to senior executives. The policy is to provide the Compensation Committee with the discretion to exclude charges where it deems it in the interests of shareholders, although such situations should be accompanied by robust disclosure and justification.
The need for this reform is amply demonstrated by the costly litigation AmerisourceBergen faces over the opioid crisis and last year’s Say-on-Pay vote.
According to the 2021 proxy statement, AmerisourceBergen uses adjusted non-GAAP EPS and adjusted non-GAAP operating income in its short-term incentive program, and compound annual adjusted non-GAAP EPS in its performance share awards. In all three cases, the metrics are calculated to exclude litigation charges. In fiscal 2020, therefore, they excluded the impact of the company’s $6.6 billion opioid-related expense accrual — a charge that drove the company to its largest ever loss and exceeded cumulative earnings over the prior nine fiscal years.
In the event, with the opioid charges excluded, the company’s short-term incentive program and fiscal 2018-2020 performance share awards paid out above target for the named executives. This led to a contentious Say-on-Pay vote at the 2021 shareholder meeting, where 48% of shares cast opposed the proposal.
We believe that insulating senior executives from legal risks by removing associated costs from the metrics that determine their incentive compensation distorts incentives around compliance and undermines the alignment with shareholders. A superior approach to aligning executive pay with the company’s performance would be to include legal and compliance costs.
We urge shareholders to vote for this proposal.
AmerisourceBergen Corporation’s Statement in Opposition to the Shareholder Proposal
The Board of Directors recommends that you vote AGAINST the Item 5 shareholder proposal (Item 5 on the Proxy Card) for the following reasons:
The metrics in AmerisourceBergen’s compensation program are consistent with the financial measures used to evaluate our business performance, are transparently disclosed, and align with long-term shareholder interests.
AmerisourceBergen’s executive compensation program links compensation for our executive officers to the metrics used by management to set business goals and evaluate financial results for internal planning and external reporting. The performance-based components of our executive compensation program are based on non-GAAP metrics, which our Board believes most effectively measure and reward operational performance and provide consistency and transparency between our financial reporting and compensation outcomes. In fiscal year 2021, the Compensation and Succession Planning Committee (“Compensation Committee”) chose adjusted earnings per share, adjusted operating income and adjusted free cash flow as the key metrics for our annual plan performance goals.
We disclose the adjustments made between GAAP and non-GAAP financial measures for metrics used in our incentive compensation program. We have consistently excluded certain financial gains and charges, including those related to litigation, that are not indicative of our ongoing operating performance because they are outside the control of the Company, inherently unusual, non-operating, unpredictable, non-cash or non-recurring. We believe these adjustments are appropriate for incentivizing executives to make decisions that are aligned with the long-term interests of shareholders because litigation and other one-time gains and charges may be unrelated to management performance or may reflect decisions made by an earlier management team.
However, the Compensation Committee is also committed to holding our management team accountable for events within its control and maintains a process to consider the use of discretion for adjustments related to significant, non-recurring financial events, as appropriate. The Compensation Committee recognizes that certain events, such as the impact from the opioid litigation settlement accrual, should be reflected in final compensation decisions, and is committed to both ensuring that the financial outcomes of our business and shareholders remain in alignment and providing transparency in this process.
We believe that by considering company performance, individual results, and code of conduct values, our incentive compensation program is appropriately designed to align the interests of our senior executives with