Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
[Mark One]
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE | |
| SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | |
| | |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 |
|
OR |
| |
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE | |
| SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 000-51293
Behringer Harvard REIT I, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Maryland | | 68-0509956 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
15601 Dallas Parkway, Suite 600, Addison, Texas 75001
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip code)
(866) 655-1605
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
None
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer o |
| |
Non-accelerated filer x (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x
As of October 29, 2008, Behringer Harvard REIT I, Inc. had 275,649,238 shares of common stock, $.0001 par value, outstanding.
Table of Contents
BEHRINGER HARVARD REIT I, INC.
FORM 10-Q
Quarter Ended September 30, 2008
2
Table of Contents
PART I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
Behringer Harvard REIT I, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(unaudited)
| | September 30, | | December 31, | |
| | 2008 | | 2007 | |
Assets | | | | | |
Real estate | | | | | |
Land | | $ | 532,543 | | $ | 514,520 | |
Buildings, net | | 3,523,972 | | 3,359,152 | |
Real estate under development | | 15,472 | | 7,038 | |
Total real estate | | 4,071,987 | | 3,880,710 | |
| | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | 361,774 | | 94,947 | |
Restricted cash | | 238,917 | | 229,803 | |
Investment in variable rate demand notes | | 80,000 | | — | |
Accounts receivable, net | | 75,275 | | 48,030 | |
Receivables from related parties | | — | | 1,023 | |
Prepaid expenses and other assets | | 22,765 | | 10,244 | |
Goodwill | | 10,295 | | 19,922 | |
Investments in unconsolidated entities | | 163,460 | | 203,212 | |
Deferred financing fees, net | | 36,520 | | 42,668 | |
Notes receivable | | 13,084 | | 13,854 | |
Lease intangibles, net | | 555,089 | | 627,714 | |
Total assets | | $ | 5,629,166 | | $ | 5,172,127 | |
| | | | | |
Liabilities and stockholders’ equity | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Liabilities | | | | | |
Notes payable | | $ | 3,367,272 | | $ | 3,198,143 | |
Accounts payable | | 15,651 | | 7,889 | |
Payables to related parties | | 6,787 | | 8,190 | |
Acquired below-market leases, net | | 159,116 | | 175,589 | |
Distributions payable | | 13,687 | | 10,951 | |
Accrued liabilities | | 138,927 | | 126,789 | |
Convertible debentures | | 75,460 | | 91,180 | |
Subscriptions for common stock | | — | | 2,984 | |
Deferred tax liabilities | | 3,685 | | 3,869 | |
Other liabilities | | 23,718 | | 22,897 | |
Total liabilities | | 3,804,303 | | 3,648,481 | |
| | | | | |
Commitments and contingencies | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Minority interest | | 15,953 | | 18,049 | |
| | | | | |
Stockholders’ equity | | | | | |
Preferred stock, $.0001 par value per share; 17,500,000 shares authorized, none outstanding | | — | | — | |
Convertible stock, $.0001 par value per share; 1,000 shares authorized, 1,000 shares issued and outstanding | | — | | — | |
Common stock, $.0001 par value per share; 382,499,000 shares authorized, 261,317,309 and 205,562,785 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively | | 26 | | 21 | |
Additional paid-in capital | | 2,333,480 | | 1,834,477 | |
Cumulative distributions and net loss | | (521,675 | ) | (327,527 | ) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | | (2,921 | ) | (1,374 | ) |
Total stockholders' equity | | 1,808,910 | | 1,505,597 | |
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | | $ | 5,629,166 | | $ | 5,172,127 | |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
Table of Contents
Behringer Harvard REIT I, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(unaudited)
| | Three months | | Three months | | Nine months | | Nine months | |
| | ended | | ended | | ended | | ended | |
| | September 30, 2008 | | September 30, 2007 | | September 30, 2008 | | September 30, 2007 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Rental revenue | | $ | 156,031 | | $ | 69,266 | | $ | 451,726 | | $ | 205,393 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Expenses | | | | | | | | | |
Property operating expenses | | 42,826 | | 16,333 | | 120,043 | | 48,140 | |
Interest expense | | 49,035 | | 22,813 | | 142,827 | | 67,642 | |
Real estate taxes | | 18,147 | | 9,791 | | 57,848 | | 29,485 | |
Property management fees | | 4,242 | | 1,990 | | 12,884 | | 6,088 | |
Asset management fees | | 6,965 | | 2,265 | | 20,502 | | 8,739 | |
General and administrative | | 2,090 | | 784 | | 4,893 | | 1,831 | |
Depreciation and amortization | | 67,932 | | 31,662 | | 203,858 | | 93,406 | |
Total expenses | | 191,237 | | 85,638 | | 562,855 | | 255,331 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Interest income | | 2,247 | | 8,850 | | 4,937 | | 18,387 | |
Gain on sale of assets | | 5,068 | | — | | 5,253 | | — | |
Loss before income taxes, minority interest, and equity in earnings of investments | | (27,891 | ) | (7,522 | ) | (100,939 | ) | (31,551 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
Provision for income taxes | | (379 | ) | (93 | ) | (824 | ) | (398 | ) |
Minority interest | | 247 | | — | | 767 | | — | |
Equity in earnings of investments | | 140 | | 1,291 | | 1,146 | | 4,072 | |
Loss from continuing operations | | (27,883 | ) | (6,324 | ) | (99,850 | ) | (27,877 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
Discontinued operations: | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Income (loss) from discontinued operations | | 340 | | 191 | | (2,510 | ) | 1,856 | |
Gain on sale of discontinued operations | | 8,711 | | — | | 16,045 | | — | |
Income from discontinued operations | | 9,051 | | 191 | | 13,535 | | 1,856 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Net loss | | $ | (18,832 | ) | $ | (6,133 | ) | $ | (86,315 | ) | $ | (26,021 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
Basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding | | 245,831,834 | | 188,347,364 | | 226,828,633 | | 161,692,741 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Basic and diluted net income (loss) per share: | | | | | | | | | |
Continuing operations | | $ | (0.10 | ) | $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | (0.44 | ) | $ | (0.17 | ) |
Discontinued operations | | 0.03 | | 0.00 | | 0.06 | | 0.01 | |
Basic and diluted loss per share | | $ | (0.07 | ) | $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | (0.38 | ) | $ | (0.16 | ) |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
Table of Contents
Behringer Harvard REIT I, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Loss
(in thousands)
(unaudited)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Cumulative | | | | | |
| | Convertible Stock | | Common Stock | | Additional | | Distributions | | Accumulated Other | | Total | |
| | Number | | Par | | Number | | Par | | Paid-in | | and | | Comprehensive | | Stockholders’ | |
| | of Shares | | Value | | of Shares | | Value | | Capital | | Net Loss | | Loss | | Equity | |
Balance at January 1, 2007 | | 1 | | $ | — | | 121,884 | | $ | 12 | | $ | 1,085,806 | | $ | (171,376 | ) | $ | — | | $ | 914,442 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Comprehensive loss: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net loss | | | | | | | | | | | | (41,631 | ) | — | | (41,631 | ) |
Unrealized loss on interest rate swap | | | | | | | | | | | | — | | (1,374 | ) | (1,374 | ) |
Total comprehensive loss | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | (41,631 | ) | (1,374 | ) | (43,005 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Issuance of common stock, net | | — | | — | | 80,029 | | 9 | | 712,756 | | — | | — | | 712,765 | |
Redemption of common stock | | — | | — | | (2,291 | ) | — | | (19,984 | ) | — | | — | | (19,984 | ) |
Distributions declared on common stock | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | (114,520 | ) | — | | (114,520 | ) |
Shares issued pursuant to Distribution Reinvestment Plan, net | | — | | — | | 5,941 | | — | | 55,899 | | — | | — | | 55,899 | |
Balance at December 31, 2007 | | 1 | | — | | 205,563 | | 21 | | 1,834,477 | | (327,527 | ) | (1,374 | ) | 1,505,597 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Comprehensive loss: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net loss | | | | | | | | | | | | (86,315 | ) | — | | (86,315 | ) |
Unrealized loss on interest rate swap | | | | | | | | | | | | — | | (1,547 | ) | (1,547 | ) |
Total comprehensive loss | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | (86,315 | ) | (1,547 | ) | (87,862 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Issuance of common stock, net | | — | | — | | 52,094 | | 5 | | 463,641 | | — | | — | | 463,646 | |
Redemption of common stock | | — | | — | | (2,224 | ) | — | | (19,984 | ) | — | | — | | (19,984 | ) |
Distributions declared on common stock | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | (107,833 | ) | — | | (107,833 | ) |
Shares issued pursuant to Distribution Reinvestment Plan, net | | — | | — | | 5,884 | | — | | 55,346 | | — | | — | | 55,346 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at September 30, 2008 | | 1 | | $ | — | | 261,317 | | $ | 26 | | $ | 2,333,480 | | $ | (521,675 | ) | $ | (2,921 | ) | $ | 1,808,910 | |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
5
Table of Contents
Behringer Harvard REIT I, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(in thousands)
(unaudited)
| | Nine months ended | | Nine months ended | |
| | September 30, 2008 | | September 30, 2007 | |
Cash flows from operating activities | | | | | |
Net loss | | $ | (86,315 | ) | $ | (26,021 | ) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash flows provided by operating activities: | | | | | |
Minority interest | | (767 | ) | — | |
Gain on sale of assets | | (5,253 | ) | — | |
Gain on sale of discontinued operations | | (16,045 | ) | — | |
Depreciation and amortization | | 204,006 | | 93,867 | |
Interest income capitalized to notes receivable | | (77 | ) | (377 | ) |
Equity in earnings of investments | | (1,146 | ) | (4,072 | ) |
Distributions from investments | | 1,146 | | 4,072 | |
Change in accounts receivable | | (27,296 | ) | (10,894 | ) |
Change in prepaid expenses and other assets | | (8,703 | ) | (1,143 | ) |
Change in lease intangibles | | (9,868 | ) | (8,955 | ) |
Change in accounts payable | | 1,756 | | (1,188 | ) |
Change in accrued liabilities | | 4,197 | | 14,604 | |
Change in payables to related parties | | 3,606 | | (1,985 | ) |
Cash provided by operating activities | | 59,241 | | 57,908 | |
| | | | | |
Cash flows from investing activities | | | | | |
Return of investments | | 6,447 | | 4,028 | |
Purchases of real estate | | (233,057 | ) | (25,112 | ) |
Investments in unconsolidated entities | | (1,447 | ) | (2,993 | ) |
Escrow deposits, pre-acquisition and pre-disposition costs | | (4,960 | ) | (36,235 | ) |
Capital expenditures for real estate | | (43,328 | ) | (28,829 | ) |
Investment in variable rate demand notes | | (80,000 | ) | — | |
Notes receivable advances | | — | | (23,000 | ) |
Proceeds from notes receivable | | 3 | | 14,089 | |
Insurance proceeds received | | 6,000 | | — | |
Proceeds from sale of discontinued operations | | 40,190 | | — | |
Proceeds from sale of assets | | 6,628 | | — | |
Change in restricted cash | | (5,224 | ) | 23,604 | |
Cash used in investing activities | | (308,748 | ) | (74,448 | ) |
| | | | | |
Cash flows from financing activities | | | | | |
Financing costs | | (820 | ) | (46 | ) |
Proceeds from notes payable | | 280,000 | | — | |
Payments on notes payable | | (147,501 | ) | (1,938 | ) |
Payments on capital lease obligations | | (46 | ) | (10 | ) |
Issuance of common stock | | 518,795 | | 708,964 | |
Redemptions of common stock | | (19,898 | ) | (5,936 | ) |
Offering costs | | (55,147 | ) | (72,425 | ) |
Distributions | | (50,237 | ) | (40,178 | ) |
Conversion of debentures | | (2,172 | ) | — | |
Change in subscriptions for common stock | | (2,984 | ) | (1,993 | ) |
Change in subscription cash received | | 2,984 | | 1,993 | |
Change in payables to related parties | | (6,640 | ) | 386 | |
Cash provided by financing activities | | 516,334 | | 588,817 | |
| | | | | |
Net change in cash and cash equivalents | | 266,827 | | 572,277 | |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | | 94,947 | | 124,948 | |
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | | $ | 361,774 | | $ | 697,225 | |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
6
Table of Contents
Behringer Harvard REIT I, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
1. Business
Organization
Behringer Harvard REIT I, Inc. and our subsidiaries (which may be referred to as the “Company,” “we,” “us,” or “our”) was incorporated in June 2002 as a Maryland corporation and has elected to be taxed, and currently qualifies, as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) for federal income tax purposes. We acquire and operate institutional quality real estate. In particular, we focus primarily on acquiring institutional quality office properties that we believe have premier business addresses, desirable locations, personalized amenities and high quality construction with highly creditworthy commercial tenants.
Substantially all of our business is conducted through Behringer Harvard Operating Partnership I LP, a Texas limited partnership organized in 2002 (“Behringer OP”). Our wholly-owned subsidiary, BHR, Inc., a Delaware corporation, is the sole general partner of Behringer OP. Our direct or indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries, BHR Business Trust, a Maryland business trust, and BHR Partners, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, are limited partners of Behringer OP.
We are externally managed and advised by Behringer Advisors, LLC, a Texas limited liability company organized in June 2007 (“Behringer Advisors”). Behringer Advisors is responsible for managing our day-to-day affairs and for identifying and making acquisitions and investments on our behalf. Prior to June 30, 2007, we were advised by Behringer Advisors LP, a Texas limited partnership, which was merged into Behringer Advisors solely to change the type of entity.
Public Offerings
On February 19, 2003, we commenced a public offering (the “Initial Offering”) of up to 80,000,000 shares of common stock offered at a price of $10.00 per share pursuant to a Registration Statement on Form S-11 filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”). The Initial Offering also covered the registration of up to 8,000,000 shares offered pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan (“DRIP”) and up to 3,520,000 shares issuable to broker-dealers pursuant to warrants whereby participating broker-dealers would have the right to purchase one share for every 25 shares they sold pursuant to the Initial Offering. We terminated the Initial Offering on February 19, 2005.
On February 11, 2005, we commenced a second public offering (the “Second Offering”) of up to 80,000,000 shares of common stock offered at a price of $10.00 per share pursuant to a Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed under the Securities Act. The Second Offering also covered the registration of up to 16,000,000 shares offered pursuant to our DRIP. We subsequently converted the Second Offering to a Registration Statement on Form S-11 and reallocated the shares of common stock in the Second Offering to offer 90,000,000 shares of common stock at a price of $10.00 per share and up to 5,473,684 shares pursuant to our DRIP. In addition, we increased the aggregate amount of the Second Offering by 2,945,017 shares in a related registration statement on Form S-11. We terminated the Second Offering on October 20, 2006 in all jurisdictions except the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and we terminated the Second Offering in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania on February 9, 2007.
On October 20, 2006, we commenced a third public offering (the “Current Offering” and together with the Initial Offering and Second Offering, the “Offerings”) of up to 200,000,000 shares of common stock offered at a price of $10.00 per share pursuant to a Registration Statement on Form S-11 filed under the Securities Act. The Current Offering also covers the registration of up to 50,000,000 shares offered pursuant to our DRIP. We extended our offering through October 31, 2008. All subscriptions from individuals, joint accounts and trusts must have been received in good order by our transfer agent no later than October 31, 2008. However, in response to the challenges arising from current market conditions, including liquidity and trade settlement delays related to certain money market sweep accounts, and in cases where fund transfers are delayed due to frozen or restricted money market accounts, we will accept those subscriptions received in good order by our transfer agent no later than December 31, 2008, provided that the subscription application must be signed and dated no later than October 31, 2008. In addition, all subscriptions made through an IRA, Roth IRA, SEP, 401(k) or other qualified accounts must be received in good order by our transfer agent no later than December 31, 2008, provided that the subscription application must be signed and dated no later than October 31, 2008.
As of September 30, 2008, we had 261,317,309 shares of our common stock outstanding, which includes the effect of a 10% stock dividend issued on October 1, 2005 and the effect of distribution reinvestments, redemptions, and 22,000 shares issued to Behringer Harvard Holdings, LLC (“Behringer Harvard Holdings”). As of September 30, 2008, we had no shares of preferred stock issued and outstanding and options to purchase 68,500 shares of common stock outstanding at a weighted average exercise price of $9.35. At September 30, 2008, Behringer OP had 432,586 units of limited partnership interest held by third parties, after giving effect to the 10% stock dividend issued October 1, 2005. These units of limited partnership interest are convertible into an equal number of shares of our common stock. We sold 1,000 shares of our non-participating, non-voting convertible stock to
7
Table of Contents
Behringer Harvard REIT I, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Behringer Advisors for $1,000 on March 22, 2006. Pursuant to its terms, the convertible stock is convertible into shares of our common stock with a value equal to 15% of the amount by which (1) our enterprise value, including the total amount of distributions paid to our stockholders, exceeds (2) the sum of the aggregate capital invested by stockholders plus a 9% cumulative, non-compounded, annual return on such capital. At the date of issuance of the shares of convertible stock, management determined the fair value under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) was less than the nominal value paid for the shares; therefore, the difference is not material. The weighted average number of shares and earnings per share data for each reported period throughout this report reflect the effects of the stock dividend. Warrants to purchase 750,937 shares of common stock from the Initial Offering expired on February 19, 2008.
Upon admission of stockholders, subscription proceeds are used for payment of dealer manager fees and selling commissions and may be utilized as consideration for investments and the payment or reimbursement of offering expenses and operating expenses. Until required for such purposes, net offering proceeds are held in short-term, liquid investments.
Our common stock is not currently listed on a national exchange. However, management anticipates by 2017 either listing the common stock on a national securities exchange or liquidating our assets. Depending upon then prevailing market conditions, it is the intention of our management to consider beginning the process of listing (or liquidating) prior to 2013. In the event we do not obtain listing prior to 2017, our charter requires us to begin selling our properties and liquidating our assets, unless a majority of the board of directors and a majority of the independent directors extend such date.
2. Interim Unaudited Financial Information
The accompanying consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on March 31, 2008. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted from this report on Form 10-Q pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC.
The results for the interim periods shown in this report are not necessarily indicative of future financial results. The accompanying consolidated balance sheet and consolidated statement of stockholders’ equity as of September 30, 2008 and consolidated statements of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 and cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 have not been audited by our independent registered public accounting firm. In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements include all adjustments necessary to fairly present our consolidated financial position as of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 and our consolidated results of operations and cash flows for the periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007. Such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature.
3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. These estimates include such items as the purchase price allocation for real estate acquisitions, impairment of long-lived assets, depreciation and amortization and allowance for doubtful accounts. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation
Our consolidated financial statements include our accounts, the accounts of variable interest entities (“VIEs”) in which we are the primary beneficiary and the accounts of other subsidiaries over which we have control. All inter-company transactions, balances and profits have been eliminated in consolidation. Interests in entities acquired are evaluated based on Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation (“FIN”) 46R “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities,” which requires the consolidation of VIEs in which we are deemed to be the primary beneficiary. If the entity is determined not to be a VIE under FIN 46R, then the entities are evaluated for consolidation under the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants’ (“AICPA”) Statement of Position (“SOP”) 78-9, “Accounting for Investments in Real Estate Ventures,” and Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) 04-5, “Determining Whether a General Partner, or the General Partners as a Group, Controls a Limited Partnership or Similar Entity When the Limited Partners Have Certain Rights.”
Real Estate
Upon the acquisition of real estate properties, we allocate the purchase price of those properties to the tangible assets acquired, consisting of land, including associated rights, and buildings, any assumed debt, identified intangible assets and asset retirement obligations based on their relative fair values in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
8
Table of Contents
Behringer Harvard REIT I, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(“SFAS”) No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” Identified intangible assets consist of the fair value of above-market and below-market leases, in-place leases, in-place tenant improvements, in-place leasing commissions and tenant relationships.
Upon the completion of a business combination, we record the tangible assets acquired, consisting of land and buildings, any assumed debt, identified intangible assets and asset retirement obligations based on their fair values in accordance with SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations.” Identified intangible assets consist of the fair value of above-market and below-market leases, in-place leases, in-place tenant improvements, in-place leasing commissions and tenant relationships. Any amount paid in excess of the fair value of the acquired assets and liabilities is recorded as goodwill. If the value of the assets and liabilities exceeds the total purchase price, then the resulting negative goodwill is allocated to the tangible and intangible assets acquired. Initial valuations are subject to change until our information is finalized, which is no later than twelve months from the acquisition date.
We determine the fair value of assumed debt by calculating the net present value of the scheduled mortgage payments using interest rates for debt with similar terms and remaining maturities that management believes we could obtain. Any difference between the fair value and stated value of the assumed debt is recorded as a discount or premium and amortized over the remaining life of the loan using the effective interest method.
The fair value of the tangible assets acquired, consisting of land and buildings, is determined by valuing the property as if it were vacant, and the “as-if-vacant” value is then allocated to land and buildings. Land values are derived from appraisals, and building values are calculated as replacement cost less depreciation or management’s estimates of the relative fair value of these assets using discounted cash flow analyses or similar methods. The value of buildings is depreciated over the estimated useful life of 25 years using the straight-line method.
We determine the value of above-market and below-market in-place leases for acquired properties based on the present value (using an interest rate that reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired) of the difference between (1) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the in-place leases and (2) management’s estimate of current market lease rates for the corresponding in-place leases, measured over a period equal to (a) the remaining non-cancelable lease term for above-market leases, or (b) the remaining non-cancelable lease term plus any fixed rate renewal options for below-market leases. We record the fair value of above-market and below-market leases as intangible assets or intangible liabilities, respectively, and amortize them as an adjustment to rental income over the determined lease term.
The total value of identified real estate intangible assets acquired is further allocated to in-place lease values, in-place tenant improvements, in-place leasing commissions and tenant relationships based on our evaluation of the specific characteristics of each tenant’s lease and our overall relationship with that respective tenant. The aggregate value for tenant improvements and leasing commissions is based on estimates of these costs incurred at inception of the acquired leases, amortized through the date of acquisition. The aggregate value of in-place leases acquired and tenant relationships is determined by applying a fair value model. The estimates of fair value of in-place leases includes an estimate of carrying costs during the expected lease-up periods for the respective spaces considering current market conditions. In estimating the carrying costs that would have otherwise been incurred had the leases not been in place, we include such items as real estate taxes, insurance and other operating expenses as well as lost rental revenue during the expected lease-up period based on current market conditions. The estimates of the fair value of tenant relationships also include costs to execute similar leases including leasing commissions, legal fees and tenant improvements as well as an estimate of the likelihood of renewal as determined by management on a tenant-by-tenant basis.
We amortize the value of in-place leases, in-place tenant improvements and in-place leasing commissions to expense over the initial term of the respective leases. The value of tenant relationship intangibles are amortized to expense over the initial term and any anticipated renewal periods. In no event does the amortization period for intangible assets exceed the remaining depreciable life of the building. Should a tenant terminate its lease, the unamortized portion of the in-place lease value and tenant relationship intangibles would be charged to expense. The estimated remaining average useful lives for acquired lease intangibles range from less than one year to more than ten years. Anticipated amortization associated with the acquired lease intangibles for each of the following five years ended December 31 is as follows (in thousands):
October 1, 2008 - December 31, 2008 | | $ | 23,919 | |
2009 | | 80,416 | |
2010 | | 64,147 | |
2011 | | 47,246 | |
2012 | | 37,450 | |
9
Table of Contents
Behringer Harvard REIT I, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
As of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, accumulated depreciation and amortization related to our consolidated real estate properties and related lease intangibles were as follows (in thousands):
| | | | Lease Intangibles | | | |
| | | | | | Acquired | | Acquired | |
| | Buildings and | | Other Lease | | Above-Market | | Below-Market | |
as of September 30, 2008 | | Improvements | | Intangibles | | Leases | | Leases | |
Cost | | $ | 3,748,251 | | $ | 658,357 | | $ | 70,897 | | $ | (196,827 | ) |
Less: depreciation and amortization | | (224,279 | ) | (152,823 | ) | (21,342 | ) | 37,711 | |
Net | | $ | 3,523,972 | | $ | 505,534 | | $ | 49,555 | | $ | (159,116 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Lease Intangibles | | | |
| | | | | | Acquired | | Acquired | |
| | Buildings and | | Other Lease | | Above-Market | | Below-Market | |
as of December 31, 2007 | | Improvements | | Intangibles | | Leases | | Leases | |
Cost | | $ | 3,475,898 | | $ | 653,176 | | $ | 74,696 | | $ | (198,516 | ) |
Less: depreciation and amortization | | (116,746 | ) | (89,132 | ) | (11,026 | ) | 22,927 | |
Net | | $ | 3,359,152 | | $ | 564,044 | | $ | 63,670 | | $ | (175,589 | ) |
Cash and Cash Equivalents
We consider investments in highly-liquid money market funds with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents.
Restricted Cash
Restricted cash as of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 includes restricted money market accounts, as required by our lenders, for anticipated tenant expansions and improvements, property taxes and insurance for our consolidated properties. Restricted cash also includes monies held by a trustee that are used for the purpose of paying interest and principal amounts due on the debentures as well as for the payment of any future conversions as required by the original indenture agreements.
Investments in Variable Rate Demand Notes
During September 2008, we purchased approximately $80.0 million of short-term investments, which consists of Variable Rate Demand Notes (“VRDN”). Our VRDN investments are tax-exempt instruments of high credit quality. The primary objectives of VRDN investments are preservation of invested funds, liquidity sufficient to meet cash flow requirements, and an attractive yield. VRDN securities have variable interest rates that reset at regular intervals of one, seven, 28, or 35 days. Although VRDN securities are issued and rated as long-term securities, they are priced and traded as short-term instruments. We classify these short-term investments as available for sale in accordance with SFAS No. 115, “Accounting for Certain Instruments in Debt and Equity Securities.” Because our VRDNs have short reset periods, their cost approximates fair value.
Accounts Receivable
Accounts receivable primarily consist of receivables from tenants of our consolidated real estate properties. Our allowance for doubtful accounts was approximately $1.7 million and $0.5 million as of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively.
Prepaid Expenses and Other Assets
Prepaid expenses and other assets include prepaid directors’ and officers’ insurance, escrow deposits and prepaid acquisition costs for the purchase of properties that we have contracted to acquire, as well as prepaid insurance and real estate taxes of properties we consolidate.
Goodwill
Goodwill consists of goodwill created in association with our purchase of all of the outstanding shares of the subsidiaries of IPC US Real Estate Investment Trust (“IPC”) through a business combination that was completed on December 12, 2007.
10
Table of Contents
Behringer Harvard REIT I, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Investments in Unconsolidated Entities
Investments in unconsolidated entities consists of our undivided tenant-in-common (“TIC”) interests in various office buildings located in Colorado, Minnesota, Missouri and the District of Columbia and our non-controlling 60% interest in the Wanamaker Building, located in Pennsylvania. Consolidation of these investments is not required as the entities do not qualify as VIEs as defined in FIN 46R and do not meet the control requirement required for consolidation under SOP 78-9 and EITF 04-5.
We account for these investments using the equity method of accounting in accordance with SOP 78-9 and EITF 04-5. The equity method of accounting requires these investments to be initially recorded at cost and subsequently increased (decreased) for our share of net income (loss), including eliminations for our share of inter-company transactions, and increased (decreased) for contributions (distributions). We use the equity method of accounting because the shared decision-making involved in these investments creates an opportunity for us to have some influence on the operating and financial decisions of these investments and thereby creates some responsibility by us for a return on our investment. Therefore, it is appropriate to include our proportionate share of the results of operations of these investments in our earnings or losses.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
For our consolidated properties, management monitors events and changes in circumstances indicating that the carrying amounts of the real estate assets may not be recoverable. When such events or changes in circumstances are present, we assess potential impairment by comparing estimated future undiscounted operating cash flows expected to be generated over the life of the asset including its eventual disposition, to the carrying amount of the asset. In the event that the carrying amount exceeds the estimated future undiscounted operating cash flows, we recognize an impairment loss to adjust the carrying amount of the asset to estimated fair value.
For our unconsolidated real estate properties, including those we own through an investment in a limited partnership, joint venture, TIC interest or other similar investment structure, at each reporting date, management compares the estimated fair value of our investment to the carrying amount. An impairment charge is recorded to the extent the fair value of our investment is less than the carrying amount and the decline in value is determined to be other than a temporary decline. There were no impairment charges during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 or 2007.
Deferred Financing Fees
Deferred financing fees are recorded at cost and are amortized using a straight-line method that approximates the effective interest method over the life of the related debt. Accumulated amortization of deferred financing fees was approximately $10.6 million and $4.2 million as of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively.
Notes Receivable
We hold a $10.0 million mezzanine loan on the Galleria Office Towers in Houston, Texas. This investment earns interest monthly at the London Interbank Offer Rate (“LIBOR”) plus 750 basis points. The loan has a maturity date of December 31, 2008, with one additional one-year extension remaining. Monthly payments of interest only are required with principal due at maturity. As of September 30, 2008, the loan was earning interest at a rate of 9.99%.
Notes receivable includes an approximately $3.0 million mortgage loan we made related to raw land held by third parties for future development of additional office buildings at the Terrace in Austin, Texas. We have the exclusive right of first offer to participate in the future development of the raw land. The annual interest rate under the loan is fixed at 7.75% through the maturity date of June 21, 2013. Initial monthly payments of interest only at a rate of 6.50% per annum are required through the maturity date. The difference between the annual interest rate and 6.50% will be accrued and added to the principal amount annually on each anniversary date of the note. We purchased the developed portion of the Terrace, an office park that currently includes four buildings, in June 2006 from parties related to the borrower of this mortgage loan.
Convertible Debentures
As part of our acquisition of the subsidiaries of IPC, we assumed a liability for convertible debentures that had not been converted as of the date of the acquisition. Restricted cash, which is held by a trustee, is used by the trustee for the purpose of paying interest and principal amounts due on the debentures as well as for the payment of any future conversions as required by the original indenture agreements.
Asset Retirement Obligations
We record the fair value of any conditional asset retirement obligations in accordance with FIN No. 47, “Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations,” if they can be reasonably estimated. As part of the anticipated renovation of acquired
11
Table of Contents
Behringer Harvard REIT I, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
properties, we will incur costs for the abatement of regulated materials, primarily asbestos-containing materials, as required under environmental regulations. Our estimate of the fair value of the liabilities is based on future anticipated costs to be incurred for the legal removal or remediation of the regulated materials. As of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the balance of our asset retirement obligation is approximately $10.5 million and $12.6 million, respectively, and is included in other liabilities.
Derivative Financial Instruments
Our objective in using derivatives is to add stability to interest expense and to manage our exposure to interest rate movements or other identified risks. To accomplish this objective, we use interest rate swaps as part of our cash flow hedging strategy. Interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges are entered into to limit our exposure to increases in the LIBOR above a “strike rate” on certain of our floating-rate debt.
We measure our derivative instruments and hedging activities at fair value and record them as an asset or liability, depending on our rights or obligations under the applicable derivative contract. For derivatives designated as fair value hedges, the changes in the fair value of both the derivative instrument and the hedged items are recorded in earnings. Derivatives used to hedge the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows, or other types of forecasted transactions, are considered cash flow hedges. For derivatives designated as cash flow hedges, the effective portions of changes in fair value of the derivative are reported in stockholders’ equity and are subsequently reclassified into earnings when the hedged item affects earnings. Changes in fair value of derivative instruments not designated as hedges and ineffective portions of hedges are recognized in earnings in the affected period. We assess the effectiveness of each hedging relationship by comparing the changes in fair value or cash flows of the derivative hedging instrument with the changes in fair value or cash flows of the designated hedged item or transaction.
In December 2007, we entered into interest rate swap agreements designated as cash flow hedges related to our credit agreement. As of September 30, 2008, we do not have any derivatives designated as fair value hedges or hedges of net investments in foreign operations, nor are derivatives being used for trading or speculative purposes.
Revenue Recognition
We recognize rental income generated from all leases on real estate assets that we consolidate on a straight-line basis over the terms of the respective leases, including the effect of rent holidays, if any. The total net increase to rental revenues due to straight-line rent adjustments for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 was approximately $21.7 million and $15.2 million, respectively. As discussed above, our rental revenue also includes amortization of above- and below-market leases. Revenues relating to lease termination fees are recognized at the time that a tenant’s right to occupy the leased space is terminated and we have satisfied all obligations under the agreement.
Offering Costs
Our advisor funds certain organization and offering costs on our behalf. We are required to reimburse our advisor for such organization and offering costs up to 1.5% of the gross offering proceeds in connection with the Current Offering, provided that no organization and offering costs are paid with respect to sales under the DRIP. Our advisor received up to 2.5% and 2.0% of gross offering proceeds for reimbursement of organization and offering expenses incurred in connection with the Initial Offering and the Second Offering, respectively. Organization and offering costs include items such as legal and accounting fees, marketing, promotional and printing costs. All offering costs are recorded as an offset to additional paid-in capital, and all organization costs are recorded as an expense at the time we become liable for the payment of these amounts. At each balance sheet date, we estimate the total gross public offering proceeds expected to be received under the public offering and recognize the amount of organization and offering reimbursement as determined under SFAS No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies.” We record the amount of reimbursement at the lower of (a) 1.5% of the estimated gross public offering proceeds, or (b) the actual public organization and offering costs incurred by our advisor.
Income Taxes
We have elected to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), and have qualified as a REIT since the year ended December 31, 2004. To qualify as a REIT, we must meet a number of organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement that we distribute at least 90% of our REIT taxable income to our stockholders. As a REIT, we generally will not be subject to federal income tax at the corporate level. We are organized and operate in such a manner as to qualify for taxation as a REIT under the Code, and we intend to continue to operate in such a manner, but no assurance can be given that we will operate in a manner so as to qualify or remain qualified as a REIT.
We acquired the subsidiaries of IPC on December 12, 2007 and intend to make an election for IPC (US), Inc. to be taxed as a REIT for federal income tax purposes for the tax year ending December 31, 2008. We believe IPC (US), Inc. is organized and
12
Table of Contents
Behringer Harvard REIT I, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
operates in a manner to qualify for this election. Prior to acquisition, IPC (US), Inc. was a taxable C-Corporation, and for the year ended December 31, 2007, IPC (US), Inc. was treated as a taxable REIT subsidiary of the Company for federal income tax purposes. We believe we can recover the cost of our investment in the subsidiaries of IPC without ultimately incurring a tax liability attributable to any underlying difference between the tax basis of the acquired assets and the financial reporting basis as a result of applying fair value in purchase accounting. Accordingly, we have not recorded an income tax provision, or deferred taxes, except for the net operating loss carry-forward and other deferred tax liabilities discussed below, with respect to IPC.
On December 31, 2001, the IRS released revised temporary and proposed regulations concerning the treatment of net built-in gains of C-corporation assets that become assets of a REIT in a carryover basis transaction. The regulations generally require the
C-corporation to recognize gains and be subject to corporate-level tax as if it had sold all the assets transferred at fair market value. In lieu of this treatment, the regulations permit the REIT to elect to be subject to the rules of Section 1374 of the Code. These rules generally subject the REIT to the maximum corporate-level tax rate on these built-in gains if recognized from the sale of the acquired assets within ten years of the transaction. We have determined that the regulations are applicable to the assets held by IPC (US), Inc. and subsidiaries and have elected to be subject to the rules of Section 1374 of the Code for any built-in gains recognized within ten years of the acquisition of IPC (US), Inc. and subsidiaries. However, we do not intend to dispose of any of the assets subject to these built-in gains in a manner that would trigger the tax liability.
Post acquisition net operating losses (“NOL”) do not reduce the built-in gain subject to the Section 1374 tax. However, any NOL carryovers that existed within IPC (US), Inc. and subsidiaries at the time of acquisition are generally available for future use and can offset any realized built-in gain subject to tax. As of September 30, 2008, IPC (US), Inc. and subsidiaries had approximately $52 million of federal and state NOL carryovers, and the deferred tax assets associated with the NOL carryovers is approximately $21 million at September 30, 2008. Based on our expectation to elect REIT status for IPC (US), Inc. in 2008 and not to recognize any built-in gain during the ten year period after the IPC acquisition, a valuation allowance has been established for approximately $21 million, as we do not expect to realize the acquired NOL carryover deferred tax asset. The NOL carry-forwards will begin to expire in 2023. In addition, at September 30, 2008, we have deferred tax liabilities of approximately $3.7 million related to various state taxing jurisdictions.
We have reviewed our tax positions under FIN 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109,” (“FIN 48”). FIN 48 clarifies the relevant criteria and approach for the recognition and measurement of uncertain tax positions. The interpretation prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition of a tax position taken, or expected to be taken, in a tax return. A tax position may only be recognized in the financial statements if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained upon examination. We believe it is more likely than not that our tax positions related to our status as a REIT will be sustained in any tax examination. In addition, we believe that it is more likely than not that our tax positions related to the taxable REIT subsidiaries will be sustained in any tax examination.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 we recognized a provision for income taxes of approximately $0.8 million and $0.4 million, respectively, related to certain state and local income taxes.
Stock Based Compensation
We have a stock-based incentive award plan for our directors and consultants and for employees, directors and consultants of our affiliates. We account for this plan under the modified prospective method of SFAS No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment.” In the modified prospective method, compensation cost is recognized for all share-based payments granted after the effective date and for all unvested awards granted prior to the effective date. In accordance with SFAS No. 123R, prior period amounts were not restated. SFAS No. 123R also requires the tax benefits associated with these share-based payments to be classified as financing activities in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, rather than as operating cash flows as required under previous regulations. For the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, we had no significant compensation cost related to these share-based payments.
Concentration of Credit Risk
At September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, we had cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash deposited in certain financial institutions in excess of federally insured levels. We have diversified our cash and cash equivalents amongst several banking institutions in an attempt to minimize exposure to any one of these entities. We regularly monitor the financial stability of these financial institutions and believe that we are not exposed to any significant credit risk in cash and cash equivalents or restricted cash. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, or “FDIC,” generally only insures limited amounts per depositor per insured bank. Beginning October 3, 2008 through December 31, 2009, the FDIC will insure up to $250,000 per depositor per insured bank; on January 1, 2010, the standard coverage limit will return to $100,000 for most deposit categories. Unlimited
13
Table of Contents
Behringer Harvard REIT I, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
deposit insurance coverage will be available to our non-interest bearing transaction accounts held at those institutions participating in FDIC’s Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program through December 31, 2009.
Minority Interest
We hold a direct or indirect majority interest in certain real estate partnerships and thus, consolidate the accounts with and into our accounts. Minority interest in partnerships represents the third-party partners’ proportionate share of the equity in consolidated real estate partnerships. Income and losses are allocated to minority interest holders based on their weighted average percentage ownership during the period.
Minority interest also includes units of limited partnership interests issued by Behringer OP to third parties. In conjunction with the July 28, 2005 acquisition of Buena Vista Plaza, 393,260 units of limited partnership interests in Behringer OP were issued at $8.90 per unit. At September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, Behringer OP had 432,586 units of limited partnership interest held by third parties, after giving effect to the 10% stock dividend issued October 1, 2005. These units of limited partnership interest are convertible into an equal number of shares of our common stock.
Earnings per Share
Earnings per share is calculated based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each period. As of September 30, 2008, we had options to purchase 68,500 shares of common stock outstanding at a weighted average exercise price of $9.35, and at September 30, 2008, Behringer OP had 432,586 units of limited partnership interest held by third parties, after giving effect to the 10% stock dividend issued October 1, 2005. These units of limited partnership interest are convertible into an equal number of shares of our common stock. The weighted average shares and earnings per share for all periods presented in this report reflect the effects of the stock dividend. The options and units of limited partnership interest are excluded from the calculation of earnings per share for all periods presented in this report because the effect would be anti-dilutive. Warrants to purchase 750,937 shares of common stock outstanding from the Initial Offering expired on February 19, 2008.
Reportable Segments
SFAS No. 131, “Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information,” establishes standards for reporting financial and descriptive information about an enterprise’s reportable segments. Our current business consists of owning, managing, operating, leasing, acquiring, developing, investing in and disposing of real estate assets. All of our consolidated revenues are from our consolidated real estate properties. Our chief operating decision maker evaluates operating performance on an individual property level and views all of our real estate assets as one industry segment, and, accordingly, all of our properties are aggregated into one reportable segment.
4. New Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements.” SFAS No. 157 establishes a single authoritative definition of fair value, sets out a framework for measuring fair value, and requires additional disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 applies only to fair value measurements that are already required or permitted by other accounting standards. Our adoption of SFAS No. 157, on January 1, 2008, did not have a material effect on our consolidated results of operations or financial position.
In February 2008, the FASB staff issued Staff Position No. 157-2 “Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157” (“FSP SFAS 157-2”). FSP SFAS 157-2 delays the effective date of SFAS No. 157 to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, for non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually). We do not expect the adoption of FSP SFAS No. 157-2 to have a material effect on the disclosures related to non-financial assets and liabilities in our financial statements.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities - Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115.” The fair value option established by SFAS No. 159 permits all entities to choose to measure eligible items at fair value at specified election dates. A business entity will report unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected in earnings (or another performance indicator if the business entity does not report earnings) at each subsequent reporting date. We adopted this standard effective January 1, 2008 and have not elected the fair value measurement option for any financial assets or liabilities at the present time; however, we may elect to measure future eligible financial assets or liabilities at fair value.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), “Business Combinations.” This Statement replaces SFAS No. 141 “Business Combinations” but retains the fundamental requirement that the acquisition method of accounting (which SFAS No. 141 called the purchase method) be used for all business combinations and for an acquirer to be identified for each business
14
Table of Contents
Behringer Harvard REIT I, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
combination. This Statement is broader in scope than that of Statement 141, which applied only to business combinations in which control was obtained by transferring consideration. SFAS No. 141(R) applies the acquisition method to all transactions and other events in which one entity obtains control over one or more other businesses. This Statement also makes certain other modifications to Statement 141, including a broader definition of a business, recognition requirements for contractual and certain noncontractual contingencies, gain recognition resulting from a bargain purchase and the requirement that acquisition related costs be expensed as incurred. This statement applies to business combinations occurring on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Early adoption is not permitted. The acquisition of a real estate property has been determined to meet the definition of a business combination as defined in SFAS No. 141(R). Therefore, SFAS No. 141(R) will have a material effect on our accounting for future acquisitions of properties as acquisition costs will no longer be capitalized, but will be expensed beginning January 1, 2009.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements - An amendment of ARB No. 51.” This Statement amends Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51 to establish accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. It clarifies that a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary, which is sometimes referred to as minority interest, is an ownership interest in the consolidated entity that should be reported as equity in the consolidated financial statements. Among other requirements, this Statement requires consolidated net income to be reported, on the face of the consolidated income statement, at amounts that include the amounts attributable to both the parent and the noncontrolling interest. This Statement is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Early adoption is not permitted. This Statement shall be applied prospectively as of the beginning of the fiscal year in which this Statement is initially adopted, except for the presentation and disclosure requirements. The presentation and disclosure requirements shall be applied retrospectively for all periods presented.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133.” SFAS No. 161 requires entities to provide greater transparency about how and why the entity uses derivative instruments, how the instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under SFAS 133, and how the instruments and related hedged items affect the financial position, results of operations, and cash flows of the entity. SFAS No. 161 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008. The principal impact to us will be to expand our disclosures regarding derivative instruments.
In May 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position APB 14-1, “Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement)” (“FSP APB 14-1”). FSP APB 14-1 applies to convertible debt instruments that, by their stated terms, may be settled in cash (or other assets) upon conversion, including partial cash settlement, unless the embedded conversion option is required to be separately accounted for as a derivative under SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.” FSP APB 14-1 requires that the issuer of a convertible debt instrument within its scope separately account for the liability and equity components in a manner that will reflect the issuer’s nonconvertible debt borrowing rate when interest cost is recognized in subsequent periods. The excess of the principal amount of the liability component over its initial fair value shall be amortized to interest cost using the effective interest method. FSP APB 14-1 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2008. Early adoption is not permitted. FSP APB 14-1 will be applied retrospectively to all periods presented. We do not expect the adoption of FSP APB 14-1 to have a material effect on our consolidated results of operations or financial position.
5. Asset and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value
On January 1, 2008, we adopted SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements.” SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 applies to reported balances that are required or permitted to be measured at fair value under existing accounting pronouncements; accordingly, the standard does not require any new fair value measurements of reported balances.
SFAS No. 157 emphasizes that fair value is a market-based measurement, not an entity-specific measurement. Therefore, a fair value measurement should be determined based on the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. As a basis for considering market participant assumptions in fair value measurements, SFAS No. 157 establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between market participant assumptions based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity (observable inputs that are classified within Levels 1 and 2 of the hierarchy) and the reporting entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions (unobservable inputs classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy).
Level 1 inputs utilize quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that we have the ability to access. Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs may include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, as well as inputs
15
Table of Contents
Behringer Harvard REIT I, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
that are observable for the asset or liability (other than quoted prices), such as interest rates, foreign exchange rates, and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, which are typically based on an entity’s own assumptions, as there is little, if any, related market activity. In instances where the determination of the fair value measurement is based on inputs from different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the entire fair value measurement falls is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the asset or liability.
Derivative financial instruments
Currently, we use interest rate swaps to manage our interest rate risk. The valuation of these instruments is determined using widely accepted valuation techniques including discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative. This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to maturity, and uses observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves and implied volatilities. The fair values of interest rate swaps are determined using the market standard methodology of netting the discounted future fixed cash receipts (or payments) and the discounted expected variable cash payments (or receipts). The variable cash payments (or receipts) are based on an expectation of future interest rates (forward curves) derived from observable market interest rate curves.
To comply with the provisions of SFAS No. 157, we incorporate credit valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect both our own nonperformance risk and the respective counterparty’s nonperformance risk in the fair value measurements. In adjusting the fair value of our derivative contracts for the effect of nonperformance risk, we have considered the impact of netting and any applicable credit enhancements, such as collateral postings, thresholds, mutual puts, and guarantees.
Although we have determined that the majority of the inputs used to value our derivatives fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments associated with our derivatives utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads to evaluate the likelihood of default by us and our counterparties. However, as of September 30, 2008, we have assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of our derivative positions and have determined that the credit valuation adjustments are not significant to the overall valuation of our derivatives. As a result, we have determined that our derivative valuations in their entirety are classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. Unrealized gains or losses on derivatives are recorded in “Accumulated other comprehensive loss” at each measurement date.
The following table sets forth our financial assets and (liabilities) measured at fair value, which equals book value, by level within the fair value hierarchy as of September 30, 2008 (in thousands). Our derivative financial instruments are included in other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet.
Description | | Total | | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | |
Derivative financial instruments | | $ | (2,921 | ) | $ | — | | $ | (2,921 | ) | $ | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
6. Acquisitions and Dispositions
Acquisitions
On January 15, 2008, we acquired a three-story office building containing approximately 143,000 net rentable square feet located on approximately nine acres of land in Houston, Texas (“Westway One”) from an unaffiliated third party. The purchase price of Westway One of approximately $32.8 million was paid from proceeds of our offering.
On June 19, 2008, we acquired a 31-story office building containing approximately 608,000 net rentable square feet located on approximately 2.2 acres of land in Houston, Texas (“One City Centre”) from an unaffiliated third party for a purchase price of approximately $140.2 million. We assumed borrowings of approximately $76.5 million under a loan agreement with LaSalle Bank National Association to pay a portion of the purchase price and paid the remaining amount from proceeds of our offering.
On September 25, 2008, we acquired a 20-story office building, containing approximately 502,000 net rentable square feet, and a seven-level parking garage located on approximately 9.3 acres of land in Houston, Texas (“One BriarLake Plaza”) from an unaffiliated third party. The purchase price of One BriarLake Plaza of approximately $133.9 million was paid from proceeds of our offering.
In addition to the acquisitions of wholly-owned properties described above, during the three months ended September 30, 2008, we increased our ownership interest to 100% from 60.43% in Travis Tower, a property containing approximately 507,000 net rentable square feet located in Houston, Texas. The purchase price for the additional interests was approximately $25.9 million
16
Table of Contents
Behringer Harvard REIT I, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
and was funded through the assumption of debt of approximately $14.1 million, with the remaining amount coming from proceeds of our offering. The transaction resulted in the consolidation of the property at September 30, 2008.
During the three months ended September 30, 2008, we increased our ownership interest in two additional TIC properties: Minnesota Center, a property containing approximately 276,000 net rentable square feet located in Bloomington, Minnesota, and the Colorado Building, a property containing approximately 122,000 net rentable square feet located in Washington, D.C. We increased our ownership interests in Minnesota Center and the Colorado Building to 96.10% from 93.07% and to 97.99% from 95.20%, respectively. The purchase price for the additional interests in Minnesota Center was approximately $1.5 million and was funded through the assumption of debt of approximately $0.9 million, with the remaining amount coming from proceeds of our offering. The purchase price for the additional interests in the Colorado Building was approximately $1.5 million and was funded through the assumption of debt of approximately $0.8 million, with the remaining amount coming from proceeds of our offering.
Dispositions
On February 15, 2008, we sold 9100 Mineral Circle, a property containing approximately 153,000 net rentable square feet located in Englewood, Colorado, to an unaffiliated third party for a contract sales price of approximately $27.0 million. The sale of the property resulted in a gain of approximately $6.9 million which was recorded as a gain on sale of discontinued operations during the nine months ended September 30, 2008. The sale was structured to qualify as a 1031 like-kind exchange to defer the taxes on the capital gain resulting from the sale of the property.
On June 5, 2008, we transferred 11 Stanwix Street, a property containing approximately 428,000 net rentable square feet located in Pittsburg, Pennsylvania, to the lender associated with this property in exchange for our obligation of the non-recourse debt on the property totaling approximately $28.4 million. Due to the fact that the carrying amount of the property was equivalent to the debt on the property, the transfer of the property resulted in neither a gain nor loss. 11 Stanwix Street was acquired in December 2007 as part of our acquisition of IPC.
On August 1, 2008, we sold 2383 Utah, a property containing approximately 150,000 net rentable square feet located in El Segundo, California, to an unaffiliated third party for a contract sales price of approximately $35.0 million which included the purchaser’s assumption of approximately $20.0 million of non-recourse debt on the property. The sale of the property resulted in a gain of approximately $9.1 million which was recorded as a gain on sale of discontinued operations during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008. The sale was structured to qualify as a 1031 like-kind exchange to defer the taxes on the capital gain resulting from the sale of the property.
In addition to the dispositions of wholly-owned properties described above, on July 1, 2008, we sold our 36.31% TIC investment in Enclave on the Lake, a property containing approximately 171,000 net rentable square feet located in Houston, Texas, to an unaffiliated third party for a contract sales price of approximately $13.5 million, which included the purchaser’s assumption of our approximately $6.8 million of non-recourse debt on the property. The sale of our interest, which was acquired in April 2004 for a contract purchase price of approximately $10.4 million, resulted in a gain of approximately $5.1 million which was recorded as a gain on sale of assets within continuing operations during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008.
7. Business Combination
On December 12, 2007, we completed the purchase of the subsidiaries of IPC, which includes a portfolio of interests in 34 office properties, comprising a total of approximately 9.6 million square feet of rentable space. The acquisition diversified our portfolio from a geographic prospective. The acquired intangible assets and liabilities are amortized over the terms of the acquired leases or remaining lives of the assumed mortgages. We are in the process of finalizing the allocation, which is subject to change until our information is finalized, no later than twelve months from the acquisition date. The following summary provides the allocation of the acquired assets and liabilities of the subsidiaries of IPC as of September 30, 2008 (in thousands).
17
Table of Contents
Behringer Harvard REIT I, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
| | Allocation | |
Land | | $ | 163,512 | |
Buildings | | 1,008,596 | |
Lease intangibles | | 181,446 | |
Cash | | 14,706 | |
Restricted cash | | 126,832 | |
Other assets | | 25,564 | |
Goodwill | | 10,295 | |
Notes receivable | | 10,844 | |
Investment in unconsolidated entities | | 54,081 | |
Acquired below market leases | | (41,402 | ) |
Liabilities assumed | | (834,848 | ) |
Minority interest | | (15,324 | ) |
Net assets acquired | | $ | 704,302 | |
The following summary presents the results of operations (in thousands) for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, on an unaudited pro forma basis, as if this transaction had occurred as of January 1, 2007. The proforma results are for illustrative purposes only and do not purport to be indicative of the actual results that would have occurred had the transaction occurred on January 1, 2007, nor are they indicative of results of operations that may occur in the future.
Nine months ended September 30, 2007 | | As Reported | | Adjustments | | Proforma | |
Total revenue | | $ | 205,393 | | $ | 212,307 | | $ | 417,700 | |
Total expenses | | (255,331 | ) | (286,854 | ) | (542,185 | ) |
Interest income | | 18,387 | | — | | 18,387 | |
Provision for income taxes | | (398 | ) | 995 | | 597 | |
Minority interest | | — | | (2,243 | ) | (2,243 | ) |
Equity in earnings of investments | | 4,072 | | (4,950 | ) | (878 | ) |
Income from discontinued operations | | 1,856 | | — | | 1,856 | |
Net loss | | $ | (26,021 | ) | $ | (80,745 | ) | $ | (106,766 | ) |
| | | | | | | |
Basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding | | 161,693 | | | | 161,693 | |
Basic and diluted loss per share | | $ | (0.16 | ) | | | $ | (0.66 | ) |
8. Investments in Unconsolidated Entities
On July 1, 2008, we sold our 36.31% TIC investment in Enclave on the Lake, a property located in Houston, Texas, to an unaffiliated third party for a contract sales price of approximately $13.5 million. We acquired our 36.31% TIC interest in Enclave on the Lake in April 2004 for a contract purchase price of approximately $10.4 million. During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, we increased our ownership interests in Minnesota Center, Colorado Building and Travis Tower. As of September 30, 2008, we had acquired all the remaining interests in Travis Tower and this property was consolidated.
The following is a summary of our investments in unconsolidated entities as of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 (in thousands):
18
Table of Contents
Behringer Harvard REIT I, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
| | September 30, | | December 31, | | September 30, | | December 31, | |
| | 2008 | | 2007 | | 2008 | | 2007 | |
| | Ownership | | Ownership | | Carrying Value | | Carrying Value | |
Property Name | | Interest | | Interest | | of Investment | | of Investment | |
Minnesota Center | | 96.10% | | 93.07% | | $ | 42,023 | | $ | 41,144 | |
Enclave on the Lake | | — | | 36.31% | | — | | 8,598 | |
St. Louis Place | | 35.71% | | 35.71% | | 10,436 | | 10,613 | |
Colorado Building | | 97.99% | | 95.20% | | 44,582 | | 43,763 | |
Travis Tower | | 100.00% | | 60.43% | | — | | 31,295 | |
Alamo Plaza | | 33.93% | | 33.93% | | 12,889 | | 13,527 | |
Wanamaker Building | | 60.00% | | 60.00% | | 53,530 | | 54,272 | |
Total | | | | | | $ | 163,460 | | $ | 203,212 | |
Our investments in unconsolidated entities as of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 consisted of our proportionate share of the combined assets and liabilities of our investment properties as follows (in thousands):
| | September 30, | | December 31, | |
| | 2008 | | 2007 | |
Land | | $ | 71,401 | | $ | 79,423 | |
Buildings, net | | 209,719 | | 259,382 | |
Lease intangibles, net | | 36,947 | | 52,039 | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | 8,688 | | 12,650 | |
Restricted cash | | 10,419 | | 18,850 | |
Accounts receivable and other assets | | 6,333 | | 7,621 | |
Total assets | | $ | 343,507 | | $ | 429,965 | |
| | | | | |
Notes payable (1) | | $ | 80,160 | | $ | 81,772 | |
Acquired below market lease intangibles, net | | 12,032 | | 13,854 | |
Other liabilities | | 8,994 | | 12,264 | |
Total liabilities | | 101,186 | | 107,890 | |
| | | | | |
Equity | | 242,321 | | 322,075 | |
Total liabilities and equity | | $ | 343,507 | | $ | 429,965 | |
(1) This amount represents the notes payable for the Wanamaker Building only. Each of the TIC investors, including us, is a borrower under the TIC notes payable. For those TIC properties that we do not consolidate, our portion of the TIC notes payable was approximately $72.0 million and $99.4 million at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively, and is reflected in the consolidated notes payable on our balance sheet.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, we recorded approximately $1.1 million of equity in earnings and approximately $7.6 million of distributions from our investments in unconsolidated entities. For the nine months ended September 30, 2007, we recorded approximately $4.1 million of equity in earnings and approximately $8.1 million of distributions from our investments in unconsolidated entities. In December 2007, we acquired a 60% non-controlling interest in the Wanamaker Building, as part of our acquisition of the subsidiaries of IPC. In July 2008, we sold our 36.31% TIC investment in Enclave on the Lake and during the third quarter of 2008, we increased our TIC ownership in three other properties. As of September 30, 2008, we had acquired all the remaining interests in Travis Tower and this property was consolidated.
Our equity in earnings from these investments is our proportionate share of the combined earnings of our unconsolidated properties for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 as follows (in thousands):
19
Table of Contents
Behringer Harvard REIT I, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
| | September 30, | | September 30, | |
| | 2008 | | 2007 | |
Rental revenue | | $ | 46,274 | | $ | 30,183 | |
| | | | | |
Expenses: | | | | | |
Property operating expenses | | 14,440 | | 8,187 | |
Real estate taxes | | 6,712 | | 4,536 | |
Depreciation and amortization | | 19,601 | | 10,680 | |
(Interest income)/interest expense and bank fees, net | | 3,302 | | (261 | ) |
Total expenses | | 44,055 | | 23,142 | |
| | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 2,219 | | $ | 7,041 | |
| | | | | |
Company’s share of net income | | $ | 1,146 | | $ | 4,072 | |
| | | | | |
Company’s share of total distributions | | $ | 7,593 | | $ | 8,100 | |
9. Minority Interest
As part of our acquisition of the subsidiaries of IPC, we acquired a majority interest in certain real estate partnerships and thus, consolidate the accounts with and into our accounts. Minority interest in partnerships represents the third-party partners’ proportionate share of the equity in consolidated real estate partnerships. Income and losses are allocated to minority interest holders based on their weighted average percentage ownership during the year.
Minority interest also includes units of limited partnership interests issued by Behringer OP to third parties. In conjunction with the July 28, 2005 acquisition of Buena Vista Plaza, 393,260 units of limited partnership interests in Behringer OP were issued at $8.90 per unit. At September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, Behringer OP had 432,586 units of limited partnership interest held by third parties, after giving effect to the 10% stock dividend issued October 1, 2005. These units of limited partnership interest are convertible into an equal number of shares of our common stock.
The following table is a summary of our minority interest investments (in thousands):
| | September 30, | | December 31, | |
| | 2008 | | 2007 | |
Non-controlling interests | | $ | 13,377 | | $ | 15,267 | |
Limited partnership units | | 2,576 | | 2,782 | |
| | $ | 15,953 | | $ | 18,049 | |
10. Capitalized Costs
We capitalize interest, property taxes, insurance and construction costs on our real estate properties under development, which include the development of a new building at Eldridge Place in Houston, Texas and the development of a parking facility at our Burnett Plaza property in Ft. Worth, Texas. As of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, we have capitalized a total of approximately $15.5 million and $7.0 million, respectively, in costs associated with real estate under development, including approximately $0.7 million and $0.3 million, respectively, in capitalized interest.
11. Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
We account for our derivatives and hedging activities under SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” as amended and interpreted. In December 2007, we entered into two interest rate swap agreements associated with our credit facility. For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, we recognized a comprehensive loss of approximately $1.5 million to adjust the carrying amount of these interest rate swaps to fair value at September 30, 2008.
We may be exposed to the risk associated with variability of interest rates that might impact our cash flows and our results of operations. The hedging strategy, therefore, is to eliminate or reduce, to the extent possible, the volatility of cash flows. For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, the swap agreements increased interest expense by approximately $1.6 million. The following table summarizes the notional value of our derivative financial instruments as of September 30, 2008. The notional value provides an indication of the extent of our involvement in these instruments at September 30, 2008, but does not represent exposure to credit, interest rate, or market risks (in thousands).
20
Table of Contents
Behringer Harvard REIT I, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
| | | | Interest Swap | | Interest Swap | | | |
Hedge Type | | Notional Value | | Pay Rate | | Receive Rate | | Maturity | |
Interest rate swaps - cash flow | | $ | 200,000 | | 3.9925% | | 30-day LIBOR | | December 13, 2010 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
12. Notes Payable
Our notes payable was approximately $3.4 billion at September 30, 2008 as compared to $3.2 billion at December 31, 2007 and consists of borrowings and assumptions of debt related to our property acquisitions, as well as the credit facility we entered into in December 2007. Each of our mortgage loans is collateralized by one or more of our properties. At September 30, 2008, the stated interest rates on our notes payable ranged from 5.02% to 8.33%, with a weighted average interest rate of approximately 5.61%. Of the $3.4 billion in notes payable at September 30, 2008, approximately $483.0 million represented debt subject to variable interest rates. However, as a result of the interest rate swap agreements, $200.0 million of these borrowings effectively bear interest at fixed rates. At September 30, 2008, our notes payable had maturity dates that ranged from July 2009 to October 2030. As of the date of this filing, we have no scheduled loans due to mature in 2008 or 2009. As of September 30, 2008, we had approximately $19.2 million in loans due to mature in 2009, but these loans were paid in full on October 21, 2008. Our loan agreements generally stipulate that we comply with certain reporting and financial covenants. These covenants include among other things, notifying the lender of any change in management and maintaining minimum debt service coverage ratios. At September 30, 2008, we believe we were in compliance with each of the debt covenants under our loan agreements. The following table summarizes our notes payable as of September 30, 2008 (in thousands):
Principal payments due in: | | | |
October 1, 2008 - December 31, 2008 | | $ | 3,424 | |
2009 | | 32,455 | |
2010 | | 539,961 | |
2011 | | 564,763 | |
2012 | | 128,163 | |
Thereafter | | 2,099,762 | |
unamortized discount | | (1,256 | ) |
Total | | $ | 3,367,272 | |
13. Convertible Debentures
As of September 30, 2008, we had a liability for convertible debentures of approximately $75.5 million. The balance reflects the remaining liability assumed in the acquisition of the subsidiaries of IPC for the convertible debentures that have not been converted. We have restricted cash on our balance sheet, totaling approximately $86.5 million, held by a trustee, which is used by the trustee for the purpose of paying interest and principal amounts due on the debentures as well as for the payment of conversions as required by the original indenture agreements. The convertible debentures are convertible at the option of the holder at a conversion price of $9.75 per unit.
14. Stockholders’ Equity
Capitalization
As of September 30, 2008, we had 261,317,309 shares of our common stock outstanding, which includes the effect of a 10% stock dividend issued on October 1, 2005 and the effect of distribution reinvestments, redemptions, and 22,000 shares issued to Behringer Harvard Holdings. As of September 30, 2008, we had no shares of preferred stock issued and outstanding and options to purchase 68,500 shares of common stock outstanding at a weighted average exercise price of $9.35. At September 30, 2008, Behringer OP had 432,586 units of limited partnership interest held by third parties, after giving effect to the 10% stock dividend issued October 1, 2005. These units of limited partnership interest are convertible into an equal number of shares of our common stock. We sold 1,000 shares of our non-participating, non-voting convertible stock to Behringer Advisors for $1,000 on March 22, 2006. Pursuant to its terms, the convertible stock is convertible into shares of our common stock with a value equal to 15% of the amount by which (1) our enterprise value, including the total amount of distributions paid to our stockholders, exceeds (2) the sum of the aggregate capital invested by stockholders plus a 9% cumulative, non-compounded, annual return on such capital. At the date of issuance of the shares of convertible stock, management determined the fair value under GAAP was less than the nominal value paid for the shares; therefore, the difference is not material. Warrants to purchase 750,937 shares of common stock from the Initial Offering expired on February 19, 2008.
Share Redemption Program
Our board of directors has authorized a share redemption program for investors who hold their shares for more than one year. The purchase price for redeemed shares is set forth in the prospectus for our Current Offering of common stock, as
21
Table of Contents
Behringer Harvard REIT I, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
supplemented from time to time. Our board of directors reserves the right in its sole discretion at any time, and from time to time, to (1) waive the one-year holding period in the event of the death, disability, need for long-term care, or other exigent circumstances such as bankruptcy, a mandatory distribution requirement under a stockholder’s IRA or with respect to shares purchased under or through our DRIP or automatic purchase plan, (2) reject any request for redemption, (3) change the purchase price for redemptions, or (4) terminate, suspend or amend the share redemption program. Under the terms of the plan, during any calendar year, we will not redeem in excess of 5% of the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the twelve-month period immediately prior to the date of redemption. In addition, our board of directors will determine whether we have sufficient cash from operations to repurchase shares, and such purchases will generally be limited to proceeds of our DRIP plus 1% of operating cash flow for the previous fiscal year. For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, we have redeemed approximately 2.2 million shares for approximately $20.0 million.
Stock Plans
Our shareholders have approved and adopted the 2005 Incentive Award Plan, which allows for equity-based incentive awards to be granted to our directors and consultants and to employees, directors and consultants of our affiliates. The 2005 Incentive Award Plan replaced the Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan, the Non-Employee Director Warrant Plan and the 2002 Employee Stock Option Plan, each of which was terminated upon the approval of the 2005 Incentive Award Plan. As of September 30, 2008, we had issued to the independent members of the board of directors options to purchase 68,500 shares of our common stock at a weighted average exercise price of $9.35 per share, as adjusted for the 10% stock dividend issued October 1, 2005 for options that were issued prior to September 30, 2005. These options vest one year from the date granted and have a maximum term of ten years. The options were anti-dilutive to earnings per share for the periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007.
Distributions
We initiated the payment of monthly distributions in November 2003 in the amount of a 7% annualized rate of return, based on an investment in our common stock of $10.00 per share and calculated on a daily record basis of $0.0019178 per share. In August 2007, the declared distributions was reduced to a daily amount of $0.0017260 per share of common stock, which is equivalent to an annual distribution rate of 6.3% assuming the share was purchased for $10.00. On August 26, 2008, our board of directors declared distributions payable to the stockholders of record each day during the months of September, October and November 2008. The declared distributions equal a daily amount of $0.0017808 per share of common stock. If this rate was paid each day for a 365-day period, it would equal a 6.5% annualized rate based on a purchase price of $10.00 per share.
Pursuant to our DRIP, stockholders may elect to reinvest any cash distribution in additional shares of common stock. We record a liability for distributions when declared. The stock issued through the DRIP is recorded to equity when the shares are actually issued. For both the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, distributions declared and recorded as a reduction to minority interest in connection with the Behringer OP limited partnership units were approximately $0.2 million. Distributions declared and payable as of September 30, 2008 were approximately $13.7 million, which included approximately $6.3 million of cash distributions payable and approximately $7.4 million of DRIP distributions payable.
The following are the distributions declared during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 (in thousands):
2008 | | Total | | Cash | | DRIP | |
1st Quarter | | $ | 33,168 | | $ | 15,628 | | $ | 17,540 | |
2nd Quarter | | 35,280 | | 16,623 | | 18,657 | |
3rd Quarter | | 39,590 | | 18,199 | | 21,391 | |
Total | | $ | 108,038 | | $ | 50,450 | | $ | 57,588 | |
2007 | | | | | | | |
1st Quarter | | $ | 22,918 | | $ | 11,607 | | $ | 11,311 | |
2nd Quarter | | 28,788 | | 14,305 | | 14,483 | |
3rd Quarter | | 31,122 | | 15,123 | | 15,999 | |
Total | | $ | 82,828 | | $ | 41,035 | | $ | 41,793 | |
22
Table of Contents
Behringer Harvard REIT I, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
15. Related Party Arrangements
Our advisor and certain of its affiliates earn fees and compensation in connection with our Offerings and in connection with the acquisition, management and sale of our assets.
Behringer Securities LP (“Behringer Securities”), an affiliate of our advisor, serves as the dealer manager for the Current Offering and receives commissions of up to 7% of gross offering proceeds (1% for sales under our DRIP) before reallowance of commissions earned by participating broker-dealers. In connection with the Current Offering, up to 2.5% of gross proceeds before reallowance to participating broker-dealers are paid to Behringer Securities as a dealer manager fee; except that no dealer manager fee is paid on purchases made pursuant to our DRIP. In the Current Offering, Behringer Securities reallows all of its commissions to participating broker-dealers and reallows a portion of its dealer manager fee of up to 2.0% of the gross offering proceeds to be paid to such participating broker-dealers; provided, however, that Behringer Securities may reallow, in the aggregate, no more than 1.5% of gross offering proceeds for marketing fees and expenses, bona fide training and educational meetings and non-itemized, non-invoiced due diligence efforts, and no more than 0.5% of gross offering proceeds for bona fide, separately invoiced due diligence expenses incurred as fees, costs and other expenses from third parties. During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, Behringer Securities’ commissions and dealer manager fees totaled approximately $35.8 million and approximately $13.0 million, respectively, and were recorded as a reduction of additional paid-in capital. During the nine months ended September 30, 2007, Behringer Securities’ commissions and dealer manager fees totaled approximately $48.3 million and approximately $17.7 million, respectively, and were recorded as a reduction of additional paid-in capital.
Our advisor, Behringer Advisors, or its affiliates, receives up to 1.5% of gross offering proceeds for reimbursement of offering expenses incurred in connection with the Current Offering, except that no offering expenses are reimbursed with respect to purchases made pursuant to our DRIP. At each balance sheet date, we estimate the total gross public offering proceeds expected to be received under the public offering and accrue the amount of organization and offering expense incurred by our advisor, as long as the amount spent by our advisor does not exceed 1.5% of gross offering proceeds expected to be raised. During the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, offering expenses of approximately $7.8 million and approximately $10.6 million, respectively, were reimbursable by us and were recorded as a reduction of additional paid-in capital.
In connection with the Current Offering, Behringer Advisors, or its affiliates, receives acquisition and advisory fees of up to 2.5% of (1) the purchase price of real estate investments acquired directly by us, including any debt attributable to these investments, or (2) when we make an investment indirectly through another entity, our pro rata share of the gross asset value of real estate investments held by that entity. Behringer Advisors or its affiliates also receive up to 0.5% of the contract purchase price of each asset purchased or the principal amount of each loan made by us for reimbursement of expenses related to making the investment. Behringer Advisors earned approximately $11.5 million and approximately $0.7 million in acquisition and advisory fees for the investments we acquired for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. We capitalize these fees as part of our real estate, goodwill or investments in unconsolidated entities.
We have paid, and expect to pay in the future, HPT Management Services LP (“HPT Management”), an affiliate of our advisor and our property manager, fees for the management and leasing of our properties, which may be subcontracted to unaffiliated third parties. We expect these fees to equal to approximately 3% of gross revenues of the respective property, plus leasing commissions based upon the customary leasing commission applicable to the geographic location of the respective property. In the event that we contract directly with a non-affiliated third party property manager in respect of a property, we will pay HPT Management an oversight fee equal to 0.5% of gross revenues of the property managed. In no event will we pay both a property management fee and an oversight fee to HPT Management with respect to any particular property. We incurred and expensed fees of approximately $13.0 million and approximately $5.6 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, for the services provided by HPT Management in connection with our real estate and investment properties. Property management fees associated with our sold properties are classified in discontinued operations.
In connection with the Current Offering, depending on the nature of the asset at the time the fee is incurred, we pay Behringer Advisors an annual asset management fee of either (1) 0.6% of aggregate asset value for operating assets or (2) 0.6% of total contract purchase price plus budgeted improvement costs for development or redevelopment assets (each fee payable monthly in an amount equal to one-twelfth of 0.6% of such total amount as of the date it is determinable). For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, we incurred and expensed approximately $20.7 million of asset management fees as compared to approximately $9.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007. Asset management fees of approximately $1.0 million were waived for the nine months ended September 30, 2007. Asset management fees associated with our sold properties are classified in discontinued operations.
We may reimburse Behringer Advisors for costs and expenses paid or incurred to provide services to us including direct expenses and the costs of salaries and benefits of persons employed by these entities and performing services for us. For the nine
23
Table of Contents
Behringer Harvard REIT I, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 we incurred and expensed approximately $0.4 million and $0.2 million, respectively, for these direct expenses and services.
We pay Behringer Advisors or its affiliates a debt financing fee equal to 1% of the amount of any debt made available to us. We incurred approximately $0.9 million in debt financing fees for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, and we incurred no debt financing fees for the nine months ended September 30, 2007.
At September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, we had payables to related parties of approximately $6.8 million and $8.2 million, respectively, each consisting primarily of management fees payable to HPT Management and commissions payable to Behringer Securities. At September 30, 2008, we had no receivables from related parties. As of December 31, 2007, we had approximately $1.0 million receivables from related parties consisting primarily of reimbursements due from HPT Management.
Behringer Advisors or their affiliates will be paid disposition fees if the advisor provides a substantial amount of services, as determined by our independent directors, in connection with the sale of one or more properties. In such event, we will pay the advisor an amount equal to the lesser of (subject to the limitation set forth below): (a) one-half of the brokerage commission paid, or (b) 3% of the sales price of each property sold. This fee will not be earned or paid unless and until our stockholders have received total distributions (excluding the 10% stock dividend) in an amount equal to or greater than the sum of the aggregate capital contributed by stockholders plus a 9% annual, cumulative, non-compounded return thereon. Subordinated disposition fees that are not earned and payable at the date of sale are reflected as a contingent liability which will be earned and paid when the above condition has been satisfied, if ever. As of September 30, 2008, assuming all the conditions above are met, Behringer Advisors would be paid approximately $0.8 million in disposition fees.
We are dependent on Behringer Securities, Behringer Advisors, and HPT Management for certain services that are essential to us, including the sale of shares of our common stock, asset acquisition and disposition decisions, property management and leasing services and other general administrative responsibilities. In the event that these companies were unable to provide us with the respective services, we would be required to obtain such services from other sources.
16. Commitments and Contingencies
As of September 30, 2008, we had commitments of approximately $17.6 million for future tenant improvements and lease incentives.
We have a land purchase agreement for our One Oxmoor Place property located in Louisville, Kentucky under which we pay annual rental payments of approximately $0.3 million. We are committed to purchase the land for approximately $5.4 million on or before December 31, 2008. This liability is included in our other liabilities at December 31, 2007 and September 30, 2008.
Behringer Advisors or their affiliates will be paid disposition fees if the advisor provides a substantial amount of services, as determined by our independent directors, in connection with the sale of one or more properties. As of September 30, 2008, assuming all conditions are met, Behringer Advisors would be paid approximately $0.8 million in disposition fees.
24
Table of Contents
Behringer Harvard REIT I, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
17. Supplemental Cash Flow Information
Supplemental cash flow information is summarized below for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007: (in thousands):
| | Nine months ended | | Nine months ended | |
| | September 30, 2008 | | September 30, 2007 | |
Interest paid, net of amounts capitalized | | $ | 132,782 | | $ | 66,415 | |
Income taxes paid | | $ | 2,605 | | $ | — | |
| | | | | |
Non-cash investing activities: | | | | | |
Property and equipment additions in accrued liabilities | | $ | 6,345 | | $ | 5,637 | |
Addition to investment in unconsolidated entities in accrued liabilities | | 2,512 | | — | |
Escrow deposit applied to purchase of real estate | | 1,000 | | — | |
| | | | | |
Non-cash financing activities: | | | | | |
Common stock issued in distribution reinvestment plan | | $ | 55,900 | | $ | 40,092 | |
Mortgage notes assumed | | 88,830 | | 3,274 | |
Mortgage notes assumed by purchaser | | (26,827 | ) | — | |
Financing costs in accrued liabilities | | 141 | | — | |
Cancellation of debt through transfer of real estate | | 25,698 | | — | |
Recapture of minority interest in lieu of note | | 844 | | — | |
18. Discontinued Operations
On February 15, 2008, we sold 9100 Mineral Circle, located in Englewood, Colorado, to an unaffiliated third party for a contract sale price of approximately $27.0 million. On June 5, 2008, we transferred 11 Stanwix Street to the lender associated with the property. On August 1, 2008, we sold 2383 Utah, located in El Segundo, California, to an unaffiliated third party for a contract sale price of approximately $35.0 million. In accordance with SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” the results of operations for these properties are classified as discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. The following table summarizes the results of discontinued operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 (in thousands):
| | Three months ended | | Nine months ended | |
| | September 30, 2008 | | September 30, 2007 | | September 30, 2008 | | September 30, 2007 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Rental revenue | | $ | 242 | | $ | 1,482 | | $ | 4,970 | | $ | 7,633 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Expenses | | | | | | | | | |
Property operating expenses | | (347 | ) | 190 | | 1,879 | | 508 | |
Interest expense | | 101 | | 291 | | 2,151 | | 861 | |
Real estate taxes | | 28 | | 204 | | 697 | | 616 | |
Property and asset management fees | | 17 | | 107 | | 343 | | 308 | |
Depreciation and amortization | | 103 | | 499 | | 2,410 | | 3,484 | |
Total expenses | | (98 | ) | 1,291 | | 7,480 | | 5,777 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Income (loss) from discontinued operations | | $ | 340 | | $ | 191 | | $ | (2,510 | ) | $ | 1,856 | |
*****
25
Table of Contents
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the accompanying consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto.
Forward-Looking Statements
This section contains forward-looking statements, including discussion and analysis of the financial condition of us and our subsidiaries, our anticipated capital expenditures required to complete projects, amounts of anticipated cash distributions to our stockholders in the future and other matters. These forward-looking statements are not historical facts but are the intent, belief or current expectations of our management based on their knowledge and understanding of our business and industry. Words such as “may,” “anticipates,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “seeks,” “estimates,” “would,” “could,” “should” and variations of these words and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, some of which are beyond our control, are difficult to predict and could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or forecasted in the forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking statements that were true at the time made may ultimately prove to be incorrect or false. We caution investors not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which reflect our management’s view only as of the date of this Report on Form 10-Q. We undertake no obligation to update or revise forward-looking statements to reflect changed assumptions, the occurrence of unanticipated events or changes to future operating results. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from any forward-looking statements made in the Form 10-Q include changes in general economic conditions, changes in real estate conditions, construction costs that may exceed estimates, construction delays, increases in interest rates, lease-up risks, inability to obtain new tenants upon the expiration of existing leases, and the potential need to fund tenant improvements or other capital expenditures out of operating cash flow. The forward-looking statements should be read in light of the risk factors identified in the “Risk Factors” section of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the SEC on March 31, 2008.
Cautionary Note
The representations, warranties and covenants made by us in any agreement filed as an exhibit to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are made solely for the benefit of the parties to the agreement, including, in some cases, for the purpose of allocating risk among the parties to the agreement, and should not be deemed to be representations, warranties or covenants to or with any other parties. Moreover, these representations, warranties or covenants should not be relied upon as accurately describing or reflecting the current state of our affairs.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The preparation of these financial statements requires our management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On a regular basis, we evaluate these estimates, including investment impairment. These estimates are based on management’s historical industry experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates. Below is a discussion of the accounting policies that we consider to be critical in that they may require complex judgment in their application or require estimates about matters that are inherently uncertain.
Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation
Our consolidated financial statements include our accounts, the accounts of variable interest entities (“VIEs”) in which we are the primary beneficiary and the accounts of other subsidiaries over which we have control. All inter-company transactions, balances and profits have been eliminated in consolidation. Interests in entities acquired are evaluated for consolidation based on Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation (“FIN”) 46R, which requires the consolidation of VIEs in which we are deemed to be the primary beneficiary. If the entity is determined not to be a VIE under FIN 46R, then the entity is evaluated for consolidation under the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants’ (“AICPA”) Statement of Position (“SOP”) 78-9, “Accounting for Investments in Real Estate Ventures,” and Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) 04-5, “Determining Whether a General Partner, or the General Partners as a Group, Controls a Limited Partnership or Similar Entity When the Limited Partners Have Certain Rights.”
There are judgments and estimates involved in determining if an entity in which we have made an investment is a VIE and if so, if we are the primary beneficiary. The entity is evaluated to determine if it is a VIE by, among other things, calculating the percentage of equity at risk compared to the total equity of the entity. FIN 46R provides some guidelines as to what the minimum equity at risk should be, but the percentage can vary depending upon the industry and/or the type of operations of the entity and it is up to management to determine that minimum percentage as it relates to our business and the facts surrounding each
26
Table of Contents
of our acquisitions. In addition, even if the entity’s equity at risk is a very low percentage, we are required by FIN 46R to evaluate the equity at risk compared to the entity’s expected future losses to determine if there could still in fact be sufficient equity in the entity. Determining expected future losses involves assumptions of various possibilities of the results of future operations of the entity, assigning a probability to each possibility and using a discount rate to determine the net present value of those future losses. A change in the judgments, assumptions and estimates outlined above could result in consolidating an entity that should not be consolidated or accounting for an investment on the equity method that should in fact be consolidated, the effects of which could be material to our financial statements.
Real Estate
Upon the acquisition of real estate properties, we allocate the purchase price of those properties to the tangible assets acquired, consisting of land, including associated rights, and buildings, any assumed debt, identified intangible assets and asset retirement obligations based on their relative fair values in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” Identified intangible assets consist of the fair value of above-market and below-market leases, in-place leases, in-place tenant improvements, in-place lease commissions and tenant relationships.
Upon the completion of a business combination, we record the tangible assets acquired, consisting of land and buildings, any assumed debt, identified intangible assets and asset retirement obligations based on their fair values in accordance with SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations.” Identified intangible assets consist of the fair value of above-market and below-market leases, in-place leases, in-place tenant improvements, in-place lease commissions and tenant relationships. Any amount paid in excess of the fair value of the assets and liabilities acquired is recorded as goodwill. If the value of the assets and liabilities exceed the total purchase price, then the resulting negative goodwill is allocated to the tangible and intangible assets acquired.
Initial valuations are subject to change until our information is finalized, which is no later than twelve months from the acquisition date.
We determine the fair value of assumed debt by calculating the net present value of the scheduled mortgage payments using interest rates for debt with similar terms and remaining maturities that management believes we could obtain. Any difference between the fair value and stated value of the assumed debt is recorded as a discount or premium and amortized over the remaining life of the loan using the effective interest method.
The fair value of the tangible assets acquired, consisting of land and buildings, is determined by valuing the property as if it were vacant, and the “as-if-vacant” value is then allocated to land and buildings. Land values are derived from appraisals, and building values are calculated as replacement cost less depreciation or management’s estimates of the relative fair value of these assets using discounted cash flow analyses or similar methods. The value of buildings is depreciated over the estimated useful life of 25 years using the straight-line method.
We determine the value of above-market and below-market in-place leases for acquired properties based on the present value (using an interest rate that reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired) of the difference between (1) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the in-place leases and (2) management’s estimate of current market lease rates for the corresponding in-place leases, measured over a period equal to (a) the remaining non-cancelable lease term for above-market leases, or (b) the remaining non-cancelable lease term plus any fixed rate renewal options for below-market leases. We record the fair value of above-market and below-market leases as intangible assets or intangible liabilities, respectively, and amortize them as an adjustment to rental income over the determined lease term.
The total value of identified real estate intangible assets acquired is further allocated to in-place lease values, in-place tenant improvements, in-place leasing commissions and tenant relationships based on our evaluation of the specific characteristics of each tenant’s lease and our overall relationship with that respective tenant. The aggregate value for tenant improvements and leasing commissions is based on estimates of these costs incurred at inception of the acquired leases, amortized through the date of acquisition. The aggregate value of in-place leases acquired and tenant relationships is determined by applying a fair value model. The estimates of fair value of in-place leases includes an estimate of carrying costs during the expected lease-up periods for the respective spaces considering current market conditions. In estimating the carrying costs that would have otherwise been incurred had the leases not been in place, we include such items as real estate taxes, insurance and other operating expenses as well as lost rental revenue during the expected lease-up period based on current market conditions. The estimates of the fair value of tenant relationships also include costs to execute similar leases including leasing commissions, legal and tenant improvements as well as an estimate of the likelihood of renewal as determined by management on a tenant-by-tenant basis.
We amortize the value of in-place leases, in-place tenant improvements and in-place lease commissions to expense over the initial term of the respective leases. The value of tenant relationship intangibles are amortized to expense over the initial term and any anticipated renewal periods, but in no event does the amortization period for intangible assets exceed the remaining depreciable life of the building. Should a tenant terminate its lease, the unamortized portion of the in-place lease value and tenant relationship intangibles would be charged to expense.
In allocating the purchase price of each of our properties, management makes assumptions and uses various estimates, including, but not limited to, the estimated useful lives of the assets, the cost of replacing certain assets, discount rates used to
27
Table of Contents
determine present values, market rental rates per square foot and the period required to lease the property up to its occupancy at acquisition if it were vacant. Many of these estimates are obtained from independent third party appraisals. However, management is responsible for the source and use of these estimates. A change in these estimates and assumptions could result in the various categories of our real estate assets and/or related intangibles being overstated or understated which could result in an overstatement or understatement of depreciation and/or amortization expense and/or rental revenue. These variances could be material to our financial statements.
Investments in Unconsolidated Entities
As of September 30, 2008, the “Investments in unconsolidated entities” on our balance sheet includes our undivided TIC interests in four office buildings and our non-controlling 60% interest in the Wanamaker Building. Consolidation of these investments is not required as they do not qualify as VIEs as defined in FIN No. 46R and do not meet the voting interest requirements required for consolidation under AICPA SOP 78-9 “Accounting for Investments in Real Estate Ventures,” and EITF 04-5 “Determining Whether a General Partner, or the General Partners as a Group, Controls a Limited Partnership or Similar Entity When the Limited Partners have Certain Rights.”
We account for these investments using the equity method of accounting in accordance with SOP 78-9. The equity method of accounting requires these investments to be initially recorded at cost and subsequently increased (decreased) for our share of net income (loss), including eliminations for our share of inter-company transactions, and increased (decreased) for contributions (distributions).
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
For our consolidated real estate properties, we monitor events and changes in circumstances indicating that the carrying amounts of the real estate assets may not be recoverable. When such events or changes in circumstances are present, we assess potential impairment by comparing estimated future undiscounted operating cash flows expected to be generated over the life of the asset and from its eventual disposition, to the carrying amount of the asset. In the event that the carrying amount exceeds the estimated future undiscounted operating cash flows, we recognize an impairment loss to adjust the carrying amount of the asset to estimated fair value.
For our unconsolidated real estate properties, including those we own through an investment in a joint venture, TIC interest or other similar investment structure, at each reporting date we compare the estimated fair value of our investment to the carrying amount. An impairment charge is recorded to the extent the fair value of our investment is less than the carrying amount and the decline in value is determined to be other than a temporary decline. No impairment charges have been taken in 2008 or 2007, but we may experience impairments of our real estate properties in the future.
In evaluating our investments for impairment, management makes several estimates and assumptions, including, but not limited to, the projected date of disposition of the properties, the estimated future cash flows of the properties during our ownership and the projected sales price of each of the properties. A change in these estimates and assumptions could result in understating or overstating the carrying amount of our investments which could be material to our financial statements.
Overview
We are externally managed and advised by Behringer Advisors, LLC (“Behringer Advisors”). Behringer Advisors is responsible for managing our day-to-day affairs and for identifying and making acquisitions and investments on our behalf. Substantially all of our business is conducted through our operating partnership, Behringer Harvard Operating Partnership I LP (“Behringer OP”).
During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, we purchased three properties located in Houston, Texas and we increased our ownership interests in three of our TIC properties: Minnesota Center, the Colorado Building and Travis Tower. During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, we disposed of 9100 Mineral Circle located in Englewood, Colorado, 11 Stanwix Street located in Pittsburg, Pennsylvania and 2383 Utah located in El Segundo, California. Enclave on the Lake, a property located in Houston, Texas in which we held a 36.31% TIC interest that was accounted for using the equity method of accounting, was also sold during the nine months ended September 30, 2008. As of September 30, 2008, we owned, directly or indirectly, a portfolio of 74 office properties located in 23 states and the District of Columbia and our portfolio was approximately 91.6% leased.
Offering
We extended our offering through October 31, 2008. All subscriptions from individuals, joint accounts and trusts must have been received in good order by our transfer agent no later than October 31, 2008. However, in response to the challenges arising from current market conditions, including liquidity and trade settlement delays related to certain money market sweep accounts, in cases where fund transfers are delayed due to frozen or restricted money market accounts, we will accept those subscriptions received in good order by our transfer agent no later than December 31, 2008, provided that the subscription application must be signed and dated no later than October 31, 2008. In addition, all subscriptions made through an IRA, Roth
28
Table of Contents
IRA, SEP, 401(k) or other qualified accounts must be received in good order by our transfer agent no later than December 31, 2008, provided that the subscription application must be signed and dated no later than October 31, 2008.
Results of Operations
Our results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 reflect significant increases in most categories due to the growth of our portfolio of properties. For the remainder of 2008, management expects increases in most categories as we begin to realize the full year impact of our 2007 and 2008 acquisitions.
Three months ended September 30, 2008 as compared to three months ended September 30, 2007
Continuing Operations
Rental Revenue. Rental revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2008 was generated by our consolidated real estate properties and was approximately $156.0 million as compared to approximately $69.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007. Approximately $74.6 million of the $86.7 million increase over the prior year was attributable to properties acquired subsequent to October 1, 2007. Rental revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2008 also included approximately $11.8 million in lease termination fees related to the early lease terminations by tenants at our Burnett Plaza property.
Property Operating Expenses. Property operating expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2008 were approximately $42.8 million as compared to approximately $16.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007 and were comprised of property operating expenses incurred at our consolidated real estate properties. Approximately $25.3 million of the $26.5 million increase over the prior year was primarily attributable to properties acquired subsequent to October 1, 2007.
Interest Expense. Interest expense for the three months ended September 30, 2008 was approximately $49.0 million as compared to approximately $22.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007 and was comprised of interest expense and amortization of deferred financing fees related to our notes payable associated with our consolidated real estate properties, TIC interest investments and our credit facility. The $26.2 million increase is primarily due to our notes payable increasing from $1.6 billion at September 30, 2007 to $3.4 billion at September 30, 2008.
Real Estate Taxes. Real estate taxes for the three months ended September 30, 2008 were approximately $18.1 million as compared to approximately $9.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007 and were comprised of real estate taxes from our consolidated real estate properties. The $8.3 million increase over the prior year was primarily attributable to properties acquired subsequent to October 1, 2007.
Property Management Fees. Property management fees for the three months ended September 30, 2008 were approximately $4.2 million as compared to approximately $2.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007 and were comprised of property management fees related to both our consolidated and unconsolidated real estate properties. The $2.2 million increase over the prior year was primarily attributable to properties acquired subsequent to October 1, 2007.
Asset Management Fees. Asset management fees for the three months ended September 30, 2008 were approximately $7.0 million as compared to approximately $2.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007 and were comprised of asset management fees associated with both our consolidated and unconsolidated real estate properties. The $4.7 million increase over the prior year was primarily attributable to asset management fees incurred for properties acquired subsequent to October 1, 2007. In addition, asset management fees of approximately $1.0 million were waived for the three months ended September 30, 2007, and no asset management fees were waived for the three months ended September 30, 2008.
General and Administrative Expense. General and administrative expense for the three months ended September 30, 2008 was approximately $2.1 million as compared to approximately $0.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007 and was comprised of corporate general and administrative expenses including directors’ and officers’ insurance premiums, audit and tax fees, legal fees, other administrative expenses, and reimbursement of certain expenses of our advisor. The $1.3 million increase is primarily due to increases in legal, financial reporting and printing expenses.
Depreciation and Amortization Expense. Depreciation and amortization expense for the three months ended September 30, 2008 was approximately $67.9 million as compared to approximately $31.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007 and was comprised of depreciation and amortization expense from each of our consolidated real estate properties. The $36.2 million increase over the prior year was primarily attributable to properties acquired subsequent to October 1, 2007. Depreciation and amortization for the three months ended September 30, 2008 also included approximately $2.7 million in write offs of lease intangibles related to early lease terminations at our Burnett Plaza property.
Interest Income. Interest income for the three months ended September 30, 2008 was approximately $2.2 million as compared to approximately $8.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007, and was comprised of interest income associated with funds on deposit at banks and our investments in variable rate demand notes. The $6.7 million decrease from the prior year is primarily due to reduced interest rates and reduced cash balances on deposit. At September 30, 2008 we had a cash
29
Table of Contents
balance of approximately $361.8 million and investments of approximately $80.0 million in variable rate demand notes. At September 30, 2007 we had a cash balance of approximately $697.2 million.
Gain on sale of assets. Gain on sale of assets for the three months ended September 30, 2008 was approximately $5.1 million resulting from the sale of our TIC investment in Enclave on the Lake. There was no gain on sale of assets for the three months ended September 30, 2007.
Equity in Earnings of Investments. Equity in earnings of investments for the three months ended September 30, 2008 was approximately $0.1 million as compared to approximately $1.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007 and was comprised of our share of equity in the earnings of unconsolidated investments. The $1.2 million decrease from the prior year is primarily due to losses at Travis Tower and losses at the Wanamaker Building, a property we acquired in December 2007 as part of our acquisition of IPC.
Discontinued Operations
Income (loss) from discontinued operations. We sold 9100 Mineral Circle in February 2008, in June 2008 we transferred 11 Stanwix Street to the lender associated with that property, and in August 2008 we sold 2383 Utah. For the three months ended September 30, 2008, we had income from discontinued operations of approximately $0.3 million as compared to approximately $0.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007.
Gain on sale of discontinued operations. We recognized a gain on sale of discontinued operations of approximately $8.7 million in the three months ended September 30, 2008, comprised of approximately $9.1 million from the sale of 2383 Utah, partially offset by a reduction of the gain on the sale of 9100 Mineral Circle of approximately $0.4 million. There was no gain on sale of discontinued operations for the three months ended September 30, 2007.
Nine months ended September 30, 2008 as compared to nine months ended September 30, 2007
Continuing Operations
Rental Revenue. Rental revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 was generated by our consolidated real estate properties and was approximately $451.7 million as compared to approximately $205.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007. Approximately $217.5 million of the $246.3 million increase over the prior year was attributable to properties acquired in 2007 and 2008. Rental revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 also included approximately $24.2 million in lease termination fees related to early lease terminations at our Burnett Plaza property.
Property Operating Expenses. Property operating expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 were approximately $120.0 million as compared to approximately $48.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and were comprised of property operating expenses from our consolidated real estate properties. Approximately $70.0 million of the $71.9 million increase over the prior year was attributable to properties acquired in 2007 and 2008.
Interest Expense. Interest expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 was approximately $142.8 million as compared to approximately $67.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and was comprised of interest expense and amortization of deferred financing fees related to our notes payable associated with our consolidated real estate properties, TIC interest investments and our credit facility. The $75.2 million increase is primarily due to our notes payable increasing from $1.6 billion at September 30, 2007 to $3.4 billion at September 30, 2008.
Real Estate Taxes. Real estate taxes for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 were approximately $57.8 million as compared to approximately $29.5 million for nine months ended September 30, 2007 and were comprised of real estate taxes from our consolidated real estate properties. The $28.3 million increase over the prior year was primarily attributable to properties acquired in 2007 and 2008.
Property Management Fees. Property management fees for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 were approximately $12.9 million as compared to approximately $6.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and were comprised of property management fees related to both our consolidated and unconsolidated real estate properties. The $6.8 million increase over the prior year was primarily attributable to properties acquired in 2007 and 2008.
Asset Management Fees. Asset management fees for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 were approximately $20.5 million as compared to approximately $8.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and were comprised of asset management fees associated with both our consolidated and unconsolidated real estate properties. The $11.8 million increase over the prior year was primarily attributable to properties acquired in 2007 and 2008. In addition, asset management fees of $1.0 million were waived for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, and no asset management fees were waived for the nine months ended September 30, 2008.
General and Administrative Expense. General and administrative expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 was approximately $4.9 million as compared to approximately $1.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and was comprised of corporate general and administrative expenses including directors’ and officers’ insurance premiums, audit and tax fees, legal fees, other administrative expenses and reimbursement of certain expenses of our advisor. The $3.1 million increase
30
Table of Contents
is primarily due to increases in legal, financial reporting and printing expenses.
Depreciation and Amortization Expense. Depreciation and amortization expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 was approximately $203.9 million as compared to approximately $93.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and was comprised of depreciation and amortization expense from each of our consolidated real estate properties. Approximately $102.50 million of the $110.5 million increase over the prior year was attributable to properties acquired in 2007 and 2008. Depreciation and amortization for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 also included approximately $7.7 million in write offs of lease intangibles related to early lease terminations at our Burnett Plaza property.
Interest Income. Interest income for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 was approximately $4.9 million as compared to approximately $18.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, and was comprised of interest income associated with funds on deposit at banks and our investments in variable rate demand notes. The $13.5 million decrease from the prior year is primarily due to reduced interest rates and reduced cash balances on deposit. At September 30, 2008 we had a cash balance of approximately $361.8 million and investments of approximately $80.0 million in variable rate demand notes. At September 30, 2007 we had a cash balance of approximately $697.2 million.
Gain of sale of assets. Gain on sale of assets for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 was approximately $5.3 million and was comprised of approximately $5.1 million from the sale of our TIC investment in Enclave on the Lake and approximately $0.2 million from the sale of a land easement at our Ashford Perimeter property. There was no gain on sale of assets for the nine months ended September 30, 2007.
Equity in Earnings of Investments. Equity in earnings of investments for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 was approximately $1.1 million as compared to $4.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and was comprised of our share of equity in the earnings of unconsolidated investments. The $3.0 million decrease from prior year is primarily due to net losses at Travis Tower and net losses the Wanamaker Building, a property we acquired in December 2007 as part of our acquisition of IPC.
Discontinued Operations
Income (loss) from discontinued operations. We sold 9100 Mineral Circle in February 2008, in June 2008 we transferred 11 Stanwix Street to the lender associated with that property, and in August 2008 we sold 2383 Utah. For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, we had a loss from the discontinued operations of approximately $2.5 million as compared to income from discontinued operations of approximately $1.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007. The income from discontinued operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 includes an approximately $3.9 million lease termination fee received at 9100 Mineral Circle.
Gain on sale of discontinued operations. We recognized a gain of approximately $16.0 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 for the sales of 9100 Mineral Circle and 2383 Utah. There was no gain on sale of discontinued operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2007.
Cash Flow Analysis
Due to the increase in the size of our portfolio, cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2007, reflect significant differences in most categories.
Nine months ended September 30, 2008 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2007
Cash flows provided by operating activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 were approximately $59.2 million and were primarily comprised of the net loss of approximately $86.3 million and changes in working capital of approximately $26.4 million adjusted for depreciation and amortization of approximately $204.0 million. During the nine months ended September 30, 2007, cash flows provided by operating activities were approximately $57.9 million and were primarily comprised of the net loss of approximately $26.0 million adjusted for depreciation and amortization of approximately $93.9 million.
Cash flows used in investing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 were approximately $308.7 million and were primarily comprised of the purchases of real estate of approximately $233.1 million and approximately $80.0 million in investment in variable rate demand notes. During the nine months ended September 30, 2007, cash flows used by investing activities were approximately $74.4 million and were primarily comprised of purchases of real estate and TIC interests and additions of property and equipment, partially offset by a reduction in restricted cash.
Cash flows provided by financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 were approximately $516.3 million and were comprised primarily of funds received from the issuance of stock, net of redemptions and offering costs, of approximately $443.8 million and proceeds from our credit facility of approximately $280.0 million, partially offset by payments on notes payable of approximately $147.5 million and distributions to our stockholders of approximately $50.2 million. Some or all of our distributions have been, and may continue to be, paid from sources other than operating cash flow, such as offering
31
Table of Contents
proceeds, cash advanced to us by, or reimbursements for expenses or waiver of fees from, our advisor and proceeds from loans including those secured by our assets. During the nine months ended September 30, 2007, cash flows provided by financing activities were approximately $588.8 million and were comprised primarily of funds received from the issuance of stock, net of redemptions and offering costs, of approximately $630.6 million, partially offset by distributions to our shareholders of approximately $40.2 million.
Funds from Operations
Funds from operations (“FFO”) is a non-GAAP financial measure that is widely recognized as a measure of REIT operating performance. FFO is defined by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts as net income (loss), computed in accordance with GAAP excluding extraordinary items, as defined by GAAP, and gains (or losses) from sales of property, plus depreciation and amortization on real estate assets, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships, joint ventures and subsidiaries. We believe that FFO is helpful to investors and our management as a measure of operating performance because it excludes depreciation and amortization, gains and losses from property dispositions, and extraordinary items, and as a result, when compared year to year, reflects the impact on operations from trends in occupancy rates, rental rates, operating costs, development activities, general and administrative expenses, and interest costs, which is not immediately apparent from net income. Historical cost accounting for real estate assets in accordance with GAAP implicitly assumes that the value of real estate diminishes predictably over time. Since real estate values have historically risen or fallen with market conditions, many industry investors and analysts have considered the presentation of operating results for real estate companies that use historical cost accounting alone to be insufficient. As a result, our management believes that the use of FFO, together with the required GAAP presentations, provide a more complete understanding of our performance. Factors that impact FFO include start-up costs, fixed costs, delay in buying assets, lower yields on cash held in accounts pending investment, income from portfolio properties and other portfolio assets, interest rates on acquisition financing and operating expenses. FFO should not be considered as an alternative to net income (loss), as an indication of our liquidity, nor is it indicative of funds available to fund our cash needs, including our ability to make distributions.
Our calculations of FFO for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 are presented below (in thousands):
| | Three months ended | | Nine months ended | |
| | September 30, | | September 30, | |
| | 2008 | | 2007 | | 2008 | | 2007 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Net loss | | $ | (18,832 | ) | $ | (6,133 | ) | $ | (86,315 | ) | $ | (26,021 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
Preferred stock dividends | | — | | — | | — | | — | |
Real estate depreciation and amortization (1) | | 71,854 | | 34,330 | | 218,330 | | 103,332 | |
Minority interest (2) | | (505 | ) | — | | (1,632 | ) | — | |
Gain on sale of depreciable real estate (3) | | (13,779 | ) | — | | (21,113 | ) | — | |
Funds from operations (FFO) | | $ | 38,738 | | $ | 28,197 | | $ | 109,270 | | $ | 77,311 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Weighted average shares | | 245,832 | | 188,347 | | 226,829 | | 161,693 | |
(1) This represents the depreciation and amortization expense of the properties we consolidate and our share of depreciation and amortization expense of the properties which we account for under the equity method of accounting. The expenses of our unconsolidated interests are reflected in our equity in earnings of investments.
(2) Reflects the minority interest adjustment for the third-party partners’ proportionate share of the real estate depreciation and amortization and adjustment for the limited partnership interests issued by Behringer OP to third parties.
(3) Includes the sale of 9100 Mineral Circle, 2383 Utah and Enclave on the Lake.
Non-cash Items Included in Net Loss:
Provided below is additional information related to selected non-cash items included in net loss above, which may be helpful in assessing our operating results. Straight-line rental revenue, amortization of intangible lease assets and liabilities, amortization of lease incentives and bad debt expense of our investment interests are reflected in our equity in earnings of investments and are included in the amounts presented below.
· Straight-line rental revenue of approximately $21.9 million and $15.7 million was recognized for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively;
· Amortization of intangible lease assets and liabilities was recognized as a net increase to rental revenues of approximately $10.9 million and $5.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively;
32
Table of Contents
· Amortization of lease incentives of approximately $1.2 million and $0.9 million was recognized as a decrease to rental revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively;
· Bad debt expense of approximately $1.9 million and $0.1 million was recognized for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively; and
· Amortization of deferred financing costs and interest rate mark to market adjustments of approximately $6.8 million and $1.6 million was recognized as interest expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
In addition, FFO may be used to fund certain capitalizable items that are excluded from FFO, such as capital expenditures and payments of principal on debt, each of which may impact the amount of cash available for distribution to our stockholders.
Given the uncertainty arising from numerous factors, including both the raising and placing of capital in the current real estate environment, ultimate FFO performance cannot be predicted with certainty. For example, if we are not able to timely invest net proceeds of our offering at favorable yields, future distributions declared and paid may exceed FFO.
Net Operating Income
Net operating income (“NOI”) is defined as net income, computed in accordance with GAAP, generated from properties before interest expense, asset management fees, interest income, general and administrative expenses, depreciation, amortization, equity in earnings of investments, minority interest, income taxes, discontinued operations and the gains on sale of assets. We believe that NOI provides an accurate measure of our operating performance because NOI reflects the operating performance of our properties and excludes certain items that are not associated with management of the properties. To facilitate understanding of this financial measure, a reconciliation of net operating income to net loss has been provided in accordance with GAAP. Our calculations of NOI for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 are presented below (in thousands):
| | Three months ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, | |
| | 2008 | | 2007 | | 2008 | | 2007 | |
Rental revenue | | $ | 156,031 | | $ | 69,266 | | $ | 451,726 | | $ | 205,393 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Operating expenses: | | | | | | | | | |
| Property operating expenses | | 42,826 | | 16,333 | | 120,043 | | 48,140 | |
| Real estate taxes | | 18,147 | | 9,791 | | 57,848 | | 29,485 | |
| Property management fees | | 4,242 | | 1,990 | | 12,884 | | 6,088 | |
Total operating expenses | | 65,215 | | 28,114 | | 190,775 | | 83,713 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Net operating income | | $ | 90,816 | | $ | 41,152 | | $ | 260,951 | | $ | 121,680 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Reconciliation to Net loss | | | | | | | | | |
Net operating income | | $ | 90,816 | | $ | 41,152 | | $ | 260,951 | | $ | 121,680 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Less: | Depreciation and amortization | | (67,932 | ) | (31,662 | ) | (203,858 | ) | (93,406 | ) |
| General and administrative expense | | (2,090 | ) | (784 | ) | (4,893 | ) | (1,831 | ) |
| Interest expense | | (49,035 | ) | (22,813 | ) | (142,827 | ) | (67,642 | ) |
| Asset management fees | | (6,965 | ) | (2,265 | ) | (20,502 | ) | (8,739 | ) |
| Minority interest | | 247 | | — | | 767 | | — | |
| Provision for income taxes | | (379 | ) | (93 | ) | (824 | ) | (398 | ) |
Add: | Interest income | | 2,247 | | 8,850 | | 4,937 | | 18,387 | |
| Gain on sale of assets | | 5,068 | | — | | 5,253 | | — | |
| Income (loss) from discontinued operations | | 340 | | 191 | | (2,510 | ) | 1,856 | |
| Gain on sale of discontinued operations | | 8,711 | | — | | 16,045 | | — | |
| Equity in earnings of investments | | 140 | | 1,291 | | 1,146 | | 4,072 | |
Net loss | | $ | (18,832 | ) | $ | (6,133 | ) | $ | (86,315 | ) | $ | (26,021 | ) |
33
Table of Contents
Liquidity and Capital Resources
General
Our principal demands for funds will continue to be for the acquisition and development of real estate-related assets, capital improvements, to pay operating expenses and distributions, and to pay principal and interest on our outstanding indebtedness. Generally, cash needs for items other than the acquisition and development of real estate-related assets are expected to be met from operations and financing activities, components of which may include borrowings (including borrowings secured by our assets) in anticipation of future operating cash flow and offering proceeds. Cash needs for real-estate related asset acquisitions are expected to be met from the net proceeds of the Current Offering and borrowings. However, there may be a delay between the sale of our shares and our purchase of real-estate related assets and receipt of income from such investments, which could result in a delay in the benefits to our stockholders of returns generated from our operations. During this period, we may decide to temporarily invest any uninvested proceeds in investments that could yield lower returns than our targeted investments in real-estate related assets. These lower returns may affect our ability to make distributions or the amount actually distributed.
The recent turbulent financial markets and disruption in the banking system have created a severe lack of credit and a rising cost of any available debt. Fortunately, we have extremely limited exposure to the currently malfunctioning credit markets. As of September 30, 2008, of our $3.4 billion in debt, 91.7% is long-term fixed rate debt, inclusive of $200.0 million of debt associated with our term loan under the credit agreement, which has an interest rate hedged against rises in interest costs. As of the date of this filing, we have no scheduled loans due to mature in 2008 or 2009. As of September 30, 2008, we had approximately $19.2 million in loans due to mature in 2009, but these loans were paid in full on October 21, 2008. We have no exposure to money market mutual funds, and we have diversified our cash and cash equivalents amongst several banking institutions in an attempt to minimize exposure to any one of these entities. We regularly monitor the financial stability of these financial institutions, and we believe that we have placed our deposits with creditworthy financial institutions.
At September 30, 2008, our portfolio was approximately 91.6% leased and we collected 99% of our accounts receivable from tenants for the third quarter of 2008, a good indication of credit quality and stability. We can provide no assurance that these trends will continue in the future. Of our financial services tenants, Bank of America represents our largest tenant occupying approximately 750,000 square feet. Other large tenants in our portfolio include Nokia, the U.S. General Services Administration, Federated Department Stores and Fifth Third Bank.
Notes Payable
At September 30, 2008, we had notes payable of approximately $3.4 billion consisting of borrowings and assumptions of debt related to our property acquisitions and borrowings under our credit facility. Each of our loans is collateralized by one or more of our properties. At September 30, 2008, the stated interest rates on our notes payable ranged from 5.02% to 8.33%, with a weighted average interest rate of approximately 5.61%. Of the $3.4 billion in notes payable at September 30, 2008, approximately $483.0 million represented debt subject to variable interest rates. However, as a result of the interest rate swap agreements, $200.0 million of these borrowings effectively bears interest at fixed rates. At September 30, 2008, our notes payable had maturity dates that ranged from July 2009 to October 2030. Our loan agreements generally require us to comply with certain reporting and financial covenants. These covenants include among other things, notifying the lender of any change in management and maintaining minimum debt service coverage ratios. At September 30, 2008, we believe we were in compliance with each of the debt covenants under our loan agreements.
If debt financing is not available on terms and conditions we find acceptable, we may not be able to obtain financing for investments. Recently, domestic and international financial markets have experienced unusual volatility and uncertainty. If this volatility and uncertainty persists, our ability to borrow monies to finance the purchase of, or other activities related to, real estate assets will be significantly impacted. If we are unable to borrow monies on terms and conditions that we find acceptable, we likely will have to reduce the number of properties we can purchase, and the return on the properties we do purchase likely will be lower. In addition, we may find it difficult, costly or impossible to refinance indebtedness upon maturity. If interest rates are higher when the properties are refinanced, we may not be able to finance the properties and our income could be reduced. In addition, if we pay fees to lock-in a favorable interest rate, falling interest rates or other factors could require us to forfeit these fees.
On December 11, 2007, Behringer OP entered into a secured credit agreement providing for up to $500 million of secured borrowings with KeyBanc Capital Markets and Wachovia Securities as co-lead arrangers and KeyBank National Association as administrative agent (referred to herein as “Lender” and as the “Agent,” in their respective roles), and other lending institutions that are parties to the credit facility (collectively, the “Lenders”). This credit facility allows Behringer OP to borrow up to $300 million of revolving loans and up to $200 million in a secured term loan. Subject to Lenders’ approval and payments of certain activation fees to the Agent and Lenders, the amount of the revolving loans may be increased up to $600 million. In addition to our use of the proceeds of the credit facility to pay approximately $340.0 million of the purchase price and closing costs of acquiring the subsidiaries of IPC, we are using the facility for general corporate and working capital purposes. The Company is a guarantor of the credit facility.
The credit facility matures on December 11, 2010. The revolving loans may be extended one additional year upon payment of an extension fee in an amount equal to fifteen basis points on the total amount of the revolving credit facility in effect
34
Table of Contents
on the original maturity date. The term loan also may be extended one additional year upon payment of an extension fee in an amount equal to ten basis points on the total amount of the term loan outstanding on the original maturity date.
Loans under the credit facility bear interest at an annual rate that is equal to either (1) the “base rate” (calculated as the greater of (i) the Agent’s “prime rate” or (ii) 0.5% above the Federal Funds Effective Rate) plus the applicable margin or (2) LIBOR plus the applicable margin. The applicable margin for base rate loans were initially 0.5% and, depending on the ratio of our consolidated total indebtedness to our gross asset value, may vary from 0.5% to 0%; the applicable margin for LIBOR loans was initially 2.0% and, depending on the ratio of our consolidated total indebtedness to our gross asset value, may vary from 2.0% to 1.5%. Behringer OP has the right to prepay the outstanding amount of any revolving loans or term loan under the credit facility, in whole or in part, at any time without penalty, provided that any partial payment is in a minimum amount of $1 million. However, prepaying the term loan prior to December 11, 2008 requires Behringer OP to pay a fee equal to fifty basis points of the amount of the term loan being prepaid. As of September 30, 2008, there was approximately $200.0 million outstanding under the term loan and approximately $280.0 million outstanding under the revolving loans. As of September 30, 2008, as a result of the interest rate swap agreements, the term loan effectively bears interest at a fixed rate of approximately 5.79%, and the average interest rate on the revolving loans was approximately 4.82%.
Distributions
Distributions are authorized at the discretion of our board of directors based on its analysis of our earnings, cash flow, anticipated cash flow, capital expenditure requirements and general financial condition. The board’s decisions are influenced, in substantial part, by the requirements necessary to maintain our REIT status. Until we generate sufficient funds from operations to fully fund the payment of distributions, we have and will continue to pay some or all of our distributions from other sources. We may generate cash to pay distributions from financing activities, components of which may include borrowings (including borrowings secured by our assets) in anticipation of future operating cash flow and offering proceeds. In addition, from time to time, our advisor and its affiliates may agree to waive or defer all, or a portion, of the acquisition, asset management or other fees or other incentives due to them, enter into lease agreements for unleased space, pay general administrative expenses or otherwise supplement investor returns in order to increase the amount of cash available to make distributions to our stockholders.
We expect to fund our short-term liquidity requirements by using the net proceeds realized from our offering, short-term borrowings and cash flow from the operations of our current investments. Operating cash flows are expected to increase as additional real estate assets are added to the portfolio. For both our short-term and long-term liquidity requirements, other potential future sources of capital may include proceeds from secured or unsecured financings from banks or other lenders, proceeds from the sale of our investments, if and when any are sold, and undistributed funds from operations. If necessary, we may use financings or other sources of capital in the event of unforeseen significant capital expenditures.
The distributions declared to common stockholders during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 were approximately $107.8 million and $82.6 million, respectively. FFO exceeded distributions declared for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 by approximately $1.4 million. Distributions declared exceeded FFO for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 by approximately $5.3 million. Accordingly, for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, 100.0% and approximately 93.6%, of the distributions declared were funded from FFO. For both the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, distributions declared and recorded as a reduction to minority interest in connection with the Behringer OP limited partnership units were approximately $0.2 million. Cash amounts distributed to stockholders in excess of FFO were funded from our borrowings and proceeds of the Current Offering.
Distributions for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 were as follows:
| | Distributions | | Distributions | |
2008 | | Declared | | Paid | |
1st Quarter | | $ | 33,168 | | $ | 32,617 | |
2nd Quarter | | 35,280 | | 34,839 | |
3rd Quarter | | 39,590 | | 37,846 | |
Total | | $ | 108,038 | | $ | 105,302 | |
2007 | | | | | |
1st Quarter | | 22,918 | | 21,669 | |
2nd Quarter | | 28,788 | | 27,028 | |
3rd Quarter | | 31,122 | | 31,192 | |
Total | | $ | 82,828 | | $ | 79,889 | |
| | | | | | | |
35
Table of Contents
Operating performance cannot be accurately predicted due to numerous factors, including our ability to invest capital at favorable yields, the financial performance of our investments in the current real estate environment, the types and mix of investments in our portfolio and the accounting treatment of our investments in accordance with our accounting policies. As a result, future distributions declared and paid may exceed FFO. FFO is a non-GAAP financial measure that is widely recognized as a measure of REIT operating performance. See “Funds from Operations” on Page 32 for a reconciliation of our net loss to FFO.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have no off-balance sheet arrangements that are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
We are exposed to interest rate changes primarily as a result of our long-term debt used to acquire properties. Our interest rate risk management objectives are to limit the impact of interest rate changes on earnings and cash flows and to lower overall borrowing costs. To achieve these objectives, we borrow primarily at fixed rates or variable rates with the lowest margins available and in some cases, the ability to convert variable rates to fixed rates. With regard to variable rate financing, we will assess interest rate cash flow risk by continually identifying and monitoring changes in interest rate exposures that may adversely impact expected future cash flows and by evaluating hedging opportunities. We have entered into derivative financial instruments to mitigate our interest rate risk on certain financial instruments and effectively lock the interest rate portion of our variable rate debt.
Of our approximately $3.4 billion in notes payable at September 30, 2008, approximately $283.0 million represented debt bearing interest at variable rates; excluding the approximately $200.00 term loan under the credit agreement, which has an interest rate hedged against rises in interest costs. If our variable interest rates increased 100 basis points, we estimate that total annual interest expense would increase by approximately $2.8 million. As a result of the interest rate swap agreements, the $200.0 million term loan effectively bears interest at fixed rates. A 100 basis point decrease in interest rates would result in a net decrease in the fair value of our interest rate swaps of approximately $4.2 million. A 100 basis point increase in interest rates would result in a net increase in the fair value of our interest rate swaps of approximately $4.1 million.
We do not have any foreign operations and thus we are not exposed to foreign currency fluctuations.
Item 4T. Controls and Procedures.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As required by Rule 13a-15(b) and Rule 15d-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated as of September 30, 2008, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e). Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures, as of September 30, 2008, were effective for the purpose of ensuring that information required to be disclosed by us in this report is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the rules and forms of the Exchange Act and is accumulated and communicated to our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
We believe, however, that a controls system, no matter how well designed and operated, cannot provide absolute assurance that the objectives of the controls systems are met, and no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud or error, if any, within a company have been detected.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended September 30, 2008 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
36
Table of Contents
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
We are not party to, and none of our properties are subject to, any material pending legal proceedings.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
The following risk factors supplement the risk factors set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.
Your investment may be subject to additional risks if we make international investments.
We may purchase real estate assets located outside the United States and may make or purchase mortgage, bridge, mezzanine or other loans or participations in mortgage, bridge, mezzanine or other loans made by a borrower located outside the United States or secured by property located outside the United States. The experience of our advisor and its affiliates with respect to investing in real estate assets located outside the United States is not as extensive as it is with respect to investments in the United States. These investments may be affected by factors peculiar to the laws of the jurisdiction in which the borrower or the property is located. These laws may expose us to risks that are different from and in addition to those commonly found in the United States. Foreign investments could be subject to the following additional risks:
· governmental laws, rules and policies including laws relating to the foreign ownership of real property or mortgages and laws relating to the ability of foreign persons or corporations to remove profits earned from activities within the country to the person’s or corporation’s country of origin;
· variations in currency exchange rates;
· adverse market conditions caused by inflation or other changes in national or local economic conditions;
· changes in relative interest rates;
· changes in the availability, cost and terms of mortgage funds resulting from varying national economic policies;
· changes in real estate and other tax rates, the tax treatment of transaction structures and other changes in operating expenses in a particular country where we have an investment;
· lack of uniform accounting standards (including availability of information with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles);
· changes in land use and zoning laws;
· more stringent environmental laws or changes in these laws;
· changes in social stability or other political, economic or diplomatic developments in or affecting a country where we have an investment;
· the fact that our sponsor and its affiliates have only limited experience investing in real property or other investments outside of the United States; and
· legal and logistical barriers to enforcing our contractual rights.
Any of these risks could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and ability to make distributions to our stockholders.
The failure of any bank in which we deposit our funds could reduce the amount of cash we have available to pay distributions and make additional investments.
37
Table of Contents
We have diversified our cash and cash equivalents between several banking institutions in an attempt to minimize exposure to any one of these entities. However, the FDIC generally only insures limited amounts per depositor per insured bank. Beginning October 3, 2008 through December 31, 2009, the FDIC will insure up to $250,000 per depositor per insured bank; on January 1, 2010, the standard coverage limit will return to $100,000 for most deposit categories. (Unlimited deposit insurance coverage will be available to our non-interest bearing transaction accounts held at those institutions participating in FDIC’s Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program through December 31, 2009.) At September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, we had cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash deposited in interest bearing transaction accounts at certain financial institutions in excess of federally insured levels. If any of the banking institutions in which we have deposited funds ultimately fails, we may lose our deposits over the federally insured levels. The loss of our deposits could reduce the amount of cash we have available to distribute or invest and could result in a decline in the value of your investment.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
Share Redemption Program
Our board of directors has authorized a share redemption program for investors who hold their shares for more than one year. The purchase prices for redeemed shares are set forth in the prospectus for our Current Offering of common stock, as supplemented from time to time. Our board of directors reserves the right in its sole discretion at any time, and from time to time, to (1) waive the one-year holding period in the event of death, disability, need for long-term care, or other exigent circumstances such as bankruptcy, a mandatory distribution requirement under a stockholder’s IRA or with respect to shares purchased under or through our DRIP or automatic purchase plan, (2) reject any request for redemption, (3) change the purchase price for redemptions, or (4) terminate, suspend or amend the share redemption program. Under the terms of the plan, during any calendar year, we will not redeem in excess of 5% of the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the prior calendar year. In addition, our board of directors will determine whether we have sufficient cash from operations to repurchase shares, and such purchases will generally be limited to proceeds of our DRIP plus 1% of operating cash flow for the previous fiscal year.
The provisions of the share redemption program in no way limit our ability to repurchase shares from stockholders by any other legally available means for any reason that our board of directors, in its discretion, deems to be in our best interest. During the quarter ended September 30, 2008, we redeemed shares as follows:
| | | | | | Total Number of | | Maximum | |
| | | | | | Shares Purchased | | Number of Shares | |
| | Total | | Average | | as Part of Publicly | | that May Yet Be | |
| | Number of | | Price Paid | | Announced Plans | | Purchased Under | |
| | Shares Redeemed | | per Share | | or Programs | | the Plans or Programs | |
July 2008 | | — | | $ | — | | — | | (1) | |
August 2008 | | 710,940 | | $ | 8.97 | | 710,940 | | (1) | |
September 2008 | | — | | $ | — | | — | | (1) | |
(1) A description of the maximum number of shares that may be purchased under our redemption program is included in the narrative preceding this table.
Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities.
None.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
None.
Item 5. Other Information.
None.
Item 6. Exhibits.
The exhibits filed in response to Item 601 of Regulation S-K are listed on the Exhibit Index attached hereto.
38
Table of Contents
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
| BEHRINGER HARVARD REIT I, INC. |
| |
| |
Dated: November 14, 2008 | By: | /s/ Gary S. Bresky |
| | Gary S. Bresky |
| | Chief Financial Officer |
| | (Principal Financial Officer) |
39
Table of Contents
Index to Exhibits
Exhibit Number | | Description |
| | |
3.1 | | Eighth Articles of Amendment and Restatement (previously filed and incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Registrant’s Post Effective Amendment No. 9 to Registration Statement on Form S-11 filed on July 24, 2008) |
| | |
3.2 | | Amended and Restated Bylaws (previously filed and incorporated by reference to Amendment No. 4 to Registration Statement on Form S-11 filed on February 11, 2003) |
| | |
3.2.1 | | Amendment to the Amended and Restated Bylaws (previously filed and incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed on February 22, 2006) |
| | |
4.1 | | Form of Subscription Agreement and Subscription Agreement Signature Page (previously filed and incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 filed on October 4, 2006) |
| | |
4.2 | | Distribution Reinvestment Plan of the Registrant, effective as of October 23, 2006 (previously filed and incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 filed on October 4, 2006) |
| | |
4.3 | | Automatic Purchase Plan of the Registrant, effective as of October 23, 2006 (previously filed and incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 filed on October 4, 2006) |
| | |
4.4 | | Statement regarding restrictions on transferability of shares of common stock (to appear on stock certificate or to be sent upon request and without charge to stockholders issued shares without certificates) (previously filed and incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Registrant’s Post-Effective Amendment No. 8 to Registration Statement on Form S-11 filed on April 24, 2008) |
| | |
10.1 | | Second Amendment to the Fifth Amended and Restated Property Management Agreement, dated August 13, 2008, by and among Behringer Harvard REIT I, Inc., Behringer Harvard Operating Partnership I LP and HPT Management Services LP (previously filed and incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed on August 13, 2008) |
| | |
31.1 | | Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) Certification (filed herewith) |
| | |
31.2 | | Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) Certification (filed herewith) |
| | |
32.1* | | Section 1350 Certifications (filed herewith) |
* In accordance with Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K, this Exhibit is not deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section. Such certification will not be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.
40