EAST KANSAS AGRI-ENERGY, LLC
NOTES TO UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2006
NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Nature of Business
East Kansas Agri-Energy, LLC, (a Kansas limited liability company) located in Garnett, Kansas, was organized to own and operate a 35 million gallon ethanol plant with distribution within the United States. East Kansas Agri-Energy, LLC (the “Company”) was formally organized as a limited liability company as of October 16, 2001. Prior to that date the Company operated as a general partnership with no formal partnership agreement. The Company began its principal operations June 15, 2005. Prior to that date, the Company was considered to be in development stage.
Basis of Accounting
The unaudited financial statements contained herein have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Accordingly, they do not include all the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included in the accompanying financial statements. The results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for a full year.
These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes included in the Company’s financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2005.
Accounts Receivable
Accounts receivable are presented at face value, net of the allowance for doubtful accounts. The allowance for doubtful accounts is established through provisions charged against income and is maintained at a level believed adequate by management to absorb estimated bad debts based on historical experience and current economic conditions. Management believes all receivables will be collected and therefore the allowance has been established to be zero at June 30, 2006.
The Company’s policy is to charge simple interest on trade receivables past due balances; accrual of interest is discontinued when management believes collection is doubtful. Receivables are considered past due based upon payment terms set forth at the date of the related sale. The Company has no receivables accruing interest at June 30, 2006.
Prepaid Offering Costs
Costs incurred related to the sale of units are recorded as prepaid offering costs until the related units are issued. Upon issuance of units, offering costs are deducted from additional paid-in capital, with any remaining amount applied to retained earnings. Offering costs include direct costs related to the offering such as legal fees, cost of meetings and materials and related costs associated with the Company’s private offering and public offering.
Financing Costs
Costs incurred related to origination of debt financing are recorded as an asset and amortized over the expected term of the debt.
Estimates
Management uses estimates and assumptions in preparing financial statements. Those estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
8
EAST KANSAS AGRI-ENERGY, LLC
NOTES TO UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2006
the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses. Actual results could differ from the estimates used.
Earnings Per Unit
Earnings per unit are calculated based on the period of time units have been issued and outstanding. For purposes of calculating diluted earnings per capital unit, units subscribed for but not issued are included in the computation of outstanding capital units.
General, administrative and selling expenses
The primary components of general and administrative expenses are management fees, insurance expense, selling expenses and payroll.
Revenue Recognition
Revenue from the production of ethanol and related products is recorded upon transfer of title to our customers. The transfer takes place at the plant site and therefore shipping terms are FOB shipping point. Interest income is recognized as earned. Income from federal and state incentives is recognized when received due to uncertainty of available funds and pro-rations used by the sponsoring organizations.
Cost of Sales
The primary components of cost of sales from the production of ethanol and related products are grain expense, energy expense (natural gas and electricity), raw materials expense (chemicals and denaturant), labor and depreciation on process equipment.
Shipping and Handling
Shipping and handling costs are expensed as incurred and are included in the cost of sales.
Organization and Start-up Costs
Organizational and start-up costs are expensed as incurred. Organizational costs consist of amounts related to the formation of the company. Start-up costs consist of amounts incurred during the development stage related to the operation and management of the Company, which do not qualify as capitalized costs.
Income Taxes
The Company is organized as a limited liability company under state law and is treated as a partnership for income tax purposes. Under this type of organization, the Company’s earnings pass through to the partners and are taxed at the partner level. Accordingly, no income tax provision has been calculated. Differences between financial statement basis of assets and tax basis of assets is related to capitalization and amortization of organizational and start-up costs for tax purposes, whereas these costs are expensed for financial statement purposes, and the difference between the recorded amounts of financial statement and tax depreciation, unrealized gains or losses on commodity contracts and incentive programs payments.
Cash Equivalents
For purposes of the statement of cash flows, the Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.
9
EAST KANSAS AGRI-ENERGY, LLC
NOTES TO UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2006
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The Company believes the carrying value of cash and cash equivalents approximates fair value due to the short maturity of these instruments. The Company estimates the fair market value of the investment in Industrial Revenue Bonds to approximate cost.
The Company believes the carrying amount of long-term note payable obligations approximates fair value. For the permanent financing, fair value approximates the carrying amount due to the variable interest rate feature of the debt.
Inventory
Inventory is stated at the lower of cost, determined on a first in, first out basis, or market value.
Investment in Commodity Contracts
SFAS No. 133 requires a company to evaluate its contracts to determine whether the contracts are derivatives. Certain contracts that literally meet the definition of a derivative may be exempted from SFAS No. 133 as normal purchases or normal sales. Normal purchases and normal sales are contracts that provide for the purchase or sale of something other than a financial instrument or derivative instrument that will be delivered in quantities expected to be used or sold over a reasonable period in the normal course of business. Contracts that meet the requirements of normal are documented as normal and exempted from the accounting and reporting requirements of SFAS No. 133.
The Company enters into short-term cash grain, option and futures contracts as a means of securing grain for the ethanol plant and managing exposure to changes in commodity prices. All derivatives are designated as non-hedge derivatives. Although the contracts are effective economic hedges of specified risks, they are not designated as and accounted for as hedging instruments.
As part of its trading activity, the Company uses futures and option contracts offered through regulated commodity exchanges to reduce risk and is exposed to risk of loss in the market value of inventories. To reduce that risk, the Company generally takes positions using cash and futures contracts and options. During the periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 this activity resulted in net losses of $1,053,343 and $28,495, respectively, which are reported in cost of sales.
Property and Equipment
Depreciation is computed over the estimated useful life of each asset using the straight-line method. Estimated useful lives generally used in computing depreciation are:
Land improvements | | 15 to 20 years | |
Buildings | | 40 years | |
Machinery and equipment | | 7 to 15 years | |
Office equipment | | 5 to 10 years | |
Computers and software | | 3 to 5 years | |
Vehicles | | 5 years | |
The Company’s property and equipment were acquired under lease agreements pursuant to an industrial revenue bond issue. The Company is required to make semi-annual deposits with the Trustee sufficient to service the principal maturities and interest requirements. Title to the property will be transferred to the Company when the lease is terminated upon retirement of the bonds. Accordingly, the bonds have been recorded as a direct obligation of the Company. The Company is also the holder of the bonds.
The Company reviews its property and equipment for impairment whenever events indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. An impairment loss is recorded if the sum of the future cash flows is less than
10
EAST KANSAS AGRI-ENERGY, LLC
NOTES TO UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2006
the carrying amount of the asset. The amount of the loss is determined by comparing the fair market value of the asset to the carrying amount of the asset. Such assessments did not result in any adjustment to the value of the non-current assets.
Environmental Liabilities
The Company’s operations are subject to federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations. These laws require the Company to investigate and remediate the effects of the release or disposal of materials at its location. Accordingly, the Company has adopted policies, practices and procedures in the areas of pollution control, occupational health, and the production, handling, storage and use of hazardous materials to prevent material environmental or other damage; and to limit the financial liability which could result from such events. Environmental liabilities are recorded when the liability is probable and the costs can be reasonably estimated.
NOTE 2 - INCENTIVE PAYMENTS
The Company has qualified for the federal U.S. Department of Agriculture Bio Energy Program. The federal program is managed by the Commodity Credit Corporation and is designed to expand the production of fuel grade ethanol by offering incentives for incremental production compared to the same quarter of the prior year. The annually funded program runs through fiscal year 2006 and incentive payments are pro-rated if applications for incentives exceed the annual funding. The maximum annual incentive program payments the Company can receive is $7,500,000; individual producers are also subject to an annual limitation of 5% of the total funding. The Company has included federal incentives of $477,366 and $104,717 in revenue for the periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
The Company has been approved for the Kansas Qualified Agricultural Ethanol Producer Incentive Fund. The incentive rate is $.075 per gallon of ethanol produced. The Company must establish they have produced 5,000,000 gallons of ethanol before the State of Kansas will disburse the funds. The Company has included state incentives of $455,671 and $0 in revenue for the periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
NOTE 3 - INVENTORY
As of June 30, 2006, inventory consists of:
Raw Material | | $1,187,173 | |
Work in Progress | | 378,755 | |
Finished Goods | | 431,253 | |
| | $1,997,181 | |
NOTE 4 - UNITS SUBJECT TO REDEMPTION
On October 11, 2004, the Company executed a Unit Purchase and Redemption Agreement with ICM, Inc. and Fagen, Inc. in which the Company agreed to issue a total of 6,250 units to them in exchange for their combined capital contribution of $6,250,000. The Company also agreed to redeem all 6,250 units from ICM, Inc. and Fagen, Inc. using the proceeds from the sale of units in a future registered offering or, to the extent the future offering is unsuccessful, from cash flow generated by operations subject to certain loan covenants, restrictions and tax distributions. The redemption price was $1,100 per unit. In connection with this capital contribution, the Company amended the Operating Agreement to allow ICM, Inc. and Fagen, Inc. to appoint a total of three directors to the Company’s board of directors, subject to the Company’s ability to terminate one of their director positions for every $2,000,000 dollars in redemption payments made to either or both of ICM, Inc. and Fagen, Inc. On January 19, 2005, the Company closed on the purchase of these units by ICM, Inc. and Fagen, Inc. and issued 3,125 units to Fagen, Inc. and 3,125 units to ICM, Inc. at a purchase price of $1,000 per unit. The purchases were made with cash
11
EAST KANSAS AGRI-ENERGY, LLC
NOTES TO UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2006
and the total amount of cash consideration for those securities was $6,250,000. On August 1, 2005, the Company redeemed the 6,250 units from ICM, Inc. and Fagen, Inc. at a price of $1,100 per unit for a total of $6,875,000.
On December 16, 2004, the Company filed a registration statement on Form SB-2 (Commission File 333-121323) with pre-effective amendments to the registration statement on February 1, 2005, April 6, 2005 and April 19, 2005, which became effective April 20, 2005.
The Company accepted units for an aggregate price of $10,000,100 and used the proceeds of the registered offering to redeem the units from ICM, Inc. and Fagen, Inc. in accordance with the agreement and retained the balance of the proceeds for working capital. The $6,250,000 of equity associated with the units subject to redemption was converted to a liability. Interest expense of $625,000 was recorded for the year ended December 31, 2005 when the liability was paid.
NOTE 5 - LONG-TERM DEBT
On November 23, 2004, the Company entered into a Credit Agreement with Home Federal Savings Bank, establishing a construction loan facility for the construction of a 35 million gallon per year ethanol plant. The construction financing is in the amount of $26,000,000 consisting of a $21,000,000 conventional term loan and a $5,000,000 loan potentially guaranteed 80% by the USDA, and is secured by substantially all of our assets.
During the construction phase, the Company made monthly payments of interest only at a variable interest rate equal to prime plus 1.75% with a floor of 6%. On September 20, 2005, following construction completion, the loan was segmented into two loans (1) a $5,000,000 loan (Loan A), and (2) a $21,000,000 conventional term loan (Loan B). The $5,000,000 loan has an amortization period and maturity date of 10 years. The Company makes monthly payments of principal and interest on the $5,000,000 loan at a interest rate of prime. The $21,000,000 conventional loan has an amortization period of ten years but will mature at the end of five years. The Company makes monthly payments of principal and interest on the $21,000,000 loan at a rate equal to prime. The effective interest rate for both loans at June 30, 2006 was 8.25%.
The Company pays a $30,000 annual administration fee related to the credit facility. This fee has been reduced to $20,000, beginning with the payment due in December of 2006. The credit facility is secured by a mortgage on our real property and a security interest in all personal and intangible assets of the Company, including assignment of all material contracts.
The $5,000,000 loan imposes a prepayment penalty depending on the year of refinancing starting with the 5% penalty in year one and decreasing to 1% in year five. The $21,000,000 conventional loan imposes a prepayment penalty starting with a 3% penalty in year one and decreasing to 1% in year three.
On May 4, 2006, the Company agreed to renegotiate terms of their bank financing. The new terms provide for a $4,000,000 term revolving loan in addition to the existing term loans. The interest rate on the term revolving loan is the prime rate. The term revolving loan available credit balance is reduced by $400,000 annually beginning December 31, 2007 and matures on October 1, 2010.
During the term of the loan, all deposit accounts related to the Company must be maintained at Home Federal Savings Bank. The Company is subject to certain financial loan covenants consisting of minimum working capital, minimum fixed charge coverage, minimum current ratio, minimum debt service, minimum net worth and maximum debt to net worth covenants during the term of the loan. The Company is also prohibited from making distributions to their members; however, the Company is allowed to distribute 50% of our net income to our members after our lender has received audited financial statements for the fiscal year. If the Company meets certain financial ratio requirements, it may distribute an additional 10% of net income. The Company must be in compliance with all financial ratio requirements and loan covenants before and after any distributions to the members. The lender temporarily waived, through December 31, 2006, certain minimum net worth and maximum debt to net worth covenants. With the waiver, the Company is in compliance with the applicable loan covenants as of June 30, 2006.
12
EAST KANSAS AGRI-ENERGY, LLC
NOTES TO UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2006
The Company is only allowed to make annual capital expenditures up to $500,000 annually without the lender’s prior approval. During the term of the loan, the Company is required to pay to the lender an annual amount equal to the greater of: 1) 75% of any Commodity Credit Corporation Bio-Energy income payments received during the year, or 2) 25% of the Company’s free cash flow for each year. Payments consisting of USDA Commodity Credit Corporation Bio-Energy income must be paid to the lender within 15 days of receipt of any such payments. These payments will continue until an aggregate sum of $7,500,000 has been received by the lender. The Company is in compliance with the applicable loan covenants as of June 30, 2006.
On May 10, 2005 the Company entered into a contract with ICM, Inc. to purchase a steam turbine electric generator for $1,760,274. The note is payable in quarterly installments of $146,689.50 plus interest at a variable rate of prime plus 1%, starting October 1, 2005 and maturing July 1, 2008. The variable interest rate will be adjusted quarterly on the first day of January, April, July and October. The note was paid in full on March 1, 2006.
The Company financed its waste water reuse facility through two bond issues by the City of Garnett. The Utility System Revenue Bonds require annual principal payments beginning on October 1, 2006 and continue through 2015. Interest payments on these bonds are due semi-annually, at interest rates ranging from 4.6% to 5.2%. The first interest payment was due April 1, 2006. The Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Bonds require semi-annual principal and interest payments beginning on July 1, 2006 and continue through 2015. The bonds have a fixed interest rate of 2%
Long-term obligations of the Company are summarized as follows at June 30, 2006:
Loan B | | $ | 17,546,477 | |
Loan A | | 4,204,961 | |
Utility System Revenue Bonds | | 525,000 | |
CDBG Bonds | | 340,920 | |
Less current portion | | (1,689,662 | ) |
Long-term portion | | $ | 20,927,696 | |
The estimated maturities of long-term debt at June 30, 2006, are as follows:
12 Month Period Ending 6/30 | | | | Amount | |
2007 | | $ | 1,689,662 | |
2008 | | 1,733,184 | |
2009 | | 1,875,511 | |
2010 | | 2,034,987 | |
2011 | | 12,588,908 | |
Thereafter | | 2,695,106 | |
| | $ | 22,617,358 | |
NOTE 6 - MEMBERS’ EQUITY
As specified in the Company’s Operating Agreement, voting rights are one vote for each voting unit registered in the name of such Member as shown on the Membership Registration maintained by the Company. No Member shall directly or indirectly own or control more than 25% of the issued and outstanding voting membership interest in the Company at any time.
Income and losses of the Company shall be allocated among the Members in proportion to each Member’s respective percentage of units when compared with the total Units issued.
13
EAST KANSAS AGRI-ENERGY, LLC
NOTES TO UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2006
The Company’s cash flow shall first be applied to the payment of the Company’s operating expenses (including debt service) and then to maintenance of adequate cash reserves as determined by the board of directors in its sole discretion, and then shall be distributed from time to time to the Members in proportion to their respective percentage units. No member has the right to demand and receive any distribution from the Company other than in cash. No distribution shall be made if, as a result thereof, the Company would be in violation of any loan agreement, and of if the Company would be in violation of any loan agreement, of if the Company’s total assets would be less than the sum of its total liabilities.
Transfer, disposition or encumbrance of Capital Units is subject to certain restrictions, including approval by the board of directors.
The Company completed its second public offering and escrow was broken in July 2005. A total of 9,091 units were subscribed and paid for during the year ended December 31, 2005. Upon issuance of the units related to the second public offering, costs related to the issuance of the units of $168,453 was charged to members’ equity.
The board of directors approved the redemption of 1,900 units from a member. The redemption represents the member’s entire unit balance. On May 10, 2006, the Company purchased the member’s units for a total of $3,800,000.
NOTE 7 - CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK
The Company maintains cash balances at five financial institutions in its trade area. The accounts are secured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation up to $100,000. At times, the Company’s bank balance may exceed $100,000.
NOTE 8 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
On November 12, 2004, the Company entered into a Trading Agreement with United Bio Energy Trading, LLC, an affiliated related party, in which United Bio Energy Trading, LLC will provide market information and consulting services for the Company. The Company anticipates that the term of the agreement will be for at least five years and will pay a monthly fee of $6,000.
On November 12, 2004, the Company entered into a Distillers Grains Marketing Agreement with United Bio Energy Ingredients, LLC, an affiliated related party, pursuant to which United Bio Energy Ingredients, LLC will purchase all dried and wet distillers grains produced at the plant for a term of at least five years at a price of 98% of the FOB plant price United Bio Energy Ingredients, LLC charges its buyers of dried distillers grains, and 95% of the FOB plant price United Bio Energy Ingredients, LLC charges its buyers of wet distillers grains. United Bio Energy Ingredients, LLC, will use its best efforts to achieve the highest resale price available under prevailing market conditions. The Company is responsible for supplying all labor and equipment to load or unload trucks or rail cars without charge to United Bio Energy Ingredients, LLC and is required to provide storage for at least 10 days production of wet and dry distiller grains. In addition, the distiller grains must meet quality requirements so that they will meet current industry standards for primary animal feed ingredients. If the Company fails to supply distiller grains that comply with industry standards, United Bio Energy Ingredients, LLC may reject them. The Company paid commissions of $151,307 and $2,952, respectively, for the periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 related to this marketing agreement.
On November 12, 2004, the Company entered into a Raw Grains Agreement with United Bio Energy Ingredients, LLC, an affiliated related party. The Raw Grains Agreement provides for the Company to purchase all raw grains necessary for ethanol production from United Bio Energy Ingredients, LLC for a period of at least five years. Pursuant to the agreement, United Bio Energy Ingredients, LLC will use its best efforts to arrange for the purchase of grain at the lowest price available under prevailing market conditions and we will supply all labor and equipment necessary to load or unload trucks or rail cars. For its service, the Company will pay United Bio Energy Ingredients, LLC the actual cash procurement price and all reasonable and necessary expenses to get the grain to the plant plus a $.02 per bushel fee. The title, risk of loss, and responsibility for the quality of grain will transfer to the Company
14
EAST KANSAS AGRI-ENERGY, LLC
NOTES TO UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2006
when it unloads the grain at the plant. Prior to that time, United Bio Energy Ingredients, LLC will bear the risk of loss. All grain delivered to the plant shall meet certain quality standards and the Company will have the option to reduce the price the Company will pay or fully reject any delivery that fails to conform to these standards, depending upon the severity of the noncompliance. For the periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, the Company paid $140,338 and $10,629, respectively, in brokerage fees for grain purchases made under this agreement.
On November 12, 2004, the Company also entered into an Ethanol Agreement with United Bio Energy Fuels, LLC, an affiliated related party. The terms of the agreement provide that United Bio Energy Fuels, LLC will market all fuel-grade ethanol produced at our plant. In exchange, the Company agrees to pay United Bio Energy Fuels, LLC a fee of $.01 for each gallon of ethanol produced at the Company’s plant during the term of the agreement. The Company expects that the term of the agreement will be at least 5 years. United Bio Energy Fuels, LLC also agreed to use its best efforts to obtain the highest price for ethanol available under prevailing market conditions. For the periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, the Company paid $196,048 and $4,629, respectively, in marketing fees for ethanol marketing under this agreement.
On November 12, 2004, the Company entered into a Management Agreement with United Bio Energy Management, LLC, a related party, in which United Bio Energy Management, LLC will supervise and direct the general operations of the plant for an anticipated period of at least five years. United Bio Energy Management, LLC will provide the services of a full-time general manager to the plant. The Company has agreed to compensate United Bio Energy Management, LLC an annual fee of $250,000 for these services payable in monthly installments of $20,833, plus an incentive bonus based on the attainment of certain financial benchmarks. United Bio Energy Management, LLC will appoint a general manager to be based on site at our plant, and shall work exclusively for us. In the event of a dispute, the Management Agreement provides that the Company will first attempt to amicably settle any dispute or difference privately between United Bio Energy Management, LLC and the Company. If the Company cannot resolve the dispute as a result of the discussions, then the Company must submit the matter to non-binding mediation. In the event that the dispute is not settled through mediation, the matter must be resolved by non-appealable arbitration in accordance with the rules of the American Arbitration Association as applicable in the State of Kansas. The determination of the arbitrator is expected to be final and may not be appealed to any court. The prevailing party in any arbitration proceeding is entitled to recover reasonable attorneys’ fees and expenses incurred. The agreement commenced during March 2005. For the periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, the Company incurred costs of $400,000 and $44,833, respectively, related to this agreement including reimbursable expenses, of which $89,324 is in related party accounts payable.
The Company has an agreement with the City of Garnett, Kansas to share the cost of certain highway improvements. Management estimates the obligation under this agreement will be approximately $135,000.
On July 28, 2005, the Company entered into an agreement with HDB Construction, Inc. for additional work on the railroad spur project not to exceed an amount of $1,567,268. As of June 30, 2006 costs related to the agreement of $1,567,268 and additional costs related to the project of $298,116 had been incurred and paid for.
Due to a builder’s design change during construction of the ethanol plant an extra beerwell was installed and remains the property of the design/builder. The Company has the option to purchase the beerwell as part of the expansion option in the original design/build agreement. If the Company does not elect to exercise the expansion option the purchase price will be negotiated at that time. On May 10, 2006, an agreement was reached on a purchase price of $1,800,000 for the additional beerwell. This amount has been paid for in full as of June 30, 2006.
The Company has issued purchase orders in the amount of $1,145,803 for planned capital expenditures.
The following is a schedule of the annual commitments related to the above agreements.
15
EAST KANSAS AGRI-ENERGY, LLC
NOTES TO UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2006
12 months ending June 30, | |
2007 | | $ | 663,275 | |
2008 | | 654,108 | |
2009 | | 654,108 | |
2010 | | 546,775 | |
2011 | | 332,108 | |
Thereafter | | 1,276,413 | |
| | $ | 4,126,787 | |
The Company is involved in various claims arising in the normal course of business. Management believes that any financial responsibility that may be incurred would not be material and therefore no additional accrual is deemed necessary.
NOTE 9 - SALE / LEASEBACK TRANSACTION
On December 20, 2005, the Company completed an industrial revenue bond financing with the City of Garnett, Kansas that will provide property tax savings for 10 years on the plant site. As part of the financing, title to the plant site and improvements have been transferred to the City of Garnett, Kansas, as security for the repayment of the bonds, and the Company is leasing back the site in an amount that is equal to the amount of the principal and interest to be paid on The City of Garnett, Kansas bonds. Home Federal Savings Bank consented to this transaction, and the bonds have been pledged to Home Federal Savings Bank as security for any obligations under the Home Federal Savings Bank Credit Agreement. As part of the financing, the Company paid the bond underwriter, Gilmore & Bell, P.C. $40,000. The maximum principal amount of the bonds is $50,000,000. The bonds were initially issued in the principal amount of $47,866,117, which is the amount of the Company’s expenditures on the plant as of December 20, 2005. Additional project costs of $2,133,883 are planned and are expected to be eligible for submission for the bond trustee for additional bond issuances.
The $40,000 of financing fees paid to the bond underwriter and $20,656 of legal and other cost associated with the bond closing will be amortized over the approximately 10.5 year life of the bonds. A total of $2,867 of amortization expense related to these costs was recognized during the period ended June 30, 2006.
From the proceeds of the bond, the Company purchased the bonds as an investment. The Company, as holder of the industrial revenue bonds, is due interest at 8.0% per annum with interest payable semi-annually on June 1st and December 1st, commencing June 1, 2006. The interest income is directly offset by the lease payments on the plant. Both the bond and the corresponding lease have terms commencing December 20, 2005 and terminating on June 1, 2016. The entire outstanding principal is due upon termination of the bonds. The outstanding principal at June 30, 2006 was $47,866,117. The lease qualifies as a capital lease. Interest income recognized on the Industrial Revenue Bonds for the period ended June 30, 2006 was $1,727,552. This amount is equal to the lease expense of the plant.
Future debt service requirements on the Industrial Revenue Bonds at June 30, 2006 are as follows:
16
EAST KANSAS AGRI-ENERGY, LLC
NOTES TO UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2006
12 months ending June 30, | | | | Interest Rate | | Principal | | Interest | | Total | |
| | | | | | | | | |
2007 | | 8% | | $ | — | | $ | 3,829,289 | | $ | 3,829,289 | |
2008 | | 8% | | — | | 3,829,289 | | 3,829,289 | |
2009 | | 8% | | — | | 3,829,289 | | 3,829,289 | |
2010 | | 8% | | — | | 3,829,289 | | 3,829,289 | |
2011 | | 8% | | — | | 3,829,289 | | 3,829,289 | |
Thereafter | | 8% | | 47,866,117 | | 19,146,449 | | 67,012,566 | |
Totals | | | | $ | 47,866,117 | | $ | 38,292,894 | | $ | 86,159,011 | |
Amount representing interest | | | | | | | | (38,292,894 | ) |
Long-Term Obligation | | | | | | | | $ | 47,866,117 | |
NOTE 10 — RETIREMENT PLAN
During 2005, the Company began a SIMPLE 401(k), Savings Incentive Match Plan for Employees, retirement plan for all eligible employees. All employees are eligible to participate in the plan. The Company makes a matching contribution of 3% of participants’ eligible wages. The employees are fully vested upon contribution to the plan. The Company match for the periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 was $20,585 and $0, respectively.
NOTE 11 — SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On July 28, 2006, the Company paid the full amount of the accrued dividend totaling $4,292,008.
17
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS AND PLAN OF OPERATION.
We prepared the following discussion and analysis to help you better understand our financial condition, changes in our financial condition, and results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006. This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes to financial statements included elsewhere in this report and the information contained in our annual report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005. Since we only became operational in June 2005, we do not have comparable income, production and sales data for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2005. Accordingly, we do not provide a comparison of our financial results between reporting periods in this report. If you undertake your own comparison of three months and six months ending June 30, 2005 and the three months and six months ending June 30, 2006, it is important that you keep that in mind.
Forward Looking Statements
This report contains or incorporates by reference “forward-looking statements” that involve future events, our future performance and our expected future operations and actions. In some cases you can identify forward-looking statements by the use of words such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “expect,” “plan,” “future,” “intend,” “could,” “estimate,” “predict,” “hope,” “potential,” “continue,” or the negative of these terms or other similar expressions. These forward-looking statements are only our predictions and involve numerous assumptions, risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to those described in the “Risk Factors” section of our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB, those listed below and those business risks and factors described elsewhere in this report and our other Securities and Exchange Commission filings.
· | | Projected growth, overcapacity or contraction in the ethanol market in which we operate; |
· | | Fluctuations in the price and market for ethanol and distillers grains; |
· | | Changes in plant production capacity, variations actual ethanol and distillers grains production from expectations or technical difficulties in operating the plant; |
· | | Availability and costs of products and raw materials, particularly corn and natural gas; |
· | | Changes in our business strategy, capital improvements or development plans for expanding, maintaining or contracting our presence in the ethanol market in which we operate; |
· | | Our ability to market and our reliance on third parties to market our products; |
· | | Our ability to distinguish ourselves from our current and future competition; |
· | | Changes in or elimination of governmental laws, tariffs, trade or other controls or enforcement practices such as: |
| | - | | national, state or local energy policy; |
| | - | | federal ethanol tax incentives; |
| | - | | legislation mandating the use of ethanol or other oxygenate additives; |
| | - | | state and federal regulation restricting or banning the use of MTBE; or |
| | - | | environmental laws and regulations that apply to our plant operations and their enforcement; |
· | | Increased competition in the ethanol and oil industries; |
· | | Fluctuations in US oil consumption and petroleum prices; |
· | | Changes in plant production capacity or technical difficulties in operating the plant; |
· | | Changes in general economic conditions or the occurrence of certain events causing an economic impact in the agriculture, oil or automobile industries; |
· | | Anticipated trends in our financial condition and results of operations |
· | | Changes and advances in ethanol production technology; and |
· | | Competition from alternative fuels and alternative fuel additives. |
Our actual results or actions could and likely will differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements for many reasons, including the reasons described in this report. We are not under any duty to update the forward-looking statements contained in this report. We cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. We caution you not to put undue reliance on any forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this report. You should read this report and the documents that we reference in this report and have filed as exhibits, completely and with the understanding that our actual future results may be materially different from what we currently expect. We qualify all of our forward-looking statements by these cautionary statements.
18
Overview
Since June 2005, we have been engaged in the production of ethanol and distillers grains. Our ethanol plant is managed by United Bio Energy Management, LLC, an affiliate of US BioEnergy Corporation of Brookings, South Dakota, which builds and operates biofuel production facilities which may be in competition with our plant. We purchase all of our corn and milo from United Bio Ingredients, LLC, another affiliate of US BioEnergy Corporation. Our revenues are derived from the sale and distribution of our ethanol and distillers grains, which are sold to United Bio Energy Fuels, LLC (also an affiliate of US BioEnergy Corporation) and United Bio Energy Ingredients, LLC, respectively, which subsequently markets and sells our products. The principal markets for our ethanol are regional petroleum terminals located in major population centers in Kansas and neighboring states, including such cities as Kansas City, Missouri; Wichita, Kansas; Tulsa, Oklahoma; and St. Louis, Missouri.
Our operating results are largely driven by the prices at which we sell ethanol and distillers grain and the costs related to their production. Historically, the price of ethanol has fluctuated with the price of petroleum-based products such as unleaded gasoline, heating oil, and crude oil. The price of distillers grains is primarily influenced the price of corn as a substitute livestock feed. We expect these price relationships to continue for the foreseeable future.
Our largest costs of production are corn, natural gas, and manufacturing chemicals. The cost of corn is largely impacted by geopolitical supply and demand factors. Natural gas and chemical/denaturant pricing levels are tied directly to the overall energy sector; crude oil, and unleaded gasoline.
Results of Operations
The following table shows the results of our operations and the percentage of revenues, cost of goods sold, operating expenses and other items to total revenues in our statements of operations for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2006:
Income Statement Data | | | | Amount | | % of Revenues | |
| | | | | |
Revenues | | $ | 23,529,722 | | 100 | % |
Cost of Sales | | $ | 13,506,556 | | 58 | % |
Gross Profit | | $ | 10,023,166 | | 42 | % |
| | | | | |
Operating Expenses | | $ | 792,217 | | 3 | % |
Operating Income | | $ | 9,230,949 | | 39 | % |
| | | | | |
Other Income (Expense) | | $ | (521,073 | ) | (2 | )% |
Net Income | | $ | 8,709,876 | | 37 | % |
Revenues. Our revenues from operations come from three primary sources: ethanol sales, distillers grain sales and ethanol incentive payments from federal and state governments. For the three months ended June 30, 2006 our total revenues were $23,529,722. The following table shows the sources of our revenue:
Revenue Sources | | | | Amount | | % of Total Revenue | |
| | | | | |
Ethanol Sales | | $ | 21,163,142 | | 90 | % |
Distillers Grain Sales | | $ | 2,114,373 | | 9 | % |
Ethanol Incentive Payments - Federal | | $ | 252,207 | | 1 | % |
Ethanol Incentive Payments - State | | -0- | | 0 | % |
Total Revenues | | $ | 23,529,722 | | 100 | % |
19
Ethanol prices remained high during the second quarter of 2006. We believe the favorable prices resulted from higher gasoline prices which encourages voluntary blending, the growing recognition of ethanol as an alternative energy source, and the unmet demand. Based on existing market conditions, we expect favorable pricing to continue through the third fiscal quarter because the price of unleaded gasoline is expected to remain near its current price levels as we finish the summer driving season.
Income from the United States Department of Agriculture’s Commodity Credit Corporation Bioenergy Program is significantly less than the amount we are eligible for based on our production. We expect minimal payments from this program in 2006 because of increased participation by ethanol producers, decreased funding, and a termination of the program on June 30, 2006. We do not expect any further payments from this program in 2006 due to termination of the program on June 30, 2006.
We also derive income from the State of Kansas through the Kansas Qualified Agricultural Ethyl Alcohol Producer’s Program. We have received the maximum reimbursement for the state’s 2006 fiscal year, but will be eligible for incentives beginning with our quarter ending September 30, 2006. We are not expecting more than minimal payments under this program.
Cost of Sales. Cost of sales for our products for the three months ended June 30, 2006 was $13,506,556 or 58% of our revenue.
Operating Expenses. Operating expenses for three months ended June 30, 2006 were equal to 3% of our revenue and totaled $792,217. We expect that these expenses will remain constant and keep in line with sales and production.
Net Income. Net income was 37% of revenues for the quarter ending June 30, 2006. Net income for the quarter was $8,709,876.
Other Income (Expense). Other income and expense for the three month period ending June 30, 2006 consisted of an expense of $521,073. Interest expense is the primary expense in this category.
Changes in Financial Condition for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2006
The following table highlights the changes in our financial condition for the three months ended June 30, 2006:
| | June 30, 2006 | | December 31, 2005 | |
Current Assets | | $ | 13,904,091 | | $ | 9,766,098 | |
Current Liabilities | | $ | 7,814,864 | | $ | 4,428,030 | |
Long-Term Debt | | $ | 20,927,696 | | $ | 23,438,059 | |
Members’ Equity | | $ | 34,381,932 | | $ | 28,127,175 | |
Current Assets. Current assets totaled $13,904,091 at June 30, 2006 up from $9,766,098 at December 31, 2005. The change resulted from increased Cash and Cash Equivalents which was $7,174,290 at June 30, 2006 compared to $4,569,145 at December 31, 2005. We were accumulating cash in anticipation of a distribution of earnings to our members. In addition, our trade accounts receivable increased to $3,942,201 at June 30, 2006 compared to $2,651,546 at December 31, 2005 and our interest receivable decreased to $312,342 from $412,173 for the same periods respectively.
Current Liabilities. Current liabilities totaled $7,814,864 at June 30, 2006, up from the $4,428,030 at December 31, 2005. This change is largely due to a dividend accrued but not paid at June 30, 2006 in the amount of $4,292,008, a decrease in the current portion of long-term debt which totaled $1,689,662 at June 30, 2006 down from $2,615,813 at December 31, 2005 and a decrease in related parties accounts payable which was $409,407 and $813,775 for the same periods. .
Long-Term Debt. Long-term debt, net of current maturities, totaled $20,927,696 at June 30, 2006, down from $23,438,059 at December 31, 2006, due to our regularly scheduled loan payments, reductions to the principal
20
amounts due to the free flow cash covenants of our credit agreement and a reduction required when we renegotiated our Master Credit Agreement with our Bank.
Members’ Equity. The members’ contributions are $24,707,100. Retained earnings as of June 30, 2006 is $13,474,832 compared to $3,420,075 at December 31, 2005. Total members’ equity as of June 30, 2006, is $34,381,932 up from $28,127,175 at December 31, 2006.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our liquidity needs are primarily met through internally generated cash flow. Our primary uses of cash are cost of sales, operating expenses, debt service and capital expenditures. The following table shows cash flows for the three months ended June 30, 2006:
| | June 30, 2006 | |
Net cash from operating activities | | $ | 14,434,470 | |
Net cash used for investing activities | | $ | (3,758,304 | ) |
Net cash used for financing activities | | $ | (8,071,021 | ) |
Cash Flow From Operations. Our operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2006, generated $14,434,470 of net cash flow, which included energy production credits from state and federal programs, as discussed above. The net cash from operating activities primarily includes net income from operations adjusted for depreciation and amortization of $1,582,134.
The loan agreement with our Home Federal Savings Bank limits distributions to our members; except we may distribute up to 50% of our net income if our lender has received audited financial statements for the fiscal year demonstrating our compliance with all financial ratio requirements and loan covenants before and after any distributions to the members. We take all of these factors into consideration, in addition to our anticipated cash requirements for future operations, in evaluating the propriety of any future distributions to members.
Cash Flow Used For Investing Activities. We used $3,758,304 of cash for investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2006, all of which was used to purchase personal property and equipment for the plant. Most of the equipment purchases are for infrastructure improvements to optimize the performance of our facility.
Due to a builder’s design change during construction of the ethanol plant, an extra beerwell was installed at the plant which remained the property of ICM, Inc. On May 10, 2006, we agreed to purchase the beerwell for $1,800,000. Including the purchase of the beerwell, we estimate that approximately $6 million in capital expenditures will be made in the next twelve months, all of which are expected to be financed from a portion of cash flows from operations or from cash provided through a revolving credit agreement with Home Federal Savings Bank.
Cash Flow Used For Financing Activities. By far, the largest use of cash during the three months ended June 30, 2006 was our financing activities, which used $8,071,021 of cash from our debt financing transactions, described below.
Long-Term Debt. Our long term debt consists of two term loans with Home Federal Savings Bank of Rochester, Minnesota: (1) a $21,000,000 conventional term loan (“Loan A”), and (2) a $5,000,000 term loan (“Loan B”). As of June 30, 2006, the principal balance on Loan A was $17,546,477 and the principal balance on the Loan B was $4,204,960. At June 30, 2006, the effective interest rate for both loans was 8.25%.
On June 10, 2006, we entered into a Master Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, First Supplement to the Master Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, Second Supplement to the Master Amended and Restated Credit Agreement and Third Amendment to Future Advance Mortgage with Home Federal Savings Bank (together, the “Amended Credit Agreements”). Under the Amended Credit Agreements, our effective interest rate on our existing Term Loan A and Term Loan B is reduced to prime, as adjusted quarterly. Under the prior credit agreement, interest on Term Loan A accrued at a variable rate equal to prime plus 1.75% with a floor of 6% and on Term Loan B at prime plus 1.75%. The Amended Credit Agreements also provide for a $4,000,000 revolving credit line. The
21
revolving credit line carries an interest rate of prime, as adjusted quarterly. The term revolving loan available credit balance will be reduced by $400,000 annually beginning December 31, 2007 and matures on October 1, 2010.
In connection with this the Amended Credit Agreements, we were required to pay down the principal amount outstanding on Term Loan A and Term Loan B to $4,250,000 and $17,750,000, respectively. In addition, we paid a $5,000 origination fee for the revolving credit line. The Amended Credit Agreements are subject to the same terms and conditions of our previous Credit Agreement dated November 23, 2004 with Home Federal Savings Bank, including the specific provisions regarding distributions to members, maintenance of deposit accounts, annual capital expenditures, certain financial loan covenants, pre-payment penalties, events of default and the granting of liens to secure our performance. We will also be prohibited from making distributions to our members, however, we will be allowed to distribute 50% of our net income to our members after our lender has received audited financial statements for the fiscal year. We must be in compliance with all financial ratio requirements and loan covenants before and after any distributions to the members. In the event of default, Home Federal Savings Bank may accelerate the due date of the loans and declare all obligations immediately due and payable.
Industrial Revenue Bonds. On December 20, 2005, we completed an industrial revenue bond financing with the City of Garnett, Kansas, which we expect to provide property tax savings for 10 years on the plant site. As part of the financing, title to the plant site and improvements have been transferred to the City of Garnett, Kansas, as security for the repayment of the bonds, and we are leasing back the site in an amount that is equal to the amount of the principal and interest to be paid on the bonds (the “sale-leaseback transaction”). We purchased all of the Bonds offered by the City of Garnett. Home Federal Savings Bank consented to the sale-leaseback transaction, and the bonds have been pledged to Home Federal Savings Bank as security for our obligations under the term debt credit facility. The maximum principal amount of the bonds is $50,000,000, of which $47,866,117 has been issued. Both the bonds and the corresponding lease have terms of 10 years. The interest income due to us as holder of the bonds is directly offset by the lease payments we owe on the plant. Both the bond and the corresponding lease have 10-year terms commencing December 20, 2005. The entire outstanding principal is due upon termination of the bonds. The outstanding principal at June 30, 2006 was $47,866,117.
Waste Water Bond Financing. We financed our waste water reuse facility through two bond issues by the City of Garnett - Utility System Revenue Bonds (“USR Bonds”) and Community Development Block Grant Bonds (“CDBG Bonds”). The USR Bonds require annual principal payments beginning on October 1, 2006 and continue through 2015. Interest payments on these bonds are due semi-annually beginning April 1, 2006, at interest rates ranging from 4.6% to 5.2%. The CDBG Bonds require semi-annual principal and interest payments beginning on July 1, 2006 and continue through 2015, at a fixed interest rate of 2%.
Distribution to Unit Holders
On June 10, 2006 our board of directors approved a total cash distribution of $196.00 per membership unit to all unit holders of record as of June 10, 2006 for a total distribution of $4,292,008. This distribution was paid on July 28, 2006. We expect that this distribution will not affect our ability to maintain financial covenants and meet operating costs.
Commodity Price Risk Protection
We seek to minimize the risks from price fluctuations in the prices of raw material inputs and finished products through the use of hedging instruments. We are using non-hedge derivative accounting for our hedge positions, which means as the current market price of our hedge positions changes, the gains and losses are immediately recognized in our cost of sales. The immediate recognition of hedging gains and losses under fair value accounting can cause net income to be volatile from quarter to quarter due to the timing of the change in value of the derivative instruments relative to the cost and use of the commodity being hedged. As of June 30, 2006, the fair value of our derivative instruments relating to corn are reflected as an asset in the amount of $327,656.
As of June 30, 2006, we have price protection in place for approximately 40% of our corn needs through December 2006. As we move forward, additional protection may be necessary. As corn prices move in reaction to market trends and information, our income statement will be affected depending on the impact such market movements have on the value of our derivative instruments. Depending on market movements, crop prospects and
22
weather, these price protection positions may cause immediate adverse effects, but are expected to produce long-term positive growth for East Kansas.
As of June 30, 2006, we currently have no price protection in place for our natural gas needs in fiscal year 2006. As we move forward in fiscal year 2006, we may determine that price protection for natural gas purchases is necessary to attempt to reduce our susceptibility to price increases. However, we may not be able to secure natural gas for prices less than current market price and we may not recover high costs of production resulting from high natural gas prices, which may raise our costs of production and reduce our net income.
Application of Critical Accounting Estimates
There were no material changes in our accounting estimates during the six months ended June 30, 2006.
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements.
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements other than those described in the notes to our Financial Statements at June 30, 2006 located above in Note 4, describing our unit purchase and redemption transaction with ICM, Inc. and Fagen, Inc., and Note 9, describing the sale-leaseback transaction with the City of Garnett.
ITEM 3. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. These disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that the information required to be disclosed is accumulated and communicated to management, including our Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and General Manager, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, the Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and General Manager recognize that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management is necessarily required to apply judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and objectives.
Our management (including the Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and General Manager) has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)), as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB. Based on such evaluation, The Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and General Manager have agreed that, as of the end of such period, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in recording, processing, summarizing and reporting, on a timely basis, information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act.
Our management (including the Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and General Manager) has reviewed and evaluated any changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred as of June 30, 2006 and there has been no change that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.
None.
23
ITEM IA. RISK FACTORS.
There have been no material changes from the factors discussed in Part I, “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005. In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or future results. The risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB are not the only risks facing us. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or operating results.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.
Repurchases of Equity Securities
The following is a breakdown of the units repurchased during the period:
Period | | Total Number of Units Purchased(1) | | Average Price Paid per Unit | | Total Units Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs(2) | | Max. Units that May Yet be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs(2) | |
May 11, 2006 | | 1,900 | | $ | 2,000 | | 0 | | 0 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
1) Redemption of all 1,900 units held by Energy Investors, LLC at a total redemption price of $3,800,000.
(2) We do not have any plans or programs to repurchase units.
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES.
None.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.
We held our 2006 annual members meeting on Saturday, June 10, 2006 for the purpose of electing directors. Votes were solicited in person and by proxy. Pursuant to our Amended and Restated Operating Agreement, as amended, eleven (11) director positions were open. We had sixteen nominees for the vacant positions. The following persons were nominated and the eleven nominees receiving the greatest number of votes were elected to serve on our board of directors:
| | NUMBER OF VOTES FOR | |
William R. Pracht | | 14,587 | |
Daniel Guetterman | | 14,460 | |
Glenn A. Caldwell | | 14,425 | |
Scott A. Burkdoll | | 14,382 | |
Roger J. Brummel | | 14,203 | |
Jill A. Zimmerman | | 13,276 | |
Charles P. Torrey | | 12,643 | |
Steve Doering | | 12,038 | |
Daniel V. Morgan | | 11,516 | |
Scott Brittenham | | 11,031 | |
Donald S. Meats | | 11,014 | |
Walter Wulf | | 3,935 | |
Brad Foote | | 3,842 | |
John Burns | | 3,492 | |
Harold Wilmarth | | 2,120 | |
Byron C. Long | | 570 | |
For the matter on which votes were entitled to be cast, there were no abstentions or broker non-votes.
Pursuant to our operating agreement, prior to the annual meeting the board passed a resolution dividing the board into three (3) classes which will serve staggered terms as follows: four directors will serve one-year terms until 2007 (“Group I”), three directors will serve two-year terms until 2008 (“Group II”), and four directors will serve three-year terms until 2009 (“Group III”). At the first regular meeting of the Board of Directors following the 2006 Annual Meeting, the directors determined by resolution which director seats shall be classified as Group I, Group II or Group III directors. As a result the board will serve terms as follows:
24
DIRECTOR | | | | POSITION | | TERM ENDS |
Steve Doering | | Director | | 2007 |
Daniel V. Morgan | | Director | | 2007 |
Scott Brittenham | | Director | | 2007 |
Donald S. Meats | | Director | | 2007 |
Jill A. Zimmerman | | Director, Secretary | | 2008 |
Charles P. Torrey | | Director | | 2008 |
Daniel Guetterman | | Director | | 2008 |
William R. Pracht | | Director, Chairman | | 2009 |
Glenn A. Caldwell | | Director | | 2009 |
Scott A. Burkdoll | | Director, Vice-Chairman | | 2009 |
Roger J. Brummel | | Director | | 2009 |
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION.
None.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS.
The following exhibits are filed as part of this report. Exhibits previously filed are incorporated by reference, as noted.
Exhibit No. | | Exhibit | |
10.1 | | Master Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated June 10, 2006 by and between East Kansas Agri-Energy, LLC and Home Federal Savings Bank | |
| | | |
10.2 | | First Supplement to the Master Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated June 10, 2006 by and between East Kansas Agri-Energy, LLC and Home Federal Savings Bank | |
| | | |
10.3 | | Second Supplement to the Master Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated June 10, 2006 by and between East Kansas Agri-Energy, LLC and Home Federal Savings Bank | |
| | | |
10.4 | | Third Amendment to Future Advance Mortgage and Security Agreement dated June 10, 2006 by and between East Kansas Agri-Energy, LLC and Home Federal Savings Bank | |
| | | |
31.1 | | Certificate Pursuant to 17 CFR 240.13(a)-14(a) | |
| | | |
31.2 | | Certificate Pursuant to 17 CFR 240.13(a)-14(a) | |
| | | |
31.3 | | Certificate Pursuant to 17 CFR 240.13(a)-14(a) | |
| | | |
32.1 | | Certificate Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 | |
| | | |
32.2 | | Certificate Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 | |
| | | |
32.3 | | Certificate Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 | |
SIGNATURES
In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| EAST KANSAS AGRI-ENERGY, LLC |
| |
Date: August 11, 2006 | /s/ William R. Pracht |
| William R. Pracht |
| President (Principal Executive Officer) |
25
Date: August 11, 2006 | /s/ Thomas D. Leitnaker |
| Thomas D. Leitnaker |
| Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial & Accounting Officer) |
| |
Date: August 11, 2006 | /s/ Mike Goblirsch |
| Mike Goblirsch |
| General Manager |
26