Description of Business (Policies) | 6 Months Ended |
Jun. 30, 2014 |
Accounting Policies [Abstract] | ' |
Unaudited Interim Financial Information | ' |
Unaudited Interim Financial Information |
The accompanying financial information as of June 30, 2014 is unaudited. The Condensed Financial Statements included in this report reflect all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) that our management considers necessary for the fair statement of the results of operations for the interim periods covered and of the financial condition of the Company at the date of the interim balance sheet. The December 31, 2013 Condensed Balance Sheet was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America, or GAAP. The results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results for the entire year or any other interim period. The accompanying Condensed Financial Statements and related financial information should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and the related notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. |
Use of Estimates | ' |
Use of Estimates |
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions about future events that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements as well as reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates. |
Reclassifications | ' |
Reclassifications |
We have reclassified certain prior period amounts to conform to the current period presentation. We reclassified certain liabilities, primarily those related to unbilled receipts, from accounts payable to other accrued liabilities on the balance sheets and made related conforming reclassifications on the statement of cash flows. |
Fair Value of Financial Instruments | ' |
Fair Value of Financial Instruments |
We determine the fair value of financial and nonfinancial assets and liabilities using the fair value hierarchy, which describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value, as follows: |
Level 1—Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities; |
|
Level 2—Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities; and |
Level 3—Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. |
We determine the fair value of Level 1 assets using quoted prices in active markets for identical assets. We review trading activity and pricing for Level 2 investments as of each measurement date. Level 2 inputs, obtained from various third-party data providers, represent quoted prices for similar assets in active markets, were derived from observable market data, or, if not directly observable, were derived from or corroborated by other observable market data. |
In certain cases where there is limited activity or less transparency around inputs to valuation, we classify securities as Level 3 within the valuation hierarchy. As of June 30, 2013, our Level 3 liability consists of a preferred stock warrant liability that we measured at estimated fair value. |
The following table summarizes, for assets and the liability recorded at fair value, the respective fair values and the classifications by level of input within the fair value hierarchy defined above (in thousands): |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 30-Jun-14 | |
| | | | | BASIS OF FAIR VALUE | |
MEASUREMENTS |
| | TOTAL | | | LEVEL 1 | | | LEVEL 2 | | | LEVEL 3 | |
Assets | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Money market funds | | $ | 8,651 | | | $ | 8,651 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
U.S. Treasury securities | | | 102,630 | | | | 102,630 | | | | — | | | | — | |
U.S. government agency securities | | | 24,892 | | | | — | | | | 24,892 | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total cash equivalents and marketable securities | | $ | 136,173 | | | $ | 111,281 | | | $ | 24,892 | | | $ | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 31-Dec-13 | |
| | | | | BASIS OF FAIR VALUE | |
MEASUREMENTS |
| | TOTAL | | | LEVEL 1 | | | LEVEL 2 | | | LEVEL 3 | |
Assets | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Money market funds | | $ | 6,456 | | | $ | 6,456 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
U.S. Treasury securities | | | 18,852 | | | | 18,852 | | | | — | | | | — | |
U.S. government agency securities | | | 48,709 | | | | — | | | | 48,709 | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total cash equivalents and marketable securities | | $ | 74,017 | | | $ | 25,308 | | | $ | 48,709 | | | $ | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
We estimated the fair value of the preferred stock warrant liability using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, or OPM. Inputs used to determine estimated fair value include the estimated fair value of the underlying stock at the valuation measurement date, the remaining contractual term of the warrants, risk-free interest rates, expected dividends and the expected volatility of the price of the underlying stock. As of June 30, 2013, as more certainty developed regarding a possible initial public offering, we began transitioning the valuation methodology for the preferred stock warrant liability for those warrants that would expire upon the initial public offering from the OPM to a probability-weighted expected return method, or PWERM. We continued to value the warrants that would not expire upon the initial public offering using the OPM. The PWERM is a scenario-based analysis that estimates the value of each class of equity, including the preferred stock warrants, on the probability-weighted present value of expected future investment returns, considering each of the possible outcomes available to us, as well as the rights of each equity class. The PWERM estimates the value of each equity class under each of three possible future scenarios—initial public offering, sale and remain a private company. The value under each scenario is then probability weighted and the resulting weighted values summed to determine the fair value per share of each equity class. In connection with the completion of our initial public offering in September 2013, or our IPO, substantially all of the warrants were automatically net exercised for a total of 4,376 shares of common stock, pursuant to the terms of the warrants and the remaining outstanding warrant to purchase Series A convertible preferred stock converted into a warrant to purchase 2,304 shares of common stock at $12.30 per share, automatically net exercised for a total of 768 shares of common stock on January 26, 2014. |
The change in the estimated fair value of the preferred stock warrant liability is summarized below (in thousands): |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | SIX MONTHS ENDED | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
30-Jun-13 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance, beginning | | $ | 563 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Change in fair value recorded in other income, net | | | (420 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance, ending | | $ | 143 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Loss Per Share of Common Stock | ' |
Net Loss Per Share of Common Stock |
We compute basic net loss per common share by dividing net loss attributable to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. We did not include potentially dilutive securities consisting of stock options, preferred stock warrants common stock warrants and convertible preferred stock in the diluted net loss per common share calculations for all periods presented because the inclusion of such shares would have had an antidilutive effect. The convertible preferred stock contains certain participation rights. |
We excluded the following securities from the calculation of diluted net loss per share as the effect would have been antidilutive (in thousands): |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended | | | Six Months Ended | |
June 30, | June 30, |
| | 2014 | | | 2013 | | | 2014 | | | 2013 | |
Convertible preferred stock | | | — | | | | 9,929 | | | | — | | | | 9,929 | |
Options to purchase common stock | | | 2,141 | | | | 2,216 | | | | 2,177 | | | | 2,426 | |
Warrants to purchase convertible preferred stock | | | — | | | | 84 | | | | — | | | | 84 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 2,141 | | | | 12,229 | | | | 2,177 | | | | 12,439 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Deferred Offering Costs | ' |
Deferred Offering Costs |
We capitalize deferred offering costs, which primarily consist of direct incremental legal and accounting fees relating to our IPO. We offset the deferred offering costs against our initial public offering proceeds upon the consummation of our IPO in September 2013. As of June 30, 2013, $1.5 million of deferred offering costs were capitalized in other long-term assets on our balance sheets. |
Recently Issued Accounting Standards | ' |
Recently Issued Accounting Standards |
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued Accounting Standards Update, or ASU, No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers.” ASU 2014-09 supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in “Topic 605, Revenue Recognition” and requires entities to recognize revenue in a way that depicts the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. ASU 2014-09 is effective retrospectively for annual or interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, with early application not permitted. We are currently evaluating the effect the adoption of ASU 2014-09 will have on our financial statements. |