
Supplemental Operating and Financial Data
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2016
About the Company
TIER REIT, Inc. is a self-managed, Dallas-based real estate investment trust focused on delivering outsized stockholder return through stock price appreciation and dividend growth while offering unparalleled tenant service. TIER REIT’s investment strategy is to acquire, develop, and operate a portfolio of best-in-class properties in select U.S. markets that consistently lead the nation in both population and office-using employment growth. Within these markets, we target TIER1 submarkets, which are primarily urban and amenity-rich locations.
As of March 31, 2016, we owned interests in 33 operating office properties, two non-operating properties, and one development property located in 14 markets throughout the United States with a total of 12.0 million rentable square feet.
|
| | |
Board of Directors | | Executive Officers and Senior Management |
Richard I. Gilchrist | | Scott W. Fordham |
Chairman of the Board and Independent Director | | Chief Executive Officer, President, and Director |
| | |
Scott W. Fordham | | Dallas E. Lucas |
Chief Executive Officer, President, and Director | | Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
| | |
Charles G. Dannis | | William J. Reister |
Independent Director | | Chief Investment Officer and Executive Vice President |
| | |
Thomas M. Herzog | | Telisa Webb Schelin |
Independent Director | | Chief Legal Officer, Executive Vice President, and Secretary |
| | |
Dennis J. Martin | | James E. Sharp |
Independent Director | | Chief Accounting Officer and Executive Vice President |
| | |
Steven W. Partridge | | R. Heath Johnson |
Independent Director | | Managing Director - Asset Management |
| | |
G. Ronald Witten | | Dean R. Hook |
Independent Director | | Senior Vice President - Information Systems |
| | |
| | Anubhav Raj |
| | Senior Vice President - Capital Markets |
|
| | | | |
Company Information |
Corporate Headquarters | | Trading Information | | Investor inquiries should be directed to: |
5950 Sherry Lane, Suite 700 | | Trading Symbol: TIER | | Scott McLaughlin |
Dallas, Texas 75225 | | New York Stock Exchange | | Senior Vice President - Investor Relations |
| | | | at 972.483.2400 or |
| | | | ir@tierreit.com |
| | | | |
Website | | | | Research Coverage |
www.tierreit.com | | | | Janney Montgomery Scott LLC |
| | | | Robert Stevenson |
| | | | 640.840.3217 |
Supplemental Operating and Financial Data
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2016
Table of Contents
|
| | |
Overview and Highlights | |
Overview | 1 |
|
Financial Highlights | 2-3 |
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets | 4 |
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations | 5 |
|
Calculation of FFO and FAD | 6 |
|
Calculation of EBITDA | 7 |
|
Non Wholly-Owned Entities Financial Summary | 8 |
|
Same Store Analysis | 9 |
|
Schedule of Properties Owned | 10 |
|
Portfolio Analysis | 11 |
|
Components of Net Asset Value | 12 |
|
Selected Non-Stabilized Properties | 13 |
|
Significant Tenants | 14 |
|
Industry Diversification | 15 |
|
| |
Leasing | |
Leasing Activity | 16-17 |
|
Lease Expirations | 18-19 |
|
Occupancy Trends | 20 |
|
| |
Capital Expenditures | |
Leasing Cost Summary | 21 |
|
Leasing Cost Trend Analysis | 22 |
|
Development, Leasing, and Capital Expenditures Summary | 23 |
|
| |
Other Information | |
Potential Future Development Sites | 24 |
|
Summary of Development Activity | 25 |
|
Properties Under Development | 26 |
|
Acquisition and Disposition Activities | 27 |
|
Summary of Financing | 28 |
|
Principal Payments by Year | 29 |
|
Definitions of Non-GAAP Financial Measures | 30-31 |
|
Forward-Looking Statements
This supplemental operating and financial data report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws relating to the business and financial outlook of TIER REIT, Inc. that are based on current expectations, estimates, forecasts, and projections and are not guarantees of future performance. Statements contained herein may be impacted by a number of risks and uncertainties, including the company’s ability to rent space on favorable terms, its ability to address debt maturities and fund its capital requirements, its intentions to sell certain properties, its intentions with respect to development activity, the value of its assets, its anticipated capital expenditures, and other matters. Words such as “may,” "will," “anticipates,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “seeks,” “estimates,” “would,” “could,” “should,” “objectives,” “strategies,” “goals,” and variations of these words and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Actual results may differ materially from those expressed in these forward-looking statements, and you should not place undue reliance on any such statements. A number of important factors could cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements contained in this document, as well as other factors described in the Risk Factors section of TIER REIT, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015. Forward-looking statements in this document speak only as of the date on which such statements were made, and we undertake no obligation to update any such statements that may become untrue because of subsequent events.
Overview
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2016
Highlights and Financial Results
| |
• | FFO attributable to common stockholders, excluding certain items, for the first quarter of 2016 was $21.3 million, or $0.45 per diluted share, as compared to $17.4 million, or $0.35 per diluted share, for the first quarter of 2015, an increase of $3.9 million, or $0.10 per diluted share |
| |
• | FFO attributable to common stockholders for the first quarter of 2016 was $20.2 million, or $0.42 per diluted share, as compared to $16.9 million, or $0.34 per diluted share, for the first quarter of 2015, an increase of $3.3 million, or $0.08 per diluted share |
| |
• | Same Store GAAP NOI for the first quarter of 2016 was $34.2 million, as compared to $30.5 million for the first quarter of 2015, an increase of $3.6 million, or 11.8% |
| |
• | Same Store Cash NOI for the first quarter of 2016 was $30.1 million, as compared to $28.7 million for the first quarter of 2015, an increase of $1.4 million, or 4.8% |
| |
• | Net loss attributable to common stockholders for the first quarter of 2016 was $12.7 million, or $0.27 per diluted share, as compared to $5.9 million, or $0.12 per diluted share, for the first quarter of 2015, an increase in loss of $6.8 million, or $0.15 per diluted share |
| |
• | Dennis J. Martin joined our board of directors as an independent director on January 1, 2016 |
Property Results
| |
• | Occupancy at March 31, 2016, was 88.9%, a decrease of 80 basis points from December 31, 2015 |
| |
• | 462,000 square feet leased - 271,000 square feet of renewals, 70,000 square feet of expansion space, and 121,000 square feet of new leasing |
Real Estate Activities
| |
• | Lawson Commons was sold for a contract sale price of $68.4 million, continuing our progress in disposing of non-strategic properties |
Capital Market Activities
| |
• | Credit facility successfully converted from secured to unsecured as a result of meeting certain financial covenants, releasing 14 properties comprising 5.6 million square feet in real estate previously encumbered |
| |
• | Increased the maximum capacity of our credit facility from $750.0 million to $860.0 million, adding a $50.0 million term loan and adding $60.0 million of capacity to our revolving line of credit |
| |
• | Paid off, without penalty, the $55.8 million construction loan secured by Two BriarLake Plaza (scheduled to mature in October 2016) using proceeds from the new $50 million term loan and the sale of Lawson Common, furthering our progress in reducing our leverage and extending our debt maturities |
| |
• | Authorized distribution of $0.18 per share of common stock for the first quarter of 2016, which was paid on April 8, 2016 |
|
| | |
Supplemental Operating and Financial Data | TIER REIT | 1st Quarter Page 1 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Financial Highlights |
(in thousands, except per share data, effective rent data, percentages, and number of properties) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | 31-Mar-16 | | 31-Dec-15 | | 30-Sep-15 | | 30-Jun-15 | | 31-Mar-15 |
Portfolio Summary: | | | | | | | | | | |
(at our ownership %, unless otherwise noted) | | | | | | | | | | |
Total operating office properties | | 33 |
| | 34 |
| | 35 |
| | 31 |
| | 34 |
|
Rentable square feet (100%) (operating properties) | | 11,535 |
| | 11,971 |
| | 12,615 |
| | 11,946 |
| | 13,624 |
|
Rentable square feet (own %) (operating properties) | | 10,419 |
| | 10,855 |
| | 10,918 |
| | 10,418 |
| | 12,487 |
|
Occupancy % | | 88.9 | % | | 89.7 | % | | 89.4 | % | | 89.0 | % | | 88.4 | % |
Executed % SF leased | | 89.7 | % | | 89.8 | % | | 90.2 | % | | 89.5 | % | | 89.7 | % |
Economic % SF leased | | 84.6 | % | | 84.1 | % | | 83.6 | % | | 82.3 | % | | 82.3 | % |
Average effective rent/square feet | | $ | 26.62 |
| | $ | 25.69 |
| | $ | 25.50 |
| | $ | 24.94 |
| | $ | 25.95 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended |
| | 31-Mar-16 | | 31-Dec-15 | | 30-Sep-15 | | 30-Jun-15 | | 31-Mar-15 |
Financial Results: | | | | | | | | | | |
Revenue | | $ | 68,478 |
| | $ | 67,085 |
| | $ | 69,423 |
| | $ | 70,038 |
| | $ | 75,819 |
|
Base rent | | $ | 46,907 |
| | $ | 47,494 |
| | $ | 47,351 |
| | $ | 51,336 |
| | $ | 56,923 |
|
Free rent | | $ | (3,259 | ) | | $ | (3,557 | ) | | $ | (3,718 | ) | | $ | (5,365 | ) | | $ | (5,173 | ) |
NOI | | $ | 36,645 |
| | $ | 36,402 |
| | $ | 38,121 |
| | $ | 36,858 |
| | $ | 36,664 |
|
Net loss attributable to common stockholders | | $ | (12,707 | ) | | $ | (11,216 | ) | | $ | (13,849 | ) | | $ | (1,151 | ) | | $ | (5,892 | ) |
Diluted loss per common share (1) (2) | | $ | (0.27 | ) | | $ | (0.24 | ) | | $ | (0.28 | ) | | $ | (0.02 | ) | | $ | (0.12 | ) |
FFO attributable to common stockholders | | $ | 20,232 |
| | $ | 17,363 |
| | $ | 18,883 |
| | $ | (18,051 | ) | | $ | 16,904 |
|
Diluted FFO per common share (1) (2) | | $ | 0.42 |
| | $ | 0.37 |
| | $ | 0.39 |
| | $ | (0.36 | ) | | $ | 0.34 |
|
FFO attributable to common stockholders, excluding certain items | | $ | 21,341 |
| | $ | 18,017 |
| | $ | 20,737 |
| | $ | 17,181 |
| | $ | 17,444 |
|
Diluted FFO, excluding certain items, per common share (2) | | $ | 0.45 |
| | $ | 0.38 |
| | $ | 0.42 |
| | $ | 0.34 |
| | $ | 0.35 |
|
FAD attributable to common stockholders | | $ | 8,185 |
| | $ | 7,667 |
| | $ | 3,954 |
| | $ | (1,176 | ) | | $ | 1,556 |
|
FAD per common share (1) (2) | | $ | 0.17 |
| | $ | 0.16 |
| | $ | 0.08 |
| | $ | (0.02 | ) | | $ | 0.03 |
|
Normalized EBITDA | | $ | 34,014 |
| | $ | 34,789 |
| | $ | 35,752 |
| | $ | 33,439 |
| | $ | 37,072 |
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic (2) | | 47,390 |
| | 47,244 |
| | 48,843 |
| | 49,893 |
| | 49,891 |
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding - diluted (2) | | 47,715 |
| | 47,436 |
| | 49,034 |
| | 50,085 |
| | 50,066 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Selected Additional Trend Information: | | | | | | | | | | |
Renewal % based on square feet | | 66 | % | | 79 | % | | 69 | % | | 83 | % | | 74 | % |
Distributions declared on common shares | | $ | 8,594 |
| | $ | 8,576 |
| | $ | 8,539 |
| | $ | 9,011 |
| | $ | — |
|
Annualized distribution yield (3) | | 5.4 | % | | 4.9 | % | | 4.9 | % | | N/A |
| | N/A |
|
(1) In periods of net loss from continuing operations or negative FFO or FAD attributable to common stockholders there are no dilutive securities and diluted earnings (loss) per common share or diluted FFO or FAD per common share is calculated using weighted average common shares outstanding - basic as the denominator.
(2) All periods presented have been adjusted to reflect the one-for-six reverse stock split that occurred on June 2, 2015.
(3) Based on the closing price of our common stock as of the last day of the associated period. Prior to the July 23, 2015, listing of our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange, no stock price is available.
Occupancy % represents the total square footage subject to commenced leases as of the reporting date as a percentage of the total rentable square feet (at our ownership interest).
Executed % SF leased represents the total square footage subject to commenced leases plus the square footage for currently vacant space that is subject to executed leases that have not commenced as of the reporting date as a percentage of the total rentable square feet (at our ownership interest).
Economic % SF leased represents the total square footage subject to commenced leases as of the reporting date adjusted to exclude the square footage associated with leases receiving rental abatements as a percentage of the total rentable square feet (at our ownership interest).
Average effective rent represents 12 times the sum of the monthly contractual amounts for base rent and the pro rata budgeted operating expense reimbursements, as of period end, related to leases in place as of period end, as reduced for free rent and excluding any scheduled future rent increases, as adjusted for our ownership interest.
This section includes non-GAAP financial measures, which are accompanied by what we consider the most directly comparable financial measures calculated and presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”). Quantitative reconciliations of the differences between the non-GAAP financial measures presented and the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures are shown on pages 6-7. A description of the non-GAAP financial measures we present and a statement of the reasons why management believes the non-GAAP measures provide useful information to investors about the Company’s financial condition and results of operations can be found on pages 30-31.
|
| | |
Supplemental Operating and Financial Data | TIER REIT | 1st Quarter Page 2 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Financial Highlights (continued) |
(in thousands, except percentages and ratios) |
| | |
| | 31-Mar-16 | | 31-Dec-15 | | 30-Sep-15 | | 30-Jun-15 | | 31-Mar-15 |
Selected Balance Sheet Items: | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total book value of real estate (1) | | $ | 1,503,088 |
| | $ | 1,573,248 |
| | $ | 1,590,422 |
| | $ | 1,488,373 |
| | $ | 1,609,953 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 5,532 |
| | $ | 12,248 |
| | $ | 7,769 |
| | $ | 153,158 |
| | $ | 5,764 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Unconsolidated cash and cash equivalents (at ownership %) | | $ | 4,175 |
| | $ | 4,086 |
| | $ | 6,293 |
| | $ | 3,368 |
| | $ | 2,480 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Restricted cash | | $ | 12,756 |
| | $ | 10,712 |
| | $ | 16,615 |
| | $ | 29,620 |
| | $ | 32,761 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total assets | | $ | 1,787,304 |
| | $ | 1,873,745 |
| | $ | 1,906,755 |
| | $ | 1,919,743 |
| | $ | 2,116,165 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Mortgage debt (1) | | $ | 358,717 |
| | $ | 415,425 |
| | $ | 463,629 |
| | $ | 505,224 |
| | $ | 903,475 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Revolving credit facility and term loans | | $ | 683,000 |
| | $ | 665,000 |
| | $ | 626,000 |
| | $ | 525,000 |
| | $ | 221,000 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Mortgage debt classified as held for sale | | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 96,824 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Unconsolidated debt (at ownership %) | | $ | 82,747 |
| | $ | 80,189 |
| | $ | 90,909 |
| | $ | 72,392 |
| | $ | 59,870 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities | | $ | 1,142,948 |
| | $ | 1,195,926 |
| | $ | 1,216,646 |
| | $ | 1,144,786 |
| | $ | 1,338,198 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Capitalization: | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Common stock outstanding (2) | | 47,405 |
| | 47,362 |
| | 47,242 |
| | 49,872 |
| | 49,901 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
OP units and restricted stock units outstanding (2) | | 141 |
| | 29 |
| | 82 |
| | 84 |
| | 86 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Restricted stock outstanding (2) | | 333 |
| | 282 |
| | 189 |
| | 192 |
| | 192 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | 47,879 |
| | 47,673 |
| | 47,513 |
| | 50,148 |
| | 50,179 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Closing stock price (3) | | $ | 13.44 |
| | $ | 14.75 |
| | $ | 14.72 |
| | N/A |
| | N/A |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Market capitalization (3) | | $ | 643,494 |
| | $ | 703,177 |
| | $ | 699,391 |
| | $ | 1,347,978 |
| | $ | 1,348,812 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total debt (4) | | $ | 1,124,464 |
| | $ | 1,160,614 |
| | $ | 1,180,538 |
| | $ | 1,102,616 |
| | $ | 1,281,169 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net debt (5) | | $ | 1,114,757 |
| | $ | 1,144,280 |
| | $ | 1,166,476 |
| | $ | 946,090 |
| | $ | 1,272,925 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total capitalization | | $ | 1,767,958 |
| | $ | 1,863,791 |
| | $ | 1,879,929 |
| | $ | 2,450,594 |
| | $ | 2,629,981 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended |
| | 31-Mar-16 | | 31-Dec-15 | | 30-Sep-15 | | 30-Jun-15 | | 31-Mar-15 |
Ratios: | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
NOI margin % | | 53.5 | % | | 54.3 | % | | 54.9 | % | | 52.6 | % | | 48.4 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Normalized fixed charge coverage (6) | | 2.46 |
| | 2.35 |
| | 2.35 |
| | 1.78 |
| | 1.76 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Normalized interest coverage (6) | | 2.72 |
| | 2.67 |
| | 2.68 |
| | 2.05 |
| | 2.06 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net debt/normalized annualized estimated full period EBITDA from properties owned at period end (6) | | 8.40x |
| | 8.22x |
| | 8.02x |
| | 7.75x |
| | 8.94x |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
(1) Excludes book value of real estate and mortgage debt classified as held for sale. | | | |
(2) All periods presented have been adjusted to reflect the one-for-six reverse stock split that occurred on June 2, 2015. |
(3) Market capitalization is equal to outstanding shares (common stock, restricted stock, OP units, and restricted stock units, as if converted) times the closing price of our common stock as of the the last day of the associated period. Prior to the July 23, 2015, listing of our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange, the price used was the estimated stock value of $26.88 per share, as reported in Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on November 3, 2014, as adjusted to reflect the one-for-six reverse stock split that occurred on June 2, 2015. |
(4) Includes book value of mortgage debt, the revolving credit facility and term loans, mortgage debt classified as held for sale, and unconsolidated debt (at ownership %). |
(5) Total debt less cash and cash equivalents and unconsolidated cash and cash equivalents (at ownership %). |
(6) See page 7 for more detailed information. |
|
| | |
Supplemental Operating and Financial Data | TIER REIT | 1st Quarter Page 3 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Consolidated Balance Sheets |
(in thousands, except share and per share data) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | 31-Mar-16 | | 31-Dec-15 | | 30-Sep-15 | | 30-Jun-15 | | 31-Mar-15 |
Assets | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Real estate | | | | | | | | | | |
| Land | | $ | 176,309 |
| | $ | 179,989 |
| | $ | 184,318 |
| | $ | 167,231 |
| | $ | 249,030 |
|
| Land held for development | | 45,059 |
| | 45,059 |
| | 44,834 |
| | 6,377 |
| | — |
|
| Buildings and improvements, net | | 1,276,519 |
| | 1,348,200 |
| | 1,361,270 |
| | 1,314,765 |
| | 1,360,923 |
|
| Real estate under development | | 5,201 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Total real estate | | 1,503,088 |
| | 1,573,248 |
| | 1,590,422 |
| | 1,488,373 |
| | 1,609,953 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | | 5,532 |
| | 12,248 |
| | 7,769 |
| | 153,158 |
| | 5,764 |
|
| Restricted cash | | 12,756 |
| | 10,712 |
| | 16,615 |
| | 29,620 |
| | 32,761 |
|
| Accounts receivable, net | | 78,562 |
| | 76,228 |
| | 74,817 |
| | 71,877 |
| | 75,466 |
|
| Prepaid expenses and other assets | | 6,025 |
| | 6,712 |
| | 22,875 |
| | 31,890 |
| | 7,222 |
|
| Investments in unconsolidated entities | | 90,000 |
| | 88,998 |
| | 85,377 |
| | 44,780 |
| | 39,422 |
|
| Deferred financing fees, net (2) | | 3,310 |
| | 3,111 |
| | 3,308 |
| | 3,344 |
| | 3,582 |
|
| Acquired above-market leases, net | | 1,258 |
| | 1,388 |
| | 1,518 |
| | 1,619 |
| | 163 |
|
| Other lease intangibles, net | | 76,787 |
| | 82,160 |
| | 84,351 |
| | 74,850 |
| | 77,480 |
|
| Other intangible assets, net | | 9,986 |
| | 10,086 |
| | 10,185 |
| | 10,284 |
| | 2,114 |
|
| Assets associated with real estate held for sale | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 255,130 |
|
Total assets | | $ | 1,787,304 |
| | $ | 1,864,891 |
| | $ | 1,897,237 |
| | $ | 1,909,795 |
| | $ | 2,109,057 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Liabilities and equity | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Mortgage debt | | $ | 358,717 |
| | $ | 415,425 |
| | $ | 463,620 |
| | $ | 505,196 |
| | $ | 903,688 |
|
| Unsecured term loans | | 575,000 |
| | 525,000 |
| | 525,000 |
| | 525,000 |
| | 125,000 |
|
| Unsecured revolving credit facility | | 108,000 |
| | 140,000 |
| | 101,000 |
| | — |
| | 96,000 |
|
| Unamortized debt issuance costs (2) | | (8,744 | ) | | (8,854 | ) | | (9,518 | ) | | (9,948 | ) | | (7,108 | ) |
| Unamortized mark to market premium (discount) | | — |
| | — |
| | 9 |
| | 28 |
| | (213 | ) |
| Total notes payable, net | | 1,032,973 |
| | 1,071,571 |
| | 1,080,111 |
| | 1,020,276 |
| | 1,117,367 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Accounts payable | | 834 |
| | 831 |
| | 1,477 |
| | 2,192 |
| | 1,118 |
|
| Payables to related parties | | 294 |
| | 292 |
| | 302 |
| | 794 |
| | 2,257 |
|
| Accrued liabilities | | 55,847 |
| | 70,766 |
| | 72,719 |
| | 64,794 |
| | 65,713 |
|
| Acquired below-market leases, net | | 10,456 |
| | 11,934 |
| | 13,321 |
| | 12,773 |
| | 14,381 |
|
| Other liabilities | | 33,944 |
| | 23,082 |
| | 30,642 |
| | 24,981 |
| | 25,797 |
|
| Distributions payable | | 8,600 |
| | 8,596 |
| | 8,556 |
| | 9,028 |
| | — |
|
| Obligations associated with real estate held for sale | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 104,457 |
|
Total liabilities | | 1,142,948 |
| | 1,187,072 |
| | 1,207,128 |
| | 1,134,838 |
| | 1,331,090 |
|
Commitments and contingencies | | | | | | | | | | |
Series A Convertible Preferred Stock | | — |
| | 2,700 |
| | 2,700 |
| | 4,626 |
| | 4,626 |
|
Equity: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Preferred stock | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Convertible stock | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Common stock, $.0001 par value per share, 382,499,000 shares authorized (1) | 5 |
| | 5 |
| | 5 |
| | 5 |
| | 5 |
|
| Additional paid-in capital (1) | | 2,603,564 |
| | 2,600,193 |
| | 2,598,333 |
| | 2,645,825 |
| | 2,646,147 |
|
| Cumulative distributions and net loss attributable to common stockholders | (1,944,022 | ) | | (1,922,721 | ) | | (1,902,927 | ) | | (1,878,611 | ) | | (1,868,447 | ) |
| Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | | (16,732 | ) | | (3,860 | ) | | (10,148 | ) | | 799 |
| | (5,336 | ) |
| Stockholders’ equity | | 642,815 |
| | 673,617 |
| | 685,263 |
| | 768,018 |
| | 772,369 |
|
| Noncontrolling interests | | 1,541 |
| | 1,502 |
| | 2,146 |
| | 2,313 |
| | 972 |
|
Total equity | | 644,356 |
| | 675,119 |
| | 687,409 |
| | 770,331 |
| | 773,341 |
|
Total liabilities and equity | | $ | 1,787,304 |
| | $ | 1,864,891 |
| | $ | 1,897,237 |
| | $ | 1,909,795 |
| | $ | 2,109,057 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Common stock, number of shares issued and outstanding (1) | | 47,404,980 |
| | 47,362,372 |
| | 47,241,851 |
| | 49,871,776 |
| | 49,901,013 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(1) All periods have been adjusted to reflect the one-for-six reverse stock split that occurred on June 2, 2015. |
(2) All periods have been adjusted to reflect adoption and retrospective application of new accounting guidance regarding presentation of certain debt issuance costs as a deduction from the corresponding debt liability. |
|
| | |
Supplemental Operating and Financial Data | TIER REIT | 1st Quarter Page 4 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Consolidated Statements of Operations |
| (in thousands, except share and per share amounts) |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | Three Months Ended |
| | | 31-Mar-16 | | 31-Dec-15 | | 30-Sep-15 | | 30-Jun-15 | | 31-Mar-15 |
Revenue | | | | | | | | | | |
| Rental income | | $ | 63,291 |
| | $ | 61,736 |
| | $ | 62,794 |
| | $ | 63,953 |
| | $ | 71,604 |
|
| Straight-line rent and lease incentive revenue | | 3,250 |
| | 3,310 |
| | 2,547 |
| | 4,625 |
| | 2,483 |
|
| Above- and below-market rent amortization | | 1,348 |
| | 1,256 |
| | 2,064 |
| | 1,335 |
| | 1,187 |
|
| Lease termination fees | | 589 |
| | 783 |
| | 2,018 |
| | 125 |
| | 545 |
|
| Total revenue | | 68,478 |
| | 67,085 |
| | 69,423 |
| | 70,038 |
| | 75,819 |
|
Expenses | | | | | | | | | | |
| Property related expenses | | 20,485 |
| | 21,812 |
| | 21,290 |
| | 20,877 |
| | 25,179 |
|
| Real estate taxes | | 11,064 |
| | 8,622 |
| | 9,670 |
| | 10,198 |
| | 11,644 |
|
| Property management fees | | 284 |
| | 249 |
| | 342 |
| | 2,105 |
| | 2,332 |
|
| Total property operating expenses | | 31,833 |
| | 30,683 |
| | 31,302 |
| | 33,180 |
| | 39,155 |
|
| Interest expense | | 11,501 |
| | 11,668 |
| | 11,884 |
| | 14,591 |
| | 15,641 |
|
| Amortization of deferred financing costs | | 739 |
| | 1,048 |
| | 914 |
| | 899 |
| | 908 |
|
| Amortization of mark to market | | — |
| | (9 | ) | | (33 | ) | | (30 | ) | | (27 | ) |
| Total interest expense | | 12,240 |
| | 12,707 |
| | 12,765 |
| | 15,460 |
| | 16,522 |
|
| General and administrative | | 5,510 |
| | 5,569 |
| | 6,378 |
| | 5,412 |
| | 5,381 |
|
| BHT Advisors termination fee and HPT Management buyout fee | | — |
| | — |
| | 101 |
| | 10,200 |
| | — |
|
| Tender offer and listing costs | | — |
| | (27 | ) | | 2,562 |
| | 2,488 |
| | 503 |
|
| Amortization of restricted shares and units | | 994 |
| | 3,371 |
| | 505 |
| | 564 |
| | 535 |
|
| Straight-line rent expense adjustment | | — |
| | — |
| | (67 | ) | | (7 | ) | | (7 | ) |
| Acquisition expense | | — |
| | 21 |
| | 644 |
| | 813 |
| | 2 |
|
| Asset impairment losses | | 4,826 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 132 |
|
| Real estate depreciation and amortization | | 31,770 |
| | 29,910 |
| | 31,217 |
| | 31,081 |
| | 30,022 |
|
| Depreciation and amortization - non-real estate assets | | 274 |
| | 272 |
| | 229 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Total expenses | | 87,447 |
| | 82,506 |
| | 85,636 |
| | 99,191 |
| | 92,245 |
|
| Interest and other income | | 274 |
| | 257 |
| | 267 |
| | 141 |
| | 145 |
|
| Loss on early extinguishment of debt | | — |
| | (24 | ) | | (30 | ) | | (21,412 | ) | | (36 | ) |
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes, equity | | | | | | | | | | |
| in operations of investments, and gain (loss) on sale of assets | | (18,695 | ) | | (15,188 | ) | | (15,976 | ) | | (50,424 | ) | | (16,317 | ) |
| Benefit (provision) for income taxes | | (182 | ) | | (209 | ) | | (36 | ) | | (1,338 | ) | | 76 |
|
| Equity in operations of investments | | 415 |
| | 3,829 |
| | (159 | ) | | 69 |
| | 243 |
|
Loss from continuing operations before gain (loss) on sale of assets | | (18,462 | ) | | (11,568 | ) | | (16,171 | ) | | (51,693 | ) | | (15,998 | ) |
Discontinued operations: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Income (loss) from discontinued operations | | — |
| | 17 |
| | 21 |
| | (121 | ) | | 1,490 |
|
| Gain on sale of discontinued operations | | — |
| | 297 |
| | 403 |
| | 6,077 |
| | 8,606 |
|
Discontinued operations | | — |
| | 314 |
| | 424 |
| | 5,956 |
| | 10,096 |
|
Gain (loss) on sale of assets | | 5,739 |
| | (2 | ) | | (85 | ) | | 44,564 |
| | — |
|
Net loss | | (12,723 | ) | | (11,256 | ) | | (15,832 | ) | | (1,173 | ) | | (5,902 | ) |
| Noncontrolling interests - continuing operations | | 16 |
| | 41 |
| | 58 |
| | 33 |
| | 27 |
|
| Noncontrolling interests - discontinued operations | | — |
| | (1 | ) | | (1 | ) | | (11 | ) | | (17 | ) |
| Dilution of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock | | — |
| | — |
| | 1,926 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Net loss attributable to common stockholders | | $ | (12,707 | ) | | $ | (11,216 | ) | | $ | (13,849 | ) | | $ | (1,151 | ) | | $ | (5,892 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Basic and diluted weighted average common shares outstanding (1) | | 47,389,591 |
| | 47,244,471 |
| | 48,842,711 |
| | 49,893,330 |
| | 49,891,436 |
|
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per common share: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Continuing operations (1) | | $ | (0.27 | ) | | $ | (0.24 | ) | | $ | (0.29 | ) | | $ | (0.14 | ) | | $ | (0.32 | ) |
| Discontinued operations (1) | | — |
| | — |
| | 0.01 |
| | 0.12 |
| | 0.20 |
|
Basic and diluted loss per common share (1) | | $ | (0.27 | ) | | $ | (0.24 | ) | | $ | (0.28 | ) | | $ | (0.02 | ) | | $ | (0.12 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Distributions declared per common share (1) | | $ | 0.18 |
| | $ | 0.18 |
| | $ | 0.18 |
| | $ | 0.18 |
| | $ | — |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Continuing operations | | $ | (12,707 | ) | | $ | (11,529 | ) | | $ | (14,272 | ) | | $ | (7,096 | ) | | $ | (15,971 | ) |
| Discontinued operations | | — |
| | 313 |
| | 423 |
| | 5,945 |
| | 10,079 |
|
Net loss attributable to common stockholders | | $ | (12,707 | ) | | $ | (11,216 | ) | | $ | (13,849 | ) | | $ | (1,151 | ) | | $ | (5,892 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
(1) All periods presented have been adjusted to reflect the one-for-six reverse stock split that occurred on June 2, 2015. |
|
| | |
Supplemental Operating and Financial Data | TIER REIT | 1st Quarter Page 5 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Calculation of FFO and FAD |
(in thousands, except per share data) |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | Three Months Ended |
Funds from operations (FFO) | | 31-Mar-16 | | 31-Dec-15 | | 30-Sep-15 | | 30-Jun-15 | | 31-Mar-15 |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Net loss | | $ | (12,723 | ) | | $ | (11,256 | ) | | $ | (15,832 | ) | | $ | (1,173 | ) | | $ | (5,902 | ) |
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests | | 16 |
| | 40 |
| | 57 |
| | 22 |
| | 10 |
|
Dilution of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock | | — |
| | — |
| | 1,926 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Adjustments (1): | | | | | | | | | | |
| Real estate depreciation and amortization - consolidated | | 31,770 |
| | 29,910 |
| | 31,217 |
| | 31,081 |
| | 30,022 |
|
| Real estate depreciation and amortization - unconsolidated joint ventures | | 2,045 |
| | 2,427 |
| | 1,904 |
| | 1,367 |
| | 1,287 |
|
| Real estate depreciation and amortization - noncontrolling interest | | (6 | ) | | (10 | ) | | (10 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
| Impairment of depreciable real estate assets | | 4,826 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 132 |
|
| Gain on sale of depreciable real estate | | (5,739 | ) | | (3,698 | ) | | (318 | ) | | (50,641 | ) | | (8,606 | ) |
| Taxes associated with sale of depreciable real estate | | 64 |
| | — |
| | (5 | ) | | 1,264 |
| | — |
|
| Noncontrolling interests | | (21 | ) | | (50 | ) | | (56 | ) | | 29 |
| | (39 | ) |
FFO attributable to common stockholders | | $ | 20,232 |
| | $ | 17,363 |
| | $ | 18,883 |
| | $ | (18,051 | ) | | $ | 16,904 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
FFO, excluding certain items | | | | | | | | | | |
FFO attributable to common stockholders | | $ | 20,232 |
| | $ | 17,363 |
| | $ | 18,883 |
| | $ | (18,051 | ) | | $ | 16,904 |
|
Adjustments (1): | | | | | | | | | | |
| Acquisition expenses | | — |
| | 26 |
| | 642 |
| | 1,193 |
| | 2 |
|
| Severance charges | | 493 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Tender offer and listing costs | | — |
| | (27 | ) | | 2,562 |
| | 2,488 |
| | 503 |
|
| Loss on early extinguishment of debt | | — |
| | 31 |
| | 127 |
| | 21,412 |
| | 36 |
|
| Non-cash default interest (2) | | 617 |
| | 625 |
| | 355 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| BHT Advisors termination fee and HPT Management buyout fee | | — |
| | — |
| | 101 |
| | 10,200 |
| | — |
|
| Noncontrolling interests | | (1 | ) | | (1 | ) | | (7 | ) | | (61 | ) | | (1 | ) |
| Dilution of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock | | — |
| | — |
| | (1,926 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
FFO attributable to common stock holders, excluding certain items | | $ | 21,341 |
| | $ | 18,017 |
| | $ | 20,737 |
| | $ | 17,181 |
| | $ | 17,444 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Funds available for distribution (FAD) | | | | | | | | | | |
FFO attributable to common stock holders | | $ | 20,232 |
| | $ | 17,363 |
| | $ | 18,883 |
| | $ | (18,051 | ) | | $ | 16,904 |
|
Adjustments (1): | | | | | | | | | | |
| Recurring capital expenditures | | (9,353 | ) | | (11,113 | ) | | (13,795 | ) | | (14,067 | ) | | (13,247 | ) |
| Straight-line rent adjustments | | (3,957 | ) | | (2,662 | ) | | (2,525 | ) | | (4,369 | ) | | (2,850 | ) |
| Above- and below-market rent amortization | | (1,423 | ) | | (1,330 | ) | | (2,139 | ) | | (1,433 | ) | | (1,289 | ) |
| Amortization of deferred financing fees and mark to market | | 793 |
| | 1,095 |
| | 930 |
| | 898 |
| | 936 |
|
| Amortization of restricted shares and units | | 994 |
| | 3,371 |
| | 505 |
| | 564 |
| | 535 |
|
| Acquisition expenses | | — |
| | 26 |
| | 642 |
| | 1,193 |
| | 2 |
|
| Tender offer and listing costs | | — |
| | (27 | ) | | 2,562 |
| | 2,488 |
| | 503 |
|
| Loss on early extinguishment of debt | | — |
| | 31 |
| | 127 |
| | 21,412 |
| | 36 |
|
| Default interest | | 617 |
| | 625 |
| | 355 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| BHT Advisors termination fee and HPT Management buyout fee | | — |
| | — |
| | 101 |
| | 10,200 |
| | — |
|
| Depreciation and amortization - non-real estate assets | | 274 |
| | 272 |
| | 229 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Noncontrolling interests | | 8 |
| | 16 |
| | 5 |
| | (11 | ) | | 26 |
|
| Dilution of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock | | — |
| | — |
| | (1,926 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
FAD attributable to common stockholders | | $ | 8,185 |
| | $ | 7,667 |
| | $ | 3,954 |
| | $ | (1,176 | ) | | $ | 1,556 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic (3) | | 47,390 |
| | 47,244 |
| | 48,843 |
| | 49,893 |
| | 49,891 |
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding - diluted (3) | | 47,715 |
| | 47,436 |
| | 49,034 |
| | 50,085 |
| | 50,066 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Diluted FFO per common share (3) (4) | | $ | 0.42 |
| | $ | 0.37 |
| | $ | 0.39 |
| | $ | (0.36 | ) | | $ | 0.34 |
|
Diluted FFO, excluding certain items, per common share (3) | | $ | 0.45 |
| | $ | 0.38 |
| | $ | 0.42 |
| | $ | 0.34 |
| | $ | 0.35 |
|
Diluted FAD per common share (3) (4) | | $ | 0.17 |
| | $ | 0.16 |
| | $ | 0.08 |
| | $ | (0.02 | ) | | $ | 0.03 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(1) Adjustments represent our pro rata share of consolidated and unconsolidated amounts, including discontinued operations. |
(2) As of March 31, 2016, we had a non-recourse loan in default which subjects us to incur default interest at a rate that is 500 basis points higher than the stated interest rate. Although there can be no assurance, we anticipate that when this property is sold or when ownership of this property is conveyed to the lender, this default interest will be forgiven. |
(3) All periods presented have been adjusted to reflect the one-for-six reverse stock split that occurred on June 2, 2015. |
(4) There are no dilutive securities for purposes of calculating diluted FFO per common share and diluted FAD per common share when FFO attributable to common stockholders or FAD attributable to common stockholders is negative. |
For additional information regarding the non-GAAP measures, see pages 30-31. |
|
| | |
Supplemental Operating and Financial Data | TIER REIT | 1st Quarter Page 6 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Calculation of EBITDA |
(in thousands, except ratios) |
| | |
| | Three Months Ended |
| | 31-Mar-16 | | 31-Dec-15 | | 30-Sep-15 | | 30-Jun-15 | | 31-Mar-15 |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net loss attributable to common stockholders | $ | (12,707 | ) | | $ | (11,216 | ) | | $ | (13,849 | ) | | $ | (1,151 | ) | | $ | (5,892 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Adjustments: | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Noncontrolling interests | (8 | ) | | (20 | ) | | (27 | ) | | (1 | ) | | (10 | ) |
| Dilution of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock | — |
| | — |
| | (1,926 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Interest expense - consolidated (including discontinued operations) | 11,501 |
| | 11,668 |
| | 11,884 |
| | 14,635 |
| | 16,304 |
|
| Interest expense - unconsolidated entities | 641 |
| | 727 |
| | 1,437 |
| | 617 |
| | 615 |
|
| Amortization of deferred financing costs - consolidated (including discontinued operations) | 739 |
| | 1,048 |
| | 914 |
| | 899 |
| | 922 |
|
| Amortization of deferred financing costs - unconsolidated entities | 54 |
| | 56 |
| | 48 |
| | 13 |
| | 13 |
|
| Mark to market - consolidated (including discontinued operations) | — |
| | (9 | ) | | (33 | ) | | (30 | ) | | (28 | ) |
| Mark to market - unconsolidated entities | — |
| | — |
| | 1 |
| | 16 |
| | 17 |
|
| Total interest expense | 12,935 |
| | 13,490 |
| | 14,251 |
| | 16,150 |
| | 17,843 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Tax (benefit) provision - consolidated (including discontinued operations) | 182 |
| | 209 |
| | 36 |
| | 1,338 |
| | (76 | ) |
| Tax provision - unconsolidated entities | 2 |
| | 1 |
| | 1 |
| | 1 |
| | 2 |
|
| Depreciation and amortization - consolidated (including discontinued operations) | 32,044 |
| | 30,182 |
| | 31,446 |
| | 31,081 |
| | 30,022 |
|
| Depreciation and amortization - unconsolidated entities | 2,045 |
| | 2,427 |
| | 1,904 |
| | 1,367 |
| | 1,287 |
|
| Depreciation and amortization - noncontrolling interest | (6 | ) | | (10 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Impairment losses | 4,826 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 132 |
|
| Gain on sale of real estate | (5,739 | ) | | (3,698 | ) | | (318 | ) | | (50,641 | ) | | (8,606 | ) |
| Loss on early extinguishment of debt | — |
| | 31 |
| | 127 |
| | 21,412 |
| | 36 |
|
EBITDA | 33,574 |
| | 31,396 |
| | 31,645 |
| | 19,556 |
| | 34,738 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Adjustments: | | | | | | | | | |
| Costs incurred in connection with listing activities | — |
| | (27 | ) | | 2,562 |
| | 2,488 |
| | 503 |
|
| Acquisition expenses | — |
| | 26 |
| | 642 |
| | 1,193 |
| | 2 |
|
| Non-cash write-off (recoveries) of tenant receivables | (53 | ) | | 557 |
| | 802 |
| | 2 |
| | 1,829 |
|
| Severance charges | 493 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Transition-related stock-based compensation expense (1) | — |
| | 2,837 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| BHT Advisors termination fee and HPT Management buyout fee | — |
| | — |
| | 101 |
| | 10,200 |
| | — |
|
Normalized EBITDA | 34,014 |
| | 34,789 |
| | 35,752 |
| | 33,439 |
| | 37,072 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Adjustments: | | | | | | | | | |
| EBITDA from properties disposed before period end | (832 | ) | | 25 |
| | (42 | ) | | (2,933 | ) | | (1,488 | ) |
| Full quarter adjustment for acquired properties | — |
| | — |
| | 656 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Normalized estimated full period EBITDA from properties owned at period end | $ | 33,182 |
| | $ | 34,814 |
| | $ | 36,366 |
| | $ | 30,506 |
| | $ | 35,584 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Fixed charges | | | | | | | | | |
| Interest expense | $ | 12,935 |
| | $ | 13,490 |
| | $ | 14,251 |
| | $ | 16,150 |
| | $ | 17,843 |
|
| Non-cash default interest (2) | (617 | ) | | (625 | ) | | (355 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
| Interest expense related to participating mortgage (3) | — |
| | (53 | ) | | (660 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
| Capitalized interest incurred (4) | 198 |
| | 199 |
| | 119 |
| | 132 |
| | 176 |
|
| Normalized interest expense | 12,516 |
| | 13,011 |
| | 13,355 |
| | 16,282 |
| | 18,019 |
|
| Principal payments (excludes debt payoff) | 1,318 |
| | 1,776 |
| | 1,876 |
| | 2,498 |
| | 3,059 |
|
Fixed charges | $ | 13,834 |
| | $ | 14,787 |
| | $ | 15,231 |
| | $ | 18,780 |
| | $ | 21,078 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Normalized interest coverage | 2.72 |
| | 2.67 |
| | 2.68 |
| | 2.05 |
| | 2.06 |
|
Normalized fixed charge coverage | 2.46 |
| | 2.35 |
| | 2.35 |
| | 1.78 |
| | 1.76 |
|
______________________
| |
(1) | During the fourth quarter of 2015, we incurred a charge from the acceleration of stock grants related to our transition from an arrears-based equity incentive program to a new, forward-looking, multi-year, long-term equity incentive program. |
(2) We have a non-recourse loan in default which subjects us to incur default interest at a rate that is 500 basis points higher than the stated interest rate. Although there can be no assurance, we anticipate that when this property is sold or when ownership of this property is conveyed to the lender, this default interest will be forgiven.
(3) Represents an estimate of the portion of the Paces West B note that will be repaid based on achievement of certain investment return thresholds which is included in interest expense- unconsolidated entities above. Paces West was sold in November 2015.
(4) Excludes capitalized interest funded from construction loans.
For additional information regarding the non-GAAP measures, see pages 30-31.
|
| | |
Supplemental Operating and Financial Data | TIER REIT | 1st Quarter Page 7 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Non Wholly-Owned Entities Financial Summary |
As of and for the Quarter Ended March 31, 2016 |
(dollars in thousands) |
| | | | | | | | |
| | Unconsolidated Entities at | | Consolidated Entities at |
| | TIER REIT Ownership Share | | TIER REIT Ownership Share |
| | Wanamaker Building | | 1325 G Street | | Colorado Building | | Domain 2 & 7 | | Domain 8 | | | | Legacy Land | | Third + Shoal | | |
Ownership % during the period | 60.00% | | 10.00% | | 10.00% | | 49.84% | | 50.00% | | | | 95.00% | | 95.00% | | |
Ownership % at period end | 60.00% | | 10.00% | | 10.00% | | 49.84% | | 50.00% | | Total | | 95.00% | | 95.00% | | Total |
Results of Operations | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Rental income | $ | 3,486 |
| | $ | 256 |
| | $ | 94 |
| | $ | 1,088 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 4,924 |
| | — |
| | 343 |
| | 343 |
|
Straight-line rent and lease incentive revenue | 147 |
| | 76 |
| | 56 |
| | 130 |
| | — |
| | 409 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Above- and below-market rent amortization | 106 |
| | (26 | ) | | (12 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | 68 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Other income | 44 |
| | 40 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 84 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Total revenue | 3,783 |
| | 346 |
| | 138 |
| | 1,218 |
| | — |
| | 5,485 |
| | — |
| | 343 |
| | 343 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Property related expenses | 1,280 |
| | 87 |
| | 43 |
| | 298 |
| | 15 |
| | 1,723 |
| | 3 |
| | 371 |
| | 374 |
|
Real estate taxes | 214 |
| | 72 |
| | 28 |
| | 233 |
| | — |
| | 547 |
| | 19 |
| | — |
| | 19 |
|
Property management fees | 108 |
| | 8 |
| | 2 |
| | 50 |
| | — |
| | 168 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| NOI | 2,181 |
| | 179 |
| | 65 |
| | 637 |
| | (15 | ) | | 3,047 |
| | (22 | ) | | (28 | ) | | (50 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest expense | 444 |
| | 53 |
| | 18 |
| | 126 |
| | — |
| | 641 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs | 20 |
| | 6 |
| | 2 |
| | 37 |
| | — |
| | 65 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Asset management fees | — |
| | 3 |
| | 1 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 4 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Real estate depreciation and amortization | 1,207 |
| | 176 |
| | 89 |
| | 428 |
| | — |
| | 1,900 |
| | — |
| | 106 |
| | 106 |
|
Interest income and other expense | 7 |
| | 1 |
| | 1 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 9 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Provision for income taxes | 2 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2 |
| | — |
| | 2 |
| | 2 |
|
| Net income (loss) | 501 |
| | (60 | ) | | (46 | ) | | 46 |
| | (15 | ) | | 426 |
| | (22 | ) | | (136 | ) | | (158 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Adjustments: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation of basis adjustments | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (146 | ) | | — |
| | (146 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Above- and below-market amortization of basis adjustment | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 7 |
| | — |
| | 7 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Eliminate amortization of deferred financing costs | 11 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 11 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Eliminate depreciation of construction management fees | 1 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Eliminate property management fees | 108 |
| | 7 |
| | 1 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 116 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Adjusted net income (loss) | 621 |
| | (53 | ) | | (45 | ) | | (93 | ) | | (15 | ) | | 415 |
| | (22 | ) | | (136 | ) | | (158 | ) |
Adjustments: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Real estate depreciation and amortization | 1,206 |
| | 176 |
| | 89 |
| | 574 |
| | — |
| | 2,045 |
| | — |
| | 106 |
| | 106 |
|
Funds from operations | $ | 1,827 |
| | $ | 123 |
| | $ | 44 |
| | $ | 481 |
| | $ | (15 | ) | | $ | 2,460 |
| | $ | (22 | ) | | $ | (30 | ) | | $ | (52 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance Sheet Information | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Real estate book value | $ | 101,930 |
| | $ | 12,781 |
| | $ | 3,786 |
| | $ | 35,914 |
| | $ | 12,459 |
| | $ | 166,870 |
| | 6,061 |
| | 13,102 |
| | 19,163 |
|
Accumulated depreciation | (25,286 | ) | | (184 | ) | | (40 | ) | | (1,685 | ) | | — |
| | (27,195 | ) | | — |
| | (198 | ) | | (198 | ) |
Real estate book value after depreciation (1) | $ | 76,644 |
| | $ | 12,597 |
| | $ | 3,746 |
| | $ | 34,229 |
| | $ | 12,459 |
| | $ | 139,675 |
| | $ | 6,061 |
| | $ | 12,904 |
| | $ | 18,965 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 1,762 |
| | $ | 268 |
| | $ | 228 |
| | $ | 1,001 |
| | $ | 916 |
| | $ | 4,175 |
| | $ | 63 |
| | $ | 836 |
| | $ | 899 |
|
Assets | $ | 96,817 |
| | $ | 15,731 |
| | $ | 5,062 |
| | $ | 40,549 |
| | $ | 13,402 |
| | $ | 171,561 |
| | $ | 6,123 |
| | $ | 13,864 |
| | $ | 19,987 |
|
Mortgage debt | $ | 45,243 |
| | $ | 9,629 |
| | $ | 3,400 |
| | $ | 24,475 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 82,747 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
Equity | $ | 48,551 |
| | $ | 5,596 |
| | $ | 1,509 |
| | $ | 14,743 |
| | $ | 12,489 |
| | $ | 82,888 |
| | $ | 6,103 |
| | $ | 13,343 |
| | $ | 19,446 |
|
Basis differences | (5,447 | ) | | (1,288 | ) | | (608 | ) | | 11,007 |
| | 3,448 |
| | 7,112 |
| | 18 |
| | (391 | ) | | (373 | ) |
Carrying value of the Company’s investment | $ | 43,104 |
| | $ | 4,308 |
| | $ | 901 |
| | $ | 25,750 |
| | $ | 15,937 |
| | $ | 90,000 |
| | $ | 6,121 |
| | $ | 12,952 |
| | $ | 19,073 |
|
________________________________ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(1) | Third + Shoal real estate book value after depreciation includes $7.6 million for a ground lease intangible. |
|
| | |
Supplemental Operating and Financial Data | TIER REIT | 1st Quarter Page 8 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Same Store Analysis |
(in thousands, except property count and percentages) |
| | | |
| | Three Months Ended | |
Same Store GAAP NOI: | 31-Mar-16 | | 31-Mar-15 | | Favorable/ (Unfavorable) | |
Revenues: | | | | | | |
Total revenue | $ | 58,924 |
| | $ | 57,411 |
| | $ | 1,513 |
| |
Less: Lease termination fees | (432 | ) | | (545 | ) | | 113 |
| |
| 58,492 |
| | 56,866 |
| | 1,626 |
| 2.9 | % |
Expenses: | | | | | | |
Property operating expenses (less tenant improvement demolition costs) | 17,556 |
| | 17,909 |
| | 353 |
| 2.0 | % |
Real estate taxes | 9,187 |
| | 8,813 |
| | (374 | ) | (4.2 | )% |
Property management fees | 142 |
| | 1,837 |
| | 1,695 |
| 92.3 | % |
Property expenses | 26,885 |
| | 28,559 |
| | 1,674 |
| 5.9 | % |
Same Store GAAP NOI - consolidated properties | 31,607 |
| | 28,307 |
| | 3,300 |
| 11.7 | % |
Same Store GAAP NOI - unconsolidated properties (at ownership %) | 2,550 |
| | 2,235 |
| | 315 |
| 14.1 | % |
Same Store GAAP NOI | $ | 34,157 |
| | $ | 30,542 |
| | $ | 3,615 |
| 11.8 | % |
| | | | | | |
Same Store Cash NOI: | | | | | | |
Same Store GAAP NOI - consolidated properties | $ | 31,607 |
| | $ | 28,307 |
| | $ | 3,300 |
| |
Less: | | | | | | |
Straight-line rent revenue adjustment | (2,663 | ) | | (413 | ) | | (2,250 | ) | |
Above- and below-market rent amortization | (1,042 | ) | | (1,220 | ) | | 178 |
| |
Same Store Cash NOI - consolidated properties | 27,902 |
| | 26,674 |
| | 1,228 |
| 4.6 | % |
Same Store Cash NOI - unconsolidated properties (at ownership %) | 2,204 |
| | 2,042 |
| | 162 |
| 7.9 | % |
Same Store Cash NOI | $ | 30,106 |
| | $ | 28,716 |
| | $ | 1,390 |
| 4.8 | % |
| | | | | | |
Occupancy % at period end (% owned) | 89.3 | % | | 89.5 | % | | | |
| | | | | | |
Operating properties | 28 |
| | | | | |
Rentable square feet (% owned) | 9,586 |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Reconciliation of net loss to Same Store GAAP NOI and Same Store Cash NOI: | | | | | | |
Net loss | $ | (12,723 | ) | | $ | (5,902 | ) | | | |
Adjustments: | | | | | | |
Interest expense | 12,240 |
| | 16,522 |
| | | |
Asset impairment losses | 4,826 |
| | 132 |
| | | |
Tenant improvement demolition costs | 64 |
| | 127 |
| | | |
General and administrative | 5,510 |
| | 5,381 |
| | | |
Tender offer and listing costs | — |
| | 503 |
| | | |
Amortization of restricted shares and units | 994 |
| | 535 |
| | | |
Straight-line rent expense adjustment | — |
| | (7 | ) | | | |
Acquisition expense | — |
| | 2 |
| | | |
Real estate depreciation and amortization | 31,770 |
| | 30,022 |
| | | |
Depreciation and amortization of non-real estate assets | 274 |
| | — |
| | | |
Interest and other income | (274 | ) | | (145 | ) | | | |
Loss on early extinguishment of debt | — |
| | 36 |
| | | |
Provision (benefit) for income taxes | 182 |
| | (76 | ) | | | |
Equity in operations of investments | (415 | ) | | (243 | ) | | | |
Income from discontinued operations | — |
| | (1,490 | ) | | | |
Gain on sale of discontinued operations | — |
| | (8,606 | ) | | | |
Gain on sale of assets | (5,739 | ) | | — |
| | | |
Net operating income of non-same store properties | (4,670 | ) | | (7,939 | ) | | | |
Lease termination fees | (432 | ) | | (545 | ) | | | |
Same store GAAP NOI of unconsolidated properties (at ownership %) | 2,550 |
| | 2,235 |
| | | |
Same Store GAAP NOI | 34,157 |
| | 30,542 |
| | | |
Straight-line rent revenue adjustment | (2,663 | ) | | (413 | ) | | | |
Above- and below-market rent amortization | (1,042 | ) | | (1,220 | ) | | | |
Cash NOI adjustments for unconsolidated properties (at ownership %) | (346 | ) | | (193 | ) | | | |
Same Store Cash NOI | $ | 30,106 |
| | $ | 28,716 |
| | | |
|
| | |
Supplemental Operating and Financial Data | TIER REIT | 1st Quarter Page 9 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Schedule of Properties Owned |
as of March 31, 2016 |
(in thousands, except average effective and gross asking rent $/RSF and percentages) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Rentable SF (100%) | | Rentable SF (own %) | | | | Average Effective Rent | | Average Effective Rent $/RSF | | Estimated Market Rent $/RSF | | | | % Average Effective Rent (own %) |
| | | | | | Occupancy % | | | | | % of NRA (own %) | |
Property (% owned, if not 100%) | | Location | | | | | | | | |
Terrace Office Park | | Austin, TX | | 619 |
| | 619 |
| | 92.7 | % | | $ | 20,311 |
| | $ | 35.37 |
| | $ | 41.60 |
| | 5.9 | % | | 8.2 | % |
Domain 3 | | Austin, TX | | 179 |
| | 179 |
| | 100.0 | % | | 6,129 |
| | $ | 34.24 |
| | $ | 36.30 |
| | 1.7 | % | | 2.5 | % |
Domain 4 | | Austin, TX | | 153 |
| | 153 |
| | 90.8 | % | | 3,826 |
| | $ | 27.52 |
| | $ | 36.30 |
| | 1.5 | % | | 1.6 | % |
Domain 7 (49.84%) | | Austin, TX | | 222 |
| | 111 |
| | 93.7 | % | | 3,492 |
| | $ | 33.68 |
| | $ | 40.91 |
| | 1.1 | % | | 1.4 | % |
Domain 2 (49.84%) | | Austin, TX | | 115 |
| | 57 |
| | 100.0 | % | | 2,319 |
| | $ | 40.58 |
| | $ | 40.91 |
| | 0.5 | % | | 0.9 | % |
Austin | | | | 1,288 |
| | 1,119 |
| | 94.1 | % | | 36,077 |
| | $ | 34.26 |
| | $ | 39.89 |
| | 10.7 | % | | 14.6 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
5950 Sherry Lane | | Dallas, TX | | 197 |
| | 197 |
| | 83.2 | % | | 5,796 |
| | $ | 35.42 |
| | $ | 39.88 |
| | 1.9 | % | | 2.4 | % |
Burnett Plaza | | Fort Worth, TX | | 1,025 |
| | 1,025 |
| | 82.2 | % | | 15,897 |
| | $ | 18.86 |
| | $ | 23.00 |
| | 9.8 | % | | 6.4 | % |
Centreport Office Center | | Fort Worth, TX | | 133 |
| | 133 |
| | 100.0 | % | | 2,726 |
| | $ | 20.46 |
| | $ | 18.00 |
| | 1.3 | % | | 1.1 | % |
Dallas/Fort Worth | | | | 1,355 |
| | 1,355 |
| | 84.1 | % | | 24,419 |
| | $ | 21.42 |
| | $ | 24.85 |
| | 13.0 | % | | 9.9 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Loop Central | | Houston, TX | | 575 |
| | 575 |
| | 89.9 | % | | 12,552 |
| | $ | 24.29 |
| | $ | 25.50 |
| | 5.5 | % | | 5.1 | % |
One & Two Eldridge Place | | Houston, TX | | 519 |
| | 519 |
| | 95.4 | % | | 15,923 |
| | $ | 32.17 |
| | $ | 36.25 |
| | 5.0 | % | | 6.5 | % |
One BriarLake Plaza | | Houston, TX | | 502 |
| | 502 |
| | 89.6 | % | | 18,880 |
| | $ | 41.99 |
| | $ | 44.26 |
| | 4.8 | % | | 7.7 | % |
Two BriarLake Plaza | | Houston, TX | | 333 |
| | 333 |
| | 67.9 | % | | 8,227 |
| | $ | 36.40 |
| | $ | 44.42 |
| | 3.2 | % | | 3.3 | % |
Three Eldridge Place | | Houston, TX | | 305 |
| | 305 |
| | 80.3 | % | | 9,810 |
| | $ | 40.01 |
| | $ | 40.51 |
| | 2.9 | % | | 4.0 | % |
Houston | | | | 2,234 |
| | 2,234 |
| | 86.5 | % | | 65,392 |
| | $ | 33.83 |
| | $ | 36.73 |
| | 21.4 | % | | 26.5 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Bank of America Plaza | | Charlotte, NC | | 891 |
| | 891 |
| | 89.5 | % | | 19,355 |
| | $ | 24.29 |
| | $ | 30.75 |
| | 8.6 | % | | 7.9 | % |
Charlotte | | | | 891 |
| | 891 |
| | 89.5 | % | | 19,355 |
| | $ | 24.29 |
| | $ | 30.75 |
| | 8.6 | % | | 7.9 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Buena Vista Plaza | | Burbank, CA | | 115 |
| | 115 |
| | 99.1 | % | | 4,172 |
| | $ | 36.53 |
| | $ | 36.53 |
| | 1.1 | % | | 1.7 | % |
Los Angeles | | | | 115 |
| | 115 |
| | 99.1 | % | | 4,172 |
| | $ | 36.53 |
| | $ | 36.53 |
| | 1.1 | % | | 1.7 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Forum Office Park | | Louisville, KY | | 328 |
| | 328 |
| | 97.6 | % | | 5,722 |
| | $ | 17.86 |
| | $ | 18.00 |
| | 3.1 | % | | 2.3 | % |
Hurstbourne Place | | Louisville, KY | | 235 |
| | 235 |
| | 87.7 | % | | 3,912 |
| | $ | 19.03 |
| | $ | 19.75 |
| | 2.3 | % | | 1.6 | % |
One Oxmoor Place | | Louisville, KY | | 135 |
| | 135 |
| | 98.5 | % | | 3,045 |
| | $ | 22.93 |
| | $ | 21.50 |
| | 1.3 | % | | 1.2 | % |
Hurstbourne Park | | Louisville, KY | | 104 |
| | 104 |
| | 72.1 | % | | 1,355 |
| | $ | 17.95 |
| | $ | 19.00 |
| | 1.0 | % | | 0.5 | % |
Steeplechase Place | | Louisville, KY | | 77 |
| | 77 |
| | 80.5 | % | | 1,069 |
| | $ | 17.19 |
| | $ | 17.50 |
| | 0.7 | % | | 0.4 | % |
Lakeview | | Louisville, KY | | 76 |
| | 76 |
| | 92.1 | % | | 1,414 |
| | $ | 20.12 |
| | $ | 19.25 |
| | 0.7 | % | | 0.6 | % |
Hunnington | | Louisville, KY | | 62 |
| | 62 |
| | 83.9 | % | | 976 |
| | $ | 18.92 |
| | $ | 17.50 |
| | 0.6 | % | | 0.4 | % |
Louisville | | | | 1,017 |
| | 1,017 |
| | 90.3 | % | | 17,493 |
| | $ | 19.06 |
| | $ | 19.01 |
| | 9.8 | % | | 7.1 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Plaza at MetroCenter | | Nashville, TN | | 361 |
| | 361 |
| | 92.0 | % | | 6,049 |
| | $ | 18.21 |
| | $ | 18.50 |
| | 3.5 | % | | 2.5 | % |
Nashville | | | | 361 |
| | 361 |
| | 92.0 | % | | 6,049 |
| | $ | 18.21 |
| | $ | 18.50 |
| | 3.5 | % | | 2.5 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Eisenhower I | | Tampa, FL | | 130 |
| | 130 |
| | 100.0 | % | | 3,553 |
| | $ | 27.31 |
| | $ | 28.00 |
| | 1.2 | % | | 1.4 | % |
Tampa | | | | 130 |
| | 130 |
| | 100.0 | % | | 3,553 |
| | $ | 27.31 |
| | $ | 28.00 |
| | 1.2 | % | | 1.4 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
801 Thompson | | Rockville, MD | | 51 |
| | 51 |
| | 100.0 | % | | 1,652 |
| | $ | 32.43 |
| | $ | 26.50 |
| | 0.5 | % | | 0.7 | % |
1325 G Street (10%) | | Washington, D.C. | | 307 |
| | 31 |
| | 83.9 | % | | 1,155 |
| | $ | 44.81 |
| | $ | 49.50 |
| | 0.3 | % | | 0.5 | % |
Colorado Building (10%) | | Washington, D.C. | | 128 |
| | 13 |
| | 76.9 | % | | 329 |
| | $ | 31.40 |
| | $ | 48.50 |
| | 0.1 | % | | 0.1 | % |
Washington, D.C. | | | | 486 |
| | 95 |
| | 91.6 | % | | 3,136 |
| | $ | 36.05 |
| | $ | 35.90 |
| | 0.9 | % | | 1.3 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating office properties in strategic portfolio | | | | 7,877 |
| | 7,317 |
| | 88.9 | % | | 179,646 |
| | $ | 27.62 |
| | $ | 30.81 |
| | 70.2 | % | | 72.9 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
500 East Pratt | | Baltimore, MD | | 280 |
| | 280 |
| | 98.2 | % | | 8,867 |
| | $ | 32.24 |
| | $ | 31.08 |
| | 2.7 | % | | 3.6 | % |
Woodcrest Corporate Center | | Cherry Hill, NJ | | 333 |
| | 333 |
| | 99.1 | % | | 6,996 |
| | $ | 21.21 |
| | $ | 21.50 |
| | 3.2 | % | | 2.8 | % |
111 Woodcrest | | Cherry Hill, NJ | | 53 |
| | 53 |
| | 84.9 | % | | 940 |
| | $ | 20.89 |
| | $ | 16.00 |
| | 0.5 | % | | 0.4 | % |
FOUR40 | | Chicago, IL | | 1,041 |
| | 1,041 |
| | 73.1 | % | | 23,752 |
| | $ | 31.19 |
| | $ | 35.71 |
| | 10.0 | % | | 9.6 | % |
Wanamaker Building (60%) | | Philadelphia, PA | | 1,390 |
| | 834 |
| | 99.5 | % | | 14,032 |
| | $ | 16.91 |
| | $ | 17.51 |
| | 8.0 | % | | 5.7 | % |
Three Parkway | | Philadelphia, PA | | 561 |
| | 561 |
| | 92.2 | % | | 12,313 |
| | $ | 23.83 |
| | $ | 24.21 |
| | 5.4 | % | | 5.0 | % |
Other operating office properties | | | | 3,658 |
| | 3,102 |
| | 88.9 | % | | 66,900 |
| | $ | 24.26 |
| | $ | 25.59 |
| | 29.8 | % | | 27.1 | % |
Total operating office properties | | 11,535 |
| | 10,419 |
| | 88.9 | % | | $ | 246,546 |
| | $ | 26.62 |
| | $ | 29.26 |
| | 100.0 | % | | 100.0 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Non-operating properties | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Hurstbourne Plaza (1) | | Louisville, KY | | 79 |
| | 79 |
| | 50.2 | % | | | | | | | | | | |
Fifth Third Center (2) | | Columbus, OH | | 331 |
| | 331 |
| | 69.3 | % | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Properties | | | | 11,945 |
| | 10,829 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(1) Hurstbourne Plaza is a retail property planned for redevelopment within the Hurstbourne Business Park. |
(2) The loan on Fifth Third Center is currently in default and we are working with the lender to dispose of this property on their behalf. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Average effective rent represents 12 times the sum of the monthly contractual amounts for base rent and the pro rata budgeted operating expense reimbursements, as of period end, related to leases in place as of period end, as reduced for free rent and excluding any scheduled future rent increases, as adjusted for our ownership interest. |
|
| | |
Supplemental Operating and Financial Data | TIER REIT | 1st Quarter Page 10 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Portfolio Analysis |
For the Three Months Ended and |
as of March 31, 2016 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Number of |
| | Number of |
| | Net Rentable |
| | Commenced |
| | % of | | NOI | | % of | |
Metro Area | | Properties |
| | Buildings |
| | Area (000's) |
| | % SF Leased |
| | NRA | | ($000) | | NOI | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Austin, TX | | 5 |
| | 8 |
| | 1,119 |
| | 94.1 | % | | 10.7 | % | | $ | 5,682 |
| | 14.9 | % | |
Dallas/Fort Worth, TX | | 3 |
| | 4 |
| | 1,355 |
| | 84.1 | % | | 13.0 | % | | 3,615 |
| | 9.5 | % | |
Houston, TX | | 5 |
| | 8 |
| | 2,234 |
| | 86.5 | % | | 21.4 | % | | 10,302 |
| | 27.0 | % | |
Charlotte, NC | | 1 |
| | 1 |
| | 891 |
| | 89.5 | % | | 8.6 | % | | 3,971 |
| | 10.4 | % | |
Los Angeles, CA | | 1 |
| | 1 |
| | 115 |
| | 99.1 | % | | 1.1 | % | | 772 |
| | 2.0 | % | |
Louisville, KY | | 7 |
| | 10 |
| | 1,017 |
| | 90.3 | % | | 9.8 | % | | 2,434 |
| | 6.4 | % | |
Nashville, TN | | 1 |
| | 3 |
| | 361 |
| | 92.0 | % | | 3.5 | % | | 882 |
| | 2.3 | % | |
Tampa, FL | | 1 |
| | 1 |
| | 130 |
| | 100.0 | % | | 1.2 | % | | 780 |
| | 2.0 | % | |
Washington, D.C. | | 3 |
| | 3 |
| | 95 |
| | 91.6 | % | | 0.9 | % | | 536 |
| | 1.4 | % | |
Other Markets | | 6 |
| | 6 |
| | 3,102 |
| | 88.9 | % | | 29.8 | % | | 9,174 |
| | 24.1 | % | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | 33 |
| | 45 |
| | 10,419 |
| | 88.9 | % | | 100.0 | % | | $ | 38,148 |
| | 100.0 | % | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Notes: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(1) Analysis relates to operating properties owned at the end of the most recent period only. | |
(2) Amounts reflect TIER REIT’s ownership %. | | | |
|
| | |
Supplemental Operating and Financial Data | TIER REIT | 1st Quarter Page 11 |
|
| | | | | | | |
Components of Net Asset Value |
(in thousands, except percentages) |
| | | | |
| | | | Annualized Three Months Ended |
| | | | 31-Mar-16 |
Consolidated total revenue | | | $ | 273,912 |
|
| Less: | | | |
| GAAP rent adjustments | | (18,392 | ) |
| Lease termination fees | | (2,356 | ) |
| | | | 253,164 |
|
Consolidated total property operating expenses | | (127,332 | ) |
Adjusted cash NOI | | 125,832 |
|
| Adjustments: | | | |
| Adjusted cash NOI from unconsolidated real estate assets, at ownership share | 10,744 |
|
| Adjusted cash NOI from sold properties, at ownership share | | (2,411 | ) |
| Adjusted cash NOI from non-stabilized properties, at ownership share (1) | | (19,288 | ) |
| Adjusted cash NOI from land and development properties, at ownership share | 208 |
|
Total adjusted cash NOI at ownership share | | $ | 115,085 |
|
| | | | |
| | | | 31-Mar-16 |
Other real estate properties | | |
| Estimated value of non-stabilized real estate properties, at ownership share | $ | 506,900 |
|
| Cost basis of land and development properties, at ownership share | | 73,240 |
|
Total other real estate properties | | $ | 580,140 |
|
| | |
Other tangible assets | | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 5,532 |
|
| Restricted cash | | 12,756 |
|
| Accounts receivable (excluding $70,670 of straight-line rent receivable) | 7,892 |
|
| Prepaid expenses and other assets | | 6,025 |
|
Total other tangible assets | | $ | 32,205 |
|
| | | |
Liabilities | | | |
| Mortgage debt | | $ | 358,717 |
|
| Unsecured term loans and revolving credit facility | | 683,000 |
|
| Accrued and other liabilities | | 99,519 |
|
| Ownership share of unconsolidated mortgage debt | | 82,747 |
|
Total liabilities | | $ | 1,223,983 |
|
| | |
Total common shares, restricted stock, and restricted stock units outstanding | | 47,879 |
|
| | | | |
| | | |
(1 | ) | Non-stabilized properties include: | Economic % SF Leased | | |
| | | |
| | 31-Mar-16 | | |
| Buena Vista Plaza (a) | 99% | | |
| Burnett Plaza | 69% | | |
| FOUR40 | 65% | | |
| Two BriarLake Plaza | 56% | | |
| | | | |
(a) |
| Free rent at Buena Vista Plaza expired February 2016. | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
Supplemental Operating and Financial Data | TIER REIT | 1st Quarter Page 12 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Selected Non-Stabilized Properties |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Property Name Market Sub-Market | | Property Type | | Rentable Square feet | | Occupancy % at March 31, 2016 | | Estimated Cash NOI at Stabilization (in thousands) | | Estimated Stabilization date | | Description |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Buena Vista Plaza | | Office | | 115,000 | | 99.1% | | $3,000 | | 2016 | | Completed ten year renewal of 113,000 square feet by the major tenant in the second quarter of 2015 with free rent for eleven months, beginning in April 2015, before returning to stabilized economic occupancy. |
Burbank | | | | | | | | | | | |
Burbank media district | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Burnett Plaza | | Office | | 1,025,000 |
| | 82.2% | | $13,500 | | 2017 | | A tenant that is in bankruptcy vacated approximately 50,000 square feet in the first quarter of 2016 and will vacate an additional approximately 50,000 square feet in the second quarter of 2016, of which approximately 50,000 square feet has been leased by an existing tenant’s expansion. Budgeted $2.2 million in strategic capital improvements. |
Dallas/Fort Worth | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fort Worth CBD | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| FOUR40 | | Office | | 1,041,000 |
| | 73.1% | | $16,500 | | 2017 | | Completed $5.8 million lobby renovation in the third quarter of 2014. Construction of a $10.6 million tenant amenity floor including wi-fi lounge, conference center, and café was completed in June 2015. |
Chicago | | | | | | | | | | | |
Central Loop | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Two BriarLake Plaza | | Office Development | | 333,000 |
| | 67.9% | | $8,000 | | 2017 | | Property operates as a multi-campus facility with our One BriarLake Plaza property. Major construction was completed in the third quarter of 2014. |
Houston | | | | | | | | | | | |
Westchase | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
Supplemental Operating and Financial Data | TIER REIT | 1st Quarter Page 13 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Significant Tenants |
March 31, 2016 |
(In thousands, except percentages and years) |
|
Properties in Strategic Portfolio |
| Annualized Gross Rental Revenues | | Percentage of Annualized Gross Rental Revenues | | | | Percentage of Square Feet Leased | | Weighted Average Remaining Term (Years) | | |
| | | Square Feet Leased | | | | Moody’s / S&P Credit Rating |
Tenant | | | | | |
Amoco | $ | 12,707 |
| | 7 | % | | 329 |
| | 5 | % | | 2.4 | | A2 / A |
Bank of America | 9,634 |
| | 5 | % | | 421 |
| | 6 | % | | 2.9 | | Baa1 / BBB+ |
Apache Corporation | 8,293 |
| | 4 | % | | 210 |
| | 3 | % | | 8.6 | | Baa3 / BBB |
Samsung Engineering America | 7,105 |
| | 4 | % | | 161 |
| | 2 | % | | 10.7 | | NR |
GSA | 6,631 |
| | 4 | % | | 278 |
| | 4 | % | | 4.2 | | U.S. Government |
McDermott, Inc. | 5,901 |
| | 3 | % | | 190 |
| | 3 | % | | 4.4 | | B1 / B+ |
Universal Pegasus International | 5,456 |
| | 3 | % | | 218 |
| | 3 | % | | 4.1 | | NR |
Americredit Financial Services | 4,558 |
| | 2 | % | | 243 |
| | 4 | % | | 10.1 | | NR |
Disney Enterprises Inc | 4,004 |
| | 2 | % | | 113 |
| | 2 | % | | 9.9 | | A2 / A |
Blackbaud, Inc. | 3,800 |
| | 2 | % | | 113 |
| | 2 | % | | 7.5 | | NR |
E.R. Squibb and Sons, LLC | 3,553 |
| | 2 | % | | 130 |
| | 2 | % | | 8.3 | | A2 / A+ |
Vinson & Elkins LLP | 3,541 |
| | 2 | % | | 88 |
| | 1 | % | | 5.8 | | NR |
SCOR Global Life | 3,394 |
| | 2 | % | | 140 |
| | 2 | % | | 12.3 | | NR / AA- |
Linebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson, LLP | 3,209 |
| | 2 | % | | 111 |
| | 2 | % | | 6.6 | | NR |
Nexen Petroleum | 2,752 |
| | 1 | % | | 63 |
| | 1 | % | | 1.2 | | NR |
Total of largest 15 tenants at operating office properties in strategic portfolio | $ | 84,538 |
| | 45 | % | | 2,808 |
| | 42 | % | | 6.0 | | |
Total all tenants at operating office properties in strategic portfolio | $ | 186,222 |
| | | | 6,504 |
| | | | 5.3 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Total Portfolio |
| Annualized Gross Rental Revenues | | Percentage of Annualized Gross Rental Revenues | | | | Percentage of Square Feet Leased | | Weighted Average Remaining Term (Years) | | |
| | | Square Feet Leased | | | | Moody’s / S&P Credit Rating |
Tenant | | | | | |
Amoco | $ | 12,707 |
| | 5 | % | | 329 |
| | 4 | % | | 2.4 | | A2 / A |
GSA | 11,381 |
| | 4 | % | | 493 |
| | 5 | % | | 4.5 | | U.S. Government |
Bank of America | 9,634 |
| | 4 | % | | 421 |
| | 5 | % | | 2.9 | | Baa1 / BBB+ |
Apache Corporation | 8,293 |
| | 3 | % | | 210 |
| | 2 | % | | 8.6 | | Baa3 / BBB |
Samsung Engineering America | 7,105 |
| | 3 | % | | 161 |
| | 2 | % | | 10.7 | | NR |
McDermott, Inc. | 5,901 |
| | 2 | % | | 190 |
| | 2 | % | | 4.4 | | B1 / B+ |
Universal Pegasus International | 5,456 |
| | 2 | % | | 218 |
| | 2 | % | | 4.1 | | NR |
Drexel University | 4,808 |
| | 2 | % | | 191 |
| | 2 | % | | 6.9 | | NR |
Americredit Financial Services | 4,558 |
| | 2 | % | | 243 |
| | 3 | % | | 10.1 | | NR |
Disney Enterprises Inc | 4,004 |
| | 2 | % | | 113 |
| | 1 | % | | 9.9 | | A2 / A |
Blackbaud, Inc. | 3,800 |
| | 1 | % | | 113 |
| | 1 | % | | 7.5 | | NR |
Xerox Corporation | 3,691 |
| | 1 | % | | 151 |
| | 2 | % | | 4.4 | | Baa2 / BBB- |
E.R. Squibb and Sons, LLC | 3,553 |
| | 1 | % | | 130 |
| | 1 | % | | 8.3 | | A2 / A+ |
Vinson & Elkins LLP | 3,541 |
| | 1 | % | | 88 |
| | 1 | % | | 5.8 | | NR |
CTC Holdings, L.P. | 3,493 |
| | 1 | % | | 87 |
| | 1 | % | | 5.9 | | NR |
Total of largest 15 tenants | $ | 91,925 |
| | 34 | % | | 3,138 |
| | 34 | % | | 5.7 | | |
Total all tenants | $ | 257,658 |
| | | | 9,262 |
| | | | 5.7 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Notes: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The above tables set forth the company’s 15 largest tenants including subsidiaries for the operating properties as of the date noted above, based upon annualized gross rents plus estimated operating cost recoveries in place at the end of the above noted period. |
As annualized rental revenue is not derived from the historical GAAP results, historical results may differ from those set forth above. |
Amounts reflect TIER REIT’s ownership %. | | | | | |
|
| | |
Supplemental Operating and Financial Data | TIER REIT | 1st Quarter Page 14 |
Industry Diversification (by square foot)
As of March 31, 2016
|
| |
Notes: |
| |
The Company’s tenants are classified according to the U.S. Government’s North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS). | |
Amounts reflect TIER REIT’s ownership %. | |
“Other” includes nine industry classifications. | |
|
| | |
Supplemental Operating and Financial Data | TIER REIT | 1st Quarter Page 15 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Leasing Activity Summary |
For the Three Months Ended |
March 31, 2016 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Occupancy | | | | | | | | | | Occupancy | | Cash | | | | Straight-lined | | |
| | Rentable SF (000’s) | | % | | SF (000’s) | | Activity for the Quarter (SF 000’s) | | SF (000’s) | | % | | Net Rent /SF | | % Increase of Cash Net Rent | | Net Rent /SF | | % Increase of SL Net Rent |
Market | | | 31-Dec-15 | | 31-Dec-15 | | Expiring | | Renewals | | Expansions | | New | | 31-Mar-16 | | 31-Mar-16 | | Expiring | | Activity | | | Expiring | | Activity | |
Austin (1) | | 1,119 |
| | 94.5 | % | | 1,057 |
| | (119 | ) | | 82 |
| | — |
| | 33 |
| | 1,053 |
| | 94.1 | % | | $ | 13.02 |
| | $ | 20.85 |
| | 60 | % | | $ | 12.63 |
| | $ | 18.59 |
| | 47 | % |
Dallas/Fort Worth | | 1,355 |
| | 86.4 | % | | 1,171 |
| | (112 | ) | | 23 |
| | 58 |
| | — |
| | 1,140 |
| | 84.1 | % | | $ | 15.86 |
| | $ | 14.18 |
| | -11 | % | | $ | 13.10 |
| | $ | 13.97 |
| | 7 | % |
Houston | | 2,234 |
| | 87.9 | % | | 1,964 |
| | (52 | ) | | 21 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,933 |
| | 86.5 | % | | $ | 11.01 |
| | $ | 9.81 |
| | -11 | % | | $ | 10.41 |
| | $ | 9.89 |
| | -5 | % |
Charlotte | | 891 |
| | 87.8 | % | | 782 |
| | (4 | ) | | 4 |
| | — |
| | 15 |
| | 797 |
| | 89.5 | % | | $ | 19.39 |
| | $ | 25.10 |
| | 29 | % | | $ | 18.16 |
| | $ | 20.39 |
| | 12 | % |
Los Angeles | | 115 |
| | 99.1 | % | | 114 |
| | (5 | ) | | 5 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 114 |
| | 99.1 | % | | $ | 30.40 |
| | $ | 29.43 |
| | -3 | % | | $ | 22.00 |
| | $ | 30.75 |
| | 40 | % |
Louisville | | 1,017 |
| | 94.8 | % | | 964 |
| | (116 | ) | | 69 |
| | — |
| | 1 |
| | 918 |
| | 90.3 | % | | $ | 12.18 |
| | $ | 9.01 |
| | -26 | % | | $ | 11.20 |
| | $ | 9.32 |
| | -17 | % |
Nashville | | 361 |
| | 92.8 | % | | 335 |
| | (3 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 332 |
| | 92.0 | % | | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | — | % | | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | 0 | % |
Tampa | | 130 |
| | 100.0 | % | | 130 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 130 |
| | 100.0 | % | | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | 0 | % |
Washington, D.C. | | 95 |
| | 93.7 | % | | 89 |
| | (3 | ) | | 1 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 87 |
| | 91.6 | % | | $ | 35.19 |
| | $ | 27.09 |
| | -23 | % | | $ | 35.74 |
| | $ | 30.08 |
| | -16 | % |
Operating office properties in strategic portfolio | | 7,317 |
| | 90.3 | % | | 6,606 |
| | (414 | ) | | 205 |
| | 58 |
| | 49 |
| | 6,504 |
| | 88.9 | % | | $ | 14.17 |
| | $ | 16.14 |
| | 14 | % | | $ | 12.84 |
| | $ | 15.07 |
| | 17 | % |
Other operating office properties | | 3,102 |
| | 87.3 | % | | 2,707 |
| | (99 | ) | | 66 |
| | 12 |
| | 72 |
| | 2,758 |
| | 88.9 | % | | $ | 16.53 |
| | $ | 15.41 |
| | -7 | % | | $ | 15.36 |
| | $ | 15.21 |
| | -1 | % |
Total | | 10,419 |
| | 89.4 | % | | 9,313 |
| | (513 | ) | | 271 |
| | 70 |
| | 121 |
| | 9,262 |
| | 88.9 | % | | $ | 14.94 |
| | $ | 15.90 |
| | 6 | % | | $ | 13.66 |
| | $ | 15.12 |
| | 11 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(1) At Domain 4 in Austin, a 52,000 square foot tenant restructured their lease effective 1/1/16 extending their term for one additional year from 12/31/16 to 12/31/17. The initial 12 months of the lease was at a net rate of $8.93 followed by a second 12 months at the current market rate
of $21.63.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Notes: | |
Analysis relates to operating properties owned at the end of the period and reflects TIER REIT’s ownership %. |
Occupancy includes all leases for tenants under lease contracts that have commenced during the period. |
Rates for expiring leases relate to the lease previously occupying the specific space for which positive absorption was shown or the current lease rate if it is a first generation lease. |
Net Rent is equal to the fixed base rental amount paid under the terms of the lease less any portion used to offset real estate taxes, utility charges, and other operating expenses incurred in connection with the leased space. |
Cash Net Rent disregards any free rent periods. Therefore, the rate shown is first full monthly cash rent paid. |
The impact of short term temporary leasing activity is excluded from the analysis of % increase of cash net rent and % increase of SL net rent. |
|
| | |
Supplemental Operating and Financial Data | TIER REIT | 1st Quarter Page 16 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Leasing Rate Activity Summary |
For the Three Months Ended |
March 31, 2016 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Renewals | | Expansions | | New |
| | | | Cash | | Straight-lined | | | | Cash | | Straight-lined | | | | Cash | | Straight-lined |
| | SF (000’s) | | Net Rent /SF | | Net Rent /SF | | SF (000’s) | | Net Rent /SF | | Net Rent /SF | | SF (000’s) | | Net Rent /SF | | Net Rent /SF |
Markets | | | Expiring | | Activity | | Expiring | | Activity | | | Expiring | | Activity | | Expiring | | Activity | | | Expiring | | Activity | | Expiring | | Activity |
Austin (1) | | 82 |
| | $ | 9.72 |
| | $ | 18.31 |
| | $ | 9.57 |
| | $ | 14.34 |
| | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | 33 |
| | $ | 21.22 |
| | $ | 27.18 |
| | $ | 20.27 |
| | $ | 29.19 |
|
Dallas/Fort Worth | | 23 |
| | $ | 15.38 |
| | $ | 14.62 |
| | $ | 13.23 |
| | $ | 14.81 |
| | 58 |
| | $ | 16.04 |
| | $ | 14.02 |
| | $ | 13.00 |
| | $ | 13.48 |
| | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
Houston | | 21 |
| | $ | 11.01 |
| | $ | 9.81 |
| | $ | 10.41 |
| | $ | 9.89 |
| | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
Charlotte | | 4 |
| | $ | 23.76 |
| | $ | 26.79 |
| | $ | 20.30 |
| | $ | 27.43 |
| | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | 15 |
| | $ | 18.08 |
| | $ | 24.59 |
| | $ | 17.45 |
| | $ | 18.19 |
|
Los Angeles | | 5 |
| | $ | 30.40 |
| | $ | 29.43 |
| | $ | 22.00 |
| | $ | 30.75 |
| | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
Louisville | | 69 |
| | $ | 12.20 |
| | $ | 8.98 |
| | $ | 11.19 |
| | $ | 9.31 |
| | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | 1 |
| | $ | 11.30 |
| | $ | 10.47 |
| | $ | 11.30 |
| | $ | 10.11 |
|
Nashville | | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
Tampa | | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
Washington, D.C. | | 1 |
| | $ | 35.19 |
| | $ | 27.09 |
| | $ | 35.74 |
| | $ | 30.08 |
| | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
Operating office properties in strategic portfolio | 205 |
| | $ | 12.22 |
| | $ | 14.37 |
| | $ | 11.25 |
| | $ | 12.98 |
| | 58 |
| | $ | 16.04 |
| | $ | 14.02 |
| | $ | 13.00 |
| | $ | 13.48 |
| | 49 |
| | $ | 20.06 |
| | $ | 26.05 |
| | $ | 19.22 |
| | $ | 25.43 |
|
Percentage increase (decrease) | | | | 18 | % | | | | 15 | % | | | | | | (13 | )% | | | | 4 | % | | | | | | 30 | % | | | | 32 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other operating office properties | | 66 |
| | $ | 13.96 |
| | $ | 14.10 |
| | $ | 13.29 |
| | $ | 14.45 |
| | 12 |
| | $ | 11.27 |
| | $ | 11.27 |
| | $ | 10.43 |
| | $ | 10.43 |
| | 72 |
| | $ | 19.80 |
| | $ | 17.34 |
| | $ | 18.10 |
| | $ | 16.70 |
|
Total | | 271 |
| | $ | 12.65 |
| | $ | 14.30 |
| | $ | 11.75 |
| | $ | 13.34 |
| | 70 |
| | $ | 15.22 |
| | $ | 13.55 |
| | $ | 12.56 |
| | $ | 12.96 |
| | 121 |
| | $ | 19.91 |
| | $ | 20.87 |
| | $ | 18.56 |
| | $ | 20.23 |
|
Percentage increase (decrease) | | | | 13 | % | | | | 14 | % | | | | | | (11 | )% | | | | 3 | % | | | | | | 5 | % | | | | 9 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(1) At Domain 4 in Austin, a 52,000 square foot tenant restructured their lease effective 1/1/16 extending their term for one additional year from 12/31/16 to 12/31/17. The initial 12 months of the lease was at a net rate of $8.93 followed by a second 12 months at the current market rate of $21.63. |
|
Notes: | |
Analysis relates to operating properties owned at the end of the period and reflects TIER REIT’s ownership %. | |
SF includes all leases for tenants under lease contracts that have commenced during the period. | |
Rates for expiring leases relate to the lease previously occupying the specific space for which positive absorption was shown or the current lease rate if it is a first generation lease. | |
Net Rent is equal to the fixed base rental amount paid under the terms of the lease less any portion used to offset real estate taxes, utility charges, and other operating expenses incurred in connection with the leased space. |
Cash Net Rent disregards any free rent periods. Therefore, the rate shown is first full monthly cash rent paid. | |
The impact of short term temporary leasing activity is excluded from the analysis of % increase of cash net rent and % increase of SL net rent. | |
|
| | |
Supplemental Operating and Financial Data | TIER REIT | 1st Quarter Page 17 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Lease Expirations |
For Four Quarters From April 1, 2016 |
(In thousands) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Market | | Month to Month | | Q2 2016 | | Q3 2016 | | Q4 2016 | | Q1 2017 | | Grand Total |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| By Square Foot | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Austin | | — |
| | 28 |
| | 90 |
| | 19 |
| | — |
| | 137 |
|
| Dallas/Fort Worth | | 1 |
| | 7 |
| | 1 |
| | 10 |
| | — |
| | 19 |
|
| Houston | | 3 |
| | 4 |
| | 61 |
| | 11 |
| | — |
| | 79 |
|
| Charlotte | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 3 |
| | — |
| | 3 |
|
| Los Angeles | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Louisville | | 4 |
| | 8 |
| | 26 |
| | 13 |
| | 66 |
| | 117 |
|
| Nashville | | 172 |
| | 2 |
| | — |
| | 16 |
| | — |
| | 190 |
|
| Tampa | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Washington, D.C. | | — |
| | 52 |
| | — |
| | 1 |
| | 2 |
| | 55 |
|
| Operating office properties in strategic portfolio | | 180 |
| | 101 |
| | 178 |
| | 73 |
| | 68 |
| | 600 |
|
| Other operating office properties | | 9 |
| | 69 |
| | 12 |
| | 6 |
| | 32 |
| | 128 |
|
| Total | | 189 |
| | 170 |
| | 190 |
| | 79 |
| | 100 |
| | 728 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| By Annualized Expiring Rentals | | | | | | | | |
| Austin | | $ | — |
| | $ | 679 |
| | $ | 2,950 |
| | $ | 736 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 4,365 |
|
| Dallas/Fort Worth | | 12 |
| | 229 |
| | 17 |
| | 271 |
| | — |
| | 529 |
|
| Houston | | 1 |
| | 137 |
| | 1,671 |
| | 510 |
| | — |
| | 2,319 |
|
| Charlotte | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 112 |
| | 27 |
| | 139 |
|
| Los Angeles | | 13 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 13 |
|
| Louisville | | 92 |
| | 136 |
| | 531 |
| | 242 |
| | 1,362 |
| | 2,363 |
|
| Nashville | | 2,874 |
| | 42 |
| | — |
| | 292 |
| | — |
| | 3,208 |
|
| Tampa | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Washington, D.C. | | 3 |
| | 1,715 |
| | — |
| | 44 |
| | 89 |
| | 1,851 |
|
| Operating office properties in strategic portfolio | | 2,995 |
| | 2,938 |
| | 5,169 |
| | 2,207 |
| | 1,478 |
| | 14,787 |
|
| Other operating office properties | | 216 |
| | 1,657 |
| | 353 |
| | 217 |
| | 1,110 |
| | 3,553 |
|
| Total | | $ | 3,211 |
| | $ | 4,595 |
| | $ | 5,522 |
| | $ | 2,424 |
| | $ | 2,588 |
| | $ | 18,340 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| By Expiring Rent Per SF | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Austin | | $ | — |
| | $ | 24.49 |
| | $ | 32.66 |
| | $ | 38.27 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 31.80 |
|
| Dallas/Fort Worth | | $ | 8.77 |
| | $ | 30.51 |
| | $ | 25.05 |
| | $ | 27.94 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 27.84 |
|
| Houston | | $ | 0.45 |
| | $ | 35.28 |
| | $ | 27.05 |
| | $ | 44.49 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 29.07 |
|
| Charlotte | | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 35.85 |
| | $ | 60.72 |
| | $ | 38.93 |
|
| Los Angeles | | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
| Louisville | | $ | 24.51 |
| | $ | 16.24 |
| | $ | 19.61 |
| | $ | 18.60 |
| | $ | 21.32 |
| | $ | 20.35 |
|
| Nashville | | $ | 16.66 |
| | $ | 21.78 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 18.75 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 16.88 |
|
| Tampa | | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
| Washington, D.C. | | $ | 32.23 |
| | $ | 32.95 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 46.29 |
| | $ | 55.83 |
| | $ | 33.85 |
|
| Operating office properties in strategic portfolio | | $ | 16.64 |
| | $ | 29.09 |
| | $ | 29.04 |
| | $ | 30.23 |
| | $ | 21.74 |
| | $ | 24.65 |
|
| Other operating office properties | | $ | 24.00 |
| | $ | 24.01 |
| | $ | 29.42 |
| | $ | 36.17 |
| | $ | 34.69 |
| | $ | 27.76 |
|
| Total | | $ | 16.99 |
| | $ | 27.03 |
| | $ | 29.06 |
| | $ | 30.68 |
| | $ | 25.88 |
| | $ | 25.19 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
Notes: | |
Leases with an expiration on the last day of the period are considered leased at the last day of the period (i.e., expiring on the first day of the following period). |
Reflects TIER REIT’s ownership %. |
Rentals shown above are the contractually obligated annualized base rent charged in the final month prior to lease termination grossed up to include current operating cost recoveries. |
|
| | |
Supplemental Operating and Financial Data | TIER REIT | 1st Quarter Page 18 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Lease Expirations |
Annually From April 1, 2016 |
(In thousands, except percentage and per SF data) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Market | 2016 |
| | 2017 |
| | 2018 |
| | 2019 |
| | 2020 |
| | 2021 |
| | 2022 |
| | 2023 |
| | 2024 |
| | 2025 |
| | 2026+ |
| | Grand Total |
|
| By Square Foot | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Austin | 137 |
| | 97 |
| | 115 |
| | 106 |
| | 103 |
| | 70 |
| | 149 |
| | 177 |
| | — |
| | 3 |
| | 95 |
| | 1,053 |
|
| Dallas/Fort Worth | 19 |
| | 128 |
| | 191 |
| | 100 |
| | 72 |
| | 69 |
| | 16 |
| | 144 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 402 |
| | 1,140 |
|
| Houston | 79 |
| | 254 |
| | 59 |
| | 315 |
| | 305 |
| | 195 |
| | 101 |
| | 25 |
| | 272 |
| | 55 |
| | 273 |
| | 1,933 |
|
| Charlotte | 3 |
| | 21 |
| | 12 |
| | 405 |
| | 17 |
| | 19 |
| | 8 |
| | 81 |
| | 32 |
| | 8 |
| | 192 |
| | 797 |
|
| Los Angeles | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 4 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 110 |
| | 114 |
|
| Louisville | 52 |
| | 273 |
| | 25 |
| | 152 |
| | 86 |
| | 54 |
| | 15 |
| | 35 |
| | 14 |
| | 192 |
| | 19 |
| | 918 |
|
| Nashville | 190 |
| | 10 |
| | 3 |
| | — |
| | 2 |
| | 21 |
| | 14 |
| | — |
| | 4 |
| | 22 |
| | 67 |
| | 332 |
|
| Tampa | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 130 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 130 |
|
| Washington, D.C. | 53 |
| | 2 |
| | 2 |
| | 1 |
| | 3 |
| | 1 |
| | 3 |
| | 5 |
| | — |
| | 6 |
| | 10 |
| | 87 |
|
| Operating office properties in strategic portfolio | 533 |
| | 785 |
| | 407 |
| | 1,083 |
| | 588 |
| | 429 |
| | 306 |
| | 467 |
| | 452 |
| | 286 |
| | 1,168 |
| | 6,504 |
|
| As a % of Occupied SF | 8 | % | | 12 | % | | 6 | % | | 17 | % | | 9 | % | | 7 | % | | 5 | % | | 7 | % | | 7 | % | | 4 | % | | 18 | % | | 100 | % |
| As a % of Total NRA | 7 | % | | 11 | % | | 6 | % | | 15 | % | | 8 | % | | 6 | % | | 4 | % | | 6 | % | | 6 | % | | 4 | % | | 16 | % | | 89 | % |
| Other operating office properties | 95 |
| | 153 |
| | 182 |
| | 174 |
| | 465 |
| | 205 |
| | 291 |
| | 381 |
| | 39 |
| | 94 |
| | 679 |
| | 2,758 |
|
| Total | 628 |
| | 938 |
| | 589 |
| | 1,257 |
| | 1,053 |
| | 634 |
| | 597 |
| | 848 |
| | 491 |
| | 380 |
| | 1,847 |
| | 9,262 |
|
| As a % of Occupied SF | 7 | % | | 10 | % | | 6 | % | | 14 | % | | 11 | % | | 7 | % | | 7 | % | | 9 | % | | 5 | % | | 4 | % | | 20 | % | | 100 | % |
| As a % of Total NRA | 6 | % | | 9 | % | | 6 | % | | 12 | % | | 10 | % | | 6 | % | | 6 | % | | 8 | % | | 5 | % | | 3 | % | | 18 | % | | 89 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| By Annualized Expiring Rentals | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Austin | $ | 4,365 |
| | $ | 3,506 |
| | $ | 4,034 |
| | $ | 4,438 |
| | $ | 4,098 |
| | $ | 2,881 |
| | $ | 6,247 |
| | $ | 7,025 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 143 |
| | $ | 4,333 |
| | $ | 41,070 |
|
| Dallas/Fort Worth | 529 |
| | 3,010 |
| | 4,738 |
| | 2,476 |
| | 2,701 |
| | 2,424 |
| | 264 |
| | 4,148 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 11,019 |
| | 31,309 |
|
| Houston | 2,319 |
| | 9,425 |
| | 2,500 |
| | 12,694 |
| | 9,881 |
| | 6,569 |
| | 2,920 |
| | 1,184 |
| | 11,885 |
| | 1,810 |
| | 11,016 |
| | 72,203 |
|
| Charlotte | 112 |
| | 702 |
| | 460 |
| | 9,422 |
| | 571 |
| | 699 |
| | 270 |
| | 2,943 |
| | 329 |
| | 415 |
| | 6,429 |
| | 22,352 |
|
| Los Angeles | 13 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 192 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 5,328 |
| | 5,533 |
|
| Louisville | 1,001 |
| | 5,135 |
| | 485 |
| | 3,180 |
| | 1,628 |
| | 1,055 |
| | 293 |
| | 840 |
| | 309 |
| | 3,933 |
| | 423 |
| | 18,282 |
|
| Nashville | 3,208 |
| | 185 |
| | 54 |
| | — |
| | 39 |
| | 407 |
| | 286 |
| | — |
| | 87 |
| | 521 |
| | 1,498 |
| | 6,285 |
|
| Tampa | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 4,473 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 4,473 |
|
| Washington, D.C. | 1,762 |
| | 89 |
| | 117 |
| | 78 |
| | 213 |
| | 50 |
| | 339 |
| | 302 |
| | 30 |
| | 336 |
| | 592 |
| | 3,908 |
|
| Operating office properties in strategic portfolio | 13,309 |
| | 22,052 |
| | 12,388 |
| | 32,480 |
| | 19,131 |
| | 14,085 |
| | 10,619 |
| | 16,442 |
| | 17,113 |
| | 7,158 |
| | 40,638 |
| | 205,415 |
|
| As a % of Total Annualized Expiring Rentals | 6 | % | | 11 | % | | 6 | % | | 16 | % | | 9 | % | | 7 | % | | 5 | % | | 8 | % | | 8 | % | | 4 | % | | 20 | % | | 100 | % |
| Other operating office properties | 2,443 |
| | 6,038 |
| | 6,045 |
| | 4,910 |
| | 13,045 |
| | 5,613 |
| | 10,162 |
| | 12,579 |
| | 973 |
| | 3,982 |
| | 11,701 |
| | 77,491 |
|
| Total | $ | 15,752 |
| | $ | 28,090 |
| | $ | 18,433 |
| | $ | 37,390 |
| | $ | 32,176 |
| | $ | 19,698 |
| | $ | 20,781 |
| | $ | 29,021 |
| | $ | 18,086 |
| | $ | 11,140 |
| | $ | 52,339 |
| | $ | 282,906 |
|
| As a % of Total Annualized Expiring Rentals | 6 | % | | 10 | % | | 7 | % | | 13 | % | | 11 | % | | 7 | % | | 7 | % | | 10 | % | | 6 | % | | 4 | % | | 19 | % | | 100 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| By Expiring Rent Per SF | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Austin | $ | 31.80 |
| | $ | 36.32 |
| | $ | 34.85 |
| | $ | 41.94 |
| | $ | 39.67 |
| | $ | 42.02 |
| | $ | 41.81 |
| | $ | 39.68 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 43.31 |
| | $ | 45.13 |
| | $ | 39.00 |
|
| Dallas/Fort Worth | $ | 27.69 |
| | $ | 23.57 |
| | $ | 24.74 |
| | $ | 24.92 |
| | $ | 37.78 |
| | $ | 34.90 |
| | $ | 16.50 |
| | $ | 28.86 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 27.41 |
| | $ | 27.45 |
|
| Houston | $ | 29.07 |
| | $ | 37.10 |
| | $ | 42.67 |
| | $ | 40.20 |
| | $ | 32.42 |
| | $ | 33.69 |
| | $ | 28.62 |
| | $ | 46.64 |
| | $ | 43.76 |
| | $ | 33.48 |
| | $ | 40.51 |
| | $ | 37.35 |
|
| Charlotte | $ | 35.85 |
| | $ | 33.37 |
| | $ | 37.92 |
| | $ | 23.26 |
| | $ | 34.35 |
| | $ | 36.34 |
| | $ | 36.47 |
| | $ | 36.30 |
| | $ | 10.37 |
| | $ | 50.86 |
| | $ | 33.60 |
| | $ | 28.05 |
|
| Los Angeles | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 44.64 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 48.47 |
| | $ | 48.44 |
|
| Louisville | $ | 19.17 |
| | $ | 18.89 |
| | $ | 19.77 |
| | $ | 20.89 |
| | $ | 18.77 |
| | $ | 19.50 |
| | $ | 18.68 |
| | $ | 23.70 |
| | $ | 22.37 |
| | $ | 20.36 |
| | $ | 22.69 |
| | $ | 19.91 |
|
| Nashville | $ | 16.88 |
| | $ | 19.29 |
| | $ | 19.01 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 19.76 |
| | $ | 19.51 |
| | $ | 20.76 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 21.04 |
| | $ | 23.26 |
| | $ | 22.47 |
| | $ | 18.92 |
|
| Tampa | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 34.39 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 34.39 |
|
| Washington, D.C. | $ | 33.22 |
| | $ | 44.40 |
| | $ | 58.57 |
| | $ | 78.44 |
| | $ | 70.95 |
| | $ | 49.80 |
| | $ | 112.93 |
| | $ | 60.36 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 55.92 |
| | $ | 59.17 |
| | $ | 45.41 |
|
| Operating office properties in strategic portfolio | $ | 24.97 |
| | $ | 28.09 |
| | $ | 30.44 |
| | $ | 29.99 |
| | $ | 32.54 |
| | $ | 32.83 |
| | $ | 34.70 |
| | $ | 35.21 |
| | $ | 37.86 |
| | $ | 25.03 |
| | $ | 34.79 |
| | $ | 31.58 |
|
| Other operating office properties | $ | 25.72 |
| | $ | 39.46 |
| | $ | 33.21 |
| | $ | 28.22 |
| | $ | 28.05 |
| | $ | 27.38 |
| | $ | 34.92 |
| | $ | 33.02 |
| | $ | 24.95 |
| | $ | 42.36 |
| | $ | 17.23 |
| | $ | 28.10 |
|
| Total | $ | 25.08 |
| | $ | 29.95 |
| | $ | 31.30 |
| | $ | 29.75 |
| | $ | 30.56 |
| | $ | 31.07 |
| | $ | 34.81 |
| | $ | 34.22 |
| | $ | 36.84 |
| | $ | 29.32 |
| | $ | 28.34 |
| | $ | 30.54 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Notes: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Leases with an expiration on the last day of the period are considered leased at the last day of the period (i.e., expiring on the first day of the following period). | | | | |
| Reflects TIER REIT’s ownership %. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Rentals shown above are the contractually obligated annualized base rent charged in the final month prior to lease termination grossed up to include current operating cost recoveries. |
|
| | |
Supplemental Operating and Financial Data | TIER REIT | 1st Quarter Page 19 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Occupancy Trends |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Rentable SF (in thousands) | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Occupancy % |
Market | | 31-Mar-16 | | 31-Mar-16 | | 31-Dec-15 | | 30-Sep-15 | | 30-Jun-15 | | 31-Mar-15 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Austin | | 1,119 |
| | 94.1 | % | | 94.5 | % | | 94.6 | % | | 93.2 | % | | 92.9 | % |
Dallas/Fort Worth | | 1,355 |
| | 84.1 | % | | 86.4 | % | | 88.2 | % | | 85.0 | % | | 83.3 | % |
Houston (1) | | 2,234 |
| | 86.5 | % | | 87.9 | % | | 93.0 | % | | 94.2 | % | | 97.2 | % |
Charlotte | | 891 |
| | 89.5 | % | | 87.8 | % | | 86.4 | % | | 89.2 | % | | 88.6 | % |
Los Angeles | | 115 |
| | 99.1 | % | | 99.1 | % | | 100.0 | % | | 100.0 | % | | 100.0 | % |
Louisville | | 1,017 |
| | 90.3 | % | | 94.8 | % | | 95.0 | % | | 92.6 | % | | 90.6 | % |
Nashville | | 361 |
| | 92.0 | % | | 92.8 | % | | 92.8 | % | | 92.8 | % | | 91.4 | % |
Tampa | | 130 |
| | 100.0 | % | | 100.0 | % | | 100.0 | % | | 100.0 | % | | 100.0 | % |
Washington, D.C. | | 95 |
| | 91.6 | % | | 93.7 | % | | 93.7 | % | | 93.7 | % | | 90.3 | % |
Operating office properties in strategic portfolio | | 7,317 |
| | 88.9 | % | | 90.3 | % | | 92.0 | % | | 91.4 | % | | 91.3 | % |
Other operating office properties | | 3,102 |
| | 88.9 | % | | 87.3 | % | | 86.3 | % | | 86.1 | % | | 85.8 | % |
Total | | 10,419 |
| | 88.9 | % | | 89.4 | % | | 90.3 | % | | 89.7 | % | | 89.5 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
(1) The fourth quarter of 2015 reflects the inclusion of our recently developed Two BriarLake Plaza property which is 67.9% leased as of March 31, 2016. |
Notes: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Analysis relates to operating properties owned at the end of the most recent period and reflects TIER REIT’s ownership %. |
Occupancy % is as of the last day of the indicated period. | | | | |
|
|
| | |
Supplemental Operating and Financial Data | TIER REIT | 1st Quarter Page 20 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Leasing Cost Summary |
For the Three Months Ended |
March 31, 2016 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Weighted Average Leasing Costs |
| | SF (000’s) | | Wtd Avg Term (Yrs) | | Per Square Foot | | Per Square Foot / Year |
Renewal | | | | Comms | | TI & Other | | Total | | Comms | | TI & Other | | Total |
Market | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Austin | | 82 |
| | 1.8 |
| | $ | 2.23 |
| | $ | 4.63 |
| | $ | 6.86 |
| | $ | 1.00 |
| | $ | 2.72 |
| | $ | 3.72 |
|
Dallas/Fort Worth | | 23 |
| | 5.9 |
| | $ | 7.28 |
| | $ | 6.68 |
| | $ | 13.95 |
| | $ | 1.30 |
| | $ | 1.12 |
| | $ | 2.42 |
|
Houston | | 21 |
| | 5.9 |
| | $ | 7.94 |
| | $ | 10.76 |
| | $ | 18.70 |
| | $ | 1.32 |
| | $ | 1.80 |
| | $ | 3.12 |
|
Charlotte | | 4 |
| | 4.2 |
| | $ | 6.51 |
| | $ | 10.20 |
| | $ | 16.71 |
| | $ | 1.56 |
| | $ | 2.45 |
| | $ | 4.01 |
|
Los Angeles | | 5 |
| | 3.0 |
| | $ | 7.80 |
| | $ | 5.00 |
| | $ | 12.80 |
| | $ | 2.60 |
| | $ | 1.67 |
| | $ | 4.27 |
|
Louisville | | 69 |
| | 3.6 |
| | $ | 3.68 |
| | $ | 9.69 |
| | $ | 13.37 |
| | $ | 0.90 |
| | $ | 2.17 |
| | $ | 3.07 |
|
Nashville | | — |
| | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
Tampa | | — |
| | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
Washington, D.C. | | 1 |
| | 8.0 |
| | $ | 22.90 |
| | $ | 24.04 |
| | $ | 46.94 |
| | $ | 2.86 |
| | $ | 3.01 |
| | $ | 5.87 |
|
Operating office properties in strategic portfolio | | 205 |
| | 3.4 |
| | $ | 4.19 |
| | $ | 7.40 |
| | $ | 11.59 |
| | $ | 1.24 |
| | $ | 2.19 |
| | $ | 3.43 |
|
Other operating office properties | | 66 |
| | 1.5 |
| | $ | 1.27 |
| | $ | 4.77 |
| | $ | 6.04 |
| | $ | 0.83 |
| | $ | 3.11 |
| | $ | 3.93 |
|
Total | | 271 |
| | 2.9 |
| | $ | 3.48 |
| | $ | 6.76 |
| | $ | 10.24 |
| | $ | 1.18 |
| | $ | 2.31 |
| | $ | 3.49 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expansion | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Market | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Austin | | — |
| | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
Dallas/Fort Worth | | 58 |
| | 9.8 |
| | $ | 15.54 |
| | $ | 8.91 |
| | $ | 24.45 |
| | $ | 1.61 |
| | $ | 0.90 |
| | $ | 2.51 |
|
Houston | | — |
| | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
Charlotte | | — |
| | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
Los Angeles | | — |
| | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
Louisville | | — |
| | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
Nashville | | — |
| | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
Tampa | | — |
| | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
Washington, D.C. | | — |
| | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
Operating office properties in strategic portfolio | | 58 |
| | 9.8 |
| | $ | 15.54 |
| | $ | 8.91 |
| | $ | 24.45 |
| | $ | 1.61 |
| | $ | 0.90 |
| | $ | 2.51 |
|
Other operating office properties | | 12 |
| | 0.4 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
Total | | 70 |
| | 8.2 |
| | $ | 12.87 |
| | $ | 7.39 |
| | $ | 20.26 |
| | $ | 1.56 |
| | $ | 0.90 |
| | $ | 2.46 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
New | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Market | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Austin | | 33 |
| | 9.5 |
| | $ | 25.61 |
| | $ | 40.91 |
| | $ | 66.53 |
| | $ | 2.67 |
| | $ | 4.28 |
| | $ | 6.95 |
|
Dallas/Fort Worth | | — |
| | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
Houston | | — |
| | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
Charlotte | | 15 |
| | 1.2 |
| | $ | 2.20 |
| | $ | 1.82 |
| | $ | 4.02 |
| | $ | 1.89 |
| | $ | 1.56 |
| | $ | 3.45 |
|
Los Angeles | | — |
| | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
Louisville | | 1 |
| | 5.3 |
| | $ | 5.46 |
| | $ | 12.35 |
| | $ | 17.81 |
| | $ | 1.04 |
| | $ | 2.35 |
| | $ | 3.39 |
|
Nashville | | — |
| | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
Tampa | | — |
| | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
Washington, D.C. | | — |
| | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
Operating office properties in strategic portfolio | | 49 |
| | 6.9 |
| | $ | 18.03 |
| | $ | 28.36 |
| | $ | 46.40 |
| | $ | 2.62 |
| | $ | 4.12 |
| | $ | 6.74 |
|
Other operating office properties | | 72 |
| | 7.5 |
| | $ | 6.05 |
| | $ | 25.63 |
| | $ | 31.68 |
| | $ | 0.80 |
| | $ | 3.41 |
| | $ | 4.21 |
|
Total | | 121 |
| | 7.3 |
| | $ | 10.90 |
| | $ | 26.74 |
| | $ | 37.64 |
| | $ | 1.50 |
| | $ | 3.68 |
| | $ | 5.18 |
|
Notes: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Analysis relates to operating properties owned at the end of the period and reflects TIER REIT’s ownership %. |
|
|
| | |
Supplemental Operating and Financial Data | TIER REIT | 1st Quarter Page 21 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Leasing Cost Trend Analysis |
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | Three Months Ended | | Year Ended | | Year Ended |
| | | 31-Mar-16 | | 31-Dec-15 | | 31-Dec-14 |
Renewal Leasing | | | | | | | |
Square Feet (in thousands) | | | 271 |
| | 1,052 |
| | 1,298 |
|
Weighted Average Term (in years) | | | 2.9 |
| | 6.8 |
| | 5.7 |
|
Commissions per SF | | | $ | 3.48 |
| | $ | 7.13 |
| | $ | 4.68 |
|
TI and Other Leasing Cost per SF | | | 6.76 |
| | 18.72 |
| | 4.62 |
|
Total Leasing Cost per SF | | | $ | 10.24 |
| | $ | 25.85 |
| | $ | 9.30 |
|
| | | | | | | |
Commissions per SF per Year | | | $ | 1.18 |
| | $ | 1.07 |
| | $ | 0.93 |
|
TI and Other Leasing Cost per SF per Year | | | 2.31 |
| | 2.70 |
| | 0.74 |
|
Total Leasing Cost per SF per Year | | | $ | 3.49 |
| | $ | 3.77 |
| | $ | 1.67 |
|
| | | | | | | |
Expansion Leasing | | | | | | | |
Square Feet (in thousands) | | | 70 |
| | 246 |
| | 264 |
|
Weighted Average Term (in years) | | | 8.2 |
| | 6.3 |
| | 6.6 |
|
Commissions per SF | | | $ | 12.87 |
| | $ | 8.73 |
| | $ | 9.41 |
|
TI and Other Leasing Cost per SF | | | 7.39 |
| | 24.07 |
| | 21.39 |
|
Total Leasing Cost per SF | | | $ | 20.26 |
| | $ | 32.80 |
| | $ | 30.80 |
|
| | | | | | | |
Commissions per SF per Year | | | $ | 1.56 |
| | $ | 1.41 |
| | $ | 1.41 |
|
TI and Other Leasing Cost per SF per Year | | | 0.90 |
| | 3.91 |
| | 3.11 |
|
Total Leasing Cost per SF per Year | | | $ | 2.46 |
| | $ | 5.32 |
| | $ | 4.52 |
|
| | | | | | | |
New Leasing | | | | | | | |
Square Feet (in thousands) | | | 121 |
| | 480 |
| | 927 |
|
Weighted Average Term (in years) | | | 7.3 |
| | 8.0 |
| | 8.4 |
|
Commissions per SF | | | $ | 10.90 |
| | $ | 12.91 |
| | $ | 12.15 |
|
TI and Other Leasing Cost per SF | | | 26.74 |
| | 40.55 |
| | 36.28 |
|
Total Leasing Cost per SF | | | $ | 37.64 |
| | $ | 53.46 |
| | $ | 48.43 |
|
| | | | | | | |
Commissions per SF per Year | | | $ | 1.50 |
| | $ | 1.60 |
| | $ | 1.45 |
|
TI and Other Leasing Cost per SF per Year | | | 3.68 |
| | 5.05 |
| | 4.34 |
|
Total Leasing Cost per SF per Year | | | $ | 5.18 |
| | $ | 6.65 |
| | $ | 5.79 |
|
| | | | | | | |
Total Leasing | | | | | | | |
Square Feet (in thousands) | | | 462 |
| | 1,778 |
| | 2,489 |
|
Weighted Average Term (in years) | | | 4.9 |
| | 7.1 |
| | 6.8 |
|
Commissions per SF | | | $ | 6.85 |
| | $ | 8.92 |
| | $ | 7.96 |
|
TI and Other Leasing Cost per SF | | | 12.09 |
| | 25.35 |
| | 18.19 |
|
Total Leasing Cost per SF | | | $ | 18.94 |
| | $ | 34.27 |
| | $ | 26.15 |
|
| | | | | | | |
Commissions per SF per Year | | | $ | 1.41 |
| | $ | 1.26 |
| | $ | 1.18 |
|
TI and Other Leasing Cost per SF per Year | | | 2.48 |
| | 3.50 |
| | 2.33 |
|
Total Leasing Cost per SF per Year | | | $ | 3.89 |
| | $ | 4.76 |
| | $ | 3.51 |
|
| | | | | | | |
Notes: | | | | | | | |
Analysis relates to operating properties owned at the end of the indicated period and reflects TIER REIT’s ownership %. |
| |
|
| | |
Supplemental Operating and Financial Data | TIER REIT | 1st Quarter Page 22 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Development, Leasing, and |
| Capital Expenditures Summary |
| (in thousands) |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | For the Three Months Ended |
| | | 31-Mar-16 | | 31-Dec-15 | | 30-Sep-15 | | 30-Jun-15 | | 31-Mar-15 |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Recurring capital expenditures | | | | | | | | | | |
| Leasing costs | | $ | 7,168 |
| | $ | 8,297 |
| | $ | 10,046 |
| | $ | 10,105 |
| | $ | 10,253 |
|
| Building improvements | | 2,185 |
| | 2,816 |
| | 3,749 |
| | 3,962 |
| | 2,994 |
|
| Subtotal recurring capital expenditures | | 9,353 |
| | 11,113 |
| | 13,795 |
| | 14,067 |
| | 13,247 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Non-recurring capital expenditures | | | | | | | | | | |
| Building improvements (1) | | 600 |
| | 1,185 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 125 |
|
| Leasing costs (2) | | 3,547 |
| | 3,258 |
| | 1,907 |
| | 4,093 |
| | 5,454 |
|
| Development (3) | | 1,409 |
| | 1,790 |
| | 3,278 |
| | 3,307 |
| | 2,286 |
|
| Redevelopment (4) | | 1,028 |
| | 298 |
| | 13 |
| | 4,375 |
| | 4,506 |
|
| Subtotal non-recurring capital expenditures | | 6,584 |
| | 6,531 |
| | 5,198 |
| | 11,775 |
| | 12,371 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total capital expenditures | | $ | 15,937 |
| | $ | 17,644 |
| | $ | 18,993 |
| | $ | 25,842 |
| | $ | 25,618 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Notes: | | | | | | | | | | |
All amounts represent TIER REIT’s ownership %. | | | | | | | | | | |
Beginning in January 2016, leasing costs reimbursed to us by tenants when tenant improvement allowances have been exceeded are excluded from the above amounts. |
| | | | | | | | | | |
(1) | Non-recurring building improvements include costs identified as deferred capital needs at the acquisition of a property. |
(2) | Non-recurring leasing costs include costs incurred within 12 months of acquisition to lease space that was vacant at acquisition and costs incurred to lease space that has been vacant for at least 12 months. Cost incurred within 12 months of acquisition to lease space that was vacant at acquisition were as follows: |
| | | $ | 992 |
| | $ | 455 |
| | $ | 534 |
| | $ | 662 |
| | $ | 674 |
|
(3) | Development includes all new construction costs related to base building and all costs associated with leasing development projects. |
(4) | Redevelopment costs are for capital projects where substantial improvements are made to the property that change the character of the asset and are expected to result in development type returns on capital. |
|
| | |
Supplemental Operating and Financial Data | TIER REIT | 1st Quarter Page 23 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Potential Future Development Sites |
March 31, 2016 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Approximate Rentable Square Feet | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Month of Acquisition | | Cost Basis (in millions) | | |
Project | | Market (submarket) | | Acres | | | | | Comments |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Hurstbourne Plaza | | Louisville (Hurstbourne) | | 6.1 | | 350,000 | | Dec-07 | | N/A | | Planned mixed-use redevelopment of the Hurstbourne Business Center |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Burnett Plaza | | Fort Worth (CBD) | | 1.4 | | N/A | | Jan-07 | | $ | 3.3 |
| | Planned mixed-use development and garage for use at Burnett Plaza |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Eisenhower II | | Tampa | | 5.2 | | 130,000 | | Dec-07 | | $ | 1.6 |
| | Office building |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Third + Shoal (95%) (1) | | Austin (CBD) | | 0.8 | | 325,000 | | Jun-15 | | $ | 13.2 |
| | Office building |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Legacy Land (95%) (1) | | Dallas (Plano - Legacy) | | 4.0 | | 570,000 | | Jun-15 | | $ | 6.4 |
| | Office building(s) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Domain B | | Austin (Domain) | | 6.2 | | 300,000 - 400,000 | | Jul-15 | | $ | 12.7 |
| | Office building(s) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Domain C | | Austin (Domain) | | 6.3 | | 400,000 - 500,000 | | Jul-15 | | $ | 16.5 |
| | Office building(s) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Domain D & G | | Austin (Domain) | | 5.6 | | 300,000 - 400,000 | | Jul-15 | | $ | 9.5 |
| | Office building |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
(1) We own 95% of this project, and the cost basis above represents 100%. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
Supplemental Operating and Financial Data | TIER REIT | 1st Quarter Page 24 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Summary Development Activity |
March 31, 2016 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Start Date | | | | Estimated Cost per SF | | | | |
| | | | Square feet (in thousands) | | | Shell Completion Date | | | Estimated Total Cost (in millions) | | Cost to Date (in millions) |
Project | | Market | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Domain 8 (1) | | Austin | | 291 |
| | Q3 2015 | | Q1 2017 | | $ | 302 |
| | $ | 88.0 |
| | $ | 28.0 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(1) We own 50% of this project, and the costs above represents 100%. |
|
| | |
Supplemental Operating and Financial Data | TIER REIT | 1st Quarter Page 25 |
Properties Under Development
Domain 8
Austin, Texas
Property Objectives
Domain 8 has an efficient design intended to accommodate single-floor and multi-tenant arrangements.
The building will seek to achieve a minimum LEED Certified Silver and will operate under Energy Star standards.
Property Description
Domain 8 is designed as a Class A office building located in The Domain, a master planned, mixed-use project located in Austin.
The building will be constructed of poured in place concrete along with a glass curtain wall system.
Property Highlights
Located in The Domain master planned, mixed-use project - a true “live, work, play” environment consisting of 1.2 million square feet of retail, 1,862 apartment units, 604 hotel rooms and 1.5 million square feet of Class A office
The Domain commands the highest Class A office rents in every submarket in Austin except the CBD
Efficient 34,000 square foot floor plates with direct elevator access to office floors from every garage level and dramatic views of The Domain and the Texas Hill Country
Walking access to a full array of amenities and hike/bike trails; on-site showers and locker room
Property Facts |
| | | |
Submarket | | Domain/Arboretum |
|
Floors | | 9 Floors Office Space/3 Floors Parking |
|
Approximate Rentable SF | | 291,000 |
|
Estimated Operating Expenses per SF | | $14.85 |
Estimated Shell Delivery Date | | 1Q 2017 |
|
Estimated Project Cost at Completion | | $88,000,000 |
Percentage Owned | | 50 | % |
Percentage Leased at March 31, 2016 | | — | % |
|
| | |
Supplemental Operating and Financial Data | TIER REIT | 1st Quarter Page 26 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Acquisition and Disposition Activities |
For the Twelve Months Ended March 31, 2016 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Number of Properties | | Square Feet (in thousands) | | Transaction Date | | Price (in thousands) |
Acquisitions | | Location | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Third + Shoal (95%) (land) | | Austin, TX | | N/A |
| | N/A |
| | 6/24/2015 | | $ | 7,500 |
|
Legacy (95%) (land) | | Plano, TX | | N/A |
| | N/A |
| | 6/25/2015 | | $ | 6,175 |
|
1325 G Street (10%) (1) | | Washington, D.C. | | 1 |
| | 31 |
| | 6/30/2015 | | $ | 15,200 |
|
Colorado Building (10%) (1) | | Washington, D.C. | | 1 |
| | 13 |
| | 6/30/2015 | | $ | 5,000 |
|
Domain 2 (49.84%) | | Austin, TX | | 1 |
| | 57 |
| | 7/23/2015 | | $ | 9,240 |
|
Domain 3 | | Austin, TX | | 1 |
| | 179 |
| | 7/23/2015 | | $ | 46,566 |
|
Domain 4 | | Austin, TX | | 1 |
| | 153 |
| | 7/23/2015 | | $ | 32,867 |
|
Domain 7 (49.84%) | | Austin, TX | | 1 |
| | 111 |
| | 7/23/2015 | | $ | 17,545 |
|
Domain A (land) | | Austin, TX | | N/A |
| | N/A |
| | 7/23/2015 | | $ | 4,087 |
|
Domain B, C, D, G, and E (land) | | Austin, TX | | N/A |
| | N/A |
| | 7/23/2015 | | $ | 52,682 |
|
Domain L, M, and N (land) | | Austin, TX | | N/A |
| | N/A |
| | 7/23/2015 | | $ | 22,000 |
|
Domain K (multifamily property) | | Austin, TX | | N/A |
| | N/A |
| | 10/16/2015 | | $ | 15,000 |
|
| | | | 6 |
| | 544 |
| | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Dispositions | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Fifth Third Center | | Cleveland, OH | | 1 |
| | 508 |
| | 4/7/2015 | | $ | 52,750 |
|
United Plaza | | Philadelphia, PA | | 1 |
| | 617 |
| | 4/23/2015 | | $ | 114,554 |
|
1650 Arch Street | | Philadelphia, PA | | 1 |
| | 553 |
| | 4/23/2015 | | $ | 76,290 |
|
1325 G Street (1) | | Washington, D.C. | | 1 |
| | 307 |
| | 6/30/2015 | | $ | 152,000 |
|
Colorado Building (1) | | Washington, D.C. | | 1 |
| | 128 |
| | 6/30/2015 | | $ | 50,000 |
|
Domain L, M, and N (land) | | Austin, TX | | N/A |
| | N/A |
| | 7/24/2015 | | $ | 22,000 |
|
Domain K (multi-family property) | | Austin, TX | | N/A |
| | N/A |
| | 10/16/2015 | | $ | 15,000 |
|
Paces West (10%) | | Atlanta, GA | | 1 |
| | 65 |
| | 11/30/2015 | | $ | 11,250 |
|
Domain A (land) | | Austin, TX | | N/A |
| | N/A |
| | 12/16/2015 | | $ | 4,250 |
|
Lawson Commons | | St. Paul, MN | | 1 |
| | 436 |
| | 3/1/2016 | | $ | 68,430 |
|
| | | | 7 |
| | 2,614 |
| | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
(1) In June 2015 we sold our 1325 G Street and Colorado Building properties to two separate joint ventures in which we own a 10% noncontrolling interest. |
|
| | |
Supplemental Operating and Financial Data | TIER REIT | 1st Quarter Page 27 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Summary of Financing | |
March 31, 2016 | |
(in thousands, except percentages and number of years) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Principal | | Weighted Average Effective Interest Rate | | % of Total | | | |
Fixed Rate Debt | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Secured mortgage debt | | | | | $ | 358,717 |
| | 5.89% | | 35% | | | |
Unsecured term loans (1) | | | | | 525,000 |
| | 3.46% | | 50% | | | |
Total fixed rate debt | | | | | 883,717 |
| | 4.45% | | 85% | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Variable Rate Debt | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Unsecured term loan (1) | | | | | 50,000 |
| | 1.97% | | 5% | | | |
Unsecured revolving credit facility (2) | | | | | 108,000 |
| | 2.01% | | 10% | | | |
Total variable rate debt | | | | | 158,000 |
| | 2.00% | | 15% | | | |
Total debt (3) | | | | | 1,041,717 |
| | 4.07% | | 100% | | | |
unamortized debt issuance costs (4) | | | | | (8,744 | ) | | | | | | | |
Total notes payable, net | | | | | $ | 1,032,973 |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
(1) The borrowing rate under $525.0 million of the term loans has been effectively fixed through the use of interest rate hedges. The remaining portion is variable rate. |
(2) Additional borrowings of $82.8 million were available under the credit facility. | |
(3) As of March 31, 2016, we had a non-recourse loan in default which subjects us to incur default interest at a rate that is 500 basis points higher than the stated interest rate which results in an overall effective weighted average interest rate of 4.31%. |
(4) Excludes $3.3 million of unamortized debt issuance costs associated with the revolving line of credit because those costs are presented as an asset on our consolidated balance sheet. |
|
| Maturities |
| Secured Mortgage Debt | | Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility and Term Loans | | Total | Annual % Maturing |
| Principal | | Rate (1) | | Principal | | Rate (1) | | Principal | | Rate (1) |
2016 | $ | 134,995 |
| | 5.88% | | $ | — |
| | — | | $ | 134,995 |
| | 5.88% | 13% |
2017 | 129,387 |
| | 5.55% | | — |
| | — | | 129,387 |
| | 5.55% | 12% |
2018 | — |
| | — | | 108,000 |
| | 2.01% | | 108,000 |
| | 2.01% | 10% |
2019 | — |
| | — | | 300,000 |
| | 3.02% | | 300,000 |
| | 3.02% | 29% |
2020 | — |
| | — | | — |
| | — | | — |
| | — | — |
Thereafter | 94,335 |
| | 6.38% | | 275,000 |
| | 3.67% | | 369,335 |
| | 4.36% | 36% |
Total debt | $ | 358,717 |
| | | | $ | 683,000 |
| | | | 1,041,717 |
| | 4.07% | |
unamortized debt issuance costs | | | | | | | | | (8,744 | ) | | | |
Total notes payable, net | | | | | | | | | 1,032,973 |
| | | |
Weighted average maturity in years | 1.9 |
| | | | 4.6 |
| | | | 3.7 |
| | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
(1) Represents weighted average effective interest rate for debt maturing in this period. |
| Maturities |
| Consolidated Debt | | Our share of unconsolidated debt | | Total | Annual % Maturing |
| Principal | | Rate (1) | | Principal | | Rate (1) | | Principal | | Rate (1) |
2016 | $ | 134,995 |
| | 5.88% | | $ | 24,475 |
| | 2.22% | | $ | 159,470 |
| | 5.32% | 14% |
2017 | 129,387 |
| | 5.55% | | — |
| | — | | 129,387 |
| | 5.55% | 12% |
2018 | 108,000 |
| | 2.01% | | 1,945 |
| | 4.82% | | 109,945 |
| | 2.06% | 10% |
2019 | 300,000 |
| | 3.02% | | — |
| | — | | 300,000 |
| | 3.02% | 27% |
2020 | — |
| | — | | 13,029 |
| | 2.21% | | 13,029 |
| | 2.21% | 1% |
Thereafter | 369,335 |
| | 4.36% | | 43,298 |
| | 3.88% | | 412,633 |
| | 4.31% | 36% |
Total debt | 1,041,717 |
| | | | 82,747 |
| | | | 1,124,464 |
| | 4.01% | |
unamortized debt issuance costs | (8,744 | ) | | | | (962 | ) | | | | (9,706 | ) | | | |
Total notes payable, net | $ | 1,032,973 |
| | | | $ | 81,785 |
| | | | $ | 1,114,758 |
| | | |
Weighted average maturity in years | 3.7 |
| | | | 4.5 |
| | | | 3.7 |
| | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
(1) Represents weighted average effective interest rate for debt maturing in this period. | | | | | |
|
Hedging Details: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Type/Description | Notional Value | | Index | Strike Rate | | Effective Date | | Maturity Date | | Loan Designation |
Interest rate swap - cash flow hedge | $ | 125,000 |
| | one-month LIBOR | 1.6775% | | 31-Dec-14 | | 31-Oct-19 | | Credit Facility |
Interest rate swap - cash flow hedge | $ | 125,000 |
| | one-month LIBOR | 1.6935% | | 30-Apr-15 | | 31-Oct-19 | | Credit Facility |
Interest rate swap - cash flow hedge | $ | 125,000 |
| | one-month LIBOR | 1.7615% | | 30-Jun-15 | | 31-May-22 | | Credit Facility |
Interest rate swap - cash flow hedge | $ | 150,000 |
| | one-month LIBOR | 1.7695% | | 30-Jun-15 | | 31-May-22 | | Credit Facility |
|
| | |
Supplemental Operating and Financial Data | TIER REIT | 1st Quarter Page 28 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Principal Payments by Year |
| as of March 31, 2016 |
| (in thousands, except percentages) |
| | | | | Stated Interest Rate | | Effective Interest Rate | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Maturity | | | | Total | | 2016 | | 2017 | | 2018 | | 2019 | | 2020 | | Thereafter |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fifth Third Center | | 1-Jul-16 | | 6.09 | % | | 6.17 | % | | $ | 48,789 |
| | $ | 48,789 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
Plaza at MetroCenter (1) | | 1-Jul-16 | | 6.06 | % | | 6.14 | % | | 23,156 |
| | 23,156 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Three Parkway | | 1-Nov-16 | | 5.48 | % | | 5.55 | % | | 63,050 |
| | 63,050 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
One & Two Eldridge | | 11-Jan-17 | | 5.41 | % | | 5.49 | % | | 70,587 |
| | 893 |
| | 69,694 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
500 E. Pratt | | 1-May-17 | | 5.55 | % | | 5.63 | % | | 58,800 |
| | — |
| | 58,800 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Unsecured - Revolving Line of Credit | | 18-Dec-18 | | 1.98 | % | | 2.01 | % | | 108,000 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 108,000 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Unsecured - Term Loan | | 18-Dec-19 | | 2.98 | % | | 3.02 | % | | 300,000 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 300,000 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
One BriarLake Plaza - mezzanine | | 1-Aug-21 | | 9.80 | % | | 9.94 | % | | 14,645 |
| | 78 |
| | 110 |
| | 121 |
| | 134 |
| | 144 |
| | 14,058 |
|
One BriarLake Plaza | | 1-Aug-21 | | 5.65 | % | | 5.72 | % | | 79,690 |
| | 1,097 |
| | 1,417 |
| | 1,501 |
| | 1,589 |
| | 1,670 |
| | 72,416 |
|
Unsecured - Term Loan | | 30-Jun-22 | | 3.62 | % | | 3.67 | % | | 275,000 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 275,000 |
|
Total | | | | 4.02 | % | | 4.07 | % | | 1,041,717 |
| | $ | 137,063 |
| | $ | 130,021 |
| | $ | 109,622 |
| | $ | 301,723 |
| | $ | 1,814 |
| | $ | 361,474 |
|
unamortized debt issuance costs (2) | | | | | | | | (8,744 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Consolidated notes payable, net | | | | | | | | $ | 1,032,973 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Notes associated with investments in unconsolidated entities and excluded from the consolidated balance above (at ownership share): |
Wanamaker Building - office (60%) | | 1-Jul-18 | | 4.75 | % | | 4.82 | % | | $ | 1,945 |
| | $ | 580 |
| | $ | 806 |
| | $ | 559 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
Wanamaker Building - office (60%) | | 7-Feb-23 | | 3.83 | % | | 3.88 | % | | 43,298 |
| | 675 |
| | 937 |
| | 974 |
| | 1,013 |
| | 1,049 |
| | 38,650 |
|
1325 G Street (10%) | | 30-Jun-20 | | 2.18 | % | | 2.21 | % | | 9,629 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 9,629 |
| | — |
|
Colorado Building (10%) | | 30-Jun-20 | | 2.18 | % | | 2.21 | % | | 3,400 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 3,400 |
| | — |
|
Domain 2 & 7 (49.84%) (3) | | 1-Sep-16 | | 2.19 | % | | 2.22 | % | | 24,475 |
| | 24,475 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Total | | | | 3.11 | % | | 3.15 | % | | 82,747 |
| | $ | 25,730 |
| | $ | 1,743 |
| | $ | 1,533 |
| | $ | 1,013 |
| | $ | 14,078 |
| | $ | 38,650 |
|
unamortized debt issuance costs | | | | | | | | (962 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total unconsolidated notes payable, net | | | | | | $ | 81,785 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total notes payable | | | | 3.96 | % | | 4.01 | % | | 1,124,464 |
| | $ | 162,793 |
| | $ | 131,764 |
| | $ | 111,155 |
| | $ | 302,736 |
| | $ | 15,892 |
| | $ | 400,124 |
|
unamortized debt issuance costs | | | | | | | | (9,706 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total notes payable, net | | | | | | | | $ | 1,114,758 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
% of principal payments due by year | | | | | | | | 100 | % | | 14 | % | | 12 | % | | 10 | % | | 27 | % | | 1 | % | | 36 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(1) | Debt was repaid in full in April 2016. |
(2) | Excludes $3.3 million of unamortized debt issuance costs associated with the revolving line of credit because those costs are presented as an asset on our consolidated balance sheet. |
(3) | Debt was refinanced in April 2016. Our ownership share of the new loan is $39.9 million. The new loan bears interest at LIBOR plus 1.65%, matures in April 2019, and provides for two one-year extension options. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
Supplemental Operating and Financial Data | TIER REIT | 1st Quarter Page 29 |
Definitions of Non-GAAP Financial Measures
We use non-GAAP financial measures in our public filings and other public disclosures. These non-GAAP financial measures are defined below.
Funds from Operations (FFO)
Historical cost accounting for real estate assets in accordance with GAAP implicitly assumes that the value of real estate diminishes predictably over time. Since real estate values have historically risen or fallen with market conditions, many industry investors and analysts have considered the presentation of operating results for real estate companies that use historical cost accounting alone to be insufficient for evaluating operating performance. FFO is a non-GAAP financial measure that is widely recognized as a measure of a REIT’s operating performance. We use FFO as defined by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (NAREIT) in the April 2002 “White Paper on Funds From Operations” which is net income (loss), computed in accordance with GAAP, excluding extraordinary items, as defined by GAAP, gains (or losses) from sales of property and impairments of depreciable real estate (including impairments of investments in unconsolidated entities which resulted from measurable decreases in the fair value of the depreciable real estate held by the unconsolidated entity), plus depreciation and amortization of real estate assets, and after related adjustments for unconsolidated entities and noncontrolling interests. The determination of whether impairment charges have been incurred is based partly on anticipated operating performance and hold periods. Estimated undiscounted cash flows from a property, derived from estimated future net rental and lease revenues, net proceeds on the sale of the property, and certain other ancillary cash flows, are taken into account in determining whether an impairment charge has been incurred. While impairment charges for depreciable real estate are excluded from net income (loss) in the calculation of FFO as described above, impairments reflect a decline in the value of the applicable property which we may not recover.
We believe that the use of FFO, together with the required GAAP presentations, is helpful in understanding our operating performance because it excludes real estate-related depreciation and amortization, gains and losses from property dispositions, impairments of depreciable real estate assets, and extraordinary items, and as a result, when compared period to period, reflects the impact on operations from trends in occupancy rates, rental rates, operating costs, development activities, general and administrative expenses, and interest costs, which are not immediately apparent from net income. Factors that impact FFO include fixed costs, yields on cash held in accounts, income from portfolio properties and other portfolio assets, interest rates on debt financing, and operating expenses.
We also evaluate FFO, excluding certain items. The items excluded relate to certain non-operating activities or certain non-recurring activities that create significant FFO volatility. We believe it is useful to evaluate FFO excluding these items because it provides useful information in analyzing comparability between reporting periods and in assessing the sustainability of our operating performance.
FFO and FFO, excluding certain items, should not be considered as alternatives to net income (loss), or as indicators of our liquidity, nor are they indicative of funds available to fund our cash needs, including our ability to make distributions. Additionally, the exclusion of impairments limits the usefulness of FFO and FFO, excluding certain items, as historical operating performance measures since an impairment charge indicates that operating performance has been permanently affected. FFO and FFO, excluding certain items, are not useful measures in evaluating net asset value because impairments are taken into account in determining net asset value but not in determining FFO and FFO, excluding certain items. FFO and FFO, excluding certain items, are non-GAAP measurements and should be reviewed in connection with other GAAP measurements. Our FFO and FFO, excluding certain items, as presented may not be comparable to amounts calculated by other REITs that do not define FFO in accordance with the current NAREIT definition, or interpret it differently, or that identify and exclude different items related to non-operating activities or certain non-recurring activities.
Funds Available for Distribution (FAD)
FAD is a non-GAAP financial measure that we define as FFO, excluding fair value mark to market adjustments, non-real estate depreciation and amortization, non-cash stock-based compensation expense, accretion or dilution of of Series A preferred stock, the amortization of financing costs, realized gains (losses) from the early extinguishment of derivatives, acquisition fees and expenses, straight-line rent amounts, amortization of above- or below-market intangible assets and liabilities, gains or losses on early extinguishment of debt, costs associated with our tender offer and NYSE listing, default interest or forgiven, and other non-recurring charges, less recurring capital expenditures, each as adjusted for our pro rata share of consolidated and unconsolidated amounts. Recurring capital expenditures are those capital expenditures, tenant improvements, leasing commissions and deferred lease incentives that are incurred to maintain current in-place rents including the leasing costs incurred to replace tenants upon lease expiration. Recurring capital expenditures exclude non-recurring capital expenditures. Non-recurring capital expenditures are those capital expenditures (1) incurred to change the class or characterization of an asset, (2) identified as deferred capital needs at the acquisition of a property and were incurred within a reasonable period of time subsequent to the property’s acquisition, or (3) incurred for tenant improvements, leasing commissions, or deferred lease incentives within twelve months of acquisition to lease space that was vacant at acquisition and costs incurred to lease space that has been vacant for at least twelve months. Although our FAD may not be comparable to that of other REITs and real estate companies, we believe it provides a meaningful indicator of our ability to fund our cash needs and to make cash distributions to equity owners.
We believe that net income (loss) is the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure to FAD. FAD does not represent cash generated from operating activities in accordance with GAAP and should not be considered as an alternative to net income (loss) as an indication of our performance or to cash flows as a measure of liquidity or our ability to make distributions.
Net Operating Income (NOI)
NOI is a non-GAAP financial measure equal to rental revenue, less property operating expenses, real estate taxes, and property management expenses. Our management uses NOI internally as a performance measure and believes NOI is useful to investors as a performance measure because NOI reflects only those income and expense items that are incurred at the property level and is therefore a useful measure for evaluating a property’s performance. Using NOI on a comparative basis allows investors to evaluate property level performance to compare the operating performance of our properties in a given market with the operating performance of other real estate companies in the same market, and consequently allocate their own investment capital accordingly.
Further, we use NOI internally as a performance measure and believe NOI is useful to investors as a performance measure because, when compared year over year, NOI reflects the impact on operations from trends in occupancy rates, rental rates, operating costs, acquisition and development activities, and general and administrative expenses on an un-leveraged basis, providing perspective not immediately apparent from net income. NOI excludes certain components from net income in order to provide results that are more closely related to a property’s results of operations.
|
| | |
Supplemental Operating and Financial Data | TIER REIT | 1st Quarter Page 30 |
Certain items such as interest expense, while included in net income, do not affect the operating performance of a real estate asset and are often incurred at the corporate level as opposed to the property level. In addition, it is useful to our management and investors that depreciation and amortization are excluded from NOI because historical cost accounting for real estate assets implicitly assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time, and, instead, real estate values have historically risen or fallen with market conditions.
NOI presented by us may not be comparable to NOI reported by other REITs that do not define NOI exactly as we do. We believe that in order to facilitate a clear understanding of our operating results, NOI should be examined in conjunction with net income as presented in our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto. NOI should not be considered as an alternative to net income as an indication of our performance or to cash flows as a measure of liquidity or our ability to make distributions.
Same Store GAAP NOI and Same Store Cash NOI
Same Store GAAP NOI is equal to rental revenue, less lease termination fee income, property operating expenses (excluding tenant improvement demolition costs), real estate taxes, and property management expenses for our same store properties and is considered a non-GAAP financial measure. Same Store Cash NOI is equal to Same Store GAAP NOI less non-cash revenue items including straight-line rent adjustments and the amortization of above- and below-market rent. The same store properties include our operating office properties owned and operated for the entirety of both periods being compared and include our comparable ownership percentage in each period for properties in which we own an unconsolidated interest. We view Same Store GAAP NOI and Same Store Cash NOI as important measures of the operating performance of our properties because they allow us to compare operating results of properties owned and operated for the entirety of both periods being compared and therefore eliminate variations caused by acquisitions or dispositions during such periods.
Same Store GAAP NOI and Same Store Cash NOI presented by us may not be comparable to Same Store GAAP NOI or Same Store Cash NOI reported by other REITs that do not define Same Store GAAP NOI or Same Store Cash NOI exactly as we do. We believe that in order to facilitate a clear understanding of our operating results, Same Store GAAP NOI and Same Store Cash NOI should be examined in conjunction with net income (loss) as presented in our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto. Same Store GAAP NOI and Same Store Cash NOI should not be considered as an indicator of our ability to make distributions or as alternatives to net income (loss) as an indication of our performance or to cash flows as a measure of liquidity.
Earnings before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA)
EBITDA, a non-GAAP financial measure, is defined as net income (loss), plus interest expense, income tax expense, and depreciation and amortization expense, and after related adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships, joint ventures and subsidiaries, and noncontrolling interests. EBITDA is not intended to represent cash flow for the period, is not presented as an alternative to operating income as an indicator of operating performance, should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with GAAP, and is not indicative of operating income or cash provided by operating activities as determined under GAAP. EBITDA is presented solely as a supplemental disclosure with respect to liquidity because we believe it provides useful information regarding our ability to service or incur debt.
We also evaluate Normalized EBITDA, which is EBITDA excluding certain revenues and operating expenses. The items excluded relate to certain non-operating activities or certain non-recurring activities that create significant EBITDA volatility. Further, we evaluate Normalized Estimated Full Period EBITDA, which is EBITDA excluding certain revenues and operating expenses and adjusted to show the pro forma impact of properties that were either acquired or disposed during the period. We believe it is useful to evaluate EBITDA excluding these items and as adjusted for property acquisitions and dispositions because it provides useful information in analyzing comparability between reporting periods and in assessing the sustainability of our operating performance.
|
| | |
Supplemental Operating and Financial Data | TIER REIT | 1st Quarter Page 31 |