Net income was $1,094,398 for the three months ended March 31, 2006, as compared to a net income of $866,183 for the three months ended March 31, 2005, an increase of $228,215 or 26.3%, as a result of an increase in income before minority interests of $980,595 or 88.8%, and an increase in minority interests of 752,380 or 315.6%.
The Company’s operations provided cash of $7,709,682 for the three months ended March 31, 2006, as compared to cash of $898,639 for the three months ended March 31, 2005, an increase of $6,811,043, which is primarily the result of the following:
(1) Net cash from continued operations increased during the period as a result of increased cash flow provided by product sales and service: For the three months ended March 31, 2006, cash flow provided by product sales and service was $4,225,218, as compared to $2,256,384 for the same period of 2005, an increase of $1,968,834 as a result of increased sales in 2006.
(2) Net cash provided by operating activities decreased during the period as a result of increased net cash used in operating assets: For the three months ended March 31, 2006, net cash used in operating assets was $8,781,067, as compared to $447,219 for the same period of 2005, a decrease of $8,333,848, mainly due to increased operating assets along with the increased sales.
(3) Net cash from continued operations increased during the period as a result of extending due date for payment in operating liabilities: The operating liabilities were $12,265,531 for the three months ended March 31, 2006, as compared to a decrease of $910,526 for the same period of 2005, an increase in net cash of $13,176,057, mainly due to the suppliers having extended the due date for payment contingent on increased purchase volume and acceptable credit rating of the Company.
As of March 31, 2006, cash and cash equivalents were $22,140,596, and working capital was $16,675,309. As of December 31, 2005, cash and cash equivalents were $12,374,944, and working capital were $9,102,809, reflecting a current ratio of 1.23:1 and 1.15:1 at March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively.
The Company intends to finance its operating costs and expenses for the remaining period of 2006 and next year in the following ways:
(1) The Company has working capital of $16,675,309 for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and cash flow provided from continued operations activities in the remaining months of 2006.
(2) Equity Line of Credit Financing: On March 20, 2006, we entered into a Standby Equity Distribution Agreement with Cornell Capital Partners, LP entitling us to, from time to time, sell common stock at a slight discount to market price for a total purchase price of up to $15 million. Under the agreement, Cornell Capital Partners, LP has committed to provide funding to be drawn down over a 24-month period at our discretion, following a registration which was declared effective on April 28, 2006..
(3) Loans by banks: Throughout 2006, the Company had a 364-day revolving credit line in the amount of $33,707,865 with Chinese banks, including $12,484,395, equivalent of RMB100, 000,000, from Bank of China, $8,739,076, equivalent of RMB70, 000,000, from China Construction Bank, $2,496,879, equivalent of RMB20, 000,000, from CITIC Industrial Bank,$3,745,318, equivalent of RMB30,000,000, from Shanghai Pudong Development Bank and $6,242,197, equivalent of RMB50,000,000, from Jingzhou Commercial Bank, respectively.
INVESTING
During the three months ended March 31, 2006, the Company expended net cash of $2,192,586 in investment activities, as compared to $770,761 for the same period of 2005, an increase of $1,421,825as a result of following factors:
(1) Net cash used in investment activities increased during the period as a result of increased net disbursement in other receivables: The Company expended net cash of $1,401,564 in other receivables for the three months ended March 31, 2006, as compared to $142,253 for the three months ended March 31, 2005, an increase of $1,259,311, mainly due to the account receivable of related parties being $1,846,889 for the three months ended March 31, 2006, as compared to the $217,633 for the same period of 2005, an increase of $1,629,256. These accounts receivable were carrying interest and repayable on demand
(2) Net cash used in investment activities increased during the period as a result of increased net disbursement in purchasing property and equipment: The Company expended net cash of $652,784 for purchasing property and equipment for the three months ended March 31, 2006, as compared to $552,890 for the three months ended March 31, 2005, an increase of $99,894, primarily due to the Renminbi rise against the US dollars.
(3) Net cash used in investment activities increased during the period as a result of increased net disbursement in purchasing intangible assets: The Company expended net cash of $138,238 for purchasing intangible assets for the three months ended March 31, 2006, as compared to $75,618 for the three months ended March 31, 2005, an increase of $62,620, primarily due to the Renminbi rise against the US dollars.
36
FINANCING
During the three months ended March 31, 2006, the Company expended net cash of $3,647,157 in financing activities, as compared to $1,679,922 for the three months ended March 31, 2005, an increase of $1,967,235 as a result of following factors:
(1) Net cash provided in financing activities decreased during the period as a result of decreased net proceeds from the bank loans: The Company has decreased the net proceeds from the bank loans of $1,081,981 for the three months ended March 31, 2006, as compared to having an increase of $2,409,638 for the same period of 2005, a decrease of $3,491,619, mainly due to net cash provided by operating activities having increased, which led to decreased demand on bank loans.
(2) Net cash provided in financing activities increased during the period as a result of decreased dividends paid to the minority interest holders of Joint-ventures: The company expended $124,844 of dividends to the minority interest holders of Joint-ventures for the three months ended March 31, 2006, as compared to $787,321 for the same period of 2005, a decrease of $662,477, mainly due to extending the due date for payment.
(3) Net cash provided in financing activities decreased during the period as a result of decreased amounts due to shareholders/directors: The Company expended $86,018 of advances from shareholders/directors for the three months ended March 31, 2006, as compared to $57,605 of advances from shareholders/directors for the same period of 2005, a decrease of $143,623, mainly due to the Company repaid shareholders/ directors part of their advances at their request for the three months ended March 31, 2006.
(4) Net cash provided in financing activities increased during the period as a result of increased financing from investors: The Company received net cash of $4,940,000 from financing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2006, while there was no such financing for the same period of 2005.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
At March 31, 2006 and 2005, the Company did not have any transactions, obligations or relationships that could be considered off-balance sheet arrangements.
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
The Company has the following material contractual obligations and capital expenditure commitments:
37
Date | | Parties involved | | Description of Commitments and Contingencies |
| |
| |
|
October 30, 2001 | | Henglong & Bishop Steering Technology Limited, “Bishop”, an Australian company | | Ten year license agreement for the design of power steering systems. Henglong is obligated to pay Bishop technical assistance fee of approximately $200,000 per year during the first two years and $110,000 per year during the remaining eight years of the agreement. |
| | | | |
July 21, 2003 | | Henglong & Namyang Industrial Co. Ltd., “Namyang”, a Korean manufacturer of steering assemblies for automobiles | | Five year license and technical assistance agreement. Henglong paid Namyang an initial payment of $100,000 and is further obligated to pay a royalty of 3% of the sales price of products sold, which includes the licensed columns and universal joint technology. |
| | | | |
March to December, 2004 | | Henglong & some equipment manufacturers | | Entered into some equipment contracts with total value approximately $4,719,967. Henglong paid $1,743,201 and $2,606,332 during 2004 and 2005. The Company paid $112,060 as of three months ended March 31, 2006 and $258,374 remains outstanding. The Company will pay $164,747 and $93,627 for the nine months ended December 31, 2006 and in 2007, respectively. |
| | | | |
March to December 2004 | | Jiulong & some equipment manufacturers | | Entered into some equipment contracts with total value of approximately $2,752,479. Jiulong paid $1,021,021 and $1,117,318 during 2004 and 2005. The Company paid $16,663 as of three months ended March 31, 2006 and $597,478 remains outstanding. The Company will pay $330,920 and $266,558 for the nine months ended December 31, 2006 and in 2007, respectively. |
| | | | |
April to December, 2005 | | Henglong & some equipment manufacturers | | Have entered into some equipment contracts with total value approximately $1,163,650. Henglong paid $1,039,442 and $7,388 in 2005 and as of three months ended March 31, 2006, respectively, and $167,420 remains outstanding. The Company will pay $161,561 and $5,904 for the nine months ended December 31, 2006 and in 2007, respectively. |
| | | | |
April to December, 2005 | | Jiulong & some equipment manufacturers | | Have entered into some equipment contracts with total value approximately $637,108. Jiulong paid $350,542 and $12,048 in 2005 and as of three months ended March 31, 2006, respectively, and $274,518 remains outstanding. The Company will pay $247,217 and $27,301 for the nine months ended December 31, 2006 and in 2007, respectively. |
| | | | |
April to December, 2005 | | USAI & some equipment manufacturers | | Have entered into some equipment contracts with total value approximately $238,577 in 2005. USAI paid $141,346 and $45,277 in 2005 and for the three months ended March 31, 2006, respectively, and will pay off the remaining $51,954 during the nine months ended December 31, 2006. |
38
On March 31, 2006, as amended on May 2, 2006, Great Genesis, the wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, entered into a Joint-venture agreement with Wuhu Chery Technology Co., Ltd., “Chery Technology”, to establish a Joint-venture, Wuhu Henglong Automotive Steering System Co., Ltd in the Wuhu Technological Development Zone. Chery Technology is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Chery Automobile. The Joint-venture will focus on producing and selling automotive steering system. The registered capital of the joint venture is $3,745,318, equivalent of RMB30,000,000. Great Genesis and Chery Technology will invest $2,896,379, equivalent of RMB23,200,000, and $848,939, equivalent of RMB 6,800,000 respectively, which will account for 77.33% and 22.67% of the total registered capital, respectively. The registered capital is required to be paid within one month after effectiveness of the agreement which was approved by the Chinese government on April 14, 2006.
SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
None
Item 3 | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK |
CREDIT RISK: The Company’s financial instruments that are exposed to concentration of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, and accounts receivable from customers. Cash and cash equivalents are maintained with major state-owned banks in the PRC. The Management has not evaluated the credit risk from banks based on its notion that state-owned banks command considerable funds with good reputation. The Company’s business activity is primarily with customers in the PRC. The Company periodically performs credit analysis and monitors the financial condition of its clients in order to minimize credit risk. Because of the increase of activities and business, and the increase of customers’ accounts receivable, there is no assurance that foresaid measures will be completely effective. We have approximately $38,000,000 of accounts receivable as of March 31, 2006, the Company’s revenues and/or operating cash flow would be materially and adversely affected if there is a 3% allowance for doubtful accounts which led to approximately $1,100,000 to the Company.
CURRENCY EXCHANGE RATE RISK: The Company’s currency exchange rate risks consist primarily of currency from financing. The Company’s financing activities were settled in US dollars and deposited in its bank account in US dollars, while the Company conducts virtually all of its business and investment activity in China and the value of our business is effectively denominated in Renminbi. The Company will convert US dollars into RMB to conduct its investment activities and business. The Company does not hedge its RMB – US dollar exchange rate exposure. The Company has dollar holdings of approximately $5,000,000 as for March 31, 2006, if the exchange rate between US dollars and RMB were to increase by 10%, we would potentially suffer loss by approximately $500,000. Therefore, we will choose to reduce our exposures through financial instruments (hedges) that provide offsets or limits to our exposures when considered appropriate.
39
MARKET INTEREST RATE RISK: The Company has $30,000,000 of short-term revolving credit line with annual interest expenses of $1,770,000 based on fully used. As result of the bank loan rate of China may be volatile and rising recently, therefore if the market interest rate increased by 10%, such increases could result in increased loan interest on the Company.
RISK OF INVENTORY PRICES: The risk of inventory prices of the Company comes from the upward movement in prices of raw materials and downward movement of selling price. Management believes the latter one is more material. For recent years, the price fluctuation on raw materials was not so great, but the price on steering had fluctuated significantly. During the years 2003 to 2005, the price on steering has decreased at approximately 10% each year on an average basis. In the year 2005, the output and sales of domestic commercial vehicles has decreased greatly as compared to 2004, as a result of influence on rectifying the over-sized and over-loaded of the commercial vehicles market, and the adjustment of the real estate and coal markets by the Chinese Government. One of the Joint-ventures of the Company, Jiulong, also suffered from that as a supplier of commercial vehicles. And there is no sign that the market is on the upturn in 2006. As of March 31, 2006, Jiulong’s inventory amount was approximately $6,000,000. If the selling price of steering decreases by 10%, then the income of the Company will decrease by $600,000. In the year 2006, the Company will take two measures as follows to decrease the inventory at a reasonable level, thus decreasing the potential risk of inventory prices.
(1) Further develop the market in order to use up the finished good from more sales.
(2) Better organize all kinds of information, adjust the inventory from various warehouses, and avoid unnecessary production.
But there is no assurance that foresaid measures will be effective.
ITEM 4 | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
(a) EVALUATION OF DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
The Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). The Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are also designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports filed under the Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) is accumulated and communicated to management, including its principal executive and financial officers, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
40
The Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including its principal executive and financial officers, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon and as of the date of that evaluation, the Company’s principal executive and financial officers concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective to provide reasonable assurance that information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
(b) CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROLS
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during our last fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
The Company is not currently a party to any threatened or pending legal proceedings, other than incidental litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, the ultimate disposition of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
The Company’s businesses, financial conditions and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected by many risk factors. Because of these risk factors, actual results might differ significantly from those projected in the forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause such differences include, among others, the following:
Risks Related to the Company’s Business and Industry
Because the Company is a holding company with substantially all of its operations conducted through its subsidiaries, its performance will be affected by the performance of its subsidiaries.
The Company has no operations independent of those of Great Genesis and its subsidiaries, and its principal assets are its investments in Great Genesis and its subsidiaries. As a result, the Company is dependent upon the performance of Great Genesis and its subsidiaries and will be subject to the financial, business and other factors affecting Great Genesis as well as general economic and financial conditions. As substantially all of the Company’s operations are and will be conducted through its subsidiaries, it will be dependent on the cash flow of its subsidiaries to meet its obligations.
41
Because virtually all of the Company’s assets are and will be held by operating subsidiaries, the claims of its stockholders will be structurally subordinate to all existing and future liabilities and obligations, and trade payables of such subsidiaries. In the event of the Company’s bankruptcy, liquidation or reorganization, the Company’s assets and those of its subsidiaries will be available to satisfy the claims of its stockholders only after all of the Company’s and its subsidiaries’ liabilities and obligations have been paid in full.
With the automobile parts markets being highly competitive and many of the Company’s competitors having greater resources than it does, the Company may not be able to compete successfully.
| The automobile parts industry is a highly competitive business. Criteria for the Company’s customers include: |
| | |
| • | Quality; |
| | |
| • | Price/cost competitiveness; |
| | |
| • | System and product performance; |
| | |
| • | Reliability and timeliness of delivery; |
| | |
| • | New product and technology development capability; |
| | |
| • | Excellence and flexibility in operations; |
| | |
| • | Degree of global and local presence; |
| | |
| • | Effectiveness of customer service; and |
| | |
| • | Overall management capability. |
The Company’s competitors include independent suppliers of parts, as well as suppliers formed by spin-offs from its customers, who are becoming more aggressive in selling parts to other vehicle manufacturers. Depending on the particular product, the number of the Company’s competitors varies significantly. Many of the Company’s competitors have substantially greater revenues and financial resources than it does, as well as stronger brand names, consumer recognition, business relationships with vehicle manufacturers, and geographic presence than it has. The Company may not be able to compete favorably and increased competition may substantially harm its business, business prospects and results of operations.
Internationally, the Company faces different market dynamics and competition. The Company may not be as successful as its competitors in generating revenues in international markets due to the lack of recognition of its products or other factors. Developing product recognition overseas is expensive and time-consuming and the Company’s international expansion efforts may be more costly and less profitable than it expects. If the Company is not successful in its target markets, its sales could decline, its margins could be negatively impacted and the Company could lose market share, any of which could materially harm the Company’s business, results of operations and profitability.
42
The cyclical nature of automotive production and sales could result in a reduction in automotive sales, which could adversely affect the Company’s business and results of operations.
The Company’s business relies on automotive vehicle production and sales by its customers, which are highly cyclical and depend on general economic conditions and other factors, including consumer spending and preferences. They also can be affected by labor relations issues, regulatory requirements, and other factors. In addition, in the last two years, the price of automobiles in China has generally declined. As a result, the volume of automotive production in China has fluctuated from year to year, which give rise to fluctuations in the demand for the Company’s products. Any significant economic decline that results in a reduction in automotive production and sales by the Company’s customers would have a material adverse effect on its results of operations. Moreover, if the prices of automobiles do not remain low, then demand for automobile parts could fall and result in lower revenues and profitability.
Increasing costs for manufactured components and raw materials may adversely affect the Company’s profitability.
The Company uses a broad range of manufactured components and raw materials in its products, including castings, electronic components, finished sub-components, molded plastic parts, fabricated metal, aluminum and steel, and resins. Because it may be difficult to pass increased prices for these items on to the Company’s customers, a significant increase in the prices of the Company’s components and materials could materially increase its operating costs and adversely affect its profit margins and profitability.
Pricing pressure by automobile manufacturers on their suppliers may adversely affect the Company’s business and results of operations.
Recently, pricing pressure from automobile manufacturers has been prevalent in the automotive parts industry in China. Virtually all vehicle manufacturers seek price reductions each year, including requiring suppliers to pay a “3-R Guarantees “ service charge for repair, replacement and refund in an amount equal to one percent of the total amount of parts supplied. Although the Company has tried to reduce costs and resist price reductions, these reductions have impacted the Company’s sales and profit margins. If the Company cannot offset continued price reductions through improved operating efficiencies and reduced expenditures, price reductions will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations.
The Company’s business, revenues and profitability would be materially and adversely affected if it loses any of its large customers.
43
For the three months ended March 31, 2006, approximately 11.9% of the Company’s sales were to Brilliance China Automotive Holdings Limited, approximately 11.2% were to Beiqi Foton Motor Co., Ltd., approximately 13.8% were to Cherry Automobile Co., Ltd. and approximately 13.0% were to Zhejiang Geely Holding Co., Ltd., the Company’s four largest customers. The loss of, or significant reduction in purchases by, one or more of these major customers could adversely affect the Company’s business.
The Company may be subject to product liability and warranty and recall claims, which may increase the costs of doing business and adversely affect the Company’s financial condition and liquidity.
The Company may be exposed to product liability and warranty claims if its products actually or allegedly fail to perform as expected or the use of its products results, or is alleged to result, in bodily injury and/or property damage. The Company started to pay to its customers’ increased after-sales service expenses due to consumer rights protection policies of “recall” issued by the Chinese Government in 2004, such as the recalling flawed vehicles policy. Beginning in 2004, automobile manufacturers unilaterally required their suppliers to pay a “3-R Guarantees “ service charge (for repair, replacement and refund) in an amount equal to one percent of the total amount of parts supplied. Accordingly, the Company has experienced and shall continue to experience higher after sales service expenses. Product liability, warranty and recall costs may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition.
The Company is subject to environmental and safety regulations, which may increase the Company’s compliance costs and may adversely affect the Company’s results of operation.
The Company is subject to the requirements of environmental and occupational safety and health laws and regulations in China. The Company cannot provide assurance that it has been or will be at all times in full compliance with all of these requirements, or that it will not incur material costs or liabilities in connection with these requirement. Additionally, these regulations may change in a manner that could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, results of operations and financial condition. The capital requirements and other expenditures that may be necessary to comply with environmental requirements could increase and become a material expense of doing business.
Non-performance by the Company’s suppliers may adversely affect its operations by delaying delivery or causing delivery failures, which may negatively affect demand, sales and profitability.
The Company purchases various types of equipment, raw materials and manufactured component parts from its suppliers. The Company would be materially and adversely affected by the failure of its suppliers to perform as expected. The Company could experience delivery delays or failures caused by production issues or delivery of non-conforming products if its suppliers failed to perform, and the Company also faces these risks in the event any of its suppliers becomes insolvent or bankrupt.
44
The Company’s business and growth may suffer if it fails to attract and retain key personnel.
The Company’s ability to operate its business and implement its strategies effectively depends on the efforts of its executive officers and other key employees. The Company depends on the continued contributions of its senior management and other key personnel. The Company’s future success also depends on its ability to identify, attract and retain highly skilled technical, particularly engineers and other employees with electronics expertise, managerial, finance and marketing personnel. The Company does not maintain a key person life insurance policy on Mr. Hanlin Chen. The loss of the services of any of the Company’s key employees or the failure to attract or retain other qualified personnel could substantially harm the Company’s business.
The Company’s management controls approximately 89.7% of its outstanding common stock and may have conflicts of interest with its minority stockholders.
Members of the Company’s management beneficially own approximately 89.7% of the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock. As a result, these majority stockholders have control over decisions to enter into any corporate transaction and have the ability to prevent any transaction that requires the approval of stockholders, which could result in the approval of transactions that might not maximize stockholders’ value. Additionally, these stockholders control the election of members of the Company’s board, have the ability to appoint new members to the Company’s management team and control the outcome of matters submitted to a vote of the holders of the Company’s common stock. The interests of these majority stockholders may at times conflict with the interests of the Company’s other stockholders.
There is a limited public float of the Company’s common stock, which can result in its stock price being volatile and prevent the realization of a profit on resale of the Company’s common stock
There is a limited public float of the Company’s common stock. Of the Company’s outstanding common stock, approximately 10% is considered part of the public float. The term “public float” refers to shares freely and actively tradable on the NASDAQ SmallCap Market and not owned by officers, directors or affiliates, as such term is defined under the Securities Act. Due to the common stock. As a result, the market price of the Company’s common stock can be volatile. This stock price volatility could prevent a stockholder seeking to sell Company common stock from being able to sell it at or above the price at which the stock was bought.
Provisions in the Company’s certificate of incorporation and bylaws and the General Corporation Law of Delaware may discourage a takeover attempt.
45
Provisions in the Company’s certificate of incorporation and bylaws and the General Corporation Law of Delaware, the state in which the Company is organized, could make it difficult for a third party to acquire the Company, even if doing so might be beneficial to the Company’s stockholders. Provisions of the Company’s certificate of incorporation and bylaws impose various procedural and other requirements, which could make it difficult for stockholders to effect certain corporate actions and possibly prevent transactions that would maximize stockholders’ value.
Risks Related to Doing Business in China and other International Countries
Because the Company’s operations are all located outside of the United States and are subject to Chinese laws, any change of Chinese laws may adversely affect the Company’s business.
All of the Company’s operations are outside the United States and in China, which exposes it to risks, such as exchange controls and currency restrictions, currency fluctuations and devaluations, changes in local economic conditions, changes in Chinese laws and regulations, exposure to possible expropriation or other Chinese government actions, and unsettled political conditions. These factors may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s operations or on the Company’s business, results of operations and financial condition.
The Company’s international expansion plans subject it to risks inherent in doing business internationally.
The Company’s long-term business strategy relies on the expansion of the Company’s international sales outside China by targeting markets, such as the United States. Risks affecting the Company’s international expansion include challenges caused by distance, language and cultural differences, conflicting and changing laws and regulations, foreign laws, international import and export legislation, trading and investment policies, foreign currency fluctuations, the burdens of complying with a wide variety of laws and regulations, protectionist laws and business practices that favor local businesses in some countries, foreign tax consequences, higher costs associated with doing business internationally, restrictions on the export or import of technology, difficulties in staffing and managing international operations, trade and tariff restrictions, and variations in tariffs, quotas, taxes and other market barriers. These risks could harm the Company’s international expansion efforts, which could in turn materially and adversely affect the Company’s business, operating results and financial condition.
The Company faces risks associated with currency exchange rate fluctuations, any adverse fluctuation may adversely affect the Company’s operating margins.
Although the Company is incorporated in the United States, the majority of its current revenues are in Chinese currency. Conducting business in currencies other than US dollars subjects the Company to fluctuations in currency exchange rates that could have a negative impact on the Company’s reported operating results. Fluctuations in the value of the US dollar relative to other currencies impact the Company’s revenues, cost of revenues and operating margins and result in foreign currency translation gains and losses. Historically, the Company has not engaged in exchange rate hedging activities. Although the Company may implement hedging strategies to mitigate this risk, these strategies may not eliminate the Company’s exposure to foreign exchange rate fluctuations and involve costs and risks of their own, such as ongoing management time and expertise, external costs to implement the strategy and potential accounting implications.
46
If relations between the United States and China worsen, the Company’s stock price may decrease and the Company may have difficulty accessing the U.S. capital markets.
At various times during recent years, the United States and China have had disagreements over political and economic issues. Controversies may arise in the future between these two countries. Any political or trade controversies between the United States and China could adversely affect the market price of the Company’s common stock and the Company’s ability to access US capital markets.
The Chinese Government could change its policies toward private enterprises, which could adversely affect the Company’s business.
The Company’s business is subject to political and economic uncertainties in China and may be adversely affected by its political, economic and social developments. Over the past several years, the Chinese Government has pursued economic reform policies including the encouragement of private economic activity and greater economic decentralization. The Chinese Government may not continue to pursue these policies or may alter them to the Company’s detriment from time to time. Changes in policies, laws and regulations, or in their interpretation or the imposition of confiscatory taxation, restrictions on currency conversion, restrictions or prohibitions on dividend payments to stockholders, devaluations of currency or the nationalization or other expropriation of private enterprises could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business. Nationalization or expropriation could result in the total loss of the Company’s investment in China.
The economic, political and social conditions in China could affect the Company’s business.
All of the Company’s business, assets and operations are located in China. The economy of China differs from the economies of most developed countries in many respects, including government involvement, level of development, growth rate, control of foreign exchange, and allocation of resources. The economy of China has been transitioning from a planned economy to a more market-oriented economy. Although the Chinese Government has implemented measures recently emphasizing the utilization of market forces for economic reform, the reduction of state ownership of productive assets and the establishment of sound corporate governance in business enterprises, a substantial portion of productive assets in China is still owned by the Chinese Government. In addition, the Chinese Government continues to play a significant role in regulating industry by imposing industrial policies. It also exercises significant control over China’s economic growth through the allocation of resources, controlling payment of foreign currency-denominated obligations, setting monetary policy and providing preferential treatment to particular industries or companies. Therefore, the Chinese Government’s involvement in the economy could adversely affect the Company’s business operations, results of operations and/or the financial condition.
47
The significant but uneven growth in the economy of China in the past 20 years could have negative effect on the Company’s business and results of operations.
The Chinese Government has implemented various measures from time to time to control the rate of economic growth. Some of these measures benefit the overall economy of China, but may have a negative effect on us.
Government control of currency conversion and future movements in exchange rates may adversely affect the Company’s operations and financial results.
The Company receives substantially all of its revenues in Renminbi, the currency of China. A portion of such revenues will be converted into other currencies to meet the Company’s foreign currency obligations. Foreign exchange transactions under the Company’s capital account, including principal payments in respect of foreign currency-denominated obligations, continue to be subject to significant foreign exchange controls and require the approval of the State Administration of Foreign Exchange in China. These limitations could affect the Company’s ability to obtain foreign exchange through debt or equity financing, or to obtain foreign exchange for capital expenditures.
The Chinese Government controls its foreign currency reserves through restrictions on imports and conversion of Renminbi into foreign currency. Although the exchange rate of the Renminbi to the US dollar has been stable since January 1, 1994, and the Chinese Government has stated its intention to maintain the stability of the value of Renminbi, there can be no assurance that exchange rates will remain stable. The Renminbi could devalue against the US dollar. The Company’s financial condition and results of operations may also be affected by changes in the value of certain currencies other than the Renminbi in which the Company’s earnings and obligations are denominated. In particular, a devaluation of the Renminbi is likely to increase the portion of the Company’s cash flow required to satisfy the Company’s foreign currency-denominated obligations.
Because the Chinese legal system is not fully developed, the Company’s legal protections may be limited.
The Chinese legal system is based on written statutes and their interpretation by the Supreme People’s Court. Although the Chinese government introduced new laws and regulations to modernize its business, securities and tax systems on January 1, 1994, China does not yet possess a comprehensive body of business law. Because Chinese laws and regulations are relatively new, interpretation, implementation and enforcement of these laws and regulations involve uncertainties and inconsistencies and it may be difficult to enforce contracts. In addition, as the Chinese legal system develops, changes in such laws and regulations, their interpretation or their enforcement may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business operations. Moreover, interpretative case law does not have the same precedential value in China as in the United States, so legal compliance in China may be more difficult or expensive.
48
It may be difficult to serve the Company with legal process or enforce judgments against the Company’s management or the Company.
All of the Company’s assets are located in China and three out of the Company’s directors and officers are non-residents of the United States, and all or substantial portions of the assets of such non-residents are located outside the United States. As a result, it may not be possible to effect service of process within the United States upon such persons to originate an action in the United States. Moreover, there is uncertainty that the courts of China would enforce judgments of U.S. courts against the Company, its directors or officers based on the civil liability provisions of the securities laws of the United States or any state, or an original action brought in China based upon the securities laws of the United States or any state.
Risks Related to the Standby Equity Distribution Agreement (“SEDA”)
Future sales by our stockholders may adversely affect our stock price and our ability to raise funds in new stock offerings.
Sales of our common stock in the public market following the SEDA could lower the market price of our common stock. Sales may also make it more difficult for us to sell equity securities or equity-related securities in the future at a time and price that our management deems acceptable, or at all. Of the 23,237,406 shares of common stock outstanding as of April 7, 2006, all such shares are, or will be, freely tradable without restriction, unless held by our “affiliates.” Some of these shares may be resold under Rule 144.
Existing stockholders could experience significant dilution from our sale of shares under the SEDA.
Our financial needs will be partially provided from the SEDA. The issuance of shares of our common stock under the SEDA, at below-market prices, will have a dilutive impact on our other stockholders and the issuance or even potential issuance of such shares could have a negative effect on the market price of our common stock. As a result, our net income per share could decrease in future periods, and the market price of our common stock could decline. In addition, the lower our stock price, the more shares of common stock we will have to issue under the SEDA to draw down the full amount. If our stock price is lower, then our existing stockholders would experience greater dilution.
Under the SEDA, Cornell Capital Partners will pay less than the then-prevailing market price of our common stock.
The common stock to be issued under the SEDA will be issued at a 1.5% discount to the lowest daily VWAP of our common stock during the five consecutive trading day period immediately following the date we notify Cornell Capital Partners that we desire to access the SEDA; provided, that the price per share paid by Cornell Capital Partners will in no event be less than a minimum of 90% of the closing bid price for our common stock on the trading day immediately preceding the date that we deliver an advance request. Further, Cornell Capital Partners will retain 4.5% of each advance under the SEDA. Based on this discount, Cornell Capital Partners will have an incentive to sell immediately to realize the gain on the 1.5% discount. These sales could cause the price of our common stock to decline, based on increased selling of our common stock.
49
The sale of our stock under the SEDA could encourage short sales by third parties, which could contribute to the future decline of our stock price.
In many circumstances, the provisions of a SEDA have the potential to cause a significant downward pressure on the price of a company’s common stock. This is especially the case if the shares being placed into the market exceed the market’s ability to take up the increased stock or if we have not performed in such a manner to show that the equity funds raised will be used for growth. Such an event could place further downward pressure on the price of our common stock. We may request numerous drawdowns pursuant to the terms of the SEDA. Even if we use the SEDA to invest in ways that are materially beneficial to us, the opportunity exists for short sellers and others to contribute to the future decline of our stock price. If there are significant short sales of stock, the price decline that would result from this activity in turn may cause long holders of the stock to sell their shares thereby contributing to sales of stock in the market. If there is an imbalance on the sell side of the market for our common stock, the price will decline.
It is not possible to predict those circumstances whereby short sales could materialize or the extent to which the stock price could drop. In some companies that have been subjected to short sales the stock price has dropped significantly. This could happen to our stock price.
Cornell Capital Partners may sell shares of our common stock after we deliver an advance notice during the pricing period, which could cause our stock price to decline.
Cornell Capital Partners is deemed to beneficially own the shares of common stock corresponding to a particular advance on the date that we deliver an advance notice to Cornell Capital Partners, which is prior to the date the stock is delivered to Cornell Capital Partners. Cornell Capital Partners may sell such shares any time after we deliver an advance notice. Accordingly, Cornell Capital Partners may sell such shares during the pricing period. Such sales may cause our stock price to decline and if so would result in a lower VWAP during the pricing period, which would result in us having to issue a larger number of shares of common stock to Cornell Capital Partners in respect of the advance.
We may not be able to obtain a cash advance under the SEDA if Cornell Capital Partners holds more than 9.9% of our common stock.
In the event Cornell Capital Partners holds more than 9.9% of our then-outstanding common stock, we will be unable to obtain a cash advance under the SEDA. A possibility exists that Cornell Capital Partners may own more than 9.9% of our outstanding common stock at a time when we would otherwise plan to request an advance under the SEDA. In that event, if we are unable to obtain additional external funding, we could fail to achieve the corporate objectives that we had hoped to use the cash to achieve.
50
ITEM 6. | EXHIBITS |
| |
INDEX TO EXHIBITS |
Exhibit Number | | Description of Document |
| |
|
3(i).1 | | Certificate of Incorporation* |
| | |
3(i).2 | | Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation** |
| | |
3(ii).1 | | By - laws*** |
| | |
10.1 | | Standby Equity Distribution Agreement dated March 20, 2006 between us and Cornell Capital Partners, LP**** |
| | |
10.2 | | Placement Agent Agreement dated March 20, 2006 between us and Newbridge Securities Corporation**** |
| | |
10.3 | | Registration Rights Agreement dated March 20, 2006 between us and Cornell Capital Partners, LP**** |
| | |
10.4 | | Securities Purchase Agreement dated March 20, 2006 between us and Cornell Capital Partners, LP**** |
| | |
10.5 | | Investor Registration Rights Agreement dated March 20, 2006 between us and Cornell Capital Partners, LP**** |
| | |
10.6 | | Warrant to purchase 86,806 shares of common stock at $14.40 per share, issued to Cornell Capital Partners, LP**** |
| | |
10.7 | | Warrant to purchase 69,444 shares of common stock at $18.00 per share, issued to Cornell Capital Partners, LP**** |
| | |
10.8 | | Joint-venture Agreement, dated March 31, 2006, as amended on May 2, 2006, between Hongkong Great Genesis Group Co., Ltd. and Wuhu Chery Technology Co., Ltd.***** |
| | |
31.1 | | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification -Hanlin Chen***** |
| | |
31.2 | | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification -Daming Hu***** |
| | |
32.1 | | Section 1350 Certification -Hanlin Chen***** |
| | |
32.2 | | Section 1350 Certification - Daming Hu***** |
| | |
|
* Incorporated by reference to exhibit 3(i) to our Form 10SB Registration Statement filed on August 27, 2001. |
|
** Incorporated by reference to Appendix A to our Schedule 14C Definitive Information Statement filed on April 21, 2003. |
|
*** Incorporated by reference to exhibit 3(ii) to our Form 10SB Registration Statement filed on August 27, 2001. |
|
**** Incorporated by reference to the exhibit of the same number to our Form S-3 Registration Statement (File No. 333 - - 133331) filed on April 17, 2006. |
|
***** Filed herewith |
51
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| CHINA AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS, INC. |
|
|
| (Registrant) |
| | |
| | |
Date: May 10, 2006 | By: | /s/ HANLIN CHEN |
| |
|
| | Hanlin Chen |
| | President and Chief Executive Officer |
| | |
| | |
Date: May 10, 2006 | By: | /s/ DAMING HU |
| |
|
| | Daming Hu |
| | Chief Financial Officer |
52