All of the net investment income distributions paid by BlackRock Municipal 2020 Term Trust during the taxable year ended June 30, 2008 qualify as tax-exempt interest dividends for Federal income tax purposes.
Additionally, the following summarizes the taxable per share distributions paid by the fund during the taxable year ended June 30, 2008:
All of the net investment income distributions paid by BlackRock Strategic Municipal Trust during the taxable year ended June 30, 2008 qualify as tax-exempt interest dividends for Federal income tax purposes.
Additionally, the following summarizes the taxable per share distributions paid by the fund during the taxable year ended June 30, 2008:
All of the net investment income distributions paid by BlackRock Florida Municipal 2020 Term Trust during the taxable year ended June 30, 2008 qualify as tax-exempt interest dividends for Federal income tax purposes.
Additionally, the following summarizes the taxable per share distributions paid by the fund during the taxable year ended June 30, 2008:
All of the net investment income distributions paid by BlackRock Pennsylvania Municipal Trust during the taxable year ended June 30, 2008 qualify as tax-exempt interest dividends for Federal income tax purposes.
Disclosure of Investment Advisory Agreement and Subadvisory Agreement |
The Board of Directors or Board of Trustees, as the case may be (collectively, the “Board,” the members of which are referred to as “Directors”), of the BlackRock Insured Municipal 2008 Term Trust, Inc. (“BRM”), BlackRock Insured Municipal Term Trust, Inc. (“BMT”), BlackRock Municipal 2018 Term Trust (“BPK”), BlackRock Municipal 2020 Term Trust (“BKK”), BlackRock Strategic Municipal Trust (“BSD”), BlackRock California Insured Municipal 2008 Term Trust, Inc. (“BFC”), BlackRock California Municipal 2018 Term Trust (“BJZ”), BlackRock Florida Insured Municipal 2008 Term Trust, Inc. (“BRF”), BlackRock Florida Municipal 2020 Term Trust (“BFO”), BlackRock New York Insured Municipal 2008 Term Trust, Inc. (“BLN”), BlackRock New York Municipal 2018 Term Trust (“BLH”) and BlackRock Pennsylvania Strategic Municipal Trust (“BPS ,” and together with BLH, BLN, BFO, BRF, BJZ, BFC, BSD, BKK, BPK, BMT and BRM, the “Funds”) met in April and May 2008 to consider approving the continuation of each Fund’s investment advisory agreement (each, an “Advisory Agreement”) with BlackRock Advisors, LLC (the “Advisor”), each Fund’s investment adviser. The Board also considered the approval of each Fund’s subadvisory agreement, if applicable (each, a “Subadvisory Agreement” and, together with the “Advisory Agreement,” the “Agreements”), between the Advisor and BlackRock Financial Management, Inc. (the “Subadvisor”). The Advisor and the Subadvisor are collectively referred to herein as the “Advisors” and, together with BlackRock, Inc., “BlackRock.”
Activities and Composition of the Board
The Board of Directors of each Fund consists of thirteen individuals, eleven of whom are not “interested persons” of the Funds as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”) (the “Independent Directors”). The Directors are responsible for the oversight of the operations of the Funds and perform the various duties imposed on the directors of investment companies by the 1940 Act. The Independent Directors have retained independent legal counsel to assist them in connection with their duties. The Chairman of the Board is an Independent Director. The Board has established four standing committees: an Audit Committee, a Governance and Nominating Committee, a Compliance Committee and a Performance Oversight Committee.
Advisory Agreement and Subadvisory Agreement
Upon the consummation of the combination of BlackRock, Inc.’s investment management business with Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.’s investment management business, including Merrill Lynch Investment Managers, L.P., and certain affiliates, each Fund entered into an Advisory Agreement and a Subadvisory Agreement, each with an initial two-year term. Consistent with the 1940 Act, after the Advisory Agreement’s and Subadvisory Agreement’s respective initial two-year term, the Board is required to consider the continuation of each Fund’s Advisory Agreement and Subadvisory Agreement on an annual basis. In connection with this process, the Board assessed, among other things, the nature, scope and quality of the services provided to each Fund by the personnel of BlackRock and its affiliates, including investment advisory services, administrative services, secondary market support services, oversight of fund accounting and custody, and assistance in meeting legal and regulatory requirements. The Board also received and assessed information regarding the services provided to each Fund by certain unaffiliated service providers.
Throughout the year, the Board also considered a range of information in connection with its oversight of the services provided by BlackRock and its affiliates. Among the matters the Board considered were: (a) investment performance for one-, three- and five-year periods, as applicable, against peer funds, as well as senior management and portfolio managers’ analysis of the reasons for underperformance, if applicable; (b) fees, including advisory, administration and other fees paid to BlackRock and its affiliates by each Fund, as applicable; (c) Fund operating expenses paid to third parties; (d) the resources devoted to and compliance reports relating to each Fund’s investment objective, policies and restrictions; (e) each Fund’s compliance with its Code of Ethics and compliance policies and procedures; (f) the nature, cost and character of non-investment management services provided by BlackRock and its affiliates; (g) BlackRock’s and other service providers’ internal controls; (h) BlackRock’s implementation of the proxy voting guidelines approved by the Board; (i) execution quality; (j) valuation and liquidity procedures; and (k) reviews of BlackRock’s business, including BlackRock’s response to the increasing scale of its business.
Board Considerations in Approving the Advisory Agreement and Subadvisory Agreement
To assist the Board in its evaluation of the Agreements, the Directors received information from BlackRock in advance of the April 22, 2008 meeting which detailed, among other things, the organization, business lines and capabilities of the Advisors, including: (a) the responsibilities of various departments and key personnel and biographical information relating to key personnel; (b) financial statements for BlackRock; (c) the advisory and/or administrative fees paid by each Fund to the Advisors, including comparisons, compiled by Lipper, Inc. (“Lipper”), an independent third party, with the management fees, which include advisory and administration fees, of funds with similar investment objectives (“Peers”); (d) the profitability of BlackRock and certain industry profitability analyses for advisers to registered investment companies; (e) the expenses of BlackRock in providing various services; (f) non-investment advisory reimbursements, if applicable, and “fallout” benefits to BlackRock; (g) economies of scale, if any, generated through the Advisors’ management of all of the BlackRock closed-end funds (the “Fund Complex”); (h) the expenses of each Fund, including comparisons of respective Fund’s expense ratios (both before and after any fee waivers) with the expense ratios of its Peers; (i) an internal comparison of management fees classified by Lipper, if applicable; and (j) each Fund’s performance for the past one-, three- and five-year periods, as applicable, as well as each Fund’s performance compared to its Peers.
The Board also considered other matters it deemed important to the approval process, where applicable, such as payments made to BlackRock or its affiliates relating to the distribution of Fund shares, services related to the valuation and pricing of Fund portfolio holdings, and direct and indirect benefits to BlackRock and its affiliates from their relationship with the Funds.
In addition to the foregoing materials, independent legal counsel to the Independent Directors provided a legal memorandum outlining, among other things, the duties of the Board under the 1940 Act, as well as the general principles of relevant law in reviewing and approving advisory contracts, the
| | |
| | | |
| | | |
68 | SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT | JUNE 30, 2008 | |
Disclosure of Investment Advisory Agreement and Subadvisory Agreement (continued) |
requirements of the 1940 Act in such matters, an adviser’s fiduciary duty with respect to advisory agreements and compensation, and the standards used by courts in determining whether investment company boards of directors have fulfilled their duties and the factors to be considered by boards in voting on advisory agreements.
The Independent Directors reviewed this information and discussed it with independent legal counsel prior to the meeting on April 22, 2008. At the Board meeting on April 22, 2008, BlackRock made a presentation to and responded to questions from the Board. Following the meeting on April 22, 2008, the Board presented BlackRock with questions and requests for additional information. BlackRock responded to these requests with additional written materials provided to the Directors prior to the meetings on May 29 and 30, 2008. At the Board meetings on May 29 and 30, 2008, BlackRock responded to further questions from the Board. In connection with BlackRock’s presentations, the Board considered each Agreement and, in consultation with independent legal counsel, reviewed the factors set out in judicial decisions and SEC statements relating to the renewal of the Agreements.
Matters Considered by the Board
In connection with its deliberations with respect to the Agreements, the Board considered all factors it believed relevant with respect to each Fund, including the following: the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by the Advisors; the investment performance of each Fund; the costs of the services to be provided and profits to be realized by the Advisors and their affiliates from their relationship with the Funds; the extent to which economies of scale would be realized as the Fund Complex grows; and whether BlackRock realizes other benefits from its relationship with the Funds.
A. Nature, Extent and Quality of the Services: In evaluating the nature, extent and quality of the Advisors’ services, the Board reviewed information concerning the types of services that the Advisors provide and are expected to provide to each Fund, narrative and statistical information concerning each Fund’s performance record and how such performance compares to each Fund’s Peers, information describing BlackRock’s organization and its various departments, the experience and responsibilities of key personnel and available resources. The Board noted the willingness of the personnel of BlackRock to engage in open, candid discussions with the Board. The Board further considered the quality of the Advisors’ investment process in making portfolio management decisions.
In addition to advisory services, the Directors considered the quality of the administrative and non-investment advisory services provided to the Funds. The Advisors and their affiliates provided each Fund with such administrative and other services, as applicable (in addition to any such services provided by others for the Funds), and officers and other personnel as are necessary for the operations of the respective Fund. In addition to investment management services, the Advisors and their affiliates provided each Fund with services such as: preparing shareholder reports and communications, including annual and semi-annual financial statements and the Funds’ web-sites; communications with analysts to support secondary market trading; assisting with daily accounting and pricing; preparing periodic filings with regulators and stock exchanges; overseeing and coordinating the activities of other service providers; administering and organizing Board meetings and preparing the Board materials for such meetings; providing legal and compliance support (such as helping to prepare proxy statements and responding to regulatory inquiries); and performing other Fund administrative tasks necessary for the operation of the respective Fund (such as tax reporting and fulfilling regulatory filing requirements). The Board considered the Advisors’ policies and procedures for assuring compliance with applicable laws and regulations.
B. The Investment Performance of the Funds and BlackRock: As previously noted, the Board received performance information regarding each Fund and its Peers. Among other things, the Board received materials reflecting each Fund’s historic performance and each Fund’s performance compared to its Peers. More specifically, each Fund’s one-, three- and five-year total returns (as applicable) were evaluated relative to its Peers (including the Peers’ median performance).
The Board reviewed a narrative and statistical analysis of the Lipper data that was prepared by BlackRock, which analyzed various factors that affect Lipper rankings.
The Board noted that although BRM, BMT, BFC, BRF and BLN underperformed their respective Peers, each Fund has a limited life and will seek to return to investors their initial investment on a fixed termination date, whereas their respective Peers are perpetual funds. Since these Funds are approaching their termination date, they maintain a shorter duration and, all other things being equal, generally will have a lower return than their respective Peers.
The Board noted that although BSD and BPS underperformed each Fund’s respective Peers in at least two of the one-, three- and five-year periods reported, BSD and BPS outperformed each Fund’s respective Peers in at least two of such periods based on a customized performance comparison provided by BlackRock utilizing a subset of the Lipper universe which gives a greater significance to current distributions, providing a more accurate comparison.
The Board noted that in general BPK, BJZ and BLH performed better than each Fund’s respective Peers in that each Fund’s performance was at or above the median in at least two of the one-, three- and five-year periods reported.
The Board noted that in general BKK and BFO performed better than their respective Peers in that their performance was at or above the median in at least two of the one-year, three-year and since inception periods reported.
After considering this information, the Boards concluded that the performance of each Fund, in light of and after considering the other facts and circumstances applicable to each Fund, supports a conclusion that each Fund’s Agreements should be renewed.
C. Consideration of the Advisory Fees and the Cost of the Services and Profits to be Realized by BlackRock and its Affiliates from their Relationship with the Funds: In evaluating the management fees and expenses that each Fund is expected to bear, the Board considered each Fund’s current man-
| | |
| | | |
| | | |
| SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT | JUNE 30, 2008 | 69 |
Disclosure of Investment Advisory Agreement and Subadvisory Agreement (concluded) |
agement fee structure and each Fund’s expense ratios in absolute terms as well as relative to the fees and expense ratios of its applicable Peers. The Board, among other things, reviewed comparisons of each Fund’s gross management fees before and after any applicable reimbursements and fee waivers and total expense ratios before and after any applicable waivers with those of applicable Peers. The Board also reviewed a narrative analysis of the Peer rankings prepared by Lipper and summarized by BlackRock at the request of the Board. This summary placed the Peer rankings into context by analyzing various factors that affect these comparisons.
The Board noted that the Funds paid contractual management fees lower than or equal to the median contractual fees paid by each Fund’s respective Peers. This comparison was made without giving effect to any expense reimbursements or fee waivers.
The Board also compared the management fees charged and services provided by the Advisors to closed-end funds in general versus other types of clients (such as open-end investment companies and separately managed institutional accounts) in similar investment categories. The Board noted certain differences in services provided and costs incurred by the Advisor with respect to closed-end funds compared to these other types of clients and the reasons for such differences.
In connection with the Board’s consideration of the fees and expense information, the Board reviewed the considerable investment management experience of the Advisors and considered the high level of investment management, administrative and other services provided by the Advisors. In light of these factors and the other facts and circumstances applicable to each Fund, the Board concluded that the fees paid and level of expenses incurred by each Fund under its Agreements support a conclusion that each Fund’s Agreements should be renewed.
D. Profitability of BlackRock: The Board also considered BlackRock’s profitability in conjunction with its review of fees. The Board reviewed BlackRock’s profitability with respect to the Fund Complex and other fund complexes managed by the Advisors. In reviewing profitability, the Board recognized that one of the most difficult issues in determining profitability is establishing a method of allocating expenses. The Board also reviewed BlackRock’s assumptions and methodology of allocating expenses, noting the inherent limitations in allocating costs among various advisory products. The Board also recognized that individual fund or product line profitability of other advisors is generally not publicly available.
The Board recognized that profitability may be affected by numerous factors including, among other things, the types of funds managed, expense allocations and business mix, and therefore comparability of profitability is somewhat limited. Nevertheless, to the extent available, the Board considered BlackRock’s operating margin compared to the operating margin estimated by BlackRock for a leading investment management firm whose operations consist primarily of advising closed-end funds. The comparison indicated that BlackRock’s operating margin was approximately the same as the operating margin of such firm.
In evaluating the reasonableness of the Advisors’ compensation, the Board also considered any other revenues paid to the Advisors, including partial reimbursements paid to the Advisors for certain non-investment advisory services, if applicable. The Board noted that these payments were less than the Advisors’ costs for providing these services. The Board also considered indirect benefits (such as soft dollar arrangements) that the Advisors and their affiliates are expected to receive, which are attributable to their management of the Fund.
The Board concluded that BlackRock’s profitability, in light of all the other facts and circumstances applicable to each Fund, supports a conclusion that each Fund’s Agreements should be renewed.
E. Economies of Scale: In reviewing each Fund’s fees and expenses, the Board examined the potential benefits of economies of scale, and whether any economies of scale should be reflected in the Fund’s fee structure, for example through the use of breakpoints for the Fund or the Fund Complex. In this regard, the Board reviewed information provided by BlackRock, noting that most closed-end fund complexes do not have fund-level breakpoints because closed-end funds generally do not experience substantial growth after their initial public offering and each fund is managed independently consistent with its own investment objectives. The Board noted that only three closed-end funds in the Fund Complex have breakpoints in their fee structures. Information provided by Lipper also revealed that only one closed-end fund complex used a complex-level breakpoint structure. The Board found, based on its review of comparable funds, that each Fund’s management fee is appropriate in light of the scale of the Fund.
F. Other Factors: In evaluating fees, the Board also considered indirect benefits or profits the Advisors or their affiliates may receive as a result of their relationships with the Funds (“fall-out benefits”). The Directors, including the Independent Directors, considered the intangible benefits that accrue to the Advisors and their affiliates by virtue of their relationships with the Funds, including potential benefits accruing to the Advisors and their affiliates as a result of participating in offerings of the Funds’ shares, potentially stronger relationships with members of the broker-dealer community, increased name recognition of the Advisors and their affiliates, enhanced sales of other investment funds and products sponsored by the Advisors and their affiliates and increased assets under management which may increase the benefits realized by the Advisors from soft dollar arrangements with broker-dealers. The Board also considered the unquantifiable nature of these potential benefits.
Conclusion with Respect to the Agreements
In reviewing the Agreements, the Directors did not identify any single factor discussed above as all-important or controlling and different Directors may have attributed different weights to the various factors considered. The Directors, including the Independent Directors, unanimously determined that each of the factors described above, in light of all the other factors and all of the facts and circumstances applicable to each respective Fund, was acceptable for each Fund and supported the Directors’ conclusion that the terms of each Agreement were fair and reasonable, that each Fund’s fees are reasonable in light of the services provided to the respective Fund and that each Agreement should be approved.
| | |
| | | |
| | | |
70 | SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT | JUNE 30, 2008 | |
Richard E. Cavanagh, Chairman of the Board and Trustee
Karen P. Robards, Vice Chair of the Board, Chair of the Audit Committee and Trustee
G. Nicholas Beckwith, III, Trustee
Richard S. Davis, Trustee
Kent Dixon, Trustee
Frank J. Fabozzi, Trustee
Kathleen F. Feldstein, Trustee
James T. Flynn, Trustee
Henry Gabbay, Trustee
Jerrold B. Harris, Trustee
R. Glenn Hubbard, Trustee
W. Carl Kester, Trustee
Robert S. Salomon, Jr., Trustee
Donald C. Burke, Trust President and Chief Executive Officer
Anne F. Ackerley, Vice President
Neal J. Andrews, Chief Financial Officer
Jay M. Fife, Treasurer
Brian P. Kindelan, Chief Compliance Officer of the Trusts
Howard Surloff, Secretary
Custodian
State Street Bank and Trust Company
Boston, MA 02101
Transfer Agents
Common Shares:
Computershare Trust Companies, N.A.
Canton, MA 02021
Preferred Shares:
For the 2018 Trusts and 2020 Trusts
BNY Mellon Shareowner Services
Jersey City, N.J. 07310
For the Trusts, except for the 2018 Trusts and 2020 Trusts
Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas
New York, NY 10005
Accounting Agent
State Street Bank and Trust Company
Princeton, NJ 08540
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Deloitte & Touche LLP
Princeton, NJ 08540
Legal Counsel
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
New York, NY 10036
Fund Address
BlackRock Closed-End Funds
c/o BlackRock Advisors, LLC
100 Bellevue Parkway
Wilmington, DE 19809
| | |
| | | |
| | | |
| SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT | JUNE 30, 2008 | 71 |
Availability of Quarterly Schedule of Investments |
Each Trust files their complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. Each Trust’s Forms N-Q are available on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov and may also be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, DC.
Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling (800) SEC-0330. Each Trust’s Forms N-Q may also be obtained upon request and without charge by calling (800) 441-7762.
Electronic copies of most financial reports are available on the Trusts’ website or shareholders can sign up for e-mail notifications of quarterly statements, annual and semi-annual reports and prospectuses by enrolling in the Trusts’ electronic delivery program.
Shareholders Who Hold Accounts with Investment Advisors, Banks or Brokerages:
Please contact your financial advisor to enroll. Please note that not all investment advisors, banks or brokerages may offer this service.
The Trusts will mail only one copy of shareholder documents, including annual and semi-annual reports and proxy statements, to shareholders with multiple accounts at the same address. This practice is commonly called “householding” and it is intended to reduce expenses and eliminate duplicate mailings of shareholder documents. Mailings of your shareholder documents may be householded indefinitely unless you instruct us otherwise. If you do not want the mailing of these documents to be combined with those for other members of your household, please contact the Trusts at (800) 441-7762.
Quarterly performance, semi-annual and annual reports and other information regarding each Trust may be found on BlackRock’s website, which can be accessed at http://www.blackrock.com. This reference to BlackRock’s website is intended to allow investors public access to information regarding each Trust and does not, and is not intended to, incorporate BlackRock’s website into this report.
| | |
| | | |
| | | |
72 | SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT | JUNE 30, 2008 | |
Additional Information (continued) | |
These amounts and sources of distributions reported are only estimates and are not being provided for tax reporting purposes. The actual amounts and source for tax reporting purposes will depend upon each Trust’s investment experience during the remainder of its fiscal year end and may be subject to changes based on the tax regulations. The Trusts will send you a Form 1099-DIV for the calendar year that will tell you how to report these distributions for federal income tax purposes.
Effective May 30, 2008, following approval by the Trusts’ Board and the applicable ratings agencies, the definition of “Deposited Securities” in the Trusts’ Statement of Preferences/Certificate of Designation/Articles Supplementary was amended in order to facilitate the redemption of the Trusts’ Preferred Shares. The following phrase was added to the definition of “Deposit Securities” found in the Statement of Preferences/Certificate of Designation/Articles Supplementary of BMT, BPK, BSD, BJZ, BLH and BPS:
; provided, however, that solely in connection with any redemption of Preferred Shares, the term Deposit Securities shall include (i) any committed financing pursuant to a credit agreement, reverse repurchase agreement facility or similar credit arrangement, in each case which makes available to the Trust, no later than the day preceding the applicable redemption date, cash in an amount not less than the aggregate amount due to Holders by reason of the redemption of their shares of Preferred Shares on such redemption date; and (ii) cash amounts due and payable to the Trust out of a sale of its securities if such cash amount is not less than the aggregate amount due to Holders by reason of the redemption of their shares of Preferred Shares on such redemption date and such sale will be settled not later than the day preceding the applicable redemption date.
The following sentence was added to the optimal redemption section found in the Statement of Preferences/Certificate of Designation/Articles Supplementary of BKK and BFO:
For the purposes of this section, the term “liquid securities” shall include:
(i) any committed financing pursuant to a credit agreement, reverse repurchase agreement facility or similar credit arrangement, in each case which makes available to the Trust, no later than the day preceding the applicable redemption date, cash in an amount not less than the aggregate amount due to Holders by reason of the redemption of their shares of Preferred Shares on such redemption date; and (ii) cash amounts due and payable to the Trust out of a sale of its securities if such cash amount is not less than the aggregate amount due to Holders by reason of the redemption of their shares of Preferred Shares on such redemption date and such sale will be settled not later than the day preceding the applicable redemption date.
| | |
| | | |
| | | |
| SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT | JUNE 30, 2008 | 73 |
Additional Information (concluded) | |
BlackRock Privacy Principles |
BlackRock is committed to maintaining the privacy of its current and former fund investors and individual clients (collectively,“Clients”) and to safeguarding their nonpublic personal information.The following information is provided to help you understand what personal information BlackRock collects, how we protect that information and why in certain cases we share such information with select parties.
If you are located in a jurisdiction where specific laws, rules or regulations require BlackRock to provide you with additional or different privacy-related rights beyond what is set forth below, then BlackRock will comply with those specific laws, rules or regulations.
BlackRock obtains or verifies personal nonpublic information from and about you from different sources, including the following: (i) information we receive from you or, if applicable, your financial intermediary, on applications, forms or other documents; (ii) information about your transactions with us, our affiliates, or others; (iii) information we receive from a consumer reporting agency; and (iv) from visits to our websites.
BlackRock does not sell or disclose to nonaffiliated third parties any nonpublic information about its Clients, except as permitted by law or as necessary to service Client accounts. These nonaffiliated third parties are required to protect the confidentiality and security of this information and to use it only for its intended purpose.
We may share information with our affiliates to service your account or to provide you with information about other BlackRock products or services that may be of interest to you. In addition, BlackRock restricts access to nonpublic personal information about its Clients to those BlackRock employees with a legitimate business need for the information. BlackRock maintains physical, electronic and procedural safeguards that are designed to protect the nonpublic personal information of its Clients, including procedures relating to the proper storage and disposal of such information.
| | |
| | | |
| | | |
74 | SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT | JUNE 30, 2008 | |
This report is transmitted to shareholders only. It is not a prospectus. Past performance results shown in this report should not be considered a representation of future performance. The Trusts have leveraged their Common Shares, which creates risks for Common Shareholders, including the likelihood of greater volatility of net asset value and market price of the Common Shares and the risk that fluctuations in the short-term dividend rates of the Preferred Shares, currently set at the maximum reset rate as a result of failed auctions, may affect the yield to Common Shareholders. Statements and other information herein are as dated and are subject to change.
A description of the policies and procedures that the Trusts use to determine how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities is available (1) without charge, upon request, by calling toll-free (800) 411-7762; (2) at www.blackrock.com; and (3) on the Securities and Exchange Commission’s website at http://www.sec.gov. Information about how each Trust voted proxies relating to securities held in each Trust’s portfolio during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available upon request and without charge (1) at www.blackrock.com or by calling (800) 441-7762 and (2) on the Securities and Exchange Commission’s website at http://www.sec.gov.
| Item 2 – | | Code of Ethics – Not Applicable to this semi-annual report |
| | | |
| Item 3 – | | Audit Committee Financial Expert – Not Applicable to this semi-annual report |
| | | |
| Item 4 – | | Principal Accountant Fees and Services – Not Applicable to this semi-annual report |
| | | |
| Item 5 – | | Audit Committee of Listed Registrants – Not Applicable to this semi-annual report |
| | | |
| Item 6 – | | Investments |
| | | (a) The registrant’s Schedule of Investments is included as part of the Report to Stockholders filed under Item 1 of this form. |
| | | (b) Not Applicable due to no such divestments during the semi-annual period covered since the previous Form N-CSR filing. |
| | | |
| Item 7 – | | Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies – Not Applicable to this semi-annual report |
| | | |
| Item 8 – | | Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies – Not Applicable to this semi-annual report |
| | | |
| Item 9 – | | Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Company and Affiliated Purchasers – Not Applicable |
| | | |
| Item 10 – | | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders – The registrant’s Nominating and Governance Committee will consider nominees to the board of directors recommended by shareholders when a vacancy becomes available. Shareholders who wish to recommend a nominee should send nominations which include biographical information and set forth the qualifications of the proposed nominee to the registrant’s Secretary. There have been no material changes to these procedures. |
| | | |
| Item 11 – | | Controls and Procedures |
| | | |
| 11(a) – | | The registrant’s principal executive and principal financial officers or persons performing similar functions have concluded that the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”)) are effective as of a date within 90 days of the filing of this report based on the evaluation of these controls and procedures required by Rule 30a-3(b) under the 1940 Act and Rule 13a-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. |
| | | |
| 11(b) – | | There were no changes in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the 1940 Act) that occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. |
| | | |
| Item 12 – | | Exhibits attached hereto |
| | | |
| 12(a)(1) – | | Code of Ethics – Not Applicable to this semi-annual report |
| | | |
| 12(a)(2) – | | Certifications – Attached hereto |
| | | |
| 12(a)(3) – | | Not Applicable |
| | | |
| 12(b) – | | Certifications – Attached hereto |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
BlackRock New York Municipal 2018 Term Trust
| By: | | /s/ Donald C. Burke |
| | | Donald C. Burke |
| | | Chief Executive Officer of |
| | | BlackRock New York Municipal 2018 Term Trust |
Date: August 22, 2008
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
| By: | | /s/ Donald C. Burke |
| | | Donald C. Burke |
| | | Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) of |
| | | BlackRock New York Municipal 2018 Term Trust |
Date: August 22, 2008
| By: | | /s/ Neal J. Andrews |
| | | Neal J. Andrews |
| | | Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer) of |
| | | BlackRock New York Municipal 2018 Term Trust |
Date: August 22, 2008
