Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions about future events that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements as well as reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates. Fair Value of Financial Instruments We determine the fair value of financial and nonfinancial assets and liabilities using the fair value hierarchy, which describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value, as follows: Level 1 —Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities; Level 2 —Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities; and Level 3 —Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. We determine the fair value of Level 1 assets using quoted prices in active markets for identical assets. We review trading activity and pricing for Level 2 investments as of each measurement date. Level 2 inputs, obtained from various third-party data providers, represent quoted prices for similar assets in active markets and were derived from observable market data, or, if not directly observable, were derived from or corroborated by other observable market data. In certain cases where there is limited activity or less transparency around inputs to valuation, we classify securities as Level 3 within the valuation hierarchy. We do not have any Level 3 securities as of June 30, 2015. The following table summarizes, for assets recorded at fair value, the respective fair values and the classifications by level of input within the fair value hierarchy defined above (in thousands): June 30, 2015 Basis of Fair Value Measurements Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Assets Money market funds $ 9,842 $ 9,842 $ — $ — U.S. Treasury securities 188,310 188,310 — — Total cash equivalents and marketable securities $ 198,152 $ 198,152 $ — $ — December 31, 2014 Basis of Fair Value Measurements Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Assets Money market funds $ 9,996 $ 9,996 $ — $ — U.S. Treasury securities 130,786 130,786 — — U.S. government agency securities 3,001 — 3,001 — Total cash equivalents and marketable securities $ 143,783 $ 140,782 $ 3,001 $ — Net Loss Per Share of Common Stock We compute basic net loss per common share by dividing net loss attributable to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. We excluded the following options and restricted stock awards, or RSAs, to purchase shares of common stock (in thousands) from the calculation of diluted net loss per share for all periods presented as the effect would have been antidilutive: Three Months Ended Six Months Ended June 30, June 30, 2015 2014 2015 2014 Options and RSAs to purchase common stock 2,604 2,141 2,635 2,177 2,604 2,141 2,635 2,177 Recently Issued Accounting Standards In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Topic |