BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES | 1. BASI Cimarex Energy Co., a Delaware corporation, is an independent oil and gas exploration and production company. Our operations are mainly located in Texas, Oklahoma and New Mexico. Basis of Presentation Our Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, or GAAP. Our significant accounting policies are discussed below. The accounts of Cimarex and its subsidiaries are presented in the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements. All intercompany accounts and transactions were eliminated in consolidation. Segment Information We have determined that our business is comprised of only one segment because our gathering, processing and marketing activities are ancillary to our production operations and are not separately managed. Use of Estimates The preparation of our financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. The more significant areas requiring the use of management’s estimates and judgments relate to the estimation of proved oil and gas reserves, the use of these oil and gas reserves in calculating depletion, depreciation and amortization (DD&A), the use of the estimates of future net revenues in computing ceiling test limitations and estimates of future abandonment obligations used in recording asset retirement obligations and the assessment of goodwill. The process of estimating quantities of oil and gas reserves is complex, requiring significant decisions in the evaluation of all available geological, geophysical, engineering and economic data. The data for a given field may also change substantially over time as a result of numerous factors including, but not limited to, additional development activity, evolving production history and continual reassessment of the viability of production under varying economic conditions. As a result, material revisions to existing reserve estimates may occur from time to time. Although every reasonable effort is made to ensure that our reserve estimates represent the most accurate assessments possible, subjective decisions and available data for our various fields make these estimates generally less precise than other estimates included in financial statement disclosures. Estimates and judgments are also required in determining the allowance for doubtful accounts, impairments of unproved properties and other assets, purchase price allocation, valuation of deferred tax assets, fair value measurements and commitments and contingencies. We analyze our estimates, including those related to oil, gas and NGL revenues, and base our estimates on historical experience and various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. Cash and Cash Equivalents Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash in banks and investments readily convertible into cash, which have original maturities of three months or less. Cash equivalents are stated at cost, which approximates market value. Oil and Gas Well Equipment and Supplies We carry our inventory at the lower of cost or net realizable value, where net realizable value is estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation. We performed an analysis of our oil and gas well equipment and supplies as of December 31, 2016, and no impairment was required. However, the industry-wide decline in drilling operations has put downward pressure on the price of oil and gas well equipment and supplies. Declines in future periods could cause us to recognize impairments on these assets. An impairment would not affect cash flow from operating activities, but would adversely affect our net income and stockholders’ equity. Oil and Gas Properties We use the full cost method of accounting for our oil and gas operations. All costs associated with property acquisition, exploration and development activities are capitalized. Exploration and development costs include dry hole costs, geological and geophysical costs, direct overhead related to exploration and development activities and other costs incurred for the purpose of finding oil and gas reserves. Salaries and benefits paid to employees directly involved in the exploration and development of properties, as well as other internal costs that can be directly identified with acquisition, exploration and development activities, are also capitalized. Under the full cost method of accounting, no gain or loss is recognized upon the disposition of oil and gas properties unless such disposition would significantly alter the relationship between capitalized costs and proved reserves. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to production expense in the period incurred. Companies that follow the full cost accounting method are required to make quarterly ceiling test calculations. This test ensures that total capitalized costs for oil and gas properties (net of accumulated DD&A and deferred income taxes) do not exceed the sum of the present value discounted at 10% of estimated future net cash flows from proved reserves, the cost of properties not being amortized, the lower of cost or estimated fair value of unproven properties included in the costs being amortized, and all related tax effects. We currently do not have any unproven properties that are being amortized. Estimated future net cash flows are determined by commodity prices and proved reserve quantities. Revenue calculations in the reserves are based on the unweighted average first-day-of-the-month prices for the prior 12 months. If net capitalized costs exceed this limit, the excess is charged to expense. At December 31, 2016, the carrying value of our oil and gas properties subject to the test did not exceed the calculated value of the ceiling limitation and, therefore, we did not recognize an impairment. However, a decline of 11% or more in the value of the ceiling limitation would have resulted in an impairment. We did recognize impairments in the first three quarters of 2016 totaling $719.1 million ($456.9 million, net of tax). For the year ended December 31, 2015, full year impairments totaled $3.7 billion ($2.4 billion, net of tax). These impairments resulted primarily from the impact of decreases in the 12-month average trailing prices for oil, natural gas and NGLs utilized in determining the future net cash flows from proved reserves. If pricing conditions decline, or if there is a negative impact on one or more of the other components of the calculation, we will incur full cost ceiling impairments in future quarters. The ceiling calculation is not intended to be indicative of the fair market value of our proved reserves or future results. Impairment charges do not affect cash flow from operating activities, but do adversely affect our net income and other components of our balance sheet. Any recorded impairment of oil and gas properties is not reversible at a later date. Depletion of proved oil and gas properties is computed on the units-of-production method, whereby capitalized costs, including future development costs and asset retirement costs, are amortized over total estimated proved reserves. Changes in our estimate of proved reserve quantities, commodity prices and impairment of oil and gas properties will cause corresponding changes in depletion expense in periods subsequent to these changes. The capitalized costs of unproved properties, including those in wells in progress, are excluded from the costs being amortized. We do not have major development projects that are excluded from costs being amortized. On a quarterly basis, we evaluate excluded costs for inclusion in the costs to be amortized. Significant unproved properties are evaluated individually. Unproved properties that are not considered individually significant are aggregated for evaluation purposes and related costs are transferred to the costs to be amortized quarterly based on the application of historical factors. Fixed Assets, net Fixed assets consist primarily of gathering and plant facilities, vehicles, airplanes, office furniture, and computer equipment and software. These items are recorded at cost and are depreciated on the straight-line method based on expected lives of the individual assets, which range from 3 to 30 years. Goodwill Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price of business combinations over the fair value of the net assets acquired and is tested for impairment at least annually. We have one reporting unit for which we first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not (with a greater than 50% threshold) that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test. If goodwill is determined to be impaired then it is written down to a calculated fair value by charging the impairment to expense. We evaluate our goodwill for impairment in the fourth quarter of each year and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the possibility that goodwill may be impaired. Based upon our qualitative assessment at December 31, 2016, goodwill was not impaired. It is possible that goodwill could become impaired in the future if commodity prices or other economic factors become less favorable. Revenue Recognition Oil, Gas and NGL Sales Revenue is recorded from the sales of oil, gas and NGLs when the product is delivered at a fixed or determinable price, title has transferred and collectability is reasonably assured. There is a ready market for our products and sales occur soon after production. Marketing Sales We market and sell natural gas for working interest owners under short term sales and supply agreements and earn a fee for such services. Revenues are recognized as gas is delivered and are reflected net of gas purchases on the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss). Gas Imbalances We use the sales method of accounting for gas imbalances. Under this method, revenue is recorded on the basis of gas actually sold. Gas reserves are adjusted to the extent there are sufficient quantities of natural gas to make up an imbalance. A liability is established in situations where there are insufficient proved reserves available to make-up an overproduced imbalance. Imbalances have not been significant in the periods presented. General and Administrative Expenses General and administrative expenses are reported net of amounts reimbursed by working interest owners of the oil and gas properties operated by Cimarex and net of amounts capitalized pursuant to the full cost method of accounting. Derivatives Our derivative contracts are recorded on the balance sheet at fair value. Our firm sales contracts qualify for the normal purchase and normal sale exception. Contracts that qualify for this treatment do not require mark-to-market accounting treatment. See Note 4 for additional information regarding our derivative instruments. Income Taxes We record deferred tax assets and liabilities to account for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the financial statements and tax returns. We classify all deferred tax assets and liabilities as noncurrent. We routinely assess the realizability of the deferred tax assets. If we conclude that it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized, the tax asset is reduced by a valuation allowance. Numerous judgments and assumptions are inherent in the determination of future taxable income, including factors such as future operating conditions (particularly as related to prevailing oil and gas prices) and changing tax laws. We regularly assess and, if required, establish accruals for tax contingencies that could result from assessments of additional tax by taxing jurisdictions where the company operates. See Note 9 for additional information regarding our income taxes. Contingencies A provision for contingencies is charged to expense when the loss is probable and the cost can be reasonably estimated. Determining when expenses should be recorded for these contingencies and the appropriate amounts for accrual is a complex estimation process that includes subjective judgment. In many cases, this judgment is based on interpretation of laws and regulations, which can be interpreted differently by regulators and/or courts of law. We closely monitor known and potential legal, environmental and other contingencies and determine when we should record losses for these items based on information available to us. See Note 10 for additional information regarding our contingencies. Asset Retirement Obligations We recognize the present value of the fair value of liabilities for retirement obligations associated with tangible long-lived assets in the period in which there is a legal obligation associated with the retirement of such assets and the amount can be reasonably estimated. The associated asset retirement costs are capitalized as part of the carrying amount of the long-lived asset. This liability includes costs related to the abandonment of wells, the removal of facilities and equipment, and site restorations. Subsequent to initial measurement, the asset retirement liability is required to be accreted each period. If the fair value of a recorded asset retirement obligation changes, a revision is recorded to both the asset retirement obligation and the asset retirement capitalized cost. Capitalized costs are included as a component of the DD&A calculations. The current portions of the asset retirement obligations are recorded in “Accrued liabilities — Other” in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and expenditures are classified as cash used in operating activities in the accompanying consolidated statements of cash flows. See Note 8 for additional information regarding our asset retirement obligations. Stock-based Compensation We recognize compensation cost related to all stock-based awards in the financial statements based on their estimated grant-date fair value. We grant various types of stock-based awards including stock options, restricted stock (including awards with service-based vesting and market condition-based vesting provisions) and restricted stock units. The fair value of stock option awards is determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Service-based restricted stock and units are valued using the market price of our common stock on the grant date. The fair value of the market condition-based restricted stock is based on the grant-date market value of the award utilizing a statistical analysis. Compensation cost is recognized ratably over the applicable vesting period. To the extent compensation cost relates to employees directly involved in oil and gas acquisition, exploration, and development activities, such amounts are capitalized to oil and gas properties. Amounts not capitalized to oil and gas properties are recognized as stock compensation expense. See Note 6 for additional information regarding our stock-based compensation. Earnings (loss) per Share We calculate earnings (loss) per share recognizing that unvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents are “participating securities” and, therefore, should be included in computing earnings per share using the two-class earnings allocation method. The two-class method is an earnings allocation formula that determines earnings per share for each class of common stock and participating security according to dividends declared (or accumulated) and participation rights in undistributed earnings. Our unvested share based payment awards, consisting of restricted stock and units, qualify as participating securities. See Note 7 for additional information regarding our earnings per share. Recently Issued Accounting Standards In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) . In July 2015, the FASB deferred the effective date by one year to annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period. Early adoption is permitted, but not before the original effective date of reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The new revenue standard provides a five-step analysis of transactions to determine when and how revenue is recognized. The core principle of the guidance is that a company should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The guidance in this update supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in Topic 605, Revenue Recognition, and most industry-specific guidance throughout the Industry Topics of the Codification . Entities can choose to apply the standard using either the full retrospective approach or a modified retrospective approach. We intend to adopt this standard on January 1, 2018, utilizing a modified retrospective approach. Management does not believe the effect of adoption will be material to our financial statements because we follow the sales method of accounting for our oil, gas and NGL production, which is generally consistent with the revenue recognition provisions of the new standard. However, we anticipate the new standard will result in more robust footnote disclosures. We cannot currently determine the extent of the new footnote disclosures as further clarification is needed for certain practices common to the industry. In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) . The key provision of this ASU is that a lessee must recognize (i) liabilities to make lease payments and (ii) right-of-use assets on its balance sheet. The ASU permits lessees to make a policy election to not recognize lease assets and liabilities for leases with terms of less than twelve months. Under current GAAP, a determination of whether a lease is a capital or operating lease is made at lease inception and no assets or liabilities are recognized for operating leases. Under this ASU, the determination to be made at the inception of a contract is whether the contract is, or contains, a lease. Leases convey the right to control the use of an identified asset in exchange for consideration. Only the lease components of a contract must be accounted for in accordance with this ASU. Non-lease components, such as activities that transfer a good or service to the customer, shall be accounted for under other applicable Topics. An entity may make a policy election to not separate lease and non-lease components and account for the non-lease components together with the lease components as a single lease component. This ASU retains a distinction between finance and operating leases concerning the recognition and presentation of the expense and payments related to leases in the statements of operations and comprehensive income and cash flows, however, both types of leases require the recognition of assets and liabilities on the balance sheet. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. Upon transition, lessees will be required to recognize and measure leases at the beginning of the earliest period presented using a modified retrospective approach. While we are in the process of evaluating the potential impact of adopting this guidance, the primary effect will be to record assets and obligations for contracts currently recognized as operating leases. We do not intend to adopt the standard early. In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting (ASU 2016-09). ASU 2016-09 simplifies the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. The amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The standard contains various amendments, and specifies whether each amendment should be adopted using a retrospective, modified retrospective, or prospective transition method. We will adopt ASU 2016-09 effective January 1, 2017. The amendments within ASU 2016-09 related to the timing of when excess tax benefits and tax benefits on dividends on nonvested equity shares are recognized and accounting for forfeitures will be adopted using a modified retrospective method. In accordance with this method, we expect to record a cumulative-effect adjustment on that date relating to those amendments, representing a decrease to beginning Deferred income taxes of approximately $33 million, a reduction to beginning Accumulated deficit of approximately $31 million and an increase to beginning Paid-in capital of approximately $2 million. The amendments within ASU 2016-09 related to the presentation in the statement of cash flows of excess tax benefits and cash outflows attributable to tax withholdings on the net settlement of equity-classified awards will be adopted using a retrospective method. In accordance with this method, we estimate that Net cash provided by operating activities would have increased and Net cash (used) provided by financing activities would have decreased by approximately $27 million, $34 million and $14 million, for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350)—Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment . This ASU eliminates step two from the goodwill impairment test. Under current guidance, if the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying amount (step 1 of the goodwill impairment test), entities must complete step two to determine the impairment amount, if any. Under step two, the impairment amount is determined by calculating the implied fair value of goodwill by assigning the fair value of a reporting unit to all of its assets and liabilities as if that reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination, and comparing it to the carrying amount of the goodwill. Under this ASU, the impairment amount is the amount by which the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value, with the amount of impairment not to exceed the carrying amount of the goodwill. This ASU retains the option to qualitatively assess whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying amount in order to determine if it is necessary to initiate step 1. This ASU is effective for annual or any interim goodwill impairment tests in the fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted for testing dates after January 1, 2017. The implementation of this ASU will affect the amount of goodwill impairment we record, if any. We adopted this ASU on January 1, 2017, and will apply its provisions in future periods if we determine our goodwill has been impaired. Subsequent Events The accompanying financial disclosures include an evaluation of subsequent events through the date of this filing. |