Exhibit 99.1
News release via Canada NewsWire, Calgary 403-269-7605
Attention Business/Financial Editors:
OPTI Canada Announces Second Quarter 2009 Results
TSX: OPC
CALGARY, July 29 /CNW/ - OPTI Canada Inc. (OPTI) announced today the
Company's financial and operating results for the quarter ended June 30, 2009.
The Long Lake Project (the Project) is the first to use OPTI's integrated
OrCrude(TM) process. Our proprietary process is designed to substantially
reduce operating costs compared to other oil sands projects while producing a
high quality, sweet synthetic crude oil.
"We significantly strengthened our financial position recently with the
equity offering that closed earlier this month, and we believe we now have the
liquidity we require to reach full production at Long Lake in late 2010," said
Chris Slubicki, President and Chief Executive Officer. "The Project is built,
operating and as it ramps up we expect to demonstrate the substantial value of
our next-generation technology which is anticipated to generate the best
netbacks in the industry."
<<
FINANCIAL SUMMARY
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Three months Six months
ended ended Year ended
June 30, June 30, December 31,
In millions 2009 2009 2008
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net loss $ (9) $ (106) $ (477)(1)
Total oil sands expenditures(2) 22 97 706
Working capital (deficiency) 255 255 (25)
Shareholders' equity $ 1,366 $ 1,366 $ 1,471
Common shares outstanding (basic)(3) 196 196 196
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notes:
(1) Includes $369 million pre-tax asset impairment provision related to
working interest sale to Nexen.
(2) Capital expenditures related to Phase 1 and future phase development.
Capitalized interest, hedging gains/losses and non-cash additions or
charges are excluded.
(3) On July 14, 2009, OPTI issued an additional 85,720,000 common shares,
which increased the common shares outstanding to 281,749,526. See
"Share Capital".
>>
PROJECT UPDATE
The ramp-up of the Project is progressing and the reservoir continues to
perform as OPTI expected, given the amount of steam that has been injected.
Steam volumes have been limited by the ability to treat water.
In May, a project to add supplementary heat to the hot lime softeners
(HLS) in the water treatment plant was successfully completed. Routine
maintenance work to remove deposits which typically build up in water
treatment plants was also completed. Steam production increased and in June we
have achieved injection rates of approximately 95,000 bbl/d. Gross bitumen
production rates reached a peak of approximately 18,000 bbl/d in June. At June
30, 2009, there were 41 of 81 well pairs on production operating with a steam
to oil ratio (SOR) that ranges between 4.0 and 5.0. We continue to anticipate
a long-term SOR of 3.0.
Bitumen production volumes for the second quarter averaged approximately
14,300 bbl/d (gross). Production volumes in the second quarter were impacted
by downtime associated with improvements made to the HLS units.
In mid-July, steam injection rates were intentionally reduced in order to
address water chemistry issues in advance of planned maintenance in the third
quarter. As a result, average bitumen production volumes for the period July 1
to July 26 averaged approximately 13,000 bbl/d. As these issues are resolved,
steam and bitumen volumes have begun to ramp-up again to approximately 69,000
bbl/d and 14,500 bbl/d, respectively.
As previously announced, a project to replace valves and conduct
maintenance on the water treatment plant during the third quarter of 2009 is
planned to further optimize steam production. We expect the cost of these
activities will not be significant but will result in scheduled downtime in
the third quarter, impacting bitumen and Premium Sweet Crude (PSC(TM))
production.
As steam generation increases, we expect that all remaining wells will be
converted to production mode. We expect steam assisted gravity drainage (SAGD)
volumes to increase from current production levels, other than the short-term
reduction in the third quarter of 2009 noted above, to full capacity of 72,000
bbl/d of bitumen in late 2010. During the SAGD ramp-up period in 2009 and
2010, we also expect to process third party bitumen.
With respect to the Upgrader, all major units are operational and
synthesis gas has been used in SAGD operations, decreasing operating costs by
reducing the requirement for purchased natural gas. Upgrader reliability is
improving with an on-stream factor of 46% during the second quarter of 2009
compared to 33% in the first quarter of 2009. The PSC(TM) that has been
marketed has, on average, been sold at pricing equal to or above pricing for
other synthetic crude oils.
Having successfully operated the Upgrader for several months, the
Operator intentionally shut down the Upgrader last week to assist in dealing
with water chemistry issues impacting steam generation for SAGD operations.
When the Upgrader is restarted, we expect to be in a position to start-up the
solvent de-asphalter and thermal cracker units. This is expected to take place
shortly before or after the planned maintenance in the third quarter. These
units will allow the Operator to transition from gasifying vacuum residue,
which contains some lighter parts of the barrel, to gasifying asphaltenes, the
heaviest part of the barrel. Once this transition is complete we expect the
PSC(TM) yields to increase to approximately 80%. In periods when the Upgrader
is shut down, we will continue to produce bitumen and blend it with diluent
for sale.
While we expect periods of downtime in the ramp-up phase we anticipate
that the reliability of operations will continue to improve. We anticipate
Upgrader capacity during ramp-up will be capable of processing all of the
forecasted SAGD volumes and we expect the Project to reach full capacity of
approximately 58,500 bbl/d of PSC(TM) and other products in late 2010.
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
As Phase 1 of the Long Lake Project is essentially complete the remaining
capital costs relate to the completion of the steam expansion project,
expected later this year, and the ash processing unit in 2010. The remaining
cost to complete these two projects is approximately $34 million net to OPTI,
most of which will be incurred in 2010.
The table below identifies historical expenditures incurred by us in
relation to the Project, other oil sands activities and other capital
expenditures.
<<
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Three months Six months
ended ended
June 30, June 30, Year ended
$ millions 2009 2009 2008
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Long Lake Project - Phase 1
Upgrader & SAGD $ 6 $ 19 $ 480
Sustaining capital 9 30 60
Capitalized operations - 18 32
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Long Lake Project 15 67 572
Expenditures on future phases
Engineering and equipment 5 10 64
Resource acquisition and
delineation 2 20 70
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total oil sands expenditures 22 97 706
Capitalized interest - 29 139
Other capital expenditures - (19) 35
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total cash expenditures 22 107 880
Non-cash capital charges - - 4
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total capital expenditures $ 22 $ 107 $ 884
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
For the three months ended June 30, 2009 we incurred capital expenditures
of $22 million. Our $6 million share of the Phase 1 expenditures for Upgrader
and SAGD were primarily related to the ongoing construction of the steam
expansion project. Sustaining capital expenditures of $9 million related
primarily to engineering and resource delineation for future Phase 1 well pads
and SAGD optimization. We discontinued capitalizing our share of the net
Upgrader operations on April 1, 2009.
For the three months ended June 30, 2009, we incurred expenditures of $5
million for engineering and $2 million for resource acquisition and
delineation for future phases.
<<
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Three months and six months ended June 30, 2009
-----------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Three
months Six months
Three months ended Six months ended
ended June 30, ended June 30,
June 30, 2008 June 30, 2008
$ millions 2009 (as revised) 2009 (as revised)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Revenue $ 34 $ - $ 63 $ -
Expenses
Operating expenses 39 - 67 -
Diluent and feedstock
purchases 20 - 49 -
Transportation 3 - 6 -
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net field operating
margin (loss) (28) - (59) -
Interest, net 42 (1) 61 (3)
General and
administrative 7 4 13 8
Financing charges 1 1 1 1
Loss on disposal
of assets 1 - 2 -
Foreign exchange
translation loss (gain) (171) (11) (96) 45
Realized loss (gain)
on hedging instruments (11) 3 (35) (4)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Income (loss) before
non-cash items 103 4 (5) (47)
Net unrealized loss
(gain) on hedging
instruments 137 40 115 (4)
Depletion, depreciation
and accretion 7 1 11 2
Future tax (recovery) (32) (8) (25) (10)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net income (loss) $ (9) $ (29) $ (106) $ (35)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comparative amounts for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 have
been revised to reflect the retroactive adoption of CICA Handbook section 3064
"Goodwill and Intangible Assets", effective January 1, 2009.
Operational Overview
--------------------
>>
Our overall operating results in the second quarter of 2009 and the six
months ended June 30, 2009 reflected the inconsistent performance of SAGD and
Upgrader operations and relatively low SAGD volumes. During the second
quarter, we resolved some of the previously identified water treating issues,
which is expected to lead to higher steam volumes and corresponding bitumen
volumes. Both HLS units are operating with additional supplementary heat. The
operating performance of the Upgrader improved considerably during the second
quarter as the Upgrader had an on-stream factor of 46% during the quarter
compared to 33% in the first quarter. On-stream factor is a measure of the
period of time that the Upgrader is producing PSC(TM) and it is calculated as
the percentage of hours the Hydrocracker Unit in the Upgrader is in operation.
As previously announced, a project to replace valves and conduct maintenance
on the water treatment plant during the third quarter of 2009 is planned,
which is expected to increase steam production. We expect that the cost of
these activities will not be significant but will result in scheduled downtime
in the third quarter, reducing bitumen and PSC(TM) production. As steam
generation increases, we expect that all wells will be converted to production
mode.
We define our net field operating margin as revenue related to petroleum
products and power sales minus operating expenses, diluent and feedstock
purchases and transportation costs. See "Non-GAAP Financial Measures". This
margin was a loss of $28 million during the three months ended June 30, 2009
as compared with a loss of $31 million in the preceding quarter. Our net field
operating margin improved during the second quarter as a result of higher
sales volumes and prices for PSC(TM), lower diluent costs as a result of more
on-stream time and lower SAGD operating costs. These improvements were offset
by the inclusion in our net field operating margin of $16 million for Upgrader
operating costs (these costs were capitalized in the first quarter). As most
of our SAGD and Upgrader operating costs are fixed, we expect that rising SAGD
volumes and an increasing Upgrader on-stream factor will lead to improvements
in our net field operating margin. This expected improvement would result in
higher PSC(TM) sales and lower diluent costs.
The results of operations for the six month period ended June 30, 2009
include SAGD results for the entire period, as well as Upgrader results from
April 1, 2009, which is the date we determined the Upgrader to be ready for
its intended use.
<<
Revenue
-------
>>
For the three months ended June 30, 2009, we earned revenue of $34
million. Our share of PSC(TM) sales averaged 1,700 bbl/day (Q1 2009: 700
bbl/day was included in capitalized operations) at an average price of
approximately $65.50/bbl, while our share of Premium Synthetic Heavy (PSH)
averaged 4,400 bbl/day (Q1 2009: 7,700 bbl/day) at an average price of
approximately $58.50/bbl. During the second quarter we received pricing
in-line with or better than other synthetic crude oils. Due to the premium
characteristics of our PSC(TM), we expect to increase the premium we receive
relative to other synthetic crude oils as production, and therefore the
availability of marketed PSC(TM), increases. In the same period, we had power
sales of $1 million representing 17,167 megawatt hours (MWh) of electricity
sold at an average price of approximately $33/MWh.
For the six months ended June 30, 2009, we earned revenue of $63 million,
which was comprised of $51 million PSH sales, $10 million of PSC(TM) sales and
$2 million of power sales. There was no revenue recorded in the three and six
month periods ending June 30, 2008 as the facilities were not considered to be
ready for their intended use.
<<
Expenses, gains and losses
--------------------------
(x) Operating expenses
>>
Operating expenses were $39 million for the three months ended June 30,
2009 and $67 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009. For both periods,
operating expenses were primarily comprised of natural gas, maintenance,
labour and operating materials and services. Operating expenses increased from
$28 million in the first quarter to $39 million because we ceased
capitalization of Upgrader operations effective April 1, 2009. In the second
quarter, operating expenses improved compared to the first quarter as we
benefited from lower natural gas costs due to lower prices, as well as reduced
maintenance costs related to start-up activities. There were no operating
expenses recorded in the corresponding periods in 2008. These costs were
capitalized as the facilities were not considered to be ready for their
intended use.
(x) Diluent and feedstock purchases
Diluent and feedstock purchases were $20 million for the three months
ended June 30, 2009 and $49 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009.
Diluent costs in the three months ended June 30, 2009 are lower than the three
months ended March 31, 2009 as a result of a higher on-stream factor for the
Upgrader and a portion of our PSC(TM) production was used as diluent for our
bitumen production. Diluent purchases averaged approximately $69/bbl in the
second quarter, while the year-to-date average was approximately $66/bbl.
There were no diluent or feedstock purchases included in operations in the
corresponding periods in 2008 since these costs were capitalized as the
facilities were not considered to be ready for their intended use.
(x) Transportation
Transportation expenses were $3 million for the three months ended June
30, 2009 and $6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009, primarily
related to pipeline costs associated with PSC(TM) and PSH sales. There were no
transportation expenses included in operations in the corresponding periods in
2008 since these costs were capitalized as the facilities were not considered
to be ready for their intended use.
(x) Net interest expense
Net interest expense was $42 million for the three months ended June 30,
2009 and $61 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009. Interest expense
increased in the second quarter as we no longer capitalize interest
attributable to the Upgrader. In 2008, $1 million of interest income was
earned in the three months ended June 30, 2008, while $3 million of interest
income was earned in the six months ended June 30, 2008. There was no interest
costs included in expenses in the corresponding periods in 2008, as this cost
was capitalized since the facilities were not considered to be ready for their
intended use.
(x) General and Administrative (G&A)
For the three months ended June 30, 2009 G&A expenses increased to $7
million from $4 million in the corresponding period in 2008. For the six
months ended June 30, 2009, G&A expenses increased to $13 million from $8
million in the corresponding period in 2008. The increase for the three and
six month period is due to one-time transition costs related to the
re-organization of OPTI after the asset sale to Nexen.
(x) Financing charges
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, financing charges were
$1 million, which is consistent with the corresponding periods in 2008.
Financing charges in 2009 relate to the evaluation of financing alternatives,
while financing charges in 2008 relate to issuance of new debt facilities.
(x) Loss on disposal of assets
Loss on disposal of assets was $1 million for the three months ended June
30, 2009 and $2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009. The loss
relates to information technology write offs in the second quarter and costs
incurred during the first quarter related to the asset sale to Nexen. There
were no asset disposals in the corresponding periods in 2008.
(x) Foreign exchange gain or loss
The gain or loss is comprised of the re-measurement of our
U.S.-dollar-denominated long-term debt and cash. For the three months ended
June 30, 2009, foreign exchange translation gain increased to $171 million
from $11 million in 2008. The Canadian dollar strengthened from CDN$1.26 to
US$1.00 to CDN$1.16 to US$1.00 in the three months ended June 30, 2009. For
the six months ended June 30, 2009, foreign exchange translation gain was $96
million compared to a loss of $45 million in 2008. The Canadian dollar
strengthened from CDN$1.22 to US$1.00 to CDN$1.16 to US$1.00 in the first six
months of 2009.
(x) Net realized gain or loss on hedging instruments
Net realized gain on hedging instruments was $11 million for the three
months ended June 30, 2009 and $35 million for the six months ended June 30,
2009. The gains in both periods are related to our US$80/bbl crude oil puts
and our US$77/bbl crude oil swaps, since we realize gains on these contracts
to the extent the contract price exceeds the West Texas Intermediate (WTI)
price. WTI averaged US$59.62 during the three months ended June 30, 2009 and
averaged US$51.35 during the six months ended June 30, 2009.
(x) Net unrealized gain or loss on hedging instruments
For the three months ended June 30, 2009, we had a net unrealized loss of
$137 million compared to a loss of $40 million in the corresponding period in
2008. The net unrealized loss is comprised of an $82 million unrealized loss
on our foreign exchange hedges due to the strengthening of the Canadian dollar
from CDN$1.26 to US$1.00 to CDN$1.16 to US$1.00 and a $55 million unrealized
loss on our commodity hedges as the future price of WTI increased during the
quarter.
For the six months ended June 30, 2009, we had a net unrealized loss of
$115 million compared to a loss of $4 million in the corresponding period in
2008. The unrealized loss in 2009 was due to a loss of $45 million on our
foreign exchange hedges as the Canadian dollar strengthened from $1.22 to
US$1.00 to CDN$1.16 to US$1.00 and a $70 million mark to market loss on our
commodity hedges as the future price of WTI increased over the first six
months of 2009.
For the remainder of 2009, our commodity hedges are comprised of a 6,000
bbl/d put option at a net price of approximately US$76/bbl and a 500 bbl/d
swap at US$77/bbl. For 2010, our commodity hedges are comprised of West Texas
Intermediate (WTI) swap options that provide for 3,000 bbl/d at strike prices
between US$64/bbl and US$67/bbl.
(x) Depletion, depreciation and amortization
For the three months ended June 30, 2009, depletion, depreciation and
amortization was $6 million compared to $1 million in 2008. For the six months
ended June 30, 2009, depletion, depreciation and amortization was $11 million
compared to $2 million in 2008. The increase for the three and six month
periods compared to the corresponding periods in 2008 is due to the Upgrader
being considered ready for its intended use effective April 1, 2009 and the
SAGD facilities being considered ready for its intended use effective July 1,
2008.
(x) Future tax recovery
Future tax expense for the three months ended June 30, 2009 is a recovery
of $32 million (2008: $8 million) and for the six months ended June 30, 2009
is a recovery of $25 million (2008: $9 million). Future tax recovery for the
six months ended June 30, 2009 is primarily related to the future tax benefit
derived from current year losses from operations, net of a valuation allowance
in respect of unrealized foreign exchange capital losses on U.S.-dollar-
denominated debt. The valuation allowance was partially reversed in the three
months ended June 30, 2009 due to a strengthening Canadian dollar relative to
the US dollar.
(x) Foreign exchange hedging instruments
OPTI is exposed to foreign exchange rate risk on our long-term
U.S.-dollar-denominated debt. To partially mitigate this exposure, we have
entered into US$875 million of foreign exchange forwards to manage our
exposure to repayment risk on our U.S.-dollar-denominated debt. The forward
contracts provide for the purchase of U.S. dollars and the sale of Canadian
dollars at a rate of approximately CDN$1.17 to US$1.00 with an expiry in April
2010. With respect to our U.S.-dollar-denominated debt, these forward
contracts provide protection against a decline in the value of the Canadian
dollar below CDN$1.17 to US$1.00 on a portion of our debt. As noted under
"Liquidity", the value of these derivatives affects our debt to capitalization
covenant as the value of these contracts is included in the measurement of our
debt for covenant purposes.
Prior to the expiry of this foreign exchange forward in April of 2010,
OPTI intends to extend this forward to a later settlement date. In the event
that this forward is extended, there would be no cash settlement until the new
maturity of the forward. If we are unable or choose not to extend the term of
this forward, we expect to pay or receive based on the mark to market of this
contract at the time of its current expiry in April 2010. We would expect to
receive (pay) an amount approximately equal to US$8.75 million for each $0.01
that the foreign exchange rate is above (below) CDN$1.17 to US$1.00.
<<
SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
In millions
(except per 2009 2008 2007
share ---------------------------------------------------------------
amounts) Q2 Q1 Q4 Q3 Q2 Q1 Q4 Q3
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Revenue $ 34 $ 29 $ 69 $ 126 $ - $ - $ - $ -
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net
earnings
(loss) (9) (97) (410) (32) (29) (6) 32 11
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Earnings
(loss)
per
share,
basic and
diluted $(0.04) $(0.50) $(2.09) $(0.16) $(0.14) $(0.03) $ 0.16 $ 0.06
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
The disclosure and analysis with respect to summary financial information
has been updated to reflect the retroactive adoption of CICA Handbook section
3064 "Goodwill and Intangible Assets" on January 1, 2009.
Prior to the third quarter of 2008, earnings have been influenced by
fluctuating foreign exchange translation gains and losses primarily related to
re-measurement of our U.S.-dollar-denominated long-term debt, fluctuating
realized and unrealized gains and losses on hedging instruments, and
fluctuating future tax expense. During the fourth quarter of 2007, we had a
$20 million unrealized gain on hedging instruments, a $6 million foreign
exchange translation gain and a $9 million recovery of future taxes primarily
as a result of a reduction in the applicable federal tax rate that increased
our earnings. During the second quarter of 2008, we had a $34 million
unrealized loss on hedging instruments.
In the third and fourth quarters of 2008, we generated revenue and
incurred operating expenditures associated with early stages of SAGD
operation. During the fourth quarter of 2008, we had a pre-tax asset
impairment for accounting purposes related to our working interest sale of
$369 million and a future tax expense recovery, primarily related to this
impairment, of $116 million, as well as a $254 million foreign exchange
translation loss and $105 million realized gain and a $28 million unrealized
gain on hedging instruments.
The first and second quarters of 2009 represent initial stages of
operation at relatively low operating volumes and therefore our operating
results associated with these activities are expected to improve as SAGD
production increases and the Upgrader produces higher volumes of PSC(TM). The
second quarter of 2009 is the first quarter when we generated revenue and
incurred operating expenditures from the Upgrader. Refer also to explanations
above regarding realized and unrealized gains and losses related to foreign
exchange translation and hedging instruments.
SHARE CAPITAL
On June 30, 2009, OPTI entered into an agreement to issue 85,720,000
common shares at a price of $1.75 per share. The financing closed on July 14,
2009 for total net proceeds of approximately $142 million. At July 15, 2009,
OPTI had 281,749,526 common shares and 5,616,316 common share options
outstanding, of which 1,465,000 common share options have an exercise price of
less than $3.50 per share. The common share options have a weighted average
exercise price of $8.89 per share. At July 15, 2009, OPTI's fully diluted
shares outstanding were 287,365,842.
<<
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Capital Resources and Liquidity
-------------------------------
>>
At June 30, 2009, we have approximately $341 million of financial
resources, consisting of $313 million of cash on hand and $28 million undrawn
under our $350 million revolving credit facility. Our cash and cash
equivalents are invested exclusively in money market instruments issued by
major Canadian institutions. Our long-term debt currently consists of US$1,750
million of Senior secured notes (Notes) and a $350 million revolving credit
facility.
For the three months ended June 30, 2009, cash used by operating
activities was $64 million, cash provided by financing activities was $235
million and cash used by investing activities was $69 million. These changes,
combined with a gain on our U.S.-dollar-denominated cash of $7 million,
resulted in an increase in cash and cash equivalents during the period of $95
million.
During the first quarter of 2009, we received significant funding as a
result of our working interest sale to Nexen that was completed in January
2009. We received gross proceeds of $735 million. We used $545 million of
these proceeds to repay amounts owing on our revolving credit facilities and
$85 million as pre-funding of a portion of our 2009 joint venture capital
program with Nexen. For the remainder of 2009, working capital, operating cash
flow and availability under our revolving credit facilities are expected to
fund our capital expenditures.
With the recently completed equity issuance, we expect our financial
resources will provide sufficient financial resources until full production of
72,000 bbl/d is reached for the Project, expected by the end of 2010.
OPTI has cash and unused credit facilities of approximately $341 million
as of June 30, 2009. This is prior to the receipt of net proceeds received
from the equity issuance of $142 million on July 14, 2009. We expect to use
our existing cash balances to significantly reduce the balance of our
revolving credit facility during the third quarter.
Our debt facilities contain a number of provisions that serve to limit
the amount of debt we may incur. With respect to our revolving credit
facility, the key maintenance covenants are with respect to the ratio of debt
outstanding under the revolving credit facility to earnings before interest,
taxes and depreciation (EBITDA), and total debt to capitalization. Maintenance
covenants are important as they are ongoing conditions that must be satisfied
to comply with the terms of the revolving credit facility.
The revolving credit facility debt to EBITDA covenant is measured
quarterly, commencing in the third quarter of 2009. It requires that this
ratio is lower than 2.5:1 commencing for the quarter ended September 30, 2009.
The first three measurements of EBITDA for this covenant will annualize EBITDA
as measured from July 1, 2009, to the end of the applicable covenant period.
Thereafter, EBITDA will be based on a trailing four quarters. Realized cash
gains on commodity contracts, such as our existing puts and forwards, are
included in EBITDA for the purposes of the covenant.
OPTI has sufficient financial resources to repay the facility in full to
satisfy compliance with this covenant for the quarter ending September 30,
2009. In the fourth and subsequent quarters, our compliance with the covenant
as currently structured will depend on our operating performance and commodity
prices.
OPTI has commenced discussions with certain key lenders (the Lenders) in
the revolving credit facility, including the administrative agent, and we plan
to broaden these discussions to include the other members of our banking
syndicate with the objective of reaching an agreement to defer and amend this
debt to EBITDA covenant prior to it becoming operative. We expect that an
amendment of this nature will provide us with greater certainty of meeting
this covenant, however, no assurances can be made with respect to reaching any
agreement with our Lenders. If we are unable to amend and defer this covenant
as described below, then we intend to repay this facility (whether temporarily
or permanently) to the extent required to satisfy this covenant or pursue
other alternatives to satisfy the covenant, including obtaining a replacement
facility or pursuing asset sales.
Other risks related to compliance with the EBITDA covenant include
commodity pricing, operating costs and capital expenditures. Commodity pricing
is a less significant risk in 2009 as a substantial portion of our production
is hedged. We have hedged 6,000 bbl/d for the remainder of 2009 at a net price
of approximately US$76/bbl, which is a substantial portion of our expected
2009 PSC(TM) sales volume. An additional 500 bbl/d for the remainder of 2009
is hedged with a US$77/bbl swap (risks associated with our hedging instruments
are discussed in more detail under "Financial Instruments"). Should operating
or capital costs be greater than anticipated, we would require additional SAGD
and PSC(TM) volumes in order to meet this covenant. The majority of our
operating and interest costs are fixed. Aside from changes in the price of
natural gas, our costs will neither decrease nor increase significantly as a
result of fluctuations in WTI prices other than with respect to royalties to
the Provincial Government of Alberta, which increase on a sliding scale at WTI
prices higher than CDN$55/bbl.
The total debt to capitalization covenant requires that we do not exceed
a ratio of 70 percent as calculated on a quarterly basis. The covenant is
calculated based on the book value of debt and equity. The book value of debt
is adjusted for the effect of any foreign exchange derivatives issued in
connection with the debt that may be outstanding. Our capitalization is
adjusted to exclude the $369 million increase to deficit as a result of the
asset impairment associated with the working interest sale to Nexen and the
$85 million increase to January 1, 2009 opening deficit as a result of new
accounting pronouncements effective on that date. At June 30, 2009, this means
for the purposes of this covenant calculation that our debt would be increased
by the value of our foreign exchange forward liability in the amount of $14
million and our deficit would be reduced by $454 million. With respect to
U.S.-dollar-denominated debt, for purposes of the total debt to capitalization
ratio, the debt is translated to Canadian dollars based on the average
exchange rate for the quarter. The total debt to capitalization is therefore
influenced by the variability in the measurement of the foreign exchange
forward, which is subject to mark to market variability and average foreign
exchange rate changes during the quarter.
In respect of each new borrowing under the $350 million revolving credit
facility, we must satisfy certain conditions precedent prior to making a new
borrowing. We must confirm that the representations and warranties in our loan
documents are correct on the date of the new borrowing, that no event of
default has occurred and that there has not been a change or development that
would constitute a material adverse effect.
With respect to our Notes, the covenants are in place primarily to limit
the total amount of debt that OPTI may incur at any time. This limit is most
affected by the present value of our total proven reserves using forecast
prices discounted at 10 percent. Based on our 2008 reserve report, as adjusted
for our new working interest in the joint venture, we have sufficient capacity
under this test to incur significant additional debt beyond our existing $350
million revolving credit facility and existing Notes. Other leverage factors,
such as debt to capitalization and total debt to EBITDA, are expected to be
more constraining than this limitation.
We have semi-annual interest payments of US$71 million in June and
December of each year until maturity of the Notes in 2014. Also, we estimate
our share of capital expenditures required to sustain production of Phase 1 at
or near planned capacity for the Project will be approximately $60 million per
year. We expect to fund these payments from future operating cash flow and
from existing financial resources that includes the available portion of the
revolving credit facility.
Recent developments in capital markets have restricted our access to new
debt and equity. Although we expect our financial resources will provide
sufficient financial resources until full production is reached by the end of
2010 based on current production and operating estimates, delays in ramp-up of
SAGD production, operating issues with the SAGD or Upgrader operations or
deterioration of commodity prices could result in additional funding
requirements earlier than we have estimated. Should the Company require such
funding, it may be difficult to obtain such financing.
CREDIT RATINGS
OPTI maintains a company rating and a rating for its revolving credit
facility and Senior Notes with Moody's Investor Service (Moody's) and Standard
and Poors (S&P). Please refer to the table below for the respective ratings.
<<
Moody's S&P
------- ---
OPTI Corporate Rating Caa1 B-
Revolving Credit Facility B1 B+
8.25% Notes Caa1 B
7.875% Notes Caa1 B
>>
The Moody's ratings were downgraded in June 2009, with the outlook
changed to rating under review from negative. The S&P rating was put on credit
watch with negative implications in June 2009.
A security rating is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities
and may be subject to revision or withdrawal at any time by the rating
organization.
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS AND COMMITMENTS
During the three months ended June 30, 2009, our long term debt increased
by $235 million as a result of borrowings on our long term revolving credit
facility.
The following table shows our contractual obligations and commitments
related to financial liabilities at June 30, 2009.
<<
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
In $ millions Remaining 2010 - 2012 -
Total 2009 2011 2013 Thereafter
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Accounts payable
and accrued
liabilities $ 84 $ 84 $ - $ - $ -
Long-term debt (Notes
- principal)(1) 2,035 - - - 2,035
Long-term debt
(Notes - interest)(2) 902 82 328 328 164
Long-term debt
(Revolving)(3) 322 - 322 - -
Capital leases(4) 71 2 7 6 56
Operating leases and
other commitments(5) 76 5 20 20 31
Contracts and purchase
orders(6) 13 13 - - -
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total commitments $ 3,503 $ 186 $ 677 $ 354 $ 2,286
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notes:
(1) Consists of principal repayments on the Notes in Canadian dollars.
(2) Consists of scheduled interest payments on the Notes in Canadian
dollars.
(3) Consists of $322 million drawn on the revolving credit facility. The
repayment represents only the final repayment of the facility at its
scheduled maturity in 2011. In addition, we are contractually
obligated for interest payments on borrowings and standby charges in
respect to undrawn amounts under the revolving credit facility, which
are not reflected in the above table as amounts cannot reasonably be
estimated due to the revolving nature of the facility and variable
interest rates. In addition, such interest amounts are not material
relative to our other commitments.
(4) Consists of our share of future payments under our product
transportation agreements with respect to future tolls during the
initial contract term.
(5) Consists of our share of payments under our product transportation
agreements with respect to future tolls during the initial contract
term.
(6) Consists of our share of commitments associated with contracts and
purchase orders in connection with the Long Lake Project and our
other oil sands activities associated with future phases.
>>
NETBACKS
We have provided below an update to our estimated netback for Phase 1 of
the Project that was last updated in our Revised Annual MD&A filed on SEDAR on
June 3, 2009. The netback calculation based on US$75 WTI pricing is similar to
our most recent update other than with respect to presentation of new
commodity price assumptions at US$60 WTI and US$90 WTI.
This financial outlook is intended to provide investors with a measure of
the ability of our Project to generate netbacks assuming full production
capacity. We believe that the ability of the Project to generate cash to fund
interest payments and invest in capital expenditures is a key advantage of our
Project and important to our investors. We believe the netback measure is the
most appropriate financial gauge to demonstrate this ability as corporate
costs (other than corporate G&A expenses), interest, and other non-cash items
are excluded from the calculation. The financial outlook may not be suitable
for other purposes. We expect netbacks generated by our Project to be lower
than shown in this outlook in the initial years following start-up due to the
lower production volumes during ramp-up and an initially higher SOR. The
netback calculation as presented is a non-GAAP financial measure. The closest
GAAP financial measure to the netback calculation is cash flow from
operations. However, cash flow from operations includes many other corporate
items that affect cash and are independent of the operations of the Project.
The actual netbacks achieved by the Project could differ materially from
these estimates. The material risk factors that we have identified toward
achieving these netbacks are outlined under "Forward Looking Information" in
our AIF. In particular, the SAGD and Long Lake Upgrader facilities may not
operate as planned; the operating costs of the Project may vary considerably
during the operating period; our results of operations will depend upon the
prevailing prices of oil and natural gas which can fluctuate substantially; we
will be subject to foreign currency exchange fluctuation exposure; and our
netback will be directly affected by the applicable royalty regime relating to
our business. The key assumptions relating to the netback estimate are set out
in the notes beneath the table.
<<
Estimated Future Project Post-Payout Netbacks(1)
WTI - WTI - WTI -
US$60(2) US$75(3) US$90(4)
----------- ----------- -----------
$/bbl $/bbl $/bbl
----------- ----------- -----------
Revenue(1) $ 75.51 $ 86.33 $ 95.44
Royalties and Corporate G&A (6.58) (8.93) (12.80)
Operating costs(5)
Natural gas(6) (3.42) (3.90) (4.30)
Other variable(7) (2.76) (2.77) (2.77)
Fixed (12.82) (12.82) (12.82)
Property taxes and insurance(8) (3.55) (3.55) (3.55)
----------- ----------- -----------
Netback(9) $ 46.38 $ 54.37 $ 59.19
Notes:
(1) The per barrel amounts are based on the expected yield for the
Project of 57,700 bbl/d of PSC(TM) and 800 bbl/d of butane, and
assume that the Upgrader will have an on-stream factor of 96 percent.
These numbers are cash costs only and do not reflect non-cash
charges. See "Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements".
(2) For purposes of this calculation, with regard to the WTI price
scenario of US$60, we have assumed natural gas costs of US$6.00/mcf,
foreign exchange rates of $1.00 (equal sign) US$0.775, heavy/light
crude oil price differentials of 32 percent of WTI and electricity
sales prices of $92.66 per MWh. Revenue includes sale of PSC(TM),
bitumen, butane and electricity.
(3) For purposes of this calculation, with regard to the WTI price
scenario of US$75, we have assumed natural gas costs of US$7.50/mcf,
foreign exchange rates of $1.00 (equal sign) US$0.850, heavy/light
crude oil price differentials of 30 percent of WTI and electricity
sales prices of $105.61 per MWh. Revenue includes sale of PSC(TM),
bitumen, butane and electricity.
(4) For purposes of this calculation, with regard to the WTI price
scenario of US$90, we have assumed natural gas costs of US$9.00/mcf,
foreign exchange rates of $1.00 (equal sign) US$0.925, heavy/light
crude oil price differentials of 27 percent of WTI and electricity
sales prices of $116.45 per MWh. Revenue includes sale of PSC(TM),
bitumen, butane and electricity.
(5) Costs are in 2009 dollars.
(6) Natural gas costs are based on our long-term estimate for a SOR of
3.0.
(7) Includes approximately $1.00/bbl for greenhouse gas mitigation costs
based on an approximate average 20 percent reduction of CO2 emissions
at a cost of $20 per tonne of CO2.
(8) Property taxes are based on expected mill rates for 2009.
(9) Figures shown above may not sum due to the effects of rounding.
>>
We estimate sustaining capital costs required to maintain production at
design rates of capacity to be approximately $8.00 to $9.00 per barrel of
PSC(TM), assuming full design rate production adjusted for long-term on-stream
expectations. The netbacks as shown are prior to abandonment and reclamation
costs. We do not include any of the foregoing costs in our netback estimates
due to the long-term nature of our assets.
Based on US$60WTI and the other assumptions set out in the notes above,
we expect our operating costs plus royalties and corporate G&A expenses to be
$29.13 per barrel of products sold. Using a foreign exchange rate of $1.00 (equal sign)
US$0.775, the annual interest on our senior secured notes is approximately
$25.00 per barrel of products sold. Based on this, at full production volumes,
our revenue will exceed our estimated operating costs, royalties, corporate
G&A expenses and interest on our senior secured notes at approximately $54.00
per barrel (US$42.00 per barrel (WTI)) of products sold.
<<
OFF-BALANCE-SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
We have no off-balance-sheet arrangements.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES
>>
Our critical accounting estimates are consistent with those noted in our
revised 2008 annual MD&A dated February 24, 2009 filed on SEDAR on June 3,
2009, except as revised below.
Depletion, depreciation and amortization
Depletion on SAGD resource assets is measured over the life of proved
reserves on a unit-of-production basis and commences when the facilities are
substantially complete and after commercial production has begun. Reserve
estimates and the associated future capital can have a significant impact on
earnings, as they are a key component to the calculation of depletion. A
downward revision in the reserve estimate or an upward revision to future
capital would result in increased depletion, reduction of earnings and lower
book value of SAGD assets. Major SAGD and Upgrader facilities are depreciated
with the unit-of-production method based on the productive capacity of the
facilities over 40 years.
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
On January 1, 2009, OPTI adopted CICA Section 3064 "Goodwill and
Intangible Assets." This standard replaces Section 3062 "Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets" and Section 3450 "Research and Development Costs". The new
section establishes standards for the recognition, measurement, presentation
and disclosure of goodwill and intangible assets. The provisions relating to
the definition and initial recognition of intangible assets are equivalent to
the corresponding provisions of International Financial Reporting Standard
(IFRS) IAS 38, "Intangible Assets." Emerging Issues Committee (EIC) 27
"Revenues and Expenditures During the Pre-Operating Period" is no longer
applicable for OPTI as we have adopted CICA 3064. Accounting Guidelines (AcG)
11 "Enterprises in the Development Stage" is amended to delete references to
deferred costs and to provide guidance on development costs as intangible
assets under Section 3064.
As a result of these changes and the adoption of these new standards,
OPTI expensed certain previously capitalized costs with retroactive effect on
January 1, 2009 with a corresponding increase of $85 million opening deficit.
This adjustment is primarily comprised of deferred costs related to SAGD
start-up activities ($70 million), translation of OPTI's U.S.-dollar debt
($167 million), offset by gains related to financial derivatives associated
with OPTI's debt ($145 million) and by a recovery of future tax expense ($23
million).
<<
NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
Credit risk and the fair value of financial assets and financial
liabilities
>>
On January 20, 2009 the EIC issued a new abstract EIC 173 "Credit Risk
and the Fair Value of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities". This
abstract concludes that an entity's own credit risk and the credit risk of the
counterparty should be taken into account when determining the fair value of
financial assets and financial liabilities, including derivative instruments.
This abstract is to apply to all financial assets and liabilities
measured at fair value in interim and annual financial statements for periods
ending on or after January 20, 2009. The adoption of this abstract did not
impact our financial statements.
IFRS
The Canadian Accounting Standards Board announced that Canadian Generally
Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) no longer apply for all publically
accountable enterprises as of January 1, 2011. From that date forward, OPTI
will be required to report under IFRS as set out by the International
Accounting Standards Board (IASB). Any adjustments resulting from a change in
policy are applied retroactively with corresponding adjustment to opening
retained earnings. OPTI is currently evaluating the impact of these new
standards. The implementation of IFRS may result in a significant impact on
our accounting policies, measurement and disclosure.
During the second quarter, OPTI commenced preparation of a Preliminary
Impact Assessment (PIA) to identify differences between Canadian GAAP and
IFRS. This work will be completed in the third quarter and the key deliverable
from this assessment will be major accounting policy choices under IFRS and
their financial statement impact. The PIA will also provide an assessment of
information systems and business process impacts of adopting IFRS.
Business Impact of IFRS
OPTI has recorded a pre-tax loss on disposal of $369 million with respect
to the working interest sale to Nexen. Under IFRS this loss would have been
significantly higher as all of OPTI's assets would have been considered
impaired under IFRS standards. IFRS permits subsequent recovery of such write
downs in future periods to the extent that fair value increases. Therefore,
the cumulative effect of the Nexen working interest sale at the date of
adoption on January 1, 2011 will depend on a fair value assessment of the
assets as of December 31, 2010.
NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES
The term net field operating margin does not have any standardized
meaning according to Canadian GAAP. It is therefore unlikely to be comparable
to similar measures presented by other companies. We plan to present this
measure on a consistent basis from period to period. We consider net field
operating margin to be an important indicator of the performance of our
business as a measure of the performance of the Project and our ability to
fund interest payments and invest in capital expenditures. The most comparable
Canadian GAAP financial measure is loss before taxes. For the three and six
months ended June 30, 2009, the following is a reconciliation of loss before
taxes to net field operating margin (loss).
<<
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Three months Six months
ended ended
June 30, June 30,
$ millions 2009 2009
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Loss before taxes $ (41) (131)
Interest, net 42 61
General and administrative 7 13
Financing charges 1 1
Loss on disposal of assets 1 2
Foreign exchange gain (171) (96)
Net realized gain on hedging instruments (11) (35)
Net unrealized loss on hedging instruments 137 115
Depletion, depreciation and accretion 7 11
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net field operating margin (loss) $ (28) (59)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
CONFERENCE CALL
OPTI Canada Inc. will conduct a conference call at 7:00 a.m. Mountain
Time (9:00 a.m. Eastern Time) on Wednesday, July 29, 2009 to review the
Company's second quarter 2009 financial and operating results. Chris Slubicki,
President and Chief Executive Officer, and Travis Beatty, Vice President,
Finance and Chief Financial Officer, will host the call. To participate in the
conference call, dial:
<<
(800) 588-4942 (North American Toll-Free)
(416) 644-3430 (Alternate)
>>
Please reference the OPTI Canada conference call with Chris Slubicki when
speaking with the Operator.
A replay of the call will be available until August 11, 2009, inclusive.
To access the replay, call (416) 640-1917 or (877) 289-8525 and enter passcode
21311681, followed by the pound sign.
This call will also be webcast, and can be accessed on OPTI Canada's
website under "Presentations and Webcasts" in the "For Investors" section. The
webcast will be available for replay for a period of 30 days. The webcast may
alternatively be accessed at:
http://www.newswire.ca/en/webcast/viewEvent.cgi?eventID(equal sign)2751980.
ABOUT OPTI
OPTI Canada Inc. is a Calgary, Alberta-based company focused on
developing major oil sands projects in Canada using our proprietary
OrCrude(TM) process. Our first project, Phase 1 of Long Lake, consists of
72,000 barrels per day of SAGD oil production integrated with an upgrading
facility. The upgrader uses the OrCrude(TM) process combined with commercially
available hydrocracking and gasification. Through gasification, this
configuration substantially reduces the exposure to and the need to purchase
natural gas. On a 100 percent basis, the Project is expected to produce 58,500
bbl/d of products, primarily 39 degree API Premium Sweet Crude with low
sulphur content, making it a highly desirable refinery feedstock. Due to its
premium characteristics, we expect PSC(TM) to sell at a price similar to West
Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude oil. The Long Lake Project is being operated in
a joint venture with Nexen Inc. OPTI holds a 35 percent working interest in
the joint venture. OPTI's common shares trade on the Toronto Stock Exchange
under the symbol OPC.
FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION
Certain statements contained herein are forward-looking statements,
including, but not limited to, statements relating to: the expected production
performance of the Long Lake Project; OPTI's other business prospects,
expansion plans and strategies; the cost, development and operation of the
Long Lake Project and OPTI's relationship with Nexen Inc.; OPTI's financial
outlook respecting the estimate of the netback for Phase 1 of the Project;
OPTI's anticipated financial condition and liquidity over the next 12 to 24
months; and our estimated future tax asset. Forward-looking information
typically contains statements with words such as "intends," "anticipate,"
"estimate," "expect," "potential," "could," "plan" or similar words suggesting
future outcomes. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on
forward-looking information because it is possible that expectations,
predictions, forecasts, projections and other forms of forward-looking
information will not be achieved by OPTI. By its nature, forward-looking
information involves numerous assumptions, inherent risks and uncertainties. A
change in any one of these factors could cause actual events or results to
differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking information.
Although OPTI believes that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking
statements are reasonable, OPTI can give no assurance that such expectations
will prove to be correct. Forward-looking statements are based on current
expectations, estimates and projections that involve a number of risks and
uncertainties which could cause actual results to differ materially from those
anticipated by OPTI and described in the forward-looking statements or
information. The forward-looking statements are based on a number of
assumptions which may prove to be incorrect. In addition to other assumptions
identified herein, OPTI has made assumptions regarding, among other things:
market costs and other variables affecting operating costs of the Project; the
ability of the Long Lake Project joint venture partners to obtain equipment,
services and supplies, including labour, in a timely and cost-effective
manner; the availability and costs of financing; oil prices and market price
for the Premium Sweet Crude (PSC(TM)) output of the OrCrude(TM) Upgrader;
foreign currency exchange rates and hedging risks. Other specific assumptions
and key risks and uncertainties are described elsewhere in this document and
in OPTI's other filings with Canadian securities authorities.
Readers should be aware that the list of assumptions, risks and
uncertainties set forth herein are not exhaustive. Readers should refer to
OPTI's current Annual Information Form (AIF) for a detailed discussion of
these assumptions, risks and uncertainties. The forward-looking statements or
information contained in this document are made as of the date hereof and OPTI
undertakes no obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking
statements or information, whether as a result of new information, future
events or otherwise, unless so required by applicable laws or regulatory
policies.
Additional information relating to our Company, including our AIF, can be
found at www.sedar.com
%CIK: 0001177446
/For further information: OPTI Canada Inc., (403) 249-9425/
(OPC.)
CO: OPTI Canada Inc.
CNW 06:00e 29-JUL-09
