FNB Bancorp 10-Q 2008 Q1 Quarterly report

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

Quarterly Report
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the Quarterly Period EndedMarch 31, 2008

FNB BANCORP

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

California
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)

000-49693	92-2115369
(Commission File Number)	(IRS Employer Identification No.)

975 El Camino Real, South San Francisco, California	94080
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:(650) 588-6800

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.   Yesx   Noo

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filero	Accelerated filerx
Non-accelerated filero	Smaller reporting companyo

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yeso   Nox

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: Common Stock as of May 4, 2008: 2,965,717 shares.

PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements.

FNB BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(UNAUDITED)

	March 31, 2008		December 31, 2007
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
ASSETS
Cash and due from banks	$	20,214	$	15,750
Federal funds sold		1,885		—
Cash and equivalents		22,099		15,750
Securities available-for-sale		87,107		94,432
Loans, net		491,400		489,574
Bank premises, equipment, and leasehold improvements		13,880		13,686
Other real estate owned		3,955		440
Goodwill		1,841		1,841
Accrued interest receivable and other assets		29,262		28,742
Total assets	$	649,544	$	644,465
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Deposits
Demand, noninterest bearing		120,140		120,423
Demand, interest bearing		63,017		61,215
Savings and money market		183,460		181,276
Time		133,062		136,341
Total deposits		499,679		499,255
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		75,000		66,000
Federal funds purchased		─		5,595
Accrued expenses and other liabilities		7,794		7,070
Total liabilities		582,473		577,920
Stockholders’ equity
Common stock, no par value, authorized 10,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 2,963,000 shares on at March 31, 2008 and 2,965,000 shares at December 31, 2007		42,785		42,858
Additional paid-in capital		255		231
Retained earnings		23,035		23,039
Accumulated other comprehensive income		996		417
Total stockholders’ equity		67,071		66,545
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	649,544	$	644,465

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

2

FNB BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF EARNINGS
(UNAUDITED)

(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)	Three months ended March 31,
	2008		2007
Interest income:
Interest and fees on loans	$	9,389	$	8,741
Interest on taxable securities		513		368
Interest on tax-exempt securities		428		525
Federal funds sold		41		270
Total interest income		10,371		9,904
Interest expense:
Deposits		2,456		2,672
FHLB advances		852		413
Federal funds purchased		14		1
Total interest expense		3,322		3,086
Net interest income		7,049		6,818
Provision for loan losses		990		150
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		6,059		6,668
Noninterest income:
Service charges		702		612
Credit card fees		164		199
Gain on sale of securities		138		—
Other income		257		193
Total noninterest income		1,261		1,004
Noninterest expense:
Salaries and employee benefits		3,517		3,225
Occupancy expense		515		449
Equipment expense		475		381
Professional fees		259		386
Telephone, postage and supplies		232		291
Bankcard expenses		153		179
Other expense		1,026		847
Total noninterest expense		6,177		5,758
Earnings before income tax expense		1,143		1,914
Income tax expense		256		455
NET EARNINGS	$	887	$	1,459
Earnings per share data:
Basic	$	0.30	$	0.49
Diluted	$	0.30	$	0.48
Weighted average shares outstanding:
Basic		2,966		2,985
Diluted		2,975		3,037

          See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

3

FNB BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(UNAUDITED)

(Dollar amounts in thousands)	Three months ended March 31,
	2008		2007
Net earnings	$	887	$	1,459
Unrealized gain on AFS securities		579		31
Total comprehensive income	$	1,466	$	1,490

          See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

4

FNB BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)

(Dollar amounts in thousands)	Three months ended March 31
	2008			2007
Cash flow from operating activities:
Net earnings	$	887		$	1,459
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities
Gain on sale of securities available-for-sale		(138	)		—
Depreciation, amortization and accretion		396			273
Stock-based compensation expense		24			8
Provision for loan losses		990			150
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accrued interest receivable and other assets		(520	)		(1,480	)
Accrued expenses and other liabilities		(124	)		(344	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		1,515			66
Cash flows from investing activities
Purchase of securities available-for-sale		(11,816	)		(10,964	)
Proceeds from matured/called/sold securities available-for-sale		20,253			13,220
Net increase in loans		(6,331	)		(21,200	)
Purchases of bank premises, equipment, leasehold improvements		(582	)		(535	)
Net cash provided by investing activities		1,524			(19,479	)
Cash flows from financing activities
Net increase in demand and savings deposits		3,703			23,555
Net increase (decrease) in time deposits		(3,279	)		9,415
Net increase in Federal Home Loan Bank advances		9,000			—
Net decrease in federal funds purchased		(5,595	)		—
Dividends paid		(446	)		(428	)
Issuance of common stock		39			—
Repurchases of common stock		(112	)		—
Net cash provided by financing activities		3,310			32,542
NET INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS		6,349			13,129
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		15,750			27,022
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	22,099		$	40,151
Additional cash flow information
Interest paid		3,351			2,964
Income taxes paid		155			—
Non-cash investing and financing activities:
Accrued dividends		445			427
Change in unrealized gain (loss) in available for-sale securities		579			31
Loans transferred to Other Real Estate Owned		3,515			—

          See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

5

FNB BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

MARCH 31, 2008

(UNAUDITED)

NOTE A – BASIS OF PRESENTATION

          FNB Bancorp (the “Company”) is a bank holding company registered under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended. The Company was incorporated under the laws of the State of California on February 28, 2001. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of FNB Bancorp and its wholly owned subsidiary, First National Bank of Northern California (the “Bank”). The Bank provides traditional banking services in San Mateo and San Francisco counties.

          All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. The financial statements include all adjustments of a normal and recurring nature, which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the financial results for the interim periods.

          The accompanying unaudited financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and, therefore, do not include all information and footnotes normally included in annual financial statements prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Accordingly, these financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2007.

          Results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results for the full year.

NOTE B – EARNINGS PER SHARE CALCULATION

          Earnings per common share (EPS) are computed based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Basic EPS excludes dilution and is computed by dividing net earnings by the weighted average of common shares outstanding. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock.

          Earnings per share have been computed based on the following (dollars in thousands):

(Dollar amounts in thousands)	Three months ended March 31,
	2008		2007
Net earnings	$	887	$	1,459
Average number of shares outstanding		2,966,000		2,985,000
Effect of dilutive options		9,000		52,000
Average number of shares outstanding used to calculate diluted earnings per share		2,975,000		3,037,000

174,738 and 43,316 antidilutive options were excluded in the 2008 and 2007 computations, respectively.

6

NOTE C – COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

          Comprehensive income is the change in equity of a business enterprise during a period from transactions and other events and circumstances from non-owner sources. Other comprehensive income consists of net unrealized gains and losses on investment securities available-for-sale. Comprehensive income for the three months ended March 31, 2008 was $1,466,000 compared to $1,490,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2007.

NOTE D – FAIR VALUE

          Effective January 1, 2008, the Company adopted SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements,” which requires enhanced disclosures about financial instruments carried at fair value. SFAS No. 157 establishes a disclosure framework that quantifies fair value estimates by the level of pricing precision utilized in measuring financial instruments, impaired loans and Other Real Estate Owned properties at fair value. The degree of judgment utilized in measuring the fair value of assets generally correlates to the level of pricing precision. Financial instruments rarely traded or not quoted will generally have a higher degree of judgment utilized in measuring fair value. Pricing precision is impacted by a number of factors including the type of asset, the availability of the asset, the market demand for the asset, and other conditions that were considered at the time of the valuation. See “Fair Value Measurements” for additional information about the level of pricing transparency associated with the financial instruments carried at fair value.

          Fair Value Measurement. The following table presents information about the Company’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value as of March 31, 2008, and indicates the fair value techniques used by the Company to determine such fair value. In general, fair values determined by Level 1 inputs utilize quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access. Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, such as interest rates and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, and include situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability. In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement in its entirety falls has been determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the asset or liability.

7

          Loans. The Bank does not record loans at fair value. However, from time to time, if a loan is considered impaired, and an allowance for loan losses is established. Loans for which it is probable that payment of interest and principal will not be made in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan agreement, are considered impaired. Once a loan is identified as individually impaired, management measures impairment in accordance with SFAS No. 114, “Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan.” The fair value of impaired loans is estimated using one of several methods, including collateral value, market value of similar debt, enterprise value, liquidation value and discounted cash flows. Those impaired loans not requiring an allowance represent loans for which the value of the expected repayments or collateral exceed the recorded investments in such loans. At March 31, 2008, the Bank held no impaired loans. In accordance with SFAS No. 157, impaired loans where an allowance is established based on the fair value of collateral require classification in the fair value hierarchy. If the fair value of the collateral is based on an observable market price or a current appraised value, the Bank records the impaired loans as nonrecurring Level 2. When an appraised value is not available, or management determines the fair value of the collateral is further impaired below the appraised value and there is no observable market price, the Bank records the impaired loans as nonrecurring Level 3.

          Goodwill and Premium on Purchased Deposits. Goodwill and premium on purchased deposits are subject to impairment testing. A projected cash flow valuation method is used in the completion of impairment testing. This valuation method requires a significant degree of management judgment. In the event the projected undiscounted net operating cash flows are less than the carrying value, the asset is recorded at fair value as determined by the valuation model. As such, the Bank classifies goodwill and premium on purchased deposits subjected to nonrecurring fair value adjustments as Level 3. As of March 31, 2008, there were no impairments of goodwill or the premium on purchased deposits.

The following table presents the recorded amount of assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis:

(Dollar amounts in thousands)			Fair Value Measurements at March 31, 2008, Using
Description	Fair Value March 31, 2008		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Available-for-sale securities	$	87,107	$	—	$	87,107	$	—
Total assets measured at fair value	$	87,107	$	—	$	87,107	$	—

The following methods were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instrument above:

Available-for-sale Securities – Fair values established for available-for-sale investment securities are based on estimates of fair values quoted for similar types of securities with similar maturities, risk and yield characteristics.

8

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

          Forward-Looking Information and Uncertainties Regarding Future Financial Performance.

          This report, including management’s discussion below, concerning earnings and financial condition, contains “forward-looking statements”. Forward-looking statements are estimates of or statements about expectations or beliefs regarding the Company’s future financial performance or anticipated future financial condition that are based on current information and that are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual operating results in the future to differ significantly from those expected at the current time. Those risks and uncertainties include, although they are not limited to, the following:

          Increased Competition. Increased competition from other banks and financial service businesses, mutual funds and securities brokerage and investment banking firms that offer competitive loan and investment products could require us to reduce interest rates and loan fees to attract new loans or to increase interest rates that we offer on time deposits, either or both of which could, in turn, reduce interest income and net interest margins.

          Possible Adverse Changes in Economic Conditions. Adverse changes in national or local economic conditions could (i) reduce loan demand which could, in turn, reduce interest income and net interest margins; (ii) adversely affect the financial capability of borrowers to meet their loan obligations, which, in turn, could result in increases in loan losses and require increases in provisions for possible loan losses, thereby adversely affecting operating results; and (iii) lead to reductions in real property values that, due to the Company’s reliance on real property to secure many of its loans, could make it more difficult to prevent losses from being incurred on non-performing loans through the sale of such real properties.

          Possible Adverse Changes in National Economic Conditions and Federal Reserve Board Monetary Policies. Changes in national economic policies, such as increases in inflation or declines in economic output often prompt changes in Federal Open Market Committee (“FOMC”) monetary policies that could reduce interest income or increase the cost of funds to the Company, either of which could result in reduced earnings.

          Changes in Regulatory Policies. Changes in federal and national bank regulatory policies, such as increases in capital requirements or in loan loss reserve or asset/liability ratio requirements, could adversely affect earnings by reducing yields on earning assets or increasing operating costs.

          Due to these and other possible uncertainties and risks, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements contained in this report, which speak only as of the date of this report, or to make predictions based solely on historical financial performance. The Company also disclaims any obligation to update forward-looking statements contained in this report.

9

          Critical Accounting Policies And Estimates

          Management’s discussion and analysis of its financial condition and results of operations are based upon the Company’s financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires the Company to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, the Company evaluates its estimates, including those related to its loans and allowance for loan losses. The Company bases its estimates on current market conditions, historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. All adjustments that, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation for the periods presented have been reflected as required by Regulation S-X, Rule 10-01. The Company believes the following critical accounting policy requires significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements.

          Allowance for Loan Losses

          The allowance for loan losses is periodically evaluated for adequacy by management. Factors considered include the Company’s loan loss experience, known and inherent risks in the portfolio, current economic conditions, known adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay, regulatory policies, and the estimated value of underlying collateral. The evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance is based on the above factors along with prevailing and anticipated economic conditions that may impact borrowers’ ability to repay loans. Determination of the allowance is in part objective and in part a subjective judgment by management based on the information it currently has in its possession. Adverse changes in any of these factors or the discovery of new adverse information could result in higher than expected charge-offs and loan loss provisions.

          Goodwill

          Goodwill arises from the Company’s purchase price exceeding the fair value of the net assets of an acquired business. Goodwill represents the value attributable to intangible elements acquired. The value of this goodwill is supported ultimately by profit from the acquired business. A decline in earnings could lead to impairment, which would be recorded as a write-down in the Company’s consolidated statements of income. Events that may indicate goodwill impairment include significant or adverse changes in results of operations of the acquired business or asset, economic or political climate; an adverse action or assessment by a regulator; unanticipated competition; and a more-likely-than-not expectation that a reporting unit will be sold or disposed of at a loss.

          Provision for Income Taxes

          The Company is subject to income tax laws of the United States, its states, and municipalities in which it operates. The Company considers its income tax provision methodology to be critical, as the determination of current and deferred taxes based on complex analyses of many factors including interpretation of federal and state laws, the difference between tax and financial reporting bases of assets and liabilities (temporary differences), estimates of amounts due or owed, the timing of reversals of temporary differences and current financial standards. Actual results could differ significantly from the estimates due to tax law interpretations used in determining the current and deferred income tax liabilities. Additionally, there can be no assurances that estimates and interpretations used in determining income tax liabilities may not be challenged by federal and state tax authorities.

10

          Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) announced that it had revised Statement 141, Business Combinations, with 141(R). The revised Statement No. 141 was written to improve the relevance, representational faithfulness and comparability of the information that a reporting entity provides in its financial reports about a business combination and its effects. This Statement establishes principles and requirements for how the acquirer:

a.	Recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree
b.	Recognizes and measures the goodwill acquired in the business combination or a gain from a bargain purchase
c.	Determines what information to disclose to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination

This Statement applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The Company does not expect this Standard to have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements.

          In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interest in Consolidated Financial Statements – an amendment of ARB No. 51.” Statement No. 160 clarifies reporting and disclosure requirements related to noncontrolling interest included in an entity’s consolidated financial statements. This Statement clarifies that noncontrolling interests are to be reported in the noncontrolling section of the balance sheet and requires net income to include amounts from both the parent and the noncontrolling interest. This Statement also requires the parent company to recognize a gain or loss in net income when a subsidiary is deconsolidated. This Statement is effective for fiscal years (and interim periods within those years), beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The Company will apply this Statement prospectively and does not expect the Statement to have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

          In March 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement No. 161 “Disclosures About Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities – an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133.” Statement No. 161 changes the disclosure requirements for derivative instruments and hedging activities by requiring enhanced disclosures about (a) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for, and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance and cash flows. This statement is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008. The Company does not expect this Standard to have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

          Earnings Analysis

          Net earnings for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 were $887,000, compared to net earnings of $1,459,000 for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, a decrease of $572,000, or 39.2%. Earnings before income tax expense for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 were $1,143,000, compared to $1,914,000 for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, a decrease of $771,000, or 40.3%.

11

          Net interest income for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 was $7,049,000, compared to $6,818,000 for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, an increase of $231,000, or 3.39%. Beginning in September of 2007, the Federal Open Market Committee (“FOMC”) began a series of significant reductions in the intended federal funds rate. Beginning in September 2007 and continuing through March 2008, the FOMC reduced the intended federal funds rate six times, for a total reduction of 300 basis points to a target of 2.25% as of March 31, 2008. This significant reduction in short term rates has negatively affected the Company’s net interest margin. The rate of decrease in the rates paid for interest bearing liabilities has not kept pace with the rate of decrease in rates earned on interest earning assets during the first quarter of 2008, effectively causing a rate related drop in net interest income compared to the same period in 2007.

          Basic earnings per share were $0.30 for the first quarter of 2008 compared to $0.49 for the first quarter of 2007. Diluted earnings per share were $0.30 for the first quarter of 2008 compared to $0.48 for the first quarter of 2007.

          The following table presents an analysis of net interest income and average earning assets and liabilities for the three-month period ended March 31, 2008 compared to the three-month period ended March 31, 2007.

12

TABLE 1	NET INTEREST INCOME AND AVERAGE BALANCES FNB BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
		Three months ended March 31,
		2008								2007
(Dollar amounts In thousands)		Average Balance		Interest			Annualized Average Yield			Average Balance		Interest			Annualized Average Yield
INTEREST EARNING ASSETS
Loans, gross (1) (2)		$	501,831	$	9,389			7.52	%	$	429,405	$	8,741			8.26	%
Taxable securities (3)			40,405		515			5.13	%		31,351		368			4.76	%
Nontaxable securities (3)			47,408		557			4.73	%		59,041		683			4.69	%
Federal funds sold			4,979		41			3.31	%		20,683		270			5.29	%
Total interest earning assets		$	594,623	$	10,502			7.10	%	$	540,480	$	10,062			7.55	%
NONINTEREST EARNING ASSETS:
Cash and due from banks		$	16,922							$	18,043
Premises and equipment			13,928								13,700
Other assets			27,003								23,803
Total noninterest earning assets		$	57,853							$	55,546
TOTAL ASSETS		$	652,476							$	596,026
INTEREST BEARING LIABILITIES:
Deposits:
Demand, interest bearing		$	60,154	($	99	)		0.66	%	$	60,911	($	103	)		0.69	%
Money market			138,120		(961	)		2.80	%		120,075		(965	)		3.26	%
Savings			45,715		(31	)		0.27	%		50,469		(65	)		0.52	%
Time deposits			134,479		(1,365	)		4.08	%		141,109		(1,539	)		4.42	%
FederalHome Loan Bank advances			77,643		(852	)		4.41	%		30,000		(413	)		5.58	%
Federal funds purchased			1,468		(14	)		3.84	%		100		(1	)		4.06	%
Total interest bearing liabilities		$	457,579	($	3,322	)		2.92	%	$	402,664	($	3,086	)		3.11	%
NONINTEREST BEARING LIABILITIES:
Demand deposits			118,251								122,530
Other liabilities			8,899								8,240
Total noninterest bearing liabilities		$	127,150							$	130,770
TOTAL LIABILITIES		$	584,729							$	533,434
Stockholders’ equity		$	67,747							$	62,592
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY		$	652,476							$	596,026
NET INTEREST INCOME AND MARGIN ON TOTAL EARNING ASSETS (4)				$	7,180			4.86	%			$	6,976			5.23	%

(1) Interest on non-accrual loans is recognized into income on a cash received basis.

(2) Amounts of interest earned included loan fees of $403,000 and $376,000 for the quarters ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

(3) Tax equivalent adjustments recorded at the statutory rate of 34% that are included in the nontaxable securities portfolio are $129,000 and $158,000 for the quarters ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Tax equivalent adjustments included in the nontaxable securities portfolio were derived from nontaxable municipal interest income. Tax equivalent adjustments recorded at the statutory rate of 34% that are included in taxable securities portfolio were created by a dividends received deduction of $2,000 and $0 in the quarters ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Tax equivalent adjustments recorded at the statutory rate of 34% that are included in the taxable investment securities portfolio were created by Freddie Mac Preferred stock.

(4) Net interest margin is computed by dividing net interest income by total average interest earning assets.

          Table 1, above, shows the various components that contributed to changes in net interest income for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007. The principal interest earning assets are loans, from a volume as well as from an earnings rate perspective. For the quarter ended March 31, 2008, average loans outstanding represented 84.4% of average earning assets. For the quarter ended March 31, 2007, they represented 79.4% of average earning assets. The Company achieved significant loan growth during all of 2007 in the Commerciall Real Estate, Construction and Commercial loan segments of the loan portfolio.

13

          The taxable equivalent yield on average interest earning assets for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 compared to the quarter ended March 31, 2007 decreased from 7.55% to 7.10%, or 42 basis points. Although average loans increased by $72,426,000, the average interest on the loan portfolio decreased from 8.26% to 7.52%. Interest income on total interest earning assets increased $440,000 or 4.37%.

          For the three months ended March 31, 2008, compared to the three months ended March 31, 2007, the cost on total interest bearing liabilities decreased from 3.11% to 2.92%, a decrease of 19 basis points. The most expensive as well as principal source of deposit liabilities comes from time deposits. Their average cost decreased from 4.42% to 4.08%, and the expense on these deposits decreased $174,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2008 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2007. Average Federal Home Loan Bank advances increased $47,643,000, but their interest rate decreased from 5.58% for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, to 4.41% for the quarter ended March 31, 2008.

          For the three month periods ended March 31, 2008 and March 31, 2007, respectively, the following tables show the dollar amount of change in interest income and expense and the dollar amounts attributable to: (a) changes in volume (changes in volume at the current year rate), and (b) changes in rate (changes in rate times the prior year’s volume). In this table, the dollar change in rate/volume is prorated to volume and rate proportionately.

TABLE 2	FNB BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY RATE/VOLUME VARIANCE ANALYSIS
(Dollar amounts in thousands)		Three months ended March 31, 2008 compared to 2007
		Interest Income/expense Variance
					Variance Attributable to
					Rate			Volume
INTEREST EARNING ASSETS
Loans		$	648		$	(707	)	$	1,355
Taxable securities			147			32			115
Nontaxable securities			(126	)		11			(137	)
Federal funds sold			(229	)		(24	)		(205	)
Total			440			(688	)		1,128
INTEREST BEARING LIABILITIES
Demand deposits			(4	)		(3	)		(1	)
Money market			(4	)		(130	)		126
Savings			(34	)		(31	)		(3	)
Time deposits			(174	)		(102	)		(72	)
Federal Home Loan Bank advances			439			(84	)		523
Federal funds purchased			13			—			13
Total			236			(350	)		586
NET INTEREST INCOME		$	204		$	(338	)	$	542

14

Noninterest income

          The following table shows the principal components of noninterest income for the periods indicated.

TABLE 3 NONINTEREST INCOME

(Dollar amounts in thousands)	Three months ended March 30,				Variance
(Dollars in thousands)	2008		2007		Amount			Percent
Service charges		702		612		90			14.7	%
Credit card fees		164		199		(35	)		-17.6	%
Gain on sale of securities		138		—		138			—
Other income		257		193		64			33.2	%
Total noninterest income	$	1,261	$	1,004	$	257			25.6	%

          Noninterest income consists mainly of service charges on deposits, credit card fees, and several other miscellaneous types of income. During the first quarter of 2008, $8,271,000 in book value municipal securities were sold resulting in a pretax gain of $138,000. The proceeds from the sale of these securities was used to reduce existing Federal Home Loan Bank borrowing levels.

Noninterest expense

          The following table shows the principal components of noninterest expense for the periods indicated.

TABLE 4 NONINTEREST EXPENSE

(Dollar amounts in thousands)	Three months ended March 31,				Variance
(Dollars in thousands)	2008		2007		Amount			Percent
Salaries and employee benefits	$	3,517	$	3,225	$	292		$	9.1	%
Occupancy expense		515		449		66			14.7	%
Equipment expense		475		381		94			24.7	%
Professional fees		259		386		(127	)		-32.9	%
Telephone, postage & supplies		232		291		(59	)		-20.3	%
Bankcard expenses		153		179		(26	)		-14.5	%
Other expense		1,026		847		179			21.1	%
Total noninterest expense	$	6,177	$	5,758	$	419			7.3	%

          Noninterest expense consists mainly of salaries and employee benefits. For the three months ended March 31, 2008 compared to three months ended March 31, 2007, it represented 56.9% and 56.0% of total noninterest expenses. The increase in salary and employee benefits expense in 2008 compared to the same three month period in 2007 is attributable to normal salary progression and a small increase in full time equivalent employees. Occupancy expense increased $66,000 for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 compared to the same quarter in 2007. This increase was primarily the result of lease rental adjustments on branch premises not owned by the Bank, and depreciation on new leasehold improvements. Equipment expense increased by $94,000. Most of this increase was attributable to $57,000 in depreciation on imaging scanners, acquired after the first quarter of 2007. Professional fees decreased $127,000. The first quarter of 2007 included approximately $136,000 in consulting fees related to placing equipment at a disaster recovery backup computer facility, and the installation and use of check imaging technology. Other expense increased by $179,000, quarter-over-quarter. The significant items in this group of accounts were an $83,000 write-down in Other Real Estate Owned, and an increase of $95,000 in Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) assessments. In 2007, banks, with the exception of de novo institutions received a partial credit against their assessment, because the FDIC insurance fund had a surplus that was created in prior years. This surplus has been used up, so the FDIC has returned to their full assessment rates in 2008.

15

Income Taxes

          The effective tax rate for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 was 22.4% compared to 23.8% for the quarter ended March 31, 2007. The effective tax rate is affected primarily by changing amounts invested in tax-free securities, by available Low Income Housing Credits, by amounts of interest income on qualifying loans in Enterprise Zones, and by the effective state tax rate.

Asset and Liability Management

          Ongoing management of the Company’s interest rate sensitivity limits interest rate risk through monitoring the mix and maturity of loans, investments and deposits. Management regularly reviews the Company’s position and evaluates alternative sources and uses of funds as well as changes in external factors. Various methods are used to achieve and maintain the desired rate sensitivity position including the sale or purchase of assets and product pricing.

          In order to ensure that sufficient funds are available for loan growth and deposit withdrawals, as well as to provide for general needs, the Company must maintain an adequate level of liquidity. Asset liquidity comes from the Company’s ability to convert short-term investments into cash and from the maturity and repayment of loans and investment securities. Liability liquidity comes from Company’s customer base, which provides core deposit growth. The overall liquidity position of the Company is closely monitored and evaluated regularly. Management believes the Company’s liquidity sources at March 31, 2008, are adequate to meet its operating needs in 2008 and going forward into the foreseeable future.

Financial Condition

          Assets. Total assets increased to $649,544,000 at March 31, 2008 from $644,465,000 at December 31, 2007, an increase of $5,079,000. Most of this increase was in cash and equivalents, which increased $6,349,000, and other real estate owned, which increased $3,515,000. These increases were partially offset by a decrease of $7,325,000 in securities available-for-sale. The increase in total assets was funded by an increase in Federal Home Loan Bank advances of $9,000,000, partially offset by a decrease in federal funds purchased of $5,595,000. During the first quarter of 2008, the Bank sold $8,271,000 in municipal securities. The proceeds of this sale were used primarily to pay down existing Federal Home Loan Bank advance debt levels.

16

          Loans. Gross loans at March 31, 2008 were $496,812,000, an increase of $1,536,000 or 0.31% from December 31, 2007. Gross real estate loans decreased $7,014,000, construction loans increased $2,738,000, commercial loans increased $6,462,000, and consumer loans decreased by $650,000. The loan portfolio breakdown was as follows:

TABLE 5	LOAN PORTFOLIO
	March 31			Percent			December 31			Percent
(Dollar amounts in thousands)	2008						2007
Real Estate	$	345,036			69.5	%	$	352,050			71.1	%
Construction		60,100			12.1	%		57,362			11.6	%
Commercial		88,690			17.8	%		82,228			16.6	%
Consumer		2,986			0.6	%		3,636			0.7	%
Gross loans	$	496,812			100.0	%	$	495,276			100.0	%
Net deferred loan cost (fees)		73						(64	)
Allowance for loan losses		(5,485	)					(5,638	)
Net loans	$	491,400					$	489,574

          Allowance for loan losses. Management of the Company is responsible for assessing the overall risks within the Bank’s loan portfolio, assessing the specific loss expectancy, and determining the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses. The level of the allowance is determined by internally generating credit quality ratings, reviewing economic conditions in the Company’s market area, and considering the Company’s historical loan loss experience. The Company considers changes in national and local economic conditions, as well as the condition of various market segments. It also reviews any changes in the nature and volume of the portfolio. It watches for the existence and effect of any concentrations of credit, and changes in the level of such concentrations. The Company also reviews the effect of external factors, such as competition and legal and regulatory requirements. Finally, the Company is committed to maintaining an adequate allowance, identifying credit weaknesses by consistent review of loans, and maintaining the ratings and changing those ratings in a timely manner as circumstances change.

           A summary of transactions in the allowance for loan losses for the three months ended March 31, 2008, and the three months ended March 31, 2007 is as follows:

TABLE 6	ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES
(Dollar amounts in thousands)	Three months ended March 31, 2008			Three months ended March 31, 2007
Balance, beginning of period	$	5,638		$	5,002
Provision for loan losses		990			150
Recoveries		9			2
Amounts charged off		(1,152	)		(23	)
Balance, end of period	$	5,485		$	5,131

           In management’s judgment, the allowance was adequate to absorb losses currently inherent in the loan portfolio at March 31, 2008. However, changes in prevailing economic conditions in the Company’s markets or in the financial condition of its customers could result in changes in the level of nonperforming assets and charge-offs in the future and, accordingly, changes in the allowance.

17

          During the first quarter of 2008, the bank experienced a significant increase in loan charge-offs when compared to the same period in 2007. Overall, an additional provision to the allowance of $990,000 was determined by management to be necessary in order to achieve an adequate allowance for inherent loan losses at March 31, 2008. The allowance is affected by a number of factors, and does not necessarily move in tandem with the level of gross loans outstanding. Management continues to monitor the factors that affect the allowance, and is prepared to make adjustments as they become necessary.

          Nonperforming assets. Nonperforming assets consist of nonaccrual loans, foreclosed assets, and loans that are 90 days or more past due but are still accruing interest and other real estate owned. At March 31, 2008, there was $14,873,000 in nonperforming assets, compared to $11,905,000 at December 31, 2007. Nonaccrual loans were $10,918,000 at March 31, 2008, compared to $11,465,000 at December 31, 2007. There was $3,955,000 in Other Real Estate Owned at March 31, 2008, and $440,000 at December 31, 2007. There were no loans past due 90 days and still accruing at either date. During the first quarter of 2008, the Bank obtained a land development property consisting of 20 residential lots, located in Martinez, California, that was recorded at the net realizable value of $3,200,000. The Bank also obtained through foreclosure a single family residence in Fairfield valued at $398,000 and a single family residence in San Jose valued at $357,000. Management intends to aggressively market these properties. While management believes these properties will sell, there can be no assurance that these properties will sell quickly given the current real estate market.

          Deposits. Total deposits at March 31, 2008, were $499,679,000 compared to $499,255,000 on December 31, 2007. Of these totals, noninterest-bearing demand deposits were $120,140,000 or 24.0% of the total on March 31, 2008, and $ 120,423,000 or 24.1% on December 31, 2007. Time deposits were $133,062,000 on March 31, 2008, and $136,341,000 on December 31, 2007. During the first three months of 2008, compared to the same period in 2007, the deposit mix has changed to include a higher proportion of deposits in interest bearing demand, and in savings and money market accounts. This change may have been partly driven by the rapidly decreasing interest rate environment.

The following table sets forth the maturity schedule of the time certificates of deposit on March 31, 2008:

TABLE 7
(Dollar amounts in thousands) Maturities	Under $100,000		$100,000 or more		Total
Three months or less	$	19,736	$	27,652	$	47,388
Over three through six months		13,789		19,723		33,512
Over six through twelve months		9,541		27,765		37,306
Over twelve months		11,199		3,657		14,856
Total	$	54,265	$	78,797	$	133,062

18

          The following table shows the risk-based capital ratios and leverage ratios at March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 for the Bank:

TABLE 11
Risk-Based Capital Ratios	March 31, 2008			December 31, 2007				Minimum “Well Capitalized” Requirements
Tier 1 Capital		10.39	%		10.47	%	=		6.00	%
Total Capital		11.31	%		11.42	%	=		10.00	%
Leverage Ratios		9.77	%		9.84	%	=		5.00	%

          Liquidity. Liquidity is a measure of the Company’s ability to convert assets into cash with minimal loss. As of March 31, 2008, liquid assets were $109,206,000, or 16.8% of total assets. As of December 31, 2007, liquid assets were $110,182,000, or 17.1% of total assets. Liquidity consists of cash and due from banks, federal funds sold, and securities available-for-sale. The Company’s primary uses of funds are loans, and the primary sources of funds are deposits. The relationship between total net loans and total deposits is a useful additional measure of liquidity. The Company also has federal funds borrowing facilities totaling $70,000,000, a Federal Home Loan Bank line of credit up to 25% of total assets, and a Federal Reserve Bank borrowing facility.

           A higher loan to deposit ratio may lead to a loss of liquid assets in the future. This must be balanced against the fact that loans represent the highest interest earning assets. A lower loan to deposit ratio means lower potential income. On March 31, 2008, net loans were at 98% of deposits. On December 31, 2007 net loans were at 98% of deposits.

          Off-Balance Sheet Items

           The Company has certain ongoing commitments under operating leases. These commitments do not significantly impact operating results. As of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, commitments to extend credit and letters of credit were the only financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk. The Company has not entered into any contracts for financial derivative instruments such as futures, swaps, options or similar instruments. Loan commitments and letters of credit were $141,749,000 and $149,161,000 at March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. As a percentage of net loans, these off-balance sheet items represent 28.8% and 30.5% respectively.

          Corporate Reform Legislation

           President George W. Bush signed the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the “Act”) on July 30, 2002, in response to corporate accounting scandals. Among other matters, the Act increased the penalties for securities fraud, established new rules for financial analysts to prevent conflicts of interest, created a new independent oversight board for the accounting profession, imposed restrictions on the consulting activities of accounting firms that audit company records and required certification of financial reports by corporate executives. The SEC has adopted a number of rule changes to implement the provisions of the Act. The SEC has also approved new rules proposed and adopted by the New York Stock Exchange and the Nasdaq Stock Market to strengthen corporate governance standards for listed companies. The Company anticipates that it will continue to incur costs to comply with the Act and the rules and regulations promulgated pursuant to the Act by the Securities and Exchange Commission of approximately $150,000 annually.

19

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.

           Market risk is the risk of loss to future earnings, to fair values of assets or to future cash flows that may result from changes in the price or value of a financial instrument. The value of a financial instrument may change as a result of changes in interest rates and other market conditions. Market risk is attributed to all market risk sensitive financial instruments, including loans, investment securities, deposits and borrowings. The Company does not engage in trading activities or participate in foreign currency transactions for its own account. Accordingly, exposure to market risk is primarily a function of asset and liability management activities and of changes in market rates of interest. Changes in rates can cause or require increases in the rates paid on deposits that may take effect more rapidly or may be greater than the increases in the interest rates that the Company is able to charge on loans and the yields that it can realize on its investments. The extent of that market risk depends on a number of variables including the sensitivity to changes in market interest rates and the maturities of the Company’s interest earning assets and deposits (see discussion of comparative changes in the prime lending rate and the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco’s Weighted Monthly Cost of Funds, in the second paragraph under the preceding “Earnings Analysis” section of this report.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

           (a)Disclosure Controls and Procedures: An evaluation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and other members of the Company’s senior management as of the end of the Company’s fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2008. The Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as currently in effect are effective in ensuring that the information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files or submits under the Act is (i) accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management (including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer) to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure, and (ii) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms.

          (b)Internal Control Over Financial Reporting: An evaluation of any changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)), that occurred during the Company’s fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2008, was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and other members of the Company’s senior management. The Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that no change identified in connection with such evaluation has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

20

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

          There are no material legal proceedings adverse to the Company or First National Bank to which any director, officer, affiliate of the Company, or 5% shareholder of the Company, or any associate of any such director, officer, affiliate or 5% shareholder of the Company are a party, and none of the foregoing persons has a material interest adverse to the Company or First National Bank.

          From time to time, the Company and/or First National Bank are a party to claims and legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. The Company’s management is not aware of any material pending legal proceedings to which either it or First National Bank may be a party or has recently been a party, which will have a material adverse effect on the financial condition or results of operations of the Company and First National Bank, taken as a whole.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

          There have been no material changes from risk factors previously disclosed by the Company in response to Item 1A, Part 1 of Form 10-K as of December 31, 2007.

Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
	c)          ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES*

Period	(a) Total Number Of Shares (or Units) Purchased		(b) Average Price Paid Per Share (or Unit)			(c) Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased As Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs		(d) Maximum Number (or Approximate dollar Value) of Shares (or Units) that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
Month #1 January 1 through January 31, 2008		0					0		99,697
Month #2 February 1 through February 29, 2008		0					0		99,697
Month #3 March 1 through March 31, 2008		3,000		$	24.50		3,000		96,697
Total		3,000					3,000

21

* On August 24, 2007 the Board of Directors of the Company authorized a stock repurchase program which calls for the repurchase of up to five percent (5%) of the Company’s then outstanding 2,863,635 shares of common stock, or 143,182 shares.

Item 6.	Exhibits
	Exhibits

31: Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications

32: Section 1350 Certifications

22

SIGNATURES

          Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

	FNB BANCORP
	(Registrant)
Dated:
May 9, 2008.	By:     /s/ Thomas C. McGraw
		Thomas C. McGraw
		Chief Executive Officer
		(Authorized Officer)
	By:     /s/ David A. Curtis
		David A. Curtis
		Senior Vice President
		Chief Financial Officer
		(Principal Financial Officer)

23