UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2014
OR
o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from ______ to ______
___________________
Commission file number 0-33377
MCG CAPITAL CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
| |
Delaware | 54-1889518 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
1001 19th Street North, 10th Floor Arlington, VA (Address of principal executive offices) | 22209 (Zip Code)
|
(703) 247-7500
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
None
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
| |
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer x |
Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company o |
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x
As of August 1, 2014, there were 49,501,096 shares of the registrant’s $0.01 par value Common Stock outstanding.
MCG CAPITAL CORPORATION
FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2014
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
| |
| |
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION | |
| |
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | |
| |
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS | |
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS | |
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS | |
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS | |
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS | |
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) | |
REVIEW REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM | |
| |
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS | |
| |
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK | |
| |
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES | |
| |
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION | |
| |
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS | |
| |
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS | |
| |
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS | |
| |
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES | |
| |
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES | |
| |
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION | |
| |
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS | |
| |
SIGNATURES | |
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MCG Capital Corporation
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
| | | | | | |
(in thousands, except per share amounts) | June 30, 2014 | December 31, 2013 |
| (unaudited) |
|
Assets |
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 69,379 |
| $ | 91,598 |
|
Cash, restricted | 131,630 |
| 33,895 |
|
Cash, securitization accounts | — |
| 13,906 |
|
Investments at fair value |
|
|
|
|
Non-affiliate investments (cost of $296,637 and $444,217, respectively) | 122,713 |
| 268,173 |
|
Affiliate investments (cost of $57,459 and $59,470, respectively) | 38,437 |
| 56,792 |
|
Control investments (cost of $59,796 and $62,751, respectively) | 34,925 |
| 43,908 |
|
Total investments (cost of $413,892 and $566,438, respectively) | 196,075 |
| 368,873 |
|
Interest receivable | 1,008 |
| 2,087 |
|
Other assets | 2,981 |
| 3,634 |
|
Total assets | $ | 401,073 |
| $ | 513,993 |
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
Borrowings (maturing within one year of $0 and $25,172, respectively) | $ | 150,000 |
| $ | 175,172 |
|
Secured financing at fair value (cost of $4,513 and $0, respectively) | 4,513 |
| — |
|
Interest payable | 2,174 |
| 2,345 |
|
Other liabilities | 4,597 |
| 2,522 |
|
Total liabilities | 161,284 |
| 180,039 |
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 11) | | |
Stockholders’ equity |
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, par value $0.01, authorized 1 share, none issued and outstanding | — |
| — |
|
Common stock, par value $0.01, authorized 200,000 shares on June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, 54,252 issued and outstanding on June 30, 2014 and 70,510 issued and outstanding on December 31, 2013 | 543 |
| 705 |
|
Paid-in capital | 924,222 |
| 980,930 |
|
Distributions in excess of earnings | (466,856 | ) | (449,915 | ) |
Net unrealized depreciation on investments | (218,120 | ) | (197,766 | ) |
Total stockholders’ equity | 239,789 |
| 333,954 |
|
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | $ | 401,073 |
| $ | 513,993 |
|
Net asset value per common share at end of period | $ | 4.42 |
| $ | 4.74 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
1
MCG Capital Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(unaudited)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three months ended | Six months ended |
| June 30 | June 30 |
(in thousands, except per share amounts) | 2014 | 2013 | 2014 | 2013 |
Revenue |
|
|
|
|
Interest and dividend income |
|
|
|
|
Non-affiliate investments (less than 5% owned) | $ | 6,985 |
| $ | 9,008 |
| $ | 14,723 |
| $ | 18,856 |
|
Affiliate investments (5% to 25% owned) | 1,076 |
| 1,694 |
| 1,889 |
| 3,321 |
|
Control investments (more than 25% owned) | 702 |
| 1,872 |
| 1,406 |
| 3,173 |
|
Total interest and dividend income | 8,763 |
| 12,574 |
| 18,018 |
| 25,350 |
|
Advisory fees and other income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-affiliate investments (less than 5% owned) | 750 |
| 316 |
| 828 |
| 774 |
|
Control investments (more than 25% owned) | 12 |
| — |
| 25 |
| 12 |
|
Total advisory fees and other income | 762 |
| 316 |
| 853 |
| 786 |
|
Total revenue | 9,525 |
| 12,890 |
| 18,871 |
| 26,136 |
|
Operating expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense | 1,866 |
| 2,305 |
| 3,856 |
| 4,687 |
|
Employee compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and benefits | 1,773 |
| 1,559 |
| 2,861 |
| 2,966 |
|
Amortization of employee restricted stock awards | 1,248 |
| 379 |
| 1,554 |
| 754 |
|
Total employee compensation | 3,021 |
| 1,938 |
| 4,415 |
| 3,720 |
|
General and administrative expense | 4,087 |
| 1,086 |
| 5,726 |
| 2,118 |
|
Restructuring expense | — |
| 5 |
| — |
| 12 |
|
Total operating expense | 8,974 |
| 5,334 |
| 13,997 |
| 10,537 |
|
Net operating income before net investment (loss) gain and income tax provision | 551 |
| 7,556 |
| 4,874 |
| 15,599 |
|
Net realized gain (loss) on investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-affiliate investments (less than 5% owned) | (4,346 | ) | (109 | ) | (8,834 | ) | (4,191 | ) |
Affiliate investments (5% to 25% owned) | — |
| 2,877 |
| — |
| 2,877 |
|
Control investments (more than 25% owned) | 114 |
| — |
| 114 |
| 51 |
|
Total net realized (loss) gain on investments | (4,232 | ) | 2,768 |
| (8,720 | ) | (1,263 | ) |
Net unrealized (depreciation) appreciation on investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-affiliate investments (less than 5% owned) | (1,127 | ) | (274 | ) | 2,120 |
| (5,369 | ) |
Affiliate investments (5% to 25% owned) | (834 | ) | (672 | ) | (16,344 | ) | 8,435 |
|
Control investments (more than 25% owned) | 359 |
| (810 | ) | (6,028 | ) | (1,024 | ) |
Other fair value adjustments | 15 |
| — |
| (102 | ) | — |
|
Total net unrealized (depreciation) appreciation on investments | (1,587 | ) | (1,756 | ) | (20,354 | ) | 2,042 |
|
Net investment (loss) gain before income tax provision | (5,819 | ) | 1,012 |
| (29,074 | ) | 779 |
|
Income tax provision (benefit) | — |
| (6 | ) | 4 |
| 52 |
|
Net (loss) income | $ | (5,268 | ) | $ | 8,574 |
| $ | (24,204 | ) | $ | 16,326 |
|
Income (loss) per basic and diluted common share | $ | (0.09 | ) | $ | 0.12 |
| $ | (0.37 | ) | $ | 0.23 |
|
Cash distributions declared per common share | $ | 0.07 |
| $ | 0.125 |
| $ | 0.195 |
| $ | 0.25 |
|
Weighted-average common shares outstanding—basic and diluted | 61,221 |
| 71,217 |
| 65,286 |
| 71,361 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
2
MCG Capital Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Net Assets
(unaudited)
|
| | | | | | |
| Six months ended |
| June 30 |
(in thousands, except per share amounts) | 2014 | 2013 |
Increase (decrease) in net assets from operations |
|
|
Net operating income before net investment loss and income tax provision | $ | 4,874 |
| $ | 15,599 |
|
Net realized loss on investments | (8,720 | ) | (1,263 | ) |
Net unrealized (depreciation) appreciation on investments | (20,354 | ) | 2,042 |
|
Income tax provision | (4 | ) | (52 | ) |
Net (loss) income | (24,204 | ) | 16,326 |
|
Distributions to stockholders |
|
|
Distributions declared from net operating income | (8,578 | ) | (13,176 | ) |
Distributions declared in excess of net operating income | (4,513 | ) | (4,628 | ) |
Net decrease in net assets resulting from stockholder distributions | (13,091 | ) | (17,804 | ) |
Capital share transactions |
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of common stock | (57,818 | ) | (2,272 | ) |
Amortization of restricted stock awards |
|
|
|
|
Employee awards accounted for as employee compensation | 1,554 |
| 754 |
|
Non-employee director awards accounted for as general and administrative expense | 28 |
| 26 |
|
Common stock withheld to pay taxes applicable to the vesting of restricted stock | (634 | ) | (49 | ) |
Net decrease in net assets resulting from capital share transactions | (56,870 | ) | (1,541 | ) |
Total decrease in net assets | (94,165 | ) | (3,019 | ) |
Net assets |
|
|
|
|
Beginning of period | 333,954 |
| 371,728 |
|
End of period | $ | 239,789 |
| $ | 368,709 |
|
Net asset value per common share at end of period | $ | 4.42 |
| $ | 5.18 |
|
Common shares outstanding at end of period | 54,252 |
| 71,222 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
3
MCG Capital Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(unaudited)
|
| | | | | | |
| Six months ended |
| June 30 |
(in thousands) | 2014 | 2013 |
Cash flows from operating activities |
|
|
Net (loss) income | $ | (24,204 | ) | $ | 16,326 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
|
|
Investments in portfolio companies | (8,008 | ) | (82,160 | ) |
Principal collections related to investment repayments or sales | 143,788 |
| 106,841 |
|
Increase in interest receivable, accrued payment-in-kind interest and dividends | 9,023 |
| (3,421 | ) |
Amortization of restricted stock awards |
|
|
|
|
Employee | 1,554 |
| 754 |
|
Non-employee director | 28 |
| 26 |
|
Decrease in cash—securitization accounts from interest collections | 1,399 |
| 1,592 |
|
Decrease (increase) in restricted cash—escrow accounts | (934 | ) | 4,912 |
|
Depreciation and amortization | 523 |
| 660 |
|
Decrease in other assets | 130 |
| 155 |
|
Decrease in other liabilities | 1,905 |
| (4,371 | ) |
Realized loss on investments | 8,720 |
| 1,263 |
|
Net unrealized depreciation (appreciation) on investments | 20,354 |
| (2,042 | ) |
Net cash provided by operating activities | 154,278 |
| 40,535 |
|
Cash flows from financing activities |
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of common stock | (57,818 | ) | (2,272 | ) |
Payments on borrowings | (25,172 | ) | (43,126 | ) |
Proceeds from borrowings | 4,513 |
| — |
|
Decrease (increase) in cash in restricted and securitization accounts |
|
|
|
|
Securitization accounts for repayment of principal on debt | 12,479 |
| (1,360 | ) |
Restricted cash | (96,774 | ) | 41,863 |
|
Payment of financing costs | — |
| (116 | ) |
Distributions paid | (13,091 | ) | (17,804 | ) |
Common stock withheld to pay taxes applicable to the vesting of restricted stock | (634 | ) | (49 | ) |
Net cash used in financing activities | (176,497 | ) | (22,864 | ) |
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents | (22,219 | ) | 17,671 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance | 91,598 |
| 73,588 |
|
Ending balance | $ | 69,379 |
| $ | 91,259 |
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information |
|
|
|
|
Interest paid | $ | 3,522 |
| $ | 4,127 |
|
Income taxes paid (received) | — |
| 46 |
|
Paid-in-kind interest accrued | 2,526 |
| 1,430 |
|
Paid-in-kind interest collected | 10,473 |
| 2,026 |
|
Dividend income collected | 326 |
| 459 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
4
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
MCG Capital Corporation |
Consolidated Schedule of Investments |
June 30, 2014 (unaudited) |
(dollars in thousands) |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | Interest Rate(7) | | | Fair Value |
Portfolio Company | Industry | Investment | Current | PIK | Total | Principal | Cost |
| | | | | | | | |
Control Investments(4): | | | | | | | |
GMC Television Broadcasting, LLC(2) | Broadcasting | Senior Debt (Due 12/16) | 4.2 | % | — |
| 4.2 | % | $ | 10,203 |
| $ | 7,864 |
| $ | 9,117 |
|
| Subordinated Debt (Due 12/16)(6) | 2.5 | % | — |
| 2.5 | % | 11,739 |
| 6,975 |
| — |
|
| | Class B Voting Units (8.0%, 86,700 units)(5) | | | | | 9,071 |
| — |
|
Jet Plastica Investors, LLC(2) | Plastic Products | Senior Debt A (Due 3/15)(1)(6) | 2.2 | % | 7.0 | % | 9.2 | % | 5,515 |
| 3,897 |
| — |
|
RadioPharmacy Investors, LLC(2) | Healthcare | Senior Debt (Due 12/16) | 7.5 | % | — |
| 7.5 | % | 7,620 |
| 7,620 |
| 7,620 |
|
| Subordinated Debt (Due 12/16) | 12.0 | % | 3.0 | % | 15.0 | % | 11,009 |
| 11,005 |
| 11,005 |
|
| | Preferred LLC Interest (19.7%, 70,000 units)(5) | | | | | 13,364 |
| 7,183 |
|
Total control investments (represents 17.8% of total investments at fair value) | | | | | 59,796 |
| 34,925 |
|
Affiliate Investments(3): | | | | | | | |
C7 Data Centers, Inc. | Business Services | Senior Debt (Due 9/17)(1) | 11.5 | % | — |
| 11.5 | % | 16,850 |
| 16,631 |
| 16,631 |
|
Series B Preferred Stock (7,142,857 shares)(5) | | | | | 2,000 |
| 3,275 |
|
Education Management, Inc.(11) | Education | Senior Debt (Due 12/15)(6) | 6.0 | % | 5.7 | % | 11.7 | % | 20,598 |
| 19,189 |
| 3,379 |
|
| Series C Preferred Stock (9.0%, 16,910 shares)(5) | | | | | 5,000 |
| — |
|
IDOC, LLC | Healthcare | Senior Debt (Due 8/17)(1) | 9.8 | % | — |
| 9.8 | % | 13,832 |
| 13,640 |
| 13,640 |
|
| | Limited Partner Interests(1)(2)(5) | | | | | 999 |
| 1,512 |
|
Total affiliate investments (represents 19.6% of total investments at fair value) | | | | | 57,459 |
| 38,437 |
|
Non-Affiliate Investments (less than 5% owned): | | | | | | |
Accurate Group Holdings, Inc.(2) | Business Services | Subordinated Unsecured Debt (Due 8/18)(1) | 12.5 | % | — |
| 12.5 | % | 10,000 |
| 9,841 |
| 9,841 |
|
Series A Preferred Stock (974,805 shares)(5) | | | | | 2,000 |
| 1,167 |
|
Advanced Sleep Concepts, Inc.(2)(10) | Home Furnishings | Senior Debt (Due 8/14 to 12/15)(6) | 10.3 | % | — |
| 10.3 | % | 7,309 |
| 6,907 |
| 4,513 |
|
Subordinated Debt (Due 12/15)(6) | 12.0 | % | 3.0 | % | 15.0 | % | 3,828 |
| 3,352 |
| — |
|
Broadview Networks Holdings, Inc.(9) | Communications | Common Stock (132,779 shares)(5) | | | | | 159,579 |
| 252 |
|
| Series A-1 Warrant to purchase Common Stock (expire 11/20)(5) | | | | | — |
| — |
|
| | Series A-2 Warrant to purchase Common Stock (expire 11/20)(5) | | | | | — |
| — |
|
Community Investors, Inc. | Business Services | Senior Debt (Due 5/18)(1) | 9.8 | % | — |
| 9.8 | % | 13,792 |
| 13,568 |
| 13,568 |
|
Preferred Stock (10.0%, 271,169 shares)(1) | | | | | 303 |
| 303 |
|
| | Series A-1 Preferred Stock (10.0%, 126,928 shares)(1) | | | | | 306 |
| 306 |
|
| | Common Stock (2,564 shares)(1)(5) | | | | | 3 |
| 119 |
|
Golden Knight II CLO, Ltd.(8) | Diversified Financial Services | Income Notes (Due 4/19) | | | | | 2,208 |
| 3,394 |
|
Hammond's Candies Since 1920 II, LLC | Manufacturing | Subordinated Debt (Due 9/18)(1) | 10.0 | % | 3.0 | % | 13.0 | % | 9,472 |
| 9,328 |
| 9,328 |
|
Huron Inc. | Manufacturing | Subordinated Unsecured Debt (Due 8/18)(1) | 10.0 | % | 4.0 | % | 14.0 | % | 13,187 |
| 12,980 |
| 12,980 |
|
Industrial Safety Technologies, LLC | Manufacturing | Subordinated Debt (Due 6/19) | 9.5 | % | 2.0 | % | 11.5 | % | 10,136 |
| 9,999 |
| 9,999 |
|
Intrafusion Holding Corp. | Healthcare | Subordinated Debt (Due 6/18)(1) | 11.7 | % | — |
| 11.7 | % | 11,500 |
| 11,310 |
| 11,310 |
|
Legacy Cabinets Holdings II, Inc.(12) | Home Furnishings | Class B-1 Common Stock (2,000 shares)(5) | | | | | 2,185 |
| 520 |
|
Maverick Healthcare Equity, LLC | Healthcare | Preferred Units (10.0%, 1,250,000 units)(5) | | | | | 2,021 |
| 813 |
|
| Class A Common Units (1,250,000 units)(5) | | | | | — |
| — |
|
Miles Media Group, LLC | Business Services | Senior Debt (Due 6/16)(1) | 12.5 | % | — |
| 12.5 | % | 18,462 |
| 18,342 |
| 18,342 |
|
Oceans Acquisition, Inc. | Healthcare | Senior Debt (Due 12/17)(1) | 10.8 | % | — |
| 10.8 | % | 14,964 |
| 14,748 |
| 13,257 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
5
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
MCG Capital Corporation |
Consolidated Schedule of Investments |
June 30, 2014 (unaudited) |
(dollars in thousands) |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | Interest Rate(7) | | | Fair Value |
Portfolio Company | Industry | Investment | Current | PIK | Total | Principal | Cost |
| | | | | | | | |
South Bay Mental Health Center, Inc. | Healthcare | Subordinated Debt (Due 10/17)(1) | 12.0 | % | 2.5 | % | 14.5 | % | 11,909 |
| 11,748 |
| 11,748 |
|
Summit Business Media Parent Holding Company LLC | Information Services | Class E Series I Units (636 units)(5) | | | | | 4,120 |
| 544 |
|
Class E Series II Units (276 units)(5) | | | | | 1,788 |
| 59 |
|
West World Media, LLC | Information Services | Class A Membership Units (25,000 units)(1)(5) | | | | | 1 |
| 350 |
|
Total non-affiliate investments (represents 62.6% of total investments at fair value) | | | | | 296,637 |
| 122,713 |
|
Total Investments | | | | | | | $ | 413,892 |
| $ | 196,075 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
6
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
MCG Capital Corporation |
Consolidated Schedule of Investments |
December 31, 2013 |
(dollars in thousands) |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | Interest Rate(7) | | | Fair Value |
Portfolio Company | Industry | Investment | Current | PIK | Total | Principal | Cost |
| | | | | | | | |
Control Investments(4): | | | | | | | |
GMC Television Broadcasting, LLC(2) | Broadcasting | Senior Debt (Due 12/16)(1) | 4.3 | % | — |
| 4.3 | % | $ | 13,329 |
| $ | 10,963 |
| $ | 12,252 |
|
| Subordinated Debt (Due 12/16)(6) | 2.5 | % | — |
| 2.5 | % | 11,593 |
| 6,975 |
| — |
|
| | Class B Voting Units (8.0%, 86,700 units)(5) | | | | | 9,071 |
| — |
|
Jet Plastica Investors, LLC(2) | Plastic Products | Senior Debt A (Due 3/15)(1)(6) | 2.4 | % | 7.5 | % | 9.9 | % | 5,326 |
| 3,897 |
| — |
|
RadioPharmacy Investors, LLC(2) | Healthcare | Senior Debt (Due 12/16)(1) | 7.5 | % | — |
| 7.5 | % | 7,640 |
| 7,640 |
| 7,640 |
|
| Subordinated Debt (Due 12/16)(1) | 12.0 | % | 3.0 | % | 15.0 | % | 10,845 |
| 10,841 |
| 10,841 |
|
| | Preferred LLC Interest (19.7%, 70,000 units)(5) | | | | | 13,364 |
| 13,175 |
|
Total control investments (represents 11.9% of total investments at fair value) | | | | | 62,751 |
| 43,908 |
|
Affiliate Investments(3): | | | | | | | |
C7 Data Centers, Inc. | Business Services | Senior Debt (Due 9/17)(1) | 9.5 | % | — |
| 9.5 | % | 17,350 |
| 17,092 |
| 17,092 |
|
Series B Preferred Stock (7,142,857 shares)(5) | | | | | 2,000 |
| 3,482 |
|
Education Management, Inc. | Education | Senior Debt (Due 12/15)(1) | 3.0 | % | 8.7 | % | 11.7 | % | 19,723 |
| 19,617 |
| 19,617 |
|
| Series C Preferred Stock (9.0%, 16,910 shares)(5) | | | | | 5,000 |
| 174 |
|
IDOC, LLC | Healthcare | Senior Debt (Due 8/17)(1) | 9.8 | % | — |
| 9.8 | % | 15,000 |
| 14,762 |
| 14,762 |
|
| | Limited Partner Interests(1)(2)(5) | | | | | 999 |
| 1,665 |
|
Total affiliate investments (represents 15.4% of total investments at fair value) | | | | | 59,470 |
| 56,792 |
|
Non-Affiliate Investments (less than 5% owned): | | | | | | |
Accurate Group Holdings, Inc.(2) | Business Services | Subordinated Unsecured Debt (Due 8/18)(1) | 12.5 | % | — |
| 12.5 | % | 10,000 |
| 9,827 |
| 9,827 |
|
Series A Preferred Stock (974,805 shares)(5) | | | | | 2,000 |
| 1,731 |
|
Advanced Sleep Concepts, Inc.(2) | Home Furnishings | Senior Debt (Due 1/14 to 8/14)(1)(6) | 10.3 | % | — |
| 10.3 | % | 7,409 |
| 7,204 |
| 4,493 |
|
Subordinated Debt (Due 1/14)(6) | — | % | 10.0 | % | 10.0 | % | 3,771 |
| 3,352 |
| — |
|
Broadview Networks Holdings, Inc.(9) | Communications | Common Stock (132,779 shares)(5) | | | | | 159,579 |
| 761 |
|
| Series A-1 Warrant to purchase Common Stock (expire 11/20)(5) | | | | | — |
| — |
|
| | Series A-2 Warrant to purchase Common Stock (expire 11/20)(5) | | | | | — |
| — |
|
Community Investors, Inc. | Business Services | Senior Debt (Due 5/18)(1) | 9.8 | % | — |
| 9.8 | % | 12,300 |
| 12,079 |
| 12,079 |
|
Preferred Stock (10.0%, 297,436 shares)(1) | | | | | 317 |
| 317 |
|
| | Common Stock (2,564 shares)(1)(5) | | | | | 3 |
| 124 |
|
Cruz Bay Publishing, Inc. | Publishing | Subordinated Debt (Due 3/15)(1) | 5.0 | % | 7.3 | % | 12.3 | % | 21,521 |
| 21,483 |
| 21,483 |
|
Dorsey School of Business Holdings, Inc. | Education | Senior Debt (Due 6/18)(1) | 9.5 | % | — |
| 9.5 | % | 10,000 |
| 9,867 |
| 9,867 |
|
G&L Investment Holdings, LLC(2) | Insurance | Subordinated Debt (Due 5/14)(1) | 11.2 | % | 4.3 | % | 15.5 | % | 19,484 |
| 19,423 |
| 19,423 |
|
| Series A Preferred Shares (14.0%, 5,000,000 shares)(5) | | | | | 8,191 |
| 4,196 |
|
| | Class C Shares (621,907 shares)(5) | | | | | 529 |
| — |
|
Golden Knight II CLO, Ltd.(8) | Diversified Financial Services | Income Notes (Due 4/19) | | | | | 2,491 |
| 3,298 |
|
Hammond's Candies Since 1920 II, LLC | Manufacturing | Subordinated Debt (Due 9/18)(1) | 10.0 | % | 4.0 | % | 14.0 | % | 9,379 |
| 9,221 |
| 9,221 |
|
Huron Inc. | Manufacturing | Subordinated Unsecured Debt (Due 8/18)(1) | 10.0 | % | 4.0 | % | 14.0 | % | 13,187 |
| 12,958 |
| 12,958 |
|
Industrial Safety Technologies, LLC | Manufacturing | Subordinated Debt (Due 6/19) | 9.7 | % | 2.0 | % | 11.7 | % | 10,035 |
| 9,888 |
| 9,888 |
|
Intrafusion Holding Corp. | Healthcare | Subordinated Debt (Due 6/18)(1) | 11.9 | % | — |
| 11.9 | % | 11,500 |
| 11,290 |
| 11,290 |
|
Legacy Cabinets Holdings II, Inc. | Home Furnishings | Class B-1 Common Stock (2,000 shares)(5) | | | | | 2,185 |
| 237 |
|
Mailsouth, Inc. | Publishing | Senior Debt (Due 12/16)(1) | 6.8 | % | — |
| 6.8 | % | 3,921 |
| 3,888 |
| 3,830 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
7
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
MCG Capital Corporation |
Consolidated Schedule of Investments |
December 31, 2013 |
(dollars in thousands) |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | Interest Rate(7) | | | Fair Value |
Portfolio Company | Industry | Investment | Current | PIK | Total | Principal | Cost |
| | | | | | | | |
Maverick Healthcare Equity, LLC | Healthcare | Preferred Units (10.0%, 1,250,000 units)(5) | | | | | 2,021 |
| 1,474 |
|
| Class A Common Units (1,250,000 units)(5) | | | | | — |
| — |
|
Midwest Technical Institute, Inc. | Education | Senior Debt (Due 10/17)(1) | 9.5 | % | — |
| 9.5 | % | 13,813 |
| 13,575 |
| 13,670 |
|
Miles Media Group, LLC | Business Services | Senior Debt (Due 6/16)(1) | 12.5 | % | — |
| 12.5 | % | 19,063 |
| 18,913 |
| 18,913 |
|
Oceans Acquisition, Inc. | Healthcare | Senior Debt (Due 12/17)(1) | 10.8 | % | — |
| 10.8 | % | 12,710 |
| 12,460 |
| 12,460 |
|
Rita’s Water Ice Franchise Company, LLC | Restaurants | Senior Debt (Due 11/16)(1) | 14.0 | % | — |
| 14.0 | % | 9,375 |
| 9,320 |
| 9,320 |
|
SC Academy Holdings, Inc. | Education | Subordinated Debt (Due 7/16)(1) | — | % | 14.0 | % | 14.0 | % | 14,641 |
| 14,577 |
| 14,577 |
|
South Bay Mental Health Center, Inc. | Healthcare | Subordinated Debt (Due 10/17)(1) | 12.0 | % | 2.5 | % | 14.5 | % | 11,761 |
| 11,581 |
| 11,614 |
|
Summit Business Media Parent Holding Company LLC | Information Services | Class E Series I Units (636 units)(1)(5) | | | | | 4,120 |
| 563 |
|
Class E Series II Units (276 units)(1)(5) | | | | | 1,788 |
| 67 |
|
TCFI CP LLC | Manufacturing | Subordinated Unsecured Debt (Due 4/19)(1) | 10.0 | % | 3.0 | % | 13.0 | % | 20,010 |
| 19,667 |
| 19,667 |
|
Ted's Café Escondido Holdings, Inc. | Restaurants | Senior Debt (Due 12/18)(1) | 9.5 | % | — |
| 9.5 | % | 14,000 |
| 13,691 |
| 13,691 |
|
The e-Media Club I, LLC | Investment Fund | LLC Interest (74 units)(5) | | | | | 88 |
| 11 |
|
Visant Corporation | Consumer Products | Senior Debt (Due 12/16)(1) | 5.3 | % | — |
| 5.3 | % | 4,711 |
| 4,711 |
| 4,657 |
|
West World Media, LLC | Information Services | Senior Debt (Due 9/15)(1) | 11.0 | % | 3.0 | % | 14.0 | % | 11,467 |
| 11,105 |
| 11,182 |
|
Class A Membership Units (25,000 units)(1)(5) | | | | | 1 |
| 362 |
|
| | Warrant to purchase Class A Membership Units (expire 9/15)(1)(5) | | | | | 324 |
| 379 |
|
Xpressdocs Holdings, Inc. | Business Services | Series A Preferred Stock (161,870 shares)(5) | | | | | 500 |
| 543 |
|
Total non-affiliate investments (represents 72.7% of total investments at fair value) | | | | | 444,217 |
| 268,173 |
|
Total Investments | | | | | | | $ | 566,438 |
| $ | 368,873 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
8
MCG Capital Corporation
Consolidated Schedule of Investments
| |
(1) | Some or all of this security is held by our SBIC subsidiary or one of our other financing subsidiaries and may have been pledged as collateral in connection therewith. See Note 5—Borrowings to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. |
| |
(2) | Includes securities issued by one or more of the portfolio company’s affiliates. |
| |
(3) | Affiliate investments represent companies in which we own at least 5%, but not more than 25% of the portfolio company’s voting securities. |
| |
(4) | Control investments represent companies in which we own more than 25% of the portfolio company’s voting securities. |
| |
(5) | Equity security is non-income producing at period-end. |
| |
(6) | Loan or debt security is on non-accrual status. |
| |
(7) | Interest rates represent the weighted-average annual stated interest rate on debt securities, presented by nature of indebtedness for a single issuer. PIK interest represents contractually deferred interest that is generally added to the principal balance of the debt security and compounded if contractually required and not paid on a current basis. PIK may be prepaid by either contract or the portfolio company's choice, but generally is paid at the end of the loan term. Rates on preferred stock and preferred LLC interests, where applicable, represent the contractual rate. |
| |
(8) | Investment is not a qualifying asset under section 55(a) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended. Qualifying assets must represent at least 70% of total assets at the time of acquisition of any additional non-qualifying assets. |
| |
(9) | Broadview Networks Holdings, Inc.’s financial statements are currently publicly available and may be accessed on-line using either the Company’s website (www.broadviewnet.com) or using the EDGAR System available on the SEC’s website (www.sec.gov) |
| |
(10) | In June 2014, we monetized substantially all of our investment in Advanced Sleep Concepts, Inc., or Advanced Sleep, through the sale of a 95% participation interest in our senior and subordinated loans. Under the terms of the sale, the purchaser will receive 100% of the payments related to the loan, including interest and principal, until the total payments received exceeds the purchase price plus any additional advances funded by the purchaser to Advanced Sleep and certain expenses incurred by the purchaser. Thereafter, the purchaser will receive 95% and we will receive 5% of any payments received from Advanced Sleep. Under the terms of the sale, the purchaser will have no recourse to us for any payments. |
We follow the guidance in Accounting Standard Codification Topic 860—Transfers and Servicing, or ASC 860, when accounting for loan participations and other partial loan sales. Such guidance requires a participation or other partial loan sale to meet the definition of a “participating interest,” as defined in the guidance, in order for sale treatment to be allowed. Due to the non-pro-rata allocation of payments, the sale of the interest in Advanced Sleep's loans does not meet the definition of a participating interest under ASC 860 and the loans remain on our Consolidated Balance Sheets and the proceeds from the sale are recorded as a secured financing until all the criteria for sale accounting are met.
| |
(11) | On June 30, 2014, we entered into a binding trade agreement to sell the senior debt and preferred stock of Education Management, Inc., which settled in July 2014. |
| |
(12) | In July 2014, we sold our investment in the class B-1 common stock of Legacy Cabinets Holdings II, Inc. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
9
MCG Capital Corporation
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
NOTE 1—DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION
These Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements present the results of operations, financial position and cash flows of MCG Capital Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries. The terms “we,” “our,” “us” and “MCG” refer to MCG Capital Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries.
We are a solutions-focused commercial finance company that provides capital and advisory services to lower middle-market companies throughout the United States. We are an internally managed, non-diversified, closed-end investment company that elected to be regulated as a business development company, or BDC, under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, or the 1940 Act. Our organization includes the following categories of subsidiaries:
Small Business Investment Subsidiaries—We own Solutions Capital I, L.P., or Solutions Capital, a wholly owned subsidiary licensed by the United States Small Business Administration, or SBA, which operates as a small business investment company, or SBIC, under the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended, or SBIC Act. In connection with the formation of Solutions Capital I, L.P., MCG also established another wholly owned subsidiary, Solutions Capital G.P., LLC, to act as the general partner of Solutions Capital I, L.P., while MCG is the sole limited partner.
Taxable Subsidiaries—We currently qualify as a regulated investment company, or RIC, for federal income tax purposes and, therefore, are not required to pay corporate income taxes on any income or gains that we distribute to our stockholders. We have certain wholly owned taxable subsidiaries, or Taxable Subsidiaries, each of which holds one or more portfolio investments listed on our Consolidated Schedules of Investments. The purpose of these Taxable Subsidiaries is to permit us to hold portfolio companies organized as limited liability companies, or LLCs, or other forms of pass-through entities and still satisfy the RIC tax requirement that at least 90% of our gross revenue for income tax purposes must consist of investment income. Absent the Taxable Subsidiaries, a portion of the gross income of any LLC or other pass-through entity portfolio investment would flow through directly to us, and be included in the calculation of the 90% test. To the extent that such income did not consist of investment income, it could jeopardize our ability to qualify as a RIC and, therefore, cause us to incur significant federal income taxes. The income of the LLCs or other pass-through entities owned by Taxable Subsidiaries is taxed to the Taxable Subsidiaries and does not flow through to us, thereby helping us preserve our RIC status and resultant tax advantages. We do not consolidate the Taxable Subsidiaries for income tax purposes and they may generate income tax expense because of the Taxable Subsidiaries’ ownership of the portfolio companies. We reflect any such income tax expense on our Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Wholly Owned Special-Purpose Financing Subsidiary—This subsidiary was a bankruptcy remote, special-purpose entity to which we transfered certain loans. The financing subsidiary, in turn, transfered the loans to a Delaware statutory trust. For accounting purposes, the transfers of the loans to the Delaware statutory trust were structured as an on-balance sheet securitization.
The accompanying financial statements reflect the consolidated accounts of MCG and the following subsidiaries: Solutions Capital; Solutions Capital G.P., LLC; and MCG’s former special-purpose financing subsidiary, MCG Finance VII, LLC.
Basis of Presentation and Use of Estimates
These unaudited financial statements and the accompanying notes are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and conform to Regulation S-X under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. We believe we have made all necessary adjustments so that the financial statements are presented fairly and that all such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. We eliminated all significant intercompany balances. In accordance with Article 6 of Regulation S-X of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, we do not consolidate portfolio company investments, including those in which we have a controlling interest. Further, in connection with the preparation of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, we have evaluated subsequent events that occurred after the balance sheet date as of June 30, 2014 through the date these financial statements were issued.
Preparing financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported on our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying notes. Although we believe the estimates and
assumptions used in preparing these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes are reasonable, actual results could differ materially.
Interim results are not necessarily indicative of results for a full year. You should read these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.
Recent Accounting Pronouncement
In June 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2013-08, Financial Services—Investment Companies (Topic 946): Amendments to the Scope, Measurement, and Disclosure Requirements, or ASU 2013-08. This update changes the approach to the assessment of whether a company is an investment company, clarifies the characteristics of an investment company, provides comprehensive guidance for the investment company assessment and contains certain disclosure requirements. ASU 2013-08 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods in fiscal years that began after December 15, 2013. Earlier application is prohibited. We adopted this standard update beginning January 1, 2014. The implementation of this standard update did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), or ASU 2014-09. This update supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-230: Revenue Recognition (Topic 605), and most industry-specific guidance throughout the industry topics of the codification. The core principal of the update is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled to exchange for those goods or services. In applying the revenue model to contracts within its scope, an entity should identify the contract(s) with a customer, identify the performance obligations in the contract, determine the transaction price, allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract, and recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation. ASU 2014-09 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within that reporting period. We are currently evaluating the potential impact the adoption of this update will have on our consolidated financial statements.
NOTE 2—INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO
The following table summarizes the composition of our investment portfolio at cost and fair value:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| COST BASIS | FAIR VALUE BASIS |
| June 30, 2014 | December 31, 2013 | June 30, 2014 | December 31, 2013 |
(dollars in thousands) | Investments at Cost | % of Total Portfolio | Investments at Cost | % of Total Portfolio | Investments at Fair Value | % of Total Portfolio | Investments at Fair Value | % of Total Portfolio |
Debt Investments | | | | | | | | |
Senior secured debt | $ | 122,406 |
| 29.5 | % | $ | 190,783 |
| 33.7 | % | $ | 100,068 |
| 51.1 | % | $ | 185,524 |
| 50.3 | % |
Subordinated debt |
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
| | |
Secured | 63,717 |
| 15.4 |
| 118,632 |
| 20.9 |
| 53,389 |
| 27.2 |
| 108,338 |
| 29.4 |
|
Unsecured | 22,821 |
| 5.5 |
| 42,452 |
| 7.5 |
| 22,821 |
| 11.6 |
| 42,452 |
| 11.5 |
|
Total debt investments | 208,944 |
| 50.4 |
| 351,867 |
| 62.1 |
| 176,278 |
| 89.9 |
| 336,314 |
| 91.2 |
|
Equity investments |
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
| | |
Preferred | 36,274 |
| 8.8 |
| 44,956 |
| 8.0 |
| 16,441 |
| 8.4 |
| 28,390 |
| 7.7 |
|
Common/common equivalents | 168,674 |
| 40.8 |
| 169,615 |
| 29.9 |
| 3,356 |
| 1.7 |
| 4,169 |
| 1.1 |
|
Total equity investments | 204,948 |
| 49.6 |
| 214,571 |
| 37.9 |
| 19,797 |
| 10.1 |
| 32,559 |
| 8.8 |
|
Total investments | $ | 413,892 |
| 100.0 | % | $ | 566,438 |
| 100.0 | % | $ | 196,075 |
| 100.0 | % | $ | 368,873 |
| 100.0 | % |
Our debt instruments bear contractual interest rates ranging from 2.5% to 15.0%, a portion of which may be in the form of paid-in-kind interest, or PIK. As of June 30, 2014, approximately 63.1% of the fair value of our loan portfolio had variable interest rates, based on a London Interbank Offer Rate, or LIBOR, benchmark or the prime rate, and 36.9% of the fair value of our loan portfolio had fixed interest rates. As of June 30, 2014, approximately 57.9% of our loan portfolio, at fair value, had LIBOR floors between 1.3% and 3.0% on a LIBOR-based index or prime floors between
2.8% and 6.0%. At origination, our loans generally have four- to six-year stated maturities. Borrowers typically pay an origination fee based on a percent of the total commitment and a fee on undrawn commitments.
When one of our loans becomes more than 90 days past due, or if we otherwise do not expect the customer to be able to service its debt and other obligations, we will, as a general matter, place the loan on non-accrual status and generally will cease recognizing interest income on that loan until all principal and interest has been brought current through payment or due to a restructuring such that the interest income is deemed to be collectible. However, we may make exceptions to this policy if the loan has sufficient collateral value and is in the process of collection. If the fair value of a loan is below cost, we may cease recognizing PIK interest and/or the accretion of a discount on the debt investment until such time that the fair value equals or exceeds cost.
The following table summarizes the cost and fair value of loans more than 90 days past due and loans on non-accrual status.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| COST BASIS | FAIR VALUE BASIS |
| June 30, 2014 | December 31, 2013 | June 30, 2014 | December 31, 2013 |
(dollars in thousands) | Investments at Cost | % of Loan Portfolio | Investments at Cost | % of Loan Portfolio | Investments at Fair Value | % of Loan Portfolio | Investments at Fair Value | % of Loan Portfolio |
Loans greater than 90 days past due | | | | | | | |
On non-accrual status | $ | 14,156 |
| 6.78 | % | $ | 3,897 |
| 1.11 | % | $ | 4,513 |
| 2.54 | % | $ | — |
| — | % |
Not on non-accrual status | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
|
Total loans greater than 90 days past due | $ | 14,156 |
| 6.78 | % | $ | 3,897 |
| 1.11 | % | $ | 4,513 |
| 2.54 | % | $ | — |
| — | % |
Loans on non-accrual status | | | | | | | | |
0 to 90 days past due | $ | 26,164 |
| 12.52 | % | $ | 17,531 |
| 4.98 | % | $ | 3,379 |
| 1.90 | % | $ | 4,493 |
| 1.34 | % |
Greater than 90 days past due | 14,156 |
| 6.78 |
| 3,897 |
| 1.11 |
| 4,513 |
| 2.54 |
| — |
| — |
|
Total loans on non-accrual status | $ | 40,320 |
| 19.30 | % | $ | 21,428 |
| 6.09 | % | $ | 7,892 |
| 4.44 | % | $ | 4,493 |
| 1.34 | % |
The following table summarizes our investment portfolio by industry at fair value:
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| June 30, 2014 | December 31, 2013 |
(dollars in thousands) | Investments at Fair Value | Percent of Total Portfolio | Investments at Fair Value | Percent of Total Portfolio |
Healthcare | $ | 78,087 |
| 39.8 | % | $ | 84,922 |
| 23.0 | % |
Business services | 63,554 |
| 32.4 |
| 64,108 |
| 17.4 |
|
Manufacturing | 32,306 |
| 16.5 |
| 51,735 |
| 14.0 |
|
Broadcasting | 9,117 |
| 4.6 |
| 12,252 |
| 3.3 |
|
Home furnishings | 5,033 |
| 2.6 |
| 4,730 |
| 1.3 |
|
Diversified financial services | 3,394 |
| 1.7 |
| 3,298 |
| 0.9 |
|
Education | 3,379 |
| 1.7 |
| 57,905 |
| 15.7 |
|
Publishing | — |
| — |
| 25,312 |
| 6.9 |
|
Insurance | — |
| — |
| 23,620 |
| 6.4 |
|
Restaurants | — |
| — |
| 23,010 |
| 6.2 |
|
Consumer products | — |
| — |
| 4,657 |
| 1.3 |
|
Other(a) | 1,205 |
| 0.7 |
| 13,324 |
| 3.6 |
|
Total | $ | 196,075 |
| 100.0 | % | $ | 368,873 |
| 100.0 | % |
______________________ (a) No individual industry within this category exceeds 1%. | | | | |
We provide financial support to our portfolio companies for investment purposes in the form of originations or draws and advances. Originations represent financial support for which we have not been previously contractually required to provide and draws and advances represent financial support for which we have been previously contractually required to provide. The following table shows our significant originations and advances:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
(in thousands) | Six months ended |
| June 30, 2014 |
Company | Originations | Draws/ Advances | PIK Advances/ Dividends | Total |
Debt | | | | |
Oceans Acquisition, Inc. | $ | — |
| $ | 3,250 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 3,250 |
|
Community Investors, Inc. | — |
| 1,667 |
| — |
| 1,667 |
|
Other (< $1 million) | — |
| 1,400 |
| 2,526 |
| 3,926 |
|
Total debt | — |
| 6,317 |
| 2,526 |
| 8,843 |
|
Equity | | | | |
Other (< $1 million) | — |
| 298 |
| 225 |
| 523 |
|
Total Equity | — |
| 298 |
| 225 |
| 523 |
|
Total originations and advances | $ | — |
| $ | 6,615 |
| $ | 2,751 |
| $ | 9,366 |
|
As of June 30, 2014, we have commitments to invest an additional $5.0 million to our portfolio companies. See Note 11—Commitments and Contingencies.
NOTE 3—FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT
We account for our investments in portfolio companies under Accounting Standard Codification Topic 820—Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, or ASC 820. ASC 820 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about assets and liabilities measured at fair value. ASC 820 defines “fair value” as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. This fair value definition focuses on exit price in the principal, or most advantageous, market and prioritizes, within a measurement of fair value, the use of market-based inputs over entity-specific inputs.
Fair Value Hierarchy
ASC 820 establishes the following three-level hierarchy, based upon the transparency of inputs to the fair value measurement of an asset or liability as of the measurement date:
|
| |
ASC 820 Fair Value Hierarchy | Inputs to Fair Value Methodology |
Level 1 | Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities |
Level 2 | Quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the financial instrument; inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability; or inputs that are derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market information |
Level 3 | Pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques and at least one significant model assumption is unobservable or when the estimation of fair value requires significant management judgment |
We categorize a financial instrument in the fair value hierarchy based on the lowest level of input that is significant to its fair value measurement. In the event that transfers between these levels were to occur in the future, we would recognize those transfers as of the ending balance sheet date, based on changes in the use of observable and unobservable inputs utilized to perform the valuation for the period.
Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
The following table presents the assets that we report at fair value on our Consolidated Balance Sheets by fair value hierarchy:
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| June 30, 2014 |
(in thousands) | Internal Models with Significant | Total Fair Value Reported in Consolidated Balance Sheet |
Observable Market Parameters (Level 2) | Unobservable Market Parameters (Level 3) |
Non-affiliate investments | | | |
Senior secured debt | $ | — |
| $ | 49,681 |
| $ | 49,681 |
|
Subordinated secured debt | — |
| 42,384 |
| 42,384 |
|
Unsecured subordinated debt | — |
| 22,821 |
| 22,821 |
|
Preferred equity | 3,394 |
| 2,589 |
| 5,983 |
|
Common/common equivalents | 252 |
| 1,592 |
| 1,844 |
|
Total non-affiliate investments | 3,646 |
| 119,067 |
| 122,713 |
|
Affiliate investments | | |
|
|
Senior secured debt | — |
| 33,650 |
| 33,650 |
|
Subordinated secured debt | — |
| — |
| — |
|
Preferred equity | — |
| 3,275 |
| 3,275 |
|
Common/common equivalents | — |
| 1,512 |
| 1,512 |
|
Total affiliate investments | — |
| 38,437 |
| 38,437 |
|
Control investments | | |
|
|
Senior secured debt | — |
| 16,737 |
| 16,737 |
|
Subordinated secured debt | — |
| 11,005 |
| 11,005 |
|
Preferred equity | — |
| 7,183 |
| 7,183 |
|
Total control investments | — |
| 34,925 |
| 34,925 |
|
Total assets at fair value | $ | 3,646 |
| $ | 192,429 |
| $ | 196,075 |
|
As of June 30, 2014, we had no investments that had quoted market prices in active markets which we would categorize as Level 1 investments under ASC 820. Cash and cash equivalents are carried at cost which approximates fair value and are Level 1 assets. Interest receivable is carried at cost which approximates fair value.
Valuation Methodologies and Procedures
As required by the 1940 Act, we classify our investments by level of control. Control investments include both majority-owned control investments and non-majority owned control investments. A majority-owned control investment represents a security in which we own more than 50% of the voting interest of the portfolio company and generally control its board of directors. A non-majority owned control investment represents a security in which we own 25% to 50% of the portfolio company’s voting equity. As of each of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, our portfolio contained zero non-majority control investments. Non-control investments represent both affiliate and non-affiliate securities for which we do not have a controlling interest. Affiliate investments represent securities in which we own 5% to 25% of the portfolio company’s equity. Non-affiliate investments represent securities in which we own less than 5% of the portfolio company’s equity.
| |
• | Majority-Owned Control Investments—Majority-owned control investments comprise 17.8% of our investment portfolio as of June 30, 2014. Market quotations are not readily available for these investments; therefore, we use a combination of market and income approaches to determine their fair value. Typically, private companies are bought and sold based on multiples of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, or EBITDA, cash flows, net income, revenues or, in limited cases, book value. Generally, we apply multiples that we observe for other comparable companies to relevant financial data for the portfolio company in question. Also, in a limited number of cases, we use income approaches to determine fair value, based on our projections of the discounted future free cash flows that the portfolio company will likely generate, as well as industry derived capital costs. Our valuation approaches for majority-owned investments estimate the value upon a hypothetical sale or exit and then allocates such value to the investment's securities in order of their relative liquidation preference. In addition, we assume that any outstanding debt or other securities that are senior to our securities are required to be repaid at par. These valuation approaches consider the value of our ability to control the portfolio company’s capital structure and the timing of a potential exit. |
| |
• | Non-Control Investments—Non-control investments comprise 82.2% of our investment portfolio as of June 30, 2014. Quoted prices are not available for 97.7% of our non-control investments as of June 30, 2014. For our non-control equity investments, we use the same market and income approaches used to value our control investments. For non-control debt investments for which no quoted prices are available, we estimate fair value using a market-yield approach based on the expected future cash flows discounted at the loans’ effective interest rates, based on our estimate of current market rates. We may adjust discounted cash flow calculations to reflect other market conditions or the perceived credit risk of the borrower. In the event the fair value of a non-control debt investment, as determined by the same market or income approach used to value our control investments, is below our cost, we estimate the fair value using the market or income approach. |
| |
• | Thinly Traded and Over-the-Counter Securities—Generally, we value securities that are traded in the over-the-counter market or on a stock exchange at the average of the prevailing bid and ask prices on the date of the relevant period end. However, we may apply a discount to the market value of restricted or thinly-traded public securities to reflect the impact that these restrictions have on the value of these securities. We review factors, including the trading volume, total securities outstanding and our percentage ownership of securities to determine whether the trading levels are active (Level 1) or inactive (Level 2). As of June 30, 2014, these securities represented 1.9% of our investment portfolio. We utilize independent pricing services to arrive at certain of our fair value estimates. To corroborate “bid/ask” quotes from independent pricing services we perform a market-yield approach to validate prices obtained or obtain other evidence. |
Our valuation analyses incorporate the impact that key events could have on the securities’ values, including public and private mergers and acquisitions, purchase transactions, public offerings, letters of intent and subsequent debt or equity sales. Our valuation analyses also include key external data, such as market changes and industry valuation benchmarks. We also engage independent valuation firms to provide additional data points for our quarterly valuation analyses. Our general practice is to obtain an independent valuation or review of valuation at least once per year for each portfolio investment that had a fair value in excess of $5.0 million, unless the fair value has otherwise been derived through a sale of some or all of our investment in the portfolio company or is a new investment made within the last twelve months. In total, as of June 30, 2014, we either obtained a valuation or review from an independent firm, considered new investments made or used market quotes in the preceding twelve-month period to calculate 98.9% of our investment portfolio, calculated on a fair value basis.
The majority of the valuations performed by the independent valuation firms utilize proprietary models and inputs. We have used, and intend to continue to use, independent valuation firms to provide additional support for our internal analyses.
Our board of directors sets our valuation policies and procedures and determines the fair value of our investments. The investment and valuation committee of our board of directors meets at least quarterly with our executive management to review management’s recommendations of fair value of our investments. Our board of directors considers our valuations, as well as the independent valuations and reviews, in its determination of the fair value of our investments.
Due to the uncertainty inherent in the valuation process, such estimates of fair value may differ significantly from the values that would have been used had a ready market for the securities existed, and such differences could be material. In addition, changes in the market environment and other events that may occur over the life of the investments may cause the gains or losses ultimately realized on these investments to differ from the valuations currently assigned.
Changes in Level 3 Fair Value Measurements
We classify securities in the Level 3 valuation hierarchy based on the significance of the unobservable factors to the overall fair value measurement. Our fair value approach for Level 3 securities primarily uses unobservable inputs, but may also include observable, actively quoted components derived from external sources. Accordingly, the gains and losses in the table below include fair value changes due, in part, to observable factors. Additionally, we transfer investments in and out of Level 1, 2 and 3 securities as of the ending balance sheet date, based on changes in the use of observable and unobservable inputs utilized to perform the valuation for the period. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, our investment in Broadview Networks Holdings, Inc. was transferred from level 3 to level 2, because its common stock began trading in an inactive market. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, there were no transfers in or out of Level 1, 2 or 3.
The following table provides a reconciliation of fair value changes during the three months ended June 30, 2014 for all investments for which we determine fair value using unobservable (Level 3) factors:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
(in thousands) | Fair value measurements using unobservable inputs (Level 3) |
Non-affiliate Investments | Affiliate Investments | Control Investments | Total |
Fair value as of March 31, 2014 | | | | |
Senior secured debt | $ | 108,196 |
| $ | 36,769 |
| $ | 19,851 |
| $ | 164,816 |
|
Subordinated secured debt | 79,205 |
| — |
| 10,922 |
| 90,127 |
|
Unsecured subordinated debt | 42,761 |
| — |
| — |
| 42,761 |
|
Preferred equity | 2,880 |
| 3,275 |
| 6,836 |
| 12,991 |
|
Common/common equivalents equity | 2,271 |
| 1,513 |
| — |
| 3,784 |
|
Total fair value as of March 31, 2014 | 235,313 |
| 41,557 |
| 37,609 |
| 314,479 |
|
Realized/unrealized gain (loss) | | | | |
Senior secured debt | (1,278 | ) | (833 | ) | 13 |
| (2,098 | ) |
Subordinated secured debt | (4,037 | ) | — |
| — |
| (4,037 | ) |
Preferred equity | 51 |
| — |
| 347 |
| 398 |
|
Common/common equivalents equity | 202 |
| (1 | ) | — |
| 201 |
|
Total realized/unrealized gain (loss) | (5,062 | ) | (834 | ) | 360 |
| (5,536 | ) |
Issuances | | | | |
Senior secured debt | 2,197 |
| 50 |
| 17 |
| 2,264 |
|
Subordinated secured debt | 554 |
| — |
| 83 |
| 637 |
|
Unsecured subordinated debt | 607 |
| — |
| — |
| 607 |
|
Preferred equity | 201 |
| — |
| — |
| 201 |
|
Total issuances | 3,559 |
| 50 |
| 100 |
| 3,709 |
|
Settlements | | | | |
Senior secured debt | (13,942 | ) | (2,336 | ) | (3,144 | ) | (19,422 | ) |
Subordinated secured debt | (23,804 | ) | — |
| — |
| (23,804 | ) |
Unsecured subordinated debt | (20,547 | ) | — |
| — |
| (20,547 | ) |
Total settlements | (58,293 | ) | (2,336 | ) | (3,144 | ) | (63,773 | ) |
Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior secured debt | (45,492 | ) | — |
| — |
| (45,492 | ) |
Subordinated secured debt | (9,534 | ) | — |
| — |
| (9,534 | ) |
Preferred equity | (543 | ) | — |
| — |
| (543 | ) |
Common/common equivalents equity | (406 | ) | — |
| — |
| (406 | ) |
Total sales | (55,975 | ) | — |
| — |
| (55,975 | ) |
Transfers | | | | |
Common/common equivalents equity | (475 | ) | — |
| — |
| (475 | ) |
Total transfers | (475 | ) | — |
| — |
| (475 | ) |
Fair value as of June 30, 2014 | | | | |
Senior secured debt | 49,681 |
| 33,650 |
| 16,737 |
| 100,068 |
|
Subordinated secured debt | 42,384 |
| — |
| 11,005 |
| 53,389 |
|
Unsecured subordinated debt | 22,821 |
| — |
| — |
| 22,821 |
|
Preferred equity | 2,589 |
| 3,275 |
| 7,183 |
| 13,047 |
|
Common/common equivalents equity | 1,592 |
| 1,512 |
| — |
| 3,104 |
|
Total fair value as of June 30, 2014 | $ | 119,067 |
| $ | 38,437 |
| $ | 34,925 |
| $ | 192,429 |
|
There were no purchases of level 3 investments during the three months ended June 30, 2014.
The following table provides a reconciliation of fair value changes during the three-month period ended June 30, 2013 for all investments for which we determine fair value using unobservable (Level 3) factors:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
(in thousands) | Fair value measurements using unobservable inputs (Level 3) |
Non-affiliate Investments | Affiliate Investments | Control Investments | Total |
Fair value as of March 31, 2013 | | | | |
Senior secured debt | $ | 99,806 |
| $ | 40,559 |
| $ | 23,383 |
| $ | 163,748 |
|
Subordinated secured debt | 93,070 |
| 8,135 |
| 10,596 |
| 111,801 |
|
Unsecured subordinated debt | 39,085 |
| — |
| — |
| 39,085 |
|
Preferred equity | 13,039 |
| 6,707 |
| 16,463 |
| 36,209 |
|
Common/common equivalents equity | 2,619 |
| 1,346 |
| — |
| 3,965 |
|
Total fair value as of March 31, 2013 | 247,619 |
| 56,747 |
| 50,442 |
| 354,808 |
|
Realized/unrealized gain (loss) | | | | |
Senior secured debt | 57 |
| 62 |
| 6 |
| 125 |
|
Subordinated secured debt | (46 | ) | 5 |
| — |
| (41 | ) |
Preferred equity | 305 |
| 484 |
| (816 | ) | (27 | ) |
Common/common equivalents equity | (147 | ) | 1,654 |
| — |
| 1,507 |
|
Total realized/unrealized gain (loss) | 169 |
| 2,205 |
| (810 | ) | 1,564 |
|
Issuances | | | | |
Senior secured debt | 76,520 |
| (9,132 | ) | 36 |
| 67,424 |
|
Subordinated secured debt | 1,103 |
| 77 |
| 80 |
| 1,260 |
|
Unsecured subordinated debt | 159 |
| — |
| — |
| 159 |
|
Preferred equity | 351 |
| 70 |
| 573 |
| 994 |
|
Common/common equivalents equity | 3 |
| — |
| — |
| 3 |
|
Total issuances | 78,136 |
| (8,985 | ) | 689 |
| 69,840 |
|
Settlements | | | | |
Senior secured debt | (10,028 | ) | — |
| (4,234 | ) | (14,262 | ) |
Total settlements | (10,028 | ) | — |
| (4,234 | ) | (14,262 | ) |
Sales | | | | |
Preferred equity | (989 | ) | — |
| — |
| (989 | ) |
Common/common equivalents equity | — |
| (3,000 | ) | — |
| (3,000 | ) |
Total sales | (989 | ) | (3,000 | ) | — |
| (3,989 | ) |
Fair value as of June 30, 2013 | | | | |
Senior secured debt | 166,355 |
| 31,489 |
| 19,191 |
| 217,035 |
|
Subordinated secured debt | 94,127 |
| 8,217 |
| 10,676 |
| 113,020 |
|
Unsecured subordinated debt | 39,244 |
| — |
| — |
| 39,244 |
|
Preferred equity | 12,706 |
| 7,261 |
| 16,220 |
| 36,187 |
|
Common/common equivalents equity | 2,475 |
| — |
| — |
| 2,475 |
|
Total fair value as of June 30, 2013 | $ | 314,907 |
| $ | 46,967 |
| $ | 46,087 |
| $ | 407,961 |
|
There were no purchases of level 3 investments during the three months ended June 30, 2013.
Unrealized (Depreciation) Appreciation of Level 3 Investments
The following table summarizes the unrealized appreciation (depreciation) that we recognized on those investments for which we determined fair value using unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three months ended June 30, 2014 | Three months ended June 30, 2013 |
(in thousands) | Non-affiliate Investments | Affiliate Investments | Control Investments | Total | Non-affiliate Investments | Affiliate Investments | Control Investments | Total |
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | | | | | | | |
Senior secured debt | $ | (1,452 | ) | $ | (833 | ) | $ | 12 |
| $ | (2,273 | ) | $ | 57 |
| $ | 62 |
| $ | 6 |
| $ | 125 |
|
Subordinated secured debt | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| (46 | ) | 5 |
| — |
| (41 | ) |
Preferred equity | 9 |
| — |
| 347 |
| 356 |
| 414 |
| 485 |
| (816 | ) | 83 |
|
Common/common equivalents equity | 209 |
| (1 | ) | — |
| 208 |
| (147 | ) | (1,223 | ) | — |
| (1,370 | ) |
Total change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on Level 3 investments | $ | (1,234 | ) | $ | (834 | ) | $ | 359 |
| $ | (1,709 | ) | $ | 278 |
| $ | (671 | ) | $ | (810 | ) | $ | (1,203 | ) |
The following table provides a reconciliation of fair value changes during the six months ended June 30, 2014 for all investments for which we determine fair value using unobservable (Level 3) factors:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
(in thousands) | Fair value measurements using unobservable inputs (Level 3) |
Non-affiliate Investments | Affiliate Investments | Control Investments | Total |
Fair value as of December 31, 2013 | | | | |
Senior secured debt | $ | 105,674 |
| $ | 51,471 |
| $ | 19,892 |
| $ | 177,037 |
|
Subordinated secured debt | 97,497 |
| — |
| 10,841 |
| 108,338 |
|
Unsecured subordinated debt | 42,452 |
| — |
| — |
| 42,452 |
|
Preferred equity | 8,261 |
| 3,656 |
| 13,175 |
| 25,092 |
|
Common/common equivalents equity | 2,504 |
| 1,665 |
| — |
| 4,169 |
|
Total fair value as of December 31, 2013 | 256,388 |
| 56,792 |
| 43,908 |
| 357,088 |
|
Realized/unrealized gain (loss) | | | | |
Senior secured debt | (1,172 | ) | (15,809 | ) | (36 | ) | (17,017 | ) |
Subordinated secured debt | (4,070 | ) | — |
| — |
| (4,070 | ) |
Preferred equity | (1,190 | ) | (381 | ) | (5,992 | ) | (7,563 | ) |
Common/common equivalents equity | (31 | ) | (153 | ) | — |
| (184 | ) |
Total realized/unrealized gain (loss) | (6,463 | ) | (16,343 | ) | (6,028 | ) | (28,834 | ) |
Issuances | | | | |
Senior secured debt | 6,699 |
| 570 |
| 27 |
| 7,296 |
|
Subordinated secured debt | 1,856 |
| — |
| 164 |
| 2,020 |
|
Unsecured subordinated debt | 916 |
| — |
| — |
| 916 |
|
Preferred equity | 321 |
| — |
| — |
| 321 |
|
Total issuances | 9,792 |
| 570 |
| 191 |
| 10,553 |
|
Settlements | | | | |
Senior secured debt | (16,028 | ) | (2,582 | ) | (3,146 | ) | (21,756 | ) |
Subordinated secured debt | (43,365 | ) | — |
| — |
| (43,365 | ) |
Unsecured subordinated debt | (20,547 | ) | — |
| — |
| (20,547 | ) |
Preferred equity | (64 | ) | — |
| — |
| (64 | ) |
Total settlements | (80,004 | ) | (2,582 | ) | (3,146 | ) | (85,732 | ) |
Sales | | | | |
Senior secured debt | (45,492 | ) | — |
| — |
| (45,492 | ) |
Subordinated secured debt | (9,534 | ) | — |
| — |
| (9,534 | ) |
Preferred equity | (4,739 | ) | — |
| — |
| (4,739 | ) |
Common/common equivalents equity | (406 | ) | — |
| — |
| (406 | ) |
Total sales | (60,171 | ) | — |
| — |
| (60,171 | ) |
Transfers | | | | |
Common/common equivalents equity | (475 | ) | — |
| — |
| (475 | ) |
Total transfers | (475 | ) | — |
| — |
| (475 | ) |
Fair value as of June 30, 2014 | | | | |
Senior secured debt | 49,681 |
| 33,650 |
| 16,737 |
| 100,068 |
|
Subordinated secured debt | 42,384 |
| — |
| 11,005 |
| 53,389 |
|
Unsecured subordinated debt | 22,821 |
| — |
| — |
| 22,821 |
|
Preferred equity | 2,589 |
| 3,275 |
| 7,183 |
| 13,047 |
|
Common/common equivalents equity | 1,592 |
| 1,512 |
| — |
| 3,104 |
|
Total fair value as of June 30, 2014 | $ | 119,067 |
| $ | 38,437 |
| $ | 34,925 |
| $ | 192,429 |
|
There were no purchases of level 3 investments during the six months ended June 30, 2014.
The following table provides a reconciliation of fair value changes during the six months ended June 30, 2013 for all investments for which we determine fair value using unobservable (Level 3) factors:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
(in thousands) | Fair value measurements using unobservable inputs (Level 3) |
Non-affiliate Investments | Affiliate Investments | Control Investments | Total |
Fair value December 31, 2012 | | | | |
Senior secured debt | $ | 163,125 |
| $ | 48,060 |
| $ | 23,376 |
| $ | 234,561 |
|
Subordinated secured debt | 96,585 |
| 7,880 |
| 10,518 |
| 114,983 |
|
Unsecured subordinated debt | 26,274 |
| — |
| — |
| 26,274 |
|
Preferred equity | 16,561 |
| 6,038 |
| 16,112 |
| 38,711 |
|
Common/common equivalents equity | 3,048 |
| 101 |
| — |
| 3,149 |
|
Total fair value December 31, 2012 | 305,593 |
| 62,079 |
| 50,006 |
| 417,678 |
|
Realized/unrealized gain (loss) | | | | |
Senior secured debt | 1,127 |
| 208 |
| 6 |
| 1,341 |
|
Subordinated secured debt | (101 | ) | 190 |
| — |
| 89 |
|
Preferred equity | (155 | ) | 1,084 |
| (1,031 | ) | (102 | ) |
Common/common equivalents equity | (573 | ) | 2,899 |
| — |
| 2,326 |
|
Total realized/unrealized gain (loss) | 298 |
| 4,381 |
| (1,025 | ) | 3,654 |
|
Issuances | | | | |
Senior secured debt | 85,005 |
| (9,055 | ) | 43 |
| 75,993 |
|
Subordinated secured debt | 7,053 |
| 157 |
| 158 |
| 7,368 |
|
Unsecured subordinated debt | 12,970 |
| — |
| — |
| 12,970 |
|
Preferred equity | 398 |
| 139 |
| 1,139 |
| 1,676 |
|
Common/common equivalents equity | 3 |
| — |
| — |
| 3 |
|
Total issuances | 105,429 |
| (8,759 | ) | 1,340 |
| 98,010 |
|
Settlements | | | | |
Senior secured debt | (75,552 | ) | (7,724 | ) | (4,234 | ) | (87,510 | ) |
Subordinated secured debt | (9,410 | ) | (10 | ) | — |
| (9,420 | ) |
Total settlements | (84,962 | ) | (7,734 | ) | (4,234 | ) | (96,930 | ) |
Sales | | | | |
Senior secured debt | (7,350 | ) | — |
| — |
| (7,350 | ) |
Preferred equity | (4,098 | ) | — |
| — |
| (4,098 | ) |
Common/common equivalents equity | (3 | ) | (3,000 | ) | — |
| (3,003 | ) |
Total sales | (11,451 | ) | (3,000 | ) | — |
| (14,451 | ) |
Fair value as of June 30, 2013 | | | | |
Senior secured debt | 166,355 |
| 31,489 |
| 19,191 |
| 217,035 |
|
Subordinated secured debt | 94,127 |
| 8,217 |
| 10,676 |
| 113,020 |
|
Unsecured subordinated debt | 39,244 |
| — |
| — |
| 39,244 |
|
Preferred equity | 12,706 |
| 7,261 |
| 16,220 |
| 36,187 |
|
Common/common equivalents equity | 2,475 |
| — |
| — |
| 2,475 |
|
Total fair value as of June 30, 2013 | $ | 314,907 |
| $ | 46,967 |
| $ | 46,087 |
| $ | 407,961 |
|
There were no purchases of level 3 investments during the six months ended June 30, 2013.
Unrealized (Depreciation) Appreciation of Level 3 Investments
The following table summarizes the unrealized appreciation (depreciation) that we recognized on those investments for which we determined fair value using unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Six months ended June 30, 2014 | Six months ended June 30, 2013 |
(in thousands) | Non-affiliate Investments | Affiliate Investments | Control Investments | Total | Non-affiliate Investments | Affiliate Investments | Control Investments | Total |
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | | | | | | | |
Senior secured debt | $ | (1,346 | ) | $ | (15,809 | ) | $ | (37 | ) | $ | (17,192 | ) | $ | 1,127 |
| $ | 209 |
| $ | 6 |
| $ | 1,342 |
|
Subordinated secured debt | (33 | ) | — |
| — |
| (33 | ) | 1,932 |
| 190 |
| — |
| 2,122 |
|
Preferred equity | 2,728 |
| (381 | ) | (5,992 | ) | (3,645 | ) | 48 |
| 1,083 |
| (1,031 | ) | 100 |
|
Common/common equivalents equity | 506 |
| (153 | ) | — |
| 353 |
| 1,130 |
| 23 |
| — |
| 1,153 |
|
Total change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on Level 3 investments | $ | 1,855 |
| $ | (16,343 | ) | $ | (6,029 | ) | $ | (20,517 | ) | $ | 4,237 |
| $ | 1,505 |
| $ | (1,025 | ) | $ | 4,717 |
|
Significant Unobservable Inputs
Our investment portfolio is not composed of homogeneous debt and equity securities that can be valued with a small number of inputs. Instead, the majority of our investment portfolio is composed of complex debt and equity securities with distinct contract terms and conditions. As such, our valuation of each investment in our portfolio is unique and complex, often factoring in numerous different inputs, including the historical and forecasted financial and operational performance of the portfolio company, projected cash flows, market multiples, comparable market transactions, the priority of our securities compared with those of other investors, credit risk, interest rates, independent valuations and reviews and other inputs too numerous to list quantitatively herein.
The following table summarizes the significant unobservable inputs in the fair value measurements of our level 3 investments by category of investment and valuation technique as of June 30, 2014:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
($ in thousands) | Fair Value | Valuation Techniques | Unobservable Inputs | Range | Weighted Average |
| Minimum | Maximum |
Senior debt | $ | 100,068 |
| Discounted cash flow | Market interest rate | 8.5 | % | 11.5 | % | 9.3 | % |
|
|
| Pending transactions/Letters of intent | Discount | — | % | — | % | — | % |
|
|
| Market comparable companies | EBITDA multiple(a) | 6.0x |
| 6.0x |
| 6.0x |
|
Subordinated debt | 76,210 |
| Discounted cash flow | Market interest rate | 7.8 | % | 14.0 | % | 12 | % |
|
|
| Pending transactions/Letters of intent | Discount | — | % | — | % | — | % |
|
|
| Market comparable companies | EBITDA multiple(a) | 6.0x |
| 6.0x |
| 6.0x |
|
Preferred and common equity | 16,151 |
| Market comparable companies | EBITDA multiple(a) | 4.4x |
| 10.0x |
| 7.1x |
|
| Pending transactions/Letters of intent | Discount | — | % | — | % | — | % |
|
|
| Discount for minority interest | — | % | 25.0 | % | 3.5 | % |
| $ | 192,429 |
| | | | | |
________________
| |
(a) | EBITDA may include proforma adjustments and/or other addbacks based on specific circumstances related to each investment. |
NOTE 4—CONCENTRATIONS OF INVESTMENT RISK
During the three months ended June 30, 2014, we had concentrations in certain industries, including the healthcare, business services, and manufacturing industries. The following table summarizes our fair value and revenue concentrations in each of those industries:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Investments at fair value | Revenue for the six months ended |
| June 30, 2014 | December 31, 2013 | June 30, 2014 | June 30, 2013 |
(dollars in thousands) | Amount | % of Total Portfolio | Amount | % of Total Portfolio | Amount | % of Total Revenue | Amount | % of Total Revenue |
Industry | | | | | | | | |
Healthcare | $ | 78,087 |
| 39.8 | % | $ | 84,922 |
| 23.0 | % | $ | 4,290 |
| 22.7 | % | $ | 6,699 |
| 25.6 | % |
Business services | 63,554 |
| 32.4 |
| 64,108 |
| 17.4 |
| 3,701 |
| 19.6 |
| 3,854 |
| 14.7 |
|
Manufacturing | 32,306 |
| 16.5 |
| 51,735 |
| 14.0 |
| 4,327 |
| 22.9 |
| 2,448 |
| 9.4 |
|
Total | $ | 173,947 |
| 88.7 |
| $ | 200,765 |
| 54.4 |
| $ | 12,318 |
| 65.2 |
| $ | 13,001 |
| 49.7 |
|
NOTE 5—BORROWINGS
As of June 30, 2014, we reported $150.0 million of borrowings on our Consolidated Balance Sheets at cost. The following table summarizes our borrowing facilities, the facility amounts and amounts outstanding.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | June 30, 2014 | December 31, 2013 |
(dollars in thousands) | Maturity Date | Total Facility/ Program | Amount Outstanding | Total Facility/ Program | Amount Outstanding |
SBIC | | | | | |
2008-10B | September 2018 | $ | 2,600 |
| $ | 2,600 |
| $ | 2,600 |
| $ | 2,600 |
|
2009-10A | March 2019 | 12,000 |
| 12,000 |
| 12,000 |
| 12,000 |
|
2009-10B | September 2019 | 13,000 |
| 13,000 |
| 13,000 |
| 13,000 |
|
2010-10B | September 2020 | 27,500 |
| 27,500 |
| 27,500 |
| 27,500 |
|
2011-10A | March 2021 | 53,500 |
| 53,500 |
| 53,500 |
| 53,500 |
|
2012-10A | March 2022 | 41,400 |
| 41,400 |
| 41,400 |
| 41,400 |
|
MCG Commercial Loan Trust 2006-1 | |
|
|
|
| | |
Series 2006-1 Class D Notes(a) | April 2018 | — |
| — |
| 40,016 |
| 25,172 |
|
Bank of America Unsecured Revolver(b) | |
|
|
|
| | |
Unsecured Revolving Note | November 2014 | — |
| — |
| 20,000 |
| — |
|
Total borrowings | | $ | 150,000 |
| $ | 150,000 |
| $ | 210,016 |
| $ | 175,172 |
|
__________
| |
(a) | In January 2014, the Class D Notes were repaid in full. |
| |
(b) | In April 2014, we terminated the undrawn Bank of America Unsecured Revolver. |
We estimate that the fair value of these borrowings as of June 30, 2014 was approximately $157.6 million, based on a market-yield approach (level 3).
On April 21, 2014, based on our assessment of our excess liquidity, we terminated our undrawn unsecured revolving credit facility with Bank of America, N.A. in the principal amount of $20.0 million, or the Bank of America Unsecured Revolver.
As a BDC, we are not permitted to incur indebtedness or issue senior securities, including preferred stock, unless immediately after such borrowing we have an asset coverage for total borrowings (excluding borrowings by our SBIC facility) of at least 200%. In addition, we may not be permitted to declare any cash dividend or other distribution on our outstanding common shares, or purchase any such shares, unless, at the time of such declaration or purchase, we have an asset coverage ratio of at least 200% after deducting the amount of such dividend, distribution or purchase price. If we are unable to meet this asset coverage requirement, we may not be able to incur additional debt. In October 2008, we received exemptive relief from the SEC which allows us to exclude debt issued by Solutions Capital from the calculation of our consolidated BDC asset coverage ratio. As of June 30, 2014, our ratio of total assets to total borrowings and other senior securities, including secured financing, was 5,413%.
Each of our borrowing facilities has certain financial covenants and non-financial covenants. We were in compliance with the covenants as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.
We had funded our secured borrowing debt facility through a bankruptcy remote, special-purpose, wholly owned subsidiary. Therefore, this subsidiary’s assets were not be available to our creditors. We continued to service those portfolio investments that we used as collateral in our secured borrowing facility.
The following table summarizes repayments of our borrowings based on the final legal maturity or the contractual principal collections of the outstanding loans that comprise the collateral, where applicable. Actual repayments could differ significantly due to future prepayments by our borrowers, modifications of our borrowers’ existing loan agreements, and monetizations.
|
| | | |
(in thousands) | June 30, 2014 |
2014 | $ | — |
|
2015 | — |
|
2016 | — |
|
2017 | — |
|
2018 | 2,600 |
|
Thereafter | 147,400 |
|
Total | $ | 150,000 |
|
SBIC Debentures
In December 2004, we formed a wholly owned subsidiary, Solutions Capital. Solutions Capital has a license from the SBA to operate as an SBIC under the SBIC Act. The license permits Solutions Capital to borrow up to $150.0 million from the SBA, which is the maximum amount of outstanding leverage available to single-license SBIC companies.
To realize the full $150.0 million in borrowings for which we have received approval under the SBIC program, we have funded a total of $75.0 million to Solutions Capital. As of each of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, Solutions Capital had borrowed $150.0 million from the SBA. We are permitted to use these funds to provide debt and equity capital to qualifying small businesses. However, we may not use these borrowings to provide additional financing to certain companies that are currently in our portfolio without SBA approval. In addition, we may not use these funds to provide working capital to MCG, Solutions Capital's parent company.
As of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, we had $114.5 million and $207.0 million, respectively, of investments in Solutions Capital and we had $129.5 million and $32.5 million, respectively, of restricted cash to be used for additional investments by Solutions Capital.
As of June 30, 2014, Solutions Capital had borrowings outstanding as summarized in the following table:
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| Amount Outstanding | |
(dollars in thousands) | June 30, 2014 | December 31, 2013 | Rate |
Tranche | | | | |
2008-10B | $ | 2,600 |
| $ | 2,600 |
| 6.44 | % | Fixed |
2009-10A | 12,000 |
| 12,000 |
| 5.34 | % | Fixed |
2009-10B | 13,000 |
| 13,000 |
| 4.95 | % | Fixed |
2010-10B | 27,500 |
| 27,500 |
| 3.93 | % | Fixed |
2011-10A | 53,500 |
| 53,500 |
| 4.80 | % | Fixed |
2012-10A | 41,400 |
| 41,400 |
| 3.38 | % | Fixed |
Total | $ | 150,000 |
| $ | 150,000 |
| 4.33 | % | |
In October 2008, we received exemptive relief from the SEC which allows us to exclude debt issued by Solutions Capital from the calculation of our consolidated BDC asset coverage ratio.
Bank of America Unsecured Revolver
In November 2012, we obtained an unsecured revolving credit facility with Bank of America, N.A. in the principal amount of $20.0 million. On April 21, 2014, we terminated our Bank of America Unsecured Revolver.
MCG Commercial Loan Trust 2006-1
In April 2006, we completed a $500.0 million debt securitization through the MCG Commercial Loan Trust 2006-1, or 2006-1 Trust, a wholly owned subsidiary. The 2006-1 Trust issued six classes of notes with interest rates ranging from LIBOR plus 0.33% to LIBOR plus 2.25%. The reinvestment period for the 2006-1 Trust ended on July 20, 2011 and all subsequent principal collections or monetization proceeds that we received from collateral used to securitize this 2006-1 Trust were applied to the outstanding balance of that facility. As of December 31, 2013, we had $25.2 million of securitized Class D Notes outstanding under the 2006-1 Trust, which was secured by $76.3 million of loans and equity investments and $13.9 million of cash. We retained all of the equity in the securitization. In November 2013, we directed the trustee to redeem the remaining notes on the next quarterly payment date and, on January 21, 2014, we repaid the Class D Notes in full and the loan and equity investments held by the 2006-1 Trust were transferred back to MCG, the parent.
Note 6—SECURED FINANCING
In June 2014, we monetized substantially all of our investment in Advanced Sleep Concepts, Inc., or Advanced Sleep, through the sale of a 95% participation interest in our senior and subordinated loans. Under the terms of the sale, the purchaser will receive 100% of the payments related to the loan, including interest and principal, until the total payments received exceeds the purchase price plus any additional advances funded by the purchaser to Advanced Sleep and certain expenses incurred by the purchaser. Thereafter, the purchaser will receive 95% and we will receive 5% of any payments received from Advanced Sleep. Under the terms of the sale, the purchaser will have no recourse to us for any payments. We will continue to service the Advanced Sleep loans on behalf of the purchaser for which we will receive an annual fee of $23,000.
We follow the guidance in Accounting Standard Codification Topic 860—Transfers and Servicing, or ASC 860, when accounting for loan participations and other partial loan sales. Such guidance requires a participation or other partial loan sale to meet the definition of a “participating interest,” as defined in the guidance, in order for sale treatment to be allowed. Due to the non-pro-rata allocation of payments, the sale of the interest in Advanced Sleep's loans does not meet the definition of a participating interest under ASC 860 and the loans remain on our Consolidated Balance Sheets and the proceeds from the sale are recorded as a secured financing until all the criteria for sale accounting are met. The secured financing is carried at fair value to correspond with the related investments, which are carried at fair value (Level 3).
NOTE 7—CAPITAL STOCK
We have one class of common stock and one class of preferred stock authorized. Our board of directors is authorized to provide for the issuance of shares of preferred stock in one or more series, establish the number of shares to be included in each such series and establish the designations, voting powers, preferences and rights of the shares of each such series, and any qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof, subject to the 1940 Act.
STOCK REPURCHASE PROGRAM
On January 17, 2012, our board of directors authorized a stock repurchase program of up to $35.0 million, which was terminated after we effected repurchases totaling approximately $29.4 million. On October 25, 2013, our board of directors authorized a second stock repurchase program of up to $25.0 million. On February 28, 2014, our board of directors increased the second stock repurchase program to $35.0 million. On April 25, 2014, our board of directors terminated the second stock repurchase program effective as of May 2, 2014 and authorized a new stock repurchase program of up to $50.0 million effective as of May 5, 2014. Under the new program, which was terminated on August 5, 2014, we were authorized to repurchase shares of our common stock in open market transactions, including through block purchases, depending on prevailing market conditions and other factors. The repurchase program could have been extended, modified or discontinued at any time for any reason. The program did not obligate us to acquire any
specific number of shares, and all repurchases were made in accordance with SEC Rule 10b-18, which sets certain restrictions on the method, timing, price and volume of stock repurchases. The following table summarizes our stock repurchases for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014.
|
| | | | | | |
| Three months ended June 30, 2014 | Six months ended June 30, 2014 |
Dollar amount repurchased (in thousands) | $ | 47,229 |
| $ | 57,818 |
|
Shares repurchased | 13,313,493 |
| 16,072,760 |
|
Average price per share | $ | 3.55 |
| $ | 3.60 |
|
Discount to quarterly weighted average net asset value per share | 18.8 | % | 18.9 | % |
On August 5, 2014, our board of directors terminated our existing stock repurchase program and authorized a new stock repurchase program of up to $50.0 million effective as of August 12, 2014. See Note 14—Subsequent Events.
We requested and received the assurance of the staff of the Division of Investment Management that it would not recommend enforcement action to the SEC under the 1940 Act or Rule 17d-1 thereunder if we engage in a stock repurchase program and agree not to issue additional restricted stock under any compensation plan unless such issuance, together with all restricted stock outstanding under all compensation plans, does not exceed 10% of our outstanding common stock at the time of such issuance less the total number of shares previously issued, in the aggregate, pursuant to all compensatory plans. Although as of June 30, 2014, there were 1,426,811 shares of our common stock available for issuance under our Third Amended and Restated 2006 Employee Restricted Stock Plan, or 2006 Plan, no shares of restricted stock could be issued under our 2006 Plan or our Third Amended and Restated 2006 Non-Employee Director Restricted Stock Plan, or 2006 Non-Employee Plan, because the 10% threshold set forth in the SEC's order had been reached due to shares we repurchased under our stock repurchase program.
DISTRIBUTIONS
The following table summarizes our distributions per share declared since January 1, 2013:
|
| | | | | |
Date Declared | Record Date | Payment Date | Amount |
August 5, 2014 | August 20, 2014 | August 29, 2014 | $ | 0.050 |
|
April 25, 2014 | May 9, 2014 | May 30, 2014 | $ | 0.070 |
|
February 28, 2014 | March 14, 2014 | March 28, 2014 | $ | 0.125 |
|
October 25, 2013 | November 8, 2013 | November 22, 2013 | $ | 0.125 |
|
July 26, 2013 | August 9, 2013 | August 30, 2013 | $ | 0.125 |
|
April 26, 2013 | May 10, 2013 | May 31, 2013 | $ | 0.125 |
|
March 1, 2013 | March 15, 2013 | March 29, 2013 | $ | 0.125 |
|
NOTE 8—SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION
EMPLOYEE SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION
Third Amended and Restated 2006 Employee Restricted Stock Plan
From time to time, we have awarded shares of restricted common stock to employees under our 2006 Plan, which our stockholders initially approved in June 2006. In May 2010, our stockholders approved an amendment to the 2006 Plan increasing the number of shares we may award from 3,500,000 to 6,050,000 shares. Shares of restricted common stock awarded under the 2006 Plan may be subject to the employees' meeting service or performance conditions specified at the time of award. The award date is the date on which the shares are awarded by the Compensation Committee of our board of directors, while the fair value of the respective stock award is based on the closing price of our common stock on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on the award date. We amortize restricted stock awards on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period and report this expense as amortization of employee restricted stock awards on our Consolidated Statements of Operations.
During each of the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, no shares of restricted stock were issued under the 2006 Plan.
During the six months ended June 30, 2014, we recognized $1.6 million of compensation expense related to share-based compensation awards including $1.1 million of compensation costs associated with the retirement of our former chief executive officer and other employee terminations. During the six months ended June 30, 2013, we recognized
$0.8 million of compensation expense related to share-based compensation awards. As of June 30, 2014, all the restricted share awards for which forfeiture provisions had not lapsed carried non-forfeitable dividend rights to the holder of the restricted shares. As of June 30, 2014, we had $0.7 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to restricted common stock awarded to employees. We expect to recognize the remaining costs over the remaining weighted-average requisite service period of 1.65 years.
Non-Employee Director Share-Based Compensation
During June 2006, our stockholders initially approved the 2006 Non-Employee Plan which was subsequently amended and restated. In May 2010, our stockholders approved an amendment to the 2006 Non-Employee Plan that increased the number of shares we may award to non-employee members of our board of directors from 100,000 to 150,000 shares. During the six months ended June 30, 2014, no shares of restricted stock were issued to non-employee directors. Our board of directors has waived the right to an automatic award of 7,500 shares of restricted stock, previously awarded to non-employee directors upon the commencement of each three-year term of board service. During the six months ended June 30, 2013, we awarded 15,000 shares of restricted common stock to non-employee directors. During each of the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, we recognized less than $0.1 million of compensation costs related to share-based awards to non-employee directors. We include this compensation cost in general and administrative expense on our Consolidated Statements of Operations. As of June 30, 2014, we had $0.1 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to restricted common stock awarded to non-employee directors, which we expect to recognize over the remaining weighted-average requisite service period of 1.5 years.
SUMMARY OF EMPLOYEE AND NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION
The following table summarizes our restricted stock award activity during the six months ended June 30, 2014:
|
| | | | | |
| Shares | Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value per Share |
Subject to forfeiture provisions as of December 31, 2013 | 895,740 |
| $ | 4.55 |
|
Awarded | — |
| $ | — |
|
Forfeiture provision satisfied | (517,165 | ) | $ | 4.58 |
|
Forfeited | (1,805 | ) | $ | 6.97 |
|
Subject to forfeiture provisions as of June 30, 2014 | 376,770 |
| $ | 4.50 |
|
NOTE 9—INCOME TAXES
As a RIC, we are taxed under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code. As such, our income generally is not taxable to the extent we distribute it to stockholders and we meet certain qualification tests as outlined in the Internal Revenue Code. However, income from certain investments owned by our wholly owned subsidiaries is subject to federal, state and local income taxes. On a continuing basis, we monitor distribution requirements in order to comply with Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code. To qualify as a RIC for federal income tax purposes, we must, among other things:
| |
1. | continue to qualify as a BDC under the 1940 Act at all times during each taxable year; |
| |
2. | derive in each taxable year at least 90% of our gross income from (1) dividends, interest, payments with respect to certain securities, loans, gains from the sale of stock or other securities, or other income derived with respect to our business of investing in such stock or securities and (2) net income derived from an interest in a “qualified publicly traded partnership;” and |
| |
3. | diversify our holdings so that at the end of each quarter of the taxable year: |
| |
a. | at least 50% of the value of our assets consist of cash, cash items, U.S. government securities, securities of other RICs, and other securities, if such other securities of any one issuer do not represent more than 5% of the value of our assets or more than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of the issuer; and |
| |
b. | no more than 25% of the value of our assets is invested in the securities, other than U.S. government securities or securities of other RICs, of (i) one issuer, (ii) two or more issuers that are controlled, as determined under applicable Internal Revenue Code rules, by us and are engaged in the same or similar or related trades or businesses or (iii) one or more “qualified publicly traded partnerships.” |
If we fail to satisfy the distribution requirement or fail to qualify as a RIC in any taxable year, we would be subject to tax in that year on all of our taxable income at regular corporate rates, regardless of whether we make any distributions to our stockholders. Distributions would not be required, and any distributions made in taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2014 would be taxable to our stockholders as ordinary dividend income that, subject to certain limitations, may be eligible for the 15% or 20% maximum tax rate (depending on income thresholds) to the extent of our current and accumulated earnings and profits. Subject to certain limitations under the Code, corporate distributees would be eligible for the dividends-received deduction. Distributions in excess of our current and accumulated earnings and profits would be treated first as a return of capital to the extent of the stockholder’s tax basis, and any remaining distributions would be treated as a capital gain.
We use the asset and liability method to account for our Taxable Subsidiaries' income taxes. Using this method, we recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities for the estimated future tax effects attributable to temporary differences between financial reporting and the tax basis of assets and liabilities. In addition, we recognize deferred tax benefits associated with net operating carryforwards that we may use to offset future tax obligations. We measure deferred tax assets and liabilities using the enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which we expect to recover or settle those temporary differences. During each of the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, we recorded income tax provisions of less than $0.1 million, which were primarily attributable to flow-through taxable income on certain investments held by our subsidiaries.
From December 2001 through June 30, 2014, we declared aggregate per share distributions of $14.08. Each year, we mail statements on Form 1099-DIV to our stockholders that identify whether we made distributions from ordinary income, net capital gains on the sale of securities, each of which are taxable distributions, and/or a return of paid-in-capital surplus, which is a nontaxable distribution. A portion of our distributions may represent a return of capital to our stockholders, to the extent that the total distributions paid in a given year exceed current and accumulated taxable earnings and profits. All or a portion of the distributions that we paid to stockholders during fiscal years 2013, 2012, 2011, 2008, 2006, 2005, 2004 and 2003 represented a return of capital.
We determine the tax attributes of our distributions as of the end of our fiscal year based upon our taxable income for the full year and distributions paid during the full year. Therefore, a determination of tax attributes made on a quarterly basis may not be representative of the actual tax attributes of distributions for a full year. If we determined the tax attributes of our distributions as of June 30, 2014, 66% would be from ordinary income and 34% would be a return of capital. Future distributions will take into account the requirements for us to distribute the majority of our taxable income to fulfill our distribution requirements as a RIC, together with an assessment of our gains and losses recognized or to be recognized for tax purposes, portfolio transactional events, liquidity, cash earnings and our asset coverage ratio at the time of such decision.
On December 22, 2010, the Regulated Investment Company Modernization Act of 2010, or the Modernization Act, was enacted, which changed various technical rules governing the tax treatment of RICs. The changes are generally effective for taxable years beginning after the date of enactment. One of the more prominent changes addresses capital loss carryforwards. Under the Modernization Act, each RIC will be permitted to carry forward capital losses incurred in taxable years beginning after the date of enactment for an unlimited period. However, any losses incurred during those subsequent taxable years will be required to be utilized prior to the losses incurred in pre-enactment taxable years, which carry an expiration date. As a result of this ordering rule, pre-enactment capital loss carryforwards may be more likely to expire unused. Additionally, post-enactment capital loss carryforwards will retain their character as either short-term or long-term capital losses rather than being considered all short-term as permitted under previous regulation. For the tax years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, we have total net capital losses of $120.8 million which have no expiration and will be carried forward indefinitely to offset future net capital gains. Capital loss carryforwards from tax years 2009 of $54.2 million and 2010 of $5.2 million will expire December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2018, respectively, unless utilized to offset future net capital gains prior to those expiration dates to the extent permitted by federal tax law.
Taxable income differs from net income recognized in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, or GAAP, because of temporary and permanent differences in income and expense recognition.
Taxable income generally excludes unrealized gains and losses from appreciation or depreciation of our investments, which are included in GAAP net income. Further, amounts recognized for financial reporting purposes may differ from amounts included in taxable income due to the accrued dividends on preferred stock, which increase the book basis but not the tax basis of our investments, and non-accrual interest on loans, which increase the tax basis but not book basis.
NOTE 10—EARNINGS PER SHARE
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted income per common share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) | Three months ended June 30, | Six months ended June 30, |
| 2014 | 2013 | 2014 | 2013 |
Numerator for basic and diluted earnings per share | | | | |
Net (loss) income | $ | (5,268 | ) | $ | 8,574 |
| $ | (24,204 | ) | $ | 16,326 |
|
Less: Dividends declared—common and restricted shares | (4,402 | ) | (8,902 | ) | (13,091 | ) | (17,804 | ) |
Undistributed loss | (9,670 | ) | (328 | ) | (37,295 | ) | (1,478 | ) |
Percentage allocated to common shares(a) | 100.0 | % | 98.4 | % | 100.0 | % | 98.4 | % |
Undistributed earnings—common shares | (9,670 | ) | (323 | ) | (37,295 | ) | (1,454 | ) |
Add: Dividends declared—common shares | 4,402 |
| 8,760 |
| 13,091 |
| 17,519 |
|
Numerator for common shares outstanding excluding participating shares | (5,268 | ) | 8,437 |
| (24,204 | ) | 16,065 |
|
Numerator for participating unvested shares only | — |
| 137 |
| — |
| 261 |
|
Numerator for basic and diluted earnings per share—total | $ | (5,268 | ) | $ | 8,574 |
| $ | (24,204 | ) | $ | 16,326 |
|
Denominator for basic and diluted weighted-average shares outstanding | | | | |
Common shares outstanding | 61,221 |
| 70,095 |
| 65,286 |
| 70,229 |
|
Participating unvested shares | — |
| 1,122 |
| — |
| 1,132 |
|
Basic and diluted weighted-average common shares outstanding—total | 61,221 |
| 71,217 |
| 65,286 |
| 71,361 |
|
Earnings (loss) per share—basic and diluted | | | | |
Excluding participating unvested shares | $ | (0.09 | ) | $ | 0.12 |
| $ | (0.37 | ) | $ | 0.23 |
|
Including participating unvested shares | $ | (0.09 | ) | $ | 0.12 |
| $ | (0.37 | ) | $ | 0.23 |
|
| | | | | |
(a) Basic and diluted weighted-average common shares: | | | | |
Weighted-average common shares outstanding | 61,221 |
| 70,095 |
| 65,286 |
| 70,229 |
|
Weighted-average restricted shares | — |
| 1,122 |
| — |
| 1,132 |
|
Total basic and diluted weighted-average common shares | 61,221 |
| 71,217 |
| 65,286 |
| 71,361 |
|
Percentage allocated to common shares | 100.0 | % | 98.4 | % | 100.0 | % | 98.4 | % |
(b) For the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, we excluded 510 and 702 weighted-average shares of restricted common stock from the calculation of diluted loss per share because the inclusion of these shares would have had an anti-dilutive impact on the calculation of loss per share. |
Holders of unvested shares of our issued and outstanding restricted common stock are eligible to receive non-forfeitable dividends. As such, these unvested shares are participating securities requiring the two-class method of computing earnings per share in periods with net income. Pursuant to the two-class method, we report basic and diluted loss per share both inclusive and exclusive of the impact of the participating securities.
NOTE 11—COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We are a party to certain legal proceedings incidental to the normal course of our business, including the enforcement of our rights under contracts with our portfolio companies. Furthermore, third parties may try to seek to impose liability on us in connection with the activities of our portfolio companies. While the outcome of these legal proceedings cannot at this time be predicted with certainty, we do not expect that these proceedings will have a material effect on our financial condition or results of operations.
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
During the normal course of business, we are party to certain financial instruments, including loans, participations in loans, guarantees, letters of credit and other financial commitments. We conduct extensive due diligence and, when appropriate, obtain collateral to limit our credit risk. Generally, these commitments have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses, which may require payment of a fee by the counterparty. We expect many of these commitments
will not be fully used before they expire; therefore, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements.
We do not report the unused portions of these commitments on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. As of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, we had $5.0 million and $18.1 million, respectively, of outstanding unused loan commitments. We estimate that as of each of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the fair value of these commitments was less than $0.1 million based on the fees that we currently charge to enter into similar arrangements, taking into account the creditworthiness of the counterparties. As of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, we had no outstanding guarantees or standby letters of credit.
LEASE OBLIGATIONS
The lease on our headquarters in Arlington, Virginia has a term from October 2012 through November 2014 with a base rent of $0.4 million per year. The base rent will not increase during the term of the lease. In February 2014, we entered into a new lease for our headquarters in Arlington, Virginia which has a term from December 2014 through December 2015. We have an option to extend the new lease for one additional one year period, which may be exercised prior to December 31, 2014. The base rent for the new lease is $0.7 million per year with a $0.2 million rent credit. The base rent will not increase during the term of the new lease. As of June 30, 2014, our obligations for the remaining term of the lease is $0.7 million, of which $0.4 million will be payable during the next twelve months.
NOTE 12—FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
The following schedule summarizes our financial highlights for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013: |
| | | | | | |
| Six months ended |
(in thousands, except per share amounts) | June 30 |
| 2014 | 2013 |
Per share data | | |
Net asset value at beginning of period(a) | $ | 4.74 |
| $ | 5.18 |
|
Net (loss) income(b) |
|
| |
Net operating income before net investment (loss) gain and income tax provision | 0.07 |
| 0.22 |
|
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | (0.13 | ) | (0.02 | ) |
Net unrealized (depreciation) appreciation on investments | (0.31 | ) | 0.03 |
|
Income tax provision | — |
| — |
|
Net (loss) income | (0.37 | ) | 0.23 |
|
Net decrease in net assets resulting from distributions | | |
Distributions declared from net operating income | (0.13 | ) | (0.19 | ) |
Distributions declared in excess of net operating income | (0.07 | ) | (0.06 | ) |
Net decrease in net assets resulting from distributions | (0.20 | ) | (0.25 | ) |
Net increase in net assets relating to stock-based transactions |
|
| |
Repurchase of common stock(b) | 0.20 |
| 0.01 |
|
Net increase in stockholders’ equity from restricted stock amortization(b) | 0.02 |
| 0.01 |
|
Net increase in stockholders’ equity from other stock transactions(b) | 0.03 |
| — |
|
Net increase in net assets relating to stock-based transactions | 0.25 |
| 0.02 |
|
Net asset value at end of period(a) | 4.42 |
| 5.18 |
|
Market price per share |
| |
Beginning of period | $ | 4.26 |
| $ | 4.60 |
|
End of period | $ | 3.92 |
| $ | 5.21 |
|
Total Return(c) | -3.40 | % | 18.70 | % |
Shares of Common Stock Outstanding |
|
| |
Weighted-average—basic and diluted | 65,286 |
| 71,361 |
|
End of period | 54,252 |
| 71,222 |
|
Net assets |
|
| |
Average | $ | 296,338 |
| $ | 369,006 |
|
End of period | $ | 239,789 |
| $ | 368,709 |
|
Ratios (annualized) |
|
| |
Operating expenses to average net assets | 9.52 | % | 5.77 | % |
Net operating income to average net assets | 3.32 | % | 8.55 | % |
General and administrative expense to average net assets | 3.90 | % | 1.16 | % |
Return on average equity | -16.48 | % | 8.95 | % |
__________________ (a) Based on total number of shares outstanding. | | |
(b) Based on weighted-average number of shares outstanding. | | |
(c) Total return = [(ending market price per share – beginning market price per share + dividends paid per share) / beginning market price per share]. |
NOTE 13—SIGNIFICANT SUBSIDIARY
We have determined that for the six months ended June 30, 2014, RadioPharmacy Investors, LLC, or RadioPharmacy, is an unconsolidated portfolio company that meets the conditions of a significant subsidiary and therefore, we are presenting summarized financial information of RadioPharmacy as of the most recent periods for which data is available. RadioPharmacy is a private company, which has prepared financial statements in accordance with GAAP but not in accordance with Regulation S-X.
RadioPharmacy is a nuclear compounding pharmacy for regional hospitals and imaging centers. During the six months ended June 30, 2014, we recognized $1.1 million of total revenue from our investment in RadioPharmacy. The following table sets forth summarized balance sheet information for RadioPharmacy as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.
|
| | | | | | |
(in thousands) | June 30, 2014 | December 31, 2013 |
| (unaudited) | (unaudited) |
Assets: | | |
Total current assets | $ | 6,431 |
| $ | 6,573 |
|
Total non-current assets | 19,677 |
| 19,409 |
|
Total assets | $ | 26,108 |
| $ | 25,982 |
|
| | |
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity: | | |
Current liabilities | $ | 3,612 |
| $ | 3,351 |
|
Long-term liabilities | 19,806 |
| 20,411 |
|
Preferred stock | 1 |
| 1 |
|
Other stockholders' equity | 2,689 |
| 2,219 |
|
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity | $ | 26,108 |
| $ | 25,982 |
|
The following table sets forth summarized income statement information for RadioPharmacy for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013.
|
| | | | | | |
| Six months ended June 30, |
(in thousands) | 2014 | 2013 |
| (unaudited) | (unaudited) |
Sales | $ | 13,467 |
| $ | 13,443 |
|
Gross margin | $ | 8,062 |
| $ | 7,888 |
|
Net income (loss) | $ | 470 |
| $ | 36 |
|
NOTE 14—SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
STOCK REPURCHASE PROGRAM
From June 30, 2014 through August 5, 2014, we repurchased 5,169,336 shares of our common stock for $20.4 million at a weighted average price of $3.95 per share which was a 10.7% discount from our June 30, 2014 net asset value
On August 5, 2014, our board of directors authorized a stock repurchase program of up to $50.0 million effective as of August 12, 2014 and terminated, effective as of August 5, 2014, the $50.0 million stock repurchase program initially approved on April 25, 2014.
Under the program, MCG management is authorized to repurchase shares in open market transactions, including through block purchases, depending on prevailing market conditions and other factors. The repurchase program may be extended, modified or discontinued at any time for any reason. The program does not obligate MCG to acquire any specific number of shares, and all repurchases will be made in accordance with SEC Rule 10b-18, which sets certain restrictions on the method, timing, price and volume of stock repurchases.
Review Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
MCG Capital Corporation
We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of MCG Capital Corporation, including the consolidated schedule of investments, as of June 30, 2014, the related consolidated statements of operations for the three- and six- month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, and the related consolidated statements of changes in net assets, cash flows and financial highlights for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013. These financial statements are the responsibility of MCG Capital Corporation’s management.
We conducted our review in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.
Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the consolidated financial statements referred to above for them to be in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of MCG Capital Corporation as of December 31, 2013, including the consolidated schedule of investments, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in net assets, cash flows, and financial highlights for the year then ended (not presented herein), and we expressed an unqualified audit opinion on those consolidated financial statements in our report dated March 5, 2014. In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2013, including the consolidated schedule of investments, is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.
/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
McLean, Virginia
August 7, 2014
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The information contained in this section should be read in conjunction with the Selected Financial Data and our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, contains forward-looking statements that involve substantial risks and uncertainties. These forward-looking statements are not historical facts, but rather are based on current expectations, estimates, forecasts, projections, intentions, goals, strategies, plans, prospects and the beliefs and assumptions of our management including, without limitation: our expectations regarding our results of operations, including revenues, net operating income, net investment losses and general and administrative expenses and the factors that may affect such results; our intentions to repurchase shares of our common stock under our stock repurchase program in light of current market conditions; our expectations regarding the full use before expiration of certain financial instruments, including loans, participations in loans, guarantees, letters of credit and other financial commitments; our intention to evaluate repayment of all or a portion of outstanding SBIC debentures; our expectations regarding the acceleration of deferred financing fees in connection with the possible repayment of our SBIC debentures; anticipated accretion to NAV resulting from stock repurchases; the use of our available liquidity to pay dividends to our stockholders and to repurchase our common stock in the open market under our stock repurchase program; the sufficiency of liquidity to meet 2014 operating requirements, as well as new origination opportunities and potential dividend distributions; estimated liquidity for repayment of our borrowing facilities from a number of sources, including cash on-hand, the maturity or monetization of our investment portfolio, other borrowing facilities and equity issuances, and from other borrowing arrangements; our decisions to make dividend distributions after taking into account our distribution requirements as a RIC, together with an assessment of our current and forecasted gains and losses recognized or to be recognized for tax purposes, portfolio transactional events, liquidity, cash earnings and our asset coverage ratio; our use of independent valuation firms to provide additional support for our internal analyses; our expectations regarding the outcome of legal proceedings incidental to our business; general market conditions; the state of the economy and other factors. Forward-looking statements can be identified by terminology such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “could,” “could increase the likelihood,” “hope,” “target,” “project,” “goals,” “potential,” “predict,” “might,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “is planned,” “may,” “should,” “will,” “will enable,” “would be expected,” “look forward,” “may provide,” “would” or similar terms, variations of such terms or the negative of those terms. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks, uncertainties, and other factors, some of which are beyond our control and difficult to predict. Important factors could cause our actual results to differ materially from those indicated or implied by forward-looking statements. Such factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include those risk factors discussed in Item IA of Part II of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Although we believe that the assumptions on which these forward-looking statements are based are reasonable, any of those assumptions could prove to be inaccurate, and as a result, the forward-looking statements based on those assumptions also could be incorrect. In light of these and other uncertainties, the inclusion of a projection or forward-looking statement in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q should not be regarded as a representation by us that our plans and objectives will be achieved. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which apply only as of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. We undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements for any reason, even if new information becomes available or other events occur in the future.
DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
We are a solutions-focused commercial finance company that provides capital and advisory services to lower middle-market companies throughout the United States. Generally, our portfolio companies use our capital investment to finance acquisitions, recapitalizations, refinance existing debt, buyouts, organic growth, working capital and other general corporate purposes.
We are an internally managed, non-diversified, closed-end investment company that has elected to be regulated as a business development company, or BDC, under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, or the 1940 Act. As a BDC we must meet various regulatory tests, which include investing at least 70% of our total assets in private or thinly traded public U.S.-based companies and limitations on our ability to incur indebtedness unless immediately after such borrowing we have an asset coverage for total borrowings (excluding small business investment company, or SBIC, debt) of at least 200% (i.e., the amount of debt generally may not exceed 50% of the value of our assets).
We also make investments in qualifying small businesses through our wholly owned subsidiary licensed by the United States Small Business Administration, or the SBA, to operate as a SBIC under the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended, or the SBIC Act. An SBIC is subject to a variety of regulations concerning, among other things, the size and nature of the companies in which it may invest and the structure of those investments.
In addition, we have elected to be treated for federal income tax purposes as a regulated investment company, or RIC, under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code. In order to continue to qualify as a RIC for federal income tax purposes and obtain favorable RIC tax treatment, we must meet certain requirements, including certain minimum distribution requirements. If we satisfy these requirements, we generally will not have to pay corporate-level taxes on any income we distribute to our stockholders as distributions, allowing us to substantially reduce or eliminate our corporate-level tax liability. From time to time, our wholly owned subsidiaries may execute transactions that trigger corporate-level tax liabilities. In such cases, we recognize a tax provision in the period when it becomes more likely than not that the taxable event will occur.
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS — Q2 2014
| |
• | Strategic Exit of Education Investments - Due to operational and regulatory challenges facing the for-profit education sector and certain of our portfolio companies, we elected to exit our investments in all four of our education portfolio companies, which represented 13% of our total portfolio at March 31, 2014. We exited three of our four education investments in the quarter ended June 30, 2014 and we settled on the sale of Education Management, Inc. in July 2014. This quarter we exited the following three education investments: |
| |
◦ | SC Academy Holdings, Inc. - We recognized a $4.0 million loss on the sale in the quarter ended June 30, 2014. However, we generated an IRR of approximately 6.4% on the investment, driven by the 14% interest rate that we charged on that investment; |
| |
◦ | Dorsey School of Business Holdings, Inc. - We sold the loan for par and generated an IRR of approximately 10.8%; and |
| |
◦ | Midwest Technical Institute, Inc. - We sold the loan for par and generated an IRR of approximately 13.4%. |
| |
• | Open-Market Purchases of Our Stock - In the quarter ended June 30, 2014, we repurchased 13,313,493 shares of our common stock at a weighted average purchase price of $3.55 equal to a 19.7% discount to our June 30, 2014 Net Asset Value, or NAV, per share. We acquired these shares in open market transactions. We retire these shares upon settlement, thereby reducing the number of shares issued and outstanding. Under our $50.0 million stock repurchase program that became effective May 5, 2014 and terminated August 5, 2014, we repurchased 12,917,799 shares of our common stock at a weighted average purchase price of $3.66 equal to a 17.3% discount to our June 30, 2014 NAV per share. From January 1, 2014 to August 5, 2014, we repurchased 21,242,096 shares of our common stock at a weighted average purchase price of $3.68 equal to a 16.7% discount to our June 30, 2014 NAV per share. |
| |
• | Originations and Advances - We made $2.7 million in advances to existing portfolio companies. |
| |
• | Loan Monetizations - We received $127.0 million in loan payoffs and amortization payments. We generated an IRR of approximately 10.2% on the monetization of ten investments this quarter. |
| |
• | Equity Monetizations - We received $0.9 million in proceeds from the payoff of our preferred stock in Xpressdocs Holdings, Inc. and from warrants to purchase membership units in West World Media, LLC. |
| |
• | Loans on Non-Accrual - No new loans were put on non-accrual in the quarter ended June 30, 2014. Loans on non-accrual were $40.3 million at cost (19.3% of the total loan portfolio) and $7.9 million at fair value (4.4% of the total loan portfolio). In the quarter ended June 30, 2014, we participated substantially all of our economic interest in Advanced Sleep Concepts, Inc. to another lender and we agreed to sell our investment in Education Management, Inc., which settled in July 2014. |
| |
• | Operating Costs - Our total operating costs, excluding interest expense, were $7.1 million, or 1.77% of total assets of $401.1 million. We incurred $1.0 million in salaries and benefits tied to qualified investment exits in our SBIC, $1.1 million in amortization of employee restricted stock awards and $2.5 million in general and administrative expense associated with the retirement of our former CEO and other employee terminations |
and $0.6 million in general and administrative expense related to the Color Star Growers of Colorado, Inc. litigation, all of which we include in total operating costs.
| |
• | Termination of Undrawn Bank of America Unsecured Revolver - On April 21, 2014, based on our assessment of our excess liquidity, we terminated our undrawn unsecured revolving credit facility with Bank of America, N.A. in the principal amount of $20.0 million, or the Bank of America Unsecured Revolver. Interest expense includes $0.1 million associated with the acceleration of deferred financing costs. |
OUTLOOK
During the quarter ended June 30, 2014, we took steps to strengthen our balance sheet by selling assets that, in our judgment, did not produce adequate compensation for the assumed risk relative to purchasing our stock in open-market transactions, which we acquired at a 19.7% discount to our NAV per share at June 30, 2014. From January 1, 2012 to August 5, 2014, we repurchased 28,440,881 shares of our common stock at a weighted average purchase price of $3.87 equal to a 12.4% discount to our June 30, 2014 NAV per share. We repurchased 5,169,336 shares in July 2014 at an average price of $3.95 that we anticipate will result in an additional $0.05 per share accretion to our NAV in the third quarter.
For new investments, we continue to evaluate the risk-reward relative to buying our stock, particularly given current market conditions. To that end, on August 5, 2014, our Board of Directors authorized a new stock repurchase program of up to $50.0 million which will commence on August 12, 2014.
We have adequate cash on-hand to retire the $150.0 million in SBIC debt outstanding at June 30, 2014. We intend to evaluate prepaying all or a part of our SBIC debt in September 2014, the next permitted prepayment date. Until scheduled maturity, our SBIC debt may be prepaid without penalty in March and September each year, in part or in full. If we were to prepay our SBIC debt in September, we would accelerate approximately $2.3 million of deferred financing costs in the quarter ended September 30, 2014.
On August 5, 2014, our board of directors declared a $0.05 per share dividend payable on August 29, 2014 to stockholders of record as of August 20, 2014.
ACCESS TO CAPITAL AND LIQUIDITY
At June 30, 2014, we had $69.4 million of cash and cash equivalents available for general corporate purposes, as well as $129.5 million of cash in restricted accounts related to our SBIC that we may use to fund new investments in the SBIC and $2.2 million of restricted cash held in escrow.
At June 30, 2014, $150.0 million of SBA borrowings were outstanding, the maximum available under our current SBIC license. As of June 30, 2014, the cost of debt of our outstanding borrowings was 4.6% including amortization of deferred financing fees.
On January 21, 2014, we repaid and terminated our MCG Commercial Loan Trust 2006-1, or 2006-1 Trust. As of December 31, 2013, we had $25.2 million of securitized Class D Notes outstanding under the 2006-1 Trust, which was secured by $76.3 million of loans and equity investments and $13.9 million of cash. Upon termination, the assets of the 2006-1 Trust were transferred to MCG, the parent.
PORTFOLIO COMPOSITION AND INVESTMENT ACTIVITY
As of June 30, 2014, the fair value of our investment portfolio was $196.1 million, which represents a $172.8 million, or 46.8%, decrease from the $368.9 million fair value as of December 31, 2013. The following sections describe the composition of our investment portfolio as of June 30, 2014 and key changes in our portfolio during the six months ended June 30, 2014.
Portfolio Composition
The following table summarizes the composition of our investment portfolio at fair value:
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| June 30, 2014 | December 31, 2013 |
(dollars in thousands) | Investments at Fair Value | Percent of Total Portfolio | Investments at Fair Value | Percent of Total Portfolio |
Debt investments | | | | |
Senior secured debt | 100,068 |
| 51.1 | % | $ | 185,524 |
| 50.3 | % |
Subordinated debt | | | | |
Secured | 53,389 |
| 27.2 |
| 108,338 |
| 29.4 |
|
Unsecured | 22,821 |
| 11.6 |
| 42,452 |
| 11.5 |
|
Total debt investments | 176,278 |
| 89.9 |
| 336,314 |
| 91.2 |
|
Equity investments | | | | |
Preferred equity | 16,441 |
| 8.4 |
| 28,390 |
| 7.7 |
|
Common/common equivalents equity | 3,356 |
| 1.7 |
| 4,169 |
| 1.1 |
|
Total equity investments | 19,797 |
| 10.1 |
| 32,559 |
| 8.8 |
|
Total investments | $ | 196,075 |
| 100.0 | % | $ | 368,873 |
| 100.0 | % |
Our debt instruments bear contractual interest rates ranging from 2.5% to 15.0%, a portion of which may be in the form of paid-in-kind interest, or PIK. As of June 30, 2014, approximately 63.1% of the fair value of our loan portfolio had variable interest rates, based on either the London Interbank Offer Rate, or LIBOR, or the prime rate, and 36.9% of the fair value of our loan portfolio had fixed interest rates. As of June 30, 2014, approximately 57.9% of our loan portfolio, at fair value, had LIBOR floors between 1.3% and 3.0% on a LIBOR-based index or prime floors between 2.8% and 6.0%. At origination, our loans generally have four- to six-year stated maturities. Borrowers typically pay an origination fee based on a percentage of the total commitment and a fee on undrawn commitments.
The following table summarizes our investment portfolio by industry at fair value:
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| June 30, 2014 | December 31, 2013 |
(dollars in thousands) | Investments at Fair Value | Percent of Total Portfolio | Investments at Fair Value | Percent of Total Portfolio |
Healthcare | $ | 78,087 |
| 39.8 | % | $ | 84,922 |
| 23.0 | % |
Business services | 63,554 |
| 32.4 |
| 64,108 |
| 17.4 |
|
Manufacturing | 32,306 |
| 16.5 |
| 51,735 |
| 14.0 |
|
Broadcasting | 9,117 |
| 4.6 |
| 12,252 |
| 3.3 |
|
Home furnishings | 5,033 |
| 2.6 |
| 4,730 |
| 1.3 |
|
Diversified financial services | 3,394 |
| 1.7 |
| 3,298 |
| 0.9 |
|
Education | 3,379 |
| 1.7 |
| 57,905 |
| 15.7 |
|
Publishing | — |
| — |
| 25,312 |
| 6.9 |
|
Insurance | — |
| — |
| 23,620 |
| 6.4 |
|
Restaurants | — |
| — |
| 23,010 |
| 6.2 |
|
Consumer products | — |
| — |
| 4,657 |
| 1.3 |
|
Other(a) | 1,205 |
| 0.7 |
| 13,324 |
| 3.6 |
|
Total | $ | 196,075 |
| 100.0 | % | $ | 368,873 |
| 100.0 | % |
______________________ (a) No individual industry within this category exceeds 1%. | | | | |
As of June 30, 2014, our ten largest portfolio companies represented approximately 78.4% of the total fair value of our investments. These ten companies accounted for 47.4% of our total revenue during the six months ended June 30, 2014. Due to operational and regulatory challenges facing the for-profit education sector and certain of our portfolio companies, we elected to exit our investments in all four of our education portfolio companies.
During the six months ended June 30, 2014, we had concentrations in certain industries, including the healthcare, business services, and manufacturing industries. The following table summarizes our fair value and revenue concentrations in each of those industries:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Investments at fair value | Revenue for the three months ended |
| June 30, 2014 | December 31, 2013 | June 30, 2014 | June 30, 2013 |
(dollars in thousands) | Amount | % of Total Portfolio | Amount | % of Total Portfolio | Amount | % of Total Revenue | Amount | % of Total Revenue |
Industry | | | | | | | | |
Healthcare | $ | 78,087 |
| 39.8 | % | $ | 84,922 |
| 23.0 | % | $ | 4,290 |
| 22.7 | % | $ | 6,699 |
| 25.6 | % |
Business services | 63,554 |
| 32.4 |
| 64,108 |
| 17.4 |
| 3,701 |
| 19.6 |
| 3,854 |
| 14.7 |
|
Manufacturing | 32,306 |
| 16.5 |
| 51,735 |
| 14.0 |
| 4,327 |
| 22.9 |
| 2,448 |
| 9.4 |
|
Total | $ | 173,947 |
| 88.7 |
| $ | 200,765 |
| 54.4 |
| $ | 12,318 |
| 65.2 |
| $ | 13,001 |
| 49.7 |
|
Changes in Investment Portfolio
The following table summarizes our total portfolio investment activity during the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013:
|
| | | | | | |
| Six months ended |
(in thousands) | June 30 |
| 2014 | 2013 |
Beginning investment portfolio | $ | 368,873 |
| $ | 477,724 |
|
Originations and advances | 9,366 |
| 86,791 |
|
Gross payments, reductions and sales of securities | (154,587 | ) | (109,326 | ) |
Net realized loss | (8,719 | ) | (1,064 | ) |
Unrealized depreciation | (24,949 | ) | (656 | ) |
Reversals of unrealized depreciation | 4,698 |
| 2,698 |
|
Origination fees and amortization of unearned income | 1,393 |
| (140 | ) |
Ending investment portfolio | $ | 196,075 |
| $ | 456,027 |
|
Originations and Advances
The following table shows our originations and advances during the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 by security type:
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Six months ended June 30, |
| 2014 | 2013 |
(dollars in thousands) | Amount | % of Total | Amount | % of Total |
Debt investments | | | | |
Senior secured debt | $ | 6,451 |
| 68.9 | % | $ | 69,344 |
| 79.9 | % |
Subordinated debt | | | | |
Secured | 1,854 |
| 19.8 |
| 2,145 |
| 2.5 |
|
Unsecured | 538 |
| 5.8 |
| 13,187 |
| 15.2 |
|
Total debt investments | 8,843 |
| 94.5 |
| 84,676 |
| 97.6 |
|
Equity investments | | | | |
Preferred equity | 523 |
| 5.5 |
| 2,112 |
| 2.4 |
|
Common/common equivalents equity | — |
| — |
| 3 |
| — |
|
Total equity investments | 523 |
| 5.5 |
| 2,115 |
| 2.4 |
|
Total originations and advances | $ | 9,366 |
| 100.0 | % | $ | 86,791 |
| 100.0 | % |
The following table shows our significant originations and advances:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
(in thousands) | Six months ended |
| June 30, 2014 |
Company | Originations | Draws/ Advances | PIK Advances/ Dividends | Total |
Debt | | | | |
Oceans Acquisition, Inc. | $ | — |
| $ | 3,250 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 3,250 |
|
Community Investors, Inc. | — |
| 1,667 |
| — |
| 1,667 |
|
Other (< $1 million) | — |
| 1,400 |
| 2,526 |
| 3,926 |
|
Total debt | — |
| 6,317 |
| 2,526 |
| 8,843 |
|
Equity | | | | |
Other (< $1 million) | — |
| 298 |
| 225 |
| 523 |
|
Total Equity | — |
| 298 |
| 225 |
| 523 |
|
Total originations and advances | $ | — |
| $ | 6,615 |
| $ | 2,751 |
| $ | 9,366 |
|
Repayments, Sales and Other Reductions of Investment Portfolio
The following table shows our gross payments, reductions and sales of securities during the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 by security type:
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Six months ended June 30, |
| 2014 | 2013 |
(dollars in thousands) | Amount | % of Total | Amount | % of Total |
Debt investments | | | | |
Senior secured debt | $ | 75,448 |
| 48.8 | % | $ | 97,036 |
| 88.8 | % |
Subordinated debt | | | | |
Secured | 52,898 |
| 34.2 |
| 4,500 |
| 4.1 |
|
Unsecured | 20,547 |
| 13.3 |
| — |
| — |
|
Total debt investments | 148,893 |
| 96.3 |
| 101,536 |
| 92.9 |
|
Equity investments | | | | |
Preferred equity | 5,288 |
| 3.4 |
| 4,787 |
| 4.4 |
|
Common/common equivalents equity | 406 |
| 0.3 |
| 3,003 |
| 2.7 |
|
Total equity investments | 5,694 |
| 3.7 |
| 7,790 |
| 7.1 |
|
Total gross payments, reductions and sales of securities | $ | 154,587 |
| 100.0 | % | $ | 109,326 |
| 100.0 | % |
During the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, our gross payments, reductions and sales of securities by transaction type included:
|
| | | | | | |
| Six months ended June 30, |
(in thousands) | 2014 | 2013 |
Principal repayments, reductions and loan sales | $ | 128,658 |
| $ | 74,468 |
|
Sale of equity investments | 5,369 |
| 7,331 |
|
Scheduled principal amortization | 9,761 |
| 25,042 |
|
Collection of accrued paid-in-kind interest and dividends | 10,799 |
| 2,485 |
|
Total gross payments, reductions and sales of securities | $ | 154,587 |
| $ | 109,326 |
|
As shown in the following table, during the six months ended June 30, 2014, we monetized 13 portfolio investment with proceeds totaling $143.9 million:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Six months ended |
| June 30, 2014 |
(in thousands) | Principal Repayments and Proceeds from Loan Sales | Sale or Settlement of Equity Investments | PIK Interest and Dividend Prepayments | Total |
Monetizations | | | | |
TCFI CP LLC | $ | 20,000 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 282 |
| $ | 20,282 |
|
G&L Investment Holdings, LLC | 17,500 |
| 4,196 |
| 2,060 |
| 23,756 |
|
Cruz Bay Publishing, Inc. | 16,857 |
| — |
| 5,345 |
| 22,202 |
|
Ted's Café Escondido Holdings, Inc. | 14,306 |
| — |
| — |
| 14,306 |
|
Midwest Technical Institute, Inc. | 12,251 |
| — |
| — |
| 12,251 |
|
West World Media LLC | 10,576 |
| 406 |
| 919 |
| 11,901 |
|
Dorsey's School of Business Holdings, Inc. | 9,653 |
| — |
| — |
| 9,653 |
|
SC Academy Holdings, Inc. | 9,534 |
| — |
| 1,530 |
| 11,064 |
|
Rita's Water Ice Franchise Company, LLC | 9,282 |
| — |
| — |
| 9,282 |
|
Visant Corporation | 4,670 |
| — |
| — |
| 4,670 |
|
Mailsouth, Inc. | 3,529 |
| — |
| — |
| 3,529 |
|
Other < 1 Million | 500 |
| 543 |
| — |
| 1,043 |
|
Total monetizations | 128,658 |
| 5,145 |
| 10,136 |
| 143,939 |
|
Other scheduled payments | 9,761 |
| 224 |
| 663 |
| 10,648 |
|
Total gross payments, sales and other reductions of investment portfolio | $ | 138,419 |
| $ | 5,369 |
| $ | 10,799 |
| $ | 154,587 |
|
The proceeds from these monetizations correlated closely with the most recently reported fair value of the associated investments.
Secured Financing
In June 2014, we monetized substantially all of our investment in Advanced Sleep Concepts, Inc., or Advanced Sleep, through the sale of a 95% participation interest in our senior and subordinated loans. Under the terms of the sale, the purchaser will receive 100% of the payments related to the loan, including interest and principal, until the total payments received exceeds the purchase price plus any additional advances funded by the purchaser to Advanced Sleep and certain expenses incurred by the purchaser. Thereafter, the purchaser will receive 95% and we will receive 5% of any payments received from Advanced Sleep. Under the terms of the sale, the purchaser will have no recourse to us for any payments. We will continue to service the Advanced Sleep loans on behalf of the purchaser for which we will receive an annual fee of $23,000.
We follow the guidance in Accounting Standard Codification Topic 860—Transfers and Servicing, or ASC 860, when accounting for loan participations and other partial loan sales. Such guidance requires a participation or other partial loan sale to meet the definition of a “participating interest,” as defined in the guidance, in order for sale treatment to be allowed. Due to the non-pro-rata allocation of payments, the sale of the interest in Advanced Sleep's loans does not meet the definition of a participating interest under ASC 860 and the loans remain on our Consolidated Balance Sheets and the proceeds from the sale are recorded as a secured financing until all the criteria for sale accounting are met. The secured financing is carried at fair value to correspond with the related investments, which are carried at fair value.
ASSET QUALITY
Asset quality is generally a function of portfolio company performance and economic conditions, as well as our underwriting and ongoing management of our investment portfolio. In addition to various risk management and monitoring tools, we use the following investment rating system to characterize and monitor our expected level of returns on each investment in our portfolio:
|
| |
Investment Rating | Summary Description |
1 | Capital gain expected or realized |
2 | Full return of principal and interest or dividend expected with customer performing in accordance with plan |
3 | Full return of principal and interest or dividend expected, but customer requires closer monitoring |
4 | Some loss of interest or dividend expected, but still expect an overall positive internal rate of return on the investment |
5 | Loss of interest or dividend and some loss of principal investment expected, which would result in an overall negative internal rate of return on the investment |
The following table shows the distribution of our investments on our 1 to 5 investment rating scale at fair value as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013:
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
(dollars in thousands) | June 30, 2014 | December 31, 2013 |
Investment Rating | Investments at Fair Value | % of Total Portfolio | Investments at Fair Value | % of Total Portfolio |
1(a) | $ | 49,704 |
| 25.4 | % | $ | 104,657 |
| 28.4 | % |
2 | 58,758 |
| 30.0 |
| 137,586 |
| 37.3 |
|
3 | 69,182 |
| 35.3 |
| 94,102 |
| 25.5 |
|
4 | 8,351 |
| 4.2 |
| 25,976 |
| 7.0 |
|
5 | 10,080 |
| 5.1 |
| 6,552 |
| 1.8 |
|
Total | $ | 196,075 |
| 100.0 | % | $ | 368,873 |
| 100.0 | % |
_________________________
| |
(a) | As of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, Investment Rating “1” included $43.8 million and $83.4 million, respectively, of loans to companies in which we also hold equity securities. |
When one of our loans becomes more than 90 days past due, or if we otherwise do not expect the customer to be able to service its debt and other obligations, we will, as a general matter, place all or a portion of the loan on non-accrual status and will cease recognizing interest income on that loan until all principal and interest have been brought current through payment or a restructuring such that the interest income is deemed to be collectible. However, we may make exceptions to this policy if the loan has sufficient collateral value and is in the process of collection. If the fair value of a loan is below cost, we may cease recognizing PIK interest and/or the accretion of a discount on the debt investment until such time that the fair value equals or exceeds cost.
The following table summarizes the cost and fair value of loans more than 90 days past due and loans on non-accrual status.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| COST BASIS | FAIR VALUE BASIS |
| June 30, 2014 | December 31, 2013 | June 30, 2014 | December 31, 2013 |
(dollars in thousands) | Investments at Cost | % of Loan Portfolio | Investments at Cost | % of Loan Portfolio | Investments at Fair Value | % of Loan Portfolio | Investments at Fair Value | % of Loan Portfolio |
Loans greater than 90 days past due | | | | | | | |
On non-accrual status | $ | 14,156 |
| 6.78 | % | $ | 3,897 |
| 1.11 | % | $ | 4,513 |
| 2.54 | % | $ | — |
| — | % |
Total loans greater than 90 days past due | $ | 14,156 |
| 6.78 | % | $ | 3,897 |
| 1.11 | % | $ | 4,513 |
| 2.54 | % | $ | — |
| — | % |
Loans on non-accrual status | | | | | | | | |
0 to 90 days past due | $ | 26,164 |
| 12.52 | % | $ | 17,531 |
| 4.98 | % | $ | 3,379 |
| 1.90 | % | $ | 4,493 |
| 1.34 | % |
Greater than 90 days past due | 14,156 |
| 6.78 |
| 3,897 |
| 1.11 |
| 4,513 |
| 2.54 |
| — |
| — |
|
Total loans on non-accrual status | $ | 40,320 |
| 19.30 | % | $ | 21,428 |
| 6.09 | % | $ | 7,892 |
| 4.44 | % | $ | 4,493 |
| 1.34 | % |
The following table summarizes the changes in the cost and fair value of the loans on non-accrual status from December 31, 2013 through June 30, 2014:
|
| | | | | | |
| Six months ended |
| June 30, 2014 |
(In thousands) | Cost | Fair Value |
Non-accrual loan balance as of December 31, 2013 | $ | 21,428 |
| $ | 4,493 |
|
Additional loan on non-accrual status - Education Management, Inc. | 19,856 |
| 4,879 |
|
Change in unrealized gain (loss) on non-accrual loans | — |
| (516 | ) |
Payments received from loans on non-accrual status | (964 | ) | (964 | ) |
Total change in non-accrual loans | 18,892 |
| 3,399 |
|
Non-accrual loan balance as of June 30, 2014 | $ | 40,320 |
| $ | 7,892 |
|
Results of Operations
The following section compares our results of operations for the three months ended June 30, 2014 to the three months ended June 30, 2013.
COMPARISON OF THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2014 AND 2013
The following table summarizes the components of our net income for the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three months ended June 30, | Variance |
(dollars in thousands) | 2014 | 2013 | $ | Percentage |
Revenue | | | | |
Interest and dividend income | | | | |
Interest income | $ | 7,562 |
| $ | 11,222 |
| $ | (3,660 | ) | (32.6 | )% |
Dividend income | 75 |
| 917 |
| (842 | ) | (91.8 | ) |
Loan fees | 1,126 |
| 435 |
| 691 |
| 158.9 |
|
Total interest and dividend income | 8,763 |
| 12,574 |
| (3,811 | ) | (30.3 | ) |
Advisory fees and other income | 762 |
| 316 |
| 446 |
| 141.1 |
|
Total revenue | 9,525 |
| 12,890 |
| (3,365 | ) | (26.1 | ) |
Operating expenses | | | | |
Interest expense | 1,866 |
| 2,305 |
| (439 | ) | (19.0 | ) |
Employee compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and benefits | 1,773 |
| 1,559 |
| 214 |
| 13.7 |
|
Amortization of employee restricted stock | 1,248 |
| 379 |
| 869 |
| 229.3 |
|
Total employee compensation | 3,021 |
| 1,938 |
| 1,083 |
| 55.9 |
|
General and administrative expense | 4,087 |
| 1,086 |
| 3,001 |
| 276.3 |
|
Restructuring expense | — |
| 5 |
| (5 | ) | (100.0 | ) |
Total operating expense | 8,974 |
| 5,334 |
| 3,640 |
| 68.2 |
|
Net operating income before net investment (loss) gain and income tax provision | 551 |
| 7,556 |
| (7,005 | ) | (92.7 | ) |
Net investment (loss) gain before income tax provision | (5,819 | ) | 1,012 |
| (6,831 | ) | NM |
|
Income tax provision (benefit) | — |
| (6 | ) | 6 |
| (100.0 | ) |
Net (loss) income | $ | (5,268 | ) | $ | 8,574 |
| $ | (13,842 | ) | NM |
|
NM=Not Meaningful | | | | |
TOTAL REVENUE
Total revenue includes interest and dividend income, loan fees, advisory fees and other income. The following sections describe the reasons for the variances in each major component of our revenue during the three months ended June 30, 2014 from the three months ended June 30, 2013.
INTEREST INCOME
The level of interest income that we earn depends upon the level of interest-bearing investments outstanding during the period, as well as the weighted-average yield on these investments. During the three months ended June 30, 2014, the total yield on our average debt portfolio at fair value was 12.4% compared to 12.5% during the three months ended June 30, 2013. The weighted-average yield varies each period because of changes in the composition of our portfolio of debt investments, changes in stated interest rates, fee accelerations of unearned fees on paid-off/restructured loans and the balance of loans on non-accrual status for which we are not accruing interest.
The following table shows the various components of the total yield on our average debt portfolio at fair value for the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013:
|
| | | | |
| Three months ended June 30, |
| 2014 | 2013 |
Average 90-day LIBOR | 0.2 | % | 0.3 | % |
Spread to average LIBOR on average loan portfolio | 11.6 |
| 12.1 |
|
Impact of fee accelerations of unearned fees on paid/restructured loans | 1.0 |
| 0.1 |
|
Impact of non-accrual loans | (0.4 | ) | — |
|
Total yield on average loan portfolio | 12.4 | % | 12.5 | % |
During the three months ended June 30, 2014, interest income was $7.6 million, compared to $11.2 million during the three months ended June 30, 2013, which represented a $3.7 million, or 32.6%, decrease. This decrease reflected a $2.6 million decrease in interest income resulting from a 25.6% decrease in our average loan balance, a decrease of $0.9 million resulting from loans that were on non-accrual status during the three months ended June 30, 2014, but that had been accruing interest during the three months ended June 30, 2013, and a $0.1 million decrease due to interest rate floors.
PIK Income
Interest income includes certain amounts that we have not received in cash, such as PIK interest. PIK interest represents contractually deferred interest that is added to the principal balance of the loan and compounded if not paid on a current basis. Borrowers may, in some instances, be required to prepay PIK because of certain contractual provisions or they may choose to prepay; however, more typically, PIK is paid at the end of the loan term. The following table shows the PIK-related activity for the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, at cost:
|
| | | | | | |
| Three months ended June 30, |
(in thousands) | 2014 | 2013 |
Beginning PIK loan balance | $ | 11,717 |
| $ | 7,973 |
|
PIK interest earned during the period | 881 |
| 1,430 |
|
Payments received from PIK loans | (8,413 | ) | (67 | ) |
Realized loss | (129 | ) | — |
|
Ending PIK loan balance | $ | 4,056 |
| $ | 9,336 |
|
As of June 30, 2014, we were not accruing interest on $1.0 million of the PIK loans, at cost, shown in the preceding table and as of June 30, 2013, all of our PIK loans were accruing interest. During the three months ended June 30, 2014, the payments received from PIK loans included $5.3 million collected in conjunction with the repayment of our our loan to Cruz Bay Publishing, Inc., $1.5 million collected in conjunction with the sale of our our loan to SC Academy Holdings, Inc. and $0.9 million collected in conjunction with the repayment of our our loan to West World Media, LLC.
DIVIDEND INCOME
We accrete dividends on equity investments with stated dividend rates as they are earned, to the extent that we believe the dividends will be paid ultimately and the associated portfolio company has sufficient value to support the accretion. Dividend accretion is included in the cost basis of the related equity instrument on our consolidated balance sheets and consolidated schedule of investments. We recognize dividends on other equity investments when we receive the dividend payment. Our dividend income varies from period to period because of changes in the size and composition of our equity investments, the yield from the investments in our equity portfolio and the ability of the portfolio companies to declare and pay dividends. During the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, we recognized $0.1 million and $0.9 million, respectively, of dividend income. In addition, during the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, we received payments on accrued dividends of $0.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively. As of June 30, 2014, the balance of accrued dividends was $7.6 million, which was principally comprised of $6.4 million related to our investment in RadioPharmacy Investors, LLC and $0.8 million related to our investment in Maverick Healthcare Equity, LLC.
ADVISORY FEES AND OTHER INCOME
Advisory fees and other income primarily include fees related to prepayment, advisory and management services, equity structuring, syndication, bank interest and other income. Generally, advisory fees and other income relate to
specific transactions or services and, therefore, may vary from period to period depending on the level and types of services provided. During the three months ended June 30, 2014, we earned $0.8 million of advisory fees and other income, which represented a $0.4 million, or 141.1%, increase from the three months ended June 30, 2013. This increase resulted principally from an increase in prepayment fees related to loan prepayments in the second quarter of 2014.
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES
Total operating expenses include interest, employee compensation and general and administrative expenses. The reasons for these variances are discussed in more detail below.
INTEREST EXPENSE
During the three months ended June 30, 2014, we incurred $1.9 million of interest expense, which represented a $0.4 million, or 19.0%, decrease from the same period in 2013. During these respective periods, our average cost to borrow increased to 4.9% from 4.4%, principally due to the repayment of securitized debt in our 2006-1 Trust which carried interest rates ranging from L+0.33% to L+2.25%. As of June 30, 2014, the cost of debt of our outstanding borrowings was 4.6% including amortization of deferred financing fees.
During the three months ended June 30, 2014, our average borrowings declined to approximately $150.0 million from an average of approximately $209.6 million for the same period in 2013, which accounted for a $0.7 million reduction in our interest expense. In addition, interest expense decreased by $0.1 million related to decreased amortization of debt issuance costs. These decreases were offset by $0.3 million attributable to the spread to LIBOR increasing from approximately 3.55% to 4.12%.
EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION
Employee compensation expense includes base salaries and benefits, variable annual incentive compensation and amortization of employee stock awards. During the three months ended June 30, 2014, our employee compensation expense was $3.0 million, which represented a $1.1 million, or 55.9%, increase from the same period in June 30, 2013. Our salaries and benefits increased by $0.2 million, or 13.7%, due to a $0.5 million increase in incentive compensation tied to qualified investment exits in our SBIC, offset by a $0.3 million decrease in salaries and benefits. As of June 30, 2014, we had 13 employees compared to 21 employees as of June 30, 2013. Amortization of employee stock awards increased $0.9 million, or 229.3%. Amortization of employee stock awards for the three months ended June 30, 2014 includes $1.1 million of accelerated amortization related to the retirement of our former chief executive officer and other employee terminations.
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE
During the three months ended June 30, 2014, general and administrative expense was $4.1 million, which represented a $3.0 million, or 276.3%, increase compared to the same period in 2013. General and administrative expense for the three months ended June 30, 2014 included $2.5 million in severance related to the retirement of our former chief executive officer and other employee terminations. In addition, general and administrative expense increased $0.6 million due to an increase in legal fees related to Color Star Growers of Colorado, Inc. litigation.
NET INVESTMENT LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAX PROVISION
During the three months ended June 30, 2014, we recorded $5.8 million of net investment loss before income tax provision, compared to $1.0 million of net investment gain during the same period in 2013. These amounts represent the total of net realized gains and losses, net unrealized appreciation (depreciation), and reversals of unrealized (appreciation) depreciation. We reverse unrealized (appreciation) depreciation at the time that we realize the gain or loss. The following table summarizes our realized and unrealized gain and (loss) on investments and changes in our unrealized appreciation and depreciation on investments for the three months ended June 30, 2014:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three months ended June 30, 2014 |
(in thousands) | Industry | Type | Realized Gain/(Loss) | Unrealized (Depreciation)/ Appreciation | Reversal of Unrealized Depreciation/ (Appreciation) | Net (Loss)/ Gain |
Portfolio Company |
SC Academy Holdings, Inc. | Education | Non-Affiliate | $ | (4,037 | ) | $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | (4,037 | ) |
Oceans Acquisition, Inc. | Healthcare | Non-Affiliate | — |
| (1,491 | ) | — |
| (1,491 | ) |
Other (< $1.0 million net gain (loss) | | | (195 | ) | (270 | ) | 174 |
| (291 | ) |
Total | | | $ | (4,232 | ) | $ | (1,761 | ) | $ | 174 |
| $ | (5,819 | ) |
| |
• | In the second quarter of 2014, we sold our subordinated debt investment in SC Academy Holdings, Inc. for net proceeds of $11.1 million resulting in a realized loss of $4.0 million. |
| |
• | We also recorded $1.5 million of unrealized depreciation on our investment in Oceans Acquisition, Inc. to reflect a decrease in that portfolio company's operating performance. |
The remaining unrealized depreciation and appreciation shown in the above table resulted predominantly from the change in the performance of certain of our portfolio companies and the multiples used to value certain of our investments.
The following table summarizes our realized and unrealized (loss) and gain on investments and changes in our unrealized appreciation and depreciation on investments for the three months ended June 30, 2013:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three months ended June 30, 2013 |
(in thousands) | Industry | Type | Realized Gain/(Loss) | Unrealized (Depreciation)/ Appreciation | Reversal of Unrealized Depreciation/ (Appreciation) | Net (Loss)/ Gain |
Portfolio Company |
Miles Media Group, LLC | Business Services | Affiliate | $ | 2,877 |
| $ | — |
| $ | (1,170 | ) | $ | 1,707 |
|
Other (< $1.0 million net gain (loss)) | | | (109 | ) | (671 | ) | 85 |
| (695 | ) |
Total | | | $ | 2,768 |
| $ | (671 | ) | $ | (1,085 | ) | $ | 1,012 |
|
| |
• | We received $3.0 million for the sale of our equity investment in Miles Media Group, LLC, which resulted in a $2.9 million realized gain and a reversal of previously unrealized appreciation of $1.2 million. |
INCOME TAX (BENEFIT) PROVISION
During the three months ended June 30, 2013, we recorded a $6,000 income tax benefit primarily attributable to an adjustment to flow-through taxable income on certain investments held by our subsidiaries.
COMPARISON OF THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2014 AND 2013
The following table summarizes the components of our net income for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Six months ended June 30, | Variance |
(dollars in thousands) | 2014 | 2013 | $ | Percentage |
Revenue | | | | |
Interest and dividend income | | | | |
Interest income | $ | 16,315 |
| $ | 22,306 |
| $ | (5,991 | ) | (26.9 | )% |
Dividend income | 225 |
| 1,815 |
| (1,590 | ) | (87.6 | ) |
Loan fees | 1,478 |
| 1,229 |
| 249 |
| 20.3 |
|
Total interest and dividend income | 18,018 |
| 25,350 |
| (7,332 | ) | (28.9 | ) |
Advisory fees and other income | 853 |
| 786 |
| 67 |
| 8.5 |
|
Total revenue | 18,871 |
| 26,136 |
| (7,265 | ) | (27.8 | ) |
Operating expenses | | | | |
Interest expense | 3,856 |
| 4,687 |
| (831 | ) | (17.7 | ) |
Employee compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and benefits | 2,861 |
| 2,966 |
| (105 | ) | (3.5 | ) |
Amortization of employee restricted stock | 1,554 |
| 754 |
| 800 |
| 106.1 |
|
Total employee compensation | 4,415 |
| 3,720 |
| 695 |
| 18.7 |
|
General and administrative expense | 5,726 |
| 2,118 |
| 3,608 |
| 170.3 |
|
Restructuring expense | — |
| 12 |
| (12 | ) | (100.0 | ) |
Total operating expense | 13,997 |
| 10,537 |
| 3,460 |
| 32.8 |
|
Net operating income before net investment (loss) gain and income tax provision | 4,874 |
| 15,599 |
| (10,725 | ) | (68.8 | ) |
Net investment (loss) gain before income tax provision | (29,074 | ) | 779 |
| (29,853 | ) | NM |
|
Income tax provision (benefit) | 4 |
| 52 |
| (48 | ) | (92.3 | ) |
Net (loss) income | $ | (24,204 | ) | $ | 16,326 |
| $ | (40,530 | ) | NM |
|
NM=Not Meaningful | | | | |
TOTAL REVENUE
Total revenue includes interest and dividend income, loan fees, advisory fees and other income. The following sections describe the reasons for the variances in each major component of our revenue during the six months ended June 30, 2014 from the six months ended June 30, 2013.
INTEREST INCOME
The level of interest income that we earn depends upon the level of interest-bearing investments outstanding during the period, as well as the weighted-average yield on these investments. During the six months ended June 30, 2014, the total yield on our average debt portfolio at fair value was 11.9% compared to 12.3% during the six months ended June 30, 2013. The weighted-average yield varies each period because of changes in the composition of our portfolio of debt investments, changes in stated interest rates, fee accelerations of unearned fees on paid-off/restructured loans and the balance of loans on non-accrual status for which we are not accruing interest.
The following table shows the various components of the total yield on our average debt portfolio at fair value for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013:
|
| | | | |
| Six months ended June 30, |
| 2014 | 2013 |
Average 90-day LIBOR | 0.2 | % | 0.3 | % |
Spread to average LIBOR on average loan portfolio | 11.9 |
| 11.9 |
|
Impact of fee accelerations of unearned fees on paid/restructured loans | 0.5 |
| 0.1 |
|
Impact of non-accrual loans | (0.7 | ) | — |
|
Total yield on average loan portfolio | 11.9 | % | 12.3 | % |
During the six months ended June 30, 2014, interest income was $16.3 million, compared to $22.3 million during the six months ended June 30, 2013, which represented a $6.0 million, or 26.9%, decrease. This decrease reflected a $4.6 million decrease in interest income resulting from a 22.1% decrease in our average loan balance, a decrease of $1.7 million resulting from loans that were on non-accrual status during the six months ended June 30, 2014, but that had been accruing interest during the six months ended June 30, 2013, a $0.1 million decrease due to interest rate floors, and a $0.1 million decrease related to the decrease in LIBOR. These decreases were partially offset by a $0.6 million increase in interest income attributable to an increase in our net spread to LIBOR.
PIK Income
The following table shows the PIK-related activity for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, at cost:
|
| | | | | | |
| Six months ended June 30, |
(in thousands) | 2014 | 2013 |
Beginning PIK loan balance | $ | 12,132 |
| $ | 9,043 |
|
PIK interest earned during the period | 2,526 |
| 2,676 |
|
Payments received from PIK loans | (10,473 | ) | (2,026 | ) |
Realized loss | (129 | ) | (357 | ) |
Ending PIK loan balance | $ | 4,056 |
| $ | 9,336 |
|
During six months ended June 30, 2014, the payments received from PIK loans included $5.3 million collected in conjunction with the repayment of our our loan to Cruz Bay Publishing, Inc., $2.1 million related to the repayment in full of our loan to G&L Investment Holdings, LLC, $1.5 million collected in conjunction with the sale of our our loan to SC Academy Holdings, Inc. and $0.9 million collected in conjunction with the repayment of our our loan to West World Media, LLC. During the six months ended June 30, 2013, the payments received from PIK loans included $1.0 million collected in conjunction with the partial repayment of our investment in Education Management, Inc., as well as $0.8 million collected in conjunction with the repayment in full of our investment in NDSSI Holdings, LLC.
DIVIDEND INCOME
During the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, we recognized dividend income of $0.2 million and $1.8 million, respectively. In addition, during the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, we received payments on accrued dividends of $0.3 million and $0.5 million, respectively. As of June 30, 2014, the balance of accrued dividends was $7.6 million.
ADVISORY FEES AND OTHER INCOME
During the six months ended June 30, 2014, we earned $0.9 million of advisory fees and other income, which represented a $0.1 million, or 8.5%, increase from the six months ended June 30, 2013. This increase resulted principally from an increase in prepayment fees related to loan prepayments in the second quarter of 2014.
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES
Total operating expenses include interest, employee compensation and general and administrative expenses. The reasons for these variances are discussed in more detail below.
INTEREST EXPENSE
During the six months ended June 30, 2014, we incurred $3.9 million of interest expense, which represented a $0.8 million, or 17.7%, decrease from the same period in 2013. Interest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2014 includes $0.2 million of interest and deferred financing costs associated with our 2006-1 Trust, which we terminated in January 2014. During these respective periods, our average cost to borrow increased to 5.0% from 4.2%, principally due to the repayment of securitized debt in our 2006-1 Trust which carried interest rates ranging from L+0.33% to L+2.25%. As of June 30, 2014, the cost of debt of our outstanding borrowings was 4.6% including amortization of deferred financing fees.
During the six months ended June 30, 2014, our average borrowings declined to approximately $152.2 million from an average of approximately $222.5 million for the same period in 2013, which accounted for a $1.6 million reduction in our interest expense. In addition, interest expense decreased by $0.1 million related to decreased amortization of debt issuance costs. These decreases were offset by $0.9 million attributable to the spread to LIBOR increasing from approximately 3.35% to 4.15%.
EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION
Employee compensation expense includes base salaries and benefits, variable annual incentive compensation and amortization of employee stock awards. During the six months ended June 30, 2014, our employee compensation expense was $4.4 million, which represented a $0.7 million, or 18.7%, increase from the same period in 2013. Our salaries and benefits decreased by $0.1 million, or 3.5%, due to a $0.5 million decrease in salaries and benefits, offset by a $0.4 million increase in incentive compensation tied to qualified investment exits in our SBIC. As of June 30, 2014, we had 13 employees compared to 21 employees as of June 30, 2013. Amortization of employee stock awards increased $0.8 million, or 106.1%. Amortization of employee stock awards for the six months ended June 30, 2014 includes $1.1 million of accelerated amortization related to the retirement of our former chief executive officer and other employee terminations.
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE
During the six months ended June 30, 2014, general and administrative expense was $5.7 million, which represented a $3.6 million, or 170.3%, increase compared to the same period in 2013. General and administrative expense for the six months ended June 30, 2014 included $2.6 million in severance related to the retirement of our former chief executive officer and other employee terminations. In addition, general and administrative expense increased $0.9 million due to an increase in legal fees related to Color Star Growers of Colorado, Inc. litigation.
NET INVESTMENT LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAX PROVISION
During the six months ended June 30, 2014, we recorded $29.1 million of net investment loss before income tax provision, compared to $0.8 million of net investment gain during the same period in 2013. These amounts represent the total of net realized gains and losses, net unrealized appreciation (depreciation), and reversals of unrealized (appreciation) depreciation. We reverse unrealized (appreciation) depreciation at the time that we realize the gain or loss. The following table summarizes our realized and unrealized gain and (loss) on investments and changes in our unrealized appreciation and depreciation on investments for the three months ended June 30, 2014:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six months ended June 30, 2014 |
(in thousands) | Industry | Type | Realized Gain/(Loss) | Unrealized (Depreciation)/ Appreciation | Reversal of Unrealized Depreciation/ (Appreciation) | Net (Loss)/ Gain |
Portfolio Company |
Education Management, Inc. | Education | Affiliate | $ | — |
| $ | (15,984 | ) | $ | — |
| $ | (15,984 | ) |
RadioPharmacy Investors, LLC | Healthcare | Control | — |
| (5,993 | ) | — |
| (5,993 | ) |
SC Academy Holdings, Inc. | Education | Non-Affiliate | (4,037 | ) | — |
| — |
| (4,037 | ) |
Oceans Acquisition, Inc. | Healthcare | Non-Affiliate | — |
| (1,491 | ) | — |
| (1,491 | ) |
G&L Investment Holdings, LLC | Insurance | Non-Affiliate | (4,416 | ) | — |
| 4,523 |
| 107 |
|
Other (< $1.0 million net gain (loss)) | | | (267 | ) | (1,584 | ) | 175 |
| (1,676 | ) |
Total | | | $ | (8,720 | ) | $ | (25,052 | ) | $ | 4,698 |
| $ | (29,074 | ) |
| |
• | During 2014, we recorded $16.0 million of unrealized depreciation on our investment in Education Management, Inc. to reflect operational, financial and business challenges facing the company and the expected sales price of our senior debt and preferred stock investments. |
| |
• | Furthermore, we reduced our valuation multiple for RadioPharmacy Investors, LLC and recorded $6.0 million of unrealized depreciation based on volume, pricing and supply-cost challenges facing the company's core business. |
| |
• | In the second quarter of 2014, we sold our subordinated debt investment in SC Academy Holdings, Inc. for net proceeds of $11.1 million resulting in a realized loss of $4.0 million. |
| |
• | We also recorded $1.5 million of unrealized depreciation on our investment in Oceans Acquisition, Inc. to reflect a decrease in that portfolio company's operating performance. |
| |
• | In addition, in the first quarter of 2014, we sold our preferred and common equity investments in G&L Investment Holdings, LLC resulting in a realized loss of $4.4 million and a reversal of previously recorded unrealized depreciation of $4.5 million. |
The remaining unrealized depreciation and appreciation shown in the above table resulted predominantly from the change in the performance of certain of our portfolio companies and the multiples used to value certain of our investments.
The following table summarizes our realized and unrealized (loss) and gain on investments and changes in our unrealized appreciation and depreciation on investments for the six months ended June 30, 2013:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six months ended June 30, 2013 |
(in thousands) | Industry | Type | Realized Gain/(Loss) | Unrealized (Depreciation)/ Appreciation | Reversal of Unrealized Depreciation/ (Appreciation) | Net (Loss)/ Gain |
Portfolio Company |
Virtual Radiologic Corporation | Healthcare | Non-Affiliate | $ | — |
| $ | (3,091 | ) | $ | — |
| $ | (3,091 | ) |
RadioPharmacy Investors, LLC | Healthcare | Control | — |
| (1,031 | ) | — |
| (1,031 | ) |
Miles Media Group, LLC | Business Services | Affiliate | 2,877 |
| 1,192 |
| (1,170 | ) | 2,899 |
|
Education Management, Inc. | Education | Non-Affiliate | — |
| 1,199 |
| — |
| 1,199 |
|
Advanced Sleep Concepts, Inc. | Home Furnishings | Non-Affiliate | (3,424 | ) | (157 | ) | 3,249 |
| (332 | ) |
Other (< $1 million net gain (loss)) | | | (716 | ) | 1,233 |
| 618 |
| 1,135 |
|
Total | | | $ | (1,263 | ) | $ | (655 | ) | $ | 2,697 |
| $ | 779 |
|
| |
• | We recorded $3.1 million of unrealized depreciation on our investment in Virtual Radiologic Corporation to reflect a decrease in the indicated market price for that security. |
| |
• | We recorded $1.0 million of unrealized depreciation on our investment in RadioPharmacy Investors, LLC due to increased cost basis related to preferred dividends partially offset by improvement in that company's performance. |
| |
• | We received $3.0 million for the sale of our equity investment in Miles Media Group, LLC, which resulted in a $2.9 million realized gain and a reversal of previously unrealized appreciation of $1.2 million. |
| |
• | We also recorded $1.2 million of unrealized appreciation on our investment in Education Management, Inc. to reflect an improvement in that portfolio company's operating performance. |
| |
• | In addition, during 2013, we wrote off our preferred and common equity investments in Advanced Sleep Concepts, Inc. resulting in a realized loss of $3.4 million and a reversal of previously recorded unrealized depreciation of $3.2 million. |
INCOME TAX (BENEFIT) PROVISION
During the six months ended June 30, 2014, we incurred a $4,000 income tax provision compared to a $52,000 income tax provision during the six months ended June 30, 2013. The income tax provision for both periods was primarily attributable to income of our taxable subsidiaries.
FINANCIAL CONDITION, LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Our financial liquidity principally comes from our cash on hand, portfolio monetizations and net operating income. In addition to making investments in portfolio companies, we may use our available liquidity to pay dividends to our stockholders and to repurchase our common stock in the open market under our stock repurchase program. For the six months ended June 30, 2014, we declared 19.5 cents per share in dividends and paid $13.1 million in total dividends. We also repurchased 16,072,760 shares of our common stock for $57.8 million at a weighted average price of $3.60 per share which was a 18.9% discount from our quarterly weighted average net asset value per share.
For the six months ended June 30, 2014, we earned 11.9% on our average loan portfolio at fair value of $301.7 million and our weighted average cost to borrow was 5.0% on average borrowings of $152.2 million. Including dividend income and fee income, we earned $4.9 million of net operating income.
At June 30, 2014, we had $69.4 million in cash and cash equivalents available for general corporate purposes, $129.5 million of cash in restricted accounts related to our SBIC, that we may use to fund new investments in the SBIC, and $2.2 million of restricted cash held in escrow. On April 21, 2014, based on our assessment of our excess liquidity, we terminated our Bank of America Unsecured Revolver, that was set to expire in November 2014.
Although there can be no assurance, we believe we have sufficient liquidity to meet our operating requirements for the remainder of 2014, as well as liquidity for new origination opportunities and potential dividend distributions.
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, CASH, RESTRICTED AND CASH, SECURITIZATION ACCOUNTS
Our Consolidated Balance Sheets and our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows reflect three categories of cash: cash and cash equivalents; cash, restricted; and cash, securitization accounts. Each of these categories is described more fully below:
| |
• | Cash and cash equivalents represent unrestricted cash, including checking accounts, interest bearing deposits collateralized by marketable debt securities and highly liquid investments with original maturities of 90 days or less. As of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, we had $69.4 million and $91.6 million, respectively, in cash and cash equivalents. As of June 30, 2014, our cash and cash equivalents included $37.7 million held in interest-bearing accounts. |
| |
• | Cash, restricted includes cash held for regulatory purposes and cash held in escrow. The largest component of restricted cash was represented by cash held by Solutions Capital I, L.P., or Solutions Capital, a wholly owned subsidiary licensed as an SBIC under the SBIC Act, which generally is restricted to the origination of new loans by Solutions Capital. As of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, we had $131.6 million and $33.9 million, respectively, of restricted cash. |
| |
• | Cash, securitization accounts included principal and interest payments received on securitized loans, which, were held in designated bank accounts until monthly or quarterly disbursements were made from the securitization trusts. We were generally required to use a portion of these amounts to pay interest expense, reduce borrowings or pay other amounts in accordance with the related securitization agreements. Cash in securitization accounts had a negative impact on our earnings since the interest we paid on borrowings typically exceeded the rate of return that we were able to earn on temporary cash investments. As of December 31, 2013, we had $13.9 million in cash, securitization accounts. On January 21, 2014, we terminated our 2006-1 Trust and the securitized cash was used to repay principal and interest due on the notes including the notes owned by MCG Capital, the parent. |
During the six months ended June 30, 2014, our operating activities provided $154.3 million of cash and cash equivalents, and our financing activities used $176.5 million of cash and cash equivalents.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES—BORROWINGS
As of June 30, 2014, we reported $150.0 million of borrowings on our Consolidated Balance Sheets at cost. The following table summarizes our borrowing facilities, the facility amounts and the amounts outstanding.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | June 30, 2014 | December 31, 2013 |
(dollars in thousands) | Maturity Date | Total Facility/ Program | Amount Outstanding | Total Facility/ Program | Amount Outstanding |
SBIC | | | | | |
2008-10B | September 2018 | $ | 2,600 |
| $ | 2,600 |
| $ | 2,600 |
| $ | 2,600 |
|
2009-10A | March 2019 | 12,000 |
| 12,000 |
| 12,000 |
| 12,000 |
|
2009-10B | September 2019 | 13,000 |
| 13,000 |
| 13,000 |
| 13,000 |
|
2010-10B | September 2020 | 27,500 |
| 27,500 |
| 27,500 |
| 27,500 |
|
2011-10A | March 2021 | 53,500 |
| 53,500 |
| 53,500 |
| 53,500 |
|
2012-10A | March 2022 | 41,400 |
| 41,400 |
| 41,400 |
| 41,400 |
|
MCG Commercial Loan Trust 2006-1 | |
|
|
|
| | |
Series 2006-1 Class D Notes(a) | April 2018 | — |
| — |
| 40,016 |
| 25,172 |
|
Bank of America Unsecured Revolver(b) | |
|
|
|
| | |
Unsecured Revolving Note | November 2014 | — |
| — |
| 20,000 |
| — |
|
Total borrowings | | $ | 150,000 |
| $ | 150,000 |
| $ | 210,016 |
| $ | 175,172 |
|
_______________
| |
(a) | In January 2014, the Class D Notes were repaid in full. |
| |
(b) | In April 2014, we terminated the undrawn Bank of America Unsecured Revolver. |
As of June 30, 2014, our ratio of total assets to total borrowings and other senior securities, including secured financing, was 5,413%. This ratio does not include our SBIC debt which the SEC has permitted us to exclude from the asset coverage ratio requirements pursuant to an exemptive order.
As our borrowing facilities mature, it is important that we have sufficient liquidity available to repay our borrowing obligations. We may obtain the liquidity for repayment of our borrowing facilities from a number of sources, including cash on-hand, the maturity or monetization of our investment portfolio, equity issuances, and from other borrowing arrangements. Our SBIC debentures may be pre-paid without penalty on the March 1 or September 1 payment dates. In the event we prepay the SBIC debentures, we may accelerate up to $2.3 million of deferred financing fees into interest expense.
SBIC DEBENTURES
In December 2004, we formed a wholly owned subsidiary, Solutions Capital. Solutions Capital has a license from the SBA to operate as an SBIC under the SBIC Act. The license enabled Solutions Capital to borrow up to $150.0 million from the SBA, which is the maximum amount of outstanding leverage available to single-license SBIC companies.
To realize the full $150.0 million borrowing for which we have received approval under the SBIC program, we have funded a total of $75.0 million to Solutions Capital. As of each of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, Solutions Capital had borrowed the full $150.0 million. We are permitted to use these funds to provide debt and equity capital to qualifying small businesses. However, we may not use these borrowings to provide additional financing to certain companies that are currently in our portfolio without SBA approval. In addition, we may not use these funds for MCG’s, the parent company’s, working capital.
SBICs are subject to regulation and oversight by the SBA, including requirements to maintain certain minimum financial ratios and other covenants. An SBIC license does not assure an SBIC of SBA-guaranteed debenture funding, which is dependent upon continued compliance with SBA regulations and policies. The SBA, as a creditor, will have superior claim to Solutions Capital’s assets over our stockholders in the event we liquidate Solutions Capital or the SBA exercises its remedies upon an event of default under the SBA-guaranteed debentures issued by Solutions Capital.
The following table sets forth the maturity of Solutions Capital debentures, as well as the maturity of the investments and the current balance of restricted cash in Solutions Capital as of June 30, 2014.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Maturities |
(in thousands) | Total | Less than 1 year | 1-3 years | 4-5 years | After 5 years |
Borrowings | $ | 150,000 |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | 14,600 |
| $ | 135,400 |
|
Collateral | | | | | |
Fair value of debt investments | 111,925 |
| — |
| 1,254 |
| 110,671 |
| — |
|
Fair value of equity investments(a) | 2,590 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 2,590 |
|
Cash, restricted account | 129,465 |
| 129,465 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
|
Total collateral | $ | 243,980 |
| $ | 129,465 |
| $ | 1,254 |
| $ | 110,671 |
| $ | 2,590 |
|
____________
(a) Equity investments do not have a stated maturity date.
BANK OF AMERICA UNSECURED REVOLVER
In November 2012, we obtained an unsecured revolving credit facility with Bank of America, N.A. in the principal amount of $20.0 million. On April 21, 2014, based on our assessment of our excess liquidity, we terminated our undrawn Bank of America Unsecured Revolver.
MCG COMMERCIAL LOAN TRUST 2006-1
As of December 31, 2013, we had $25.2 million of securitized Class D Notes outstanding under the 2006-1 Trust, which was secured by $76.3 million of loans and equity investments and $13.9 million of cash. We retained all of the equity in the securitization. In November 2013, we directed the trustee to redeem the remaining notes on the next quarterly payment date and, on January 21, 2014, we repaid the Class D Notes in full and the loan and equity investments held by the 2006-1 Trust were transferred back to MCG, the parent.
WEIGHTED-AVERAGE BORROWINGS AND COST OF FUNDS
The following table shows our weighted-average borrowings, the weighted-average interest rate on all of our borrowings, including amortization of deferred debt issuance costs and commitment fees, the average LIBOR, and the average spread to LIBOR for 2014 and 2013:
|
| | | | | | |
| Six months ended June 30, |
(dollars in thousands) | 2014 | 2013 |
Weighted-average borrowings | $ | 152,156 |
| $ | 222,509 |
|
Average LIBOR | 0.23 | % | 0.28 | % |
Average spread to LIBOR, excluding amortization of deferred debt issuance costs | 4.15 |
| 3.35 |
|
Impact of amortization of deferred debt issuance costs | 0.66 |
| 0.56 |
|
Total cost of funds | 5.04 | % | 4.19 | % |
As of June 30, 2014, the cost of debt of our outstanding borrowings was 4.6% including amortization of deferred financing fees.
SECURED FINANCING
In June 2014, we monetized substantially all of our investment in Advanced Sleep through the sale of a 95% participation interest in our senior and subordinated loans. Under the terms of the sale, the purchaser will receive 100% of the payments related to the loan, including interest and principal, until the total payments received exceeds the purchase price plus any additional advances funded by the purchaser to Advanced Sleep and certain expenses incurred by the purchaser. Thereafter, the purchaser will receive 95% and we will receive 5% of any payments received from Advanced Sleep. Under the terms of the sale, the purchaser will have no recourse to us for any payments. We will continue to service the Advanced Sleep loans on behalf of the purchaser for which we will receive an annual fee of $23,000.
We follow the guidance in ASC 860—Transfers and Servicing when accounting for loan participations and other partial loan sales. Such guidance requires a participation or other partial loan sale to meet the definition of a “participating interest,” as defined in the guidance, in order for sale treatment to be allowed. Due to the non-pro-rata allocation of payments, the sale of the interest in Advanced Sleep's loans does not meet the definition of a participating interest under ASC 860 and the loans remain on our Consolidated Balance Sheets and the proceeds from the sale are recorded as a secured financing until the definition is met. The secured financing is carried at fair value to correspond with the related investments, which are carried at fair value.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES—COMMON STOCK
We are a closed-end investment company that has elected to be regulated as a BDC under the 1940 Act. The 1940 Act prohibits us from selling shares of our common stock at a price below the current net asset value of such stock, except in limited circumstances, including approval by our stockholders of such a sale and certain determinations by our board of directors.
On January 17, 2012, our board of directors authorized a stock repurchase program of up to $35.0 million, which was terminated after we effected repurchases totaling approximately $29.4 million. On October 25, 2013, our board of directors authorized a second stock repurchase program of up to $25.0 million. On February 28, 2014, our board of directors increased the second stock repurchase program to $35.0 million. On April 25, 2014, our board of directors terminated the second stock repurchase program effective as of May 2, 2014 and authorized a third stock repurchase program of up to $50.0 million effective as of May 5, 2014. On August 5, 2014, our board of directors terminated the third stock repurchase program and authorized a new stock repurchase program of up to $50.0 million effective as of August 12, 2014. Under the new program, we are authorized to repurchase shares of our common stock in open market transactions, including through block purchases, depending on prevailing market conditions and other factors. The repurchase program may be extended, modified or discontinued at any time for any reason. The program does not obligate us to acquire any specific number of shares, and all repurchases will be made in accordance with SEC Rule 10b-18, which sets certain restrictions on the method, timing, price and volume of stock repurchases. During the six months ended June 30, 2014, we repurchased 16,072,760 shares of our common stock at a weighted average purchase price of $3.60 per share, which was a 18.9% discount from our quarterly weighted average net asset value per share.
We requested and received the assurance of the staff of the Division of Investment Management that it would not recommend enforcement action to the SEC under the 1940 Act or Rule 17d-1 thereunder if we engage in a stock repurchase program and agree not to issue additional restricted stock under any compensation plan unless such issuance, together with all restricted stock outstanding under all compensation plans, does not exceed 10% of our outstanding common stock at the time of such issuance less the total number of shares previously issued, in the aggregate, pursuant to all compensatory plans. Although as of June 30, 2014, there were 1,426,811 shares of our common stock available for issuance under our Third Amended and Restated 2006 Employee Restricted Stock Plan, or 2006 Plan, no shares of restricted stock could be issued under our 2006 Plan or our Third Amended and Restated 2006 Non-Employee Director Restricted Stock Plan, because the10% threshold set forth in the SEC's order had been reached due to shares we repurchased under our stock repurchase program.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
We are party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financial needs of our customers. These instruments include commitments to extend credit and involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit risk in excess of the amount recognized in the balance sheet. We attempt to limit our credit risk by conducting extensive due diligence and obtaining collateral where appropriate.
Commitments to extend credit include the unused portions of commitments that obligate us to extend credit in the form of loans, participations in loans, guarantees, letters of credit and other financial commitments. Commitments to extend credit would also include loan proceeds we are obligated to advance, such as loan draws, rotating or revolving credit arrangements, or similar transactions. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee by the counterparty. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements.
We do not report the unused portions of these commitments on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. As of June 30, 2014, we had $5.0 million of outstanding unused loan commitments. We believe that our operations, monetizations, revolving credit facility and unrestricted cash will provide sufficient liquidity to fund, as necessary, requests to draw on these unfunded commitments. We estimate that the fair value of these commitments was less than $0.1 million based on the fees that we currently charge to enter into similar arrangements, taking into account the creditworthiness of the counterparties. From time to time, we provide guarantees or standby letters of credit on behalf of our portfolio companies. As of June 30, 2014, we had no outstanding guarantees or standby letters of credit.
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
The following table shows our contractual obligations as of June 30, 2014:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(in thousands) | Payments Due by Period |
Contractual Obligations(a) | Total | Less than 1 year | 1-3 years | 4-5 years | After 5 years |
Borrowings | | | | | |
SBIC | 150,000 |
| — |
| — |
| 14,600 |
| 135,400 |
|
Interest payments on borrowings(b) | 43,716 |
| 6,503 |
| 13,006 |
| 12,922 |
| 11,285 |
|
Operating leases | 739 |
| 397 |
| 342 |
| — |
| — |
|
Severance obligations(c) | 2,145 |
| 1,250 |
| 895 |
| — |
| — |
|
Total contractual obligations | $ | 196,600 |
| $ | 8,150 |
| $ | 14,243 |
| $ | 27,522 |
| $ | 146,685 |
|
_______________
| |
(a) | Excludes the unused commitments to extend credit to our customers of $5.0 million as discussed above. Also excludes the $4.5 million secured financing accounted for in accordance with ASC 860 which has no recourse to us. |
| |
(b) | Interest payments are based on contractual maturity and the current outstanding principal balance of our borrowings and assume no changes in interest rate benchmarks. |
| |
(c) | Represents remaining severance payments and employer taxes that we are obligated to pay stemming from the resignation of our former chief executive officer. |
DISTRIBUTIONS
We currently qualify as a RIC for federal income tax purposes, which generally allows us to avoid paying corporate income taxes on any income or gains that we distribute to our stockholders. Generally, we intend to distribute sufficient dividends to eliminate taxable income and may distribute more than the taxable income, which amount would be considered a return of capital. As a RIC, we are subject to a 4% excise tax to the extent that we do not distribute on an actual or deemed basis: (i) 98.0% of our current year ordinary income; and (ii) 98.2% of our current year net capital gain income.
We may not be able to achieve operating results that will allow us to make distributions at a specific level or to increase the amount of these distributions. In addition, we may be limited in our ability to make distributions due to the BDC asset coverage test for borrowings applicable to us as a BDC under the 1940 Act and due to provisions in our credit facilities and SBA regulations. If we do not distribute a certain percentage of our income annually, we will suffer adverse tax consequences, including possible loss of favorable RIC tax treatment. We cannot assure stockholders that they will receive any distributions, or distributions at a particular level. We may make distributions to our stockholders of certain net capital gains. Since December 2001, we have declared aggregate per share distributions of $14.08.
The following table summarizes the distributions that we declared since January 1, 2012:
|
| | | | | |
Date Declared | Record Date | Payable Date | Dividends per Share |
August 5, 2014 | August 20, 2014 | August 29, 2014 | $ | 0.050 |
|
April 25, 2014 | May 9, 2014 | May 30, 2014 | $ | 0.070 |
|
February 28, 2014 | March 14, 2014 | March 28, 2014 | $ | 0.125 |
|
October 25, 2013 | November 8, 2013 | November 22, 2013 | $ | 0.125 |
|
July 26, 2013 | August 9, 2013 | August 30, 2013 | $ | 0.125 |
|
April 26, 2013 | May 10, 2013 | May 31, 2013 | $ | 0.125 |
|
March 1, 2013 | March 15, 2013 | March 29, 2013 | $ | 0.125 |
|
October 26, 2012 | November 16, 2012 | November 30, 2012 | $ | 0.125 |
|
July 27, 2012 | August 17, 2012 | August 31, 2012 | $ | 0.140 |
|
April 27, 2012 | June 13, 2012 | July 13, 2012 | $ | 0.140 |
|
February 24, 2012 | April 13, 2012 | May 15, 2012 | $ | 0.170 |
|
If we determined the tax attributes of our distributions as of June 30, 2014, 66% would be from ordinary income and 34% would be a return of capital. A return of capital is a return of stockholder investment, rather than a return of earnings or gains derived from our investment activities. While not immediately taxable to the extent of a stockholder's basis in its shares, a stockholder's basis in the investment will be reduced by the nontaxable amount, which will result in additional gain or a lower loss when the shares are sold. However, actual determinations of the tax attributes of our distributions, including determinations of return of capital, are made annually as of the end of our fiscal year based upon our taxable income and distributions paid for the full year. Therefore, a determination as to the tax attributes of the distributions made on a quarterly basis may not be representative of the actual tax attributes for a full year. We intend to update stockholders quarterly with an estimated percentage of our distributions that resulted from taxable ordinary income. The actual tax characteristics of distributions to stockholders will be reported to stockholders annually on a Form 1099-DIV. Future distributions will take into account the requirements for us to distribute the majority of our taxable income to fulfill our distribution requirements as a RIC, together with an assessment of our gains and losses recognized or to be recognized for tax purposes, portfolio transactional events, liquidity, cash earnings and our asset coverage ratio at the time of such decision.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
These Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are based on the selection and application of critical accounting policies, which require management to make significant estimates and assumptions. The following section describes our accounting policies associated with the valuation of our portfolio of investments. For a full discussion of our other critical accounting policies and estimates, see Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.
VALUATION OF INVESTMENTS
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS AND DISCLOSURES
We account for our investments at fair value in accordance with Accounting Standard Codification Topic 820—Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, or ASC 820. ASC 820 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about assets and liabilities measured at fair value. ASC 820 defines “fair value” as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. This fair value definition focuses on exit price in the principal, or most advantageous, market and prioritizes, within a measurement of fair value, the use of market-based inputs over entity-specific inputs.
ASC 820 establishes the following three-level hierarchy, based upon the transparency of inputs to the fair value measurement of an asset or liability as of the measurement date:
|
| |
ASC 820 Fair Value Hierarchy | Inputs to Fair Value Methodology |
Level 1 | Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities |
Level 2 | Quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the financial instrument; inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability; or inputs that are derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market information |
Level 3 | Pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques and at least one significant model assumption is unobservable or when the estimation of fair value requires significant management judgment |
We categorize a financial instrument in the fair value hierarchy based on the lowest level of input that is significant to its fair value measurement. In the event that transfers between these levels were to occur in the future, we would recognize those transfers as of the ending balance sheet date, based on changes in the use of observable and unobservable inputs utilized to perform the valuation for the period.
DETERMINATION OF FAIR VALUE IN GOOD FAITH
As a BDC, we invest primarily in illiquid securities, including debt and equity securities of private companies. To protect our investments and maximize our returns, we negotiate the structure of each equity security and the majority of the debt securities in our investment portfolio. Our contracts with our portfolio companies generally include many terms governing interest rate, repayment terms, prepayment premiums, financial covenants, operating covenants, ownership and corporate governance rights, dilution parameters, liquidation preferences, voting rights, and put or call rights. In some cases, our loan agreements also allow for increases in the spread to the base index rate, if the portfolio company’s financial or operational performance deteriorates or shows negative variances from its business plan and, in some cases, allow for decreases in the spread if financial or operational performance improves or exceeds the portfolio company’s plan. Generally, our investments are subject to some restrictions on resale and have no established trading market. Because of the type of investments that we make and the nature of our business, our valuation processes require analyses of numerous market, industry and company-specific factors, including: the performance of the underlying investment; the financial condition of the portfolio company; changing market events; market prices, when available; estimates of market interest rates that would otherwise be made available to our portfolio companies; and other factors relevant to the individual security.
There is no single approach for determining fair value in good faith. Unlike banks, we are not permitted to provide a general reserve for anticipated loan losses. As a result, for portfolio investments that do not have an active market, we must apply business judgment to the specific facts and circumstances associated with each security to determine fair value.
Generally, we value securities that are traded in the over-the-counter market or on a stock exchange at the average of the prevailing bid and ask prices on the date of the relevant period end. When such market prices are not available, we use several valuation methodologies to estimate the fair value of our investment portfolio, which generally results in a range of fair values from which we derive a single estimate of fair value. To determine a portfolio company’s fair value, we analyze its historical and projected financial results, as well as key market value factors. In determining a security's fair value, we assume we would exchange it in an orderly transaction at the measurement date. We use the following methods to determine the fair value of investments in our portfolio that are not traded actively:
| |
• | Majority-Owned Control Investments—Majority-owned control investments comprise 17.8% of our investment portfolio at fair value. Market quotations are not readily available for these investments; therefore, we use a combination of market and income approaches to determine their fair value. Typically, private companies are bought and sold based on multiples of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, or EBITDA, cash flows, net income, revenues or, in limited cases, book value. Generally, we apply multiples that we observe for other comparable companies to relevant financial data for the portfolio company in question. Also, in a limited number of cases, we use income approaches to determine the fair value of these securities, based on our projections of the discounted future free cash flows that the portfolio company will likely generate, as well as industry derived capital costs. Our valuation approaches for majority-owned investments estimate the value |
upon a hypothetical sale or exit and then allocates such value to the investment's securities in order of their relative liquidation preference. In addition, we assume that any outstanding debt or other securities that are senior to our securities are required to be repaid at par. These valuation approaches also consider the value of our ability to control the portfolio company’s capital structure and the timing of a potential exit.
| |
• | Non-Control Investments—Non-control investments comprise 82.2% of our investment portfolio at fair value. Quoted prices are not available for 97.7% of our non-control investments at fair value. For our non-control equity investments, we use the same market and income approaches used to value our control investments. For non-control debt investments for which no quoted prices are available, we estimate fair value using a market-yield approach based on the expected future cash flows discounted at the loans’ effective interest rates, based on our estimate of current market rates. We may adjust discounted cash flow calculations to reflect other market conditions or the perceived credit risk of the borrower. In the event the fair value of a non-control debt investment, as determined by the same market or income approach used to value our control investments, is below our cost, we estimate the fair value using the market or income approach. |
| |
• | Thinly-Traded and Over-the-Counter Securities—Generally, we value securities that are traded in the over-the-counter market or on a stock exchange at the average of the prevailing bid and ask prices on the date of the relevant period end. However, we may apply a discount to the market value of restricted or thinly-traded public securities to reflect the impact that these restrictions have on the value of these securities. We review factors, including the trading volume, total securities outstanding and our percentage ownership of securities to determine whether the trading levels are active (Level 1) or inactive (Level 2). As of June 30, 2014, these securities represented 1.9% of our investment portfolio at fair value. We utilize independent pricing services to arrive at certain of our fair value estimates. To corroborate “bid/ask” quotes from independent pricing services we perform a market-yield approach to validate prices obtained or obtain other evidence. |
Our valuation analyses incorporate the impact that key events could have on the securities’ values, including public and private mergers and acquisitions, purchase transactions, public offerings, letters of intent and subsequent debt or equity sales. Our valuation analyses also include key external data, such as market changes and industry valuation benchmarks. We also engage independent valuation firms to provide additional data points for our quarterly valuation analyses. Our general practice is to obtain an independent valuation or review of valuation at least once per year for each portfolio investment that had a fair value in excess of $5.0 million, unless the fair value has otherwise been derived through a sale of some or all of our investment in the portfolio company or is a new investment made within the last twelve months. In total, as of June 30, 2014, we either obtained a valuation or review from an independent firm, considered new investments made or used market quotes in the preceding twelve month period to calculate 98.9% of the fair value of our investment portfolio.
The majority of the valuations performed by the independent valuation firms utilize proprietary models and inputs. We have used, and intend to continue to use, independent valuation firms to provide additional support for our internal analyses.
Our board of directors sets our valuation policies and procedures and determines the fair value of our investments. The investment and valuation committee of our board of directors meets at least quarterly with our executive management to review management’s recommendations of fair value of our investments. Our board of directors considers our valuations, as well as the independent valuations and reviews, in its determination of the fair value of our investments.
Due to the uncertainty inherent in the valuation process, such fair value estimates may differ significantly from the values that would have been used had a ready market for the securities existed, and the differences could be material. In addition, changes in the market environment and other events that may occur over the life of the investments may cause the gains or losses that we ultimately realize on these investments to differ from the valuations currently assigned.
Significant Unobservable Inputs
Our investment portfolio is not composed of homogeneous debt and equity securities that can be valued with a small number of inputs. Instead, the majority of our investment portfolio is composed of complex debt and equity securities with distinct contract terms and conditions. As such, our valuation of each investment in our portfolio is unique and complex, often factoring in numerous different inputs, including the historical and forecasted financial and operational
performance of the portfolio company, projected cash flows, market multiples, comparable market transactions, the priority of our securities compared with those of other investors, credit risk, interest rates, independent valuations and reviews and other inputs too numerous to list quantitatively herein.
The following table summarizes the significant unobservable inputs in the fair value measurements of our level 3 investments by category of investment and valuation technique as of June 30, 2014.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
($ in thousands) | Fair Value | Valuation Techniques | Unobservable Inputs | Range | Weighted Average |
| Minimum | Maximum |
Senior debt | $ | 100,068 |
| Discounted cash flow | Market interest rate | 8.5 | % | 11.5 | % | 9.3 | % |
|
|
| Pending transactions/Letters of intent | Discount | — | % | — | % | — | % |
|
|
| Market comparable companies | EBITDA multiple(a) | 6.0x |
| 6.0x |
| 6.0x |
|
Subordinated debt | 76,210 |
| Discounted cash flow | Market interest rate | 7.8 | % | 14.0 | % | 12 | % |
|
|
| Pending transactions/Letters of intent | Discount | — |
| — |
| — |
|
|
|
| Market comparable companies | EBITDA multiple(a) | 6.0x |
| 6.0x |
| 6.0x |
|
Preferred and common equity | 16,151 |
| Market comparable companies | EBITDA multiple(a) | 4.4x |
| 10.0x |
| 7.1x |
|
|
|
| Discount for minority interest | — | % | 25.0 | % | 3.5 | % |
| $ | 192,429 |
| | | | | |
______________
| |
(a) | EBITDA may include proforma adjustments and/or other addbacks based on specific circumstances related to each investment. |
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENT
In June 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2013-08, Financial Services—Investment Companies (Topic 946): Amendments to the Scope, Measurement, and Disclosure Requirements, or ASU 2013-08. This update changes the approach to the assessment of whether a company is an investment company, clarifies the characteristics of an investment company, provides comprehensive guidance for the investment company assessment and contains certain disclosure requirements. ASU 2013-08 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods in fiscal years that begin after December 15, 2013. Earlier application is prohibited. We adopted this standard update beginning January 1, 2014. The implementation of this standard update did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), or ASU 2014-09. This update supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-230: Revenue Recognition (Topic 605), and most industry-specific guidance throughout the industry topics of the codification. The core principal of the update is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled to exchange for those goods or services. In applying the revenue model to contracts within its scope, an entity should identify the contract(s) with a customer, identify the performance obligations in the contract, determine the transaction price, allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract, and recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation. ASU 2014-09 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within that reporting period. We are currently evaluating the potential impact the adoption of this update will have on our consolidated financial statements.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We are subject to financial market risks, including changes in interest rates. In the event of financial downturns affecting the banking system and financial markets, the financial position and results of operations of certain of the middle-market companies in our portfolio could be affected adversely, which ultimately could lead to difficulty in their meeting debt service requirements and an increase in defaults.
Interest rate sensitivity refers to the change in earnings that may result from changes in the level of interest rates. Our net interest income is affected by changes in various interest rates, including LIBOR, prime rates and commercial paper rates. As of June 30, 2014, approximately 63.1% of our loan portfolio, at fair value, bore interest at a spread to either the LIBOR or the prime rate, and 36.9% at a fixed interest rate. As of June 30, 2014, approximately 57.9% of our loan portfolio, at fair value, had LIBOR floors between 1.3% and 3.0% on a LIBOR-base index or prime floors between 2.8% and 6.0%. The three-month weighted-average LIBOR interest rate was 0.23% as of June 30, 2014. Thus, the LIBOR floors in these loan investments lessen the impact of such historically low LIBOR rates.
We regularly measure exposure to interest rate risk. We assess interest rate risk and we manage our interest rate exposure on an ongoing basis by comparing our interest rate sensitive assets to our interest rate sensitive liabilities. Based on this review, we determine whether or not any hedging transactions are necessary to mitigate exposure to changes in interest rates.
The following table shows a comparison of the interest rate base for our interest-bearing cash, outstanding commercial loans, at cost, and our outstanding borrowings as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| June 30, 2014 | December 31, 2013 |
(in thousands) | Interest Bearing Cash and Commercial Loans | Borrowings | Interest Bearing Cash and Commercial Loans | Borrowings |
Money market rate | $ | 37,699 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 56,685 |
| $ | — |
|
Prime rate | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
|
LIBOR | | | | |
30-day | 36,542 |
| — |
| 57,725 |
| — |
|
60-day | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
|
90-day | 96,206 |
| — |
| 194,133 |
| 25,172 |
|
180-day | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
|
Fixed rate | 76,196 |
| 150,000 |
| 100,009 |
| 150,000 |
|
Total | $ | 246,643 |
| $ | 150,000 |
| $ | 408,552 |
| $ | 175,172 |
|
Based on our June 30, 2014 balance sheet, the following table shows the impact to net income of hypothetical base rate increases in interest rates, assuming no changes in our investment and borrowing structure. The impact to net income of hypothetical base rate decreases in interest rates is not shown in the following table because as of June 30, 2014, the quarterly average LIBOR was 0.23% and a 100-basis point decrease could not occur:
|
| | | | | | | | | |
(dollars in thousands) Basis Point Change | Interest Income | Interest Expense | Net Income |
100 | $ | 510 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 510 |
|
200 | 1,467 |
| — |
| 1,467 |
|
300 | 3,010 |
| — |
| 3,010 |
|
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2014. The term “disclosure controls and procedures” (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) means controls and other procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the company’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives and management necessarily applies its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Based on the foregoing evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2014, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of such date, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.
INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
No change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act), occurred during the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2014 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.
As disclosed in our December 12, 2013 Current Report on Form 8-K, on December 12, 2013 we and Solutions Capital filed in the District Court of Texas, Dallas County, an Original Petition against defendants: Barrier Advisors, or Barrier; Huibert Verbeek; Engelbrecht Verbeek; Kenney Verbeek; Jack Ormberget; and Ehrhardt, Keefe, Steiner, Hottman PC, or Ehrhardt, collectively referred to as the Named Parties. In the pleadings, we and Solutions Capital claim, among other things, that in approximately August - November, 2012, defendants Barrier, Huibert Verbeek, Engelbrecht Verbeek, Kenney Verbeek, Jack Ormberget and Ehrhardt materially misrepresented the financial condition of Color Star Growers of Colorado, Inc., Vast, Inc., and Color Star L.L.C., collectively referred to as Color Star, to us and Solutions Capital in connection with the subordinated loan transaction Solutions Capital entered into with Color Star on November 15, 2012. In addition, in the pleadings, we and Solutions Capital claim that, among other things, Ehrhardt, Color Star’s former auditor, failed to conduct its annual audits of Color Star with reasonable care. In the complaint, we and Solutions Capital seek various forms of relief, including, but not limited to, rescission of the subordinated loan to Color Star and damages in the amount of all of the outstanding principal remaining on the $13.5 million loan to Color Star, compensatory damages for the losses sustained as a result of Named Parties’ conduct, costs incurred in this action and such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper.
From time to time, we are a party to certain legal proceedings incidental to the normal course of our business, including the enforcement of our rights under contracts with our portfolio companies. While we cannot predict the outcome of these legal proceedings with certainty, we do not expect that these proceedings will have a material effect on our financial condition or results of operations. During the quarter ended June 30, 2014, there were no new or material developments in legal proceedings.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS.
Investing in our common stock may be speculative and involves a high degree of risk. In addition to the other information contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including our financial statements, the related notes, schedules and exhibits, you should carefully consider the risk factors discussed in Part I, “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, which could materially affect our business, financial condition and/or operating results. The risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks facing our Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or operating results.
Other than described below, there have been no material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in Part I, “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, which should be read together with the other risk factors and information disclosed elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and our other reports filed with the SEC.
The following disclosure replaces and supplements the risk factors titled "Our portfolio is concentrated in certain industries, which increases our risk of significant loss if any one of these companies fails to service our debt because of industry downturns","If we fail to qualify as a RIC, we will have to pay corporate-level taxes on our income and our income available for distribution would be reduced significantly or eliminated" and "If we fail to service our existing debt arrangements adequately, or to establish new credit facilities on favorable terms, our business could be harmed materially" included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013:
Our portfolio is concentrated in certain industries, which increases our risk of significant loss if any one of these companies fails to service our debt because of industry downturns.
From time to time, we target specific industries in which to invest on a recurring basis, which may result in significant concentrations in our portfolio. As a consequence, the aggregate returns we realize may be substantially adversely affected by the unfavorable performance of a small number of such investments or a substantial write-down of any one investment. Beyond regulatory and income tax diversification requirements, we do not have fixed guidelines for industry concentration. In addition, while we generally decline to make investments in a particular industry or group of industries that would exceed 15.0% of our total assets at the time of closing, it is possible that as the values of our portfolio companies change, one industry or a group of industries may come to exceed such level. As a result, a downturn in an industry in which we have invested a significant portion of our total investments could have a materially adverse effect on us. As of June 30, 2014, 39.8%, 32.4% and 16.5% of our total investments at fair value were invested in healthcare, business services, and manufacturing industries, respectively. Therefore, we are susceptible to the economic circumstances in these industries, and a downturn in any one of these industries could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
If we fail to qualify as a RIC, we will have to pay corporate-level taxes on our income and our income available for distribution would be reduced significantly or eliminated.
We have elected to be taxed for federal income tax purposes as a RIC, under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code. To qualify as a RIC under the Internal Revenue Code, we must meet certain source-of-income, asset diversification and annual distribution requirements and maintain our status as a BDC, including:
| |
• | Sources of Income. We must obtain at least 90% of our income each year from dividends, interest, gains from the sale of stock or securities or similar sources. |
| |
• | Asset Diversification. At the end of each taxable year, at least 50% of the value of our assets must consist of cash, cash equivalents, U.S. government securities, securities of other RICs, and other acceptable securities. No more than 25% of the value of our assets may be invested in the securities, other than U.S. government securities or securities of other RICs, (i) of one issuer, or (ii) of two or more issuers that are controlled, as determined under applicable Internal Revenue Code rules, by us and that are engaged in the same or similar or related trades or businesses or of certain “qualified publicly traded partnerships.” |
| |
• | Income Distribution. We must distribute to our stockholders at least 90% of our ordinary income and realized net short-term capital gains in excess of realized net long-term capital losses, if any, on an annual basis. Because we are subject to an asset coverage ratio requirement under the 1940 Act, and may also be subject to certain financial covenants under any debt financings we may incur, we could, under certain circumstances, be restricted from making the distributions necessary to satisfy the IRS requirement. Our SBIC subsidiary |
may be limited by the SBIC Act and SBA regulations governing SBICs from making certain distributions to us that may be necessary to maintain our status as a RIC.
As our total assets continue to decline associated with the possible repayment of all or a portion of our SBA debentures, our stock repurchase program, dividend distributions to stockholders and other transactions that reduce our total assets there is an increased risk of non-qualification as a RIC due to the 50% asset diversification test as outlined in Internal Revenue Code Section 851(b)(3). The 50% diversification test requires at least 50% of the value of a RIC’s total assets be invested in cash, cash items (including receivables), government securities (as defined under the 1940 Act), securities of other RIC’s, or investments in other securities that, with respect to any one issuer, do not represent more than 5 percent of the RIC’s assets or more than 10 percent of the issuer’s voting securities. The 50% diversification test must be satisfied at the end of each quarter of a RIC’s taxable year.
Failure to meet the foregoing requirements may result in our having to dispose of certain investments quickly in order to prevent the loss of RIC status. Because most of our investments will be in private companies, and, therefore, will be relatively illiquid, any such dispositions could be made at disadvantageous prices and could result in losses. If we fail to qualify as a RIC for any reason we would become subject to corporate-level income tax, substantially reducing our net assets, the amount of income available for distribution and the amount of our distributions. Such a failure would have a material adverse effect on our stockholders and us.
If we fail to service our existing debt arrangements adequately, or to establish new credit facilities on favorable terms, our business could be harmed materially.
Solutions Capital has issued SBA debentures that require our SBIC to generate sufficient cash flow to make required interest payments. Further, Solutions Capital must maintain a minimum capitalization that if impaired could materially and adversely affect our liquidity, financial condition and results of operations. Our borrowings under our SBA debentures are collateralized by the assets of Solutions Capital.
Our continued compliance with these borrowings depends on many factors, some of which are beyond our control. Material net asset devaluation in connection with additional borrowings could result in an inability to comply with our obligation to restrict the level of indebtedness that we are able to incur in relation to the value of our assets or to maintain a minimum level of stockholders' equity.
Furthermore, we cannot be certain that we will be able to establish new borrowing facilities to provide working and investment capital, including for new originations. If we are unable to establish new facilities of a reasonable size, our liquidity will be reduced significantly. Even if we are able to consummate new borrowing facilities, we may not be able to do so on favorable terms.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.
STOCK REPURCHASE PROGRAM
On January 17, 2012, our board of directors authorized a stock repurchase program of up to $35.0 million, which was terminated after we effected repurchases totaling approximately $29.4 million. On October 25, 2013, our board of directors authorized a second stock repurchase program of up to $25.0 million. On February 28, 2014, our board of directors increased the second stock repurchase program to $35.0 million. On April 25, 2014, our board of directors terminated the second stock repurchase program effective as of May 2, 2014 and authorized a third stock repurchase program of up to $50.0 million effective as of May 5, 2014. On August 5, 2014, our board of directors terminated the third stock repurchase program and authorized a new stock repurchase program of up to $50.0 million effective as of August 12, 2014. Under the new program, we are authorized to repurchase shares of our common stock in open market transactions, including through block purchases, depending on prevailing market conditions and other factors. The repurchase program may be extended, modified or discontinued at any time for any reason. The program does not obligate us to acquire any specific number of shares, and all repurchases will be made in accordance with SEC Rule 10b-18, which sets certain restrictions on the method, timing, price and volume of stock repurchases. The following table summarizes our stock repurchases for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014.
|
| | | | | | |
| Three months ended June 30, 2014 | Six months ended June 30, 2014 |
Dollar amount repurchased (in thousands) | $ | 47,229 |
| $ | 57,818 |
|
Shares repurchased | 13,313,493 |
| 16,072,760 |
|
Average price per share | $ | 3.55 |
| $ | 3.60 |
|
Discount to quarterly weighted average net asset value per share | 18.8 | % | 18.9 | % |
NET ISSUANCE OF RESTRICTED STOCK
For certain employees, we may be deemed to have purchased through the net issuance of shares, a portion of the shares of restricted stock previously issued under the 2006 Plan for which the forfeiture provisions have lapsed to satisfy the applicable employee’s income tax withholding obligations. We retire immediately all such shares of common stock that we purchase in connection with such net issuance to employees.
DIVIDEND REINVESTMENT PLAN
As part of our dividend reinvestment plan for our common stockholders, we may direct the plan administrator to purchase shares of our common stock on the open market to satisfy dividend reinvestment requests related to dividends that we pay on outstanding shares of our common stock.
The following table summarizes the shares of common stock that we have purchased during the three months ended June 30, 2014:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Period/Purpose | Total number of shares | Average Price Paid per Share | | Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs | Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs |
April 1 – 30, 2014 | | | | | |
Stock repurchase program(a) | 4,682,121 |
| $ | 3.71 |
| | 4,682,121 |
| $ | 4,606,352 |
|
Restricted stock vesting(b) | 118,365 |
| $ | 3.54 |
| (c) | n/a |
| n/a |
|
Total April 1 – 30, 2014 | 4,800,486 |
| $ | 3.71 |
| | 4,682,121 |
| $ | 4,606,352 |
|
May 1 – 31, 2014 | | | | | |
Stock repurchase program(a) | 4,286,865 |
| $ | 3.40 |
| | 4,286,865 |
| $ | 38,446,957 |
|
Restricted stock vesting(b) | 59,568 |
| $ | 3.26 |
| (c) | n/a |
| n/a |
|
Dividend reinvestment requirements(d) | 1,189 |
| $ | 3.42 |
| (e) | n/a |
| n/a |
|
Total May 1 – 31, 2014 | 4,347,622 |
| $ | 3.40 |
| | 4,286,865 |
| $ | 38,446,957 |
|
June 1 – 30, 2014 | | | | | |
Stock repurchase program(a) | 4,344,507 |
| $ | 3.51 |
| | 4,344,507 |
| $ | 23,181,650 |
|
Restricted stock vesting(b) | 1,477 |
| $ | 3.92 |
| (c) | n/a |
| n/a |
|
Total June 1 – 30, 2014 | 4,345,984 |
| $ | 3.51 |
| | 4,344,507 |
| $ | 23,181,650 |
|
Total | 13,494,092 |
| $ | 3.55 |
| | 13,313,493 |
| $ | 23,181,650 |
|
| |
(a) | On October 25, 2013, our board of directors authorized a stock repurchase program of up to $25.0 million, which was increased on February 28, 2014 to $35.0 million. On April 25, 2014, our board of directors terminated our existing stock repurchase program effective as of May 2, 2014 and authorized a new stock repurchase program of up to $50.0 million effective as of May 5, 2014. |
| |
(b) | Represents shares repurchased from our employees in connection with the net issuance of shares to satisfy employee tax withholding obligations in connection with the vesting of restricted stock. |
| |
(c) | Based on the weighted-average closing share prices of our common stock on the dates that the forfeiture restrictions lapsed. |
| |
(d) | Represents stock purchased on the open market to satisfy dividend reinvestment requests. |
| |
(e) | Represents the weighted-average purchase price per share, including commissions, for shares purchased pursuant to the terms of our dividend reinvestment plan. |
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES.
Not Applicable.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES.
Not Applicable.
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION.
As disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, effective March 6, 2014, Beverly Jane Alley, our former Controller, assumed the position of Interim Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer. On August 5, 2014, our board of directors appointed Ms. Alley Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS.
The following table lists exhibits filed as part of this report, according to the number assigned to them in Item 601 of Regulation S-K. All exhibits listed in the following table are incorporated by reference except for those exhibits denoted in the last column.
|
| | | | | |
| | Incorporated by Reference | |
Exhibit No. | Description | Form and SEC File No. | Filing Date with SEC | Exhibit No. | Filed with this 10-Q |
| | | | | |
10.1 | Agreement Terminating Financing Agreement between MCG Capital Corporation and Bank of America, N.A. dated April 21, 2014. | 8-K (0-33377) | April 21, 2014 | 10.1 | |
10.2 | Letter Agreement between MCG Capital Corporation and B. Hagen Saville dated April 21, 2014. | 8-K (0-33377) | April 21, 2014 | 10.2 | |
10.3 | Amendment No. 1 to Severance, Confidentiality and Non-Solicitation Agreement by and between MCG Capital Corporation and Keith Kennedy dated April 21, 2014. | 8-K (0-33377) | April 21, 2014 | 10.3 | |
15.1 | Letter regarding unaudited interim financial information from Ernst & Young LLP, independent registered public accounting firm | | | | * |
31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | | | | * |
31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | | | | * |
32.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | | | | † |
32.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | | | | † |
* | Filed herewith. | | | | |
† | Furnished herewith. | | | | |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
| | | |
| | | MCG Capital Corporation |
| | | |
Date: | August 7, 2014 | By: | /s/ KEITH KENNEDY |
| | | Keith Kennedy |
| | | Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |
| | | |
Date: | August 7, 2014 | By: | /s/ BEVERLY JANE ALLEY |
| | | Beverly Jane Alley |
| | | Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |