UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED
MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act File Number: 811-02258
Boston Income Portfolio
(Exact Name of registrant as Specified in Charter)
Two International Place Boston, Massachusetts 02110
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
Maureen A. Gemma
Two International Place Boston, Massachusetts 02110
(Name and Address of Agent for Services)
(617) 482-8260
(registrant’s Telephone Number)
October 31
Date of Fiscal Year End
October 31, 2009
Date of Reporting Period
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Item 1. Reports to Stockholders
Boston Income Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS
| | | | | | | | | | |
Senior Floating-Rate Interests — 7.7%(1) |
|
| | Principal
| | | | | | |
| | Amount
| | | | | | |
Security | | (000’s omitted) | | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Aerospace — 0.6% |
|
Hawker Beechcraft Acquisition, Term Loan, 2.26%, Maturing 3/26/14 | | $ | 17,907 | | | $ | 14,235,861 | | | |
Hawker Beechcraft Acquisition, Term Loan, 2.28%, Maturing 3/26/14 | | | 1,060 | | | | 842,359 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 15,078,220 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Automotive & Auto Parts — 1.1% |
|
EPD Holdings, (Goodyear Engineering Products), Term Loan - Second Lien, 6.00%, Maturing 7/13/15 | | $ | 5,410 | | | $ | 3,300,100 | | | |
Ford Motor Co., Revolving Loan, Maturing 12/15/13(2) | | | 3,900 | | | | 3,547,050 | | | |
Ford Motor Co., Term Loan, 3.29%, Maturing 12/16/13 | | | 23,116 | | | | 20,659,697 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 27,506,847 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Broadcasting — 0.3% |
|
HIT Entertainment, Inc., Term Loan - Second Lien, 5.98%, Maturing 2/5/13 | | $ | 13,910 | | | $ | 7,546,175 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 7,546,175 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Building Materials — 0.4% |
|
Panolam Industries Holdings, Inc., Term Loan, 5.00%, Maturing 9/30/12 | | $ | 10,649 | | | $ | 9,610,450 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 9,610,450 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Capital Goods — 0.1% |
|
Dresser, Inc., Term Loan - Second Lien, 6.00%, Maturing 5/4/15 | | $ | 2,120 | | | $ | 1,929,200 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,929,200 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Consumer Products — 0.1% |
|
Amscan Holdings, Inc., Term Loan, 2.65%, Maturing 5/25/13 | | $ | 3,149 | | | $ | 2,860,568 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,860,568 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Diversified Media — 0.1% |
|
Nielsen Finance, LLC, Term Loan, 2.24%, Maturing 8/9/13 | | $ | 3,579 | | | $ | 3,340,322 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 3,340,322 | | | |
|
|
|
Electronics / Electrical — 0.3% |
|
Freescale Semiconductor, Inc., Term Loan, 2.00%, Maturing 11/29/13 | | $ | 9,055 | | | $ | 7,382,493 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 7,382,493 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Food & Drug Retail — 0.8% |
|
Rite Aid Corp., Term Loan, 9.50%, Maturing 6/10/15 | | $ | 10,350 | | | $ | 10,729,504 | | | |
Warner Chilcott Corp., Term Loan, Maturing 10/30/14(2) | | | 2,780 | | | | 2,788,564 | | | |
Warner Chilcott Corp., Term Loan, Maturing 4/30/15(2) | | | 3,058 | | | | 3,067,329 | | | |
Warner Chilcott Corp., Term Loan, Maturing 4/30/15(2) | | | 973 | | | | 975,998 | | | |
Warner Chilcott Corp., Term Loan, Maturing 4/30/15(2) | | | 1,390 | | | | 1,394,017 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 18,955,412 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Food / Beverage / Tobacco — 0.4% |
|
Dole Food Company, Inc., Term Loan, 7.78%, Maturing 4/12/13 | | $ | 992 | | | $ | 1,004,074 | | | |
Dole Food Company, Inc., Term Loan, 8.00%, Maturing 4/12/13 | | | 6,214 | | | | 6,287,874 | | | |
Dole Food Company, Inc., Term Loan, 8.00%, Maturing 4/12/13 | | | 1,730 | | | | 1,750,676 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 9,042,624 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Gaming — 0.4% |
|
BLB Worldwide Holdings, Term Loan - Second Lien, 0.00%, Maturing 7/18/12(3) | | $ | 8,520 | | | $ | 575,100 | | | |
Cannery Casino Resorts, LLC, Term Loan - Second Lien, 4.50%, Maturing 5/16/14 | | | 3,220 | | | | 2,342,550 | | | |
Great Lakes Entertainment, Term Loan, 9.00%, Maturing 8/15/12 | | | 6,208 | | | | 5,990,775 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 8,908,425 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Health Care — 0.4% |
|
Viant Holdings, Inc., Term Loan, 2.54%, Maturing 6/25/14 | | $ | 9,230 | | | $ | 8,998,869 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 8,998,869 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Insurance — 0.3% |
|
HUB International, Ltd., Term Loan, Maturing 6/12/14(2) | | $ | 6,280 | | | $ | 6,166,175 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 6,166,175 | | | |
|
|
|
See notes to financial statements18
Boston Income Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Principal
| | | | | | |
| | Amount
| | | | | | |
Security | | (000’s omitted) | | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Leisure — 0.3% |
|
Universal City Development Partners, Ltd., Term Loan, 6.00%, Maturing 6/9/11 | | $ | 6,840 | | | $ | 6,822,900 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 6,822,900 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Services — 1.2% |
|
Neff Rental, Inc., Term Loan - Second Lien, 3.78%, Maturing 11/20/14 | | $ | 2,730 | | | $ | 573,300 | | | |
Rental Service Corp., Term Loan - Second Lien, 3.82%, Maturing 11/30/13 | | | 7,661 | | | | 6,952,461 | | | |
Travelport, LLC, Term Loan, 2.78%, Maturing 8/23/13 | | | 1,668 | | | | 1,520,762 | | | |
Travelport, LLC, Term Loan, 2.78%, Maturing 8/23/13 | | | 9,332 | | | | 8,515,504 | | | |
Travelport, LLC, Term Loan, 2.78%, Maturing 8/23/13 | | | 1,658 | | | | 1,512,871 | | | |
Travelport, LLC, Term Loan, 10.50%, Maturing 8/23/13 | | | 9,576 | | | | 9,735,603 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 28,810,501 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Steel — 0.2% |
|
RathGibson, Inc., DIP Loan, 10.70%, Maturing 2/10/10 | | $ | 5,858 | | | $ | 5,858,461 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 5,858,461 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Transportation Ex Air / Rail — 0.1% |
|
CEVA Group, PLC, Term Loan, 3.25%, Maturing 6/29/15 | | $ | 2,526 | | | $ | 2,132,605 | | | |
CEVA Group, PLC, Term Loan, 3.28%, Maturing 8/2/15 | | | 848 | | | | 705,170 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,837,775 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Utilities — 0.6% |
|
TXU Texas Competitive Electric Holdings Co., LLC, Term Loan, 3.74%, Maturing 10/10/14 | | $ | 17,711 | | | $ | 13,767,337 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 13,767,337 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Senior Floating-Rate Interests | | |
(identified cost $186,225,555) | | $ | 185,422,754 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Corporate Bonds & Notes — 87.8% |
|
| | Principal
| | | | | | |
| | Amount
| | | | | | |
Security | | (000’s omitted) | | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Aerospace — 0.4% |
|
Alion Science and Technologies Corp., 10.25%, 2/1/15 | | $ | 2,910 | | | $ | 2,066,100 | | | |
Bombardier, Inc., 8.00%, 11/15/14(4) | | | 2,620 | | | | 2,698,600 | | | |
Hawker Beechcraft Acquisition, 9.75%, 4/1/17 | | | 4,255 | | | | 2,861,488 | | | |
Spirit AeroSystems, Inc., 7.50%, 10/1/17(4) | | | 2,170 | | | | 2,164,575 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 9,790,763 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Air Transportation — 0.0% |
|
Continental Airlines, 7.033%, 6/15/11 | | $ | 1,135 | | | $ | 1,021,650 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,021,650 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Automotive & Auto Parts — 4.3% |
|
Affinia Group, Inc., Sr. Notes, 10.75%, 8/15/16(4) | | $ | 1,810 | | | $ | 1,995,525 | | | |
Allison Transmission, Inc., 11.00%, 11/1/15(4) | | | 1,690 | | | | 1,732,250 | | | |
Allison Transmission, Inc., (PIK), 11.25%, 11/1/15(4) | | | 12,235 | | | | 11,485,606 | | | |
Altra Industrial Motion, Inc., 9.00%, 12/1/11 | | | 6,560 | | | | 6,732,200 | | | |
Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc., Sr. Notes, 8.00%, 7/1/13 | | | 5,790 | | | | 3,329,250 | | | |
Ford Motor Credit Co., Sr. Notes, 7.50%, 8/1/12 | | | 12,115 | | | | 11,805,401 | | | |
Ford Motor Credit Co., Sr. Notes, 7.80%, 6/1/12 | | | 9,235 | | | | 9,047,797 | | | |
Ford Motor Credit Co., Sr. Notes, 8.00%, 12/15/16 | | | 17,655 | | | | 17,077,523 | | | |
Ford Motor Credit Co., Sr. Notes, 9.875%, 8/10/11 | | | 8,495 | | | | 8,692,806 | | | |
Ford Motor Credit Co., Sr. Notes, 12.00%, 5/15/15 | | | 4,785 | | | | 5,394,241 | | | |
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. (The), Sr. Notes, 10.50%, 5/15/16 | | | 13,235 | | | | 14,393,062 | | | |
Navistar International Corp., Sr. Notes, 8.25%, 11/1/21 | | | 10,405 | | | | 10,209,906 | | | |
United Components, Inc., Sr. Sub. Notes, 9.375%, 6/15/13 | | | 1,895 | | | | 1,804,988 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 103,700,555 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Banks and Thrifts — 0.5% |
|
General Motors Acceptance Corp., 6.875%, 9/15/11(4) | | $ | 1,213 | | | | 1,176,610 | | | |
See notes to financial statements19
Boston Income Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Principal
| | | | | | |
| | Amount
| | | | | | |
Security | | (000’s omitted) | | | Value | | | |
|
|
Banks and Thrifts (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
General Motors Acceptance Corp., 8.00%, 11/1/31(4) | | $ | 13,210 | | | $ | 11,426,650 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 12,603,260 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Broadcasting — 1.2% |
|
Cequel Communications Holdings, LLC, 8.625%, 11/15/17(4) | | $ | 6,795 | | | $ | 6,700,507 | | | |
Rainbow National Services, LLC, Sr. Sub. Notes, 10.375%, 9/1/14(4) | | | 2,490 | | | | 2,626,950 | | | |
Sirius XM Radio, Inc., Sr. Notes, 9.75%, 9/1/15(4) | | | 4,520 | | | | 4,633,000 | | | |
XM Satellite Radio Holdings, Inc., Sr. Notes, 11.25%, 6/15/13(4) | | | 7,655 | | | | 8,076,025 | | | |
XM Satellite Radio Holdings, Inc., Sr. Notes, 13.00%, 8/1/13(4) | | | 7,025 | | | | 7,025,000 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 29,061,482 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Building Materials — 0.6% |
|
Interface, Inc., Sr. Notes, 11.375%, 11/1/13(4) | | $ | 2,320 | | | $ | 2,517,200 | | | |
Interface, Inc., Sr. Sub. Notes, 9.50%, 2/1/14 | | | 965 | | | | 952,938 | | | |
Panolam Industries International, Sr. Sub. Notes, 10.75%, 10/1/13(3) | | | 11,740 | | | | 3,815,500 | | | |
Texas Industries, Inc., Sr. Notes, 7.25%, 7/15/13(4) | | | 4,030 | | | | 3,969,550 | | | |
USG Corp., 9.75%, 8/1/14(4) | | | 2,335 | | | | 2,463,425 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 13,718,613 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Cable / Satellite TV — 2.0% |
|
CCO Holdings, LLC/CCO Capital Corp., Sr. Notes, 8.75%, 11/15/13(3) | | $ | 12,405 | | | $ | 13,614,487 | | | |
Charter Communications, Inc., Sr. Notes, 10.375%, 4/30/14(3)(4) | | | 1,865 | | | | 1,906,963 | | | |
Charter Communications, Inc., Sr. Notes, 12.875%, 9/15/14(3)(4) | | | 6,050 | | | | 6,715,500 | | | |
Kabel Deutschland GmbH, 10.625%, 7/1/14 | | | 6,840 | | | | 7,241,850 | | | |
National Cable PLC, Sr. Notes, 9.125%, 8/15/16 | | | 10,585 | | | | 10,955,475 | | | |
Virgin Media Finance PLC, 9.50%, 8/15/16 | | | 7,255 | | | | 7,708,437 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 48,142,712 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Capital Goods — 1.5% |
|
American Railcar Industry, Sr. Notes, 7.50%, 3/1/14 | | $ | 3,895 | | | $ | 3,563,925 | | | |
Chart Industries, Inc., Sr. Sub. Notes, 9.125%, 10/15/15 | | | 3,575 | | | | 3,575,000 | | | |
ESCO Corp., Sr. Notes, 8.625%, 12/15/13(4) | | | 7,300 | | | | 7,245,250 | | | |
RBS Global & Rexnord Corp., 9.50%, 8/1/14(4) | | | 3,506 | | | | 3,488,470 | | | |
RBS Global & Rexnord Corp., 11.75%, 8/1/16 | | | 5,290 | | | | 5,157,750 | | | |
Terex Corp., Sr. Notes, 10.875%, 6/1/16 | | | 11,975 | | | | 12,992,875 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 36,023,270 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Chemicals — 2.8% |
|
Ashland, Inc., 9.125%, 6/1/17(4) | | $ | 6,940 | | | $ | 7,512,550 | | | |
CII Carbon, LLC, 11.125%, 11/15/15(4) | | | 5,555 | | | | 5,499,450 | | | |
Dow Chemical Co. (The), 8.55%, 5/15/19 | | | 14,475 | | | | 16,552,655 | | | |
INEOS Group Holdings PLC, Sr. Sub. Notes, 8.50%, 2/15/16(4) | | | 8,975 | | | | 5,070,875 | | | |
Nalco Co., Sr. Notes, 8.25%, 5/15/17(4) | | | 5,500 | | | | 5,802,500 | | | |
Nova Chemicals Corp., Sr. Notes, 8.375%, 11/1/16(4) | | | 5,500 | | | | 5,555,000 | | | |
Reichhold Industries, Inc., Sr. Notes, 9.00%, 8/15/14(4) | | | 11,950 | | | | 9,739,250 | | | |
Solutia, Inc., 8.75%, 11/1/17 | | | 4,840 | | | | 5,033,600 | | | |
Terra Capital, Inc., Sr. Notes, 7.75%, 11/1/19(4) | | | 5,235 | | | | 5,287,350 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 66,053,230 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Consumer Products — 1.2% |
|
ACCO Brands Corp., 7.625%, 8/15/15 | | $ | 4,145 | | | $ | 3,771,950 | | | |
ACCO Brands Corp., Sr. Notes, 10.625%, 3/15/15(4) | | | 6,630 | | | | 7,127,250 | | | |
Amscan Holdings, Inc., Sr. Sub. Notes, 8.75%, 5/1/14 | | | 12,225 | | | | 11,613,750 | | | |
Sealy Mattress Co., 8.25%, 6/15/14 | | | 4,115 | | | | 4,012,125 | | | |
Sealy Mattress Co., Sr. Notes, 10.875%, 4/15/16(4) | | | 1,415 | | | | 1,591,875 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 28,116,950 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Containers — 0.7% |
|
Intertape Polymer US, Inc., Sr. Sub. Notes, 8.50%, 8/1/14 | | $ | 5,160 | | | $ | 4,050,600 | | | |
Pliant Corp., Sr. Notes, 11.625%, 6/15/10(3) | | | 9,994 | | | | 8,819,628 | | | |
Solo Cup Co., Sr. Notes, 10.50%, 11/1/13(4) | | | 4,680 | | | | 4,984,200 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 17,854,428 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Diversified Financial Services — 0.2% |
|
Cantor Fitzgerald, LP, 7.875%, 10/15/19(4) | | $ | 5,410 | | | $ | 5,456,905 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 5,456,905 | | | |
|
|
|
See notes to financial statements20
Boston Income Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Principal
| | | | | | |
| | Amount
| | | | | | |
Security | | (000’s omitted) | | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Diversified Media — 3.1% |
|
Affinion Group, Inc., 10.125%, 10/15/13 | | $ | 1,800 | | | $ | 1,854,000 | | | |
Affinion Group, Inc., 11.50%, 10/15/15 | | | 4,865 | | | | 5,108,250 | | | |
Catalina Marketing Corp., 11.625%, 10/1/17(4) | | | 6,747 | | | | 6,865,072 | | | |
Catalina Marketing Corp., (PIK), 10.50%, 10/1/15(4) | | | 1,845 | | | | 1,877,288 | | | |
Interpublic Group Cos., Inc., 10.00%, 7/15/17 | | | 9,315 | | | | 10,060,200 | | | |
LBI Media, Inc., Sr. Disc. Notes, 11.00%, 10/15/13 | | | 3,320 | | | | 2,112,350 | | | |
MDC Partners, Inc., 11.00%, 11/1/16(4) | | | 7,310 | | | | 7,355,687 | | | |
Nielsen Finance, LLC, 10.00%, 8/1/14 | | | 15,390 | | | | 15,928,650 | | | |
Nielsen Finance, LLC, 11.50%, 5/1/16 | | | 6,670 | | | | 7,120,225 | | | |
Nielsen Finance, LLC, 12.50%, (0.00% until 8/1/11), 8/1/16 | | | 4,600 | | | | 4,007,750 | | | |
Nielsen Finance, LLC, Sr. Notes, 11.625%, 2/1/14 | | | 795 | | | | 852,638 | | | |
Warner Music Group Acquisition Corp., Sr. Notes, 9.50%, 6/15/16(4) | | | 10,465 | | | | 11,223,712 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 74,365,822 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Energy — 7.5% |
|
Allis-Chalmers Energy, Inc., Sr. Notes, 9.00%, 1/15/14 | | $ | 6,125 | | | $ | 5,206,250 | | | |
Berry Petroleum Co., Sr. Notes, 10.25%, 6/1/14 | | | 6,755 | | | | 7,261,625 | | | |
Bill Barrett Corp., 9.875%, 7/15/16 | | | 1,410 | | | | 1,501,650 | | | |
Clayton Williams Energy, Inc., 7.75%, 8/1/13 | | | 4,650 | | | | 4,068,750 | | | |
Compton Pet Finance Corp., 7.625%, 12/1/13 | | | 8,727 | | | | 6,479,798 | | | |
Denbury Resources, Inc., Sr. Sub. Notes, 7.50%, 12/15/15 | | | 4,315 | | | | 4,336,575 | | | |
Denbury Resources, Inc., Sr. Sub. Notes, 9.75%, 3/1/16 | | | 9,875 | | | | 10,640,312 | | | |
El Paso Corp., Sr. Notes, 9.625%, 5/15/12 | | | 6,220 | | | | 6,499,620 | | | |
Forbes Energy Services, Sr. Notes, 11.00%, 2/15/15 | | | 10,125 | | | | 8,530,313 | | | |
Holly Corp., 9.875%, 6/15/17(4) | | | 10,620 | | | | 11,044,800 | | | |
OPTI Canada, Inc., Sr. Notes, 7.875%, 12/15/14 | | | 4,010 | | | | 3,147,850 | | | |
OPTI Canada, Inc., Sr. Notes, 8.25%, 12/15/14 | | | 3,605 | | | | 2,847,950 | | | |
Petroleum Development Corp., Sr. Notes, 12.00%, 2/15/18 | | | 3,885 | | | | 3,894,713 | | | |
Petroplus Finance, Ltd., 6.75%, 5/1/14(4) | | | 955 | | | | 897,700 | | | |
Petroplus Finance, Ltd., 7.00%, 5/1/17(4) | | | 15,495 | | | | 14,100,450 | | | |
Petroplus Finance, Ltd., Sr. Notes, 9.375%, 9/15/19(4) | | | 12,145 | | | | 12,236,087 | | | |
Quicksilver Resources, Inc., 7.125%, 4/1/16 | | | 11,035 | | | | 9,959,087 | | | |
Quicksilver Resources, Inc., Sr. Notes, 11.75%, 1/1/16 | | | 9,830 | | | | 10,960,450 | | | |
SandRidge Energy, Inc., Sr. Notes, 8.00%, 6/1/18(4) | | | 6,300 | | | | 6,268,500 | | | |
SandRidge Energy, Inc., Sr. Notes, (PIK), 8.625%, 4/1/15 | | | 11,760 | | | | 11,995,200 | | | |
SemGroup, L.P., Sr. Notes, 8.75%, 11/15/15(3)(4) | | | 10,225 | | | | 664,625 | | | |
SESI, LLC, Sr. Notes, 6.875%, 6/1/14 | | | 1,150 | | | | 1,127,000 | | | |
Southwestern Energy Co., Sr. Notes, 7.50%, 2/1/18 | | | 9,050 | | | | 9,344,125 | | | |
Stewart & Stevenson, LLC, Sr. Notes, 10.00%, 7/15/14 | | | 5,930 | | | | 5,485,250 | | | |
Tesoro Corp., 9.75%, 6/1/19 | | | 2,320 | | | | 2,395,400 | | | |
United Refining Co., Sr. Notes, 10.50%, 8/15/12 | | | 21,745 | | | | 18,809,425 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 179,703,505 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Entertainment / Film — 1.9% |
|
AMC Entertainment, Inc., 11.00%, 2/1/16 | | $ | 33,741 | | | $ | 35,596,755 | | | |
Marquee Holdings, Inc., Sr. Disc. Notes, 9.505%, 8/15/14 | | | 10,360 | | | | 8,663,550 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 44,260,305 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Environmental — 0.8% |
|
Casella Waste Systems, Inc., Sr. Notes, 11.00%, 7/15/14(4) | | $ | 2,350 | | | $ | 2,520,375 | | | |
Clean Harbors, Inc., Sr. Notes, 7.625%, 8/15/16(4) | | | 3,115 | | | | 3,208,450 | | | |
Waste Services, Inc., Sr. Sub. Notes, 9.50%, 4/15/14(4) | | | 5,965 | | | | 6,024,650 | | | |
Waste Services, Inc., Sr. Sub. Notes, 9.50%, 4/15/14 | | | 7,240 | | | | 7,312,400 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 19,065,875 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Food & Drug Retail — 0.4% |
|
Duane Reade, Inc., Sr. Notes, 11.75%, 8/1/15(4) | | $ | 1,365 | | | $ | 1,460,550 | | | |
Supervalu, Inc., Sr. Notes, 8.00%, 5/1/16 | | | 7,530 | | | | 7,699,425 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 9,159,975 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Food / Beverage / Tobacco — 1.9% |
|
ASG Consolidated, LLC/ASG Finance, Inc., Sr. Disc. Notes, 11.50%, 11/1/11 | | $ | 10,090 | | | $ | 9,913,425 | | | |
Dole Foods Co., 13.875%, 3/15/14(4) | | | 9,405 | | | | 11,050,875 | | | |
See notes to financial statements21
Boston Income Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Principal
| | | | | | |
| | Amount
| | | | | | |
Security | | (000’s omitted) | | | Value | | | |
|
|
Food / Beverage / Tobacco (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Smithfield Foods, Inc., Sr. Notes, 7.00%, 8/1/11 | | $ | 15,675 | | | $ | 15,204,750 | | | |
Smithfield Foods, Inc., Sr. Notes, 10.00%, 7/15/14(4) | | | 7,905 | | | | 8,339,775 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 44,508,825 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Gaming — 6.1% |
|
Buffalo Thunder Development Authority, 9.375%, 12/15/14(3)(4) | | $ | 11,355 | | | $ | 2,157,450 | | | |
CCM Merger, Inc., 8.00%, 8/1/13(4) | | | 8,020 | | | | 6,616,500 | | | |
Chukchansi EDA, Sr. Notes, Variable Rate, 4.913%, 11/15/12(4) | | | 5,045 | | | | 3,153,125 | | | |
Eldorado Casino Shreveport, 10.00%, 8/1/12(5) | | | 518 | | | | 456,573 | | | |
Fontainebleau Las Vegas Casino, LLC, 11.00%, 6/15/15(3)(4) | | | 19,830 | | | | 793,200 | | | |
Galaxy Entertainment Finance, 9.875%, 12/15/12(4) | | | 15,060 | | | | 14,834,100 | | | |
Galaxy Entertainment Finance, Variable Rate, 6.218%, 12/15/10(4) | | | 5,565 | | | | 5,481,525 | | | |
Greektown Holdings, LLC, Sr. Notes, 10.75%, 12/1/13(3)(4) | | | 1,804 | | | | 369,820 | | | |
Harrah’s Operating Co., Inc., Sr. Notes, 11.25%, 6/1/17(4) | | | 6,105 | | | | 6,257,625 | | | |
Harrah’s Operating Escrow Corp., Sr. Notes, 11.25%, 6/1/17(4) | | | 5,595 | | | | 5,734,875 | | | |
Indianapolis Downs, LLC & Capital Corp., Sr. Notes, 11.00%, 11/1/12(4) | | | 4,635 | | | | 2,989,575 | | | |
Inn of the Mountain Gods, Sr. Notes, 12.00%, 11/15/10(3) | | | 7,910 | | | | 3,183,775 | | | |
Majestic HoldCo, LLC, 12.50%, 10/15/11(3)(4) | | | 3,390 | | | | 4,068 | | | |
MGM Mirage, Inc., Sr. Notes, 10.375%, 5/15/14(4) | | | 4,625 | | | | 4,948,750 | | | |
MGM Mirage, Inc., Sr. Notes, 11.125%, 11/15/17(4) | | | 4,790 | | | | 5,292,950 | | | |
Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority, Sr. Sub. Notes, 6.875%, 2/15/15 | | | 7,630 | | | | 5,073,950 | | | |
Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority, Sr. Sub. Notes, 7.125%, 8/15/14 | | | 7,140 | | | | 5,033,700 | | | |
Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority, Sr. Sub. Notes, 8.00%, 4/1/12 | | | 15,085 | | | | 12,897,675 | | | |
Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority, Sr. Sub. Notes, 11.50%, 11/1/17(4) | | | 5,385 | | | | 5,290,763 | | | |
MTR Gaming Group, Inc., 12.625%, 7/15/14(4) | | | 6,760 | | | | 6,658,600 | | | |
Park Place Entertainment, 7.875%, 3/15/10 | | | 12,605 | | | | 12,573,487 | | | |
Peninsula Gaming, LLC, 8.375%, 8/15/15(4) | | | 1,350 | | | | 1,346,625 | | | |
Peninsula Gaming, LLC, 10.75%, 8/15/17(4) | | | 7,675 | | | | 7,655,813 | | | |
Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc., Sr. Sub. Notes, 7.50%, 6/15/15 | | | 2,590 | | | | 2,343,950 | | | |
Pokagon Gaming Authority, Sr. Notes, 10.375%, 6/15/14(4) | | | 2,172 | | | | 2,258,880 | | | |
San Pasqual Casino, 8.00%, 9/15/13(4) | | | 2,005 | | | | 1,914,775 | | | |
Seminole Hard Rock Entertainment, Variable Rate, 2.799%, 3/15/14(4) | | | 3,875 | | | | 3,138,750 | | | |
Tunica-Biloxi Gaming Authority, Sr. Notes, 9.00%, 11/15/15(4) | | | 9,455 | | | | 8,556,775 | | | |
Waterford Gaming, LLC, Sr. Notes, 8.625%, 9/15/14(4) | | | 11,167 | | | | 8,913,499 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 145,931,153 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Health Care — 7.7% |
|
Accellent, Inc., 10.50%, 12/1/13 | | $ | 6,335 | | | $ | 6,239,975 | | | |
AMR HoldCo, Inc./EmCare HoldCo, Inc., Sr. Sub. Notes, 10.00%, 2/15/15 | | | 12,320 | | | | 12,997,600 | | | |
Apria Healthcare Group, Inc., Sr. Notes, 12.375%, 11/1/14(4) | | | 1,115 | | | | 1,218,138 | | | |
Biomet, Inc., 11.625%, 10/15/17 | | | 25,120 | | | | 27,663,400 | | | |
Biomet, Inc., (PIK), 10.375%, 10/15/17 | | | 7,475 | | | | 8,082,344 | | | |
DJO Finance, LLC/DJO Finance Corp., 10.875%, 11/15/14 | | | 13,120 | | | | 13,743,200 | | | |
Elan Finance PLC/Elan Finance Corp., 8.75%, 10/15/16(4) | | | 10,270 | | | | 9,576,775 | | | |
Fresenius US Finance II, Inc., Sr. Notes, 9.00%, 7/15/15(4) | | | 3,685 | | | | 4,071,925 | | | |
HCA, Inc., 9.25%, 11/15/16 | | | 10,125 | | | | 10,605,937 | | | |
HCA, Inc., 9.875%, 2/15/17(4) | | | 7,880 | | | | 8,510,400 | | | |
Inverness Medical Innovations, Inc., Sr. Sub. Notes, 9.00%, 5/15/16 | | | 11,385 | | | | 11,584,237 | | | |
MultiPlan, Inc., Sr. Sub. Notes, 10.375%, 4/15/16(4) | | | 12,035 | | | | 11,613,775 | | | |
National Mentor Holdings, Inc., 11.25%, 7/1/14 | | | 7,385 | | | | 7,366,537 | | | |
Res-Care, Inc., Sr. Notes, 7.75%, 10/15/13 | | | 4,620 | | | | 4,596,900 | | | |
Rural/Metro Corp., 9.875%, 3/15/15 | | | 1,325 | | | | 1,334,938 | | | |
Rural/Metro Corp., Sr. Disc. Notes, 12.75%, (0.00% until 3/15/10), 3/15/16 | | | 6,320 | | | | 6,320,000 | | | |
Talecris Biotherapeutics Holdings Corp., Sr. Notes, 7.75%, 11/15/16(4) | | | 9,420 | | | | 9,584,850 | | | |
US Oncology, Inc., 10.75%, 8/15/14 | | | 8,635 | | | | 9,066,750 | | | |
US Oncology, Inc., Sr. Notes, 9.125%, 8/15/17(4) | | | 11,655 | | | | 12,354,300 | | | |
Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, 8.375%, 6/15/16(4) | | | 4,910 | | | | 5,045,025 | | | |
Viant Holdings, Inc., 10.125%, 7/15/17(4) | | | 3,163 | | | | 3,020,665 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 184,597,671 | | | |
|
|
|
See notes to financial statements22
Boston Income Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Principal
| | | | | | |
| | Amount
| | | | | | |
Security | | (000’s omitted) | | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Homebuilders / Real Estate — 0.3% |
|
CB Richard Ellis Group, Inc., Sr. Sub. Notes, 11.625%, 6/15/17 | | $ | 7,190 | | | $ | 7,864,063 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 7,864,063 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Insurance — 0.5% |
|
Alliant Holdings I, Inc., 11.00%, 5/1/15(4) | | $ | 4,190 | | | $ | 4,106,200 | | | |
HUB International Holdings, Inc., Sr. Notes, 9.00%, 12/15/14(4) | | | 4,265 | | | | 4,094,400 | | | |
U.S.I. Holdings Corp., Sr. Notes, Variable Rate, 4.315%, 11/15/14(4) | | | 3,265 | | | | 2,709,950 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 10,910,550 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Leisure — 2.7% |
|
HRP Myrtle Beach Operations, LLC/HRP Myrtle Beach Capital Corp., 12.50%, 4/1/13(3)(4)(5) | | $ | 3,635 | | | $ | 0 | | | |
HRP Myrtle Beach Operations, LLC/HRP Myrtle Beach Capital Corp., Variable Rate, 0.00%, 4/1/12(3)(4)(5) | | | 6,665 | | | | 0 | | | |
HRP Myrtle Beach Operations, LLC/HRP Myrtle Beach Capital Corp., Sr. Notes, (PIK), 14.50%, 4/1/14(3)(4)(5) | | | 5,141 | | | | 0 | | | |
Royal Caribbean Cruises, Sr. Notes, 6.875%, 12/1/13 | | | 4,095 | | | | 3,900,488 | | | |
Royal Caribbean Cruises, Sr. Notes, 7.00%, 6/15/13 | | | 5,505 | | | | 5,339,850 | | | |
Royal Caribbean Cruises, Sr. Notes, 7.25%, 6/15/16 | | | 2,185 | | | | 2,042,975 | | | |
Royal Caribbean Cruises, Sr. Notes, 7.25%, 3/15/18 | | | 4,390 | | | | 4,016,850 | | | |
Royal Caribbean Cruises, Sr. Notes, 8.75%, 2/2/11 | | | 910 | | | | 923,650 | | | |
Universal City Development Partners, Sr. Notes, 11.75%, 4/1/10 | | | 7,775 | | | | 7,833,312 | | | |
Universal City Florida Holdings, Sr. Notes, 8.375%, 5/1/10 | | | 670 | | | | 673,350 | | | |
Universal City Florida Holdings, Sr. Notes, Variable Rate, 5.233%, 5/1/10 | | | 39,285 | | | | 39,481,425 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 64,211,900 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Metals / Mining — 3.3% |
|
Arch Coal, Inc., Sr. Notes, 8.75%, 8/1/16(4) | | $ | 2,660 | | | $ | 2,739,800 | | | |
FMG Finance PTY, Ltd., 10.625%, 9/1/16(4) | | | 16,890 | | | | 18,621,225 | | | |
Murray Energy Corp., Sr. Notes, 10.25%, 10/15/15(4) | | | 12,580 | | | | 12,517,100 | | | |
Novelis, Inc./GA, Sr. Notes, 11.50%, 2/15/15(4) | | | 2,710 | | | | 2,831,950 | | | |
Teck Resources, Ltd., Sr. Notes, 9.75%, 5/15/14 | | | 9,050 | | | | 10,203,875 | | | |
Teck Resources, Ltd., Sr. Notes, 10.25%, 5/15/16 | | | 6,785 | | | | 7,853,637 | | | |
Teck Resources, Ltd., Sr. Notes, 10.75%, 5/15/19 | | | 20,430 | | | | 23,903,100 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 78,670,687 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Paper — 4.7% |
|
Boise Paper Holdings, LLC, Sr. Notes, 9.00%, 11/1/17(4) | | $ | 5,985 | | | $ | 6,074,775 | | | |
Domtar Corp., Sr. Notes, 10.75%, 6/1/17 | | | 9,560 | | | | 11,017,900 | | | |
International Paper Co., 7.95%, 6/15/18 | | | 8,220 | | | | 9,176,799 | | | |
International Paper Co., 9.375%, 5/15/19 | | | 26,585 | | | | 32,236,599 | | | |
International Paper Co., Sr. Notes, 7.50%, 8/15/21 | | | 3,100 | | | | 3,401,562 | | | |
Jefferson Smurfit Corp., Sr. Notes, 7.50%, 6/1/13(3) | | | 1,555 | | | | 1,220,675 | | | |
Jefferson Smurfit Corp., Sr. Notes, 8.25%, 10/1/12(3) | | | 3,390 | | | | 2,627,250 | | | |
NewPage Corp., 10.00%, 5/1/12 | | | 6,580 | | | | 4,342,800 | | | |
NewPage Corp., Sr. Notes, 11.375%, 12/31/14(4) | | | 27,510 | | | | 27,578,775 | | | |
Smurfit-Stone Container Corp., Sr. Notes, 8.00%, 3/15/17(3) | | | 9,315 | | | | 7,219,125 | | | |
Smurfit-Stone Container Corp., Sr. Notes, 8.375%, 7/1/12(3) | | | 3,260 | | | | 2,567,250 | | | |
Verso Paper Holdings, LLC/Verso Paper, Inc., 11.375%, 8/1/16 | | | 7,275 | | | | 4,765,125 | | | |
Verso Paper Holdings, LLC/Verso Paper, Inc., Sr. Notes, Variable Rate, 4.233%, 8/1/14 | | | 975 | | | | 643,500 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 112,872,135 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Publishing / Printing — 0.1% |
|
Dex Media West/Finance, Series B, 9.875%, 8/15/13(3) | | $ | 5,422 | | | $ | 1,097,955 | | | |
Local Insight Regatta Holdings, Inc., 11.00%, 12/1/17 | | | 1,660 | | | | 821,700 | | | |
Reader’s Digest Association, Inc. (The), Sr. Sub. Notes, 9.00%, 2/15/17(3) | | | 10,390 | | | | 155,850 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,075,505 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Railroad — 0.8% |
|
Kansas City Southern Mexico, Sr. Notes, 7.375%, 6/1/14 | | $ | 2,350 | | | $ | 2,232,500 | | | |
Kansas City Southern Mexico, Sr. Notes, 7.625%, 12/1/13 | | | 8,155 | | | | 7,869,575 | | | |
See notes to financial statements23
Boston Income Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Principal
| | | | | | |
| | Amount
| | | | | | |
Security | | (000’s omitted) | | | Value | | | |
|
|
Railroad (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Kansas City Southern Mexico, Sr. Notes, 8.00%, 6/1/15 | | $ | 6,410 | | | $ | 6,602,300 | | | |
Kansas City Southern Mexico, Sr. Notes, 9.375%, 5/1/12 | | | 1,885 | | | | 1,932,125 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 18,636,500 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Restaurants — 0.6% |
|
El Pollo Loco, Inc., 11.75%, 11/15/13 | | $ | 5,085 | | | $ | 4,703,625 | | | |
NPC International, Inc., Sr. Sub. Notes, 9.50%, 5/1/14 | | | 9,800 | | | | 9,726,500 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 14,430,125 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Services — 5.2% |
|
Education Management, LLC, Sr. Notes, 8.75%, 6/1/14 | | $ | 10,305 | | | $ | 10,665,675 | | | |
Education Management, LLC, Sr. Sub. Notes, 10.25%, 6/1/16 | | | 3,666 | | | | 4,014,270 | | | |
GEO Group, Inc. (The), 7.75%, 10/15/17(4) | | | 900 | | | | 918,000 | | | |
Hertz Corp., 8.875%, 1/1/14 | | | 1,025 | | | | 1,042,938 | | | |
Hertz Corp., 10.50%, 1/1/16 | | | 1,750 | | | | 1,833,125 | | | |
KAR Holdings, Inc., 8.75%, 5/1/14 | | | 5,580 | | | | 5,670,675 | | | |
Laureate Education, Inc., 10.00%, 8/15/15(4) | | | 23,262 | | | | 22,796,760 | | | |
Laureate Education, Inc., 11.75%, 8/15/17(4) | | | 13,854 | | | | 13,542,285 | | | |
Laureate Education, Inc., (PIK), 10.25%, 8/15/15(4) | | | 16,970 | | | | 15,345,783 | | | |
MediMedia USA, Inc., Sr. Sub. Notes, 11.375%, 11/15/14(4) | | | 5,110 | | | | 3,806,950 | | | |
Muzak, LLC/Muzak Finance, Sr. Notes, 10.00%, 2/15/09(9) | | | 2,950 | | | | 1,268,500 | | | |
Rental Service Corp., 9.50%, 12/1/14 | | | 5,905 | | | | 5,860,712 | | | |
RSC Equipment Rental, Inc., Sr. Notes, 10.00%, 7/15/17(4) | | | 10,890 | | | | 11,870,100 | | | |
Ticketmaster Entertainment, Inc., 10.75%, 8/1/16 | | | 6,385 | | | | 6,608,475 | | | |
United Rentals North America, Inc., 10.875%, 6/15/16(4) | | | 8,360 | | | | 9,112,400 | | | |
West Corp., 9.50%, 10/15/14 | | | 11,165 | | | | 11,220,825 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 125,577,473 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Steel — 0.1% |
|
RathGibson, Inc., Sr. Notes, 11.25%, 2/15/14(3) | | $ | 8,245 | | | $ | 3,030,038 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 3,030,038 | | | |
|
|
|
Super Retail — 8.4% |
|
General Nutrition Center, Sr. Notes, (PIK), Variable Rate, 5.178%, 3/15/14 | | $ | 26,035 | | | $ | 23,301,325 | | | |
General Nutrition Center, Sr. Sub. Notes, 10.75%, 3/15/15 | | | 11,780 | | | | 11,927,250 | | | |
Limited Brands, Inc., Sr. Notes, 8.50%, 6/15/19(4) | | | 13,445 | | | | 14,184,475 | | | |
Neiman Marcus Group, Inc., 9.00%, 10/15/15 | | | 24,434 | | | | 21,648,753 | | | |
Neiman Marcus Group, Inc., 10.375%, 10/15/15 | | | 21,998 | | | | 19,468,230 | | | |
Sally Holdings, LLC, Sr. Notes, 10.50%, 11/15/16 | | | 24,865 | | | | 26,481,225 | | | |
Toys “R” Us, 7.375%, 10/15/18 | | | 905 | | | | 809,975 | | | |
Toys “R” Us, 7.625%, 8/1/11 | | | 14,410 | | | | 14,482,050 | | | |
Toys “R” Us, 7.875%, 4/15/13 | | | 16,830 | | | | 16,451,325 | | | |
Toys “R” Us, 10.75%, 7/15/17(4) | | | 14,005 | | | | 15,265,450 | | | |
Yankee Acquisition Corp., 8.50%, 2/15/15 | | | 21,540 | | | | 20,678,400 | | | |
Yankee Acquisition Corp., 9.75%, 2/15/17 | | | 16,750 | | | | 15,870,625 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 200,569,083 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Technology — 4.7% |
|
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., Sr. Notes, 7.75%, 11/1/12 | | $ | 8,614 | | | $ | 7,687,995 | | | |
Amkor Technologies, Inc., Sr. Notes, 9.25%, 6/1/16 | | | 25,205 | | | | 26,465,250 | | | |
Avago Technologies Finance, 11.875%, 12/1/15 | | | 12,875 | | | | 14,162,500 | | | |
Avaya, Inc., Sr. Notes, 9.75%, 11/1/15(4) | | | 10,540 | | | | 10,171,100 | | | |
Avaya, Inc., Sr. Notes, 10.125%, 11/1/15(4) | | | 15,860 | | | | 13,629,767 | | | |
Ceridian Corp., Sr. Notes, 11.25%, 11/15/15 | | | 10,280 | | | | 9,945,900 | | | |
Jabil Circuit, Inc., Sr. Notes, 7.75%, 7/15/16 | | | 1,195 | | | | 1,245,788 | | | |
SunGard Data Systems, Inc., Sr. Notes, 10.625%, 5/15/15(4) | | | 27,755 | | | | 30,044,787 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 113,353,087 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Telecommunications — 8.1% |
|
Digicel Group, Ltd., Sr. Notes, 9.125%, 1/15/15(4) | | $ | 32,026 | | | $ | 30,905,090 | | | |
Digicel Group, Ltd., Sr. Notes, 9.25%, 9/1/12(4) | | | 9,255 | | | | 9,440,100 | | | |
Digicel Group, Ltd., Sr. Notes, 12.00%, 4/1/14(4) | | | 4,330 | | | | 4,903,725 | | | |
Intelsat Bermuda, Ltd., 11.25%, 6/15/16 | | | 30,855 | | | | 33,014,850 | | | |
Intelsat Corp., 9.25%, 8/15/14 | | | 3,761 | | | | 3,845,623 | | | |
Intelsat Jackson Holdings, Ltd., 9.50%, 6/15/16 | | | 10,378 | | | | 10,948,790 | | | |
Intelsat Subsidiary Holdings Co., Ltd., 8.875%, 1/15/15 | | | 2,340 | | | | 2,372,175 | | | |
Intelsat Subsidiary Holdings Co., Ltd., 8.875%, 1/15/15(4) | | | 8,600 | | | | 8,675,250 | | | |
NII Capital Corp., 10.00%, 8/15/16(4) | | | 9,510 | | | | 10,080,600 | | | |
See notes to financial statements24
Boston Income Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Principal
| | | | | | |
| | Amount
| | | | | | |
Security | | (000’s omitted) | | | Value | | | |
|
|
Telecommunications (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Qwest Communications International, Inc., 7.50%, 2/15/14 | | $ | 8,975 | | | $ | 8,840,375 | | | |
Qwest Corp., Sr. Notes, 7.625%, 6/15/15 | | | 3,500 | | | | 3,552,500 | | | |
SBA Telecommunications, Inc., 8.00%, 8/15/16(4) | | | 4,075 | | | | 4,238,000 | | | |
SBA Telecommunications, Inc., 8.25%, 8/15/19(4) | | | 2,725 | | | | 2,861,250 | | | |
Sprint Capital Corp., 6.875%, 11/15/28 | | | 10,610 | | | | 8,010,550 | | | |
Telesat Canada/Telesat, LLC, Sr. Notes, 11.00%, 11/1/15 | | | 16,235 | | | | 17,696,150 | | | |
Telesat Canada/Telesat, LLC, Sr. Sub. Notes, 12.50%, 11/1/17 | | | 12,665 | | | | 13,947,331 | | | |
Wind Acquisition Finance SA, Sr. Notes, 11.75%, 7/15/17(4) | | | 11,150 | | | | 12,655,250 | | | |
Windstream Corp., 7.875%, 11/1/17(4) | | | 8,875 | | | | 9,008,125 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 194,995,734 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Textiles / Apparel — 1.3% |
|
Levi Strauss & Co., Sr. Notes, 8.875%, 4/1/16 | | $ | 2,025 | | | $ | 2,075,625 | | | |
Levi Strauss & Co., Sr. Notes, 9.75%, 1/15/15 | | | 4,096 | | | | 4,300,800 | | | |
Oxford Industries, Inc., Sr. Notes, 11.375%, 7/15/15 | | | 7,020 | | | | 7,581,600 | | | |
Perry Ellis International, Inc., Sr. Sub. Notes, 8.875%, 9/15/13 | | | 12,545 | | | | 12,200,012 | | | |
Quiksilver, Inc., 6.875%, 4/15/15 | | | 7,400 | | | | 5,753,500 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 31,911,537 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Transportation Ex Air / Rail — 0.5% |
|
CEVA Group, PLC, Sr. Notes, 10.00%, 9/1/14(4) | | $ | 8,305 | | | $ | 7,806,700 | | | |
CEVA Group, PLC, Sr. Notes, 11.625%, 10/1/16(4) | | | 2,990 | | | | 3,049,800 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 10,856,500 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Utilities — 1.7% |
|
AES Corp., Sr. Notes, 8.75%, 5/15/13(4) | | $ | 1,572 | | | $ | 1,615,230 | | | |
AES Eastern Energy, Series 99-A, 9.00%, 1/2/17 | | | 2,427 | | | | 2,378,760 | | | |
Calpine Construction Finance Co., Sr. Notes, 8.00%, 6/1/16(4) | | | 11,965 | | | | 12,204,300 | | | |
Dynegy Holdings, Inc., Sr. Notes, 8.375%, 5/1/16 | | | 1,940 | | | | 1,818,750 | | | |
Edison Mission Energy, Sr. Notes, 7.00%, 5/15/17 | | | 3,715 | | | | 3,018,437 | | | |
Edison Mission Energy, Sr. Notes, 7.20%, 5/15/19 | | | 2,825 | | | | 2,267,063 | | | |
NGC Corp., 7.625%, 10/15/26 | | | 7,090 | | | | 4,856,650 | | | |
NRG Energy, Inc., 7.25%, 2/1/14 | | | 1,100 | | | | 1,094,500 | | | |
NRG Energy, Inc., Sr. Notes, 7.375%, 2/1/16 | | | 11,865 | | | | 11,820,506 | | | |
Reliant Energy, Inc., Sr. Notes, 7.625%, 6/15/14 | | | 785 | | | | 769,300 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 41,843,496 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Corporate Bonds & Notes | | |
(identified cost $2,107,050,881) | | $ | 2,104,945,362 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Convertible Bonds — 0.6% |
|
| | Principal
| | | | | | |
| | Amount
| | | | | | |
Security | | (000’s omitted) | | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Cable / Satellite TV — 0.2% |
|
Virgin Media, Inc., 6.50%, 11/15/16(4) | | $ | 3,955 | | | $ | 4,202,188 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 4,202,188 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Health Care — 0.2% |
|
LifePoint Hospitals, Inc., 3.25%, 8/15/25 | | $ | 6,100 | | | $ | 5,490,000 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 5,490,000 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Technology — 0.2% |
|
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., 6.00%, 5/1/15 | | $ | 4,660 | | | $ | 3,413,450 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 3,413,450 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Convertible Bonds | | |
(identified cost $10,050,658) | | $ | 13,105,638 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Common Stocks — 0.1% |
|
Security | | Shares | | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Consumer Products — 0.0% |
|
HF Holdings, Inc.(5)(6) | | | 3,400 | | | $ | 0 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 0 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Gaming — 0.0% |
|
Fontainebleau Equity Holdings, Class A(5)(7) | | | 301,724 | | | $ | 3,017 | | | |
Shreveport Gaming Holdings, Inc.(5) | | | 3,597 | | | | 64,746 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 67,763 | | | |
|
|
|
See notes to financial statements25
Boston Income Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Security | | Shares | | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Super Retail — 0.1% |
|
GNC Acquisition Holdings, Class A(5)(6)(7) | | | 204,221 | | | $ | 2,403,681 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,403,681 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Common Stocks | | |
(identified cost $4,829,586) | | $ | 2,471,444 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Convertible Preferred Stocks — 0.5% |
|
Security | | Shares | | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Energy — 0.3% |
|
Chesapeake Energy Corp., 4.50% | | | 80,133 | | | $ | 6,090,108 | | | |
Chesapeake Energy Corp., 5.00%(4) | | | 9,586 | | | | 800,431 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 6,890,539 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Telecommunications — 0.2% |
|
Crown Castle International Corp., (PIK), 6.25% | | | 85,673 | | | $ | 4,647,760 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 4,647,760 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Convertible Preferred Stocks | | |
(identified cost $12,778,160) | | $ | 11,538,299 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Preferred Stocks — 0.0% |
|
Security | | Shares/Units | | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Gaming — 0.0% |
|
Fontainebleau Resorts LLC (PIK)(5)(7) | | | 9,234 | | | $ | 92 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 92 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Super Retail — 0.0% |
|
GNC Acquisition Holdings(5)(6)(7) | | | 69,779 | | | $ | 422,163 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 422,163 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Preferred Stocks | | |
(identified cost $9,582,685) | | $ | 422,255 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Miscellaneous — 0.1% |
|
Security | | Shares | | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Cable / Satellite TV — 0.1% |
|
Adelphia, Inc., Escrow Certificate(6) | | | 10,260,000 | | | $ | 359,100 | | | |
Adelphia, Inc., Escrow Certificate(6) | | | 5,085,000 | | | | 177,975 | | | |
Adelphia Recovery Trust(6) | | | 14,818,854 | | | | 426,042 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 963,117 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Energy — 0.0% |
|
VeraSun Energy Corp., Escrow Certificate(5)(6) | | | 1,900,000 | | | $ | 0 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 0 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Utilities — 0.0% |
|
Mirant Corp., Escrow Certificate(5)(6)(7) | | | 4,900,000 | | | $ | 490 | | | |
Mirant Corp., Escrow Certificate(5)(6)(7) | | | 2,205,000 | | | | 221 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 711 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Miscellaneous | | |
(identified cost $13,802,587) | | $ | 963,828 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Warrants — 0.0% |
|
Security | | Shares | | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Gaming — 0.0% |
|
Peninsula Gaming LLC, Convertible Preferred Membership Interests(5)(6)(7) | | | 6,338 | | | $ | 616,668 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 616,668 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Warrants (identified cost $0) | | $ | 616,668 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
See notes to financial statements26
Boston Income Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Short-Term Investments — 0.9% |
|
| | Interest
| | | | | | |
Description | | (000’s Omitted) | | | Value | | | |
|
|
Cash Management Portfolio, 0.00%(8) | | $ | 22,256 | | | $ | 22,255,974 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Short-Term Investments | | |
(identified cost $22,255,974) | | $ | 22,255,974 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Investments — 97.7 % | | |
(identified cost $2,366,576,086) | | $ | 2,341,742,222 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Other Assets, Less Liabilities — 2.3% | | $ | 55,143,539 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net Assets — 100.0% | | $ | 2,396,885,761 | | | |
|
|
The percentage shown for each investment category in the Portfolio of Investments is based on net assets.
DIP - Debtor in Possession
PIK - Payment In Kind
| | |
(1) | | Senior floating-rate interests (Senior Loans) often require prepayments from excess cash flows or permit the borrowers to repay at their election. The degree to which borrowers repay, whether as a contractual requirement or at their election, cannot be predicted with accuracy. As a result, the actual remaining maturity may be substantially less than the stated maturities shown. However, Senior Loans will have an expected average life of approximately two to four years. The stated interest rate represents the weighted average interest rate of all contracts within the senior loan facility and includes commitment fees on unfunded loan commitments, if any. Senior Loans typically have rates of interest which are redetermined either daily, monthly, quarterly or semi-annually by reference to a base lending rate, plus a premium. These base rates are primarily the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) and secondarily, the prime rate offered by one or more major United States banks (the “Prime Rate”) and the certificate of deposit (“CD”) rate or other base lending rates used by commercial lenders. |
|
(2) | | This Senior Loan will settle after October 31, 2009, at which time the interest rate will be determined. |
|
(3) | | Defaulted security. Currently the issuer is in default with respect to interest and/or principal payments. |
|
(4) | | Security exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. These securities may be sold in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. At October 31, 2009, the aggregate value of these securities is $792,585,424 or 33.1% of the Portfolio’s net assets. |
|
(5) | | Security valued at fair value using methods determined in good faith by or at the direction of the Trustees. |
|
(6) | | Non-income producing security. |
|
(7) | | Restricted security (see Note 5). |
|
(8) | | Affiliated investment company available to Eaton Vance portfolios and funds which invests in high quality, U.S. dollar denominated money market instruments. The rate shown is the annualized seven-day yield as of October 31, 2009. |
| | |
(9) | | Defaulted matured security. |
See notes to financial statements27
Boston Income Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Statement of Assets and Liabilities
| | | | | | |
As of October 31, 2009 | | | | | |
|
Assets |
|
Unaffiliated investments, at value (identified cost, $2,344,320,112) | | $ | 2,319,486,248 | | | |
Affiliated investment, at value (identified cost, $22,255,974) | | | 22,255,974 | | | |
Cash | | | 3,275,360 | | | |
Restricted cash* | | | 66,000 | | | |
Interest and dividends receivable | | | 57,412,823 | | | |
Receivable for investments sold | | | 34,115,369 | | | |
Receivable for open swap contracts | | | 1,654,115 | | | |
|
|
Total assets | | $ | 2,438,265,889 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Liabilities |
|
Payable for investments purchased | | $ | 38,553,686 | | | |
Premium received on swap contracts | | | 1,388,595 | | | |
Payable to affiliates: | | | | | | |
Investment adviser fee | | | 1,205,347 | | | |
Trustees’ fees | | | 4,208 | | | |
Accrued expenses | | | 228,292 | | | |
|
|
Total liabilities | | $ | 41,380,128 | | | |
|
|
Net Assets applicable to investors’ interest in Portfolio | | $ | 2,396,885,761 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Sources of Net Assets |
|
Net proceeds from capital contributions and withdrawals | | $ | 2,420,065,510 | | | |
Net unrealized depreciation | | | (23,179,749 | ) | | |
|
|
Total | | $ | 2,396,885,761 | | | |
|
|
| |
* | Represents restricted cash on deposit at the custodian as collateral for open swap contracts. |
| | | | | | |
For the Year Ended
| | | | | |
October 31, 2009 | | | | | |
|
Investment Income |
|
Interest and other income | | $ | 213,515,155 | | | |
Dividends | | | 762,055 | | | |
Interest income allocated from affiliated investment | | | 963,915 | | | |
Expenses allocated from affiliated investment | | | (557,132 | ) | | |
|
|
Total investment income | | $ | 214,683,993 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Expenses |
|
Investment adviser fee | | $ | 11,344,093 | | | |
Trustees’ fees and expenses | | | 50,191 | | | |
Custodian fee | | | 386,902 | | | |
Legal and accounting services | | | 139,392 | | | |
Miscellaneous | | | 97,783 | | | |
|
|
Total expenses | | $ | 12,018,361 | | | |
|
|
Deduct — | | | | | | |
Reduction of custodian fee | | $ | 62 | | | |
|
|
Total expense reductions | | $ | 62 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net expenses | | $ | 12,018,299 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 202,665,694 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) |
|
Net realized gain (loss) — | | | | | | |
Investment transactions | | $ | (51,394,320 | ) | | |
Swap contracts | | | (20,762,617 | ) | | |
|
|
Net realized loss | | $ | (72,156,937 | ) | | |
|
|
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) — | | | | | | |
Investments | | $ | 577,067,937 | | | |
Swap contracts | | | 10,539,471 | | | |
|
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | $ | 587,607,408 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain | | $ | 515,450,471 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net increase in net assets from operations | | $ | 718,116,165 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements28
Boston Income Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
| | | | | | | | | | |
Increase (Decrease)
| | Year Ended
| | | Year Ended
| | | |
in Net Assets | | October 31, 2009 | | | October 31, 2008 | | | |
|
From operations — | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 202,665,694 | | | $ | 167,638,115 | | | |
Net realized loss from investment transactions and swap contracts | | | (72,156,937 | ) | | | (94,577,450 | ) | | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from investments and swap contracts | | | 587,607,408 | | | | (597,303,339 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from operations | | $ | 718,116,165 | | | $ | (524,242,674 | ) | | |
|
|
Capital transactions — | | | | | | | | | | |
Contributions | | $ | 918,981,224 | | | $ | 700,585,865 | | | |
Withdrawals | | | (771,550,984 | ) | | | (683,481,633 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase in net assets from capital transactions | | $ | 147,430,240 | | | $ | 17,104,232 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets | | $ | 865,546,405 | | | $ | (507,138,442 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Net Assets |
|
At beginning of year | | $ | 1,531,339,356 | | | $ | 2,038,477,798 | | | |
|
|
At end of year | | $ | 2,396,885,761 | | | $ | 1,531,339,356 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements29
Boston Income Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Supplementary Data
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
| | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | |
|
|
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses(1) | | | 0.65 | % | | | 0.65 | % | | | 0.62 | % | | | 0.66 | %(2) | | | 0.65 | %(2) | | |
Net investment income | | | 10.52 | % | | | 8.92 | % | | | 7.91 | % | | | 7.85 | % | | | 7.71 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover | | | 74 | % | | | 54 | % | | | 84 | % | | | 68 | % | | | 71 | % | | |
|
|
Total Return | | | 40.41 | % | | | (25.45 | )% | | | 6.65 | % | | | 11.10 | % | | | 5.80 | % | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net assets, end of year (000’s omitted) | | $ | 2,396,886 | | | $ | 1,531,339 | | | $ | 2,038,478 | | | $ | 1,874,813 | | | $ | 1,686,172 | | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Excludes the effect of custody fee credits, if any, of less than 0.005%. |
|
(2) | | The investment adviser waived a portion of its investment adviser fee (equal to less than 0.01% of average daily net assets for the years ended October 31, 2006 and 2005). |
See notes to financial statements30
Boston Income Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1 Significant Accounting Policies
Boston Income Portfolio (the Portfolio) is a New York trust registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act), as a diversified, open-end management investment company. The Portfolio’s investment objective is to provide as much current income as possible. The Portfolio also seeks reasonable preservation of capital to the extent attainable from such investments, and growth of income and capital as secondary objectives. The Declaration of Trust permits the Trustees to issue interests in the Portfolio. At October 31, 2009, Eaton Vance Income Fund of Boston, Eaton Vance Diversified Income Fund, Eaton Vance Strategic Income Fund and Eaton Vance Medallion Strategic Income Fund held an interest of 89.5%, 2.4%, 7.2% and 0.8%, respectively, in the Portfolio.
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies of the Portfolio. The policies are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. A source of authoritative accounting principles applied in the preparation of the Portfolio’s financial statements is the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (the Codification), which superseded existing non-Securities and Exchange Commission accounting and reporting standards for interim and annual reporting periods ending after September 15, 2009. The adoption of the Codification for the current reporting period did not impact the Portfolio’s application of generally accepted accounting principles.
A Investment Valuation — Debt obligations (including short-term obligations with a remaining maturity of more than sixty days) will normally be valued on the basis of quotations provided by third party pricing services. The pricing services will use various techniques that consider factors including, but not limited to, reported trades or dealer quotations, prices or yields of securities with similar characteristics, benchmark yields, broker/dealer quotes, issuer spreads, as well as industry and economic events. Short-term debt securities with a remaining maturity of sixty days or less are generally valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value. Interests in senior floating-rate loans (Senior Loans) for which reliable market quotations are readily available are valued generally at the average mean of bid and ask quotations obtained from a third party pricing service. Other Senior Loans are valued at fair value by the investment adviser under procedures approved by the Trustees. In fair valuing a Senior Loan, the investment adviser utilizes one or more of the valuation techniques described in (i) through (iii) below to assess the likelihood that the borrower will make a full repayment of the loan underlying such Senior Loan relative to yields on other Senior Loans issued by companies of comparable credit quality. If the investment adviser believes that there is a reasonable likelihood of full repayment, the investment
adviser will determine fair value using a matrix pricing approach that considers the yield on the Senior Loan. If the investment adviser believes there is not a reasonable likelihood of full repayment, the investment adviser will determine fair value using analyses that include, but are not limited to: (i) a comparison of the value of the borrower’s outstanding equity and debt to that of comparable public companies; (ii) a discounted cash flow analysis; or (iii) when the investment adviser believes it is likely that a borrower will be liquidated or sold, an analysis of the terms of such liquidation or sale. In certain cases, the investment adviser will use a combination of analytical methods to determine fair value, such as when only a portion of a borrower’s assets are likely to be sold. In conducting its assessment and analyses for purposes of determining fair value of a Senior Loan, the investment adviser will use its discretion and judgment in considering and appraising relevant factors. Fair value determinations are made by the portfolio managers of the Portfolio based on information available to such managers. The portfolio managers of other funds managed by the investment adviser that invest in Senior Loans may not possess the same information about a Senior Loan borrower as the portfolio managers of the Portfolio. At times, the fair value of a Senior Loan determined by the portfolio managers of other funds managed by the investment adviser that invest in Senior Loans may vary from the fair value of the same Senior Loan determined by the portfolio managers of the Portfolio. The fair value of each Senior Loan is periodically reviewed and approved by the investment adviser’s Valuation Committee and by the Trustees based upon procedures approved by the Trustees. Junior Loans are valued in the same manner as Senior Loans. Equity securities (including common shares of closed-end investment companies) listed on a U.S. securities exchange generally are valued at the last sale price on the day of valuation or, if no sales took place on such date, at the mean between the closing bid and asked prices therefore on the exchange where such securities are principally traded. Equity securities listed on the NASDAQ Global or Global Select Market generally are valued at the NASDAQ official closing price. Unlisted or listed securities for which closing sales prices or closing quotations are not available are valued at the mean between the latest available bid and asked prices or, in the case of preferred equity securities that are not listed or traded in the over-the-counter market, by a third party pricing service that will use various techniques that consider factors including, but not limited to, prices or yields of securities with similar characteristics, benchmark yields, broker/dealer quotes, quotes of underlying common stock, issuer spreads, as well as industry and economic events. Credit default swaps are normally valued using valuations provided by a third party pricing service. The pricing services employ electronic data processing techniques to determine the present value based on credit spread quotations obtained from broker/dealers and expected default recovery rates determined by the pricing service using proprietary
31
Boston Income Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
models. Investments for which valuations or market quotations are not readily available or are deemed unreliable are valued at fair value using methods determined in good faith by or at the direction of the Trustees of the Portfolio in a manner that most fairly reflects the security’s value, or the amount that the Portfolio might reasonably expect to receive for the security upon its current sale in the ordinary course. Each such determination is based on a consideration of all relevant factors, which are likely to vary from one pricing context to another. These factors may include, but are not limited to, the type of security, the existence of any contractual restrictions on the security’s disposition, the price and extent of public trading in similar securities of the issuer or of comparable companies or entities, quotations or relevant information obtained from broker-dealers or other market participants, information obtained from the issuer, analysts, and/or the appropriate stock exchange (for exchange-traded securities), an analysis of the company’s or entity’s financial condition, and an evaluation of the forces that influence the issuer and the market(s) in which the security is purchased and sold.
The Portfolio may invest in Cash Management Portfolio (Cash Management), an affiliated investment company managed by Boston Management and Research (BMR), a subsidiary of Eaton Vance Management (EVM). Cash Management generally values its investment securities utilizing the amortized cost valuation technique permitted by Rule 2a-7 of the 1940 Act, pursuant to which Cash Management must comply with certain conditions. This technique involves initially valuing a portfolio security at its cost and thereafter assuming a constant amortization to maturity of any discount or premium. If amortized cost is determined not to approximate fair value, Cash Management may value its investment securities in the same manner as debt obligations described above.
B Investment Transactions — Investment transactions for financial statement purposes are accounted for on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses on investments sold are determined on the basis of identified cost.
C Income — Interest income is recorded on the basis of interest accrued, adjusted for amortization of premium or accretion of discount. Fees associated with loan amendments are recognized immediately. Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date for dividends received in cash and/or securities.
D Federal Taxes — The Portfolio has elected to be treated as a partnership for federal tax purposes. No provision is made by the Portfolio for federal or state taxes on any taxable income of the Portfolio because each investor in the Portfolio is ultimately responsible for the payment of any taxes on its share of taxable income. Since
at least one of the Portfolio’s investors is a regulated investment company that invests all or substantially all of its assets in the Portfolio, the Portfolio normally must satisfy the applicable source of income and diversification requirements (under the Internal Revenue Code) in order for its investors to satisfy them. The Portfolio will allocate, at least annually among its investors, each investor’s distributive share of the Portfolio’s net investment income, net realized capital gains and any other items of income, gain, loss, deduction or credit.
As of October 31, 2009, the Portfolio had no uncertain tax positions that would require financial statement recognition, de-recognition, or disclosure. Each of the Portfolio’s federal tax returns filed in the 3-year period ended October 31, 2009 remains subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service.
E Expense Reduction — State Street Bank and Trust Company (SSBT) serves as custodian of the Portfolio. Pursuant to the custodian agreement, SSBT receives a fee reduced by credits, which are determined based on the average daily cash balance the Portfolio maintains with SSBT. All credit balances, if any, used to reduce the Portfolio’s custodian fees are reported as a reduction of expenses in the Statement of Operations.
F Use of Estimates — The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expense during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
G Indemnifications — Under the Portfolio’s organizational documents, its officers and Trustees may be indemnified against certain liabilities and expenses arising out of the performance of their duties to the Portfolio. Interestholders in the Portfolio are jointly and severally liable for the liabilities and obligations of the Portfolio in the event that the Portfolio fails to satisfy such liabilities and obligations; provided, however, that, to the extent assets are available in the Portfolio, the Portfolio may, under certain circumstances, indemnify interestholders from and against any claim or liability to which such holder may become subject by reason of being or having been an interestholder in the Portfolio. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the Portfolio enters into agreements with service providers that may contain indemnification clauses. The Portfolio’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Portfolio that have not yet occurred.
32
Boston Income Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
H Credit Default Swaps — When the Portfolio is the buyer of a credit default swap contract, the Portfolio is entitled to receive the par (or other agreed-upon) value of a referenced debt obligation (or basket of debt obligations) from the counterparty to the contract if a credit event by a third party, such as a U.S. or foreign corporate issuer, on the debt obligation occurs. In return, the Portfolio pays the counterparty a periodic stream of payments over the term of the contract provided that no credit event has occurred. If no credit event occurs, the Portfolio would have spent the stream of payments and received no benefits from the contract. When the Portfolio is the seller of a credit default swap contract, it receives the stream of payments, but is obligated to pay to the buyer of the protection an amount up to the notional amount of the swap and in certain instances take delivery of securities of the reference entity upon the occurrence of a credit event, as defined under the terms of that particular swap agreement. Credit events are contract specific but may include bankruptcy, failure to pay, restructuring, obligation acceleration and repudiation/moratorium. If the Portfolio is the seller of protection and a credit event occurs, the maximum potential amount of future payments that the Portfolio could be required to make would be an amount equal to the notional amount of the agreement. This potential amount would be partially offset by any recovery value of the respective referenced obligation, or net amount received from the settlement of a buy protection credit default swap agreement entered into by the Portfolio for the same referenced obligation.
As the seller, the Portfolio effectively adds leverage to its portfolio because, in addition to its total net assets, the Portfolio is subject to investment exposure on the notional amount of the swap. The interest fee paid or received on the swap contract, which is based on a specified interest rate on a fixed notional amount, is accrued daily as a component of unrealized appreciation (depreciation) and is recorded as realized gain upon receipt or realized loss upon payment. The Portfolio also records an increase or decrease to unrealized appreciation (depreciation) in an amount equal to the daily valuation. Upfront payments or receipts, if any, are recorded as other assets or other liabilities, respectively, and amortized over the life of the swap contract as realized gains or losses. The Portfolio segregates assets in the form of cash or liquid securities in an amount equal to the notional amount of the credit default swaps of which it is the seller. The Portfolio segregates assets in the form of cash or liquid securities in an amount equal to any unrealized depreciation of the credit default swaps of which it is the buyer, marked to market on a daily basis. These transactions involve certain risks, including the risk that the seller may be unable to fulfill the transaction.
2 Investment Adviser Fee and Other Transactions with Affiliates
The investment adviser fee is earned by BMR as compensation for investment advisory services rendered to the Portfolio. Pursuant to the investment advisory agreement and subsequent fee reduction agreements between the Portfolio and BMR, the fee is computed at an annual rate of 0.625% of the Portfolio’s average daily net assets up to $1.5 billion, 0.60% from $1.5 billion up to $2 billion, 0.575% from $2 billion up to $5 billion, and 0.555% of average daily net assets of $5 billion or more, and is payable monthly. The fee reduction cannot be terminated without the consent of the Trustees and shareholders. The portion of the adviser fee payable by Cash Management on the Portfolio’s investment of cash therein is credited against the Portfolio’s investment adviser fee. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the Portfolio’s investment adviser fee totaled $11,874,582 of which $530,489 was allocated from Cash Management and $11,344,093 was paid or accrued directly by the Portfolio. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the Portfolio’s investment adviser fee, including the portion allocated from Cash Management, was 0.62% of the Portfolio’s average daily net assets.
Except for Trustees of the Portfolio who are not members of EVM’s or BMR’s organizations, officers and Trustees receive remuneration for their services to the Portfolio out of the investment adviser fee. Trustees of the Portfolio who are not affiliated with the investment adviser may elect to defer receipt of all or a percentage of their annual fees in accordance with the terms of the Trustees Deferred Compensation Plan. For the year ended October 31, 2009, no significant amounts have been deferred. Certain officers and Trustees of the Portfolio are officers of the above organizations.
3 Purchases and Sales of Investments
Purchases and sales of investments, other than short-term obligations and including maturities and principal repayments on Senior Loans, aggregated $1,684,209,945 and $1,325,657,121, respectively, for the year ended October 31, 2009.
4 Federal Income Tax Basis of Investments
The cost and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments of the Portfolio at October 31, 2009, as determined on a federal income tax basis, were as follows:
| | | | | | |
Aggregate cost | | $ | 2,381,197,454 | | | |
|
|
Gross unrealized appreciation | | $ | 198,310,963 | | | |
Gross unrealized depreciation | | | (237,766,195 | ) | | |
|
|
Net unrealized depreciation | | $ | (39,455,232 | ) | | |
|
|
33
Boston Income Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
5 Restricted Securities
At October 31, 2009, the Portfolio owned the following securities (representing 0.1% of net assets) which were restricted as to public resale and not registered under the Securities Act of 1933 (excluding Rule 144A securities). The Portfolio has various registration rights (exercisable under a variety of circumstances) with respect to these securities. The value of these securities is determined based on valuations provided by brokers when available, or if not available, they are valued at fair value using methods determined in good faith by or at the direction of the Trustees.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Date of
| | | Shares/
| | | | | | | | | |
Description | | Acquisition | | | Units | | | Cost | | | Value | | | |
|
Stocks, Miscellaneous and Warrants |
|
GNC Acquisition Holdings, Class A | | | 3/15/07 | | | | 204,221 | | | $ | 1,021,105 | | | $ | 2,403,681 | | | |
GNC Acquisition Holdings, Preferred | | | 3/15/07 | | | | 69,779 | | | | 348,895 | | | | 422,163 | | | |
Fontainebleau Equity Holdings, Class A | | | 6/1/07 | | | | 301,724 | | | | 3,620,688 | | | | 3,017 | | | |
Fontainebleau Resorts LLC (PIK), Preferred | | | 6/1/07 | | | | 9,234 | | | | 9,233,790 | | | | 92 | | | |
Mirant Corp., Escrow Certificate | | | 1/5/06 | | | | 2,205,000 | | | | 0 | (1) | | | 221 | | | |
Mirant Corp., Escrow Certificate | | | 1/5/06 | | | | 4,900,000 | | | | 0 | (1) | | | 490 | | | |
Peninsula Gaming LLC, Convertible Preferred Membership Interests | | | 7/8/99 | | | | 6,338 | | | | 0 | (1) | | | 616,668 | | | |
|
|
Total Restricted Securities | | | | | | | | | | $ | 14,224,478 | | | $ | 3,446,332 | | | |
|
|
6 Financial Instruments
The Portfolio may trade in financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of its investing activities. These financial instruments may include swap contracts and may involve, to a varying degree, elements of risk in excess of the amounts recognized for financial statement purposes. The notional or contractual amounts of these instruments represent the investment the Portfolio has in particular classes of financial instruments and does not necessarily represent the amounts potentially subject to risk. The measurement of the risks associated with these instruments is meaningful only when all related and offsetting transactions are considered.
A summary of obligations under these financial instruments at October 31, 2009 is as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Credit Default Swaps — Sell Protection |
|
| | | | | | Notional
| | | Receive
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Amount**
| | | Annual
| | | | | Net
| | | |
| | Reference
| | Credit
| | (000’s
| | | Fixed
| | | Termination
| | Unrealized
| | | |
Counterparty | | Entity | | Rating* | | omitted) | | | Rate | | | Date | | Appreciation | | | |
|
Bank of America | | First Data Corp. | | Caa1/B- | | $ | 3,475 | | | | 3.20 | % | | 12/20/09 | | $ | 8,670 | | | |
Bank of America | | Ford Motor Credit Co. | | Caa1/CCC+ | | | 6,800 | | | | 5.00 | (1) | | 3/20/10 | | | 375,633 | | | |
Citigroup, Inc. | | First Data Corp. | | Caa1/B- | | | 6,950 | | | | 3.20 | | | 12/20/09 | | | 17,340 | | | |
Citigroup, Inc. | | First Data Corp. | | Caa1/B- | | | 6,950 | | | | 3.55 | | | 12/20/09 | | | 23,540 | | | |
Citigroup, Inc. | | First Data Corp. | | Caa1/B- | | | 10,440 | | | | 5.00 | (1) | | 12/20/10 | | | 1,228,932 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 1,654,115 | | | |
|
|
| | |
* | | Credit ratings are those of Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. and Standard & Poor’s Corp. The credit ratings of the reference debt obligation (together with the unrealized appreciation or depreciation on the swap) are a representative measure of the current payment/performance risk of the credit default swap. A lower credit rating increases the probability of the occurrence of a credit event. |
|
** | | If the Portfolio is the seller of credit protection, the notional amount is the maximum potential amount of future payments the Portfolio could be required to make if a credit event, as defined in the credit default swap agreement, were to occur. At October 31, 2009, such maximum potential amount for all open credit default swaps in which the Portfolio is the seller was $34,615,000. |
|
(1) | | Upfront payment is exchanged with the counterparty as a result of the standardized trading coupon. |
At October 31, 2009, the Portfolio had sufficient cash and/or securities to cover commitments under these contracts.
The Portfolio adopted FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 161 (FAS 161), “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”, (currently FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 815-10), effective May 1, 2009. Such standard requires enhanced disclosures about an entity’s derivative and hedging activities, including qualitative disclosures about the objectives and strategies for using derivatives, quantitative disclosures about fair value amounts of and gains and losses on derivative instruments, and disclosures about credit-risk related contingent features in derivative instruments. The disclosure below includes additional information as a result of implementing FAS 161.
The Portfolio is subject to credit risk in the normal course of pursuing its investment objectives. The Portfolio may enter into credit default swap contracts to manage its credit risk, to gain exposure to a credit in which it may otherwise invest, or to enhance return.
The Portfolio enters into swap contracts that may contain provisions whereby the counterparty may terminate the contract under certain conditions, including but not limited to a decline in the Portfolio’s net assets below a certain level over a certain period of time, which would trigger a payment by the Portfolio for those swaps in a
34
Boston Income Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
liability position. At October 31, 2009, the Portfolio held no derivatives with credit-related contingent features in a net liability position.
The non-exchange traded derivatives in which the Portfolio invests, including swap contracts, are subject to the risk that the counterparty to the contract fails to perform its obligations under the contract. At October 31, 2009, the maximum amount of loss the Portfolio would incur due to counterparty risk was $1,654,115, representing the fair value of such derivatives in an asset position. Such amount would be reduced by any unamortized upfront payments received by the Portfolio.
The fair value of derivative instruments (not considered to be hedging instruments for accounting disclosure purposes) and whose primary underlying risk exposure is credit risk at October 31, 2009 was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fair Value |
| | |
Derivative | | Asset Derivative(1) | | | Liability Derivative | | | |
|
Credit default swap contracts | | $ | 1,654,115 | | | $ | — | | | |
| | |
(1) | | Statement of Assets and Liabilities location: Receivable for open swap contracts; Net unrealized depreciation. |
The effect of derivative instruments (not considered to be hedging instruments for accounting disclosure purposes) on the Statement of Operations and whose primary underlying risk exposure is credit risk for the six months ended October 31, 2009 was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Change in
| | | |
| | | | | Unrealized
| | | |
| | Realized Gain
| | | Appreciation
| | | |
| | (Loss) on
| | | (Depreciation) on
| | | |
| | Derivatives
| | | Derivatives
| | | |
| | Recognized in
| | | Recognized in
| | | |
Derivative | | Income(1) | | | Income(2) | | | |
|
Credit default swap contracts | | $ | 1,653,457 | | | $ | 1,345,953 | | | |
| | |
(1) | | Statement of Operations location: Net Realized gain (loss) – Swap contracts. |
|
(2) | | Statement of Operations location: Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) – Swap contracts. |
The average notional amount of credit default swap contracts outstanding during the six months ended October 31, 2009, which is indicative of the volume of this derivative type, was $34,615,000.
7 Line of Credit
The Portfolio participates with other portfolios and funds managed by EVM and its affiliates in a $450 million unsecured line of credit agreement with a group of banks. Borrowings are made by the Portfolio solely to facilitate the handling of unusual and/or unanticipated short-term cash requirements. Interest is charged to the Portfolio
based on its borrowings at an amount above either the Eurodollar rate or Federal Funds rate. In addition, a fee computed at an annual rate of 0.10% on the daily unused portion of the line of credit is allocated among the participating portfolios and funds at the end of each quarter. The Portfolio did not have any significant borrowings or allocated fees during the year ended October 31, 2009.
8 Concentration of Credit Risk
The Portfolio regularly invests in lower rated and comparable quality unrated high yield securities. These investments have different risks than investments in debt securities rated investment grade and held by the Portfolio. Risk of loss upon default by the borrower is significantly greater with respect to such debt than with other debt securities because these securities are generally unsecured and are more sensitive to adverse economic conditions, such as recession or increasing interest rates, than are investment grade issuers.
9 Fair Value Measurements
The Portfolio adopted FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157 (FAS 157), “Fair Value Measurements”, (currently FASB ASC 820-10), effective November 1, 2008. Such standard established a three-tier hierarchy to prioritize the assumptions, referred to as inputs, used in valuation techniques to measure fair value. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad levels listed below.
| | |
| • | Level 1 – quoted prices in active markets for identical investments |
|
| • | Level 2 – other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar investments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.) |
|
| • | Level 3 – significant unobservable inputs (including a fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments) |
The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
At October 31, 2009, the inputs used in valuing the Portfolio’s investments, which are carried at value, were as follows:
35
Boston Income Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Quoted
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Prices in
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Active
| | | Significant
| | | | | | | | | |
| | Markets for
| | | Other
| | | Significant
| | | | | | |
| | Identical
| | | Observable
| | | Unobservable
| | | | | | |
| | Assets | | | Inputs | | | Inputs | | | | | | |
| | |
Asset Description | | (Level 1) | | | (Level 2) | | | (Level 3) | | | Total | | | |
|
Senior Floating-Rate Interests | | $ | — | | | $ | 185,422,754 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 185,422,754 | | | |
Corporate Bonds & Notes | | | — | | | | 2,104,488,789 | | | | 456,573 | | | | 2,104,945,362 | | | |
Convertible Bonds | | | — | | | | 13,105,638 | | | | — | | | | 13,105,638 | | | |
Common Stocks | | | — | | | | — | | | | 2,471,444 | | | | 2,471,444 | | | |
Convertible Preferred Stocks | | | 6,090,108 | | | | 5,448,191 | | | | — | | | | 11,538,299 | | | |
Preferred Stocks | | | — | | | | — | | | | 422,255 | | | | 422,255 | | | |
Miscellaneous | | | — | | | | 963,117 | | | | 711 | | | | 963,828 | | | |
Warrants | | | — | | | | — | | | | 616,668 | | | | 616,668 | | | |
Short-Term Investments | | | 22,255,974 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 22,255,974 | | | |
|
|
Total Investments | | $ | 28,346,082 | | | $ | 2,309,428,489 | | | $ | 3,967,651 | | | $ | 2,341,742,222 | | | |
|
|
Credit Default Swaps | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,654,115 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,654,115 | | | |
|
|
Total | | $ | 28,346,082 | | | $ | 2,311,082,604 | | | $ | 3,967,651 | | | $ | 2,343,396,337 | | | |
|
|
The following is a reconciliation of Level 3 assets for which significant unobservable inputs were used to determine fair value:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Investments
| | | Investments
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | in Senior
| | | in Corporate
| | | Investments
| | | Investments
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Floating-Rate
| | | Bonds &
| | | in Common
| | | in Preferred
| | | Investments in
| | | Investments
| | | | | | |
| | Interests | | | Notes | | | Stocks | | | Stocks | | | Miscellaneous | | | in Warrants | | | Total | | | |
|
Balance as of October 31, 2008 | | $ | 93,402 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 3,491,584 | | | $ | 2,371,760 | | | $ | 711 | | | $ | 616,668 | | | $ | 6,574,125 | | | |
Realized gains (losses) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | |
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation)* | | | — | | | | (3,744,466 | ) | | | (1,202,753 | ) | | | (3,018,215 | ) | | | (2,112 | ) | | | 182,579 | | | | (7,784,967 | ) | | |
Net purchases (sales) | | | (93,402 | ) | | | — | | | | 182,613 | | | | 1,068,710 | | | | 2,112 | | | | (182,579 | ) | | | 977,454 | | | |
Accrued discount (premium) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | |
Net transfers to (from) Level 3 | | | — | | | | 4,201,039 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 4,201,039 | | | |
|
|
Balance as of October 31, 2009 | | $ | — | | | $ | 456,573 | | | $ | 2,471,444 | | | $ | 422,255 | | | $ | 711 | | | $ | 616,668 | | | $ | 3,967,651 | | | |
|
|
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments still held as of October 31, 2009* | | $ | — | | | $ | (3,744,466 | ) | | $ | (1,202,753 | ) | | $ | (3,018,215 | ) | | $ | (2,112 | ) | | $ | — | | | $ | (7,967,546 | ) | | |
|
|
| | |
* | | Amount is included in the related amount on investments in the Statement of Operations. |
10 Review for Subsequent Events
In connection with the preparation of the financial statements of the Portfolio as of and for the year ended October 31, 2009, events and transactions subsequent to October 31, 2009 through December 23, 2009, the date the financial statements were issued, have been evaluated by the Portfolio’s management for possible adjustment and/or disclosure. Management has not identified any subsequent events requiring financial statement disclosure as of the date these financial statements were issued.
36
Boston Income Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Trustees and the Investors of
Boston Income Portfolio:
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of Boston Income Portfolio (the “Portfolio”), including the portfolio of investments, as of October 31, 2009, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the supplementary data for each of the three years in the period then ended. These financial statements and supplementary data are the responsibility of the Portfolio’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and supplementary data based on our audits. The supplementary data for the year ended October 31, 2006, and all prior periods presented, were audited by other auditors. Those auditors expressed an unqualified opinion on that supplementary data in their report dated December 27, 2006.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and supplementary data are free of material misstatement. The Portfolio is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Portfolio’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures included confirmation of securities and senior loans owned as of October 31, 2009, by correspondence with the custodian, brokers, and selling or agent banks; where replies were not received from brokers and selling or agent banks, we performed other auditing procedures. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and supplementary data referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Boston Income Portfolio as of October 31, 2009, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the supplementary data for each of the three years in the period then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
December 23, 2009
37
Eaton Vance Income Fund of Boston
BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ ANNUAL APPROVAL OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT
Overview of the Contract Review Process
The Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), provides, in substance, that each investment advisory agreement between a fund and its investment adviser will continue in effect from year to year only if its continuance is approved at least annually by the fund’s board of trustees, including by a vote of a majority of the trustees who are not “interested persons” of the fund (“Independent Trustees”), cast in person at a meeting called for the purpose of considering such approval.
At a meeting of the Boards of Trustees (each a “Board”) of the Eaton Vance group of mutual funds (the “Eaton Vance Funds”) held on April 27, 2009, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, voted to approve continuation of existing advisory and sub-advisory agreements for the Eaton Vance Funds for an additional one-year period. In voting its approval, the Board relied upon the affirmative recommendation of the Contract Review Committee of the Board (formerly the Special Committee), which is a committee comprised exclusively of Independent Trustees. Prior to making its recommendation, the Contract Review Committee reviewed information furnished for a series of meetings of the Contract Review Committee held in February, March and April 2009. Such information included, among other things, the following:
Information about Fees, Performance and Expenses
| | |
| • | An independent report comparing the advisory and related fees paid by each fund with fees paid by comparable funds; |
| • | An independent report comparing each fund’s total expense ratio and its components to comparable funds; |
| • | An independent report comparing the investment performance of each fund to the investment performance of comparable funds over various time periods; |
| • | Data regarding investment performance in comparison to relevant peer groups of funds and appropriate indices; |
| • | Comparative information concerning fees charged by each adviser for managing other mutual funds and institutional accounts using investment strategies and techniques similar to those used in managing the fund; |
| • | Profitability analyses for each adviser with respect to each fund; |
Information about Portfolio Management
| | |
| • | Descriptions of the investment management services provided to each fund, including the investment strategies and processes employed, and any changes in portfolio management processes and personnel; |
| • | Information concerning the allocation of brokerage and the benefits received by each adviser as a result of brokerage allocation, including information concerning the acquisition of research through “soft dollar” benefits received in connection with the funds’ brokerage, and the implementation of a soft dollar reimbursement program established with respect to the funds; |
| • | Data relating to portfolio turnover rates of each fund; |
| • | The procedures and processes used to determine the fair value of fund assets and actions taken to monitor and test the effectiveness of such procedures and processes; |
Information about each Adviser
| | |
| • | Reports detailing the financial results and condition of each adviser; |
| • | Descriptions of the qualifications, education and experience of the individual investment professionals whose responsibilities include portfolio management and investment research for the funds, and information relating to their compensation and responsibilities with respect to managing other mutual funds and investment accounts; |
| • | Copies of the Codes of Ethics of each adviser and its affiliates, together with information relating to compliance with and the administration of such codes; |
| • | Copies of or descriptions of each adviser’s proxy voting policies and procedures; |
| • | Information concerning the resources devoted to compliance efforts undertaken by each adviser and its affiliates on behalf of the funds (including descriptions of various compliance programs) and their record of compliance with investment policies and restrictions, including policies with respect to market-timing, late trading and selective portfolio disclosure, and with policies on personal securities transactions; |
| • | Descriptions of the business continuity and disaster recovery plans of each adviser and its affiliates; |
Other Relevant Information
| | |
| • | Information concerning the nature, cost and character of the administrative and other non-investment management services provided by Eaton Vance Management and its affiliates; |
| • | Information concerning management of the relationship with the custodian, subcustodians and fund accountants by each adviser or the funds’ administrator; and |
| • | The terms of each advisory agreement. |
38
Eaton Vance Income Fund of Boston
BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ ANNUAL APPROVAL OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT CONT’D
In addition to the information identified above, the Contract Review Committee considered information provided from time to time by each adviser throughout the year at meetings of the Board and its committees. Over the course of the twelve-month period ended April 30, 2009, the Board met eighteen times and the Contract Review Committee, the Audit Committee, the Governance Committee, the Portfolio Management Committee and the Compliance Reports and Regulatory Matters Committee, each of which is a Committee comprised solely of Independent Trustees, met seven, five, six, six and six times, respectively. At such meetings, the Trustees received, among other things, presentations by the portfolio managers and other investment professionals of each adviser relating to the investment performance of each fund and the investment strategies used in pursuing the fund’s investment objective.
For funds that invest through one or more underlying portfolios, the Board considered similar information about the portfolio(s) when considering the approval of advisory agreements. In addition, in cases where the fund’s investment adviser has engaged a sub-adviser, the Board considered similar information about the sub-adviser when considering the approval of any sub-advisory agreement.
The Contract Review Committee was assisted throughout the contract review process by Goodwin Procter LLP, legal counsel for the Independent Trustees. The members of the Contract Review Committee relied upon the advice of such counsel and their own business judgment in determining the material factors to be considered in evaluating each advisory and sub-advisory agreement and the weight to be given to each such factor. The conclusions reached with respect to each advisory and sub-advisory agreement were based on a comprehensive evaluation of all the information provided and not any single factor. Moreover, each member of the Contract Review Committee may have placed varying emphasis on particular factors in reaching conclusions with respect to each advisory and sub-advisory agreement.
Results of the Process
Based on its consideration of the foregoing, and such other information as it deemed relevant, including the factors and conclusions described below, the Contract Review Committee concluded that the continuance of the investment advisory agreement of Boston Income Portfolio, the portfolio in which Eaton Vance Income Fund of Boston (the “Fund”) invests (the “Portfolio”), with Boston Management and Research (the “Adviser”), including the fee structure, is in the interests of shareholders and, therefore, the Contract Review Committee recommended to the Board approval of the agreement. The Board accepted the recommendation of the Contract Review Committee as well as the factors considered and conclusions reached by the Contract Review Committee with respect to the agreement. Accordingly, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, voted to approve continuation of the investment advisory agreement for the Portfolio.
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services
In considering whether to approve the investment advisory agreement of the Portfolio, the Board evaluated the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Portfolio by the Adviser.
The Board considered the Adviser’s management capabilities and investment process with respect to the types of investments held by the Portfolio, including the education, experience and number of its investment professionals and other personnel who provide portfolio management, investment research, and similar services to the Portfolio. In particular, the Board evaluated the abilities and experience of such investment personnel in analyzing special considerations relevant to investing in high-yield debt. The Board also took into account the resources dedicated to portfolio management and other services, including the compensation paid to recruit and retain investment personnel, and the time and attention devoted to the Portfolio by senior management.
The Board also reviewed the compliance programs of the Adviser and relevant affiliates thereof. Among other matters, the Board considered compliance and reporting matters relating to personal trading by investment personnel, selective disclosure of portfolio holdings, late trading, frequent trading, portfolio valuation, business continuity and the allocation of investment opportunities. The Board also evaluated the responses of the Adviser and its affiliates to requests from regulatory authorities such as the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.
The Board considered shareholder and other administrative services provided or managed by Eaton Vance Management and its affiliates, including transfer agency and accounting services. The Board evaluated the benefits to shareholders of investing in a fund that is a part of a large family of funds, including the ability, in many cases, to exchange an investment among different funds without incurring additional sales charges.
The Board considered the Adviser’s recommendations for Board action and other steps taken in response to the unprecedented dislocations experienced in the capital markets over recent periods, including sustained periods of high volatility, credit disruption and government intervention. In particular, the Board considered the Adviser’s efforts and expertise with respect to each of the following matters as they relate to the Fund and/or other funds within the Eaton Vance family of funds: (i) negotiating and maintaining the
39
Eaton Vance Income Fund of Boston
BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ ANNUAL APPROVAL OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT CONT’D
availability of bank loan facilities and other sources of credit used for investment purposes or to satisfy liquidity needs; (ii) establishing the fair value of securities and other instruments held in investment portfolios during periods of market volatility and issuer-specific disruptions; and (iii) the ongoing monitoring of investment management processes and risk controls.
After consideration of the foregoing factors, among others, the Board concluded that the nature, extent and quality of services provided by the Adviser, taken as a whole, are appropriate and consistent with the terms of the investment advisory agreement.
Fund Performance
The Board compared the Fund’s investment performance to a relevant universe of similarly managed funds identified by an independent data provider and appropriate benchmark indices. The Board reviewed comparative performance data for the one-, three-, five- and ten-year periods ended September 30, 2008 for the Fund. The Board concluded that the performance of the Fund was satisfactory.
Management Fees and Expenses
The Board reviewed contractual investment advisory fee rates, including any administrative fee rates, payable by the Portfolio and the Fund (referred to as “management fees”). As part of its review, the Board considered the management fees and the Fund’s total expense ratio for the year ended September 30, 2008, as compared to a group of similarly managed funds selected by an independent data provider.
After reviewing the foregoing information, and in light of the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by the Adviser, the Board concluded that the management fees charged for advisory and related services and the Fund’s total expense ratio are reasonable.
Profitability
The Board reviewed the level of profits realized by the Adviser and relevant affiliates thereof in providing investment advisory and administrative services to the Fund, the Portfolio and to all Eaton Vance Funds as a group. The Board considered the level of profits realized without regard to revenue sharing or other payments by the Adviser and its affiliates to third parties in respect of distribution services. The Board also considered other direct or indirect benefits received by the Adviser and its affiliates in connection with its relationship with the Fund and the Portfolio.
The Board concluded that, in light of the foregoing factors and the nature, extent and quality of the services rendered, the profits realized by the Adviser and its affiliates are reasonable.
Economies of Scale
In reviewing management fees and profitability, the Board also considered the extent to which the Adviser and its affiliates, on the one hand, and the Fund, on the other hand, can expect to realize benefits from economies of scale as the assets of the Fund and Portfolio increase. The Board acknowledged the difficulty in accurately measuring the benefits resulting from the economies of scale with respect to the management of any specific fund or group of funds. The Board reviewed data summarizing the increases and decreases in the assets of the Fund and of all Eaton Vance Funds as a group over various time periods, and evaluated the extent to which the total expense ratio of the Fund and the profitability of the Adviser and its affiliates may have been affected by such increases or decreases. Based upon the foregoing, the Board concluded that the benefits from economies of scale are currently being shared equitably by the Adviser and its affiliates and the Fund. The Board also concluded that, assuming reasonably foreseeable increases in the assets of the Portfolio, the structure of the advisory fee, which includes breakpoints at several asset levels, can be expected to cause the Adviser and its affiliates and the Fund to continue to share such benefits equitably.
40
Eaton Vance Income Fund of Boston
MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION
Fund Management. The Trustees of Eaton Vance Series Trust II (the Trust) and Boston Income Portfolio (the Portfolio) are responsible for the overall management and supervision of the Trust’s and Portfolio’s affairs. The Trustees and officers of the Trust and the Portfolio are listed below. Except as indicated, each individual has held the office shown or other offices in the same company for the last five years. Trustees and officers of the Trust and the Portfolio hold indefinite terms of office. The “Noninterested Trustees” consist of those Trustees who are not “interested persons” of the Trust and the Portfolio, as that term is defined under the 1940 Act. The business address of each Trustee and officer is Two International Place, Boston, Massachusetts 02110. As used below, “EVC refers to Eaton Vance Corp., “EV” refers to Eaton Vance, Inc., “EVM” refers to Eaton Vance Management, “BMR” refers to Boston Management and Research, “Parametric” refers to Parametric Portfolio Associates LLC and “EVD” refers to Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc. EVC and EV are the corporate parent and trustee, respectively, of EVM and BMR. EVD is the Fund’s principal underwriter, the Portfolio’s placement agent and a wholly-owned subsidiary of EVC. Each officer affiliated with Eaton Vance may hold a position with other Eaton Vance affiliates that is comparable to his or her position with EVM listed below.
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Position(s)
| | Term of
| | | | Number of Portfolios
| | | |
| | with the
| | Office and
| | | | in Fund Complex
| | | |
Name and
| | Trust and
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
| | Overseen By
| | | |
Date of Birth | | the Portfolio | | Service | | During Past Five Years | | Trustee(1) | | | Other Directorships Held |
|
|
|
Interested Trustee |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Thomas E. Faust Jr. 5/31/58 | | Trustee | | Since 2007 | | Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of EVC, Director and President of EV, Chief Executive Officer and President of EVM and BMR, and Director of EVD. Trustee and/or officer of 176 registered investment companies and 4 private investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. Mr. Faust is an interested person because of his positions with EVM, BMR, EVD, EVC and EV, which are affiliates of the Trust and Portfolio. | | | 176 | | | Director of EVC |
|
Noninterested Trustees |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Benjamin C. Esty 1/2/63 | | Trustee | | Since 2005 | | Roy and Elizabeth Simmons Professor of Business Administration and Finance Unit Head, Harvard University Graduate School of Business Administration. | | | 176 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Allen R. Freedman 4/3/40 | | Trustee | | Since 2007 | | Former Chairman (2002- 2004) and a Director (1983-2004) of Systems & Computer Technology Corp. (provider of software to higher education). Formerly, a Director of Loring Ward International (fund distributor) (2005-2007). Formerly, Chairman and a Director of Indus International, Inc. (provider of enterprise management software to the power generating industry) (2005-2007). | | | 176 | | | Director of Assurant, Inc. (insurance provider) and Stonemor Partners, L.P. (owner and operator of cemeteries) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
William H. Park 9/19/47 | | Trustee | | Since 2003 | | Vice Chairman, Commercial Industrial Finance Corp. (specialty finance company) (since 2006). Formerly, President and Chief Executive Officer, Prizm Capital Management, LLC (investment management firm) (2002-2005). | | | 176 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ronald A. Pearlman 7/10/40 | | Trustee | | Since 2003 | | Professor of Law, Georgetown University Law Center. | | | 176 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Helen Frame Peters 3/22/48 | | Trustee | | Since 2008 | | Professor of Finance, Carroll School of Management, Boston College. Adjunct Professor of Finance, Peking University, Beijing, China (since 2005). | | | 176 | | | Director of BJ’s Wholesale Club, Inc. (wholesale club retailer) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Heidi L. Steiger 7/8/53 | | Trustee | | Since 2007 | | Managing Partner, Topridge Associates LLC (global wealth management firm) (since 2008); Senior Advisor (since 2008), President (2005-2008), Lowenhaupt Global Advisors, LLC (global wealth management firm). Formerly, President and Contributing Editor, Worth Magazine (2004-2005). Formerly, Executive Vice President and Global Head of Private Asset Management (and various other positions), Neuberger Berman (investment firm) (1986-2004). | | | 176 | | | Director of Nuclear Electric Insurance Ltd. (nuclear insurance provider), Aviva USA (insurance provider) and CIFG (family of financial guaranty companies) and Advisory Director of Berkshire Capital Securities LLC (private investment banking firm) |
41
Eaton Vance Income Fund of Boston
MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Position(s)
| | Term of
| | | | Number of Portfolios
| | | |
| | with the
| | Office and
| | | | in Fund Complex
| | | |
Name and
| | Trust and
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
| | Overseen By
| | | |
Date of Birth | | the Portfolio | | Service | | During Past Five Years | | Trustee(1) | | | Other Directorships Held |
|
|
Noninterested Trustees (continued) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Lynn A. Stout 9/14/57 | | Trustee | | Since 2001 | | Paul Hastings Professor of Corporate and Securities Law (since 2006) and Professor of Law (2001-2006), University of California at Los Angeles School of Law. | | | 176 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ralph F. Verni 1/26/43 | | Chairman of the Board and Trustee | | Chairman of the Board since 2007 and Trustee since 2005 | | Consultant and private investor. | | | 176 | | | None |
Principal Officers who are not Trustees
| | | | | | |
| | Position(s)
| | Term of
| | |
| | with the
| | Office and
| | |
Name and
| | Trust and
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
|
Date of Birth | | the Portfolio | | Service | | During Past Five Years |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Michael W. Weilheimer 2/11/61 | | President | | Since 2002 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 24 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Thomas P. Huggins 3/7/66 | | Vice President | | Vice President of the Trust since 2000 and of the Portfolio since 2001 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 4 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Thomas Seto 9/27/62 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Vice President and Director of Portfolio Management of Parametric. Officer of 32 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
David M. Stein 5/4/51 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Managing Director and Chief Investment Officer of Parametric. Officer of 32 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Barbara E. Campbell 6/19/57 | | Treasurer | | Treasurer of the Trust since 2005 and of the Portfolio since 2008 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 176 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Maureen A. Gemma 5/24/60 | | Secretary and Chief Legal Officer | | Secretary since 2007 and Chief Legal Officer since 2008 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 176 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Paul M. O’Neil 7/11/53 | | Chief Compliance Officer | | Since 2004 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 176 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | |
(1) | | Includes both master and feeder funds in a master-feeder structure. |
The SAI for the Fund includes additional information about the Trustees and officers of the Fund and the Portfolio and can be obtained on Eaton Vance’s website at www.eatonvance.com or without charge by calling 1-800-262-1122.
42
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Investment Adviser of Boston Income Portfolio
Boston Management and Research
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
Administrator of Eaton Vance Income Fund of BostonEaton Vance Management
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc.
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
(617) 482-8260
State Street Bank and Trust Company
200 Clarendon Street
Boston, MA 02116
PNC Global Investment Servicing
Attn: Eaton Vance Funds
P.O. Box 9653
Providence, RI 02940-9653
(800) 262-1122
Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmDeloitte & Touche LLP
200 Berkeley Street
Boston, MA 02116-5022
Eaton Vance Income Fund of BostonTwo International Place
Boston, MA 02110
* FINRA BrokerCheck. Investors may check the background of their Investment Professional by contacting the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). FINRA BrokerCheck is a free tool to help investors check the professional background of current and former FINRA-registered securities firms and brokers. FINRA BrokerCheck is available by calling 1-800-289-9999 and at www.FINRA.org. The FINRA BrokerCheck brochure describing the program is available to investors at www.FINRA.org.
This report must be preceded or accompanied by a current prospectus. Before investing, investors should consider carefully the Fund’s investment objective(s), risks, and charges and expenses. The Fund’s current prospectus contains this and other information about the Fund and is available through your financial advisor. Please read the prospectus carefully before you invest or send money. For further information please call 1-800-262-1122.
Item 2. Code of Ethics
The registrant has adopted a code of ethics applicable to its Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer. The registrant undertakes to provide a copy of such code of ethics to any person upon request, without charge, by calling 1-800-262-1122.
Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert
The registrant’s Board has designated William H. Park, an independent trustee, as its audit committee financial expert. Mr. Park is a certified public accountant who is the Vice Chairman of Commercial Industrial Finance Corp (specialty finance company). Previously, he served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Prizm Capital Management, LLC (investment management firm) and as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of United Asset Management Corporation (“UAM”) (a holding company owning institutional investment management firms).
Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
(a)-(d)
The following table presents the aggregate fees billed to the registrant for the registrant’s fiscal years ended October 31, 2008 and October 31, 2009 by the registrant’s principal accountant, Deloitte & Touche LLP (D&T), for professional services rendered for the audit of the registrant’s annual financial statements and fees billed for other services rendered by the principal accountant during such periods.
| | | | | | | | |
Fiscal Years Ended | | 10/31/08 | | 10/31/09 |
|
Audit Fees | | | 63,135 | | | | 63,500 | |
|
Audit-Related Fees(1) | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
|
Tax Fees(2) | | | 13,960 | | | | 14,960 | |
|
All Other Fees(3) | | | 1,750 | | | | 2,500 | |
|
Total | | $ | 78,845 | | | $ | 80,960 | |
| | |
(1) | | Audit-related fees consist of the aggregate fees billed for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit of the registrant’s financial statements and are not reported under the category of audit fees. |
|
(2) | | Tax fees consist of the aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered by the principal accountant relating to tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning and specifically include fees for tax return preparation and other related tax compliance/planning matters. |
|
(3) | | All other fees consist of the aggregate fees billed for products and services provided by the registrant’s principal accountant other than audit, audit-related, and tax services. |
For both the fiscal years ended October 31, 2008 and October 31, 2009, the registrant was billed $40,000, by D&T, for work done in connection with its Rule 17Ad-13 examination of Eaton Vance Management’s assertion that it has maintained an effective internal control structure over sub-transfer agent and registrar functions, such services being pre-approved in accordance with Rule 2-01(c)(7)(ii) of Regulation S-X.
(e)(1) The registrant’s audit committee has adopted policies and procedures relating to the pre-approval of services provided by the registrant’s principal accountant (the “Pre-Approval Policies”). The Pre-Approval Policies establish a framework intended to assist the audit committee in the proper discharge
of its pre-approval responsibilities. As a general matter, the Pre-Approval Policies (i) specify certain types of audit, audit-related, tax, and other services determined to be pre-approved by the audit committee; and (ii) delineate specific procedures governing the mechanics of the pre-approval process, including the approval and monitoring of audit and non-audit service fees. Unless a service is specifically pre-approved under the Pre-Approval Policies, it must be separately pre-approved by the Audit Committee.
The Pre-Approval Policies and the types of audit and non-audit services pre-approved therein must be reviewed and ratified by the registrant’s audit committee at least annually. The registrant’s audit committee maintains full responsibility for the appointment, compensation, and oversight of the work of the registrant’s principal accountant.
(e)(2) No services described in paragraphs (b)-(d) above were approved by the registrant’s audit committee pursuant to the “de minimis exception” set forth in Rule 2-01 (c)(7)(i)(C) of Regulation S-X.
(f) Not applicable.
(g) The following table presents (i) the aggregate non-audit fees (i.e., fees for audit-related, tax, and other services) billed to the registrant by the registrant’s principal accountant for the registrant’s fiscal year ended October 31 2008 and the fiscal year ended October 31, 2009; and (ii) the aggregate non-audit fees (i.e., fees for audit related, tax, and other services) billed to the Eaton Vance organization by the registrant’s principal accountant for the same time periods.
| | | | | | | | |
Fiscal Years Ended | | 10/31/08 | | 10/31/09 |
|
Registrant | | $ | 13,960 | | | $ | 17,460 | |
|
Eaton Vance(1) | | $ | 325,329 | | | $ | 280,861 | |
| | |
(1) | | Certain entities that provide ongoing services to the registrant are subsidiaries of Eaton Vance Corp. |
(h) The registrant’s audit committee has considered whether the provision by the registrant’s principal accountant of non-audit services to the registrant’s investment adviser and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the adviser that provides ongoing services to the registrant that were not pre-approved pursuant to Rule 2-01(c)(7)(ii) of Regulation S-X is compatible with maintaining the principal accountant’s independence.
Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed registrants
Not required in this filing.
Item 6. Schedule of Investments
Please see schedule of investments contained in the Report to Stockholders included under Item 1 of this Form N-CSR.
Item 7. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies
Not required in this filing.
Item 8. Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies
Not required in this filing.
Item 9. Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Company and Affiliated Purchasers.
Not required in this filing.
Item 10. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
No Material Changes.
Item 11. Controls and Procedures
(a) It is the conclusion of the registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer that the effectiveness of the registrant’s current disclosure controls and procedures (such disclosure controls and procedures having been evaluated within 90 days of the date of this filing) provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by the registrant has been recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time period specified in the Commission’s rules and forms and that the information required to be disclosed by the registrant has been accumulated and communicated to the registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer in order to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
(b) There have been no changes in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Item 12. Exhibits
| | |
(a)(1) | | Registrant’s Code of Ethics — Not applicable (please see Item 2). |
| | |
(a)(2)(i) | | Treasurer’s Section 302 certification. |
| | |
(a)(2)(ii) | | President’s Section 302 certification. |
| | |
(b) | | Combined Section 906 certification. |
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Boston Income Portfolio
| | | | |
By: | | /s/ Michael W. Weilheimer Michael W. Weilheimer | | |
| | President | | |
| | | | |
Date: | | December 23, 2009 | | |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
| | | | |
By: | | /s/ Barbara E. Campbell Barbara E. Campbell | | |
| | Treasurer | | |
| | | | |
Date: | | December 23, 2009 | | |
| | | | |
By: | | /s/ Michael W. Weilheimer | | |
| | | | |
| | Michael W. Weilheimer | | |
| | President | | |
| | | | |
Date: | | December 23, 2009 | | |