Basis of Presentation | Note 2. Basis of Presentation Basis of Presentation The accompanying interim unaudited condensed financial statements have been prepared by the Company pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and reflect the accounts of the Company as of September 30, 2017 and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for complete financial statements. The accompanying interim unaudited condensed financial statements reflect all adjustments consisting of normal recurring adjustments which, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair statement of the Company’s financial position and the results of its operations and cash flows, as of and for the periods presented. The unaudited condensed balance sheet at December 31, 2016 has been derived from the audited financial statements at that date but does not include all of the information and disclosures required by GAAP for annual financial statements. The results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited financial statements and notes thereto for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 23, 2017. Going Concern In accordance with the criteria of Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-15, Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern The Company will need to raise additional capital to fund its operations and service its near and long-term debt obligations until its revenue reaches a level sufficient to provide for self-sustaining cash flows. There can be no assurance that additional capital will be available on acceptable terms, or at all, or that the Company’s revenue will reach a level sufficient to provide for self-sustaining cash flows. If sufficient additional capital is not available as and when needed, the Company may have to delay, scale back or discontinue one or more product development programs, curtail its commercialization activities, significantly reduce expenses, sell assets (potentially at a discount to their fair value or carrying value), enter into relationships with third parties to develop or commercialize products or technologies that the Company otherwise would have sought to develop or commercialize independently, cease operations altogether, pursue a sale of the Company at a price that may result in up to a total loss on investment for its stockholders, file for bankruptcy or seek other protection from creditors, or liquidate all assets. In addition, if the Company defaults under its term loan agreement, its lenders could foreclose on its assets, including substantially all of its cash and cash equivalents which are held in accounts with its lenders. Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The Company’s significant estimates include revenue recognition, stock-based compensation expense, bonus accrual, income tax valuation allowances, recovery of long-lived assets, inventory obsolescence and inventory valuation. Actual results could materially differ from those estimates. Fair Value of Financial Instruments The carrying value of financial instruments classified as current assets and current liabilities approximate fair value due to their liquidity and short-term nature. Investments that are classified as available-for-sale are recorded at fair value, which is determined using quoted market prices, broker or dealer quotations or alternative pricing sources with reasonable levels of price transparency. The Growth Term Loan and NuvoGen obligation are considered financial instruments. However, the Company is unable to reasonably determine the fair value of these obligations. Revenue Recognition – Collaborative Development Service Revenue The Company follows ASC 605-25, Revenue Recognition – Multiple-Element Arrangements and ASC 808, Collaborative Arrangements, if applicable, to determine the appropriate recognition of revenue under its collaborative research, development and commercialization agreements that contain multiple elements. These multiple elements, or deliverables, may include access to the Company’s technology through grants of licenses to its intellectual property, research and development services and participation in joint development steering committees, amongst others. The payments the Company receives under these arrangements typically include one or more of the following: non-refundable up-front fees, monthly development service fees, milestone payments upon acceptance of contract deliverables or profit sharing payments for completed contract milestones. Research and Development Costs Research and development expenses represent costs incurred internally for research and development activities and costs incurred externally to fund research activities. These costs include those generated through research and development efforts for the improvement and expansion of the Company’s proprietary technology and product offerings as well as those related to third-party collaborative development agreements, for which related revenue is included in service revenue in the condensed statements of operations. Concentration Risks Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to credit risk consist principally of cash and cash equivalents and uncollateralized accounts receivable. The Company maintains the majority of its cash balances in the form of cash deposits in bank checking and money market accounts in amounts in excess of federally insured limits. Management believes, based upon the quality of the financial institution, that the credit risk with regard to these deposits is not significant. The Company sells its instruments, consumables, sample processing services, custom panel design and collaborative development services primarily to biopharmaceutical companies, academic institutions and molecular labs. The Company routinely assesses the financial strength of its customers and credit losses have been minimal to date. The Company had product revenue consisting of revenue from the sale of instruments and consumables for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, as follows: Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 2016 2017 2016 Instruments $ 199,205 $ 5,846 $ 370,263 $ 88,146 Consumables 426,400 500,219 1,203,663 1,595,236 Total product revenue $ 625,605 $ 506,065 $ 1,573,926 $ 1,683,382 The Company had service revenue consisting of revenue from custom assay development, sample processing and collaborative development services for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, as follows: Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 2016 2017 2016 Custom assay development $ 73,567 $ 103,719 $ 419,515 $ 103,719 Sample processing 893,618 304,117 2,428,863 1,887,848 Collaborative development services 2,130,694 — 2,433,105 — Total service revenue $ 3,097,879 $ 407,836 $ 5,281,483 $ 1,991,567 The Company’s top three customers accounted for 57%, 10% and 4% of the Company’s total revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2017, compared with 27%, 24% and 9% for the three months ended September 30, 2016. The top three customers accounted for 35%, 13% and 5% of the Company’s revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2017, compared with 38%, 14% and 7% for the nine months ended September 30, 2016. The top two customers accounted for approximately 62% and 6% of the Company’s accounts receivable as of September 30, 2017, compared with approximately 28% and 15% as of December 31, 2016. The Company currently relies on a single supplier to supply a subcomponent used in the HTG EdgeSeq processors and a second single supplier to provide raw materials used in its HTG EdgeSeq proprietary assays. A loss of either of these suppliers could significantly delay the delivery of products or the completion of services to be performed, which in turn would materially affect the Company’s ability to generate revenue. Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements In July 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU No. 2015-11, Inventory: Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Share-Based Payment: Simplifying the Accounting for Share-Based Payments Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-08, Revenue Recognition: Clarifying the new Revenue Standard’s Principal-Versus-Agent Guidance In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-10, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing In May 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-12, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Narrow Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients. The new revenue standard and the standards that amend it will be effective for public entities for fiscal years and interim periods within those fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, using either of the following transition methods: (i) a full retrospective approach reflecting the application of the standard in each prior reporting period with the option to elect certain practical expedients; or (ii) a retrospective approach with the cumulative effect of initially adopting ASU 2014-09 recognized at the date of adoption (which includes additional footnote disclosures). The Company plans to adopt the new guidance beginning January 1, 2018 and is currently assessing which transition method to apply. The Company is in the process of analyzing the new guidance for all of its contracts with customers, which includes performing a detailed review of how the new standard affects each of its different types of customer contracts, comparing historical accounting policies and practices to the new standard and assessing the impact on internal controls over financial reporting. As of September 30, 2017, the Company has completed and documented a preliminary assessment of the impact of the new revenue standard on its standard instrument, consumables and sample processing contracts. Additionally, the Company’s assessments of the impact of the new revenue standard on its collaborative arrangements are in process and are mostly complete. The FASB has included on its agenda a project to make targeted improvements to the guidance in ASC 808, Collaborative Arrangements In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-09, Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting In July 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-11, Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Down Round Features |