FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT | FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT The Company’s valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair value and the definition of the three levels (Level 1, Level 2, and Level 3) of the fair value hierarchy are disclosed in Part II, Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 4—Fair Value Measurement” of the 2017 Annual Report. The Company has not changed the valuation techniques or inputs it uses for its fair value measurement, except for its adoption of ASU 2016-01, “Financial Instruments—Overall (Subtopic 825-10), Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities," during the nine months ended September 30, 2018 . See additional information regarding adoption of the new standard in Note (1), “Basis of Presentation” and additional disclosures below. Assets and Liabilities Measured on a Recurring Basis The Company’s restricted cash equivalents that serve as collateral for the Company’s outstanding letters of credit typically consist of money market funds that are measured at fair value based on quoted prices, which are Level 1 inputs. The Company’s restricted cash equivalents and investments that serve as collateral for the Company’s captive insurance company primarily consist of commercial paper that is measured at observable market prices for identical securities that are traded in less active markets, which are Level 2 inputs. Of the $61,567 commercial paper issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2018 , $23,023 had original maturities greater than three months, which were considered available-for-sale securities. As of December 31, 2017 , the Company had $28,708 commercial paper issued and outstanding, of which $6,074 had original maturities greater than three months and were considered available-for-sale securities. The increase in commercial paper issued and outstanding is due to additional restricted investments related to the captive insurance company. The Company’s contingent consideration liabilities are measured at fair value using a probability-weighted discounted cash flow analysis or a simulation-based methodology for the acquired companies, which are Level 3 inputs. The Company recognizes changes to the fair value of its contingent consideration liabilities in selling, general and administrative expenses in the condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive income. The following tables present information about the above-referenced assets and liabilities and indicate the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques utilized to determine such fair value: Fair Value Measurements as of September 30, 2018 Total Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) Money market funds $ 2,739 $ 2,739 $ — $ — Commercial paper 61,567 — 61,567 — Acquisition contingent consideration liabilities (8,793 ) — — (8,793 ) Fair Value Measurements as of December 31, 2017 Total Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) Money market funds $ 2,713 $ 2,713 $ — $ — Commercial paper 28,708 — 28,708 — Acquisition contingent consideration liabilities (2,070 ) — — (2,070 ) Level 3 Information The following tables set forth a reconciliation of changes in the fair value of contingent consideration liabilities classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy: Three Months Ended September 30, 2018 2017 Balance as of July 1, $ (10,119 ) $ (1,932 ) Change in fair value of contingent consideration liability from HealthSource Global Stafffing (“HSG”) acquisition — (20 ) Change in fair value of contingent consideration liability from PDA and LFT acquisition (1,194 ) — Change in fair value of contingent consideration liability from MedPartners acquisition 2,520 — Balance as of September 30, $ (8,793 ) $ (1,952 ) Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018 2017 Balance as of January 1, $ (2,070 ) $ (6,816 ) Settlement of The First String Healthcare contingent consideration liability for year ended December 31, 2016 — 3,000 Settlement of HSG contingent consideration liability for year ended December 31, 2016 70 1,930 Settlement of HSG contingent consideration liability for year ended December 31, 2017 2,000 — Contingent consideration liability from PDA and LFT acquisition on April 6, 2018 (5,700 ) — Contingent consideration liability from MedPartners acquisition on April 9, 2018 (4,400 ) — Change in fair value of contingent consideration liability from HSG acquisition — (66 ) Change in fair value of contingent consideration liability from PDA and LFT acquisition (1,213 ) — Change in fair value of contingent consideration liability from MedPartners acquisition 2,520 — Balance as of September 30, $ (8,793 ) $ (1,952 ) Assets Measured on a Non-Recurring Basis The Company applies fair value techniques on a non-recurring basis associated with valuing potential impairment losses related to its goodwill, indefinite-lived intangible assets, long-lived assets, and equity investments. The Company evaluates goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets annually for impairment and whenever circumstances occur indicating that goodwill might be impaired. The Company determines the fair value of its reporting units based on a combination of inputs, including the market capitalization of the Company, as well as Level 3 inputs such as discounted cash flows, which are not observable from the market, directly or indirectly. The Company determines the fair value of its indefinite-lived intangible assets using the income approach (relief-from-royalty method) based on Level 3 inputs. The Company’s equity investment represents an investment in a non-controlled corporation without a readily determinable market value. The Company has elected to measure the investment at cost minus impairment, if any, plus or minus changes resulting from observable price changes. The fair value is determined by using quoted prices for identical or similar investments of the same issuer, which are Level 2 inputs. The Company recognizes changes to the fair value of its equity investment in interest expense, net, and other in the condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive income. The following tables set forth a reconciliation of changes in the balance of the equity investment classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy: Three Months Ended September 30, 2018 2017 Balance as of July 1, $ 2,000 $ 2,000 Additional investment 4,600 — Change in fair value 1,359 — Balance as of September 30, $ 7,959 $ 2,000 Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018 2017 Balance as of January 1, $ 2,000 $ — Initial investment — 2,000 Additional investment 4,600 — Change in fair value 1,359 — Balance as of September 30, $ 7,959 $ 2,000 There were no triggering events identified, no indication of impairment of the Company’s goodwill, indefinite-lived intangible assets, long-lived assets, or equity investments, and no impairment charges recorded during the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017 . Fair Value of Financial Instruments The Company is required to disclose the fair value of financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate the value, even though these instruments are not recognized at fair value in the consolidated balance sheets. As of September 30, 2018 , the Company's senior notes have a carrying amount of $325,000 and an estimated fair value of $314,438 . As of December 31, 2017 , the senior notes had a carrying amount of $325,000 and an estimated fair value of $335,156 . Quoted market prices in active markets for identical liabilities based inputs (Level 1) were used to estimate fair value. The senior notes were issued in October 2016 and have a fixed rate of 5.125% . See additional information in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—Note (8), Notes Payable and Credit Agreement” of our 2017 Annual Report. The fair value of the Company’s long-term self-insurance accruals cannot be estimated as the Company cannot reasonably determine the timing of future payments. |