Exhibit 99.1
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT
To the Shareholders of
Novadaq Technologies Inc.,
We have audited the accompanying consolidated financial statements ofNovadaq Technologies Inc. (the “Company”), which comprise the consolidated statements of financial position as at December 31, 2012 and 2011 and the consolidated statements of loss and comprehensive loss, changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, and a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.
Management’s responsibility for the consolidated financial statements
Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these consolidated financial statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board, and for such internal control as management determines is necessary to enable the preparation of consolidated financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
Auditors’ responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free from material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditors’ judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements, evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained in our audits is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.
Opinion
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position ofNovadaq Technologies Inc. as at December 31, 2012 and 2011 and the consolidated statements of loss and comprehensive loss, changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board.
| | |
| | /s/ Ernst & Young LLP |
Toronto, Canada | | Chartered Accountants |
February 6, 2013 | | Licenses Public Accountants |
Novadaq Technologies Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION
(expressed in U.S. dollars, except common shares outstanding)
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Notes | | As at December 31, 2012 | | | As at December 31, 2011 | |
ASSETS | | | | | | | | | | |
Current assets | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | 19 | | $ | 38,954,181 | | | $ | 9,633,608 | |
Accounts receivable | | 19 | | | 4,056,954 | | | | 2,018,782 | |
Prepaid expenses and other assets | | | | | 852,674 | | | | 829,625 | |
Inventories | | 6 | | | 1,713,577 | | | | 1,166,417 | |
| | | |
Non-current assets | | | | | | | | | | |
Property and equipment, net | | 8 | | | 10,717,661 | | | | 6,623,986 | |
Deferred tax assets | | 15 | | | 170,442 | | | | 248,640 | |
Intangible assets, net | | 9 | | | 1,121,808 | | | | 2,272,434 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total Assets | | | | $ | 57,587,297 | | | $ | 22,793,492 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | | | | | | | | | |
Current liabilities | | | | | | | | | | |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | | | | $ | 3,407,329 | | | $ | 2,485,994 | |
Provisions | | 13 | | | 85,260 | | | | 41,300 | |
Deferred revenue | | | | | 637,864 | | | | 396,859 | |
Deferred partnership fee revenue | | 16 | | | 1,300,000 | | | | 1,300,000 | |
Repayable government assistance | | 12, 14 | | | 203,148 | | | | 197,760 | |
| | | |
Non-current liabilities | | | | | | | | | | |
Deferred tax liabilities | | 15 | | | 170,442 | | | | 248,640 | |
Convertible debentures | | 12 | | | 4,656,746 | | | | 4,223,454 | |
Deferred revenue | | | | | 144,204 | | | | 188,883 | |
Deferred partnership revenue | | 16 | | | 3,291,666 | | | | 4,591,666 | |
Repayable government assistance | | 12, 14 | | | 17,946 | | | | 214,402 | |
Shareholder warrants | | 11 | | | 13,002,930 | | | | 8,278,105 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total Liabilities | | | | $ | 26,917,535 | | | $ | 22,167,063 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Shareholders’ Equity | | | | | | | | | | |
Share capital | | 21 | | $ | 139,946,563 | | | $ | 98,695,023 | |
Contributed surplus | | | | | 7,908,224 | | | | 6,772,298 | |
Equity component of convertible debentures | | 12 | | | 1,454,353 | | | | 1,454,353 | |
Deficit | | | | | (118,639,378 | ) | | | (106,295,245 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total Shareholders’ Equity | | | | $ | 30,669,762 | | | $ | 626,429 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity | | | | $ | 57,587,297 | | | $ | 22,793,492 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total number of common shares outstanding | | 21 | | | 40,226,243 | | | | 32,769,462 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Commitments and contingencies | | 23 | | | | | | | | |
These consolidated financial statements are authorized for issue by the Board of Directors on February 6, 2012. They are signed on the Company’s behalf by:
On behalf of the Board:
| | | | |
| | | | |
Anthony Griffiths, Director | | | | William Mackinnon, Director |
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements
Novadaq Technologies Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF LOSS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED
(expressed in U.S. dollars, except per share amounts)
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Notes | | December 31, 2012 | | | December 31, 2011 | |
Product sales | | | | $ | 19,037,096 | | | $ | 12,925,953 | |
Royalty revenue | | 7 | | | 1,849,668 | | | | 395,398 | |
Partnership fee revenue | | 16 | | | 1,300,000 | | | | 841,667 | |
Service revenue | | | | | 802,296 | | | | 1,129,423 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total revenues | | 24 | | | 22,989,060 | | | | 15,292,441 | |
Cost of sales | | | | | 8,537,408 | | | | 6,634,206 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Gross profit | | | | | 14,451,652 | | | | 8,658,235 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Selling and distribution expenses | | | | | 4,926,376 | | | | 5,375,612 | |
Research and development expenses | | | | | 5,958,499 | | | | 4,610,694 | |
Administrative expenses | | | | | 6,573,484 | | | | 4,550,971 | |
Write-down of equipment | | | | | — | | | | 314,213 | |
Write-down of inventory | | 6 | | | 57,540 | | | | 15,287 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total operating expenses | | | | | 17,515,899 | | | | 14,866,777 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Loss from operations | | | | | (3,064,247 | ) | | | (6,208,542 | ) |
| | | |
Finance costs | | 17 | | | (707,500 | ) | | | (679,079 | ) |
Finance income | | | | | 61,798 | | | | 15,421 | |
Warrants revaluation adjustment | | 11 | | | (8,558,323 | ) | | | (3,306,128 | ) |
Gain on investment | | 19 | | | 25,000 | | | | 25,000 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Loss from operations before income taxes | | | | | (12,243,272 | ) | | | (10,153,328 | ) |
Income tax expense | | | | | (100,861 | ) | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net loss and comprehensive loss for the year | | 22 | | ($ | 12,344,133 | ) | | ($ | 10,153,328 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Basic and diluted loss and comprehensive loss per share for the year | | 22 | | ($ | 0.32 | ) | | ($ | 0.32 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements
Novadaq Technologies Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(expressed in U.S. dollars)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Share capital | | | Contributed surplus | | | Equity component of convertible debentures | | | Deficit | | | Total | |
As at December 31, 2011 | | $ | 98,695,023 | | | $ | 6,772,298 | | | $ | 1,454,353 | | | ($ | 106,295,245 | ) | | $ | 626,429 | |
Net loss and comprehensive loss for the year | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (12,344,133 | ) | | | (12,344,133 | ) |
Public offering, net | | | 40,336,250 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 40,336,250 | |
Transaction costs | | | (3,389,352 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (3,389,352 | ) |
Exercise of options | | | 137,622 | | | | (50,130 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | 87,492 | |
Exercise of warrants | | | 4,167,020 | | | | (130,627 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | 4,036,393 | |
Share-based compensation | | | — | | | | 1,316,683 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1,316,683 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
As at December 31, 2012 | | $ | 139,946,563 | | | $ | 7,908,224 | | | $ | 1,454,353 | | | ($ | 118,639,378 | ) | | $ | 30,669,762 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Share capital | | | Contributed surplus | | | Equity component of convertible debentures | | | Deficit | | | Total | |
As at December 31, 2010 | | $ | 87,897,555 | | | $ | 5,985,190 | | | $ | 1,968,395 | | | ($ | 96,638,219 | ) | | ($ | 787,079 | ) |
Net loss and comprehensive loss for the year | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (10,153,328 | ) | | | (10,153,328 | ) |
Issue of common shares | | | 11,319,477 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 11,319,477 | |
Transaction costs | | | (739,795 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (739,795 | ) |
Exercise of options | | | 132,323 | | | | (89,659 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | 42,664 | |
Reclassification | | | — | | | | — | | | | (496,302 | ) | | | 496,302 | | | | — | |
Debt conversion | | | 85,463 | | | | — | | | | (17,740 | ) | | | — | | | | 67,723 | |
Share-based compensation | | | — | | | | 876,767 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 876,767 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
As at December 31, 2011 | | $ | 98,695,023 | | | $ | 6,772,298 | | | $ | 1,454,353 | | | ($ | 106,295,245 | ) | | $ | 626,429 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements
Novadaq Technologies Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED
(expressed in U.S dollars)
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Notes | | | December 31, 2012 | | | December 31, 2011 | |
OPERATING ACTIVITIES | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Loss and comprehensive loss for the year | | | | | | ($ | 12,344,133 | ) | | ($ | 10,153,328 | ) |
Items not affecting cash | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation of property and equipment | | | 8,17 | | | | 2,142,633 | | | | 1,050,929 | |
Amortization of intangible assets | | | 9 | | | | 1,150,626 | | | | 1,119,691 | |
Stock-based compensation | | | 18 | | | | 1,316,683 | | | | 876,767 | |
Imputed interest on convertible debentures | | | | | | | 433,292 | | | | 398,448 | |
Warrants revaluation adjustment | | | 11 | | | | 8,558,323 | | | | 3,306,128 | |
Write-down of equipment | | | 8 | | | | — | | | | 314,213 | |
Write-down of inventory | | | 6 | | | | 57,540 | | | | 15,287 | |
Gain on investment | | | 19 | | | | (25,000 | ) | | | (25,000 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 1,289,964 | | | | (3,096,865 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Changes in non-cash working capital | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Increase in accounts receivable | | | | | | | (2,038,172 | ) | | | (583,818 | ) |
Increase in inventories | | | 6 | | | | (604,700 | ) | | | (857,810 | ) |
Decrease in prepaid expenses and other assets | | | | | | | 55,149 | | | | 259,614 | |
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable | | | | | | | 839,696 | | | | (588,099 | ) |
Increase in deferred revenue | | | | | | | 263,336 | | | | 346,994 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net change in non-cash working capital balances related to operations | | | | | | | (1,484,691 | ) | | | (1,423,119 | ) |
| | | |
(Decrease) increase in long-term deferred revenue | | | | | | | (1,325,602 | ) | | | 1,656,607 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash used in operating activities | | | | | | | (1,520,329 | ) | | | (2,863,377 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
INVESTING ACTIVITIES | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Purchase of property and equipment | | | 8 | | | | (6,511,829 | ) | | | (6,545,062 | ) |
Disposal of property and equipment | | | 8 | | | | 275,521 | | | | 213,492 | |
Purchase of Transmyocardial Revascularization (“TMR”) business | | | 10 | | | | — | | | | (1,000,000 | ) |
Redemption of long-term investment | | | 19 | | | | 25,000 | | | | 25,000 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash used in investing activities | | | | | | | (6,211,308 | ) | | | (7,306,570 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
FINANCING ACTIVITIES | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from issuance of common shares and warrants | | | 21 | | | | 40,336,250 | | | | 15,273,401 | |
Transaction costs paid relating to issuance of common shares and warrants | | | 21 | | | | (3,389,352 | ) | | | (998,207 | ) |
Repayable government assistance | | | | | | | (191,068 | ) | | | (95,513 | ) |
Proceeds from exercise of options | | | | | | | 87,492 | | | | 42,664 | |
Proceeds from exercise of warrants | | | | | | | 202,895 | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash provided by financing activities | | | | | | | 37,046,217 | | | | 14,222,345 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents | | | | | | | 29,314,580 | | | | 4,052,398 | |
Net foreign exchange difference | | | | | | | 5,993 | | | | (16,197 | ) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year | | | | | | | 9,633,608 | | | | 5,597,407 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year | | | | | | $ | 38,954,181 | | | $ | 9,633,608 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements
The consolidated financial statements of Novadaq Technologies Inc. [the “Company”] for the year ended December 31, 2012 were authorized for issuance in accordance with a resolution of the directors on February 6, 2013. The Company is a listed company incorporated and domiciled in Canada whose shares are publicly traded on the Toronto Stock Exchange (“TSX”) and NASDAQ. The registered office is located at 2585 Skymark Avenue, Suite 306, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.
The Company was incorporated under the Canada Business Corporations Act on April 14, 2000. Novadaq Corp. was incorporated in the State of Delaware in June 2005 as a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiary. The Company develops and commercializes medical imaging and therapeutic devices for use in the operating room. The Company’s proprietary imaging platform can be used to visualize blood vessels, nerves and the lymphatic system during surgical procedures.
3. | SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES |
These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards [“IFRS”] as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board [“IASB”].
The consolidated financial statements are presented in the currency of United States dollars [“U.S. dollars”]. They are prepared on the historical cost basis except for derivative financial instruments and available-for-sale financial instruments, which are measured at fair value. The accounting policies set out below have been applied consistently to all periods presented in these consolidated financial statements.
| [b] | Statement of compliance |
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with IFRS as issued by the IASB.
| [c] | Basis of consolidation |
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its directly owned subsidiary Novadaq Corp. as at December 31, 2012. The subsidiary is fully consolidated from the date of acquisition, being the date on which the Company obtains control, and continues to be consolidated until the date that such control ceases. The financial statements of the subsidiary are prepared for the same reporting period as the Company, using consistent accounting policies. All intra-company balances, income and expenses and unrealized gains and losses resulting from intra-company transactions are eliminated in full.
| [d] | Business combinations and goodwill |
Business combinations are accounted for using the purchase method. The cost of an acquisition is measured as the fair value of the assets given, equity instruments and liabilities incurred or assumed at the date of exchange. Acquisition costs for business combinations incurred subsequent to January 1, 2010 are expensed and included in administrative expenses. Identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination are measured initially at fair value at the date of acquisition.
Goodwill is initially measured at cost, being the excess of the cost of the business combination over the Company’s share in the net fair value of the acquiree’s identifiable assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities. Any negative difference is recognized directly in the consolidated statements of loss and comprehensive loss. If the fair values of the assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities can only be calculated on a provisional basis, the business combination is recognized using provisional values. Any adjustments resulting from the completion of the measurement process are recognized within 12 months of the date of acquisition.
| [e] | Cash and cash equivalents |
Cash and cash equivalents comprise cash on hand and highly liquid investments that are readily convertible to cash with maturities of less than 90 days at the time of purchase. For the purpose of the consolidated statements of cash flows, cash and cash equivalents consist of cash and highly liquid investments as defined above, net of outstanding bank overdrafts, if any.
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business less the estimated costs of completion and the estimated costs necessary to make the sale. Cost is determined on a first-in, first-out basis.
| [g] | Property and equipment |
Property and equipment are stated at cost, net of accumulated depreciation and any impairment losses determined. Cost includes the purchase price, any costs directly attributable to bringing the asset to the location and condition necessary and, where relevant, the present value of all dismantling and removal costs. All repair and maintenance costs are recognized in the consolidated statements of loss and comprehensive loss as an expense when incurred. Depreciation is provided over the estimated useful lives of the assets as follows:
| | |
Medical devices | | 2 to 5 years |
Furniture and fixtures | | 3 years |
Computer equipment | | 2 years |
Leasehold improvements | | Over the term of the lease |
An item of property and equipment and any significant part initially recognized is derecognized upon disposal or when no future economic benefits are expected from its use or disposal. Any gain or loss arising on derecognition of the asset is included in the consolidated statements of loss and comprehensive loss when the asset is derecognized.
The assets’ useful lives and methods of depreciation are reviewed at each financial year end, and adjusted prospectively, if appropriate. No depreciation is taken on construction in progress until the asset is ready for management’s intended use.
The Company owns intangible assets consisting of licenses, SPY software and Xillix patent rights.
Intangible assets acquired separately are measured on initial recognition at cost. The cost of intangible assets acquired in a business combination is its fair value at the date of acquisition. Following initial recognition, intangible assets are carried at cost less accumulated amortization and impairment losses, if any. The useful lives of intangible assets are assessed as either finite or indefinite.
The Company currently does not hold any intangible assets with indefinite lives.
Intangible assets with finite useful lives are amortized over the useful economic life and assessed for impairment whenever there is an indication that the intangible asset may be impaired. The amortization method and amortization period of an intangible asset with a finite useful life is reviewed at least annually. Changes in the expected useful life or the expected pattern of consumption of future economic benefits embodied in the asset is accounted for by changing the amortization period or method, as appropriate, and are treated as changes in accounting estimates. The amortization expense on intangible assets with finite lives is recognized in the consolidated statements of loss and comprehensive loss in the expense category consistent with the function of the intangible assets.
Internally generated intangible assets, such as deferred development costs, are capitalized when the product or process is technically and commercially feasible and the Company has sufficient resources to complete development. The cost of an internally generated intangible asset comprises all directly attributable costs necessary to create, produce and prepare the asset to be capable of operating in the manner intended by management. Amortization of the internally generated intangible assets begins when the development is complete and the asset is available for use. It is amortized over the period of expected future benefit. Amortization is recorded in cost of sales.
Intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over the lesser of their useful lives and the life of the patents, or the term of the patent rights:
| | |
TMR manufacturing license | | 2 years |
SPY software | | 2 years |
Xillix patent rights | | 5 to 15 years |
| [i] | Impairment of non-financial assets |
The Company assesses at each reporting date whether there is an indication that an asset may be impaired. If such an indication exists, the Company estimates the asset’s recoverable amount. The recoverable amount is the higher of an asset’s or cash-generating unit’s [“CGU”] fair value less costs to sell and its value-in-use. Where the carrying amount of an asset or CGU exceeds its recoverable amount, the asset is considered impaired and is written down to its recoverable amount.
Value-in-use is determined by discounting estimated future cash flows using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects the current market assessment of the time value of money and the specific risks of the asset. In determining fair value less costs to sell, recent market transactions are taken into account, if available. If no such transactions can be identified, an appropriate valuation model has to be used. The recoverable amount of assets that do not generate independent cash flows is determined based on the CGU to which the asset belongs.
The Company bases its impairment calculation on detailed budgets and forecast calculations which are prepared separately for each of the Company’s CGUs to which the individual assets are allocated. These budgets and forecast calculations are generally cover a period of three to five years.
An impairment loss is recognized in the consolidated statements of loss and comprehensive loss if an asset’s carrying amount or that of the CGU to which it is allocated is higher than its recoverable amount. Impairment losses of CGUs are charged against the carrying value of assets in a CGU, in proportion to their carrying amount. In the consolidated statements of loss and comprehensive loss, the impairment losses are recognized in the expense categories consistent with the function of the impaired asset.
An assessment is made at each reporting date as to whether there is any indication that previously recognized impairment losses may no longer exist or may have decreased. For purposes of impairment testing, the Company determined that it has two CGUs, namely the SPY Imaging Technology business and the TMR business.
The calculation of value-in-use for the CGU would be most sensitive to the following assumptions:
| • | | Price development for the consumables and medical devices; and |
| • | | Market share assumptions. |
Gross margins—Gross margins are based on historical and forecasted values.
Discount rates—Discount rates reflect the current market assessment of the risks specific to each CGU. The discount rate was estimated based on the average percentage of a weighted average cost of capital for the medical device industry.
Price development for the consumables and medical devices—Estimates are obtained from published forecasts about the future development of applicable procedures in North America during the detailed forecast period, as well as management’s own judgments.
Market share assumptions—These assumptions are important because management assesses how the CGU’s position, relative to its competitors, might change over the budget period.
Leased assets are depreciated over the useful life of the asset. However, if there is no reasonable certainty that the Company will obtain ownership by the end of the lease term, the asset is depreciated over the shorter of the estimated useful life of the asset and the lease term.
Operating lease payments are recognized as an expense in the consolidated statements of loss and comprehensive loss on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
The Company classifies its financial instruments as either [i] financial assets at fair value through profit or loss, [ii] loans and receivables or [iii] available-for-sale, and its financial liabilities as either [i] financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss or [ii] other financial liabilities. Appropriate classification of financial assets and liabilities is determined at the time of initial recognition or when reclassified in the consolidated statements of financial position.
All financial instruments are recognized initially at fair value plus, in the case of investments and liabilities not at fair value through profit or loss, directly attributable transaction costs. Financial instruments are recognized on the trade date, which is the date on which the Company commits to purchase or sell the asset.
There are currently no financial instruments classified as available-for-sale.
Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss:
Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss include financial assets held for trading and financial assets designated upon initial recognition at fair value through profit or loss. Financial assets are classified as held for trading if they are acquired for the purpose of selling or repurchasing in the near term.
Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss are carried at fair value. Related realized and unrealized gains and losses are included in the consolidated statements of loss and comprehensive loss in finance income or finance costs.
The Company has currently not designated any financial assets upon initial recognition as at fair value through profit or loss.
Loans and receivables:
Loans and receivables are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market. Loans and receivables are initially recognized at fair value plus transaction costs. They are subsequently measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method less any impairment. The losses arising from impairment are recognized in the consolidated statements of loss and comprehensive loss in finance costs.
Derecognition:
A financial asset is derecognized when the rights to receive cash flows from the asset have expired or when the Company has transferred its rights to receive cash flows from the asset.
Impairment of financial assets:
The Company assesses at each reporting date whether there is any objective evidence that a financial asset or a group of financial assets is impaired. A financial asset is deemed to be impaired if, and only if, there is objective evidence of impairment as a result of one or more events that have occurred after the initial recognition of the asset [an incurred ‘loss event’] and that loss event has an impact on the estimated future cash flows of the financial asset or the group of financial assets that can be reliably estimated.
For financial assets carried at amortized cost, the Company first assesses individually whether objective evidence of impairment exists individually for financial assets that are individually significant, or collectively for financial assets that are not individually significant. If the Company determines that no objective evidence of impairment exists for an individually assessed financial asset, it includes the asset in a group of financial assets with similar credit risk characteristics and collectively assesses them for impairment. Assets that are individually assessed for impairment and for which an impairment loss is, or continues to be, recognized are not included in a collective assessment of impairment.
If there is objective evidence that an impairment loss has occurred, the amount of the loss is measured as the difference between the asset’s carrying amount and the present value of estimated future cash flows.
The carrying amount of the asset is reduced through the use of an allowance account and the amount of the loss is recognized in profit or loss.
Loans and receivables together with the associated allowance are written off when there is no realistic prospect of future recovery. If, in a subsequent year, the amount of the estimated impairment loss increases or decreases because of an event occurring after the impairment was recognized, the previously recognized impairment loss is increased or reduced by adjusting the allowance account. If a write-off is later recovered, the recovery is credited to finance costs in profit or loss.
Financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss:
Financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss include financial liabilities held for trading and financial liabilities designated upon initial recognition at fair value through profit or loss.
Because the Company’s shareholder warrants are denominated in Canadian dollars [a currency different from the Company’s functional currency] they are recognized as a financial liability and are remeasured at fair value through profit or loss.
Other financial liabilities:
Financial liabilities are measured at amortized cost using the effective interest rate method. Financial liabilities include long-term debt issued, which is initially measured at fair value, which is the consideration received, net of transaction costs incurred. Transaction costs related to the long-term debt instruments are included in the value of the instruments and amortized using the effective interest rate method. The effective interest expense is included in finance costs in the consolidated statements of loss and comprehensive loss.
Derecognition:
A financial liability is derecognized when the obligation under the liability is discharged or cancelled or expires.
When an existing financial liability is replaced by another from the same lender on substantially different terms, or the terms of an existing liability are substantially modified, such an exchange or modification is treated as a derecognition of the original liability and the recognition of a new liability, and the difference in the respective carrying amounts is recognized in the consolidated statements of loss and comprehensive loss.
| [l] | Offsetting of financial instruments |
Financial assets and financial liabilities are offset and the net amount reported in the consolidated statements of financial position if, and only if, there is a currently enforceable legal right to offset the recognized amounts and there is an intention to settle on a net basis, or to realize the assets and settle the liabilities simultaneously.
| [m] | Fair value of financial instruments |
Fair value is the estimated amount that the Company would pay or receive to dispose of the financial instrument contracts in an arm’s length transaction between knowledgeable, willing parties who are under no compulsion to act. The fair value of financial instruments that are traded in active markets at each reporting date is determined by reference to quoted market prices, without any deduction for transaction costs.
For financial instruments not traded in an active market, the fair value is determined using appropriate valuation techniques that are recognized by market participants. Such techniques may include using recent arm’s length market transactions, reference to the current fair value of another instrument that is substantially the same, discounted cash flow analysis or other valuation models.
| [n] | Common share warrants derivatives |
The Company’s common share warrants are considered to be derivative liabilities due to the warrants being exercisable in a currency (Canadian dollar) other than the functional currency of the Company (U.S. dollar). Accordingly, the warrants are measured at fair value at each reporting date, with changes in fair value included in the statement of loss and comprehensive loss for the applicable reporting period.
Revenue is recognized to the extent that it is probable that the economic benefits will flow to the Company and the revenue can be reliably measured, regardless of when the payment is being made. Revenue is measured at the fair value of the consideration received or receivable, taking into account contractually defined terms of payment and excluding taxes or duty. The Company assesses its revenue arrangements with all of its customers and partners against specific criteria to determine if it is acting as principal or agent. The Company has concluded that it is acting as a principal in all of its revenue arrangements. The specific recognition criteria described below must also be met before revenue is recognized.
Product sales
Product sales to customers
Revenue from the sale of medical devices and consumables is recognized when significant risks and rewards of ownership of the products have passed or transferred to the customer, usually when the products are picked up by the shipper for delivery, collection of the related receivable is probable, persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists and the sales price is fixed or determinable.
Products sales under partnership agreements
Revenue is recognized on sale of capital devices or consumable products when they are picked up by the shipper for delivery to the partners, as at that point-of-time the Company has transferred all relevant risks of ownership [inventory risks for the delivered products, credit risk for the transaction with the end customer and price risk for the transaction with the end customer] to the partners, who maintains the business relationship with the end customer. Under the current partnership agreements, the Company shares on-going revenues from its partners’ sales to end customers, net of contracted minimum pricing retained by the Company upon initial shipments to its partners, related to the SPY imaging system and the disposable products required to perform the SPY imaging procedure. The Company records any additional amounts when its partners sell to the end customer.
Rental income
Rental income arising from the rental of capital devices is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease terms and included in product sales.
Multiple element arrangements
The Company may enter into arrangements in which it commits to provide multiple products and services to its customers occurring at different points in time. Revenue recognition for these arrangements is determined based on evaluation of the individual elements of the arrangements. If the element delivered has stand-alone value to the customer and the fair value associated with the element can be measured reliably, the amount recognized as revenue for that element is the fair value of the element in relation to the fair value of the arrangement as a whole. Otherwise, the entire arrangement is treated as one unit of accounting and revenue is deferred and recognized ratably over the remaining term of the arrangements, commencing when all elements are delivered.
Royalty revenue
The Company earns and recognizes royalties upon sale of its products to the end user by its partner.
Partnership fee revenue
Partnership fee revenue relates to upfront payments received from partners for exclusive sales and marketing rights. Upfront payments are deferred and recognized on a straight-line basis over the exclusive sales and marketing terms.
Service revenue
Service revenue primarily relates to extended warranty services agreements in connection with capital sales. Revenue from these agreements are deferred and recognized on a straight-line basis over the extended warranty services term.
| [p] | Foreign currency translation |
The Company’s functional currency is the U.S. dollar.
Transactions in foreign currencies are initially recorded by the Company at their respective functional currency rates prevailing at the date of the transaction.
Monetary items are translated at the functional currency spot rate as of the reporting date. Exchange differences from monetary items are recognized in profit or loss. Non-monetary items that are not carried at fair value are translated using the exchange rates as at the dates of the initial transaction. Non-monetary items measured at fair value in a foreign currency are translated using the exchange rates at the date when the fair value is determined.
The computation of basic loss per share is based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the year. Diluted loss per share is calculated in a similar way to basic loss per share except that the weighted average number of common shares outstanding are increased to include additional shares assuming the exercise of stock options, warrants and convertible debenture options, if dilutive.
| [r] | Share-based compensation plan |
Employees [including senior executives and Board members] of the Company receive remuneration in the form of stock options.
In situations where stock options are issued and some or all of the goods or services received by the entity as consideration cannot be specifically identified, the unidentified goods or services received are measured as the difference between the fair value of the share-based compensation transaction and the fair value of any identifiable goods or services received at the grant date. This is then capitalized or expensed as appropriate.
The cost of equity-settled transactions with employees is measured by reference to the fair value at the date on which they are granted. The cost of stock option transactions is recognized, together with a corresponding increase in contributed surplus, over the period in which the performance and/or service conditions are fulfilled.
The cumulative expense recognized for share-based compensation transactions at each reporting date until the vesting date reflects the extent to which this vesting period has expired and the Company’s best estimate of the number of shares that will ultimately vest. The expense or credit recognized for a period represents the movement in cumulative expense recognized as at the beginning and end of that period and is recognized in the consolidated statements of loss and comprehensive loss in the respective function line.
When options are exercised, the amounts previously credited to contributed surplus are reversed and credited to shareholders’ equity. The amount of cash, if any, received from participants is also credited in share capital in shareholders’ equity.
Where the terms of stock options are modified, the minimum expense recognized is the expense as if the terms had not been modified, if the original terms of the award are met. An additional expense is recognized for any modification that increases the total fair value of the share-based compensation transaction, or is otherwise beneficial to the employee as measured at the date of modification.
The dilutive effect, if any, of outstanding options is reflected as additional share dilution in the computation of diluted loss per share.
| [s] | Government contributions and grants |
Government grants are recognized where there is reasonable assurance that the grant will be received and all attached conditions will be complied with. When the grant relates to an expense item, it is recognized as income over the period necessary to match the grant on a systemic basis to the costs that it is intended to compensate. When the grant relates to an asset, it is recognized as deferred revenue and released to income in equal amounts over the expected useful life of the related asset.
Government contributions relating to research and development are recorded as a reduction of expenses when the related expenditures are incurred.
Where forgivable loans are provided by governments depending on meeting certain criteria by the Company, the forgivable loan is recorded as other operating income when there is reasonable assurance that the Company will meet the terms for forgiveness of the loan.
The Company is a taxable entity under the Income Tax Act (Canada). Current income tax assets and liabilities for the current period are measured at the amount expected to be recovered from or paid to
the taxation authorities. The tax rates and tax laws used to compute the amount are those that are enacted or substantively enacted at the reporting date in the countries where the Company operates and generates taxable income. Current income tax relating to items recognized directly in equity is recognized in equity and not in the consolidated statements of loss and comprehensive loss. Management periodically evaluates positions taken in the tax returns with respect to situations in which applicable tax regulations are subject to interpretation and establishes provisions, where appropriate.
Provisions are recognized when the Company has a present obligation, legal or constructive, as a result of a past event, it is probable that an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation and a reliable estimate can be made of the amount of the obligation. The expense relating to any provision is presented in the consolidated statements of loss and comprehensive loss.
Provisions for warranty-related costs for the standard one year manufacturer’s warranty are recognized when the product is sold. Initial recognition is based on historical experience and future expected costs. The initial estimate of warranty-related costs is revised annually. The time value of money is not material.
4. | SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES AND ASSUMPTIONS |
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements requires the use of estimates and assumptions to be made in applying the accounting policies that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, expenses and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. The estimates and related assumptions are based on previous experience and other factors considered reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis of making the assumptions about carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources.
The estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis. Revisions to accounting estimates are recognized in the period in which the estimate is revised if the revision affects only that period or in the period of the revision and future periods if the revision affects both current and future periods. Judgments made by management in the application of IFRS that have a significant effect on the consolidated financial statements relate to the following:
Impairment of non-financial assets
The Company’s impairment test is based on value-in-use calculations that use a discounted cash flow model. The cash flows are derived from the projections for the next three to five years and are sensitive to the discount rate used as well as the expected future cash inflows and the growth rate used for extrapolation purposes.
Development costs
Initial capitalization of costs is based on management’s judgment that technical and economical feasibility is confirmed, usually when a project has reached a defined milestone according to an established project management model.
Useful lives of key property and equipment and intangible assets
The depreciation method and useful lives reflect the pattern in which management expects the asset’s future economic benefits to be consumed by the Company.
Accounts receivable
The Company reviews its individually significant receivables at each reporting date to assess whether an impairment loss should be recorded in the consolidated statements of loss and comprehensive loss. In particular, judgment by management is required in the estimation of the amount and timing of future cash flows when determining the impairment loss. In estimating these cash flows, the Company makes judgments about the borrower’s financial situation and the net realizable value of collateral, if any. These estimates are based on assumptions about a number of factors and actual results may differ, resulting in future changes to the allowance.
Fair value of financial instruments
Where the fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities recorded in the consolidated statements of financial position cannot be derived from active markets, they are determined using valuation techniques including the discounted cash flow models. The inputs to these models are taken from observable markets. Changes in input from observable market factors could affect the reported fair value of financial instruments.
Share-based compensation
The Company measures the cost of equity-settled transactions with employees by reference to the fair value of equity instruments at the date at which they are granted. Estimating fair value for share-based compensation requires determining the most appropriate valuation model for a grant of these instruments, which is dependent on the terms and conditions of the grant. This also requires determining the most appropriate inputs to the valuation model, including the risk-free interest rate expected life of the option, volatility and dividend yield.
Shareholder warrants
In determining the fair value of the shareholder warrants, the Company used the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: average volatility rate; market price as at the reporting date; risk-free interest rate; the remaining expected life of the warrant; and an exchange rate as at the reporting date. The inputs used in the Black-Scholes model are taken from observable markets. In particular, changes in estimates of the fair value of the shareholder warrants can have a material impact on the reported loss and comprehensive loss for a given period.
5. | STANDARDS ISSUED BUT NOT YET EFFECTIVE |
Standards issued but not yet effective up to the date of issuance of the Company’s consolidated financial statements are listed below. This listing is of standards and interpretations issued, which the Company reasonably expects to be applicable at a future date. The Company intends to adopt those standards when they become effective.
IFRS 9Financial Instruments: Classification and Measurement
In November 2009, the IASB issued IFRS 9, which covers classification and measurement as the first part of its project to replace IAS 39. In October 2010, the Board of Directors also incorporated new accounting
requirements for liabilities. The standard introduces new requirements for measurement and eliminates the current classification of loans and receivables, available-for-sale and held-to-maturity, currently in IAS 39. There are new requirements for the accounting of financial liabilities as well as a carryover of requirements from IAS 39. The standard is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2015. The Company does not anticipate early adoption and will adopt the standard when it is mandated by the IASB. The Company is currently assessing the impact of the standard on the consolidated financial statements.
IFRS 13Fair Value Measurement
IFRS 13 is a comprehensive standard for fair value measurement and disclosure requirements for use across all IFRS standards. IFRS 13 defines fair value and establishes disclosures about fair value measurement. The effective date of this amendment is for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013. The Company is currently assessing the impact of the standard on the consolidated financial statements.
IAS 32Offsetting Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities
IAS 32Financial Instruments: Presentationand IFRS 7Financial Instruments: Disclosures
In December 2011, the IASB publishedOffsetting Financial Assets and Financial Liabilitiesand issued new disclosure requirements in IFRS 7Financial Instruments: Disclosures. The effective date for the amendments to IAS 32Financial Instruments: Presentationis for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2014.
IFRS 7Financial Instruments: Disclosures
In October 2010, the IASB issued amendments to IFRS 7Financial Instruments: Disclosures, which increase the disclosure requirements for transactions involving transfers of financial assets. The effective date for the amendments to IFRS 7 is for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013. The Company does not expect implementation of these amendments to have a significant impact on its disclosures or presentation.
Inventories by category are as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2012 | | | December 31, 2011 | |
| | $ | | | $ | |
Raw materials | | | 1,168,045 | | | | 877,895 | |
Medical devices, software and parts | | | 499,502 | | | | 165,345 | |
TMR kits | | | 46,030 | | | | 123,177 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | 1,713,577 | | | | 1,166,417 | |
| | | | | | | | |
For the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company wrote down $57,540 of inventory to its net realizable value [2011—$15,287] and wrote up inventory of nil [2011—nil]. Inventory is valued at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Cost is determined on a first-in, first-out basis for finished goods and weighted average for raw materials.
For the year ended December 31, 2012, $1,521,412 [2011—$1,438,080] of inventory has been recognized in cost of sales.
On January 13, 2009, the Company entered into two agreements with Intuitive Surgical® Inc. [“Intuitive”], a License and Development Agreement and a Supply Agreement. Under the License and Development Agreement, the Company and Intuitive integrated the Company’s SPY imaging technology into Intuitive’s da Vinci® robot surgical system. The Company received an initial $2,000,000 license payment upon execution of the agreements and received additional amounts totalling $3,000,000 based upon achieving certain predefined development milestones. In August 2010, the Company received the final milestone payment representing the final design review and acceptance of the integrated technology. The total receipt of $5,000,000 has been recorded as a sale of which $3,958,737 of revenue was recognized in 2010 and $1,041,263 was recognized earlier based on the cost recovery method of revenue recognition. The associated costs were recognized in the same periods.
Under the Supply Agreement, the Company is also appointed as the exclusive long-term supplier for key components of the Integrated Product and for the imaging agent used to perform each imaging procedure with the Integrated Product. Supply commenced under this agreement in February 2011, following Intuitive’s receipt of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s 510(k) clearance for the Integrated Product and commercialization activities were initiated.
Additionally, the Company received royalty payments for each surgical robot system sold that included the Company’s SPY imaging technology [the “Integrated Product”]. The Company has also been paid royalties for systems that have been previously sold and installed in hospitals that were field upgraded to include the Integrated Product. The royalty period commenced in February 2011 based on the first commercial sale of the Integrated Product and is renewable subject to certain terms and conditions. For the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company earned royalties of $1,849,668 [2011—$395,398] through the sales of the Integrated Product.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Medical devices | | | Furniture and fixtures | | | Computer equipment | | | Leasehold improvements | | | Total | |
| | $ | | | $ | | | $ | | | $ | | | $ | |
Cost: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at January 1, 2012 | | | 8,971,551 | | | | 392,190 | | | | 1,161,916 | | | | 185,902 | | | | 10,711,559 | |
Additions | | | 6,350,607 | | | | 18,223 | | | | 92,273 | | | | 50,726 | | | | 6,511,829 | |
Disposals | | | (332,443 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (332,443 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at December 31, 2012 | | | 14,989,715 | | | | 410,413 | | | | 1,254,189 | | | | 236,628 | | | | 16,890,945 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at January 1, 2012 | | | (2,488,182 | ) | | | (386,898 | ) | | | (1,121,429 | ) | | | (91,064 | ) | | | (4,087,573 | ) |
Depreciation | | | (2,039,898 | ) | | | (4,083 | ) | | | (59,346 | ) | | | (39,306 | ) | | | (2,142,633 | ) |
Disposals | | | 56,922 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 56,922 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at December 31, 2012 | | | (4,471,158 | ) | | | (390,981 | ) | | | (1,180,775 | ) | | | (130,370 | ) | | | (6,173,284 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net book value at December 31, 2012 | | | 10,518,557 | | | | 19,432 | | | | 73,414 | | | | 106,258 | | | | 10,717,661 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | Medical devices | | | Furniture and fixtures | | | Computer equipment | | | Leasehold improvements | | | Total | |
| | $ | | | $ | | | $ | | | $ | | | $ | |
Cost: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at January 1, 2011 | | | 5,011,226 | | | | 389,190 | | | | 1,126,622 | | | | 184,282 | | | | 6,711,320 | |
Additions | | | 6,505,148 | | | | 3,000 | | | | 35,294 | | | | 1,620 | | | | 6,545,062 | |
Write-down of equipment | | | (2,177,308 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (2,177,308 | ) |
Disposals | | | (367,515 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (367,515 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at December 31, 2011 | | | 8,971,551 | | | | 392,190 | | | | 1,161,916 | | | | 185,902 | | | | 10,711,559 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at January 1, 2011 | | | (3,573,226 | ) | | | (377,061 | ) | | | (1,048,587 | ) | | | (54,888 | ) | | | (5,053,762 | ) |
Depreciation | | | (932,074 | ) | | | (9,837 | ) | | | (72,842 | ) | | | (36,176 | ) | | | (1,050,929 | ) |
Write-down of equipment | | | 1,863,095 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1,863,095 | |
Disposals | | | 154,023 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 154,023 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at December 31, 2011 | | | (2,488,182 | ) | | | (386,898 | ) | | | (1,121,429 | ) | | | (91,064 | ) | | | (4,087,573 | ) |
| | | | | | | �� | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net book value at December 31, 2011 | | | 6,483,369 | | | | 5,292 | | | | 40,487 | | | | 94,838 | | | | 6,623,986 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
During the year, write-down of equipment was nil [2011—$314,213] and recognized a loss of disposal of medical devices of $275,521 [2011—$213,492].
As at December 31, 2012, medical devices includes construction-in-progress of $1,188,369 [2011—$589,312], which are not being depreciated. Depreciation will commence when the devices are placed at medical institutions.
For the year ended December 31, 2012, additions included expenditures of $5,173,349 [2011—$5,478,835] on SPYElite placed at medical institutions to generate revenue.
Intangible assets include licenses, SPY software and Xillix patent rights as summarized below:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Licenses | | | SPY software | | | Xillix patent rights | | | Total | |
| | $ | | | $ | | | $ | | | $ | |
Cost: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at January 1 and December 31, 2012 | | | 5,913,642 | | | | 405,195 | | | | 2,534,836 | | | | 8,853,673 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Amortization: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at January 1, 2012 | | | (5,142,503 | ) | | | (202,597 | ) | | | (1,236,139 | ) | | | (6,581,239 | ) |
Amortization | | | (711,821 | ) | | | (202,598 | ) | | | (236,207 | ) | | | (1,150,626 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at December 31, 2012 | | | (5,854,324 | ) | | | (405,195 | ) | | | (1,472,346 | ) | | | (7,731,865 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net book value at December 31, 2012 | | | 59,318 | | | | — | | | | 1,062,490 | | | | 1,121,808 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
| | Licenses | | | SPY software | | | Xillix patent rights | | | Total | |
| | $ | | | $ | | | $ | | | $ | |
Cost: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Opening balance at January 1, 2011 | | | 4,490,000 | | | | 405,195 | | | | 2,534,836 | | | | 7,430,031 | |
Additions | | | 1,423,642 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1,423,642 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at December 31, 2011 | | | 5,913,642 | | | | 405,195 | | | | 2,534,836 | | | | 8,853,673 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Amortization: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Opening balance at January 1, 2011 | | | (4,490,000 | ) | | | — | | | | (971,548 | ) | | | (5,461,548 | ) |
Amortization | | | (652,503 | ) | | | (202,597 | ) | | | (264,591 | ) | | | (1,119,691 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at December 31, 2011 | | | (5,142,503 | ) | | | (202,597 | ) | | | (1,236,139 | ) | | | (6,581,239 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net book value at December 31, 2011 | | | 771,139 | | | | 202,598 | | | | 1,298,697 | | | | 2,272,434 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The Xillix patent rights include a portfolio of owned and licensed patents which are being amortized over the term of the patents ranging from 5 to 15 years.
10. | ACQUISITION OF PLC SYSTEMS INC. |
Effective February 1, 2011, and based on the asset purchase agreement from November 8, 2010, the Company acquired Laser System Business for TMR from PLC Systems Inc. [“PLC”]. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company has acquired all assets employed by PLC in the TMR business including manufacturing rights, product inventories, equipment, intellectual property, regulatory approvals, clinical data and all documentation related to TMR.
The acquisition has been accounted for by the purchase method with the results of the TMR operations included in the Company’s consolidated statements of loss and comprehensive loss from the date of acquisition. The assets and liabilities of the TMR business as at the date of acquisition were:
| | | | |
| | $ | |
Inventories | | | 146,003 | |
Property and equipment | | | 17,095 | |
TMR manufacturing license [note 9] | | | 1,423,642 | |
| | | | |
Purchase consideration | | | 1,586,740 | |
| | | | |
The purchase consideration consisted of $1,000,000 cash paid and the settlement of the Company’s prepaid asset of $586,740 stemming from the pre-existing relationship with PLC. The allocation of the purchase price to acquired assets and liabilities is based on the fair value assessed for each of the individual acquired assets and liabilities.
From the date of acquisition (February 1, 2011) to December 31, 2011, the TMR business had contributed $4,065,000 of revenue and $621,000 to the net profit of the Company. If the combination had taken place at the beginning of that year, revenue would have increased by $4,289,000 and the profit would have been $665,000. Transaction costs of $136,644 were expensed and included in administrative expenses.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Broker | | | Shareholder | | | Shareholder | | | | |
| | Warrants | | | Amount | | | Warrants | | | Amount | | | Warrants | | | Amount | | | Total | |
| | # | | | $ | | | # | | | $ | | | # | | | $ | | | $ | |
January 1, 2011 | | | 128,066 | | | | 153,679 | | | | 609,838 | | | | 1,276,464 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1,430,143 | |
Issued | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 2,129,339 | | | | 3,695,513 | | | | 3,695,513 | |
Exercised | | | (50,000 | ) | | | (60,000 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (60,000 | ) |
Revaluation | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 491,975 | | | | — | | | | 2,814,153 | | | | 3,306,128 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at December 31, 2011 | | | 78,066 | | | | 93,679 | | | | 609,838 | | | | 1,768,439 | | | | 2,129,339 | | | | 6,509,666 | | | | 8,371,784 | |
Exercised | | | (58,856 | ) | | | (70,627 | ) | | | (67,407 | ) | | | (437,889 | ) | | | (507,493 | ) | | | (3,395,609 | ) | | | (3,904,125 | ) |
Revaluation | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1,924,278 | | | | — | | | | 6,634,045 | | | | 8,558,323 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at December 31, 2012 | | | 19,210 | | | | 23,052 | | | | 542,431 | | | | 3,254,828 | | | | 1,621,846 | | | | 9,748,102 | | | | 13,025,982 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
On March 24, 2011, the Company closed a private placement of U.S. $14,280,240, net of transaction costs of $998,207, in exchange for 4,731,864 units at a price of CDN $3.17 per unit. Each unit consists of one common share and 0.45 of a warrant, representing 2,129,339 warrants. Each warrant has a five-year term and is exercisable for one common share at an exercise price of CDN $3.18 per share. Because such warrants were denominated in Canadian dollars [a currency different from the Company’s functional currency] they are recognized as a financial liability at fair value through profit or loss. In determining the fair value of the warrants, the Company used the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: average volatility rate of 66%; risk-free interest rate of 1.98%; expected life of five years; and an exchange rate of 1.026. The value of $3,695,513, net of transaction costs, was established on March 24, 2011 and
subsequently revalued on December 31, 2011 utilizing the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: average volatility rate of 64%; risk-free interest rate of 1.85%; expected life of 4.23 years; and exchange rate of 0.980. The fair value of the warrants before transaction costs were initially U.S. $1.86 per warrant at issuance and at December 31, 2011 were valued at U.S. $3.06 per warrant.
As at December 31, 2012, the warrants were revalued at U.S. $6.01 per warrant utilizing the following assumptions: volatility rate of 47%; risk-free interest rate of 1.80%; expected life of 3.23 years; and an exchange rate of 1.0051.
In February 2010, the Company closed a private placement of U.S. $6,610,157, net of cash transaction costs of $511,180 in which 3,049,205 units at CDN $2.43 per unit were issued. Each unit is comprised of one common share and one-fifth warrant. Each warrant has a five-year term and is exercisable for one common share at an exercise price of CDN $3.00. Because such warrants were denominated in Canadian dollars [a currency different from the Company’s functional currency] they are recognized as a financial liability at fair value through profit or loss. Broker cashless warrants of 128,066 were also issued as part of broker compensation which are exercisable for one common share at CDN $2.82 over a three-year term. Such broker warrants represented compensation provided to the brokers in connection with the private placement and were accounted for as non-cash transaction costs. The fair value of broker compensation for the services provided approximated the fair value of those warrants. In determining the fair value of the warrants, the Company used the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: average volatility rate of 69%; risk-free interest rate of 1.88%; and expected life of five years for shareholder warrants and three years for broker warrants. Shareholder warrants were initially established at U.S. $1.47 and closed on December 31, 2010 at U.S. $2.09.
As at December 31, 2012, the warrants were revalued at U.S. $6.00 per warrant utilizing the following assumptions: volatility rate of 46%; risk-free interest rate of 1.80%; expected life of 2.14 years; and an exchange rate of 1.0051.
12. | INTEREST-BEARING LOANS AND BORROWINGS |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Maturity | | | December 31, 2012 $ | | | December 31, 2011 $ | |
Interest-bearing loans and borrowings | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Repayable government assistance | | | 31/01/2014 | | | | 221,094 | | | | 412,162 | |
Non-current interest-bearing loans and borrowings | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Convertible debentures | | | 18/02/2014 | | | | 4,656,746 | | | | 4,223,454 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total interest-bearing loans and borrowings | | | | | | | 4,877,840 | | | | 4,635,616 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
On February 18, 2009, the Company completed a private placement in the amount of $5,150,000 of senior, unsecured, convertible debentures maturing on February 18, 2014 [the “Debentures”]. Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited and certain of its subsidiaries subscribed for $5,000,000 and certain members of management of the Company subscribed for $150,000. The Debentures are convertible, at the option of the holder, at any time prior to maturity, into common shares of the Company at a conversion price of CDN $2.33 [U.S. $1.87] per share, subject to anti-dilution adjustments.
The Debentures bear an interest rate of 5% per annum on the full amount, payable in arrears, in equal, semi-annual instalments, in cash, or at the option of the Company, in additional debentures. The effective interest rate is 9.9%. On maturity of the Debentures, the Company has the option of repaying the principal in cash or in common shares at a conversion rate equal to 95% of the weighted average trading price of the common shares on the Toronto Stock Exchange for the 20 trading days preceding the maturity date. In the event a Fundamental Change occurs [defined as the occurrence of a “Change of Control” or a “Termination of Trading”] following the original issuance of the Debentures, it may result in the Company repurchasing the Debentures at 110% of the Debenture amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, subject to repurchasing terms in the Debenture Agreement.
On December 31, 2009, the Company and debenture holders executed the First Amending Agreement to the original Debenture Agreement permitting flexible interest rate revisions. The Company exercised its right to issue payment-in-kind [“PIK”] debentures for $153,478 in lieu of six months’ cash interest payment due on December 31, 2009. The PIK debentures are convertible into common shares of the Company with a conversion price of CDN $2.62 [U.S. $2.23] per share. All other terms are subject to the terms of the original Debenture Agreement. The effective interest rate is 6.6%.
The Debentures are required to be classified in their liability and equity components as determined by their fair values. The Company determined the liability component by discounting the Debentures of February 18, 2009 using a rate of 16.5% based on an assessment of similar companies in the marketplace. Similarly, the PIK debentures of December 31, 2009 were discounted utilizing a rate of 13.1%.
As at December 31, 2012, the principal value of the Debentures was $5,218,015 [2011—$5,218,015] and the interest expense paid for the year ended December 31, 2012 was $260,952 [2011—$264,120].
Provisions are recognized for extended warranty claims on products sold during the last 12 months based on past experience of the level of repairs and returns. It is expected that all of these warranty claims will be incurred in the next financial year. Assumptions used to calculate the provision for warranties were based on current sales levels and current information available about warranty costs.
| | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2012 $ | | | December 31, 2011 $ | |
Balance at January 1 | | | 41,300 | | | | 19,520 | |
Arising during the period | | | 115,200 | | | | 45,760 | |
Utilization of accrual | | | (71,240 | ) | | | (23,980 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Balance at December 31 | | | 85,260 | | | | 41,300 | |
| | | | | | | | |
14. | GOVERNMENT GRANTS AND CREDITS |
Repayable government assistance
The Company has received contributions totalling CDN $985,050 from the National Research Council of Canada [“NRC”] Industrial Research Assistance Program. The NRC contributed to two separate projects. This contribution was conditionally repayable commencing in 2004 for one project, and commencing in 2005 for the other project. For each project, the Company is obligated to pay the NRC 1% of its gross revenue. The Company’s obligation ceases if 150% of the contribution is repaid within the first three years of the repayment period. The Company is expected to repay its obligation in full by earlier of February 2014 based on the repayment schedule agreed upon with NRC or by March 2015.
Because the Company has repaid a material portion of the contributions from the NRC and is expecting to repay the remaining amount, it is not reasonably assured that the Company will meet the terms for forgiveness of the loan. Therefore, the Company has recorded such contribution from the NRC as a liability at the time when such contributions were made. As at December 31, 2012, the Company has a repayable government assistance totalling $221,094 [2011—$412,162] representing the outstanding principal balance, repayable in equal monthly instalments of $17,007 over the next 13 months.
Investment tax credits
The Company is eligible to receive refundable Ontario Innovation Tax Credits and non-refundable Federal Investment Tax Credits as a result of incurring eligible expenditures for Scientific Research and Experimental Development. Such investment tax credits are deducted from the research and development expenses.
The Company offsets tax assets and liabilities if and only if it has a legally enforceable right to offset the current tax assets and current tax liabilities or deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities and they relate to taxes levied by the same tax authority.
The tax benefits of the following unused tax losses and deductible temporary differences have not been recognized for financial statement purposes:
| | | | | | | | |
| | 2012 | | | 2011 | |
Deductible temporary differences | | $ | | | $ | |
Non-capital losses | | | 93,181,000 | | | | 81,055,000 | |
Investment Tax Credits (“ITC”) | | | 809,000 | | | | 794,000 | |
Scientific research and experimental development expenses | | | 2,773,000 | | | | 2,722,000 | |
Accrued warranty and reserves, and accrued inter-company royalty | | | 3,564,000 | | | | 1,332,000 | |
Share issue costs | | | 3,522,000 | | | | 1,281,000 | |
Warrants and other | | | 7,636,000 | | | | 3,225,000 | |
Property and equipment and licenses | | | 16,986,000 | | | | 25,962,000 | |
Net unrecognized deductible temporary differences | | | (128,471,000 | ) | | | (116,371,000 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | |
A reconciliation between the Company’s statutory and effective tax rates is presented below:
| | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2012 | | | December 31, 2011 | |
| | % | | | % | |
Statutory rate | | | 25.3 | | | | 27.0 | |
Permanent differences | | | (3.9 | ) | | | (3.7 | ) |
Impact of foreign income tax rate differential | | | (1.2 | ) | | | — | |
Change in enacted rates and true up | | | 2.4 | | | | — | |
Unrecognized benefit of current year’s tax loss and other | | | (22.6 | ) | | | (23.3 | ) |
US alternative minimum tax and state tax | | | (0.8 | ) | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | |
Effective tax rate | | | (0.8 | ) | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | |
The Company has available research and development expenditures for income tax purposes, which may be carried forward indefinitely to reduce future years’ taxable income. The potential income tax benefits associated with these expenditures have not been recorded in the consolidated financial statements. The total of such expenditures accumulated to December 31, 2012 is approximately $2,773,000 [2011—$2,714,000].
At December 31, 2012, the Company has $66,430,000 of Canadian non-capital loss carryfowards [2011—$61,267,000] that will expire from 2014 to 2032, and $26,751,000 of US non-capital losses [2011—$26,733,000) that will expire from 2014 to 2032.
The Company has unclaimed Canadian scientific research investment tax credits of $807,000 [2011—$791,000] that will expire from 2020 to 2028.
16. | MARKETING AND DISTRIBUTION AGREEMENTS |
LifeCell™ Corporation and Kinetics Concepts Inc.
On November 29, 2011, the Company, LifeCell™ Corporation [“LifeCell”] and LifeCell’s parent company, Kinetics Concepts Inc. [“KCI”], signed exclusive multi-year marketing and sales distribution alliance agreements for the commercialization of the Company’s SPY imaging system for additional surgical and wound care applications in North American and certain other markets. As part of the agreements the Company received $3,000,000 upon executing the agreement and will receive further unrelated milestone payments. These unrelated milestone payments will consist of $1,000,000 for delivery of a newly designed wound care device for KCI to use in clinical studies and a further $1,000,000 upon delivery of the first commercial sale or rental of a wound care device. Additionally, KCI or its affiliates, including LifeCell, will pay the Company $1,000,000 upon the first commercial sale or rental of a SPY device in Japan and will also pay the Company $1,000,000 for the first commercial sale or rental of a SPY device in the Middle East, Europe or Africa. Under the agreements, the Company will equally share on-going revenues from LifeCell’s and KCI’s sales to end customers related to the SPY imaging system and the disposable products required to perform the SPY imaging procedure, net of contracted minimum pricing retained by the Company upon initial shipments to LifeCell or KCI. LifeCell and KCI will provide sales and marketing and distribution activities to the end customer. The Company will continue to be responsible for research and development, manufacturing and field service.
On September 1, 2010, the Company entered into a five-year agreement with LifeCell, providing exclusive rights to market and distribute the Company’s SPY imaging system in the fields of plastic reconstructive, gastrointestinal and head and neck surgery in North America. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company received $5,000,000 including $1,000,000 from KCI, for which KCI received 281,653 shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of CDN $3.75 per share. Under the agreement, the Company shares on-going revenues from LifeCell’s sales to end customers related to the SPY imaging system and the disposable products required to perform the SPY imaging procedure, net of contracted minimum pricing retained by the Company upon initial shipments to LifeCell. LifeCell will provide market development and commercialization activities, including professional education, clinical support, reimbursement and sales distribution for the SPY imaging system. The Company will continue to be responsible for research and development, manufacturing and field service.
As at December 31, 2012, the Company’s deferred partnership fee revenues of $4,591,666 [2011—$5,891,666] represents the current and long-term portions of deferred partnership fee revenues for both the LifeCell and the LifeCell/KCI agreements.
MAQUET Cardiovascular, LLC
On January 3, 2012, the Company entered into an agreement with MAQUET Cardiovascular, LLC [“MAQUET”], naming MAQUET as the exclusive United States distributor of the Company’s CO2 Heart Laser™ System TMR and the procedure kits required to perform the TMR procedure. The agreement provides for a revenue sharing formula with respect to the sales and marketing services being provided by MAQUET and the Company supplying and supporting the products.
17. | FINANCE COSTS AND OPERATING EXPENSES |
[a] Finance costs
| | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2012 | | | December 31, 2011 | |
| | $ | | | $ | |
Cash paid interest on repayable government assistance | | | 13,256 | | | | 16,511 | |
Cash paid interest on convertible debentures | | | 260,952 | | | | 264,120 | |
Imputed interest on convertible debentures | | | 433,292 | | | | 398,448 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | 707,500 | | | | 679,079 | |
| | | | | | | | |
[b] Depreciation and cost of inventories included in the consolidated statements of loss and comprehensive loss
| | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2012 | | | December 31, 2011 | |
| | $ | | | $ | |
Included in cost of sales | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation | | | 1,938,294 | | | | 922,065 | |
Cost of inventories recognized as an expense | | | 1,521,412 | | | | 1,438,080 | |
| | |
Included in administrative expenses | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation | | | 62,687 | | | | 128,864 | |
| | |
Included in research and development expenses | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation | | | 141,652 | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | |
[c] Employee and benefits expense
| | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2012 | | | December 31, 2011 | |
| | $ | | | $ | |
Wages and salaries | | | 6,007,884 | | | | 5,189,089 | |
Benefit and bonus expense | | | 1,423,972 | | | | 1,315,060 | |
Social security costs/benefits | | | 176,209 | | | | 134,977 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | 7,608,065 | | | | 6,639,126 | |
| | | | | | | | |
[d] Lease payment expense
The Company has recognized $400,513 in lease expense for the year ended December 31, 2012 [2011—$194,539].
18. | SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION PLAN |
On March 29, 2005, the Company established an amended stock option plan [the “Plan”] for the employees, directors, senior officers and consultants of the Company and any affiliate of the Company which governs all options issued under its previously existing stock option plans and future option grants made under the Plan. On May 15, 2008, the shareholders at the annual and special meeting approved the “Second Amended and Restated Stock Option Plan”, which was an amendment to the Plan.
Under the Plan, options to purchase common shares of the Company may be granted by the Board of Directors. Options granted under the Plan will have an exercise price of not less than the volume-weighted average trading price of the common shares for the five trading days preceding the date on which the options are granted. The maximum aggregate number of common shares which may be subject to options under the Plan is 10% of the common shares of the Company outstanding from time to time.
Options granted under the Plan will generally vest over a three-year period and may be exercised in whole or in part at any time as follows: 33% on or after the first anniversary of the grant date, 67% on or after the second anniversary of the grant date and 100% on or after the third anniversary of the grant date. Options expire on the tenth anniversary of the grant date. Any options not exercised prior to the expiry date will become null and void. In connection with certain change of control transactions, including a take-over bid, merger or other structured acquisition, the Board of Directors may accelerate the vesting date of all unvested options such that all optionees will be entitled to exercise their full allocation of options and in certain circumstances, where such optionee’s employment is terminated in connection with such transaction, such accelerated vesting will be automatic. Options granted under the Plan will terminate on the earlier of the expiration of the option or 180 days following the death of the optionee or termination of the optionee’s employment because of permanent disability, as a result of termination of the optionee’s employment because of retirement of an optionee or as a result of such optionee ceasing to be a director, or 30 days following termination of an optionee.
The share-based compensation cost that has been recognized for the year ended December 31, 2012 and included in the respective function line in the consolidated statements of loss and comprehensive loss is $1,316,684 [2011—$876,767] with a corresponding increase to contributed surplus.
A summary of the options outstanding as at December 31, 2012 and 2011 under the Plan are presented below:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2012 | | | December 31, 2011 | |
| | Number outstanding | | | Weighted average exercise price | | | Number outstanding | | | Weighted average exercise price | |
| | # | | | $ | | | # | | | $ | |
Options outstanding, beginning of year | | | 2,589,211 | | | | 3.18 | | | | 2,339,556 | | | | 2.93 | |
Options granted | | | 518,250 | | | | 6.77 | | | | 370,500 | | | | 4.27 | |
Options exercised | | | (24,363 | ) | | | 2.79 | | | | (72,589 | ) | | | 1.53 | |
Options forfeited | | | (16,803 | ) | | | 4.00 | | | | (48,256 | ) | | | 2.10 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Options outstanding, end of year | | | 3,066,295 | | | | 3.98 | | | | 2,589,211 | | | | 3.18 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Options exercisable, end of year | | | 2,192,098 | | | | 3.35 | | | | 1,767,267 | | | | 3.09 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The following table lists the inputs to the Black-Scholes option pricing model used for the Plan for the year ended December 31, 2012 and 2011.
| | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2012 | | | December 31, 2011 | |
Dividend yield | | | — | | | | — | |
Expected volatility rate | | | 63 | % | | | 66 | % |
Risk-free interest rate | | | 1.80 | % | | | 1.98 | % |
Expected life of share options for employees | | | 4.0 years | | | | 8.6 years | |
Weighted average share price | | $ | 6.77 | | | $ | 4.27 | |
| | | | | | | | |
The expected life of the stock options is based on historical data and current expectations and is not necessarily indicative of exercise patterns that may occur. The expected volatility reflects the assumption that the historical volatility over a period similar to the options is indicative of future trends, which may also not necessarily be the actual outcome.
There have been no modifications to the Plan during the years presented in the consolidated financial statements.
19. | FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT |
[a] Fair value
Set out below is a comparison by class of the carrying amounts and fair value of the Company’s financial instruments that are carried in the consolidated financial statements:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2012 | | | December 31, 2011 | |
| | Carrying amount | | | Fair value | | | Carrying amount | | | Fair value | |
| | $ | | | $ | | | $ | | | $ | |
Financial assets | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Held-for-trading | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | | 38,954,181 | | | | 38,954,181 | | | | 9,633,608 | | | | 9,633,608 | |
Loans and receivables | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Accounts receivable | | | 4,056,954 | | | | 4,056,954 | | | | 2,018,782 | | | | 2,018,782 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 43,011,135 | | | | 43,011,135 | | | | 11,652,390 | | | | 11,652,390 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Financial liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Derivative financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Shareholder warrants | | | 13,002,930 | | | | 13,002,930 | | | | 8,278,105 | | | | 8,278,105 | |
Other financial liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Convertible debentures | | | 4,656,746 | | | | 4,656,746 | | | | 4,223,454 | | | | 4,223,454 | |
Repayable government assistance | | | 221,094 | | | | 221,094 | | | | 412,162 | | | | 412,162 | |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities and provisions | | | 3,492,589 | | | | 3,492,589 | | | | 2,527,294 | | | | 2,527,294 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 21,373,359 | | | | 21,373,359 | | | | 15,441,015 | | | | 15,441,015 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The fair values of the financial assets and liabilities are shown at the amount at which the instrument could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties, other than in a forced or liquidation sale.
The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair values:
| • | | Cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, repayable government assistance, accounts payable and accrued liabilities and provisions approximate their carrying amounts largely due to the short-term maturities of these instruments. |
| • | | Convertible debentures are evaluated by the Company based on parameters such as interest rates and the risk characteristics of the instrument. |
| • | | The fair value of the warrants is estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model incorporating various inputs including the underlying price volatility and discount rate. |
[b] Fair value hierarchy
The Company uses the following hierarchy for determining and disclosing the fair value of financial instruments by valuation technique:
| • | | Level 1—Inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices [unadjusted] for identical assets or liabilities in active markets. |
| • | | Level 2—Inputs to valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument. |
| • | | Level 3—Inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement. |
The fair value hierarchy of financial instruments measured at fair value on the consolidated statements of financial position is as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2012 | | | December 31, 2011 | |
| | Level 1 | | | Level 2 | | | Level 3 | | | Level 1 | | | Level 2 | | | Level 3 | |
| | $ | | | $ | | | $ | | | $ | | | $ | | | $ | |
Financial assets | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | | 38,954,181 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 9,633,608 | | | | — | | | | — | |
Financial liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Shareholder warrants | | | — | | | | 13,002,930 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 8,278,105 | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
During the reporting periods, there were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements.
The Company has non-current investments that are classified as available-for-sale, which are measured at fair value using Level 3 inputs as of December 31, 2012.
In April 2010, the brokerage firm administering the Company’s investments reported a decrease in the value of this investment based on a market devaluation of the Auction Rate Securities [“ARS”] by reputable financial rating firms. In recognition of this market devaluation, the Company wrote down the fair value of the ARS to nil in the first quarter of 2010. During the year, the Company received $25,000 as a recovery on ARS. As at December 31, 2012, the principal value of the ARS is $100,000 [2011—$125,000] with a fair value of nil [2011—nil].
[c] Management of risks arising from financial instruments
The Company’s principal financial liabilities, other than warrants, comprise loans and borrowings and trade and other payables. The main purpose of these financial liabilities is to finance the Company’s operations and to provide guarantees to support its operations. The Company has trade and other receivables and cash that are derived directly from its operations. The Company also holds available-for-sale financial instruments and enters into derivative transactions.
The Company’s activities expose it to a variety of financial risks: market risk [including foreign currency and interest rate risk], credit risk and liquidity risk. The Company’s overall risk management program focuses on
the unpredictability of financial markets and seeks to minimize potential adverse effects on the Company’s financial performance. The Company uses to a limited extent derivative financial instruments to mitigate certain risk exposures. The Company does not purchase any derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes. Risk management is the responsibility of the corporate finance function, which has the appropriate skills, experience and supervision. The Company’s domestic and foreign operations, along with the corporate finance function, identify, evaluate and, where appropriate, mitigate financial risks. Material risks are monitored and are regularly discussed with the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors. The Audit Committee provides assurance to the Company’s senior management that the Company’s financial risk-taking activities are governed by appropriate policies and procedures and that financial risks are identified, measured and managed in accordance with Company’s policies and risk appetite.
The risks associated with the Company’s financial instruments are as follows:
[i] Market risk
Market risk is the risk that the fair value of future cash flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate because of changes in market prices. Components of market risk to which the Company is exposed are discussed below. Financial instruments affected by market risk include trade accounts receivable and payable, available-for-sale financial instruments and derivative financial instruments.
The sensitivity analyses in the following sections relate to the financial position as at December 31, 2012.
The sensitivity analyses have been prepared on the basis that the amount of net debt, the ratio of fixed to floating interest rates of the debt and derivatives and the proportion of financial instruments in foreign currencies are all constant. The analyses exclude the impact of movements in market variables on the carrying value of provisions and on the non-financial assets and liabilities of foreign operations.
The following assumptions have been made in calculating the sensitivity analyses:
| • | | The consolidated statements of financial position sensitivity relates to warrants. |
| • | | The sensitivity of the relevant consolidated statements of loss and comprehensive loss items is the effect of the assumed changes in respective market risks. This is based on the financial assets and financial liabilities held at December 31, 2012. |
Foreign currency risk
Foreign currency risk arises due to fluctuations in the fair value or cash flows of financial instruments due to changes in foreign exchange rates and exposure.
Since a significant part of the Company’s purchases are transacted in Canadian dollars and the Company has repayable government assistance denominated in Canadian dollars, the Company may experience transaction exposures because of volatility in the exchange rate between the Canadian and U.S. dollar. Based on the Company’s Canadian dollar denominated net inflows and outflows for the year ended December 31, 2012, a weakening (strengthening) of the U.S. dollar of 10% would, everything else being equal, have a positive (negative) effect on net income before income taxes [due to changes in the fair value of monetary assets and liabilities including non-designated foreign currency derivatives] of $158,456 [2011—($73,198)]. The Company’s exposure to foreign currency changes for all other currencies is not material.
Interest rate risk
Interest rate risk is the risk that the fair value or future cash flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate because of changes in market interest rates. The Company does not have exposure to interest rate risk as interest rates for its convertible debentures and repayable government assistance loan are fixed.
[ii] Credit risk
Credit risk is the risk that one party to a financial instrument fails to discharge an obligation and causes financial loss to another party. The Company is exposed to credit risk from its operating activities [primarily for trade accounts receivable] and from financing activities, including cash deposits with banks and financial institutions.
Accounts receivable are subject to credit risk exposure and the carrying values reflect management’s assessment of the associated maximum exposure to such credit risk. The maximum exposure to credit risk is equal to the carrying value of the financial assets. The objective of managing counterparty credit risk is to prevent losses in financial assets. The Company assesses the credit quality of the counterparties, taking into account their financial position, past experience and other factors. Credit risk is mitigated by entering into sales contracts with only stable, creditworthy parties and through frequent reviews of exposures to individual entities. The Company has not experienced any direct material impacts to date of the economic downturn; however, the indirect impact could impact future profitability.
Approximately $3,617,173 or 84% [2011—$1,957,796 or 75%] of the outstanding accounts receivable, before provisions at December 31, 2012, is due from three customers [2011—nine customers]. As at December 31, 2012, one customer accounts for $1,939,810 of accounts receivable, before provisions [2011—$822,075].
The Company assesses the credit risk of accounts receivable by evaluating the aging of accounts receivable based on the invoice date. The carrying amount of accounts receivable is reduced through the use of an allowance account and the amount of the loss is recognized in the consolidated statements of loss and comprehensive loss. When a receivable balance is considered uncollectible, it is written off against the allowance for doubtful accounts. Subsequent recoveries of amounts previously written off are credited against operating expenses in the consolidated statements of loss and comprehensive loss. As at December 31, 2012, the Company has made a provision of $228,454 [2011—$583,477] in respect of accounts which it believes may not be collectible. As at December 31, 2012, the Company’s accounts receivable, before provision, were 95% concentrated in the United States and Canada and 5% were concentrated in Europe and Asia [2011—United States and Canada—81%, Europe and Asia—19%].
The carrying amount of accounts receivable is reduced through the use of an allowance account and the amount of the loss is recognized in the consolidated statements of loss and comprehensive loss within operating expenses. When a receivable balance is considered uncollectible, it is written off against the allowance for accounts receivable. Subsequent recoveries of amounts previously written off are credited against other operating expenses in the consolidated statements of loss and comprehensive loss. The following table sets forth details of the aging of trade accounts receivable that are not overdue, as well as an analysis of overdue amounts and related allowance for doubtful accounts:
| | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2012 | | | December 31, 2011 | |
| | $ | | | $ | |
Total accounts receivable | | | 4,285,408 | | | | 2,602,259 | |
Less allowance for doubtful accounts | | | (228,454 | ) | | | (583,477 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Total accounts receivable, net | | | 4,056,954 | | | | 2,018,782 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Of which | | | | | | | | |
Current | | | 3,505,582 | | | | 1,884,480 | |
31—60 days | | | 351,024 | | | | 129,939 | |
61—90 days | | | — | | | | 33,448 | |
Over 90 days | | | 428,802 | | | | 554,392 | |
Less allowance for doubtful accounts | | | (228,454 | ) | | | (583,477 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Total accounts receivable, net | | | 4,056,954 | | | | 2,018,782 | |
| | | | | | | | |
The movement in the Company’s allowance for doubtful accounts for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 were as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2012 | | | December 31, 2011 | |
| | $ | | | $ | |
Balance, beginning of year | | | 583,477 | | | | 588,746 | |
Additional provision recognized | | | 2,598 | | | | 68,256 | |
Amounts recovered during the year | | | (65,060 | ) | | | (73,525 | ) |
Amounts written off during the year | | | (292,561 | ) | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | |
Balance, end of year | | | 228,454 | | | | 583,477 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Credit risk from balances with banks and financial institutions is managed by the Company’s treasury, responsible in accordance with the Company’s policy. Investments of surplus funds are made only with approved counterparties and within credit limits assigned to each counterparty. Counterparty credit limits are reviewed by the Company’s Board of Directors on an annual basis and may be updated throughout the year, subject to approval of the Company’s Finance Committee. The limits are set to minimize the concentration of risks and therefore mitigate financial loss through the counterparty’s potential failure. The Company’s maximum exposure to credit risk for the components of the consolidated statements of financial position is the carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents and other current financial assets.
[iii] Liquidity risk
Liquidity risk is the potential inability to meet financial obligations as they fall due. The Company manages this risk by monitoring detailed quarterly cash forecasts for the next 12 months, and annual forecasts for the following one-year period to ensure adequate and efficient use of cash resources. The Company has accounts payable and accrued liabilities and repayable government assistance that have contractual cash flows approximating their fair value and have maturities of less than one year. The Company attempts to achieve this obligation through managing cash from operations and through the availability of funding from strategic alliances or equity placements.
The tables below summarize the maturity profile of the Company’s financial liabilities as at December 31, 2012 and 2011 based on contractual undiscounted payments:
December 31, 2012:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Total | | | Less than 1 year | | | 1 to 3 years | | | 4 to 5 years | | | Thereafter | |
| | $ | | | $ | | | $ | | | $ | | | $ | |
Convertible debentures | | | 5,218,015 | | | | — | | | | 5,218,015 | | | | — | | | | — | |
Convertible debentures interest payable | | | 295,926 | | | | 260,901 | | | | 35,025 | | | | — | | | | — | |
Repayable government assistance | | | 221,094 | | | | 203,148 | | | | 17,946 | | | | — | | | | — | |
Repayable government assistance interest payable | | | 28,035 | | | | 27,833 | | | | 202 | | | | — | | | | — | |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | | | 3,407,329 | | | | 3,407,329 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total financial liability payments | | | 9,170,399 | | | | 3,899,211 | | | | 5,271,188 | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
December 31, 2011:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Total | | | Less than 1 year | | | 1 to 3 years | | | 4 to 5 years | | | Thereafter | |
| | $ | | | $ | | | $ | | | $ | | | $ | |
Convertible debentures | | | 5,218,015 | | | | — | | | | 5,218,015 | | | | — | | | | — | |
Convertible debentures interest payable | | | 556,827 | | | | 260,901 | | | | 295,926 | | | | — | | | | — | |
Repayable government assistance | | | 412,162 | | | | 197,760 | | | | 214,402 | | | | — | | | | — | |
Repayable government assistance interest payable | | | 80,053 | | | | 52,262 | | | | 27,791 | | | | — | | | | — | |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | | | 2,485,994 | | | | 2,485,994 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total financial liability payments | | | 8,753,051 | | | | 2,996,917 | | | | 5,756,134 | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Capital management
The primary objective of the Company is to ensure receipt of sufficient funds from sales, equity offerings, partnership fees and debt instruments to support the cash requirements for ongoing operations.
20. | RELATED PARTY DISCLOSURES |
A director of the Company is also a director of Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited.
As at December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company has no receivable or payable values with key management personnel or directors.
The key management personnel include the President and Chief Executive Officer; Chief Financial Officer; Senior Vice President and General Manager; Senior Vice President, Marketing and Business Development, Open Surgery; Vice President, Operations; and Vice President, Investor Relations and Corporate Development.
Compensation of key management personnel of the Company
| | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2012 | | | December 31, 2011 | |
| | $ | | | $ | |
Wages and salaries | | | 1,256,144 | | | | 1,123,871 | |
Benefits and bonus expense | | | 624,152 | | | | 587,997 | |
Social security costs | | | 16,496 | | | | 15,559 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total key management compensation | | | 1,896,792 | | | | 1,727,427 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Key management interests in an employee incentive plan
Stock options held by key management personnel and members of the Board of Directors to purchase common shares have the following expiry dates and exercise prices:
Key management personnel
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | December 31, 2012 | | | December 31, 2011 | |
Issue date | | Expiry date | | Exercise price | | | | Number outstanding | | | Number outstanding | |
13-Apr-03 | | 13-Apr-13 | | U.S. $1.07 | | | | | 199,535 | | | | 199,535 | |
16-Feb-04 | | 16-Feb-14 | | U.S. $1.07 | | | | | 93,271 | | | | 93,271 | |
29-Mar-05 | | 29-Mar-15 | | U.S. $1.07 | | | | | 270,486 | | | | 270,486 | |
13-Dec-05 | | 13-Dec-15 | | CDN $9.50 | | | | | 35,000 | | | | 35,000 | |
17-Aug-07 | | 17-Aug-17 | | CDN $6.50 | | | | | 125,000 | | | | 125,000 | |
15-May-08 | | 15-May-18 | | CDN $4.01 | | | | | 7,500 | | | | 7,500 | |
1-Aug-08 | | 1-Aug-18 | | CDN $1.76 | | | | | 12,500 | | | | 12,500 | |
19-Mar-09 | | 19-Mar-19 | | CDN $2.50 | | | | | 270,000 | | | | 270,000 | |
2-Apr-10 | | 2-Apr-20 | | CDN $2.75 | | | | | 170,000 | | | | 170,000 | |
20-May-11 | | 20-May-21 | | CDN $4.15 | | | | | 175,000 | | | | 175,000 | |
23-May-12 | | 23-May-22 | | CDN $6.47 | | | | | 355,000 | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | 1,713,292 | | | | 1,358,292 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Board of Directors
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | December 31, 2012 | | | December 31, 2011 | |
Issue date | | Expiry date | | Exercise price | | | | Number outstanding | | | Number outstanding | |
30-Sep-03 | | 30-Sep-13 | | U.S. $1.07 | | | | | 27,981 | | | | 27,981 | |
5-Sep-06 | | 5-Sep-16 | | CDN $8.07 | | | | | 7,500 | | | | 7,500 | |
24-May-07 | | 24-May-17 | | CDN $7.74 | | | | | 15,000 | | | | 15,000 | |
17-Aug-07 | | 17-Aug-17 | | CDN $6.50 | | | | | 16,450 | | | | 16,450 | |
15-May-08 | | 15-May-18 | | CDN $4.01 | | | | | 20,400 | | | | 20,400 | |
1-Aug-08 | | 1-Aug-18 | | CDN $1.76 | | | | | 15,000 | | | | 15,000 | |
21-May-09 | | 21-May-19 | | CDN $3.09 | | | | | 42,500 | | | | 42,500 | |
20-May-10 | | 20-May-20 | | CDN $4.26 | | | | | 45,000 | | | | 45,000 | |
31-Aug-10 | | 31-Aug-20 | | CDN $3.82 | | | | | 15,000 | | | | 15,000 | |
20-May-11 | | 20-May-21 | | CDN $4.15 | | | | | 67,500 | | | | 67,500 | |
23-May-12 | | 23-May-22 | | CDN $6.47 | | | | | 68,000 | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | 340,331 | | | | 272,331 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Issued and outstanding
| | | | | | | | |
| | Common shares | |
| | # | | | $ | |
Balance at December 31, 2010 | | | 27,897,147 | | | | 87,897,555 | |
Private placement | | | 4,731,864 | | | | 10,579,682 | |
Debt conversion | | | 45,488 | | | | 85,463 | |
Exercise of stock options | | | 72,589 | | | | 132,323 | |
Exercise of broker warrants | | | 22,374 | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | |
Balance at December 31, 2011 | | | 32,769,462 | | | | 98,695,023 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Public offering | | | 7,015,000 | | | | 36,946,898 | |
Exercise of broker warrants pursuant to private placement | | | 25,299 | | | | 130,627 | |
Exercise of stock options | | | 24,363 | | | | 137,622 | |
Exercise of warrants | | | 392,119 | | | | 4,036,393 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Balance at December 31, 2012 | | | 40,226,243 | | | | 139,946,563 | |
| | | | | | | | |
On April 9, 2012, the Company announced that it had completed the closing of its public offering of 7,015,000 common shares at a price of $5.75 per share. Gross proceeds from the offering were approximately $40,336,250 resulting in cash proceeds of $36,946,898, net of transaction costs. The shares of the Company are registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission and listed on the NASDAQ in addition to the TSX.
The Company has authorized share capital as follows: common shares—unlimited, no par value; preference shares – unlimited, no par value, issuable in one or more series.
Basic loss per share amounts are calculated by dividing net loss for the period attributable to ordinary equity holders of the parent by the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share amounts are calculated by dividing the net income attributable to ordinary equity holders of the parent by the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the period plus the weighted average number of ordinary shares that would be issued on conversion of all the dilutive potential ordinary shares into ordinary shares.
The following reflects the loss and share data used in the basic and diluted loss per share computations:
| | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2012 | | | December 31, 2011 | |
| | $ | | | $ | |
Net loss and comprehensive loss for the year attributable to shareholders for basic and diluted loss per share | | | 12,344,133 | | | | 10,153,328 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Weighted average number of common shares for basic and diluted loss per share | | | 38,006,691 | | | | 31,612,834 | |
| | | | | | | | |
There have been no other transactions involving ordinary shares or potential ordinary shares between the reporting date and the date of completion of these consolidated financial statements.
The conversion of outstanding stock options, warrants and convertible notes has not been included in the determination of basic and diluted loss per share as to do so would have been anti-dilutive.
23. | COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES |
Lease commitments
The Company has entered into lease commitments for office premises located in Mississauga, Ontario, Richmond, British Columbia and Taunton, Massachusetts. The total future minimum annual lease payments, including four months free base rent in Richmond, British Columbia and proportionate operating expenses for three locations, are as follows:
| | | | |
| | $ | |
Within one year | | | 412,126 | |
After one year but not more than five years | | | 163,501 | |
More than five years | | | — | |
| | | | |
| | | 575,627 | |
| | | | |
Sales and marketing agreement
On September 1, 2010, the Company entered into a five-year agreement with LifeCell, providing exclusive rights to market and distribute the SPY Imaging Technology in the fields of plastic reconstructive, gastrointestinal and head and neck surgery in North America. Pursuant to the agreement, the Company has a three-year annual commitment to spend a minimum amount on research and development which is within normal business operating expenses.
Loan agreement
On August 26, 2011, the Company executed a revolving credit agreement with a Canadian chartered bank entitling the Company to borrow to a maximum limit of $2,500,000, subject to a borrowing base formula, certain financial covenants and reporting requirements. The credit facility is secured by a General Security Agreement constituting a first ranking security interest in all personal property of the Company, with a conventional rate of interest. Since its inception and as at December 31, 2012, the Company has not utilized the credit facility. The Company is in compliance with the financial covenants and reporting requirements at December 31, 2012.
Contingent liabilities
On September 2, 2011, a former employee commenced litigation against the Company in Ontario, seeking damages for wrongful dismissal. The Company has refuted an offer to settle as the Company believes the former employee’s claim is without merit and is vigorously defending against the claim.
On June 29, 2011, a customer commenced a claim for breach of contract against the Company seeking damages for an undetermined amount. On June 12, 2012, the two parties resolved the lawsuit with no financial settlement and the plaintiff has filed for dismissal of the litigation.
Revenue by region is as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2012 | | | December 31, 2011 | |
| | $ | | | $ | |
United States | | | 22,229,246 | | | | 15,078,580 | |
Japan | | | 708,600 | | | | 187,000 | |
Other | | | 51,214 | | | | 26,861 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total | | | 22,989,060 | | | | 15,292,441 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Property and Equipment net is as follows
| | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2012 | | | December 31, 2011 | |
| | $ | | | $ | |
Canada | | | 2,419,062 | | | | 1,142,180 | |
United States | | | 8,298,599 | | | | 5,481,806 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total | | | 10,717,661 | | | | 6,623,986 | |
| | | | | | | | |
25. | COMPARATIVE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
Certain of the comparative figures have been reclassified where necessary, to conform to the current year’s presentation.