The Bank maintains a portfolio of securities as part of its asset/liability and liquidity management programs which emphasize effective yields and maturities to match its needs. The composition of the investment portfolio is examined periodically and appropriate realignments are initiated to meet liquidity and interest rate sensitivity needs for the Bank.
Held to maturity securities are bonds, notes and debentures for which the Bank has the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity and which are reported at cost, adjusted by premiums and discounts that are recognized in interest income using the interest method over the period to maturity or to call dates. The Bank had no “Held to Maturity” securities at June 30, 2006 or December 31, 2005.
Available for sale securities are reported at fair value and consist of bonds, notes, debentures and certain equity securities not classified as trading securities or as held to maturity securities.
Unrealized holding gains and losses, net of tax, on available for sale securities are reported as a net amount in a separate component of stockholders’ equity. Realized gains and losses on the sale of available for sale securities are determined using the specific-identification method. Premiums and discounts are recognized in interest income using the interest method over the period to maturity or to call dates.
Declines in the fair value of individual held to maturity and available for sale securities below cost that are other than temporary are reflected as write-downs of the individual securities to fair value. Related write-downs are included in earnings as realized losses.
Investments in available for sale securities of $47,062,892 consisted of corporate securities, municipal securities, U.S. Governmental agencies and mortgage backed securities (MBS) at June 30, 2006. Included in corporate securities are holdings of Ford Motor Company and General Motors Corporation, which were recently downgraded to junk status. The Company feels this is a temporary impairment and will not be written down due to the strong interest rates associated with these securities and the ability of both companies to turn around their sluggish sales in both the short and long term.
Federal funds sold consist of short-term loans to other financial institutions. These loans are made to various financial institutions and were $3,389,000 and $8,281,000 on June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively. No single loan exceeds Waccamaw Bank’s legal lending limit.
Net loans outstanding on June 30, 2006, were $277,806,738 compared to $257,574,925 on December 31, 2005. The Bank maintains a loan portfolio dominated by real estate and commercial loans diversified among various industries. The $20,231,813 increase in loans was due to stronger real estate and commercial demand due to local economies improving in the areas covered by Waccamaw Bank and also the acquisition of $4,500,000 in loans from the Bank of Heath Springs acquisition. This resulted in increased construction and development during the first six months of 2006.
Deposits on June 30, 2006, were $306,150,962 compared to $271,035,468 on December 31, 2005. Interest-bearing accounts represented 87.48% of total deposits at June 30, 2006 and 90.65% of total deposits at December 31, 2005. The significant increase in deposits, necessary to satisfy strong loan demand, was the result of an aggressive marketing and advertising program offering higher deposit rates at the Bank and also the acquisition of $14,400,000 in deposits from the Bank of Heath Springs acquisition.
Liabilities
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase on June 30, 2006, were $4,725,000 compared to $2,736,000 on December 31, 2005. Long-term debt on June 30, 2006 was $11,500,000 compared to $6,500,000 on December 31, 2005 as all long-term debt is funded by the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta. Short-term borrowings on June 30, 2006 were $5,000,000 compared to $10,000,000 on December 31, 2005 as all short-term borrowings are funded by the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta and mature within one year.
Stockholders’ Equity
Waccamaw Bankshares, Inc. maintains a strong capital position which exceeds all capital adequacy requirements of Federal regulatory authorities. Total stockholders’ equity at June 30, 2006 was $24,459,225 compared to $22,498,644 at December 31, 2005. This $1,960,581 increase was largely due to operating profits of $1,733,536. The Bank also exceeds all capital requirements under the leverage guidelines.
For the six months ended June 30, 2006, the operating profit of the Bank was $1,733,536 compared to a $1,382,619 profit for the six months ended June 30, 2005.
Asset Quality
The provision for possible loan losses charged to operations was $620,000 in the first six months of 2006 and $480,000 for the same period of 2005. The reserve for loan losses on June 30, 2006, was $4,601,420 or 1.63% of period end loans. The increase of $180,000 in loan loss provision was due to the increased loan volume in which the bank increased the loan loss provision adequately to reserve for the increased volume in loans.
The level of reserve is established based upon management’s evaluation of portfolio composition, current and projected national and local economic conditions and results of independent reviews of the loan portfolio by internal and external examination. Management recognizes the inherent risk associated with commercial and consumer lending, including whether or not a borrower’s actual results of operations will correspond to those projected by the borrower when the loan was funded, economic factors such as the number of housing starts and fluctuations in interest rates, etc., depression of collateral values, and completion of projects within the original cost and time estimates. As a result, management continues to actively monitor the Bank’s asset quality and lending policies. Management believes that its loan portfolio is diversified so that a downturn in a particular market or industry will not have a significant impact on the loan portfolio or the Bank’s financial condition.
Management believes that its provision and reserve offer an adequate allowance for future loan losses and provide a sound reserve for the loan portfolio.
At June 30, 2006 the Bank had $1,609,178 loans in nonaccrual status as compared to $422,813 at June 30, 2005. There were no repossessed assets at June 30, 2006 and at June 30, 2005. The increase in non-accrual loans of $1,200,000 from June 30, 2005 to June 30, 2006 was the result of a loan of $1,471,000 that was placed under non-accrual status in the third quarter of 2005. The bank feels this loan is adequately collateralized and reserved against future losses.
Comparison of Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2006 and 2005
The Company reported net income of $887,925 or $.19 per share for the three months ended June 30, 2006, as compared with net income of $726,954 or $.16 per share for the three months ended June 30, 2005, an increase of $160,971 or 22.1% in net income. The Company had significant increases in net interest income in the second quarter of 2006 as compared to the second quarter of 2005, as these increases were due to strong growth in interest earning assets and increases in net interest margin. The Company has incurred additional non-interest expenses both as a result of growth from period to period, and also as a result of additional hiring and other costs incurred as a result of the branch expansion during 2005 and 2006 and the acquisition of the Bank of Heath Springs, located in Heath Springs, SC on April 28, 2006.
10
Net Interest Income
Like most financial institutions, the primary component of earnings for the Company is net interest income. Net interest income is the difference between the interest earned on loans, the investment portfolio and interest earning deposits and the cost of funds, consisting primarily of the interest paid on deposits and borrowings. Changes in net interest income result from changes in volume, spread and margin. For this purpose, volume refers to the average dollar level of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, spread refers to the difference between the average yield on interest-earning assets and the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities, and margin refers to net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets. Margin is influenced by the level and relative mix of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, as well as by levels of non-interest-bearing liabilities and stockholders’ equity.
For the three months ended June 30, 2006, the net interest income of the Bank was $3,490,829 compared to $2,529,012 for the three months ended June 30, 2005. The increase in net interest income can be attributed to strong growth in loans and increases in net interest margin.
Provision for Loan Losses
The Company expensed $515,000 as the provision for loan losses in the second quarter of 2006, as compared to the $255,000 provision for loan losses in the second quarter of 2005. Provisions for loan losses are charged to income to bring the allowance for loan losses to a level deemed appropriate by Management. Management considers the current level of the loan loss allowance to be satisfactory based on loan volume, the current level of delinquencies, other non-performing assets, prevailing economic conditions and other factors that my affect a borrower’s ability to repay. The increase in the provision for loan losses was due to the increase in real estate and commercial loan demand in the second quarter of 2006 versus the second quarter of 2005.
Non-Interest Income
Non-interest income totaled $602,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2006 as compared with $568,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2005. The principal reason for the increase of $34,000 in total non-interest income for the current quarter was the increase of $39,000 in net servicing fees from mortgage and investments. Increases of $9,000 in services charges on deposit accounts and decreases in other operating income of $41,000 and $27,000 in earnings on bank owned life insurance made up the difference in the three months ended June 30, 2006 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2005.
Non-Interest Expenses
Non-interest expenses totaled $2.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006, an increase of $500,000 or 30.3% over the $1.7 million reported for the three months ended June 30, 2005. Substantially all of this increase resulted from the Bank’s growth and development, and reflects the additional expenses in the current quarter associated with new hires and the opening of two new branches and the acquisition of the Bank of Heath Springs, located in Heath Springs, SC on April 28, 2006. For the three months ended June 30, 2006, personnel costs increased by $270,000, or 29.2% to $1,194,000 as compared to $924,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2005.
Provision for Income Taxes
The Company provided $480,000 for income taxes during the three months ended June 30, 2006, compared to a provision for income taxes of $419,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2005.
Comparison of Results of Operations for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2006 and 2005
The Company reported net income of $1,733,536 or $.38 per share for the six months ended June 30, 2006, as compared with net income of $1,382,619 or $.31 per share for the six months ended June 30, 2005, an increase of $350,917 or 25.4% in net income. The Company had significant increases in net interest income in the first six months of 2006 as compared to the first six months of 2005, as these increases were due to strong growth in interest earning assets and increases in net interest margin. The Company has incurred additional non-interest expenses both as a result of growth from period to period, and also as a result of additional hiring and other costs incurred as a result of the branch expansion during 2005 and 2006 and the acquisition of the Bank of Heath Springs located in Heath Springs, SC on April 28, 2006.
11
Net Interest Income
Like most financial institutions, the primary component of earnings for the Company is net interest income. Net interest income is the difference between the interest earned on loans, the investment portfolio and interest earning deposits and the cost of funds, consisting primarily of the interest paid on deposits and borrowings. Changes in net interest income result from changes in volume, spread and margin. For this purpose, volume refers to the average dollar level of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, spread refers to the difference between the average yield on interest-earning assets and the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities, and margin refers to net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets. Margin is influenced by the level and relative mix of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, as well as by levels of non-interest-bearing liabilities and stockholders’ equity.
For the six months ended June 30, 2006, the net interest income of the Bank was $6,592,896 compared to $4,814,299 for the six months ended June 30, 2005. The increase in net interest income can be attributed to strong growth in loans and increases in net interest margin.
Provision for Loan Losses
The Company expensed $620,000 to provision for loan losses in 2006, as compared to the $480,000 provision for loan losses in 2005. Provisions for loan losses are charged to income to bring the allowance for loan losses to a level deemed appropriate by Management. Management considers the current level of the loan loss allowance to be satisfactory based on loan volume, the current level of delinquencies, other non-performing assets, prevailing economic conditions and other factors that my affect a borrower’s ability to repay. The increase in the provision for loan losses was due to the increase in real estate and commercial loan demand.
Non-Interest Income
Non-interest income totaled $1,250,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2006 as compared with $1,102,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2005. The principal reason for the increase of $148,000 in total non-interest income for the six months ended June 30, 2006 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2005 was an increase of $53,000 in net servicing fees from mortgage and investments. Increases of $50,000 in other operating income, an increase of $26,000 in earnings on bank owned life insurance and an increase of $20,000 in service charges made up the difference in the six months ended June 30, 2006 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2005.
Non-Interest Expenses
Non-interest expenses totaled $4.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006, an increase of $1,000,000 or 32.7% over the $3.3 million reported for the six months ended June 30, 2005. Substantially all of this increase resulted from the Bank’s growth and development, and reflects the additional expenses in the current year associated with new hires and the opening of two new branches and the acquisition of the Bank of Heath Springs, located in Heath Springs, SC on April 28, 2006. For the six months ended June 30, 2006, personnel costs increased by $646,000, or 36.5% to $36.5 million as compared to $1.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005.
Provision for Income Taxes
The Company provided $1,156,000 for income taxes during the six months ended June 30, 2006, compared to a provision for income taxes of $788,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2005.
Interest Sensitivity and Liquidity
One of the principal duties of the Bank’s Asset/Liability Management Committee (“ALCO”) is management of interest rate risk. The Bank utilizes quarterly asset/liability reports prepared internally to project the impact on net interest income that might occur with hypothetical interest rate changes. The committee monitors and manages asset and liability strategies and pricing.
Another function of ALCO is maintaining adequate liquidity and planning for future liquidity needs. Having adequate liquidity means the ability to meet current needs, including deposit withdrawals and commitments, in an orderly manner without sacrificing earnings. The Bank funds its investing activities, including making loans and purchasing investments, by attracting deposits and utilizing short-term borrowings when necessary.
12
At June 30, 2006, the liquidity position of the Bank was strong, with short-term liquid assets of $29,934,000 or 8.26% of total assets.
Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk |
The Company’s profitability is dependent to a large extent upon its net interest income, which is the difference between its interest income on interest-bearing assets, such as loans and investments, and its interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities, such as deposits and borrowings. The Company’s primary market risk is interest rate risk, which is the result of differing maturities or repricing intervals of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities with the goals of minimizing interest rate fluctuations in its net interest income.
ALCO meets on a monthly basis in order to assess interest rate risk, liquidity, capital and overall balance sheet management through rate shock analysis measuring various interest rate scenarios over the future 12 months. Through ALCO, the Company is able to determine fluctuations to net interest income from changes in the Prime Rate of up to 300 basis points up or down during a 12-month period. ALCO also reviews policies and procedures related to funds management and interest rate risk based on local, national and global economic conditions along with funding strategies and balance sheet management to minimize the potential impact of earnings and liquidity from interest rate movements.
Additional information regarding interest rate risk is included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005. The Company has not had any material changes in the overall interest rate risk since December 31, 2005.
Item 4. | Controls and Procedures |
Based on their evaluation, as of the end of the period covered by the report, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports filed or submitted by it under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the applicable rules and forms, and include controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in such reports is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. There have not been any changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the company’s last quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
13
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. | | Legal Proceedings |
| | |
| | The Company is not party to, nor is any of its property the subject of, any material pending legal proceeding incidental to the business of the Company or the Bank. |
| | |
Item 1A. | | Risk Factors |
| | |
| | No material changes in the Registrant’s risk factors occurred during the quarter. |
| | |
Item 4. | | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders |
| | |
| | At the bank’s annual meeting of shareholders held on April 20, 2006, the shareholders (1.) Elected Dr. Maudie M. Davis, James E. Hill, Jr. and Alan W. Thompson to serve as directors of the bank and (2.) Ratified the appointment of Larrowe & Company, P.L.C. as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2006. |
| | |
| | The following proposals were voted for: |
| Proposal 1 – Election of Directors | | | | |
| Dr. Maudie M. Davis | | votes for 3,481,173 | | withheld 10,600 | | abstain -0- |
| James E. Hill, Jr. | | votes for 3,481,958 | | withheld 9,815 | | abstain - 0- |
| Alan W. Thompson | | votes for 3,485,004 | | withheld 6,769 | | abstain - 0- |
| Proposal 2 – To ratify the selection of Larrowe & Company, P.L.C. as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2006. |
| | Votes for 3,470,189 against 2,206 abstain 19,378 |
| | | | |
Item 6. | | Exhibits |
| | | | |
| | 31.1 | | Section 302 Certification – CEO |
| | | | |
| | 31.2 | | Section 302 Certification – CFO |
| | | | |
| | 32 | | Section 906 Certification |
| | | | | |
14
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| Waccamaw Bankshares, Inc. |
| | |
| | |
Date: August 11, 2006 | By: | /s/ David A. Godwin |
| |
|
| | David A. Godwin |
| | Chief Financial Officer |
| | (Principal Financial Officer) |
15