UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K
Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006
Commission file number 1-16791
Dover Downs Gaming & Entertainment, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware |
| 51-0414140 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation) |
| (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
1131 North DuPont Highway, Dover, Delaware 19901
(Address of principal executive offices)
(302) 674-4600
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of Class |
|
|
| Name of Exchange on Which Registered |
| |
Common Stock, $.10 Par Value |
| New York Stock Exchange |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None.
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yes o No x
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act.
Yes o No x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer x Non-accelerated filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes o No x
The aggregate market value of common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was $268,410,178 as of June 30, 2006 (the last day of our most recently completed second quarter).
As of February 28, 2007, the number of shares of each class of the registrant’s common stock outstanding is as follows:
Common Stock - |
| 15,642,707 shares |
Class A Common Stock - |
| 17,003,173 shares |
Documents Incorporated by Reference
Portions of the registrant’s Proxy Statement in connection with the Annual Meeting of Stockholders held April 25, 2007 are incorporated by reference into Part III, Items 10 through 14 of this report.
Part I
References in this document to “we,” “us” and “our” mean Dover Downs Gaming & Entertainment, Inc. and/or its wholly owned subsidiaries, as appropriate.
Item 1. Business
We are a diversified gaming and entertainment company whose operations consist of Dover Downs Slots — a 97,000 square-foot video lottery (slots) casino complex; the Dover Downs Hotel — featuring luxury accommodations with conference, banquet, fine dining, ballroom and concert hall facilities; and Dover Downs Raceway — a harness racing track with pari-mutuel wagering on live and simulcast horse races. Our entertainment complex is located in Dover, the capital of the State of Delaware.
Dover Downs Gaming & Entertainment, Inc. is a public holding company that has two wholly owned subsidiaries: Dover Downs, Inc. and Dover Downs Management Corp. Dover Downs, Inc. was incorporated in 1967 and began motorsports and harness racing operations in 1969. In June of 1994, legislation authorizing video lottery operations in the State of Delaware (the “State”) was adopted. Our video lottery (slots) casino operations began on December 29, 1995. As a result of several restructurings, Dover Downs, Inc. became a wholly owned subsidiary of Dover Motorsports, Inc. (formerly known as Dover Downs Entertainment, Inc.) (“DVD”), and became the operating entity for all of DVD’s gaming operations.
Dover Downs Gaming & Entertainment, Inc. was incorporated in the State in December of 2001 as a wholly owned subsidiary of DVD. Effective March 31, 2002, DVD completed a tax-free spin-off of its gaming operations by contributing 100% of the issued and outstanding common stock of Dover Downs, Inc. to Dover Downs Gaming & Entertainment, Inc., and subsequently distributing 100% of our issued and outstanding common stock to DVD stockholders. Immediately following the spin-off, Dover Downs Gaming & Entertainment, Inc. became an independent public company.
Dover Downs, Inc. is authorized to conduct video lottery operations as a “Licensed Agent” under the Delaware State Lottery Code. Pursuant to Delaware’s Horse Racing Redevelopment Act, enacted in 1994, the Delaware State Lottery Office administers and controls the operation of the video lottery.
Our license from the Delaware Harness Racing Commission (the “Commission”) to hold harness race meetings on our premises and to offer pari-mutuel wagering on live and simulcast horse races must be renewed on an annual basis. In order to maintain our license to conduct video lottery operations, we are required to maintain our harness horse racing license. We have received an annual license from the Commission for the past 38 consecutive years and management believes that our relationship with the Commission remains good.
Due to the nature of our business activities, we are subject to various federal, state and local regulations.
Dover Downs Slots
Our video lottery (slot) machine casino opened in December 1995 with approximately 500 video lottery (slot) machines. Due to its popularity, the video lottery (slot) machine casino has expanded five times since its opening and the number of machines has increased steadily to 2,724 at December 31, 2006. The most recent expansion, which was completed in July of 2006, converted 4,000 square-feet of space within our existing complex to gaming space and added more than 200 new machines.
In the first quarter of 2006, the State of Delaware passed legislation which allowed us to expand our operating hours, add additional slot machines and provide free promotional play through our recently enhanced slots marketing system. We now operate 24 hours per day, except on Sunday morning from 6am to noon. The legislation increased the number of allowable slot machines for each of the three licensed facilities in Delaware from 2,500 to 4,000. Each slot machine in excess of 2,500 requires payment of an annual fee of $1,100 per machine for the first 500 machines added, $700 per machine for the next 500 machines added, and $300 per machine for the last 500 machines added.
2
Since legislation now allows us to operate up to 4,000 video lottery (slot) machines, we are proceeding with our plans to expand the casino facility. We are currently finalizing a bid package for the Phase VI expansion of our casino which is expected to include additional casino space, as well as restaurant and retail offerings.
Our video lottery (slot) machines range from our popular penny machines to $100 machines in the Premium Slots area and include most popular games found in the country’s major gaming jurisdictions. We have recently added multi-player electronic table games, such as Blackjack and Poker, which accomodate up to five players in an interactive setting that features a virtual dealer. Additional amenities include the Garden Cafe, which becomes a lounge with live entertainment several nights a week. The Las Vegas style video lottery casino housing the gaming equipment was designed and built using expertise from Caesars World Gaming Development Corporation (“Caesars”), a leader in the gaming industry. Our facilities are open every day of the year, except Christmas and Easter, and were visited by approximately 3 million patrons in 2006.
The Delaware State Lottery Office administers and controls our video lottery (slot) machine operations. We are a Licensed Agent authorized to conduct video lottery operations under the Delaware State Lottery Code and one of only three locations permitted to do so in the State of Delaware. We are permitted by law to set the payout to customers between 87% and 95%.
We use sophisticated database marketing to enable us to develop long-term relationships with our patrons and to target promotions to specific customer segments. Our Capital Club®, a slots players club and tracking system, allows us to identify customers and to reward their level of play through various marketing programs. Membership in this club currently stands at approximately 143,000 active patrons. Our state-of-the-art customer management and slot data system allows us to market our property more effectively and has allowed for the conversion of our entire casino floor to ticket-in, ticket-out (cashless) technology.
We have implemented extensive procedures for financial and accounting controls, safekeeping and accounting of monies, and security provisions. Security over the gaming operations involves the integration of surveillance cameras, observation and oversight by employees, security and gaming staff, and various security features built into the video lottery (slot) machines. The above, when combined with proper internal control procedures and daily monitoring of each video lottery (slot) machine by the Delaware State Lottery Office, are intended to maintain the security, integrity and accountability of the video lottery operations.
On May 30, 2003, the Advisory Council on Video Lottery Planning, a committee created by the Delaware House of Representatives (the “Committee”), issued a favorable assessment as to the merits of conducting sports wagering in the State through its video lottery agents. The Committee concluded that sports gaming is feasible in the State, outlined proposed structures for its implementation and provided various financial projections. The report has been provided to the Delaware General Assembly for consideration. By Federal law, Delaware is the only state east of Montana, and one of only four states in the United States, where sports betting is legally permitted. Enabling legislation needed to establish sports gaming operations at our property is being discussed by the Delaware legislature.
Dover Downs Hotel
Our luxury hotel facility, the Dover Downs Hotel, connects to our casino. The facility was completed in April 2002 and includes 232 rooms, a multi-purpose ballroom/concert hall, a fine dining restaurant, swimming pool and health spa. When we built the hotel we also built a 425-seat buffet restaurant and renovated our enclosed harness racing grandstand with state-of-the-art simulcasting facilities. By offering a wide range of entertainment options to our patrons, including concerts featuring prominent entertainers, live boxing, gourmet dining, trade shows and conferences, we are able to attract new patrons and lengthen the stay of current patrons. Since opening the Dover Downs Hotel, we have managed its operations ourselves. In 2006, hotel occupancy averaged almost 97% and the hotel was awarded the AAA Four Diamond Award for the fourth consecutive year.
3
On March 16, 2006, we announced an expansion plan that will more than double the number of hotel rooms from 232 to 500, including eleven luxury spa suites, and add a luxurious 6,000 square-foot spa to the Dover Downs Hotel. Construction began in the second quarter of 2006 and is expected to be completed in the fall of 2007. The estimated cost of the expansion is $53,600,000, of which approximately $16,400,000 was paid through 2006.
Dover Downs Raceway
Dover Downs Raceway has presented pari-mutuel harness racing events for 38 consecutive years. Live harness races are conducted at Dover Downs Raceway between November and April and are simulcast to more than 400 tracks and other off-track betting locations across North America on each of our more than 130 live race dates. The harness horse racing track is a 5/8-mile track and is lighted for nighttime operations. The track is adjacent to our casino and hotel on land owned by DVD on the inside of DVD’s auto racing superspeedway. Use of the track is pursuant to an easement granted by DVD which does not require the payment of any rent.
Within our main grandstand is the simulcast parlor where our patrons can wager on harness and thoroughbred races received by satellite into Dover Downs Raceway year round from numerous tracks across North America. Television monitors throughout the parlor area provide views of all races simultaneously and the parlor’s betting windows are connected to a central computer allowing bets to be received on all races from all tracks. Additional amenities include the Winners Circle® Restaurant.
Harness racing in the State of Delaware is governed by the Delaware Harness Racing Commission. We hold a license from the Commission authorizing us to hold harness race meetings on our premises and to offer pari-mutuel wagering on live and simulcast horse races.
In harness racing competing horses are harnessed to a two-wheeled sulky, which carries the driver. Pari-mutuel wagering is pooled betting by which the wagering public, not the track, determines the odds and the payoff. The track retains a commission, which is a percentage of the total amount wagered, or the “handle.” Simulcasting is the transmission of live horse racing by television, cable or satellite signal from one race track to another with pari-mutuel wagering being conducted at the sending and receiving track and a portion of the handle being shared by the sending and receiving tracks.
The legislation authorizing video lottery operations in the State of Delaware was adopted in June 1994, and is referred to as the “Horse Racing Redevelopment Act.” The Delaware General Assembly’s stated purpose in approving the legislation was to (i) provide non-state supported assistance in the form of increased economic activity and vitality for Delaware’s harness and thoroughbred horse racing industries, which activity and vitality will enable the industry to improve its facilities and breeding stock, and cause increased employment; and (ii) restrict the location of such lottery to locations where wagering is already permitted and controls exist. A portion of the proceeds from the wagering on the video lottery (slot) machines is allocated to increase the purses for harness horse races held at Dover Downs Raceway and is intended to provide increased vitality for Delaware’s horse racing industry.
We have an agreement with the Delaware Standardbred Owner’s Association, Inc. (“DSOA”) effective August 1, 2003 and continuing through July 31, 2007. We believe that the agreement will be renegotiated in 2007 at terms similar to those in the current agreement. DSOA’s membership consists of owners, trainers and drivers of harness horses participating in harness race meetings at our facilities and elsewhere in the United States and Canada. The DSOA has been organized and exists for the purpose of promoting the sport of harness racing; improving the lot of owners, drivers and trainers of harness racing horses participating in race meetings; establishing health, welfare and insurance programs for owners, drivers and trainers of harness racing horses; negotiating with harness racing tracks on behalf of owners, trainers, drivers and grooms of harness racing horses; and generally rendering assistance to them whenever and wherever possible. Under the DSOA agreement, we are required to distribute as purses for races conducted at our facilities a percentage of our retained share of pari-mutuel revenues.
We enjoy a good relationship with representatives of DSOA and anticipate that this relationship will continue. We believe that the DSOA agreement is typical of similar agreements in the industry.
4
Licensing and Regulation by Gaming and Other Authorities
General
We are subject to extensive federal, state and local regulations related to our operations, particularly our video lottery (slot) operations, live harness racing and pari-mutuel wagering. These operations are contingent upon continued government approval of such operations as forms of legalized gaming and could be subjected at any time to additional or more restrictive regulations. The following is a brief outline of some of the more significant regulations affecting our gaming operations and not intended as a recitation of all regulations applicable to our business.
Delaware law regulates the percentage of commission we are entitled to receive from our gaming activities, which comprises a significant portion of our overall revenues. Our licenses to conduct video lottery (slot) machine operations, harness horse races and pari-mutuel wagering could be modified or repealed at any time and we could be required to terminate our gaming operations.
Video Lottery (Slot) Operations
General. Video lottery (slot) operations are by statute operated and administered by the Director of the Delaware State Lottery Office (the “Lottery Director”). We are a Licensed Agent authorized to conduct video lottery (slot) operations under the Delaware State Lottery Code.
A “video lottery (slot) machine” is defined by law as any machine in which bills, coins or tokens are deposited in order to play in a game of chance in which the results, including options available to the player, are randomly and immediately determined by the machine. A machine may use spinning reels or video displays or both, and may or may not dispense coins or tokens directly to winning players. A machine shall be considered a video lottery (slot) machine notwithstanding (i) the use of an electronic credit system making the deposit of bills, coins or tokens unnecessary, or (ii) the fact that the video lottery (slot) machine has employed dual function terminal technology. Various video lottery (slot) machines are in use at our casino.
The Lottery Director has discretion to adopt such rules and regulations as the Lottery Director deems necessary or desirable for the efficient and economical operation and administration of the system, including (i) type and number of games permitted, (ii) pricing of games, (iii) numbers and sizes of prizes, (iv) manner of payment, (v) value of bills, coins or tokens needed to play, (vi) requirements for licensing agents and service providers, (vii) standards for advertising, marketing and promotional materials used by Licensed Agents, (viii) procedures for accounting and reporting, (ix) registration, kind, type, number and location of video lottery (slot) machines on a Licensed Agent’s premises, (x) security arrangements for the video lottery system, and (xi) reporting and auditing of financial information of Licensed Agents.
Licensing Requirements. We were granted a license on December 13, 1995. Delaware gaming licenses do not have an expiration date.
There are continuing licensure requirements for all officers, directors, key employees and persons who own directly or indirectly 10% or more of a Licensed Agent, which licensure requirements shall include the satisfaction of such security, fitness and background standards as the Lottery Director may deem necessary relating to competence, honesty and integrity, such that a person’s reputation, habits and associations do not pose a threat to the public interest of the State or to the reputation of or effective regulation and control of the video lottery; it being specifically understood that any person convicted of any felony, a crime involving gambling, or a crime of moral turpitude within 10 years prior to applying for a license or at any time thereafter shall be deemed unfit.
There are similar licensure requirements for providers of the video lottery (slot) machines and certain companies that seek to provide services to a Licensed Agent.
Revocation, Suspension or Modification of License. The Lottery Director may revoke or suspend the license of a Licensed Agent, such as ours, for “cause.” “Cause” is broadly defined and could potentially include falsifying any application for license or report required by the rules and regulations, the failure to report any information required
5
by the rules and regulations, the material violation of any rules and regulations promulgated by the Lottery Director or any conduct by the licensee which undermines the public confidence in the video lottery system or serves the interest of organized gambling or crime and criminals in any manner. A license may be revoked for an unintentional violation of any federal, state or local law, rule or regulation provided that the violation is not cured within a reasonable time as determined by the Lottery Director. A hearing officer’s decision revoking or suspending the license shall be appealable to the Delaware Superior Court under the provisions of the Administrative Procedures Act. All existing or new officers, directors, key employees and owners of a Licensed Agent are subject to background investigation. Failure to satisfy the background investigation may constitute cause for suspension or revocation of the License.
Ownership Changes. Under Delaware law, a change of ownership of a Licensed Agent will automatically terminate its license 90 days after the change of ownership occurs, unless the Lottery Director determines after application to issue a new license to the new owners. Change of ownership may occur if any new individual or entity acquires, directly or indirectly, 10% or more of the Licensed Agent or if more than 20% of the legal or beneficial interest in the Licensed Agent is transferred, whether by direct or indirect means. The Commission may require extensive background investigations of any new owner acquiring a 10% or greater interest in a Licensed Agent, including criminal background checks. Accordingly, we have a restrictive legend on our shares of common stock which require that (a) any holders of common stock found to be disqualified or unsuitable or not possessing the qualifications required by any appropriate gaming authority could be required to dispose of such stock and (b) any holder of common stock intending to acquire 10% or more of our outstanding common stock must first obtain prior written approval from the Delaware State Lottery Office.
Harness Racing Events. In order to maintain our license for video lottery (slot) machine gaming, we are required to maintain our license for harness horse racing with the Commission and must conduct a minimum of 80 live race days each racing season, subject to the availability of racing stock.
Control Over Equipment and Technology. We do not own or lease the video lottery (slot) machines or computer systems used by the State in connection with our video lottery gaming operations. The Lottery Director enters into contracts directly with the providers of the video lottery (slot) machines and computer systems (the “Technology Providers”). Equipment is provided to the State by sale or lease and all Technology Providers must be licensed by the Lottery Director. Our operations could be disrupted in the event that a licensed Technology Provider in any way breaches its agreement with the State or ceases to be properly licensed for any reason. Such an event would be outside of our control.
Harness Racing and Pari-Mutuel Wagering
Licensing Requirements. Harness racing in the State of Delaware is governed by the Delaware Harness Racing Commission. We hold a license from the Commission by which we are authorized to hold harness race meetings on our premises and to make, conduct and sell pools by the use of pari-mutuel machines or totalizators. The license must be renewed on an annual basis. The Commission may reject an application for a license for any cause which it deems sufficient and the action of the Commission is final. The Commission may also suspend or revoke a license which it has issued and its action in that respect is final, subject to review, upon questions of law only, by the Superior Court of the County within which the license was granted. The action of the Commission stands unless and until reversed by the Court. We have received an annual license from the Commission for the past 38 consecutive years and management believes that our relationship with the Commission remains good. However, there can be no assurances that we will continue to be licensed by the Commission in the future.
Under the law, the Commission has broad powers of supervision and regulation. The Commission may prescribe rules, regulations and conditions under which all harness racing and betting pools shall be conducted; may regulate the performance of any service or the sale of any article on the premises of a licensee; may compel the production of books and documents of a licensee and require that books and records be kept in such manner as the Commission may prescribe; may visit, investigate and place accountants or other persons as it deems necessary, at the expense of a licensee, in the office, track or place of business of a licensee; may summon witnesses and administer oaths; and may require the removal of any employee or official employed by a licensee. All proposed extensions, additions or improvements to the property of a licensee are subject to the approval of the Commission.
6
The Commission is required to inspect a licensee’s racing plant not less than five days prior to a race meeting and may withdraw the license for the meeting if the racing plant is found to be unsafe for animals or persons or is not rendered safe prior to the opening of the meeting. A licensee must deposit with the Commission, ten days before a race meeting, a policy of insurance against personal injury liability in an amount to be approved by the Commission.
USTA. Any license granted by the Commission is also subject to such reasonable rules and regulations as may be prescribed from time to time by the United States Trotting Association (“USTA”). The USTA sets various rules relating to the conduct of harness racing. According to its Articles of Incorporation, the purposes of the USTA shall include the improvement of the breed of trotting and pacing horses, the establishment of rules regulating standards and the registration of such horses thereunder, the advancement and promotion of the interest of harness racing in the United States, the investigation, ascertainment and registration of the pedigrees of such horses, the regulation and government of the conduct of the sport of harness racing, the establishment of rules for the conduct thereof, not inconsistent with the laws of the various states, and the sanctioning of the holding of exhibitions of such horses and meetings for the racing thereof, the issuance of licenses to qualified persons to officiate at harness race meetings and exhibitions, the issuance of licenses to the owners of horses permitting the exhibition and racing of such horses and the qualification thereof, the issuance of licenses to drivers of horses participating in such races or exhibitions, and providing for the enforcement of the rules promulgated by the USTA, and providing for the fixing of penalties, fines, and the suspension or expulsion from membership, or privileges or for any other misconduct detrimental to the sport.
Gaming Taxes and Fees
We believe that the prospect of significant additional tax revenue is one of the primary reasons why jurisdictions have legalized gaming. As a result, gaming operators are typically subject to significant taxes and fees in addition to normal federal and state corporate income taxes. These taxes and fees are subject to increase at any time. We pay substantial taxes and fees with respect to our operations and would likely incur similar burdens in any other jurisdiction in which we may conduct gaming operations in the future.
Compliance with Other Laws
We are subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations in addition to gaming regulations. These laws and regulations include, but are not limited to, restrictions and conditions concerning alcoholic beverages, environmental matters, employees, currency transactions, taxation, zoning and building codes, and marketing and advertising.
The Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) requires operators of casinos located in the United States to file information returns for United States citizens, including names and addresses of winners, for all winnings in excess of stipulated amounts. The IRS also requires operators to withhold taxes on certain winnings.
Regulations adopted by the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network of the Treasury Department (“FinCEN”) require us to report currency transactions in excess of stipulated amounts occurring within a gaming day, including identification of the patron by name and social security number. FinCEN has also established regulations that require us to file suspicious activity reports on all transactions that we know, suspect, or have reason to suspect fall into specific categories that are deemed to be suspicious. We believe our programs meet the requirements of the applicable regulations.
Laws and regulations are always subject to change, can be interpreted differently in the future, and new laws and regulations may be enacted which could adversely affect the tax, regulatory, operational or other aspects of the gaming industry and our company. Furthermore, noncompliance with one or more of these laws and regulation could result in the imposition of substantial penalties against us.
7
Competition
The gaming industry in the United States is intensely competitive and features many participants, including riverboat casinos, dockside casinos, land-based casinos, video lottery (slot) and poker machines, whether or not located in casinos, native American gaming, pari-mutuel wagering on live and simulcast horse racing, off-track betting, state run lotteries, internet gambling and other forms of gambling. Gaming competition is particularly intense in each of these sectors.
We compete in local and regional markets with horse tracks, off-track betting parlors, state run lotteries, casinos and other gaming facilities. We cannot be certain that we will maintain our market share or compete more effectively with our competitors. The introduction or expansion of gaming in neighboring jurisdictions, particularly Maryland, Virginia, West Virginia, Washington, D.C., Pennsylvania or New Jersey, or the legalization of additional gaming venues in Delaware, could have a material adverse effect on our cash flows and results of operations. Approximately 70% of our Capital Club member slot win comes from out of state patrons. In July 2004, Pennsylvania adopted legislation which authorizes up to 61,000 slot machines at various existing and proposed venues throughout the state. It is difficult for us to predict the effect that such legislation will have on us, but several of these facilities in Pennsylvania began operations in the latter half of 2006. Pennsylvania has one of the highest effective tax rates on slot machine gaming in the country and charges an up front $50,000,000 license fee to the horse racing and casino venues that are granted a gaming license. Management has estimated that slot win from Pennsylvania patrons represents approximately 5% of our total slot win.
Pennsylvania, Maryland and New Jersey all have state-run lotteries. Atlantic City, New Jersey is located approximately 100 miles from our entertainment facility and offers a full range of gaming products. Maryland, Virginia and Washington, D.C. do not permit video lottery (slot) machine operations.
Competition in horse racing is varied since racetracks in the surrounding area differ in many respects. Some tracks only offer thoroughbred or harness horse racing; others have both. Tracks have live racing seasons that may or may not overlap with neighboring tracks. Depending on the purse structure, tracks that are farther apart may compete with each other more for quality horses than for patrons.
Live harness racing also competes with simulcasts of thoroughbred and harness racing. All racetracks in the region are involved with simulcasting. In addition, a number of off-track betting parlors compete with track simulcasting activities. With respect to the simulcasting of our live harness races to tracks and other locations, our simulcast signals are in direct competition with live races at the receiving track and other races being simulcast to the receiving location.
Within the State of Delaware, we face little direct live competition from the State’s other two tracks. Harrington Raceway, a south central Delaware fairgrounds track, conducts harness horse racing periodically between May and November. There is no overlap presently with our live race season. Delaware Park, a northern Delaware track, conducts thoroughbred horse racing from April through mid-November. Its race season only overlaps with ours for approximately six weeks each year.
We compete with harness and thoroughbred racing and simulcasting facilities in the neighboring states of Pennsylvania, Maryland and New Jersey. We also receive simulcast harness and thoroughbred races from approximately 80 race tracks.
Competition for our hotel varies and consists of local and regional competition. With respect to hotel accommodations only, we compete with a variety of nearby hotels in the Dover area; however, few of these offer the luxury accommodations that we offer. Our hotel is the only hotel in the Dover area, and one of only three hotels in the State, to receive the AAA Four Diamond Award. With respect to trade shows, conferences, concerts and hotel room packages tied to these events or tied to our casino and other gaming offerings, we compete at a regional level with the other gaming operations referred to above and with convention centers and larger hotels in major cities such as Philadelphia, Washington, D.C., Baltimore and Wilmington.
In addition, our activities compete with other leisure, entertainment and recreational activities.
8
Growth Strategies
We offer a unique gaming and entertainment experience and make available to our patrons a number of different options: slot machine gaming, live harness horse racing, fine dining, national recording and entertainment acts, live boxing and simulcasting of thoroughbred and harness horse races from across North America. Our mission is simple: to provide all of our customers a premier gaming and entertainment experience with a focus on unparalleled customer service. Our growth strategy is to foster customer loyalty by following this mission, focus on our most valuable customers, expand and improve the quality of our slot gaming positions, enhance our gaming products with additional entertainment offerings and create an exciting gaming environment while focusing on areas that we believe will increase our revenue and profitability. Our efforts in this regard include the following:
Increase The Utilization Of Our Casino
We use a sophisticated database marketing program to enable us to develop long-term relationships with our patrons and to target promotions to specific customer segments. Our Capital Club, a slots players club and tracking system, allows us to identify customers and to reward their level of play through various marketing programs. Membership in this club currently stands at approximately 143,000 active patrons. This state-of-the-art customer management and slot data system allows us to market our property more effectively and has allowed for the conversion of a majority of our casino floor to ticket-in, ticket-out (cashless) technology. As of December 31, 2006, we have converted virtually our entire casino floor to ticket-in, ticket-out technology. We expect to increase attendance at both our casino and hotel through effective promotional use of our database and by making improvements to our facilities and gaming offerings based on what we learn from our Capital Club members. For example, we continue to add machines with differing denominations and progressive slot machines with large jackpot sizes because they offer patrons a more exciting gaming experience. Additionally, we have recently added multi-player electronic table games, such as Blackjack and Poker, which seat up to five players in an interactive setting that features a virtual dealer.
In the first quarter of 2006, the State of Delaware passed legislation which allowed us to expand our operating hours, add additional slot machines and provide free promotional play through our recently enhanced slots marketing system. We now operate 24 hours per day, except on Sunday morning from 6am to noon. The legislation increased the number of allowable slot machines for each of the three licensed facilities in Delaware from 2,500 to 4,000. Each slot machine in excess of 2,500 requires payment of an annual fee of $1,100 per machine for the first 500 machines added, $700 per machine for the next 500 machines added, and $300 per machine for the last 500 machines added. In July of 2006, we converted 4,000 square-feet of space within our existing complex to gaming space and we added more than 200 new machines. We have determined that there is a demand for additional machines and amenities and are proceeding with our plans to expand the casino facility. We are currently finalizing a bid package for the Phase VI expansion of our casino which is expected to include additional casino space, as well as restaurant and retail offerings.
On May 30, 2003, a committee created by the Delaware House of Representatives issued a favorable assessment as to the merits of conducting sports wagering in the State through its three video lottery agents. The Committee concluded that sports gaming is feasible in the State, outlined proposed structures for its implementation and provided various financial projections. The report has been provided to the Delaware General Assembly for consideration. By Federal law, Delaware is the only state east of Montana, and one of only four states in the United States, where sports betting is legally permitted. Enabling legislation needed to establish sports gaming operations at our property is being discussed by the Delaware legislature.
Capitalize On Our Luxury Hotel
Our luxury hotel facility, the Dover Downs Hotel, is located adjacent to our casino. It is the only hotel in the Dover area, and one of only three hotels in the State, to receive the AAA Four Diamond Award. The facility was completed in April 2002 and includes 232 rooms, a multi-purpose ballroom/concert hall, a fine dining restaurant, swimming pool and health spa. Construction that occurred simultaneously with building the hotel included, among other things, building a new 425-seat buffet restaurant and renovating the enclosed harness racing grandstand with state-of-the-art simulcasting facilities. By offering a wide range of entertainment options to our patrons, including
9
concerts featuring prominent entertainers, live boxing, gourmet dining, trade shows and conferences, we are able to attract new patrons and lengthen the stay of current patrons.
On March 16, 2006, we announced an expansion plan that will more than double the number of hotel rooms from 232 to 500, including eleven luxury spa suites, and add a luxurious 6,000 square-foot spa to the Dover Downs Hotel. Construction began in the second quarter of 2006 and is expected to be completed in the fall of 2007. The estimated cost of the expansion is $53,600,000, of which approximately $16,400,000 was paid through 2006.
Increase Wagering On Live Harness Horse Racing Through Increased Purse Levels
With a percentage of video lottery (slot) machine revenues supplementing the purses for the horsemen, we have experienced dramatic increases in the amount of our purses. By the end of our 2005-2006 season, our average daily purse distribution increased to approximately $200,000 from $8,000 in 1995. The result is that we continue to attract higher quality horses. We have prestigious events such as our annual “Progress Pace” with an estimated $400,000 purse, an event which attracts the country’s top three-year-old horses. Bettors are attracted to races with larger purses and typically wager more on the higher quality and more predictable horses. We have also completed various upgrades to enhance the harness horse racing facilities, including renovations to the track and grounds, receiving barn and paddock areas and, more recently, our simulcast parlor which has state-of-the-art facilities that allow year round wagering. We continue to focus on improvements that we believe allow us to increase attendance and wagering, including wagering on our events from other tracks and off-track wagering facilities that receive our racing signal.
Seasonality
Our quarterly operating results are affected by weather and the general economic conditions in the United States. Our quarterly operating results are generally distributed evenly throughout the year. However, the results for any quarter are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected in any future period.
Employees
As of December 31, 2006, we had 772 full-time employees and 116 part-time employees. We engage temporary personnel to assist during our live harness racing season. None of our employees are party to a collective bargaining agreement and we believe that our relationship with our employees is good.
Available Information
We file annual, quarterly and current reports, information statements and other information with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). The public may read and copy any materials we file with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC also maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. The address of that site is http://www.sec.gov.
Internet Address
We maintain a website where additional information concerning our business and various upcoming events can be found. The address of our Internet website is http://www.doverdowns.com. We provide a link on our website, under Investor Relations, to our filings with the SEC, including our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and all amendments to those reports.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Disclosure regarding the most significant factors that may adversely affect our business, operations, industry or financial position or our future financial performance is set forth under the section entitled, “Factors That May Affect Operating Results; Forward-Looking Statements,” beginning on page 21.
10
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
We have not received any written comments that were issued more than 180 days before December 31, 2006, the end of the fiscal year covered by this report, from the SEC staff regarding our periodic or current reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 that remain unresolved.
Item 2. Properties
We own our principal executive office located in Dover, Delaware; Dover Downs Slots—our 97,000 square-foot casino; the Dover Downs Hotel—featuring luxury accommodations with conference, banquet, fine dining, ballroom and concert hall facilities; and the Dover Downs Raceway—indoor grandstands, betting and simulcasting parlors, all of which are located at our entertainment complex situated on approximately 69 acres of land owned by us.
Our use of DVD’s 5/8-mile harness racing track is pursuant to an easement granted to us by DVD which does not require the payment of any rent. Under the terms of the easement, we have exclusive use of the harness track during the period beginning November 1 of each year and ending April 30 of the following year, together with set up and tear down rights for the two weeks before and after such period. The harness track is located on property owned by DVD and is on the inside of DVD’s motorsports superspeedway. Our indoor grandstands are used by DVD at no charge in connection with its major motorsports events. DVD also leases its principal office space from us. Various easements and agreements relative to access, utilities and parking have also been entered into between DVD and us relative to our respective Dover, Delaware facilities.
Intellectual Property
We have various registered and common law trademark rights, including, but not limited to, ”Dover Downs Gaming & Entertainment,” “Dover Downs,” “Dover Downs Raceway,” “Dover Downs Slots,” “Capital Club,” “Capital Gold,” “Capital Platinum,” “Dover Downs Hotel & Casino,” “Dover Downs is Cooking,” “Sweet Perks,” “Gazebo Bar,” “Winners Circle,” “Michele’s at Dover Downs,” “Rollins Center,” “$1 Million Jackpot Slot,” “Come Play!.” We also have limited rights to use the names and logos of other businesses in connection with promoting our facilities and special events at those facilities. Due to the value of our intellectual property rights for promotional purposes, it is our intention to vigorously protect these rights, through litigation, if necessary.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
We are a party to ordinary routine litigation incidental to our business. Management does not believe that the resolution of any of these matters is likely to have a serious negative effect on our financial condition, cash flows or profitability.
Item 4. Submission Of Matters To A Vote Of Security Holders
No matters were submitted during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year covered by this report to a vote of security holders.
Part II
Item 5. Market For Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters And Issuer Purchases Of Equity Securities
Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol “DDE.” Our Class A common stock is not publicly traded but is freely convertible on a one-for-one basis into common stock at any time at the option of the holder thereof. As of February 28, 2007, there were 15,642,707 shares of common stock and 17,003,173 shares of Class A common stock outstanding. There were 1,059 holders of record for common stock and 14 holders of record for Class A common stock.
11
The high and low sales prices for our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange and the dividends declared per share for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 are detailed in the following table.
Quarter Ended: |
|
|
| High |
| Low |
| Dividends |
| |||
December 31, 2006 |
| $ | 15.50 |
| $ | 11.89 |
| $ | 0.045 |
| ||
September 30, 2006 |
| $ | 20.60 |
| $ | 11.73 |
| $ | 0.045 |
| ||
June 30, 2006 |
| $ | 20.15 |
| $ | 14.53 |
| $ | 0.045 |
| ||
March 31, 2006 |
| $ | 14.70 |
| $ | 9.33 |
| $ | 0.040 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
December 31, 2005 |
| $ | 9.63 |
| $ | 7.97 |
| $ | 0.040 |
| ||
September 30, 2005 |
| $ | 10.09 |
| $ | 8.67 |
| $ | 0.040 |
| ||
June 30, 2005 |
| $ | 9.20 |
| $ | 7.67 |
| $ | 0.040 |
| ||
March 31, 2005 |
| $ | 9.72 |
| $ | 7.73 |
| $ | 0.040 |
|
The amounts for 2005 and the quarters ended March 31, 2006 and June 30, 2006 have been adjusted to reflect the three-for-two split of our common stock and Class A common stock which was effective June 15, 2006.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
We have a stock incentive plan which provides for the grant of up to 2,250,000 shares of common stock to our officers and key employees through stock options and/or awards valued in whole or in part by reference to our common stock, such as restricted stock awards. Refer to NOTE 8-Stockholders’ Equity to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this document for further discussion. Securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans at December 31, 2006 are as follows:
|
|
|
| Number of |
| Weighted-average |
| Number of securities |
| |
|
| (a) |
| (b) |
| (c) |
| |||
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders |
| 953,749 |
| $ | 6.86 |
| 959,909 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| |||
Total |
| 953,749 |
| $ | 6.86 |
| 959,909 |
|
On October 23, 2002, our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to 3,000,000 shares of our outstanding common stock. The purchases may be made in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions as conditions warrant. The repurchase authorization does not obligate us to acquire any specific number of shares and may be suspended at any time. At December 31, 2006, we had remaining repurchase authority of 2,668,733 shares.
On April 26, 2006, our Board of Directors approved a three-for-two split of both classes of our common stock. The split was effected in the form of a stock dividend by issuing one additional share of stock for every two shares of stock held. On June 15, 2006, 4,967,650 shares of common stock and 5,837,343 shares of Class A common stock were distributed to shareholders of record at the close of business on May 10, 2006. No fractional shares were issued. Shareholders were paid cash in lieu of any fractional shares. All share and per share amounts have been restated to give effect to the stock split.
12
Common Stock Performance
The graph below compares the cumulative total return of the following:
· our Common Stock;
· the Russell 2000 Index; and
· an index of peer companies.
The peer index we selected consists of the following companies engaged in the gaming business: Dover Downs Gaming & Entertainment, Inc., MTR Gaming Group, Inc., Ameristar Casinos, Inc., Penn National Gaming, Inc., Churchill Downs, Inc., Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc., and Magna Entertainment Corp. The graph assumes that the value of the investment in our Common Stock and each index was 100 at April 1, 2002 (the date of our spin-off from Dover Motorsports, Inc.) and all dividends were reinvested. The comparisons in this table are required by the Securities and Exchange Commission and, therefore, are not intended to forecast or be necessarily indicative of any future return on our Common Stock.
COMPARISON OF 57 MONTH CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN*
AMONG DOVER DOWNS GAMING & ENTERTAINMENT, INC., THE RUSSELL 2000 INDEX
AND A PEER GROUP
* $100 invested on April 1, 2002 in stock or index—including reinvestment of dividends. Fiscal year ending December 31.
13
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
The table below has selected consolidated financial data from our consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005, 2004, 2003 and 2002. This information should be read together with Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and our consolidated financial statements and notes contained elsewhere in this document.
Five Year Selected Financial Data
|
| Years Ended December 31, |
| |||||||||||||
|
| 2006 |
| 2005 |
| 2004 |
| 2003 |
| 2002 |
| |||||
Consolidated Statement of Earnings Data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Gaming |
| $ | 220,412 |
| $ | 202,372 |
| $ | 193,922 |
| $ | 175,023 |
| $ | 193,723 |
|
Other operating |
| 16,039 |
| 14,480 |
| 13,822 |
| 13,809 |
| 12,752 |
| |||||
|
| 236,451 |
| 216,852 |
| 207,744 |
| 188,832 |
| 206,475 |
| |||||
Less — non-recurring gaming charge (a) |
| — |
| — |
| 448 |
| — |
| — |
| |||||
|
| 236,451 |
| 216,852 |
| 207,296 |
| 188,832 |
| 206,475 |
| |||||
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Gaming |
| 163,288 |
| 151,973 |
| 152,725 |
| 138,423 |
| 148,817 |
| |||||
Non-recurring gaming charge (a) |
| — |
| — |
| 1,802 |
| — |
| — |
| |||||
Other operating |
| 14,202 |
| 13,167 |
| 13,013 |
| 9,899 |
| 10,351 |
| |||||
General and administrative |
| 5,905 |
| 4,765 |
| 4,603 |
| 4,317 |
| 5,061 |
| |||||
Depreciation |
| 7,146 |
| 6,998 |
| 6,791 |
| 6,287 |
| 5,176 |
| |||||
|
| 190,541 |
| 176,903 |
| 178,934 |
| 158,926 |
| 169,405 |
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Gain on sale of shopping center (b) |
| — |
| 5,837 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| |||||
Operating earnings |
| 45,910 |
| 45,786 |
| 28,362 |
| 29,906 |
| 37,070 |
| |||||
Interest expense |
| (2,943 | ) | (1,875 | ) | (762 | ) | (842 | ) | (903 | ) | |||||
Earnings before income taxes |
| 42,967 |
| 43,911 |
| 27,600 |
| 29,064 |
| 36,167 |
| |||||
Income taxes |
| (17,639 | ) | (17,871 | ) | (11,219 | ) | (11,827 | ) | (14,725 | ) | |||||
Net earnings |
| $ | 25,328 |
| $ | 26,040 |
| $ | 16,381 |
| $ | 17,237 |
| $ | 21,442 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Net earnings per common share (d): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Basic |
| $ | 0.78 |
| $ | 0.73 |
| $ | 0.41 |
| $ | 0.43 |
| $ | 0.53 |
|
Diluted |
| $ | 0.77 |
| $ | 0.72 |
| $ | 0.41 |
| $ | 0.43 |
| $ | 0.53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Dividends declared per common share (d) |
| $ | 0.175 |
| $ | 0.16 |
| $ | 0.15 |
| $ | 0.13 |
| $ | 0.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Selected Consolidated Operating Data (unaudited): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Average number of slot machines |
| 2,599 |
| 2,500 |
| 2,432 |
| 2,000 |
| 2,000 |
| |||||
Casino square-footage |
| 97,000 |
| 91,000 |
| 91,000 |
| 80,000 |
| 80,000 |
|
|
| December 31, |
| |||||||||||||
|
| 2006 |
| 2005 |
| 2004 |
| 2003 |
| 2002 |
| |||||
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data (in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Working capital |
| $ | 11,979 |
| $ | 9,216 |
| $ | 8,505 |
| $ | 8,917 |
| $ | 7,117 |
|
Total assets |
| 173,027 |
| 153,461 |
| 160,300 |
| 152,159 |
| 152,506 |
| |||||
Long-term debt (b) |
| 59,425 |
| 24,075 |
| 51,950 |
| 31,225 |
| 40,890 |
| |||||
Total stockholders’ equity (c) |
| 77,259 |
| 93,270 |
| 72,770 |
| 94,975 |
| 84,439 |
| |||||
(a) Effective December 2004, we changed our policy relating to our point loyalty program to allow points earned by customers to be redeemed for cash under certain circumstances. As a result, we recorded a non-recurring charge of $2,250,000 ($1,338,000 after income tax benefit) in the fourth quarter of 2004 to record the net impact of the program change. The estimated amount of points redeemable for cash was recorded as a reduction of revenue and the estimated amount of points redeemable for services and merchandise was recorded as gaming expense.
14
(b) On December 28, 2005, we closed on the sale of a shopping center we owned in Dover, Delaware. The sales price was $12,450,000 and we recognized a gain on the sale of $5,837,000 ($3,461,000 after income taxes). The proceeds from the sale were used to pay down outstanding amounts on our credit facility.
(c) On November 10, 2004, we commenced a tender offer to purchase up to 1,560,632 shares of our common stock and up to 2,411,259 shares of our Class A common stock at a fixed price of $8.00 per share. The offer expired on December 10, 2004. We purchased 1,560,632 shares of our common stock and 2,400,000 shares of our Class A common stock for $32,045,000, including expenses, in connection with the tender offer.
On December 19, 2005, we commenced a tender offer to purchase up to 1,595,906 shares of our common stock and up to 1,988,202 shares of our Class A common stock at a fixed price of $9.67 per share. The offer expired on January 19, 2006. We purchased 1,595,906 shares of our common stock and 1,987,500 shares of our Class A common stock for $34,996,000, including expenses, in connection with the tender offer.
(d) On April 26, 2006, our Board of Directors approved a three-for-two split of both classes of our common stock. The split was effected in the form of a stock dividend by issuing one additional share of stock for every two shares of stock held. On June 15, 2006, 4,967,650 shares of common stock and 5,837,343 shares of Class A common stock were distributed to shareholders of record at the close of business on May 10, 2006. No fractional shares were issued. Shareholders were paid cash in lieu of any fractional shares. All share and per share amounts have been restated to give effect to the stock split.
Item 7. Management’s Discussion And Analysis Of Financial Condition And Results Of Operations
The following discussion is based upon and should be read together with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this document.
Dover Downs Gaming & Entertainment, Inc. is a diversified gaming and entertainment company whose operations consist of Dover Downs Slots — a 97,000 square-foot video lottery (slots) casino complex; the Dover Downs Hotel — featuring luxury accommodations with conference, banquet, fine dining, ballroom and concert hall facilities; and Dover Downs Raceway — a harness racing track with pari-mutuel wagering on live and simulcast horse races.
Approximately 90% of our revenue is derived from video lottery (slot) machine win. Several factors contribute to the video lottery (slot) machine win for any gaming company, including, but not limited to:
· Proximity to major population bases,
· Competition in our market,
· The quantity and types of slot machines available,
· The quality of the physical property,
· Other amenities offered on site,
· Customer service levels, and
· Marketing programs.
We believe that we hold a strong position in each of these areas. Our entertainment complex is located in Dover, the capital of the State of Delaware. We draw patrons from several major metropolitan areas. Philadelphia, Baltimore and Washington, D.C. are all within a two hour drive. According to the 2000 United States Census, approximately 32.8 million people live within 150 miles of our complex. There are significant barriers to entry related to the gaming business in Delaware. By law, only three existing horse racing facilities in the State are allowed to have a gaming license. Our property, designed and developed with the assistance of Caesars, is similar to properties found in the country’s largest gaming markets. We offer the only luxury hotel in the Delaware gaming market, providing a strong marketing tool, especially to higher-end players. We also utilize our recently improved slot marketing system to allow for the most efficient marketing programs and the highest levels of customer service.
15
Because all of our operations are located at one facility, we face the risk of increased competition from the legalization of new or additional gaming venues. We have therefore focused on creating the region’s premier gaming destination and building and rewarding customer loyalty through innovative marketing efforts and unparalleled customer service.
Results of Operations
Gaming revenues represent (i) the net win from video lottery (slot) machine wins and losses and (ii) commissions from pari-mutuel wagering. Other operating revenues consist of hotel rooms revenue, food and beverage sales and other miscellaneous income. Revenues do not include the retail amount of hotel rooms, food and beverage and other miscellaneous goods and services provided without charge to customers as promotional items. The estimated direct cost of providing these items has been charged to the casino through interdepartmental allocations and is included in gaming expenses in the consolidated statement of earnings.
For the video lottery operations, the difference between the amount wagered by bettors and the amount paid out to bettors is referred to as the win. The win is included in the amount recorded in our consolidated financial statements as gaming revenue. The Delaware State Lottery Office sweeps the win from the video lottery operations, collects the State’s share of the win and the amount due to the vendors under contract with the State who provide the video lottery (slot) machines and associated computer systems, collects the amount allocable to purses for harness horse racing and remits the remainder to us as our commission for acting as a Licensed Agent. Gaming expenses include the amounts collected by the State (i) for the State’s share of the win, (ii) for remittance to the providers of the video lottery (slot) machines and associated computer systems, and (iii) for harness horse racing purses. We recognize revenues from pari-mutuel commissions earned from live harness horse racing and importing of simulcast signals from other race tracks when the race occurs. Revenues from hotel rooms, food and beverage sales and other miscellaneous income are recognized at the time the service is provided.
Year Ended December 31, 2006 vs. Year Ended December 31, 2005
Gaming revenues increased by $18,040,000, or 8.9%, to $220,412,000 in 2006, primarily the result of increased play in our casino. We believe that the increase in casino play can be attributed to the conversion of 4,000 square-feet of space within our existing complex to gaming space which allowed us to add more than 200 new machines, our marketing efforts using our player database which allows us to target specific customer segments, and our efforts to provide our customers with enhanced video lottery (slot) products and other amenities. Our average number of machines increased from 2,500 in 2005 to 2,599 in 2006.
Other operating revenues were $16,039,000 in 2006 as compared to $14,480,000 in 2005. Net rooms revenue increased $617,000 in 2006 compared to 2005 primarily due to an increase in cash sales and fewer rooms being provided to customers on a complimentary basis. Net food and beverage revenues increased $1,168,000 to $10,946,000 from $9,778,000 in 2005 primarily due to an increase in sales at our premium buffet restaurant, an increase in banquet sales and the opening of a new coffee shop in our hotel lobby during the second quarter of 2006. The remainder of the other operating revenue increase resulted mainly from an increase in concert ticket sales. Partially offsetting these increases was a loss of $752,000 of rental income from a property we sold in December 2005. Other operating revenues do not include the retail amount of promotional allowances which are provided to customers on a complimentary basis of $15,152,000 and $15,103,000 in 2006 and 2005, respectively. Promotional allowances represented 48.6% and 51.1% of gross other operating revenues in 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Gaming expenses increased by $11,315,000, or 7.4%, reflecting the higher gaming revenues. Amounts retained by the State of Delaware and the amount collected by the State for payment to the vendors under contract with the State who provide the video lottery (slot) machines and associated computer systems increased by $6,793,000 and $1,629,000, respectively. Additionally, amounts allocated from the video lottery operation for harness horse racing purses increased from $23,292,000 in 2005 to $25,333,000 in 2006.
Other operating expenses increased by $1,035,000, or 7.9%, slightly less than the percentage increase in revenues. Expenses related to our rooms operations increased by $236,000. Expenses related to our food and beverage operations were $11,815,000 in 2006 as compared to $10,999,000 in 2005. The increase resulted primarily from higher payroll costs and increased food costs and supplies expenses due to the increase in food and beverage sales. Additionally, fewer
16
expenses were allocated to the gaming operations through interdepartmental charges in 2006 since a lower percentage of gross revenues represent promotional items provided to gaming customers on a complimentary basis.
General and administrative expenses increased by $1,140,000 to $5,905,000 from $4,765,000 in 2005 primarily the result of stock-based compensation expense from the adoption of Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Statement No. 123R effective January 1, 2006, higher wages and benefits costs, increased legal fees and the write-off of office expansion costs.
Depreciation expense increased slightly to $7,146,000 in 2006 from $6,998,000 in 2005. The increase resulted primarily from the improvements to our heating, cooling and lighting systems which were placed in service during the later part of 2006 and the expansion of our gaming space within our existing facility.
Interest expense increased by $1,068,000 due to an increase in our average interest rate from 4.2% during 2005 to 5.9% during 2006 and higher average outstanding borrowings on our credit facility during 2006 as compared to 2005 due primarily to our self-tender in January 2006.
Our effective income tax rates were 41.1% and 40.7% for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The increase in the effective rate was due primarily to the non-deductibility of stock-based compensation expense recorded as a result of adopting FASB Statement No. 123R.
Net earnings were $25,328,000 in 2006 as compared to $26,040,000 in 2005, a decrease of $712,000, or 2.7%.
On December 28, 2005, we closed on the sale of a shopping center we owned in Dover, Delaware. The sales price was $12,450,000 and we recognized a gain on the sale of $5,837,000 ($3,461,000 after income taxes). We believe that excluding the impact of this item will enhance comparative analysis of our operating results. The following table reconciles and compares results reported in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) for 2006 and 2005 with results excluding the impact of the sale of the shopping center in 2005:
| 2006 |
| 2005 |
| |||
GAAP net earnings |
| $ | 25,328,000 |
| $ | 26,040,000 |
|
Gain on sale of shopping center, net of income taxes of $2,376,000 |
| — |
| (3,461,000 | ) | ||
Adjusted net earnings |
| $ | 25,328,000 |
| $ | 22,579,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
GAAP net earnings per common share — diluted |
| $ | 0.77 |
| $ | 0.72 |
|
Gain on sale of shopping center, net of income taxes of $0.07 |
| — |
| (0.09 | ) | ||
Adjusted net earnings per common share — diluted |
| $ | 0.77 |
| $ | 0.63 |
|
Excluding the gain on sale of the shopping center in 2005, adjusted net earnings in 2006 increased $2,749,000, or 12.2%, to $25,328,000 compared to 2005 adjusted net earnings of $22,579,000. The increase was primarily due to the improved results for our gaming operations that resulted from an increase in slot win, partially offset by increased general and administrative, depreciation and interest expenses.
Year Ended December 31, 2005 vs. Year Ended December 31, 2004
Gaming revenues increased by $8,450,000, or 4.4%, to $202,372,000 in 2005, primarily the result of increased play in our casino. During the first quarter of 2004, we added 500 new video lottery (slot) machines which increased our average number of machines from 2,432 in 2004 to 2,500 in 2005.
Other operating revenues were $14,480,000 in 2005 as compared to $13,822,000 in 2004. Net rooms revenue increased $542,000 in 2005 as compared to 2004 primarily due to an increase in cash sales and fewer rooms being provided to customers on a complimentary basis. Net food and beverage revenues increased $680,000 to $9,778,000 from $9,098,000 in 2004 primarily due to higher casino attendance. Partially offsetting these increases was a decrease in concert revenues as a result of us promoting fewer shows in 2005 as compared to 2004, including a large outdoor concert promoted in 2004 that generated revenues of $840,000 which was not promoted in 2005. Other operating revenues do not include the retail amount of promotional allowances which are provided to customers on a complimentary basis of $15,103,000 and $19,973,000 in 2005 and 2004, respectively. The decrease in promotional allowances was primarily
17
due to a decrease in retail room rates. Promotional allowances represented 51% and 59% of gross other operating revenues in 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Gaming expenses decreased by $752,000 primarily due to the fact that we no longer incur expenses associated with a management agreement with Caesars that expired on December 28, 2004. During 2004, we expensed $4,448,000 in gaming expenses pursuant to this agreement. Additionally, we reduced our marketing and advertising costs in 2005 as compared to 2004. Other gaming expenses increased as a result of our increased slot win. Amounts retained by the State of Delaware and the amount collected by the State for payment to the vendors under contract with the State who provide the video lottery (slot) machines and associated computer systems increased by $3,279,000 and $979,000, respectively. Amounts allocated from the video lottery operation for harness horse racing purses increased from $22,269,000 in 2004 to $23,292,000 in 2005.
Other operating expenses increased by $154,000, or 1.2%. Expenses related to our food and beverage operations were $10,999,000 in 2005 as compared to $9,669,000 in 2004. The increase resulted primarily from higher payroll and related employee costs and food costs necessary to support added amenities at our facility, the increase in food and beverage sales and the addition of higher quality menu items. Additionally, fewer expenses were allocated to the gaming operations through interdepartmental charges in 2005 since a lower percentage of gross revenues represent promotional items provided to gaming customers on a complimentary basis as compared to 2004. Partially offsetting these increases was a decrease in concert expenses of $2,599,000 as a result of us promoting fewer shows in 2005 as compared to 2004, including a large outdoor concert promoted in 2004 that was not promoted in 2005.
General and administrative expenses increased by $162,000 to $4,765,000 from $4,603,000 in 2004 primarily the result of higher wages and benefits and pension costs.
Depreciation expense increased to $6,998,000 in 2005 from $6,791,000 in 2004 primarily due to assets being placed in service related to the continued conversion of video lottery (slot) machines to ticket-in, ticket-out (cashless) technology.
Interest expense increased by $1,113,000, primarily due to the increase in average outstanding borrowings during the year under our credit facility resulting from our self tender in the fourth quarter of 2004 and an increase in our average interest rate from 2.33% during 2004 to 4.23% during 2005.
Our effective income tax rates were 40.7% and 40.6% for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Net earnings were $26,040,000 in 2005 as compared to $16,381,000 in 2004, an increase of $9,659,000, or 59.0%.
On December 28, 2005, we closed on the sale of a shopping center we owned in Dover, Delaware. The sales price was $12,450,000 and we recognized a gain on the sale of $5,837,000 ($3,461,000 after income taxes). Additionally, effective December 2004, we changed our policy relating to our point loyalty program to allow points earned by customers to be redeemed for cash under certain circumstances. As a result, we recorded a non-recurring charge of $2,250,000 ($1,338,000 after income tax benefit) in the fourth quarter of 2004 to record the net impact of the program change. We believe that excluding the impact of these items will enhance comparative analysis of our operating results.
The following table reconciles and compares results reported in accordance with GAAP for 2005 and 2004 with results excluding the impact of the sale of the shopping center in 2005 and the change in our point loyalty program in 2004:
| 2005 |
| 2004 |
| |||
GAAP net earnings |
| $ | 26,040,000 |
| $ | 16,381,000 |
|
Gain on sale of shopping center, net of income taxes of $2,376,000 |
| (3,461,000 | ) | — |
| ||
Non-recurring charge for points, net of income tax benefit of $912,000 |
| — |
| 1,338,000 |
| ||
Adjusted net earnings |
| $ | 22,579,000 |
| $ | 17,719,000 |
|
18
| 2005 |
| 2004 |
| |||
GAAP net earnings per common share — diluted |
| $ | 0.72 |
| $ | 0.41 |
|
Gain on sale of shopping center, net of income taxes of $0.07 |
| (0.09 | ) | — |
| ||
Non-recurring charge for points, net of income tax benefit of $0.02 |
| — |
| 0.04 |
| ||
Adjusted net earnings per common share — diluted |
| $ | 0.63 |
| $ | 0.45 |
|
Excluding the gain on sale of the shopping center in 2005 and the net, non-recurring charge for the 2004 change in our point loyalty program, adjusted net earnings in 2005 increased $4,860,000, or 27.4%, to $22,579,000 compared to 2004 adjusted net earnings of $17,719,000. The increase was primarily due to the improved results for our gaming operations that resulted from an increase in slot win and the elimination of the Caesars’ management fee, partially offset by increased general and administrative, depreciation and interest expenses.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Net cash provided by operating activities was $26,791,000 for the year ended December 31, 2006 compared to $29,521,000 for the year ended December 31, 2005. The decrease was primarily due to the timing of income tax payments related to the gain on sale of a shopping center. We sold the shopping center in December 2005; however, the income taxes on the gain on sale were paid in 2006.
Net cash used in investing activities was $22,065,000 for the year ended December 31, 2006 compared to net cash provided by investing activities of $6,406,000 for the year ended December 31, 2005. Capital expenditures of $22,065,000 for 2006 related primarily to the Dover Downs Hotel expansion and the improvements to the heating, cooling and lighting systems for our entire entertainment complex. Capital expenditures of $5,512,000 for 2005 related primarily to the conversion of video lottery (slot) machines to ticket-in, ticket-out (cashless) technology, payments related to our customer management and slot data system and the addition of new harness track lighting. Proceeds from the sale of a shopping center, net of transaction costs, were $11,918,000 and included in cash provided by investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2005.
Net cash used in financing activities was $4,692,000 for the year ended December 31, 2006 compared to $33,629,000 for the year ended December 31, 2005. We had net borrowings under our credit facility of $35,350,000 during 2006 primarily to fund stock repurchases of $35,052,000. We did not repurchase any of our stock in 2005. We made net repayments under our credit facility of $27,875,000 during 2005 which included the use of $11,918,000 of proceeds from the sale of a shopping center. We paid $5,510,000 and $5,737,000 in cash dividends during 2006 and 2005, respectively.
On January 24, 2007, our Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend on both classes of common stock of $0.045 per share. The dividend is payable on March 10, 2007 to shareholders of record at the close of business on February 10, 2007.
On October 23, 2002, our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to 3,000,000 shares of our outstanding common stock. The purchases may be made in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions as conditions warrant. The repurchase authorization does not obligate us to acquire any specific number of shares and may be suspended at any time. No purchases of our equity securities were made pursuant to this authorization during the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005. At December 31, 2006, we had remaining repurchase authority of 2,668,733 shares.
On March 16, 2006, we announced an expansion plan that will more than double the number of hotel rooms from 232 to 500, including eleven luxury spa suites, and add a luxurious 6,000 square-foot spa to the Dover Downs Hotel. Construction began in the second quarter of 2006 and is expected to be completed in the fall of 2007. The estimated cost of the hotel expansion is $53,600,000, of which approximately $16,400,000 was paid through 2006 with the remainder expected to be paid in 2007. We are currently finalizing a bid package for the Phase VI expansion of our casino which is expected to include additional casino space, as well as restaurant and retail offerings. Although we are currently unable to estimate the cost of the casino expansion, approximately $350,000 was paid in 2006 with the remainder of the expenditures expected to be paid in 2007 and early 2008. Based on current business conditions, we expect to make additional capital expenditures of approximately $5,500,000 during 2007, primarily for casino equipment and improvements, an improved surveillance system and improvements in our
19
food and beverage departments. Additionally, we expect to contribute approximately $1,000,000 to our pension plans in 2007.
On December 19, 2005, we commenced a tender offer to purchase up to 1,595,906 shares of our common stock and up to 1,988,202 shares of our Class A common stock at a fixed price of $9.67 per share. The offer expired on January 19, 2006. We purchased 1,595,906 shares of our common stock and 1,987,500 shares of our Class A common stock for $34,996,000, including expenses, in connection with the tender offer. The tender offer was funded with borrowings on our unsecured revolving line of credit.
We have a $105,000,000 credit facility with Wilmington Trust Company that expires on April 17, 2011. Interest is based, at our option, upon LIBOR plus a margin that varies between 75 and 125 basis points depending on the ratio of funded debt to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (the “leverage ratio”) or the base rate (the greater of the prime rate or the federal funds rate plus 0.5%) less a margin that varies between 50 and 100 basis points depending on the leverage ratio. The credit facility has minimum net worth, interest coverage and maximum leverage requirements. Material adverse changes in our results of operations could impact our ability to satisfy these requirements. The facility is for seasonal funding needs, capital improvements (including our hotel expansion) and other general corporate purposes. At December 31, 2006, we were in compliance with all terms of the facility and there was $59,425,000 outstanding at a weighted average interest rate of 6.2%. At December 31, 2006, $45,575,000 was available pursuant to the facility.
We expect that our net cash flows from operating activities and funds available from our credit facility will be sufficient to provide for our working capital needs and capital spending requirements at least through the next twelve months, as well as any cash dividends our Board of Directors may declare. We expect cash flows from operating activities and funds available from our credit facility to also provide for long-term liquidity.
The introduction or expansion of gaming in and around our market area could have a material adverse effect on our cash flows and results of operations. See Part I, Item 1 — Business included elsewhere in this document for further discussion.
Contractual Obligations
At December 31, 2006, we had the following contractual obligations:
|
|
|
| Payments Due by Period |
| |||||||||||
|
| Total |
| 2007 |
| 2008 — 2009 |
| 2010 — 2011 |
| Thereafter |
| |||||
Revolving line of credit |
| $ | 59,425,000 |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | 59,425,000 |
| $ | — |
|
Estimated interest payments on revolving line of credit |
| 15,900,000 |
| 3,700,000 |
| 7,400,000 |
| 4,800,000 |
| — |
| |||||
Pension contributions |
| 5,000,000 |
| 1,000,000 |
| 2,000,000 |
| 2,000,000 |
| — |
| |||||
Purchase obligations |
| 37,200,000 |
| 37,200,000 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| |||||
|
| $ | 117,525,000 |
| $ | 41,900,000 |
| $ | 9,400,000 |
| $ | 66,225,000 |
| $ | — |
|
The future interest payments on our revolving credit agreement were estimated using the current outstanding principal as of December 31, 2006 and related interest rates.
Although we have no required minimum contribution related to our pension plans, we expect to contribute approximately $1,000,000 per year to the plans.
At December 31, 2006, we have purchase obligations related to the expansion of the Dover Downs Hotel. On March 16, 2006, we announced an expansion plan that will more than double the number of hotel rooms from 232 to 500, including eleven luxury spa suites, and add a luxurious 6,000 square-foot spa to the Dover Downs Hotel. Construction began in the second quarter of 2006 and is expected to be completed in the fall of 2007. The estimated cost of the expansion is $53,600,000, of which approximately $16,400,000 was paid through 2006.
20
Related Party Transactions
See NOTE 9 — Related Party Transactions to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this document for a full description of related party transactions.
Critical Accounting Policies
The accounting policies described below are those considered critical by us in preparing our consolidated financial statements and/or include significant estimates made by management using information available at the time the estimates are made. As described below, these estimates could change materially if different information or assumptions were used.
Points Program
We currently have a point loyalty program for our video lottery customers which allows them to earn points based on the volume of their video lottery activity. The points may be redeemed for various services and merchandise throughout the gaming facility and for cash under certain circumstances. All reward points earned by customers are expensed in the period they are earned. The estimated amount of points redeemable for cash is recorded as a reduction of revenue and the estimated amount of points redeemable for services and merchandise is recorded as gaming expense. In determining the amount of the liability, which was $2,010,000 and $2,289,000, respectively, at December 31, 2006 and 2005, we estimate a redemption rate, a cost of rewards to be offered and the mix of cash, goods and services for which reward points will be redeemed. We use historical data to estimate those amounts.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are recorded at cost. Depreciation is provided for financial reporting purposes using the straight-line method over estimated useful lives ranging from 5 to 10 years for furniture, fixtures and equipment and up to 40 years for facilities. These estimates require assumptions that are believed to be reasonable. We perform reviews for impairment of long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. No such events or changes in circumstances have occurred to date. An impairment loss would be measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds its fair value. Generally, fair value will be determined using valuation techniques such as the present value of future cash flows.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
See NOTE 2—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this document for a full description of recent accounting pronouncements including the expected dates of adoption and effects on results of operations and financial condition.
Factors That May Affect Operating Results; Forward-Looking Statements
In addition to historical information, this Annual Report on Form 10-K includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, relating to our financial condition, profitability, liquidity, resources, business outlook, proposed acquisitions, market forces, corporate strategies, consumer preferences, contractual commitments, legal matters, capital requirements and other matters. The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a safe harbor for forward-looking statements. To comply with the terms of the safe harbor, we note that a variety of factors could cause our actual results and experience to differ substantially from the anticipated results or other expectations expressed in our forward-looking statements. When words and expressions such as: “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “plans,” “intends,” “objectives,” “goals,” “aims,” “projects,” “forecasts,” “possible,” “seeks,” “may,” “could,” “should,” “might,” “likely,” “enable” or similar words or expressions are used in this document, as well as statements containing phrases such as “in our view,” “there can be no assurance,” “although no assurance can be given” or “there is no way to anticipate with certainty,” forward-looking statements are being made.
21
Various risks and uncertainties may affect the operation, performance, development and results of our business and could cause future outcomes to differ materially from those set forth in our forward-looking statements, including the following factors:
· success of any expansion to or renovation of our existing facilities or changes in our growth strategies;
· expansion of gaming in neighboring jurisdications;
· anticipated trends in the gaming industry;
· patron demographics;
· general market and economic conditions, including consumer and corporate spending sentiment;
· our ability to finance future business requirements;
· our ability to effectively compete in the marketplace;
· the availability of adequate levels of insurance;
· our development and potential acquisition of new facilities;
· our ability to successfully integrate acquired companies and businesses;
· management retention and development;
· changes in Federal, state, and local laws and regulations, including environmental, gaming license and tax legislation;
· the effect of weather conditions or travel on attendance at our facilities;
· military or other government actions; and
· national or local catastrophic events.
We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements as a result of future developments, events or conditions. New risk factors emerge from time to time and it is not possible for us to predict all such risk factors, nor can we assess the impact of all such risk factors on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ significantly from those forecast in any forward-looking statements. Given these risks and uncertainties, stockholders should not overly rely or attach undue weight to our forward-looking statements as an indication of our actual future results.
Our Gaming Activities Compete Directly With Other Gaming Facilities And Other Entertainment Businesses
We compete in local and regional markets with horse tracks, off-track betting parlors, state run lotteries, casinos and other gaming facilities. We cannot be certain that we will maintain our market share or compete more effectively with our competitors. The introduction or expansion of gaming in neighboring jurisdictions, particularly Maryland, Virginia, West Virginia, Washington, D.C., Pennsylvania or New Jersey, or the legalization of additional gaming venues in Delaware, could have a material adverse effect on our cash flows and results of operations. From time to time legislation is proposed for adoption in these jurisdictions which if enacted, would further expand state gambling and wagering opportunities, including video lottery (slot) machines at racetracks. Enactment of such legislation could increase our competition and could adversely affect our business, financial condition and overall profitability. For example, in 2005, the Maryland Senate passed a bill providing for various gaming venues for the third straight year and for the third straight year could not reach any consensus with the Maryland House. Accordingly, no legislation was passed. Approximately 70% of our Capital Club member slot win comes from out
22
of state patrons. In July 2004, Pennsylvania adopted legislation which authorizes up to 61,000 slot machines at various existing and proposed venues throughout the state. It is difficult for us to predict the effect that such legislation will have on us, but several facilities in Pennsylvania began operations by the end of 2006. Pennsylvania has one of the highest effective tax rates on slot machine gaming in the country and charges an up front $50,000,000 license fee to the horse racing and casino venues that are granted a gaming license. Management has estimated that slot win from Pennsylvania patrons represents approximately 5% of our total slot win.
All Of Our Facilities Are In One Location
Our facilities are located adjacent to one another at a single location in Dover, Delaware. Any prolonged disruption of operations at these facilities due to damage or destruction or other reasons could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. We maintain property and business interruption insurance to protect against such types of disruption, but there can be no assurance that the proceeds of such insurance would be adequate to repair or rebuild our facilities or to compensate us for lost profits.
The Revocation, Suspension Or Modification Of Our Gaming Licenses Would Adversely Affect Our Gaming Business
The Delaware State Lottery Office and the Delaware Harness Racing Commission regulate our gaming operations. Our license from the Commission must be renewed on an annual basis. To keep our license for video lottery (slot) machine gaming, we must remain licensed for harness horse racing by the Commission and conduct at least 80 live race days each racing season, subject to the availability of harness race horses. The Commission has broad discretion to reject any application for a license or suspend or revoke a license once it is issued. The Director of the Delaware State Lottery Office (the “Lottery Director”) has broad discretion to revoke, suspend or modify the terms of a video lottery license. Any modification or termination of existing licensing regulations or any revocation, suspension or modification of our licenses could adversely affect our business, financial condition and overall profitability.
Our Gaming Activities Are Subject To Extensive Government Regulation And Any Additional Government Regulation Or Taxation Of Gaming Activities Could Substantially Reduce Our Revenue Or Profit
Video lottery (slot) machine gaming, harness horse racing and pari-mutuel wagering are subject to extensive government regulation. Delaware law regulates the win we are entitled to retain and the percentage of commission we are entitled to receive from our gaming revenues, which comprises a significant portion of our overall revenues. The State granted us a license to conduct video lottery (slot) machine operations and a license to conduct harness horse races and pari-mutuel wagering. The laws under which these licenses are granted could be modified or repealed at any time and we could be required to terminate our gaming operations. If we are required to terminate our gaming operations or if the amount of the commission we receive from the State for conducting our gaming operations is decreased, our business operations and overall profitability would be significantly impaired.
We believe that the prospect of significant additional tax revenue is one of the primary reasons why jurisdictions have legalized gaming. As a result, gaming operators are typically subject to significant taxes and fees in addition to normal federal and state corporate income taxes. These taxes and fees are subject to increase at any time. We pay substantial taxes and fees with respect to our operations and will likely incur similar burdens in any other jurisdiction in which we may conduct gaming operations in the future. Any material increase in taxes or fees, or the adoption of additional taxes or fees, may have a material adverse effect on our future financial results.
We are subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations in addition to gaming regulations. These laws and regulations include, but are not limited to, restrictions and conditions concerning alcoholic beverages, environmental matters, employees, currency transactions, taxation, zoning and building codes, and marketing and advertising. Such laws and regulations are always subject to change, can be interpreted differently in the future, and new laws and regulations may be enacted which could adversely affect the tax, regulatory, operational or other aspects of our gaming operations. Furthermore, noncompliance with one or more of these laws and regulations could result in the imposition of substantial penalties against us.
23
We Do Not Own Or Lease Our Video Lottery (Slot) Machines And Related Technology
We do not own or lease the video lottery (slot) machines or computer systems used by the State in connection with our video lottery gaming operations. The Lottery Director enters into contracts directly with the providers of the video lottery (slot) machines and computer systems. The State purchases or leases all equipment and the Lottery Director licenses all technology providers. Our operations could be disrupted if a licensed technology provider violates its agreement with the State or ceases to be licensed for any reason. Such an event would be outside of our control and could adversely affect our gaming revenues.
Due to Our Concentrated Stock Ownership, Stockholders May Have No Effective Voice In Our Management
We have elected to be treated as a “controlled corporation” as defined by New York Stock Exchange Rule 303A. We are a controlled corporation because a single person, Henry B. Tippie, the Chairman of our Board of Directors, controls in excess of fifty percent of our voting power. This means that he has the ability to determine the outcome of the election of directors at our annual meetings and to determine the outcome of many significant corporate transactions, many of which only require the approval of a majority of our voting power. Such a concentration of voting power could also have the effect of delaying or preventing a third party from acquiring us at a premium. In addition, as a controlled corporation, we are not required to comply with certain New York Stock Exchange rules.
Item 7A. Quantitative And Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk
We do not utilize financial instruments for trading purposes and hold no derivative financial instruments which could expose us to market risk. Our exposure to market risks related to fluctuations in interest rates is limited to our variable rate borrowings of $59,425,000 at December 31, 2006 under our revolving credit facility. A change in interest rates of one percent on the balance outstanding at December 31, 2006 would cause a change in total annual interest costs of $594,000. The carrying values of these borrowings approximate their fair values at December 31, 2006.
Item 8. Financial Statements And Supplementary Data
Our consolidated financial statements and the Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm included in this report are shown on the Index to Consolidated Financial Statements on page 32.
Item 9. Changes In And Disagreements With Accountants On Accounting And Financial Disclosure
None.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We have established disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to us, including our consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to the officers who certify our financial reports and to other members of senior management and the Board of Directors.
Based on their evaluation as of December 31, 2006, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) are effective to ensure that the information we are required to disclose in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms.
24
(b) Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2006 that have materially affected, or that are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
(c) Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. We conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on our evaluation, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2006. Our management’s assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006 has been audited by KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which is included herein.
(d) Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Dover Downs Gaming & Entertainment, Inc.:
We have audited management’s assessment, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting (Item 9A(c)), that Dover Downs Gaming & Entertainment, Inc. (the Company) maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management’s assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
25
In our opinion, management’s assessment that Dover Downs Gaming & Entertainment, Inc. maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Also, in our opinion, Dover Downs Gaming & Entertainment, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Dover Downs Gaming & Entertainment, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of earnings and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2006, and our report dated March 6, 2007 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
KPMG LLP
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 6, 2007
Item 9B. Other Information
None.
Part III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers And Corporate Governance
Except as presented below, biographical information relating to our directors and executive officers, information regarding our audit committee financial experts and information on Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance called for by this Item 10 are incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on April 25, 2007.
We have a Code of Business Conduct applicable to all of our employees, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. We also have a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for Directors and Executive Officers and Related Party Transactions Policy applicable to all directors and executive officers. Copies of these Codes and other corporate governance documents are available on our website at http://www.doverdowns.com under the heading Investor Relations. We will post on our website any amendments to, or waivers from, these Codes as required by law.
Executive Officers of the Registrant. As of December 31, 2006, our executive officers were:
Name |
|
|
| Position |
| Age |
| Term of Office |
Denis McGlynn |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |
| 60 |
| 11/79 to date | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Edward J. Sutor |
| Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer |
| 57 |
| 3/99 to date | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Timothy R. Horne |
| Sr. Vice President-Finance, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer |
| 40 |
| 11/96 to date | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Klaus M. Belohoubek |
| Sr. Vice President-General Counsel and Secretary |
| 47 |
| 7/99 to date |
26
Our Chairman of the Board, Henry B. Tippie, is a non-employee director and, therefore, not an executive officer. Mr. Tippie has served as Chairman of the Board since our initial public offering in 2002. Mr. Tippie also serves as Chairman of the Board to DVD as a non-employee director.
Denis McGlynn has served as our President and Chief Executive Officer for 27 years. Mr. McGlynn also serves as President and Chief Executive Officer to DVD.
Edward J. Sutor has been Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer since 1999. Previously, Mr. Sutor served as Senior Vice President of Finance at Caesars Atlantic City from 1983 until 1999. Mr. Sutor previously served as Executive Vice President to DVD, a position he held from 1999 to 2002.
Timothy R. Horne has been Sr. Vice President-Finance, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer since November 1996. Mr. Horne previously served as Vice President-Finance and Chief Financial Officer to DVD.
Klaus M. Belohoubek has been Sr. Vice President-General Counsel and Secretary since 1999 and has provided us legal representation in various capacities since 1990. Mr. Belohoubek also serves as Sr. Vice President-General Counsel and Secretary to DVD.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
The information called for by this Item 11 is incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on April 25, 2007.
Item 12. Security Ownership Of Certain Beneficial Owners And Management And Related Stockholder Matters
The information called for by this Item 12 is incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on April 25, 2007.
Item 13. Certain Relationships And Related Transactions, And Director Independence
The information called for by this Item 13 is incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on April 25, 2007.
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees And Services
The information called for by this Item 14 is incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on April 25, 2007.
Part IV
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules
(a) (1) |
| Financial Statements — See accompanying Index to Consolidated Financial Statements on page 32. |
|
|
|
(2) |
| Financial Statement Schedules — None. |
|
|
|
(3) |
| Exhibits: |
|
|
|
2.1 |
| Amended and Restated Agreement Regarding Distribution and Plan of Reorganization, dated as of February 15, 2002, by and between Dover Motorsports, Inc. (formerly known as Dover Downs Entertainment, Inc.) and Dover Downs Gaming & Entertainment, Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Form 10 filed on February 26, 2002, which was declared effective on March 7, 2002). |
27
3.1 Certificate of Incorporation of Dover Downs Gaming & Entertainment, Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Form 10 filed on November 21, 2001, which was declared effective on March 7, 2002).
3.2 Amended and Restated By-laws of Dover Downs Gaming & Entertainment, Inc. dated March 1, 2002 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Form 10 filed on March 7, 2002).
4.1 Form of Common Stock Certificate of Dover Downs Gaming & Entertainment, Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Form 10 filed on November 21, 2001, which was declared effective on March 7, 2002).
4.2 Rights Agreement dated as of January 2, 2002 between Dover Downs Gaming & Entertainment, Inc. and Mellon Investor Services, as Rights Agent (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Form 10 filed on January 16, 2002, which was declared effective on March 7, 2002).
10.1 Employee Benefits Agreement, dated as of January 15, 2002, by and between Dover Motorsports, Inc. (formerly known as Dover Downs Entertainment, Inc.) and Dover Downs Gaming & Entertainment, Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Form 10 filed on January 16, 2002, which was declared effective on March 7, 2002).
10.2 Transition Support Services Agreement, dated as of January 15, 2002, by and between Dover Motorsports, Inc. (formerly known as Dover Downs Entertainment, Inc.) and Dover Downs Gaming & Entertainment, Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Form 10 filed on January 16, 2002, which was declared effective on March 7, 2002).
10.3 Tax Sharing Agreement, dated as of January 15, 2002, by and between Dover Motorsports, Inc. (formerly known as Dover Downs Entertainment, Inc.) and Dover Downs Gaming & Entertainment, Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Form 10 filed on January 16, 2002, which was declared effective on March 7, 2002).
10.4 Real Property Agreement dated as of January 15, 2002, by and between Dover Motorsports, Inc. (formerly known as Dover Downs Entertainment, Inc.) and Dover Downs Gaming & Entertainment, Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Form 10 filed on January 16, 2002, which was declared effective on March 7, 2002).
10.5 Agreement between Dover Downs, Inc. and Delaware Standardbred Owners Association, Inc. dated October 22, 2003 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Form 10-K filed on March 9, 2004).
10.6 Credit Agreement among Dover Downs Gaming & Entertainment, Inc. and Wilmington Trust Company, dated as of January 15, 2002 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Form 10 filed on January 16, 2002, which was declared effective on March 7, 2002).
10.7 Amended and Restated Credit Agreement among Dover Downs Gaming & Entertainment, Inc. and Wilmington Trust Company, as agent, dated as of March 25, 2002 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Form 10-Q filed on May 10, 2002).
10.8 Amended and Restated Guaranty and Suretyship Agreement by and between Dover Downs, Inc. and Wilmington Trust Company, as agent, dated as of March 25, 2002 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Form 10-Q filed on May 10, 2002).
10.9 Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement among Dover Downs Gaming & Entertainment, Inc. and Wilmington Trust Company, as agent, dated as of August 12, 2002 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 10-Q filed on November 4, 2002).
28
10.10 Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement among Dover Downs Gaming & Entertainment, Inc. and Wilmington Trust Company, as agent, dated as of February 19, 2004 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to the Form 10-K filed on March 9, 2004).
10.11 Third Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement among Dover Downs Gaming & Entertainment, Inc. and Wilmington Trust Company, as agent, dated as of November 5, 2004 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to the Form 10-K filed on March 10, 2005).
10.12 Fourth Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement among Dover Downs Gaming & Entertainment, Inc. and Wilmington Trust Company, as agent, dated as of December 14, 2005 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K filed on December 16, 2005).
10.13 Fifth Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement among Dover Downs Gaming & Entertainment, Inc. and Wilmington Trust Company, as agent, dated as of April 18, 2006 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K filed on April 21, 2006).
10.14 Amended and Restated Employment and Non-Compete Agreement between Dover Downs Gaming & Entertainment, Inc. and Denis McGlynn dated February 13, 2006 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K filed on February 17, 2006).
10.15 Amended and Restated Employment and Non-Compete Agreement between Dover Downs Gaming & Entertainment, Inc. and Edward J. Sutor dated February 13, 2006 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Form 8-K filed on February 17, 2006).
10.16 Amended and Restated Employment and Non-Compete Agreement between Dover Downs Gaming & Entertainment, Inc. and Timothy R. Horne dated February 13, 2006 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Form 8-K filed on February 17, 2006).
10.17 Amended and Restated Employment and Non-Compete Agreement between Dover Downs Gaming & Entertainment, Inc. and Klaus M. Belohoubek dated February 13, 2006 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Form 8-K filed on February 17, 2006).
10.18 Amended and Restated Non-Compete Agreement between Dover Downs Gaming & Entertainment, Inc. and Patrick J. Bagley dated February 13, 2006 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Form 8-K filed on February 17, 2006).
10.19 Non-Compete Agreement between Dover Downs Gaming & Entertainment, Inc. and Henry B. Tippie dated June 16, 2004 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Form 10-Q filed on August 6, 2004).
10.20 Dover Downs Gaming & Entertainment, Inc. 2002 Stock Incentive Plan, as Amended and Restated (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit A to our Proxy Statement filed on March 29, 2004).
10.21 Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement Used with Dover Downs Gaming & Entertainment, Inc. 2002 Stock Incentive Plan, as Amended and Restated (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 10-Q filed on November 3, 2004).
10.22 Form of Restricted Stock Grant Agreement Used with Dover Downs Gaming & Entertainment, Inc. 2002 Stock Incentive Plan, as Amended and Restated (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Form 10-Q filed on November 3, 2004).
10.23 Description of Annual Salary and Certain Discretionary Incentives to Executive Officers
21.1 List of Subsidiaries of Dover Downs Gaming & Entertainment, Inc.
24.1 Powers of Attorney for Directors
29
31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)
31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)
32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
99.1 Information Statement dated as of March 7, 2002 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Form 10 filed on March 7, 2002).
99.2 Audit Committee Charter of Dover Downs Gaming & Entertainment, Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit B to our Proxy Statement filed on March 29, 2004).
30
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
DATED: March 6, 2007 |
| Dover Downs Gaming & Entertainment, Inc. | ||
|
|
|
| Registrant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| BY: |
| /s/ Denis McGlynn |
|
|
|
| Denis McGlynn |
|
|
|
| President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
| and Director |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:
/s/ Timothy R. Horne |
| Sr. Vice President-Finance, |
| March 6, 2007 |
Timothy R. Horne |
| Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
The Directors of the registrant (listed below) executed a power of attorney appointing Denis McGlynn and Timothy R. Horne their attorneys-in-fact, empowering either of them to sign this report, or any amendments, on their behalf.
Henry B. Tippie, Chairman of the Board
Kenneth K. Chalmers, Director and Chairman of the Audit Committee
R. Randall Rollins, Director
Patrick J. Bagley, Director
John W. Rollins, Jr., Director
Jeffrey W. Rollins, Director
/s/ Denis McGlynn |
| As Attorney-in-Fact |
| March 6, 2007 |
Denis McGlynn |
| and Director |
|
|
31
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
| Page | |
Statement of Management Responsibility |
| 33 |
|
|
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
| 34 |
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Earnings for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 |
| 35 |
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2006 and 2005 |
| 36 |
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 |
| 37 |
|
|
|
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements |
| 38 |
32
STATEMENT OF MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITY
Dover Downs Gaming & Entertainment, Inc. and subsidiaries’ (the “Company”) management is responsible for the preparation, integrity and objectivity of the consolidated financial statements and other financial information included in the Company’s 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and reflect the effects of certain estimates and judgments made by management.
The Company’s management also is responsible for establishing and maintaining a system of internal controls designed to provide reasonable assurance that assets are safeguarded and transactions are properly recorded and executed in accordance with management’s authorization. The system is regularly monitored by direct management review and by internal auditors who conduct an extensive program of audits throughout the Company. The Director of Internal Audit reports directly to the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors. We have confidence in our financial reporting, the underlying system of internal controls, and our people, who are objective in their responsibilities and operate under the Company’s Code of Business Conduct and with the highest level of ethical standards. These standards are a key element of the Company’s control system.
The Company conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on the Company’s evaluation, management of the Company concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2006.
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, which is comprised entirely of independent directors, has direct and private access to and meets regularly with management, the internal auditors and the independent registered public accounting firm to review accounting, reporting, auditing and internal control matters.
/s/ Denis McGlynn |
| /s/ Timothy R. Horne |
Denis McGlynn |
| Timothy R. Horne |
President and Chief Executive |
| Sr. Vice President — Finance, |
Officer and Director |
| Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
33
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Dover Downs Gaming & Entertainment, Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Dover Downs Gaming & Entertainment, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of earnings and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2006. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Dover Downs Gaming & Entertainment, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2006, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
As discussed in Notes 2, 7 and 8 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment,” effective January 1, 2006 using the modified prospective method, Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans,” on December 31, 2006, and Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108, “Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements,” effective January 1, 2006.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of Dover Downs Gaming & Entertainment, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated March 6, 2007 expressed an unqualified opinion on management’s assessment of, and the effective operation of, internal control over financial reporting.
KPMG LLP
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 6, 2007
34
DOVER DOWNS GAMING & ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS
|
| Years ended December 31, |
| |||||||
|
| 2006 |
| 2005 |
| 2004 |
| |||
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Gaming |
| $ | 220,412,000 |
| $ | 202,372,000 |
| $ | 193,922,000 |
|
Other operating |
| 16,039,000 |
| 14,480,000 |
| 13,822,000 |
| |||
|
| 236,451,000 |
| 216,852,000 |
| 207,744,000 |
| |||
Less — non-recurring gaming charge |
| — |
| — |
| 448,000 |
| |||
|
| 236,451,000 |
| 216,852,000 |
| 207,296,000 |
| |||
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Gaming |
| 163,288,000 |
| 151,973,000 |
| 152,725,000 |
| |||
Non-recurring gaming charge |
| — |
| — |
| 1,802,000 |
| |||
Other operating |
| 14,202,000 |
| 13,167,000 |
| 13,013,000 |
| |||
General and administrative |
| 5,905,000 |
| 4,765,000 |
| 4,603,000 |
| |||
Depreciation |
| 7,146,000 |
| 6,998,000 |
| 6,791,000 |
| |||
|
| 190,541,000 |
| 176,903,000 |
| 178,934,000 |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Gain on sale of shopping center |
| — |
| 5,837,000 |
| — |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Operating earnings |
| 45,910,000 |
| 45,786,000 |
| 28,362,000 |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Interest expense |
| (2,943,000 | ) | (1,875,000 | ) | (762,000 | ) | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Earnings before income taxes |
| 42,967,000 |
| 43,911,000 |
| 27,600,000 |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Income taxes |
| (17,639,000 | ) | (17,871,000 | ) | (11,219,000 | ) | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Net earnings |
| $ | 25,328,000 |
| $ | 26,040,000 |
| $ | 16,381,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Net earnings per common share (Note 2): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Basic |
| $ | 0.78 |
| $ | 0.73 |
| $ | 0.41 |
|
Diluted |
| $ | 0.77 |
| $ | 0.72 |
| $ | 0.41 |
|
The Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these consolidated statements.
35
DOVER DOWNS GAMING & ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
|
| December 31, |
| ||||
|
| 2006 |
| 2005 |
| ||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash |
| $ | 20,020,000 |
| $ | 19,986,000 |
|
Accounts receivable |
| 4,325,000 |
| 3,805,000 |
| ||
Due from State of Delaware |
| 10,972,000 |
| 9,100,000 |
| ||
Inventories |
| 1,765,000 |
| 1,955,000 |
| ||
Prepaid expenses and other |
| 1,838,000 |
| 2,000,000 |
| ||
Prepaid income taxes |
| 128,000 |
| — |
| ||
Receivable from Dover Motorsports, Inc. |
| — |
| 15,000 |
| ||
Deferred income taxes |
| 1,247,000 |
| 2,067,000 |
| ||
Total current assets |
| 40,295,000 |
| 38,928,000 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Property and equipment, net |
| 132,732,000 |
| 114,533,000 |
| ||
Total assets |
| $ | 173,027,000 |
| $ | 153,461,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Accounts payable |
| $ | 8,173,000 |
| $ | 4,814,000 |
|
Purses due horsemen |
| 8,899,000 |
| 8,332,000 |
| ||
Accrued liabilities |
| 11,198,000 |
| 12,748,000 |
| ||
Payable to Dover Motorsports, Inc. |
| 9,000 |
| — |
| ||
Income taxes payable |
| — |
| 3,706,000 |
| ||
Deferred revenue |
| 37,000 |
| 112,000 |
| ||
Total current liabilities |
| 28,316,000 |
| 29,712,000 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Revolving line of credit |
| 59,425,000 |
| 24,075,000 |
| ||
Liability for pension benefits |
| 2,640,000 |
| — |
| ||
Deferred income taxes |
| 5,387,000 |
| 6,404,000 |
| ||
Total liabilities |
| 95,768,000 |
| 60,191,000 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Commitments and contingencies (see Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements) |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Stockholders’ equity: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Preferred stock, $.10 par value; 1,000,000 shares authorized; shares issued and outstanding: none |
| — |
| — |
| ||
Common stock, $.10 par value; 74,000,000 shares authorized; shares issued and outstanding: 15,413,867 and 10,639,874, respectively |
| 1,542,000 |
| 1,064,000 |
| ||
Class A common stock, $.10 par value; 50,000,000 shares authorized; shares issued and outstanding: 17,003,173 and 13,254,687, respectively |
| 1,700,000 |
| 1,326,000 |
| ||
Additional paid-in capital |
| 769,000 |
| 36,461,000 |
| ||
Retained earnings |
| 73,736,000 |
| 55,459,000 |
| ||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
| (488,000 | ) | — |
| ||
Deferred compensation |
| — |
| (1,040,000 | ) | ||
Total stockholders’ equity |
| 77,259,000 |
| 93,270,000 |
| ||
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity |
| $ | 173,027,000 |
| $ | 153,461,000 |
|
The Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these consolidated statements.
36
DOVER DOWNS GAMING & ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
| Years ended December 31, |
| |||||||
|
| 2006 |
| 2005 |
| 2004 |
| |||
Operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Net earnings |
| $ | 25,328,000 |
| $ | 26,040,000 |
| $ | 16,381,000 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Depreciation |
| 7,146,000 |
| 6,998,000 |
| 6,791,000 |
| |||
Amortization of credit facility origination fees |
| 44,000 |
| 41,000 |
| 62,000 |
| |||
Stock-based compensation |
| 732,000 |
| 214,000 |
| 67,000 |
| |||
Deferred income taxes |
| (218,000 | ) | (356,000 | ) | 165,000 |
| |||
Cumulative effect of accounting change |
| (1,541,000 | ) | — |
| — |
| |||
Gain on sale of shopping center |
| — |
| (5,837,000 | ) | — |
| |||
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Accounts receivable |
| (520,000 | ) | (886,000 | ) | (1,005,000 | ) | |||
Due from State of Delaware |
| (1,872,000 | ) | 980,000 |
| (1,410,000 | ) | |||
Inventories |
| 190,000 |
| 192,000 |
| (346,000 | ) | |||
Prepaid expenses and other |
| 118,000 |
| (40,000 | ) | 132,000 |
| |||
Prepaid income taxes/income taxes payable |
| (3,480,000 | ) | 3,055,000 |
| 943,000 |
| |||
Accounts payable |
| 79,000 |
| (792,000 | ) | (909,000 | ) | |||
Purses due horsemen |
| 567,000 |
| (750,000 | ) | 1,125,000 |
| |||
Accrued liabilities |
| 269,000 |
| 758,000 |
| 5,975,000 |
| |||
Payable to/receivable from Dover Motorsports, Inc. |
| 24,000 |
| (13,000 | ) | (98,000 | ) | |||
Deferred revenue |
| (75,000 | ) | (83,000 | ) | (66,000 | ) | |||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
| 26,791,000 |
| 29,521,000 |
| 27,807,000 |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Capital expenditures |
| (22,065,000 | ) | (5,512,000 | ) | (6,329,000 | ) | |||
Proceeds from sale of shopping center, net |
| — |
| 11,918,000 |
| — |
| |||
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities |
| (22,065,000 | ) | 6,406,000 |
| (6,329,000 | ) | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Borrowings from revolving line of credit |
| 196,010,000 |
| 169,109,000 |
| 226,905,000 |
| |||
Repayments of revolving line of credit |
| (160,660,000 | ) | (196,984,000 | ) | (206,180,000 | ) | |||
Dividends paid |
| (5,510,000 | ) | (5,737,000 | ) | (6,098,000 | ) | |||
Repurchase of common stock |
| (35,052,000 | ) | — |
| (32,555,000 | ) | |||
Proceeds from stock options exercised |
| 470,000 |
| 4,000 |
| — |
| |||
Excess tax benefit on stock awards |
| 50,000 |
| — |
| — |
| |||
Other |
| — |
| (21,000 | ) | — |
| |||
Net cash used in financing activities |
| (4,692,000 | ) | (33,629,000 | ) | (17,928,000 | ) | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Net increase in cash |
| 34,000 |
| 2,298,000 |
| 3,550,000 |
| |||
Cash, beginning of year |
| 19,986,000 |
| 17,688,000 |
| 14,138,000 |
| |||
Cash, end of year |
| $ | 20,020,000 |
| $ | 19,986,000 |
| $ | 17,688,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Supplemental information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Interest paid |
| $ | 3,032,000 |
| $ | 1,894,000 |
| $ | 650,000 |
|
Income taxes paid |
| $ | 20,235,000 |
| $ | 15,172,000 |
| $ | 10,112,000 |
|
The Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these consolidated statements.
37
DOVER DOWNS GAMING & ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1—Business Operations
References in this document to “we,” “us” and “our” mean Dover Downs Gaming & Entertainment, Inc. and/or its wholly owned subsidiaries, as appropriate.
We are a diversified gaming and entertainment company whose operations consist of Dover Downs Slots — a 97,000 square-foot video lottery (slots) casino complex; the Dover Downs Hotel — featuring luxury accommodations with conference, banquet, fine dining, ballroom and concert hall facilities; and Dover Downs Raceway — a harness racing track with pari-mutuel wagering on live and simulcast horse races. Our entertainment complex is located in Dover, the capital of the State of Delaware.
Dover Downs Gaming & Entertainment, Inc. is a public holding company that has two wholly owned subsidiaries: Dover Downs, Inc. and Dover Downs Management Corp. Dover Downs, Inc. was incorporated in 1967 and began motorsports and harness racing operations in 1969. In June of 1994, legislation authorizing video lottery operations in the State of Delaware (the “State”) was adopted. Our video lottery (slots) casino operations began on December 29, 1995. As a result of several restructurings, Dover Downs, Inc. became a wholly owned subsidiary of Dover Motorsports, Inc. (formerly known as Dover Downs Entertainment, Inc.) (“DVD”), and became the operating entity for all of DVD’s gaming operations.
Dover Downs Gaming & Entertainment, Inc. was incorporated in the State in December of 2001 as a wholly owned subsidiary of DVD. Effective March 31, 2002, DVD completed a tax-free spin-off of its gaming operations by contributing 100% of the issued and outstanding common stock of Dover Downs, Inc. to Dover Downs Gaming & Entertainment, Inc., and subsequently distributing 100% of our issued and outstanding common stock to DVD stockholders. Immediately following the spin-off, Dover Downs Gaming & Entertainment, Inc. became an independent public company.
Dover Downs, Inc. is authorized to conduct video lottery operations as a “Licensed Agent” under the Delaware State Lottery Code. Pursuant to Delaware’s Horse Racing Redevelopment Act, enacted in 1994, the Delaware State Lottery Office administers and controls the operation of the video lottery.
Our license from the Delaware Harness Racing Commission (the “Commission”) to hold harness race meetings on our premises and to offer pari-mutuel wagering on live and simulcast horse races must be renewed on an annual basis. In order to maintain our license to conduct video lottery operations, we are required to maintain our harness horse racing license. We have received an annual license from the Commission for the past 38 consecutive years and management believes that our relationship with the Commission remains good.
Due to the nature of our business activities, we are subject to various federal, state and local regulations.
NOTE 2—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of consolidation—The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Dover Downs Gaming & Entertainment, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries. Intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.
Inventories—Inventories, consisting primarily of food and beverage items, are stated at the lower of cost or market with cost being determined on the first-in, first-out basis.
38
Property and equipment—Property and equipment is stated at cost. Depreciation is provided for financial reporting purposes using the straight-line method over the following estimated useful lives:
Facilities |
| 10-40 years |
Furniture, fixtures and equipment |
| 5-10 years |
We perform reviews for impairment of long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. No such events or changes in circumstances have occurred to date. An impairment loss would be measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds its fair value. Generally, fair value will be determined using valuation techniques such as the present value of future cash flows.
Interest capitalization—Interest is capitalized in connection with the construction of major facilities. The capitalized interest is amortized over the estimated useful life of the asset to which it relates. During the year ended December 31, 2006, we incurred $3,255,000 of interest cost, of which $312,000 was capitalized. During the year ended December 31, 2005, we incurred $1,875,000 of interest cost, none of which was capitalized. During the year ended December 31, 2004, we incurred $779,000 of interest cost, of which $17,000 was capitalized.
Income taxes—Deferred income taxes are provided in accordance with the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, on all differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts in the consolidated financial statements based upon enacted statutory tax rates in effect at the balance sheet date.
Point loyalty program—We currently have a point loyalty program for our video lottery customers which allows them to earn points based on the volume of their video lottery activity. Prior to December 2004, the points could be redeemed for various services and merchandise throughout the gaming facility; however, they were not redeemable for cash or casino play. Effective December 2004, we changed our policy relating to our point loyalty program to allow points earned by customers to be redeemed for cash under certain circumstances. As a result, we recorded a non-recurring charge of $2,250,000 in the fourth quarter of 2004 to record the net impact of the program change. All reward points earned by customers are now expensed in the period they are earned. The estimated amount of points redeemable for cash is recorded as a reduction of revenue and the estimated amount of points redeemable for services and merchandise is recorded as gaming expense. In determining the amount of the liability, which was $2,010,000 and $2,289,000, respectively, at December 31, 2006 and 2005, we estimate a redemption rate, a cost of rewards to be offered and the mix of cash, goods and services for which reward points will be redeemed. We use historical data to estimate those amounts.
Revenue and expense recognition—Gaming revenues represent (i) the net win from video lottery (slot) machine wins and losses and (ii) commissions from pari-mutuel wagering. Other operating revenues consist of hotel rooms revenue, food and beverage sales and other miscellaneous income. Revenues do not include the retail amount of hotel rooms, food and beverage and other miscellaneous goods and services provided without charge to customers as promotional items of $15,152,000, $15,103,000 and $19,973,000 for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The estimated direct cost of providing these items has been charged to the casino through interdepartmental allocations and is included in gaming expenses in the consolidated statement of earnings.
For the video lottery operations, which account for at least 90% of revenues for all periods presented, the difference between the amount wagered by bettors and the amount paid out to bettors is referred to as the win. The win is included in the amount recorded in our consolidated financial statements as gaming revenue. The Delaware State Lottery Office sweeps the win from the video lottery operations, collects the State’s share of the win and the amount due to the vendors under contract with the State who provide the video lottery (slot) machines and associated computer systems, collects the amount allocable to purses for harness horse racing and remits the remainder to us as our commission for acting as a Licensed Agent. Gaming expenses include the amounts collected by the State (i) for the State’s share of the win, (ii) for remittance to the providers of the video lottery (slot) machines and associated computer systems, and (iii) for harness horse racing purses. We recognize revenues from pari-mutuel commissions earned from live harness horse racing and importing of simulcast signals from other race tracks when the race occurs. Revenues from hotel rooms, food and beverage sales and other miscellaneous income are recognized at the time the service is provided.
39
Advertising costs—The cost of general advertising is charged to operations as incurred.
Net earnings per share—Weighted average shares used in computing basic and diluted net earnings per common share (“EPS”) are as follows:
| Years ended December 31, |
| |||||
|
| 2006 |
| 2005 |
| 2004 |
|
Basic EPS |
| 32,353,000 |
| 35,681,000 |
| 39,509,000 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities |
| 568,000 |
| 249,000 |
| 112,000 |
|
Diluted EPS |
| 32,921,000 |
| 35,930,000 |
| 39,621,000 |
|
Dilutive securities include stock options and nonvested stock awards.
For the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, options to purchase 22,500 and 420,270 shares of common stock, respectively, were not included in the computation of diluted EPS because the options’ exercise prices were greater than the average market price of the common stock during the period. There were no anti-dilutive securities excluded from the computation of diluted EPS for the year ended December 31, 2006.
Accounting for stock-based compensation—Prior to January 1, 2006, we accounted for our stock-based compensation expense in accordance with Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related interpretations, pursuant to which we recognized compensation expense for our nonvested stock awards over the vesting period equal to the fair market value of the stock on the grant date. We were not required to recognize compensation expense related to our stock options as all options granted had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on the grant date.
Effective January 1, 2006, we adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Statement No. 123R, Share-Based Payment. Statement No. 123R revised FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, and superseded APB Opinion No. 25 and related interpretations. Statement No. 123R requires recognition of the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments in the financial statements over the period the employee is required to perform the services. We adopted Statement No. 123R using the modified prospective method. Under this method, we are required to record compensation expense for all awards granted after the date of adoption and for the unvested portion of previously granted awards that remain outstanding at the date of adoption. We calculate compensation expense for our stock options based upon the fair value at the grant date using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The modified prospective approach does not allow for the restatement of prior period amounts.
Statement No. 123R requires the cash flows resulting from the tax benefits from tax deductions in excess of the compensation cost recognized for nonvested stock awards and options (“Excess Tax Benefits”) to be classified as a financing activity in our consolidated statement of cash flows.
We recorded total stock-based compensation expense of $732,000, $214,000, and $67,000 as general and administrative expenses for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Total stock-based compensation expense of $680,000 and $641,000 would have been recorded as general and administrative expenses for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, had we been subject to reporting under Statement No. 123R during that period. Our earnings before income taxes and net earnings for the year ended December 31, 2006 were $372,000 lower than they would have been pursuant to our previous accounting method for stock-based compensation. We recorded income tax benefits of $147,000, $87,000 and $27,000 for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively, related to our nonvested stock awards. The adoption of Statement No. 123R reduced basic and diluted earnings per share by approximately $0.01 for the year ended December 31, 2006.
40
The following table illustrates the effect on net earnings and net earnings per common share if we had applied the fair-value recognition provisions of Statement No. 123R to stock-based employee compensation related to our stock options and awards:
| Years ended December 31, |
| |||||
|
| 2005 |
| 2004 |
| ||
Net earnings, as reported |
| $ | 26,040,000 |
| $ | 16,381,000 |
|
Add: Stock-based employee compensation expense included in reported net earnings, net of related tax effects |
| 127,000 |
| 40,000 |
| ||
Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair-value based method for all awards, net of related tax effects |
| (593,000 | ) | (614,000 | ) | ||
Pro forma net earnings |
| $ | 25,574,000 |
| $ | 15,807,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net earnings per common share: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Basic — as reported |
| $ | 0.73 |
| $ | 0.41 |
|
Basic — pro forma |
| $ | 0.72 |
| $ | 0.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Diluted — as reported |
| $ | 0.72 |
| $ | 0.41 |
|
Diluted — pro forma |
| $ | 0.71 |
| $ | 0.40 |
|
Use of estimates—The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Fair value of financial instruments—The carrying amounts of financial instruments reported in the balance sheet for current assets and current liabilities approximates their fair values because of the short maturity of these instruments. The carrying value of long-term debt at December 31, 2006 and 2005 approximates its fair value based on the interest rates available on similar borrowings.
Segment information—We account for our operating segment in accordance with FASB Statement No. 131, Disclosures About Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information. Statement No. 131 establishes guidelines for public companies in determining operating segments based on those used for internal reporting to management. Based on these guidelines, we report information under a single gaming and entertainment segment.
Reclassifications—Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior year consolidated financial statements to conform to the current year presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on net earnings.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements—In June 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48 (“FIN 48”), Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes. FIN 48 prescribes detailed guidance for the financial statement recognition, measurement and disclosure of uncertain tax positions recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109. Tax positions must meet a more-likely-than-not recognition threshold at the effective date to be recognized upon the adoption of FIN 48 and in subsequent periods. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006 and the provisions of FIN 48 are applied to all tax positions under Statement No. 109 upon initial adoption. The cumulative effect of applying the provisions of FIN 48 will be reported as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings for that fiscal year. We are currently evaluating the potential impact of FIN 48 on our consolidated financial statements.
In June 2006, the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) issued EITF 06-3, How Taxes Collected from Customers and Remitted to Governmental Authorities Should Be Presented in the Income Statement (That Is, Gross versus Net Presentation), to clarify diversity in practice on the presentation of different types of taxes in the financial statements. The Task Force concluded that, for taxes within the scope of EITF 06-3, a company may adopt a policy of presenting taxes either gross within revenue or net. That is, it may include charges to customers for taxes within revenues and the charge for the taxes from the taxing authority within cost of sales, or, alternatively, it may net the charge to the customer and the charge from the taxing authority. If taxes subject to EITF 06-3 are significant,
41
a company is required to disclose its accounting policy for presenting taxes and the amounts of such taxes that are recognized on a gross basis. The guidance in EITF 06-3 is effective for the first interim reporting period beginning after December 15, 2006. We adopted EITF 06-3 as of January 1, 2007. The adoption of EITF 06-3 did not have an impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In September 2006 the FASB issued Statement No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, which establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. Statement No. 157 applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements and, accordingly, Statement No. 157 does not require any new fair value measurements. Statement No. 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. We will adopt Statement No. 157 as of January 1, 2008. The adoption of Statement No. 157 is not expected to have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement No. 158, Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans, which requires an employer to (a) recognize in its statement of financial position an asset for a plan’s overfunded status or a liability for a plan’s underfunded status, (b) measure a plan’s assets and its obligations that determine its funded status as of the end of the employer’s fiscal year, and (c) recognize changes in the funded status of a defined postretirement plan in the year in which the changes occur (reported in comprehensive income). The requirement to recognize the funded status of our benefit plans and the disclosure requirements are effective for our year ended December 31, 2006. The requirement to measure the plan assets and benefit obligations as of the date of the employer’s fiscal year-end statement of financial position is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2008. As a result of adopting Statement No. 158, we increased our pension liability and recorded accumulated other comprehensive loss in the amount of $821,000 ($488,000 after income tax benefit) in our December 31, 2006 consolidated balance sheet. Additionally, we reclassified our pension liability from accrued liabilities (current) to liability for pension benefits (non-current). The adoption of Statement No. 158 did not have an impact on our 2006 consolidated statement of earnings or cash flows. Refer to NOTE 7 — Pension Plans for further discussion.
In September 2006, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 108, Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements, which provides interpretive guidance on how the effects of the carryover or reversal of prior year misstatements should be considered in quantifying a current year misstatement. The SEC staff believes that registrants should quantify errors using both a balance sheet and an income statement approach and evaluate whether either approach results in a misstatement that, when all relevant quantitative and qualitative factors are considered, is material and therefore must be recorded. We adopted SAB No. 108 during the quarter ended December 31, 2006. Refer to NOTE 8 — Stockholders’ Equity for further discussion.
NOTE 3—Property and Equipment
Property and equipment consists of the following as of December 31:
| 2006 |
| 2005 |
| |||
Land |
| $ | 780,000 |
| $ | 780,000 |
|
Casino facility |
| 32,474,000 |
| 32,153,000 |
| ||
Hotel facility |
| 65,795,000 |
| 65,648,000 |
| ||
Harness racing facilities |
| 9,447,000 |
| 9,284,000 |
| ||
General facilities |
| 12,858,000 |
| 9,783,000 |
| ||
Furniture, fixtures and equipment |
| 37,597,000 |
| 36,355,000 |
| ||
Construction in progress |
| 20,817,000 |
| 529,000 |
| ||
|
| 179,768,000 |
| 154,532,000 |
| ||
Less accumulated depreciation |
| (47,036,000 | ) | (39,999,000 | ) | ||
|
| $ | 132,732,000 |
| $ | 114,533,000 |
|
On December 28, 2005, we closed on the sale of a shopping center we owned in Dover, Delaware. The sales price was $12,450,000 and we recognized a gain on the sale of $5,837,000.
42
NOTE 4—Accrued Liabilities
Accrued liabilities consist of the following as of December 31:
| 2006 |
| 2005 |
| |||
Point loyalty program |
| $ | 2,010,000 |
| $ | 2,289,000 |
|
Payroll and related items |
| 2,263,000 |
| 2,569,000 |
| ||
Win due to Delaware State Lottery Office |
| 5,441,000 |
| 5,009,000 |
| ||
Pension |
| — |
| 1,706,000 |
| ||
Other |
| 1,484,000 |
| 1,175,000 |
| ||
|
| $ | 11,198,000 |
| $ | 12,748,000 |
|
NOTE 5—Credit Facility
We have a $105,000,000 credit facility with Wilmington Trust Company that expires on April 17, 2011. Interest is based, at our option, upon LIBOR plus a margin that varies between 75 and 125 basis points depending on the ratio of funded debt to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (the “leverage ratio”) or the base rate (the greater of the prime rate or the federal funds rate plus 0.5%) less a margin that varies between 50 and 100 basis points depending on the leverage ratio. The credit facility has minimum net worth, interest coverage and maximum leverage requirements. Material adverse changes in our results of operations could impact our ability to satisfy these requirements. The facility is for seasonal funding needs, capital improvements (including our hotel expansion) and other general corporate purposes. At December 31, 2006, we were in compliance with all terms of the facility and there was $59,425,000 outstanding at a weighted average interest rate of 6.2%. At December 31, 2006, $45,575,000 was available pursuant to the facility.
NOTE 6—Income Taxes
The current and deferred income tax provisions are as follows:
| Years ended December 31, |
| ||||||||
|
| 2006 |
| 2005 |
| 2004 |
| |||
Current: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Federal |
| $ | 14,112,000 |
| $ | 14,326,000 |
| $ | 8,691,000 |
|
State |
| 3,745,000 |
| 3,901,000 |
| 2,363,000 |
| |||
|
| 17,857,000 |
| 18,227,000 |
| 11,054,000 |
| |||
Deferred: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Federal |
| (247,000 | ) | (280,000 | ) | 127,000 |
| |||
State |
| 29,000 |
| (76,000 | ) | 38,000 |
| |||
|
| (218,000 | ) | (356,000 | ) | 165,000 |
| |||
Total income taxes |
| $ | 17,639,000 |
| $ | 17,871,000 |
| $ | 11,219,000 |
|
A reconciliation of the effective income tax rate with the applicable statutory federal income tax rate is as follows:
| Years ended December 31, |
| |||||
|
| 2006 |
| 2005 |
| 2004 |
|
Federal tax at statutory rate |
| 35.0 | % | 35.0 | % | 35.0 | % |
State taxes, net of federal benefit |
| 5.7 | % | 5.7 | % | 5.7 | % |
Other |
| 0.4 | % | — | % | (0.1 | )% |
Effective income tax rate |
| 41.1 | % | 40.7 | % | 40.6 | % |
43
The components of deferred income tax assets and liabilities are as follows as of December 31:
| 2006 |
| 2005 |
| |||
Deferred income tax assets: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Point loyalty program |
| $ | 817,000 |
| $ | 931,000 |
|
Accrued expenses |
| 939,000 |
| 1,067,000 |
| ||
Other |
| 243,000 |
| 89,000 |
| ||
Total deferred income tax assets |
| 1,999,000 |
| 2,087,000 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Deferred income tax liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Depreciation — property and equipment |
| (6,139,000 | ) | (6,424,000 | ) | ||
Total deferred income tax liabilities |
| (6,139,000 | ) | (6,424,000 | ) | ||
Net deferred income tax liabilities |
| $ | (4,140,000 | ) | $ | (4,337,000 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheet: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Current deferred income tax assets |
| $ | 1,247,000 |
| $ | 2,067,000 |
|
Noncurrent deferred income tax liabilities |
| (5,387,000 | ) | (6,404,000 | ) | ||
|
| $ | (4,140,000 | ) | $ | (4,337,000 | ) |
NOTE 7—Pension Plans
We maintain a non-contributory, tax qualified defined benefit pension plan. All of our full time employees are eligible to participate in this qualified pension plan. Benefits provided by our qualified pension plan are based on years of service and employees’ remuneration over their term of employment. Pension costs are funded in accordance with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code. We also maintain a non-qualified, non-contributory defined benefit pension plan for certain employees. This excess plan provides benefits that would otherwise be provided under the qualified pension plan but for maximum benefit and compensation limits applicable under federal tax law. The cost associated with the excess plan is determined using the same actuarial methods and assumptions as those used for our qualified pension plan.
The following table sets forth the plans’ funded status and amounts recognized in our consolidated balance sheet as of December 31:
| 2006 |
| 2005 |
| |||
Change in benefit obligation: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Benefit obligation at beginning of year |
| $ | 7,055,000 |
| $ | 5,307,000 |
|
Service cost |
| 1,233,000 |
| 1,014,000 |
| ||
Interest cost |
| 415,000 |
| 315,000 |
| ||
Actuarial (gain) loss |
| (389,000 | ) | 609,000 |
| ||
Benefits paid |
| (267,000 | ) | (38,000 | ) | ||
Other |
| — |
| (152,000 | ) | ||
Benefit obligation at end of year |
| 8,047,000 |
| 7,055,000 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Change in plan assets: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year |
| 3,795,000 |
| 2,747,000 |
| ||
Actual gain on plan assets |
| 654,000 |
| 239,000 |
| ||
Employer contribution |
| 1,225,000 |
| 999,000 |
| ||
Benefits paid |
| (267,000 | ) | (38,000 | ) | ||
Other |
| — |
| (152,000 | ) | ||
Fair value of plan assets at end of year |
| 5,407,000 |
| 3,795,000 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Unfunded status |
| (2,640,000 | ) | (3,260,000 | ) | ||
Unrecognized net loss |
| — |
| 1,495,000 |
| ||
Unrecognized prior service cost |
| — |
| 59,000 |
| ||
Net amount recognized |
| $ | (2,640,000 | ) | $ | (1,706,000 | ) |
44
Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss that have not yet been recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost at December 31, 2006 are as follows:
Net actuarial loss |
| $ | 771,000 |
|
Prior service cost |
| 50,000 |
| |
|
| $ | 821,000 |
|
For the year ending December 31, 2007, we expect to recognize the following amounts as components of net periodic benefit cost which are included in accumulated comprehensive loss as of December 31, 2006:
Actuarial loss |
| $ | 4,000 |
|
Prior service cost |
| 9,000 |
| |
|
| $ | 13,000 |
|
We plan to contribute approximately $1,000,000 to our pension plans in 2007.
The accumulated benefit obligation was $6,226,000 and $5,483,000, respectively, as of December 31, 2006 and 2005.
Benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, as appropriate, are expected to be paid as follows:
2007 |
| $ | 117,000 |
|
2008 |
| $ | 140,000 |
|
2009 |
| $ | 170,000 |
|
2010 |
| $ | 208,000 |
|
2011 |
| $ | 285,000 |
|
2012-2016 |
| $ | 2,801,000 |
|
The components of net periodic pension cost for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 are as follows:
| 2006 |
| 2005 |
| 2004 |
| ||||
Service cost |
| $ | 1,233,000 |
| $ | 1,014,000 |
| $ | 895,000 |
|
Interest cost |
| 415,000 |
| 315,000 |
| 258,000 |
| |||
Expected return on plan assets |
| (391,000 | ) | (260,000 | ) | (225,000 | ) | |||
Recognized net actuarial loss |
| 72,000 |
| 25,000 |
| 35,000 |
| |||
Recognized prior service cost |
| 9,000 |
| 9,000 |
| 9,000 |
| |||
|
| $ | 1,338,000 |
| $ | 1,103,000 |
| $ | 972,000 |
|
The principal assumptions used to determine the net periodic pension cost for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, and the actuarial value of the projected benefit obligation at December 31, 2006 and 2005 (the measurement dates) for our pension plans are as follows:
|
| Net Periodic Pension Cost |
| Projected Benefit |
| ||||||
|
| 2006 |
| 2005 |
| 2004 |
| 2006 |
| 2005 |
|
Weighted-average discount rate |
| 5.85 | % | 6.25 | % | 6.25 | % | 6.15 | % | 5.85 | % |
Weighted-average rate of compensation increase |
| 5.00 | % | 5.00 | % | 5.00 | % | 5.00 | % | 5.00 | % |
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets |
| 9.00 | % | 9.00 | % | 9.00 | % | n/a |
| n/a |
|
For 2006, we assumed a long-term rate of return on plan assets of 9.0%. In developing the 9.0% expected long-term rate of return assumption, we reviewed asset class return expectations and long-term inflation assumptions and considered our historical compounded return, which was consistent with our long-term rate of return assumption.
45
Our pension plan asset allocation at December 31, 2006 and 2005, and target allocation for 2007 are as follows:
| Percentage of Plan |
| Target |
| |||||
Asset Category |
|
|
| 2006 |
| 2005 |
| 2007 |
|
Equity securities |
| 65 | % | 63 | % | 70 | % | ||
Debt securities |
| 30 | % | 22 | % | 20 | % | ||
Other (money market mutual funds) |
| 5 | % | 15 | % | 10 | % | ||
Total |
| 100 | % | 100 | % | 100 | % | ||
Our investment goals are to maximize returns subject to specific risk management policies. Our risk management policies permit investments in mutual funds, and prohibit direct investments in debt and equity securities and derivative financial instruments. We address diversification by the use of mutual fund investments whose underlying investments are in domestic and international equity and fixed income securities. These mutual funds are readily marketable and can be sold to fund benefit payment obligations as they become payable.
We maintain a defined contribution 401(k) plan which permits participation by substantially all employees. Our matching contributions to the 401(k) plan were $64,000, $64,000 and $50,000 for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
46
NOTE 8—Stockholders’ Equity
Changes in the components of stockholders’ equity are as follows (in thousands, except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Accumulated |
|
|
| ||||||
Balance at December 31, 2003 |
| $ | 1,033 |
| $ | 1,615 |
| $ | 67,454 |
| $ | 24,873 |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
|
Net earnings |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 16,381 |
| — |
| — |
| ||||||
Dividends paid, $.15 per share (1) |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| (6,098 | ) | — |
| — |
| ||||||
Issuance of restricted stock awards |
| 5 |
| — |
| 596 |
| — |
| — |
| (601 | ) | ||||||
Amortization of deferred compensation |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 67 |
| ||||||
Conversion of Class A common stock to common stock |
| 7 |
| (7 | ) | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| ||||||
Repurchase and retirement of common stock |
| (109 | ) | (160 | ) | (32,286 | ) | — |
| — |
| — |
| ||||||
Balance at December 31, 2004 |
| 936 |
| 1,448 |
| 35,764 |
| 35,156 |
| — |
| (534 | ) | ||||||
Net earnings |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 26,040 |
| — |
| — |
| ||||||
Dividends paid, $.16 per share (1) |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| (5,737 | ) | — |
| — |
| ||||||
Issuance of restricted stock awards, net of forfeitures |
| 6 |
| — |
| 714 |
| — |
| — |
| (720 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds from stock options exercised |
| — |
| — |
| 4 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| ||||||
Amortization of deferred compensation, net of forfeitures |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 214 |
| ||||||
Conversion of Class A common stock to common stock |
| 122 |
| (122 | ) | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| ||||||
Other |
| — |
| — |
| (21 | ) | — |
| — |
| — |
| ||||||
Balance at December 31, 2005 |
| 1,064 |
| 1,326 |
| 36,461 |
| 55,459 |
| — |
| (1,040 | ) | ||||||
Reclassification of deferred compensation upon adoption of FASB Statement No. 123R |
| — |
| — |
| (1,040 | ) | — |
| — |
| 1,040 |
| ||||||
Cumulative effect of accounting change for adoption of SAB No. 108 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| (1,541 | ) | — |
| — |
| ||||||
Net earnings |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 25,328 |
| — |
| — |
| ||||||
Dividends paid, $.17 per share (1) |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| (5,510 | ) | — |
| — |
| ||||||
Repurchase and retirement of common stock |
| (106 | ) | (133 | ) | (34,813 | ) | — |
| — |
| — |
| ||||||
Proceeds from stock options exercised |
| 5 |
| — |
| 465 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| ||||||
Issuance of nonvested stock awards, net of forfeitures |
| 6 |
| — |
| (6 | ) | — |
| — |
| — |
| ||||||
Stock-based compensation |
| — |
| — |
| 732 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| ||||||
Excess tax benefit on stock awards |
| — |
| — |
| 50 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| ||||||
Conversion of Class A common stock to common stock |
| 77 |
| (77 | ) | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| ||||||
Three-for-two stock split |
| 496 |
| 584 |
| (1,080 | ) | — |
| — |
| — |
| ||||||
Adoption of FASB Statement No.158, net of income tax benefit of $333 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| (488 | ) | — |
| ||||||
Balance at December 31, 2006 |
| $ | 1,542 |
| $ | 1,700 |
| $ | 769 |
| $ | 73,736 |
| $ | (488 | ) | $ | — |
|
(1) Restated for stock split (see below).
We have 125,000,000 shares of authorized capital stock which consists of 74,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $.10 per share; 50,000,000 shares of Class A common stock, par value $.10 per share; and 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $.10 per share.
47
On April 26, 2006, our Board of Directors approved a three-for-two split of both classes of our common stock. The split was effected in the form of a stock dividend by issuing one additional share of stock for every two shares of stock held. On June 15, 2006, 4,967,650 shares of common stock and 5,837,343 shares of Class A common stock were distributed to shareholders of record at the close of business on May 10, 2006. No fractional shares were issued. Shareholders were paid cash in lieu of any fractional shares. All share and per share amounts have been restated to give effect to the stock split, except for the number of shares shown as outstanding at December 31, 2005 on our consolidated balance sheet. The statement of stockholders’ equity reflects the stock split by reclassifying from additional paid-in capital to common stock and Class A common stock an amount equal to the par value of the additional shares issued to effect the stock split.
The holders of common stock are entitled to one vote per share and the holders of our Class A common stock are entitled to 10 votes per share. There is no cumulative voting. Shares of Class A common stock are convertible at any time into our shares of common stock on a one-for-one basis at the option of the stockholder. Subject to rights of any preferred stockholder, holders of our common stock and Class A common stock are entitled to receive on a pro rata basis such dividends, if any, as may be declared from time to time by the Board of Directors out of funds legally available for that purpose. At the discretion of our Board of Directors, we may pay to the holders of common stock a cash dividend greater than the dividend, if any, paid to the holders of Class A common stock.
Under Delaware law, a change of ownership of a Licensed Agent will automatically terminate its license 90 days after the change of ownership occurs, unless the Director of the Delaware State Lottery Office determines after application to issue a new license to the new owners. Change of ownership may occur if any new individual or entity acquires, directly or indirectly, 10% or more of the Licensed Agent or if more than 20% of the legal or beneficial interest in the Licensed Agent is transferred, whether by direct or indirect means. The Commission may require extensive background investigations of any new owner acquiring a 10% or greater interest in a Licensed Agent, including criminal background checks. Accordingly, we have a restrictive legend on our shares of common stock which require that (a) any holders of common stock found to be disqualified or unsuitable or not possessing the qualifications required by any appropriate gaming authority could be required to dispose of such stock and (b) any holder of common stock intending to acquire 10% or more of our outstanding common stock must first obtain prior written approval from the Delaware State Lottery Office.
We adopted a stockholder rights plan in 2002. The rights are attached to and trade in tandem with our common stock and Class A common stock. Each right entitles the registered holder to purchase from us one share of common stock at a purchase price of $200 per share. The rights, unless earlier redeemed by our Board of Directors, will detach and trade separately from our common stock upon the occurrence of certain events such as the unsolicited acquisition by a third party of beneficial ownership of 10% or more of our outstanding combined common stock and Class A common stock or the announcement by a third party of the intent to commence a tender or exchange offer for 10% or more of our outstanding combined common stock and Class A common stock. After the rights have detached, the holders of such rights would generally have the ability to purchase such number of either shares of our common stock or stock of an acquirer of ours having a market value equal to twice the exercise price of the right being exercised, thereby causing substantial dilution to a person or group of persons attempting to acquire control of us. The rights may serve as a significant deterrent to unsolicited attempts to acquire control of us, including transactions involving a premium to the market price of our stock. The rights expire on January 1, 2012, unless earlier redeemed.
We adopted SAB No. 108 during the quarter ended December 31, 2006. Prior to adopting SAB No. 108, our approach to quantifying misstatements only considered the amount of the error originating in the current year statement of earnings. Thus the effects of correcting the portion of the balance sheet misstatement that originated in prior years were not considered. Upon adopting SAB No. 108, we changed our approach to quantifying the effects of misstatements to include an analysis of the impact on the current year statement of earnings for the cumulative balance of any known errors, regardless of when they originated. When we applied the new approach to quantifying the effects of misstatements to our 2006 consolidated financial statements, we identified an error that was not material to our consolidated statement of earnings in any prior quarter or annual period; however, the cumulative error would have been material to correct in the current period. The error resulted from a difference in the amount of slot win we recorded from our meters as compared to the amount of cash slot win that was taken out of the slot machines and had accumulated over several years. Since the error was not material to any prior statement of earnings, we were not required to restate prior year financial statements. The consolidated financial statements were
48
corrected with an adjustment of $1,541,000, net of income tax effect of $1,055,000, to the beginning balance of retained earnings at January 1, 2006.
On January 24, 2007, our Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend on both classes of common stock of $.045 per share. The dividend is payable on March 10, 2007 to stockholders of record at the close of business on February 10, 2007.
On October 23, 2002, our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to 3,000,000 shares of our outstanding common stock. The purchases may be made in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions as conditions warrant. The repurchase authorization does not obligate us to acquire any specific number of shares and may be suspended at any time. No purchases of our equity securities were made pursuant to this authorization during the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005. During the year ended December 31, 2004, we purchased and retired 76,350 shares of our outstanding common stock pursuant to this plan at an average purchase price of $6.63 per share, not including nominal brokerage commissions. At December 31, 2006, we had remaining repurchase authority of 2,668,733 shares.
During 2006, we purchased and retired 3,431 shares of our outstanding common stock for $56,000. These purchases were made from employees in connection with the vesting of restricted stock awards under our stock incentive plan and were not pursuant to the aforementioned repurchase authorization. Since the vesting of a restricted stock award is a taxable event to our employees for which income tax withholding is required, the plan allows employees to surrender to us some of the shares that would otherwise have vested in satisfaction of their tax liability. The surrender of these shares is treated by us as a purchase of the shares.
On November 10, 2004, we commenced a tender offer to purchase up to 1,560,632 shares of our common stock and up to 2,411,259 shares of our Class A common stock at a fixed price of $8.00 per share. The offer expired on December 10, 2004. We purchased 1,560,632 shares of our common stock and 2,400,000 shares of our Class A common stock for $32,045,000, including expenses, in connection with the tender offer.
On December 19, 2005, our Board of Directors authorized us to commence a tender offer to purchase up to 1,595,906 shares of our common stock and up to 1,988,202 shares of our Class A common stock at a fixed price of $9.67 per share. The offer expired on January 19, 2006. We purchased 1,595,906 shares of our common stock and 1,987,500 shares of our Class A common stock for $34,996,000, including expenses, in connection with the tender offer.
We have a stock incentive plan which provides for the grant of up to 2,250,000 shares of common stock to our officers and key employees through stock options and/or awards valued in whole or in part by reference to our common stock, such as nonvested stock awards. Under the plan, option grants must have an exercise price of not less than 100% of the fair market value of the underlying shares of common stock at the date of the grant. The stock options have eight-year terms and generally vest equally over a period of six years from the date of grant. Once the options are exercised, our plan requires that the common stock be held for a minimum of one year. The nonvested stock vests an aggregate of twenty percent each year beginning on the second anniversary date of the grant. As of December 31, 2006, there were 959,909 shares available for granting options or stock awards.
Stock option activity for the year ended December 31, 2006 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
| Weighted |
|
|
| |||
Outstanding at December 31, 2005 |
| 1,026,384 |
| $ | 6.88 |
|
|
|
|
| |
Forfeited |
| (7,500 | ) | $ | 6.34 |
|
|
|
|
| |
Exercised |
| (65,135 | ) | $ | 7.18 |
|
|
|
|
| |
Outstanding at December 31, 2006 |
| 953,749 |
| $ | 6.86 |
| 2.9 |
| $ | 6,208,293 |
|
Exercisable at December 31, 2006 |
| 602,924 |
| $ | 6.89 |
| 2.5 |
| $ | 3,906,357 |
|
49
No stock options were granted during the three year period ending December 31, 2006. The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 was $560,000 and $3,000, respectively. No stock options were exercised during the year ended December 31, 2004.
Nonvested stock option activity for the year ended December 31, 2006 was as follows:
|
|
| Weighted |
| ||
Nonvested at December 31, 2005 |
| 505,929 |
| $ | 2.99 |
|
Forfeited |
| (3,750 | ) | $ | 2.68 |
|
Vested |
| (151,354 | ) | $ | 3.02 |
|
Nonvested at December 31, 2006 |
| 350,825 |
| $ | 2.99 |
|
The total fair value of stock options vested during the year ended December 31, 2006 was $457,000. We recorded, within general and administrative expenses, compensation expense of $372,000 related to stock options for the year ended December 31, 2006. As of December 31, 2006, there was $553,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested stock options granted to employees under our stock incentive plan. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2 years.
Nonvested restricted stock activity for the year ended December 31, 2006 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
| ||
Nonvested at December 31, 2005 |
| 160,500 |
| $ | 8.23 |
|
Granted |
| 112,500 |
| $ | 9.58 |
|
Vested |
| (14,100 | ) | $ | 7.75 |
|
Forfeited |
| (15,600 | ) | $ | 8.78 |
|
Nonvested at December 31, 2006 |
| 243,300 |
| $ | 8.85 |
|
The aggregate market value of the nonvested stock at the date of issuance is being amortized on a straight-line basis over the six-year service period. The total fair value of shares vested during the year ended December 31, 2006 was $109,000. No shares vested during the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004. The weighted-average grant-date fair value of nonvested stock awards granted during the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 was $9.58, $8.61 and $7.75, respectively. We recorded, within general and administrative expenses, compensation expense of $360,000, $214,000 and $67,000 related to nonvested stock awards for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. As of December 31, 2006, there was $1,620,000 of total deferred compensation cost related to nonvested stock awards granted to employees under our stock incentive plan. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 4.6 years.
NOTE 9—Related Party Transactions
During the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, we allocated costs of $1,614,000, $1,613,000 and $1,241,000, respectively, to DVD for certain administrative and operating services. Additionally, DVD allocated costs of $121,000, $113,000 and $116,000 to us for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The allocations were based on an analysis of each company’s share of the costs. In connection with DVD’s 2006, 2005 and 2004 NASCAR event weekends at Dover International Speedway, we provided certain catering services for which DVD was invoiced $965,000, $938,000 and $933,000, respectively. Additionally, DVD invoiced us $149,000, $113,000 and $238,000, respectively, for tickets and other services related to the 2006, 2005 and 2004 Dover events. As of December 31, 2006 and 2005, our consolidated balance sheet includes a $9,000 payable and $15,000 receivable from DVD, respectively, for the aforementioned items. We have since settled the payable in the first quarter of 2007. The net costs incurred by each company for these services are not necessarily indicative of the costs that would have been incurred if the companies had been unrelated entities and/or had otherwise independently managed these functions; however, management believes that these costs are reasonable.
50
Our use of DVD’s 5/8-mile harness racing track is pursuant to an easement granted to us by DVD which does not require the payment of any rent. Under the terms of the easement, we have exclusive use of the harness track during the period beginning November 1 of each year and ending April 30 of the following year, together with set up and tear down rights for the two weeks before and after such period. The harness track is located on property owned by DVD and is on the inside of DVD’s motorsports superspeedway. Our indoor grandstands are used by DVD at no charge in connection with its major motorsports events. DVD also leases its principal office space from us. Various easements and agreements relative to access, utilities and parking have also been entered into between DVD and us relative to our respective Dover, Delaware facilities.
In conjunction with the spin-off from DVD, we and DVD entered into various agreements that addressed the allocation of assets and liabilities between the two companies and that define the companies’ relationship after the separation. Among these are the Real Property Agreement, the Transition Support Services Agreement and the Tax Sharing Agreement.
The Real Property Agreement governs certain real property transfers, leases and easements affecting our Dover, Delaware facility.
The Transition Support Services Agreement provides for each of us and DVD to provide each other with certain administrative and operational services. The party receiving the services is required to pay for them within 30 business days after receipt of an invoice at rates agreed upon by us and DVD. The agreement may be terminated in whole or in part 90 days after the request of the party receiving the services or 180 days after the request of the party providing the services.
The Tax Sharing Agreement provides for, among other things, the treatment of income tax matters for periods beginning before and including the date of the spin-off and any taxes resulting from transactions effected in connection with the spin-off. With respect to any period ending on or before the spin-off or any tax period in which the spin-off occurs, DVD:
· continues to be the sole and exclusive agent for us in all matters relating to our income, franchise, property, sales and use tax liabilities;
· subject to our obligation to pay for items relating to our gaming business, bears any costs relating to tax audits, including tax assessments and any related interest and penalties and any legal, litigation, accounting or consulting expenses;
· continues to have the sole and exclusive responsibility for the preparation and filing of consolidated federal and consolidated state income tax returns; and
· subject to the right and authority of us to direct DVD in the defense or prosecution of the portion of a tax contest directly and exclusively related to any Dover Downs Gaming & Entertainment, Inc. tax adjustment, generally has the powers, in DVD’s sole discretion, to contest or compromise any claim or refund on our behalf.
Henry B. Tippie, the Chairman of our Board of Directors, controls in excess of fifty percent of our voting power. Mr. Tippie’s voting control with respect to us emanates from his direct and indirect holdings of common stock and Class A common stock, from his status as executor of the estate of John W. Rollins, our largest stockholder, and from certain shares as to which he has voting rights pursuant to a voting agreement with R. Randall Rollins, one of our directors. This means that Mr. Tippie has the ability to determine the outcome of our election of directors and to determine the outcome of many significant corporate transactions, many of which only require the approval of a majority of our voting power.
Patrick J. Bagley, Kenneth K. Chalmers, Denis McGlynn, Jeffrey W. Rollins, John W. Rollins, Jr., R. Randall Rollins and Henry B. Tippie are all Directors of ours and DVD. Denis McGlynn is the President and Chief Executive Officer of both companies, Klaus M. Belohoubek is the Senior Vice President — General Counsel and Secretary of both companies and Patrick J. Bagley is the Senior Vice President — Finance and Chief Financial Officer of DVD. Mr. Tippie controls in excess of fifty percent of the voting power of DVD.
51
NOTE 10—Commitments and Contingencies
We are a party to ordinary routine litigation incidental to our business. Management does not believe that the resolution of any of these matters is likely to have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.
As of December 31, 2006, we have purchase obligations related to the expansion of the Dover Downs Hotel. Construction began in the second quarter of 2006 and is expected to be completed in the fall of 2007. The estimated cost of the hotel expansion is $53,600,000, of which approximately $16,400,000 was paid through 2006 with the remainder expected to be paid in 2007.
We have employment, severance and noncompete agreements with certain of our officers and directors under which certain change of control, severance and noncompete payments and benefits might become payable in the event of a change in our control, defined to include a tender offer or the closing of a merger or similar corporate transactions. In the event of such a change in our control and the subsequent termination of employment of all employees covered under these agreements, the maximum contingent liability would be approximately $9,600,000.
NOTE 11—Quarterly Results (unaudited)
|
| March 31 |
| June 30 |
| September 30 |
| December 31 (a) |
| ||||
Year Ended December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Revenues |
| $ | 59,272,000 |
| $ | 56,831,000 |
| $ | 61,681,000 |
| $ | 58,667,000 |
|
Operating earnings |
| $ | 11,104,000 |
| $ | 11,136,000 |
| $ | 12,655,000 |
| $ | 11,015,000 |
|
Net earnings |
| $ | 6,163,000 |
| $ | 6,090,000 |
| $ | 6,994,000 |
| $ | 6,081,000 |
|
Net earnings per share-basic |
| $ | 0.19 |
| $ | 0.19 |
| $ | 0.22 |
| $ | 0.19 |
|
Net earnings per share-diluted |
| $ | 0.18 |
| $ | 0.19 |
| $ | 0.21 |
| $ | 0.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Year Ended December 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Revenues |
| $ | 52,091,000 |
| $ | 54,674,000 |
| $ | 56,072,000 |
| $ | 54,015,000 |
|
Operating earnings |
| $ | 8,824,000 |
| $ | 9,999,000 |
| $ | 10,941,000 |
| $ | 16,022,000 |
|
Net earnings |
| $ | 4,979,000 |
| $ | 5,644,000 |
| $ | 6,195,000 |
| $ | 9,222,000 |
|
Net earnings per share-basic |
| $ | 0.14 |
| $ | 0.16 |
| $ | 0.17 |
| $ | 0.26 |
|
Net earnings per share-diluted |
| $ | 0.14 |
| $ | 0.16 |
| $ | 0.17 |
| $ | 0.26 |
|
(a) Included in our 2005 fourth quarter results is a gain on the sale of a shopping center of $5,837,000 ($3,461,000 after income taxes).
Per share data amounts for the quarters have each been calculated separately. Accordingly, quarterly amounts may not add to the annual amounts because of differences in the average common shares outstanding during each period.
52