Table of Contents
Commonwealth Edison Company | : | |||
: | ||||
Proposal to implement a competitive procurement | : | 05-0159 | ||
process by establishing Rider CPP, Rider PPO-MVM, | : | |||
Rider TR-CPP and revising Rider PPO-MI. (Tariffs | : | |||
filed February 25, 2005) | : | |||
: | ||||
: |
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
1 | ||||
1 | ||||
4 | ||||
9 | ||||
9 | ||||
9 | ||||
9 | ||||
10 | ||||
11 | ||||
12 | ||||
12 | ||||
13 | ||||
14 | ||||
15 | ||||
15 | ||||
16 | ||||
16 | ||||
23 | ||||
26 | ||||
28 | ||||
30 | ||||
34 | ||||
36 |
i
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
36 | ||||
36 | ||||
39 | ||||
42 | ||||
45 | ||||
47 | ||||
48 | ||||
48 | ||||
50 | ||||
50 | ||||
53 | ||||
55 | ||||
56 | ||||
56 | ||||
56 | ||||
56 | ||||
56 | ||||
57 | ||||
57 | ||||
57 | ||||
57 | ||||
58 | ||||
58 | ||||
58 | ||||
58 |
ii
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
58 | ||||
59 | ||||
59 | ||||
59 | ||||
59 | ||||
59 | ||||
60 | ||||
60 | ||||
60 | ||||
60 | ||||
60 | ||||
60 | ||||
61 | ||||
62 | ||||
62 | ||||
62 | ||||
62 | ||||
62 | ||||
63 | ||||
63 | ||||
64 | ||||
64 | ||||
64 | ||||
64 | ||||
65 |
iii
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
65 | ||||
65 | ||||
66 | ||||
66 | ||||
66 | ||||
68 | ||||
69 | ||||
69 | ||||
69 | ||||
70 | ||||
71 | ||||
71 | ||||
71 | ||||
71 | ||||
72 | ||||
72 | ||||
73 | ||||
73 | ||||
74 | ||||
74 | ||||
74 | ||||
74 | ||||
75 | ||||
75 | ||||
76 |
iv
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
76 | ||||
76 | ||||
77 | ||||
77 | ||||
77 | ||||
78 | ||||
78 | ||||
79 | ||||
79 | ||||
79 | ||||
79 | ||||
79 | ||||
80 | ||||
81 | ||||
81 | ||||
81 | ||||
81 | ||||
81 | ||||
82 | ||||
82 | ||||
83 | ||||
83 | ||||
83 | ||||
83 | ||||
83 |
v
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
84 | ||||
85 | ||||
85 | ||||
85 | ||||
85 | ||||
86 | ||||
87 | ||||
87 | ||||
87 | ||||
87 | ||||
88 | ||||
88 | ||||
88 | ||||
88 | ||||
89 | ||||
89 | ||||
89 | ||||
90 | ||||
90 | ||||
90 | ||||
91 | ||||
92 | ||||
92 | ||||
92 | ||||
92 |
vi
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
92 | ||||
93 | ||||
93 | ||||
93 | ||||
93 | ||||
93 | ||||
94 | ||||
94 | ||||
94 | ||||
94 | ||||
95 | ||||
95 | ||||
95 | ||||
95 | ||||
95 | ||||
95 | ||||
95 | ||||
96 | ||||
96 | ||||
97 | ||||
97 | ||||
100 | ||||
100 | ||||
100 | ||||
100 |
vii
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
100 | ||||
101 | ||||
102 | ||||
102 | ||||
102 | ||||
102 | ||||
102 | ||||
102 | ||||
103 | ||||
103 | ||||
103 | ||||
103 | ||||
104 | ||||
104 | ||||
104 | ||||
104 | ||||
104 | ||||
104 | ||||
105 | ||||
105 | ||||
106 | ||||
106 | ||||
107 | ||||
107 | ||||
107 |
viii
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
107 | ||||
108 | ||||
108 | ||||
108 | ||||
108 | ||||
108 | ||||
109 | ||||
109 | ||||
109 | ||||
109 | ||||
109 | ||||
110 | ||||
110 | ||||
111 | ||||
111 | ||||
111 | ||||
112 | ||||
112 | ||||
112 | ||||
112 | ||||
113 | ||||
113 | ||||
114 | ||||
114 | ||||
114 |
ix
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
114 | ||||
115 | ||||
115 | ||||
115 | ||||
115 | ||||
115 | ||||
115 | ||||
115 | ||||
116 | ||||
116 | ||||
116 | ||||
116 | ||||
116 | ||||
116 | ||||
116 | ||||
117 | ||||
117 | ||||
117 | ||||
117 | ||||
117 | ||||
117 | ||||
118 | ||||
118 | ||||
118 |
x
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
119 | ||||
119 | ||||
119 | ||||
119 | ||||
120 | ||||
120 | ||||
120 | ||||
121 | ||||
122 | ||||
122 | ||||
125 | ||||
125 | ||||
125 | ||||
125 | ||||
126 | ||||
126 | ||||
127 | ||||
127 | ||||
127 | ||||
127 | ||||
128 | ||||
128 | ||||
128 | ||||
128 | ||||
128 |
xi
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
128 | ||||
129 | ||||
129 | ||||
129 | ||||
129 | ||||
129 | ||||
129 | ||||
129 | ||||
131 | ||||
133 | ||||
135 | ||||
135 | ||||
136 | ||||
136 | ||||
137 | ||||
139 | ||||
139 | ||||
139 | ||||
139 | ||||
140 | ||||
140 | ||||
141 | ||||
141 | ||||
142 | ||||
143 |
xii
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
144 | ||||
144 | ||||
144 | ||||
145 | ||||
145 | ||||
146 | ||||
147 | ||||
147 | ||||
148 | ||||
148 | ||||
148 | ||||
149 | ||||
149 | ||||
149 | ||||
149 | ||||
150 | ||||
151 | ||||
151 | ||||
151 | ||||
152 | ||||
153 | ||||
153 | ||||
153 | ||||
154 | ||||
154 |
xiii
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
154 | ||||
154 | ||||
155 | ||||
155 | ||||
155 | ||||
155 | ||||
155 | ||||
156 | ||||
156 | ||||
156 | ||||
156 | ||||
156 | ||||
156 | ||||
156 | ||||
156 | ||||
158 | ||||
159 | ||||
160 | ||||
162 | ||||
162 | ||||
162 | ||||
162 | ||||
163 | ||||
163 |
xiv
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
163 | ||||
164 | ||||
164 | ||||
165 | ||||
165 | ||||
165 | ||||
165 | ||||
165 | ||||
165 | ||||
166 | ||||
166 | ||||
166 | ||||
167 | ||||
167 | ||||
167 | ||||
168 | ||||
168 | ||||
168 | ||||
169 | ||||
170 | ||||
171 | ||||
173 | ||||
173 | ||||
175 | ||||
175 |
xv
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
175 | ||||
176 | ||||
177 | ||||
177 | ||||
179 | ||||
180 | ||||
181 | ||||
182 | ||||
183 | ||||
183 | ||||
183 | ||||
184 | ||||
185 | ||||
186 | ||||
187 | ||||
187 | ||||
188 | ||||
188 | ||||
193 | ||||
199 | ||||
202 | ||||
202 | ||||
204 | ||||
205 |
xvi
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
205 | ||||
205 | ||||
207 | ||||
208 | ||||
209 | ||||
209 | ||||
209 | ||||
209 | ||||
210 | ||||
211 | ||||
212 | ||||
212 | ||||
212 | ||||
213 | ||||
215 | ||||
216 | ||||
218 | ||||
218 | ||||
218 | ||||
221 | ||||
222 | ||||
222 | ||||
223 |
xvii
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
224 | ||||
225 | ||||
225 | ||||
225 | ||||
227 | ||||
227 | ||||
227 | ||||
228 | ||||
228 | ||||
228 | ||||
229 | ||||
229 | ||||
229 | ||||
230 | ||||
230 | ||||
230 | ||||
230 | ||||
231 | ||||
231 | ||||
232 | ||||
232 | ||||
232 | ||||
233 | ||||
233 |
xviii
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
233 | ||||
233 | ||||
234 | ||||
234 | ||||
235 | ||||
235 | ||||
235 | ||||
236 | ||||
236 | ||||
236 | ||||
236 | ||||
236 | ||||
236 | ||||
237 | ||||
237 | ||||
238 | ||||
238 | ||||
239 | ||||
239 | ||||
239 | ||||
239 | ||||
239 | ||||
239 | ||||
239 |
xix
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Commonwealth Edison Company | : | |||
: | ||||
Proposal to implement a | : | 05-0159 | ||
competitive procurement process | : | |||
by establishing Rider CPP, Rider | : | |||
PPO-MVM, Rider TR-CPP and | : | |||
revising Rider PPO-MI. (Tariffs filed | : | |||
February 25, 2005) | : |
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
2
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
3
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
4
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
5
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
6
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
7
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
8
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
A. | Background: The Illinois Electric Service Customer Choice and Rate Relief Law of 1997 |
1. | ComEd’s Position |
9
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
2. | AG’s Position |
10
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
3. | CCSAO’s Position |
11
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
4. | Staff’s Position |
5. | IIEC |
12
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
6. | CES’ Position |
13
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
7. | DES-USESC’s Position |
14
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
8. | CCG’s Position |
9. | Dynegy’s Position |
15
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
B. | ICC Authority under Articles IX and XVI to Approve the Filed Tariffs1 |
1. | ComEd’s Position |
1 | Discussion of the issues set forth in the outline at VIII are included because of the inter-relationship of those issues. |
16
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
17
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
18
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
19
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
20
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
21
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
22
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
2. | Attorney General’s Position |
23
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
24
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
25
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
3. | CUB’s Position |
26
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
27
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
4. | CCSAO’s Position |
28
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
29
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
5. | Staff’s Position |
30
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
31
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
32
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
33
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
7. | CCG’s Position |
34
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
35
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
8. | CES’ Position |
C. | Relationship of Illinois and Federal Law and Jurisdiction |
1. | ComEd’s Position |
36
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
37
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
38
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
2. | AG’s Position |
39
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
• | evidence of direct head to head competition between the affiliate and competing unaffiliated suppliers in a formal solicitation or informal negotiation process; | ||
• | evidence of the prices which non affiliated buyers were willing to pay for similar services from the affiliate; or | ||
• | benchmark evidence that shows the prices, terms and conditions of sales made by non affiliated sellers. |
40
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
41
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
3. | Staff’s Position |
42
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
43
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
44
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
4. | CCG’s Position |
45
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
46
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
D. | References to Post-2006 Initiative References and Results |
47
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
E. | Conclusions Relating to Commission Authority |
1. | Market-Based Rates for Service not Declared Competitive |
48
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
49
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
2. | Transfer of Generation Plants |
3. | Prudency |
50
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
51
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
52
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
4. | State and Federal Authority; Federal Preemption |
53
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
54
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
5. | Prudency of Contingency Purchases |
55
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
6. | Accounting Reconciliation |
A. | Markets’ Relationship to Auction Process |
1. | ComEd’s Position |
2. | Staff Position |
56
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
3. | AG’s Position |
4. | Constellation Energy Commodities Group’s Position |
5. | Midwest Generation’s Position |
6. | Commission Conclusion |
57
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
B. | Other Jurisdictions’ Experiences with Competitive Electricity Procurement |
1. | ComEd’s Position |
2. | CECG’s Position |
3. | AG’s Position |
4. | Commission Conclusion |
58
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
C. | Retail Market Conditions |
1. | ComEd’s Position |
2. | CES’ Position |
3. | AG’s Position |
4. | IIEC’s Position |
59
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
5. | Commission Conclusion |
D. | Relevant Product Market |
1. | Required Products |
2. | Physical vs. Financial Markets |
3. | PJM Capacity Market |
a. | ComEd’s Position |
60
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
b. | AG’s Position |
61
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
c. | CUB’s and CCSAO’s Position |
d. | Commission Conclusion |
E. | Relevant Geographic Market |
1. | Significance of Political Boundaries |
a. | ComEd’s Position |
62
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
b. | AG’s Position |
c. | CCSAO’s Position |
63
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
d. | CUB’s Position |
e. | Commission Conclusion |
2. | PJM/MISO Seam & Joint Operation Agreement |
a. | ComEd’s Position |
64
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
b. | CUB’s Position |
c. | CCSAO’s Position |
d. | Commission Conclusion |
65
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
F. | Market Characteristics, Including Supplier Concentration |
1. | ComEd’s Position |
2. | AG’s Position |
66
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
67
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
3. | CUB and CCSAO’s Position |
68
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
4. | Commission Conclusion |
G. | Transmission Constraints |
1. | ComEd’s Position |
69
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
2. | AG’s Position |
70
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
3. | CCSAO’s Position |
4. | CUB’s Position |
5. | Commission Conclusion |
H. | Limitations on Generator Entry |
71
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
I. | Relationship to Small Commercial and Residential Customers |
1. | ComEd’s Position |
72
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
2. | CCSAO’s Position |
3. | AG’s Position |
73
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
4. | Commission Conclusion |
J. | Market Rules and Monitoring |
1. | PJM Market Rules |
a. | ComEd’s Position |
74
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
b. | CUB/CCSAO’s Position |
c. | AG’s Position |
75
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
d. | Commission Conclusion |
2. | PJM Market Monitoring Unit |
a. | ComEd’s Position |
76
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
b. | AG’s Position |
c. | CCSAO’s Position |
d. | Commission Conclusion |
77
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
3. | Proposed Illinois Market Monitor |
K. | Other Competitive Market Issues |
78
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
A. | General Effectiveness and Suitability |
1. | ComEd’s Position |
2. | Staff’s Position |
3. | AG’s Position |
79
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
4. | DES’ Position |
80
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
5. | CCSAO’s Position |
6. | DES’ Position |
7. | Commission Conclusion |
B. | Full Requirements Product |
1. | ComEd’s Position |
81
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
2. | Staff’s Position |
3. | AG’s Position |
82
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
4. | Commission Conclusion |
C. | Multiple Round Descending Clock Format |
1. | General Effectiveness and Suitability |
a. | ComEd’s Position |
b. | MW Gen’s Position |
83
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
opportunity under well-defined conditions. This in turn creates a “virtuous circle” that assures customers will benefit from competitive market pricing and risk allocations in the future. |
c. | Commission Conclusion |
84
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
2. | Load Caps |
a. | ComEd’s Position |
b. | Staff’s Position |
c. | MW Gen’s Position |
85
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
d. | IIEC’s Position |
86
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
IIEC states that by establishing a load cap, ComEd’s proposal would limit the amount of supply that a very efficient bidder could offer into the auction and compete with the supply of others. IIEC further states that limiting this efficient bidder’s objective influence on the market forces of the auction would be inappropriate and result in higher market prices. In other words, limiting the number of competing supply tranches reduces the competitiveness of the auction and will likely raise and certainly not lower, the prices resulting from the auction. |
e. | Commission Conclusion |
3. | Starting Prices |
a. | ComEd’s Position |
b. | Staff’s Position |
87
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
c. | AG’s Position |
d. | Commission Conclusion |
4. | Bid Decrements |
a. | ComEd’s Position |
88
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
b. | Staff’s Position |
c. | BOMA’s Position |
d. | Commission Conclusion |
89
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
5. | Auction Volume Reductions |
a. | ComEd’s Position |
b. | Staff’s Position |
90
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
c. | Dynegy’s Position |
91
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
d. | Commission Conclusion |
6. | Portfolio Rebalancing |
a. | ComEd’s Position |
b. | Staff’s Position |
c. | Dynegy’s Position |
92
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
d. | Commission Conclusion |
7. | Association and Confidential Information Rules |
a. | ComEd’s Position |
b. | Staff’s Position |
c. | PES’ Position |
93
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
d. | Commission Conclusion |
8. | Tranche Size |
a. | ComEd’s Position |
b. | Staff’s Position |
94
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
c. | Commission Conclusion |
9. | “Price Taker” Proposal |
a. | ComEd’s Position |
b. | Staff’s Position |
c. | MW Gen’s Position |
d. | Commission Conclusion |
10. | Other Format Concepts and Issues |
95
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
D. | Clearing Price: Uniform vs. Pay-as-Bid |
1. | ComEd’s Position |
96
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
2. | Staff’s Position |
3. | BOMA’s Position |
97
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
98
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
99
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
4. | MW Gen’s Position |
5. | AG’s Position |
6. | Commission Conclusion |
E. | Auction management |
1. | Auction Manager |
100
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
a. | Staff’s Position |
101
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
b. | Commission Conclusion |
2. | Role of ComEd |
a. | ComEd’s Position |
b. | Commission Conclusion |
3. | Role of Staff |
a. | ComEd’s Position |
102
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
b. | Staff’s Position |
c. | Commission Conclusion |
4. | Representation of Consumer Interests/Separate Consumer Observer |
a. | ComEd’s Position |
103
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
104
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
105
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
106
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
107
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
108
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
109
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
110
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
111
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
112
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
113
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
114
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
115
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
116
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
117
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
118
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
119
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
120
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
121
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
122
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
123
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
124
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
125
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
126
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
127
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
128
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
129
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
130
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
131
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
132
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
133
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
134
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
135
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
2 | The accounting reconciliation discussion is placed in this section due to the inter-relationship of issues. |
136
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
137
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
138
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
139
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
140
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
141
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
142
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
143
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
144
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
145
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
146
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
147
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
148
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
149
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
150
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
151
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
152
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
153
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
154
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
155
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
156
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
157
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
158
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
159
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
160
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
161
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
162
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
163
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
164
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
165
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
166
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
167
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
168
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
169
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
170
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
171
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
172
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
173
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
174
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
175
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
176
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
177
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
178
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
179
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
180
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
181
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
182
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
183
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
184
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
185
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
186
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
187
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
188
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
189
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
190
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
191
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
192
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
193
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
194
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
195
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
196
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
197
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
198
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
c. | Commission’s Analysis and Conclusions |
199
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
200
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
201
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
13. | Alternative Proposals re Service to Self-Generation Customers |
a. | IIEC’s Position |
202
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
203
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
b. | ComEd’s Position |
204
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
c. | Commission’s Analysis and Conclusions |
14. | Alternative Proposals re Interruptible Service (ALM and Non-ALM Demand Response) |
a. | IIEC’s Position |
205
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
206
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
b. | ComEd’s Position |
207
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
c. | Commission’s Analysis and Conclusions |
208
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
B. | Rider PPO-MVM |
1. | Supply Charge |
2. | Supply Administration Charge |
a. | ComEd’s Position |
209
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
b. | CES’ Position |
210
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
c. | Staff’s Position |
211
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
d. | Commission’s Analysis and Conclusions |
3. | Retention of a Market Index Tariff Such as Those Currently Effective or a Neutral Fact Finder Tariff, in Addition to the Auction-Based Determination of Market Value |
a. | BOMA’s Position |
212
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
b. | ComEd’s Position |
213
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
214
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
c. | Staff’s Position |
215
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
d. | Commission’s Analysis and Conclusions |
216
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
217
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
C. | Other Matters |
1. | Staff’s Rate Increase Mitigation Proposal |
a. | Staff’s Position |
218
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
219
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
220
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
b. | ComEd’s Position |
221
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
c. | Dynegy’s Position |
d. | CCG’s Position |
222
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
e. | AG’s Position |
223
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
f. | MWGen’s Position |
224
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
g. | Commission’s Analysis and Conclusions |
2. | Non-Residential Space Heating Customers |
a. | BOMA’s Position |
225
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
226
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
b. | ComEd’s Position |
c. | Dynegy’s Position |
d. | Commission’s Analysis and Conclusions |
227
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
3. | Elimination of Rider ISS |
a. | BOMA’s Position |
b. | ComEd’s Position |
228
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
c. | Commission’s Analysis and Conclusions |
4. | DASR Procedures in Anticipation of Serving New Customer Facilities |
a. | CES’ Position |
229
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
b. | ComEd’s Position |
c. | Commission’s Analysis and Conclusions |
5. | Recategorizing Certain Condominium Customers as Non Residential Customers |
a. | CES’ Position |
230
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
b. | ComEd’s Position |
c. | Commission’s Analysis and Conclusions |
231
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
6. | Treatment of Uncollectibles |
a. | CES’ Position |
b. | Staff’s Position |
232
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
c. | ComEd’s Position |
d. | Commission’s Analysis and Conclusions |
7. | Credit Risk and other Administrative Costs |
a. | CES’ Position |
233
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
b. | ComEd’s Position |
c. | Commission’s Analysis and Conclusions |
234
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
8. | Integrated Distribution Company Issues |
a. | CES’ Position |
b. | ComEd’s Position |
235
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
c. | Commission Analysis and Conclusions |
VIII. | CONCLUSIONS AND MIXED LEGAL/FACTUAL ISSUES |
A. | Legality of Rider CPP |
B. | Legality of Rider PPO-MVM |
C. | Issues Concerning Compliance of Auction Process Details with Illinois Law |
1. | Illinois Open Meetings Act |
236
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
2. | The Illinois Ethics Law |
3. | Regulation of Public Records |
237
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
4. | Ex Parte Communications |
5. | Decisions of the ICC Being Based on Record Evidence |
238
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
D. | Other Conclusions and Mixed Legal/Factual Issues |
IX. | OTHER ISSUES |
A. | Renewable Resources |
1. | ComEd’s Position |
2. | Staff’s Position |
3. | CUB-CCSAO’s Position |
4. | Commission Conclusion |
239
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
B. | Additional Other Issues |
X. | FINDINGS AND ORDERING PARAGRAPHS |
(1) | Commonwealth Edison Company is an Illinois corporation engaged in the retail sale and delivery of electricity to the public in Illinois, and is a “public utility” as defined in Section 3-105 of the Public Utilities Act and an “electric utility” as defined in Section 16-102 of the Public Utilities Act; | ||
(2) | the Commission has jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter herein; | ||
(3) | the recitals of fact and conclusions of law reached in the prefatory portion of this Order are supported by the evidence of record, and are hereby adopted as findings of fact and conclusions of law; | ||
(4) | the Commission has authority under the Public Utilities Act to establish reasonable rates and charges for retail service, including Rider CPP and PPO-MVM as modified in this Order; |
240
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
(5) | the Commission has the authority to approve the competitive procurement process and the associated tariffs, subject to the conditions imposed for procurement of power and energy; | ||
(6) | the tariff proposed by ComEd in its initial filing, as modified to reflect the findings herein, are just and reasonable, and ComEd should be authorized to file and put into effect such tariff sheets, as modified; | ||
(7) | the new tariff sheets authorized to be filed by this Order should reflect an effective date not less than 30 days after the date of filing, with the tariff sheets to be corrected, if necessary, within that time period, and should reflect an operational date of no earlier than January 2, 2007; | ||
(8) | ComEd should be subject to the annual reconciliation proceedings related to its power purchases as described and approved in the prefatory portion of this Order; and | ||
(9) | ComEd should be required to implement the rate mitigation proposal described and approved in the prefatory part of this Order. |
241
Table of Contents
Proposed Order
Reply Briefs on Exceptions due: December 27, 2005
242