Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2006
OR
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM [ ] TO [ ]
Commission file number: | 333-89312-02 | |
333-90756-03 | ||
333-101598-03 | ||
333-107942-05 | ||
333-119261-27 | ||
333-120642-27 | ||
333-127262-45 | ||
333-131342-56 | ||
333-133115-61 |
ElderTrust Operating Limited Partnership
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Delaware | 23-2915846 | |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
10350 Ormsby Park Place, Suite 300
Louisville, Kentucky
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
40223
(Zip Code)
(502) 357-9000
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer ¨ Accelerated filer ¨ Non-accelerated filer x |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
Table of Contents
ELDERTRUST OPERATING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
FORM 10-Q
2
Table of Contents
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ELDERTRUST OPERATING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands)
September 30, 2006 | December 31, 2005 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | (Audited) | |||||||
Assets | ||||||||
Real estate investments: | ||||||||
Land | $ | 15,601 | $ | 15,601 | ||||
Buildings and improvements | 139,963 | 139,754 | ||||||
155,564 | 155,355 | |||||||
Accumulated depreciation | (14,159 | ) | (10,162 | ) | ||||
Net real estate investments | 141,405 | 145,193 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | 338 | 439 | ||||||
Escrow deposits and restricted cash | 5,865 | 5,616 | ||||||
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $4 and $36, respectively | 1,799 | 1,401 | ||||||
Investment in affiliates | 9,039 | 9,039 | ||||||
Other | 354 | 473 | ||||||
Total assets | $ | 158,800 | $ | 162,161 | ||||
Liabilities and Partners’ Capital | ||||||||
Liabilities: | ||||||||
Debt | $ | 66,161 | $ | 67,200 | ||||
Note payable to affiliate | 7,500 | 7,500 | ||||||
Accrued interest | 522 | 434 | ||||||
Accounts payable and accrued and other liabilities | 2,987 | 3,191 | ||||||
Total liabilities | 77,170 | 78,325 | ||||||
Partners’ capital | 81,630 | 83,836 | ||||||
Total liabilities and partners’ capital | $ | 158,800 | $ | 162,161 | ||||
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
ELDERTRUST OPERATING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per unit amounts)
For the Three Months Ended September 30, | For the Nine Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||||||
2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||||
Revenues: | |||||||||||||
Rental income | $ | 4,130 | $ | 4,111 | $ | 12,360 | $ | 12,267 | |||||
Interest and other income | 33 | 13 | 91 | 35 | |||||||||
Total revenues | 4,163 | 4,124 | 12,451 | 12,302 | |||||||||
Expenses: | |||||||||||||
Interest | 1,278 | 1,301 | 3,825 | 3,899 | |||||||||
Depreciation | 1,337 | 1,327 | 3,997 | 3,979 | |||||||||
Property-level operating expenses | 394 | 364 | 1,082 | 1,061 | |||||||||
General, administrative and professional fees | 221 | 268 | 772 | 1,012 | |||||||||
Intercompany interest | 151 | 151 | 450 | 449 | |||||||||
Total expenses | 3,381 | 3,411 | 10,126 | 10,400 | |||||||||
Income before discontinued operations | 782 | 713 | 2,325 | 1,902 | |||||||||
Discontinued operations | — | 28 | — | (48 | ) | ||||||||
Net income | $ | 782 | $ | 741 | $ | 2,325 | $ | 1,854 | |||||
Net income allocated to Class A general partner | $ | 1 | $ | 1 | $ | 2 | $ | 2 | |||||
Net income allocated to Class A limited partners | 746 | 707 | 2,219 | 1,813 | |||||||||
Net income allocated to Class C limited partner | 3 | 3 | 9 | 7 | |||||||||
Net income allocated to Class D limited partners | 32 | 30 | 95 | 32 | |||||||||
Net income per unit: | |||||||||||||
Class A general partnership units | $ | 0.13 | $ | 0.13 | $ | 0.25 | $ | 0.25 | |||||
Class A limited partnership units | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.28 | 0.23 | |||||||||
Class C limited partnership units | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.29 | 0.23 | |||||||||
Class D limited partnership units | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.28 | 0.22 | |||||||||
Units used to compute per unit amount: | |||||||||||||
Class A general partnership units | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |||||||||
Class A limited partnership units | 8,041 | 8,041 | 8,041 | 8,041 | |||||||||
Class C limited partnership units | 31 | 31 | 31 | 31 | |||||||||
Class D limited partnership units | 345 | 339 | 345 | 143 |
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
ELDERTRUST OPERATING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(In thousands)
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: | ||||||||
Net income | $ | 2,325 | $ | 1,854 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | ||||||||
Depreciation (including amounts in discontinued operations) | 3,997 | 4,118 | ||||||
Straight-lining of rental income | (371 | ) | (337 | ) | ||||
Other | (32 | ) | 50 | |||||
Net changes in operating assets and liabilities: | ||||||||
(Increase) decrease in escrow deposits and restricted cash | (249 | ) | 1,530 | |||||
Decrease (increase) in accounts receivable and other assets | 124 | (31 | ) | |||||
Decrease in accounts payable and accrued and other liabilities | (45 | ) | (465 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 5,749 | 6,719 | ||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: | ||||||||
Net investment in real estate properties | (209 | ) | (13 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in investing activities | (209 | ) | (13 | ) | ||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | ||||||||
Distributions (to) from unit holders | (4,602 | ) | 2,606 | |||||
Repayment of debt | (1,039 | ) | (10,196 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in financing activities | (5,641 | ) | (7,590 | ) | ||||
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents | (101 | ) | (884 | ) | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | 439 | 1,210 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $ | 338 | $ | 326 | ||||
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1—ORGANIZATION
ElderTrust Operating Limited Partnership (together with its subsidiaries, unless otherwise indicated or except where the context otherwise requires, “we,” “us,” “our,” “ETOP” or the “Partnership”) is a limited partnership organized under the laws of the State of Delaware. We invest in seniors housing and other healthcare facilities, primarily skilled nursing facilities, assisted and independent living facilities and medical and other office buildings. ElderTrust, a Maryland real estate investment trust (“ElderTrust”), is our sole general partner. In February 2004, ElderTrust became a wholly owned direct subsidiary of Ventas, Inc. (“Ventas”), a healthcare real estate investment trust based in Louisville, Kentucky, whose common stock is publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange.
As of September 30, 2006, our consolidated assets included seventeen properties located in three states, consisting of nine seniors housing facilities, five skilled nursing facilities, two medical office buildings and a financial office building. Except with respect to our office buildings, we lease these facilities to third-party healthcare providers, generally under “triple-net” leases, which require the tenants to pay all property-related expenses.
NOTE 2—BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management of our general partner, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair statement of results for the interim period have been included. Operating results for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006 are not necessarily an indication of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2006. The Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2005 has been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2005. The accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005. Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to current period presentation.
We operate through one reportable segment: investment in real estate. Our primary business consists of financing, owning and leasing healthcare-related and seniors housing facilities and leasing or subleasing those facilities to third parties. With the exception of our office buildings, we do not operate our facilities nor do we allocate capital to maintain our properties. Substantially all depreciation and interest expenses reflected in the condensed consolidated statements of income relate to our investment in real estate.
Gain on Sale of Facilities
We recognize sales of facilities only upon the closing of the transaction with the purchaser. Payments received from purchasers prior to closing are recorded as deposits and classified as other assets in the consolidated balance sheet. Gains on facilities sold are recognized using the full accrual method upon closing when the collectibility of the sales price is reasonably assured, we are not obligated to perform significant activities after the sale to earn the profit, we have received adequate initial investment from the buyer, and other profit recognition criteria have been satisfied. Gains may be deferred in whole or in part until the sales satisfy the requirements of gain recognition on sales of real estate under the Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 66, “Accounting for Sales of Real Estate.”
NOTE 3—CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK
As of September 30, 2006, approximately 53.5% and 35.2% of our properties, based on their original cost, were leased to or managed by Genesis HealthCare Corporation (“Genesis HealthCare”) and certain of its related entities (collectively “Genesis”) and Benchmark Assisted Living LLC and certain of its related entities (collectively “Benchmark”), respectively. Approximately 49.7% and 30.7% of our total revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 were derived from leases with Genesis and Benchmark, respectively.
6
Table of Contents
Because we lease a substantial portion of our properties to Genesis and Benchmark and they are each a significant source of our total revenues, their financial condition and ability and willingness to satisfy their obligations under their respective leases and certain other agreements with us will significantly impact our revenues and our ability to service our indebtedness and to make distributions to our partners. We cannot assure you that Genesis or Benchmark will have sufficient assets, income and access to financing to enable it to satisfy its obligations under its respective leases and other agreements with us, and any inability or unwillingness on its part to do so would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operation and liquidity, on our ability to service our indebtedness and on our ability to make distributions to our partners.
Genesis HealthCare is subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) and is required to file with the Commission annual reports containing audited financial information and quarterly reports containing unaudited interim financial information. The information related to Genesis HealthCare contained or referred to in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q is derived from filings made by Genesis HealthCare with the Commission or other publicly available information, or has been provided to us by Genesis HealthCare. We have not verified this information either through an independent investigation or otherwise. We have no reason to believe that this information is inaccurate in any material respect, but we cannot assure you that all such information is accurate. Genesis HealthCare’s filings with the Commission can be found at the Commission’s website at www.sec.gov. We are providing this data for informational purposes only, and you are encouraged to obtain Genesis HealthCare’s publicly available filings from the Commission.
NOTE 4—DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
In October 2005, we completed the sale of one seniors housing facility. The operating results of this facility are presented in discontinued operations in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2005.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2006, we did not dispose of any operating assets or have any operating assets classified as held for sale and, therefore, no amounts were reported in discontinued operations.
Set forth below is a summary of the results of operations of the facility sold in October 2005:
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2005 | For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2005 | ||||||
Revenues: | |||||||
Rental income | $ | 202 | $ | 607 | |||
Interest and other income | 15 | 55 | |||||
Total revenues | 217 | 662 | |||||
Expenses: | |||||||
Interest | 131 | 522 | |||||
Depreciation | 46 | 139 | |||||
General, administrative and professional fees | 12 | 49 | |||||
Total expenses | 189 | 710 | |||||
Discontinued operations | $ | 28 | $ | (48 | ) | ||
NOTE 5—RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
In accordance with our Limited Partnership Agreement, our general partner uses an allocation method for its general, administrative and professional fees and charges these to us on a quarterly basis. This allocation method is based on our total revenues in relation to the consolidated revenues of the general partner. Other direct expenses are incurred by us and expensed at the time incurred. Approximately 94.3% and 96.4% of our consolidated general, administrative and professional fees for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, resulted from this allocation.
7
Table of Contents
NOTE 6—NOTE PAYABLE TO AFFILIATE
In April 2004, we entered into a promissory note in the amount of $7.5 million with Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership, a wholly owned subsidiary of Ventas (“Ventas Realty”). Under the terms of the note, interest is paid quarterly at an annual rate of 8.0% beginning on July 1, 2004. The note has a maturity date of December 31, 2013, at which time a principal balloon payment equal to the full amount of the note is due.
NOTE 7—CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING INFORMATION
We and certain of our direct and indirect wholly owned subsidiaries (the “ETOP Subsidiary Guarantors”) have provided full and unconditional guarantees, on a joint and several basis with Ventas and certain of Ventas’s direct and indirect wholly owned subsidiaries, of the obligation to pay principal and interest with respect to each series of senior notes issued by Ventas Realty and Ventas Capital Corporation (collectively, the “Ventas Issuers”), both wholly owned subsidiaries of Ventas. The aggregate principal amount of senior notes outstanding as of September 30, 2006 was $1.3 billion. Certain of our other subsidiaries (the “ETOP Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries”) have not provided the guarantee of the senior notes and therefore are not directly obligated with respect to the senior notes. Contractual and legal restrictions, including those contained in the instruments governing certain of the ETOP Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries’ outstanding indebtedness, may under certain circumstances restrict our ability to obtain cash from the ETOP Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries for the purpose of satisfying our debt service obligations, including our guarantee of payment of principal and interest on the senior notes. Additionally, we and the ETOP Subsidiary Guarantors have guaranteed Ventas Realty’s $500.0 million senior unsecured revolving credit facility and certain of the ETOP Subsidiary Guarantors’ properties are subject to mortgages.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
As of September 30, 2006
(In thousands) | ETOP and ETOP Subsidiary | ETOP Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries | Consolidated Elimination | Consolidated | ||||||||||
Assets | ||||||||||||||
Net real estate investments | $ | 54,596 | $ | 86,809 | $ | — | $ | 141,405 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | — | 338 | — | 338 | ||||||||||
Escrow deposits and restricted cash | — | 5,865 | — | 5,865 | ||||||||||
Equity in affiliates | 80,766 | 15 | (80,781 | ) | — | |||||||||
Investment in affiliates | 9,039 | — | — | 9,039 | ||||||||||
Other assets | 618 | 1,535 | — | 2,153 | ||||||||||
Total assets | $ | 145,019 | $ | 94,562 | $ | (80,781 | ) | $ | 158,800 | |||||
Liabilities and partners’ capital | ||||||||||||||
Liabilities: | ||||||||||||||
Debt | $ | 415 | $ | 65,746 | $ | — | $ | 66,161 | ||||||
Intercompany | (5,333 | ) | 5,333 | — | — | |||||||||
Note payable to affiliate | 7,500 | — | — | 7,500 | ||||||||||
Accrued interest | 105 | 417 | — | 522 | ||||||||||
Accounts payable and accrued and other liabilities | 103 | 2,884 | — | 2,987 | ||||||||||
Total liabilities | 2,790 | 74,380 | — | 77,170 | ||||||||||
Total partners’ capital | 142,229 | 20,182 | (80,781 | ) | 81,630 | |||||||||
Total liabilities and partners’ capital | $ | 145,019 | $ | 94,562 | $ | (80,781 | ) | $ | 158,800 | |||||
8
Table of Contents
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
As of December 31, 2005
(In thousands) | ETOP and ETOP Subsidiary | ETOP Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries | Consolidated Elimination | Consolidated | ||||||||||
Assets | ||||||||||||||
Net real estate investments | $ | 56,201 | $ | 88,992 | $ | — | $ | 145,193 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | 1 | 438 | — | 439 | ||||||||||
Escrow deposits and restricted cash | 26 | 5,590 | — | 5,616 | ||||||||||
Equity in affiliates | 80,390 | 15 | (80,405 | ) | — | |||||||||
Investment in affiliates | 9,039 | — | — | 9,039 | ||||||||||
Other assets | 508 | 1,366 | — | 1,874 | ||||||||||
Total assets | $ | 146,165 | $ | 96,401 | $ | (80,405 | ) | $ | 162,161 | |||||
Liabilities and partners’ capital | ||||||||||||||
Liabilities: | ||||||||||||||
Debt | $ | 424 | $ | 66,776 | $ | — | $ | 67,200 | ||||||
Intercompany | (4,804 | ) | 4,804 | — | — | |||||||||
Note payable to affiliate | 7,500 | — | — | 7,500 | ||||||||||
Accrued interest | 3 | 431 | — | 434 | ||||||||||
Accounts payable and accrued and other liabilities | 174 | 3,017 | — | 3,191 | ||||||||||
Total liabilities | 3,297 | 75,028 | — | 78,325 | ||||||||||
Total partners’ capital | 142,868 | 21,373 | (80,405 | ) | 83,836 | |||||||||
Total liabilities and partners’ capital | $ | 146,165 | $ | 96,401 | $ | (80,405 | ) | $ | 162,161 | |||||
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME
For the three months ended September 30, 2006
(In thousands) | ETOP and ETOP Guarantors | ETOP Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries | Consolidated Elimination | Consolidated | ||||||||||
Revenues: | ||||||||||||||
Rental income | $ | 1,432 | $ | 2,698 | $ | — | $ | 4,130 | ||||||
Equity loss in affiliates | (55 | ) | — | 55 | — | |||||||||
Interest and other income | — | 33 | — | 33 | ||||||||||
Total revenues | 1,377 | 2,731 | 55 | 4,163 | ||||||||||
Expenses: | ||||||||||||||
Interest | 9 | 1,269 | — | 1,278 | ||||||||||
Depreciation | 537 | 800 | — | 1,337 | ||||||||||
Property-level operating expenses | — | 394 | — | 394 | ||||||||||
General, administrative and professional fees | 83 | 138 | — | 221 | ||||||||||
Intercompany interest | (34 | ) | 185 | — | 151 | |||||||||
Total expenses | 595 | 2,786 | — | 3,381 | ||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 782 | $ | (55 | ) | $ | 55 | $ | 782 | |||||
9
Table of Contents
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME
For the three months ended September 30, 2005
(In thousands) | ETOP and ETOP Subsidiary Guarantors | ETOP Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries | Consolidated Elimination | Consolidated | ||||||||||
Revenues: | ||||||||||||||
Rental income | $ | 1,422 | $ | 2,689 | $ | — | $ | 4,111 | ||||||
Equity loss in affiliates | (71 | ) | — | 71 | — | |||||||||
Interest and other income | — | 13 | — | 13 | ||||||||||
Total revenues | 1,351 | 2,702 | 71 | 4,124 | ||||||||||
Expenses: | ||||||||||||||
Interest | 9 | 1,292 | — | 1,301 | ||||||||||
Depreciation | 535 | 792 | — | 1,327 | ||||||||||
Property-level operating expenses | — | 364 | — | 364 | ||||||||||
General, administrative and professional fees | 103 | 165 | — | 268 | ||||||||||
Intercompany interest | (9 | ) | 160 | — | 151 | |||||||||
Total expenses | 638 | 2,773 | — | 3,411 | ||||||||||
Income (loss) before discontinued operations | 713 | (71 | ) | 71 | 713 | |||||||||
Discontinued operations | 28 | — | — | 28 | ||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 741 | $ | (71 | ) | $ | 71 | $ | 741 | |||||
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME
For the nine months ended September 30, 2006
(In thousands) | ETOP and ETOP Subsidiary Guarantors | ETOP Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries | Consolidated Elimination | Consolidated | ||||||||||
Revenues: | ||||||||||||||
Rental income | $ | 4,285 | $ | 8,075 | $ | — | $ | 12,360 | ||||||
Equity loss in affiliates | (107 | ) | — | 107 | — | |||||||||
Interest and other income | — | 91 | — | 91 | ||||||||||
Total revenues | 4,178 | 8,166 | 107 | 12,451 | ||||||||||
Expenses: | ||||||||||||||
Interest | 26 | 3,799 | — | 3,825 | ||||||||||
Depreciation | 1,606 | 2,391 | — | 3,997 | ||||||||||
Property-level operating expenses | — | 1,082 | — | 1,082 | ||||||||||
General administrative and professional fees | 300 | 472 | — | 772 | ||||||||||
Intercompany interest | (79 | ) | 529 | — | 450 | |||||||||
Total expenses | 1,853 | 8,273 | — | 10,126 | ||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 2,325 | $ | (107 | ) | $ | 107 | $ | 2,325 | |||||
10
Table of Contents
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME
For the nine months ended September 30, 2005
(In thousands) | ETOP and ETOP Subsidiary Guarantors | ETOP Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries | Consolidated Elimination | Consolidated | |||||||||||
Revenues: | |||||||||||||||
Rental income | $ | 4,260 | $ | 8,007 | $ | — | $ | 12,267 | |||||||
Equity loss in affiliates | (329 | ) | — | 329 | — | ||||||||||
Interest and other income | 1 | 34 | — | 35 | |||||||||||
Total revenues | 3,932 | 8,041 | 329 | 12,302 | |||||||||||
Expenses: | |||||||||||||||
Interest | 27 | 3,872 | — | 3,899 | |||||||||||
Depreciation | 1,604 | 2,375 | — | 3,979 | |||||||||||
Property-level operating expenses | — | 1,061 | — | 1,061 | |||||||||||
General, administrative and professional fees and | 409 | 603 | — | 1,012 | |||||||||||
Intercompany interest | (10 | ) | 459 | — | 449 | ||||||||||
Total expenses | 2,030 | 8,370 | — | 10,400 | |||||||||||
Income (loss) before discontinued operations | 1,902 | (329 | ) | 329 | 1,902 | ||||||||||
Discontinued operations | (48 | ) | — | — | (48 | ) | |||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 1,854 | $ | (329 | ) | $ | 329 | $ | 1,854 | ||||||
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
For the nine months ended September 30, 2006
(In thousands) | ETOP and ETOP Subsidiary Guarantors | ETOP Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries | Consolidated Elimination | Consolidated | |||||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | $ | 3,419 | $ | 2,330 | $ | — | $ | 5,749 | |||||||
Net cash used in investing activities | — | (209 | ) | — | (209 | ) | |||||||||
Net cash used in financing activities | (3,420 | ) | (2,221 | ) | — | (5,641 | ) | ||||||||
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents | (1 | ) | (100 | ) | — | (101 | ) | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | 1 | 438 | — | 439 | |||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $ | — | $ | 338 | $ | — | $ | 338 | |||||||
11
Table of Contents
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
For the nine months ended September 30, 2005
(In thousands) | ETOP and ETOP Subsidiary Guarantors | ETOP Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries | Consolidated Elimination | Consolidated | |||||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | $ | 6,372 | $ | 347 | $ | — | $ | 6,719 | |||||||
Net cash used in investing activities | — | (13 | ) | — | (13 | ) | |||||||||
Net cash used in financing activities | (6,409 | ) | (1,181 | ) | — | (7,590 | ) | ||||||||
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents | (37 | ) | (847 | ) | — | (884 | ) | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | 37 | 1,173 | — | 1,210 | |||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $ | — | $ | 326 | $ | — | $ | 326 | |||||||
ITEM 2.MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Unless otherwise indicated or except where the context otherwise requires, the terms “we,” “us,” “our,” “ETOP” and the “Partnership” and other similar terms in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q refer to ElderTrust Operating Limited Partnership and its consolidated subsidiaries.
Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). All statements regarding our expected future financial position, results of operations, cash flows, financing plans, business strategy, budgets, projected costs, capital expenditures, competitive positions, growth opportunities, expected lease income, plans and objectives of management for future operations and statements that include words such as “anticipate,” “if,” “believe,” “plan,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “could,” “should,” “will” and other similar expressions are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are inherently uncertain, and security holders must recognize that actual results may differ from our expectations. We do not undertake a duty to update such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date on which they are made.
Our actual future results and trends may differ materially depending on a variety of factors discussed in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”). Factors that may affect our plans or results include without limitation:
• | the ability and willingness of our tenants and operators, including Genesis HealthCare Corporation (“Genesis HealthCare”) and certain of its related entities (collectively, “Genesis”), and Benchmark Assisted Living LLC and certain of its related entities (collectively, “Benchmark”) to meet and/or perform the obligations under their various contractual arrangements with us; |
• | the ability of our tenants and operators to maintain the financial strength and liquidity necessary to satisfy their respective obligations and liabilities to third parties, including without limitation obligations under their existing credit facilities; |
• | the nature and extent of future competition; |
12
Table of Contents
• | the extent of future or pending healthcare reform and regulation, including cost containment measures and changes in reimbursement policies, procedures and rates; |
• | increases in our cost of borrowing; |
• | the ability of our operators to deliver high quality care and to attract patients; |
• | the results of litigation affecting us; |
• | changes in general economic conditions and/or economic conditions in the markets in which we may, from time to time, compete; |
• | our ability to pay down, refinance, restructure and/or extend our indebtedness as it becomes due; |
• | the movement of interest rates; |
• | the ability and willingness of our tenants to renew their leases with us upon expiration of the leases and our ability to relet our properties on the same or better terms in the event such leases expire and are not renewed by the existing tenants; and |
• | the impact on the liquidity, financial condition and results of operations of our tenants and operators resulting from increased operating costs and uninsured liabilities for professional liability claims, and the ability of our tenants and operators to accurately estimate the magnitude of such liabilities. |
Many of these factors are beyond our control and the control of our management.
Background Information
We are a limited partnership organized under the laws of the State of Delaware. We invest in seniors housing and other healthcare facilities, primarily skilled nursing facilities, assisted and independent living facilities and medical and other office buildings. ElderTrust, a Maryland real estate investment trust (“ElderTrust”), is our sole general partner. In February 2004, ElderTrust became a wholly owned direct subsidiary of Ventas, Inc. (“Ventas”), a healthcare real estate investment trust based in Louisville, Kentucky, whose common stock is publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange.
As of September 30, 2006, our consolidated assets included seventeen properties, located in three states, consisting of nine seniors housing facilities, five skilled nursing facilities, two medical office buildings and a financial office building with an aggregate net book value of $141.4 million. Except with respect to our office buildings, we lease these facilities to third-party healthcare providers, generally under “triple-net” leases, which require the tenants to pay all property-related expenses.
As of September 30, 2006, approximately 53.5% and 35.2% of our properties, based on their original cost, were operated by Genesis and Benchmark, respectively. Approximately 49.7% and 30.7% of our total revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 were derived from leases with Genesis and Benchmark, respectively. As a result of these relationships with Genesis and Benchmark, our revenues and ability to meet our obligations depend, in significant part, upon the ability of Genesis and Benchmark to meet their lease obligations. Any failure of Genesis and/or Benchmark to continue their operations and/or to continue to make lease payments to us could have a significant adverse impact on our operations and cash flows.
Recent Developments Regarding Government Regulation
Medicare Reimbursement; Skilled Nursing Facilities
On August 18, 2006, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (“CMS”) published a final rule reducing reimbursement of uncollectible Medicare coinsurance amounts for all beneficiaries (other than beneficiaries of both Medicare
13
Table of Contents
and Medicaid) from 100% to 70% for skilled nursing facility cost reporting periods beginning on or after October 1, 2005. CMS estimates that the change in the treatment of bad debt will result in a decrease in payments to skilled nursing facilities of $490 million over the five-year period from fiscal year 2006 to 2010.
The rule also includes various options for classifying and weighing patients transferred to a skilled nursing facility after a hospital stay less than the mean length of stay associated with that particular diagnosis-related group. This change in methodology could affect skilled nursing facility admissions, although, we currently cannot predict what impact it will have on the liquidity or profitability of our skilled nursing facility operators.
In addition, under the rule, the $1,740 annual cap on Medicare part B reimbursement for physical therapy and speech-language pathology services and the separate annual cap of $1,740 on occupational therapy is lifted for those patients who can demonstrate medical necessity. Unless Congress takes prior action, the caps will go back into effect on January 1, 2007.
On August 4, 2005, CMS published a final rule under the prospective payment system for skilled nursing facilities. Pursuant to the rule, CMS, among other things, adopted a refinement to the resource utilization groups (“RUGs”) used to determine payment for beneficiaries in skilled nursing facilities which increases the number of RUGs from 44 to 53. CMS also increased the case mix index adjustment for all RUGs categories and implemented a market basket increase of 3%. The market basket increase became effective on October 1, 2005, and the RUGs refinements became effective January 1, 2006. CMS projects the overall effect of these changes in 2006 to be a 0.1% increase in aggregate Medicare payments, but within this aggregate CMS expects some facilities to have modest decreases and some to have modest increases.
In the past, CMS has updated skilled nursing facility payment rates under Medicare part A through annual rulemaking. For fiscal year 2007, however, CMS issued a guidance that the payment rates under Medicare Part A will increase by 3.1% beginning on October 1, 2006. We cannot assure you that the payment rates under Medicare Part A will not be changed by Congress or as to the extent of any such changes.
Medicaid Reimbursement; Skilled Nursing Facilities
The changes made by the August 18, 2006 rule described above are anticipated to reduce Medicaid payments to skilled-nursing facilities operators in the future. Further, President Bush’s Budget for fiscal year 2007 proposes limiting to 3% the taxes that states may impose on healthcare providers and which would qualify for federal financial participation under Medicaid. The ceiling is currently set at 6%. There is strong opposition from state governors, and it is uncertain whether the proposal will go into effect. If it does, it could have an adverse effect in certain states, although we cannot predict at this time how any such reduction would affect our skilled nursing facility operators.
At this time, we also cannot predict whether significant Medicaid rate freezes, cuts or other program changes will be adopted, and if so, by how many states or the impact of such action on our skilled nursing facility operators. However, severe and widespread rate cuts or freezes could have a material adverse effect on those operators and in turn could have an adverse effect on us.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, which requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts in the financial statements and the related disclosures. We believe that the following critical accounting policies, among others, affect our more significant estimates and judgments used in the preparation of our financial statements.
Long-Lived Assets
Investments in real estate properties are recorded at cost. We account for acquisitions using the purchase method. The cost of the properties acquired is allocated among tangible land, buildings and improvements and recognized intangibles based upon estimated fair values in accordance with the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 141, “Business Combinations.” We estimate fair values of the components of assets acquired as of the acquisition date or engage a third-party appraiser as necessary. Recognized intangibles, if any, include the value of acquired lease contracts and
14
Table of Contents
related customer relationships.
Our method for determining fair value varies with the categorization of the asset acquired. We estimate the fair value of buildings on an as-if-vacant basis, and depreciate the building value over the estimated remaining life of the building. We determine the allocated value of other fixed assets based upon the replacement cost and depreciate such value over the estimated remaining useful lives. We determine the value of land either based on real estate tax assessed values in relation to the total value of the asset, internal analyses of recently acquired and existing comparable properties within our portfolio or third-party appraisals. The fair value of in-place leases, if any, reflects (i) above and below market leases, if any, determined by discounting the difference between the estimated current market rent and the in-place rentals, the resulting intangible asset of which is amortized to rental revenue over the remaining life of the associated lease plus any fixed rate renewal periods, if applicable, (ii) the estimated value of the cost to obtain tenants, including tenant allowances, tenant improvements and leasing commissions, which is amortized over the remaining life of the associated lease, and (iii) an estimated value of the absorption period to reflect the value of the rents and recovery costs foregone during a reasonable lease-up period, as if the acquired space was vacant, which is amortized over the remaining life of the associated lease. We also estimate the value of tenant or other customer relationships acquired by considering the nature and extent of existing business relationships with the tenant, growth prospects for developing new business with such tenant, such tenant’s credit quality, expectations of lease renewals with such tenant, and the potential for significant, additional future leasing arrangements with such tenant. We amortize such value, if any, over the expected term of the associated arrangements or leases, which would include the remaining lives of the related leases and any expected renewal periods.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
We periodically evaluate our long-lived assets, primarily consisting of investments in real estate, for impairment indicators. If indicators of impairment are present, we evaluate the carrying value of the related real estate investments in relation to the future undiscounted cash flows of the underlying operations and adjust the net book value of leased properties and other long-lived assets to fair value if the sum of the expected future cash flow or sales proceeds is less than book value. An impairment loss is recognized at the time we make any such adjustment. Future events could occur which would cause management to conclude that impairment indicators exist and an impairment loss is warranted.
Revenue Recognition
Certain of our leases provide for periodic and determinable increases in base rent. Base rental revenues under these leases are recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the applicable lease. Certain of our other leases provide for an annual increase in rental payments only if certain revenue parameters or other contingencies are met. We recognize the increased rental revenue under these leases only if the revenue parameters or other contingencies are met, rather than on a straight-line basis over the term of the applicable lease. We recognize income from rent, lease termination fees and other income once all of the following criteria are met in accordance with the Commission’s Staff Accounting Bulletin 104: (i) the agreement has been fully executed and delivered; (ii) services have been rendered; (iii) the amount is fixed or determinable; and (iv) the collectibility is reasonably assured.
Gain on Sale of Facilities
We recognize sales of facilities only upon the closing of the transaction with the purchaser. Payments received from purchasers prior to closing are recorded as deposits and classified as other assets in the consolidated balance sheet. Gains on facilities sold are recognized using the full accrual method upon closing when the collectibility of the sales price is reasonably assured, we are not obligated to perform significant activities after the sale to earn the profit, we have received adequate initial investment from the buyer, and other profit recognition criteria have been satisfied. Gains may be deferred in whole or in part until the sales satisfy the requirements of gain recognition on sales of real estate under SFAS No. 66, “Accounting for Sales of Real Estate.”
Results of Operations
There was no material change in our revenues for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 from the comparable periods in 2005. The majority of our general, administrative and professional fees results from the allocation of
15
Table of Contents
corporate expenses from our general partner. The decrease in this expense during the third quarter of 2006 and for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2006 is attributable primarily to lower allocations from the general partner. There were no material changes in our other expenses from the third quarter or first nine months of 2005. Discontinued operations in 2005 reflect the operating results of a seniors housing facility that was sold in October 2005.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
During the nine months ended September 30, 2006, our principal source of liquidity was cash flows from operations. We anticipate that cash flows from operations will be sufficient to fund our business operations and distributions to unit holders for the foreseeable future.
We had cash and cash equivalents of $0.3 million and escrow deposits and restricted cash of $5.9 million as of September 30, 2006.
Net cash provided by operating activities was $5.7 million and $6.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. This $1.0 million decrease is due primarily due to changes in operating assets and liabilities at September 30, 2006, partially offset by operational improvements.
Net cash used in investing activities was $209,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and related solely to building improvements for our medical office buildings. Similar investments of $13,000 were made during the same period in 2005.
Net cash used in financing activities was $5.6 million and $7.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. This decrease is the result of lower debt repayments, offset by higher net cash distributions to a greater number of unit holders.
ITEM 3.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We receive revenue primarily by leasing our assets under long-term triple-net leases in which the rental rate is generally fixed with annual escalators, subject to certain limitations. Our bonds payable and substantially all of our mortgage indebtedness bear interest at fixed rates. We do not utilize interest rate swaps or any other type of derivative financial instruments to mitigate interest rate risk.
For fixed rate debt, changes in interest rates generally affect the fair market value of the underlying indebtedness, but not earnings or cash flows. We generally cannot prepay fixed rate debt prior to maturity without premium. Therefore, interest rate risk and changes in fair market value should not have a significant impact on the fixed rate debt until we would be required to refinance such debt.
To highlight the sensitivity of the fixed rate debt to changes in interest rates, the following summary shows the effects of a hypothetical instantaneous change of 100 basis points (BPS) in interest rates as of September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 (in thousands):
Fixed Rate Debt | ||||||
As of September 30, 2006 | As of December 31, 2005 | |||||
Book value | $ | 73,245 | $ | 74,276 | ||
Fair value | 77,102 | 79,778 | ||||
Fair value reflecting change in interest rates: | ||||||
-100 BPS | 81,044 | 84,197 | ||||
+100 BPS | 73,576 | 75,831 |
16
Table of Contents
The fair market value of our fixed rate debt is based on current interest rates at which similar borrowings could be made by us. These sensitivity analyses are limited in that they were performed at a particular point in time and are subject to the accuracy of the various assumptions used.
We may borrow additional money with variable interest rates in the future. Increases in interest rates, therefore, would result in increases in interest expense, which could adversely affect our cash flow and our ability to pay our obligations.
ITEM 4.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We have established disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to us is timely communicated to the officers who certify our financial reports and to other members of our management, including ElderTrust’s Board of Trustees.
Based upon their evaluation as of September 30, 2006, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of ElderTrust, our general partner, have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in our Exchange Act filings is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms.
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
During the third quarter of 2006, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) or in other factors that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Exhibit Number | Description of Document | |
31.1 | Certification of Debra A. Cafaro, President and Chief Executive Officer of ElderTrust, general partner of the Partnership, pursuant to 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. | |
31.2 | Certification of Richard A. Schweinhart, Chief Financial Officer of ElderTrust, general partner of the Partnership, pursuant to 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. | |
32.1 | Certification of Debra A. Cafaro, President and Chief Executive Officer of ElderTrust, general partner of the Partnership, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and 18 U.S.C. 1350. | |
32.2 | Certification of Richard A. Schweinhart, Chief Financial Officer of ElderTrust, general partner of the Partnership, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and 18 U.S.C. 1350. |
17
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Date: November 13, 2006
ELDERTRUST OPERATING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP | ||
By: | ELDERTRUST, its general partner | |
By: | /s/ Debra A. Cafaro | |
Debra A. Cafaro | ||
President and Chief Executive Officer | ||
By: | /s/ Richard A. Schweinhart | |
Richard A. Schweinhart | ||
Chief Financial Officer |
18
Table of Contents
Exhibit Number | Description of Document | |
31.1 | Certification of Debra A. Cafaro, President and Chief Executive Officer of ElderTrust, general partner of the Partnership, pursuant to 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. | |
31.2 | Certification of Richard A. Schweinhart, Chief Financial Officer of ElderTrust, general partner of the Partnership, pursuant to 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. | |
32.1 | Certification of Debra A. Cafaro, President and Chief Executive Officer of ElderTrust, general partner of the Partnership, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and 18 U.S.C. 1350. | |
32.2 | Certification of Richard A. Schweinhart, Chief Financial Officer of ElderTrust, general partner of the Partnership, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and 18 U.S.C. 1350. |
19