Significant Accounting Policies [Text Block] | NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Organization Dextera Surgical Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated in the state of Delaware on October 15, 1997, as Vascular Innovations, Inc. On November 26, 2001, the Company changed its name to Cardica, Inc., and on June 19, 2016, changed its name to Dextera Surgical Inc. The Company is commercializing and developing the MicroCutter 5/80™ stapler based on its proprietary “staple-on-a-strip” technology intended for use by thoracic, pediatric, bariatric, colorectal and general surgeons. The Company rebranded the latest version of its MicroCutter XCHANGE® 30 combo device as Dextera MicroCutter 5/80 stapler, which is currently commercially available, is a cartridge-based microcutter device with a 5 millimeter shaft diameter, 80 degrees of articulation, and a 30 millimeter staple line cleared for specified indications for use in the United States and in the European Union, or EU, for a broader range of specified indications of use. The Company previously had additional products in development, including the MicroCutter XCHANGE® 45, a cartridge-based microcutter device with an 8 millimeter shaft and a 45 millimeter staple line, and the MicroCutter FLEXCHANGE™ 30, a cartridge-based microcutter device with a flexible shaft to facilitate endoscopic procedures requiring cutting and stapling; however, the Company suspended development of these additional potential products to focus solely on development of the first MicroCutter XCHANGE 30, and now the MicroCutter 5/80. In March 2012, the Company completed the design verification for and applied Conformité Européenne, or the CE Mark, to the MicroCutter XCHANGE 30 (where the Company uses the term “MicroCutter XCHANGE 30” herein, the Company refers to earlier versions of the MicroCutter XCHANGE 30, not the latest version that the Company rebranded as the MicroCutter 5/80) and, in December 2012, began a controlled commercial launch of the MicroCutter XCHANGE 30 in Europe. The Company received from the United States Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, 510(k) clearances for the MicroCutter XCHANGE 30 and blue reload in January 2014, and for the white reload in February 2014, for use in multiple open or minimally-invasive surgical procedures for the transection, resection and/or creation of anastomoses in small and large intestine, as well as the transection of the appendix. The blue reload is a cartridge inserted in the MicroCutter XCHANGE 30 to deploy staples for use in medium thickness tissue, and the white reload is a cartridge inserted in the MicroCutter XCHANGE 30 to deploy staples for use in thin tissue. In March 2014, the Company made its first sale of the MicroCutter XCHANGE 30 in the United States, and subsequently temporarily suspended its controlled commercial launch in November 2014, as the Company shifted its focus to improved performance based on surgeons’ feedback. In April 2015, the Company resumed its controlled commercial launch primarily in Europe, of the MicroCutter XCHANGE 30 for thinner tissue usually requiring deployment of white reloads. In November 2015, the Company issued a voluntary withdrawal of the MicroCutter XCHANGE 30 blue cartridges from the market, and continued to sell the MicroCutter XCHANGE 30 device solely for use with the white cartridge. While the Company continues this controlled commercial launch, the Company’s goal was to complete product improvements on the MicroCutter 5/80 which accommodates thicker tissue by enabling deployment of both white and blue reloads. The Company has since ceased the production of the MicroCutter XCHANGE 30, and is focusing on producing and selling the MicroCutter 5/80. To further expand the use of the MicroCutter 5/80, the Company submitted 510(k) Premarket Notifications to the FDA to expand the indications for use to include vascular structures, and in January 2016, received FDA 510(k) clearance to use the MicroCutter 5/80 with a white reload and in July 2016, received FDA 510(k) clearance to use the MicroCutter 5/80 with a blue reload, both for the transection and resection in open or minimally invasive urologic, thoracic, and pediatric surgical procedures. These clearances complement the existing indications for use of the MicroCutter 5/80 in surgical procedures in the small and large intestine and in the appendix. Following the 510(k) clearances, the Company conducted its evaluation of the MicroCutter 5/80, that deploys both blue and white cartridges, with selected centers of key opinion leaders in the U.S. and Europe through initial market preference testing to validate clinical benefits prior to broadening its commercial launch. The Company recently completed its market preference testing of the MicroCutter 5/80 with approximately 55 procedures and 200 staple cartridge deployments with reliable, consistent performance and excellent hemostasis (stopping of the blood flow). Following its successful evaluation of the MicroCutter 5/80, the Company plans to expand its commercial launch to a select group of customers in the U.S. and Europe. The Company is currently conducting the MicroCutter-Assisted Thoracic Surgery Hemostasis (“MATCH”) registry, a post-market surveillance registry, to evaluate the hemostasis and ease-of-use for the MicroCutter 5/80. This is a prospective, open-label, multi-center registry and the Company plans to enroll up to 120 patients requiring surgical stapling during a lobectomy (surgical removal of a lobe of an organ) or segmentectomy (surgical removal of a segment of a lung lobe) at leading centers in the U.S. and Europe. The Company is also attempting to expand use of the MicroCutter 5/80 in the international market with selected regulatory filings. The Company submitted the application to Health Canada for regulatory approval of the MicroCutter XCHANGE 30 and the white cartridge reload and, in March 2016, received a medical device license to market in Canada. Although the Company is licensed to market the MicroCutter XCHANGE 30 with white reloads in Canada, the Company intends to wait until the Company files an amendment for the MicroCutter 5/80 with Health Canada for regulatory approval before it can market the MicroCutter 5/80 in Canada. In addition, in August 2013, the Company’s exclusive distributor in Japan, Century Medical, Inc., or Century, filed for regulatory approval of the MicroCutter XCHANGE 30 white and blue cartridge reloads with the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency, or PMDA, in Japan and in April 2014, filed for approval for the MicroCutter XCHANGE 30 with TUV Rheinland Japan Ltd, a registered third-party agency in Japan, and received approvals in late 2014 for both reloads and stapler, to market in Japan. Also, in January 2015, Century submitted an application to PMDA relating to a change in the material of the reload insert component within the reloads, changing the distal tip of the reload insert material from a Vectra Liquid Crystal Polymer, or LCP, to IXEF Polyarylamide, or IXEF, and received approval in August 2015 to market in Japan. Though approvals of the MicroCutter XCHANGE 30 and reloads for marketing in Japan have been obtained, Century intends to wait until the Company releases the MicroCutter 5/80 to Century and Century will need to file additional regulatory approvals with the Ministry of Health to market the MicroCutter 5/80 in Japan. Historically, the Company generated product revenues primarily from the sale of automated anastomotic systems; however, the Company started generating revenues from the commercial sales of the microcutter products since its introduction in Europe in December 2012, and in the United States in March 2014, and through September 30, 2016, the Company generated $1.8 million of net product revenues from the commercial sales of the microcutter products. For the three months ended September 30, 2016, the Company generated net revenue of $0.5 million, including $0.4 million from the sale of automated anastomotic systems, $56,000 from commercial sales of the microcutter products, $26,000 from license and development revenue and $14,000 of royalty revenue. Need for Additional Capital Going Concern The Company has incurred cumulative net losses of $209.7 million through September 30, 2016, and negative cash flows from operating activities and expects to incur losses for the next several years. As of September 30, 2016, the Company had approximately $9.0 million of cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments, and $4.0 million of debt principal outstanding. The Company believes that the existing cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments will be sufficient to meet its anticipated cash needs to enable it to conduct its business substantially as currently conducted for at least the next six months, subject to the ultimate resolution of the following uncertainty. The Company does not agree with Century’s assertions as the Company believes that it had notified Century of the financing that occurred in April 2014 and the extension of the due date of the note agreement effectively waived the prepayment provisions of the loan. The Company is currently in discussions with Century to resolve this matter. The Company does not believe it is probable that Century would prevail in a legal resolution of this matter. Accordingly, the Company has not changed the classification of the note as a noncurrent liability as of September 30, 2016. Penalty interest has not been reflected in the financial statements as its payment is not considered probable. Additionally, the Company has not accelerated amortization of the remaining note discount ($0.8 million at September 30, 2016). If the Company is required to repay the $4.0 million loan from Century along with the related penalty interest prior to September 30, 2018, this will reduce the period during which the existing cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments will be sufficient to meet the Company’s anticipated cash needs to less than three months from September 30, 2016, which would severely impair the Company’s ability to continue its business unless it is able to raise other funds to repay this debt. The Company may be able to extend these time periods to the extent that it decreases its planned expenditures, or raises additional capital. The Company would need to further reduce expenses in advance of the date on which it would exhaust its cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments in the event that it is unable to complete a financing, strategic or commercial transaction in the near term to ensure that it has sufficient capital to meet its obligations and continue on a path designed to create and preserve stockholders’ value. In order to satisfy its longer term liquidity requirements, the Company may seek to sell additional equity or debt securities, obtain a credit facility, enter into product development, license or distribution agreements with third parties or divest one or more of its commercialized products or products in development. The sale of additional equity or convertible debt securities could result in significant dilution to its stockholders, particularly in light of the prices at which its common stock has been recently trading. In addition, if the Company raises additional funds through the sale of equity securities, new investors could have rights superior to its existing stockholders. If additional funds are raised through the issuance of debt securities, these securities could have rights senior to those associated with its common stock and could contain covenants that would restrict its operations. Any product development, licensing, distribution or sale agreements that the Company enters into may require it to relinquish valuable rights, including with respect to commercialized products or products in development that the Company would otherwise seek to commercialize or develop itself. The Company may not be able to obtain sufficient additional financing or enter into a strategic transaction in a timely manner. Its need to raise capital may require it to accept terms that may harm its business or be disadvantageous to its current stockholders. The Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that it will continue as a going concern. This assumption contemplates the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. Its continuation as a going concern is contingent upon its ability to generate revenue and cash flow to meet its obligations on a timely basis and its ability to raise financing. The Company’s plans may be adversely impacted if it fails to realize its assumed levels of revenues and expenses or savings from its cost reduction activities. However, there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to generate cash flows and raise such funds if and when they are required. Failure to obtain future funding when needed or on acceptable terms would adversely affect its ability to fund operations and continue as a going concern. These matters raise substantial doubt about the ability of the Company to continue in existence as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of these uncertainties. Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. The unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the same basis as the annual financial statements which include the accounts of Dextera Surgical Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiary in Germany. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments necessary for the fair statement of balances and results have been included. The results of operations of any interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations for the full year or any other interim period. The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes thereto for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016, included in the Company’s Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 12, 2016. Reverse Stock Split On February 16, 2016, the Company filed an amendment to its Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation to effect a one-for-ten reverse split of its outstanding common stock (the “Reverse Split”) which had the effect of reducing the number of outstanding shares of common stock from 89,344,777 to 8,934,452, effective February 17, 2016. Any fractional shares of common stock resulting from the Reverse Split were settled in cash equal to the fraction of a share to which the holder was entitled. As a result of the Reverse Split, the Company reclassified its consolidated balance sheets total par value of approximately $80,000 from common stock to additional paid-in capital for the reporting periods. All shares of common stock, stock options, warrants to purchase common stock, the conversion rate of preferred stock and per share information presented in the condensed consolidated financial statements have been adjusted to reflect the Reverse Split on a retroactive basis for all periods presented and all share information is rounded down to the nearest whole share after reflecting the Reverse Split. Recently Issued Accounting Standards In June 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-13, "Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments," which amends the current guidance by replacing the incurred loss model with a forward-looking expected loss model. The standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted. The Company will be evaluating the impact of the adoption of this guidance on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. In May 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-12, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients," amending guidance in the new revenue standard on transition, collectability, noncash consideration and the presentation of sales taxes and other similar taxes. The amendments clarify that for a contract to be considered completed at transition, substantially all of the revenue must have been recognized under the existing GAAP. The amendments also clarified the collectability assessment and expanded circumstances under which nonrefundable consideration may receive revenue recognition when collectability of the remainder is not probable. It clarified that the fair value of noncash consideration should be measured at contract inception for determining the transaction price. The amendments permit an entity to make a policy election to exclude from the transaction price sales taxes and similar taxes. The effective date and transition requirements for these amendments are the same as those of the new revenue standard (ASU 2014-09, as amended by ASU 2015-14). The Company will be evaluating the impact of the adoption of this guidance on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-10, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing," adding clarification, while retaining the core principles in the revenue guidance. For identifying performance obligations, the ASU clarifies when a promised good or service is separately identifiable (i.e., distinct within the context of the contract) and allow entities to disregard items that are immaterial in the context of a contract. For licensing, the ASU clarifies how an entity should evaluate the nature of its promise in granting a license of IP, which will determine whether it recognizes revenue over time (“symbolic IP”) or at a point in time (“functional IP”).The effective date and transition requirements for these amendments are the same as those of the new revenue standard (ASU 2014-09, as amended by ASU 2015-14). The Company will be evaluating the impact of the adoption of this guidance on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Compensation – Stock Compensation: Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting, In March 2016, the FASB issued an accounting standard update ASU 2016-08, which clarifies the implementation guidance on principal versus agent considerations under the new revenue recognition standard, ASU 2014-09 (Topic 606), Revenue from Contracts with Customers. It requires the entity to determine whether the nature of its promise is to provide that good or service to the customer (that is, the entity is a principal) or to arrange for the good or service to be provided to the customer by the other party (that is, the entity is an agent). This determination is based upon whether the entity controls the good or service before it is transferred to the customer. The amendment will be effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, which will be the Company’s fiscal year 2019 (beginning July 1, 2018). The Company will be evaluating the impact of the adoption of this guidance on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases, In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-17, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes In July 2015, the FASB issued an accounting standard update which requires an entity measuring inventory other than last-in, first-out (LIFO) or the retail inventory method to measure inventory at the lower of cost and net realizable value. When evidence exists that the net realizable value of inventory is lower than its costs, the difference will be recognized as a loss in the statement of operations. The standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company will be evaluating the impact of the adoption of this standard on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and disclosures. In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Revenue from Contracts with Customers Revenue Recognition Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP generally requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements. Significant estimates include the valuation of inventory, measurement of stock based compensation, valuation of financial instruments and revenue recognition. Actual results could materially differ from these estimates. Revenue Recognition The Company recognizes revenue when four basic criteria are met: (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (2) title has transferred; (3) the fee is fixed or determinable; and (4) collectability is reasonably assured. The Company uses contracts and customer purchase orders to determine the existence of an arrangement. The Company uses shipping documents and third-party proof of delivery to verify that title has transferred. The Company assesses whether the fee is fixed or determinable based upon the terms of the agreement associated with the transaction. To determine whether collection is probable, the Company assesses a number of factors, including past transaction history with the customer and the creditworthiness of the customer. If the Company determines that collection is not reasonably assured, then the recognition of revenue is deferred until collection becomes reasonably assured, which is generally upon receipt of payment. The Company records product sales net of estimated product returns and discounts from the list prices for its products. The amounts of product returns and the discount amounts have not been material to date. The Company’s sales to distributors do not include price protection. Payments that are contingent upon the achievement of a substantive milestone are recognized in their entirety in the period in which the milestone is achieved subject to satisfaction of all revenue recognition criteria at that time. Revenue generated from license fees and performing development services are recognized when they are earned and non-refundable upon receipt, over the period of performance, or upon incurrence of the related development expenses in accordance with contractual terms, based on the actual costs incurred to date plus overhead costs for certain project activities. Amounts paid but not yet earned on a project are recorded as deferred revenue until such time as performance is rendered or the related development expenses, plus overhead costs for certain project activities, are incurred. Inventories Inventories are recorded at the lower of cost or market on a first-in, first-out basis. The Company periodically assesses the recoverability of all inventories, including materials, work-in-process and finished goods, to determine whether adjustments for impairment are required. Inventory that is obsolete or in excess of forecasted usage is written down to its estimated net realizable value based on assumptions about future demand and market conditions. Further reduced demand may result in the need for additional inventory write-downs in the near term. Inventory write-downs are charged to cost of product sales and establish a lower cost basis for the inventory. Risks and Uncertainties The Company depends upon a number of key suppliers, including single source suppliers, the loss of which would materially harm the Company’s business. Single source suppliers are relied upon for certain components and services used in manufacturing the Company’s products. The Company does not have long-term contracts with any of the suppliers; rather, purchase orders are submitted for each order. Because long-term contracts do not exist, none of the suppliers are required to provide the Company any guaranteed minimum quantities. Foreign Currency Translation The Company’s foreign operations are subject to exchange rate fluctuations and foreign currency costs. The functional currency of the German subsidiary is the United States dollar. Transactions and balances denominated in dollars are presented at their original amounts. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the dollar are re-measured at the current exchange rate prevailing at the balance sheet date. All transaction gains or losses from the re-measurement of monetary assets and liabilities are included in the consolidated statements of operations within other income (expense). |