UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
| x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE |
| SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009
| ¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES |
For the transition period from _____ to _____.
Commission file number: 0-49936
ST. JOSEPH, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Colorado | | CH 47-0844532 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | | (IRS Employer Identification No.) |
| | |
4870 S. Lewis, Suite 250 Tulsa, OK | | 74105 |
Address of Principal Executive Offices) | | (Zip Code) |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (918) 742-1888
Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
x Yes ¨ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
x Yes ¨ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer ¨ | Accelerated filer ¨ |
| |
Non-accelerated filer ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company x |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
APPLICABLE ONLY TO ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY
PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PRECEDING FIVE YEARS
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Sections 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court.
¨ Yes ¨ No
APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: 9,906,802 shares as of May 14, 2009.
ST. JOSEPH, INC.
Form 10-Q
Table of Contents
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION | | 3 |
ITEM 1. | FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | | 3 |
ITEM 2. | MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS | | 10 |
ITEM 3. | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK | | 15 |
ITEM 4. | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES | | 15 |
ITEM 4T. | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES | | 15 |
| | | |
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION | | 16 |
ITEM 1. | LEGAL PROCEEDINGS | | 16 |
ITEM 1A. | RISK FACTORS | | 17 |
ITEM 2. | UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS | | 17 |
ITEM 3. | DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES | | 17 |
ITEM 4. | SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS | | 18 |
ITEM 5. | OTHER INFORMATION | | 18 |
ITEM 6. | EXHIBITS | | 18 |
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. | FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
ST. JOSEPH, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
| | UNAUDITED | | | AUDITED | |
| | March 31, | | | December 31, | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
ASSETS | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
CURRENT ASSETS: | | | | | | |
Cash | | $ | 298,868 | | | $ | 221,992 | |
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $2,208 | | | 176,318 | | | | 212,821 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total current assets | | | 475,186 | | | | 434,813 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Property and equipment, net of Accum Dep of $179,893 (3/31/09) and $179,606 (12/31/08) | | | 2,691 | | | | 2,978 | |
Deposits | | | 1,230 | | | | 1,230 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 479,107 | | | $ | 439,021 | |
| | | | | | | | |
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
CURRENT LIABILITIES: | | | | | | | | |
Accounts payable | | $ | 197,316 | | | $ | 264,206 | |
Accrued liabilities | | | 33,586 | | | | 18,168 | |
Accrued preferred dividend | | | 117,311 | | | | 117,311 | |
Due to former officer | | | 25,000 | | | | 25,000 | |
Notes payable: | | | | | | | | |
Notes payable | | | 5,000 | | | | 5,000 | |
Bank (Note 4) | | | 180,000 | | | | 180,000 | |
Former Officer (Note 2) | | | 48,120 | | | | 48,120 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total current liabilities | | | 606,333 | | | | 657,805 | |
| | | | | | | | |
STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT (Note 7): | | | | | | | | |
Preferred stock, Series A, $.001 par value, $3.00 face value; 25,000,000 shares authorized, 386,208 shares issued and outstanding | | | 386 | | | | 386 | |
Common stock, $.001 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized, 9,906,802 (3/31/09) and 7,406,802 (12/31/08) issued and outstanding | | | 9,907 | | | | 7,407 | |
Additional paid-in capital | | | 2,072,701 | | | | 1,950,201 | |
Retained deficit | | | (2,210,220 | ) | | | (2,176,778 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Total Stockholders' Deficit | | | (127,226 | ) | | | (218,784 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 479,107 | | | $ | 439,021 | |
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
ST. JOSEPH, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
UNAUDITED
| | Three Months Ended | |
| | March 31, | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
REVENUES: | | | | | | |
Contract | | $ | 373,350 | | | $ | 640,457 | |
| | | | | | | | |
COST OF REVENUES | | | 292,481 | | | | 510,748 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Gross Margin | | | 80,869 | | | | 129,709 | |
| | | | | | | | |
COSTS AND EXPENSES: | | | | | | | | |
General and Administrative Expenses | | | 110,979 | | | | 120,197 | |
Depreciation and Amortization | | | 287 | | | | 1,013 | |
Total Costs and Expenses | | | 111,266 | | | | 121,210 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Operating Income (Loss) | | | (30,397 | ) | | | 8,499 | |
| | | | | | | | |
OTHER INCOME AND (EXPENSE): | | | | | | | | |
Interest Income | | | - | | | | - | |
Other Income (expense) | | | 400 | | | | (100 | ) |
Interest Expense | | | (3,444 | ) | | | (10,044 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Net Other Expense | | | (3,044 | ) | | | (10,144 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Loss before provision for income taxes | | | (33,441 | ) | | | (1,645 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES: | | | | | | | | |
Provision for Federal income tax | | | - | | | | - | |
Provision for State income tax | | | - | | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total provision for income taxes | | | - | | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | |
Loss before benefit from tax loss carryforward | | | (33,441 | ) | | | (1,645 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Benefit from tax loss carryforward | | | - | | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net Loss | | | (33,441 | ) | | | (1,645 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Preferred stock dividend requirements | | | - | | | | (19,552 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Loss applicable to common stockholders | | $ | (33,441 | ) | | $ | (21,197 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Basic and diluted loss per common share | | $ | (0.00 | ) | | $ | (0.00 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Weighted average common shares outstanding | | | 9,240,135 | | | | 7,406,802 | |
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
ST. JOSEPH, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
UNAUDITED
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Additional | | | | | | | |
| | Preferred Stock-Series A | | | Common Stock | | | Paid-in | | | Retained | | | | |
| | Shares | | | Par value | | | Shares | | | Par value | | | Capital | | | Deficit | | | Total | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance December 31, 2008 | | | 386,208 | | | $ | 386 | | | | 7,406,802 | | | $ | 7,407 | | | $ | 1,950,201 | | | $ | (2,176,779 | ) | | $ | (218,785 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Sale of common stock @ $0.05 per share | | | - | | | | - | | | | 2,500,000 | | | | 2,500 | | | | 122,500 | | | | | | | | 125,000 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net loss for the three months ended March 31, 2009 | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | (33,441 | ) | | | (33,441 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance March 31, 2009 | | | 386,208 | | | | 386 | | | | 9,906,802 | | | | 9,907 | | | | 2,072,701 | | | | (2,210,220 | ) | | | (127,226 | ) |
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
ST. JOSEPH, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOW
UNDAUDITED
| | Three Months Ended | |
| | March 31, | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
OPERATING ACTIVITIES | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Net loss | | $ | (33,441 | ) | | $ | (1,645 | ) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 287 | | | | 1,013 | |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | | | | | | | | |
Increase/decrease in accounts receivable | | | 36,503 | | | | (26,582 | ) |
Increase in allowance for doubtful accounts | | | - | | | | - | |
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable | | | (66,890 | ) | | | (27,529 | ) |
Decrease in accrued liabilities | | | 15,417 | | | | 38,033 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities | | | (48,124 | ) | | | (16,710 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
INVESTING ACTIVITIES | | | | | | | | |
Equipment acquisitions | | | - | | | | (1,628 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Net cash used in investing activities | | | - | | | | (1,628 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
FINANCING ACTIVITIES | | | | | | | | |
Payments on line of credit | | | - | | | | - | |
Proceeds from notes payable | | | - | | | | - | |
Proceeds from notes payable to related parties | | | - | | | | - | |
Payments on notes payable to related parties | | | - | | | | - | |
Payments on preferred stock dividends | | | - | | | | - | |
Proceeds from sale of common stock | | | 125,000 | | | | - | |
Proceeds from sale of preferred stock | | | - | | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | | | 125,000 | | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | |
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH | | | 76,876 | | | | (18,338 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
CASH AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD | | | 221,992 | | | | 204,135 | |
| | | | | | | | |
CASH AT END OF PERIOD | | $ | 298,868 | | | $ | 185,797 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: | | | | | | | | |
Cash paid during the period for: | | | | | | | | |
Interest | | $ | 3,444 | | | $ | 3,870 | |
Income taxes | | $ | - | | | $ | - | |
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
ST. JOSEPH, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
The condensed financial statements presented herein have been prepared by St. Joseph, Inc. (the “Company”) in accordance with the instructions for Form 10-Q and the accounting policies described in its Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, and should be read in conjunction with the notes thereto.
In the opinion of management, the accompanying condensed financial statements contain all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) which are necessary to provide a fair presentation of operating results for the interim periods presented. The results of operations presented for the three months ended March 31, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the year.
Financial data presented herein are unaudited.
(2) | Related Party Transactions |
On June 16, 2005, we issued our President at the time, John Simmons, a promissory note in the amount of $96,000. This note replaced and superseded a promissory note that we issued to Mr. Simmons in December of 2003. The note carries a ten percent interest rate, payable quarterly and matured on June 16, 2006. Mr. Simmons resigned as our President, Chief Executive Officer on May 17, 2006 and as our Director on May 30, 2006. During the quarter ended March 31, 2009, we did not repay any balance under the note. As of September 30, 2006, we owed $48,120 in principal and $2,406 in accrued interest on the note. The note obligation is included in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as Note payable, former officer. Under the terms of the note, we are currently in default of the note. Mr. Simmons has instituted legal proceedings to collect this note and if he prevails, we will have to pay Mr. Simmons his court costs, including reasonable attorneys’ fees. However, we believe that the amount owed to Mr. Simmons on the note is fully or partially offset by sums owed to us in connection with expense reimbursements that were paid to Mr. Simmons while he was the President of our Company and to which we believe he may not have the rights. We currently have a lawsuit against Mr. Simmons in the U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division, to recover damages against Mr. Simmons of not less than $75,000, plus attorneys’ fees, costs of litigation, interest and tremble damages.
The Company has a $200,000 line of credit. At March 31, 2009, the Company has an unpaid and outstanding balance of $180,000. Interest payments are due monthly. The Company paid $2,409 in interest payments during the quarter ended March 31, 2009. The line matures on July 7, 2009.
Preferred Stock
During the three months ended March 31, 2009, the Company did not issue any Series A Convertible Preferred Stock. The Board of Directors is authorized to issue shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock and to fix the number of shares in such series as well as the designation, relative rights, powers, preferences, restrictions, and limitations of all such series. In December 2003, the Company issued 386,208 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock that remain outstanding at March 31, 2009. Each share of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock is convertible to one share of common stock and has a yield of 6.75% dividend per annum, payable on a quarterly basis out of funds legally available therefor, for a period of 5 years or until December 31, 2008. As the Company did not have funds legally available for distribution at times during this 5-year period, Series A Convertible Preferred Stock dividends in the amount of $117,311 as of March 31, 2009 have been accrued to be paid at such time as the Company may legally do so.
Common Stock
In a private placement completed in the quarter ended March 31, 2009, the Company sold 3,000,000 shares of common stock to 11 accredited investors at a price of $0.05 per share for projected gross proceeds of $150,000, of which $125,000 was received by the Company in the quarter ended March 31, 2009 and $25,000 remains payable. No underwriters were used and no underwriting discounts or commissions were payable.
The shares have been offered and sold by the Company in reliance upon the exemption from registration provided by Regulation D promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The shares were offered and sold to only to accredited investors; as such term is defined by Rule 501 of Regulation D. All of the shares sold in the private placement are restricted securities pursuant to Rule 144.
Common Stock Options
The following schedule summarizes the changes in the Company’s equity awards for the three months ended March 31, 2009:
| | | | | | | | Weighted | | Weighted | | | |
| | Awards | | | | | | Average | | Average | | | |
| | Outstanding | | | Exercise | | | Exercise | | Remaining | | Aggregate | |
| | and | | | Price | | | Price | | Contractual | | Intrinsic | |
| | Exercisable | | | Per Share | | | Per Share | | Life | | Value | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Outstanding at January 1, 2009 | | | 560,000 | | | $ | 0.10 - $1.05 | | | $ | 0.80 | | 2.8 years | | | |
Granted | | | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | | | |
Exercised | | | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | | | |
Cancelled/Expired | | | (150,000 | ) | | $ | 0.10 | | | $ | - | | | | | |
Outstanding at March 31, 2009 | | | 410,000 | | | $ | 1.05 | | | $ | 1.05 | | 2.4 years | | $ - | |
The Company records its income taxes in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes”. The Company incurred net operating losses during all periods presented resulting in a deferred tax asset, which has been fully allowed for; therefore, the net benefit and expense resulted in no income taxes.
(6) | Concentration of Credit Risk |
The Company conducts a significant portion of its operations with one customer. During the three months ended March 31, 2009, approximately 83 percent of the Company's service revenues were conducted with this one customer.
As previously disclosed in a current report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on June 20, 2007, on June 8, 2007, we filed a complaint against our former President, CEO and Director John H. Simmons in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado, Civil Action No. 07-CV-01208. The complaint alleged, among other things, that Mr. Simmons breached his fiduciary duties by diverting Company funds for personal and recreational use and acquiring shares of our common stock without adequate consideration. We are seeking damages against Mr. Simmons of not less than $75,000, attorneys’ fees, costs of litigation, interest and tremble damages. On August 27, 2007, this suit was dismissed due to jurisdictional reasons and the parties agreed to move the case to Texas.
On October 11, 2007, we re-filed this lawsuit in United States District Court, Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division, Civil Action No. 307CV1718-R for the same causes of action and asking for the same relief. Although we believe that our claims against Mr. Simmons are meritorious, there can be no assurance that we will prevail in this litigation. At this time, we cannot estimate any possible loss from this litigation in the event that we do not prevail.
On October 3, 2007, Mr. Simmons filed a lawsuit in United States District Court, Dallas County, Civil Action No. DC-07-11801 against the Company, its officers, and other individuals. The complaint alleged, among other things, that Mr. Simmons' 1,900,000 options were converted and that the Company failed to repay a $96,000 promissory note and breached a duty to indemnify Mr. Simmons in relation to previously filed litigation. The complaint also makes a variety of accusations against the Company’s officers and other individuals, including accusations that these individuals breached fiduciary duties with regard to Mr. Simmons, engaged in fraud and conspiracy to commit fraud, and converted shares and options owned by him. Mr. Simmons seeks unspecified damages, both actual and exemplary, against the Company and the other defendants. During the quarter ended March 31, 2008, Gerald McIlhargey, Maureen O’Brien, Donal Ford and Bruce Schreiner, and David Core were all released from the suit as defendants. The Company believes that Mr. Simmons accusations are without factual basis and intends to vigorously defend against the lawsuit. The costs of defending against the complaint could be substantial; however we are unable to predict an exact amount, or even a meaningful estimate, at this time.
As previously disclosed in a quarterly report on Form 10-QSB, filed with the SEC on November 20, 2006, on July 28, 2006, Zachary Karo, a former employee, filed a lawsuit against the Company and its subsidiary Staf*Tek Services, Inc. in the district court in Tulsa County, Oklahoma, Case No. CJ 2006 04713, in connection with stock options allegedly granted to Mr. Karo. Mr. Karo alleges that he was granted an option to purchase up to 25,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at $0.10 per share but that management refused to issue Mr. Karo such shares upon his attempt to exercise of the alleged option. A motion was made by the Company and granted with prejudice to dismiss the case. Mr. Karo re-filed to vacate the dismissal, which was subsequently vacated, and in a hearing on April 2, 2008 the motion for dismissal was approved. At this time there has not been a date set for a pretrial. Mr. Karo is seeking damages, actual and exemplary, against the Company in an amount in excess of $10,000. Management denies that Mr. Karo was owed such stock options. The Company has engaged local counsel and intends to vigorously defend this action on the basis brought by the plaintiffs. The costs of defending against the complaint could be substantial; however management is unable to estimate an amount at this time.
On September 4, 2008, Phyllis L. Bell and Paul D. Aelmore filed a lawsuit in United States District Court, Northern District of Oklahoma, Case No. 08-CF-00470-TCK-SAJ against the Company, and officers and directors of the Company. Ms. Bell and Mr. Aelmore are holders of the Company’s Series A Convertible Preferred Stock which they received for selling Staf*Tek Services, Inc. to the Company in January 2004 pursuant to an Agreement of Share Exchange and Purchase and Sale (the “Purchase Agreement”). The complaint alleged, among other things, that the Company breached the Share Purchase Agreement by failing to pay dividends on the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock. The Company has been accruing the dividends following a determination by its management that the Company did not have funds legally available for distribution. The complaint also alleges that the Company made misrepresentations that under circumstances that constituted fraudulent inducement, fraud and/or constructive fraud, and breached its duty to deal in good faith with the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs seek unspecified damages against the Company and the other defendants for compensatory and punitive damages in excess of $75,000, costs, and pre-judgment interest. The Company is currently making efforts to reach a settlement with the plaintiffs, but cannot provide any assurance that such efforts will be successful. The costs of defending against the complaint could be substantial; however we are unable to predict an exact amount, or even a meaningful estimate, at this time.
ITEM 2. | MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
The following presentation of Management’s Discussion and Analysis has been prepared by internal management and should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Except for the historical information contained herein, the discussion in this report contains certain forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, such as statements of our business plans, objectives, expectations and intentions as of the date of this filing. The cautionary statements about reliance on forward-looking statements made earlier in this document should be given serious consideration with respect to all forward-looking statements wherever they appear in this report, notwithstanding that the “safe harbor” protections available to some publicly reporting companies under applicable federal securities law do not apply to us as an issuer of penny stocks. Our actual results could differ materially from those discussed here.
General
St. Joseph, Inc. (“us,” “we,” “our” or the “Company”) currently conducts all of our business through our wholly-owned subsidiary, Staf*Tek Services, Inc. We also hope to acquire other operating companies as subsidiaries and are pursuing suitable candidates for future acquisition that could potentially create value for our existing shareholders. Acquisition targets may be in sectors other than our current sector of providing employment agency services. Although it is not our goal, we would also consider a reverse merger opportunity, if it were seen to be a growth opportunity for our existing shareholders.
To date, we have not consummated any acquisition and cannot provide any assurance that we will be successful in this endeavor. Any acquisition may be structured as a share exchange and may result in significant dilution to our existing shareholders.
Staf*Tek Services, Inc.
Staf*Tek Services, Inc. (“Staf*Tek”) was organized as an Oklahoma corporation on January 2, 1997. On January 2, 2004, we closed our acquisition of Staf*Tek pursuant to an agreement by which we acquired 100% percent of the issued and outstanding shares of Staf*Tek's common stock in exchange for (i) 380,500 shares of our $.001 par value Series A convertible preferred stock; (ii) 219,500 shares of our $.001 par value common stock; and (ii) $200,000 in cash. Our Series A convertible preferred stock has a face value of $3.00 per share with a yield of 6.75% dividend per annum, payable on a quarterly basis out of funds legally available therefor, for a period of five years. As the Company did not have funds legally available for distribution at times during this 5-year period, Series A Convertible Preferred Stock dividends in the amount of $117,312 as of March 31, 2009 have been accrued to be paid at such time as the Company may legally do so.
The Series A convertible preferred stock may be converted into our common stock at the rate of one share of convertible preferred stock for one share of common stock at any time by the shareholder. We may call the Series A convertible preferred stock for redemption no sooner than two years after the date of issuance, and only if our common stock is trading on a recognized United States stock exchange for a period of no less than thirty consecutive trading days at a market value of $5.00 or more per share. However, as of this date, our common stock has not traded at that amount.
Staf*Tek specializes in the recruiting and placement of professional technical personnel, as well as finance and accounting personnel on a temporary and permanent basis. Staf*Tek provides its customers with employee candidates with information technology (“IT”) skills in areas ranging from multiple platform systems integration to end-user support, including specialists in programming, networking, systems integration, database design, help desk support, including senior and entry level finance and accounting candidates. Staf*Tek's candidate databases contain information on the candidates experience, skills, and performance and are continually being updated to include information on new referrals and to update information on existing candidates. Staf*Tek responds to a broad range of assignments from technical one-person assignments to major projects including, without limitation, Internet/Intranet development, desktop applications development, project management, enterprise systems development, SAP implementation and legacy mainframe projects. Staf*Tek also provides employee candidates computer training, online assessments, certification and the opportunity to be tested and certified in over 50 skill sets.
Cancellation of Stock Options
Between October 28, 2003 and March 23, 2004, our Board of Directors approved the grant of stock options to each of our then Directors, John H. Simmons, Bruce E. Schreiner, Kenneth L. Johnson, Dr. Milton Harbuck, Kimberly Samon, Gerald McIlhargey and Jerry Malone (each, an “Optionee”) in consideration for services provided to our Company as Directors. Each option was exercisable immediately at the exercise price of $0.10 per share and expires on the tenth day after an Optionee’s removal from our Board of Directors for reasons other than for a voluntary resignation.
As disclosed in the Report on Form 8-K filed by the Company on August 30, 2006, at the annual meeting of our Board of Directors on August 24, 2006, our Directors reviewed the options previously granted by our Board Directors to the Optionees in consideration for services provided to our Company as Directors. After careful and exhaustive deliberation, our Directors concluded that the options granted to Mr. Simmons as consideration for providing the same directorial services as the other Optionees was not fair and reasonable to our shareholders. Specifically, our Board of Directors concluded that the amount of options granted to Mr. Simmons, which was 2,000% more than the amount of options granted the other Optionees individually, and 333% more than the amount of options granted to the other Optionees in the aggregate was unduly excessive, unreasonable, and unfair to our shareholders. Therefore, our Board of Directors resolved to void 1,900,000 options previously granted to Mr. Simmons.
In connection with the cancellation of the options previously granted to Mr. Simmons, our Board of Directors cancelled 250,000 shares of our common stock that were previously issued to Mr. Simmons pursuant to the exercise of these now cancelled options.
In the same meeting, our Directors concluded that the grant of 100,000 options to each Optionee was fair and reasonable, and accordingly ratified the issuance of 100,000 options to each Optionee, including Mr. Simmons. To the extent that the issuance of the 1,900,000 options which have been voided by resolution of our Board of Directors is deemed fair, we may have contingent liability for cancelling Mr. Simmons’ options and shares.
Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 and 2008
| | For the Three Months Ended | |
| | March 31, 2009 | | | March 31, 2008 | | | Change | | | Change | |
| | $ | | | % of Revenue | | | $ | | | % of Revenue | | | $ | | | % | |
Net Revenues | | $ | 373,350 | | | | 100.00 | % | | $ | 640,457 | | | | 100.00 | % | | $ | (267,107 | ) | | | (41.71 | )% |
Cost of Revenues | | | 292,481 | | | | 78.34 | % | | | 510,748 | | | | 79.75 | % | | | (218,267 | ) | | | (42.73 | )% |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Gross Margin (Loss) | | | 80,869 | | | | 21.66 | % | | | 129,709 | | | | 20.25 | % | | | (48,840 | ) | | | (37.65 | )% |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating Expenses | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses | | | 110,979 | | | | 29.73 | % | | | 120,197 | | | | 18.77 | % | | | (9,218 | ) | | | (7.67 | )% |
Depreciation and Amortization | | | 287 | | | | 0.08 | % | | | 1,013 | | | | 0.16 | % | | | (726 | ) | | | (71.67 | )% |
Total Operating Expenses | | $ | 111,266 | | | | 29.80 | % | | $ | 121,210 | | | | 18.93 | % | | $ | (9,944 | ) | | | (8.20 | )% |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income (Loss) from Operations | | $ | (30,397 | ) | | | (8.14 | )% | | | 8,499 | | | | 1.33 | % | | | (38,896 | ) | | | (457.65 | )% |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other Income (Expense) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest Income | | | | | | | 0.00 | % | | | - | | | | 0.00 | % | | | 0 | | | | 0.00 | % |
Other Income (Expense) | | | 400 | | | | 0.11 | % | | | (100.00 | ) | | | (0.02 | )% | | | 500 | | | | (500.00 | )% |
Interest Expense | | | (3,444 | ) | | | (0.92 | )% | | | (10,044 | ) | | | (1.57 | )% | | | 6,600 | | | | (65.71 | )% |
Net Other Expense | | $ | (3,044 | ) | | | (0.82 | )% | | $ | (10,144 | ) | | | (1.58 | )% | | $ | 7,100 | | | | (69.99 | )% |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Loss before provision for income tax | | | (33,441 | ) | | | (8.96 | )% | | | (1,645 | ) | | | (0.26 | )% | | | (31,796 | ) | | | 1,932.89 | % |
Provision for Income Taxes | | | 0 | | | | 0.00 | % | | | - | | | | 0.00 | % | | | 0 | | | | 0.00 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Income (Loss) | | $ | (33,441 | ) | | | (8.96 | )% | | $ | (1,645 | ) | | | (0.26 | )% | | $ | (31,796 | ) | | | 1,932.89 | % |
Gross Profit
For the three-month period ended March 31, 2009, we had a gross margin of $80,869 compared to a gross margin of $129,709 for the three-month period ended March 31, 2008. This decrease in our gross profitability of $48,840, or approximately 37.65 % over the prior period, is due primarily to lower number of contractors and renegotiated bill rates as explained below.
Revenues for the three-month period ended March 31, 2009 decreased to $373,350 from $640,457 for the three-month period ended March 31, 2008. This decrease in net revenues of $267,107, or approximately 41.71 %, over the prior period, is due primarily to lower number of contractors and renegotiated bill rates.
Cost of revenues for the three-month period ended March 31, 2009 decreased to $292,481 from $510,748 for the three-month period ended March 31, 2008. This decrease in cost of revenues of $218,267, or approximately 42.73 %, over the prior period, is due primarily to lower number of contractors and renegotiated bill rates.
Total Costs and Expenses
Total costs and expenses for the three-month period ended March 31, 2009 decreased to $111,266 from $121,210 for the three-month period ended March 31, 2008. This decrease in our total operating expenses of $9,944 is approximately 8.20 % over that of the prior period.
General and administrative expenses for the three-month period ended March 31, 2009 decreased to $110,979 from $120,197 for the three-month period ended March 31, 2008. This decrease in general and administrative expenses of $9,218 is approximately 7.67 % over that of the prior period.
Other Income/Expenses
Interest expense for the three-month period ended March 31, 2009 decreased to $3,444 from $10,044 for the three-month period ended March 31, 2008. This decrease in interest expense of $6,600, or approximately 65.71 % over the prior period, is due primarily to the decrease in interest due on legal fees and our line of credit.
For the three-month period ended March 31, 2009, we had other income of $400 compared to other expenses of $100 for the three-month period ended March 31, 2008. This decrease of other expenses of $500, or approximately 500 % over the prior period, is due primarily to the sale of office furniture.
For the three-month period ended March 31, 2009, we had total other expenses in the amount of $3,044 compared to $10,144 in total other expenses for the three-month period ended March 31, 2008. This decrease of $7,100 is approximately 69.99 % over the prior period.
Profits
For the three-month period ended March 31, 2009, we incurred an operating loss of $30,397 compared to an operating profit for the three-month period ended March 31, 2008 of $8,499. This decrease in operating profits is due primarily to lower margins and decreased number of revenue generating contractor placements.
Net loss for the three-month period ended March 31, 2009 increased to $33,441 from $1,645 for the three-month period ended March 31, 2008. This increase in losses of $31,796 or 1,932.89 % over the prior period is due primarily to lower margins and decreased number of revenue generating contractor placements as discussed above.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of March 31, 2009, we had a cash reserve of $298,868. During the three-months ended March 31, 2009, we used cash in the amount of $48,124 in our operating activities. During this period $125,000 of new funds were raised.
During the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company’s cash activities were as follows:
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
Cash used for operating activities | | | (48,124 | ) | | $ | (16,710 | ) |
Cash used in investing activities | | | - | | | $ | (1,628 | ) |
Cash provided by financing activities | | | 125,000 | | | | - | |
Internal Sources of Liquidity
For the three months ended March 31, 2009, the funds generated from our operations were insufficient to fund our daily operations. For the three months ended March 31, 2009, we had a gross margin of $80,869, and we were thus unable to meet our operating expenses of $110,979 for the same period. After accounting for our total other expenses (mostly interest expenses) of $ 3,444 for this period, we suffered a net loss of $33,441 for the period. We can provide no assurance that funds from our operations will continue to meet the requirements of our daily operations in the future. In the event that funds from our operations are insufficient to meet our expenses, we will need to seek other sources of financing to maintain liquidity.
External Sources of Liquidity
Because the funds generated from our operations have been not been sufficient to fully fund our operations, we have been on dependent on debt and equity financing to make up the shortfall. We actively pursue all potential financing options as we look to secure additional funds to both stabilize and grow our business operations. Our management will review any financing options at their disposal, and will judge each potential source of funds on its individual merits. There can be no assurance that we will be able to secure additional funds from debt or equity financing, as and when we need to, or if we can, that the terms of such financing will be favorable to us or our existing stockholders. As a result, our independent registered public accounting firm has issued a “going concern” modification to its report on our audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2008.
We have been utilizing a $200,000 line of credit in order to meet our operating expenses. This line of credit is secured by most of our assets and expires on July 7, 2009. Interest is due on the line of credit at the rate of 6.79% per annum and interest payments are due monthly. As of March 31, 2009, the line of credit had an outstanding balance of $180,000.
During the quarter ended March 31, 2009, we completed a private offering we commenced in October 2008. In the private placement we sold 3,000,000 shares of common stock to 11 accredited investors at a price of $0.05 per share for projected gross proceeds of $150,000, of which $125,000 has already been received by the Company. Of these amounts, during the quarter ended March 31, 2009, we sold 2,300,000 shares of common stock to seven accredited investors for projected gross proceeds of $115,000 of which $90,000 has been received by the Company as of the date of this report. Of the 3,000,000 shares sold in the private placement, 500,000 shares have not yet been issued and consequently are not reflected in the number of our issued and outstanding shares on the cover of this report.
As of March 31, 2009, we had debt owing to a former officer aggregating $48,120 as further discussed in Item 3 of Part II of this report.
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have nor do we maintain any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that are material to our investors.
Risk Factors
Reference is made to “Risk Factors” included in our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2008 for information concerning risk factors. There have been no material changes in the risk factors since the filing of this Annual Report with the SEC on March 31, 2009.
ITEM 3. | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK |
As a smaller reporting company, we are not required to provide the information required by this Item.
ITEM 4. | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
As required by Rule 13a-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), we carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls as of the end of the period covered by this report, March 31, 2009. This evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Gerald McIlhargey, and our Treasurer, Mr. Kenneth L. Johnson (collectively, the “Certifying Officers”). Based upon that evaluation, our Certifying Officers concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this report, March 31, 2009, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in timely alerting management to material information relating to us and required to be included in our periodic filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”).
Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our periodic reports under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Commission's rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our periodic reports that we file under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Further, as required by Rule 13a-15(d) of the Exchange Act and under the supervision and with the participation of our Certifying Officers, we carried out an evaluation as to whether there has been any change in our internal control over financial reporting during our fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2009. Based upon this evaluation, our Certifying Officers have concluded that there has not been any change in our internal control over financial reporting during our fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2009, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, our principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by our board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that: (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
ITEM 4T. | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
Not Applicable.
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
As previously disclosed in a current report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on June 20, 2007, on June 8, 2007, we filed a complaint against our former President, CEO and Director John H. Simmons in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado, Civil Action No. 07-CV-01208. The complaint alleged, among other things, that Mr. Simmons breached his fiduciary duties by diverting Company funds for personal and recreational use and acquiring shares of our common stock without adequate consideration. We are seeking damages against Mr. Simmons of not less than $75,000, attorneys’ fees, costs of litigation, interest and tremble damages. On August 27, 2007, this suit was dismissed due to jurisdictional reasons and the parties agreed to move the case to Texas.
On October 11, 2007, we re-filed this lawsuit in United States District Court, Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division, Civil Action No. 307CV1718-R for the same causes of action and asking for the same relief. Although we believe that our claims against Mr. Simmons are meritorious, there can be no assurance that we will prevail in this litigation. At this time, we cannot estimate any possible loss from this litigation in the event that we do not prevail.
On October 3, 2007, Mr. Simmons filed a lawsuit in United States District Court, Dallas County, Civil Action No. DC-07-11801 against the Company, its officers, and other individuals. The complaint alleged, among other things, that Mr. Simmons' 1,900,000 options were converted and that the Company failed to repay a $96,000 promissory note and breached a duty to indemnify Mr. Simmons in relation to previously filed litigation. The complaint also makes a variety of accusations against the Company’s officers and other individuals, including accusations that these individuals breached fiduciary duties with regard to Mr. Simmons, engaged in fraud and conspiracy to commit fraud, and converted shares and options owned by him. Mr. Simmons seeks unspecified damages, both actual and exemplary, against the Company and the other defendants. During the quarter ended March 31, 2008, Gerald McIlhargey, Maureen O’Brien, Donal Ford and Bruce Schreiner, and David Core were all released from the suit as defendants. The Company believes that Mr. Simmons accusations are without factual basis and intends to vigorously defend against the lawsuit. The costs of defending against the complaint could be substantial; however we are unable to predict an exact amount, or even a meaningful estimate, at this time.
As previously disclosed in a quarterly report on Form 10-QSB, filed with the SEC on November 20, 2006, on July 28, 2006, Zachary Karo, a former employee, filed a lawsuit against the Company and its subsidiary Staf*Tek Services, Inc. in the district court in Tulsa County, Oklahoma, Case No. CJ 2006 04713, in connection with stock options allegedly granted to Mr. Karo. Mr. Karo alleges that he was granted an option to purchase up to 25,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at $0.10 per share but that management refused to issue Mr. Karo such shares upon his attempt to exercise of the alleged option. A motion was made by the Company and granted with prejudice to dismiss the case. Mr. Karo re-filed to vacate the dismissal, which was subsequently vacated, and in a hearing on April 2, 2008 the motion for dismissal was approved. At this time there has not been a date set for a pretrial. Mr. Karo is seeking damages, actual and exemplary, against the Company in an amount in excess of $10,000. Management denies that Mr. Karo was owed such stock options. The Company has engaged local counsel and intends to vigorously defend this action on the basis brought by the plaintiffs. The costs of defending against the complaint could be substantial; however management is unable to estimate an amount at this time.
On September 4, 2008, Phyllis L. Bell and Paul D. Aelmore filed a lawsuit in United States District Court, Northern District of Oklahoma, Case No. 08-CF-00470-TCK-SAJ against the Company, and officers and directors of the Company. Ms. Bell and Mr. Aelmore are holders of the Company’s Series A Convertible Preferred Stock which they received for selling Staf*Tek Services, Inc. to the Company in January 2004 pursuant to an Agreement of Share Exchange and Purchase and Sale (the “Purchase Agreement”). The complaint alleged, among other things, that the Company breached the Share Purchase Agreement by failing to pay dividends on the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock. The Company has been accruing the dividends following a determination by its management that the Company did not have funds legally available for distribution. The complaint also alleges that the Company made misrepresentations that under circumstances that constituted fraudulent inducement, fraud and/or constructive fraud, and breached its duty to deal in good faith with the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs seek unspecified damages against the Company and the other defendants for compensatory and punitive damages in excess of $75,000, costs, and pre-judgment interest. The Company is currently making efforts to reach a settlement with the plaintiffs, but cannot provide any assurance that such efforts will be successful. The costs of defending against the complaint could be substantial; however we are unable to predict an exact amount, or even a meaningful estimate, at this time.
As a smaller reporting company, we are not required to provide the information required by this Item.
ITEM 2. | UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS |
From January 2009 through February 2009, we sold 2,300,000 shares of common stock to seven accredited investors for projected gross proceeds of $115,000, of which $90,000 has been received by the Company as of the date of this report and $25,000 remains payable. The shares have been offered and sold by the Company in reliance upon the exemption from registration provided by Regulation D promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The shares were offered and sold to only to accredited investors, as such term is defined by Rule 501 of Regulation D. All of the shares sold in the private placement are restricted securities pursuant to Rule 144.
ITEM 3. | DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES |
Other than discussed below, there have been no material defaults in the payment of principal, interest, a sinking or purchase fund installment, or any other material default not cured within 30 days, with respect to any of our indebtedness exceeding 5% of our total assets.
On June 16, 2005, we issued John Simmons, our President at the time, a promissory note in the amount of $96,000. This note replaced and superseded a promissory note that we issued to Mr. Simmons in December of 2003. The note carries a ten percent interest rate, payable quarterly and matured on June 16, 2006. Mr. Simmons resigned as our President, Chief Executive Officer on May 17, 2006 and as our Director on May 30, 2006. During the three months ended March 31, 2009, we did not repay any balance under the note. As of March 31, 2009, we owed $48,120 in principal and $2,406 in accrued interest on the note.
Under the terms of the note, we are currently in default of the note. Mr. Simmons decided to institute legal proceeding to collect this note and if he prevails, we will have to pay Mr. Simmons his court costs, including reasonable attorneys’ fees. However, we believe that the amount owed to Mr. Simmons on the note is fully or partially offset by sums owed to us in connection with expense reimbursements that were paid to Mr. Simmons while he was the President of our Company and to which we believe he may not have the rights. The Company believes any sums owed by Mr. Simmons to the Company will offset amounts payable to him pursuant to the note.
In addition, at the annual meeting of our Board of Directors on August 24, 2006, the Company’s Directors reviewed the options previously granted to Mr. Simmons and after careful and exhaustive deliberation, concluded that the options granted to Mr. Simmons as consideration for providing the same directorial services as the other optionees was not fair and reasonable to our shareholders. Specifically, our Board of Directors concluded that the amount of options granted to Mr. Simmons, which was 2,000% more than the amount of options granted the other optionees individually, and 333% more than the amount of options granted to the other optionees in the aggregate was unduly excessive, unreasonable, and unfair to our shareholders. Therefore, our Board of Directors resolved to void 1,900,000 options previously granted to Mr. Simmons. Of the 1,900,000 options voided, Mr. Simmons had exercised 250,000 shares at a price of $0.10 per share on December 16, 2004. We have cancelled the 250,000 shares previously issued to Mr. Simmons and added the exercise price of $25,000 as note payable to Mr. Simmons. As discussed above, we have a tentative oral agreement that any sums owed by Mr. Simmons to the Company will offset amounts payable to him pursuant to the note.
ITEM 4. | SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS |
No matters were submitted to a vote of our security holders during the three-month period ended March 31, 2009.
None.
Exhibit No. | | Description |
| | |
31.1 | | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (Filed herewith) |
| | |
31.2 | | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (Filed herewith) |
| | |
32.1 | | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Filed herewith) |
| | |
32.2 | | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Filed herewith) |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirments of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
| Date: May 15, 2009 |
| |
| ST. JOSEPH, INC. |
| |
| |
| /s/ GERALD MCILHARGEY |
| Gerald McIlhargey, Chief Executive Officer |