in the US District Court for the District of New Jersey (‘MDL’). These actions allege that the brokers breached their duties to their clients by entering into contingent compensation agreements with either no disclosure or limited disclosure to clients and participated in other improper activities. Plaintiffs seek monetary damages, including punitive damages, and certain equitable relief. In May 2011, the majority of defendants, including the Company and HRH, entered into a written settlement agreement with plaintiffs. On June 28, 2011, the Judge entered an Order granting preliminary approval to the settlement agreement. Notice of the settlement will be sent to all members of the class and each member will have the opportunity to opt out of the settlement and pursue its own individual claim against any defendant. A Fairness Hearing to decide if the settlement should be given final approval is scheduled for September 14, 2011. The amount of the proposed settlement to be paid by the Company and HRH is immaterial and was previously reserved.
Additional actions could be brought in the future by individual policyholders. The Company disputes the allegations in all of these suits and has been and intends to continue to defend itself vigorously against these actions. The outcomes of these lawsuits, however, including any losses or other payments that may occur as a result, cannot be predicted at this time.
Reinsurance Market Dispute
Various legal proceedings are pending, have concluded, or may commence between reinsurers, reinsureds and in some cases their intermediaries, including reinsurance brokers, relating to personal accident excess of loss reinsurance for the years 1993 to 1998. The proceedings principally concern allegations by reinsurers that they have sustained substantial losses due to an alleged abnormal ‘spiral’ in the market in which the reinsurance contracts were placed, the existence and nature of which, as well as other information, was not disclosed to them by the reinsureds or their reinsurance broker.
A ‘spiral’ is a market term for a situation in which reinsureds and reinsurers reinsure each other with the effect that the same loss or portion of that loss moves through the market multiple times.
18
Notes to the financial statements
(Unaudited)
| |
7. | COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Continued) |
The reinsurers concerned have taken the position that, despite their decisions to underwrite risks or a group of risks, they are no longer bound by their reinsurance contracts. As a result, they have stopped settling claims and are seeking to recover claims already paid. The Company also understands that there have been arbitration awards in relation to a ‘spiral,” among other things, in which the reinsurer successfully argued that it was no longer bound by parts of its reinsurance program. Willis Limited, the Company’s principal insurance brokerage subsidiary in the United Kingdom, acted as the reinsurance broker or otherwise as intermediary, but not as an underwriter, for numerous personal accident reinsurance contracts. Due to the small number of reinsurance brokers generally, Willis Limited also utilized other brokers active in this market assub-agents, including brokers who are parties to the legal proceedings described above, for certain contracts and may be responsible for any errors and omissions they may have made. In July 2003, one of the reinsurers received a judgment in the English High Court against certain parties, including asub-broker Willis Limited used to place two of the contracts involved in this trial. Although neither the Company nor any of its subsidiaries were a party to this proceeding or any arbitration, Willis Limited entered into tolling agreements with certain of the principals to the reinsurance contracts tolling the statute of limitations pending the outcome of proceedings between the reinsureds and reinsurers.
Two former clients of Willis Limited, American Reliable Insurance Company and one of its associated companies (‘ARIC’), and CNA Insurance Company Limited and two of its associated companies (‘CNA’) terminated their respective tolling agreements with Willis Limited and commenced litigation in September 2007 and January 2008, respectively, in the English Commercial Court against Willis Limited. ARIC alleged conspiracy between a former Willis Limited employee and the ARIC underwriter as well as negligence and CNA alleged deceit and negligence by the same Willis Limited employee both in connection with placements of personal accident reinsurance in the excess of loss market in London and elsewhere. On June 9, 2009, Willis Limited entered into a settlement agreement under which Willis Limited paid a total of $139 million to ARIC, which was covered by errors and omissions insurance. On September 11, 2009, Willis Limited entered into a settlement agreement under which Willis Limited paid a total of $130 million to CNA. The Company has collected in full from errors and omissions insurers. The settlements include no admission of wrongdoing by any party. Each party also realized and waived all claims it may have against any of the other parties arising out of or in connection with the subject matter of the litigation.
From time to time, former clients or their reinsurers request co-operation from the Company and suggest that claims may be asserted against the Company. Such claims may be made against the Company if reinsurers do not pay claims on policies issued by them. A number of mutual releases have been entered by the Company or its subsidiaries with former clientsand/or reinsurers for no financial consideration. The Company cannot predict at this time whether any further claims will be made or the damages that may be alleged.
Gender Discrimination Class Action
In December 2006, a purported class action was filed against the Company in the United States District Court, Southern District of New York, alleging that the Company discriminated against female officers and officer equivalent employees on the basis of their gender and seeking injunctive relief, monetary damages and attorneys’ fees and costs. In January 2011, the Company reached a monetary settlement with plaintiffs that resolves all individual and class claims. The amount of this settlement is not material. However, this matter cannot be formally and finally settled until the Court approves the settlement and until members of the class are given an opportunity to object to the terms of the settlement.
World Trade Center
The Company acted as the insurance broker, but not as an underwriter, for the placement of both property and casualty insurance for a number of entities which were directly impacted by the September 11, 2001 destruction of the World Trade Center complex, including Silverstein Properties LLC, which acquired a99-year leasehold interest in the twin towers and related facilities from the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey in July 2001. Although the World Trade Center complex insurance was bound at or before the July 2001 closing of the leasehold acquisition, consistent with standard industry practice, the final policy wording for the placements was still in the process of being finalized when the
19
Willis Group Holdings plc
| |
7. | COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Continued) |
twin towers and other buildings in the complex were destroyed on September 11, 2001. There have been a number of lawsuits in the United States between the insured parties and the insurers for several placements. Other disputes may arise in respect of insurance placed by us which could affect the Company including claims by one or more of the insureds that the Company made culpable errors or omissions in connection with our brokerage activities. However, the Company does not believe that our role as broker will lead to liabilities which in the aggregate would have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition or liquidity.
Stanford Financial Group Litigation
The Company has been named as a defendant in six similar lawsuits relating to the collapse of The Stanford Financial Group (‘Stanford’), for which Willis of Colorado, Inc. acted as broker of record on certain lines of insurance. The complaints in these actions generally allege that the defendants actively and materially aided Stanford’s alleged fraud by providing Stanford with certain letters regarding coverage that they knew would be used to help retain or attract actual or prospective Stanford client investors. The complaints further allege that these letters, which contain statements about Stanford and the insurance policies that the defendants placed for Stanford, contained untruths and omitted material facts and were drafted in this manner to help Stanford promote and sell its allegedly fraudulent certificates of deposit.
The six actions are as follows:
| |
• | Troice, et al. v. Willis of Colorado, Inc., et al., C.A.No. 3:09-CV-01274-N, was filed on July 2, 2009 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas against Willis Group Holdings plc, Willis of Colorado, Inc. and a Willis associate, among others. On April 1, 2010, plaintiffs filed the operative Third Amended Class Action Complaint on behalf of a putative, worldwide class of Stanford investors, adding Willis Limited as a defendant and alleging claims under Texas statutory and common law and seeking damages in excess of $1 billion, punitive damages and costs. On May 2, 2011, the defendants filed motions to dismiss the Third Amended Class Action Complaint, which motions are currently pending. It may be several months or longer before rulings are issued on these motions. |
|
• | Ranni v. Willis of Colorado, Inc., et al., C.A.No. 09-22085, was filed on July 17, 2009 against Willis Group Holdings plc and Willis of Colorado, Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida. The complaint was filed on behalf of a putative class of Venezuelan and other South American Stanford investors and alleges claims under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (andRule 10b-5 thereunder) and Florida statutory and common law and seeks damages in an amount to be determined at trial. On October 6, 2009,Ranniwas transferred, for consolidation or coordination with other Stanford-related actions (includingTroice), to the Northern District of Texas by the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (the ‘JPML’). The defendants have not yet responded to the complaint inRanni. |
|
• | Canabal, et al. v. Willis of Colorado, Inc., et al., C.A.No. 3:09-CV-01474-D, was filed on August 6, 2009 against Willis Group Holdings plc, Willis of Colorado, Inc. and the same Willis associate named as a defendant inTroice, among others, also in the Northern District of Texas. The complaint was filed on behalf of a putative class of Venezuelan Stanford investors, alleged claims under Texas statutory and common law and sought damages in excess of $1 billion, punitive damages, attorneys’ fees and costs. On December 18, 2009, the parties inTroiceandCanabalstipulated to the consolidation of those actions (under theTroicecivil action number), and, on December 31, 2009, the plaintiffs inCanabalfiled a notice of dismissal, dismissing the action without prejudice. |
|
• | Rupert, et al. v. Winter, et al., Case No. 2009C115137, was filed on September 14, 2009 on behalf of 97 Stanford investors against Willis Group Holdings plc, Willis of Colorado, Inc. and the same Willis associate, among others, in Texas state court (Bexar County). The complaint alleges claims under the Securities Act of 1933, Texas and Colorado statutory law and Texas common law and seeks special, consequential and treble damages of more than $300 million, attorneys’ fees and costs. On October 20, 2009, certain defendants, including Willis of Colorado, Inc., (i) removedRupertto the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas, (ii) notified the JPML of the pendency of this related action and (iii) moved to stay the action pending a determination by the JPML as to whether it should be transferred to the Northern District of Texas for consolidation or coordination with the other Stanford-related actions. On April 1, 2010, the JPML issued a final transfer order for the transfer ofRupertto the Northern District of Texas, where it is currently pending. The defendants have not yet responded to the complaint inRupert. |
20
Notes to the financial statements
(Unaudited)
| |
7. | COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Continued) |
| |
• | Casanova, et al. v. Willis of Colorado, Inc., et al., C.A.No. 3:10-CV-01862-O, was filed on September 16, 2010 on behalf of seven Stanford investors against Willis Group Holdings plc, Willis Limited, Willis of Colorado, Inc. and the same Willis associate, among others, also in the Northern District of Texas. The complaint alleges claims under Texas statutory and common law and seeks actual damages in excess of $5 million, punitive damages, attorneys’ fees and costs. The defendants have not yet responded to the complaint inCasanova. |
|
• | Rishmague, et ano. v. Winter, et al., Case No. 2011CI02585, was filed on March 11, 2011 on behalf of two Stanford investors, individually and as representatives of certain trusts, against Willis Group Holdings plc, Willis of Colorado, Inc., Willis of Texas, Inc. and the same Willis associate, among others, in Texas state court (Bexar County). The complaint alleges claims under Texas and Colorado statutory law and Texas common law and seeks special, consequential and treble damages of more than $37 million and attorneys’ fees and costs. On April 11, 2011, certain defendants, including Willis of Colorado, Inc., (i) removedRishmagueto the Western District of Texas, (ii) notified the JPML of the pendency of this related action and (iii) moved to stay the action pending a determination by the JPML as to whether it should be transferred to the Northern District of Texas for consolidation or coordination with the other Stanford-related actions. On April 13, 2011, the JPML issued a conditional transfer order for the transfer ofRishmagueto the Northern District of Texas, which the plaintiffs moved to vacate on May 13, 2011. That motion is currently pending. The defendants have not yet responded to the complaint inRishmague. |
Additional actions could be brought in the future by other investors in certificates of deposit issued by Stanford and its affiliates. The Company disputes these allegations and intends to defend itself vigorously against these actions. The outcomes of these actions, however, including any losses or other payments that may occur as a result, cannot be predicted at this time.
Regulatory Investigation
Given the increased interest expressed by US and UK regulators in the effectiveness of compliance controls relating to financial crime in our market sector in particular, we began a voluntary internal review of our policies and controls four years ago. This review includes analysis and advice from external experts on best practices, review of public regulatory decisions, and discussions with government regulators in the US and UK. In addition, the UK Financial Services Authority (the ‘FSA’) conducted an investigation of Willis Limited’s, our UK brokerage subsidiary, compliance systems and controls between 2005 and 2009. On July 21, 2011, we and the FSA announced a settlement under which the FSA concluded its investigation by assessing a £7 million ($11 million) fine on Willis Limited for lapses in its implementation and documentation of its controls to counter the risks of improper payments being made to non-FSA authorized overseas third parties engaged to help win business, particularly in high risk jurisdictions.
As a result of the FSA settlement, we will also be conducting a further internal review of all payments made between 2005 and 2009. We also continue to fully cooperate with our US regulators, however we are unable to predict at this time when our discussions with them will be concluded. We do not believe that this further internal review or our discussions with the US regulators will result in any material fines or sanctions, but there can be no assurance that any resolution will not have an adverse impact on our ability to conduct our business in certain jurisdictions. While we believe that our current systems and controls are adequate and in accordance with all applicable laws and regulations, we cannot assure that such systems and controls will prevent any violations of applicable laws and regulations.
| |
8. | DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES |
Fair value of derivative financial instruments
In addition to the note below, see Note 9 for information about the fair value hierarchy of derivatives.
21
Willis Group Holdings plc
| |
8. | DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES (Continued) |
Primary risks managed by derivative financial instruments
The main risks arising from the Company’s financial instruments are interest rate risk, liquidity risk, foreign currency risk and credit risk. The Company’s board of directors reviews and agrees to policies for managing each of these risks as summarized below.
The Company enters into derivative transactions (principally interest rate swaps and forward foreign currency contracts) in order to manage interest rate and currency risks arising from the Company’s operations and its sources of finance. The Company does not hold financial or derivative instruments for trading purposes.
Interest rate risk
As a result of the Company’s operating activities, the Company receives cash for premiums and claims which it deposits in short-term investments denominated in US dollars and other currencies. The Company earns interest on these funds, which is included in the Company’s financial statements as investment income. These funds are regulated in terms of access and the instruments in which they may be invested, most of which are short-term in maturity. In order to manage interest rate risk arising from these financial assets, the Company enters into interest rate swaps to receive a fixed rate of interest and pay a variable rate of interest denominated in the various currencies related to the short-term investments. The use of interest rate contracts essentially converts groups of short-term variable rate investments to fixed rates.
The fair value of these contracts is recorded in other assets and other liabilities. For contracts that qualify as cash flow hedges for accounting purposes, the effective portions of changes in fair value are recorded as a component of other comprehensive income.
At June 30, 2011, the Company had the following derivative financial instruments that were designated as cash flow hedges of interest rate risk:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Notional
| | Fair
|
| | | | amount(i) | | value |
| | | | (millions) |
|
US dollar | | Receivefixed-pay variable | | $ | 840 | | | $ | 10 | |
Pounds sterling | | Receivefixed-pay variable | | | 250 | | | | 3 | |
Euro | | Receivefixed-pay variable | | | 146 | | | | — | |
| | |
(i) | | Notional amounts represent US dollar equivalents translated at the spot rate as of June 30, 2011. |
The Company’s operations are financed principally by $2,050 million fixed rate senior notes and $356 million under a5-year term loan facility. Of the fixed rate senior notes, $350 million are due 2015, $300 million are due 2016, $600 million are due 2017, $300 million are due 2019 and $500 million are due 2021. At June 30, 2011, we had $nil million outstanding under our $300 million revolving credit facility and $nil outstanding under both our $200 million facility and our $20 million UK facility which is solely for use by our main regulated UK entity in certain exceptional circumstances.
The5-year term loan facility bears interest at LIBOR plus 2.250%. Drawings under the revolving $300 million credit facility bear interest at LIBOR plus 2.250%. Drawings under the revolving $200 million credit facility bear interest at LIBOR plus a margin of either 1.750% or 2.750% depending upon the currency of the loan. This margin applies while the Company’s debt rating remains BBB-/Baa3. Should the Company’s debt rating change, then the margin will change in accordance with the credit facilities agreements.
During the six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company entered into a series of interest rate swaps for a total notional amount of $350 million to receive a fixed rate and pay a variable rate on a semi-annual basis, with a maturity date of July 15, 2015. The Company has designated and accounts for these instruments as fair value hedges against its
22
Notes to the financial statements
(Unaudited)
| |
8. | DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES (Continued) |
$350 million 5.625% senior notes due 2015. The fair values of the interest rate swaps are included within other assets or other liabilities and the fair value of the hedged element of the senior notes is included within long-term debt.
At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company’s interest rate swaps were all designated as hedging instruments.
Liquidity risk
The Company’s objective is to ensure that it has the ability to generate sufficient cash either from internal or external sources, in a timely and cost-effective manner, to meet its commitments as they fall due. The Company’s management of liquidity risk is embedded within its overall risk management framework. Scenario analysis is continually undertaken to ensure that the Company’s resources can meet its liquidity requirements. These resources are supplemented by access to a total $520 million under three revolving credit facilities.
Foreign currency risk
The Company’s primary foreign exchange risks arise:
| |
• | from changes in the exchange rate between US dollars and pounds sterling as its London market operations earn the majority of their revenues in US dollars and incur expenses predominantly in pounds sterling, and may also hold a significant net sterling asset or liability position on the balance sheet. In addition, the London market operations earn significant revenues in Euros and Japanese yen; and |
|
• | from the translation into US dollars of the net income and net assets of its foreign subsidiaries, excluding the London market operations which are US dollar denominated. |
The foreign exchange risks in its London market operations are hedged as follows:
| |
• | to the extent that forecast pound sterling expenses exceed pound sterling revenues, the Company limits its exposure to this exchange rate risk by the use of forward contracts matched to specific, clearly identified cash outflows arising in the ordinary course of business; |
|
• | to the extent the UK operations earn significant revenues in Euros and Japanese yen, the Company limits its exposure to changes in the exchange rate between the US dollar and these currencies by the use of forward contracts matched to a percentage of forecast cash inflows in specific currencies and periods; and |
|
• | to the extent that the net sterling asset or liability position in its London market operations relate to short-term cash flows, the Company limits its exposure by the use of forward purchases and sales. These forward purchases and sales are not effective hedges for accounting purposes. |
The Company does not hedge net income earned within foreign subsidiaries outside of the UK.
The fair value of foreign currency contracts is recorded in other assets and other liabilities. For contracts that qualify as accounting hedges, changes in fair value resulting from movements in the spot exchange rate are recorded as a component of other comprehensive income whilst changes resulting from a movement in the time value are recorded in interest expense. For contracts that do not qualify for hedge accounting, the total change in fair value is recorded in interest expense. Amounts held in comprehensive income are reclassified into earnings when the hedged exposure affects earnings.
At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company’s foreign currency contracts were all designated as hedging instruments except for those relating to short-term cash flows in its London market operations.
23
Willis Group Holdings plc
| |
8. | DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES (Continued) |
The table below summarizes by major currency the contractual amounts of the Company’s forward contracts to exchange foreign currencies for pounds sterling in the case of US dollars and US dollars for Euro and Japanese yen at June 30, 2011.
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | Fair
|
| | Sell(i) | | value |
| | (millions) |
|
US dollar | | $ | 325 | | | $ | 10 | |
Euro | | | 161 | | | | (5 | ) |
Japanese yen | | | 64 | | | | (4 | ) |
| | |
(i) | | Foreign currency notional amounts are reported in US dollars translated at contracted exchange rates. |
Credit risk and concentrations of credit risk
Credit risk represents the loss that would be recognized at the reporting date if counterparties failed to perform as contracted and from movements in interest rates and foreign exchange rates. The Company currently does not anticipate non-performance by its counterparties. The Company generally does not require collateral or other security to support financial instruments with credit risk; however, it is the Company’s policy to enter into master netting arrangements with counterparties as practical.
Concentrations of credit risk that arise from financial instruments exist for groups of customers or counterparties when they have similar economic characteristics that would cause their ability to meet contractual obligations to be similarly affected by changes in economic or other conditions. Financial instruments on the balance sheet that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and derivatives which are recorded at fair value.
The Company maintains a policy providing for the diversification of cash and cash equivalent investments and places such investments in an extensive number of financial institutions to limit the amount of credit risk exposure. These financial institutions are monitored on an ongoing basis for credit quality predominantly using information provided by credit agencies.
Concentrations of credit risk with respect to receivables are limited due to the large number of clients and markets in which the Company does business, as well as the dispersion across many geographic areas. Management does not believe significant risk exists in connection with the Company’s concentrations of credit as of June 30, 2011.
24
Notes to the financial statements
(Unaudited)
| |
8. | DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES (Continued) |
Derivative financial instruments
The table below presents the fair value of the Company’s derivative financial instruments and their balance sheet classification at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Fair value | |
| | Balance sheet
| | June 30,
| | | | |
Derivative financial instruments designated as hedging instruments: | | classification | | 2011 | | | December 31, 2010 | |
| | | | (millions) | |
|
Assets: | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest rate swaps (cash flow hedges) | | Other assets | | $ | 15 | | | $ | 17 | |
Interest rate swaps (fair value hedges) | | Other assets | | | 22 | | | | 14 | |
Forward exchange contracts | | Other assets | | | 13 | | | | 16 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments | | | | $ | 50 | | | $ | 47 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest rate swaps (cash flow hedges) | | Other liabilities | | | (2 | ) | | | (2 | ) |
Forward exchange contracts | | Other liabilities | | | (12 | ) | | | (10 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments | | | | $ | (14 | ) | | $ | (12 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
25
Willis Group Holdings plc
| |
8. | DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES (Continued) |
Cashflow hedges
The table below presents the effects of derivative financial instruments in cash flow hedging relationships on the consolidated statements of operations and the consolidated statements of equity for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | Amount of
| |
| | | | | | | | | | | | gain (loss)
| |
| | | | | | | Amount of
| | | | | recognized
| |
| | | | | | | gain (loss)
| | | | | in income
| |
| | Amount of
| | | | | reclassified
| | | | | on derivative
| |
| | gain (loss)
| | | | | from
| | | | | (ineffective
| |
| | recognized
| | | | | accumulated
| | | Location of gain (loss)
| | hedges and
| |
| | in OCI(i)
| | | Location of gain (loss)
| | OCI(i) into
| | | recognized in income
| | ineffective
| |
| | on derivative
| | | reclassified from
| | income
| | | on derivative (ineffective
| | element of
| |
Derivatives in cash flow
| | (effective
| | | accumulated OCI(i) into
| | (effective
| | | hedges and ineffective
| | effective
| |
hedging relationships | | element) | | | income (effective element) | | element) | | | element of effective hedges) | | hedges) | |
| | (millions) | | | | | (millions) | | | | | (millions) | |
|
Three months ended June 30, 2011 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest rate swaps | | $ | 6 | | | Investment income | | $ | (4 | ) | | Other operating expenses | | $ | — | |
Forward exchange contracts | | | (7 | ) | | Other operating expenses | | | — | | | Interest expense | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | (1 | ) | | | | $ | (4 | ) | | | | $ | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Three months ended June 30, 2010 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest rate swaps | | $ | 6 | | | Investment income | | $ | (6 | ) | | Other operating expenses | | $ | — | |
Forward exchange contracts | | | 7 | | | Other operating expenses | | | 2 | | | Interest expense | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 13 | | | | | $ | (4 | ) | | | | $ | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Six months ended June 30, 2011 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest rate swaps | | $ | 4 | | | Investment income | | $ | (8 | ) | | Other operating expenses | | $ | — | |
Forward exchange contracts | | | (5 | ) | | Other operating expenses | | | (1 | ) | | Interest expense | | | 1 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | (1 | ) | | | | $ | (9 | ) | | | | $ | 1 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Six months ended June 30, 2010 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest rate swaps | | $ | 11 | | | Investment income | | $ | (13 | ) | | Other operating expenses | | $ | — | |
Forward exchange contracts | | | 4 | | | Other operating expenses | | | 7 | | | Interest expense | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 15 | | | | | $ | (6 | ) | | | | $ | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Amounts above shown gross of tax.
| | |
(i) | | OCI means other comprehensive income. |
For interest rate swaps all components of each derivative’s gain or loss were included in the assessment of hedge effectiveness. For foreign exchange contracts, only the changes in fair value resulting from movements in the spot exchange rates are included in this assessment. In instances where the timing of expected cashflows can be matched exactly to the maturity of the foreign exchange contract, then changes in fair value attributable to movement in the forward points are also included.
At June 30, 2011 the Company estimates there will be $2 million of net derivative gains reclassified from accumulated comprehensive income into earnings within the next twelve months.
26
Notes to the financial statements
(Unaudited)
| |
8. | DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES (Continued) |
Fair value hedges
The table below presents the effects of derivative financial instruments in fair value hedging relationships on the consolidated statements of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Gain (loss)
| | | Ineffectiveness
| |
| | | | Gain (loss)
| | | recognized
| | | recognized in
| |
| | Hedged item in fair value
| | recognized
| | | for hedged
| | | interest
| |
Derivatives in fair value hedging relationships | | hedging relationship | | for derivative | | | item | | | expense | |
| | | | | | | (millions) | | | | |
|
Three months ended June 30, 2011 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest rate swaps | | 5.625% senior notes due 2015 | | $ | (6 | ) | | $ | 6 | | | $ | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Three months ended June 30, 2010 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest rate swaps | | 5.625% senior notes due 2015 | | $ | 12 | | | $ | (12 | ) | | $ | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Six months ended June 30, 2011 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest rate swaps | | 5.625% senior notes due 2015 | | $ | 5 | | | $ | (4 | ) | | $ | (1 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Six months ended June 30, 2010 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest rate swaps | | 5.625% senior notes due 2015 | | $ | 14 | | | $ | (14 | ) | | $ | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
All components of each derivative’s gain or loss were included in the assessment of hedge effectiveness.
| |
9. | FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT |
The following table presents, for each of the fair-value hierarchy levels, the Company’s assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | June 30, 2011 | |
| | Quoted
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | prices in
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | active markets
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | for
| | | Significant other
| | | Significant other
| | | | |
| | identical assets | | | observable inputs | | | unobservable inputs | | | | |
| | Level 1 | | | Level 2 | | | Level 3 | | | Total | |
| | (millions) | |
|
Assets at fair value: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 317 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 317 | |
Fiduciary funds—restricted (included within Fiduciary assets) | | | 1,957 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1,957 | |
Derivative financial instruments | | | — | | | | 50 | | | | — | | | | 50 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total assets | | $ | 2,274 | | | $ | 50 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 2,324 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Liabilities at fair value: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | $ | — | | | $ | 14 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 14 | |
Changes in fair value of hedged debt(i) | | | — | | | | 16 | | | | — | | | | 16 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities | | $ | — | | | $ | 30 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 30 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
(i) | | Changes in the fair value of the underlying hedged debt instrument since inception of the hedging relationship are included in long-term debt. |
27
Willis Group Holdings plc
| |
9. | FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT (Continued) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2010 | |
| | Level 1 | | | Level 2 | | | Level 3 | | | Total | |
| | (millions) | |
|
Assets at fair value: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 316 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 316 | |
Fiduciary funds—restricted (included within Fiduciary assets) | | | 1,764 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1,764 | |
Derivative financial instruments | | | — | | | | 47 | | | | — | | | | 47 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total assets | | $ | 2,080 | | | $ | 47 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 2,127 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Liabilities at fair value: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | $ | — | | | $ | 12 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 12 | |
Changes in fair value of hedged debt(i) | | | — | | | | 12 | | | | — | | | | 12 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities | | $ | — | | | $ | 24 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 24 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
(i) | | Changes in the fair value of the underlying hedged debt instrument since inception of the hedging relationship are included in long-term debt. |
The estimated fair value of the Company’s financial instruments held or issued to finance the Company’s operations is summarized below. Certain estimates and judgments were required to develop the fair value amounts. The fair value amounts shown below are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that the Company would realize upon disposition nor do they indicate the Company’s intent or ability to dispose of the financial instrument.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | June 30, 2011 | | December 31, 2010 |
| | Carrying
| | Fair
| | Carrying
| | Fair
|
| | amount | | value | | amount | | value |
| | (millions) |
|
Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 317 | | | $ | 317 | | | $ | 316 | | | $ | 316 | |
Fiduciary funds—restricted (included within Fiduciary assets) | | | 1,957 | | | | 1,957 | | | | 1,764 | | | | 1,764 | |
Derivative financial instruments | | | 50 | | | | 50 | | | | 47 | | | | 47 | |
Liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Short-term debt | | $ | 114 | | | $ | 114 | | | $ | 110 | | | $ | 110 | |
Long-term debt | | | 2,307 | | | | 2,436 | | | | 2,157 | | | | 2,450 | |
Derivative financial instruments | | | 14 | | | | 14 | | | | 12 | | | | 12 | |
The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating its fair value disclosure for financial instruments:
Cash and cash equivalents — The estimated fair value of these financial instruments approximates their carrying values due to their short maturities.
Fiduciary funds-restricted — Fair values are based on quoted market values.
Long-term debt excluding the fair value hedge — Fair values are based on quoted market values.
Derivative financial instruments — Market values have been used to determine the fair value of interest rate swaps and forward foreign exchange contracts based on estimated amounts the Company would receive or have to pay to terminate the agreements, taking into account the current interest rate environment or current foreign currency forward rates.
28
Notes to the financial statements
(Unaudited)
Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of businesses acquired over the fair market value of identifiable net assets at the dates of acquisition. Goodwill is not amortized but is subject to impairment testing annually and whenever facts or circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts may not be recoverable.
When a business entity is sold, goodwill is allocated to the disposed entity based on the fair value of that entity compared to the fair value of the reporting unit in which it is included.
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill by operating segment for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and the year ended December 31, 2010 are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | North
| | | | | | | |
| | Global | | | America | | | International | | | Total | |
| | (millions) | |
|
Balance at January 1, 2010 | | $ | 1,065 | | | $ | 1,780 | | | $ | 432 | | | $ | 3,277 | |
Purchase price allocation adjustments | | | — | | | | 6 | | | | — | | | | 6 | |
Other movements(i) | | | — | | | | (3 | ) | | | — | | | | (3 | ) |
Foreign exchange | | | (2 | ) | | | — | | | | 16 | | | | 14 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at December 31, 2010 | | $ | 1,063 | | | $ | 1,783 | | | $ | 448 | | | $ | 3,294 | |
Purchase price allocation adjustments | | | — | | | | — | | | | 2 | | | | 2 | |
Other movements(i)(ii) | | | 60 | | | | — | | | | (61 | ) | | | (1 | ) |
Foreign exchange | | | 3 | | | | — | | | | 19 | | | | 22 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at June 30, 2011 | | $ | 1,126 | | | $ | 1,783 | | | $ | 408 | | | $ | 3,317 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
(i) | | North America—$1 million (2010 : $3 million) tax benefit arising on the exercise of fully vested HRH stock options which were issued as part of the acquisition of HRH in 2008. |
|
(ii) | | Effective January 1, 2011, the Company changed its internal reporting structure: Global Markets International, previously reported within the International segment, is now reported in the Global segment; and Mexico Retail, which was previously reported within the International segment, is now reported in the North America segment. As a result of these changes, goodwill of $60 million has been reallocated from the International segment into the Global segment for Global Markets International, and $1 million has been reallocated from the International segment into the North America segment for Mexico Retail. Goodwill has been reallocated between segments using the relative fair value allocation approach. |
| |
11. | OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS, NET |
Other intangible assets are classified into the following categories:
| |
• | ‘Customer and Marketing Related’, including: |
| | |
| • | client relationships; |
|
| • | client lists; |
|
| • | non-compete agreements; |
|
| • | trade names; and |
| |
• | ‘Contract based, Technology and Other’ includes all other purchased intangible assets. |
29
Willis Group Holdings plc
| |
11. | OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS, NET (Continued) |
The major classes of amortizable intangible assets are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | June 30, 2011 | | | December 31, 2010 | |
| | Gross
| | | | | | Net
| | | Gross
| | | | | | Net
| |
| | carrying
| | | Accumulated
| | | carrying
| | | carrying
| | | Accumulated
| | | carrying
| |
| | amount | | | amortization | | | amount | | | amount | | | amortization | | | amount | |
| | (millions) | |
|
Customer and Marketing Related: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Client Relationships | | $ | 705 | | | $ | (247 | ) | | $ | 458 | | | $ | 695 | | | $ | (207 | ) | | $ | 488 | |
Client Lists | | | 8 | | | | (7 | ) | | | 1 | | | | 9 | | | | (7 | ) | | | 2 | |
Non-compete Agreements | | | 36 | | | | (36 | ) | | | — | | | | 36 | | | | (36 | ) | | | — | |
Trade Names | | | 11 | | | | (10 | ) | | | 1 | | | | 11 | | | | (10 | ) | | | 1 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Customer and Marketing Related | | | 760 | | | | (300 | ) | | | 460 | | | | 751 | | | | (260 | ) | | | 491 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Contract based, Technology and Other | | | 4 | | | | (3 | ) | | | 1 | | | | 4 | | | | (3 | ) | | | 1 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total amortizable intangible assets | | $ | 764 | | | $ | (303 | ) | | $ | 461 | | | $ | 755 | | | $ | (263 | ) | | $ | 492 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The aggregate amortization of intangible assets for the six months ended June 30, 2011 was $34 million (2010: $42 million), of which $17 million was recognized in the three months ended June 30, 2011 (2010: $21 million). The estimated aggregate amortization of intangible assets for each of the next five years ended December 31 is as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Remainder of
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2011 | | | 2012 | | | 2013 | | | 2014 | | | 2015 | | | Thereafter | | | Total | |
| | (millions) | |
|
Amortization of intangible assets | | $ | 34 | | | $ | 61 | | | $ | 53 | | | $ | 45 | | | $ | 38 | | | $ | 230 | | | $ | 461 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
30
Notes to the financial statements
(Unaudited)
An analysis of other assets is as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | June 30,
| | | December 31,
| |
| | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
| | (millions) | |
|
Other current assets | | | | | | | | |
Unamortized cash retention awards | | $ | 148 | | | $ | 125 | |
Prepayments and accrued income | | | 58 | | | | 73 | |
Derivatives | | | 17 | | | | 17 | |
Debt issuance costs | | | 8 | | | | 8 | |
Income tax receivable | | | 42 | | | | 69 | |
Other receivables | | | 54 | | | | 48 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total other current assets | | $ | 327 | | | $ | 340 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Other non-current assets | | | | | | | | |
Unamortized cash retention awards | | $ | 145 | | | $ | 48 | |
Deferred compensation plan assets | | | 115 | | | | 114 | |
Prepayments and accrued income | | | 17 | | | | — | |
Debt issuance costs | | | 19 | | | | 27 | |
Derivatives | | | 33 | | | | 30 | |
Income taxes receivable | | | 11 | | | | — | |
Other receivables | | | 25 | | | | 14 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total other non-current assets | | $ | 365 | | | $ | 233 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total other assets | | $ | 692 | | | $ | 573 | |
| | | | | | | | |
31
Willis Group Holdings plc
An analysis of other liabilities is as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | June 30,
| | | December 31,
| |
| | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
| | (millions) | |
|
Other current liabilities | | | | | | | | |
Other taxes payable | | $ | 46 | | | $ | 41 | |
Accounts payable | | | 72 | | | | 39 | |
Accrued dividends payable | | | 46 | | | | 46 | |
Accrued interest payable | | | 37 | | | | 21 | |
Derivatives | | | 7 | | | | 6 | |
Other payables | | | 110 | | | | 113 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total other current liabilities | | $ | 318 | | | $ | 266 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Other non-current liabilities | | | | | | | | |
Incentives from lessors | | $ | 156 | | | $ | 150 | |
Deferred compensation plan liability | | | 122 | | | | 120 | |
Capital lease obligation | | | 25 | | | | 23 | |
Derivatives | | | 7 | | | | 6 | |
Other payables | | | 57 | | | | 48 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total other non-current liabilities | | $ | 367 | | | $ | 347 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total other liabilities | | $ | 685 | | | $ | 613 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Short-term debt and current portion of the long-term debt consists of the following:
| | | | | | | | |
| | June 30,
| | | December 31,
| |
| | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
| | (millions) | |
|
Current portion of5-year term loan facility | | $ | 110 | | | $ | 110 | |
6.000% loan notes due 2012 | | | 4 | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 114 | | | $ | 110 | |
| | | | | | | | |
32
Notes to the financial statements
(Unaudited)
Long-term debt consists of the following:
| | | | | | | | |
| | June 30,
| | | December 31,
| |
| | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
| | (millions) | |
|
5-year term loan facility | | $ | 246 | | | $ | 301 | |
Revolving $300 million credit facility | | | — | | | | 90 | |
6.000% loan notes due 2012 | | | — | | | | 4 | |
5.625% senior notes due 2015 | | | 350 | | | | 350 | |
Fair value adjustment on 5.625% senior notes due 2015 | | | 16 | | | | 12 | |
12.875% senior notes due 2016 | | | — | | | | 500 | |
4.125% senior notes due 2016 | | | 299 | | | | — | |
6.200% senior notes due 2017 | | | 600 | | | | 600 | |
7.000% senior notes due 2019 | | | 300 | | | | 300 | |
5.750% senior notes due 2021 | | | 496 | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 2,307 | | | $ | 2,157 | |
| | | | | | | | |
The5-year term loan facility bears interest at LIBOR plus 2.250% and is repayable at $27 million per quarter, with a final payment of $115 million currently due in the fourth quarter of 2013.
In March 2011, the Company issued $300 million of 4.125% senior notes due 2016 and $500 million of 5.750% senior notes due 2021. The effective interest rates of these senior notes are 4.240% and 5.871% respectively, which include the impact of the discount upon issuance. The proceeds were used to repurchase $465 million of 12.875% senior notes due 2016 including a make-whole payment (representing a slight discount to the contractual make-whole amount) of $146 million. Following the repurchase the Company wrote off $13 million of unamortized debt issuance costs in first quarter 2011.
In March 2011, the Company irrevocably called the remaining $35 million of the 12.875% senior notes due 2016, which required a contractual make-whole redemption amount of approximately $12 million, expensed in first quarter 2011. The redemption was completed on April 18, 2011.
33
Willis Group Holdings plc
| |
15. | SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION |
Supplemental disclosures regarding cash flow information and non-cash flow investing and financing activities are as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | Six months ended
| |
| | June 30, | |
| | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
| | (millions) | |
|
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: | | | | | | | | |
Cash (receipts) payments for income taxes, net of cash received | | $ | (24 | ) | | $ | 56 | |
Cash payments for interest | | | 62 | | | | 82 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Supplemental disclosures of non-cash flow investing and financing activities: | | | | | | | | |
Write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs | | $ | (13 | ) | | $ | — | |
| | | | | | | | |
Acquisitions: | | | | | | | | |
Fair value of assets acquired | | $ | 2 | | | $ | 1 | |
Less: Liabilities assumed | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net assets acquired, net of cash acquired | | $ | 2 | | | $ | 1 | |
| | | | | | | | |
a) The components of comprehensive income are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three months ended
| | | Six months ended
| |
| | June 30, | | | June 30, | |
| | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
| | (millions) | | | (millions) | |
|
Net income | | $ | 89 | | | $ | 91 | | | $ | 131 | | | $ | 302 | |
Other comprehensive income, net of tax: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Foreign currency translation adjustment (net of tax of $nil, $nil, $nil and $nil) | | | 25 | | | | (29 | ) | | | 65 | | | | (35 | ) |
Pension funding adjustment (net of tax of $nil, $(2) million, $(1) million and $(5) million) | | | — | | | | 6 | | | | (5 | ) | | | 12 | |
Net loss on derivative instruments (net of tax of $1 million, $(2) million, $3 million and $(2) million) | | | (4 | ) | | | 7 | | | | (7 | ) | | | 7 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other comprehensive income (net of tax of $1 million, $(4) million, $2 million and $(7) million) | | | 21 | | | | (16 | ) | | | 53 | | | | (16 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Comprehensive income | | | 110 | | | | 75 | | | | 184 | | | | 286 | |
Noncontrolling interest | | | (4 | ) | | | (2 | ) | | | (12 | ) | | | (9 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Comprehensive income attributable to Willis Group Holdings | | $ | 106 | | | $ | 73 | | | $ | 172 | | | $ | 277 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
34
Notes to the financial statements
(Unaudited)
| |
16. | COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (Continued) |
b) The components of accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax, are as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | June 30,
| | | December 31,
| |
| | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
| | (millions) | |
|
Net foreign currency translation adjustment | | $ | 13 | | | $ | (52 | ) |
Pension funding adjustment | | | (508 | ) | | | (503 | ) |
Net unrealized gain on derivative instruments | | | 7 | | | | 14 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, attributable to Willis Group Holdings, net of tax | | $ | (488 | ) | | $ | (541 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
| |
17. | EQUITY AND NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS |
The components of stockholders’ equity and noncontrolling interests are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | June 30, 2011 | | | June 30, 2010 | |
| | Willis
| | | | | | | | | Willis
| | | | | | | |
| | Group
| | | | | | | | | Group
| | | | | | | |
| | Holdings
| | | Noncontrolling
| | | Total
| | | Holdings
| | | Noncontrolling
| | | Total
| |
| | stockholders | | | interests | | | equity | | | stockholders | | | interests | | | equity | |
| | (millions) | |
|
Balance at beginning of period | | $ | 2,577 | | | $ | 31 | | | $ | 2,608 | | | $ | 2,180 | | | $ | 49 | | | $ | 2,229 | |
Comprehensive income: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income | | | 119 | | | | 12 | | | | 131 | | | | 293 | | | | 9 | | | | 302 | |
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax | | | 53 | | | | — | | | | 53 | | | | (16 | ) | | | — | | | | (16 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Comprehensive income | | | 172 | | | | 12 | | | | 184 | | | | 277 | | | | 9 | | | | 286 | |
Dividends | | | (90 | ) | | | (12 | ) | | | (102 | ) | | | (89 | ) | | | (22 | ) | | | (111 | ) |
Additional paid-in capital | | | 48 | | | | — | | | | 48 | | | | 33 | | | | — | | | | 33 | |
Purchase of subsidiary shares from noncontrolling interests | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (4 | ) | | | (4 | ) |
Foreign currency translation | | | — | | | | 1 | | | | 1 | | | | — | | | | (4 | ) | | | (4 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at end of period | | $ | 2,707 | | | $ | 32 | | | $ | 2,739 | | | $ | 2,401 | | | $ | 28 | | | $ | 2,429 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The effects of changes in Willis Group Holdings ownership interest in its subsidiaries on equity are as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | June 30,
| | | June 30,
| |
| | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
| | (millions) | |
|
Net income attributable to Willis Group Holdings | | $ | 119 | | | $ | 293 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Transfers from noncontrolling interest: | | | | | | | | |
Decrease in Willis Group Holdings paid-in capital for purchase of noncontrolling interests | | | — | | | | (14 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Net transfers to noncontrolling interests | | | — | | | | (14 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Change from net income attributable to Willis Group Holdings and transfers from noncontrolling interests | | $ | 119 | | | $ | 279 | |
| | | | | | | | |
35
Willis Group Holdings plc
During the periods presented, the Company operated through three segments: Global, North America and International. Global provides specialist brokerage and consulting services to clients worldwide for specific industrial and commercial activities and is organized by specialism. North America and International predominantly comprise our retail operations which provide services to small, medium and major corporates, accessing Global’s specialist expertise when required.
The Company evaluates the performance of its operating segments based on organic revenue growth and operating income. For internal reporting and segmental reporting, the following items for which segmental management are not held accountable are excluded from segmental expenses:
| | |
| (i) | costs of the holding company; |
|
| (ii) | foreign exchange loss from the devaluation of the Venezuelan currency; |
|
| (iii) | foreign exchange hedging activities, foreign exchange movements on the UK pension plan asset and foreign exchange gains and losses from currency purchases and sales; |
|
| (iv) | amortization of intangible assets; |
|
| (v) | gains and losses on the disposal of operations; |
|
| (vi) | significant legal and regulatory settlements which are managed centrally; and |
|
| (vii) | costs associated with the 2011 Operational Review. |
The accounting policies of the operating segments are consistent with those described in Note 2 — Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies to the Company’s Annual Report onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. There are no inter-segment revenues, with segments operating on a revenue-sharing basis equivalent to that used when sharing business with other third-party brokers.
Effective January 1, 2011, the Company changed its internal reporting structure: Global Markets International, previously reported within the International segment, is now reported in the Global segment. In addition, Mexico Retail, which was previously reported within the International segment, is now reported in the North America segment. Comparative data have been adjusted accordingly.
Selected information regarding the Company’s operating segments is as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three months ended June 30, 2011 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Interest in
| |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Depreciation
| | | | | | Earnings of
| |
| | Commissions
| | | Investment
| | | Other
| | | Total
| | | and
| | | Operating
| | | Associates,
| |
| | and Fees | | | Income | | | Income | | | Revenues | | | Amortization | | | Income | | | net of tax | |
| | (millions) | |
|
Global | | $ | 271 | | | $ | 3 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 274 | | | $ | 5 | | | $ | 89 | | | $ | — | |
North America | | | 326 | | | | 1 | | | | 1 | | | | 328 | | | | 3 | | | | 61 | | | | — | |
International | | | 257 | | | | 4 | | | | — | | | | 261 | | | | 10 | | | | 56 | | | | (3 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Retail | | | 583 | | | | 5 | | | | 1 | | | | 589 | | | | 13 | | | | 117 | | | | (3 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Operating Segments | | | 854 | | | | 8 | | | | 1 | | | | 863 | | | | 18 | | | | 206 | | | | (3 | ) |
Corporate and Other(ii) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 18 | | | | (49 | ) | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Consolidated | | $ | 854 | | | $ | 8 | | | $ | 1 | | | $ | 863 | | | $ | 36 | | | $ | 157 | | | $ | (3 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
36
Notes to the financial statements
(Unaudited)
| |
18. | SEGMENT INFORMATION (Continued) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three months ended June 30, 2010(i) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Interest in
| |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Depreciation
| | | | | | Earnings of
| |
| | Commissions
| | | Investment
| | | Other
| | | Total
| | | and
| | | Operating
| | | Associates,
| |
| | and Fees | | | Income | | | Income | | | Revenues | | | Amortization | | | Income | | | net of tax | |
| | (millions) | |
|
Global | | $ | 249 | | | $ | 2 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 251 | | | $ | 5 | | | $ | 87 | | | $ | — | |
North America | | | 328 | | | | 5 | | | | — | | | | 333 | | | | 6 | | | | 68 | | | | — | |
International | | | 212 | | | | 3 | | | | — | | | | 215 | | | | 5 | | | | 41 | | | | (2 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Retail | | | 540 | | | | 8 | | | | — | | | | 548 | | | | 11 | | | | 109 | | | | (2 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Operating Segments | | | 789 | | | | 10 | | | | — | | | | 799 | | | | 16 | | | | 196 | | | | (2 | ) |
Corporate and Other(ii) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 21 | | | | (27 | ) | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Consolidated | | $ | 789 | | | $ | 10 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 799 | | | $ | 37 | | | $ | 169 | | | $ | (2 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
(i) | | Effective January 1, 2011, the Company changed its internal reporting structure: Global Markets International, previously reported within the International segment, is now reported in the Global segment. In addition, Mexico Retail, which was previously reported within the International segment, is now reported in the North America segment. As a result of these changes, second quarter 2010 revenues of $36 million, previously allocated to our International segment, have been included in Global: $34 million; and North America: $2 million. Operating income of $18 million previously allocated to our International segment has been included in Global: $18 million; and North America: $nil. |
|
(ii) | | Corporate and Other includes the following: |
| | | | | | | | |
| | Three months ended
| |
| | June 30, | |
| | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
| | (millions) | |
|
Amortization of intangible assets | | $ | (17 | ) | | $ | (21 | ) |
Foreign exchange hedging | | | 1 | | | | (2 | ) |
Foreign exchange on the UK pension plan asset | | | — | | | | 2 | |
Net gain on disposal of operations | | | — | | | | (2 | ) |
2011 Operational Review | | | (18 | ) | | | — | |
FSA regulatory settlement | | | (11 | ) | | | — | |
Other(a) | | | (4 | ) | | | (4 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Total Corporate and Other | | $ | (49 | ) | | $ | (27 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
(a) | | Other includes $6 million of the $9 million total benefit in second quarter 2011 from the release of funds and reserves related to potential legal liabilities. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six months ended June 30, 2011 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Interest in
| |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Depreciation
| | | | | | Earnings of
| |
| | Commissions
| | | Investment
| | | Other
| | | Total
| | | and
| | | Operating
| | | Associates,
| |
| | and Fees | | | Income | | | Income | | | Revenues | | | Amortization | | | Income | | | net of tax | |
| | (millions) | |
|
Global | | $ | 629 | | | $ | 6 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 635 | | | $ | 9 | | | $ | 264 | | | $ | — | |
North America | | | 682 | | | | 3 | | | | 1 | | | | 686 | | | | 10 | | | | 146 | | | | — | |
International | | | 543 | | | | 7 | | | | — | | | | 550 | | | | 15 | | | | 142 | | | | 13 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Retail | | | 1,225 | | | | 10 | | | | 1 | | | | 1,236 | | | | 25 | | | | 288 | | | | 13 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Operating Segments | | | 1,854 | | | | 16 | | | | 1 | | | | 1,871 | | | | 34 | | | | 552 | | | | 13 | |
Corporate and Other(ii) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 39 | | | | (157 | ) | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Consolidated | | $ | 1,854 | | | $ | 16 | | | $ | 1 | | | $ | 1,871 | | | $ | 73 | | | $ | 395 | | | $ | 13 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
37
Willis Group Holdings plc
| |
18. | SEGMENT INFORMATION (Continued) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six months ended June 30, 2010(i) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Interest in
| |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Depreciation
| | | | | | Earnings of
| |
| | Commissions
| | | Investment
| | | Other
| | | Total
| | | and
| | | Operating
| | | Associates,
| |
| | and Fees | | | Income | | | Income | | | Revenues | | | Amortization | | | Income | | | net of tax | |
| | (millions) | |
|
Global | | $ | 580 | | | $ | 5 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 585 | | | $ | 9 | | | $ | 241 | | | $ | — | |
North America | | | 693 | | | | 8 | | | | — | | | | 701 | | | | 12 | | | | 161 | | | | — | |
International | | | 479 | | | | 6 | | | | — | | | | 485 | | | | 10 | | | | 128 | | | | 18 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Retail | | | 1,172 | | | | 14 | | | | — | | | | 1,186 | | | | 22 | | | | 289 | | | | 18 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Operating Segments | | | 1,752 | | | | 19 | | | | — | | | | 1,771 | | | | 31 | | | | 530 | | | | 18 | |
Corporate and Other(ii) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 42 | | | | (60 | ) | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Consolidated | | $ | 1,752 | | | $ | 19 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,771 | | | $ | 73 | | | $ | 470 | | | $ | 18 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
(i) | | Effective January 1, 2011, the Company changed its internal reporting structure: Global Markets International, previously reported within the International segment, is now reported in the Global segment. In addition, Mexico Retail, which was previously reported within the International segment, is now reported in the North America segment. As a result of these changes, first half year 2010 total revenues of $70 million, previously allocated to our International segment, have been included in Global: $65 million; and North America: $5 million. Operating income of $34 million previously allocated to our International segment has been included in Global: $34 million; and North America: $nil. |
|
(ii) | | Corporate and Other includes the following: |
| | | | | | | | |
| | Six months ended
| |
| | June 30, | |
| | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
| | (millions) | |
|
Amortization of intangible assets | | $ | (34 | ) | | $ | (42 | ) |
Foreign exchange hedging | | | 2 | | | | (6 | ) |
Foreign exchange on the UK pension plan asset | | | 1 | | | | 6 | |
Net gain (loss) on disposal of operations | | | 4 | | | | (2 | ) |
2011 Operational Review | | | (115 | ) | | | — | |
FSA regulatory settlement | | | (11 | ) | | | — | |
Venezuela currency devaluation | | | — | | | | (12 | ) |
Other(a) | | | (4 | ) | | | (4 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Total Corporate and Other | | $ | (157 | ) | | $ | (60 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
(a) | | Other includes $6 million of the $9 million total benefit in second quarter 2011 from the release of funds and reserves related to potential legal liabilities. |
The following table reconciles total consolidated operating income, as disclosed in the operating segment tables above, to consolidated income before income taxes and interest in earnings of associates:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three months ended
| | | Six months ended
| |
| | June 30, | | | June 30, | |
| | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
| | (millions) | |
|
Total consolidated operating income | | $ | 157 | | | $ | 169 | | | $ | 395 | | | $ | 470 | |
Make-whole on repurchase and redemption of senior notes and write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs | | | — | | | | — | | | | (171 | ) | | | — | |
Interest expense | | | (34 | ) | | | (41 | ) | | | (74 | ) | | | (84 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income before income taxes and interest in earnings of associates | | $ | 123 | | | $ | 128 | | | $ | 150 | | | $ | 386 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
38
Notes to the financial statements
(Unaudited)
| |
19. | FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR PARENT GUARANTOR, OTHER GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES AND NON-GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES |
Willis North America Inc. (‘Willis North America’) has $350 million senior notes outstanding that were issued on July 1, 2005. On March 28, 2007, Willis North America issued further senior notes totaling $600 million under its June 2006 registration statement. On September 29, 2009, Willis North America issued senior notes totaling $300 million.
Until December 22, 2010, all direct obligations under the senior notes were jointly and severally, irrevocably and fully and unconditionally guaranteed by Willis Group Holdings, Willis Netherlands Holdings B.V., Willis Investment UK Holdings Limited, TA I Limited, TA II Limited, Trinity Acquisition plc, TA III Limited, TA IV Limited and Willis Group Limited, the Guarantor Companies. On that date and in connection with an internal group reorganization, TA II Limited, TA III Limited and TA IV Limited transferred their obligations as guarantors to the Other Guarantor Companies. TA II Limited, TA III Limited and TA IV Limited entered voluntary liquidation on December 31, 2010. The assets of these companies were distributed to the Other Guarantor Companies, either directly or indirectly, as a final distribution paid prior to their entering voluntary liquidation. As such, these transactions did not have a material impact on the guarantees of the senior notes and did not require the consent of the noteholders under the applicable indentures.
Presented below is condensed consolidating financial information for:
| | |
| (i) | Willis Group Holdings, which is a guarantor, on a parent company only basis; |
|
| (ii) | the Other Guarantors, which are all 100 percent directly or indirectly owned subsidiaries of the parent and are all direct or indirect parents of the issuer; |
|
| (iii) | the Issuer, Willis North America; |
|
| (iv) | Other, which are the non-guarantor subsidiaries, on a combined basis; |
|
| (v) | Consolidating adjustments; and |
|
| (vi) | the Consolidated Company. |
The equity method has been used for investments in subsidiaries in the condensed consolidating balance sheets of Willis Group Holdings, the Other Guarantors and the Issuer. Investments in subsidiaries in the condensed consolidating balance sheet for Other represents the cost of investment in subsidiaries recorded in the parent companies of the non-guarantor subsidiaries.
The entities included in the Other Guarantors column as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 are Willis Netherlands Holdings B.V., Willis Investment UK Holdings Limited, TA I Limited, Trinity Acquisition plc and Willis Group Limited.
39
Willis Group Holdings plc
| |
19. | FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR PARENT GUARANTOR, OTHER GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES AND NON-GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES (Continued) |
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three months ended June 30, 2011 | |
| | Willis
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Group
| | | The Other
| | | | | | | | | Consolidating
| | | | |
| | Holdings | | | Guarantors | | | The Issuer | | | Other | | | adjustments | | | Consolidated | |
| | (millions) | |
|
REVENUES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Commissions and fees | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 854 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 854 | |
Investment income | | | — | | | | 3 | | | | 1 | | | | 7 | | | | (3 | ) | | | 8 | |
Other income | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 24 | | | | (23 | ) | | | 1 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total revenues | | | — | | | | 3 | | | | 1 | | | | 885 | | | | (26 | ) | | | 863 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
EXPENSES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Salaries and benefits | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (523 | ) | | | 17 | | | | (506 | ) |
Other operating expenses | | | — | | | | 1 | | | | (48 | ) | | | (119 | ) | | | 2 | | | | (164 | ) |
Depreciation expense | | | — | | | | — | | | | (3 | ) | | | (16 | ) | | | — | | | | (19 | ) |
Amortization of intangible assets | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (22 | ) | | | 5 | | | | (17 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total expenses | | | — | | | | 1 | | | | (51 | ) | | | (680 | ) | | | 24 | | | | (706 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
OPERATING INCOME (LOSS) | | | — | | | | 4 | | | | (50 | ) | | | 205 | | | | (2 | ) | | | 157 | |
Investment income from Group undertakings | | | 1 | | | | 137 | | | | 110 | | | | 40 | | | | (288 | ) | | | — | |
Interest expense | | | (10 | ) | | | (60 | ) | | | (37 | ) | | | (102 | ) | | | 175 | | | | (34 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(LOSS) INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES AND INTEREST IN EARNINGS OF ASSOCIATES | | | (9 | ) | | | 81 | | | | 23 | | | | 143 | | | | (115 | ) | | | 123 | |
Income taxes | | | 2 | | | | 2 | | | | 1 | | | | (39 | ) | | | 3 | | | | (31 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(LOSS) INCOME BEFORE INTEREST IN EARNINGS OF ASSOCIATES | | | (7 | ) | | | 83 | | | | 24 | | | | 104 | | | | (112 | ) | | | 92 | |
Interest in earnings of associates, net of tax | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (5 | ) | | | 2 | | | | (3 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(LOSS) NET INCOME | | | (7 | ) | | | 83 | | | | 24 | | | | 99 | | | | (110 | ) | | | 89 | |
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (4 | ) | | | — | | | | (4 | ) |
EQUITY ACCOUNT FOR SUBSIDIARIES | | | 92 | | | | 9 | | | | (42 | ) | | | — | | | | (59 | ) | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO WILLIS GROUP HOLDINGS | | $ | 85 | | | $ | 92 | | | $ | (18 | ) | | $ | 95 | | | $ | (169 | ) | | $ | 85 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
40
Notes to the financial statements
(Unaudited)
| |
19. | FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR PARENT GUARANTOR, OTHER GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES AND NON-GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES (Continued) |
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three months ended June 30, 2010 | |
| | Willis
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Group
| | | The Other
| | | | | | | | | Consolidating
| | | | |
| | Holdings | | | Guarantors | | | The Issuer | | | Other | | | adjustments | | | Consolidated | |
| | (millions) | |
|
REVENUES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Commissions and fees | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 789 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 789 | |
Investment income | | | — | | | | 2 | | | | — | | | | 13 | | | | (5 | ) | | | 10 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total revenues | | | — | | | | 2 | | | | — | | | | 802 | | | | (5 | ) | | | 799 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
EXPENSES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Salaries and benefits | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (466 | ) | | | 10 | | | | (456 | ) |
Other operating expenses | | | 369 | | | | 8 | | | | (61 | ) | | | (436 | ) | | | (15 | ) | | | (135 | ) |
Depreciation expense | | | — | | | | — | | | | (2 | ) | | | (14 | ) | | | — | | | | (16 | ) |
Amortization of intangible assets | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (21 | ) | | | — | | | | (21 | ) |
Net gain on disposal of operations | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 2,433 | | | | (2,435 | ) | | | (2 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total expenses | | | 369 | | | | 8 | | | | (63 | ) | | | 1,496 | | | | (2,440 | ) | | | (630 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
OPERATING INCOME (LOSS) | | | 369 | | | | 10 | | | | (63 | ) | | | 2,298 | | | | (2,445 | ) | | | 169 | |
Investment income from Group undertakings | | | — | | | | 218 | | | | 117 | | | | 65 | | | | (400 | ) | | | — | |
Interest expense | | | — | | | | (79 | ) | | | (38 | ) | | | (154 | ) | | | 230 | | | | (41 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES AND INTEREST IN EARNINGS OF ASSOCIATES | | | 369 | | | | 149 | | | | 16 | | | | 2,209 | | | | (2,615 | ) | | | 128 | |
Income taxes | | | — | | | | (7 | ) | | | 16 | | | | (45 | ) | | | 1 | | | | (35 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
INCOME BEFORE INTEREST IN EARNINGS OF ASSOCIATES | | | 369 | | | | 142 | | | | 32 | | | | 2,164 | | | | (2,614 | ) | | | 93 | |
Interest in earnings of associates, net of tax | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (6 | ) | | | 4 | | | | (2 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
NET INCOME | | | 369 | | | | 142 | | | | 32 | | | | 2,158 | | | | (2,610 | ) | | | 91 | |
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (2 | ) | | | (2 | ) |
EQUITY ACCOUNT FOR SUBSIDIARIES | | | (280 | ) | | | 97 | | | | (35 | ) | | | — | | | | 218 | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO WILLIS GROUP HOLDINGS | | $ | 89 | | | $ | 239 | | | $ | (3 | ) | | $ | 2,158 | | | $ | (2,394 | ) | | $ | 89 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
41
Willis Group Holdings plc
| |
19. | FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR PARENT GUARANTOR, OTHER GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES AND NON-GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES (Continued) |
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six months ended June 30, 2011 | |
| | Willis
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Group
| | | The Other
| | | | | | | | | Consolidating
| | | | |
| | Holdings | | | Guarantors | | | The Issuer | | | Other | | | adjustments | | | Consolidated | |
| | (millions) | |
|
REVENUES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Commissions and fees | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,854 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,854 | |
Investment income | | | — | | | | 6 | | | | 1 | | | | 15 | | | | (6 | ) | | | 16 | |
Other income | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 24 | | | | (23 | ) | | | 1 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total revenues | | | — | | | | 6 | | | | 1 | | | | 1,893 | | | | (29 | ) | | | 1,871 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
EXPENSES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Salaries and benefits | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (1,116 | ) | | | 26 | | | | (1,090 | ) |
Other operating expenses | | | 1 | | | | 25 | | | | (93 | ) | | | (253 | ) | | | 3 | | | | (317 | ) |
Depreciation expense | | | — | | | | — | | | | (7 | ) | | | (32 | ) | | | — | | | | (39 | ) |
Amortization of intangible assets | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (39 | ) | | | 5 | | | | (34 | ) |
Net gain on disposal of operations | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 6 | | | | (2 | ) | | | 4 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total expenses | | | 1 | | | | 25 | | | | (100 | ) | | | (1,434 | ) | | | 32 | | | | (1,476 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
OPERATING INCOME (LOSS) | | | 1 | | | | 31 | | | | (99 | ) | | | 459 | | | | 3 | | | | 395 | |
Investment income from Group undertakings | | | 35 | | | | 218 | | | | 173 | | | | 33 | | | | (459 | ) | | | — | |
Make-whole on repurchase and redemption of senior notes and write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs | | | — | | | | (171 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (171 | ) |
Interest expense | | | (12 | ) | | | (125 | ) | | | (73 | ) | | | (208 | ) | | | 344 | | | | (74 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES AND INTEREST IN EARNINGS OF ASSOCIATES | | | 24 | | | | (47 | ) | | | 1 | | | | 284 | | | | (112 | ) | | | 150 | |
Income taxes | | | 2 | | | | 45 | | | | 14 | | | | (89 | ) | | | (4 | ) | | | (32 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INTEREST IN EARNINGS OF ASSOCIATES | | | 26 | | | | (2 | ) | | | 15 | | | | 195 | | | | (116 | ) | | | 118 | |
Interest in earnings of associates, net of tax | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 9 | | | | 4 | | | | 13 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
NET INCOME (LOSS) | | | 26 | | | | (2 | ) | | | 15 | | | | 204 | | | | (112 | ) | | | 131 | |
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (12 | ) | | | — | | | | (12 | ) |
EQUITY ACCOUNT FOR SUBSIDIARIES | | | 93 | | | | 133 | | | | (37 | ) | | | — | | | | (189 | ) | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO WILLIS GROUP HOLDINGS | | $ | 119 | | | $ | 131 | | | $ | (22 | ) | | $ | 192 | | | $ | (301 | ) | | $ | 119 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
42
Notes to the financial statements
(Unaudited)
| |
19. | FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR PARENT GUARANTOR, OTHER GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES AND NON-GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES (Continued) |
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six months ended June 30, 2010 | |
| | Willis
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Group
| | | The Other
| | | | | | | | | Consolidating
| | | | |
| | Holdings | | | Guarantors | | | The Issuer | | | Other | | | adjustments | | | Consolidated | |
| | (millions) | |
|
REVENUES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Commissions and fees | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,752 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,752 | |
Investment income | | | — | | | | 5 | | | | 1 | | | | 18 | | | | (5 | ) | | | 19 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total revenues | | | — | | | | 5 | | | | 1 | | | | 1,770 | | | | (5 | ) | | | 1,771 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
EXPENSES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Salaries and benefits | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (957 | ) | | | 15 | | | | (942 | ) |
Other operating expenses | | | 565 | | | | (26 | ) | | | (59 | ) | | | (730 | ) | | | (34 | ) | | | (284 | ) |
Depreciation expense | | | — | | | | — | | | | (4 | ) | | | (27 | ) | | | — | | | | (31 | ) |
Amortization of intangible assets | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (42 | ) | | | — | | | | (42 | ) |
Net gain (loss) on disposal of operations | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 2,435 | | | | (2,437 | ) | | | (2 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total expenses | | | 565 | | | | (26 | ) | | | (63 | ) | | | 679 | | | | (2,456 | ) | | | (1,301 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
OPERATING INCOME (LOSS) | | | 565 | | | | (21 | ) | | | (62 | ) | | | 2,449 | | | | (2,461 | ) | | | 470 | |
Investment income from Group undertakings | | | — | | | | 551 | | | | 173 | | | | 488 | | | | (1,212 | ) | | | — | |
Interest expense | | | — | | | | (211 | ) | | | (80 | ) | | | (211 | ) | | | 418 | | | | (84 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES AND INTEREST IN EARNINGS OF ASSOCIATES | | | 565 | | | | 319 | | | | 31 | | | | 2,726 | | | | (3,255 | ) | | | 386 | |
Income taxes | | | — | | | | (4 | ) | | | 9 | | | | (119 | ) | | | 12 | | | | (102 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
INCOME BEFORE INTEREST IN EARNINGS OF ASSOCIATES | | | 565 | | | | 315 | | | | 40 | | | | 2,607 | | | | (3,243 | ) | | | 284 | |
Interest in earnings of associates, net of tax | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 14 | | | | 4 | | | | 18 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
NET INCOME | | | 565 | | | | 315 | | | | 40 | | | | 2,621 | | | | (3,239 | ) | | | 302 | |
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (3 | ) | | | (6 | ) | | | (9 | ) |
EQUITY ACCOUNT FOR SUBSIDIARIES | | | (272 | ) | | | 132 | | | | (30 | ) | | | — | | | | 170 | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO WILLIS GROUP HOLDINGS | | $ | 293 | | | $ | 447 | | | $ | 10 | | | $ | 2,618 | | | $ | (3,075 | ) | | $ | 293 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
43
Willis Group Holdings plc
| |
19. | FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR PARENT GUARANTOR, OTHER GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES AND NON-GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES (Continued) |
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As at June 30, 2011 | |
| | Willis
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Group
| | | The Other
| | | The
| | | | | | Consolidating
| | | | |
| | Holdings | | | Guarantors | | | Issuer | | | Other | | | adjustments | | | Consolidated | |
| | (millions) | |
|
ASSETS |
CURRENT ASSETS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 87 | | | $ | 230 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 317 | |
Accounts receivable | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1,021 | | | | 28 | | | | 1,049 | |
Fiduciary assets | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 11,919 | | | | (663 | ) | | | 11,256 | |
Deferred tax assets | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 32 | | | | — | | | | 32 | |
Other current assets | | | 3 | | | | 138 | | | | 37 | | | | 434 | | | | (285 | ) | | | 327 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total current assets | | | 3 | | | | 138 | | | | 124 | | | | 13,636 | | | | (920 | ) | | | 12,981 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investments in subsidiaries | | | (911 | ) | | | 4,031 | | | | 1,423 | | | | 3,875 | | | | (8,418 | ) | | | — | |
Amounts owed by (to) Group undertakings | | | 4,462 | | | | (5,193 | ) | | | 882 | | | | (151 | ) | | | — | | | | — | |
NON-CURRENT ASSETS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fixed assets | | | — | | | | — | | | | 58 | | | | 335 | | | | (2 | ) | | | 391 | |
Goodwill | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1,699 | | | | 1,618 | | | | 3,317 | |
Other intangible assets | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 477 | | | | (16 | ) | | | 461 | |
Investments in associates | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (45 | ) | | | 231 | | | | 186 | |
Deferred tax assets | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 7 | | | | 2 | | | | 9 | |
Pension benefits asset | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 231 | | | | — | | | | 231 | |
Other non-current assets | | | 6 | | | | 139 | | | | 48 | | | | 172 | | | | — | | | | 365 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total non-current assets | | | 6 | | | | 139 | | | | 106 | | | | 2,876 | | | | 1,833 | | | | 4,960 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
TOTAL ASSETS | | $ | 3,560 | | | $ | (885 | ) | | $ | 2,535 | | | $ | 20,236 | | | $ | (7,505 | ) | | $ | 17,941 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY |
CURRENT LIABILITIES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fiduciary liabilities | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 11,919 | | | $ | (663 | ) | | $ | 11,256 | |
Deferred revenue and accrued expenses | | | 1 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 322 | | | | — | | | | 323 | |
Income taxes payable | | | — | | | | 51 | | | | — | | | | 107 | | | | (108 | ) | | | 50 | |
Short-term debt | | | — | | | | — | | | | 110 | | | | 4 | | | | — | | | | 114 | |
Deferred tax liabilities | | | — | | | | 1 | | | | — | | | | 21 | | | | — | | | | 22 | |
Other current liabilities | | | 58 | | | | 14 | | | | 57 | | | | 222 | | | | (33 | ) | | | 318 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total current liabilities | | | 59 | | | | 66 | | | | 167 | | | | 12,595 | | | | (804 | ) | | | 12,083 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Long-term debt | | | 794 | | | | — | | | | 1,513 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 2,307 | |
Liabilities for pension benefits | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 150 | | | | — | | | | 150 | |
Deferred tax liabilities | | | — | | | | 2 | | | | 28 | | | | 81 | | | | — | | | | 111 | |
Provisions for liabilities | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 188 | | | | (4 | ) | | | 184 | |
Other non-current liabilities | | | — | | | | 5 | | | | 12 | | | | 350 | | | | — | | | | 367 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total non-current liabilities | | | 794 | | | | 7 | | | | 1,553 | | | | 769 | | | | (4 | ) | | | 3,119 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
TOTAL LIABILITIES | | $ | 853 | | | $ | 73 | | | $ | 1,720 | | | $ | 13,364 | | | $ | (808 | ) | | $ | 15,202 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
EQUITY | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Willis Group Holdings stockholders’ equity | | | 2,707 | | | | (958 | ) | | | 815 | | | | 6,840 | | | | (6,697 | ) | | | 2,707 | |
Noncontrolling interests | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 32 | | | | — | | | | 32 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total equity | | | 2,707 | | | | (958 | ) | | | 815 | | | | 6,872 | | | | (6,697 | ) | | | 2,739 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY | | $ | 3,560 | | | $ | (885 | ) | | $ | 2,535 | | | $ | 20,236 | | | $ | (7,505 | ) | | $ | 17,941 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
44
Notes to the financial statements
(Unaudited)
| |
19. | FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR PARENT GUARANTOR, OTHER GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES AND NON-GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES (Continued) |
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As at December 31, 2010 | |
| | Willis
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Group
| | | The Other
| | | The
| | | | | | Consolidating
| | | | |
| | Holdings | | | Guarantors | | | Issuer | | | Other | | | adjustments | | | Consolidated | |
| | (millions) | |
|
ASSETS |
CURRENT ASSETS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 76 | | | $ | 240 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 316 | |
Accounts receivable | | | 2 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 809 | | | | 28 | | | | 839 | |
Fiduciary assets | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 10,167 | | | | (598 | ) | | | 9,569 | |
Deferred tax assets | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1 | | | | 35 | | | | — | | | | 36 | |
Other current assets | | | — | | | | 23 | | | | 57 | | | | 293 | | | | (33 | ) | | | 340 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total current assets | | | 2 | | | | 23 | | | | 134 | | | | 11,544 | | | | (603 | ) | | | 11,100 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investments in subsidiaries | | | (1,039 | ) | | | 3,814 | | | | 1,455 | | | | 3,855 | | | | (8,085 | ) | | | — | |
Amounts owed by (to) Group undertakings | | | 3,659 | | | | (4,590 | ) | | | 1,002 | | | | (71 | ) | | | — | | | | — | |
NON-CURRENT ASSETS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fixed assets | | | — | | | | — | | | | 52 | | | | 330 | | | | (1 | ) | | | 381 | |
Goodwill | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1,696 | | | | 1,598 | | | | 3,294 | |
Other intangible assets | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 492 | | | | — | | | | 492 | |
Investments in associates | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (51 | ) | | | 212 | | | | 161 | |
Deferred tax assets | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 7 | | | | — | | | | 7 | |
Pension benefits asset | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 179 | | | | — | | | | 179 | |
Other non-current assets | | | — | | | | 166 | | | | 41 | | | | 149 | | | | (123 | ) | | | 233 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total non-current assets | | | — | | | | 166 | | | | 93 | | | | 2,802 | | | | 1,686 | | | | 4,747 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
TOTAL ASSETS | | $ | 2,622 | | | $ | (587 | ) | | $ | 2,684 | | | $ | 18,130 | | | $ | (7,002 | ) | | $ | 15,847 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY |
CURRENT LIABILITIES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fiduciary liabilities | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 10,167 | | | $ | (598 | ) | | $ | 9,569 | |
Deferred revenue and accrued expenses | | | 1 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 297 | | | | — | | | | 298 | |
Income taxes payable | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 69 | | | | (12 | ) | | | 57 | |
Short-term debt | | | — | | | | — | | | | 110 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 110 | |
Deferred tax liabilities | | | — | | | | 3 | | | | 1 | | | | 5 | | | | — | | | | 9 | |
Other current liabilities | | | 44 | | | | 15 | | | | 38 | | | | 189 | | | | (20 | ) | | | 266 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total current liabilities | | | 45 | | | | 18 | | | | 149 | | | | 10,727 | | | | (630 | ) | | | 10,309 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Long-term debt | | | — | | | | 500 | | | | 1,653 | | | | 4 | | | | — | | | | 2,157 | |
Liabilities for pension benefits | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 164 | | | | — | | | | 164 | |
Deferred tax liabilities | | | — | | | | 3 | | | | 26 | | | | 54 | | | | — | | | | 83 | |
Provisions for liabilities | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 183 | | | | (4 | ) | | | 179 | |
Other non-current liabilities | | | — | | | | 10 | | | | 16 | | | | 321 | | | | — | | | | 347 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total non-current liabilities | | | — | | | | 513 | | | | 1,695 | | | | 726 | | | | (4 | ) | | | 2,930 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
TOTAL LIABILITIES | | $ | 45 | | | $ | 531 | | | $ | 1,844 | | | $ | 11,453 | | | $ | (634 | ) | | $ | 13,239 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
EQUITY | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Willis Group Holdings stockholders’ equity | | | 2,577 | | | | (1,118 | ) | | | 840 | | | | 6,646 | | | | (6,368 | ) | | | 2,577 | |
Noncontrolling interests | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 31 | | | | — | | | | 31 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total equity | | | 2,577 | | | | (1,118 | ) | | | 840 | | | | 6,677 | | | | (6,368 | ) | | | 2,608 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY | | $ | 2,622 | | | $ | (587 | ) | | $ | 2,684 | | | $ | 18,130 | | | $ | (7,002 | ) | | $ | 15,847 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
45
Willis Group Holdings plc
| |
19. | FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR PARENT GUARANTOR, OTHER GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES AND NON-GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES (Continued) |
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six months ended June 30, 2011 | |
| | Willis
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Group
| | | The Other
| | | | | | | | | Consolidating
| | | | |
| | Holdings | | | Guarantors | | | The Issuer | | | Other | | | adjustments | | | Consolidated | |
| | (millions) | |
|
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) OPERATING ACTIVITIES | | $ | 3 | | | $ | 76 | | | $ | 54 | | | $ | 140 | | | $ | (147 | ) | | $ | 126 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds on disposal of fixed and intangible assets | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 5 | | | | — | | | | 5 | |
Additions to fixed assets | | | — | | | | — | | | | (13 | ) | | | (34 | ) | | | — | | | | (47 | ) |
Acquisitions of subsidiaries, net of cash acquired | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (4 | ) | | | — | | | | (4 | ) |
Acquisitions of investments in associates | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (2 | ) | | | — | | | | (2 | ) |
Investment in Trident V Parallel Fund, LP | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (4 | ) | | | — | | | | (4 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net cash used in investing activities | | | — | | | | — | | | | (13 | ) | | | (39 | ) | | | — | | | | (52 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from draw down of revolving credit facility | | | — | | | | — | | | | (90 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | (90 | ) |
Senior notes issued | | | 794 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 794 | |
Debt issuance costs | | | (7 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (7 | ) |
Repayments of debt | | | — | | | | (500 | ) | | | (55 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | (555 | ) |
Make-whole on repurchase and redemption of senior notes | | | — | | | | (158 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (158 | ) |
Proceeds from issue of shares | | | 42 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 42 | |
Amounts owed by and to Group undertakings | | | (742 | ) | | | 590 | | | | 115 | | | | 37 | | | | — | | | | — | |
Excess tax benefits from share-based payment arrangements | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 4 | | | | — | | | | 4 | |
Dividends paid | | | (90 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | (147 | ) | | | 147 | | | | (90 | ) |
Acquisition of noncontrolling interests | | | — | | | | (8 | ) | | | — | | | | (1 | ) | | | — | | | | (9 | ) |
Dividends paid to noncontrolling interests | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (12 | ) | | | — | | | | (12 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net cash used in financing activities | | | (3 | ) | | | (76 | ) | | | (30 | ) | | | (119 | ) | | | 147 | | | | (81 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS | | | — | | | | — | | | | 11 | | | | (18 | ) | | | — | | | | (7 | ) |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 8 | | | | — | | | | 8 | |
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD | | | — | | | | — | | | | 76 | | | | 240 | | | | — | | | | 316 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 87 | | | $ | 230 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 317 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
46
Notes to the financial statements
(Unaudited)
| |
19. | FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR PARENT GUARANTOR, OTHER GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES AND NON-GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES (Continued) |
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six months ended June 30, 2010(i) | |
| | Willis
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Group
| | | The Other
| | | | | | | | | Consolidating
| | | | |
| | Holdings | | | Guarantors | | | The Issuer | | | Other | | | adjustments | | | Consolidated | |
| | | | | | | | (millions) | | | | | | | |
|
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) OPERATING ACTIVITIES | | $ | 569 | | | $ | 321 | | | $ | 42 | | | $ | (22 | ) | | $ | (756 | ) | | $ | 154 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds on disposal of fixed and intangible assets | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 4 | | | | — | | | | 4 | |
Additions to fixed assets | | | — | | | | — | | | | (13 | ) | | | (32 | ) | | | — | | | | (45 | ) |
Acquisitions of subsidiaries, net of cash acquired | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (15 | ) | | | — | | | | (15 | ) |
Acquisitions of investments in associates | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (1 | ) | | | — | | | | (1 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net cash used in investing activities | | | — | | | | — | | | | (13 | ) | | | (44 | ) | | | — | | | | (57 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from draw down of revolving credit facility | | | — | | | | — | | | | 30 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 30 | |
Repayments of debt | | | — | | | | — | | | | (61 | ) | | | (9 | ) | | | — | | | | (70 | ) |
Proceeds from issue of shares | | | 17 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 17 | |
Amounts owed by and to Group undertakings | | | (542 | ) | | | (189 | ) | | | (21 | ) | | | 752 | | | | — | | | | — | |
Excess tax benefits from share-based payment arrangements | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1 | | | | — | | | | 1 | |
Dividends paid | | | (44 | ) | | | (132 | ) | | | — | | | | (669 | ) | | | 756 | | | | (89 | ) |
Acquisition of noncontrolling interests | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (4 | ) | | | — | | | | (4 | ) |
Dividends paid to noncontrolling interests | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (22 | ) | | | — | | | | (22 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities | | | (569 | ) | | | (321 | ) | | | (52 | ) | | | 49 | | | | 756 | | | | (137 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS | | | — | | | | — | | | | (23 | ) | | | (17 | ) | | | — | | | | (40 | ) |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (14 | ) | | | — | | | | (14 | ) |
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD | | | — | | | | — | | | | 104 | | | | 117 | | | | — | | | | 221 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 81 | | | $ | 86 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 167 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
(i) | | The 2010 Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows has been recast to conform to the new balance sheet presentation. See Note 2 — Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies for details |
47
Willis Group Holdings plc
| |
20. | FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR PARENT ISSUER, GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES AND NON-GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES |
The Company may offer debt securities, preferred stock, ordinary stock and other securities pursuant to an effective shelf registration onForm S-3. On March 17, 2011, the Company issued senior notes totaling $800 million under its existing registration statement. The debt securities issued (‘Holdings Debt Securities’), are guaranteed by certain of the Company’s subsidiaries. Therefore, the Company is providing the condensed consolidating financial information below. The following 100 percent directly or indirectly owned subsidiaries fully and unconditionally guarantee the Holdings Debt Securities on a joint and several basis: Willis Netherlands Holdings B.V., Willis Investment UK Holdings Limited, TA I Limited, Trinity Acquisition plc, Willis Group Limited and Willis North America (the ‘Guarantors’).
The guarantor structure described above differs from the existing guarantor structure associated with the senior notes issued by Willis North America (the ‘Willis North America Debt Securities’) (and for which condensed consolidating financial information is presented in Note 19) in that Willis Group Holdings is the Parent Issuer and Willis North America is a subsidiary guarantor.
Presented below is condensed consolidating financial information for:
| | |
| (i) | Willis Group Holdings, which is the Parent Issuer; |
|
| (ii) | the Guarantors, which are all 100 percent directly or indirectly owned subsidiaries of the parent; |
|
| (iii) | Other, which are the non-guarantor subsidiaries, on a combined basis; |
|
| (iv) | Consolidating adjustments; and |
|
| (v) | the Consolidated Company. |
The equity method has been used for investments in subsidiaries in the condensed consolidating balance sheets of Willis Group Holdings and the Guarantors. Investments in subsidiaries in the condensed consolidating balance sheet for Other represents the cost of investment in subsidiaries recorded in the parent companies of the non-guarantor subsidiaries.
The entities included in the Guarantors column as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 are Willis Netherlands Holdings B.V., Willis Investment UK Holdings Limited, TA I Limited, Trinity Acquisition plc, Willis Group Limited and Willis North America.
48
Notes to the financial statements
(Unaudited)
| |
20. | FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR PARENT ISSUER, GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES AND NON-GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES (Continued) |
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three months ended June 30, 2011 | |
| | Willis
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Group
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Holdings —
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | the Parent
| | | The
| | | | | | Consolidating
| | | | |
| | Issuer | | | Guarantors | | | Other | | | adjustments | | | Consolidated | |
| | (millions) | |
|
REVENUES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Commissions and fees | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 854 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 854 | |
Investment income | | | — | | | | 3 | | | | 8 | | | | (3 | ) | | | 8 | |
Other income | | | — | | | | — | | | | 24 | | | | (23 | ) | | | 1 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total revenues | | | — | | | | 3 | | | | 886 | | | | (26 | ) | | | 863 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
EXPENSES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Salaries and benefits | | | — | | | | — | | | | (523 | ) | | | 17 | | | | (506 | ) |
Other operating expenses | | | — | | | | (47 | ) | | | (119 | ) | | | 2 | | | | (164 | ) |
Depreciation expense | | | — | | | | (3 | ) | | | (16 | ) | | | — | | | | (19 | ) |
Amortization of intangible assets | | | — | | | | — | | | | (22 | ) | | | 5 | | | | (17 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total expenses | | | — | | | | (50 | ) | | | (680 | ) | | | 24 | | | | (706 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
OPERATING (LOSS) INCOME | | | — | | | | (47 | ) | | | 206 | | | | (2 | ) | | | 157 | |
Investment income from Group undertakings | | | 1 | | | | 247 | | | | 40 | | | | (288 | ) | | | — | |
Interest expense | | | (10 | ) | | | (97 | ) | | | (102 | ) | | | 175 | | | | (34 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(LOSS) INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES AND INTEREST IN EARNINGS OF ASSOCIATES | | | (9 | ) | | | 103 | | | | 144 | | | | (115 | ) | | | 123 | |
Income taxes | | | 2 | | | | 3 | | | | (39 | ) | | | 3 | | | | (31 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(LOSS) INCOME BEFORE INTEREST IN EARNINGS OF ASSOCIATES | | | (7 | ) | | | 106 | | | | 105 | | | | (112 | ) | | | 92 | |
Interest in earnings of associates, net of tax | | | — | | | | — | | | | (5 | ) | | | 2 | | | | (3 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
NET (LOSS) INCOME | | | (7 | ) | | | 106 | | | | 100 | | | | (110 | ) | | | 89 | |
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | | | — | | | | — | | | | (4 | ) | | | — | | | | (4 | ) |
EQUITY ACCOUNT FOR SUBSIDIARIES | | | 92 | | | | (14 | ) | | | — | | | | (78 | ) | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO WILLIS GROUP HOLDINGS | | $ | 85 | | | $ | 92 | | | $ | 96 | | | $ | (188 | ) | | $ | 85 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
49
Willis Group Holdings plc
| |
20. | FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR PARENT ISSUER, GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES AND NON-GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES (Continued) |
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three months ended June 30, 2010 | |
| | Willis
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Group
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Holdings —
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | the Parent
| | | The
| | | | | | Consolidating
| | | | |
| | Issuer | | | Guarantors | | | Other | | | adjustments | | | Consolidated | |
| | (millions) | |
|
REVENUES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Commissions and fees | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 789 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 789 | |
Investment income | | | — | | | | 2 | | | | 13 | | | | (5 | ) | | | 10 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total revenues | | | — | | | | 2 | | | | 802 | | | | (5 | ) | | | 799 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
EXPENSES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Salaries and benefits | | | — | | | | — | | | | (466 | ) | | | 10 | | | | (456 | ) |
Other operating expenses | | | 369 | | | | (53 | ) | | | (436 | ) | | | (15 | ) | | | (135 | ) |
Depreciation expense | | | — | | | | (2 | ) | | | (14 | ) | | | — | | | | (16 | ) |
Amortization of intangible assets | | | — | | | | — | | | | (21 | ) | | | — | | | | (21 | ) |
Net gain (loss) on disposal of operations | | | — | | | | — | | | | 2,433 | | | | (2,435 | ) | | | (2 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total expenses | | | 369 | | | | (55 | ) | | | 1,496 | | | | (2,440 | ) | | | (630 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
OPERATING INCOME (LOSS) | | | 369 | | | | (53 | ) | | | 2,298 | | | | (2,445 | ) | | | 169 | |
Investment income from Group undertakings | | | — | | | | 335 | | | | 65 | | | | (400 | ) | | | — | |
Interest expense | | | — | | | | (117 | ) | | | (154 | ) | | | 230 | | | | (41 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES AND INTEREST IN EARNINGS OF ASSOCIATES | | | 369 | | | | 165 | | | | 2,209 | | | | (2,615 | ) | | | 128 | |
Income taxes | | | — | | | | 9 | | | | (45 | ) | | | 1 | | | | (35 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
INCOME BEFORE INTEREST IN EARNINGS OF ASSOCIATES | | | 369 | | | | 174 | | | | 2,164 | | | | (2,614 | ) | | | 93 | |
Interest in earnings of associates, net of tax | | | — | | | | — | | | | (6 | ) | | | 4 | | | | (2 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
NET INCOME | | | 369 | | | | 174 | | | | 2,158 | | | | (2,610 | ) | | | 91 | |
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (2 | ) | | | (2 | ) |
EQUITY ACCOUNT FOR SUBSIDIARIES | | | (280 | ) | | | 65 | | | | — | | | | 215 | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO WILLIS GROUP HOLDINGS | | $ | 89 | | | $ | 239 | | | $ | 2,158 | | | $ | (2,397 | ) | | $ | 89 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
50
Notes to the financial statements
(Unaudited)
| |
20. | FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR PARENT ISSUER, GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES AND NON-GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES (Continued) |
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six months ended June 30, 2011 | |
| | Willis
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Group
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Holdings —
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | the Parent
| | | The
| | | | | | Consolidating
| | | | |
| | Issuer | | | Guarantors | | | Other | | | adjustments | | | Consolidated | |
| | (millions) | |
|
REVENUES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Commissions and fees | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,854 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,854 | |
Investment income | | | — | | | | 6 | | | | 16 | | | | (6 | ) | | | 16 | |
Other income | | | — | | | | — | | | | 24 | | | | (23 | ) | | | 1 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total revenues | | | — | | | | 6 | | | | 1,894 | | | | (29 | ) | | | 1,871 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
EXPENSES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Salaries and benefits | | | — | | | | — | | | | (1,116 | ) | | | 26 | | | | (1,090 | ) |
Other operating expenses | | | 1 | | | | (68 | ) | | | (253 | ) | | | 3 | | | | (317 | ) |
Depreciation expense | | | — | | | | (7 | ) | | | (32 | ) | | | — | | | | (39 | ) |
Amortization of intangible assets | | | — | | | | — | | | | (39 | ) | | | 5 | | | | (34 | ) |
Net gain on disposal of operations | | | — | | | | — | | | | 6 | | | | (2 | ) | | | 4 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total expenses | | | 1 | | | | (75 | ) | | | (1,434 | ) | | | 32 | | | | (1,476 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
OPERATING INCOME (LOSS) | | | 1 | | | | (69 | ) | | | 460 | | | | 3 | | | | 395 | |
Investment income from Group undertakings | | | 35 | | | | 391 | | | | 33 | | | | (459 | ) | | | — | |
Make-whole on repurchase and redemption of senior notes and write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs | | | — | | | | (171 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | (171 | ) |
Interest expense | | | (12 | ) | | | (198 | ) | | | (208 | ) | | | 344 | | | | (74 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES AND INTEREST IN EARNINGS OF ASSOCIATES | | | 24 | | | | (47 | ) | | | 285 | | | | (112 | ) | | | 150 | |
Income taxes | | | 2 | | | | 59 | | | | (89 | ) | | | (4 | ) | | | (32 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
INCOME BEFORE INTEREST IN EARNINGS OF ASSOCIATES | | | 26 | | | | 12 | | | | 196 | | | | (116 | ) | | | 118 | |
Interest in earnings of associates, net of tax | | | — | | | | — | | | | 9 | | | | 4 | | | | 13 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
NET INCOME | | | 26 | | | | 12 | | | | 205 | | | | (112 | ) | | | 131 | |
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | | | — | | | | — | | | | (12 | ) | | | — | | | | (12 | ) |
EQUITY ACCOUNT FOR SUBSIDIARIES | | | 93 | | | | 119 | | | | — | | | | (212 | ) | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO WILLIS GROUP HOLDINGS | | $ | 119 | | | $ | 131 | | | $ | 193 | | | $ | (324 | ) | | $ | 119 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
51
Willis Group Holdings plc
| |
20. | FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR PARENT ISSUER, GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES AND NON-GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES (Continued) |
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six months ended June 30, 2010 | |
| | Willis
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Group
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Holdings —
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | the Parent
| | | The
| | | | | | Consolidating
| | | | |
| | Issuer | | | Guarantors | | | Other | | | adjustments | | | Consolidated | |
| | (millions) | |
|
REVENUES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Commissions and fees | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,752 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,752 | |
Investment income | | | — | | | | 6 | | | | 18 | | | | (5 | ) | | | 19 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total revenues | | | — | | | | 6 | | | | 1,770 | | | | (5 | ) | | | 1,771 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
EXPENSES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Salaries and benefits | | | — | | | | — | | | | (957 | ) | | | 15 | | | | (942 | ) |
Other operating expenses | | | 565 | | | | (85 | ) | | | (730 | ) | | | (34 | ) | | | (284 | ) |
Depreciation expense | | | — | | | | (4 | ) | | | (27 | ) | | | — | | | | (31 | ) |
Amortization of intangible assets | | | — | | | | — | | | | (42 | ) | | | — | | | | (42 | ) |
Net gain on disposal of operations | | | — | | | | — | | | | 2,435 | | | | (2,437 | ) | | | (2 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total expenses | | | 565 | | | | (89 | ) | | | 679 | | | | (2,456 | ) | | | (1,301 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
OPERATING INCOME (LOSS) | | | 565 | | | | (83 | ) | | | 2,449 | | | | (2,461 | ) | | | 470 | |
Investment income from Group undertakings | | | — | | | | 724 | | | | 488 | | | | (1,212 | ) | | | — | |
Interest expense | | | — | | | | (291 | ) | | | (211 | ) | | | 418 | | | | (84 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES AND INTEREST IN EARNINGS OF ASSOCIATES | | | 565 | | | | 350 | | | | 2,726 | | | | (3,255 | ) | | | 386 | |
Income taxes | | | — | | | | 5 | | | | (119 | ) | | | 12 | | | | (102 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
INCOME BEFORE INTEREST IN EARNINGS OF ASSOCIATES | | | 565 | | | | 355 | | | | 2,607 | | | | (3,243 | ) | | | 284 | |
Interest in earnings of associates, net of tax | | | — | | | | — | | | | 14 | | | | 4 | | | | 18 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
NET INCOME | | | 565 | | | | 355 | | | | 2,621 | | | | (3,239 | ) | | | 302 | |
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | | | — | | | | — | | | | (3 | ) | | | (6 | ) | | | (9 | ) |
EQUITY ACCOUNT FOR SUBSIDIARIES | | | (272 | ) | | | 92 | | | | — | | | | 180 | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO WILLIS GROUP HOLDINGS | | $ | 293 | | | $ | 447 | | | $ | 2,618 | | | $ | (3,065 | ) | | $ | 293 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
52
Notes to the financial statements
(Unaudited)
| |
20. | FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR PARENT ISSUER, GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES AND NON-GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES (Continued) |
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As at June 30, 2011 | |
| | Willis
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Group
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Holdings —
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | the Parent
| | | The
| | | | | | Consolidating
| | | | |
| | Issuer | | | Guarantors | | | Other | | | adjustments | | | Consolidated | |
| | (millions) | |
|
ASSETS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
CURRENT ASSETS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | — | | | $ | 87 | | | $ | 230 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 317 | |
Accounts receivable | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1,021 | | | | 28 | | | | 1,049 | |
Fiduciary assets | | | — | | | | — | | | | 11,919 | | | | (663 | ) | | | 11,256 | |
Deferred tax assets | | | — | | | | — | | | | 32 | | | | — | | | | 32 | |
Other current assets | | | 3 | | | | 175 | | | | 434 | | | | (285 | ) | | | 327 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total current assets | | | 3 | | | | 262 | | | | 13,636 | | | | (920 | ) | | | 12,981 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investments in subsidiaries | | | (911 | ) | | | 4,639 | | | | 3,875 | | | | (7,603 | ) | | | — | |
Amounts owed by (to) Group undertakings | | | 4,462 | | | | (4,311 | ) | | | (151 | ) | | | — | | | | — | |
NON-CURRENT ASSETS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fixed assets | | | — | | | | 58 | | | | 335 | | | | (2 | ) | | | 391 | |
Goodwill | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1,699 | | | | 1,618 | | | | 3,317 | |
Other intangible assets | | | — | | | | — | | | | 477 | | | | (16 | ) | | | 461 | |
Investments in associates | | | — | | | | — | | | | (45 | ) | | | 231 | | | | 186 | |
Deferred tax assets | | | — | | | | — | | | | 7 | | | | 2 | | | | 9 | |
Pension benefits asset | | | — | | | | — | | | | 231 | | | | — | | | | 231 | |
Other non-current assets | | | 6 | | | | 187 | | | | 172 | | | | — | | | | 365 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total non-current assets | | | 6 | | | | 245 | | | | 2,876 | | | | 1,833 | | | | 4,960 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
TOTAL ASSETS | | $ | 3,560 | | | $ | 835 | | | $ | 20,236 | | | $ | (6,690 | ) | | $ | 17,941 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
CURRENT LIABILITIES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fiduciary liabilities | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 11,919 | | | $ | (663 | ) | | $ | 11,256 | |
Deferred revenue and accrued expenses | | | 1 | | | | — | | | | 322 | | | | — | | | | 323 | |
Income taxes payable | | | — | | | | 51 | | | | 107 | | | | (108 | ) | | | 50 | |
Short-term debt | | | — | | | | 110 | | | | 4 | | | | — | | | | 114 | |
Deferred tax liabilities | | | — | | | | 1 | | | | 21 | | | | — | | | | 22 | |
Other current liabilities | | | 58 | | | | 71 | | | | 222 | | | | (33 | ) | | | 318 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total current liabilities | | | 59 | | | | 233 | | | | 12,595 | | | | (804 | ) | | | 12,083 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Long-term debt | | | 794 | | | | 1,513 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 2,307 | |
Liabilities for pension benefits | | | — | | | | — | | | | 150 | | | | — | | | | 150 | |
Deferred tax liabilities | | | — | | | | 30 | | | | 81 | | | | — | | | | 111 | |
Provisions for liabilities | | | — | | | | — | | | | 188 | | | | (4 | ) | | | 184 | |
Other non-current liabilities | | | — | | | | 17 | | | | 350 | | | | — | | | | 367 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total non-current liabilities | | | 794 | | | | 1,560 | | | | 769 | | | | (4 | ) | | | 3,119 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
TOTAL LIABILITIES | | $ | 853 | | | $ | 1,793 | | | $ | 13,364 | | | $ | (808 | ) | | $ | 15,202 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
EQUITY | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Willis Group Holdings stockholders’ equity | | | 2,707 | | | | (958 | ) | | | 6,840 | | | | (5,882 | ) | | | 2,707 | |
Noncontrolling interests | | | — | | | | — | | | | 32 | | | | — | | | | 32 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total equity | | | 2,707 | | | | (958 | ) | | | 6,872 | | | | (5,882 | ) | | | 2,739 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY | | $ | 3,560 | | | $ | 835 | | | $ | 20,236 | | | $ | (6,690 | ) | | $ | 17,941 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
53
Willis Group Holdings plc
| |
20. | FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR PARENT ISSUER, GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES AND NON-GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES (Continued) |
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As at December 31, 2010 | |
| | Willis
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Group
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Holdings —
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | the Parent
| | | The
| | | | | | Consolidating
| | | | |
| | Issuer | | | Guarantors | | | Other | | | adjustments | | | Consolidated | |
| | (millions) | |
|
ASSETS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
CURRENT ASSETS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | — | | | $ | 76 | | | $ | 240 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 316 | |
Accounts receivable | | | 2 | | | | — | | | | 809 | | | | 28 | | | | 839 | |
Fiduciary assets | | | — | | | | — | | | | 10,167 | | | | (598 | ) | | | 9,569 | |
Deferred tax assets | | | — | | | | 1 | | | | 35 | | | | — | | | | 36 | |
Other current assets | | | — | | | | 80 | | | | 293 | | | | (33 | ) | | | 340 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total current assets | | | 2 | | | | 157 | | | | 11,544 | | | | (603 | ) | | | 11,100 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investments in subsidiaries | | | (1,039 | ) | | | 4,429 | | | | 3,855 | | | | (7,245 | ) | | | — | |
Amounts owed by (to) Group undertakings | | | 3,659 | | | | (3,588 | ) | | | (71 | ) | | | — | | | | — | |
NON-CURRENT ASSETS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fixed assets | | | — | | | | 52 | | | | 330 | | | | (1 | ) | | | 381 | |
Goodwill | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1,696 | | | | 1,598 | | | | 3,294 | |
Other intangible assets | | | — | | | | — | | | | 492 | | | | — | | | | 492 | |
Investments in associates | | | — | | | | — | | | | (51 | ) | | | 212 | | | | 161 | |
Deferred tax assets | | | — | | | | — | | | | 7 | | | | — | | | | 7 | |
Pension benefits asset | | | — | | | | — | | | | 179 | | | | — | | | | 179 | |
Other non-current assets | | | — | | | | 207 | | | | 149 | | | | (123 | ) | | | 233 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total non-current assets | | | — | | | | 259 | | | | 2,802 | | | | 1,686 | | | | 4,747 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
TOTAL ASSETS | | $ | 2,622 | | | $ | 1,257 | | | $ | 18,130 | | | $ | (6,162 | ) | | $ | 15,847 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
CURRENT LIABILITIES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fiduciary liabilities | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 10,167 | | | $ | (598 | ) | | $ | 9,569 | |
Deferred revenue and accrued expenses | | | 1 | | | | — | | | | 297 | | | | — | | | | 298 | |
Income taxes payable | | | — | | | | — | | | | 69 | | | | (12 | ) | | | 57 | |
Short-term debt | | | — | | | | 110 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 110 | |
Deferred tax liabilities | | | — | | | | 4 | | | | 5 | | | | — | | | | 9 | |
Other current liabilities | | | 44 | | | | 53 | | | | 189 | | | | (20 | ) | | | 266 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total current liabilities | | | 45 | | | | 167 | | | | 10,727 | | | | (630 | ) | | | 10,309 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Long-term debt | | | — | | | | 2,153 | | | | 4 | | | | — | | | | 2,157 | |
Liabilities for pension benefits | | | — | | | | — | | | | 164 | | | | — | | | | 164 | |
Deferred tax liabilities | | | — | | | | 29 | | | | 54 | | | | — | | | | 83 | |
Provisions for liabilities | | | — | | | | — | | | | 183 | | | | (4 | ) | | | 179 | |
Other non-current liabilities | | | — | | | | 26 | | | | 321 | | | | — | | | | 347 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total non-current liabilities | | | — | | | | 2,208 | | | | 726 | | | | (4 | ) | | | 2,930 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
TOTAL LIABILITIES | | $ | 45 | | | $ | 2,375 | | | $ | 11,453 | | | $ | (634 | ) | | $ | 13,239 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
EQUITY | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Willis Group Holdings stockholders’ equity | | | 2,577 | | | | (1,118 | ) | | | 6,646 | | | | (5,528 | ) | | | 2,577 | |
Noncontrolling interests | | | — | | | | — | | | | 31 | | | | — | | | | 31 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total equity | | | 2,577 | | | | (1,118 | ) | | | 6,677 | | | | (5,528 | ) | | | 2,608 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY | | $ | 2,622 | | | $ | 1,257 | | | $ | 18,130 | | | $ | (6,162 | ) | | $ | 15,847 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
54
Notes to the financial statements
(Unaudited)
| |
20. | FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR PARENT ISSUER, GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES AND NON-GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES (Continued) |
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six months ended June 30, 2011 | |
| | Willis
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Group
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Holdings —
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | the Parent
| | | The
| | | | | | Consolidating
| | | | |
| | Issuer | | | Guarantors | | | Other | | | adjustments | | | Consolidated | |
| | (millions) | |
|
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) OPERATING ACTIVITIES | | $ | 3 | | | $ | 130 | | | $ | 140 | | | $ | (147 | ) | | $ | 126 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds on disposal of fixed and intangible assets | | | — | | | | — | | | | 5 | | | | — | | | | 5 | |
Additions to fixed assets | | | — | | | | (13 | ) | | | (34 | ) | | | — | | | | (47 | ) |
Acquisitions of subsidiaries, net of cash acquired | | | — | | | | — | | | | (4 | ) | | | — | | | | (4 | ) |
Acquisitions of investments in associates | | | — | | | | — | | | | (2 | ) | | | — | | | | (2 | ) |
Investment in Trident V Parallel Fund, LP | | | — | | | | — | | | | (4 | ) | | | — | | | | (4 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net cash used in investing activities | | | — | | | | (13 | ) | | | (39 | ) | | | — | | | | (52 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Draw down of revolving credit facility | | | — | | | | (90 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | (90 | ) |
Senior notes issued | | | 794 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 794 | |
Debt issuance costs | | | (7 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (7 | ) |
Repayments of debt | | | — | | | | (555 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | (555 | ) |
Make-whole on repurchase and redemption of senior notes | | | — | | | | (158 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | (158 | ) |
Proceeds from issue of shares | | | 42 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 42 | |
Amounts owed by and to Group undertakings | | | (742 | ) | | | 705 | | | | 37 | | | | — | | | | — | |
Excess tax benefits from share-based payment arrangement | | | — | | | | — | | | | 4 | | | | — | | | | 4 | |
Dividends paid | | | (90 | ) | | | — | | | | (147 | ) | | | 147 | | | | (90 | ) |
Acquisition of noncontrolling interests | | | — | | | | (8 | ) | | | (1 | ) | | | — | | | | (9 | ) |
Dividends paid to noncontrolling interests | | | — | | | | — | | | | (12 | ) | | | — | | | | (12 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net cash used in financing activities | | | (3 | ) | | | (106 | ) | | | (119 | ) | | | 147 | | | | (81 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS | | | — | | | | 11 | | | | (18 | ) | | | — | | | | (7 | ) |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents | | | — | | | | — | | | | 8 | | | | — | | | | 8 | |
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF YEAR | | | — | | | | 76 | | | | 240 | | | | — | | | | 316 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF YEAR | | | — | | | | 87 | | | | 230 | | | | — | | | | 317 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
55
Willis Group Holdings plc
| |
20. | FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR PARENT ISSUER, GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES AND NON-GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES (Continued) |
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six months ended June 30, 2010 | |
| | Willis
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Group
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Holdings —
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | the Parent
| | | The
| | | | | | Consolidating
| | | | |
| | Issuer | | | Guarantors | | | Other | | | adjustments | | | Consolidated | |
| | (millions) | |
|
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) OPERATING ACTIVITIES | | $ | 569 | | | $ | 363 | | | $ | (22 | ) | | $ | (756 | ) | | $ | 154 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds on disposal of fixed and intangible assets | | | — | | | | — | | | | 4 | | | | — | | | | 4 | |
Additions to fixed assets | | | — | | | | (13 | ) | | | (32 | ) | | | — | | | | (45 | ) |
Acquisitions of subsidiaries, net of cash acquired | | | — | | | | — | | | | (15 | ) | | | — | | | | (15 | ) |
Acquisitions of investments in associates | | | — | | | | — | | | | (1 | ) | | | — | | | | (1 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net cash used in investing activities | | | — | | | | (13 | ) | | | (44 | ) | | | — | | | | (57 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from draw down of revolving credit facility | | | — | | | | 30 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 30 | |
Repayments of debt | | | — | | | | (61 | ) | | | (9 | ) | | | — | | | | (70 | ) |
Proceeds from issue of shares | | | 17 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 17 | |
Amounts owed by and to Group undertakings | | | (542 | ) | | | (210 | ) | | | 752 | | | | — | | | | — | |
Excess tax benefits from share-based payment arrangement | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1 | | | | — | | | | 1 | |
Dividends paid | | | (44 | ) | | | (132 | ) | | | (669 | ) | | | 756 | | | | (89 | ) |
Acquisition of noncontrolling interests | | | — | | | | — | | | | (4 | ) | | | — | | | | (4 | ) |
Dividends paid to noncontrolling interests | | | — | | | | — | | | | (22 | ) | | | — | | | | (22 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities | | | (569 | ) | | | (373 | ) | | | 49 | | | | 756 | | | | (137 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS | | | — | | | | (23 | ) | | | (17 | ) | | | — | | | | (40 | ) |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents | | | — | | | | — | | | | (14 | ) | | | — | | | | (14 | ) |
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF YEAR | | | — | | | | 104 | | | | 117 | | | | — | | | | 221 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF YEAR | | $ | — | | | $ | 81 | | | $ | 86 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 167 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
56
Business review
Item 2—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
This discussion includes references to non-GAAP financial measures as defined in Regulation G of the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘SEC’). We present such non-GAAP financial measures, as we believe such information is of interest to the investment community because it provides additional meaningful methods of evaluating certain aspects of the Company’s operating performance from period to period on a basis that may not be otherwise apparent on a GAAP basis. Organic revenue growth and organic growth in commissions and fees exclude the impact of acquisitions and disposals, year over year movements in foreign exchange, legacy contingent commissions assumed as part of the HRH acquisition, and investment and other income from growth in revenues and commissions and fees. We believe organic revenue growth and organic growth in commissions and fees provide measures that the investment community may find helpful in assessing the
performance of operations that were part of our operations in both the current and prior periods, and provide measures against which our businesses may be assessed in the future. These financial measures should be viewed in addition to, not in lieu of, the consolidated financial statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011.
This discussion includes forward-looking statements, including under the headings ‘Business Overview and Market Outlook’, ‘Executive Summary’, ‘Operating Results—Group’, ‘Operating Results—Segment Information’ and ‘Liquidity and Capital Resources’. Please see ‘Forward-Looking Statements’ for certain cautionary information regarding forward-looking statements and a list of factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those predicted in the forward-looking statements.
BUSINESS OVERVIEW AND MARKET OUTLOOK
We provide a broad range of insurance broking, risk management and consulting services to our clients worldwide. Our core specialty businesses include Aerospace; Energy; Marine; Construction; Financial and Executive Risks; Fine Art, Jewelry and Specie; Special Contingency Risks; and Reinsurance. Our retail operations provide services to small, medium and major corporations and the employee benefits practice, our largest product-based practice group, provides health, welfare and human resources consulting and brokerage services.
In our capacity as advisor and insurance broker, we act as an intermediary between our clients and insurance carriers by advising our clients on their risk management requirements, helping clients determine the best means of managing risk, and negotiating and placing insurance risk with insurance carriers through our global distribution network.
We derive most of our revenues from commissions and fees for brokerage and consulting services and do not determine the insurance premiums on which our commissions are generally based. Fluctuations in these premiums charged by the insurance carriers have a direct and potentially material impact on our results of operations. Commission levels generally follow the same trend as premium levels as they are derived from a percentage of the premiums paid by the insureds. Due to the cyclical nature of the insurance market and the impact of other market conditions on insurance premiums, they
may vary widely between accounting periods. Reductions in premium rates, leading to downward pressure on commission revenues (a ‘soft’ market), can have a potentially material adverse impact on our commission revenues and operating margin.
A ‘hard’ market occurs when premium uplifting factors, including a greater than anticipated loss experience or capital shortages, more than offset any downward pressures on premiums. This usually has a favorable impact on our commission revenues and operating margin.
Following the hard market experienced between 2000 and 2003, we saw a rapid transition to a soft market in 2004, with premium rates falling in most sectors including property and casualty and the reinsurance markets. Rates continued to decline in most sectors through 2005 and 2006, with the exception of catastrophe-exposed markets. In 2007, the market softened further with decreases in many of the market sectors in which we operated and this continued into 2008 with further premium rate declines across most product lines and geographic areas in which we operate.
The global economic downturn which began in the latter half of 2008 has impacted our results in recent years and may continue to do so for the foreseeable future, in particular due to a lower overall value of insurance coverage purchased by our clients driven by reductions in
57
Willis Group Holdings plc
their property holdings, headcount, related salaries and benefits expense, and the market value of assets and other insured values.
In 2009, there was modest stabilization of rates in some specialty markets but this benefit was more than offset by the adverse impact of the continued soft market in other sectors and the weakened economic environment across the globe, which has continued to impact our results throughout 2010 and into first half 2011, in particular in
the reinsurance market and our retail operations in North America and UK and Ireland.
In first half 2011, we have seen some modest increases in catastrophe-exposed property insurance and reinsurance pricing levels driven by significant 2011 catastrophe losses including the Japanese earthquake and tsunami, the New Zealand earthquake and the mid-west US tornadoes. However, we continue to be impacted by the soft insurance market and challenging economic conditions across other sectors.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Overview
Despite the difficult trading conditions, we reported total revenue growth of 8 percent in second quarter 2011 and 6 percent in first half 2011 compared with the same periods of 2010, reflecting positive organic growth in commissions and fees driven by our International and Global operations.
International achieved total revenue growth of 21 percent in second quarter 2011 and 13 percent in first half 2011, including 6 percent organic growth in commissions and fees in both periods. Global reported 9 percent total revenue growth in second quarter and 8 percent in first half 2011, including 3 percent and 6 percent organic growth in second quarter and first half 2011, respectively.
Our North America operations reported negative total revenue growth of 1 percent in second quarter and negative 2 percent in first half 2011. This included flat organic growth for second quarter 2011 and negative organic growth of 1 percent for first half 2011, reflecting the continued adverse impact of the soft market and difficult economic conditions.
Net income for second quarter 2011 was $85 million, or $0.48 per diluted share, compared with $89 million, or $0.52 per diluted share, in same period 2010 as revenue growth was more than offset by increased expenses in second quarter 2011, including:
| |
• | $12 million post-tax, or $0.07 per diluted share, relating to the 2011 Operational Review. See ‘2011 Operational Review’, below; |
|
• | an $11 million, or $0.06 per diluted share, non tax-deductible expense relating to a previously announced UK Financial Services Authority (FSA) regulatory settlement; and |
|
• | a $9 million post-tax, or $0.05 per diluted share, increase in the amortization charge relating to our |
| |
| cash retention awards. See ‘Salaries and benefits—Cash retention awards’, below. |
Net income for first half 2011 was $119 million, or $0.68 per diluted share, compared with $293 million, or $1.71 per diluted share, in same period 2010, reflecting the impact of a number of significant expense items in 2011, including:
| |
• | $115 million relating to the 2011 Operational Review, equivalent to $81 million post-tax or $0.46 per diluted share. See, ‘2011 Operational Review’, below; |
|
• | $171 million relating to the make-whole amounts on the repurchase and redemption of $500 million of our senior debt and the write-off of related unamortized debt issuance costs, equivalent to $124 million post-tax or $0.71 per diluted share. See, ‘Make-whole on repurchase and redemption of senior notes and write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs’, below; |
|
• | a $21 million post-tax, or $0.12 per diluted share, increase in the amortization charge relating to our cash retention awards; and |
|
• | the $11 million, or $0.06 per diluted share, second quarter 2011 non tax-deductible expense relating to the UK FSA regulatory settlement. |
Following the successful debt refinancing, our main priorities for the remainder of 2011 are:
| |
• | execution of the Willis Cause—aiming to become the broker and risk adviser of choice globally by aligning our business model to the needs of each client segment and maintaining a focus on growth; |
|
• | continued investment in technology, advanced analytics, product innovation and industry talent and expertise to support our growth strategy; and |
58
Business review
| |
• | completion of our 2011 Operational Review which aims to better align resources with our growth |
| |
| strategies and enable related long-term expense savings. |
Results from operations: second quarter 2011
Total revenues at $863 million for second quarter 2011 were $64 million, or 8 percent, higher than in second quarter 2010, reflecting positive organic commissions and fees growth of 3 percent and a net 5 percent benefit from foreign currency translation, reflecting theperiod-over-period weakening of the US dollar against a basket of currencies in which we earn our revenues.
Organic commissions and fees growth of 3 percent comprised 4 percent net new business growth (which constitutes the revenue growth from business won over the course of the period net of the revenue from existing business lost) and a 1 percent negative impact from declining premium rates and other market factors.
Operating margin at 18 percent was 3 percentage points lower than in second quarter 2010 with the decrease mainly reflecting:
| |
• | the $18 million expense for the 2011 Operational Review, discussed below, equivalent to approximately 2 percentage points; |
|
• | a $14 million net increase in incentive expenses, equivalent to approximately 2 percentage points, including a $12 million increase in the amortization of cash retention awards; and |
|
• | the $11 million expense for a UK FSA regulatory settlement, equivalent to approximately 1 percentage point; |
partly offset by
| |
• | the $64 million increase in revenues including organic growth in commissions and fees; |
|
• | a $9 million benefit from the release of funds and reserves related to potential legal liabilities; and |
|
• | rigorous expense management. |
Foreign exchange had a net adverse impact on second quarter 2011 margin of approximately 1 percentage point compared with same period 2010.
Income tax expense for second quarter 2011 was $31 million compared with $35 million in same period 2010, reflecting the reduction in income before taxation and changes to the geographical mix of profits.
The effective tax rate for the second quarter 2011 was 25 percent. After adjusting for the net effect of non-recurring items, including the 2011 Operational Review expense, relieved at a higher average rate than the underlying tax rate and the UK FSA regulatory settlement expense for which no tax relief is available, the underlying tax rate for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 was also 25 percent, compared with 26 percent for full year 2010.
Results from operations: six months ended June 30, 2011
Total revenues at $1,871 million for first half 2011 were $100 million, or 6 percent, higher than in first half 2010, reflecting positive organic commissions and fees growth of 3 percent and a net 3 percent benefit from foreign currency translation.
Organic commissions and fees growth of 3 percent comprised 4 percent net new business growth (which constitutes the revenue growth from business won over the course of the period net of the revenue from existing business lost) and a 1 percent negative impact from declining premium rates and other market factors.
Operating margin at 21 percent was 6 percentage points lower than in first half 2010 with the decrease mainly reflecting:
| |
• | the $115 million expense for the 2011 Operational Review, discussed below, equivalent to approximately 6 percentage points; |
|
• | a $24 million net increase in incentive expenses, equivalent to approximately 1 percentage point, primarily reflecting a $28 million increase in the amortization of cash retention awards; and |
|
• | the $11 million second quarter 2011 expense for a UK FSA regulatory settlement; |
59
Willis Group Holdings plc
partly offset by
| |
• | the $100 million increase in revenues driven by organic growth in commissions and fees; |
|
• | theperiod-over-period benefit from a $12 million charge relating to the first quarter 2010 devaluation of the Venezuelan currency; |
|
• | a $9 million benefit from the release of funds and reserves related to potential legal liabilities; and |
|
• | rigorous expense management. |
Foreign exchange had a small net adverse impact on first half 2011 operating margin compared with first half 2010.
We incurred a $171 million charge in first quarter 2011 relating to the make-whole amounts of $158 million for the repurchase and redemption of our $500 million 12.875% senior notes and a related $13 million write-off of unamortized debt costs, as discussed below.
Income tax expense for first half 2011 was $32 million compared with $102 million in same period 2010. The reduction of $70 million largely reflects the impact of the significantly reduced income before taxation and changes to the geographical mix of profits, driven by costs associated with the 2011 Operational Review and the make-whole amounts on repurchase and redemption of senior notes.
The effective tax rate for the first half 2011 was 21 percent. After adjusting for the net effect of non-recurring items, the underlying tax rate for first half 2011 was 25 percent, compared with 26 percent for full year 2010.
Earnings from associates of $13 million in first half 2011 were $5 million lower than in the same period 2010, primarily reflecting reduced net income in our principal associates, GS & Cie Groupe (Gras Savoye) and Al-Futtaim Willis.
2011 Operational Review
Willis aims to be the broker and risk adviser of choice globally by aligning our business model to the needs of each client segment and maintaining a focus on growth: this is our value proposition which we call the ‘Willis Cause’.
We expect full year 2011 salaries and benefits expense (excluding costs attributable to the 2011 Operational Review) to increase by approximately $100 million compared with 2010, as a result of the following:
| |
• | an approximately $60 million increase due to higher amortization of cash retention payments, of which $12 million and $28 million was recognized in second quarter and first half of 2011, respectively; |
|
• | the reinstatement of annual salary reviews for all employees from April 2011; and |
|
• | the reinstatement of a 401(k) match plan for North America employees. |
We estimate that of those items noted above, approximately $25 million will continue through to 2012 as incremental expense: reflecting a further but significantly lower increase in the amortization of cash retention awards in 2012 compared with 2011, and the full year impact of the 2011 annual salary review.
In addition to these costs, we continue to invest in technology, advanced analytics, product innovation, and industry talent and expertise to support the growth
strategy and continued execution of the Willis Cause through 2011 and beyond.
In order to fund the higher anticipated salaries and benefits expense and continued investment for future growth, we implemented a review of all our businesses in 2011 to better align our resources with our growth strategies.
In connection with this review, we recorded a pre-tax charge in second quarter 2011 of $18 million, bringing the total pre-tax charge for first half 2011 to $115 million, including:
| |
• | $57 million of severance costs relating to approximately 600 positions which have been, or are in the process of being, eliminated; |
|
• | $35 million of other salaries and benefits expense to buy out previously existing incentive schemes and other contractual arrangements that no longer align with the Group’s overall remuneration strategy; and |
|
• | $23 million of other operating expenses, including: property and systems rationalization costs; related accelerated systems depreciation of $5 million; andre-negotiation of sourcing contracts. |
We continue to expect the full year cost of the 2011 Operational Review to be approximately $130 million.
In first half 2011, we realized total cost savings attributable to the 2011 Operational Review of
60
Business review
approximately $23 million, $20 million of which was realized in second quarter 2011. We anticipate that the full year 2011 related cost savings will be between
$65 million and $75 million, reaching approximate annualized savings of between $95 million and $105 million beginning in 2012.
Make-whole on repurchase and redemption of senior notes and write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs
We issued $800 million of new debt in March 2011, comprised of $300 million of 4.125% senior notes due 2016 and $500 million of 5.750% senior notes due 2021.
Net proceeds of the issue, after underwriting discounts and expenses, were $787 million and were used to finance the first quarter 2011 repurchase of $465 million of our 12.875% senior notes due 2016, together with a make-whole payment of $146 million, which represented a slight discount to the make-whole redemption amount provided in the indenture governing this debt.
In March 2011, we also irrevocably called the remaining $35 million of the 12.875% senior notes due 2016, together with an additional contractual make-whole payment of $12 million. As this agreement was contractually binding, we recognized the additional $12 million make-whole payment in our first quarter 2011 results.
In addition to the make-whole payments of $158 million, we also wrote off unamortized debt issuance costs of $13 million, giving a total of $171 million recognized wholly in first quarter 2011.
Outlook
As a result of the implementation of the 2011 Operational Review and continued investment in our business model driven by the Willis Cause, we expect to deliver accelerated adjusted margin and adjusted diluted earnings per share growth in 2012 and beyond.
The statements under ‘2011 Operational Review’ and ‘Outlook’ constitute forward-looking statements. Please see ‘Forward-Looking Statements’ for certain cautionary information regarding forward-looking statements and a list of factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those predicted in the forward-looking statements.
Acquisitions
During first quarter 2011, we acquired a 23 percent interest in a new South African associate company at a total cost of $2 million.
In first quarter 2010, we acquired an additional 39 percent of our Chinese operations at a total cost of approximately $17 million, bringing our ownership to 90 percent.
2010 Venezuela currency devaluation
With effect from January 1, 2010 the Venezuelan economy was designated as hyper-inflationary. The Venezuelan government also devalued the Bolivar Fuerte in January 2010. As a result of these actions, we recorded
a one-time $12 million charge in other expenses in first quarter 2010 to reflect the re-measurement of our net monetary assets denominated in Venezuelan Bolivar Fuerte at January 1, 2010.
Cash and financing
Cash at June 30, 2011 of $317 million was $1 million higher than at December 31, 2010.
Net cash generated from operating activities in first half 2011 was $126 million compared with $154 million in first half 2010, with the decrease of $28 million primarily
reflecting the impact of cash payments associated with the charge relating to the 2011 Operational Review. Net cash generated from operating activities in first half 2011 of $126 million and net proceeds on issue of senior notes of $787 million were used principally to fund debt
61
Willis Group Holdings plc
repayments and associated expenses of $803 million and dividends to stockholders of $90 million.
In March 2011, we issued $300 million of 4.125% senior notes due 2016 and $500 million of 5.750% senior notes due 2021. We received net proceeds, after underwriting discounts and expenses, of approximately $787 million which were used to repurchase $465 million of 12.875% senior notes due 2016 in March 2011 and make a related make-whole payment of $146 million. Following this repurchase, we also expensed approximately $13 million of related unamortized debt issuance costs.
In March 2011, we also irrevocably called the remaining $35 million of the 12.875% senior notes due 2016, including the contractual make-whole cost of approximately $12 million, which was expensed in first quarter 2011. The redemption was completed on April 18, 2011.
At June 30, 2011, we have $nil outstanding under our $300 million revolving credit facility, following full
repayment of the $90 million balance outstanding at December 31, 2010. We also have $nil outstanding under both our $200 million facility and our $20 million UK facility, which is solely for use by our main regulated UK entity, Willis Limited, in certain exceptional circumstances.
Total debt, total equity and the capitalization ratio at June 30, 2011 were as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | June 30,
| | | December 31,
| |
| | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
| | (millions, except percentages) | |
|
Long-term debt | | $ | 2,307 | | | $ | 2,157 | |
Short-term debt and current portion of long-term debt | | | 114 | | | | 110 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total debt | | $ | 2,421 | | | $ | 2,267 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total equity | | $ | 2,739 | | | $ | 2,608 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Capitalization ratio | | | 47 | % | | | 47 | % |
| | | | | | | | |
Liquidity
Our principal sources of liquidity are cash from operations, cash and cash equivalents of $317 million at June 30, 2011 and $500 million remaining availability under our Group revolving credit facilities, excluding the $20 million UK facility which is solely for use by our main regulated UK entity, Willis Limited, in certain exceptional circumstances.
The repurchase and redemption of our previously existing $500 million of 12.875% senior notes due 2016, the related make-whole payments and the issuance of $300 million of senior notes due 2016 and $500 million
of notes due 2021, has lengthened our debt maturity profile.
We continue to monitor our debt maturity profile and related financing costs going forwards and, subject to prevailing market conditions, may seek to further restructure our debt from time to time.
Based on current market conditions and information available to us at this time, we believe that we have sufficient liquidity to meet our cash needs for at least the next 12 months.
Management structure
Effective January 1, 2011, we changed our internal reporting structure: Global Markets International, previously reported within our International segment, is now reported in our Global segment. In addition, Mexico
Retail, which was previously reported within our International segment, is now reported in our North America segment.
62
Business review
OPERATING RESULTS —GROUP
Revenues
Total revenues for the Group and by operating segment for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 are shown below:
Three months ended June 30,
Six months ended June 30,
63
Willis Group Holdings plc
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Change attributable to: | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Foreign
| | | Acquisitions
| | | | | | Organic
| |
| | | | | | | | %
| | | currency
| | | and
| | | Contingent
| | | revenue
| |
Three months ended June 30,(a) | | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | Change | | | translation | | | disposals | | | Commissions(c) | | | growth(b) | |
| | (millions) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Global | | $ | 271 | | | $ | 249 | | | | 9 | % | | | 6 | % | | | — | % | | | — | % | | | 3 | % |
North America | | | 326 | | | | 328 | | | | (1 | )% | | | — | % | | | — | % | | | (1 | )% | | | — | % |
International | | | 257 | | | | 212 | | | | 21 | % | | | 15 | % | | | — | % | | | — | % | | | 6 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Commissions and fees | | $ | 854 | | | $ | 789 | | | | 8 | % | | | 5 | % | | | — | % | | | — | % | | | 3 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investment income | | | 8 | | | | 10 | | | | (20 | )% | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other income | | | 1 | | | | — | | | | 100 | % | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total revenues | | $ | 863 | | | $ | 799 | | | | 8 | % | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Change attributable to: | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Foreign
| | | Acquisitions
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | %
| | | currency
| | | and
| | | Contingent
| | | Organic revenue
| |
Six months ended June 30,(a) | | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | Change | | | translation | | | disposals | | | Commissions(c) | | | growth(b) | |
| | (millions) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Global(d) | | $ | 629 | | | $ | 580 | | | | 8 | % | | | 2 | % | | | — | % | | | — | % | | | 6 | % |
North America | | | 682 | | | | 693 | | | | (2 | )% | | | — | % | | | — | % | | | (1 | )% | | | (1 | )% |
International | | | 543 | | | | 479 | | | | 13 | % | | | 7 | % | | | — | % | | | — | % | | | 6 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Commissions and fees | | $ | 1,854 | | | $ | 1,752 | | | | 6 | % | | | 3 | % | | | — | % | | | — | % | | | 3 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investment income | | | 16 | | | | 19 | | | | 16 | % | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other income | | | 1 | | | | — | | | | 100 | % | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total revenues | | $ | 1,871 | | | $ | 1,771 | | | | 6 | % | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
(a) | | Effective January 1, 2011, we changed our internal reporting structure: Global Markets International, previously reported within the International segment, is now reported in the Global segment. In addition, Mexico Retail, which was previously reported within the International segment, is now reported in the North America segment. As a result of these changes, commissions and fees of $35 million in second quarter 2010 and $69 million in first half 2010, previously allocated to our International segment, have been included in Global: $33 million and $63 million; and North America: $2 million and $6 million. |
|
(b) | | Organic revenue growth excludes: (i) the impact of foreign currency translation; (ii) the first twelve months of net commission and fee revenues generated from acquisitions; (iii) the net commission and fee revenues related to operations disposed of in each period presented; (iv) in North America, legacy contingent commissions assumed as part of the HRH acquisition that had not been converted into higher standard commission; and (v) investment income and other income from reported revenues. |
|
(c) | | Included in North America reported commissions and fees were legacy HRH contingent commissions of $nil in second quarter 2011 and $4 million in first half 2011, compared with $2 million and $10 million in the second quarter and first half of 2010, respectively. |
|
(d) | | Reported commissions and fees and organic revenue growth for Global for the six months ended June 30, 2011 included a first quarter 2011 favorable impact from a change in accounting methodology in a Global Specialty business of $6 million. |
Our methods of calculating these measures may differ from those used by other companies and therefore comparability may be limited.
Second quarter 2011
Revenues for second quarter 2011 at $863 million were $64 million, or 8 percent, higher than in same period 2010, including organic growth in commissions and fees of 3 percent, which comprised 4 percent net new business growth driven by solid new business generation and higher retention of existing clients, and a 1 percent negative impact from declining premium rates and other market factors.
There was a net 5 percentperiod-over-period benefit to revenue growth from foreign currency translation, partly offset by smaller decreases attributable to: theperiod-over-period reduction in contingent commissions assumed as part of the HRH acquisition, for which we reported $nil in second quarter 2011; and a reduction in investment income.
Investment income was $8 million for second quarter 2011, $2 million lower than in second quarter 2010, as low interest rates across the globe, in particular in the
64
Business review
UK and US, continued to impact our investment income: the majority of our fiduciary cash is US dollar-denominated and tied to US interest rates.
The impact of the low interest rates on our investment income was partially mitigated by our forward hedging program. While we expect this forward hedging program to generate additional income in 2011 compared to current LIBOR based rates, there will be a lower benefit than in 2010 as older, more beneficial hedges, continue to expire. Consequently, we continue to expect investment income to be closer to $30 million for full year 2011, compared with $38 million for full year 2010.
Our International and Global operations earn a significant portion of their revenues in currencies other than the US dollar, including the Euro and Pound sterling. For the quarter ended June 30, 2011, reported revenues benefited from aperiod-over-period net positive impact from foreign currency translation driven by the weakening of the US dollar against a number of currencies in which we earn our revenues, most notably the Australian dollar, Euro, Japanese yen and Pound sterling.
Organic growth in commissions and fees was 3 percent for second quarter 2011:
| |
• | International achieved 6 percent organic growth including double digit growth in Latin America and Eastern Europe regions, together with good organic growth in Asia and Continental Europe; |
|
• | Global achieved 3 percent growth, reflecting good positive growth in both our Reinsurance and Global Specialties businesses, partly offset by negative growth in our transaction oriented WCMA business due primarily to the non-recurrence of a significant transaction fee earned in second quarter 2010; and |
|
• | North America reported flat organic revenue growth, as the benefits of growth in our Employee Benefits practice and some of our specialty business practices were more than offset by the continued impact of the soft market and ongoing weakened economic conditions. |
Six months ended June 30, 2011
Revenues for first half 2011 at $1,871 million were $100 million, or 6 percent, higher than in same period 2010, including organic growth in commissions and fees of 3 percent, which comprised 4 percent net new business growth driven by solid new business generation and higher retention of existing clients, and a 1 percent negative impact from declining premium rates and other market factors.
There was a net 3 percentperiod-over-period benefit to revenue growth from foreign currency translation, partly offset by smaller decreases attributable to: the $6 millionperiod-over-period reduction in contingent commissions assumed as part of the HRH acquisition; and a net reduction in investment and other income.
Investment income was $16 million for first half 2011, $3 million lower than in first half 2010, as low interest rates across the globe, in particular in the UK and US, continued to impact our investment income.
For the six months ended June 30, 2011, reported revenues benefited from aperiod-over-period net positive impact from foreign currency translation driven by the weakening of the US dollar against a number of currencies in which we earn our revenues, most notably
the Australian dollar, Euro, Japanese yen and Pound sterling.
Organic growth in commissions and fees was 3 percent for first half 2011:
| |
• | International achieved 6 percent organic growth driven by our Latin America, Eastern Europe and Asia regions; |
|
• | Global also achieved 6 percent growth for the six months ended June 30, 2011, including positive growth in Reinsurance, Global Specialties, London Market Wholesale and WCMA businesses, together with a $6 million first quarter 2011 benefit from a change in accounting within a Global Specialty business to conform to current Group accounting policy; and |
|
• | North America organic revenue growth was negative 1 percent, as the benefits of higher retention rates and growth in some specialties businesses were more than offset by the continued impact of the soft market and ongoing weakened economic conditions. |
Organic revenue growth by segment is discussed further in‘Operating Results—Segment Information’ below.
65
Willis Group Holdings plc
General and administrative expenses
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three months
| | | Six months
| |
| | ended June 30, | | | ended June 30, | |
| | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
| | (millions, except percentages) | |
|
Salaries and benefits | | $ | 506 | | | $ | 456 | | | $ | 1,090 | | | $ | 942 | |
Other | | | 164 | | | | 135 | | | | 317 | | | | 284 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
General and administrative expenses | | $ | 670 | | | $ | 591 | | | $ | 1,407 | | | $ | 1,226 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Salaries and benefits as a percentage of revenues | | | 59 | % | | | 57 | % | | | 58 | % | | | 53 | % |
Other as a percentage of revenues | | | 19 | % | | | 17 | % | | | 17 | % | | | 16 | % |
Salaries and benefits
Second quarter 2011
Salaries and benefits were 59 percent of revenues in second quarter 2011, compared with 57 percent in same period 2010, primarily reflecting:
| |
• | additional salaries and benefits expense in second quarter 2011 of $10 million associated with our 2011 Operational Review, as discussed above, equivalent to 1 percentage point; |
|
• | a $14 million net increase in incentive expenses, equivalent to 2 percentage points, including a $12 million increase in the amortization of cash retention awards; |
|
• | aperiod-over-period net adverse impact on salaries and benefits expense from foreign currency translation, driven primarily by the weakening of the US dollar against the Pound sterling (in which our London Market based operations incur the majority of their expenses); |
|
• | a $3 million expense relating to the reinstatement of our 401(k) match plan for our North America employees from January 2011 and the incremental expense of the reinstatement of annual salary reviews for all employees from April 2011; and |
|
• | theperiod-over-period impact of investment in new client-facing hires; |
partly offset by
| |
• | an $8 million decrease in pension expense. |
Six months ended June 30, 2011
Salaries and benefits were 58 percent of revenues in first half 2011, compared with 53 percent in same period 2010, primarily reflecting:
| |
• | additional salaries and benefits expense in first half 2011 of $92 million associated with our 2011 Operational Review, as discussed above, equivalent to 5 percentage points; |
| |
• | a $24 million net increase in incentive expenses, equivalent to approximately 1 percentage point, primarily reflecting a $28 million increase in the amortization of cash retention awards; |
|
• | aperiod-over-period net adverse impact on salaries and benefits expense from foreign currency translation, driven primarily by the weakening of the US dollar against the Pound sterling (in which our London Market based operations incur the majority of their expenses); |
|
• | a $6 million expense relating to reinstatement of our 401(k) match plan for North America employees from January 2011 and the incremental expense of the reinstatement of annual salary reviews for all employees from April 2011; and |
|
• | theperiod-over-period impact of investment in new client-facing hires; |
partly offset by
| |
• | a $12 million decrease in pension expense. |
Cash retention awards
We started making cash retention awards in 2005 to a small number of employees. With the success of the program, we expanded it over time to include more staff and we believe it is a contributing factor to the reduction in employee turnover we have seen in recent years.
Salaries and benefits do not reflect the unamortized portion of annual cash retention awards made to employees. Employees must repay a proportionate amount of these cash retention awards if they voluntarily leave our employ (other than in the event of retirement or permanent disability) before a certain time period, currently three years. We make cash payments to our
66
Business review
employees in the year we grant these retention awards and recognize these payments ratably over the period they are subject to repayment, beginning in the quarter in which the award is made.
During the second quarter and first half 2011, we made $11 million and $206 million of cash retention award payments compared with $16 million and $185 million in the same periods of 2010. Salaries and benefits in the second quarter and first half of 2011 include $44 million
and $88 million of amortization of cash retention award payments made on or before June 30, 2011 compared with $32 million and $60 million in the same periods of 2010. As of June 30, 2011, December 31, 2010 and June 30, 2010, we included $293 million, $173 million and $217 million, respectively, within other current assets and other non-current assets on the balance sheet, which represented the unamortized portion of cash retention award payments made on or before those dates.
Other expenses
Second quarter 2011
Other expenses were 19 percent of revenues in second quarter 2011 compared with 17 percent in second quarter 2010, reflecting the impact of:
| |
• | an $11 million expense relating to a previously announced UK FSA regulatory settlement; |
|
• | costs associated with the 2011 Operational Review of $7 million in second quarter 2011, as discussed above; and |
|
• | increased systems expense in corporate functions, including amortization of capitalized project costs, in support of our growth initiatives; |
partly offset by
| |
• | a $9 million benefit from the release of funds and reserves related to potential legal liabilities, $6 million |
| |
| of which is included within Corporate and Other discussed below; and |
|
• | continued disciplined management of discretionary expenses. |
Six months ended June 30, 2011
Other expenses were 17 percent of revenues in first half 2011 compared with 16 percent in first half 2010, primarily reflecting the impact of: the $11 million second quarter 2011 UK FSA regulatory settlement; and costs associated with the 2011 Operational Review of $18 million; partly offset by: theperiod-over-period positive effect of the $12 million first quarter 2010 charge relating to the devaluation of the Venezuelan currency; and the $9 million benefit from the release of funds and reserves related to potential legal liabilities.
Depreciation expense
Depreciation expense was $19 million and $39 million for second quarter and first half 2011, compared with $16 million and $31 million in the same periods of 2010.
The increases primarily reflect the accelerated depreciation expense of $1 million and $5 million for
second quarter and first half 2011 relating to systems rationalization in connection with the 2011 Operational Review.
We expect depreciation expense for the remainder of 2011 to be approximately $17 million per quarter.
Amortization of intangible assets
Amortization of intangible assets was $17 million and $34 million in second quarter and first half 2011, compared with $21 million and $42 million in the same periods of 2010.
The decreases primarily reflect theperiod-over-period benefit of the second quarter and first half 2010
amortization of the HRH non-compete agreement intangible acquired in 2008, which was fully amortized in 2010.
We expect the amortization of intangible assets expense for full year 2011 to be approximately $68 million, compared with $82 million for full year 2010.
67
Willis Group Holdings plc
Operating income and margin (operating income as a percentage of revenues)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three months
| | Six months
|
| | ended June 30, | | ended June 30, |
| | 2011 | | 2010 | | 2011 | | 2010 |
| | (millions, except percentages) |
|
Revenues | | $ | 863 | | | $ | 799 | | | $ | 1,871 | | | $ | 1,771 | |
Operating income | | | 157 | | | | 169 | | | | 395 | | | | 470 | |
Operating margin or operating income as a percentage of revenues | | | 18 | % | | | 21 | % | | | 21 | % | | | 27 | % |
Second quarter 2011
Operating margin at 18 percent was 3 percentage points lower than in second quarter 2010 with the decrease mainly reflecting:
| |
• | the $18 million expense for the 2011 Operational Review, discussed below, equivalent to approximately 2 percentage points; |
|
• | a $14 million net increase in incentive expenses, equivalent to approximately 2 percentage points, including a $12 million increase in the amortization of cash retention awards; and |
|
• | the $11 million expense for a UK FSA regulatory settlement, equivalent to approximately 1 percentage point; |
partly offset by
| |
• | the $64 million increase in revenues including organic growth in commissions and fees; |
|
• | a $9 million benefit from the release of funds and reserves related to potential legal liabilities; and |
|
• | rigorous expense management. |
Foreign exchange had a net adverse impact on second quarter 2011 margin of approximately 1 percentage point compared with second quarter 2010.
Six months ended June 30, 2011
Operating margin at 21 percent was 6 percentage points lower than in first half 2010 with the decrease mainly reflecting:
| |
• | the $115 million expense for the 2011 Operational Review, discussed below, equivalent to approximately 6 percentage points; |
|
• | a $24 million net increase in incentive expenses, equivalent to approximately 1 percentage point, primarily reflecting a $28 million increase in the amortization of cash retention awards; and |
|
• | the $11 million second quarter 2011 expense for a UK FSA regulatory settlement; |
partly offset by
| |
• | the $100 million increase in revenues including positive organic growth in commissions and fees; |
|
• | theperiod-over-period benefit from a $12 million charge relating to the first quarter 2010 devaluation of the Venezuelan currency; |
|
• | a $9 million benefit from the release of funds and reserves related to potential legal liabilities; and |
|
• | rigorous expense management. |
Foreign exchange had a small net adverse impact on first half 2011 margin compared with first half 2010.
Operating segment margins are discussed in‘Operating Results—Segment Information’ below.
Make-whole amounts on repurchase and redemption of senior notes and write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three months
| | Six months
|
| | ended June 30, | | ended June 30, |
| | 2011 | | 2010 | | 2011 | | 2010 |
| | (millions) |
|
Make-whole amounts on repurchase and redemption of senior notes and write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 171 | | | $ | — | |
68
Business review
The first half 2011 make-whole amounts on the repurchase and redemption of senior notes and write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs total expense of $171 million comprised:
| |
• | a charge of $146 million relating to the make-whole payment (at a small discount to the contractual agreement) on the early repurchase of $465 million of our 12.875% senior notes due 2016 in March 2011; |
| |
• | a charge of $12 million relating to the redemption of the remaining $35 million of 12.875% senior notes due 2016, that were called in March 2011 and redeemed on April 18, 2011; and |
|
• | the write-off of $13 million of unamortized debt issuance costs relating to these notes. |
Interest expense
Interest expense for second quarter and first half 2011 was $34 million and $74 million, compared with $41 million and $84 million in the same periods of 2010.
The decreases in interest expense primarily reflect the lower coupon payable on our new debt issued in March 2011, theperiod-over-period decrease in the outstanding balance on our5-year term loan facility and net gains recognized on our forward rate hedging program.
We expect interest expense for the remainder of 2011 to be approximately $34 million per quarter.
We continue to monitor our debt profile going forward to identify any further opportunities to reduce our financing costs.
Income taxes
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three months
| | Six months
|
| | ended June 30, | | ended June 30, |
| | 2011 | | 2010 | | 2011 | | 2010 |
| | (millions, except percentages) |
|
Income before taxes | | $ | 123 | | | $ | 128 | | | $ | 150 | | | $ | 386 | |
Income tax charge | | | 31 | | | | 35 | | | | 32 | | | | 102 | |
Effective tax rate | | | 25 | % | | | 27 | % | | | 21 | % | | | 26 | % |
The effective tax rate for second quarter 2011 of 25 percent includes the impact of certain non-recurring items:
| |
• | the benefit from the higher tax rate at which costs associated with the 2011 Operational Review will be relieved; and |
|
• | the impact of the UK FSA regulatory settlement expense for which no tax relief is available. |
The effective tax rate for first half 2011 of 21 percent was also impacted by the above non-recurring items together with the benefit of:
| |
• | the make-whole expense on early repurchase and redemption of the 2016 senior notes attracting tax relief at the UK corporation tax rate which is higher than our Group underlying tax rate; and |
|
• | the net non-taxable gain on disposal of operations. |
Excluding these items, the underlying tax rate for second quarter and first half 2011 was 25 percent, compared with 26 percent for full year 2010.
Interest in earnings of associates
Interest in earnings of associates, net of tax, in first half 2011 of $13 million was $5 million lower than in first half 2010. This fall is primarily driven by a reduction in net income reported by our principal associates: Gras Savoye and Al-Futtaim Willis.
We currently expect interest in earnings of associates in the second half of 2011 to be broadly in line with second half 2010.
69
Willis Group Holdings plc
Net income and diluted earnings per share
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three months
| | Six months
|
| | ended June 30, | | ended June 30, |
| | 2011 | | 2010 | | 2011 | | 2010 |
| | (millions, except per share data) |
|
Net income | | $ | 85 | | | $ | 89 | | | $ | 119 | | | $ | 293 | |
Diluted earnings per share | | $ | 0.48 | | | $ | 0.52 | | | $ | 0.68 | | | $ | 1.71 | |
Weighted average diluted number of shares outstanding | | | 176 | | | | 171 | | | | 175 | | | | 171 | |
Second quarter 2011
Net income for second quarter 2011 of $85 million was $4 million lower than second quarter 2010, and diluted earnings per share decreased by $0.04, primarily reflecting:
| |
• | the $12 million post-tax cost of the 2011 Operational Review, as discussed above, equivalent to $0.07 per diluted share; |
|
• | an $11 million non tax-deductible expense relating to a previously announced UK FSA regulatory settlement, equivalent to $0.06 per diluted share; |
|
• | a $9 million post-tax increase in the amortization charge relating to our cash retention awards, equivalent to $0.05 per diluted share; and |
|
• | the salaries and benefits expense impact of the reinstated annual salary review and North American 401(k) match plan in 2011, as discussed above; |
partly offset by
| |
• | the $64 million increase in revenues, equivalent to $48 million post-tax, or $0.27 per diluted share; and |
|
• | the decrease in interest expense. |
Foreign currency translation had a $0.01 favorable impact on second quarter 2011 diluted earnings per share.
Average diluted share count for second quarter 2011 was 176 million compared with 171 million in same period 2010. The increased share count primarily reflected the rise in our average share price which has increased the number of options which are dilutive.
Six months ended June 30, 2011
Net income for first half 2011 of $119 million was $174 million lower than first half 2010, and diluted
earnings per share decreased by $1.03, primarily reflecting:
| |
• | the $81 million post-tax cost of the 2011 Operational Review, as discussed above, equivalent to $0.46 per diluted share; |
|
• | the $124 million post-tax impact of the make-whole amounts associated with the early repurchase and redemption of the $500 million 12.875% senior notes due 2016, equivalent to $0.71 per diluted share; |
|
• | a $21 million post-tax, or $0.12 per diluted share, increase in the amortization charge relating to our cash retention awards; and |
|
• | the $11 million non tax-deductible expense relating to a previously announced UK FSA regulatory settlement, equivalent to $0.06 per diluted share; |
partly offset by
| |
• | the $100 million increase in revenues, equivalent to $75 million post-tax, or $0.43 per diluted share; and |
|
• | the $8 million post-tax decrease in interest expense, equivalent to $0.05 per diluted share. |
Foreign currency translation, excluding theperiod-over-period benefit of the 2010 Venezuelan currency devaluation, had a $0.05 favorable impact on diluted earnings per share. Theperiod-over-period benefit in first half 2011 from the 2010 Venezuela currency devaluation was $0.07 per diluted share.
Average diluted share count for first half 2011 was 175 million compared with 171 million in same period 2010. The increased share count primarily reflected the rise in our average share price which has increased the number of options which are dilutive.
With our share price remaining at current levels, we would expect average diluted share count for full year 2011 to be approximately 176 million.
70
Business review
OPERATING RESULTS—SEGMENT INFORMATION
We organize our business into three segments: Global, North America and International. Our Global business provides specialist brokerage and consulting services to clients worldwide for risks arising from specific industries and activities. North America and International comprise our retail operations and provide services to small, medium and major corporations.
Effective January 1, 2011, we changed our internal reporting structure: Global Markets International,
previously reported within the International segment, is now reported in the Global segment. In addition, Mexico Retail, which was previously reported within the International segment, is now reported in the North America segment. Comparative data has been adjusted accordingly.
The following table is a summary of our operating results by segment for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three months ended June 30,(a) | |
| | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
| | | | | Operating
| | | Operating
| | | | | | Operating
| | | Operating
| |
| | Revenues | | | Income | | | Margin | | | Revenues | | | Income | | | Margin | |
| | (millions) | | | | | | (millions) | | | | |
|
Global | | $ | 274 | | | $ | 89 | | | | 32 | % | | $ | 251 | | | $ | 87 | | | | 35 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
North America | | | 328 | | | | 61 | | | | 19 | % | | | 333 | | | | 68 | | | | 20 | % |
International | | | 261 | | | | 56 | | | | 21 | % | | | 215 | | | | 41 | | | | 19 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Retail | | | 589 | | | | 117 | | | | 20 | % | | | 548 | | | | 109 | | | | 20 | % |
Corporate & Other | | | — | | | | (49 | ) | | | n/a | | | | — | | | | (27 | ) | | | n/a | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Consolidated | | $ | 863 | | | $ | 157 | | | | 18 | % | | $ | 799 | | | $ | 169 | | | | 21 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six months ended June 30,(a) | |
| | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
| | | | | Operating
| | | Operating
| | | | | | Operating
| | | Operating
| |
| | Revenues | | | Income | | | Margin | | | Revenues | | | Income | | | Margin | |
| | (millions) | | | | | | (millions) | | | | |
|
Global | | $ | 635 | | | $ | 264 | | | | 42 | % | | $ | 585 | | | $ | 241 | | | | 41 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
North America | | | 686 | | | | 146 | | | | 21 | % | | | 701 | | | | 161 | | | | 23 | % |
International | | | 550 | | | | 142 | | | | 26 | % | | | 485 | | | | 128 | | | | 26 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Retail | | | 1,236 | | | | 288 | | | | 23 | % | | | 1,186 | | | | 289 | | | | 24 | % |
Corporate & Other | | | — | | | | (157 | ) | | | n/a | | | | — | | | | (60 | ) | | | n/a | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Consolidated | | $ | 1,871 | | | $ | 395 | | | | 21 | % | | $ | 1,771 | | | $ | 470 | | | | 27 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
(a) | | Effective January 1, 2011, we changed our internal reporting structure: Global Markets International, previously reported within the International segment, is now reported in the Global segment. In addition, Mexico Retail, which was previously reported within the International segment, is now reported in the North America segment. As a result of these changes, commissions and fees of $35 million in second quarter 2010 and $69 million in first half 2010, previously allocated to our International segment, have been included in Global: $33 million and $63 million; and North America: $2 million and $6 million. Operating income of $18 million in second quarter 2010 and $34 million in first half 2010 has been allocated to our Global segment, with a corresponding reduction in International in the same periods of 2010. |
Global
Our Global operations comprise Global Specialties, Reinsurance, London Market Wholesale and Willis Capital Markets & Advisory (WCMA).
From January 1, 2011, London Market Wholesale also includes our Global Markets International unit.
The following table sets out Global’s revenues, organic revenue growth and operating income and margin for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010:
71
Willis Group Holdings plc
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three months
| | | Six months
| |
| | ended June 30,(a) | | | ended June 30,(a) | |
| | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
| | (millions, except percentages) | |
|
Commissions and fees(b) | | $ | 271 | | | $ | 249 | | | $ | 629 | | | $ | 580 | |
Investment income | | | 3 | | | | 2 | | | | 6 | | | | 5 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total revenues | | $ | 274 | | | $ | 251 | | | $ | 635 | | | $ | 585 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating income | | $ | 89 | | | $ | 87 | | | $ | 264 | | | $ | 241 | |
Organic revenue growth(c) | | | 3 | % | | | 9 | % | | | 6 | % | | | 8 | % |
Operating margin | | | 32 | % | | | 35 | % | | | 42 | % | | | 41 | % |
| | |
(a) | | Effective January 1, 2011, we changed our internal reporting structure: Global Markets International, previously reported within the International segment, is now reported in the Global segment. As a result of this change, commissions and fees of $33 million in second quarter 2010 and $63 million in first half 2010, previously allocated to our International segment, have been included in Global. Operating income of $18 million in second quarter 2010 and $34 million in first half 2010 has been allocated to our Global segment, with a corresponding reduction in International in the same periods of 2010. |
|
(b) | | Reported commissions and fees and organic revenue growth for the six months ended June 30, 2011 included a first quarter 2011 favorable impact from a change in accounting methodology in a Global Specialty business of $6 million. |
|
(c) | | Organic revenue growth excludes: (i) the impact of foreign currency translation; (ii) the first twelve months of net commission and fee revenues generated from acquisitions; (iii) the net commission and fee revenues related to operations disposed of in each period presented; and (iv) investment income and other income from reported revenues. |
Revenues
Commissions and fees of $271 million were $22 million, or 9 percent, higher in second quarter 2011 compared with same period 2010 reflecting good organic revenue growth of 3 percent and a net benefit from foreign currency translation of 6 percent.
Our Reinsurance and Global Specialties business both reported good positive organic growth in second quarter 2011. The organic growth included the benefit of net new business generation despite the adverse impact of the continued difficult rate environment and soft market in many of the specialty classes.
High single-digit organic growth in Reinsurance in second quarter 2011 was led by good growth in North America and International and Specialty businesses, reflecting the benefit of net new business growth. The benefit of modest increases in some catastrophe-exposed property reinsurance markets was more than offset by the impact of rates remaining generally soft across other reinsurance markets.
Organic growth in Global Specialties was led by strong contributions from Aerospace, Marine, Energy and Financial and Executive Risk practices, reflecting good new business, high retention levels, targeted hiring of producer talent and global connectivity.
However, the operating environment remains challenging across most Global Specialty businesses with depressed
world trade and transit volumes, industry consolidation and pressure on financing of construction projects still evident.
Our London Market Wholesale business reported flat organic growth in second quarter 2011, as positive growth in Global Markets International was offset by lower revenues in our Faber & Dumas businesses, primarily reflecting the continued soft wholesale market, impacted by the weakened economy.
Our WCMA business is a transaction-oriented business and its results are therefore more variable than some of our other businesses. We reported negative organic revenue growth for WCMA in second quarter 2011, substantially due to the non-recurrence of a significant fee transaction in second quarter 2010.
The 6 percent net benefit to revenue growth from foreign currency translation in second quarter 2011 primarily reflected theperiod-over-period positive impact of the weakening of the US dollar against both the Euro and Pound sterling, in which we earn a significant portion of Global revenues.
Commissions and fees of $629 million were $49 million, or 8 percent, higher in first half 2011 compared with same period 2010 reflecting good organic revenue growth of 6 percent and a net benefit from foreign currency translation of 2 percent.
72
Business review
Organic revenue growth of 6 percent for first half 2011 included positive growth across Reinsurance, Global Specialties, London Market Wholesale and WCMA businesses, together with a $6 million first quarter 2011 benefit from a change in accounting within a Global
Specialty business to conform to current Group accounting policy.
Client retention levels improved to 91 percent for first half 2011, compared with 90 percent for full year 2010.
Operating margin
Operating margin was 32 percent in second quarter 2011 compared with 35 percent in second quarter 2010, with the decrease primarily reflecting:
| |
• | a net negative impact from foreign currency movements; |
|
• | a $3 million increase in incentive expense, including amortization of cash retention award payments; and |
|
• | the impact of costs associated with continued support of current and future growth; |
partly offset by
| |
• | the positive 3 percent organic growth discussed above; and |
|
• | a $4 million decrease in pension expense. |
Operating margin of 42 percent in first half 2011 was 1 percent higher than in same period 2010, primarily reflecting:
| |
• | the strong 6 percent organic growth discussed above; and |
|
• | an $8 million decrease in pension expense; |
partly offset by
| |
• | a net negative impact from foreign currency movements; |
|
• | an $8 million increase in incentive expense, including amortization of cash retention award payments; and |
|
• | the impact of costs associated with continued support of current and future growth. |
Operating margin in Global is impacted by foreign exchange movements as the London Market businesses within our Global operations earn revenues in US dollars, Pounds sterling and Euros and primarily incur expenses in Pounds sterling. In addition, they are exposed to exchange risk on certain Pound sterling-denominated balances.
Theperiod-over-period net negative impact from foreign currency movements in both second quarter and first half 2011 primarily reflected the increased US dollar value of our net Pound sterling expense base as a result of the significant second quarter and first half 2011 weakening of the US dollar against the Pound sterling. This was partly offset by the US dollar’s relative weakening against the Euro, increasing the US dollar value of our Euro-denominated revenues.
73
Willis Group Holdings plc
North America
Our North America business provides risk management, insurance brokerage, related risk services and employee benefits brokerage and consulting to a wide array of industry and client segments in the United States, Canada and as of January 1, 2011, Mexico.
The following table sets out revenues, organic revenue growth and operating income and margin for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three months
| | | Six months
| |
| | ended June 30,(a) | | | ended June 30,(a) | |
| | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
| | (millions, except percentages) | |
|
Commissions and fees(b) | | $ | 326 | | | $ | 328 | | | $ | 682 | | | $ | 693 | |
Investment income | | | 1 | | | | 5 | | | | 3 | | | | 8 | |
Other income | | | 1 | | | | — | | | | 1 | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total revenues | | $ | 328 | | | $ | 333 | | | $ | 686 | | | $ | 701 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating income | | $ | 61 | | | $ | 68 | | | $ | 146 | | | $ | 161 | |
Organic revenue growth(c) | | | — | % | | | (1 | )% | | | (1 | )% | | | — | % |
Operating margin | | | 19 | % | | | 20 | % | | | 21 | % | | | 23 | % |
| | |
(a) | | Effective January 1, 2011, we changed our internal reporting structure: Mexico Retail, which was previously reported within the International segment, is now reported in the North America segment. As a result of this change, commissions and fees of $2 million in second quarter 2010 and $6 million in first half 2010, previously allocated to our International segment, have been included in North America. |
|
(b) | | Included in North America reported commissions and fees were legacy HRH contingent commissions of $nil in second quarter 2011 and $4 million in first half 2011, compared with $2 million and $10 million in the second quarter and first half of 2010, respectively. |
|
(c) | | Organic revenue growth excludes: (i) the impact of foreign currency translation; (ii) the first twelve months of net commission and fee revenues generated from acquisitions; (iii) the net commission and fee revenues related to operations disposed of in each period presented; (iv) in North America, legacy contingent commissions assumed as part of the HRH acquisition and that had not been converted into higher standard commission; and (v) investment income and other income from reported revenues. |
Revenues
Commissions and fees of $326 million were $2 million, or 1 percent, lower for second quarter 2011 compared with same period 2010.
Organic revenue growth was flat for second quarter 2011 as the benefits of:
| |
• | good net new business growth; and |
|
• | positive growth in Employee Benefits, our largest North America practice; |
were offset by
| |
• | a negative impact from rate declines and other market factors; |
|
• | a decline in our Construction business reflecting the ongoing impact of the weakened economy on this sector; |
|
• | negative growth in our Loan Protector specialty business, acquired as part of the HRH acquisition, driven by theperiod-over-period adverse impact of a $3 million second quarter 2010 benefit from a one- |
| |
| time accounting adjustment together with the impact of lower foreclosure levels and certain changes to compensation agreements; and |
|
• | smaller declines elsewhere reflecting the impact of the continued soft market conditions and weak US economy. |
Commissions and fees of $682 million in first half 2011 were $11 million, or 2 percent, lower than in same period 2010, of which $6 million was attributable to the decrease in legacy contingent commissions assumed as part of the HRH acquisition. We recorded $nil in second quarter 2011 for these legacy contingent commissions.
Organic revenue growth was negative 1 percent for the six months ended June 30, 2011 as the benefits of net new business generation, improved client retention levels and growth in some specialty businesses was more than offset by the impact of the soft market conditions and weakened economy across most sectors.
74
Business review
Net new business growth includes the benefit of higher standard commissions where these have been negotiated in lieu of contingent commissions. These higher standard commissions however may not have been negotiated at the same level or be received in the same periods as the related contingent commissions. Furthermore, the business to which they related may not have been renewed.
Following the introduction of the 2010 Health Care Reform Legislation, some major carriers in the North American Employee Benefits market have begun to
change their compensation practices in particular lines of business in certain locations. These carriers are now imposing volume-based compensation as their standard payment approach, and after fully disclosing this development to our clients, we have started to accept this compensation, where imposed upon us in medical lines. Willis fully discloses this compensation to its clients.
Client retention levels increased to 93 percent for first half 2011, compared with 92 percent for full year 2010.
Operating margin
Operating margin in North America was 19 percent in second quarter 2011 compared with 20 percent in same period 2010, reflecting the impact of:
| |
• | flat organic growth for second quarter 2011; |
|
• | a $4 million decrease in investment income in second quarter 2011; |
|
• | aperiod-over-period increase in 401(k) match plan expense of $3 million following its reinstatement in 2011; and |
|
• | a reduction in legacy HRH contingent commissions of $2 million in second quarter 2011 and $6 million in first half 2011; |
partly offset by
| |
• | a $2 million decrease in stock-based compensation charge in second quarter 2011; and |
|
• | the benefit of cost reductions driven by our continued focus on expense management. |
Operating margin in North America was 21 percent in first half 2011 compared with 23 percent in first half 2010, primarily reflecting the impact of:
| |
• | negative organic growth in commissions and fees, discussed above; |
|
• | a reduction in legacy HRH contingent commissions of $6 million in first half 2011; |
|
• | theperiod-over-period increase in 401(k) match plan expense of $6 million in first half 2011: we expect the full year 2011 401(k) expense to be approximately $10 million; |
|
• | a $6 million first half 2011 increase in incentive expense, including amortization of cash retention award payments; and |
|
• | a reduction in investment income driven by continued low US interest rates; |
partly offset by
| |
• | the benefit of cost reductions driven by our continued focus on expense management. |
International
Our International business comprises our retail operations in Eastern and Western Europe, the United Kingdom and Ireland, Asia-Pacific, Russia, the Middle East, South Africa and Latin America. The services provided are focused according to the characteristics of each market and vary across offices, but generally include direct risk
management and insurance brokerage and employee benefits consulting.
The following table sets out revenues, organic revenue growth and operating income and margin for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010:
75
Willis Group Holdings plc
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three months
| | | Six months
| |
| | ended June 30,(a) | | | ended June 30,(a) | |
| | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
| | (millions, except percentages) | |
|
Commissions and fees | | $ | 257 | | | $ | 212 | | | $ | 543 | | | $ | 479 | |
Investment income | | | 4 | | | | 3 | | | | 7 | | | | 6 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total revenues | | $ | 261 | | | $ | 215 | | | $ | 550 | | | $ | 485 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating income | | $ | 56 | | | $ | 41 | | | $ | 142 | | | $ | 128 | |
Organic revenue growth(b) | | | 6 | % | | | 6 | % | | | 6 | % | | | 5 | % |
Operating margin | | | 21 | % | | | 19 | % | | | 26 | % | | | 26 | % |
| | |
(a) | | Effective January 1, 2011, we changed our internal reporting structure: Global Markets International, previously reported within the International segment, is now reported in the Global segment. In addition, Mexico Retail, which was previously reported within the International segment, is now reported in the North America segment. As a result of these changes, commissions and fees of $35 million in second quarter 2010 and $69 million in first half 2010, previously allocated to our International segment, have been included in our Global and North America segments. Operating income of $18 million in second quarter 2010 and $34 million in first half 2010, previously allocated to International, has been included in our Global segment. |
|
(b) | | Organic revenue growth excludes: (i) the impact of foreign currency translation; (ii) the first twelve months of net commission and fee revenues generated from acquisitions; (iii) the net commission and fee revenues related to operations disposed of in each period presented; and (iv) investment income and other income from reported revenues. |
Revenues
Commissions and fees of $257 million were $45 million, or 21 percent, higher for second quarter 2011 compared with same period 2010, comprising 6 percent organic revenue growth and a net 15 percent positive impact from foreign currency translation. Net new business growth was 8 percent and there was a negative 2 percent impact from rates and other market factors.
A significant part of International’s revenues are earned in currencies other than the US dollar, notably the Euro, Pound sterling and Australian dollar. The US dollar has weakened significantly against these and a basket of other currencies in which we earn International revenues in second quarter 2011 compared with same period 2010. The benefit of these movements was a 15 percent increase in second quarter 2011 revenues compared to second quarter 2010.
There were strong contributions to our second quarter 2011 organic growth from most regions, including double-digit growth in our Latin America and Eastern Europe regions, together with high single-digit growth in Asia. In particular, there was good growth in:
| |
• | Brazil, Colombia, Venezuela and Argentina in Latin America; |
|
• | Russia in Eastern Europe; and |
|
• | China and Hong Kong in Asia. |
There was also single-digit growth in our large retail operations in Continental Europe, primarily driven by strong growth in Spain and Denmark, despite the ongoing challenging economic conditions in this region.
Organic revenue growth for second quarter 2011 was also positive in our UK and Irish retail operations, driven by improved client retention levels, despite the economic pressures that continue to affect both the UK and Ireland.
Commissions and fees of $543 million in first half 2011 were $64 million, or 13 percent, higher than in same period 2010, reflecting strong organic revenue growth of 6 percent and a net 7 percent benefit from foreign currency translation.
Organic revenue growth of 6 percent for first half 2011 was driven by strong growth across most regions, particularly Latin America, Asia and Eastern Europe.
The net 7 percent benefit from foreign currency translation in first half 2011 primarily reflected the weakening of the US dollar against many other currencies in which we earn International revenues, most notably the Euro, Pound sterling and Australian dollar.
Client retention levels increased to 94 percent for first half 2011, compared with 92 percent for full year 2010.
76
Business review
Operating margin
Operating margin in International was 21 percent in second quarter 2011, compared with 19 percent in same period 2010, with the increase reflecting the benefit of:
| |
• | 6 percent positive organic revenue growth; |
|
• | a net benefit from foreign currency movements, reflecting the benefit of theperiod-over-period weakening of the US dollar against a number of currencies in which we earn a significant portion of our operating income, notably the Euro, Australian dollar and Pound sterling; and |
|
• | lower pension expense; |
partly offset by
| |
• | a $4 million increase in incentive expenses in second quarter 2011, including amortization of cash retention award payments; |
|
• | the impact of the reinstated annual salary review for all employees from April 2011; and |
|
• | increased spending on initiatives to drive future growth, including investment hires. |
Operating margin was 26 percent in both first half 2011 and first half 2010, as the benefits of:
| |
• | 6 percent positive organic revenue growth; |
|
• | a net benefit from foreign currency movements, reflecting the benefit of theperiod-over-period |
| |
| weakening of the US dollar against a number of currencies in which we earn a significant portion of our operating income, notably the Euro, Australian dollar and Pound sterling; and |
|
• | lower pension expense; |
were partly offset by
| |
• | a $10 million increase in incentive expenses in first half 2011, including amortization of cash retention award payments; |
|
• | the impact of the reinstated annual salary review for all employees from April 2011; and |
|
• | increased spending on initiatives to drive future growth, including investment hires. |
Operating margin in International is impacted by foreign exchange movements as our International business earns revenues and incurs expenses primarily in currencies other than the US dollar.
Theperiod-over-period net benefit from foreign currency movements in both second quarter and first half 2011 primarily reflects the increased US dollar value of operating income earned in a number of currencies which have strengthened against the US dollar compared to the same periods of 2010, notably the Euro, Australian dollar and Pound sterling.
Corporate & Other
Corporate & Other operating loss comprises the following:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three months
| | | Six months
| |
| | ended June 30, | | | ended June 30, | |
| | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
| | (millions) | |
|
Amortization of intangible assets | | $ | (17 | ) | | $ | (21 | ) | | $ | (34 | ) | | $ | (42 | ) |
Foreign exchange hedging | | | 1 | | | | (2 | ) | | | 2 | | | | (6 | ) |
Foreign exchange gain on the UK pension plan asset | | | — | | | | 2 | | | | 1 | | | | 6 | |
Net (loss) gain on disposal of operations | | | — | | | | (2 | ) | | | 4 | | | | (2 | ) |
2011 Operational Review | | | (18 | ) | | | — | | | | (115 | ) | | | — | |
UK FSA regulatory settlement | | | (11 | ) | | | — | | | | (11 | ) | | | — | |
Venezuela currency devaluation | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (12 | ) |
Other(a) | | | (4 | ) | | | (4 | ) | | | (4 | ) | | | (4 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | (49 | ) | | $ | (27 | ) | | $ | (157 | ) | | $ | (60 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
(a) | | Other includes $6 million of the $9 million total benefit in second quarter 2011 from the release of funds and reserves related to potential legal liabilities. |
77
Willis Group Holdings plc
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES
The accounting estimates or assumptions that management considers to be the most important to the presentation of our financial condition or operating performance are discussed in our Annual Report onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 25, 2011 and Current Report onForm 8-K subsequently filed on March 14, 2011. There were no significant additions or changes to these assumptions in first half 2011.
NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (‘FASB’) issued new guidance to provide a consistent definition of fair value and ensure that fair value measurements and disclosure requirements are similar between US GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (‘IFRS’). The guidance changes certain fair value measurement principles and enhances the disclosure requirements for fair value measurements.
In June 2011, the FASB also issued new guidance to revise the manner in which entities present comprehensive income in their financial statements, requiring that the components of comprehensive income be presented in either a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. The amendments do not change the items that must be reported in other comprehensive income (OCI) or when an item of OCI must be reclassified to net income.
Both of the above accounting changes become effective for the Company from first quarter 2012, though early adoption is permitted for the OCI disclosure change.
Further details of the changes are described in Note 2 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
The Company is currently evaluating the impact adoption of this guidance will have on the consolidated financial statements.
Other than the changes described above, there were no new accounting standards issued during second quarter 2011 that would have a significant impact on the Company’s reporting.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
In March 2011, we issued $300 million of 4.125% senior notes due 2016 and $500 million of 5.750% senior notes due 2021. We received net proceeds, after underwriting discounts and expenses, of approximately $787 million which were used to repurchase $465 million of 12.875% senior notes due 2016 in March 2011 together with a make-whole payment of $146 million. Following this repurchase, we also wrote off approximately $13 million of related unamortized debt issuance costs.
In March 2011, we also irrevocably called the remaining $35 million of the 12.875% senior notes due 2016 which required a related contractual make-whole payment of approximately $12 million, expensed in first quarter 2011. The redemption was completed on April 18, 2011.
In first half 2011, we also made $55 million of mandatory repayments against the5-year term loan, thereby reducing the total outstanding balance as at June 30, 2011 to $356 million.
At June 30, 2011, we have $nil outstanding under our $300 million revolving credit facility, following full repayment of the $90 million balance outstanding at December 31, 2010. We also have $nil outstanding under both our $200 million facility and our $20 million UK facility, which is solely for use by our main regulated UK entity, Willis Limited, in certain exceptional circumstances.
Total debt as of June 30, 2011 was $2.4 billion, compared with $2.3 billion at December 31, 2010. During first half 2011, we amended our credit agreements to increase the maximum leverage ratio (total indebtedness measured against operating income before depreciation, amortization and certain other items) under which we may make certain restricted payments including share repurchases, as calculated under this agreement, to 2.75:1 from the previously existing 2.5:1 ratio.
The leverage ratio at June 30, 2011, as calculated under the credit agreements, was approximately 2.5:1.
78
Business review
Following the April 18, 2011 redemption of the remaining $35 million outstanding on the 12.875% senior notes, the only mandatory debt repayments falling due within the next 12 months are scheduled repayments on our
$700 million5-year term loan totaling $110 million and repayment of our $4 million 6.000% loan notes falling due in first half 2012.
Liquidity
Our principal sources of liquidity are cash from operations, cash and cash equivalents of $317 million at June 30, 2011 and remaining availability of $500 million under our revolving credit facilities, excluding the $20 million UK facility which is solely for use by our main regulated UK entity in certain exceptional circumstances.
The repurchase and redemption of our previously existing $500 million of 12.875% senior notes due 2016, the related make-whole payments and the issuance of $300 million of senior notes due 2016 and $500 million of notes due 2021, has lengthened our debt maturity profile.
As of June 30, 2011, our short-term liquidity requirements consisted of:
| |
• | payment of interest on debt, $110 million of mandatory repayments under our5-year term loan and |
| |
| the $4 million mandatory repayment of our 6.000% loan notes; |
|
• | capital expenditure; and |
|
• | working capital requirements. |
Our long-term liquidity requirements consist of:
| |
• | the principal amount of outstanding notes; and |
|
• | borrowings under our5-year term loan facility. |
Based on current market conditions and information available to us at this time, we believe that we have sufficient liquidity to meet our cash needs for at least the next 12 months.
We continue to identify and implement further actions to control costs and enhance our operating performance, including future cash flow.
Fiduciary funds
As an intermediary, we hold funds generally in a fiduciary capacity for the account of third parties, typically as the result of premiums received from clients that are in transit to insurers and claims due to clients that are in transit from insurers. We report premiums, which are held on account of, or due from, clients as assets with a corresponding liability due to the insurers. Claims held by, or due to, us which are due to clients are also shown as both assets and liabilities.
Fiduciary funds are generally required to be kept in certain regulated bank accounts subject to guidelines which emphasize capital preservation and liquidity; such funds are not available to service the Company’s debt or for other corporate purposes. Notwithstanding the legal relationships with clients and insurers, the Company is entitled to retain investment income earned on fiduciary funds in accordance with industry custom and practice and, in some cases, as supported by agreements with insureds.
Own funds
As of June 30, 2011, we had cash and cash equivalents of $317 million, compared with $316 million at December 31, 2010.
At June 30, 2011, we also had $500 million remaining availability under our Group revolving credit facilities, excluding the $20 million UK facility which is solely for use by our main regulated UK entity, Willis Limited, in certain exceptional circumstances.
79
Willis Group Holdings plc
Operating activities
Net cash provided by operations was $126 million in first half 2011 compared with $154 million in first half 2010.
The $28 million decrease in 2011 compared with 2010 primarily reflected:
| |
• | a $21 million increase in cash payments for incentive awards in first half 2011; and |
|
• | costs associated with the 2011 Operational Review, of which approximately $65 million were paid in cash in first half 2011; |
partly offset by
| |
• | a $16 million increase in net income before: $171 million for the make-whole amounts on repurchase and redemption of senior notes and related costs; and the non-cash charges for: depreciation expense; amortization of intangible assets; amortization of cash retention award payments; and the Venezuela currency devaluation charge in first quarter 2010; and |
|
• | the timing of cash collections and other working capital movements. |
Pension contributions
UK Plan
We made cash contributions to our UK defined benefit plan of $46 million in first half 2011, (including amounts in respect of the salary sacrifice contributions) compared with $43 million in first half 2010.
We currently expect full year cash contributions in 2011 to be approximately $92 million, including amounts in respect of the salary sacrifice contributions and an additional payment required under the UK plan’s funding strategy which we are required to agree with the plan’s Trustee.
The most recent funding strategy was agreed in February 2009 and requires full year contributions to the UK plan of approximately $40 million for 2009 through 2012,
excluding amounts in respect of the salary sacrifice scheme. In addition, if certain funding targets were not met at the beginning of any of the following years, 2010 through 2012, a further contribution of $40 million would be required for that year.
In 2011, the additional funding requirement was triggered and we began making the additional contributions in first quarter 2011. A similar, additional contribution may also be required for 2012, depending on actual performance against funding targets at the beginning of 2012.
We are currently in negotiations with the plan’s Trustee to agree an updated funding strategy.
US Plan
We made cash contributions to our US defined benefit plan of $13 million in both first half 2011 and 2010.
For the US plan, expected contributions are the contributions we will be required to make under US
pension legislation based on our December 31, 2010 balance sheet position. We currently expect to contribute $30 million for full year 2011.
International Plans
We made cash contributions to our International defined benefit pension plans of $4 million in both first half 2011 and first half 2010.
In 2011, we expect to contribute approximately $7 million to our International plans.
80
Business review
Investing activities
Total net cash outflow from investing activities was $52 million in first half 2011 compared with $57 million in same period 2010, primarily reflecting:
| |
• | an $11 million decrease in cash payments for acquisitions of subsidiaries, mainly reflecting a |
| |
| reduction in deferred payments in respect of prior year acquisitions; |
partly offset by
| |
• | a $4 million cash payment in first half 2011 for investment in Trident V Parallel Fund, LP. |
Financing activities
Net cash used in financing activities was $81 million in first half 2011 compared with $137 million in 2010.
The net decrease in cash used in financing activities of $56 million was mainly attributable to:
| |
• | the net cash proceeds from the issuance of senior notes due 2016 and 2021 totaling $787 million, as discussed above; and |
|
• | a $25 million increase in cash proceeds from the issuance of shares relating to share option exercises; |
partly offset by
| |
• | a $485 million increase in debt repayment, primarily reflecting the first half 2011 early repayment of the $500 million 12.875% senior notes due 2016; |
| |
• | the $158 million cash paid relating to the make-whole payments on repurchase and redemption of the 12.875% senior notes; and |
|
• | a $120 million first half 2011period-over-period decrease in draw down against our revolving credit facilities, comprising a $90 million repayment in first half 2011 compared with a $30 million draw down in first half 2010. |
At June 30, 2011, we have $nil outstanding under our $300 million revolving credit facility, following full repayment of the $90 million balance outstanding at December 31, 2010. We also have $nil outstanding under both our $200 million facility and our $20 million UK facility, which is solely for use by our main regulated UK entity, Willis Limited, in certain exceptional circumstances.
Share buybacks
The Company is authorized to repurchase or redeem shares under a variety of methods and will consider whether to do so from time to time based on many factors, including market conditions.
We did not repurchase or redeem any shares in first half 2011 or 2010. There remains $925 million under the current buyback authorization.
Dividends
Cash dividends paid in first half 2011 were $90 million, compared with $89 million in first half 2010.
The $1 million increase in 2011 is driven by the smallperiod-over-period increase in average share count.
In July 2011, we declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.26 per share, an annual rate of $1.04 per share.
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
There have been no material changes to our contractual obligations since December 31, 2010, except contractual, planned payments and the following changes to our debt
81
Willis Group Holdings plc
profile, as discussed under‘Liquidity and Capital Resources’above:
| |
• | In March 2011, we issued additional senior notes totaling $800 million, comprising $300 million of |
| |
| 4.125% senior notes due 2016 and $500 million of 5.750% senior notes due 2021; and |
|
• | we subsequently repurchased the previously outstanding $500 million of 12.875% senior notes due 2016. |
OFF BALANCE SHEET TRANSACTIONS
Apart from commitments, guarantees and contingencies, as disclosed in Note 7 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, the Company has no off-balance
sheet arrangements that have, or are reasonably likely to have, a material effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.
| |
Item 3— | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk |
There has been no material change with respect to market risk from that described in the Company’s Annual Report onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
Item 4—Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of June 30, 2011, the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and the Group Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange ActRule 13a-15(e). Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Group Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective in ensuring that the information required to be included in the Company’s periodic SEC filings is
recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to them as appropriate to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
There have been no changes in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting during the quarter ended June 30, 2011 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
82
Other information
PART II—OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1—Legal Proceedings
Information regarding legal proceedings is set forth in Note 7—‘Commitments and Contingencies’ to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) appearing in Part I, Item 1 of this report.
Item 1A—Risk Factors
Other than as discussed below, there have been no material changes to the risk factors described in Part I, Item 1A ‘Risk Factors’ included in theForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
Our compliance systems and controls cannot guarantee that we are in compliance with all applicable federal and state or foreign laws and regulations, and actions by regulatory authorities or changes in applicable laws and regulations in the jurisdictions in which we operate may have an adverse effect on our business.
Our activities are subject to extensive regulation under the laws of the United States, the United Kingdom and the European Union and its member states, and the other jurisdictions in which we operate. Indeed, over the last few years, there has been a general increase in focus and developments in these laws and regulations. Compliance with laws and regulations that are applicable to our operations is complex and may increase our cost of doing business. These laws and regulations include insurance industry regulations, economic and trade sanctions and laws against financial crimes such as money laundering, bribery or other corruption, such as the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. In most jurisdictions, governmental and regulatory authorities have the ability to interpret and amend these laws and regulations and impose penalties for non-compliance, including sanctions, civil remedies, fines, injunctions, revocation of licenses or approvals, suspension of individuals, limitations on business activities or redress to clients.
Given the increased interest expressed by US and UK regulators in the effectiveness of compliance controls relating to financial crime in our market sector in particular, we began a voluntary internal review of our policies and controls four years ago. This review includes analysis and advice from external experts on best practices, review of public regulatory decisions, and discussions with government regulators in the US and UK. In addition, the
UK Financial Services Authority conducted an investigation of Willis Limited’s, our UK brokerage subsidiary, compliance systems and controls between 2005 and 2009. On July 21, 2011, we and the FSA announced a settlement under which the FSA concluded its investigation by assessing a £7 million ($11 million) fine on Willis Limited for lapses in its implementation and documentation of its controls to counter the risks of improper payments being made to non-FSA authorized overseas third parties engaged to help win business, particularly in high risk jurisdictions.
As a result of the FSA settlement, we will also be conducting a further internal review of all payments made between 2005 and 2009. We also continue to fully cooperate with our US regulators, however we are unable to predict at this time when our discussions with them will be concluded. We do not believe that this further internal review or our discussions with the US regulators will result in any material fines or sanctions, but there can be no assurance that any resolution will not have an adverse impact on our ability to conduct our business in certain jurisdictions. While we believe that our current systems and controls are adequate and in accordance with all applicable laws and regulations, we cannot assure that such systems and controls will prevent any violations of applicable laws and regulations.
Item 2—Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
During the quarter ended June 30, 2011, no shares were issued by the Company without registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
The Company is authorized to purchase up to one billion shares from time to time in the open market and it may also redeem its shares through negotiated trades with
persons who are not affiliated with the Company so long as the cost of the acquisition of the Company’s shares (whether by redemption or open market purchases) does not exceed $925 million. During the quarter ended June 30, 2011, there were no shares repurchased or redeemed.
83
Willis Group Holdings plc
Item 3—Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4—(Removed and Reserved)
Item 5—Other Information
None.
Item 6—Exhibits
| | | | |
| 10 | .1 | | First Amendment to the Amended and Restated Willis U.S. 2005 Deferred Compensation Plan, effective June 1, 2011 |
| 10 | .2 | | Form of Time-Based Restricted Share Unit Award Agreement granted under the Willis Group Holdings 2001 Share Purchase and Option Plan (for executive officers) |
| 10 | .3 | | Form of Performance-Based Share Option Award Agreement granted under the Willis Group Holdings 2008 Share Purchase and Option Plan (for executive officers) |
| 10 | .4 | | Form of Performance-Based Restricted Share Unit Award Agreement granted under the Willis Group Holdings 2008 Share Purchase and Option Plan (for executive officers) |
| 10 | .5 | | Form of Performance-Based Share Options Award Agreement granted under the Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company 2007 Share Incentive Plan (for executive officers) |
| 10 | .6 | | Form of Performance-Based Restricted Share Unit Award Agreement granted under the Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company 2007 Share Incentive Plan (for executive officers) |
| 10 | .7 | | Form of Performance-Based Restricted Share Unit Award Agreement granted under the Willis Group Holdings 2008 Share Purchase and Option Plan, dated May 2, 2011, between Joseph J. Plumeri and Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company |
| 10 | .8 | | Form of Performance-Based Restricted Share Unit Award Agreement granted under the Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company 2007 Share Incentive Plan, dated May 2, 2011, between Martin Sullivan and Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company |
| 31 | .1 | | Certification Pursuant toRule 13a-14(a) |
| 31 | .2 | | Certification Pursuant toRule 13a-14(a) |
| 32 | .1 | | Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 |
| 32 | .2 | | Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 |
| 101 | .INS* | | XBRL Instance Document† |
| 101 | .SCH* | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document† |
| 101 | .CAL* | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document† |
| 101 | .DEF* | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document† |
| 101 | .LAB* | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document† |
| 101 | .PRE* | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document† |
| | |
* | | Pursuant to Rule 406T ofRegulation S-T, the Interactive Data Files on Exhibit 101 hereto are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, are deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise are not subject to liability under those sections. |
† | | To be furnished within 30 days in accordance with Rule 405(a)(2) of RegulationS-T. |
84
Willis Group Holdings plc
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Willis Group Holdings plc
(Registrant)
| | |
| By: | /s/ Michael K. Neborak |
Michael K. Neborak
Group Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Dated: August 9, 2011
85