UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One) | |
| |
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
| For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006 |
|
OR |
|
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
| For the transition period from to |
Commission file number: 000-49706
Willow Financial Bancorp, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Pennsylvania | | 80-0034942 |
(State or other jurisdiction | | (I.R.S. Employer |
of incorporation or organization) | | Identification No.) |
170 South Warner Road, Wayne, Pennsylvania 19087
(Address of principal executive offices)
(610) 995-1700
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Not applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
YES x NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer x Non-accelerated filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
YES o NO x
APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
The Registrant had 16,624,861 shares of common stock issued and outstanding as of November 3, 2006.
WILLOW FINANCIAL BANCORP, INC.
INDEX
2
WILLOW FINANCIAL BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
(Dollars in Thousands, Except for Share Amounts)
| | (Unaudited) | | | |
| | September 30, | | June 30, | |
| | 2006 | | 2006 | |
Assets | | | | | |
Cash in banks | | $ | 27,306 | | $ | 32,930 | |
Interest-earning deposits | | 17,429 | | 4,289 | |
Total cash and cash equivalents | | 44,735 | | 37,219 | |
Investment securities — trading | | 1,012 | | 902 | |
Federal Home Loan Bank Stock | | 14,580 | | 16,856 | |
Investment securities available for sale (amortized cost of $206,471 and $203,221, respectively) | | 203,557 | | 196,925 | |
Investment securities held to maturity (fair value of $99,493 and $102,087, respectively) | | 101,455 | | 105,561 | |
Loans held for sale | | 3,829 | | 2,635 | |
Loans receivable | | 1,045,232 | | 1,081,789 | |
Deferred fees and other discounts | | (651 | ) | (1,170 | ) |
Allowance for loan losses | | (15,300 | ) | (16,737 | ) |
Loans receivable, net | | 1,029,281 | | 1,063,882 | |
Accrued interest receivable | | 6,505 | | 6,647 | |
Property and equipment, net | | 10,820 | | 10,064 | |
Bank owned life insurance | | 11,591 | | 11,483 | |
Real estate owned | | 2,003 | | 51 | |
Core deposit intangible, net | | 12,401 | | 12,975 | |
Goodwill | | 94,072 | | 94,072 | |
Other assets | | 17,182 | | 17,788 | |
Total Assets | | $ | 1,553,023 | | $ | 1,577,060 | |
| | | | | |
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity | | | | | |
Liabilities: | | | | | |
Interest-bearing deposits | | $ | 870,441 | | $ | 855,526 | |
Non-interest bearing deposits | | 158,195 | | 162,864 | |
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase | | 20,000 | | 20,000 | |
Advance payments by borrowers for taxes and insurance | | 2,414 | | 4,776 | |
Federal Home Loan Bank advances | | 245,664 | | 282,717 | |
Trust preferred securities | | 36,101 | | 36,149 | |
Accrued interest payable | | 2,137 | | 2,205 | |
Other liabilities | | 10,366 | | 9,425 | |
Total Liabilities | | 1,345,318 | | 1,373,662 | |
| | | | | |
Stockholders’ Equity: | | | | | |
Common stock - $0.01 par value; 40,000,000 shares authorized; 16,612,445 and 16,584,870 shares issued at September 30, 2006 and June 30, 2006, respectively | | 166 | | 166 | |
Additional paid-in capital | | 179,344 | | 178,886 | |
Retained earnings — substantially restricted | | 61,849 | | 60,404 | |
Treasury stock (1,736,865 and 1,736,308 shares at September 30, 2006 and June 30, 2006, respectively, at cost) | | (28,251 | ) | (28,251 | ) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | | (1,333 | ) | (3,317 | ) |
Obligation of deferred compensation plan | | 1,369 | | 1,258 | |
Unallocated common stock held by: | | | | | |
Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) | | (2,949 | ) | (3,287 | ) |
Recognition and Retention Plan Trust (RRP) | | (2,490 | ) | (2,461 | ) |
Total Stockholders’ Equity | | 207,705 | | 203,398 | |
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity | | $ | 1,553,023 | | $ | 1,577,060 | |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
WILLOW FINANCIAL BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Dollars in Thousands, Except for Per Share Amounts, Unaudited)
| | Three Months Ended September 30, | |
| | 2006 | | 2005 | |
INTEREST INCOME: | | | | | |
Loans | | $ | 17,714 | | $ | 11,749 | |
Mortgage-backed and investment securities | | 4,197 | | 3,823 | |
Total interest income | | 21,911 | | 15,572 | |
INTEREST EXPENSE: | | | | | |
Deposits | | 6,425 | | 3,375 | |
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase | | 255 | | — | |
Borrowings | | 3,008 | | 2,980 | |
Total interest expense | | 9,688 | | 6,355 | |
NET INTEREST INCOME | | 12,223 | | 9,217 | |
Provision (recovery) for loan losses | | (100 | ) | 513 | |
Net interest income after provision for loan losses | | 12,323 | | 8,704 | |
NON-INTEREST INCOME: | | | | | |
Investment services income, net | | 748 | | 349 | |
Service charges and fees | | 1,443 | | 827 | |
Gain (loss) on the sale of: | | | | | |
Loans | | 153 | | 114 | |
Securities available for sale | | — | | (1,021 | ) |
Other | | 228 | | 94 | |
Total non-interest income | | 2,572 | | 363 | |
OPERATING EXPENSES: | | | | | |
Salaries and employee benefits | | 5,516 | | 4,410 | |
Occupancy and equipment | | 1,908 | | 909 | |
Data processing | | 349 | | 335 | |
Advertising | | 394 | | 153 | |
Deposit insurance premiums | | 30 | | 25 | |
Amortization of intangible assets | | 575 | | 178 | |
Professional fees | | 532 | | 709 | |
Other | | 1,011 | | 1,123 | |
Total operating expenses | | 10,315 | | 7,842 | |
Income before income taxes | | 4,580 | | 1,225 | |
Income tax expense | | 1,466 | | 299 | |
NET INCOME | | $ | 3,114 | | $ | 926 | |
EARNINGS PER SHARE | | | | | |
Basic | | $ | 0.22 | | $ | 0.08 | |
Diluted | | $ | 0.21 | | $ | 0.08 | |
DIVIDENDS PER SHARE PAID DURING PERIOD | | $ | 0.12 | | $ | 0.12 | |
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING | | | | | |
Basic | | 14,286,688 | | 10,659,590 | |
Diluted | | 14,580,778 | | 10,960,192 | |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
WILLOW FINANCIAL BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Dollars in Thousands, Unaudited)
| | Three Months Ended September 30, | |
| | 2006 | | 2005 | |
Net income | | $ | 3,114 | | $ | 926 | |
| | | | | |
Other comprehensive income, net of tax: | | | | | |
Net unrealized holding gains (losses) on securities available for sale during the period | | 2,192 | | (762 | ) |
Reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income | | — | | 781 | |
Net unrealized gain (loss) on cash flow hedge | | (208 | ) | 200 | |
Comprehensive income | | $ | 5,098 | | $ | 1,145 | |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
5
WILLOW FINANCIAL BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOW
(Dollars in Thousands, Unaudited)
| | Three Months Ended September 30, | |
| | 2006 | | 2005 | |
Net income | | $ | 3,114 | | $ | 926 | |
Add (deduct) items not affecting cash flows from operating activities: | | | | | |
Depreciation | | 597 | | 256 | |
Amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts on investments, net | | 43 | | 7 | |
Amortization of intangible assets | | 575 | | 177 | |
Provision (recovery) for loan losses | | (100 | ) | 513 | |
Gain on sale of loans held for sale | | (153 | ) | (114 | ) |
Loss on sale of investment securities | | — | | 1,021 | |
Origination of loans held for sale | | (4,525 | ) | (36,722 | ) |
Proceeds from the sale of loans held for sale | | 3,484 | | 36,365 | |
Increase in trading account securities | | (110 | ) | — | |
Amortization of deferred loan fees, discounts and premiums | | (370 | ) | (255 | ) |
Decrease in accrued interest receivable | | 142 | | 755 | |
Increase in value of bank owned life insurance | | (108 | ) | (64 | ) |
(Increase) decrease in other assets | | (629 | ) | 28,272 | |
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities | | 941 | | (7,911 | ) |
Stock based compensation | | 512 | | 495 | |
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation | | (57 | ) | — | |
Decrease in accrued interest payable | | (68 | ) | (848 | ) |
Net cash flows provided by operating activities | | 3,288 | | 22,873 | |
Cash flows from investment activities: | | | | | |
Capital expenditures | | (1,618 | ) | (142 | ) |
Proceeds from the sale of office buildings | | 265 | | — | |
Net decrease (increase) in loans | | 33,071 | | (2,950 | ) |
Proceeds from maturities, sales, payments and calls of investment securities held to maturity | | 4,107 | | 44,116 | |
Purchase of securities available for sale | | (10,825 | ) | (1,150 | ) |
Decrease in FHLB stock | | 2,276 | | — | |
Proceeds from sales and calls of securities available for sale | | 7,532 | | 56,281 | |
Proceeds from sale of other real estate owned | | — | | 2 | |
Net cash used for acquisition | | — | | (51,000 | ) |
Net cash flows provided by investment activities | | 34,808 | | 45,157 | |
Cash flows from financing activities: | | | | | |
Net increase (decrease) in deposits | | 10,246 | | (10,047 | ) |
Decrease in securities sold under agreements to repurchase | | — | | (2,080 | ) |
Proceeds from FHLB advances | | — | | 72,000 | |
Repayments of FHLB advances | | (37,053 | ) | (102,597 | ) |
Decrease in advance payments by borrowers for taxes and insurance | | (2,362 | ) | (1,307 | ) |
Cash dividends on common stock | | (1,719 | ) | (1,178 | ) |
Obligation of deferred compensation plan | | — | | (54 | ) |
Stock options exercised | | 251 | | 261 | |
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation | | 57 | | — | |
Net cash flows used in financing activities | | (30,580 | ) | (45,002 | ) |
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents | | 7,516 | | 23,028 | |
Cash and cash equivalents: | | | | | |
Beginning of period | | 37,219 | | 20,609 | |
End of period | | $ | 44,735 | | $ | 43,637 | |
Supplemental disclosures: | | | | | |
Cash payments during the year for: | | | | | |
Taxes | | $ | — | | $ | 300 | |
Interest | | $ | 9,756 | | $ | 5,711 | |
Non-cash items: | | | | | |
Net unrealized loss on investment securities available for sale, net of tax | | $ | (2,192 | ) | $ | (19 | ) |
Net unrealized gain (loss) on cash flow hedge, net of tax | | $ | (208 | ) | $ | 200 | |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
6
WILLOW FINANCIAL BANCORP, INC.
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Description of Business
Effective after the close of business on September 21, 2006, Willow Grove Bancorp, Inc. and Willow Grove Bank changed their names to Willow Financial Bancorp, Inc. and Willow Financial Bank, respectively. As contained herein, references to the Company include both Willow Financial Bancorp, Inc. and Willow Grove Bancorp, Inc. and references to the Bank include both Willow Financial Bank and Willow Grove Bank. Coincident with the name change, the Company’s trading symbol on the NASDAQ Select Global Market was changed from “WGBC” to “WFBC”.
Willow Financial Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”), is a Pennsylvania corporation and parent holding company for Willow Financial Bank (the “Bank”). The Bank, which was originally organized in 1909, is a federally chartered savings bank and wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. The Bank’s business consists primarily of making commercial business and consumer loans as well as real estate loans, both commercial and residential, funded primarily by retail and business deposits along with borrowings obtained from the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) of Pittsburgh.
After the close of business on August 31, 2005, the Company completed its acquisition of Chester Valley Bancorp Inc. (“Chester Valley”), a registered bank holding company headquartered in Downingtown, Pennsylvania, with over $654 million in assets. Chester Valley had two wholly owned subsidiaries, First Financial Bank, a Pennsylvania chartered commercial bank (“FFB”) with 13 full-service banking offices, and Philadelphia Corporation for Investment Services, a registered investment advisor and broker dealer (“PCIS”).
Pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of January 20, 2005 (the “Merger Agreement”), Chester Valley was merged with and into the Company, with the Company as the surviving corporation (the “Merger”), and FFB was merged with and into Willow Financial Bank with Willow Financial Bank as the surviving bank (the “Bank Merger”). PCIS became a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. As a result of the Merger, each outstanding share of Chester Valley common stock, par value $1.00 per share (the “Chester Valley Common Stock”), was converted into the right to receive, at the election of the shareholder, either $27.90 in cash or 1.4823 shares of the Company common stock, par value $0.01 per share (the “Willow Financial Common Stock”), subject to the allocation and pro ration provisions set forth in the Merger Agreement. The acquisition resulted in the Company’s issuance of an aggregate of 4,977,256 shares of Willow Financial Common Stock and $51.0 million in cash. The total merger consideration paid for the Chester Valley Common Stock was $145.3 million. This included capitalized acquisition costs and the value of Chester Valley vested stock options converted to options of the Company at the average stock price of the Company on the four days surrounding the announcement of the acquisition. The Company used general corporate funds to pay the aggregate cash consideration of approximately $51.0 million for the shares of Chester Valley Common Stock acquired in the Merger for cash, as well as the approximate $3.2 million in acquisition costs.
The Merger has been accounted for using the purchase method of accounting, which requires that the Company’s financial statements include activity of Chester Valley only subsequent to the acquisition date of August 31, 2005. Accordingly, the Company’s consolidated financial statements and the information herein include the combined results of the former Chester Valley and its former subsidiaries, FFB and PCIS, since September 1, 2005.
Effective February 28, 2006, the Bank completed the sale of all outstanding shares of capital stock of Philadelphia Corporation for Investment Services (“PCIS”) to Uvest BD-A, Inc., a North Carolina Corporation and registered broker-dealer (“Uvest”) for consideration of $100 but providing that such shares may be repurchased for $100 at any time after the closing date of the stock sale. Concurrently with the execution of the sale of PCIS, the parties entered into a related Sub-Clearing and Brokerage Services Agreement, which provides that an affiliate of Uvest will provide securities clearing and certain supervisory and compliance services for the Bank, and a Financial Services Agreement between PCIS and the Bank which provides that the Bank will be entitled to 92% of the revenue generated by the securities brokerage activities conducted at the PCIS office and will bear substantially all operational and overhead expenses. Upon consummation of the sale of PCIS stock to Uvest, PCIS is no longer a subsidiary of the Company. However, under the provisions of FIN 46R (“Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities”), the results of PCIS continue to be consolidated in the Company’s financial statements. The affiliation agreement with Uvest has the primary effect of relieving PCIS of direct responsibility for securities clearing and certain back-office and oversight obligations.
References to the Company include its business segment, PCIS, unless the context of the reference indicates otherwise.
7
The Bank’s customer deposits are insured to the maximum extent provided by law, by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”), through the Savings Association Insurance Fund (“SAIF”). The Bank is subject to examination and comprehensive regulation by the Office of Thrift Supervision (“OTS”) and is also regulated by the FDIC. The Bank is also subject to reserve requirements established by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “Federal Reserve Board” or “FRB”), and is a member of the FHLB of Pittsburgh, one of the regional banks comprising the Federal Home Loan Bank System.
Our executive offices are located at 170 South Warner Road, Wayne, Pennsylvania, and our telephone number is (610) 995-1700.
In September 2000, Willow Grove Investment Corporation (“WGIC”), a Delaware corporation was formed as a wholly owned subsidiary of the Bank to conduct the investment activities of the Bank. In May 2003, Willow Grove Insurance Agency, LLC (the “Agency”), a Pennsylvania limited liability company was formed by the Bank to sell fixed rate annuity products on a retail basis for the Bank.
2. Basis of Financial Statement Presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with instructions to Form 10-Q, and therefore, do not include information or footnotes necessary for a complete presentation of financial condition, results of operations and cash flows in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). However, all normal, recurring adjustments, which, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of these financial statements, have been included. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and the notes thereto for the Company for the year ended June 30, 2006, which are included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2006 (File No. 000-49706). The results for the interim periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending June 30, 2007.
Certain amounts in prior years are reclassified for comparability to the current year’s presentation. Such reclassifications, when applicable, have no effect on net income. The Company reclassified collateralized customer deposit balances at June 30, 2006 from securities sold under agreements to repurchase to interest-bearing deposits on the consolidated statements of financial condition.
The consolidated financial statements include the balances of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries and business segment. All material inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
In preparing the consolidated financial statements, the Company is required to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the statement of financial condition and statement of operations for the period. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates. Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change in the near-term include the determination of the allowance for loan losses, income taxes and intangible asset impairment.
8
3. Acquisition of Chester Valley
The following table summarizes the pro forma operating results of Willow Grove Bancorp for the three month period ended September 30, 2005 had the acquisition of Chester Valley occurred on July 1, 2005.
Willow Financial Bancorp
Pro-forma Operating Results with Chester Valley Acquisition
For three months ended September 30, 2005
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Total interest income | | $ | 21,447 | |
Total interest expense | | 8,540 | |
Provision for loan losses | | 957 | |
Other income | | 1,305 | |
Other expense | | 17,516 | |
Income before tax | | (4,261 | ) |
Income tax | | (1,552 | ) |
Net loss | | (2,709 | ) |
Non-recurring items (a) | | 8,426 | |
Adjusted net income (b) | | $ | 2,768 | |
Earnings (loss) per Share: | | | |
Basic | | $ | (0.26 | ) |
Diluted | | $ | (0.25 | ) |
(a) Reflects losses on securities sales ($1.8 million), professional fees ($1.8 million) and stock option compensation payments to holders of certain Chester Valley options ($4.8 million).
(b) Adjusted for non-recurring items at an effective tax rate of 35%.
4. Recent Accounting Pronouncements
FASB Statement No, 155, Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments
In February 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 155, Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments. Under this new statement, an entity may re-measure at fair value a hybrid financial instrument that contains an embedded derivative that otherwise would require bifurcation from the host, if the holder irrevocably elects to account for the whole instrument on a fair value basis. Subsequent changes in the fair value of the instrument would be recognized in earnings. This statement is effective for all financial instruments that the Company acquires or issues after July 1, 2007. We do not expect the adoption of this statement to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.
FASB Statement No, 157, Fair Value Measurements
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS 157”). SFAS 157 establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, and enhances disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 applies when other accounting pronouncement require fair value measurements; it does not require new fair value measurements. SFAS 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and for interim periods within those years.
FASB Interpretation 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Tax Positions
In July 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Tax Positions.” This interpretation clarifies the application of FASB Statement No. 109 by establishing a threshold condition that a tax position must meet for any part of the benefit of that position to be recognized in the financial statements. In addition to recognition, the interpretation provides guidance on the measurement, derecognition, classification, and disclosure of tax positions and is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2006. The Company is evaluating the potential impact of this interpretation on results of its future operations and financial condition.
9
Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108, Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements When Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements
In September 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) published Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108, “Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements When Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements” (“SAB No. 108”). SAB No. 108 expresses the SEC staff’s views regarding the process of quantifying financial statement misstatements. The SEC staff suggests that registrants electing not to restate prior periods should reflect the effects of applying the guidance in this interpretation in the annual financial statements covering the first fiscal year ending after November 15, 2006. This interpretation will not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements upon adoption.
EITF 06-4, Accounting for Deferred Compensation and Postretirement Benefit Aspects of Endorsement Split-Dollar Life Insurance Arrangements
The Task Force reached a consensus that, for endorsement split-dollar life insurance arrangements, an employer should recognize the liability for future benefits based on the substantive agreement with the employee, since the postretirement benefit obligation is not effectively settled. An entity is permitted to apply the consensus by retrospective application to all prior periods in accordance with FASB Statement No. 154, including its required disclosures. The consensus is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2007, with early adoption permitted as of the beginning of an entity’s fiscal year. The Bank has recorded a liability of $246 thousand within other liabilities on the consolidated statements of financial condition to account for the settlement of the future benefit obligation.
5. Stock Compensation Plans
The stockholders of the Company approved a stock option plan in fiscal 2000 (the “1999 Plan”) for officers, directors and certain employees of the Company and its subsidiaries. Pursuant to the terms of the 1999 Plan, the number of common shares reserved for issuance was a total of 510,961, of which 47,755 options were unawarded at September 30, 2006. Included in this amount are 5,718 shares forfeited during the three-month period ended September 30, 2006. Additionally, the stockholders of the Company approved a stock option plan in fiscal 2003 (the “2002 Plan”) for officers, directors and certain employees of the Company and its subsidiaries. Pursuant to the terms of the 2002 Plan, the number of common shares reserved for issuance was 641,412 of which 142,967 were available for future grants at September 30, 2006. Included in this amount are 29,141 shares forfeited during the three-month period ended September 30, 2006. Options were granted with an exercise price equal to fair market value at the date of grant and expire in 10 years from the date of grant. Stock options granted vest over a five-year period commencing on the first anniversary of the date of grant. Compensation expense and related tax benefit on stock options were $72 thousand and $15 thousand and $86 thousand and $15 thousand for the three month periods ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
The following table provides information about options outstanding for the three-months ended September 30, 2006:
| | | | Weighted | | Weighted | |
| | | | Average | | Average | |
| | | | Exercise | | Grant Date | |
| | Shares | | Price | | Fair Value | |
Options outstanding, beginning of period | | 1,012,749 | | $ | 10.41 | | $ | 3.79 | |
Granted | | 4,000 | | 16.58 | | 3.30 | |
Forfeited | | (34,859 | ) | 12.10 | | 2.69 | |
Exercised | | (27,575 | ) | 9.12 | | 2.95 | |
Options outstanding, end of period | | 954,315 | | $ | 10.61 | | $ | 3.85 | |
For the three months ended September 30, 2005, the Company granted 20,063 options at a weighted average grant date fair value of $3.99.
The following table provides information about unvested options for the three months ended September 30, 2006:
| | | | Weighted | |
| | | | Average | |
| | | | Grant Date | |
| | Shares | | Fair Value | |
Unvested options, beginning of period | | 159,239 | | $ | 2.65 | |
Granted | | 4,000 | | 3.30 | |
Vested | | (22,208 | ) | 2.73 | |
Forfeited | | (34,859 | ) | 2.69 | |
Unvested options, period end | | 106,172 | | $ | 2.80 | |
10
Proceeds, related tax benefits realized from options exercised and intrinsic value of options exercised were as follows:
| | Three Months Ended September 30 | |
| | 2006 | | 2005 | |
Proceeds of options exercised | | $ | 251,438 | | $ | 260,429 | |
Related tax benefit recognized | | $ | 57,243 | | $ | 73,000 | |
Intrinsic value of options exercised | | $ | 183,793 | | $ | 213,555 | |
The following table provides information about options outstanding and exercisable options at September 30, 2006:
| | Options | | Exercisable | |
| | Outstanding | | Options | |
Number | | 954,315 | | 743,189 | |
Weighted average exercise price | | $ | 10.61 | | $ | 10.01 | |
Aggregate intrinsic value | | $ | 4,819,291 | | $ | 4,199,018 | |
Weighted average contractual term (in years) | | 5.4 | | 5.2 | |
The weighted average remaining contractual life for options outstanding and weighted average exercise price per share for exercisable options at September 30, 2006 were as follows:
| | Options Outstanding | | Exercisable Options | |
Exercise Price | | Shares | | Weighted Average Exercise Price Per Share | | Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (in Years) | | Shares | | Weighted Average Exercise Price Per Share | |
$3.50 - $5.00 | | 128,127 | | $ | 3.97 | | 3.1 | | 128,127 | | $ | 3.97 | |
$8.00 - $9.50 | | 252,132 | | 8.66 | | 4.9 | | 230.572 | | 8.69 | |
$10.00 - $14.00 | | 510,478 | | 12.65 | | 5.9 | | 341,413 | | 12.55 | |
$14.50 - $17.50 | | 63,578 | | 15.28 | | 7.8 | | 43,077 | | 14.89 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | 954,315 | | $ | 10.61 | | 5.4 | | 743,189 | | $ | 10.01 | |
The fair value of stock options granted during the three-month periods ended September 30, 2006 and September 30, 2005 was determined at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes options-pricing model. The fair value of option awards under the Option Plans is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes valuation methodology, which is dependent upon certain assumptions, as summarized in the following table.
| | Three Months Ended September 30 | |
Assumption | | 2006 | | 2005 | |
Expected average risk-free interest rate | | 5.12 | % | 3.88 | % |
Expected average life (in years) | | 5.50 | | 6.67 | |
Expected volatility | | 20.73 | % | 19.36 | % |
Expected dividend yield | | 3.14 | % | 3.15 | % |
The expected average risk-free rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve on the day of grant. The expected average life represents the weighted average period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding giving consideration to vesting schedules and historical option exercise experience. Expected volatility is based on historical volatilities of the Company’s common stock. The expected dividend yield is based on historical information.
RRP
Pursuant to the 1999 Recognition and Retention Plan and Trust Agreement (the “1999 RRP”), the Company acquired 204,384 shares at a cost of $929 thousand. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, all 204,384 shares have been awarded to directors and management from the 1999 RRP Trust. As of September 30, 2006, 197,622 granted shares were vested pursuant to the terms of the 1999 Plan. In fiscal 2003, the Company adopted the 2002 Recognition and Retention Plan and Trust Agreement (the “2002 RRP”), and acquired 256,565 shares at a cost of $3.2 million. Pursuant to the terms of the 2002 RRP, 222,468 shares have been awarded to
11
directors and management; however, 25,600 shares have been forfeited. As of September 30, 2006, 166,041granted shares were vested pursuant to the terms of the 2002 RRP. In fiscal 2006, the Company adopted the 2005 Recognition and Retention Plan and Trust Agreement (the “2005 RRP”). Under the 2005 RRP, the Trust can purchase 350,000 shares of common stock for future awards of restricted stock to certain officers and directors of the Company. As of September 30, 2006, 89,613 shares were granted under the 2005 RRP; however, 1,864 shares have been forfeited. Compensation expense related to the RRP shares was $198 thousand and $133 thousand for the three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Activity in issued but unvested RRP shares under the three plans during the three months ended September 30, 2006 was as follows:
| | | | Weighted | |
| | | | Average | |
| | | | Grant Date | |
RRP Shares | | RRP Shares | | Fair Value | |
Unvested awards beginning of period | | 125,831 | | $ | 13.28 | |
Vested | | (13,638 | ) | 14.26 | |
Granted | | 6,970 | | 16.12 | |
Forfeited | | (22,135 | ) | 11.49 | |
Unvested awards period end | | 97,028 | | $ | 14.76 | |
The aggregate intrinsic value of unvested RRP awards under the three plans at September 30, 2006 is $87,325.
6. Earnings Per Share
Earnings per share, basic and diluted, were $0.22 and $0.21, respectively, for the three months ended September 30, 2006, compared to $0.08, and $0.08, respectively, for the three months ended September 30, 2005.
The following is a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted earnings per share calculations:
| | Three Months Ended September 30, | |
| | 2006 | | 2005 | |
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) | | Basic | | Diluted | | Basic | | Diluted | |
Net income | | $ | 3,114 | | $ | 3,114 | | $ | 926 | | $ | 926 | |
Dividends on unvested common stock awards | | (16 | ) | (16 | ) | (22 | ) | (22 | ) |
Net income available to common stockholders | | $ | 3,098 | | $ | 3,098 | | $ | 904 | | $ | 904 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Weighted average shares outstanding | | 14,286,688 | | 14,286,688 | | 10,659,590 | | 10,659,590 | |
Effect of dilutive securities: | | | | | | | | | |
Common stock equivalents | | — | | 294,090 | | — | | 300,602 | |
Adjusted weighted average shares used in earnings per share computation | | 14,286,688 | | 14,580,778 | | 10,659,590 | | 10,960,192 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Earnings per share | | $ | 0.22 | | $ | 0.21 | | $ | 0.08 | | $ | 0.08 | |
12
7. Securities
The amortized cost and estimated fair value of held to maturity and available for sale securities at September 30, 2006 and June 30, 2006 are as follows:
| | September 30, 2006 | |
| | Amortized cost | | Unrealized gains | | Unrealized losses | | Estimated fair value | |
| | | | (Dollars in thousands) | | | |
Held to maturity: | | | | | | | | | |
Mortgage-backed securities: | | | | | | | | | |
FNMA | | $ | 18,145 | | $ | — | | $ | (489 | ) | $ | 17,656 | |
FHLMC | | 13,825 | | — | | (480 | ) | 13,345 | |
CMOs | | 69,485 | | — | | (993 | ) | 68,492 | |
Total held to maturity | | $ | 101,455 | | $ | — | | $ | (1,962 | ) | $ | 99,493 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Available for sale: | | | | | | | | | |
US government agency securities | | $ | 44,670 | | $ | 122 | | $ | (246 | ) | $ | 44,546 | |
Municipal bonds | | 9,195 | | 91 | | (2 | ) | 9,284 | |
Mortgage-backed securities: | | | | | | | | | |
FNMA | | 48,497 | | 21 | | (1,314 | ) | 47,204 | |
FHLMC | | 44,520 | | 19 | | (1,206 | ) | 43,333 | |
CMOs | | 28,133 | | 69 | | (169 | ) | 28,033 | |
GNMA | | 3,896 | | 7 | | (13 | ) | 3,890 | |
Corporate debt securities | | 15,918 | | 32 | | (128 | ) | 15,822 | |
Equity securities | | 11,642 | | 88 | | (285 | ) | 11,445 | |
Total available for sale | | $ | 206,471 | | $ | 449 | | $ | (3,363 | ) | $ | 203,557 | |
Total securities | | $ | 307,926 | | $ | 449 | | $ | (5,325 | ) | $ | 303,050 | |
| | June 30, 2006 | |
| | Amortized cost | | Unrealized gains | | Unrealized losses | | Estimated fair value | |
| | (Dollars in thousands) | |
Held to maturity: | | | | | | | | | |
Mortgage-backed securities: | | | | | | | | | |
FNMA | | $ | 18,639 | | $ | — | | $ | (779 | ) | $ | 17,860 | |
FHLMC | | 14,567 | | — | | (765 | ) | 13,802 | |
CMOs | | 72,355 | | — | | (1,930 | ) | 70,425 | |
Total held to maturity | | $ | 105,561 | | $ | — | | $ | (3,474 | ) | $ | 102,087 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Available for sale: | | | | | | | | | |
US government agency securities | | $ | 35,473 | | $ | — | | $ | (1,176 | ) | $ | 34,297 | |
Municipal bonds | | 9,105 | | 90 | | (68 | ) | 9,127 | |
Mortgage-backed securities: | | | | | | | | | |
FNMA | | 52,181 | | 13 | | (2,054 | ) | 50,140 | |
FHLMC | | 47,153 | | 6 | | (1,988 | ) | 45,171 | |
GNMA | | 4,189 | | 4 | | (35 | ) | 4,158 | |
CMOs | | 29,059 | | — | | (561 | ) | 28,498 | |
Corporate debt securities | | 14,419 | | 24 | | (235 | ) | 14,208 | |
Equity securities | | 11,642 | | 69 | | (385 | ) | 11,326 | |
Total available for sale | | $ | 203,221 | | $ | 206 | | $ | (6,502 | ) | $ | 196,925 | |
Total securities | | $ | 308,782 | | $ | 206 | | $ | (9,976 | ) | $ | 299,012 | |
Securities are evaluated periodically to determine whether a decline in their fair value is other than temporary. Management utilizes criteria such as the magnitude and duration of the decline, in addition to the reasons underlying the decline, to determine whether the loss in value is other than temporary. The term “other-than-temporary” is not intended to indicate that the decline is permanent, but indicates that the prospects for a near-term recovery of value is not necessarily favorable, or that there is a lack of evidence to support realizable value equal to or greater than carrying value of the investment. Once a decline in fair value is determined to be other than temporary, the fair value of the security is reduced through a charge to earnings in the statement of operations. Management does not believe any of the above individual unrealized losses as of September 30, 2006 are other-than-temporary impairments as the declines in fair value are a direct result of movements in interest rates. Additionally, the Company has both the ability and intent to hold such securities until such time as the value recovers or the security matures.
As part of the acquisition of Chester Valley, the company acquired three non-rated Pennsylvania Municipal Authority bonds that have been classified as substandard, which are included in investment securities available for sale at September 30, 2006. These securities were originally purchased at various times during the period from June 1998 through June 2000. The aggregate book value of the bonds is $3.6 million at September 30, 2006. Two of the three bonds with an aggregate book value of $3.1 million at September 30, 2006 are zero coupon bonds with maturities extending up to 2034. Both bonds are secured by the revenue streams of commercial
13
office buildings, which are leased to various agencies of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania under long-term lease arrangements with renewal options.
A third bond was issued by the Housing Authority of Chester County and has a book balance of $547 thousand at September 30, 2006 and bears interest at rates between 5.60% and 6.00% and matures in June 2019. This bond involves low-income scattered housing in Chester County under a program of the Office of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”). HUD has provided additional funds to build additional houses, which would be sold to provide proceeds to redeem these bonds.
8. Loan Portfolio
Information about the Bank’s loans receivable portfolio is presented below as of and for the periods indicated:
| | As of September 30, 2006 | | As of June 30, 2006 | |
(Dollars in thousands) | | Amount | | Percentage of Total | | Amount | | Percentage of Total | |
Real estate loans: | | | | | | | | | |
Single-family residential | | $ | 292,191 | | 27.95 | % | $ | 298,509 | | 27.59 | % |
Commercial real estate and multi-family residential | | 323,193 | | 30.92 | | 326,268 | | 30.16 | |
Construction | | 81,935 | | 7.84 | | 112,774 | | 10.42 | |
Home equity | | 266,608 | | 25.51 | | 259,119 | | 23.96 | |
Total real estate loans | | 963,927 | | 92.22 | | 996,670 | | 92.13 | |
Consumer loans | | 3,985 | | 0.38 | | 4,304 | | 0.40 | |
Commercial business loans | | 77,320 | | 7.40 | | 80,815 | | 7.47 | |
Total loans receivable | | 1,045,232 | | 100.0 | % | 1,081,789 | | 100.00 | % |
| | | | | | | | | |
Allowance for loan losses | | (15,300 | ) | | | (16,737 | ) | | |
Deferred net loan origination fees and other discounts | | (651 | ) | | | (1,170 | ) | | |
Loans receivable, net | | $ | 1,029,281 | | | | $ | 1,063,882 | | | |
The following is a summary of the activity in the allowance for loan losses for the three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005:
(Dollars in thousands) | | 2006 | | 2005 | |
Balance at the beginning of period | | $ | 16,737 | | $ | 6,113 | |
Plus: (Reductions) provisions for loan losses | | (100 | ) | 513 | |
Less charge-offs for: | | | | | |
Mortgage loans | | (28 | ) | — | |
Consumer loans | | (51 | ) | (15 | ) |
Commercial business loans | | (1,265 | ) | (12 | ) |
Total charge-offs | | (1,344 | ) | (27 | ) |
Plus: Recoveries | | 7 | | 9 | |
Allowance acquired in the Merger | | — | | 6,937 | |
Balance at the end of the period | | $ | 15,300 | | $ | 13,545 | |
9. Trust Preferred Securities
Effective with the acquisition of Chester Valley, the Company assumed the liability for $10.5 million of Junior Subordinated Debentures to the Chester Valley Statutory Trust, a Pennsylvania Business Trust, in which the Company owns all of the common equity as a result of the acquisition of Chester Valley. The Trust issued $10.0 million of Trust Preferred Securities to investors, which are secured by the Junior Subordinated Debentures and the guarantee of the Company. The Junior Subordinated Debentures are treated as debt of the Company but they qualify as Tier I capital, subject to certain limitations under the risk-based capital guidelines of the OTS. The Trust Preferred Securities are callable by the Company on or after March 26, 2007, or at any time in the event the deduction of related interest expense for federal income taxes is prohibited, the treatment as Tier I capital is no longer permitted or under certain other circumstances. The Trust Preferred Securities must be redeemed by the Company upon their maturity in the year 2032.
On March 31, 2006, the Company issued $25.8 million of Junior Subordinated Debentures to Willow Financial Statutory Trust I, a Connecticut Statutory Trust, in which the Company owns all of the common equity. The Trust then issued $25.0 million of Trust Preferred Securities, which pay interest quarterly at three-month Libor plus 1.31% to investors, which are secured by the Junior
14
Subordinated Debentures and the guarantee of the Company. The Junior Subordinated Debentures are treated as debt of the Company but qualify as Tier I capital of the Bank to the extent of the amount of the proceeds which are invested in the Bank. The Trust Preferred Securities are callable by the Company on or after September 30, 2011. The Trust Preferred Securities must be redeemed by the Company upon their maturity in the year 2036.
10. Dividends
On July 25, 2006, the Company declared a cash dividend on its common stock of $0.12 per share, paid on August 25, 2006 to owners of record on August 11, 2006. Additionally, a second cash dividend was declared by the Company’s Board of Directors on October 24, 2006 in the amount of $0.12 per share to be payable on November 24, 2006 to shareholders of record on November 10, 2006.
11. Guarantees
In the normal course of business, the Company sells loans in the secondary market. As is customary in such sales, the Company provides indemnification to the buyer under certain circumstances. This indemnification may include the obligation to repurchase loans by the Company, under certain circumstances. In most cases repurchases and losses are rare, and no provision is made for losses at the time of sale. When repurchases and losses are probable and reasonably estimable, a provision is made in the financial statements for such estimated losses.
On May 12, 2003, the Company entered into a sales and servicing master agreement with the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh (“FHLB”). The agreement allows the Company to sell loans to the FHLB while retaining servicing and providing for a credit enhancement. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company receives a ten basis point annual fee in exchange for assuming the credit risk on losses in excess of its contractual obligation up to a maximum of $605 thousand. The Company has sold $16.6 million in loans under this agreement and had a maximum credit risk exposure of $461 thousand at September 30, 2006. The fair value of these guarantees was determined to be $0 at September 30, 2006.
12. Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
The Company may from time to time utilize derivative instruments such as interest rate swaps, interest rate collars, interest rate floors, interest rate swaptions or combinations thereof to assist in its asset/liability management. In accordance with SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments”, the Company documents its hedge relationships, including identification of the hedging instruments and the hedged items, as well as its risk management objectives and strategies for undertaking the hedge. The Company also assesses, both at inception and at least quarterly thereafter, whether the derivative instruments that are used in hedging transactions are highly effective in offsetting the changes in either the fair value or cash flows of the hedged item. For fair value hedges, both the effective and ineffective portions of the changes in the fair value of the derivative, along with the gain or loss on the hedged item that is attributable to the hedged risk, are recorded in the statement of operations within interest income or interest expense. For cash flow hedges, the effective portion of the change in the fair value of the derivative is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income. When the hedged item impacts the statement of operations, the gain or loss included in accumulated other comprehensive income is reported on the same line in the statement of operations as the hedged item. In addition, the ineffective portion of the changes in the fair value of derivatives used as cash flow hedges is reported in the statement of operations.
Additionally, in August 2003, Chester Valley had purchased a $30.0 million notional amount 3.50% Three Month LIBOR interest rate cap while simultaneously selling a $30.0 million notional amount 6.00% Three Month LIBOR interest rate cap (“Interest Rate Corridor”) which expires in August 2008. Chester Valley paid a net premium, which entitled it to receive the difference between Three Month LIBOR from 3.50% up to 6.00% times the $30.0 million notional amount. Upon consummation of the Merger, the Company assumed the Interest Rate Corridor and designated it to hedge certain borrowings of Willow Financial Bank, which were variable in nature and indexed to Three Month LIBOR. The Interest Rate Corridor is being used to hedge the cash flows of this borrowing. The Interest Rate Corridor could potentially reduce the negative impact on earnings of the borrowings in a rising interest rate environment. The fair market value of the Interest Rate Corridor has two components: the intrinsic value and the time value of the option. The Interest Rate Corridor is marked-to-market quarterly, with changes in the intrinsic value of the Interest Rate Corridor, net of tax, included as a separate component of other comprehensive income and change in the time value of the option included directly as interest expense as required under SFAS 133. In addition, the ineffective portion, if any, would have been expensed in the period in which ineffectiveness was determined. The fair value of the Interest Rate Corridor at September 30, 2006 was $853 thousand.
Subsequent to September 30, 2006, the Company unwound the Interest Rate Corridor and will recognize a gain of $815 thousand through the statement of operations in its second fiscal quarter.
15
13. Segment Information
Under the definition of SFAS No. 131, “Disclosures About Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information”, the Company has two operating segments at September 30, 2006; Willow Financial Bank and PCIS. The Willow Financial Bank segment primarily provides loan and deposit services to commercial and retail customers through its network of 28 branch locations. The PCIS segment, which was acquired on August 31, 2005 in connection with the Merger, operates a full service investment advisory and securities brokerage firm.
Segment information for the three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 is as follows:
| | Three months ended September 30, | |
| | 2006 | | 2005 | |
| | Bank | | PCIS | | Total | | Bank | | PCIS | | Total | |
| | (Dollars in thousands) | |
Interest income | | $ | 21,911 | | $ | — | | $ | 21,911 | | $ | 15,572 | | $ | — | | $ | 15,572 | |
Interest expense | | 9,688 | | — | | 9,688 | | 6,355 | | — | | 6,355 | |
Net interest income | | 12,223 | | — | | 12,223 | | 9,217 | | — | | 9,217 | |
Non-interest income | | 1,969 | | 603 | | 2,572 | | 38 | | 325 | | 363 | |
Depreciation expense | | 597 | | — | | 597 | | 256 | | — | | 256 | |
Income tax expense | | 1,466 | | — | | 1,466 | | 299 | | — | | 299 | |
Total net income | | 2,959 | | 155 | | 3,114 | | 886 | | 40 | | 926 | |
Total assets | | 1,552,802 | | 221 | | 1,553,023 | | 1,603,326 | | 2,281 | | 1,605,607 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
14. Regulatory Matters
The Bank is subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory, and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Company’s financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the Bank’s assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under accounting practices. The Bank’s capital amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors.
At September 30, 2006, the Bank had regulatory capital, which was well in excess of regulatory limits set by the Office of Thrift Supervision. The current requirements and the Bank’s actual capital levels are detailed below:
| | Actual Capital | | Required for Capital Adequacy Purposes | | Required to Be Well Capitalized under Prompt Corrective Action Provision | |
(Dollars in thousands) | | Amount | | Ratio | | Amount | | Ratio | | Amount | | Ratio | |
As of September 30, 2006 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Tangible capital (to tangible assets) | | $ | 118,251 | | 8.2 | % | $ | 21,584 | | 1.5 | % | $ | 28,779 | | 2.0 | % |
Core capital (to adjusted tangible assets) | | 118,251 | | 8.2 | % | 57,557 | | 4.0 | % | 71,947 | | 5.0 | % |
Tier I capital (to risk-weighted assets) | | 118,251 | | 12.4 | % | N/A | | N/A | | 56,773 | | 6.0 | % |
Risk-based capital (to risk-weighted assets) | | 129,661 | | 13.7 | % | 75,698 | | 8.0 | % | 94,622 | | 10.0 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
As of June 30, 2006 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Tangible capital (to tangible assets) | | $ | 114,061 | | 7.8 | % | $ | 22,028 | | 1.5 | % | $ | 29,370 | | 2.0 | % |
Core capital (to adjusted tangible assets) | | 114,061 | | 7.8 | % | 58,711 | | 4.0 | % | 73,426 | | 5.0 | % |
Tier I capital (to risk-weighted assets) | | 114,061 | | 11.9 | % | N/A | | N/A | | 57,165 | | 6.0 | % |
Risk-based capital (to risk-weighted assets) | | 125,569 | | 13.2 | % | 76,220 | | 8.0 | % | 95,274 | | 10.0 | % |
In its letter approving the merger of Willow Financial Bank and First Financial Bank, the Office of Thrift Supervision (“OTS”), as one of the conditions for approval, indicated that, for the periods ending December 31, 2005, 2006, and 2007, Willow Financial Bank must have tier one core capital ratios at least equal to 6.50%, 6.75%, and 7.25%, respectively, and total risk-based capital equal to 11.97%, 12.02% and 12.40%, respectively. Willow Financial Bank must also submit to the Office of Thrift
16
Supervision, quarterly status reports detailing its compliance with the conditions on regulatory capital outlined in its approval letter. The Office of Thrift Supervision’s conditions for approval of the Bank Merger also indicated that, for the periods ending December 31, 2005, 2006, and 2007, Willow Financial Bancorp must have consolidated tangible capital ratios at least equal to 5.14%, 5.59% and 6.12%, respectively. The Bank currently exceeds all of these requirements.
15. Commitments and Contingencies
See the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2006 for a summary of existing commitments and contingencies. There have been no material changes in the Company’s commitments and contingencies since June 30, 2006.
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
This Form 10-Q contains certain forward-looking statements (as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the regulations thereunder) which are not historical facts or as to Willow Financial Bancorp, Inc., management’s intentions, plans, beliefs, expectations or opinions. Forward looking statements may be identified by the use of words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “should,” “could,” “may,” “likely,” “probably,” or “possibly”. These statements reflect our current view with respect to future events and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties, and assumptions. Such statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, many of which are difficult to predict and generally beyond the control of Willow Financial Bancorp, Inc. and its management, that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in, or implied or projected by, the forward looking information and statements. Factors that may affect the Company’s future operations are discussed in documents filed by Willow Financial Bancorp, Inc. with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) from time to time, including the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2006. Additional factors that could cause future results to vary from current management expectations include, but are not limited to, general economic conditions and the interest rate yield curve, legislative and regulatory changes, demand for loan products, changes in deposit flows, competition, changes in the quality or composition of the Company’s loan and investment portfolios, among other things. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those described herein as anticipated, believed, estimated, expected, or intended. We do not intend to update these forward-looking statements. Copies of the above referenced documents may be obtained from Willow Financial Bancorp, Inc. upon request without charge (except for Exhibits thereto) or can be accessed at the website maintained by the SEC at http://www.sec.gov.
Description of Business
Effective after the close of business on September 21, 2006, Willow Grove Bancorp, Inc. and Willow Grove Bank changed their names to Willow Financial Bancorp, Inc. and Willow Financial Bank, respectively. As contained herein, references to the Company include both Willow Financial Bancorp, Inc. and Willow Grove Bancorp, Inc. and references to the Bank include both Willow Financial Bank and Willow Grove Bank. Coincident with the name change, the Company’s trading symbol on the NASDAQ Select Global Market was changed from “WGBC” to “WFBC”.
Willow Financial Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”), is a Pennsylvania corporation and parent holding company for Willow Financial Bank (the “Bank”). The Bank, which was originally organized in 1909, is a federally chartered savings bank and wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. The Bank’s business consists primarily of making commercial business and consumer loans as well as real estate loans, both commercial and residential, funded primarily by retail and business deposits along with borrowings obtained from the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) of Pittsburgh.
The Company’s business plan focuses on the following primary goals—changing operations to a full-service community bank and continued steady growth while maintaining a high level of asset quality. Until the acquisition of Chester Valley, the growth was accomplished through internal means. To the extent that additional acquisition opportunities present themselves and are deemed prudent by the Board of Directors and management, additional acquisitions of financial institutions will be considered to further enhance shareholder value. We also will consider adding additional de novo Bank branch offices to expand our existing network.
Results of Operations
General. Net income for the three-month period ended September 30, 2006 was $3.1 million or $0.21 diluted earnings per share as compared to net income of $926 thousand or $0.08 diluted earnings per share for the comparable quarter in the prior year. The Company’s net interest margin on a tax-equivalent basis remained relatively flat at 3.49% for the three months ended September 30, 2006 as compared to 3.50% for the three months ended September 30, 2005. The results for the three months ended September 30, 2005 include only one month of merged operations of Willow Financial and Chester Valley.
Net Interest Income. Net interest income is determined primarily from the average interest rate spread (i.e. the difference between the average yields on interest-earning assets and the average rates paid on interest-costing liabilities) as well as the relative amounts of average interest-earning assets compared to interest-bearing liabilities. For both the three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, our interest rate spread was 3.33%.
Net interest income for the three-month period ended September 30, 2006 was $12.2 million compared to $9.2 million for the prior year three-month period, an increase of $3.0 million or 32.6%. Net interest income increased primarily as a result of increased average balances of the loan portfolio. The average cost of interest-bearing liabilities was 2.88% for the three-month period ended September 30, 2006 as compared to 2.47% for the three-month period ended September 30, 2005. From September 2005 through September 2006, the Federal Reserve has increased short-term rates by 150 basis points resulting in an increase in the average rate of the Company’s adjustable rate loans. This increase has been partially offset by a corresponding increase in rates on deposit products and Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) Advances.
Average interest-earning assets increased $289.1 million, or 26.2%, for the three-month period ended September 30, 2006 compared to the prior year comparable period. Average interest-bearing liabilities for the three-month period ended September 30, 2006 increased $308.4 million, or 30.0%, over the comparable prior year period.
17
The following tables present the average daily balances for various categories of assets and liabilities, and income and expense related to those assets and liabilities for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2006 and 2005. Loans receivable include non-accrual loans. To adjust nontaxable securities to a taxable equivalent, a 35.0% and 34.0% effective rate has been used for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The adjustment of tax-exempt loans and securities to a tax equivalent yield in the table below may be considered to include non-GAAP financial information. Management believes that it is a standard practice in the banking industry to present net interest margin, net interest spread and net interest income on a fully tax equivalent basis. Therefore, management believes, these measures provide useful information to investors by allowing them to make peer comparisons. A GAAP reconciliation also is included below.
| | Three Months Ended September 30, | |
| | 2006 | | 2005 | |
(Dollars in Thousands) | | Average Balance | | Interest | | Yield/ Rate | | Average Balance | | Interest | | Yield/ Rate | |
Interest-earning assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total loans | | $ | 1,063,639 | | $ | 17,839 | | 6.56 | % | $ | 747,200 | | $ | 11,801 | | 6.32 | % |
Securities and other investments | | 328,218 | | 4,261 | | 5.08 | % | 355,217 | | 4,197 | | 4.73 | % |
Total interest-earning assets | | 1,391,857 | | $ | 22,100 | | 6.21 | % | 1,102,417 | | $ | 15,998 | | 5.80 | % |
Non-interest earning assets | | 160,274 | | | | | | 80,309 | | | | | |
Total Assets | | $ | 1,552,131 | | | | | | $ | 1,182,726 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total deposits | | $ | 1,022,559 | | $ | 6,425 | | 2.49 | % | $ | 743,931 | | $ | 3,375 | | 1.80 | % |
Borrowings | | 313,551 | | 3,263 | | 4.13 | % | 283,799 | | 2,980 | | 4.17 | % |
Total interest-bearing liabilities | | 1,336,110 | | 9,688 | | 2.88 | % | 1,027,730 | | 6,355 | | 2.47 | % |
Non-interest-bearing liabilities | | 10,252 | | | | | | 16,016 | | | | | |
Stockholders’ equity | | 205,769 | | | | | | 138,980 | | | | | |
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | | $ | 1,552,131 | | | | | | $ | 1,182,726 | | | | | |
Net interest income/interest rate spread | | | | $ | 12,412 | | 3.33 | % | | | $ | 9,643 | | 3.33 | % |
Net interest-earning assets/net interest margin | | $ | 55,747 | | | | 3.49 | % | $ | 74,687 | | | | 3.50 | % |
Ratio of average interest-earning assets to interest-bearing liabilities | | | | | | 104 | % | | | | | 107 | % |
Although management believes that the above mentioned non-GAAP financial measures enhance investors’ understanding of the Company’s business and performance, these non-GAAP financial measures should not be considered an alternative to GAAP. The reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measures from GAAP to non-GAAP is presented below.
| | Three Months Ended September 30, | |
| | 2006 | | 2005 | |
| | Interest Income | | Tax Adjustment | | Adjusted Income | | Interest Income | | Tax Adjustment | | Adjusted Income | |
| | (Dollars in thousands) | |
Loans | | $ | 17,714 | | $ | 125 | | $ | 17,839 | | $ | 11,749 | | $ | 52 | | $ | 11,801 | |
Investments | | 4,197 | | 64 | | 4,261 | | 3,823 | | 374 | | 4,197 | |
Total | | $ | 21,911 | | $ | 189 | | $ | 22,100 | | $ | 15,572 | | $ | 426 | | $ | 15,998 | |
Interest Income. Interest income on loans increased $6.0 million, or 50.8%, for the three-month period ended September 30, 2006 compared to the three-month period ended September 30, 2005. This resulted primarily from an increase in average loan balances of $316.4 million, or 42.3%. Additionally, the average yields earned on loans for the three-month period ended September 30, 2006 increased 24 basis points to 6.56%. The increase in the average yield of the loan portfolio was largely the result of a change in the mix of the loan portfolio reflecting that the Company has reduced its reliance on long-term single-family residential mortgage loans, along with the interest sensitive assets acquired from Chester Valley at a time in which the Federal Reserve was aggressively raising short-term interest rates. Interest income on securities increased $374 thousand, or 9.8%, for the three-month period ended September 30, 2006 compared to the three-month period ended September 30, 2005. The increase in the average tax-equivalent yields earned on securities was 35 basis points for the three-month period ended September 30, 2006 as compared to the same period ended September 30, 2005. The increased yields were partially offset by a decline in average balance of investment securities of $27.0 million, or 7.6%,
18
for the three-month period ended September 30, 2006 compared to the same period ended on September 30, 2005.
Interest Expense. Interest expense on deposit accounts increased $3.1 million, or 93.9%, for the three-month period ended September 30, 2006 compared to the comparable prior year period. The increase resulted primarily from an increase in average deposits of $278.6 million, or 37.5% as well as an increase of 69 basis points in the average cost of deposits for the three-month period ended September 30, 2006 compared to the same period ended September 30, 2005. During the three-month period ended September 30, 2006, interest expense on borrowings increased by a balance of $283 thousand, or 9.5%, over the comparable period ended September 30, 2005. This increase was due primarily to the increase in the average borrowings of $29.8 million, or 10.5%, for the three-month period ended September 30, 2006 as compared to the comparable prior year period.
Provision for Loan Losses. The Company’s provision for loan losses decreased $613 thousand for the three months ended September 30, 2006 compared to the corresponding prior three month period due to repayments experienced in the loan portfolio. Management believes, to the best of its knowledge, that the allowance for loan losses was adequate at September 30, 2006 and represents at such date all known and inherent losses in the portfolio that are both probable and reasonably estimable, however, no assurance can be given as to the amount or timing of additional provisions for loan losses in the future as a result of potential increases in the amount of the Company’s non-performing loans in the remainder of the Company’s loan portfolio.
Non-Interest Income. Non-interest income increased $2.2 million, or 609.0%, for the three-month period ended September 30, 2006 as compared to the comparable period ended September 30, 2005. The increase was due primarily to increased service charges and fees of $616 thousand and increased investment services income of $399 thousand. These increases resulted principally from the acquisition of Chester Valley Bancorp. In addition, during the quarter ended September 30, 2005, the Company realized approximately $1.0 million in losses on the sale of investment securities. These securities were sold to enable the Company to maintain its interest rate sensitivity immediately prior to the Merger.
Non-Interest Expense. Non-interest expense increased $2.5 million, or 31.5%, for the three-month period ended September 30, 2006. Compensation costs increased by $1.1 million as a result of the acquisition of Chester Valley as well as new hirings in the lending and wealth management areas during the three-month period ended September 30, 2006. Occupancy costs increased by $1.0 million, partially as a result of the acquisition of Chester Valley and also due to additional rental costs incurred at the corporate headquarters building. In addition, amortization of core deposit intangibles increased by $397 thousand for the three-month period ended September 30, 2006 as compared to the same period ended September 30, 2005.
Income Tax Expense. The provision for income taxes for the three-month period ended September 30, 2006 was $1.5 million. This compares to a provision of $299 thousand for the similar prior year period. The effective tax rate for the three-month period ended September 30, 2006 was 32.0% compared to 24.4% for the three-month period ended September 30, 2005. The increase in the tax rate was primarily due to a one-time benefit recognized in the prior year period as a result of the acquisition of Chester Valley. The amount of this benefit related to the increase in tax rate was approximately $94 thousand.
Changes in Financial Condition
General. Total assets of the Company decreased by $24.0 million, or 1.5%, from June 30, 2006 to September 30, 2006 due primarily to a $34.6 million reduction in the net loan portfolio. Cash and cash equivalents increased by approximately $7.5 million. Additionally, securities available for sale and held to maturity increased a combined $2.5 million.
Total liabilities amounted to $1.3 billion at September 30, 2006, a decrease of $28.3 million, or 2.1% from June 30, 2006. FHLB advances decreased $37.1 million, or 13.1%, from June 30, 2006. Total deposits increased $10.2 million, or 1.0%, to $1.0 billion. Total stockholders’ equity increased $4.3 million to $207.4 million at September 30, 2006.
Cash and Cash Equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents amounted to $44.7 million and $37.2 million at September 30, 2006 and June 30, 2006, respectively. Cash and cash equivalents increased during the period due primarily to growth in deposits and repayment of loan balances.
Assets Available or Held for Sale. At September 30, 2006, securities classified as available for sale and loans classified as held for sale amounted to $203.6 million and $3.8 million, respectively. This compares to $196.9 million in available for sale securities and $2.6 million in held for sale loans at June 30, 2006. Investment securities available for sale, as a percentage of total assets, have increased to 13.1% at September 30, 2006 as compared to 12.5% at June 30, 2006.
Investment Securities Held to Maturity. At September 30, 2006, securities classified as held to maturity totaled $101.5 million as compared to $105.6 million at June 30, 2006. The approximate $4.1 million decline was the result of principal repayments within the portfolio.
Loans. The net loan portfolio of the Company decreased $34.6 million, or 3.3% to $1.0 billion at September 30, 2006. The decrease was the result of the Company continuing to experience repayments within the construction and commercial real estate loan portfolios.
19
The following table sets forth information with respect to non-performing assets identified by the Company, including non-accrual loans and other real estate owned.
(Dollars in thousands) | | September 30, 2006 | | June 30, 2006 | |
Non-accrual loans: | | | | | |
Mortgage loans: | | | | | |
Single-family residential | | $ | 808 | | $ | 1,059 | |
Commercial real estate and multi-family residential | | 5,222 | | 7,753 | |
Home Equity | | 532 | | 479 | |
Consumer loans | | 170 | | 154 | |
Commercial business loans | | 4,288 | | 6,036 | |
Total | | 11,020 | | 15,481 | |
| | | | | |
Performing troubled debt restructurings | | 32 | | 256 | |
Total non-performing loans | | 11,052 | | 15,737 | |
Other real estate owned, net | | 2,003 | | 51 | |
Total non-performing assets | | $ | 13,055 | | $ | 15,788 | |
Non-performing loans to total loans | | 1.06 | % | 1.45 | % |
Non-performing assets to total assets | | 0.84 | % | 1.00 | % |
Total non-performing assets decreased $2.7 million, or 17.3%, to $13.1 million at September 30, 2006 compared to $15.8 million at June 30, 2006. Non-performing loans to total loans and non-performing loans to total assets were 1.06% and 0.84%, respectively, at September 30, 2006 as compared to 1.45% and 1.00%, respectively at June 30, 2006. This decrease was due primarily to a charge-off during the quarter ended September 30, 2006 of $1.3 million for one loan relationship which was categorized as non-accrual at June 30, 2006 and the payment of a $1.1 million loan during the three-month period ended September 30, 2006 which was in non-accrual status at June 30, 2006. Additionally, a loan balance of approximately $2.0 million was transferred from non-accrual to other real estate owned during the quarter ended September 30, 2006. The allowance to gross loans decreased to 1.46% at September 30, 2006 from 1.55% at June 30, 2006.
Intangible Assets. The amount of our intangible assets totaled $110.9 million at September 30, 2006 compared to $111.5 million at June 30, 2006. The decrease resulted solely from amortization recorded on the core deposit intangibles resulting from the acquisition of Chester Valley.
Deposits. The Company’s total deposits increased by $10.2 million, or 1.0%, to $1.0 billion at September 30, 2006. The increase resulted primarily from an increase in money market demand deposit accounts.
Borrowings. Advances from the FHLB of Pittsburgh are an additional source of funds used to supplement the funding of loan demand as well as for liquidity and other asset/liability management purposes. At September 30, 2006, the total amount of these borrowings outstanding was $245.7 million, which is a $37.1 million, or a 13.1%, decrease from the $282.7 million outstanding at June 30, 2006. This decrease was the direct result of repayments as the excess cash generated from the deposit growth and loan repayments in the current quarter was utilized to repay certain FHLB advances.
Stockholders’ Equity. Total stockholders’ equity of the Company amounted to $207.7 million at September 30, 2006 compared to $203.4 million at June 30, 2006, an increase of $4.3 million. This increase was primarily the result of net income of $3.1 million and an increase of $2.0 million in accumulated other comprehensive income, which were partially offset by the payment of $1.7 million in cash dividends.
Liquidity and Commitments
The Company’s liquidity, represented by cash and cash equivalents, is a product of its operating, investing, and financing activities. The Company’s primary sources of funds are deposits, sales, amortization, prepayments and maturities of outstanding loans and mortgage-backed securities, sales and maturities of investment securities and other short-term investments and funds provided from operations. The Company also utilizes borrowings, generally in the form of FHLB advances, as a source of funds. While scheduled payments from the amortization of loans and mortgage related securities and maturing investment securities and short-term investments are relatively predictable sources of funds, deposit flows and loan prepayments are greatly influenced by general interest rates, economic conditions and competition. In addition, the Company invests excess funds in short-term interest-earning assets, which provide liquidity to meet lending requirements. Additionally, the Company’s portfolio of securities available for sale provides the Company with additional tools in managing its liquidity.
Liquidity management is both a daily and long-term function of business management. Excess liquidity is generally invested in short-term investments such as U.S. Treasury securities. The Company uses its sources of funds primarily to meet its ongoing
20
commitments, to pay maturing certificates of deposit and savings withdrawals, fund loan commitments and maintain a portfolio of mortgage backed and mortgage related securities and investment securities. Certificates of deposit scheduled to mature in one year or less at September 30, 2006 totaled $229.7 million. Based on historical experience, management believes, over the longer term, that a significant portion of maturing certificates of deposit will remain with the Company. The Company has the ability to utilize borrowings, typically in the form of FHLB advances, as an additional source of funds. The maximum borrowing capacity available to the Company from the FHLB was $721.4 million as of September 30, 2006, based on qualifying collateral, of which $473.1 million was available to draw upon at September 30, 2006. The Company is required to maintain sufficient liquidity to ensure its safe and sound operation. The Company anticipates that it will continue to have sufficient funds, together with borrowings, to meet its current commitments.
Legal Proceedings
Irvine Construction Co. v. Sklaroff, et al., (Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County, Pennsylvania). On September 5, 2003, a complaint was filed against Willow Grove Bank and eight additional defendants by Irvine Construction Co., Inc., alleging thirteen causes of action related to an agreement for the construction of an office building. Eleven of such causes include the Bank as a defendant and are: breach of contract (two counts), unjust enrichment/equitable restitution (in the alternative), fraud, civil conspiracy (two counts), fraudulent transfer and aiding and abetting fraudulent transfers, constructive trust, abuse of process, and tortuous interference with existing contractual relations (two counts). Four counts against the Bank seek damages in excess of $1.0 million, five counts seek damages in excess of $50 thousand, punitive damages and other relief, and two counts seek constructive relief. On May 12, 2004, the Court struck the claim for unjust enrichment and all claims for attorney's fees. The remaining claims continue to be litigated and discovery is ongoing. Plaintiff and all defendants have propounded and responded to interrogatories and document requests. Plaintiff has produced in excess of 11,000 document pages to the Bank, and the Bank is pursuing additional discovery in the form of more complete interrogatory responses and requests to admit. The Bank anticipates filing additional motions to compel and partially dispositive motions. Presently, plaintiff and five of the defendants are engaged in motions practice regarding the lis pendens plaintiff filed on the property at issue, although the Bank is not involved in these proceedings. No depositions are presently scheduled. The Bank is vigorously defending the claims and believes that they are without merit.
As previously described in the company’s prospectus/joint proxy statement dated April 27, 2005 and included in its registration statement on Form S-4 (file No. 333-123622) filed in connection with the Merger, FFB previously received a subpoena from the Regional Municipal Securities Counsel in the Philadelphia Office of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). The subpoena arose out of a non-public SEC investigation titled “Hummelstown General Authority,” which Authority issued non-rated revenue bonds now in default, underwritten by the firm of a former director of Chester Valley and FFB. The SEC subpoena requested the production of certain documents concerning FFB’s involvement with non-rated municipal securities, including those issued to finance the Whitetail Golf Course by the Dauphin County General Authority and the Hummelstown General Authority, through the former director’s firm, and related matters. FFB previously produced documents to the SEC and certain officers of FFB provided testimony to the SEC in response to the SEC’s voluntary request for assistance in this matter. On August 3, 2006, the SEC filed a complaint in federal court against the former director, his wife, and the former director's firm. The Bank is not named as a defendant in the complaint filed by the SEC.
FFB is a party to three civil actions relating to some of the revenue bonds which are the subject of the SEC investigation described above. On August 30, 2005, a writ of summons was filed by the Boyertown Area School District in the Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County, Pennsylvania commencing a civil action against, inter alia, FFB. Boyertown Area School District v. First Financial Bank et. al., No. 05-21799. A complaint was filed on November 9, 2005, asserting the following claims against FFB: Breach of Trust Indenture and Fiduciary Duties (Count 1), Breach of Fiduciary Duties (Count 2), Civil Conspiracy (Count 3), and Concerted Action (Count 4). Preliminary Objections have been filed and are pending. On September 13, 2005, Red Lion Area School District filed a complaint in the Court of Common Pleas, York County, Pennsylvania, against, inre alia, FFB. Red Lion Area School District v. Bradbury et. al., No. 2005-SU-1656-Y01; No. 2005-SU-2544-Y01. This case has been transferred to the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County, Pennsylvania. The complaint asserts the following claims against FFB: Civil Conspiracy (Count 14), and Breach of Duty as Trustee (Count 15). Preliminary Objections have been filed and are pending. On March 16, 2006, Perkiomen Valley School District filed a complaint in the Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County, Pennsylvania, against, inte alia, FFB Perkiomen Valley School District v. First Financial Bank et.al., No. 06-06533. The complaint asserts the following claims against FFB: Breach of Trust Indenture (Count 1), Breach of Fiduciary Duties (Count 2), Vicarious Liability and Respondeat Superior (Count 3), Civil Conspiracy (Count 4), and Concert of Action (Count 5).
The actions have been consolidated for discovery and case management purposes, but not for trial. Preliminary Objections have been filed and are pending in each of these actions. No discovery has taken place. One of the plaintiffs has filed a motion to stay the proceedings pending the outcome of the SEC action described above.
In the normal course of business, the Company is involved in various legal proceedings. Management of the Company, based on discussions with legal counsel, believes that such proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on the financial condition or operations of the Company. There can be no assurance that any of the outstanding legal proceedings to which the Company is a party will not be decided adversely to the Company's interests and have a material adverse effect on the financial condition and operations of the Company.
Capital
At September 30, 2006 and June 30, 2006, the Bank had regulatory capital, which was well in excess of regulatory limits set by the Office of Thrift Supervision. For additional information and the Bank’s specific levels of regulatory capital at September 30, 2006 and June 30, 2006, see note 14 of the Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.
21
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
For the discussion of the Company’s asset and liability management policies as well as the potential impact of interest rate changes upon the market value of the Company’s portfolio equity, see “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk” in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2006. Management, as part of its regular practices, performs periodic reviews of the impact of interest rate changes upon net interest income and the market value of the Company’s portfolio equity. Management monitors interest rate risk and takes actions which it deems appropriate to maintain the short-term risk at levels considered acceptable while focusing on a longer-term loan diversification plan, which concentrates on the acquisition of shorter maturity or repricing assets.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Our management evaluated, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and regulations and, except as noted below, are operating in an effective manner.
No change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) or 15(d)-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) occurred during the last fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
22
Part II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item l. Legal Proceedings
Not applicable.
Item 1a. Risk Factors
Management of the Company does not believe that there have been any material changes to the risk factors previously described under Item 1A of the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2006, previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Not applicable.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Not applicable.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
Not applicable
Item 5. Other Information
a. Not applicable.
b. Not applicable.
Item 6. Exhibits
Exhibit No. | | Description |
3.1 | | Articles of Incorporation of Willow Financial Bancorp, Inc. (1) |
3.2 | | Amended and Restated Bylaws of Willow Financial Bancorp, Inc. (through August 31, 2005)(2) |
4.0 | | Form of Stock Certificate of Willow Grove Bancorp, Inc. (3) |
4.1 | | Indenture, dated as of March 31, 2006, between Willow Grove Bancorp, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee (4) |
4.2 | | Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust of Willow Grove Statutory Trust I, dated as March 31, 2006, among Willow Grove Bancorp, Inc., as sponsor, U.S. Bank National Association, as institutional trustee, and the administrators named therein (4) |
4.3 | | Guarantee Agreement, dated as of March 31, 2006, between Willow Grove Bancorp, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association, as guarantee trustee (4) |
10.1 | | Employment Agreement, dated July 15, 2005, by and among Willow Grove Bancorp, Inc., Willow Grove Bank and Donna M. Coughey (2) |
10.2 | | Retirement and Severance Agreement by and among Willow Grove Bancorp, Inc., Willow Grove Bank and Frederick A. Marcell Jr. (5) |
10.3 | | Employment Agreement, dated July 15, 2005, by among Willow Grove Bancorp, Inc., Willow Grove Bank and Joseph T. Crowley (2) |
10.4 | | Employment Agreement, dated November 25, 2002, between First Financial Bank and Michael J. Sexton (6)* |
10.5 | | Form of Employment Agreement entered into between Willow Grove Bank and each of John T. Powers and Ammon J. Baus (7) |
10.6 | | Form of Employment Agreement entered into between Willow Grove Bank and each of G. Richard Bertolet, Matthew D. Kelly and Colin N. Maropis (8) |
10.7 | | Form of Change in Control Severance Agreement between Willow Grove Bank and William Byrne (8) |
10.8 | | Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreement (9) |
10.9 | | Non-Employee Directors’ Retirement Plan and amendment thereto(10) |
10.10 | | 1999 Stock Option Plan (11)* |
10.11 | | 1999 Recognition and Retention Plan and Trust Agreement (11) |
10.12 | | 2002 Stock Option Plan (12) |
10.13 | | 2002 Recognition and Retention Plan and Trust Agreement (12) |
10.14 | | Deferred Compensation Plan (13) |
10.15 | | Chester Valley Bancorp Inc. 1993 Stock Option Plan, as amended (14) |
23
10.16 | | Chester Valley Bancorp Inc. 1997 Stock Option Plan, as amended (15) |
10.17 | | Form of First Financial Bank Executive Survivor Income Agreement by and between First Financial Bank and each of Donna M. Coughey, G. Richard Bertolet, Matthew D. Kelly and Colin N. Maropis (8) |
10.18 | | First Financial Bank Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended and restated effective January 1, 2003, and amendments thereto (16) |
10.19 | | First Financial Bank 2005 Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, and amendments thereto (16) |
10.20 | | First Financial Bank Board of Directors Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended and restated effective January 1, 2003, and amendments thereto (16) |
10.21 | | First Financial Bank 2005 Board of Directors Deferred Compensation Plan, and amendments thereto (16) |
10.22 | | Change in Control Severance Agreement Between Willow Grove Bank and Allen L. Wagner (17). |
10.23 | | Change in Control Severance Agreement, dated January 18, 2006, between Willow Grove Bank and Neil Kalani (18) |
10.24 | | Change in Control Severance Agreement, dated January 18, 2006, between Willow Grove Bank and Patrick Killeen (18) |
10.25 | | Willow Grove Bancorp, Inc. 2006 Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan(19) |
10.26 | | 2005 Recognition and Retention Plan and Trust Agreement(20) |
31.1 | | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of the Chief Executive Officer |
31.2 | | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of the Chief Financial Officer |
32.0 | | Section 1350 Certifications |
(1) | Incorporated by reference from the Company’s Form 8-K, dated September 21, 2006 and filed with the SEC on September 22, 2006 (SEC File No. 000-49706) |
| |
(2) | Incorporated by reference from the Company’s Form 8-K, dated August 31, 2005 and filed with the SEC on September 1, 2005 (SEC File No. 000-49706) |
| |
(3) | Incorporated by reference from the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on December 14, 2001, as amended, and declared effective on February 11, 2002 (Registration No. 333-75106) |
| |
(4) | Exhibit not included pursuant to Item 601(b)(4)(iii) of Regulation S-K. The Company will provide a copy of such exhibit to the SEC upon request. |
| |
(5) | Incorporated by reference from the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A, dated as of January 20, 2005 and filed with the SEC on January 26, 2005 (SEC File No. 0-49706). |
| |
(6) | Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10L to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Chester Valley Bancorp Inc. for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2003 and filed with the SEC on September 12, 2003 (SEC File No. 0-18833). |
(7) | Incorporated by reference from the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, filed with the SEC on May 14, 2004 (SEC File No. 000-49706). |
| |
(8) | Incorporated by reference from the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2006, filed with the SEC on September 13, 2005 (SEC File No. 000-49706). |
| |
(9) | Incorporated by reference from the registration statement on Form S-1 filed by the Company’s predecessor, a federal corporation also known as Willow Grove Bancorp, Inc. (the “Mid-Tier”) on September 18, 1998, as amended, and declared effective on November 12, 1998 (Registration No. 333-63737). |
| |
(10) | Incorporated by reference from the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002, filed with the SEC on November 14, 2002 (SEC File No. 000-49706) and the Company’s Form 8-K, dated as of October 25, 2005 and filed with the SEC on October 31, 2005 (SEC File No. 000-49706) |
| |
(11) | Incorporated by reference from the Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed by the Mid-Tier on June 23, 1999 (SEC File No. 000-25191). |
| |
(12) | Incorporated by reference from the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed on October 9, 2002 (SEC File No. 000-49706). |
| |
(13) | Incorporated by reference from the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2003, filed with the SEC on February 12, 2004 (SEC File No. 000-49706). |
24
(14) | Incorporated by reference from Chester Valley’s Registration Statement on Form S-4/A (Commission File No. 333-50077) filed with the Commission on April 28, 1998. |
| |
(15) | Incorporated by reference from Chester Valley’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the Commission on January 19, 2001 (File No. 333-54020). |
| |
(16) | Incorporated by reference from the Company’s Form 8-K, dated as of October 25, 2005 and filed with the SEC on October 31, 2005 (SEC File No. 000-49706). |
| |
(17) | Incorporated by reference from the Company’s Form 8-K, dated as of January 5, 2006, and filed with the SEC on January 11, 2006 (SEC File No. 000-49706). |
| |
(18) | Incorporated by reference from the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated as of January 18, 2006, and filed with the SEC on January 20, 2006 (SEC File No. 000-49706). |
| |
(19) | Incorporated by reference from the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated as of March 28, 2006, and filed with the SEC on April 3, 2006 (SEC File No. 000-49706). |
| |
(20) | Incorporated by reference from the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A as filed on October 5, 2005 (SEC File No. 000-49706). |
25
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
WILLOW FINANCIAL BANCORP, INC.
Date: November 9, 2006 | | By: | /s/ Donna M. Coughey |
| | Donna M. Coughey |
| | President and Chief Executive Officer |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Date: November 9, 2006 | | By: | /s/ Joseph T. Crowley |
| | Joseph T. Crowley |
| | Chief Financial Officer |
26