This Amendment No. 2 (this “Amendment”) amends and supplements the Tender Offer Statement on Schedule TO (as amended and together with any amendments and supplements thereto, the “Schedule TO”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 18, 2021 by (a) Franklin Acquisition Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Purchaser”) and a wholly owned subsidiary of Amgen Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Amgen”), and (b) Amgen. The Schedule TO relates to the offer by Purchaser to purchase all of the outstanding shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Shares”), of Five Prime Therapeutics, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Five Prime”), at a purchase price of $38.00 per Share, in cash, minus any applicable withholding taxes and without interest, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the offer to purchase, dated March 18, 2021, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit (a)(1)(A) (together with any amendments, supplements or modifications thereto, the “Offer to Purchase”) and in the related Letter of Transmittal (together with any amendments, supplements or modifications thereto, the “Letter of Transmittal” and, together with the Offer to Purchase, the “Offer”), a copy of which is attached as Exhibit (a)(1)(B).
Except as otherwise set forth in this Amendment, the information set forth in the Schedule TO remains unchanged and is incorporated herein by reference to the extent relevant to the items in this Amendment. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Offer to Purchase or in the Schedule TO.
The Schedule TO is hereby amended and supplemented as follows:
Item 11. Additional Information.
The Offer to Purchase and Item 11 of the Schedule TO, to the extent such Item incorporates by reference the information contained in the Offer to Purchase, are hereby amended and restated as follows:
| 1. | The information set forth in the section of the Offer to Purchase entitled “The Tender Offer—Certain Legal Matters; Regulatory Approvals; Litigation” is hereby amended and restated by replacing the fourth paragraph of the subsection entitled “Antitrust Matters” with the following paragraph: |
“Subsequent to the filing of the Offer to Purchase, on March 19, 2021, Amgen and Five Prime each submitted a Premerger Notification and Report Form with the DOJ and the FTC in connection with the purchase of the Shares in the Offer. The 15-day waiting period expired on April 5, 2021 at 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time. Accordingly, the condition to the Offer requiring that the waiting period (or any extension thereof) applicable to the Offer under the HSR Act has expired or been terminated has been satisfied. The Offer continues to be subject to the remaining conditions set forth in the section of the Offer to Purchase entitled “The Tender Offer—Conditions of the Offer.”
| 2. | The information set forth in the section of the Offer to Purchase entitled “The Tender Offer—Certain Legal Matters; Regulatory Approvals; Litigation” is hereby amended and restated by replacing the first paragraph of the subsection entitled “Litigation” with the following paragraph: |
“Subsequent to the filing of the Offer to Purchase, eight lawsuits were filed challenging the proposed transaction. One lawsuit (captioned Wang v. Five Prime Therapeutics, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-00395-UNA) was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware on March 18, 2021. A second lawsuit was filed on March 22, 2021 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California (captioned Dyson v. Five Prime Therapeutics, Inc. et al., Case No. 3:21-cv-01988). A third lawsuit was filed on March 23, 2021, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (captioned Carroll v. Five Prime Therapeutics, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-01509). Two additional lawsuits were filed on March 24, 2021, in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware (captioned Wilson v. Five Prime Therapeutics, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-00422-UNA, and Baker v. Five Prime Therapeutics, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-00423-UNA, respectively). A sixth lawsuit was filed on March 25, 2021 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California (captioned Wheeler v. Five Prime Therapeutics, Inc. et al., Case No. 3:21-cv-02097). Two additional lawsuits were filed on March 30, 2021 in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (captioned Ciccotelli v. Five Prime Therapeutics, Inc. et al., Case No. 2:21-cv-01512) and the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (captioned Mills v. Five Prime Therapeutics, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-02718), respectively. All of the complaints name Five Prime and its directors as defendants. The Baker and Ciccotelli complaints also name Amgen and Purchaser as defendants. The complaints generally allege violations of Section 14(d), Section 14(e) and Section 20 of the Exchange Act due to an incomplete and materially misleading Solicitation/Recommendation Statement filed by Five Prime on Schedule 14D-9 with the SEC on March 18, 2021 (the “Schedule 14D-9”). The complaints seek various legal and equitable relief, including, among other things, orders (i) enjoining the defendants from proceeding with, consummating or closing the Merger until the allegedly omitted information is disclosed, (ii) rescinding the Merger if consummated, or awarding rescissory damages, (iii) directing the Five Prime Board to file a corrected Solicitation/Recommendation Statement on Schedule 14D-9; and (iv) awarding plaintiffs’ costs, including attorneys’ fees. Amgen may be named in additional similar complaints. If such additional complaints are filed, absent new or different allegations that are material, Five Prime, Amgen and Purchaser will not necessarily announce such additional filings. Five Prime and the current members of its board of directors have been served with the Wang, Dyson, Wheeler, Baker, and Mills complaints, but have not otherwise been served with the other complaints. Neither Amgen nor Purchaser has been served with any of the complaints. Defendants have not answered any of the complaints. Defendants believe the claims asserted in the complaints are without merit, deny any wrongdoing in connection with the filing of the Schedule 14D-9, and intend to vigorously defend against the claims.”