Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | 12 Months Ended |
Jan. 31, 2015 |
Accounting Policies [Abstract] | |
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
|
Organization |
|
References to the “Company,” “we,” “us,” or “our” means Aéropostale, Inc. and its subsidiaries, except as expressly indicated or unless the context otherwise requires. We are a primarily mall-based, specialty retailer of casual apparel and accessories, principally targeting 14 to 17 year-old young women and men through our Aéropostale stores and 4 to 12 year-olds through our P.S. from Aéropostale stores. As of January 31, 2015, we operated 860 stores, consisting of 773 Aéropostale stores in all 50 states and Puerto Rico, 61 Aéropostale stores in Canada, as well as 26 P.S. from Aéropostale stores in 12 states. In addition, pursuant to various licensing agreements, our licensees operated 239 Aéropostale and P.S. from Aéropostale locations in the Middle East, Asia, Europe and Latin America as of January 31, 2015. |
|
In November 2012, we acquired substantially all of the assets of online women's fashion footwear and apparel retailer GoJane.com, Inc. (“GoJane”). Based in Ontario, California, GoJane focuses primarily on fashion footwear, with a select offering of contemporary apparel and other accessories. See Note 5 for additional information on the acquisition of GoJane. |
|
Basis of Consolidation and Presentation |
|
The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”). The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Aéropostale, Inc. and its subsidiaries. All inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. |
|
Fiscal Year |
|
Our fiscal year ends on the Saturday nearest to January 31. Fiscal 2014 was the 52-week period ended January 31, 2015, fiscal 2013 was the 52-week period ended February 1, 2014 and fiscal 2012 was the 53-week period ended February 2, 2013. Fiscal 2015 will be the 52-week period ending January 30, 2016. |
|
Our Business and Liquidity |
|
Declining mall traffic, a highly promotional and competitive teen retail environment and a shift in customer demand away from logo-based product have contributed to unfavorable financial performance. We have experienced declining store sales and incurred net losses from operations in fiscal 2014 and 2013. This has led to cash outflows from operations of $55.7 million in fiscal 2014 and $38.4 million in fiscal 2013. In fiscal 2014, we took steps to enhance our liquidity position including increasing the availability under our revolving credit facility (refer to Note 10), obtaining financing from affiliates of Sycamore Partners, (refer to note 2), restructuring our corporate headquarters and P.S. from Aéropostale business, closing under-performing Aéropostale stores (refer to Note 3) and various other strategic actions directed toward improving our sales and margin. Our ability to fund operations and capital expenditures in the future will be dependent on our ability to generate cash from operations, maintain or improve margins, decrease significantly the rate of decline in store sales and to borrow funds available under our loan agreements. Our ability to borrow funds is dependent, in part, on our ability to meet all covenants, including a financial covenant in our loan agreement with affiliates of Sycamore Partners which requires a minimum liquidity coverage of $70.0 million of cash and availability under the revolving credit facility. At January 31, 2015, we had cash and cash equivalents of $151.8 million, other working capital of $150.4 million and no borrowings outstanding under our revolving credit facility with availability of $116.8 million. Our cash on hand and availability under the revolving credit facility exceeded the $70.0 million minimum availability covenant by $198.6 million. If we do not generate sufficient cash flow from operations to fund our working capital needs and planned capital expenditures, and our cash reserves are depleted, we may need to take various further actions, such as down-sizing and/or eliminating certain operations, which could include exit costs, or reducing or delaying capital expenditures, strategic investments or other actions. We believe that cash on hand and availability under our revolving credit facility will be sufficient to fund operations and cash flow requirements for fiscal 2015. However, there can be no assurance that we will be able to achieve our strategic initiatives or obtain additional funding on favorable terms in the future which would have a significant adverse effect on our operations. |
|
|
|
Use of Estimates |
|
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in our Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ materially from those estimated. |
|
The most significant estimates made by management include those made in the areas of merchandise inventory valuation, impairment analysis of long-lived assets, exit cost obligations, impairment analysis of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets and income taxes. Management periodically evaluates estimates used in the preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements for continued reasonableness. Appropriate adjustments, if any, to the estimates used are made prospectively based on such periodic evaluations. |
|
Concentration of Credit Risk |
|
Financial instruments that potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk consist of cash and cash equivalents. We invest our excess cash in demand deposits and money market funds that are classified as cash equivalents. We have established guidelines that relate to credit quality, diversification and maturity and that limit exposure to any one issuer of securities. |
|
During fiscal 2014 and 2013, we sourced approximately 81% and 83%, respectively, of our merchandise from our top five merchandise vendors. The loss of any of these sources could adversely impact our ability to operate our business. |
|
Seasonality |
|
Our business is highly seasonal and historically, we have realized a significant portion of our sales and cash flow in the second half of the fiscal year, attributable to the impact of the back-to-school selling season in the third quarter and the holiday selling season in the fourth quarter. Additionally, working capital requirements fluctuate during the year, increasing in mid-summer in anticipation of the third and fourth quarters. |
|
Translation of Foreign Currency Financial Statements and Foreign Currency Transactions |
|
The financial statements of our Canadian subsidiary have been translated into United States dollars by translating balance sheet accounts at the year-end exchange rate and statement of operations accounts at the average exchange rates for the year. Foreign currency translation gains and losses are reflected in the equity section of our consolidated balance sheet in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and are not adjusted for income taxes as they relate to a permanent investment in our subsidiary in Canada. The balance of the unrealized foreign currency translation adjustment included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) was income of $1.2 million as of January 31, 2015 compared to $0.8 million as of February 1, 2014. Foreign currency transaction gains and losses are charged or credited to earnings as incurred. |
|
Cash Equivalents |
|
We include credit card receivables and all short-term investments that qualify as cash equivalents with an original maturity of three months or less in cash and cash equivalents. |
|
Fair Value Measurements |
|
We follow the guidance in Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurement Disclosures” (“ASC 820”) as it relates to financial and nonfinancial assets and liabilities. Our non-financial assets, which include fixtures, equipment and improvements and intangible assets, are not required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis. However, if certain triggering events occur, or if an impairment test is required and we are required to evaluate the non-financial asset for impairment, we would record an impairment charge if the carrying value of the non-financial asset exceeds its fair value. (See Note 4 for a further discussion). |
|
We currently have one financial liability measured at fair value. See Note 4 for fair value measurements related to GoJane liabilities. ASC 820 prioritizes inputs used in measuring fair value into a hierarchy of three levels: Level 1—quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities; Level 2—inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are either directly or indirectly observable; and Level 3—unobservable inputs in which little or no market activity exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing. |
|
Merchandise Inventory |
|
Merchandise inventory consists of finished goods and is valued utilizing the cost method at the lower of cost or market determined on a weighted average basis. Merchandise inventory includes warehousing, freight, merchandise and design costs as an inventory product cost. We make certain assumptions regarding future demand and net realizable selling price in order to assess that our inventory is recorded properly at the lower of cost or market. These assumptions are based on both historical experience and current information. We recorded adjustments to reduce the carrying value of inventory to the lower of cost or market of $15.5 million as of January 31, 2015 and $27.6 million as of February 1, 2014. |
|
Vendor Rebates |
|
We receive vendor rebates from certain merchandise suppliers. The vendor rebates are earned as we receive merchandise from the suppliers and are computed at an agreed upon percentage of the purchase amount. Vendor rebates are recorded as a reduction of merchandise inventory and are then recognized as a reduction of cost of sales when the related inventory is sold. Vendor rebates recorded as a reduction of the carrying value of merchandise inventory were $0.5 million as of January 31, 2015 and $0.9 million as of February 1, 2014. Vendor rebates recorded as a reduction of cost of sales were $6.1 million for fiscal 2014, $9.7 million for fiscal 2013, and $10.1 million for fiscal 2012. |
|
Fixtures, Equipment and Improvements |
|
Fixtures, equipment and improvements are stated at cost. Depreciation and amortization are provided for by the straight-line method over the following estimated useful lives: |
|
|
| |
Fixtures and equipment | 10 years |
Leasehold improvements | Lesser of useful lives or lease term |
Computer equipment | 5 years |
Software | 3 years |
|
Goodwill and intangible assets |
|
We estimate and record intangible assets, which primarily consists of trademarks and customer relationships at fair value at the acquisition date. The fair value of these intangible assets is estimated based on management's assessment, considering independent third party appraisals, as warranted. Goodwill represents the excess of purchase consideration for an acquired entity over the fair value amounts assigned to assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination. |
|
Goodwill and trademarks with an indefinite life are not amortized, but instead are assessed for impairment at least annually (on the first day of our fourth fiscal quarter) based on comparisons of their respective fair values to their carrying values. Additionally, goodwill and intangible assets are tested for impairment if an event occurs or circumstances change that would indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. We test goodwill at the reporting unit level. In connection with the acquisition of substantially all of the assets of GoJane.com, Inc. on November 13, 2012, we allocated $13.9 million of the purchase price to goodwill, which was also its carrying value as of January 31, 2015. A reporting unit is an operating segment for which discrete financial information is prepared and regularly reviewed by segment management. We have deemed the GoJane operating segment to be the reporting unit at which goodwill is tested for GoJane. |
|
ASU No. 2011-08, “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Goodwill for Impairment” (“ASU 2011-08”) amended the rules for testing goodwill for impairment and provided an entity with the option to first assess qualitative factors for each reporting unit to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. The optional qualitative assessment can be performed at the discretion of management for any or all of the reporting units in any given period. In preparing a qualitative analysis for each of our reporting units, we assess events and circumstances that may impact the fair value and the carrying amount of each reporting unit. The identification of relevant events and circumstances and how these may impact a reporting unit’s fair value or carrying amount involve significant judgments and assumptions. For each reporting unit, we compare its current carrying value as of the testing date to its most recent fair value. Based upon the differential noted, we may decide to perform the first step of the quantitative impairment test or to continue with the qualitative assessment by analyzing whether changes in the business and/or operating environment have occurred since the most recent fair value obtained that may impact this relationship. This assessment includes, but is not limited to, the identification of macroeconomic conditions, industry and market considerations that currently impact the reporting unit’s operating environment, as well as cost factors, overall financial performance including actual and projected operating results and peer group share price trends. We examine the positive and negative influences of each relevant factor on the reporting unit’s fair value and qualitatively assess the impact that such factors (when considered both individually and in the aggregate) would have on a reporting unit’s fair value since the last full valuation was performed. If, after assessing the totality of events or circumstances, we determine that the potential impact of the positive and negative factors do not indicate that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, we will conclude that goodwill is not impaired and performance of the two-step quantitative impairment test is not required. |
|
When quantitatively evaluating goodwill for impairment, we determine the current fair value of the reporting unit by blending results from the market multiples approach and the income approach. These valuation approaches consider a number of factors that include, but are not limited to, expected future cash flows, growth rates, discount rates, and comparable multiples from publicly-traded companies in our industry and require us to make certain assumptions and estimates regarding industry economic factors and future profitability of our business. It is our policy to conduct impairment testing based on our most current business plans, projected future revenues and cash flows, which reflect changes we anticipate in the economy and the industry. The cash flows are based on five-year financial forecasts developed internally by management and are discounted to a present value using discount rates that properly account for the risk and nature of the reporting unit’s cash flows and the rates of return market participants would require to invest their capital in our reporting unit. The outcome of the market multiples and income approaches are heavily dependent upon the aforementioned projections. If the carrying value exceeds the fair value, we would then calculate the implied fair value of our reporting unit’s goodwill as compared to its carrying value to determine the appropriate impairment charge, if any. To calculate the implied fair value of goodwill the Company would allocate the reporting unit’s fair value to all of the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit, including any unrecognized intangible assets, in a hypothetical scenario that faithfully represents an acquisition of the reporting unit in a business combination. If the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill is less than its carrying value, the difference is recorded as an impairment charge, not to exceed the balance of goodwill. |
|
For the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014 goodwill and indefinite lived intangible asset impairment testing, management updated the five-year financial forecasts for fiscal 2015 through fiscal 2019, which contained declines in the projected financial performance of the GoJane reporting unit compared to the projections used in the impairment tests of prior years. The decrease in financial projections was primarily due to the fiscal 2014 decline in operating results, due in large part to a lack of new fashion trends and increased online competition in the target market. This reduction in revenues and cash flows forecasted for the GoJane reporting unit warranted performing the two-step quantitative test. Upon completing the step one quantitative impairment test, it was determined that the fair value exceeded the carrying value of the reporting unit and accordingly, no impairment charge was recorded. The fair value estimates incorporated in step one of the quantitative assessment were primarily based on third party appraisals, the market approach and the income approach and specifically the relief from royalty method in regard to certain intangible assets. This appraisal incorporated a significant amount of judgment on the part of the third party valuation specialists regarding appropriate comparable companies and assessments of current market conditions, and the income approach valuations incorporated significant estimates and assumptions made by management including those relating to projected long-term rates of revenue and margin growth, and profitability. |
|
The estimated fair value of the GoJane reporting unit exceeded its carrying value at the date of testing by 9%. Given the current competitive environment and the uncertainties inherent in this business, there can be no assurance that the estimates and assumptions regarding the future revenue growth and profitability, made for purposes of our goodwill impairment testing, will prove to be accurate predictions of the future. If our assumptions of the GoJane reporting unit are not achieved, we may be required to record goodwill impairment charges in future periods, whether in connection with our next annual impairment testing in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2015, or on an interim basis, if any triggering event occurs outside of the quarter when we regularly perform our annual goodwill impairment test. |
|
In connection with the acquisitions of the assets of GoJane, we allocated $11.4 million of the purchase price to the trademarks. A trademark is considered impaired if the estimated fair value of the trademark is less than the carrying amount. If a trademark is considered impaired, we recognize a loss equal to the difference between the carrying amount and the estimated fair value of the trademark. The fair value of the trademarks is determined using an independent third party valuation specialist. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014, we completed our annual impairment review of the trademarks and as a result, we recognized $5.1 million of impairment charges because the fair value of the GoJane trademarks did not exceed its carrying amount as of the date of our annual impairment review. As of January 31, 2015, the carrying value of the trademarks was written down to $6.3 million. As noted above, if actual results are not consistent with our estimates and projections of future operating performance used in the calculations, we may be required to record further impairment charges. |
|
|
|
|
Evaluation for Long-Lived Asset Impairment |
|
We periodically evaluate the need to recognize impairment losses relating to long-lived assets in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 360, “Property, Plant and Equipment” (“ASC 360”). Long-lived assets are evaluated for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that an asset may have been impaired. In evaluating an asset for recoverability, we estimate the future undiscounted net cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition. If the cumulative undiscounted net cash flows are less than the carrying amount of the asset, the net cash flows are then discounted at the Company’s weighted average cost of capital and compared to the carrying value of the assets. The result is a write down of the asset to fair value by recording an impairment charge. The estimation of fair value is measured by discounting expected future net cash flows. The recoverability assessment related to store-level assets requires judgments and estimates of future revenues, gross margin rates, store expenses and the weighted average cost of capital. We base these estimates upon our past and expected future performance. We believe our estimates are appropriate in light of current market conditions. However, actual results may differ materially from those estimated which could result in additional impairments of long-lived assets in future periods, and could have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements (See Note 4 for a further discussion). |
|
Pre-Opening Expenses |
|
New store pre-opening costs are expensed as they are incurred. |
|
Exit Cost Obligations |
|
When stores under long-term leases close, we record a liability at fair value for the future minimum lease payments and related ancillary costs, net of estimated future sublease recoveries. Fair value is determined by estimating net future cash flows and discounting them using a risk-adjusted rate of interest. Reserve estimates and related assumptions are updated on a quarterly basis. If the lease is subsequently terminated, the termination cost, if any, is recorded and the remaining exit cost obligation is reversed at the date of termination. |
|
Leases |
|
Our store operating leases typically provide for fixed non-contingent rent escalations. Rent payments under our store leases typically commence when the store opens. These leases include a pre-opening period that allows us to take possession of the property to fixture and merchandise the store. We recognize rent expense on a straight-line basis over the non-cancelable term of each individual underlying lease, commencing when we take possession of the property (see Note 15 for further information regarding leases). |
|
In addition, most store leases require us to pay additional rent based on specified percentages of sales, after we achieve specified annual sales thresholds. We use store sales trends to estimate and record liabilities for these additional rent obligations during interim periods. Most of our store leases entitle us to receive tenant allowances from our landlords. We record these tenant allowances as a deferred rent liability, which we amortize as a reduction of rent expense over the non-cancelable term of each underlying lease. |
|
Revenue Recognition |
|
Sales revenue is recognized at the “point of sale” in our stores and at the time our e-commerce customers take possession of merchandise. Allowances for sales returns are recorded as a reduction of net sales in the periods in which the related sales are recognized. Also included in sales revenue is shipping revenue from our e-commerce customers. Sales tax collected from customers is excluded from revenue and is included in accrued expenses on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Revenue from international licensing arrangements is recognized when earned in accordance with the terms of the underlying agreement, generally based upon the greater of the contractually earned or guaranteed minimum royalty levels. We recorded revenue related to international licensing arrangements in net sales of $34.7 million in fiscal 2014, $21.5 million in fiscal 2013 and $7.2 million in fiscal 2012. Additionally, we recorded net sales related to gift card breakage income of $4.9 million in fiscal 2014, $5.8 million in fiscal 2013 and $3.7 million in fiscal 2012. |
|
|
|
|
|
Gift Cards |
|
We sell gift cards to our customers in our retail stores, through our websites and through select third parties. We do not charge administrative fees on unused gift cards and our gift cards do not have an expiration date. Revenue is not recorded on the purchase of gift cards. A current liability is recorded upon purchase and revenue is recognized when the gift card or store credits are redeemed for merchandise. We also recognize breakage income for the portion of gift cards estimated to be unredeemed. We have relieved our legal obligation to escheat the value of unredeemed gift cards to the relevant jurisdiction. We therefore determined that the likelihood of certain gift cards being redeemed by the customer was remote, based upon historical redemption patterns of gift cards. For those gift cards that we determined redemption to be remote, we reversed our liability and recorded gift card breakage income in net sales. |
|
Cost of Sales |
|
Cost of sales includes costs related to merchandise sold, including inventory valuation adjustments, distribution and warehousing, freight from the distribution center to the stores, shipping and handling costs, payroll for our design, buying and merchandising departments and occupancy costs. Occupancy costs include rent, contingent rents, common area maintenance, real estate taxes, utilities, repairs and maintenance, depreciation and amortization and impairment charges. |
|
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses, or “SG&A”, include costs related to selling expenses, store management and corporate expenses such as payroll and employee benefits, marketing expenses, employment taxes, information technology maintenance costs and expenses, insurance and legal expenses, e-commerce transaction related expenses, store pre-opening costs and other corporate level expenses. Store pre-opening costs include store level payroll, grand opening event marketing, travel, supplies and other store pre-opening expenses. |
|
Self-Insurance |
|
We self-insure our workers compensation claims and our employee medical benefits. The recorded liabilities for these obligations are calculated primarily using historical experience and current information. The liabilities include amounts for actual claims and estimated claims incurred but not yet reported. Self-insurance liabilities were $5.7 million at January 31, 2015 and $5.2 million at February 1, 2014. We paid workers compensation claims of $0.9 million in fiscal 2014, $0.9 million in fiscal 2013 and $1.0 million in fiscal 2012. In addition, we paid employee medical claims of $15.4 million in fiscal 2014, $16.2 million in fiscal 2013 and $14.1 million in fiscal 2012. |
|
Retirement Benefit Plans |
|
Our retirement benefit plan costs are accounted for using actuarial valuations required by FASB ASC Topic 715 “Compensation – Retirement Benefits” (“ASC 715”). ASC 715 requires an entity to recognize the funded status of its defined pension plans on the balance sheet and to recognize changes in the funded status that arise during the period but are not recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost, within other comprehensive (loss) income, net of income taxes (see Note 13 for a further discussion). |
|
Marketing Costs |
|
Marketing costs, which include e-commerce, print, radio and other media advertising, are expensed at the point of first broadcast or distribution, and were $26.7 million in fiscal 2014, $22.4 million in fiscal 2013, and $17.5 million in fiscal 2012. |
|
Stock-Based Compensation |
|
We follow the provisions from the FASB ASC Topic 718 “Compensation – Stock Compensation” (“ASC 718”). Under such guidance, all forms of share-based payment to employees and directors, including stock options, must be treated as compensation and recognized in the statements of operations (see Note 12 for a further discussion). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Taxes |
|
Income taxes are accounted for in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 740, “Income Taxes” (“ASC 740”). Under ASC 740, income taxes are recognized for the amount of taxes payable for the current year and deferred tax assets and liabilities for the future tax consequence of events that have been recognized differently in the financial statements than for tax purposes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are established using statutory tax rates and are adjusted for tax rate changes. |
|
ASC 740 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an entity’s financial statements and requires companies to determine whether it is “more likely than not” that a tax position will be sustained upon examination by the appropriate taxing authorities before any part of the benefit can be recorded in the financial statements. For those tax positions where it is not “more likely than not” that a tax benefit will be sustained, no tax benefit is recognized. Where applicable, associated interest and penalties are also recorded. Interest and penalties, if any, are recorded within the provision for income taxes in our Consolidated Statements of Operations and are classified on the Consolidated Balance Sheets with the related liability for uncertain tax contingency liabilities. |
|
A valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets is recorded when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. In determining the need for a valuation allowance, management considers all available positive and negative evidence, including historical operating results, forecasted future earnings, taxable income, the mix of earnings in the jurisdictions in which we operate, tax planning strategies and other relevant factors. The need for and the amount of valuation allowances can change in future periods if operating results and projections change significantly. |
|
Reclassifications |
|
Certain reclassifications were made to prior year amounts to conform to the current period presentation, specifically we condensed the amortization of intangible assets into depreciation and amortization in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow as of February 1, 2014 and February 2, 2013. |
|
Recent Accounting Developments |
|
In August 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-15, Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern ("ASU 2014-15"). Under ASU 2014-15, management is required to perform interim and annual assessments of an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year of the date the financial statements are issued. An entity must provide certain disclosures if “conditions or events raise substantial doubt about [the] entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.” The new standard applies to all entities and is effective for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016, and interim periods thereafter, with early adoption permitted. Management is still assessing the impact of the adoption to our consolidated financial statements. |
|
In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers ("ASU 2014-09"). It outlines a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes most current revenue recognition guidance, including industry-specific guidance. The core principle of the revenue model is that “an entity recognizes revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.” ASU 2014-09 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016 and interim periods within those annual periods. Management is still assessing the impact of the adoption to our consolidated financial statements. |
|
In April 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-08, Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity ("ASU 2014-08"). Under ASU 2014-08, only disposals that represent a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on the entity’s results and operations would qualify as discontinued operations. In addition, the ASU expands the disclosure requirements for disposals that meet the definition of a discontinued operation, requires entities to disclose information about disposals of individually significant components and defines “discontinued operations” similarly to how it is defined under International Financial Reporting Standards 5, Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations. The ASU is effective prospectively for all disposals (except disposals classified as held for sale before the adoption date) or components initially classified as held for sale in periods beginning on or after December 15, 2014, with early adoption permitted. We have elected to early adopt this guidance effective as of the beginning of the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014. See Note 3 for the impact of the adoption. |
|
In July 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update 2013-11, Income Taxes ("ASU 2013-11") which requires that an unrecognized tax benefit, or a portion of an unrecognized tax benefit, should be presented in the financial statements as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward, with certain exceptions. This ASU is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013, with early adoption permitted. This guidance became effective prospectively for the Company in the first quarter of 2014. The adoption did not have a material impact to the overall tax provision of Aéropostale. |