Significant Accounting Policies | (2) Significant Accounting Policies (a) Basis of Presentation The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“US GAAP”). Further, the consolidated financial statements give effect to the business combination and related transactions discussed in Note 1(a) above under the acquisition method of accounting and are treated as a reverse acquisition. Under the acquisition method of accounting, Midstream Holdings was the accounting acquirer in the transactions because its parent company, Devon, obtained control of us through the indirect control of the general partner as a result of the business combination. Consequently, Midstream Holdings’ assets and liabilities retained their carrying values. All financial results prior to March 7, 2014 reflect the historical operations of Midstream Holdings and its majority-owned subsidiaries and are reflected as Predecessor income on the statement of operations. Additionally, our assets acquired and liabilities assumed by Midstream Holdings in the business combination were recorded at their fair values measured as of the acquisition date, March 7, 2014. The excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair values of our net assets acquired was recorded as goodwill. Financial results subsequent to March 7, 2014 reflect the combined operations of Midstream Holdings, us and their majority-owned subsidiaries, which give effect to new contracts entered into with Devon and include the legacy Partnership assets. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated. Certain assets were not contributed to Midstream Holdings from the Predecessor and the operations of such non contributed assets have been presented as discontinued operations. In conjunction with the business combination, Midstream Holdings became a non-taxable entity which was treated as a reorganization under common control with the removal of historical deferred taxes reflected through equity. During the fourth quarter of 2014 and the first half of 2015, we acquired assets from ENLC and Devon through drop down transactions. Due to ENLC's control of us through its ownership and control of the general partner and Devon's control of us through its ownership of the managing member of ENLC, each acquisition from ENLC and Devon was considered a transfer of net assets between entities under common control. As such, we were required to recast our historical financial statements to include the activities of such assets from the date that these entities were under common control. The consolidated financial statements for periods prior to our acquisition of the assets from ENLC and Devon have been prepared from ENLC’s and Devon's historical cost-basis accounts for the acquired assets and may not necessarily be indicative of the actual results of operations that would have occurred if we had owned the acquired assets during the periods reported. Net income attributable to the assets acquired from ENLC and Devon for periods prior to our acquisition is allocated to the general partner. (b) Management's Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in accordance with US GAAP requires our management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the period. Actual results could differ from these estimates. (c) Revenue Recognition We generate the majority of our revenues from midstream energy services, including gathering, processing, transmission, fractionation, condensate stabilization and brine services, through various contractual arrangements, which include fee based contract arrangements or arrangements where we purchase and resell commodities in connection with providing the related service and earn a net margin for our fee. While our transactions vary in form, the essential element of each transaction is the use of our assets to transport a product or provide a processed product to an end-user at the tailgate of the plant, barge terminal or pipeline. We reflect revenue as Product sales and Midstream services revenue on the Consolidated Statements of Operations as follows: • Product sales - Product sales represent the sale of natural gas, NGLs, crude oil and condensate where the product is purchased and resold in connection with providing our midstream services as outlined above. • Midstream services - Midstream services represents all other revenue generated as a result of performing our midstream services outlined above. We recognize revenue for sales or services at the time the natural gas, NGLs, crude oil or condensate are delivered or at the time the service is performed at a fixed or determinable price. We generally accrue one month of sales and the related natural gas, NGL, condensate and crude oil purchases and reverse these accruals when the sales and purchases are actually invoiced and recorded in the subsequent month. Actual results could differ from the accrual estimates. Except for fixed-fee based arrangements, we act as the principal in these purchase and sale transactions, bearing the risk and reward of ownership as evidenced by title transfer, scheduling the transportation of products and assuming credit risk. We account for taxes collected from customers attributable to revenue transactions and remitted to government authorities on a net basis (excluded from revenues). (d) Gas Imbalance Accounting Quantities of natural gas and NGLs over-delivered or under-delivered related to imbalance agreements are recorded monthly as receivables or payables using weighted average prices at the time of the imbalance. These imbalances are typically settled with deliveries of natural gas or NGLs. We had imbalance payables of $2.6 million and $1.5 million at December 31, 2015 and 2014 , respectively, which approximate the fair value of these imbalances. We had imbalance receivables of $3.6 million and $1.2 million at December 31, 2015 and 2014 , respectively, which are carried at the lower of cost or market value. Imbalance receivables and imbalance payables are included in the line items “Accrued Revenue and other” and “Accrued gas, condensate and crude oil purchases”, respectively, on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. (e) Cash and Cash Equivalents We consider all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. (f) Income Taxes Certain of our operations are subject to income taxes assessed by the federal and various state jurisdictions in the U.S. Additionally, certain of our operations are subject to tax assessed by the State of Texas that is computed based on modified gross margin as defined by the State of Texas. The Texas franchise tax is presented as income tax expense in the accompanying statements of operations. The Predecessor's operations prior to the merger on March 7, 2014 were subject to income taxes assessed by federal and various state jurisdictions. We account for deferred income taxes related to the federal and state jurisdictions using the asset and liability method. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets are also recognized for the future tax benefits attributable to the expected utilization of existing tax net operating loss carryforwards and other types of carryforwards. If the future utilization of some portion of carryforwards is determined to be unlikely, a valuation allowance is provided to reduce the recorded tax benefits from such assets. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences and carryforwards are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. In the event interest or penalties are incurred with respect to income tax matters, our policy will be to include such items in income tax expense. (g) Natural Gas, Natural Gas Liquids, Crude Oil and Condensate Inventory Our inventories of products consist of natural gas, NGLs, crude oil and condensate. We report these assets at the lower of cost or market value which is determined by using the first-in, first-out method. (h) Property, Plant, and Equipment Property, plant and equipment are stated at historical cost less accumulated depreciation. Assets acquired in a business combination are recorded at fair value, including our assets acquired by the Predecessor in the business combination. Repairs and maintenance are charged against income when incurred. Renewals and betterments, which extend the useful life of the properties, are capitalized. Subsequent to the business combination, interest costs for material projects are capitalized to property, plant and equipment during the period the assets are undergoing preparation for intended use. The components of property, plant and equipment are as follows (in millions): December 31, 2015 2014 Transmission assets $ 1,285.1 $ 1,100.1 Gathering systems 2,999.2 2,391.9 Gas processing plants 2,673.7 2,356.1 Other property and equipment 135.9 379.5 Construction in process 330.5 241.5 Property, plant and equipment 7,424.4 6,469.1 Accumulated depreciation (1,757.6 ) (1,426.3 ) Property, plant and equipment, net $ 5,666.8 $ 5,042.8 Change in Depreciation Method. Historically, Midstream Holdings depreciated certain property, plant, and equipment using the units-of-production method. As a result of the business combination, we are operated as an independent midstream company and thus no longer have access to Devon’s proprietary reserve and production data historically used to compute depreciation under the units-of-production method. Additionally, the existing contracts with Devon were revised to a fee-based arrangement with minimum volume commitments. Effective March 7, 2014, we changed our method of computing depreciation for these assets to the straight-line method, consistent with the depreciation method applied to our acquired assets. In accordance with FASB ASC 250, we determined that the change in depreciation method was a change in accounting estimate effected by a change in accounting principle, and accordingly, the straight-line method was applied on a prospective basis. This change is considered preferable because the straight-line method will more accurately reflect the pattern of usage and the expected benefits of such assets. The effect of this change in estimate resulted in a decrease in depreciation expense for the year ended December 31, 2014 by approximately $29.4 million and $0.12 per unit. Depreciation is calculated using the straight-line method based on the estimated useful life of each asset, as follows: Useful Lives Transmission assets 20 - 25 years Gathering systems 20 - 25 years Gas processing plants 20 - 25 years Other property and equipment 3 - 15 years Depreciation expense of $331.3 million , $247.8 million and $187.0 million was recorded for the years ended December 31, 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively. Gain or Loss on Disposition. Upon the disposition or retirement of property, plant and equipment related to continuing operations, any gain or loss is recognized in operating income in the statement of operations. When a disposition or retirement occurs which qualifies as discontinued operations, any gain or loss is recognized as income or loss from discontinued operations in the statement of operations. We recognized a loss on disposition of assets of $ 1.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 , which primarily relates to the retirement of a compressor due to fire damage. As of December 31, 2015 , we retired net property, plant and equipment of $5.1 million , which was offset by $ 2.9 million of nonrefundable cash proceeds collected from our insurance carrier and $ 1.0 million of proceeds from the sale of property. Additionally, we collected $ 2.4 million of business interruption proceeds from our insurance carrier which was presented in the Midstream services revenue line item in the Consolidated Statement of Operations as of December 31, 2015 . Impairment Review. We evaluate our property, plant and equipment for potential impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable. The carrying amount of a long-lived asset is not recoverable when it exceeds the undiscounted sum of the future cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset. Estimates of expected future cash flows represent management’s best estimate based on reasonable and supportable assumptions. When the carrying amount of a long-lived asset is not recoverable, an impairment loss is recognized equal to the excess of the asset’s carrying value over its fair value. The fair values of long-lived assets are generally determined from estimated discounted future net cash flows. Our estimate of cash flows is based on assumptions which include (1) the amount of fee based services, the purchase and resale margins and the volume of natural gas, NGL, condensate and crude oil available to the asset, (2) markets available to the asset, (3) operating expenses, and (4) future natural gas, crude oil, condensate and NGL product prices. The volume of available natural gas, condensate, NGLs and crude oil to an asset is sometimes based on assumptions regarding future drilling activity, which may be dependent in part on natural gas, NGL, condensate and crude oil prices. Projections of volumes and future commodity prices are inherently subjective and contingent upon a number of variable factors. Any significant variance in any of the above assumptions or factors could materially affect our cash flows, which could require us to record an impairment of an asset. During December 2015, we recognized a $12.1 million impairment on property, plant and equipment, primarily related to costs associated with the cancellation of various capital projects in our Texas, Louisiana and Crude and Condensate segments. (i) Equity Method of Accounting We account for investments where it does not control the investment but has the ability to exercise significant influence using the equity method of accounting. Under this method, unconsolidated affiliate investments are initially carried at the acquisition cost, increased by our proportionate share of the investee’s net income and by contributions made, and decreased by our proportionate share of the investee’s net losses and by distributions received. We evaluate our unconsolidated affiliate investments for potential impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the investments may not be recoverable. (j) Goodwill Goodwill is the cost of an acquisition less the fair value of the net identifiable assets of the acquired business. We evaluate goodwill for impairment annually as of October 31 st , and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. We first assess qualitative factors to evaluate whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as the basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test. We may elect to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test without completing a qualitative assessment. If a two-step goodwill impairment test is elected or required, the first step involves comparing the fair value of the reporting unit with its carrying amount. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the second step of the process involves comparing the implied fair value of goodwill to the carrying value of the goodwill for that reporting unit. If the carrying value of the goodwill of a reporting unit exceeds the implied fair value of that goodwill, the excess of the carrying value over the implied fair value is recognized as an impairment loss. During the year ended December 31, 2015, we recognized a goodwill impairment loss totaling $1,328.2 million for our Louisiana, Texas and Crude and Condensate reporting units. See Note 4- Goodwill and Intangible Assets for further discussion regarding the goodwill impairments. (k) Intangible Assets Intangible assets associated with customer relationships are amortized on a straight-line basis over the expected period of benefits of the customer relationships, which range from ten to twenty years. (l) Asset Retirement Obligations We recognize liabilities for retirement obligations associated with our pipelines and processing and fractionation facilities. Such liabilities are recognized when there is a legal obligation associated with the retirement of the assets and the amount can be reasonably estimated. The initial measurement of an asset retirement obligation is recorded as a liability at its fair value, with an offsetting asset retirement cost recorded as an increase to the associated property, plant and equipment. If the fair value of a recorded asset retirement obligation changes, a revision is recorded to both the asset retirement obligation and the asset retirement cost. Our retirement obligations include estimated environmental remediation costs which arise from normal operations and are associated with the retirement of the long-lived assets. The asset retirement cost is depreciated using the straight line depreciation method similar to that used for the associated property, plant and equipment. (m) Other Long-Term Liabilities Other current and long-term liabilities include a liability related to an onerous performance obligation assumed in the business combination of $62.8 million and $80.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 , respectively. We have one delivery contract which requires us to deliver a specified volume of gas each month at an indexed base price with a term to 2019. We realize a loss on the delivery of gas under this contract each month based on current prices. The fair value of this onerous performance obligation was recorded as a result of the March 7, 2014 business combination and was based on forecasted discounted cash obligations in excess of market under this gas delivery contract. The liability is reduced each month as delivery is made over the remaining life of the contract with an offsetting reduction in purchase gas costs. (n) Derivatives We use derivative instruments to hedge against changes in cash flows related to product price only. We generally determine the fair value of swap contracts based on the difference between the derivative's fixed contract price and the underlying market price at the determination date. The asset or liability related to the derivative instruments is recorded on the balance sheet as fair value of derivative assets or liabilities in accordance with FASB ASC 815. Changes in fair value of derivative instruments are recorded in gain (loss) on derivative activity in the period of change. Realized gains and losses on commodity related derivatives are recorded as gain or loss on derivative activity within revenues in the consolidated statement of operations in the period incurred. Settlements of derivatives are included in cash flows from operating activities. (o) Concentrations of Credit Risk Financial instruments, which potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk, consist primarily of trade accounts receivable and commodity financial instruments. Management believes the risk is limited, other than our exposure to Devon discussed below, since our customers represent a broad and diverse group of energy marketers and end users. In addition, we continually monitor and review credit exposure of our marketing counter-parties and letters of credit or other appropriate security are obtained when considered necessary to limit the risk of loss. We record reserves for uncollectible accounts on a specific identification basis since there is not a large volume of late paying customers. We had a reserve for uncollectible receivables as of December 31, 2015 of $0.3 million and had no reserve for uncollectible receivables as of December 31, 2014 . During the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 , we had only one customer other than the affiliate transactions that individually represented greater than 10.0% of our consolidated midstream revenues. The customer is located in the Louisiana segment and represented 11.7% and 11.0% of the consolidated revenues for years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 , respectively. The affiliate transactions with Devon represented 16.6% , 30.6% and 92.2% of the consolidated midstream revenues for the years ended December 31, 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively. As we continue to grow and expand, the relationship between individual customer sales and consolidated total sales is expected to continue to change. Devon and our Louisiana customer represent a significant percentage of revenues and the loss of either as a customer would have a material adverse impact on our results of operations because the gross operating margin received from transactions with these customers are material to us. (p) Environmental Costs Environmental expenditures are expensed or capitalized depending on the nature of the expenditures and the future economic benefit. Expenditures that relate to an existing condition caused by past operations that do not contribute to current or future revenue generation are expensed. Liabilities for these expenditures are recorded on an undiscounted basis (or a discounted basis when the obligation can be settled at fixed and determinable amounts) when environmental assessments or clean-ups are probable and the costs can be reasonably estimated. Environmental expenditures were $3.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 . For December 31, 2014 and 2013, such expenditures were not material. (q) Unit-Based Awards Prior to the business combination, Devon granted certain share-based awards to members of its board of directors and selected employees. The Predecessor did not grant share-based awards because it previously participated in Devon’s share-based award plans since the Predecessor comprised Devon's U.S. midstream assets. The awards granted under Devon’s plans were measured at fair value on the date of grant and were recognized as expense over the applicable requisite service periods. We recognize compensation cost related to all unit-based awards in our consolidated financial statements in accordance with FASB ASC 718. We and ENLC each have similar unit-based payment plans for employees. Unit-based compensation associated with ENLC's unit-based compensation plans awarded to directors, officers and employees of our general partner are recorded by us since ENLC has no substantial or managed operating activities other than its interests in us and Midstream Holdings. (r) Commitments and Contingencies Liabilities for loss contingencies arising from claims, assessments, litigation or other sources are recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount can be reasonably estimated. (s) Discontinued Operations We classify as discontinued operations our assets that have clearly distinguishable cash flows and are in the process of being sold or have been sold. We also include as discontinued operations Predecessor assets that were not contributed in the business combination. (t) Other Assets Costs incurred in connection with the issuance of long-term debt are deferred and recorded as interest expense over the term of the related debt. Gains or losses on debt repurchases, redemptions and debt extinguishments include any associated unamortized debt issue costs. Unamortized debt issuance costs totaling $ 23.0 million and $ 16.6 million as of December 31, 2015 and 2014 , respectively, are included in other assets, net. Debt issuance costs are amortized into interest expense using the straight-line method over the term of the debt. (u) Legal Costs Expected to be Incurred in Connection with a Loss Contingency Legal costs incurred in connection with a loss contingency are expensed as incurred. (v) Redeemable Non-Controlling Interest Non-controlling interests that contain an option for the non-controlling interest holder to require us to buy out such interests for cash are considered to be redeemable non-controlling interests because the redemption feature is not deemed to be a freestanding financial instrument and because the redemption is not solely within the control of us. Redeemable non-controlling interest is not considered to be a component of partners' equity and is reported as temporary equity in the mezzanine section on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The amount recorded as redeemable non-controlling interest at each balance sheet date is the greater of the redemption value and the carrying value of the redeemable non-controlling interest (the initial carrying value increased or decreased for the non-controlling interest holder's share of net income or loss and distributions). (w) Recent Accounting Pronouncements In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, Financial Instruments-Overall: Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities ("ASU 2016-01"). Under this new standard, the FASB issued new guidance related to accounting for equity investments, financial liabilities under the fair value option, and the presentation and disclosure requirements for financial instruments. In addition, the FASB clarified guidance related to the valuation allowance assessment when recognizing deferred tax assets resulting from unrealized losses on available-for-sale debt securities. ASU 2016-01 is effective beginning after December 15, 2017 including interim periods within those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact this standard will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-17, Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes ("ASU 2015-17"). The new standard requires that deferred tax assets and liabilities be classified as noncurrent in a classified statement of financial position. ASU 2015-17 is effective in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those years. Early adoption is permitted. ASU 2015-17 may be applied either prospectively, for all deferred tax assets and liabilities, or retrospectively. We are currently evaluating the impact this standard will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. In September 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-16, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments (“ASU 2015-16”), which eliminates the requirement for an acquirer to retrospectively adjust the financial statements for measurement-period adjustments that occur in periods after a business combination is consummated. ASU 2015-16 is effective for public business entities for annual periods, including interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2015. For all other entities, ASU 2015-16 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted. The update is effective for us beginning on January 1, 2016. In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASU 2014-09”). ASU 2014-09 will replace existing revenue recognition requirements in GAAP and will require entities to recognize revenue at an amount that reflects the consideration to which we expect to be entitled in exchange for transferring goods or services to a customer. The new standard will also require significantly expanded disclosures regarding the qualitative and quantitative information of our nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. ASU 2014-09 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period, and is to be applied retrospectively, with early application permitted for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. We are currently evaluating the impact this standard will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03, Interest – Imputation of Interest: Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs (Topic 835). The update requires debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented on the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability. The standard requires retrospective application and is effective for us beginning on January 1, 2016. In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-06, Effects on Historical Earnings per Unit of Master Limited Partnership Dropdown Transactions (a Consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force) (“ASU 2015-06”), which requires a master limited partnership (MLP) to allocate earnings (losses) of a transferred business entirely to the general partner when computing earnings per unit (EPU) for periods before the dropdown transaction occurred. The EPU that the limited partners previously reported would not change as a result of the dropdown transaction. ASU 2015-06 also requires an MLP to disclose the effects of the dropdown transaction on EPU for the periods before and after the dropdown transaction occurred. ASU 2015-06 is effective for the fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within those fiscal years. ASU 2015-06 requires retrospective application and early adoption is permitted. In February 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-02, Consolidation (Topic 810): Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis. The update provides additional guidance to reporting entities in evaluating whether certain legal entities, such as limited partnerships, limited liability corporations and securitization structures, should be consolidated. The update is considered to be an improvement on current accounting requirements as it reduces the number of existing consolidation models. The update is effective for us beginning on January 1, 2016, and will have no impact on our consolidated financial statements or related disclosures. Subject to these evaluations, we have reviewed all recently issued accounting pronouncements that became effective during the year ended December 31, 2015 , and have determined that none would have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements. |