Investments | 5. Investments The gross unrealized gains and losses on investments in fixed maturity securities, including redeemable preferred stocks that have characteristics of fixed maturities, and equity securities, including interests in mutual funds, and other invested assets were as follows for the periods indicated. As of March 31, 2016 Gross Unrealized Losses (3) Cost or Gross Non-OTTI OTTI Estimated Amortized Unrealized Unrealized Unrealized Fair Cost Gains Losses Losses (4) Value U.S. Treasury securities $ $ $ $ — $ Obligations of states and political subdivisions — Residential mortgage-backed securities (1) — Commercial mortgage-backed securities — Other asset-backed securities — Corporate and other securities — Subtotal, fixed maturity securities — Equity securities (2) — Other invested assets (5) — — — Totals $ $ $ $ — $ As of December 31, 2015 Gross Unrealized Losses (3) Cost or Gross Non-OTTI OTTI Estimated Amortized Unrealized Unrealized Unrealized Fair Cost Gains Losses Losses (4) Value U.S. Treasury securities $ $ — $ $ — $ Obligations of states and political subdivisions — Residential mortgage-backed securities (1) — Commercial mortgage-backed securities — Other asset-backed securities — Corporate and other securities — Subtotal, fixed maturity securities — Equity securities (2) — Other invested assets (5) — — — Totals $ $ $ $ — $ (1) Residential mortgage-backed securities consists primarily of obligations of U.S. Government agencies including collateralized mortgage obligations issued, guaranteed and/or insured by the following issuers: Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA), Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (FHLMC), Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA) and the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB). (2) Equity securities included interests in mutual funds held to fund the Company’s executive deferred compensation plan. (3) Our investment portfolio included 328 and 514 securities in an unrealized loss position at March 31 , 2016 and December 31 , 2015 , respectively. (4) Amounts in this column represent other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income. (5) Other invested assets are accounted for under the equity method which approximated fair value. The amortized cost and the estimated fair value of fixed maturity securities, by maturity, are shown below for the period indicated. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties. As of March 31, 2016 Amortized Estimated Cost Fair Value Due in one year or less $ $ Due after one year through five years Due after five years through ten years Due after ten years through twenty years Due after twenty years Asset-backed securities Totals $ $ The gross realized losses and gains on sales of investments were as follows for the periods indicated. Three Months Ended March 31, 2016 2015 Gross realized gains Fixed maturity securities $ $ Equity securities Gross realized losses Fixed maturity securities Equity securities Net realized (losses) gains on investments $ $ In the normal course of business, the Company enters into transactions involving various types of financial instruments, including investments in fixed maturities and equity securities. Investment transactions have credit exposure to the extent that a counter party may default on an obligation to the Company. Credit risk is a consequence of carrying, trading and investing in securities. To manage credit risk, the Company focuses on higher quality fixed income securities, reviews the credit strength of all companies in which it invests, limits its exposure in any one investment and monitors the portfolio quality, taking into account credit ratings assigned by recognized statistical rating organizations. The following tables as of March 31 , 2016 and December 31 , 2015 present the gross unrealized losses included in the Company’s investment portfolio and the fair value of those securities aggregated by investment category. The tables also present the length of time that they have been in a continuous unrealized loss position. As of March 31, 2016 Less than 12 Months 12 Months or More Total Estimated Unrealized Estimated Unrealized Estimated Unrealized Fair Value Losses Fair Value Losses Fair Value Losses U.S. Treasury securities $ $ $ — $ — $ $ Obligations of states and political subdivisions — — Residential mortgage-backed securities Commercial mortgage-backed securities — — Other asset-backed securities — — Corporate and other securities Subtotal, fixed maturity securities Equity securities Total temporarily impaired securities $ $ $ $ $ $ As of December 31, 2015 Less than 12 Months 12 Months or More Total Estimated Unrealized Estimated Unrealized Estimated Unrealized Fair Value Losses Fair Value Losses Fair Value Losses U.S. Treasury securities $ $ $ — $ — $ $ Obligations of states and political subdivisions Residential mortgage-backed securities Commercial mortgage-backed securities — — Other asset-backed securities — — Corporate and other securities Subtotal, fixed maturity securities Equity securities Total temporarily impaired securities $ $ $ $ $ $ Other-Than-Temporary Impairments ASC 320, Investments – Debt and Equity Securities requires entities to separate an OTTI of a debt security into two components when there are credit related losses associated with the impaired debt security for which the Company asserts that it does not have the intent to sell the security, and it is more likely than not that it will not be required to sell the security before recovery of its cost basis. Under ASC 320, the amount of the OTTI related to a credit loss is recognized in earnings, and the amount of the OTTI related to other factors is recorded as a component of other comprehensive income (loss). In instances where no credit loss exists but it is more likely than not that the Company will have to sell the debt security prior to the anticipated recovery, the decline in market value below amortized cost is recognized as an OTTI in earnings. In periods after the recognition of an OTTI on debt securities, the Company accounts for such securities as if they had been purchased on the measurement date of the OTTI at an amortized cost basis equal to the previous amortized cost basis less the OTTI recognized in earnings. For debt securities for which OTTI was recognized in earnings, the difference between the new amortized cost basis and the cash flows expected to be collected will be accreted or amortized into net investment income. The Company holds no subprime mortgage debt securities. All of the Company’s holdings in mortgage-backed securities are either U.S. Government or Agency guaranteed or are rated investment grade by either Moody’s or Standard & Poor’s. The unrealized losses in the Company’s fixed income and equity portfolio as of March 31 , 2016 were reviewed for potential other-than-temporary asset impairments. The Company held four debt securities at December 31 , 2015 with a material ( 20% or greater) unrealized loss for four or more consecutive quarters that additionally had certain qualitative factors that led to an impairment charge. As a result of our analysis, during the quarter ended March 31, 2016, the Company recognized OTTI of $292 which consisted entirely of credit losses related to fixed maturity securities. There was no OTTI related to fixed maturity securities during the quarter ended March 31, 2015. Specific qualitative analysis was also performed for any additional securities appearing on the Company’s “Watch List,” if any. Qualitative analysis considered such factors as the financial condition and the near term prospects of the issuer, whether the debtor is current on its contractually obligated interest and principal payments, changes to the rating of the security by a rating agency and the historical volatility of the fair value of the security. The qualitative analysis performed by the Company concluded that outside of the securities that were recognized through OTTI, the unrealized losses recorded on the investment portfolio at March 31 , 2016 resulted from fluctuations in market interest rates and other temporary market conditions as opposed to fundamental changes in the credit quality of the issuers of such securities. Therefore, decreases in fair values of the Company’s securities are viewed as being temporary. The following table summarizes the credit loss recognized in earnings related to fixed maturity securities. Three Months Ended March 31, 2016 2015 Credit losses on fixed maturity securities, beginning of period $ $ - Add: credit losses on OTTI not previously recognized - Less: credit losses on securities sold - Less: credit losses on securities impaired due to intent to sell - - Add: credit losses on previously impaired securities - - Less: increases in cash flows expected on previously impaired securities - - Credit losses on fixed maturity securities, end of period $ $ - At March 31 , 2016 and December 31 , 2015 , there were no amounts included in accumulated other comprehensive income related to securities which were considered by the Company to be other-than-temporarily impaired. Based upon the qualitative analysis performed, the Company’s decision to hold these securities, the Company’s current level of liquidity and our history of positive operating cash flows, management believes it is more likely than not that it will not be required to sell any of its securities before the anticipated recovery in the fair value to its amortized cost basis. Net Investment Income The components of net investment income were as follows: Three Months Ended March 31, 2016 2015 Interest on fixed maturity securities $ $ Dividends on equity securities Equity in earnings of other invested assets Interest on other assets Interest on cash and cash equivalents Total investment income Investment expenses Net investment income $ $ Fair Value Measurements ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosure provides a revised definition of fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands financial statement disclosure requirements for fair value information. Under ASC 820, fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants (an exit price). ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between inputs based on market data from independent sources (“observable inputs”) and a reporting entity’s internal assumptions based upon the best information available when external market data is limited or unavailable (“unobservable inputs”). The fair value hierarchy in ASC 820 prioritizes fair value measurements into three levels based on the nature of the inputs as follows: Level 1 — Valuations based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities; Level 2 — Valuations based on observable inputs that do not meet the criteria for Level 1, including quoted prices in inactive markets and quoted prices in active markets for similar, but not identical instruments; and Level 3 — Valuations based on unobservable inputs. Fair values for the Company’s fixed maturity securities are based on prices provided by its custodian bank and its investment managers. Both the Company’s custodian bank and investment managers use a variety of independent, nationally recognized pricing services to determine market valuations. If the pricing service cannot provide fair value determinations, the Company obtains non-binding price quotes from broker-dealers. A minimum of two quoted prices is obtained for the majority of the Company’s available-for-sale fixed maturity securities in its investment portfolio. The Company’s custodian bank is its primary provider of quoted prices from third-party pricing services and broker-dealers. To provide reasonable assurance of the validity of each price or quote, a secondary third-party pricing service or broker-dealer quote is obtained from the Company’s investment managers. An examination of the pricing data is then performed for each security. If the variance between the primary and secondary price quotes for a security is within an accepted tolerance level, the quoted price obtained from the Company’s custodian bank is used in the financial statements for the security. If the variance between the primary and secondary price quotes exceeds an accepted tolerance level, the Company obtains a quote from an alternative source, if possible, and documents and resolves any differences between the pricing sources. In addition, the Company may request that its investment managers and its traders provide input as to which vendor is providing prices that its traders believe are reflective of fair value for the security. Following this process, the Company may decide to value the security in its financial statements using the secondary or alternative source if it believes that pricing is more reflective of the security’s value than the primary pricing provided by its custodian bank. The Company analyzes market valuations received to verify reasonableness, to understand the key assumptions used and their sources, and to determine an appropriate ASC 820 fair value hierarchy level based upon trading activity and the observability of market inputs. Based on this evaluation and investment class analysis, each price is classified into Level 1, 2 or 3. Fair values of instruments are based on (i) quoted prices in active markets for identical assets (Level 1), (ii) quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active and model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs are observable in active markets (Level 2) or (iii) valuations derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs are unobservable in the marketplace (Level 3). The Company’s Level 1 securities consist of equity securities whose values are based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets. The Company’s Level 2 securities are comprised of available-for-sale fixed maturity securities whose fair value was determined using observable market inputs. The Company’s Level 3 securities consist of two investments; (1) a real estate investment trust equity investment whose fair value was determined using the trust’s net asset value obtained from its audited financial statements; however, the Company is required to submit a request 45 days before a quarter end to dispose of the security; and (2) an investment in the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston related to Safety Insurance Company’s membership stock, which is not redeemable in a short-term time frame. Fair values for securities for which quoted market prices were unavailable were estimated based upon reference to observable inputs such as benchmark interest rates, market comparables, and other relevant inputs. Investments valued using these inputs include U.S. Treasury securities, obligations of states and political subdivisions, corporate and other securities, commercial and residential mortgage-backed securities, and other asset-backed securities. Inputs into the fair value application that are utilized by asset class include but are not limited to: · Obligations of states and political subdivisions : overall credit quality, including assessments of market sectors and the level and variability of sources of payment such as general obligation, revenue or lease; credit support such as insurance, state or local economic and political base, prefunded and escrowed to maturity covenants. · Corporate and other securities : overall credit quality, the establishment of a risk adjusted credit spread over the applicable risk-free yield curve for discounted cash flow valuations; assessments of the level of industry economic sensitivity, company financial policies, indenture restrictive covenants, and/or security and collateral. · Residential mortgage-backed securities , U.S. agency pass-throughs, collateralized mortgage obligations (“CMOs”), non U.S. agency CMOs : estimates of prepayment speeds based upon historical prepayment rate trends, underlying collateral interest rates, original weighted average maturity, vintage year, borrower credit quality characteristics, interest rate and yield curve forecasts, U.S. government support programs, tax policies, and delinquency/default trends. · Commercial mortgage-backed securities : overall credit quality, including assessments of the level and variability of credit support and collateral type such as office, retail, or lodging, predictability of cash flows for the deal structure, prevailing economic market conditions. · Other asset-backed securities : overall credit quality, estimates of prepayment speeds based upon historical trends and characteristics of underlying loans, including assessments of the level and variability of collateral, revenue generating agreements, area licenses agreements, product sourcing agreements and equipment and property leases. · Real estate investment trust (“REIT”): net asset value per share derived from member ownership in capital venture to which a proportionate share of independently appraised net assets is attributed. · Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston (“FHLB-Boston”): value is equal to the cost of the member stock purchased. In order to ensure the fair value determination is representative of an exit price (consistent with ASC 820), the Company’s procedures for validating quotes or prices obtained from third parties include, but are not limited to, obtaining a minimum of two price quotes for each fixed maturity security if possible, as discussed above, the periodic testing of sales activity to determine if there are any significant differences between the market price used to value the security as of the balance sheet date and the sales price of the security for sales that occurred around the balance sheet date, and the periodic review of reports provided by its investment manager regarding those securities with ratings changes and securities placed on its “Watch List.” In addition, valuation techniques utilized by pricing services and prices obtained from external sources are reviewed by the Company’s external investment manager, whose investment professionals are familiar with the securities being priced and the markets in which they trade, to ensure the fair value determination is representative of an exit price (consistent with ASC 820). All unadjusted estimates of fair value for our fixed maturities priced by the pricing services as described above are included in the amounts disclosed in Level 2. With the exception of the REIT and FHLB-Boston securities, which are categorized as Level 3 securities, the Company’s entire available-for-sale portfolio was priced based upon quoted market prices or other observable inputs as of March 31 , 2016 . There were no significant changes to the valuation process during the three months ended March 31 , 2016 . As of March 31 , 2016 and December 31 , 2015 , no quotes or prices obtained were adjusted by management. All broker quotes obtained were non-binding. At March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 , investments in fixed maturities and equity securities classified as available-for-sale had a fair value which equaled carrying value of $ 1,202,385 and $ 1,191,841 , respectively. We have no short-term investments. The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents and investment income accrued approximated fair value. The following tables summarize the Company’s total fair value measurements for available-for-sale investments for the periods indicated. As of March 31, 2016 Total Level 1 Inputs Level 2 Inputs Level 3 Inputs U.S. Treasury securities $ $ — $ $ — Obligations of states and political subdivisions — — Residential mortgage-backed securities — — Commercial mortgage-backed securities — — Other asset-backed securities — — Corporate and other securities — — Equity securities — Total investment securities $ $ $ $ As of December 31, 2015 Total Level 1 Inputs Level 2 Inputs Level 3 Inputs U.S. Treasury securities $ $ — $ $ — Obligations of states and political subdivisions — — Residential mortgage-backed securities — — Commercial mortgage-backed securities — — Other asset-backed securities — — Corporate and other securities — — Equity securities — Total investment securities $ $ $ $ There were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 during the three months ended March 31, 2016 and the year ended December 31, 2015 . The following table summarizes the changes in the Company’s Level 3 fair value securities for the periods indicated. Three Months Ended March 31, 2016 2015 Level 3 Level 3 Fair Value Fair Value Securities Securities Balance at beginning of period $ Net gains and losses included in earnings — — Net gains included in other comprehensive income Purchases — — Sales — — Transfers into Level 3 — — Transfers out of Level 3 — — Balance at end of period $ $ Amount of total losses included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized losses related to assets still held at end of period $ — $ — Transfers in and out of Level 3 are attributable to changes in the ability to observe significant inputs in determining fair value exit pricing. As noted in the table above, no transfers were made in or out of Level 3 during the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 . The Company held two Level 3 securities at March 31 , 2016 and March 31 , 2015 . |