Significant Accounting Policies Significant Accounting (Policies) | 3 Months Ended |
Mar. 31, 2014 |
Accounting Policies [Abstract] | ' |
fixed fee service revenues [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Rental Income – Under the Company’s fixed-fee code-share and fixed-fee charter agreements, the Company is reimbursed an amount per aircraft designed to compensate the Company for certain aircraft ownership costs. The Company has concluded that a component of its fixed-fee service revenue under the agreement discussed above is rental income, inasmuch as the agreement identifies the “right of use” of a specific type and number of aircraft over a stated period of time. The amounts deemed to be rental income during the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, were $106.4 million and $92.3 million, respectively and have been included in fixed-fee service revenues in the Company’s condensed consolidated statements of operations. |
charter and other revenue [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Charter and Other Revenue – Charter and other revenue primarily consists of lease revenue for aircraft subleased under operating leases and miscellaneous revenue related to charter flying. Charter revenues are recognized at the point that our charter service is realizable and earned, which is when the transportation is provided. All other revenue is recognized as revenue when the related goods and services are provided. |
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Restricted Cash and Cash Equivalents, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Restricted Cash – Restricted cash primarily consists of balances in escrow for our long-term charter agreement, restricted amounts for satisfying debt and lease payments due within the next year and certificates of deposit that secure certain letters of credit issued for workers' compensation claim reserves and certain airport authorities. Restricted cash is carried at cost, which management believes approximates fair value. |
Earnings Per Share, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
|
Net Income (Loss) Per Common Share – The following table is based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. The following is a reconciliation of the weighted average common shares for the basic and diluted per share computations (in millions, except per share information): |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended March 31, | | | | | | | | |
| | 2014 | | 2013 | | | | | | | | |
Basic and diluted income per share: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income from continuing operations | | $ | 14 | | | $ | 11.4 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax | | — | | | (11.1 | ) | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Net income | | 14 | | | 0.3 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income effect of assumed-conversion interest on convertible debt | | 0.5 | | | 0.3 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income after assumed conversion | | $ | 14.5 | | | $ | 0.6 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Weighted average common shares outstanding | | 49.6 | | | 48.7 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Effect of dilutive securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Stock options | | 0.4 | | | 0.6 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Convertible debt | | 4.9 | | | 4.7 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Shares used to compute diluted earnings per share | | 54.9 | | | 54 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income per share - basic: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income from continuing operations | | $ | 0.28 | | | $ | 0.23 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax | | — | | | (0.22 | ) | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 0.28 | | | $ | 0.01 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income per share - diluted: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income from continuing operations | | $ | 0.26 | | | $ | 0.22 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax | | — | | | (0.21 | ) | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 0.26 | | | $ | 0.01 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
|
The Company excluded 3.4 million and 3.0 million employee stock options from the calculation of diluted net income per share due to their anti-dilutive impact for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. |
|
The Company has two convertible notes, both with original face values of $25.0 million. One has a book value of $22.3 million, while the other has a book value of $25.5 million, net of a $1.7 million discount, which is convertible in whole or in part, at the option of the holder, for up to 2.2 million and 2.7 million shares, respectively, of the Company’s common stock as of March 31, 2014. The convertible notes payable were dilutive for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013. |
|
On April 7, 2014, the Company redeemed the convertible note by paying $22.3 million of cash. The Company has the ability to redeem the other convertible note to the extent the note has not previously been converted by the holder. Upon not less than 30 days nor more than 60 days advance written notice, the Company can redeem the $27.2 million note at a premium to face value at any time through October 28, 2016 at which point the note can be redeemed at face value thereafter. |
|
Fair Value Measurement, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Fair Value Measurements - Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, requires disclosures about how fair value is determined for assets and liabilities and a hierarchy for which these assets and liabilities must be grouped is established. The Topic establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows: |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Level 1 | quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Level 2 | quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Level 3 | unobservable inputs for the asset or liability. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
The following table sets forth information regarding the Company's assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis (in millions): |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fair Value of Assets on a Recurring Basis | | 31-Mar-14 | | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 |
Chautauqua restructuring asset | | $ | 95.7 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 95.7 | |
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fair Value of Assets on a Recurring Basis | | 31-Dec-13 | | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 |
Chautauqua restructuring asset | | $ | 79.6 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 79.6 | |
|
|
Chautauqua restructuring asset - In October 2012, the Company restructured certain aircraft ownership obligations related to its 50-seat regional jet platform, Chautauqua. In connection with the restructuring, the Company issued a convertible note payable with a face value of $25.0 million, provided call rights on 28 of its owned aircraft and agreed to parent company guarantees related to future minimum lease payments, among other commitments. |
|
The Company elected the fair value option under ASC 825-10, "Financial Instruments" for the agreement related to its 28 owned aircraft because management believes the fair value option provides the most accurate representation of the economic benefit of this agreement to Chautauqua in the Company's financial statements. Under the fair value option, the Company recorded an $86.4 million asset representing the combined fair value of expected future cash inflows under the agreement, net of the value of the Company's obligations attributable to the call rights on the 28 aircraft. The recurring fair value measurement of this agreement has been calculated using an income approach, which requires the use of subjective assumptions that are considered level 3 inputs. Fair values have been estimated by discounting the cash flows expected to be received over the term of the agreement, using a discount rate based on observable yields on instruments bearing comparable risks and credit worthiness of the counterparty. Critical assumptions used in the fair value measurement primarily include the amount and timing of cash inflows, the discount rate and the probability of whether the call option on the restructured aircraft will be exercised by the counterparty. A change in these assumptions could result in a significantly higher or lower fair value measurement, which would result in a gain or loss during the period in which the assumption changes. A 100 basis point change in the discount rate used would have changed the fair value of the restructuring asset by approximately $2.1 million as of March 31, 2014. Similarly, a change in the assumed probability of whether the call option on the restructured aircraft will be exercised could result in either a gain or loss of up to $3.3 million per aircraft during the period in which that assumption changed. |
|
On February 11, 2014, the Company announced the early termination of its 44 to 50 seat fixed-fee agreements with United Airlines and American Airlines, which were scheduled to terminate in 2014. These agreements wind-down beginning in March 2014 through August 2014 and will result in the grounding of 27 small jet aircraft. The Company notified the counterparty that 15 of the 27 aircraft to be grounded are subject to this agreement and callable by the counterparty. The Company was notified by the counterparty during the first quarter 2014 that it did not intend to exercise its call option on these aircraft. The Company recorded a fair value gain of $18.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014, which represents the fair value of the increase in cash flows expected to be received over the remaining term of the agreement, due to the counterparty's obligation to increase its payment to the Company for aircraft that cease to have applicable capacity purchase agreement reimbursement rates. |
|
In March 2013 the agreement was amended, which resulted in a $12.0 million increase in the restructuring asset under the fair value option. The $12.0 million increase represents the fair value of expected future cash inflows under the amendment. In addition, this amendment resulted in a $12.0 million deferred credit. |
|
As of March 31, 2014, the Company would owe approximately $21.8 million under certain circumstances of non-performance or voluntary repayment, however, the Company estimated the probability of repayment as remote. The difference between the fair value of the restructuring asset at inception and the fair value of the convertible note at inception is recognized as a reduction to depreciation expense over the remaining useful life of the related aircraft subject to this agreement. |
|
The following is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances for the periods indicated of recurring fair value measurements using Level 3 inputs (in millions): |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Quarter Ended | | | | | | | | |
Chautauqua Restructuring Asset | | 31-Mar-14 | | 31-Dec-13 | | | | | | | | |
Beginning Balance | | $ | 79.6 | | | $ | 86.4 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Amendment to agreement | | — | | | 12 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Fair value gain | | 18.4 | | | — | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Cash received or other | | (2.3 | ) | | (18.8 | ) | | | | | | | | |
Ending Balance | | $ | 95.7 | | | $ | 79.6 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
|
|
Aircraft and Other Assets Impairment - Nonrecurring - In March 2014, we recorded a $19.9 million impairment charge related to our decision to abandon our owned E140 fleet in March 2014, impairing these aircraft to zero during the quarter ended March 31, 2014. |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
($ in millions) | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Nonrecurring Fair Value Measurements Using | | |
Description | | 3 mos ended March 31, 2014 | | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) | | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | | Pre-tax Losses |
Long-lived assets abandoned | | $ | — | | | | | | | $ | — | | | $ | (19.9 | ) |
|
|
|
Fair Value of Debt - Market risk associated with our fixed and variable rate long-term debt primarily relates to the potential change in fair value and impact to future earnings, respectively, from a change in interest rates. In the table below, the aggregate fair value of debt was based primarily on recently completed market transactions and estimates based on interest rates, maturities, credit risk, and underlying collateral and is classified primarily as level 3 within the fair value hierarchy. |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
($ in millions) | | March 31, | | December 31, | | | | | | | | |
| | 2014 | | 2013 | | | | | | | | |
Net carrying amount | | $ | 2,224.30 | | | $ | 2,166.80 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Estimated fair value | | 2,142.70 | | | 2,099.80 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
|
New Accounting Pronouncements, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
New Accounting Pronouncements – In April 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-08, Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant, and Equipment (Topic 360): Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity. The objective of the update change the requirements for reporting discontinued operations in Subtopic 205-20. It is effective in the first quarter of 2015, and the impact to the consolidated financial statements is not expected to be material. |
|
In January 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-05, Service Concession Arrangements (Topic 853), a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force. The objective of the update is to specify that an operating entity should not account for a service concession arrangement within the scope of this update as a lease in accordance with Topic 840, Leases. It is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2014, and the impact to the consolidated financial statements is being evaluated by the Company. |
|
In July 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-11–Income Taxes (Topic 740), Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists. The standard provides updated guidance on the financial statement presentation of an unrecognized tax benefit when a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward exists. The amendment becomes affective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2013. The Company adopted this accounting standard on January 1, 2014, and the impact to the consolidated financial statements was not material. |