UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period endedJune 30, 2007
[ ] TRANSACTION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from ____________ to ___________
Commission File Number:333-117287
U.S. GEOTHERMAL INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Delaware | 84-1472231 |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of | (I.R.S. Employer |
Incorporation or Organization) | Identification No.) |
| |
1509 Tyrell Lane, Suite B | |
Boise, Idaho | 83706 |
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) | (Zip Code) |
208-424-1027
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for at least the past 90 days.
Yes [X] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-
accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer [ ] Accelerated filer [ ] Non-accelerated filer [X]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes [ ] No [X]
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common equity, as of
the latest practicable date.
Class of Equity | Shares Outstanding as of July 31, 2007 |
Common stock, par value | 53,364,695 |
$ 0.001 per share | |
U.S. Geothermal Inc. and Subsidiaries
Form 10-Q
For the Quarter Ended June 30, 2007
INDEX
Part I- Financial Information
Item 1 - Financial Statements
The financial statements included herein have been prepared by the Company, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles may have been condensed or omitted. However, in the opinion of management, all adjustments (which include only normal recurring accruals) necessary to present fairly the financial position and results of operations for the periods presented have been made. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes, and with the audited financial statements and notes to the financial statements included in the Company’s 10-K for the year ended, March 31, 2007. The results of operations for the three months ended June 30, 2007 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2008.
U.S. GEOTHERMAL INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2007
U.S. GEOTHERMAL INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Stated in U.S. Dollars)
| | Unaudited | | | | |
| | June 30, | | | March 31, | |
| | 2007 | | | 2007 | |
| | | | | | |
ASSETS | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Current | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 23,618,374 | | $ | 6,759,161 | |
Restricted cash | | 4,704,000 | | | 5,363,400 | |
Receivable from subsidiary | | 125,370 | | | 154,277 | |
Other current assets | | 46,195 | | | 27,706 | |
Total current assets | | 28,493,939 | | | 12,304,544 | |
| | | | | | |
Investment in subsidiary (note 2) | | 6,147,722 | | | 6,230,410 | |
Property, plant and equipment | | 5,312,684 | | | 4,138,386 | |
Total assets | $ | 39,954,345 | | $ | 22,673,340 | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
LIABILITIES | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Current: | | | | | | |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | $ | 921,888 | | $ | 1,446,952 | |
Related party accounts payable | | 10,311 | | | 9,510 | |
Total current liabilities | | 932,199 | | | 1,456,462 | |
Long-term: | | | | | | |
Stock compensation payable (note 2 and 6) | | 3,193,078 | | | 2,397,564 | |
Total liabilities | | 4,125,277 | | | 3,854,026 | |
| | | | | | |
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Capital stock | | | | | | |
Authorized: | | | | | | |
100,000,000 common shares with a $0.001 par value | | | | | | |
Issued and outstanding: | | | | | | |
53,192,612 shares at June 30, 2007 and | | | | | | |
43,810,512 shares at March 31, 2007 | | 53,193 | | | 43,811 | |
Additional paid-in capital | | 43,110,974 | | | 25,767,826 | |
Accumulated deficit before development stage | | (1,004,630 | ) | | (1,004,630 | ) |
Accumulated deficit during development stage | | (6,330,469 | ) | | (5,987,693 | ) |
Total stockholders’ equity | | 35,829,068 | | | 18,819,314 | |
| | | | | | |
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | $ | 39,954,345 | | $ | 22,673,340 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
-3-
U.S. GEOTHERMAL INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
(Stated in U.S. Dollars)
| | | | | | | | Unaudited | |
| | Unaudited | | | Unaudited | | | Cumulative Period | |
| | | | | | | | From February 26, | |
| | Three Months Ended June, | | | 2002 (Inception) to | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | June 30, 2007 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Revenue | $ | - | | $ | - | | $ | - | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Operating Expenses | | | | | | | | | |
Loss from investment in subsidiary | | 87,121 | | | - | | | 189,457 | |
Consulting fees | | 15,114 | | | 8,246 | | | 478,918 | |
Corporate admin and development | | 44,777 | | | 27,305 | | | 594,258 | |
Exploration expenditures | | - | | | - | | | 440,611 | |
Professional fees | | 159,547 | | | 213,068 | | | 1,786,548 | |
Management fees | | 13,570 | | | 12,328 | | | 340,318 | |
Salaries and wages | | 77,485 | | | 157,125 | | | 1,171,708 | |
Stock based compensation | | 159,382 | | | 438,659 | | | 1,910,545 | |
Travel and promotion | | 69,867 | | | 105,046 | | | 952,441 | |
Loss from Operations | | (626,863 | ) | | (961,777 | ) | | (7,864,804 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
Other Income | | | | | | | | | |
Foreign exchange gain | | 79,375 | | | 410,329 | | | 501,986 | |
Other income | | 13,545 | | | - | | | 103,751 | |
Interest income | | 191,167 | | | 178,962 | | | 928,598 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Net Loss | $ | (342,776 | ) | $ | (372,486 | ) | $ | (6,330,469 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Basic And Diluted Net Loss Per Share | $ | (0.01 | ) | $ | (0.01 | ) | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Weighted Average Number Of Shares | | | | | | | | | |
Outstanding for Basic and DilutedCalculations | | 46,534,927 | | | 43,283,844 | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) | | | | | | | | | |
Net loss for the period | $ | (342,776 | ) | $ | (372,486 | ) | $ | (6,330,469 | ) |
Foreign currency translation adjustment | | - | | | - | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total Comprehensive Loss | $ | (342,776 | ) | $ | (372,486 | ) | $ | (6,330,469 | ) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
-4-
U.S. GEOTHERMAL INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Stated in U.S. Dollars)
| | | | | | | | Unaudited | |
| | Unaudited | | | Unaudited | | | From February | |
| | | | | | | | 26, 2002 | |
| | Three Months Ended June, | | | (Inception) to | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | June 30, 2007 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Operating Activities: | | | | | | | | | |
Net loss | $ | (342,776 | ) | $ | (372,486 | ) | $ | (6,330,469 | ) |
Add non-cash items: | | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation | | 7,903 | | | 1,458 | | | 27,739 | |
Loss of operations of subsidiary | | 87,121 | | | - | | | 220,425 | |
Loss on disposal of equipment | | 12,375 | | | - | | | 12,375 | |
Stock based compensation | | 159,382 | | | 438,659 | | | 1,910,544 | |
Change in non-cash working capital items: | | | | | | | | | |
Accounts receivable, subsidiary | | 28,907 | | | - | | | (125,370 | ) |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | | (21,883 | ) | | 242,328 | | | 98,865 | |
Prepaid expenses & other | | (18,489 | ) | | (32,093 | ) | | (46,195 | ) |
Total cash used by operating activities | | (87,460 | ) | | 277,866 | | | (4,232,086 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
Investing Activities: | | | | | | | | | |
Purchases of property, plant and equipment | | (1,696,956 | ) | | (3,285,246 | ) | | (4,519,464 | ) |
Cash acquired in business combination | | - | | | - | | | 5,798 | |
Cash restricted under contract | | 659,400 | | | - | | | (4,704,000 | ) |
Investment in subsidiary | | (4,433 | ) | | - | | | (6,373,945 | ) |
Total cash used by investing activities | | (1,041,989 | ) | | (3,285,246 | ) | | (15,591,611 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
Financing Activities: | | | | | | | | | |
Issuance of share capital, net of share issue cost | | 17,988,662 | | | 19,983,281 | | | 43,442,071 | |
Total cash provided by financing activities | | 17,988,662 | | | 19,983,281 | | | 43,442,071 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Foreign Exchange Effect On Cash And Cash | | | | | | | | | |
Equivalents | | - | | | - | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Increase (Decrease) In Cash And Cash Equivalents | | 16,859,213 | | | 16,975,901 | | | 23,618,374 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Cash And Cash Equivalents, Beginning Of Period | | 6,759,161 | | | 196,499 | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Cash And Cash Equivalents, End Of Period | $ | 23,618,374 | | $ | 17,172,400 | | $ | 23,618,374 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
-5-
U.S. GEOTHERMAL INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (CONTINUED)
(Stated in U.S. Dollars)
| | | | | | | | Unaudited | |
| | Unaudited | | | Unaudited | | | From February 26, | |
| | Three Months Ended June, | | | 2002 (Inception) to | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | June 30, 2007 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Supplemental Disclosure: | | | | | | | | | |
Non-cash investing and financing activities | | | | | | | | | |
Shares issued for settlement of debt | | - | | | - | | $ | 173,639 | |
Shares issued with employment agreements | | - | | | - | | | 198,984 | |
Shares issued for geothermal property | | - | | | - | | | 77,350 | |
Purchase of property and equipment on account | $ | 502,380 | | | - | | | 2,169,048 | |
Warrants issued for share issue cost | | - | | | - | | | 158,778 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
-6-
U.S. GEOTHERMALINC.
(ADevelopment StageCompany)
CONSOLIDATEDSTATEMENT OFSTOCKHOLDERS’EQUITY(Continued)
FROMINCEPTION,FEBRUARY 26, 2002 TO JUNE 30, 2007
(Stated in U.S. Dollars)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ACCUM. | | | | | | | |
| NUMBER | | | | | | ADDITIONAL | | | CAPITAL | | | STOCK | | | OTHER | | | | | | | |
| OF | | | | | | PAID-IN | | | STOCK | | | PURCHASE | | | COMP. | | | ACCUM. | | | | |
| SHARES | | | AMOUNT | | | CAPITAL | | | ISSUABLE | | | WARRANTS | | | INCOME | | | DEFICIT | | | TOTAL | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Shares issued for cash at $0.015 per share – February 26, | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2002 | 2,600,000 | | $ | 2,600 | | $ | 37,400 | | $ | - | | $ | - | | $ | - | | $ | - | | $ | 40,000 | |
Shares and warrants issued for Geothermal property at | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$0.009 – March 5, 2002 | 1,895,000 | | | 1,895 | | | 15,105 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 17,000 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance, March 31, 2002 – U.S. Geothermal Inc. – Idaho | 4,495,000 | | | 4,495 | | | 52,505 | | | - | | | - | | | - | | | - | | | 57,000 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Shares issued for cash at $0.25 per share – May 28, 2002 | 395,000 | | | 395 | | | 98,355 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 98,750 | |
Shares issued for services at $0.25 per share – May 28, | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2002 | 5,000 | | | 5 | | | 1,245 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1,250 | |
Shares issued for cash at $0.30 per share – November 1, | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2002 | 1,023,667 | | | 1,024 | | | 306,076 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 307,100 | |
Shares issued for services at $0.30 per share – November | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1, 2002 | 10,000 | | | 10 | | | 2,990 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3,000 | |
Shares issued for services at $0.30 per share – February | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
14, 2003 | 151,170 | | | 151 | | | 45,199 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 45,350 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net loss for the period | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (164,909 | ) | | (164,909 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance carried forward, March 31, 2003 – U.S. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Geothermal Inc. – Idaho | 6,079,837 | | $ | 6,080 | | $ | 506,370 | | $ | - | | $ | - | | $ | - | | $ | (164,909 | ) | $ | 347,541 | |
-7-
U.S. GEOTHERMALINC.
(ADevelopment StageCompany)
CONSOLIDATEDSTATEMENT OFSTOCKHOLDERS’EQUITY(Continued)
FROMINCEPTION,FEBRUARY 26, 2002, TO JUNE 30, 2007
(Stated in U.S. Dollars)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ACCUM. | | | | | | | |
| NUMBER | | | | | | ADDITIONAL | | | CAPITAL | | | STOCK | | | OTHER | | | | | | | |
| OF | | | | | | PAID-IN | | | STOCK | | | PURCHASE | | | COMP. | | | ACCUM. | | | | |
| SHARES | | | AMOUNT | | | CAPITAL | | | ISSUABLE | | | WARRANTS | | | INCOME | | | DEFICIT | | | TOTAL | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance carried forward, March 31, 2003 – U.S. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Geothermal Inc. – Idaho | 6,079,837 | | $ | 6,080 | | $ | 506,370 | | $ | - | | $ | - | | $ | - | | $ | (164,909 | ) | $ | 347,541 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Consolidation adjustment to the number of shares issued | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
and outstanding as a result of the reverse take-over | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
transaction- U.S. Geothermal Inc.- Idaho; December | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
19, 2003 | (6,079,837 | ) | | (6,080 | ) | | 6,080 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - | |
Legal parent company shares issued and outstanding at | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
time of reverse take-over- U.S. Cobalt Inc.; December | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
19, 2003 | 2,274,616 | | | 2,275 | | | (2,275 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - | |
Shares issued for acquisition of U.S. Geothermal Inc.- | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Idaho | 6,939,992 | | | 6,940 | | | (6,940 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | (408,166 | ) | | (408,166 | ) |
Warrants issued for acquisition of U.S. Geothermal Inc.- | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Idaho | | | | | | | | | | | | | 629,256 | | | | | | (629,256 | ) | | - | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Shares and warrants issued for cash at a price of $0.45 per | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
share in a private placement, net of share issue costs of | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$75,122 paid in cash and $25,437 paid by issuance of | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
83,333 agent’s warrants- December 19, 2003 | 3,322,221 | | | 3,322 | | | 959,230 | | | | | | 457,326 | | | | | | | | | 1,419,878 | |
Shares and warrants issued for conversion of notes at | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$0.45 per share – February 20, 2004 | 385,864 | | | 386 | | | 123,090 | | | | | | 50,162 | | | | | | | | | 173,638 | |
Stock options granted | | | | | | | 296,081 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 296,081 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Foreign currency translation gain | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 35,792 | | | | | | 35,792 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net loss for the year | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (676,398 | ) | | (676,398 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance, March 31, 2004 | 12,922,693 | | $ | 12,923 | | $ | 1,881,636 | | $ | - | | $ | 1,136,744 | | $ | 35,792 | | $ | (1,878,729 | ) | $ | 1,188,366 | |
-8-
U.S. GEOTHERMAL INC.
(ADevelopment StageCompany)
CONSOLIDATEDSTATEMENT OFSTOCKHOLDERS’EQUITY(Continued)
FROMINCEPTION,FEBRUARY 26, 2002 TO JUNE 30, 2007
(Stated in U.S. Dollars)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ACCUM. | | | | | | | |
| NUMBER | | | | | | ADDITIONAL | | | CAPITAL | | | STOCK | | | OTHER | | | | | | | |
| OF | | | | | | PAID-IN | | | STOCK | | | PURCHASE | | | COMP. | | | ACCUM. | | | | |
| SHARES | | | AMOUNT | | | CAPITAL | | | ISSUABLE | | | WARRANTS | | | INCOME | | | DEFICIT | | | TOTAL | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance, March 31, 2004 | 12,922,693 | | $ | 12,923 | | $ | 1,881,636 | | $ | - | | $ | 1,136,744 | | $ | 35,792 | | $ | (1,878,729 | ) | $ | 1,188,366 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Shares and warrants issued for cash at a price of $0.66 in | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
a private placement, net of share issue costs of | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$225,131 paid in cash and $133,341 paid by the | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
issuance of 280,000 agent’s warrants- September 17, | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2004 | 4,000,001 | | | 4,000 | | | 1,103,082 | | | | | | 1,324,038 | | | | | | | | | 2,431,120 | |
Shares issued for property at a price of $0.60- February | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
22, 2005 | 100,000 | | | 100 | | | 60,251 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 60,351 | |
Shares issued for stock options exercised | 308,735 | | | 309 | | | 145,133 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 145,442 | |
Stock options granted | | | | | | | 295,540 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 295,540 | |
Foreign currency translation gain | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 129,470 | | | | | | 129,470 | |
Net loss for the year | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (1,830,421 | ) | | (1,830,421 | ) |
Balance, March 31, 2005 | 17,331,429 | | | 17,332 | | | 3,485,642 | | | - | | | 2,460,782 | | | 165,262 | | | (3,709,150 | ) | | 2,419,868 | |
Stock options granted | | | | | | | 180,780 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 180,780 | |
Expiration of stock purchase warrants | | | | | | | 1,061,145 | | | | | | (1,061,145 | ) | | | | | | | | - | |
Shares issued for stock options and warrants exercised | 812,415 | | | 812 | | | 526,753 | | | | | | (75,599 | ) | | | | | | | | 451,966 | |
Stock issued as result of employment agreements | 120,000 | | | 120 | | | 83,880 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 84,000 | |
Foreign currency translation loss | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (165,262 | ) | | 32,792 | | | (132,470 | ) |
Capital stock issuable as result of a private placement to | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
be closed April 3, 2006 | | | | | | | | | | 20,134,260 | | | | | | | | | | | | 20,134,260 | |
Stock compensation liability | | | | | | | (383,510 | ) | | | | | (1,324,038 | ) | | | | | | | | (1,707,548 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net loss for the year | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (1,523,385 | ) | | (1,523,385 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance, March 31, 2006 | 18,263,844 | | $ | 18,264 | | $ | 4,954,690 | | $ | 20,134,260 | | $ | - | | $ | - | | $ | (5,199,743 | ) | $ | 19,907,471 | |
-9-
U.S. GEOTHERMALINC.
(ADevelopment StageCompany)
CONSOLIDATEDSTATEMENT OFSTOCKHOLDERS’EQUITY(Continued)
FROMINCEPTION,FEBRUARY 26, 2002 TO JUNE 30, 2007
(Stated in U.S. Dollars)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ACCUM. | | | | | | | |
| NUMBER | | | | | | ADDITIONAL | | | CAPITAL | | | STOCK | | | OTHER | | | | | | | |
| OF | | | | | | PAID-IN | | | STOCK | | | PURCHASE | | | COMP. | | | ACCUM. | | | | |
| SHARES | | | AMOUNT | | | CAPITAL | | | ISSUABLE | | | WARRANTS | | | INCOME | | | DEFICIT | | | TOTAL | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance, March 31, 2006 | 18,263,844 | | $ | 18,264 | | $ | 4,954,690 | | $ | 20,134,260 | | $ | - | | $ | - | | $ | (5,199,743 | ) | $ | 19,907,471 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Stock issued as result of employment agreements | 49,168 | | | 49 | | | 65,331 | | | | | | | | | | | | 4 | | | 65,384 | |
Stock options granted | | | | | | | 978,772 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 978,772 | |
Shares issued for stock options and warrants | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
exercised | 497,500 | | | 498 | | | 487,595 | | | | | | (137,806 | ) | | | | | | | | 350,287 | |
Capital stock issued as result of a private | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
placement closed April 3, 2006 | 25,000,000 | | | 25,000 | | | 20,109,260 | | | (20,134,260 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | - | |
Stock purchase warrants expired | | | | | | | 1,186,232 | | | | | | (1,186,232 | ) | | | | | | | | - | |
Stock compensation liability | | | | | | | (2,014,054 | ) | | | | | 1,324,038 | | | | | | | | | (690,016 | ) |
Net loss for the period | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (1,792,584 | ) | | (1,792,584 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance, March 31, 2007 | 43,810,512 | | | 43,811 | | | 25,767,826 | | | - | | | - | | | - | | | (6,992,323 | ) | | 18,819,314 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Capital stock issued as result of a private | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
placement closed June 5, 2007 | 9,090,900 | | | 9,091 | | | 17,757,681 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 17,766,772 | |
Shares issued for stock options and warrants | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
exercised | 291,200 | | | 291 | | | 221,599 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 221,890 | |
Stock compensation liability | | | | | | | (636,132 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (636,132 | ) |
Net loss for the period | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (342,776 | ) | | (342,776 | ) |
Balance, June 30, 2007 (unaudited) | 53,192,612 | | $ | 53,193 | | $ | 43,110,974 | | $ | - | | $ | - | | $ | - | | $ | (7,335,099 | ) | $ | 35,829,068 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
-10-
U.S. GEOTHERMAL INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
(Unaudited – Prepared by Management)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2007
(Stated in U.S. Dollars)
NOTE 1 - ORGANIZATION AND DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
When U.S. Cobalt Inc. (“GTH” or the “Company”) completed a reverse take-over on December 19, 2003, the former stockholders of U.S. Geothermal Inc. (“GEO – Idaho”) a company incorporated on February 26, 2002 in the State of Idaho, acquired control of GTH. In connection with the transaction, U.S. Cobalt Inc. changed its name to U.S. Geothermal Inc. and consolidated its common stock on a one new to five old basis. All references to common shares in these financial statements have been restated to reflect the roll-back of common stock.
The Company has been in the development stage since its formation and has not yet realized any revenues from its planned operations. GEO - - Idaho operates for the purpose of acquiring geothermal properties and entered into an agreement with Vulcan Power Company (“Vulcan”) of Bend, Oregon, U.S.A., pursuant to which it acquired a 100% interest in the Raft River Geothermal Property located in Cassia County, Idaho, U.S.A. (Note 3).
Basis of Presentation
These consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The Company consolidates more-than-50% owned subsidiaries that it controls and entities over which control is achieved through means other than voting rights. These consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. The accounts of the following companies are consolidated in these financial statements:
| i) | U.S. Geothermal Inc. (incorporated in the State of Delaware); |
| ii) | U.S. Geothermal Inc. (incorporated in the State of Idaho); |
| iii) | U.S. Cobalt Inc. (incorporated in the State of Colorado); |
| iv) | U.S. Geothermal Services, LLC (incorporated in the State of Delaware). |
All Company transactions are eliminated on consolidation.
Raft River Energy I LLC was consolidated through July 2006, after which the entity is recorded under the equity method. See Consolidation of Variable Interest Entity in Note 2 for further discussion.
Reclassification
Certain amounts from prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. This reclassification has resulted in no changes to the Company’s accumulated deficit or net losses presented.
- 11 -
NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The following are summarized accounting policies considered to be significant by the Company’s management:
Accounting Method
The Company’s financial statements are prepared using the accrual basis of accounting in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and have been consistently applied in the preparation of the financial statements.
Development Stage Company
Pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 7, “Accounting and Reporting by Development Stage Enterprises” (SFAS 7), the Company is considered to be a development stage enterprise since its planned principal operations have not commenced. The various entities that comprised the Company prior to February 26, 2002 were not engaged in operations directly related to the development of geothermal power plants. After that time, the Company began its current and primary development activities, and accordingly, accounted for the accumulated deficit separately from the prior operations. The statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows present the accumulated activities from the inception of the current operating activities to present. This presentation will continue until the Company begins operations.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles requires the use of estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities known to exist as of the date the financial statements are published, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Uncertainties with respect to such estimates and assumptions are inherent in the preparation of the Company’s financial statements; accordingly, it is possible that the actual results could differ from these estimates and assumptions and could have a material effect on the reported amounts of the Company’s financial position and results of operations.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all unrestricted cash, short term deposits, and other investments with maturities of no more than ninety days when acquired to be cash and cash equivalents for the purposes of the statement of cash flows. Discussion regarding restricted cash is included in Notes 5 and 9. With the large value of funds invested in short term deposits, small variations in short term interest rates may materially affect the value of cash equivalents. Investments in government obligations accumulate higher interest, but the principal balance is not insured by the FDIC. All investments held by the Company are highly liquid, available on demand.
Concentration of Credit Risk
The Company’s cash and cash equivalents consisted of commercial bank deposits, a money market account, and petty cash. The money market funds totaled $28,096,690, and are not subject to deposit insurance. Cash deposits are held in a commercial bank in Boise, Idaho, and in a commercial bank in Vancouver, British Columbia. The accounts in Idaho are guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) up to $100,000. The Canadian dollar accounts in British Columbia are guaranteed by the Canadian Deposit Insurance Corporation (CIDC) up to $100,000 Canadian
- 12 -
(approximately $94,000 in U.S. dollars at June 30, 2007). At June 30, 2007, the Company exceeded the FDIC insured amount by approximately $68,987 and did not exceed the CIDC insured amount.
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities
The Company has a significant interest in a Raft River Energy I, LLC (RREI), which has been determined to be a variable interest entity as defined by FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) (FIN 46(R)). RREI’s purpose is to hold the financial interests of the first phase of the Raft River project for the construction of a 10 megawatt geothermal power plant. As described below, the Company’s interest changed during the current fiscal period from primary beneficiary to a significant interest.
RREI resulted from agreements signed August 9, 2006, between U.S. Geothermal Inc. and Raft River Holdings, LLC, a subsidiary of the Goldman Sachs Group, for construction financing of Phase I of the Raft River project. To accommodate the construction financing, U.S. Geothermal sold 50% of its ownership in Raft River Energy to Raft River Holdings. As a result of the agreements, U.S. Geothermal is required to contribute approximately $6,400,000 in cash and property, and Raft River Holdings is required to contribute $34,000,000 to Raft River Energy.
As of June 30, 2007, U.S. Geothermal Inc. has contributed $6,363,714 in cash and property to the project, while Raft River Holdings has contributed $30,993,100. As a result, Raft River Holdings has been designated the primary beneficiary.
For periods prior to August 2006, U.S. Geothermal was the 100% owner of RREI and consolidated the loss of $30,968. For the period August 2006 to March 2007, U.S. Geothermal recorded RREI under the equity method of accounting for investments in subsidiaries based on the capital contribution ratio at March 31, 2007 (loss of $102,336).
RREI’s latest audited financial information is summarized as follows:
As of November 24, 2006: | | | |
Total current assets | $ | 3,417,793 | |
Property and equipment | | 18,618,764 | |
Total assets | $ | 22,036,557 | |
| | | |
Total current liabilities | $ | 3,360,052 | |
Members’ equity | | 18,676,505 | |
Total liabilities and equity | $ | 22,036,557 | |
| | | |
From inception on August 18, 2005 to | | | |
November 24, 2006: | | | |
Operating revenues | $ | 0 | |
Operating loss | | (245,879 | ) |
Net loss | | (237,309 | ) |
Property, Plant and Equipment
Costs of acquisition of geothermal properties are capitalized on an area-of-interest basis. Geothermal properties include all direct costs for the acquisition of land rights, water rights and mineral rights. Amortization of these costs will be on a unit-of-production basis, based on estimated proven geothermal reserves should such reserves be found. If an area of interest is abandoned, the costs thereof are charged to income in the year of abandonment. With the inherent uncertainty of calculating the units of
- 13 -
production for a renewable resource, revisions to the estimates and the subsequent field performance of the resource would cause the life of the resource to differ significantly from the estimated units of production. A large percentage increase or decrease in the estimated reserves would decrease or increase the depreciation, depletion or amortization of capital costs proportionately.
The Company expenses all costs related to the development of geothermal reserves prior to the establishment of proven and probable reserves.
Depreciation will be based upon the estimated useful life of the asset. For assets directly related to revenue production defined by a specific contract, the estimated useful lives will not exceed the life of the contract. Depletion on wells and other assets directly involved in the extraction of the natural resources will be based upon the total estimated capacity on a unit of production basis. Units will be defined as gallons of geothermal water, processed through the plant, used directly in the production of revenues.
Other equipment is recorded at cost. Depreciation of other equipment is calculated on a straight-line basis at an annual rate of 30%.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144 “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets” (SFAS 144) establishes a single accounting model for long-lived assets to be disposed of by sale including discontinued operations. SFAS 144 requires that these long-lived assets be measured at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell, whether reported in continuing operations or discontinued operations. The Company has adopted SFAS 144 and evaluates its long-term assets annually for impairment or when circumstances or events occur that may impact the fair value of the assets. The fair value of geothermal property is primarily evaluated based upon the present value of expected revenues directly associated with those assets. An impairment loss would be recognized if the carrying amount of a capitalized asset is not recoverable and exceeds its fair value. As expected for the initial stages of the Company’s operations, circumstances have not warranted the recognition of losses due to the impairment of long-lived assets.
Stock Options Granted to Employees and Non-employees
On April 1, 2006, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment” (SFAS 123(R)), which requires the measurement of the value of employee services received in exchange for an award of an equity instrument based on the grant-date fair value of the award. For employees, directors and officers, the fair value of the awards are expensed over the vesting period. The current vesting period for all options is eighteen months.
Under SFAS 123(R), the Company has elected to use the modified prospective transition method, and accordingly, the Company’s consolidated financial statements for periods prior to adoption of SFAS 123(R) have not been restated to reflect, and do not include the impact of adopting.
For non-employee stock based compensation, the Company has adopted EITF Issue No. 96-18, “Accounting for Equity Instruments That Are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services” and EITF Issue No. 00-18, “Accounting Recognition for Certain Transactions involving Equity Instruments Granted to Other Than Employees.” Non-employee stock options have been granted, at the Board of Director’s discretion, to select vendors as a bonus for exceptional performance. Prior to issuance of the awards, the Company was not under any obligation to issue the stock options. Subsequent to the award, the recipient was not obligated to
- 14 -
perform any services. Therefore, the fair value of these options was expensed on the grant date which was also the measurement date.
Pursuant to the requirements to SFAS 123(R), the Company made certain reclassifications to its consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2006, to reflect the stock compensation liability that resulted from the issuance of stock options denominated in a foreign currency. The reclassification from shareholder equity to liabilities amounted to $1,707,548 at March 31, 2006. We account for stock-based compensation in accordance with SFAS No.123(R),Share-Based Payment. Under the fair value recognition provisions of this statement, share-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the value of the award and is recognized as expense over the vesting period. Determining the fair value of share-based awards at the grant date requires judgment, including estimating expected dividends. In addition, judgment is also required in estimating the amount of share-based awards that are expected to be forfeited. If actual results differ significantly from these estimates, stock-based compensation expense and our results of operations could be materially impacted.
Earnings Per Share
The Company has adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 128 “Earnings per Share” (SFAS 128), which provides for calculation of "basic" and "diluted" earnings per share. Basic earnings per share includes no dilution and is computed by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted average common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share reflect the potential dilution of securities that could share in the earnings of an entity similar to fully diluted earnings per share. Although there were common stock equivalents outstanding at June 30, 2007 and March 31, 2007, they were not included in the calculation of earnings per share because their inclusion would have been considered anti-dilutive.
Financial Instruments
The Company’s financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, refundable tax credits, and accounts payable and accrued liabilities. Unless otherwise noted, it is management’s opinion that the Company is not exposed to significant interest, currency or credit risks arising from these financial instruments. The fair values of these financial instruments approximate their carrying values, unless otherwise noted.
Refundable tax credit is comprised of Goods and Services Tax (“GST”) which is refundable from the Government of Canada and is included in other assets.
Foreign Currency Translation
The Company’s functional currency is the U.S. dollar. Transactions in foreign currency are converted into U.S. dollars using the current method as follows:
- Monetary items at the rate prevailing at the balance sheet date;
- Non-monetary items at the historical exchange rate;
- Revenue and expenses at the average rate in effect during the applicable accounting period.
Foreign Operations
The accompanying balance sheet contains certain recorded Company assets (principally cash) in a foreign country (Canada). Although Canada is considered economically stable, it is always possible that unanticipated events in foreign countries could disrupt the Company’s operations.
- 15 -
Provision for Taxes
Income taxes are provided based upon the liability method of accounting pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes” (SFAS 109). Under this approach, deferred income taxes are recorded to reflect the tax consequences in future years of differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their financial reporting amounts at each year-end. A valuation allowance is recorded against deferred tax assets if management does not believe the Company has met the “more likely than not” standard imposed by SFAS 109 to allow recognition of such an asset.
At June 30, 2007, the Company had net deferred tax assets calculated at an expected rate of 34% of approximately $2,295,000 (March 31, 2007 - $2,177,500) principally arising from net operating loss carry forwards and stock compensation. As management of the Company cannot determine that it is more likely than not that the Company will realize the benefit of the net deferred tax asset, a valuation allowance equal to the net deferred tax asset was recorded at June 30, 2007. The significant components of the deferred tax asset at June 30, 2007 and March 31, 2007 were as follows:
| | June 30, | | | March 31, | |
| | 2007 | | | 2007 | |
Estimated net operating loss carry forward | $ | 6,750,000 | | $ | 6,404,500 | |
| | | | | | |
Deferred tax asset | $ | 2,295,000 | | $ | 2,177,500 | |
Deferred tax asset valuation allowance | | (2,295,000 | ) | | (2,177,500 | ) |
Net deferred tax asset | $ | - | | $ | - | |
At June 30, 2007, the Company has net operating loss carry forwards of approximately $6,750,000 ($6,404,500 in March 31, 2007), which expire in the years 2023 through 2027. The change in the allowance account from March 31, 2007 to June 30, 2007 was $117,500.
Although we believe that our estimates are reasonable, no assurance can be given that the final tax outcome of these matters will not be different than that which is reflected in our tax provisions. Ultimately, the actual tax benefits to be realized will be based upon future taxable earnings levels, which are very difficult to predict.
Going Concern
Based on the Company’s projected spending over the next 12 months, the approximate $17.8 million in cash generated from the private placement completed June 5, 2007, and the Company’s other available resources obtained from prior issuance stock offerings; the Company’s auditors have removed the going concern qualification on the Company’s financial statements. Management believes that sufficient funding will be available to meet its business objectives, including anticipated cash needs for working capital, and financing for construction of the phase one power plant. As shown in the accompanying consolidated financial statements, the Company has incurred an accumulated deficit of $7,335,099 and has no revenue from operations. In the ordinary course of constructing a power plant facility of this size and complexity, cost overruns and contract delays can significantly affect the economics of the project. Failure to achieve commercial operations of the power plant prior to December 31, 2008 would jeopardize the production tax credit, and could materially affect the ability of U.S. Geothermal to operate as a going concern.
- 16 -
Accounting Pronouncements - Recent
The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities
In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (SFAS 159). This statement permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. The objective is to improve financial reporting by providing entities with the opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. This Statement is expected to expand the use of fair value measurement, which is consistent with the Board’s long-term measurement objectives for accounting for financial instruments. This Statement is effective as of the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2007, although early adoption is permitted. Management is currently evaluating the potential impact of the adoption of this statement on the financial position, results of operations and cash flows of the Company. Management has not elected early adoption of this statement.
Fair Value Measurements
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (SFAS 157). This statement defines fair value as used in numerous accounting pronouncements, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosure related to the use of fair value measures in financial statements. The statement is to be effective for financial statements issued in 2008; however, earlier application is encouraged. The Company is currently evaluating the timing of adoption and the impact that adoption might have on its financial position or results of operations.
NOTE 3 - REVERSE TAKE-OVER
Effective December 19, 2003, GTH acquired 100% of the issued and outstanding voting shares of GEO - Idaho by issuing 6,939,992 common shares and 2,420,217 share purchase warrants, of which 2,150,309 common shares and no share purchase warrants were held in escrow as at December 31, 2005 (as of March 31, 2005, 4,243,325 common shares and 1,946,937 share purchase warrants were held in escrow). Each share purchase warrant entitled the holder to purchase one additional common share at a price of $0.75 per share until December 19, 2005. As of December 31, 2005, the 2,420,217 stock purchase warrants noted above expired without exercise. Since the transaction resulted in the former shareholders of GEO - Idaho owning the majority of the issued shares of GTH, the transaction, which is referred to as a “reverse take-over”, has been treated for accounting purposes as an acquisition by GEO - Idaho of the net assets and liabilities of GTH. Under this purchase method of accounting, the results of operations of GTH are included in these financial statements from December 19, 2003. GEO - Idaho is deemed to be the purchaser for accounting purposes. Accordingly, its net assets are included in the balance sheet at their previously recorded values.
The Company determined that the share purchase warrants issued as part of the aforementioned transaction have a fair value of $629,256 as determined by using the Black-Scholes pricing model with the assumptions as stated in Note 6. The amount is considered to be additional consideration given to the former GEO - Idaho shareholders and, as such, was allocated, along with the net liabilities assumed of GTH, to accumulated deficit. The acquisition is summarized as follows:
| Current assets (including cash of $5,798) | $ | 11,616 | |
| Current liabilities | | (419,782 | ) |
| Net liabilities assumed | $ | (408,166 | ) |
- 17 -
The net liabilities assumed have been charged to accumulated deficit.
NOTE 4 - PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
During the quarter ended June 30, 2007, the Company incurred costs of $101,647 in the continued construction of Raft River Project phase I. The Company acquired additional geothermal rights for $1,015,102. An interconnection facility study was competed that amounted to $56,000. Vehicles and computer equipment utilized by the corporate administrative and the Raft River site offices were purchased for $21,827.
During the year ended March 31, 2007, the Company incurred an additional $12,084,849 in construction costs for Raft River Project phase I. These costs were primarily for the drilling of additional wells and the construction of the power plant and related infrastructure. Raft River Holdings reimbursed the Company for $4,917,100 in amounts associated with Raft River Energy phase I. As described in note 2, property (both geothermal property and construction in process) was transferred to Raft River Energy, in exchange Company’s interest in the subsidiary that amounted to $6,363,714. In addition to construction activities, the Company acquired 1,083 acres of surface rights in exchange for cash payments of $1,281,006 and 631 acre feet per annum in water rights for $138,820. Legal fees for $87,121 were incurred for the acquisition of mineral rights. The Company acquired access to 5,409 acres of surface, mineral and geothermal rights through a lease payment of $15,000. Vehicles, furniture and computer equipment utilized by the corporate administrative and the Raft River site offices were purchased for $102,800.
- 18 -
Property, plant and equipment consisted of the following at the dates shown:
| | | June 30, | | | March 31, | |
| | | 2007 | | | 2007 | |
| Geothermal Property (land and equipment) | | | | | | |
| Balance, beginning of period | $ | 1,816,115 | | $ | 775,079 | |
| Contributed to subsidiary | | - | | | (480,911 | ) |
| Acquisitions | | 1,071,102 | | | 1,521,947 | |
| Balance, end of period | | 2,887,217 | | | 1,816,115 | |
| | | | | | | |
| Construction in Process- Raft River Project | | | | | | |
| Balance, beginning of period | | 2,233,982 | | | 949,036 | |
| Contributed to subsidiary | | - | | | (5,882,803 | ) |
| Reimbursed by partner | | - | | | (4,917,100 | ) |
| Acquisitions | | 101,647 | | | 12,084,849 | |
| Balance, end of period | | 2,335,629 | | | 2,233,982 | |
| | | | | | | |
| Other Equipment | | | | | | |
| Balance, beginning of period | | 108,125 | | | 5,325 | |
| Acquisitions | | 21,827 | | | 102,800 | |
| Deletions | | (15,000 | ) | | - | |
| Balance, end of period | | 114,952 | | | 108,125 | |
| Less: Accumulated depreciation | | (25,114 | ) | | (19,836 | ) |
| Balance, end of period | | 89,838 | | | 88,289 | |
| | | | | | | |
| | $ | 5,312,684 | | $ | 4,138,386 | |
NOTE 5 - CAPITAL STOCK
The Company is authorized to issue 100,000,000 shares of common stock. All shares have equal voting rights, are non-assessable and have one vote per share. Voting rights are not cumulative and, therefore, the holders of more than 50% of the common stock could, if they choose to do so, elect all of the directors of the Company.
During the quarter ended June 30, 2007, the Company issued 291,200 common shares to officers, employees and consultants upon exercise of stock options at strike prices ranging from $0.60 CDN to $1.40 CDN.
On June 5, 2007, the Company completed a private placement of 9,090,900 common shares at a price of $2.20 CDN ($2.08 U.S. as of June 5, 2007). Proceeds, net of financing fees, totaled $17,766,772.
During the quarter ended March 31, 2007, the Company issued 62,500 common shares upon the exercise of 12,500 stock options, plus 50,000 broker compensation options at an exercise price of $1.00 CDN ($0.83 U.S.).
During the quarter ended December 31, 2006, the Company issued 72,741 shares to employees in satisfaction of employment agreements at an average price of $0.90, and 23,573 shares previously held in escrow were cancelled and returned to treasury.
- 19 -
During the quarter ended September 30, 2006, the Company issued 395,000 common shares upon the exercise of 280,000 stock purchase warrants at an exercise price of $0.85 CDN ($0.73 -$0.75 U.S.), the exercise of 15,000 stock purchase warrants at an exercise price of $1.25 CDN ($0.86 U.S.), and the exercise of 100,000 options at an exercise price of $0.60 CDN ($0.54 U.S.).
During the quarter ended June 30, 2006, the Company issued 40,000 common shares upon the exercise of 40,000 options at an exercise price of $0.60 CDN ($0.53 U.S.).
On April 3, 2006, the Company completed a private placement of 25,000,000 common shares at a price of $1.00 CDN ($0.86 U.S. as of April 3, 2006). Proceeds, net of financing fees, totaled $20,134,260. Of the net proceeds, $172,370 had been received in the Company’s bank accounts prior to year end. Since the subscription forms reflected a March 30, 2006 date, and the remainder of the cash of $19,961,890 was on deposit with Dundee Securities Corporation, the private placement was recorded as “Private placement proceeds receivable” and as “Capital Stock Issuable” in the financial statements at March 31, 2006.
NOTE 6 - STOCK BASED COMPENSATION
The Company’s stock option plan provides for the grant of incentive stock options for up to 4,381,051 common shares to employees, consultants, officers and directors of the Company. All terms and conditions of the options are the same for external parties as well as internal employees and directors. Options are granted for a term of up to five years from the date of grant. Stock options granted generally vest over a period of eighteen months, with no conditions precedent to vesting. Since the plan has been administered by the Company’s Vancouver office and Pacific Corporate Trust Company, the Company has issued stock options with an exercise price stated in Canadian dollars per share.
U.S. Geothermal and their Board of Directors have previously provided additional incentive to our United States (“U.S.A.”) employees and consultants by offering stock options at a discount off market price as allowed by the TSX Venture exchange. The U.S.A. legislature and the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) are now issuing regulations to dissuade companies from granting these discounted stock options. Through the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 and the Internal Revenue Code Section 409A, discounted stock options have now been classified as deferred compensation in which the “discount” is taxable at the date of vesting, instead of upon the date of exercise. They have also dictated that a 20% penalty on all discounts is to be paid at date of vesting. These new rules have been retroactively applied to all options vesting after January 1, 2005.
Since U.S. Geothermal stock options vest 25% on date of grant and 25% every six months thereafter, option holders would be subject to amending tax returns for prior years and paying tax and penalty on the value of the discount. These amendment and payments would be required whether or not the option holder exercises the options. The IRS is allowing option holders until December 31, 2007 to rectify the situation by allowing them to reprice the existing options to the market price on the date of option grant. As of March 31, 2007, the majority of our U.S.A. option holders have repriced their options to the market price on the date of grant. An adjustment to the fair market value of the repriced options was included in the stock compensation accrual for March 2007.
During the quarter ended March 31, 2007, the Company granted 235,000 stock options to consultants and employees exercisable at a price of $1.40 CDN ($1.24 U.S.) until January 22, 2012.
- 20 -
During the quarter ended September 30, 2006, the Company granted 170,000 stock options to consultants and employees exercisable at a price of $1.00 CDN ($0.89 U.S.) until July 31, 2011.
During the quarter ended June 30, 2006, the Company granted 1,763,000 stock options to consultants, employees, directors and officers exercisable at prices ranging from $0.85 to $1.00 CDN ($0.77 to $0.90 U.S.) until April 12, 2011.
The following table reflects the summary of stock options outstanding at June 30, 2007 and changes during the three months ended:
| | | | | Weighted | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Average | | | Weighted | | | Aggregate | |
| | Number of | | | Exercise | | | Average | | | Intrinsic | |
| | shares under | | | Price Per | | | Fair Value | | | Value | |
| | options | | | Share | | | (US $) | | | (US $) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance outstanding, March 31, 2006 | $ | 1,065,628 | | $ | 0.69 CDN | | $ | 0.37 | | $ | 399,146 | |
Forfeited | | (145,000 | ) | | 0.86 CDN | | | 0.62 | | | (90,487 | ) |
Exercised | | (152,500 | ) | | 0.63 CDN | | | 0.30 | | | (46,427 | ) |
Granted | | 2,168,000 | | | 1.05 CDN | | | 0.99 | | | 2,140,719 | |
Balance outstanding, March 31, 2007 | | 2,936,128 | | | 0.96 CDN | | | 0.82 | | | 2,402,951 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Forfeited | | - | | | - | | | - | | | - | |
Exercised | | (291,200 | ) | | 0.83 CDN | | | 0.44 | | | (128,209 | ) |
Granted | | - | | | - | | | - | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance outstanding, June 30, 2007 | | 2,644,928 | | $ | 0.98 CDN | | $ | 0.86 | | $ | 2,274,742 | |
The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model using the assumptions noted in the following table. Expected volatilities are based on historical volatility of the Company’s stock. The Company uses historical data to estimate option exercises and employee termination within the Black-Scholes model. The expected term of options granted represents the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding, based upon past experience and future estimates and includes data from the Plan. The risk-free rate for periods within the expected term of the option is based upon the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. The Company currently does not foresee the payment of dividends in the near term.
The fair value of the stock options granted was estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and is amortized over the vesting period of the underlying options. The weighted average fair value of options granted was $0.99 per share. The assumptions used to calculate the fair value are as follows:
| | Fiscal Years Ended | |
| 2007 | 2006 | 2005 |
| | | |
Dividend yield | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Expected volatility | 82-149% | 140% | 144-155% |
Risk free interest rate | 3.94-4.20% | 3.25% | 2.83-3.18% |
Expected life (years) | 3.36 | 3.00 | 3.06 |
Changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate and,
- 21 -
therefore, the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable measure of the fair value of the Company’s stock options.
The following table summarizes information about the stock options outstanding at June 30, 2007:
| OPTIONS OUTSTANDING | | OPTIONS EXERCISABLE |
| | | REMAINING | | |
| EXERCISE | NUMBER OF | CONTRACTUAL | | NUMBER OF |
| PRICE | SHARES | LIFE (YEARS) | | SHARES |
| | | | | |
| $ 0.60 CDN | 275,628 | 1.66 | | 275,628 |
| 0.72 CDN | 115,000 | 2.42 | | 115,000 |
| 0.85 CDN | 20,000 | 3.75 | | 15,000 |
| 0.90 CDN | 250,000 | 2.42 | | 250,000 |
| 1.00 CDN | 1,609,300 | 3.75 | | 1,205,425 |
| 1.15 CDN | 165,000 | 4.25 | | 82,500 |
| 1.40 CDN | 210,000 | 4.58 | | 33,750 |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| $ 0.98 CDN | 2,644,928 | 3.45 | | 1,977,303 |
The following table summarizes information about the stock options outstanding at March 31, 2007:
| OPTIONS OUTSTANDING | | OPTIONS EXERCISABLE |
| | | REMAINING | | |
| EXERCISE | NUMBER OF | CONTRACTUAL | | NUMBER OF |
| PRICE | SHARES | LIFE (YEARS) | | SHARES |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| $ 0.60 CDN | 355,628 | 1.91 | | 355,628 |
| 0.72 CDN | 197,500 | 2.67 | | 197,500 |
| 0.85 CDN | 20,000 | 4.00 | | 15,000 |
| 0.90 CDN | 347,500 | 2.67 | | 347,500 |
| 1.00 CDN | 1,615,500 | 4.00 | | 807,750 |
| 1.15 CDN | 165,000 | 4.50 | | 82,500 |
| 1.40 CDN | 235,000 | 4.83 | | 58,750 |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| $ 0.96 CDN | 2,936,128 | 3.59 | | 1,864,628 |
- 22 -
A summary of the status of the Company’s nonvested stock options for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007 and for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 are presented as follows:
| | | | | Weighted | | Weighted | |
| | | | | Average Grant | | Average | |
| | Number of | | | Date Fair Value | | Grant Date | |
| | Options | | | Per Share | | Fair Value | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Nonvested, March 31, 2006 | $ | 142,500 | | $ | 0.69 CDN | | $ | 0.37 | |
Granted | | 2,168,000 | | | 1.05 CDN | | | 0.99 | |
Vested | | (1,094,000 | ) | | 0.63 CDN | | | 0.30 | |
Forfeited | | (145,000 | ) | | 0.86 CDN | | | 0.62 | |
Nonvested, March 31, 2007 | | 1,071,500 | | | 0.96 CDN | | | 0.82 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Granted | | - | | | - | | | - | |
Vested | | (403,875 | ) | | 1.00 CDN | | | 0.68 | |
Forfeited | | - | | | - | | | - | |
Nonvested, June 30, 2007 | | 667,625 | | $ | 1.12 CDN | | $ | 1.10 | |
As of June 30, 2007, there was $216,819 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested share-based compensation arrangements granted under the Plan. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.5 years. The total fair value of shares vested during the year ended March 31, 2007 was $992,778; and for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 was $159,382.
Stock Purchase Warrants
As at June 30, 2007, 454,545 share purchase warrants at an exercise price of $2.08 US were issued to compensate brokers resulting from the private placement of 9,090,900 common shares issued June 5, 2007.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2006, stock purchase warrants representing 3,985,001 common shares at an exercise price of $1.25 CDN expired without being exercised, stock purchase warrants representing 280,000 common shares at an exercise price of $0.85 CDN were exercised, and stock purchase warrants representing 15,000 common shares at an exercise price of $1.25 CDN were exercised.
NOTE 7 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
At June 30, 2007 and March 31, 2007, the amounts of $10,311 and $9,510, respectively, are payable to directors and officers of the Company. These amounts are unsecured and due on demand.
The Company’s subsidiary Raft River Energy I, LLC owed the Company $125,370 and $154,277 at June 30, 2007 and March 31, 2007; respectively, for operating and maintenance expenses. The receivable balance is comprised of unsecured demand obligations due within the next year of operations.
- 23 -
The Company incurred the following transactions with directors, officers and a company with a common director:
| | | Quarter | | | | |
| | | Ended | | | Year Ended | |
| | | June 30, | | | March 31, | |
| | | 2007 | | | 2007 | |
| | | | | | | |
| Administrative services | $ | 5,472 | | $ | 20,563 | |
| Director fees | | 7,500 | | | 23,250 | |
| Consulting fees | | 6,000 | | | 24,000 | |
| | | | | | | |
| | $ | 18,972 | | $ | 67,813 | |
NOTE 8 - DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CANADIAN AND U.S. GAAP
The Company’s consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). The material difference in respect to these financial statements between U.S. and Canadian GAAP is reflected in the recording of Property, Plant and Equipment. Under Canadian GAAP, development and exploration costs associated with the Raft River project (property lease payments, geological consulting fees, well monitoring and permitting, etc.) are recorded as a capital asset. Under U.S. GAAP, these amounts are expensed. As a result of the above, under Canadian GAAP the following line items in the consolidated balance sheets and income statements would have been presented as follows:
Consolidated Balance Sheets
| U.S. GAAP June 30, 2007
| Canadian GAAP June 30, 2007 | U.S. GAAP March 31, 2007 | Canadian GAAP March 31, 2007 |
Plant, Property & Equipment | $ 5,312,684 | $ 5,753,295 | $ 4,138,386 | $ 4,578,997 |
Total Assets | 39,954,345 | 40,394,956 | 22,673,340 | 23,113,951 |
Stockholders’ Equity | 35,829,068 | 36,269,679 | 21,216,878 | 21,657,489 |
Total Liabilities & Stockholders’ Equity | $39,954,345 | $40,394,956 | $22,673,340 | $23,113,951 |
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss | U.S. GAAP Qtr Ended June 30, 2007 | Canadian GAAP Qtr Ended June 30, 2007 | U.S. GAAP Year ended March 31, 2007 | Canadian GAAP Year ended March 31, 2007 |
Exploration Expenditures | $ - | $ - | $ - | $ - |
Loss from Operations | (626,863) | (626,863) | (2,987,869) | (2,987,869) |
Net Loss | (342,776) | (342,776) | (1,792,584) | (1,792,584) |
- 24 -
NOTE 9 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Operating Lease Agreements
The Company has entered into several lease agreements with terms expiring up to December 1, 2034 for geothermal properties adjoining the Raft River Geothermal Property and for Neal Hot Springs. The leases provide for the following annual payments within the next five fiscal years:
Year | | | |
Ending | | | |
March 31, | | Amount | |
| | | |
2008 | $ | 45,400 | |
2009 | | 50,800 | |
2010 | | 53,800 | |
2011 | | 54,100 | |
2012 | | 46,250 | |
Thereafter | | 379,100 | |
Power Purchase Agreement
The Company has signed a 10 megawatt power purchase agreement with Idaho Power Company for sale of power generated from its planned phase one power plant. The Company has also signed a transmission agreement with Bonneville Power Administration for transmission of the electricity from this plant to Idaho Power, and from the phase two plants to other purchasers. These agreements are all contingent upon successful financing and construction of the power plant at Raft River. These agreements will govern the operational revenues for the initial phases of the Company’s operating activities.
Construction Contract
On December 5, 2005, the Company signed a contract (the “Ormat EPC Agreement”) with Ormat Nevada, Inc. (Ormat) for Ormat to construct a 13 megawatt geothermal power plant at Raft River, Idaho for a lump sum price of $20,200,000 (exclusive of taxes). The Company expects the output of the plant will be used to meet power delivery requirements of the Company’s agreements with Idaho Power Company. As part of the Ormat EPC Agreement, as amended, the Company has established a $1,000,000 letter of credit with Wells Fargo Bank to collateralize amounts committed by Ormat, but not paid by the Company. The amount will increase monthly until a maximum letter of credit amount of $10,252,000 is reached. A $4,704,000 money market fund is pledged as collateral backing the letter of credit as of June 30, 2007, and is reported as restricted cash.
Partnership Agreement Construction Costs
Under the Amended and Restated Operating Agreement of Raft River Energy I LLC, dated as of August 9, 2006, among Raft River Energy I LLC, Raft River I Holdings, LLC and us, Raft River I Holdings, LLC, a subsidiary of The Goldman Sachs Group Inc., will contribute in staged payments a total of $34 million in cash and we will contribute $5 million in cash and approximately $1.4 million in production and injection wells and geothermal leases to Raft River Energy I LLC, the Phase 1 project joint venture company. If total construction costs exceed budget, US Geothermal will contribute the required additional funding to the joint venture.
Office Lease
The Company leases general office space for an executive office in Boise at an annual cost of $31,051. The underlying lease is a year-to-year lease that expires on January 31, 2008.
- 25 -
Item 2 - Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Plan ofOperations
With the exception of historical facts, the statements contained in this report are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, which reflect our current expectations and beliefs regarding our future results of operations, performance and achievements. These statements are subject to risks and uncertainties and are based upon assumptions and beliefs that may or may not materialize. Forward-looking statements may be identified by words such as “may”, “should”, “anticipates”, “expects”, “believes”, “plans”, “predicts” and similar terms. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements concerning our strategy, operating forecasts, and our working capital requirements and availability. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance, and are subject to various risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results and outcomes to differ materially from those discussed or anticipated, including the factors set forth in the section entitled “Risk Factors” included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2007 and our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We also wish to advise readers not to place any undue reliance on the forward-looking statements contained in this report, which reflect our beliefs and expectations only as of the date of this report. We assume no obligation to update or revise these forward-looking statements to reflect new events or circumstances or any changes in our beliefs or expectations, other than as required by law.
The US dollar is the Company’s functional currency; however some transactions involved the Canadian dollar. All references to “dollars” or “$” are to United States dollars and all references to $ CDN are to Canadian dollars.
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in this report.
U.S. Geothermal Inc. is a Delaware corporation. The Company’s shares of common stock trade on the TSX Venture Exchange under the symbol “GTH” and on the Bulletin Board under the symbol “UGTH”. On December 19, 2003, the Company acquired all of the outstanding securities of U.S. Geothermal Inc., an Idaho corporation (“Geo-Idaho”) incorporated in February 2002, through a transaction merging Geo-Idaho into Evergreen Power Inc., a wholly-owned Idaho subsidiary formed for purposes of the merger transaction. Following the merger, the Company changed its name from U.S. Cobalt Inc. to U.S. Geothermal Inc. Pursuant to the merger, Geo-Idaho became the surviving subsidiary of the Company, and Evergreen Power, Inc. ceased to exist. GTH is still a development stage company and has produced no revenues to date.
During the three months ended June 30, 2007, GTH was focused on (1) supporting construction of Phase I of the Raft River, Idaho geothermal project (“Raft River”), (2) the completion of drilling of production and injection wells for Phase I, and (3) the evaluation of potential new geothermal project acquisitions.
The construction of the Unit One, 13-megawatt power plant is under the direction of Ormat Nevada Inc., a subsidiary of Ormat Technologies Inc. Plant construction is proceeding on
- 26 -
schedule and budget. This element of the Raft River project is expected to be fully functional and online in the fourth quarter of 2007.
- All major power plant equipment has been delivered to site and set on foundations.
- The prime electrical construction contract was awarded to Merit Electric Incorporated in May.
- Piping and electrical connections are proceeding on schedule.
- The control room and motor control center building has been erected and switchgear installed.
- The cooling tower is 95% complete.
- The geothermal injection pumps and motors have been set in place.
- High voltage interconnection to BPA substation with Idaho Power and Raft River Electrical Co-operative metering is nearing completion.
U.S. Geothermal is construction manager for the remainder of the project construction work outside the scope of the Ormat contract. This work includes pipelines, production pumps and certain electrical transmission activities. The first two geothermal production pumps have been delivered to the site. A drill rig is currently on site and has installed a 29-stage, 800 to 1,000 horsepower production pump in production well RRG-2. The drill rig will move next to production well RRG-1 to install a 33-stage, 1,000 horsepower production pump. Two more production well pumps are scheduled for delivery to the site within the next 60 days.
Pipeline completion activities and wellhead installations are in progress. A major supplier has delivered to production well RRG-2 the first of four containerized well control modules. Each module contains an electronic control package, cooling system, and lubrication system required to operate and monitor the pump at the production well. Hot geothermal brine from production well RRG-2 is scheduled to flow through the new geothermal pipelines to the power plant for the first time in mid-August.
The cooling water supply piping system is approximately 75% complete for initial operations, including the refurbishment of an existing 300,000 gallon storage tank, and the development of a land application system that will be used to dispose of the cooling tower blow down water. Electrical transmission work needed to connect the new geothermal power plant to the existing substation is complete.
The Company has assembled a team of seven qualified technicians for the ongoing operation and maintenance of the Unit One power plant and planned future power plant units at Raft River. The team is currently on site and undergoing training and other activities associated with the finalization of the power plant construction and its planned operating procedures.
Contract negotiations with Idaho Power Company, the regulated utility owned by IDACORP, are progressing toward the mutual goal of converting the existing power sales contract for Unit One from a limit of 10 average megawatts per month to a full output contract with an estimated annual average output of between 12 and 14 megawatts. Detailed contract negotiations are focusing on the terms and conditions specific to Idaho’s first geothermal power project. Idaho Power and the Company expect to be able to use this first contract as a template for advancing negotiations for the output from the planned Unit Three at Raft River
- 27 -
and 26 megawatts of planned production from the Company’s Neal Hot Springs project located in southeast Oregon. As reported earlier, Idaho Power named U.S. Geothermal successful bidder for 45 megawatts of geothermal power from future development of Raft River and the initial phase of Neal Hot Springs.
The Company is also in the final stages of contract negotiations with Eugene Water and Electric Board (“EWEB”), Eugene Oregon, for a power purchase agreement associated with the power output from the planned 13-megawatt Unit Two at Raft River. The negotiations with Idaho Power and EWEB recognize that the power purchase agreements are subject to the parties’ board approval and are contingent upon extension of the federal Production Tax Credit and successful drilling and resource discovery at Raft River and Neal Hot Springs.
In addition, Raft River Rural Electric Cooperative has finished construction of the 3.2 -mile power transmission line that connects the power plant to the Bonneville Power Administration substation at Bridge, Idaho. Equipment upgrades to the substation including a breaker, relays, and communications systems are underway.
With carbon regulation widely anticipated to increase the cost of power sourced from coal, and limited opportunities to purchase baseload geothermal power, the company has found that utilities across the Western United States have been eager to discuss power purchases from the Raft River geothermal resource. As a result of the increased interest, U.S. Geothermal elected to withdraw its Unit 2 and Unit 3 Idaho Power PPAs without submitting them to the IPUC for approval in order to pursue larger capacity PPAs with other utilities. With the concurrence of Idaho Power, the Unit 2 and Unit 3 10 megawatt contracts have been voided without further obligation on either party.
Eugene Water and Electric Board (“EWEB”), from Eugene, Oregon and U.S. Geothermal have signed a letter of intent for EWEB to purchase the full 13 megawatt electrical output of Unit 2. The parties have exchanged a draft PPA and intend to complete it by October 2007. Upon execution of the EWEB PPA, and if Unit 1 is successful in the Idaho Power Request for Proposal, then the total output from the Unit 1 and Unit 2 Raft River power plants will be 26 megawatts from two plants, instead of the originally planned 30 megawatts from three plants, resulting in substantial capital and operating cost savings through improved economy of scale.
In addition, the strong regional interest in geothermal power has resulted in several utilities from California to Washington entering into discussions with U.S. Geothermal to purchase the electrical power output of Unit 3. Subject to drilling confirmation of sufficient geothermal resource, the power plant output from three units at Raft River would be 39 megawatts, instead of the maximum 30 megawatts under the previous Idaho Power PPA provisions.
On April 26, 2006, GTH issued a Notice to Proceed to Ormat under the Ormat EPC agreement as amended April 25, 2006. An initial payment of $2,020,000 allows Ormat to proceed with ordering of equipment with significant manufacturing lead times. Under the amendment, Ormat commits to a guaranteed final completion date of November 25, 2007 on the Phase I facility.
- 28 -
On May 8, 2006, Idaho Power confirmed that GTH would be allowed to bid the Raft River Unit 1 project into the recently issued Idaho Power geothermal “Request for Proposal for Geothermal Power”. If Idaho Power selects GTH as a successful bidder, the Company expects that under a new PPA with Idaho Power which could replace the current PPA, the Unit 1 power plant will be allowed to sell its full output capacity of up to 13 megawatt annual average, instead of being capped at 10 average megawatt per month as mandated under the current PPA. This 30% increase in plant output would be achieved with relatively small amounts of additional capital investment and is expected to decrease the operating cost per kilowatt-hour.
On May 16, 2006, a $225,000 contract was signed with Raft River Rural Electrical Co-op to build the production well power distribution lines for delivery of electricity from the power plant to the well heads. At June 30, 2007, the distribution lines were approximately 95% complete.
On May 22, 2006, a $2.6 million contract was signed with Industrial Builders of Ontario, Oregon to construct the geothermal pipeline gathering and distribution system which will connect the production and injection wells with the power plant. At June 30, 2007, this component was approximately 90% complete.
On May 24, 2006, GTH signed a geothermal lease agreement with JR Land and Livestock Inc. for the lease of approximately 5,409 acres of surface, mineral and geothermal rights in Malheur County, Oregon. The lease term is for ten years with lease payments of $15,000 at signing, $20,000 in first year, $25,000 in second year, and $30,000 for each subsequent year. A geothermal program was completed in early 2007, and plans are in progress for a drilling program.
On August 3, 2006, the Company announced the signing of $4.6 million renewable energy credit (REC) purchase and sale agreement encompassing the first 10 years of Phase I of the Raft River project with Holy Cross Energy.
As of July 2006, the Company completed the acquisitions of two new properties with ground water rights that will provide cooling water to the Phase One and Phase Two power plants and surface access for pipelines and project facilities. The two land parcels total 1,083 acres and have irrigation water rights for 1,904 acre-feet of water. A third purchase of water rights only was also completed for an additional 544 acre-feet of ground water.
On August 10, 2006, the $34 million project finance was announced for Phase I of the Raft River development. The project finance structure is channeled through a qualified special purpose entity, Raft River Energy I, LLC (RREI). Raft River Holdings is an affiliate of The Goldman Sachs Group, and is the Company’s investment partner in RREI. The Company has made a $5 million dollar cash contribution and is transferring to RREI the existing seven production and injection wells, and certain geothermal rights and leases covering the 1,800 acres from the 5,238 total acres of geothermal rights currently held. Raft River Holdings will make capital contributions totaling $34 million in accordance with the construction payments schedule. The partnership does not restrict further development of the Company’s geothermal rights and allows for the development of the planned Phase Two power plants.
- 29 -
Announced on September 5, 2006, property for a second geothermal project at Neal Hot Springs in eastern Oregon near the Idaho Border was acquired by the Company. The new property consists of 8.5 square miles of geothermal energy and surface rights and was leased from a private, third party. The property has an identified geothermal resource and was made part of U.S. Geothermal’s submittal to Idaho Power Company’s Request For Proposals for electricity produced from geothermal sources.
On February 6, 2007, a lease was entered into with Cyprus Gold Exploration Corporation (“Cyprus”), a subsidiary of Phelps Dodge Corporation, for and undivided interest in geothermal rights associated with 4,760 acres (7.4 square miles) at Neal Hot Springs. This lease adds 758 acres (1.2 square miles) of new area to the lease announced on September 5, 2006, and overlaps both surface and undivided geothermal rights that were previously acquired at the site.
With the Cyprus lease, U.S. Geothermal has increased its total Neal Hot Springs project holdings to 6,167 acres (9.6 square miles) and increased ownership of the overlapping area to a majority of the geothermal rights in that area. The Cyprus lease has a primary term of 10 years that extends thereafter for as long as commercial production is maintained and includes annual rental and production royalty payment provisions. U.S. Geothermal has ongoing negotiations with additional geothermal rights holders in the area.
U.S. Geothermal has awarded a $1.3 million dollar contract to ITT Industries/Goulds Pumps to provide line-shaft geothermal production pumps for the project. The first two production pumps have been delivered and one is installed.
The well improvement drill program, which began in August 2006, has been completed. Four existing wells were enhanced either by deepening or adding directional legs to improve their production or injection characteristics. Two new wells were drilled to expand the geothermal resource for the planned second 13 megawatt net output power plant at Raft River. Resource utilization studies have determined that production well RRG-3 will be converted to an injection well and that injection well RRG-7 will be converted to a production well.
On December 28, 2006, the Company entered into an agreement with Disco Associates, Inc. for well-head construction for the initial base amount of $478,475. At June 30, 2007, this project was approximately 80% complete.
On March 21, 2007, the Company was named successful bidder in Idaho Power Company’s request for geothermal electricity. Negotiations began on the terms of a purchase power agreement for an annual average of 45.5 megawatts from the Raft River and Neal Hot Springs projects.
The Company entered into an agreement with a syndicate of Canadian investment dealers to underwrite a private placement of 6,818,182 shares of common shares at a cost of $2.20 CDN per share to raise gross proceeds of approximately $15 million in Canadian dollars ($13.5 million US Dollars). The Underwriters had the option to purchase up to an additional 2,272,727 common shares at the issue price under the offering that could gross up to
- 30 -
approximately $20 million in Canadian dollars ($18.0 million US Dollars). The proceeds will be used to fund current and future plant development. The offering closed June 5, 2007.
Operating Results
For the quarter ended June 30, 2007, we incurred a loss of $342,776 which represented $0.01 per share. The operating loss was consistent with the loss incurred during the first quarter of 2006. Most operating expenses were reasonably consistent with the prior year. Significant variances were noted in stock based compensation and foreign exchange gain.
Stock based compensation costs were $279,277 (approximately 64%) lower in the first quarter of 2007 compared to the first quarter of 2006. In the first quarter 2006, 1.76 million stock options were issued by the Company. Of those options, 25% vested in that quarter. Also, a large portion of options issued prior to the first quarter 2006, vested in that quarter and the respective costs were recognized.
A large foreign exchange gain that amounted to $410,329 was reported in the first quarter of 2006 that related to the funds generated in Canadian currency from a private placement offering that were left in the foreign currency until favorable exchange rates were available. The level of gain reported in the first quarter of 2007 is more typical of the Company’s operations.
Contractual Obligations
The following table denotes contractual obligation by payments due for each period.
| Total | < 1 year | 1-3 years | 3-5 years | > 5 years |
Capital Leases | $ 665,550 | $ 40,100 | $ 96,200 | $ 103,900 | $ 425,350 |
Raft River Energy I LLC is the joint venture partnership constructing the power plant at Raft River, Idaho. This subsidiary is not consolidated into the financial statements. As such, the obligations of Raft River Energy are not reflected in this table.
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of June 30, 2007, the Company does not have any off balance sheet arrangements.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We believe our cash and liquid investments at June 30, 2007, added to our recent private placement completed June 5, 2007, is adequate to fund our general operating and development activities through March 31, 2009. The Company obtained project capital to construct Raft River power plant through a partnership arrangement. Through the arrangement, equity funds of approximately $34 million were made available for the construction of the project. Total capital expenditures for the phase one project are currently estimated to be between $39 and $41 million. The majority of the funds needed for the project will be provided by existing funds and through the partnership arrangement. If additional funds are needed, we anticipate that the equity may be raised through the issuance
- 31 -
of shares, exercise of existing outstanding warrants, and/or through the sale of ownership interest in tax credits and benefits
Potential Acquisitions
The Company intends to continue its growth through the acquisition of ownership or leasehold interests in properties and/or property rights that it believes will add to the value of the Company’s geothermal resources, and through possible mergers with or acquisitions of operating power plants and geothermal or other renewable energy properties.
Critical Accounting Policies
The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon the consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Certain accounting policies involve judgments and uncertainties to such an extent that there is reasonable likelihood that materially different amounts could have been reported under different conditions, or if different assumptions had been made. We evaluate our estimates and assumptions on a regular basis. We base our estimates on historical experience and various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for the financial statements.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers cash deposits and highly liquid investments to be cash and cash equivalents for financial reporting presentation on the consolidated balance sheet and statement of cash flows. The Company subscribes to the accounting standards that define cash equivalents as highly liquid, short-term instruments that are readily convertible to known amounts of cash, which are generally defined investments that have original maturity dates of less than three months. With the large value of funds invested in short term deposits, small variations in short term interest rates may materially affect the value of cash equivalents. Investments in government obligations accumulate higher interest, but the principal balance is not insured by the FDIC.
The Company does not consider such items to be cash equivalents if there is a significant restriction placed upon the use of those assets. At fiscal year end, the Company held deposits that were restricted according to a contractual arrangement with a major vendor. Accordingly, these deposits were classified as restricted cash, rather than cash equivalents.
Going Concern
Based on our projected spending over the next 12 months, our current operating funds and approximately $18 million that was raised from the private placement completed June 5, 2007, our auditors have determined that the going concern qualification on our financial statements is not needed. Management believes that sufficient funding will be available to meet our business objectives, including anticipated cash needs for working capital, and financing for construction of the Phase 1 power plant. As shown in the accompanying
- 32 -
consolidated financial statements, we have incurred an accumulated deficit of $7,335,099 for the period from February 26, 2002 (inception) to June 30, 2007, and have no revenue from operations. In the ordinary course of constructing a power plant facility of this size and complexity, cost overruns and contract delays can significantly affect the economics of the project. Failure to achieve commercial operations of the power plant prior to December 31, 2007 would jeopardize the production tax credit, and could materially affect the ability of U.S. Geothermal to operate as a going concern.
Property, Plant and Equipment
During the development stage of operations, the Company has purchased and otherwise acquired geothermal properties for the production of power. The geothermal properties include: drilled wells, power plant components, power plant support components, land, land rights, surface water rights, and mineral rights. Since the costs of land and the rights surrounding the access geothermal and surface water reservoirs are relatively small, these items have been included, but have not been reported separately in our financial statements. The Company’s first power plant is scheduled to be operational in October 2007; however, it was still under construction at June 30, 2007. The costs of this power plant are being accumulated in construction in process accounts until the plant becomes operational. Once the plant is operational, these costs will be charged to operations in a systematic manner based upon the total estimated gallons of water the plant is expected to produce over its useful life. The factors and assumptions that comprise this allocation process will be based upon the best information available to us, and will be evaluated, at least, annually for viability. If it is determined that our cost allocations have produced results that vary significantly from the conditions surrounding the value of the Company’s geothermal properties, a gain or loss adjustment will be made in the period in which this determination is made. The cost allocation or amortization process is not intended to present the fair market value of our geothermal properties; rather to allocate the actual historical costs of those properties over their service lives.
The costs of machinery, vehicles and other equipment, currently in operation, are being depreciated in a systematic manner. For these assets, depreciation is calculated based upon the straight-line method at a rate of 30%, which allocates the costs evenly over the asset’s estimated service life. Depreciation costs calculated for assets that are not directly involved in the production of geothermal properties are charged to operations.
Income Taxes
According to generally accepted accounting practices, entities must recognize assets and/or liabilities that originate with the differences in revenues and expenses presented for financial reporting purposes and those revenues and expenses that are utilized to comply with federal and state income tax law. Often deductions can be accelerated for income tax purposes, thus creating temporary or timing differences. Other items (generally non-allowable expenses) do not reverse over time, and are considered to be permanent differences. These types of costs are, typically, not factored into the deferred income tax asset or liability calculation. The Company’s primary element that impacts the liability or asset calculation relates to the operating losses generated in its early stages of operation that will be allowed to offset future earnings. Stock-based compensation is another significant area that impacts that recognition of deferred income taxes. Compensation that has been provided to employees and contractors based upon the value of the issuance of stock options is reported as an operating
- 33 -
cost. However, this compensation is not an allowable deduction for income tax purposes. At the end of the fiscal year, the Company’s significant tax differences would ultimately result in the recognition of an asset; however, due to the uncertainly surrounding future earnings, an allowance has been calculated that effectively removes the asset. The Company continues to track the financial elements that comprise the deferred income tax calculation and will remove or reduce the asset allowance if the Company is determined to be in position where it is likely to produce earnings.
Stock-Based Compensation
At the beginning of the fiscal year, the Company adopted a standard that states that if certain conditions are present surrounding the issuance of equity instruments as employee compensation, then circumstances may warrant the recognition of a liability for financial reporting purposes. One such condition was present when the Company originally issued stock options in a foreign currency (Canadian dollars) to employees both before and after the beginning of the fiscal year. Authors of the standard have reasoned that when a condition is present that creates a financial risk to the recipient in addition to normal market risks (i.e., foreign currency translation risk), then the instrument takes on the characteristics of a liability, rather than an equity item. As the underlying stock options are exercised or are forfeited, then the stock based compensation liability will be reduced. The Company’s financial statements reflect these changes in the consolidated balance sheet. As the value of the options change over the vesting periods, these changes will ultimately be reflected in the amount of expense charged to operations.
The Company awards stock options for compensation to non-employees for services performed and/or services performed above and beyond expectations. After the services have been completed, the awards are made at the discretion of the Board of Directors. The fair value of the options are determined on the date the options are awarded according to several factors that include the exercise price of the option, the current price of the underlying share, the expected life of the options and the expected volatility of the stock. Generally speaking, a longer life and higher expected volatility yields a higher value of the option. In accordance with appropriate accounting guidance, the Company records the value of these options as operating expense during the period in which they are awarded. Stock options awarded to Company employees are also valued on the date they are awarded. However, the value of these options are expensed or capitalized over the vesting period. The current vesting period for all options is eighteen months. The nature of the services provided determines whether the value will be expensed or added to the value of a Company asset. To date, no services have been provided directly related to the construction of property and equipment, thus, all services have been charged to operations.
Item 3 – Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Interest Risk on Investments
At June 30, 2007, the Company held investments of $28,096,690 in money market accounts. These are highly liquid investments that are subject to risks associated with changes in interest rates. The money market funds are invested in governmental obligations with minimal fluctuations in interest rates and fixed terms.
- 34 -
Foreign Currency Risk
The Company is subject to limited amount of foreign currency risks associated with cash deposits maintained in Canadian currency. The Company has utilized and it is continuing to utilize the Canadian markets for raising capital. By proper timing of the transactions and then maintenance of adequate operating funds in other financial resources, the Company has been able to mitigate some of the risks surrounding foreign currency exchanges. At fiscal year end, the company held deposits that amounted to less than $30,000 in U.S. dollar equivalents. Also, the Canadian currency exchange rate has been reasonably consistent over the past fiscal year. As a matter of standard operating practice, the Company does not maintain large balances of Canadian currency; and, substantially, all operating transactions are conducted in U.S. dollars.
The strike price for the Company’s stock option plan has been stated in Canadian dollars as the plan has been administered through our Vancouver office and Pacific Corporate Trust Company. This subjects the Company to foreign currency risk in addition to the normal market risks associated with the stock price fluctuations. A long-term liability has been established to reflect the fair value of the stock options payable. The strike price on future option grants will be stated in US dollars.
Commodity Price Risk
The Company is exposed to risks surrounding the volatility of energy prices. These risks are impacted by various circumstances surrounding the energy production from natural gas, nuclear, hydro, solar, coal and oil. The Company has been able to mitigate, to a certain extent, this risk by signing a power purchase contract for a 20 year period for the first power plant scheduled to go into production. This type of arrangement will be the model for power purchase contracts planned for future power plants.
Item 4 - Controls and Procedures
An evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rule 13(a)-15(e) or 15d-15(e) as of June 30, 2007. Based on that evaluation, our management, including the CEO and CFO, concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
There has been no change to our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter or fiscal year ended June 30, 2007 that has materially affected, or is likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
The company is not required to have, nor was Williams & Webster engaged to perform, an audit of internal control over financial reporting. The audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectives of the company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, Williams & Webster expressed no such opinion.
- 35 -
PART II- OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1 - Legal Proceedings
As of June 30, 2007, management is not aware of any proceedings in which the Company is a party, as plaintiff or defendant.
Item 1A - Risk Factors
There have been no material changes in the risk factors presented in our Form 10-K, Item I, Part 1A for the year ended March 31, 2007.
Item 2 - Unregistered Sales Of Equity Securities And Use Of Proceeds
On June 5, 2007, the Company completed a public offering of 9,090,900 shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share. The offering grossed proceeds of $19,999,980 CDN at $2.20 CDN per share. Cormark Securities Inc., Dundee Securities Corporation and Toll Cross Securities Inc. have been paid an aggregate cash fee of $999,999 CDN, representing 5% of the aggregate gross proceeds from the offering, and have been issued broker warrants to purchase up to 454,545 common shares of the Company at $2.08 US exercisable for 18 months. The proceeds of the private placement will be used for the ongoing development and exploration at our Raft River and Neal Hot Springs projects, and for general corporate working capital purposes.
During the quarter ended June 30, 2007, the Company issued 291,200 common shares to officers, employees and consultants upon exercise of stock options at strike prices ranging from $0.60 CDN to $1.40 CDN.
Item 4 – Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None.
Item 5 - Other Information
None.
Item 6 - Exhibits And Reports
See the exhibits index to this Form 10-Q.
- 36 -
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
| U.S. GEOTHERMAL INC. |
| (Registrant) |
| | |
Date: August 14, 2007 | By: | /s/ Daniel J. Kunz |
| | Daniel J. Kunz |
| | President, Chief Executive Officer and |
| | Director |
| | |
Date: August 14, 2007 | By: | /s/ Kerry D. Hawkley |
| | Kerry D. Hawkley |
| | Chief Financial Officer |
- 37 -
EXHIBIT LIST
Exhibit Number | Description
|
3.1 | Certificate of Incorporation of U.S. Cobalt Inc. (now known as U.S. Geothermal Inc.) (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 3.1 to the registrant’s Form SB-2 registration statement as filed on July 8, 2004) |
3.2 | Certificate of Domestication of Non-U.S. Corporation (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 3.2 to the registrant’s Form SB-2 registration statement as filed on July 8, 2004) |
3.3 | Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation (changing name of U.S. Cobalt Inc. to U.S. Geothermal Inc.) (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 3.3 to the registrant’s Form SB-2 registration statement as filed on July 8, 2004) |
3.4 | Bylaws of U.S. Cobalt Inc. (now known as U.S. Geothermal Inc.) (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 3.4 to the registrant’s Form SB-2 registration statement as filed on July 8, 2004) |
3.5 | Plan of Merger of U.S. Geothermal, Inc. and EverGreen Power Inc. (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 3.5 to the registrant’s Form SB-2 registration statement as filed on July 8, 2004) |
3.6 | Amendment to Plan of Merger (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 3.6 to the registrant’s Form SB-2 registration statement as filed on July 8, 2004) |
4.1 | Form of Stock Certificate (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.1 to the registrant’s Form SB-2 registration statement as filed on July 8, 2004) |
4.2 | Form of Warrant Certificate (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.2 to the registrant’s Form SB- 2 registration statement as filed on July 8, 2004) |
4.3 | Provisions Regarding Rights of Stockholders (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.3 to the registrant’s Form SB-2 registration statement as filed on July 8, 2004) |
10.1 | Agreement between U.S. Geothermal Inc. and Vulcan Power Company dated December 3, 2002 regarding the acquisition of the Vulcan interest (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1 to the registrant’s Form SB-2 registration statement as filed on July 8, 2004) |
10.2 | Amendment No. 1 dated November 15, 2003 to Agreement between U.S. Geothermal Inc. and Vulcan Power Company (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.2 to the registrant’s Form SB-2 registration statement as filed on July 8, 2004) |
10.3 | Amendment No. 2 to “Agreement by and between U.S. Geothermal Inc. and Vulcan Power Company” dated December 30, 2003 (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.3 to the registrant’s Form SB-2 registration statement as filed on July 8, 2004) |
10.4 | Geothermal Lease and Agreement dated July 11, 2002, between Sergene Jensen, Personal Representative of the Estate of Harlan B. Jensen, and U.S. Geothermal Inc. (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.5 to the registrant’s Form SB-2 registration statement as filed on July 8, 2004) |
10.5 | Geothermal Lease and Agreement dated June 14, 2002, between Jensen Investments Inc. and U.S. Geothermal Inc. (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.6 to the registrant’s Form SB- 2 registration statement as filed on July 8, 2004) |
10.6 | Geothermal Lease and Agreement dated March 1, 2004, between Jay Newbold and U.S. Geothermal Inc. (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.7 to the registrant’s Form SB-2 registration statement as filed on July 8, 2004) |
10.7 | Geothermal Lease and Agreement dated June 28, 2003, between Janice Crank and the children of Paul Crank and U.S. Geothermal Inc. (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.8 to the |
- 38 -
| registrant’s Form SB-2 registration statement as filed on July 8, 2004) |
10.8 | Geothermal Lease and Agreement dated December 1, 2004, between Reid S. Stewart and Ruth O. Stewart and US Geothermal Inc. (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.9 to the registrant’s Amendment No. 2 to Form SB-2 registration statement as filed on January 10, 2005) |
10.9 | Geothermal Lease and Agreement, dated July 5, 2005, between Bighorn Mortgage Corporation and US Geothermal Inc. (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.11 to the registrant’s Form 10-QSB quarterly report as filed on February 17, 2006) |
10.10 | Geothermal Lease and Agreement, dated June 23, 2005, among Dale and Ronda Doman, and US Geothermal Inc. (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.13 to the registrant’s Form 10-QSB quarterly report as filed on February 17, 2006) |
10.11 | Geothermal Lease and Agreement, dated June 23, 2005, among Michael and Cleo Griffin, Harlow and Pauline Griffin, Douglas and Margaret Griffin, Terry and Sue Griffin, Vincent and Phyllis Jorgensen, and Alice Mae Griffin Shorts, and US Geothermal Inc. (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.14 to the registrant’s Form 10-QSB quarterly report as filed on February 17, 2006) |
10.12 | Geothermal Lease and Agreement dated January 25, 2006, between Philip Glover and US Geothermal Inc. (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.9 to the registrant’s Form 10-QSB quarterly report as filed on February 17, 2006) |
10.13 | Geothermal Lease and Agreement, dated May 24, 2006, between JR Land and Livestock Inc. and US Geothermal Inc. (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.30 to the registrant’s Form 10- KSB annual report as filed on June 29, 2006) |
10.14 | Administrative Services Contract, dated January 1, 2004, between U.S. Geothermal Inc. and New Dawn Holdings Ltd. (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.10 to the registrant’s Form SB- 2 registration statement as filed on July 8, 2004) |
10.15 | Employment Agreement dated April 1, 2006, with Daniel J. Kunz (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.12 to the registrant’s Form 10-KSB annual report as filed on June 29, 2006) |
10.16 | Employment Agreement dated April 1, 2006, with Kerry D. Hawkley (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.22 to the registrant’s Form 10-KSB annual report as filed on June 29, 2006) |
10.17 | Employment Agreement dated April 1, 2006, with Douglas J. Glaspey (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.23 to the registrant’s Form 10-KSB annual report as filed on June 29, 2006) |
10.18 | Escrow Agreement made December 19, 2003, among U.S. Geothermal Inc., Pacific Corporate Trust Company, as escrow agent, and certain security holders (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.15 to the registrant’s Form SB-2 registration statement as filed on July 8, 2004) |
10.19 | Escrow Agreement made December 19, 2003, among U. S. Geothermal Inc., Pacific Corporate Trust Company, as escrow agent, and certain security holders (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.16 to the registrant’s Form SB-2 registration statement as filed on July 8, 2004) |
10.20 | First Amended and Restated Merger Agreement dated November 30, 2003 among U.S. Cobalt Inc., EverGreen Power Inc., U.S. Geothermal Inc., and the stockholders of U.S. Geothermal Inc. (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.17 to the registrant’s Form SB-2 registration statement as filed on July 8, 2004) |
10.22 | Agreement with Dundee Securities Corporation dated June 28, 2004 (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.18 to the registrant’s Form SB-2 registration statement as filed on July 8, 2004) |
10.23 | Amended and Restated Stock Option Plan of U.S. Geothermal Inc. dated September 29, 2006. (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.23 to the registrant’s Form SB-2 registration statement as filed on October 2, 2006.) |
- 39 -
10.24 | Power Purchase Agreement dated December 29, 2004 between U.S. Geothermal Inc. and Idaho Power Company (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.19 to the registrant’s Amendment No. 2 to Form SB-2 registration statement as filed on January 10, 2005) |
10.25 | Engineering, Procurement and Construction Agreement dated December 5, 2005 between U.S. Geothermal Inc. and Ormat Nevada Inc. (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.28 to the registrant’s Form 10-QSB quarterly report as filed on February 17, 2006) * |
10.26 | Amendment to the Engineering, Procurement and Construction Agreement dated April 26, 2006 between U.S. Geothermal Inc. and Ormat Nevada Inc. (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 99.1 to the registrant’s Form 8-K as filed on May 2, 2006) |
10.27 | Letter of Intent from Eugene Water and Electric Board to U.S. Geothermal Inc. dated February 22, 2006 (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.27 to the registrant’s Form SB-2 as filed on September 29, 2006). |
10.28 | Renewable Energy Credits Purchase and Sales Agreement dated July 29, 2006 between Holy Cross Energy and U.S. Geothermal Inc. (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.28 to the registrant’s Form SB-2 as filed on September 29, 2006). |
10.29 | Transmission Agreement dated June 24, 2005 between Department of Energy’s Bonneville Power Administration - Transmission Business Line and U.S. Geothermal Inc. (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.27 to the registrant’s Form 10-QSB quarterly report as filed on August 12, 2005) |
10.30 | Interconnection and Wheeling Agreement dated March 9, 2006 between Raft River Rural Electric Co-op and U.S. Geothermal Inc. (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.28 to the registrant’s Form 10-KSB annual report as filed on June 29, 2006) |
10.31 | Construction Contract dated May 16, 2006 between Raft River Rural Electric Co-op and U.S. Geothermal Inc. (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.31 to the registrant’s Form SB-2 as filed on September 29, 2006). |
10.32 | Membership Admission Agreement, dated August 9, 2006, among Raft River Energy I LLC, U.S. Geothermal Inc., and Raft River I Holdings, LLC (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1 to the registrant’s Form 8-K as filed on August 23, 2006) * |
10.33 | Amended and Restated Operating Agreement of Raft River Energy I LLC, dated as of August 9, 2006, among Raft River Energy I LLC, Raft River I Holdings, LLC and U.S. Geothermal Inc (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.2 to the registrant’s Form 8-K as filed on August 23, 2006).* |
10.34 | Management Services Agreement, dated as of August 9, 2006, between Raft River Energy I LLC and U.S. Geothermal Services, LLC (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.3 to the registrant’s Form 8-K as filed on August 23, 2006) * |
10.35 | Construction contract dated May 22, 2006 between Industrial Builders and U.S. Geothermal Inc. (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.31 to the registrant’s Form 10-KSB annual report as filed on June 29, 2006) |
10.36 | First Amendment to the Amended and Restated Operating Agreement of Raft River Energy I LLC, dated as of November 7, 2006, among Raft River Energy I LLC, Raft River I Holdings, LLC and U.S. Geothermal Inc. (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.36 to the registrant’s Form 10-QSB as filed on February 20, 2007). * |
31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
- 40 -
* - Agreements are the subject of a confidential treatment request filed with the Commission on August 23, 2006.
- 41 -