LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES | LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES The following table presents the balances in the Company’s loan portfolios as of the dates indicated: ($ in thousands) September 30, December 31, Commercial: Commercial and industrial $ 1,789,478 $ 1,944,142 Commercial real estate 891,029 867,013 Multifamily 1,563,757 2,241,246 SBA 75,359 68,741 Construction 228,561 203,976 Consumer: Single family residential mortgage 1,775,953 2,305,490 Other consumer 59,122 70,265 Total loans (1) $ 6,383,259 $ 7,700,873 Allowance for loan losses (62,927 ) (62,192 ) Loans receivable, net $ 6,320,332 $ 7,638,681 (1) Total loans include deferred loan origination costs/(fees) and premiums/(discounts), net of $15.3 million and $17.7 million , respectively, at September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 . Non-Traditional Mortgage Loans ("NTM") The following table presents the composition of the NTM portfolio as of the dates indicated: September 30, 2019 December 31, 2018 ($ in thousands) Count Amount Percent Count Amount Percent Consumer: Single family residential mortgage: Green Loans (HELOC) - first liens (1) 76 $ 59,538 9.1 % 88 $ 67,729 8.2 % Interest-only - first liens (2) 409 588,567 90.1 % 519 753,061 91.1 % Negative amortization (3) 9 3,062 0.5 % 11 3,528 0.4 % Total NTM - first liens 494 651,167 99.6 % 618 824,318 99.7 % Other consumer: Green Loans (HELOC) - second liens (1) 7 2,308 0.4 % 10 2,413 0.3 % Total NTM - second liens 7 2,308 0.4 % 10 2,413 0.3 % Total NTM loans 501 $ 653,475 100.0 % 628 $ 826,731 100.0 % Total loans receivable $ 6,383,259 $ 7,700,873 % of total NTM loans to total loans receivable 10.2 % 10.7 % Green Loans Green Loans are single family residential first and second mortgage lines of credit with a linked checking account that allows all types of deposits and withdrawals to be performed. These loans are generally interest only for a 15 -year term with a balloon payment due at maturity. At September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 , $286 thousand and $0 , respectively, of the Company's Green Loans were non-performing. As a result of their unique payment feature, Green Loans possess higher credit risk; however, management believes the risk is mitigated through the Company’s loan terms and underwriting standards, including its policies on LTV ratios and the Company’s contractual ability to curtail loans when the value of the underlying collateral declines. The Company discontinued origination of Green Loans in 2011. Interest Only Loans Interest only loans are primarily single family residential first mortgage loans with payment features that allow interest only payments in initial periods before converting to a fully amortizing loan. At September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 , interest only loans totaled $588.6 million and $753.1 million , respectively. At September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 , $827 thousand and $0 , respectively, of the interest only loans were non-performing. Loans with the Potential for Negative Amortization Negative amortization loans totaled $3.1 million and $3.5 million at September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 , respectively. The Company discontinued origination of negative amortization loans in 2007. At September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 , none of the loans with the potential for negative amortization were non-performing. These loans pose a potentially higher credit risk because of the lack of principal amortization and potential for negative amortization; however, management believes the credit risk associated with these loans is mitigated through the loan terms and underwriting standards, including the Company’s policies on LTV ratios. Allowance for Loan Losses The Company has established credit risk management processes that include regular management review of the loan portfolio to identify problem loans. During the ordinary course of business, management may become aware of borrowers and lessees who may not be able to fulfill the contractual payment requirements of the loan agreements. Such loans are subject to increased monitoring. Consideration is given to placing the loan or lease on non-accrual status, assessing the need for additional ALLL, and partial or full charge off the principal balance. The Company maintains the ALLL at a level that is considered adequate to cover the estimated incurred losses in the loan portfolio. The Company also maintains a separate reserve for unfunded loan commitments at a level that is considered adequate to cover the estimated incurred loss. The estimated funding of the loan commitments and credit risk factors are determined based on outstanding loans that share similar credit risk exposure are used to determine the adequacy of the reserve. At September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 , the reserve for unfunded loan commitments was $4.4 million and $4.6 million , respectively, which are included in Accrued expenses and Other liabilities on the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. The credit risk monitoring system is designed to identify impaired and potential problem loans, and to perform periodic evaluation of impairment and the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses in a timely manner. In addition, the Board of Directors of the Bank has adopted a credit policy that includes a credit review and control system that it believes should be effective in ensuring that the Company maintains an adequate allowance for loan losses. The Board of Directors also provides oversight and guidance for management’s allowance evaluation process. The following table presents a summary of activity in the ALLL for the periods indicated: Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30, ($ in thousands) 2019 2018 2019 2018 Balance at beginning of period $ 59,523 $ 56,678 $ 62,192 $ 49,333 Loans charged off (35,546 ) (388 ) (39,060 ) (15,977 ) Recoveries of loans previously charged off 410 82 730 864 Net charge-offs (35,136 ) (306 ) (38,330 ) (15,113 ) Provision for loan losses 38,540 1,410 39,065 23,562 Balance at end of period $ 62,927 $ 57,782 $ 62,927 $ 57,782 During the three months ended September 30, 2019, the Company recorded a $35.1 million charge-off of a line of credit originated in November 2017 to a borrower purportedly the subject of a fraudulent scheme. In addition, the charge-off increased the loss factor used in our allowance for loan loss for commercial and industrial loans, resulting in an additional loan loss provision of $3.0 million . On October 22, 2019, in connection with this matter, the Bank filed a complaint in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California (Case CV '19 02031 GPC KSC) seeking to recover its losses and other monetary damages against Chicago Title Insurance Company and Chicago Title Company, asserting claims under RICO, 18 U.S.C § 1962 and for RICO Conspiracy, Fraud, Aiding and Abetting Fraud, Negligent Misrepresentation, Breach of Fiduciary Duty and Negligence. We are actively considering and pursuing available sources of recovery and other potential means of mitigating the loss; however, no assurance can be given that we will be successful in that regard. During the third quarter of 2019, the Company undertook an extensive collateral review of all commercial lending relationships $5 million and above not secured by real estate, consisting of 53 loans representing $536 million in commitments. The collateral review focused on security and collateral documentation and confirmation of the Bank's collateral interest. The review was performed within the Bank's Internal Audit division and the work was validated by an independent third party. Our review and outside validation have not identified any other instances of apparent fraud for the credits reviewed or concerns over the existence of collateral held by the Bank or on our behalf at third parties; however, there are no assurances that our internal review and third party validation will be sufficient to identify all such issues. During the three months ended March 31, 2018, the Company recorded a charge-off of $13.9 million , which reflected the outstanding balance under a $15.0 million line of credit that was originated during the three months ended March 31, 2018. Subsequent to the granting of the line of credit, representations from the borrower in applying for the line of credit were determined by the Bank to be false, and third party bank account statements provided by the borrower to secure the line of The following table presents the activity and balance in the ALLL and the recorded investment, excluding accrued interest, in loans based on the impairment methodology as of or for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019 : ($ in thousands) Commercial and Industrial Commercial Real Estate Multifamily SBA Construction Lease Financing Single Family Residential Mortgage Other Consumer Total ALLL: Balance at June 30, 2019 $ 21,529 $ 6,877 $ 12,625 $ 3,120 $ 3,715 $ — $ 11,072 $ 585 $ 59,523 Charge-offs (34,673 ) — — (738 ) — — (135 ) — (35,546 ) Recoveries 59 — — 50 — 3 — 298 410 Net (charge-offs) recoveries (34,614 ) — — (688 ) — 3 (135 ) 298 (35,136 ) Provision (reversal) 37,660 (298 ) (660 ) 1,686 165 (3 ) 342 (352 ) 38,540 Balance at September 30, 2019 $ 24,575 $ 6,579 $ 11,965 $ 4,118 $ 3,880 $ — $ 11,279 $ 531 $ 62,927 Balance at December 31, 2018 $ 18,191 $ 6,674 $ 17,970 $ 1,827 $ 3,461 $ — $ 13,128 $ 941 $ 62,192 Charge-offs (36,788 ) — (6 ) (1,086 ) — — (1,086 ) (94 ) (39,060 ) Recoveries 102 — — 152 — 9 150 317 730 Net (charge-offs) recoveries (36,686 ) — (6 ) (934 ) — 9 (936 ) 223 (38,330 ) Provision (reversal) 43,070 (95 ) (5,999 ) 3,225 419 (9 ) (913 ) (633 ) 39,065 Balance at September 30, 2019 $ 24,575 $ 6,579 $ 11,965 $ 4,118 $ 3,880 $ — $ 11,279 $ 531 $ 62,927 Individually evaluated for impairment $ 4,614 $ — $ — $ 2,858 $ — $ — $ — $ 21 $ 7,493 Collectively evaluated for impairment 19,961 6,579 11,965 1,260 3,880 — 11,279 510 55,434 Total ending ALLL balance $ 24,575 $ 6,579 $ 11,965 $ 4,118 $ 3,880 $ — $ 11,279 $ 531 $ 62,927 Loans: Individually evaluated for impairment $ 22,042 $ — $ — $ 5,696 $ 2,519 $ — $ 20,641 $ 822 $ 51,720 Collectively evaluated for impairment 1,767,436 891,029 1,563,757 69,663 226,042 — 1,755,312 58,300 6,331,539 Total ending loan balances $ 1,789,478 $ 891,029 $ 1,563,757 $ 75,359 $ 228,561 $ — $ 1,775,953 $ 59,122 $ 6,383,259 The following table presents the activity and balance in the ALLL and the recorded investment, excluding accrued interest, in loans based on the impairment methodology as of or for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 : ($ in thousands) Commercial and Industrial Commercial Real Estate Multifamily SBA Construction Lease Financing Single Family Residential Mortgage Other Consumer Total ALLL: Balance at June 30, 2018 $ 16,864 $ 5,732 $ 14,630 $ 1,840 $ 3,419 $ — $ 13,236 $ 957 $ 56,678 Charge-offs (342 ) — — — — — (45 ) (1 ) (388 ) Recoveries 61 — — 8 — 3 — 10 82 Net (charge-offs) recoveries (281 ) — — 8 — 3 (45 ) 9 (306 ) Provision (reversal) (40 ) 280 843 22 (172 ) (3 ) 407 73 1,410 Balance at September 30, 2018 $ 16,543 $ 6,012 $ 15,473 $ 1,870 $ 3,247 $ — $ 13,598 $ 1,039 $ 57,782 Balance at December 31, 2017 $ 14,280 $ 4,971 $ 13,265 $ 1,701 $ 3,318 $ — $ 10,996 $ 802 $ 49,333 Charge-offs (689 ) — (8 ) (683 ) — — (524 ) (14,073 ) (15,977 ) Recoveries 158 — — 240 — 12 436 18 864 Net (charge-offs) recoveries (531 ) — (8 ) (443 ) — 12 (88 ) (14,055 ) (15,113 ) Provision (reversal) 2,794 1,041 2,216 612 (71 ) (12 ) 2,690 14,292 23,562 Balance at September 30, 2018 $ 16,543 $ 6,012 $ 15,473 $ 1,870 $ 3,247 $ — $ 13,598 $ 1,039 $ 57,782 Individually evaluated for impairment $ 122 $ — $ — $ 133 $ — $ — $ 640 $ 7 $ 902 Collectively evaluated for impairment 16,421 6,012 15,473 1,737 3,247 — 12,958 1,032 56,880 Total ending ALLL balance $ 16,543 $ 6,012 $ 15,473 $ 1,870 $ 3,247 $ — $ 13,598 $ 1,039 $ 57,782 Loans: Individually evaluated for impairment $ 5,614 $ — $ — $ 1,834 $ — $ — $ 22,364 $ 739 $ 30,551 Collectively evaluated for impairment 1,667,441 823,193 2,112,190 69,660 200,294 — 2,277,705 72,259 7,222,742 Total ending loan balances $ 1,673,055 $ 823,193 $ 2,112,190 $ 71,494 $ 200,294 $ — $ 2,300,069 $ 72,998 $ 7,253,293 The following table presents loans individually evaluated for impairment by class of loans as of the dates indicated. The recorded investment, excluding accrued interest, presents customer balances net of any partial charge-offs recognized on the loans and net of any deferred fees and costs and any purchase premium or discount. September 30, 2019 December 31, 2018 ($ in thousands) Unpaid Principal Balance Recorded Investment Allowance for Loan Losses Unpaid Principal Balance Recorded Investment Allowance for Loan Losses With no related ALLL recorded: Commercial: Commercial and industrial $ 1,749 $ 1,738 $ — $ 5,491 $ 5,455 $ — Commercial real estate — — — — — — SBA 1,387 1,321 — 1,668 1,588 — Construction 2,519 2,519 — — — — Consumer: Single family residential mortgage 20,544 20,641 — 12,115 12,161 — Other consumer 821 801 — 469 469 — With an ALLL recorded: Commercial: Commercial and industrial 20,310 20,304 4,614 — — — SBA 4,572 4,375 2,858 823 788 562 Consumer: Single family residential mortgage — — — 5,993 6,032 161 Other consumer 21 21 21 468 452 106 Total $ 51,923 $ 51,720 $ 7,493 $ 27,027 $ 26,945 $ 829 The following table presents information on impaired loans, disaggregated by class, for the periods indicated: Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended ($ in thousands) Average Recorded Investment Interest Income Recognized Cash Basis Interest Recognized Average Recorded Investment Interest Income Recognized Cash Basis Interest Recognized September 30, 2019 Commercial: Commercial and industrial $ 22,619 $ 40 $ 32 $ 16,154 $ 295 $ 286 Commercial real estate — — — 193 — — SBA 5,843 4 4 4,328 12 12 Construction 2,519 — — 2,519 — — Consumer: Single family residential mortgage 20,706 59 53 20,374 175 150 Other consumer 827 3 4 950 10 10 Total $ 52,514 $ 106 $ 93 $ 44,518 $ 492 $ 458 September 30, 2018 Commercial: Commercial and industrial $ 5,423 $ — $ — $ 5,552 $ 4 $ 4 SBA 1,240 — — 756 — — Consumer: Single family residential mortgage 20,908 60 50 20,299 175 146 Other consumer 744 3 4 751 9 9 Total $ 28,315 $ 63 $ 54 $ 27,358 $ 188 $ 159 Past Due Loans The following table presents the aging of the recorded investment in past due loans, excluding accrued interest receivable (which is not considered to be material), by class of loans as of dates indicated: ($ in thousands) 30 - 59 Days Past Due 60 - 89 Days Past Due Greater than 89 Days Past due Total Past Due Current Total September 30, 2019 NTM loans: Single family residential mortgage $ 9,821 $ 11,112 $ 827 $ 21,760 $ 629,407 $ 651,167 Other consumer — — — — 2,308 2,308 Total NTM loans 9,821 11,112 827 21,760 631,715 653,475 Traditional loans: Commercial: Commercial and industrial 776 2,890 1,577 5,243 1,784,235 1,789,478 Commercial real estate — — — — 891,029 891,029 Multifamily — — — — 1,563,757 1,563,757 SBA 377 230 1,762 2,369 72,990 75,359 Construction — — 2,519 2,519 226,042 228,561 Consumer: Single family residential mortgage 11,999 1,370 10,318 23,687 1,101,099 1,124,786 Other consumer 547 — 217 764 56,050 56,814 Total traditional loans 13,699 4,490 16,393 34,582 5,695,202 5,729,784 Total $ 23,520 $ 15,602 $ 17,220 $ 56,342 $ 6,326,917 $ 6,383,259 December 31, 2018 NTM loans: Single family residential mortgage $ 7,430 $ 617 $ — $ 8,047 $ 816,271 $ 824,318 Other consumer — — — — 2,413 2,413 Total NTM loans 7,430 617 — 8,047 818,684 826,731 Traditional loans: Commercial: Commercial and industrial 350 1,596 3,340 5,286 1,938,856 1,944,142 Commercial real estate — 582 — 582 866,431 867,013 Multifamily 356 — — 356 2,240,890 2,241,246 SBA 551 77 862 1,490 67,251 68,741 Construction — 939 — 939 203,037 203,976 Consumer: Single family residential mortgage 7,321 3,160 9,198 19,679 1,461,493 1,481,172 Other consumer 3,132 573 446 4,151 63,701 67,852 Total traditional loans 11,710 6,927 13,846 32,483 6,841,659 6,874,142 Total $ 19,140 $ 7,544 $ 13,846 $ 40,530 $ 7,660,343 $ 7,700,873 Non-accrual Loans The following table presents non-accrual loans as of the dates indicated: September 30, 2019 December 31, 2018 ($ in thousands) NTM Loans Traditional Loans Total NTM Loans Traditional Loans Total Non-accrual loans Commercial: Commercial and industrial $ — $ 20,762 $ 20,762 $ — $ 5,455 $ 5,455 Commercial real estate — — — — — — SBA — 5,773 5,773 — 2,574 2,574 Construction — 2,519 2,519 — — — Consumer: Single family residential mortgage 1,110 14,477 15,587 — 12,929 12,929 Other consumer — 528 528 — 627 627 Total non-accrual loans $ 1,110 $ 44,059 $ 45,169 $ — $ 21,585 $ 21,585 At September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 , zero and $470 thousand of loans were past due 90 days or more and still accruing. Loans in Process of Foreclosure At September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 , consumer mortgage loans of $10.6 million and $5.1 million , respectively, were secured by residential real estate properties for which formal foreclosure proceedings were in process according to local requirements of the applicable jurisdiction. Troubled Debt Restructurings A modification of a loan constitutes a troubled debt restructuring (TDR) when the Company, for economic or legal reasons related to a borrower’s financial difficulties, grants a concession to the borrower that it would not otherwise consider. The concessions may be granted in various forms, including reduction in the stated interest rate, reduction in the amount of principal amortization, forgiveness of a portion of the loan balance or accrued interest, or extension of the maturity date. In order to determine whether a borrower is experiencing financial difficulty, an evaluation is performed of the probability that the borrower will be in payment default on any of its debt in the foreseeable future without the modification. This evaluation is performed under the Company’s internal underwriting policy. TDR loans consisted of the following as of the dates indicated: September 30, 2019 December 31, 2018 ($ in thousands) NTM Loans Traditional Loans Total NTM Loans Traditional Loans Total Commercial: Commercial and industrial $ — $ 15,790 $ 15,790 $ — $ 2,276 $ 2,276 SBA — 266 266 — 187 187 Consumer: Single family residential mortgage 2,646 2,408 5,054 2,668 2,596 5,264 Other consumer 294 — 294 294 — 294 Total $ 2,940 $ 18,464 $ 21,404 $ 2,962 $ 5,059 $ 8,021 The Company had commitments to lend to customers with outstanding loans that were classified as TDRs of $135 thousand and zero as of September 30, 2019 or December 31, 2018 , respectively. Accruing TDRs were $6.8 million and non-accrual TDRs were $14.6 million at September 30, 2019 compared to accruing TDRs of $5.7 million and non-accrual TDRs of $2.3 million at December 31, 2018 . The increase in TDRs during the three months ended September 30, 2019 was primarily due to one commercial and industrial relationship. The following table summarizes the pre-modification and post-modification balances of the new TDRs for the periods indicated: Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended ($ in thousands) Number of Loans Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment Number of Loans Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment September 30, 2019 Commercial: Commercial and industrial (1) — $ — $ — 10 $ 17,339 $ 14,692 SBA — — — 2 3,214 869 Consumer: Single family residential mortgage — — — — — — Other consumer — $ — $ — — $ — $ — Total — — — 12 $ 20,553 $ 15,561 September 30, 2018 Commercial: Commercial and industrial — $ — $ — 2 $ 171 $ 163 Total — $ — $ — 2 $ 171 $ 163 (1) Post-modification outstanding recorded investment reflects a $2.3 million principal repayment by the borrower, which was a condition precedent to the modification. The Company considers a TDR to be in payment default once it becomes 30 days or more past due following a modification. During the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018 , there were no loans that were modified as TDRs during the past 12 months that had subsequent payment defaults during the periods. The following table summarizes TDRs by modification type for the periods indicated: Three Months Ended Modification Type Change in Principal Payments and Interest Rates Change in Principal Payments Total ($ in thousands) Count Amount Count Amount Count Amount September 30, 2019 Total — $ — — $ — — $ — September 30, 2018 Total — $ — — $ — — $ — Nine Months Ended Modification Type Change in Principal Payments and Interest Rates Change in Principal Payments Total ($ in thousands) Count Amount Count Amount Count Amount September 30, 2019 Commercial: Commercial and industrial 10 $ 14,692 — $ — 10 $ 14,692 SBA 2 $ 869 — $ — 2 $ 869 Total 12 $ 15,561 — $ — 12 $ 15,561 September 30, 2018 Commercial: Commercial and industrial — $ — 2 $ 163 2 $ 163 Total — $ — 2 $ 163 2 $ 163 Credit Quality Indicators The Company categorizes loans into risk categories based on relevant information about the ability of borrowers to service their debt such as: current financial information, historical payment experience, credit documentation, public information, and current economic trends, among other factors. The Company performs historical loss analysis that is combined with a comprehensive loan or lease to value analysis to analyze the associated risks in the current loan and lease portfolio. The Company analyzes loans individually by classifying the loans as to credit risk. This analysis includes all loans delinquent over 60 days and non-homogeneous loans such as commercial and commercial real estate loans. The Company uses the following definitions for risk ratings: Pass : Loans classified as pass are in compliance in all respects with the Bank’s credit policy and regulatory requirements, and do not exhibit any potential or defined weakness as defined under “Special Mention”, “Substandard” or “Doubtful”. Special Mention : Loans classified as special mention have a potential weakness that deserves management’s close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the loan or lease or of the Company’s credit position at some future date. Substandard : Loans classified as substandard are inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Loans so classified have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the Company will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. Doubtful : Loans classified as doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in those classified as substandard, with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, highly questionable and improbable. The following table presents the risk categories for total loans as of the dates indicated: ($ in thousands) Pass Special Mention Substandard Doubtful Total September 30, 2019 NTM loans: Single family residential mortgage $ 633,950 $ 5,173 $ 12,044 $ — $ 651,167 Other consumer 2,308 — — — 2,308 Total NTM loans 636,258 5,173 12,044 — 653,475 Traditional loans: Commercial: Commercial and industrial 1,673,655 77,431 38,392 — 1,789,478 Commercial real estate 887,232 2,520 1,277 — 891,029 Multifamily 1,551,231 8,428 4,098 — 1,563,757 SBA 63,543 3,120 7,894 802 75,359 Construction 219,056 6,986 2,519 — 228,561 Consumer: Single family residential mortgage 1,100,990 4,291 18,988 517 1,124,786 Other consumer 55,947 317 550 — 56,814 Total traditional loans 5,551,654 103,093 73,718 1,319 5,729,784 Total $ 6,187,912 $ 108,266 $ 85,762 $ 1,319 $ 6,383,259 December 31, 2018 NTM loans: Single family residential mortgage $ 811,056 $ 10,966 $ 2,296 $ — $ 824,318 Other consumer 2,413 — — — 2,413 Total NTM loans 813,469 10,966 2,296 — 826,731 Traditional loans: Commercial: Commercial and industrial 1,859,569 41,302 43,271 — 1,944,142 Commercial real estate 851,604 11,376 4,033 — 867,013 Multifamily 2,239,301 — 1,945 — 2,241,246 SBA 53,433 6,114 8,340 854 68,741 Construction 197,851 3,606 2,519 — 203,976 Consumer: Single family residential mortgage 1,461,721 2,602 16,849 — 1,481,172 Other consumer 66,228 979 645 — 67,852 Total traditional loans 6,729,707 65,979 77,602 854 6,874,142 Total $ 7,543,176 $ 76,945 $ 79,898 $ 854 $ 7,700,873 Purchases, Sales, and Transfers From time to time, the Company purchases and sells loans in the secondary market. Certain loans are transferred from held-for-investment to held-for-sale at the lower of cost or fair value and any reductions in value on transfer are reflected as write-downs to allowance for loan losses. The Company had no purchases of loans, excluding loans held-for-sale, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018 . The following table presents loans transferred from (to) loans held-for-sale by portfolio segment for the periods indicated: Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended ($ in thousands) Transfers from Held-For-Sale Transfers (to) Held-For-Sale Transfers from Held-For-Sale Transfers (to) Held-For-Sale September 30, 2019 Commercial: Commercial real estate $ — $ — $ — $ (573 ) Multifamily — — — (752,087 ) SBA — (559 ) — (559 ) Consumer: Single family residential mortgage — — — (374,679 ) Total $ — $ (559 ) $ — $ (1,127,898 ) September 30, 2018 Commercial: Commercial and industrial $ — $ (1,133 ) $ — $ (1,133 ) Multifamily — — — (71,449 ) Consumer: Single family residential mortgage — (18,886 ) — (154,899 ) Other consumer — — — (4,362 ) Total $ — $ (20,019 ) $ — $ (231,843 ) Included in transfers to loans held for sale for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 is $573.9 million in multifamily loans from loans held-for-investment related to our completed Freddie Mac multifamily securitization which closed during the third quarter of 2019. The loans included in the securitization had a weighted average coupon of 3.79% and a weighted average term to initial reset of 3.5 years . The related mortgage servicing rights were also sold. In connection with the securitization, during the second quarter of 2019 , the Company entered into interest rate swap agreements with a combined notional value of $543.4 million to offset variability in the fair value of the related loans as a result of changes in market interest rates. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019 , the Company recognized a gain of $603 thousand and loss of $9.0 million , respectively, related to these swap agreements. The $9.0 million loss on these interest rate swap agreements was due to a decline in interest rates since their execution and was offset by the $8.9 million gross gain realized on the loans sold into the securitization during the third quarter of 2019. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019 , the Company sold $144 thousand and $374.8 million , respectively, in single family residential loans, resulting in a (loss) gain of $(150) thousand and $1.6 million , respectively. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019 , the Company sold $573.5 million and $751.6 million , respectively, in multifamily residential loans, resulting in a gross gain of $8.9 million and $11.7 million , respectively. |